EP2281974A2 - Fussbodensystem, das mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten umfasst - Google Patents

Fussbodensystem, das mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten umfasst Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2281974A2
EP2281974A2 EP10181566A EP10181566A EP2281974A2 EP 2281974 A2 EP2281974 A2 EP 2281974A2 EP 10181566 A EP10181566 A EP 10181566A EP 10181566 A EP10181566 A EP 10181566A EP 2281974 A2 EP2281974 A2 EP 2281974A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
tongue
joint
locking
plane
groove
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP10181566A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2281974A3 (de
Inventor
Darko Pervan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Valinge Innovation AB
Original Assignee
Valinge Innovation AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=26655372&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2281974(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from SE0100101A external-priority patent/SE519768C2/sv
Priority claimed from SE0100100A external-priority patent/SE523823C2/sv
Application filed by Valinge Innovation AB filed Critical Valinge Innovation AB
Publication of EP2281974A2 publication Critical patent/EP2281974A2/de
Publication of EP2281974A3 publication Critical patent/EP2281974A3/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F15/00—Flooring
    • E04F15/02—Flooring or floor layers composed of a number of similar elements
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F15/00—Flooring
    • E04F15/02—Flooring or floor layers composed of a number of similar elements
    • E04F15/04—Flooring or floor layers composed of a number of similar elements only of wood or with a top layer of wood, e.g. with wooden or metal connecting members
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F2201/00—Joining sheets or plates or panels
    • E04F2201/01—Joining sheets, plates or panels with edges in abutting relationship
    • E04F2201/0107—Joining sheets, plates or panels with edges in abutting relationship by moving the sheets, plates or panels substantially in their own plane, perpendicular to the abutting edges
    • E04F2201/0115—Joining sheets, plates or panels with edges in abutting relationship by moving the sheets, plates or panels substantially in their own plane, perpendicular to the abutting edges with snap action of the edge connectors
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F2201/00—Joining sheets or plates or panels
    • E04F2201/01—Joining sheets, plates or panels with edges in abutting relationship
    • E04F2201/0153—Joining sheets, plates or panels with edges in abutting relationship by rotating the sheets, plates or panels around an axis which is parallel to the abutting edges, possibly combined with a sliding movement
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F2201/00—Joining sheets or plates or panels
    • E04F2201/02—Non-undercut connections, e.g. tongue and groove connections
    • E04F2201/023—Non-undercut connections, e.g. tongue and groove connections with a continuous tongue or groove
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F2201/00—Joining sheets or plates or panels
    • E04F2201/02—Non-undercut connections, e.g. tongue and groove connections
    • E04F2201/025—Non-undercut connections, e.g. tongue and groove connections with tongue and grooves alternating transversally in the direction of the thickness of the panel, e.g. multiple tongue and grooves oriented parallel to each other
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F2201/00—Joining sheets or plates or panels
    • E04F2201/04—Other details of tongues or grooves
    • E04F2201/041—Tongues or grooves with slits or cuts for expansion or flexibility
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F2201/00—Joining sheets or plates or panels
    • E04F2201/04—Other details of tongues or grooves
    • E04F2201/042—Other details of tongues or grooves with grooves positioned on the rear-side of the panel
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F2201/00—Joining sheets or plates or panels
    • E04F2201/05—Separate connectors or inserts, e.g. pegs, pins, keys or strips
    • E04F2201/0517—U- or C-shaped brackets and clamps

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a locking system for mechanical joining of floorboards, floorboards having such a locking system, a method of installing these floorboards, a method of producing them, a tool as well as use of such a tool for installation of floorboards.
  • the invention is particularly suited for floorboards which are based on wood material and in the normal case have a core of wood and which are intended to be mechanically joined.
  • the following description of prior-art technique and the objects and features of the invention will therefore be directed at this field of application and, above all, rectangular parquet floors which are joined on long side as well as short side.
  • the invention is particularly suited for floating floors, i.e. floors that can move in relation to the base.
  • the invention can be used on all types of existing hard floors, such as homogeneous wooden floors, wooden floors with a lamellar core or plywood core, floors with a surface of veneer and a core of wood fibre, thin laminate floors, floors with a plastic core and the like.
  • the invention can, of course, also be used in other types of floorboards which can be machined with cutting tools, such as subfloors of plywood or particle board. Even if it is not preferred, the floorboards can after installation be fixed to the base.
  • Mechanical joint systems are very convenient for joining not only of laminate floors but also wooden floors and composite floors.
  • Such floorboards may consist of a large number of different materials in the surface, core and rear side. As will be described below, these materials can also be included in the different parts of the joint system, such as strip, locking element and tongue.
  • a 15-mm-thick parquet floor should have a strip which is of a width which is approximately the same as the thickness of the floor, i.e. about 15 mm. With a tongue of about 3 mm, the amount of waste will be 18 mm.
  • the floorboard has a normal width of about 200 mm. Therefore the amount of material waste will be about 9%. In general, the cost of material waste will be great if the floorboards consist of expensive materials, if they are thick or if their format is small, so that the number of running meters of joint per square meter of floor will be great.
  • the aluminium strip can in a number of applications result in a better and also more inexpensive joint system than a strip machined and formed from the core.
  • the aluminium strip is disadvantageous since the investment cost can be considerable and extensive reconstruction of the factory may be necessary to convert an existing traditional production line so that floorboards with such a mechanical joint system can be produced.
  • An advantage of the prior-art aluminium strip is, however, that the starting format of the floorboards need not be changed.
  • the strip has disadvantages in the form of its being sensitive to damage during transport and installation.
  • An object of the invention therefore is to indicate solutions which aim at reducing the cost while at the same time strength and function are retained.
  • the invention starts from known floorboards which have a core, a front side, a rear side and opposite joint edge portions, of which one is formed as a tongue groove defined by upper and lower lips and having a bottom end, and the other is formed as a tongue with an upwardly directed portion at its free outer end.
  • the tongue groove has the shape of an undercut groove with an opening, an inner portion and an inner locking surface.
  • At least parts of the lower lip are formed integrally with the core of the floorboard and the tongue has a locking surface which is designed to coact with the inner locking surface in the tongue groove of an adjoining floorboard, when two such floorboards are mechanically joined, so that their front sides are located in the same surface plane (HP) and meet at a joint plane (VP) directed perpendicular thereto.
  • This technique is disclosed in, inter alia DE-A-3041781 , which will be discussed in more detail below.
  • Figs 3a and 3b show a floorboard 1 according to WO 9426999 from above and from below, respectively.
  • the board 1 is rectangular with an upper side 2, an underside 3, two opposite long sides with joint edge portions 4a and 4b, and two opposite short sides with joint edge portions 5a and 5b.
  • joint edge portions 4a, 4b of the long sides as well as the joint edge portions 5a, 5b of the short sides can be joined mechanically without glue in a direction D2 in Fig. 1c , so as to meet in a joint plane VP (marked in Fig. 2c ) and so as to have, in their laid state, their upper sides in a common surface plane HP (marked in Fig. 2c ).
  • the board 1 has a factory-mounted plane strip 6 which extends along the entire long side 4a and which is made of a flexible, resilient aluminium sheet.
  • the strip 6 extends outwards beyond the joint plane VP at the joint edge portion 4a.
  • the strip 6 can be attached mechanically according to the shown embodiment or else by glue or in some other manner.
  • the strip 6 can instead be formed integrally with the board 1, for instance by suitable machining of the core of the board 1.
  • the present invention is usable for floorboards where the strip or at least part thereof is integrally formed with the core, and the invention solves special problems that arise in such floorboards and the production thereof.
  • the core of the floorboard need not, but is preferably, made of a uniform material.
  • the strip 6, however, is always integrated with the board 1, i.e. it should be formed on the board or be factory-mounted.
  • the width of the strip 6 can be about 30 mm and the thickness about 0.5 mm.
  • the part of the strip 6 projecting beyond the joint plane VP is formed with a locking element 8 which extends along the entire strip 6.
  • the locking element 8 has in its lower part an operative locking surface 10 facing the joint plane VP and having a height of, for instance, 0.5 mm. In laying, this locking surface 10 coacts with a locking groove 14 which is made in the underside 3 of the joint edge portion 4b of the opposite long side of an adjoining board 1'.
  • the strip 6' along the short side is provided with a corresponding locking element 8', and the joint edge portion 5b of the opposite short side has a corresponding locking groove 14'.
  • the edge of the locking grooves 14, 14' facing away from the joint plane VP forms an operative locking surface 10' for coaction with the operative locking surface 10 of the locking element.
  • the board 1 is also along its one long side (joint edge portion 4a) and its one short side (joint edge portion 5a) formed with a laterally open recess or tongue groove 16. This is defined upwards by an upper lip at the joint edge portion 4a, 5a and downwards by the respective strips 6, 6'.
  • an upper recess 18 which defines a locking tongue 20 coacting with the recess or tongue groove 16 (see Fig. 2a ).
  • Figs 1a-1c show how two long sides 4a, 4b of two such boards 1, 1' on a base U can be joined with each other by downward angling by pivoting about a centre C close to the intersection between the surface plane HP and the joint plane VP, while the boards are held essentially in contact with each other.
  • Figs 2a-2c show how the short sides 5a, 5b of the boards 1, 1' can be joined together by snap action.
  • the long sides 4a, 4b can be joined by means of both methods, whereas the joining of the short sides 5a, 5b - after laying of the first row of floorboards - is normally carried out merely by snap action after the long sides 4a, 4b have first been joined.
  • Figs 2a-2c show how the short side edge portions 5a and 5b of the boards 1, 1' can be joined mechanically in the D1 as well as the D2 direction by the new board 1' being displaced essentially horizontally towards the previously laid board 1. This can in particular be carried out after the long side of the new board 1' has been joined, by inward angling according to Figs 1a-c , with a previously laid board 1 in an adjoining row.
  • bevelled surfaces of the recess 16 and the locking tongue 20 cooperate so that the strip 6' is forced downwards as a direct consequence of the bringing-together of the short side edge portions 5a, 5b.
  • the strip 6' snaps up when the locking element 8' enters the locking groove 14', so that the operative locking surfaces 10, 10' on the locking element 8' and in the locking groove 14' engage each other.
  • the prior-art boards should, after being joined, along their long sides be able to take a position where there is a possibility of a minor play between the operative locking surface 10 of the locking element and the operative locking surface 10' of the locking groove 14.
  • no play is necessary in the actual butt joint between the boards in the joint plane VP close to the upper side of the boards (i.e. in the surface plane HP).
  • WO 9426999 A more detailed description of this play is to be found in WO 9426999 .
  • Such a play can be in the order of 0.01-0.05 mm between the operative locking surfaces 10, 10' when pressing the long sides of adjoining boards against each other. This play facilitates entering of the locking element 8 in the locking groove 14, 14' and its leaving the same. As mentioned, however, no play is required in the joint between the boards, where the surface plane HP and the joint plane VP intersect at the upper side of the floorboards.
  • the joint system enables displacement along the joint edge in the locked position after joining of an optional side. Therefore laying can take place in many different ways which are all variants of the three basic methods:
  • the most common and safest laying method is that the long side is first angled downwards and locked against another floorboard. Subsequently, a displacement in the locked position takes place towards the short side of a third floorboard, so that the snapping-in of the short side can take place. Laying can also be made by one side, long side or short side, being snapped together with another board. Then a displacement in the locked position takes place until the other side snaps together with a third board. These two methods require snapping-in of at least one side. However, laying can also take place without snap action.
  • the third alternative is that the short side of a first board is angled inwards first towards the short side of a second board, which is already joined on its long side with a third board.
  • first and the second board are slightly angled upwards.
  • the first board is displaced in the upwardly angled position along its short side until the upper joint edges of the first and the third board are in contact with each other, after which the two boards are jointly angled downwards.
  • FIGs 6a-d Another known design of floorboards with a mechanical locking system is shown in Figs 6a-d in the accompanying drawings and is described and shown in CA-A-0991373 .
  • this mechanical locking system all forces striving to pull the long sides of the boards apart are taken up by the locking element at the outer end of the strip (see Fig. 6a ).
  • the material When laying and taking up the floor, the material must be flexible to allow the tongue to be released by rotation about two centres at the same time. A tight fit between all surfaces makes rational manufacture and displacement in the locked position impossible.
  • the short side 6c has no horizontal lock. This type of mechanical lock, however, causes a large amount of material waste owing to the design of the large locking elements.
  • FIG. 1 One more known design of mechanical locking systems for boards is shown in GB-A-1430429 and Figs 7a-7b in the accompanying drawings.
  • This system is basically a tongue-and-groove joint which is provided with an extra holding hook on an extended lip on one side of the tongue groove and which has a corresponding holding ridge formed on the upper side of the tongue.
  • the system requires considerable elasticity of the lip provided with the hook, and dismounting cannot take place without destroying the joint edges of the boards.
  • a tight fit makes manufacture difficult and the geometry of the joint causes a large amount of material waste.
  • Tongue-and-groove joints having an inclined groove and tongue have also been suggested according to US-A-1124228 .
  • the type of joint which is shown in Figs 12c-d in the accompanying drawings makes it possible to mount a new board by pushing it down over the obliquely upwardly directed tongue on the previously laid board.
  • To secure the newly laid board use is made of nails which are driven obliquely down through the board above the obliquely upwardly directed tongue.
  • this technique cannot be used since a dovetail joint is used.
  • This technique certainly causes a small amount of material waste but is not at all suitable if a floating floor is to be provided, with individual floorboards which, without being damaged, are to be mounted and dismounted in a simple manner and which have high-quality joints.
  • DE-A-3041781 discloses and shows a locking system for joining of boards, especially for making roller-skating rings and bowling alleys of plastic material. Such a joint system is also shown in Figs 13a-d in the accompanying drawings.
  • This system comprises an undercut longitudinal groove along one edge of the board and a projecting upwardly bent tongue along the opposite edge of the board.
  • the undercut groove has a first portion which is defined by parallel surface portions and is parallel with the principal plane of the board, and a second interior portion which is trapezoidal or semi-trapezoidal ( Figs 13a-b and Figs 13c-d , respectively, in the accompanying drawings).
  • the tongue has two plane-parallel portions angled relative to each other, where the portion closest to the centre of the board is parallel with the principal plane of the board and where the outer free portion is angled in the upward direction in correspondence with the corresponding surface portion within the trapezoidal part of the undercut groove.
  • the design of the tongue and groove as well as the edge portions of the board is such that when two such boards are mechanically joined, engagement is obtained between on the one hand the surface portions of the tongue and corresponding surface portions of the undercut groove along the entire upper side and outer end of the tongue as well as along the underside of the inner plane-parallel portion of the tongue and, on the other hand, between the edge surfaces of the joined boards above and below the tongue and the groove, respectively.
  • the new board is angled upwards at a suitable angle for insertion of the angled outer portion of the tongue into the outer plane-parallel part of the groove in the previously laid board. Subsequently the tongue is inserted into the groove while the new board is being angled downwards.
  • a serious drawback of the mechanical locking system according to DE-A-3041781 is that it is difficult to produce.
  • As production method it is suggested to use a mushroom-type shank end mill with an outer portion which generates the cross-sectionally trapezoidal inner part of the tongue groove.
  • Such a production method is not particularly rational and besides causes great tolerance problems if the production method should be used for producing floorboards or other boards of wood material for forming wall panels or parquet floorboards having high-quality joints.
  • a further drawback of the mechanical locking system according to DE-A-3041781 is that it is not very suited in connection with high-quality floors which are made of wood materials or wood-fibre-based materials and which therefore require a tight fit in the vertical direction between tongue and groove in order to prevent creaking.
  • WO 9747834 discloses floorboards with different types of mechanical locking systems.
  • the locking systems which are intended for locking together the long sides of the boards ( Figs 2-4 , 11 and 22-25 in the document) are designed so as to be mounted and dismounted by a connecting and angling movement, while most of those intended for locking together the short sides of the boards ( Figs 5-10 ) are designed so as to be connected to each other by being translatorily pushed towards each other for connection by means of a snap lock, but these locking systems at the short sides of the boards cannot be dismounted without being destroyed or, in any case, damaged.
  • Some of the boards that are disclosed in WO 9747834 and that have been designed for connection and dismounting by an angular motion have at their one edge a groove and a strip projecting below the groove and extending beyond a joint plane where the upper sides of two joined boards meet.
  • the strip is designed to coact with an essentially complementarily formed portion on the opposite edge of the board, so that two similar boards can be joined.
  • a common feature of these floorboards is that the upper side of the tongue of the boards and the corresponding upper boundary surface of the groove are plane and parallel with the upper side or surface of the floorboards.
  • connection of the boards to prevent them from being pulled apart transversely of the joint plane is obtained exclusively by means of locking surfaces on the one hand on the underside of the tongue and, on the other hand, on the upper side of the lower lip or strip below the groove.
  • These locking systems also suffer from the drawback that they require a strip portion which extends beyond the joint plane, which causes material waste also within the joint edge portion where the groove is formed.
  • WO 9747834 also discloses mechanical joint systems which comprise a circular-arc-shaped tongue and a correspondingly formed groove in the opposite side edge of the floorboard (cf. Figs 14d-14e in the accompanying drawings).
  • the tip of the tongue is put towards the opening of the arcuate groove, after which downward angling is begun. In this downward angling, there is a large surface contact between all the arcuate surfaces of tongue and groove.
  • US-A-2740167 discloses parquet boards or squares which are made of wood and which at their opposite edges are formed with edge portions which are hooked into each other when laying several parquet squares in a row.
  • One edge portion has a downwardly directed hook, and the opposite edge portion has an upwardly directed hook.
  • the underside of the upwardly directed hook is bevelled.
  • the parquet boards that are joined at a vertical joint plane are secured merely in the horizontal direction transversely of the joint plane.
  • CA-A-2252791 shows and describes floorboards which are formed with a specially designed groove along one long side and a complementarily formed tongue along the other long side.
  • the tongue and groove are rounded and angled obliquely upwards to enable joining of one board with another by the new board being placed close to the laid one and then being simultaneously raised and angled, after which the groove is pulled down over the obliquely upwardly directed tongue during simultaneous bringing together and downward angling.
  • tongue and groove are complementarily formed, it is difficult to connect and, optionally, once more pull adjoining floorboards apart. A deviation from the plane form, i.e. the existence of "banana shape", results in a further obstacle to the connecting of two such boards. The risk of damage to the tongue is therefore great, and the design also causes great frictional forces between the surfaces of the tongue and groove.
  • US-A-5797237 discloses a snap lock system for joining parquet boards.
  • Fig. 17a is a section through two joined boards, while Fig. 17b shows that such a known floorboard cannot be dismounted by the board being angled upwards relative to the remaining, lying floorboard. Instead, as shown in Fig. 4B in the patent specification, both the board that is to be removed and the board to which it is connected and which is to remain, must be lifted up to pull out the tongue from the groove.
  • the system bears great resemblance with that disclosed in the above-mentioned US-A-2740167 ( Figs 15a-b in the accompanying drawings) but with the difference that a short lower lip is formed below the upper hook-shaped projection or lip.
  • FR-A-2675174 discloses a mechanical joint system for ceramic tiles which have complementarily formed opposite edge portions, in which case use is made of separate spring clips which are mounted at a distance from each other and which are formed to grasp a bead on the edge portion of an adjoining tile.
  • the joint system is not designed for dismounting by pivoting, which is obvious from Fig. 18a and, in particular, Fig. 18b in the accompanying drawings.
  • Figs 19a and 19b show floorboards which are formed according to JP 7180333 and are made by extrusion of metal material. After mounting, it is practically impossible to dismount such floorboards owing to the joint geometry, which is evident from Fig. 19b .
  • Figs 20a and 20b show another known joint system which is disclosed in GB-A-2117813 and which is intended for large insulated wall panels.
  • This system bears great resemblance with the above-mentioned system according to CA-A-2252791 and the system from WO 9747834 as shown in Figs 14d and 14e in the accompanying drawings.
  • the system suffers from the same drawbacks as these last-mentioned two systems and is not suited for efficient production of floorboards based on wood material or wood fibre material, especially if high-quality joints in a high-quality floor are desired.
  • the construction according to this GB publication uses metal sections as connecting elements and is not openable by upward angling.
  • An object of the present invention is to satisfy this need and provide such an optimal locking system for floorboards and such optimal floorboards.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide a rational method of producing floorboards with such a locking system.
  • One more object of the invention is to provide a new installation method, which allows easier and more rational laying than does prior art.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide a tool to facilitate the laying of floorboards by upward angling and joining of floorboards.
  • Yet another object of the invention is to provide use of such a tool for laying of floorboards.
  • a floorboard and an openable locking system therefor comprise an undercut groove on one long side of the floorboard and a projecting tongue on the opposite long side of the floorboard.
  • the undercut groove has a corresponding upwardly directed inner locking surface at a distance from its tip.
  • the tongue and the undercut groove are formed to be brought together and pulled apart by a pivoting motion, which has its centre close to the intersection between the surface planes and the common joint plane of two adjoining floorboards.
  • the undercut in the groove of such a locking system is made by means of disk-shaped cutting tools, whose rotary shafts are inclined relative to each other to form first an inner part of the undercut portion of the groove and then a locking surface positioned closer to the opening of the groove.
  • a laying method for a floor of such boards comprises the steps of laying a new board adjacent to a previously laid board, moving the tongue of the new board into the opening of the undercut groove of the previously laid board, angling the new board upwards during simultaneous insertion of the tongue into the undercut groove and simultaneously angling down the new board to the final position.
  • the invention is applicable to rectangular floorboards having a first pair of parallel sides and a second pair of parallel sides. With a view to simplifying the description, the first pair is below referred to as long sides and the second pair as short sides. It should, however, be pointed that the invention is also applicable to boards that can be square.
  • joint quality is meant a tight fit in the locked position between the floorboards both vertically and horizontally. It should be possible to join the floorboards without very large visible gaps or differences in level between the joint edges in the unloaded as well as in the normally loaded state. In a high-quality floor, joint gaps and differences in level should not be greater than 0.2 and 0.1 mm respectively.
  • Inward angling should also take place in a manner that simultaneously guides the floorboards towards each other with tight joint edges and straightens out any banana shape (i.e. deviation from a straight flat shape of the floorboard).
  • the locking element and the locking groove should have guiding means which coact with each other during inward angling. The downward angling should take place with great safety without the boards getting stuck and pinching each other so as to cause a risk of the locking system being damaged.
  • the board In connection with the downward angling, a slight downwards bending of the strip usually takes place, so that the locking element is bent backwards and downwards and opens. If the joint system is not formed with suitable angles and radii, the board can after laying be locked in such manner that taking up is not possible.
  • the short side can, after the joint of the long side has been opened by upward angling, usually be pulled out along the joint edge, but it is advantageous if also the short side can be opened by upward angling. This is particularly advantageous when the boards are long, for instance 2.4 m, which makes pulling out of short sides difficult.
  • the upward angling should take place with great safety without the boards getting stuck and pinching each other so as to cause a risk of the locking system being damaged.
  • each square meter of floor surface will have about six times more long side joints than short side joints. A large amount of material waste and expensive joint materials are therefore of less importance on short side than on long side.
  • the locking element For high strength to be achieved, the locking element must as a rule have a high locking angle, so that the locking element does not snap out.
  • the locking element must be high and wide so that it does not break when subjected to high tensile load as the floor shrinks in winter owing to the low relative humidity at this time of the year. This also applies to the material closest to the locking groove in the other board.
  • the short side joint should have higher strength than the long side joint since the tensile load during shrinking in winter is distributed over a shorter joint length along the short side than along the long side.
  • a good function, production tolerance and quality require that the joint profile can be measured continuously and checked.
  • the critical parts in a mechanical joint system should be designed in such manner that production and measurement are facilitated. It should be possible to produce them with tolerances of a few hundredths of a millimetre, and it should therefore be possible to measure them with great accuracy, for instance in a so-called profile projector. If the joint system is produced with linear cutting machining, the joint system will, except for certain production tolerances, have the same profile over the entire edge portion. Therefore the joint system can be measured with great accuracy by cutting out some samples by sawing from the floorboards and measuring them in the profile projector or a measuring microscope. Rational production, however, requires that the joint system can also be measured quickly and easily without destructive methods, for instance using gages. This is facilitated if the critical parts in the locking system are as few as possible.
  • long and short side should be optimised in view of their different properties as stated above.
  • the long side should be optimised for downward angling, upward angling, positioning and displaceability, while the short side should be optimised for snapping-in and high strength.
  • An optimally designed floorboard should thus have different joint systems on long and short side.
  • Figs 4a and 4b show prior-art systems of the type Alloc ® original and Alloc ® Home with a projecting strip that can be angled and snapped together.
  • Prior-art joint systems according to Figs 9-16 can produce a mechanical joint with less waste than mechanical locking systems having a projecting and machined strip. However, all of them do not satisfy the above-mentioned requirements and do not solve the problems that the present invention intends to solve.
  • Figs 12a-b cannot be angled or snapped but must first be inserted by being pushed in parallel with the joint edge.
  • the joint according to Figs 12c-d cannot be snapped. It may possibly be angled inward, but in that case it must be produced with too great a play in the joint system.
  • the strength in the vertical direction is low since upper and lower engaging surfaces are parallel.
  • the joint is also difficult to produce and to displace in the locked position since it does not contain any free surfaces.
  • nailing to the base is suggested, using nails which are driven obliquely into the floorboard above the tongue directed obliquely upwards.
  • the joint systems according to Figs 6c-d , 15a-b and 17a-b are examples of joints that have no vertical lock, i.e. allow movements perpendicular to the upper side of the boards.
  • the inward angling joint according to Figs 14d-e has a number of drawbacks because it is manufactured and constructed according to the principle that it should have a tight fit and that upper and lower parts of the tongue and groove follow circular arcs having their centre at the upper joint edge, i.e. in the intersection between the joint and surface planes.
  • This joint does not have the necessary guiding parts, and the joint is difficult to angle together since it has an incorrect design and too large engaging surfaces. As a result, it pinches and suffers from the so-called drawer effect during inward angling.
  • the strength in the horizontal direction is too low, which depends on a low upper locking angle and too small angular difference between the upper and lower engaging surfaces.
  • the front and upper upwardly angled part of the tongue groove is too small to manage the forces that are required for a high-quality joint system.
  • the too large contact surfaces between tongue and groove, the absence of the necessary free surfaces without contact and the requirement for a tight fit in the entire joint make lateral displacement of the floorboard along the joint edge considerably more difficult and also renders rational production with the possibility of achieving good tolerances difficult. Nor can it be snapped together horizontally.
  • the joint system according to Figs 16a-b has a design that does not allow it to be angled together without a considerable degree of material deformation, which is difficult to achieve in normal board materials that are suitable for floors. Also in this case, all parts of the tongue and groove are in contact with each other. This makes lateral displacement of a board in the locked position difficult or impossible. Nor is rational machining possible owing to the fact all surfaces are in contact with each other. Snapping cannot be carried out either.
  • the joint system according to Figs 6a-b cannot be angled together since it is constructed to move about two pivoting centres simultaneously. It has no horizontal lock in the tongue groove. All surfaces are in contact with each other with a tight fit. In practice, the joint system cannot be displaced and manufactured rationally. It is intended for use with a locking system which is shown in Figs 6c-d and is formed on the adjoining perpendicularly set edge of the board and which does not require lateral displacement for connecting purposes.
  • the joint system according to Figs 8a-b have a tongue groove which cannot be manufactured with rotating cutting tools having a large tool diameter. It cannot snap and is constructed to prevent, by initial stress and a tight fit adjacent to the outer vertical part of the strip, lateral displacement.
  • the joint system according to Figs 5a-b comprises two aluminium sections. Production with rotating cutting tools with a large tool diameter for forming the tongue groove is not feasible.
  • the joint system is formed so that it is impossible to angle a new board inwards by its upper joint edge being held in contact with the upper joint edge of the previously laid board, so that the inward angling takes place about a pivoting centre at the intersection between joint plane and surface plane.
  • To allow inward angling when using this prior-art system it is necessary to have a considerable play that exceeds what is acceptable in normal floorboards where high-quality, esthetically good joints are required.
  • the joint system according to Figs 13a-d is difficult to manufacture since it requires contact over a large surface part of the outer part of the tongue and the tongue groove. This also makes lateral displacement in the locked position difficult.
  • the joint geometry makes upward angling about the upper joint edge impossible.
  • the invention is based on a first understanding that by using suitable production methods, essentially by machining and using tools whose tool diameter significantly exceeds the thickness of the board, it is possible to form advanced shapes rationally with great accuracy of wood materials, wood-based boards and plastic materials, and that this type of machining can be made in a tongue groove at a distance from the joint plane.
  • the shape of the joint system should be adapted to rational production which should be able to take place with very narrow tolerances. Such an adaptation, however, is not allowed to take place at the expense of other important properties of the floorboard and the locking system.
  • the invention is also based on a second understanding, which is based on the knowledge of the requirements that must be satisfied by a mechanical joint system for optimal function.
  • This understanding has made it possible to satisfy these requirements in a manner that has previously not been known, viz. by a combination of a) the design of the joint system with, for instance, specific angles, radii, play, free surfaces and ratios between the different parts of the system, and b) optimal utilisation of the material properties of the core or core, such as compression, elongation, bending, tensile strength and compressive strength.
  • the invention is further based on a third understanding that it is possible to provide a joint system at a lower production cost while at the same time function and strength can be retained or even, in some cases, be improved by a combination of manufacturing technique, joint design, choice of materials and optimisation of long and short sides.
  • the invention is based on a fourth understanding that the joint system, the manufacturing technique and the measuring technique must be developed and adjusted so that the critical parts requiring narrow tolerances should, to the greatest possible extent, be as few as possible and also be designed so as to allow measuring and checking in continuous production.
  • a locking system and a floorboard with such a locking system for mechanical joining of all four sides of this floorboard in a first vertical direction D1, a second horizontal direction D2 and a third direction D3 perpendicular to the second horizontal direction, with corresponding sides of other floorboards with identical locking systems.
  • the floorboards can on two sides have a disconnectible mechanical joint system, which is of a known type and which can be laterally displaced in the locked position and locked by inward angling about the upper joint edges or by horizontal snapping.
  • the floorboards have, on the other two sides, a locking system according to the invention.
  • the floorboards can also have a locking system according to the invention on all four sides.
  • At least two opposite sides of the floorboard thus have a joint system which is designed according to the invention and which comprises a tongue and a tongue groove defined by upper and lower lips, where the tongue in its outer and upper part has an upwardly directed part and where the tongue groove in its inner and upper part has an undercut.
  • the upwardly directed part of the tongue and the undercut of the tongue groove in the upper lip have locking surfaces that counteract and prevent horizontal separation in a direction D2 transversely of the joint plane.
  • the tongue and the tongue groove also have coacting supporting surfaces which prevent vertical separation in a direction D1 parallel with the joint plane. Such supporting surfaces are to be found at least in the bottom part of the tongue and on the lower lip of the tongue groove.
  • the coacting locking surfaces can serve as upper supporting surfaces, but the upper lip of the tongue groove and the tongue can advantageously also have separate upper supporting surfaces.
  • the tongue, the tongue groove, the locking element and the undercut are designed so that they can be manufactured by machining using tools which have a greater tool diameter than the thickness of the floorboard.
  • the tongue can with its upwardly directed portion be inserted into the tongue groove and its undercut by an inward angling motion with its centre of rotation close to the intersection between the joint plane and the surface plane, and the tongue can also leave the tongue groove if the floorboard is pivoted or angled upwards with its upper joint edge in contact with the upper joint edge of an adjoining floorboard.
  • the joint system is formed with surfaces which are not in contact with each other both during inward angling and in the locked position.
  • the floorboard has two edge portions with a joint system according to the invention, where the tongue with its upwardly directed portion both can be inserted into the tongue groove and its undercut and can leave the tongue groove by downward angling and upward angling, respectively, by the boards being kept in contact with each other with their upper joint edges close to the intersection between joint plane and surface plane, so that the pivoting takes place about a pivoting centre close to this point.
  • the locking system can be snapped together by horizontal displacement, essentially the lower part of the tongue groove being bent and the locking element of the tongue snapping into the locking groove.
  • the tongue can be made flexible to facilitate such snapping-in at the short side after the long sides of the floorboards have been joined.
  • the invention also relates to a snap joint which can be released by upward angling with upper joint edges in contact with each other.
  • the floorboard has two edge portions with a joint system which is formed according to the invention, where the tongue, while the board is held in an upwardly angled position, can be snapped into the tongue groove and then be angled down by a pivoting motion about the upper joint edge.
  • the tongue In the upwardly angled position, the tongue can be partially inserted into the tongue groove by the board in this position being moved in a translatory movement to the tongue groove until the upper joint edges have come into contact with each other, after which downward angling takes place for final joining of tongue and tongue groove and for obtaining a locking-together.
  • the lower lip can be shorter than the upper lip so as to enable greater degrees of freedom when designing the undercut of the upper lip.
  • a plurality of aspects of the invention are also applicable to the known systems without these aspects being combined with the preferred locking systems described here.
  • the invention also describes the basic principles that should be satisfied for a tongue-and-groove joint which is to be angled inwards with upper joint edges in contact with each other and which is to be snapped in with a minimum bending of joint components.
  • the invention also describes how material properties can be used to achieve great strength and low cost in combination with angling and snapping as well as laying methods.
  • FIG. 21a A first preferred embodiment of a floorboard 1, 1', which is provided with a mechanical locking system according to the invention, will now be described with reference to Figs 21a and 21b .
  • the joint system is shown schematically. It should be emphasised that a better function can be achieved with other preferred embodiments that will be described below.
  • Figs 21a, 21b show schematically a section through a joint between a long side edge portion 4a of a board 1 and an opposite long side edge portion 4b of another board 1'.
  • the upper sides of the boards are essentially positioned in a common surface plane HP and the upper parts of the joint edge portions 4a, 4b engage each other in a vertical joint plane VP.
  • the mechanical locking system results in locking of the boards relative to each other in both the vertical direction D1 and the horizontal direction D2 which extends perpendicular to the joint plane VP.
  • one board (1') can be displaced along the other board (1) in a direction D3 (see Fig. 3a ) along the joint plane VP.
  • Such a displacement can be used, for instance, to provide locking-together of floorboards that are positioned in the same row.
  • the edges of the floorboard have in a manner known per se a tongue groove 36 in one edge portion 4a of the floorboard inside the joint plane VP, and a tongue 38 formed in the other joint edge portion 4b and projecting beyond the joint plane VP.
  • the board 1 has a core or core 30 of wood which supports a surface layer of wood 32 on its front side and a balancing layer 34 on its rear side.
  • the board 1 is rectangular and has a second mechanical locking system also on the two parallel short sides.
  • this second locking system can have the same design as the locking system of the long sides, but the locking system on the short sides can also be of a different design according to the invention or be a previously known mechanical locking system.
  • the floorboard can be of parquet type with a thickness of 15 mm, a length of 2.4 m and a width of 0.2 m.
  • the invention can also be used for parquet squares or boards of a different size.
  • the core 30 can be of lamella type and consist of narrow wooden blocks of an inexpensive kind of wood.
  • the surface layer 32 may have a thickness of 3-4 mm and consist of a decorative kind of hardwood and be varnished.
  • the balancing layer 34 of the rear side may consist of a 2 mm veneer layer. In some cases, it may be advantageous to use different types of wood materials in different parts of the floorboard for optimal properties within the individual parts of the floorboard.
  • the mechanical locking system comprises a tongue groove 36 in one joint edge portion 4a of the floorboard, and a tongue 38 on the opposite joint edge portion 4b of the floorboard.
  • the tongue groove 36 is defined by upper and lower lips 39, 40 and has the form of an undercut groove with an opening between the two lips 39, 40.
  • the different parts of the tongue groove 36 are best seen in Fig. 21b .
  • the tongue groove is formed in the core or core 30 and extends from the edge of the floorboard. Above the tongue groove, there is an upper edge portion or joint edge surface 41 which extends up to the surface plane HP. Inside the opening of the tongue groove, there is an upper engaging or supporting surface 43 which in this case is parallel with the surface plane HP. This engaging or supporting surface passes into an inclined locking surface 43 which has a locking angle A to the horizontal plane HP. Inside the locking surface, there is surface portion 46 which forms the upper boundary surface of the undercut portion 35 of the tongue groove.
  • the tongue groove further has a bottom end 48 which extends down to the lower lip 40. On the upper side of this lip there is an engaging or supporting surface 50. The outer end of the lower lip has a joint edge surface 52 and extends in this case slightly beyond the joint plane VP.
  • the shape of the tongue is also best seen in Fig. 21b .
  • the tongue is made of the material of the core or core 30 and extends beyond the joint plane VP when this joint edge portion 4b is mechanically joined with the joint edge portion 4a of an adjoining floorboard.
  • the joint edge portion 4b also has an upper edge portion or upper joint edge surface 61 which extends along the joint plane VP down to the root of the tongue 38.
  • the upper side of the root of the tongue has an upper engaging or supporting surface 64 which in this case extends to an inclined locking surface 65 of an upwardly directed portion 8 close to the tip of the tongue.
  • the locking surface 65 passes into a guiding surface portion 66 which ends in an upper surface 67 of the upwardly directed portion 8 of the tongue.
  • a bevel which may serve as a guiding surface 68.
  • This extends to the tip 69 of the tongue.
  • a further guiding surface 70 which extends obliquely downwards to the lower edge of the tongue and an engaging or supporting surface 71.
  • the supporting surface 71 is intended to coact with the supporting surface 50 of the lower lip when two such floorboards are mechanically joined, so that their upper sides are positioned in the same surface plane HP and meet at a joint plane VP directed perpendicular thereto, so that the upper joint edge surface 41, 61 of the boards engage each other.
  • the tongue has a lower joint edge surface 72 which extends to the underside.
  • the locking surfaces 45, 65 both as locking surfaces for locking together in the direction D2 parallel with the surface plane HP and as supporting surfaces for counteracting movements in the direction D2 perpendicular to the surface plane.
  • the locking surfaces 45, 65 and the engaging surfaces 43, 64 coact as upper supporting surfaces in the system.
  • the tongue 38 extends beyond the joint plane VP and has an upwardly directed portion 8 at its free outer end or tip 69.
  • the tongue has also a locking surface 65 which is formed to coact with the inner locking surface 45 in the tongue groove 36 of an adjoining floorboard when two such floorboards are mechanically joined, so that their front sides are positioned in the same surface plane HP and meet at a joint plane VP directed perpendicular thereto.
  • the tongue 38 has a surface portion 52 between the locking surface 51 and the joint plane VP.
  • the surface portion 52 engages the surface portion 45 of the upper lip 8.
  • the tongue can, as shown in Figs 21a, 21b , have a bevel 66 between the locking surface 65 and the surface portion 57.
  • a bevel 68 can be positioned between the surface portion 57 and the tip 69 of the tongue.
  • the bevel 66 may serve as a guiding part by having a lower angle of inclination to the surface plane than the angle of inclination A of the locking surfaces 43, 51.
  • the supporting surface 71 of the tongue is in this embodiment essentially parallel with the surface plane HP.
  • the tongue has a bevel 70 between this supporting surface and the tip 69 of the tongue.
  • the lower lip 40 has a supporting surface 50 for coaction with the corresponding supporting surface 71 on the tongue 36 at a distance from the bottom end 48 of the undercut groove.
  • At least the major part of the bottom end 48 of the undercut groove, seen parallel with the surface plane HP, is located further away from the joint plane VP than is the outer end or tip 69 of the tongue 36.
  • Another important feature of a mechanical locking system according to the invention is that all parts of the portions of the lower lip 40 which are connected with the core 30, seen from the point C, where the surface plane HP and the joint plane VP intersect, are located outside a plane LP2.
  • This plane is located further away from said point C than a locking plane LP1 which is parallel with the plane LP2 and which is tangent to the coacting locking surfaces 45, 65 of the undercut groove 36 and the tongue 38, where these locking surfaces are most inclined relative to the surface plane HP.
  • the undercut groove can, as will be described in more detail below, be made by using large disk-shaped rotating cutting tools for machining of the edge portions of the floorboards.
  • a further important feature of a locking system according to the present invention is that the upper and lower lips 39, 40 and tongue 38 of the joint edge portions 4a, 4b are designed to enable disconnection of two mechanically joined floorboards by one floorboard being pivoted upwards relative to the other about a pivoting centre close to the point of intersection C between the surface plane HP and the joint plane VP, so that the tongue of this floorboard is pivoted out of the undercut groove of the other floorboard.
  • the board 1' is placed on the base and moved towards the previously laid board 1' until the narrow tip 69 of the tongue 38 has been inserted into the opening of the undercut groove 36. Then the floorboard 1' is angled upwards so that the upper parts 41, 61 of the boards on both sides of the joint plane VP contact each other. While maintaining this contact, the board is angled downwards by pivoting about the centre of pivoting C. The insertion takes place by the bevel 66 of the tongue sliding along the locking surface 45 of the upper lip 39 while at the same time the bevel 70 of the tongue 38 slides against the outer edge of the upper side of the lower lip 40. The locking system can then be opened by the floorboard 1' being angled upwards by pivoting about the centre of pivoting C close to the intersection between the surface plane HP and the joint plane VP.
  • the second way of locking-together is provided by moving the new board with its joint edge portion 4a formed with a tongue groove towards the joint edge portion 4b, provided with a tongue, of the previously laid board. Then the new board is pivoted upwards until contact is obtained between the upper parts 41, 61 of the boards close to the intersection between surface plane and joint plane, after which the board is pivoted downwards to bring tongue and groove together until the final locked position is achieved.
  • the floorboards can also be joined by one board being moved in an upwardly angled position towards the other.
  • a third way of providing joining of the floorboards in this embodiment of floorboards according to the invention involves that the new board 1' is displaced horizontally towards the previously laid board 1, so that the tongue 38 with its locking element or upwardly directed portion 8 is inserted into the tongue groove 36, the lower flexible lip 40 being bent slightly downwards for the locking element 8 to snap into the undercut portion 35 of the tongue groove. Also in this case, disconnection takes place by upward angling as described above.
  • the joint system according to the preferred embodiment may consist of several combinations of materials.
  • the upper lip 39 can be made of a rigid and hard upper surface layer 32 and a softer lower part which is part of the core 30.
  • the lower lip 40 can consist of the same softer upper part 30 and also a lower soft part 34 which can be another kind of wood.
  • the directions of the fibres in the three kinds of wood may vary. This can be used to provide a joint system which utilises these material properties.
  • the locking element is therefore according to the invention positioned closer to the upper hard and rigid part, which thus is flexible and compressible to a limited extent only, while the snap function is formed in the softer lower and flexible part. It should be pointed that the joint system can also be made in a homogeneous floorboard.
  • Fig. 22 shows schematically the basic principles of inward angling about a point C (upper joint edges) when using the present invention.
  • Fig. 22 shows schematically how a locking system should be designed to enable inward angling about the upper joint edges.
  • the parts of the joint system follow in prior-art manner a circular arc with is centre C close to the intersection between the surface plane HP and the joint plane VP. If a great play between all parts of the joint system is allowed, or if essential deformation during inward angling is possible, the tongue and groove can be formed in many different ways.
  • the joint system must have contact surfaces that prevent vertical and horizontal separation without any play between the engaging or supporting surfaces and if material deformation is not possible, the joint system should be constructed according to the following principles.
  • C1B is a circular arc which has it centre C at the top at the upper joint edges 41, 61 and which in this preferred embodiment intersects a contact point between the upper lip 39 and the upper part of the tongue 38 at the point P2. All the other contact points between P2, P3, P4 and P5 between the upper lip 39 and the upper part 8 of the tongue 38 and between this point of intersection P2 and the vertical plane VP are positioned on or inside this circular arc C1B, whereas all other contact points from P2 to P1 between the upper lip 39 and the upper part of the tongue 38 and between this point of intersection P2 and the outer part of the tongue 38 are positioned on or outside this circular arc C1B. These conditions should be satisfied for all contact points.
  • C2B is a circular arc which is concentric with the circular arc C1A and which in this preferred embodiment intersects a contact point between the lower lip 40 and the lower part of the tongue 38 at the point P7. All the other contact points between P7, P8 and P9 between the lower lip 40 and the lower part of the tongue 38 and between this point of intersection P7 and the vertical plane are positioned on or outside the circular arc C2B, and all other contact points between P6, P7 and between the lower lip 40 and the lower part of the tongue 38 and between this point of intersection P7 and the outer part of the tongue 38 are positioned on or inside this circular arc C2B. The same applies to the contact point P6 with the circular arc C2A.
  • a joint system constructed according to this preferred embodiment may have good inward angling properties. It can easily be combined with upper engaging or supporting surfaces 43, 64 which can be parallel with the horizontal plane HP and which can thus provide excellent vertical locking.
  • Figs 23a, 23b show how a joint system according to Figs 21a , 2b can be produced.
  • the floorboard 1 according to prior art is positioned with its surface 2 downwards on a ball bearing chain in a milling machine which conveys the board with extremely great accuracy past a number of milling cutters which, for instance, have a tool diameter of 80-300 mm and which can be set at an optional angle to the horizontal plane of the board.
  • the floorboard is shown with its surface plane HP directed upwards.
  • Fig. 23a shows how the first tool with the tool position TP1 makes a traditional tongue groove. The tool operates in this case at a tool angle TA1 which is 0°, i.e.
  • the undercut is made by means of a second tool, where the position TP2 and the design of the tool are such that the undercut 35 can be formed without the tool affecting the shape of the lower lip 40.
  • the tool has an angle TA2 which is equal to the angle of the locking surface 45 in the undercut 35.
  • This manufacturing method is possible by the locking plane LP1 being located at such a distance from the joint plane that the tool can be inserted into the previously formed tongue groove. The thickness of the tool therefore cannot exceed the distance between the two planes LP1 and LP2, as discussed in connection with Figs 21a and 21b .
  • This manufacturing method is prior-art technique and does not constitute part of the manufacturing method according to the present invention as will be described below.
  • Figs 24a, 24b show another variant of the invention.
  • This embodiment is characterised in that the joint system is formed completely according to the basic principle of inward angling about the upper joint edges as described above.
  • the locking surfaces 45, 65 and the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71 are in this embodiment plane, but they can have a different shape.
  • C1 and C2 are two circular arcs with their centre C at the upper end of adjoining joint edges 41, 61.
  • the smaller circular arc C1 is tangent to the lower contact point closest to the vertical plane between the locking surfaces 45, 65 at the point P4 which has the tangent TL1 corresponding to the locking plane LP1.
  • the locking surfaces 45, 65 have the same inclination as this tangent.
  • the greater circular arc 62 is tangent to the upper contact point between the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71 closest to the inner part 48 of the tongue groove at the point P7, which has the tangent TL2.
  • the supporting surfaces 50, 71 have the same inclination as this tangent.
  • This embodiment is characterised in particular in that all contact surfaces between the contact point P4 and the joint plane VP, in this case the point P5, and the inner part 48 of the tongue groove, respectively, are positioned inside and outside, respectively, the circular arc C1 and thus not on the circular arc C1.
  • the contact point P7 where all contact points between P7 and the vertical plane VP, in this case the point P8, and the inner part 48 of the tongue groove, respectively, are positioned outside and inside, respectively, the circular arc C2 and thus not on the circular arc C2.
  • the joint system can, if this condition is satisfied, be designed so that inward angling can take place with clearance during essentially the entire angular motion which can be terminated by the boards being locked with a tight fit or with a press fit when they have taken their final horizontal position.
  • the invention enables a combination of an inward angling and upward angling without resistance and a locking with high joint quality.
  • a joint system can be provided, where only the two above-mentioned points P4 on the upper lip and P7 on the lower part of the tongue are contact points between the tongue groove 36 and the tongue 38 during the entire inward angling until final locking takes place, and during the entire upward angling until the boards can be released from each other. Locking with clearance or with only line contact is a great advantage since the friction will be low and the boards can easily be angled inward and angled upward without parts of the system getting stuck and pinching each other with a risk of the joint system being damaged. A press fit especially in the vertical direction is very important for the strength.
  • the boards will, when subjected to tensile load, slide along the locking surfaces until the lower engaging or supporting surfaces have taken a position with a press fit.
  • a play will result in both a joint gap and differences in level between upper joint edges.
  • high strength can be achieved if the locking surfaces have an angle of about 40° to the surface plane HP and if the lower engaging or supporting surfaces have an angle of about 15° to the surface plane HP.
  • the locking plane LP1 has in Fig. 24a a locking angle A to the horizontal plane HP of about 39°, while the supporting plane TL2 along the supporting surfaces 50, 71 has a supporting angle VLA of about 14°.
  • the difference in angle between LP1 and the supporting plane TL2 is 25°.
  • a high locking angle and a great difference in angle between locking angle and supporting angle should be strived for since this results in a great horizontal locking force.
  • the locking surfaces and the supporting surfaces can be made arcuate, stepped, with several angles etc, but this makes manufacture difficult.
  • the locking surfaces may also constitute upper supporting surfaces or be complements to separate upper supporting surfaces.
  • the locking surfaces and supporting surfaces have contact points that deviate somewhat from these basic principles, they can be angled inward at their upper joint edges if the joint system is adjusted so that its contact points or surfaces are small in relation to the floor thickness and so that the properties of the board material in the form of compression, elongation and bending are used maximally in combination with very small plays between the contact surfaces. This can be used to increase the locking angle and the difference in angle between locking angle and supporting angle.
  • the basic principle of inward angling thus shows that the critical parts are the locking surfaces 45, 65 and the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71. It also shows that the degree of freedom is great as regards designing of the other parts, for instance the upper supporting surfaces 43, 64, the guiding 44 of the locking groove, the guiding 66 and the top surface 67 of the locking element 8, the inner parts 48, 49 of the tongue groove 36 and the lower lip 40, the guiding and the outer part 51 of the lower lip as well as outer/lower parts 69, 70, 72 of the tongue.
  • Angling about the upper joint edge can, as mentioned above, be facilitated if the joint system is constructed so that there can be a small play between above all said locking surfaces 45, 65 if the joint edges of the boards are pressed together.
  • the construction play also facilitates lateral displacement in the locked position, reduces the risk of creaking and gives greater degrees of freedom in manufacture, allows inward angling with locking surfaces that have a greater inclination than the tangent LP1 and contribute to compensating for swelling of upper joint edges.
  • the play gives considerably smaller joint gaps at the upper side of the boards and considerably smaller vertical displacements than would a play between the engaging or supporting surfaces, above all owing to this play being small and also owing to the fact that a sliding in the tensile-loaded position will follow the angle of the lower supporting surface, i.e. an angle which is essentially smaller than the locking angle.
  • This minimal play, if any, between the locking surfaces can be very small, for instance only 0.01 mm.
  • the play can be non-existent, i.e. 0, the joint system can be constructed so that a play appears only in maximal pressing together of the joint edges of the boards. It has been found that also a greater play of about 0.05 mm will result in a very high joint quality, since the joint gap which is to be found in the surface plane HP and which may arise in the tensile-loaded position is hardly visible.
  • joint system can be constructed without any play between the locking surfaces.
  • Play and material compression between the locking surfaces and bending of joint parts at the locking surfaces can easily be measured indirectly by the joint system being subjected to tensile load and the joint gap at the upper joint edges 41, 61 being measured at a predetermined load which is less than the strength of the joint system.
  • strength is meant that the joint system is not broken or does not snap out.
  • a suitable tensile load is about 50% of the strength.
  • a long side joint should normally have a strength exceeding 300 kg per running meter of joint. Short side joints should have still greater strength.
  • a parquet floor with a suitable joint system according to the invention can withstand a tensile load of 1000 kg per running meter of joint.
  • a high-quality joint system should have a joint gap at the upper joint edges 41, 61 of about 0.1-0.2 mm when subjected to tensile load with approximately half the maximum strength.
  • the joint gap should decrease when the load ceases.
  • the relationship between construction play and material deformation can be determined. In case of lower tensile load, the joint gap is essentially a measure of the construction play. In case of a higher load, the joint gap increases owing to material deformation.
  • the joint system can also be constructed with built-in initial stress and a press fit between locking surfaces and supporting surfaces, so that the above-mentioned joint gap is not visible in case of the above-mentioned load.
  • the geometry of the joint system, play between the locking surfaces in combination with compression of the material round the upper joint edges 41, 61 can also be measured by the joint being sawn up transversely of the joint edge. Since the joint system is manufactured with linear machining, it will have the same profile along its entire joint edge. The only exception is manufacturing tolerances in the form of lack of parallelism owing to the fact that the board can optionally be turned or displaced vertically or horizontally as it passes different milling tools in the machine. Normally seen, the two samples from each joint edge, however, give a very reliable picture of what the joint system looks like. After grinding the samples and cleaning them of loose fibres so that a sharp joint profile is to be seen, they can be analysed as regards joint geometry, material compression, bending etc.
  • the two joint parts can, for instance, be compressed by means of a force which is such as not to damage the joint system, above all the upper joint edges 41, 61.
  • the play between the locking surfaces and the joint geometry can then be measured in a measuring microscope with an accuracy of 0.01 mm or less according to equipment. If stable and modern machines are used in manufacture, it is as a rule sufficient to measure the profile in two smaller areas of a floorboard to determine the average play, joint geometry etc.
  • the locking element or the upwardly directed portion 8 of the tongue has a guiding part 66.
  • the guiding part of the locking element comprises parts having an inclination which is lower than the inclination of the locking surface and, in this case, also the inclination of the tangent TL1.
  • a suitable degree of inclination of the tool that produces the locking surface 45 is indicated by TA2 which in this embodiment is equal to the tangent TL1.
  • the locking surface 45 of the tongue groove has a guiding part 44 which coacts with the guiding part 66 of the tongue during inward angling. Also this guiding part 44 comprises parts that have a smaller inclination than the locking surface.
  • a rounded guiding part 51 which coacts with the radius in the lower part of the tongue in connection with the lower engaging surface 71 at the point P7 and which facilitates inward angling.
  • the lower lip 40 can be resilient. In connection with inward angling, a small degree of compression can also take place of the contact points between the lower parts of the tongue 38 and the lower lip 40. As a rule, this compression is significantly smaller than may be the case for the locking surfaces since the lower lip 40 can have considerably better resilience properties than the upper lip 39 and the tongue 38, respectively. In connection with inward angling and upward angling, the lip can thus be bent downwards.
  • a bending capacity of merely one tenth of a millimetre or somewhat more gives, together with material compression and small contact surfaces, good chances of forming, for instance, the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71, so that they can have an inclination which is smaller than the tangent TL2 while at the same time inward angling can easily be made.
  • a flexible lip should be combined with a relatively high locking angle. If the locking angle is low, a large amount of the tensile load will press the lip downward, which results in undesirable joint gaps and differences in level between the joint edges.
  • Both the tongue groove 36 and the tongue 38 have guiding parts 42, 51 and 68, 70 which guide the tongue into the groove and facilitate snapping-in and inward angling.
  • Fig. 25 illustrates variants of the invention, where the lower lip 40 is shorter than the upper lip 39 and thus is positioned at a distance from the vertical plane VP.
  • the advantage is that there will be greater degrees of freedom in designing the locking groove 45 with a high tool angle TA while at the same time relatively large tools can be used.
  • the tongue groove 36 has been made deeper than is required by the space for the tip of the tongue 38.
  • the dash-dotted joint edge portion 4b shows how the parts of the system are related to each other in connection with inward angling about the upper joint edge, while the dashed joint edge portion 4b shows how the parts of the system are related to each other in connection with snapping-in of the tongue into the tongue groove by displacement of the joint edge portion 4b straight towards the joint edge portion 4a.
  • Fig. 26 shows a further variant of the above-mentioned basic principles.
  • the joint system is here formed with locking surfaces which are angled at 90° to the surface plane HP and which are considerably more angled than the tangent TL1.
  • Such a preferred locking system is openable by upward angling by the locking surfaces being extremely small and by the joint locking essentially only by line contact. If the core is hard, such a locking system can give high strength.
  • the design of the locking element and the locking surfaces allows snapping-in with only a small degree of downward bending of the lower lip, as indicated by means of dashed lines.
  • Figs 27a-c show a laying method by inward angling.
  • one board is referred to as groove board and the other as tongue board.
  • the boards are identical.
  • a possible laying method involves that the tongue board lies flat on the subfloor either as a loose board or joined with other boards on one, two or three sides, depending on where in the laying sequence/row it is positioned.
  • the groove board is placed with its upper lip 39 partly over the outer part of the tongue 38, so that the upper joint edges are in contact with each other. Then the groove board is turned down towards the subfloor while being pressed against the joint edge of the tongue board until final locking takes place according to Fig. 27c .
  • Figs 27a-c show that the inward angling can take place with clearance, or alternatively merely contact between the upper part of the tongue groove and the tongue or with line contact between the upper and lower parts of the tongue and the tongue groove.
  • Line contact can in this embodiment arise at points P4 and P7.
  • Inward angling can easily take place without considerable resistance and can be terminated with a very close fit that locks the floorboards in the final position with high joint quality vertically and horizontally.
  • the downward angling can in practice be carried out as follows.
  • the groove board is moved at an angle towards the tongue board, the tongue groove being passed over part of the tongue.
  • the groove board is pressed towards the tongue board and angled gradually downwards using, for instance, compression in the centre of the board and, after that, on both edges.
  • the final downward angling can be made.
  • Figs 28a-c show how a corresponding laying can be carried out by the tongue board being angled into groove board.
  • Figs 29a-b show joining by snapping-in.
  • the tongue is guided into the groove.
  • the lower lip 40 bends, and the locking element 8 snaps into the locking groove or the undercut 35.
  • the preferred joint system shows the basic principles of snapping-in, where the lower lip is flexible.
  • the joint system must, of course, be adjusted to the bending capacity of the material and the depth of the tongue groove 36, the height of the locking element 8 and the thickness of the lower lip 40 and should be dimensioned so that snapping-in is feasible.
  • the basic principles of a joint system according to the invention which is more convenient for use in materials with a lower degree of flexibility and bendability will be evident from the following description and Fig. 34 .
  • the described laying methods can be used optionally on all four sides and be combined with each other. After laying of one side, a lateral displacement usually takes place in the locked position.
  • FIG. 30 shows a first board 1, and an upwardly angled second board 2a and an upwardly angled new third board 2b which on its short side is already joined with the second board 2b.
  • the new board 2b After the new board 2b has been laterally displaced along the short side of the second board 2a in the upwardly angled and short-side-locked position, the two boards 2a and 2b can be angled down jointly and locked on the long side to the first board 1.
  • the new board 2b can be inserted with its tongue into the tongue groove when the board is displaced parallel with the second board 2a and when the second board 2a has a part of its tongue partially inserted into the tongue groove and when its upper joint edge is in contact with the upper joint edge of the first board 1.
  • Fig. 30 shows that the joint system can be made with such a design of the tongue groove, tongue and locking element that this is possible.
  • Figs 31a, 31b show part of a floorboard with a combination joint.
  • the tongue groove 36 and the tongue 38 can be formed according to one of the embodiments above.
  • the groove board has on its underside a known strip 6 with a locking element 8b and a locking surface 10.
  • the tongue side has a locking groove 35 according to a known embodiment.
  • the locking element 8b with its relatively large guiding part 9 will function as an extra guiding during the first part of the inward angling and significantly facilitates this first part of the inward angling when positioning takes place and any banana shape is straightened out.
  • the locking element 8b causes automatic positioning and compression of the floorboards until the guiding part of the tongue is engaged with the locking groove 35 and final locking can take place.
  • the joint will be very strong by coaction of the two locking systems.
  • This joint is very convenient for joining of large floor surfaces particularly in public rooms.
  • the strip 6 has been attached to the groove side, but it can also be attached to the tongue side. The positioning of the strip 6 thus is optional.
  • the joint can be both snapped in and angled upwards and be laterally displaced in the locked position.
  • this joint can be used optionally in different variants on both long and short side, and it can be optionally combined with all joint variants described here and with other known systems.
  • a convenient combination is a snap system on the short side without an aluminium strip. This may in some cases facilitate manufacture.
  • a strip that is attached after manufacture also has the advantage that it may also constitute part of or even the entire lower lip 40. This gives very great degrees of freedom for forming, with cutting tools, for instance the upper lip 39 and forming locking surfaces with high locking angles.
  • the locking system according to this embodiment can, of course, be made snappable, and it can also be manufactured with an optional width of the strip, for instance with a strip 6 that does not protrude outside the outer part of the upper lip 39, as is the case in the embodiment according to Fig. 50 .
  • the strip need not be continuous over the entire length of the joint but may consist of several small portions which are attached with space in between on both long side and short side.
  • the locking element 8b and its locking groove 35 can be formed with different angles, heights and radii which can be selected optionally, so that they either prevent separation and/or facilitate inward angling or snapping-in.
  • Figs 32a-d illustrate in four steps how inward angling can be made.
  • the broad strip 6 makes it possible for the tongue 38 to be easily laid on the strip at the beginning of the inward angling.
  • the tongue can then, in connection with downward angling, essentially automatically slide into the tongue groove 36.
  • the corresponding laying can be made by the strip 6 being inserted under the tongue board. All laying functions that have been described above can also be used in floorboards with this preferred combination system.
  • Figs 33 and 34 show a production-specific and optimised joint system for above all a floorboard with a core of wood.
  • Fig. 33 shows how the long side can be formed.
  • the joint system is optimised with regard to, above all, inward angling, upward angling and a small amount of material waste.
  • Fig. 34 shows how the short side can be formed.
  • the joint system is optimised for snapping-in and high strength. The differences are as follows.
  • the tongue 38 and the locking element of the short side 5a are longer, measured in the horizontal plane. This gives a higher shear strength in the locking element 8.
  • the tongue groove 36 is deeper on the short side 5b, which helps the lower lip to be bent downwards to a greater extent.
  • the locking element 8 is on the short side 5a lower in the vertical direction, which reduces the requirement for the downward bending of the lower lip in connection with the snapping.
  • the locking surfaces 45, 65 have a higher locking angle and the lower engaging surfaces have a lower angle.
  • the guiding parts of the long side 4a, 4b in the locking element and the locking groove are greater for optimal guiding, while at the same time the contact surface between the locking surfaces is smaller since the strength requirements are lower than for the short side.
  • the joint systems on the long and short side can consist of different materials or material properties in upper lip, lower lip and tongue, and these properties can be adjusted so that they contribute to optimising the different properties that are desired for long side and short side, respectively, with regard to function and strength.
  • Fig. 35 shows in detail how the joint system of the floorboard can be formed on the long side.
  • the principles here described can, of course, be used on both long side and short side. Only the parts that have previously not been discussed in detail will now essentially be described.
  • the locking surfaces 45, 65 have an angle HLA which is greater than the tangent TL1. This gives a higher horizontal locking force. This overbending should be adjusted to the wood material of the core and optimised with regard to compression and flexural rigidity so that inward angling and upward angling can still take place. The contact surfaces of the locking surfaces should be minimised and adjusted to the properties of the core.
  • a small part preferably less than half the extent of the locking element in the vertical direction, constitutes the contact surfaces of the locking element 8 and the locking groove 14.
  • the major part constitutes rounded, inclined or bent guiding parts which in the joined position and during inward angling and upward angling are not in contact with each other.
  • the inventor has discovered that very small contact surfaces in relation to the floor thickness T between the locking surfaces 45, 65 of, for instance, a few tenths of a millimetre can result in a very high locking force and that this locking force can exceed the shear strength of the locking element in the horizontal plane (i.e. the surface plane HP). This can be used to provide locking surfaces with an angle exceeding the tangent TL1.
  • the locking surfaces 45, 65 are plane and parallel. This is advantageous especially as regards the locking surface 55 of the locking groove. If the tool is displaced parallel with the locking surface 45, this will not affect the vertical distance to the joint plane VP, and it is easier to provide a high joint quality. Of course, small deviations from the plane form may give equivalent results.
  • the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71 have been made essentially plane and with an angle VLA2 which in this case is greater than the tangent line TL2 to the point P7 which is positioned on the supporting surface 71 closest to the bottom of the tongue groove. This causes inward angling with clearance during essentially the entire angular motion.
  • the supporting surfaces 50, 71 are relatively small in relation to the floor thickness T. These supporting surfaces can also be made essentially plane. Plane supporting surfaces facilitate the manufacture according to the above described principles.
  • the supporting surfaces 50, 71 can also be made with angles that are smaller than the angle of inclination of the tangent TL2. In this case, angling can take place partly by means of a certain degree of material compression and downward bending of the lower lip 40. If the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71 are small in relation to the floor thickness T, the possibilities of forming the surfaces with angles that are greater and smaller, respectively, than the tangent TL1 and TL2, respectively, increase.
  • Fig. 36 shows upward angling of a board which has a geometry according to Fig. 35 and whose locking surfaces thus have a greater inclination than the tangent TL1 and whose supporting surfaces have a smaller inclination than the tangent TL2 while at the same time these surfaces are relatively small.
  • the overlap at the points P4 and P7 in connection with inward angling and upward angling will then be extremely small.
  • the point P4 can be angled depending on a combination of the material being compressed at the upper joint edges K1, K2 and at the point P4, K3, K4 while at the same time the upper lip 39 and the tongue 38 can bend in the direction B1 and B2 from the contact point P4.
  • the lower lip can bend downwards away from the contact point P7 in the direction B3.
  • the upper supporting surfaces 43, 64 are preferably perpendicular to the joint plane VP. The manufacture is facilitated significantly if the upper and lower supporting surfaces are plane-parallel and preferably horizontal.
  • the circular arc C1 shows, for instance, that the upper supporting surfaces can be formed in many different ways inside this circular arc C1 without this interfering with the possibilities of angling and snapping.
  • the circular arc C2 shows that the inner parts of the tongue groove and the outer parts of the tongue according to the previously preferred principles can be formed in many different ways without this interfering with the possibilities of angling and snapping.
  • the upper lip 39 is over its entire extent thicker than the lower lip 40. This is advantageous from the viewpoint of strength. Moreover, this is advantageous in connection with parquet floors, which as a result can be formed with a thicker surface layer of a hard kind of wood.
  • S1-S5 indicate areas where joint surfaces on both sides should not be in contact with each other at least in the joined position, but preferably also during inward angling.
  • a contact between the tongue and the tongue groove in these areas S1-S5 contributes only marginally to improving the locking in D1 direction and hardly at all to improving the locking in the D2 direction.
  • a contact prevents inwardly angling and lateral displacement, causes unnecessary tolerance problems in connection with manufacture and increases the risk of creaking and undesired effects as the boards swell.
  • the tool angle TA which in Fig. 38d is indicated by TA4, forms the locking surface 44 of the undercut 35 and operates with the same angle as the angle of the locking surface, and the part of this tool which is positioned inside the vertical plane towards the tongue groove has a width perpendicular to the tool angle TA which is indicated by TT.
  • the angle TA and the width TT determine partly the possibilities of forming the outer parts 52 of the lower lip 40.
  • a plurality of ratios and angles are important for an optimal manufacturing method, function, cost and strength.
  • the extent of the contact surfaces should be minimised. This reduces friction and facilitates displacement in the locked position, inward angling and snapping in, simplifies manufacture and reduces the risk of swelling problems and creaking.
  • less than 30% of the surface parts of the tongue 38 constitute contact surfaces with the tongue groove 36.
  • the contact surfaces of the locking surfaces 65, 45 are in this embodiment only 2% of the floor thickness T, and the lower supporting surfaces have a contact surface which is only 10% of the floor thickness T.
  • the locking system has in this embodiment a plurality of parts S1-S5 which constitute free surfaces without contact with each other.
  • free surfaces can within the scope of the invention be filled with glue, sealing agent, impregnation of different kinds, lubricant and the like.
  • free surfaces is here meant the form of the surfaces in the joint system that it obtains in connection with machining by means of the respective cutting tools.
  • the locking surfaces 65, 45 can prevent horizontal separation even when they have an angle HLA to the horizontal plane HP which is greater than zero.
  • the tensile strength of the joint system increases significantly when this locking angle becomes greater and when there is a difference in angle between the locking angle HLA of the locking surfaces 45, 65 and the engaging angle VLA2 of the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71, provided that this angle is smaller. If high strength is not required, the locking surfaces can be formed with low angles and small differences in angle to the lower engaging surfaces.
  • the locking angle HLA and the difference in angle to lower supporting surfaces HLA - VLA2 must as a rule be about 20°. Still better strength is obtained if the locking angle HLA and the difference in angle HLA-VLA2 is, for instance 30°. In the preferred example according to Fig. 35 , the locking angle is 50° and the angle of the supporting surfaces 20°. As shown in previous embodiments, joint systems according to the invention can be formed with still greater locking angles and differences in angle.
  • the horizontal extent PA of the tongue should exceed 1/3 of the thickness T of the floorboard, and it should preferably be about 0.5 * T. As a rule, this is necessary for a strong locking element 8 with a guiding part to be formed and for sufficient material to be available in the upper lip 39 between the locking surface 65 and the vertical plane VP.
  • the horizontal extent PA of the tongue 38 should be divided into two essentially equal parts PA1 and PA2, where PA1 should constitute the locking element and the major part of PA2 should constitute the supporting surface 64.
  • the horizontal extent PA1 of the locking element should not be less than 0.2 times the floor thickness.
  • the upper supporting surface 64 should not be too great, above all on the long side of the floorboard. Otherwise, the friction in connection with lateral displacement can be too high.
  • the depth G of the tongue groove should be 2% deeper than the projection of the tongue PA from the joint plane VP.
  • the smallest distance of the upper lip to the floor surface adjacent to the locking groove 35 should be greater than the smallest distance of the lower lip between the lower supporting surface 71 and the rear side of the floorboard.
  • the tool width TT should exceed 0.1 times the floor thickness T.
  • Figs 37a-c illustrate a floorboard according to the invention.
  • the joint system on the short side may consist of different materials and material combinations 30b and 30c and that these can also differ from the joint material 30 of the long side.
  • the tongue groove part 36 of the short sides may consist of a harder and more flexible wood material than, for instance, the tongue part 38 which can be hard and rigid and have other properties than the core of the long side.
  • the tongue groove 36 On the short side with the tongue groove 36, it is possible to select, for instance, a kind of wood 30b which is more flexible than the kind of wood 30c on the other short side where the tongue is formed.
  • the blocks that are positioned between the two short sides can be of different kinds of wood or materials, so that some of them can be selected with regard to their contributing with suitable properties which improve laying, strength etc.
  • Different properties can also be obtained with different fibre orientation on long and short side, and also plastic materials can be used on the short sides and, for instance, on different parts of the long side.
  • the floorboard or parts of its core consist of, for example, plywood with several layers, these layers can be selected so that the upper lip, the tongue and the lower lip on both long side and short side can all have parts with a different composition of materials, fibre orientation etc. which can give different properties as regards strength, flexibility, machinability etc.
  • Figs 38a-d show a manufacturing method according to the present invention.
  • the manufacture of the joint edge and the tongue groove occurs in four steps.
  • the tools used have a tool diameter which exceeds the floor thickness.
  • the tools are used to form an undercut groove with a high locking angle in a tongue groove with a lower lip, which extends beyond the undercut groove.
  • edges of the boards are illustrated with the floor surface directed upwards. Normally, the boards are, however, positioned with their surface directed downwards during machining.
  • the first tool TP1 is a roughing cutter which operates at an angle TA1 to the horizontal plane.
  • the second tool TP2 can operate horizontally and forms the upper and lower supporting surfaces.
  • the third tool TA3 can operate essentially vertically but also at an angle and forms the upper joint edge.
  • the critical tool is the tool TP4 which forms the outer part of the locking groove and its locking surface.
  • TA4 corresponds to TA in Fig. 35 .
  • this tool removes only a minimum amount of the material and forms essentially the locking surface with a high angle.
  • the amount of material to be removed should be as small as possible to reduce wear and strain on the tool. This is achieved with a suitable angle and design of the roughing cutter TP1.
  • this manufacturing method is characterised especially in that it requires at least two cutting tools which operate at two different angles to form an undercut locking groove 35 in the upper part of the tongue groove 36.
  • the tongue groove can be made using still more tools, the tools being used in a different order.
  • a tongue groove 36 in a floorboard which has an upper side 2 in a surface plane HP and a joint edge portion 4a having a joint plane VP directed perpendicular to the upper side.
  • the tongue groove extends from the joint plane 4a and is defined by two lips 39, 40 each having a free outer end.
  • the tongue groove has an undercut 35 which comprises a locking surface 45 and is positioned further away from the joint plane VP than is the free outer end 52 of the other lip.
  • machining is carried out by means of a plurality of rotating cutting tools which have a larger diameter than the thickness T of the floorboard.
  • the cutting tools and the floorboard are made to perform a relative motion relative to each other and parallel to the joint edge of the floorboard.
  • the undercut is formed by means of at least two such cutting tools, which have their rotatary shaft inclined at different angles to the upper side 2 of the floorboard; 2) that a first of these tools is driven to form portions of the undercut further away from the joint plane VP than the locking surface 45 of the intended undercut; and 3) that a second of these tools is driven to form the locking surface 45 of the undercut.
  • the first of these tools is driven with its rotary shaft set at a greater angle to the upper side 2 of the floorboard than is said second of these tools.
  • the lower lip 40 can be formed so as to extend beyond the joint plane VP.
  • the lower lip 40 can also be formed so as to extend to the joint plane VP.
  • the lower lip 40 can be formed so as to end at a distance from the joint plane VP.
  • the first of the tools can, according to an embodiment, be driven with its rotary shaft set at an angle of at most 85° to the surface plane HP.
  • the second of the tools can, according to an embodiment, be driven with its rotary shaft set at an angle of at most 60° to the surface plane HP.
  • the tools can be caused to engage the floorboard in order in dependence on the angle of their rotary shaft to the surface plane HP, so that tools with a greater angle of the rotary shaft are caused to machine the floorboard before tools with a smaller angle of the rotary shaft.
  • a third of the tools can be driven to form the lower parts of the tongue groove 36.
  • This third tool can be brought into contact with the floorboard between said first and said second of the tools.
  • the third tool can further be driven with its rotary shaft set at an angle of about 90° to the surface plane HP.
  • first of the tools can be driven to machine a broader surface portion of the joint edge portion 4a of the floorboard than said second of the tools.
  • the second of the tools can be formed so that its surface facing the surface plane HP is profiled for reduction of the thickness of the tool, seen parallel with the rotary shaft, within the radially outer portions of the tool.
  • at least three of the tools can be driven with different settings of their rotary shaft to form the undercut parts of the tongue groove.
  • the tools can be used to machine a floorboard of wood or wood-fibre-based material.
  • Fig. 39 shows how a joint system can be formed to enable compensation for swelling. Since the relative humidity increases in the change between cold and warm weather, the surface layer 32 swells and the floorboards 4a and 4b are pressed apart. If the joint has no flexibility, the joint edges 41 and 61 can be crushed, or the locking element 8 can be broken. This problem can be solved by the joint system being constructed so as to obtain the following properties which each separately and in combination contribute to a reduction of the problem.
  • the joint system can be formed so that the floorboards can have a small play when the joint edges are pressed together horizontally, for instance, in connection with production and at normal relative humidity.
  • a play of a few hundredths of a millimetre contributes to a reduction of the problem.
  • a negative play, i.e. initial stress, can give the opposite effect.
  • the joint system can be formed so that the locking surfaces are more easily compressed than the upper joint edges 41, 61.
  • the locking element 8 can be formed with a grove 64a between the locking surface and the upper horizontal supporting surface 64. With a suitable design of the tongue 38 and the locking element 8, the outer part 69 of the tongue can be bent outwards to the inner part 48 of the tongue groove and operate as a resilient element in connection with swelling and shrinking of the surface layers.
  • the lower supporting surfaces of the joint system are formed parallel with the horizontal plane for maximum locking vertically. It is also possible to obtain expansibility by applying a compressible material between, for instance, the two locking surfaces 45, 65 or selecting compressible materials as materials for the tongue or groove part.
  • Fig. 40 shows a joint system according to the invention which has been optimised for high rigidity in the tongue 38.
  • the outer part of the tongue is in contact with the inner part of the tongue groove. If this contact surface is small and if the contact occurs without very great compression, the joint system can be displaceable in the locked position.
  • Fig. 41 shows a joint system where the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71 have two angles.
  • the portions of the supporting surfaces outside the joint plane are parallel with the horizontal plane. Inside the joint plane closest to the inner part of the tongue groove, they have an angle corresponding to the tangent to the circular arc 32 which is tangent to the innermost edge of the supporting surface parts engaging each other.
  • the locking surfaces have a relatively low locking angle. The strength can still be sufficient since the lower lip 40 can be made hard and rigid and since the difference in angle is great to the parallel part of the lower supporting surfaces 50, 71.
  • the locking surfaces 45, 65 also serve as upper supporting surfaces.
  • the joint system has no upper supporting surfaces in addition to the locking surfaces which thus also prevent vertical separation.
  • Figs 42a and 42b show a joint system which is convenient for short side locking and which can have high tensile strength also in softer materials since the locking element 8 has a large horizontal shear-absorbing surface.
  • the tongue 38 has a lower part which is positioned outside the circular arc C2 and which thus does not follow the above-described basic principle of inward angling.
  • the joint system can still be released by upward angling about the upper joint edges since the locking element 8 of the tongue 38, after the first upward angling operation has been carried out, can leave the tongue groove by being pulled out horizontally.
  • Figs 43a-c show the basic principle of how the lower part of the tongue is to be formed in relation to the lower lip 40 to facilitate horizontal snapping-in according to the invention in a joint system with locking grooves in a rigid upper lip 39 and with a flexible lower lip 40.
  • the upper lip 39 is significantly more rigid, inter alia owing to the fact that it may be thicker or that it may consist of harder and more rigid materials.
  • the lower lip 40 can be thinner and softer, and in connection with snapping-in the essential bending will therefore take place in the lower lip 40. Snapping-in can be significantly facilitated, among other things, by the maximal bending of the lower lip 40 being limited as far as possible.
  • Fig. 43b shows that the maximum bending can be limited by the tongue groove 36 and the tongue 38 being designed in such manner that there is a space S4 between the lower and outer part 49 of the tongue and the lower lip 40.
  • Horizontal snapping-in is as a rule used in connection with snapping-in of the short side after locking of the long side.
  • Figs 45-50 show different variants of the invention which can be used on the long or short side and which can be manufactured using large rotating cutting tools. With modern manufacturing technology it is possible to form according to the invention complicated shapes by machining in board materials at a low cost. It should be pointed out that most of the shown geometries in these and previously preferred figures can, of course, be formed, for example, by extrusion, but this method is usually considerably more expensive than machining and is not convenient for forming of most board materials that are normally used in floors.
  • Figs 45a and 45b show a locking system according to the invention where the outer part of the tongue 38 has been formed so as to be bendable. This bendability has been obtained by the tip of the tongue being split. During snapping-in, the lower lip 40 bends downwards and the outer lower part of the tongue 38 bends upwards.
  • Figs 46a and 46b show a locking system according to the invention with a split tongue. During snapping-in, the two parts of the tongue bend towards each other while at the same time the two lips bend away from each other.
  • Figs 47a and 47b show a combination joint where a separate part 40b constitutes an extended part of the lower lip and where this part can be resilient.
  • the joint system is angleable.
  • the lower lip which constitutes part of the core, is formed with its supporting surface in such a manner that snapping-in can take place without this lip needing to be bent.
  • the extended separate part which can be made of aluminium sheet, is resilient.
  • the joint system can also be formed so that both parts of the lip are resilient.
  • Figs 48a and 48b show snapping-in of a combination joint with a lower lip consisting of two parts, where merely the separate lip constitutes the supporting surface.
  • This joint system can be used, for instance, on the short side together with some other joint system according to the invention.
  • the advantage of this joint system is that, for instance, the locking groove 35 can be formed with great degrees of freedom rationally and using large cutting tools.
  • the outer lip 40b is attached, and its shape does not affect the possibilities of machining.
  • the outer lip 40b is resilient and has in this embodiment no locking element.
  • Another advantage is that the joint system enables joining of extremely thin core materials since the lower lip can be made very thin.
  • the core material can be, for instance, a thin compact laminate, and the upper and the lower layer can be relatively thick layers of e.g. cork or soft plastic material, which can give a soft and sound-absorbing floor.
  • cork or soft plastic material e.g. cork or soft plastic material, which can give a soft and sound-absorbing floor.
  • Figs 49 and 50 show two variants of combination joints which can be used, for example, in the short side in combination with other preferred systems.
  • the combination joint according to Fig. 49 can be made in an embodiment where the strip constitutes an extended resilient part of the tongue, and the system will then have a function similar to the one in Fig. 45.
  • Fig. 50 shows that this combination joint can be formed with a locking element 8b in the outer lower lip 40b which is positioned inside the joint plane.
  • Figs. 51a-f show a laying method which is according to the invention and which can be used to join floorboards by a combination of horizontal bringing-together, upward angling, snapping in the upwardly angled position and downward angling.
  • This laying method can be used for floorboards according to the invention, but it can also be used on optional mechanical joint systems in floors having such properties that the laying method can be applied.
  • the laying method is shown by one board, referred to as the groove board, being joined with the other board, referred to as the tongue board.
  • the boards are in practice identical. It is obvious that the entire laying sequence can also be carried out by the tongue side being joined with the groove side in the same way.
  • a tongue board 4a with a tongue 38 and a groove board 4b with a tongue groove 36 are in the starting position lying flat on a subfloor according to Fig. 51a .
  • the tongue 38 and the tongue groove 36 have locking means which present vertical and horizontal separation.
  • the groove board 4b is displaced horizontally in the direction F1 towards the tongue board 4a until the tongue 38 is in contact with the tongue groove 36 and until the upper and lower parts of the tongue are partially inserted into the tongue groove according to Fig. 51b .
  • This first operation forces the joint edge portions of the boards to take the same relative vertical position over the entire longitudinal extent of the board, and any differences in arcuate shape will therefore be straightened out.
  • the groove board 4b is then angled upwards with an angular motion S1 while at the same time it is held in contact with the tongue board or alternatively is pressed in the direction F1 towards the tongue board 4a according to Fig. 51c .
  • the groove board 4b reaches an angle SA to the subfloor which corresponds to an upwardly angled snap position, according to the above description and as shown in Fig. 44 , the groove board 4b can be moved towards the tongue board 4a so that the upper joint edges 41, 61 come into contact with each other and so that the locking means of the tongue are partially inserted into the locking means of the tongue groove by a snap function.
  • This snap function in the upwardly angled position is characterised in that the outer parts of the tongue groove widen and spring back. The widening is essentially smaller than is required in connection with snapping in in the horizontal position.
  • the snap angle SA is dependent on the force by which the boards are pressed towards each other in connection with upward angling of the groove board 4b. If the press force in the direction F1 is high, the boards will snap in at a lower angle SA than if the force is low.
  • the snapping-in position is also characterised in that the guiding parts of the locking means are in contact with each other so that they can perform their snapping-in function. If the boards are banana-shaped, they will be straightened out and locked in connection with the snapping-in.
  • the groove board 4b can now, with an angular motion S2 combined with pressing towards the joint edge, be angled downwards according to Fig. 51e and locked against the tongue board in its final position. This is illustrated in Fig. 51f .
  • a preferred aid according to the present invention can be a striking or pressing block 80 which is designed so as to have a front and lower part 81 which angles the groove board upwards when it is inserted under the edge portion of the floorboard. It has an upper abutment edge 82 which in the upwardly angled position is in contact with the edge portion of the groove board.
  • the tongue groove of the groove board 4a can now be snapped together with the tongue of the tongue board by pressing or striking against the striking block.
  • the striking block can be moved to different parts of the board. It is obvious that this can take place in combination with other pressing against the other parts of the board, using a plurality of striking blocks and using different types of aids which give a similar result where, for instance, one aid angles the board up to the snapping-in angle and another is used for pressing together.
  • the same method can be used if instead one wants to angle up the groove side of the new board and join it with the tongue side of the previously laid board.
  • Such a tool for laying of floorboards by interconnecting a tongue and groove joint thereof can be designed as a block 80 with an engaging surface 82 for engaging a joint edge 4a, 4b of the joint edge portion of the floorboard.
  • the tool can be formed as a wedge for insertion under the floorboard and have its engaging surface 82 arranged close to the thick end of the wedge.
  • the engaging surface 82 of the tool can be concavely curved for at least partial enclosure of the joint edge 4a, 4b of the floorboard.
  • the wedge angle S1 of the wedge and the position of the engaging surface 82 on the thick portion of the wedge can be adjusted to obtain a predetermined lifting angle of a floorboard when it is being lifted with the wedge 80 and the joint edge of the floorboard contacts the engaging surface 82.
  • the abutment surface 82 of the wedge 80 can be formed to abut against a joint edge portion 4b which has a tongue 38 directed obliquely upwards for joining an undercut tongue groove 36 formed at the opposite joint edge portion 4a of the floorboard with the tongue 38 of a previously laid floorboard.
  • the abutment surface 82 of the wedge can be formed to abut against a joint edge portion 4a, which has an undercut groove 36, for joining a tongue 38 directed obliquely upwards and formed at the opposite joint edge portion 4b of the floorboard.
  • the tool described above can be used for mechanical joining of floorboards by lifting one floorboard relative to another and joining and locking of mechanical locking systems of the floorboards.
  • the tool can also be used for mechanical joining of such a floorboard with another such floorboard by snapping together the mechanical locking systems of the floorboards while the floorboard is in its lifted state.
  • the tool can be used so that the engaging surface 82 of the wedge is made to abut against a joint edge portion 4b which has a tongue 38 directed obliquely upwards for joining an undercut groove 36 formed at the opposite joint edge portion 4a of the floorboard with the tongue 38 of a previously laid floorboard.
  • the tool can be used so that the engaging surface 82 of the wedge is made to abut against a joint edge portion 4a which has an undercut groove 36, for joining a tongue 38 which is directed obliquely upwards and formed at the opposite joint edge portion 4b of the floorboard with the undercut groove 38 of a previously laid floorboard.
  • Fig. 53 shows that the boards 2a and 2b, after being joined with adjoining boards along the long side edge, can be displaced in the locked position in the direction F2 so that joining of the other two sides can take place by a horizontal snapping together.
  • Snapping-in in the upwardly angled position can take place of long sides as well as short sides. If the short side of one board has first been joined, its long side can also be snapped in the upwardly angled position by this board with its locked short being angled up so that it takes its snap angle. Subsequently, snapping-in takes place in the upwardly angled position while at the same time displacement in the locked position takes place along the short side. After snapping-in, the board is angled down and it is locked on both long side and short side.
  • Figs 53 and 54 describe a problem which can arise in connection with snapping-in of two short sides of two boards 2a and 2b which have already been joined on their long sides with another first board 1.
  • the inner corner portions 91 and 92, closest to the long side of the first board 1 are located in the same plane. This is due to the fact that the two boards 2a and 2b on their respective long sides are joined to the same floorboard 1.
  • Fig. 54b which shows the section C3-C4
  • the tongue 38 cannot be inserted into the tongue groove 36 to begin the downward bending of the lower lip 40.
  • the tongue 38 can be inserted into the groove 36 to begin the downward bending of the lower lip 40 by the board 2b being automatically angled up corresponding to the height of the locking element 8.
  • a groove or the like 63 can be made at the upper and inner part of the tongue inside the vertical plane VP.
  • the entire extent PB of the tongue from its inner part to its outer part can be extended, and it can, for instance, be made greater than half the floor thickness T.
  • Figs 56 and 57 show how the parts of the joint system bend in connection with snapping-in at the inner corner portion 91, 92 ( Fig. 57 ) and the outer corner portion 93, 94 ( Fig. 56 ) of two floorboards 2a and 2b.
  • Figs 56a and 57a show the position when the edges of the boards come into contact with each other.
  • the joint system is constructed in such manner that even in this position, the outermost tip of the tongue 38 will be located inside the outer part of the lower lip 40.
  • the tongue 38 in the inner corner 91, 92 will press the board 2b upward according to Figs 56b, 57b .
  • the tongue will bend downward and the board 2b at the outer corner 93, 94 will be angled upward.
  • Fig. 57c shows that the tongue 38 at the inner corner 91, 92 will be bent downward.
  • the tongue 38 is bent upward and the lower lip 40 is bent downward.
  • Figs 56d, 57d this bending continues when the boards are moved further towards each other, and now also the lower lip 40 is bent at the inner corner 91, 92 according to Fig. 57d.
  • Figs 56e, 57e show the snapped-in position. Snapping-in can thus be facilitated significantly if the tongue 38 is bendable and if the outer part of the tongue 38 is positioned inside the outer part of the lower lip 40 when tongue and groove come into contact with each other as the boards are located in the same plane in connection with snapping-in that takes place after the floorboard has already been locked along its two other sides.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Floor Finish (AREA)
  • Conveying And Assembling Of Building Elements In Situ (AREA)
  • Connection Of Plates (AREA)
  • Load-Engaging Elements For Cranes (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)
  • Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
  • Vehicle Step Arrangements And Article Storage (AREA)
  • Jib Cranes (AREA)
  • Joining Of Building Structures In Genera (AREA)
  • Dry Formation Of Fiberboard And The Like (AREA)
  • Cultivation Receptacles Or Flower-Pots, Or Pots For Seedlings (AREA)
EP10181566.0A 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem, das mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten umfasst Withdrawn EP2281974A3 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0100101A SE519768C2 (sv) 2001-01-12 2001-01-12 Låssystem för mekanisk hopfogning av golvskivor och golvskiva med ett sådant låssystem
SE0100100A SE523823C2 (sv) 2001-01-12 2001-01-12 Golvskivor och förfarande för tillverkning och läggning av dem
EP02729616.9A EP1349995B2 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbaren Fussbodenplatten
EP07150247A EP1903158B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten

Related Parent Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02729616.9 Division 2002-01-14
EP02729616.9A Division EP1349995B2 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbaren Fussbodenplatten
EP07150247A Division-Into EP1903158B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten
EP07150247A Division EP1903158B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten
EP07150247.0 Division 2007-12-20

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2281974A2 true EP2281974A2 (de) 2011-02-09
EP2281974A3 EP2281974A3 (de) 2015-03-11

Family

ID=26655372

Family Applications (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10181566.0A Withdrawn EP2281974A3 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem, das mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten umfasst
EP02729615A Expired - Lifetime EP1349994B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbaren Fussbodenplatten
EP02729616.9A Expired - Lifetime EP1349995B2 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbaren Fussbodenplatten
EP10179843.7A Withdrawn EP2275616A3 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Verfahren zum Fügen von Fussbodenplatten
EP07150247A Expired - Lifetime EP1903158B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten
EP07114318.4A Expired - Lifetime EP1852563B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem, das mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten umfasst

Family Applications After (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02729615A Expired - Lifetime EP1349994B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbaren Fussbodenplatten
EP02729616.9A Expired - Lifetime EP1349995B2 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbaren Fussbodenplatten
EP10179843.7A Withdrawn EP2275616A3 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Verfahren zum Fügen von Fussbodenplatten
EP07150247A Expired - Lifetime EP1903158B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten
EP07114318.4A Expired - Lifetime EP1852563B1 (de) 2001-01-12 2002-01-14 Fussbodensystem, das mehrere mechanisch verbindbare Fussbodenplatten umfasst

Country Status (24)

Country Link
EP (6) EP2281974A3 (de)
JP (2) JP4092202B2 (de)
KR (3) KR100842477B1 (de)
CN (2) CN1212462C (de)
AT (2) ATE383480T1 (de)
AU (2) AU2002219750C1 (de)
BR (2) BR0206564A (de)
CA (2) CA2434168C (de)
CY (1) CY1108037T1 (de)
CZ (2) CZ305227B6 (de)
DE (2) DE60224499T3 (de)
DK (2) DK1349994T3 (de)
ES (3) ES2299570T5 (de)
HU (2) HU229924B1 (de)
IL (4) IL156528A0 (de)
NO (2) NO327717B1 (de)
NZ (2) NZ527355A (de)
PL (2) PL202339B1 (de)
PT (2) PT1349995E (de)
RU (2) RU2277159C2 (de)
SI (2) SI1349994T1 (de)
SK (2) SK287961B6 (de)
UA (2) UA75905C2 (de)
WO (2) WO2002055810A1 (de)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2754772A1 (de) * 2013-01-11 2014-07-16 Spanolux N.V. Div. Balterio Bodenplattenanordnung, Bodenplatte und Verbindungselemente zur Verwendung damit
EP1918482B1 (de) * 2006-11-04 2016-12-28 LaminatePark GmbH & Co. KG Befestigungssystem für tafelförmige Paneele

Families Citing this family (135)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7775007B2 (en) 1993-05-10 2010-08-17 Valinge Innovation Ab System for joining building panels
SE514645C2 (sv) 1998-10-06 2001-03-26 Perstorp Flooring Ab Golvbeläggningsmaterial innefattande skivformiga golvelement avsedda att sammanfogas av separata sammanfogningsprofiler
SE517183C2 (sv) 2000-01-24 2002-04-23 Valinge Aluminium Ab Låssystem för mekanisk hopfogning av golvskivor, golvskiva försedd med låssystemet och metod för framställning av sådana golvskivor
SE518184C2 (sv) 2000-03-31 2002-09-03 Perstorp Flooring Ab Golvbeläggningsmaterial innefattande skivformiga golvelement vilka sammanfogas med hjälp av sammankopplingsorgan
US8028486B2 (en) 2001-07-27 2011-10-04 Valinge Innovation Ab Floor panel with sealing means
SE525558C2 (sv) 2001-09-20 2005-03-08 Vaelinge Innovation Ab System för bildande av en golvbeläggning, sats av golvskivor samt förfarande för tillverkning av två olika typer av golvskivor
US8250825B2 (en) 2001-09-20 2012-08-28 Välinge Innovation AB Flooring and method for laying and manufacturing the same
SE525661C2 (sv) 2002-03-20 2005-03-29 Vaelinge Innovation Ab System för bildande av dekorativa fogpartier och golvskivor därför
EP2281978B1 (de) 2002-04-03 2016-10-12 Välinge Innovation AB Verfahren zur Befestigung eines Streifens an einer Bodenplatte
US8850769B2 (en) 2002-04-15 2014-10-07 Valinge Innovation Ab Floorboards for floating floors
UA85821C2 (uk) * 2002-04-22 2009-03-10 Велінге Інновейшн Аб Знімний настил підлоги
US7739849B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2010-06-22 Valinge Innovation Ab Floorboards, flooring systems and methods for manufacturing and installation thereof
EP1416103A1 (de) * 2002-10-31 2004-05-06 Li Co. GmbH Bodenbelag umfassend miteinander verbindbare Bodenplatten
BE1015239A3 (nl) * 2002-12-09 2004-11-09 Flooring Ind Ltd Vloerpaneel en werkwijze voor het koppelen, respectievelijk ontkoppelen van vloerpanelen.
US20040206036A1 (en) 2003-02-24 2004-10-21 Valinge Aluminium Ab Floorboard and method for manufacturing thereof
BRPI0407674B1 (pt) 2003-02-24 2015-01-06 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Método de fabricação de tábuas de assoalho
US7845140B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-12-07 Valinge Innovation Ab Flooring and method for installation and manufacturing thereof
US7677001B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-03-16 Valinge Innovation Ab Flooring systems and methods for installation
AT501440A1 (de) 2003-03-07 2006-09-15 Kaindl Flooring Gmbh Verkleidungsplatte
US7442423B2 (en) 2003-04-28 2008-10-28 Shaw Industries Group Hard surface-veneer engineered surfacing tiles
US7886497B2 (en) 2003-12-02 2011-02-15 Valinge Innovation Ab Floorboard, system and method for forming a flooring, and a flooring formed thereof
US20050166516A1 (en) 2004-01-13 2005-08-04 Valinge Aluminium Ab Floor covering and locking systems
US7516588B2 (en) 2004-01-13 2009-04-14 Valinge Aluminium Ab Floor covering and locking systems
FR2871826A1 (fr) * 2004-06-22 2005-12-23 Valerie Roy Ensemble de panneau pour un mur, un plafond ou sol
US20060005498A1 (en) * 2004-07-07 2006-01-12 Vincente Sabater Flooring system having sub-panels with complementary edge patterns
KR20070073741A (ko) * 2004-08-05 2007-07-10 폴 맥스웰 트래비스 곤트 마루 공구 어셈블리
SE527570C2 (sv) 2004-10-05 2006-04-11 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Anordning och metod för ytbehandling av skivformat ämne samt golvskiva
US7841144B2 (en) 2005-03-30 2010-11-30 Valinge Innovation Ab Mechanical locking system for panels and method of installing same
ATE535660T1 (de) 2004-10-22 2011-12-15 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Verfahren zur anbringung eines mechanischen verriegelungssystems auf fussbodenpaneele
US7454875B2 (en) 2004-10-22 2008-11-25 Valinge Aluminium Ab Mechanical locking system for floor panels
DE202004019475U1 (de) * 2004-12-15 2006-04-20 Fritz Egger Gmbh & Co. Paneel, insbesondere Fußbodenpaneel
US8215078B2 (en) 2005-02-15 2012-07-10 Välinge Innovation Belgium BVBA Building panel with compressed edges and method of making same
US20130139478A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2013-06-06 Flooring Industries Limited, Sarl Methods for packaging floor panels, as well as packed set of floor panels
US8061104B2 (en) 2005-05-20 2011-11-22 Valinge Innovation Ab Mechanical locking system for floor panels
US20060260253A1 (en) * 2005-05-23 2006-11-23 Quality Craft Ltd. Laminate flooring panel bevel and method of manufacturing same
DE102005026554B4 (de) * 2005-06-06 2009-06-10 Dirk Dammers Verfahren zum Einbringen einer Verriegelungsnut in eine Nutflanke
US20080216435A1 (en) * 2005-07-28 2008-09-11 Granbay Holdings Pty Ltd. Interlocking Member
US20070175144A1 (en) 2006-01-11 2007-08-02 Valinge Innovation Ab V-groove
US7854100B2 (en) 2006-01-12 2010-12-21 Valinge Innovation Ab Laminate floor panels
SE530653C2 (sv) 2006-01-12 2008-07-29 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Fuktsäker golvskiva samt golv med ett elastiskt ytskikt omfattande ett dekorativt spår
US8464489B2 (en) 2006-01-12 2013-06-18 Valinge Innovation Ab Laminate floor panels
BE1017157A3 (nl) 2006-06-02 2008-03-04 Flooring Ind Ltd Vloerbekleding, vloerelement en werkwijze voor het vervaardigen van vloerelementen.
SE533410C2 (sv) 2006-07-11 2010-09-14 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Golvpaneler med mekaniska låssystem med en flexibel och förskjutbar tunga samt tunga därför
US7861482B2 (en) 2006-07-14 2011-01-04 Valinge Innovation Ab Locking system comprising a combination lock for panels
US8323016B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2012-12-04 Valinge Innovation Belgium Bvba Device and method for compressing an edge of a building panel and a building panel with compressed edges
US8689512B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2014-04-08 Valinge Innovation Ab Mechanical locking of floor panels with vertical folding
US11725394B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2023-08-15 Välinge Innovation AB Mechanical locking of floor panels with vertical folding
SE531111C2 (sv) 2006-12-08 2008-12-23 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Mekanisk låsning av golvpaneler
DE202007000310U1 (de) * 2007-01-03 2007-04-19 Akzenta Paneele + Profile Gmbh Paneel sowie Bodenbelag
DE102007015048B4 (de) 2007-03-26 2009-03-05 Kronotec Ag Paneel, insbesondere Bodenpaneel
US20100180529A1 (en) * 2007-10-13 2010-07-22 Alexandre Drannikov Universal device and method for parquet installation
EP4357553A3 (de) * 2007-11-07 2024-06-12 Välinge Innovation AB Mechanische verriegelung von bodenplatten mit vertikaler schnappfaltung
BE1018600A5 (nl) * 2007-11-23 2011-04-05 Flooring Ind Ltd Sarl Vloerpaneel.
DE102007062430B3 (de) * 2007-12-20 2009-07-02 Flooring Technologies Ltd. Verfahren zum spanabhebenden Bearbeiten einer Seitenkante eines Paneels und Vorrichtung zum Durchführen des Verfahrens
BE1018389A3 (nl) * 2008-12-17 2010-10-05 Unilin Bvba Samengesteld element, meerlagige plaat en paneelvormig element voor het vormen van zulk samengesteld element.
EP3750676B1 (de) 2009-07-31 2023-04-26 Välinge Innovation AB Werkzeugkonfiguration in zusammenhang mit der ätzbearbeitung von gebäudetafeln
US11717901B2 (en) 2009-07-31 2023-08-08 Valinge Innovation Ab Methods and arrangements relating to edge machining of building panels
CN102574292B (zh) * 2009-07-31 2016-05-18 瓦林格创新股份有限公司 与建筑镶板的边缘加工相关的方法和设备
US8365499B2 (en) 2009-09-04 2013-02-05 Valinge Innovation Ab Resilient floor
US11725395B2 (en) 2009-09-04 2023-08-15 Välinge Innovation AB Resilient floor
CN102652201B (zh) 2009-12-17 2014-11-12 瓦林格创新股份有限公司 与建筑镶板的表面成形相关的方法和设备
EP2524093B1 (de) 2010-01-12 2020-02-05 Välinge Innovation AB Mechanisches verschlusssystem für bodenplatten
DE102010004717A1 (de) 2010-01-15 2011-07-21 Pergo (Europe) Ab Set aus Paneelen umfassend Halteprofile mit einem separaten Clip sowie Verfahren zum Einbringen des Clips
WO2011096879A1 (en) 2010-02-04 2011-08-11 Välinge Innovation AB Mechanical locking system for floor panels and a tongue therefore
CN104831904B (zh) 2010-05-10 2017-05-24 佩尔戈(欧洲)股份公司 地板组件
DE102010047137A1 (de) 2010-09-30 2012-04-05 Kronoplus Technical Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Herstellung von Verlege- und Verriegelungsprofilen von Laminatpaneelen
UA109938C2 (uk) 2011-05-06 2015-10-26 Механічна фіксуюча система для будівельних панелей
UA114715C2 (uk) 2011-07-05 2017-07-25 Сералок Інновейшн Аб Механічна фіксація панелей настилу підлоги до язичка з нанесеним шаром клею
US9725912B2 (en) 2011-07-11 2017-08-08 Ceraloc Innovation Ab Mechanical locking system for floor panels
US8650826B2 (en) 2011-07-19 2014-02-18 Valinge Flooring Technology Ab Mechanical locking system for floor panels
US8857126B2 (en) 2011-08-15 2014-10-14 Valinge Flooring Technology Ab Mechanical locking system for floor panels
US8763340B2 (en) 2011-08-15 2014-07-01 Valinge Flooring Technology Ab Mechanical locking system for floor panels
PL3115161T3 (pl) 2011-08-29 2020-05-18 Ceraloc Innovation Ab Mechaniczny układ blokujący dla paneli podłogowych
CN102409830A (zh) * 2011-09-06 2012-04-11 江西南丰振宇实业集团有限公司 一种锁扣式地板
BE1020433A3 (nl) * 2012-01-05 2013-10-01 Flooring Ind Ltd Sarl Paneel.
CN103358405B (zh) * 2012-04-09 2015-06-24 深圳市鑫运祥精密刀具有限公司 一种人造玉石地板的加工方法及加工刀具
EP2662192B1 (de) 2012-05-08 2017-07-12 Ab Gustaf Kähr Bodenplatte und Herstellungsverfahren dafür
CN104302854B (zh) 2012-05-08 2017-01-18 古斯塔夫康氏公司 芯、嵌板坯件、地板嵌板及其生产方法
EA033473B1 (ru) 2012-06-19 2019-10-31 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Способ разделения панели на первую панель и вторую панель, способ формирования механической замковой системы для фиксации первой и второй панелей и строительные панели
CN204804040U (zh) 2012-06-26 2015-11-25 房屋部分信托与交易有限公司托管会 建筑系统、楼面组件及屋顶组件
LT2923012T (lt) 2012-11-22 2019-11-11 Ceraloc Innovation Ab Grindų plokščių mechaninio fiksavimo sistema
DE202014011061U1 (de) 2013-03-25 2017-08-03 Välinge Innovation AB Bodenplatten mit mechanischem Verriegelungssystem
ES2936868T3 (es) 2013-06-27 2023-03-22 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Panel de construcción con un sistema de bloqueo mecánico
CN105358777B (zh) 2013-07-09 2018-03-02 塞拉洛克创新股份有限公司 用于地板镶板的机械锁定系统
CN104343228B (zh) * 2013-08-06 2017-03-01 王柏泉 带有内置固定转轴连接锁扣的地板
PL3047160T3 (pl) 2013-09-16 2019-08-30 Välinge Innovation AB Produkt zmontowany i sposób montowania produktu zmontowanego
US9726210B2 (en) 2013-09-16 2017-08-08 Valinge Innovation Ab Assembled product and a method of assembling the product
EP3527743B1 (de) 2013-10-25 2021-07-07 Ceraloc Innovation AB Mechanisches arretierungssystem für bodenplatten
KR101462919B1 (ko) * 2013-11-15 2014-11-19 현대자동차주식회사 공용변속레버와 브라켓 체결구조
US9714672B2 (en) 2014-01-10 2017-07-25 Valinge Innovation Ab Panels comprising a mechanical locking device and an assembled product comprising the panels
CN105873475A (zh) 2014-01-10 2016-08-17 瓦林格创新股份有限公司 家具面板
WO2015155312A1 (en) 2014-04-10 2015-10-15 Berryalloc Nv Floor board with universal connection system
SG11201608909VA (en) 2014-05-09 2016-11-29 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Mechanical locking system for building panels
US9458634B2 (en) 2014-05-14 2016-10-04 Valinge Innovation Ab Building panel with a mechanical locking system
US10246883B2 (en) 2014-05-14 2019-04-02 Valinge Innovation Ab Building panel with a mechanical locking system
WO2016007082A1 (en) 2014-07-11 2016-01-14 Välinge Innovation AB Panel with a slider
AU2015290300B2 (en) 2014-07-16 2019-05-16 Valinge Innovation Ab Method to produce a thermoplastic wear resistant foil
FR3023862B1 (fr) 2014-07-21 2017-10-20 Jean-Louis Lefort Lame de parquet, ensemble d'au moins deux telles lames et procede d'assemblage associe
EA033977B1 (ru) 2014-11-27 2019-12-16 Велинге Инновейшн Аб Система механической фиксации для напольных панелей
MY187745A (en) 2014-12-19 2021-10-18 Valinge Innovation Ab Panels comprising a mechanical locking device
PL3237704T3 (pl) * 2014-12-22 2020-05-18 Ceraloc Innovation Ab Mechaniczny układ blokujący dla paneli podłogowych
US10670064B2 (en) 2015-04-21 2020-06-02 Valinge Innovation Ab Panel with a slider
UA123581C2 (uk) 2015-04-30 2021-04-28 Велінге Інновейшн Аб Панель з кріпильним пристроєм
PL3353429T3 (pl) 2015-09-22 2024-04-29 Välinge Innovation AB Zestaw paneli zawierający mechaniczne urządzenie blokujące i sposób demontażu wspomnianych paneli
AU2016364705B2 (en) 2015-12-03 2021-02-25 Välinge Innovation AB Panels comprising a mechanical locking device and an assembled product comprising the panels
AU2017212222B2 (en) 2016-01-26 2022-02-10 Välinge Innovation AB Panels comprising a mechanical locking device and an assembled product comprising the panels
UA124624C2 (uk) 2016-02-04 2021-10-20 Велінге Інновейшн Аб Набір панелей для складеного виробу
CA3011703A1 (en) 2016-02-09 2017-08-17 Valinge Innovation Ab Element and method for providing dismantling groove
KR20180113546A (ko) 2016-02-09 2018-10-16 뵈린게 이노베이션 에이비이 3개의 패널-형상 요소들의 세트
CN108602198B (zh) 2016-02-15 2021-06-01 瓦林格创新股份有限公司 形成用于家具产品的镶板的方法
BR112018076069B1 (pt) * 2016-06-29 2023-01-17 Vãlinge Innovation Ab Método e dispositivo para inserir uma lingueta
US9938726B2 (en) * 2016-08-26 2018-04-10 Quickstyle Industries Inc. Densified foam core (DFC) tile with imitation grout line
EA037341B1 (ru) 2016-10-27 2021-03-15 Велинге Инновейшн Аб Набор панелей с устройством механической блокировки
EP3625464B1 (de) 2017-05-15 2023-01-11 Välinge Innovation AB Elemente und verriegelungsvorrichtung für ein montiertes produkt
US11072929B2 (en) 2017-06-27 2021-07-27 Flooring Industries Limited, Sarl Wall or ceiling panel and wall or ceiling assembly
CN111465773B (zh) 2017-12-22 2021-11-02 瓦林格创新股份有限公司 镶板组、用于组装该镶板组的方法和用于家具产品的锁定装置
MX2020006573A (es) 2017-12-22 2020-12-03 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Un conjunto de paneles, un metodo para su ensamble y un dispositivo de bloqueo para un producto mobiliario.
CN111818821B (zh) * 2018-03-06 2023-02-17 可立克楼梯私人有限公司 家具系统
US10736416B2 (en) 2018-03-23 2020-08-11 Valinge Innovation Ab Panels comprising a mechanical locking device and an assembled product comprising the panels
PL3781824T3 (pl) 2018-04-18 2024-06-24 Välinge Innovation AB Zestaw paneli z mechanicznym urządzeniem blokującym
JP7305673B2 (ja) 2018-04-18 2023-07-10 ベーリンゲ、イノベイション、アクチボラグ 機械的ロック装置を有するパネルのセット
EP3781823B1 (de) 2018-04-18 2024-04-10 Välinge Innovation AB Satz aus platten mit mechanischer verriegelungsvorrichtung
BR112020020770A2 (pt) 2018-04-18 2021-01-19 Välinge Innovation AB Língua simétrica e cruz t
US11614114B2 (en) 2018-04-19 2023-03-28 Valinge Innovation Ab Panels for an assembled product
BR112020025052A2 (pt) 2018-06-13 2021-03-23 Ceraloc Innovation Ab sistema de piso fornecido com um sistema de conexão e um dispositivo de conexão associado
ES2934795T3 (es) * 2018-06-15 2023-02-27 Akzenta Paneele Profile Gmbh Panel
CN108789746B (zh) * 2018-08-23 2023-08-08 浙江云峰莫干山地板有限公司 一种地暖用实木地板块连接机构及其加工方法
HUE066232T2 (hu) 2018-08-30 2024-07-28 Vaelinge Innovation Ab Mechanikus rögzítõszerkezettel ellátott panelkészlet
WO2020145862A1 (en) 2019-01-10 2020-07-16 Välinge Innovation AB Set of panels that can be vertically unlocked, a method and a device therefore
KR102057624B1 (ko) 2019-07-03 2019-12-19 유성현 도배지 및 이의 도배방법
EP3798385A1 (de) 2019-09-24 2021-03-31 Välinge Innovation AB Gebäudeplatte
DE102020127485B4 (de) 2020-10-19 2024-10-02 Guido Schulte Verfahren zur Herstellung von plattenförmigen Bauelementen
CN112720762B (zh) * 2020-12-28 2022-07-08 新代科技(苏州)有限公司 一种改善木工挑角效果的加工方法
AU2022304605A1 (en) 2021-06-29 2023-12-07 Välinge Innovation AB Panels comprising a mechanical locking device and an associated assembled article
WO2023002243A1 (en) * 2021-07-19 2023-01-26 Flo.It Srl Multilayer panel for floors, with especially shaped coupling edges

Citations (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1124228A (en) 1913-02-28 1915-01-05 Ross Houston Matched flooring or board.
US2740167A (en) 1952-09-05 1956-04-03 John C Rowley Interlocking parquet block
DE1212275B (de) 1956-06-27 1966-03-10 Roberto Piodi Fussbodenbelagplatte
GB1430429A (en) 1973-05-18 1976-03-31 Plessey Co Ltd Telephone system with ringing-path detector
CA991373A (en) 1972-08-05 1976-06-22 Heinrich Hebgen Shape-locking joint connector for panel-shaped construction elements without any separate connecting parts
DE3041781A1 (de) 1980-11-05 1982-06-24 Terbrack Kunststoff GmbH & Co KG, 4426 Vreden Verbindungsmittel fuer platten
GB2117813A (en) 1982-04-06 1983-10-19 Leonid Ostrovsky Pivotal assembly of insulated wall panels
DE3343601A1 (de) 1983-12-02 1985-06-13 Bütec Gesellschaft für bühnentechnische Einrichtungen mbH, 4010 Hilden Verbindungsanordnung fuer rechteckige platten
FR2675174A1 (fr) 1991-04-12 1992-10-16 Lemasson Paul Element de construction.
DE4242530A1 (de) 1992-12-16 1994-06-23 Walter Friedl Bauelement für Wände, Decken oder Dächer von Bauwerken
EP0623724A1 (de) 1993-05-07 1994-11-09 Hendrikus Johannes Schijf Paneel, und dafür geeigneter Scharnierabschnitt
WO1994026999A1 (en) 1993-05-10 1994-11-24 Välinge Aluminium AB System for joining building boards
JPH07180333A (ja) 1993-12-24 1995-07-18 Misawa Homes Co Ltd 床材の施工構造
WO1996027721A1 (en) 1995-03-07 1996-09-12 Perstorp Flooring Ab Flooring panel or wall panel and use thereof
WO1997047834A1 (en) 1996-06-11 1997-12-18 Unilin Beheer B.V. Floor covering, consisting of hard floor panels and method for manufacturing such floor panels
US5797237A (en) 1997-02-28 1998-08-25 Standard Plywoods, Incorporated Flooring system
CA2252791A1 (en) 1997-11-25 1999-05-25 Premark Rwp Holdings, Inc. Article with interlocking edges and covering product prepared therefrom
WO1999066151A1 (en) 1998-06-03 1999-12-23 Välinge Aluminium AB Locking system and flooring board
EP0976889A1 (de) 1998-07-28 2000-02-02 Kronospan AG Verbindungselement für Paneelen zur Bildung eines Fussbodenbelages
JP2000179137A (ja) 1998-12-11 2000-06-27 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd 床板の施工方法
DE20001225U1 (de) 2000-01-14 2000-07-27 Hornitex Werke Gebr. Künnemeyer GmbH & Co. KG, 32805 Horn-Bad Meinberg Profil zum formschlüssigen, leimfreien und wieder lösbaren Verbinden von Fußbodendielen, Paneel oder ähnlichen Bauteilen
EP1045083A1 (de) 1999-04-12 2000-10-18 Premark RWP Holdings, Inc. Artikel mit ineinandergreifbaren Rändern und daraus hergestelltes Abdeckungsprodukt
DE20013380U1 (de) 2000-08-01 2000-11-16 Hornitex Werke Gebr. Künnemeyer GmbH & Co. KG, 32805 Horn-Bad Meinberg Verlegehilfe
DE19925248A1 (de) 1999-06-01 2000-12-21 Schulte Johannes Fußbodendiele
JP3169967B2 (ja) 1996-04-05 2001-05-28 ケメロ，アントニオ 骨折の骨接合のための髄内釘

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US274016A (en) 1883-03-13 Shoe-brush
BE651734A (de) * 1964-08-12
CH562377A5 (en) * 1971-11-29 1975-05-30 Hebgen Heinrich Form-locked building panel joint connection - with shaped end of one fitting into lipped rounded edge channel of next
GB1430423A (en) 1973-05-09 1976-03-31 Gkn Sankey Ltd Joint structure
JPH03169967A (ja) 1989-11-27 1991-07-23 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd 置敷き床材
DE4130115C2 (de) 1991-09-11 1996-09-19 Herbert Heinemann Verblendelement aus Blech
DK1242220T3 (da) * 1999-12-20 2004-09-13 Polymer Sheet Applic Inc Fremgangsmåde til fremstilling af et kompositmateriale samt kompositmateriale fremstillet dermed
BE1013569A3 (nl) * 2000-06-20 2002-04-02 Unilin Beheer Bv Vloerbekleding.
DE10031639C2 (de) * 2000-06-29 2002-08-14 Hw Ind Gmbh & Co Kg Fussbodenplatte
DE10101202B4 (de) * 2001-01-11 2007-11-15 Witex Ag Parkettplatte

Patent Citations (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1124228A (en) 1913-02-28 1915-01-05 Ross Houston Matched flooring or board.
US2740167A (en) 1952-09-05 1956-04-03 John C Rowley Interlocking parquet block
DE1212275B (de) 1956-06-27 1966-03-10 Roberto Piodi Fussbodenbelagplatte
CA991373A (en) 1972-08-05 1976-06-22 Heinrich Hebgen Shape-locking joint connector for panel-shaped construction elements without any separate connecting parts
GB1430429A (en) 1973-05-18 1976-03-31 Plessey Co Ltd Telephone system with ringing-path detector
DE3041781A1 (de) 1980-11-05 1982-06-24 Terbrack Kunststoff GmbH & Co KG, 4426 Vreden Verbindungsmittel fuer platten
GB2117813A (en) 1982-04-06 1983-10-19 Leonid Ostrovsky Pivotal assembly of insulated wall panels
DE3343601A1 (de) 1983-12-02 1985-06-13 Bütec Gesellschaft für bühnentechnische Einrichtungen mbH, 4010 Hilden Verbindungsanordnung fuer rechteckige platten
FR2675174A1 (fr) 1991-04-12 1992-10-16 Lemasson Paul Element de construction.
DE4242530A1 (de) 1992-12-16 1994-06-23 Walter Friedl Bauelement für Wände, Decken oder Dächer von Bauwerken
EP0623724A1 (de) 1993-05-07 1994-11-09 Hendrikus Johannes Schijf Paneel, und dafür geeigneter Scharnierabschnitt
WO1994026999A1 (en) 1993-05-10 1994-11-24 Välinge Aluminium AB System for joining building boards
JPH07180333A (ja) 1993-12-24 1995-07-18 Misawa Homes Co Ltd 床材の施工構造
WO1996027721A1 (en) 1995-03-07 1996-09-12 Perstorp Flooring Ab Flooring panel or wall panel and use thereof
JP3169967B2 (ja) 1996-04-05 2001-05-28 ケメロ，アントニオ 骨折の骨接合のための髄内釘
WO1997047834A1 (en) 1996-06-11 1997-12-18 Unilin Beheer B.V. Floor covering, consisting of hard floor panels and method for manufacturing such floor panels
US5797237A (en) 1997-02-28 1998-08-25 Standard Plywoods, Incorporated Flooring system
CA2252791A1 (en) 1997-11-25 1999-05-25 Premark Rwp Holdings, Inc. Article with interlocking edges and covering product prepared therefrom
WO1999066151A1 (en) 1998-06-03 1999-12-23 Välinge Aluminium AB Locking system and flooring board
EP0976889A1 (de) 1998-07-28 2000-02-02 Kronospan AG Verbindungselement für Paneelen zur Bildung eines Fussbodenbelages
JP2000179137A (ja) 1998-12-11 2000-06-27 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd 床板の施工方法
EP1045083A1 (de) 1999-04-12 2000-10-18 Premark RWP Holdings, Inc. Artikel mit ineinandergreifbaren Rändern und daraus hergestelltes Abdeckungsprodukt
DE19925248A1 (de) 1999-06-01 2000-12-21 Schulte Johannes Fußbodendiele
DE20001225U1 (de) 2000-01-14 2000-07-27 Hornitex Werke Gebr. Künnemeyer GmbH & Co. KG, 32805 Horn-Bad Meinberg Profil zum formschlüssigen, leimfreien und wieder lösbaren Verbinden von Fußbodendielen, Paneel oder ähnlichen Bauteilen
DE20013380U1 (de) 2000-08-01 2000-11-16 Hornitex Werke Gebr. Künnemeyer GmbH & Co. KG, 32805 Horn-Bad Meinberg Verlegehilfe

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1918482B1 (de) * 2006-11-04 2016-12-28 LaminatePark GmbH & Co. KG Befestigungssystem für tafelförmige Paneele
EP2754772A1 (de) * 2013-01-11 2014-07-16 Spanolux N.V. Div. Balterio Bodenplattenanordnung, Bodenplatte und Verbindungselemente zur Verwendung damit
WO2014108537A1 (en) * 2013-01-11 2014-07-17 Spanolux N.V.- Div. Balterio Floor panel assembly, floor panel and joining members for use therein

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR0206563B1 (pt) 2010-11-16
KR100898652B1 (ko) 2009-05-22
SI1349995T2 (sl) 2013-12-31
CA2434168C (en) 2009-10-27
EP1903158B1 (de) 2012-10-03
EP1349995B1 (de) 2008-01-09
HUP0400740A2 (en) 2004-07-28
EP1903158A2 (de) 2008-03-26
AU2002219750C1 (en) 2006-02-16
CA2433487A1 (en) 2002-07-18
PL363051A1 (en) 2004-11-15
HUP0303954A2 (hu) 2004-03-01
UA76974C2 (uk) 2006-10-16
CZ305227B6 (cs) 2015-06-24
DE60224499T2 (de) 2009-01-29
EP1903158A3 (de) 2009-09-23
RU2003124758A (ru) 2005-01-27
ES2291467T3 (es) 2008-03-01
NO20032688L (no) 2003-09-12
EP1852563B1 (de) 2013-07-31
NO20032687D0 (no) 2003-06-13
CN1484728A (zh) 2004-03-24
JP4405149B2 (ja) 2010-01-27
IL156530A (en) 2009-09-01
JP2004520502A (ja) 2004-07-08
JP2004518042A (ja) 2004-06-17
KR20030094234A (ko) 2003-12-11
ATE383480T1 (de) 2008-01-15
IL156528A0 (en) 2004-01-04
KR20090028647A (ko) 2009-03-18
EP2275616A2 (de) 2011-01-19
JP4092202B2 (ja) 2008-05-28
RU2277159C2 (ru) 2006-05-27
BR0206563A (pt) 2004-06-22
CZ304981B6 (cs) 2015-03-04
KR100842477B1 (ko) 2008-07-01
NO327717B1 (no) 2009-09-14
DK1349995T4 (da) 2013-11-25
NZ527355A (en) 2005-09-30
NO20032688D0 (no) 2003-06-13
KR20030094235A (ko) 2003-12-11
CZ20031850A3 (cs) 2004-03-17
ES2299570T3 (es) 2008-06-01
DE60224499D1 (de) 2008-02-21
RU2003124759A (ru) 2005-01-27
DE60221788T2 (de) 2008-06-05
BR0206564A (pt) 2004-02-25
CA2433487C (en) 2010-03-23
IL156530A0 (en) 2004-01-04
AU2002219750B2 (en) 2005-08-25
EP1349994B1 (de) 2007-08-15
NO327720B1 (no) 2009-09-14
DK1349995T3 (da) 2008-04-28
CY1108037T1 (el) 2013-09-04
WO2002055809A1 (en) 2002-07-18
SK287961B6 (sk) 2012-07-03
DE60221788D1 (de) 2007-09-27
AU2002217740C1 (en) 2006-02-16
CZ20031846A3 (cs) 2004-01-14
ATE370293T1 (de) 2007-09-15
CN1233914C (zh) 2005-12-28
EP1349994A1 (de) 2003-10-08
AU2002217740B2 (en) 2005-08-25
EP1852563A2 (de) 2007-11-07
EP2275616A3 (de) 2014-10-01
WO2002055810A1 (en) 2002-07-18
RU2277158C2 (ru) 2006-05-27
PL202339B1 (pl) 2009-06-30
HU229924B1 (en) 2015-01-28
CN1212462C (zh) 2005-07-27
EP1349995B2 (de) 2013-08-21
HUP0303954A3 (en) 2004-06-28
EP2281974A3 (de) 2015-03-11
CA2434168A1 (en) 2002-07-18
PL201620B1 (pl) 2009-04-30
CN1484727A (zh) 2004-03-24
PT1349994E (pt) 2007-11-16
PL362995A1 (en) 2004-11-15
PT1349995E (pt) 2008-04-03
NZ527354A (en) 2004-09-24
SI1349994T1 (sl) 2008-02-29
EP1852563A3 (de) 2009-08-19
DE60224499T3 (de) 2014-02-06
UA75905C2 (uk) 2006-06-15
IL156528A (en) 2008-03-20
DK1349994T3 (da) 2007-12-03
SI1349995T1 (sl) 2008-06-30
EP1349995A1 (de) 2003-10-08
NO20032687L (no) 2003-09-12
SK9242003A3 (sk) 2005-08-04
ES2396985T3 (es) 2013-03-01
ES2299570T5 (es) 2013-12-23
SK287962B6 (sk) 2012-07-03
SK9252003A3 (sk) 2005-06-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1349995B2 (de) Fussbodensystem umfassend mehrere mechanisch verbindbaren Fussbodenplatten
US6851241B2 (en) Floorboards and methods for production and installation thereof
AU2002219750A1 (en) Floorboards and methods for production and installation thereof
US6769218B2 (en) Floorboard and locking system therefor
AU2002217740A1 (en) Floorboard and locking system
US7398625B2 (en) Locking system for floorboards

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20101006

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 1903158

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

Ref document number: 1349995

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: VAELINGE INNOVATION AB

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E04F 15/02 20060101AFI20150205BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20150912