EP2132361A1 - Verfahren zur entfernung von magnetit und kupfer enthaltenden ablagerungen aus behältern von industrie- und kraftwerksanlagen - Google Patents

Verfahren zur entfernung von magnetit und kupfer enthaltenden ablagerungen aus behältern von industrie- und kraftwerksanlagen

Info

Publication number
EP2132361A1
EP2132361A1 EP08715871A EP08715871A EP2132361A1 EP 2132361 A1 EP2132361 A1 EP 2132361A1 EP 08715871 A EP08715871 A EP 08715871A EP 08715871 A EP08715871 A EP 08715871A EP 2132361 A1 EP2132361 A1 EP 2132361A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
copper
complexing agent
agent
container
cleaning solution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP08715871A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Konrad Bitter
Ursula Hollwedel
Enkhtsetseg Batchuluun
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Areva GmbH
Original Assignee
Areva NP GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Areva NP GmbH filed Critical Areva NP GmbH
Publication of EP2132361A1 publication Critical patent/EP2132361A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • C23G1/14Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with alkaline solutions
    • C23G1/19Iron or steel
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B08CLEANING
    • B08BCLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
    • B08B9/00Cleaning hollow articles by methods or apparatus specially adapted thereto 
    • B08B9/08Cleaning containers, e.g. tanks
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • C23G1/14Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with alkaline solutions
    • C23G1/20Other heavy metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G5/00Cleaning or de-greasing metallic material by other methods; Apparatus for cleaning or de-greasing metallic material with organic solvents
    • C23G5/02Cleaning or de-greasing metallic material by other methods; Apparatus for cleaning or de-greasing metallic material with organic solvents using organic solvents
    • C23G5/032Cleaning or de-greasing metallic material by other methods; Apparatus for cleaning or de-greasing metallic material with organic solvents using organic solvents containing oxygen-containing compounds
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F22STEAM GENERATION
    • F22BMETHODS OF STEAM GENERATION; STEAM BOILERS
    • F22B37/00Component parts or details of steam boilers
    • F22B37/02Component parts or details of steam boilers applicable to more than one kind or type of steam boiler
    • F22B37/48Devices for removing water, salt, or sludge from boilers; Arrangements of cleaning apparatus in boilers; Combinations thereof with boilers
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F22STEAM GENERATION
    • F22BMETHODS OF STEAM GENERATION; STEAM BOILERS
    • F22B37/00Component parts or details of steam boilers
    • F22B37/02Component parts or details of steam boilers applicable to more than one kind or type of steam boiler
    • F22B37/48Devices for removing water, salt, or sludge from boilers; Arrangements of cleaning apparatus in boilers; Combinations thereof with boilers
    • F22B37/483Devices for removing water, salt, or sludge from boilers; Arrangements of cleaning apparatus in boilers; Combinations thereof with boilers specially adapted for nuclear steam generators
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F28HEAT EXCHANGE IN GENERAL
    • F28GCLEANING OF INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL SURFACES OF HEAT-EXCHANGE OR HEAT-TRANSFER CONDUITS, e.g. WATER TUBES OR BOILERS
    • F28G9/00Cleaning by flushing or washing, e.g. with chemical solvents
    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21FPROTECTION AGAINST X-RADIATION, GAMMA RADIATION, CORPUSCULAR RADIATION OR PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT; TREATING RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL; DECONTAMINATION ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR
    • G21F9/00Treating radioactively contaminated material; Decontamination arrangements therefor
    • G21F9/001Decontamination of contaminated objects, apparatus, clothes, food; Preventing contamination thereof
    • G21F9/002Decontamination of the surface of objects with chemical or electrochemical processes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21FPROTECTION AGAINST X-RADIATION, GAMMA RADIATION, CORPUSCULAR RADIATION OR PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT; TREATING RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL; DECONTAMINATION ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR
    • G21F9/00Treating radioactively contaminated material; Decontamination arrangements therefor
    • G21F9/28Treating solids
    • G21F9/30Processing

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for the removal of magnetite and copper-containing deposits from containers of industrial and power plants, especially from steam generators of nuclear power plants.
  • the copper comes from components such as pumps, valves, brass-plated capacitors and the like. and is present in metallic form, but also in part as copper oxide.
  • Most of the installations of the water-steam circuit of nuclear power plants consist of carbon steel or low-alloy steels.
  • Some of the deposits adhere to the component surfaces as deposits, and some of them settle as sludge in containers, such as the steam generators, such as a steam generator.
  • the deposits must be removed from time to time because, for example in the case of steam generators, they hinder the heat transfer to heat exchanging walls or cause selective corrosion.
  • the inner surfaces of the container are contacted with a cleaning solution, usually at elevated temperature, to dissolve the deposits containing magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ), copper oxide (Cu 2 O) and metallic copper.
  • a cleaning solution usually at elevated temperature
  • the material of the container which is referred to below as the base metal
  • the base metal is generally in alkaline solution (pH> 7 ) worked.
  • Metallic copper leaves dissolve only in the presence of an oxidizing agent.
  • the dissolution of the magnetite is usually under reducing conditions to avoid oxidative dissolution of the base metal. In such methods, the magnetite is first dissolved under reducing conditions with the addition of a complexing agent.
  • the metallic copper is dissolved with an alkaline cleaning solution in the presence of an oxidizing agent and a complexing agent.
  • an oxidizing agent strong oxidizing agents such as oxygen and hydrogen peroxide are used, which would convert the dissolved Fe 2+ immediately into Fe 3+ . Therefore, the container must be emptied before performing the copper dissolution, which increases the amount of cleaning solution to be disposed. If the reaction solution of the magnetite dissolution were not removed and an oxidizing agent was added to this solution, this would convert the complex-dissolved iron-II into iron-III, which would react with the parent metal with the dissolution of elemental iron.
  • the magnetite and copper dissolution is carried out with a single cleaning solution, which is changed after the completion of the iron dissolution so that it is suitable for the copper dissolution.
  • the container is treated with an alkaline cleaning solution at a temperature of about 160 0 C, which contains a reducing agent, such as hydrazine, and as a complexing agent nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA).
  • NTA forms a soluble complex with Fe-II ions, accelerating the magnetite dissolution and keeping the iron II in solution in complexed form.
  • the reducing agent Due to the reducing agent is in Magnetite containing iron-III to iron-II and the Cu-I of the above-mentioned copper oxide reduced to metallic copper.
  • the alkalizing agents used are, for example, ammonia or morpholine.
  • the cleaning solution is cooled to 50 ° C. to 160 ° C., its pH is increased, and oxygen is introduced to adjust the oxidizing conditions or hydrogen peroxide is added.
  • a disadvantage of this method is a relatively high base metal removal.
  • the object of the invention is to propose a method of the aforementioned type, which achieves a low base metal removal without draining the cleaning solution between the magnetite and the copper dissolution.
  • This object is achieved according to claim 1 by a method in which, in a first step, the container is treated with an alkaline cleaning solution comprising a complexing agent which forms a soluble complex with iron (II) ions, a reducing agent and an alkalizing agent contains, and in a second step in the cleaning solution of the first step in the container, another complexing agent which forms a more stable complex with ferric ions than the complexing agent used in the first step, and an oxidizing agent are metered.
  • an alkaline cleaning solution comprising a complexing agent which forms a soluble complex with iron (II) ions, a reducing agent and an alkalizing agent contains, and in a second step in the cleaning solution of the first step in the container, another complexing agent which forms a more stable complex with ferric ions than the complexing agent used in the first step, and an oxidizing agent are metered.
  • the dissolution of the magnetite is carried out in virtually the same way as in the method of DE 198 57 342.
  • An attack of the cleaning solution on the base metal and a corresponding material removal are relatively low in such a procedure, especially if at temperatures from 140 0 C to 180 0 C, as in a preferred process variant, worked. At such temperatures, the reaction between the complexing agent and the iron II originating from the magnetite proceeds much faster than the base metal attack, which also proceeds via iron II.
  • the cleaning agent still contains the iron II complex of the first process step.
  • iron (III) complexes of the complexing agents used in processes of the present type such as EDTA and NTA, are less stable in alkaline solution than the corresponding iron (II) complexes, ie, under the conditions prevailing in the second process step, they can be destroyed, with the liberated iron -III ions with hydroxide ions present in the solution form a sparingly soluble precipitate of iron hydroxide, which would have to be removed by extensive rinsing out of the container.
  • this undesired reaction is at least suppressed by adding a complexing agent which, under the conditions prevailing in the second step, forms a complex with iron (III) ions which is more stable than the corresponding complex of the complexing agent of the first process step. In this way, the concentration of free iron (III) ions is reduced by, for example, immediately trapping freshly formed iron (III) ions. A Grundmetallabtrag in the second process step is thereby prevented or at least reduced.
  • the further complexing agent and then the oxidizing agent are added first.
  • any free, that is not complexed, iron II ions are bound by the further complexing agent in the cleaning solution so that, upon addition of the oxidizing agent, there are no longer any free iron II ions from which iron (III) ions can form.
  • This effect is particularly effective if, before the addition of the oxidizing agent, thorough mixing of the cleaning solution takes place, preferably by blowing in a gas which is weakly or only slightly oxidizing, such as air or better an inert gas such as nitrogen or argon.
  • the oxidizing agent added in the second process step has two functions.
  • the addition of the polyethyleneimine is primarily for the purpose of preventing the formation of free Fe-III ions. Accordingly, in a preferred variant of the method, a quantity which is substoichiometric in relation to the amount of copper to be dissolved is added. At best, some of the copper ions are complexed by the polyethyleneimine. To bind the remaining amount of copper or in general to complex the copper, the cleaning solution is used a further complexing agent, for example a complexing agent already used in the first process step, such as EDTA or NTA.
  • the used is polyethyleneimine at least on a part of the N-atoms of the main chain a carboxyl group, for example CH 3 COO "bound.
  • the copper dissolution is accelerated in a preferred process variant in that the cleaning solution ammonium in the form of at least one ammonium salt, preferably ammonium carbonate is supplied.
  • Ammonium ions catalyze the dissolution of copper in the presence of an oxidizing agent in a manner known per se. Unlike chloride or sulfate-containing ammonium salts, ammonium carbonate does not cause corrosion. Further acceleration of the copper dissolution takes place with the aid of ammonium nitrate.
  • the first process step is preferably carried out at a temperature of 140 0 C to 180 0 C.
  • the addition of a corrosion inhibitor is not required because a corrosive attack of the complexing agent on the base metal is practically not to be feared. Namely, at such high temperatures, the complexing reaction between the complexing agent and iron II and / or iron III ions originating from the magnetite proceeds much faster than the Dissolution of the base metal by the complexing agent.
  • the first process step does not necessarily have to be carried out in the stated high-temperature range. Also conceivable is a temperature below 100 ° C., for example in the range from 80 ° C. to 95 ° C.
  • the addition of a corrosion inhibitor is expedient, since the complexing of the magnetite-derived iron (II) and / or iron (III) Ion is slowed down and accordingly more complexing agent is available for the dissolution of the base metal.
  • the implementation of the second process step is generally carried out at a temperature of below 100 0 C, preferably in the range of 80 0 C to 95 0 C. At low temperatures, the risk of hydroxylamine decomposing to NO 2 is significantly lower than at higher temperatures. NO 2 would decompose the complexing agents used.
  • This experiment relates to a variant of the method in which the Magnetitankans at a temperature of more than 100 0 C, specifically at 160 0 C and the copper in the unpressurized range, ie at a temperature below 100 0 C temperature, namely at about 90 0 C. , After heating the autoclave to 160 0 C, 445 ml of deionized are filled and purged with argon to remove air or dissolved in the deionized oxygen.
  • reaction solution containing 65.6 g of (NH 4 ) 3 -EDTA is added, which is an excess of 5% over the stoichiometric amount, that is, the amount of EDTA required to complex the amount of iron contained in the magnetite.
  • the reaction solution also contains 22 ml of a 25 percent hydrazine hydrate solution.
  • the metered amount of hydrazine is four times the stoichiometric amount. The excess ensures that despite a loss of hydrazine due to thermal or catalytic decomposition (due to the presence of metallic copper) is always a sufficient amount for reducing the magnetite present in the magnetite available.
  • a pH of approx. 9 is set in the cleaning solution.
  • the second process step is initiated by the solution is cooled to 80 0 C and a complexing agent is metered, compared to the complexing agent used in the first step 1 (EDTA) Fe III ions bind more firmly, namely a polyethyleneimine available under the trade name Trilon P from BASF in the form of the 1: 3.4 diluted aqueous original BASF solution.
  • Trilon ⁇ P has a molecular weight of about 50,000 and a nitrogen / carbon atom ratio in the main chain of 0.5.
  • this complexing agent binds possibly present free iron (III) ions, which is the case, for example, when the amount of magnetite sludge present in a container was underestimated and therefore an insufficient amount of EDTA was added.
  • the cleaning solution is mixed by blowing an inert gas. Now, 200 ml of an aqueous solution containing 36 ml of a 50 percent hydroxylamine solution is fed. The amount of hydroxylamine contained therein is double stoichiometric with respect to the presence of metallic copper and residual hydrazine.
  • EDTA is fed into the autoclave in an amount which is more than stoichiometric with respect to the amount of copper present (dissolved Cu-II), for example with an excess of 7.2%, in order to bind the Cu-II formed.
  • small samples of the cleaning solution are continuously withdrawn and their copper content is determined, for example by titration.
  • the first process step is carried out at a temperature below 100 ° C., specifically at 92 ° C.
  • a container to be cleaned can be opened to the atmosphere. Accordingly, no autoclave is required for the experiment.
  • an open container a beaker
  • the 68 g (NH 4 J 2 -EDTA, 3.8 g of hydrazine hydrate, 10 ml Korantin PM and 2 ml of Plurafac contains Korantin PM is a corrosion inhibitor
  • Plurafac is a surfactant Both are available from BASF A surfactant improves the adhesion of the inhibitor on the bare surfaces of the parent metal.
  • the amount of EDTA used corresponds to 111% of the stoichiometric amount required for complexing the amount of iron present (10.4 g).
  • the reducing agent (hydrazine) is gem.
  • Experiment 507 added in excess (about 4-fold stoichiometric).
  • a pH of about 9 is maintained.
  • the process step 2 is initiated by dosing 50 ml of a 1: 3.4 diluted aqueous solution of Trilon P whereby the cleaning solution is cooled to about 85 ° C. , After mixing by blowing an inert gas, 100 ml of a reaction solution containing 26 ml of a 50% aqueous hydroxylamine solution are added, which corresponds to about 20 g of hydroxy lamin. This amount is four times stoichiometric with respect to the existing metallic copper and residual hydrazine.
  • Experiment 512 essentially forms the method acc. US Pat. No. 3,627,687, in which the magnetite and the copper dissolution is carried out with one and the same alkaline cleaning solution.
  • the cleaning solution acc. essentially contains EDTA and as further complexing agent a polyethyleneimine, which is used in the present experiment in the form of Trilon P.
  • the copper-containing magnetite slurry used in the other experiments and 550 ml of deionized are added. After rinsing with inert gas is heated to 160 0 C and 240 ml of a added to aqueous reagent solution.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Cleaning And De-Greasing Of Metallic Materials By Chemical Methods (AREA)
  • Cleaning By Liquid Or Steam (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Preventing Corrosion Or Incrustation Of Metals (AREA)
EP08715871A 2007-03-07 2008-02-20 Verfahren zur entfernung von magnetit und kupfer enthaltenden ablagerungen aus behältern von industrie- und kraftwerksanlagen Withdrawn EP2132361A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102007011063 2007-03-07
DE102007023247A DE102007023247B3 (de) 2007-03-07 2007-05-18 Verfahren zur Entfernung von Magnetit und Kupfer enthaltenden Ablagerungen aus Behältern von Industrie- und Kraftwerksanlagen
PCT/EP2008/001300 WO2008107072A1 (de) 2007-03-07 2008-02-20 Verfahren zur entfernung von magnetit und kupfer enthaltenden ablagerungen aus behältern von industrie- und kraftwerksanlagen

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2132361A1 true EP2132361A1 (de) 2009-12-16

Family

ID=39587582

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08715871A Withdrawn EP2132361A1 (de) 2007-03-07 2008-02-20 Verfahren zur entfernung von magnetit und kupfer enthaltenden ablagerungen aus behältern von industrie- und kraftwerksanlagen

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (1) US7931753B2 (zh)
EP (1) EP2132361A1 (zh)
JP (1) JP5055388B2 (zh)
KR (1) KR101136308B1 (zh)
CN (1) CN101611172B (zh)
CA (1) CA2678753C (zh)
DE (1) DE102007023247B3 (zh)
RU (1) RU2453636C2 (zh)
TW (1) TWI387668B (zh)
UA (1) UA93451C2 (zh)
WO (1) WO2008107072A1 (zh)
ZA (1) ZA200904772B (zh)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2418023A1 (de) 2010-08-13 2012-02-15 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Abschluss einer chemischen Kraftwerksreinigung
US9347205B2 (en) 2012-02-10 2016-05-24 Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc. Estimation of the relative attitude and position between a vehicle body and an implement operably coupled to the vehicle body
WO2014018787A1 (en) * 2012-07-26 2014-01-30 Dominion Engineering, Inc. Methods of reusing a cleaning solution
KR20140095266A (ko) * 2013-01-24 2014-08-01 한국원자력연구원 금속 표면 고착성 방사능 오염 산화막 제거를 위한 무착화성 화학 제염제 및 이를 이용한 화학 제염방법
CN104060283B (zh) * 2014-06-30 2016-11-16 湖北三江航天江河化工科技有限公司 一种用于清除火炮内膛积碳的擦拭剂及其制备方法
JP6363037B2 (ja) * 2015-03-04 2018-07-25 三菱日立パワーシステムズ株式会社 貫流ボイラの火炉壁管の洗浄方法
CN110608633A (zh) * 2019-10-15 2019-12-24 中冶南方都市环保工程技术股份有限公司 一种锅炉蒸汽加氧降压吹管系统及方法
DE102020119180A1 (de) 2020-07-21 2022-01-27 Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Verfahren zum Entfernen eines Korrosionsprodukts von einer Metalloberfläche

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3072502A (en) * 1961-02-14 1963-01-08 Pfizer & Co C Process for removing copper-containing iron oxide scale from metal surfaces
US3248269A (en) * 1962-08-15 1966-04-26 Pfizer & Co C Scale removal
CH422470A (fr) * 1963-08-10 1966-10-15 Borg Holding Ag Procédé de décapage et de nettoyage d'ouvrages au moins en partie métalliques, notamment d'installations thermiques
NL6703105A (zh) * 1966-03-03 1967-09-04
GB1132122A (en) * 1966-04-02 1968-10-30 Houseman And Thompson Ltd Improved removal of scale from metals
US3627687A (en) * 1968-02-09 1971-12-14 Dow Chemical Co Cleaning of ferrous metal surfaces
US3730901A (en) * 1972-04-27 1973-05-01 Halliburton Co Composition and method for removing copper containing iron oxide scales from ferrous metals
US3854996A (en) * 1972-04-27 1974-12-17 Halliburton Co Method for removing magnetite scale
US3996062A (en) * 1975-08-28 1976-12-07 Halliburton Company Method for removing scale from metallic substrates
US4666528A (en) * 1985-11-27 1987-05-19 Halliburton Company Method of removing iron and copper-containing scale from a metal surface
DE3771859D1 (de) * 1986-12-01 1991-09-05 Siemens Ag Verfahren zum reinigen eines behaelters.
US5009714A (en) * 1989-08-25 1991-04-23 Halliburton Company Process for removing copper and copper oxide deposits from surfaces
US5037483A (en) * 1990-01-30 1991-08-06 Nalco Chemical Company On-line iron clean-up
FR2691282B1 (fr) * 1992-05-12 1994-10-21 Framatome Sa Procédé d'élimination de dépôts de corrosion dans la partie secondaire d'un générateur de vapeur d'un réacteur nucléaire.
US5413168A (en) * 1993-08-13 1995-05-09 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Cleaning method for heat exchangers
FR2764364B1 (fr) * 1997-06-05 1999-09-03 Framatome Sa Procede de nettoyage d'un generateur de vapeur d'un reacteur nucleaire refroidi par de l'eau sous pression
CA2333215C (en) * 1998-05-22 2008-04-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for cleaning a container
DE19857342A1 (de) * 1998-12-11 2000-02-17 Siemens Ag Verfahren zum Reinigen eines Behälters
RU2216701C1 (ru) * 2002-03-18 2003-11-20 Государственное предприятие Научно-исследовательский технологический институт им. А.П.Александрова Способ отмывки парогенератора
JP2004064634A (ja) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-26 Seiko Epson Corp 運行情報記録装置
UA64145A (en) 2003-02-11 2004-02-16 Yurii Petrovych Buravchuk Method for chemical cleaning of nuclear power plant steam generators
CA2562979C (en) * 2004-04-01 2014-05-20 Westinghouse Electric Company, Llc Improved scale conditioning agents and treatment method
DE102004054471B3 (de) * 2004-11-11 2006-04-27 Framatome Anp Gmbh Reinigungsverfahren zur Entfernung von Magnetit enthaltenden Ablagerungen aus einem Druckbehälter eines Kraftwerks
JP5050447B2 (ja) * 2005-08-30 2012-10-17 栗田エンジニアリング株式会社 化学洗浄廃液の処理方法

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2008107072A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA200904772B (en) 2010-04-28
CN101611172B (zh) 2012-12-05
RU2453636C2 (ru) 2012-06-20
KR101136308B1 (ko) 2012-04-26
DE102007023247B3 (de) 2008-08-07
UA93451C2 (ru) 2011-02-10
JP2010520466A (ja) 2010-06-10
CA2678753A1 (en) 2008-09-12
CN101611172A (zh) 2009-12-23
US7931753B2 (en) 2011-04-26
WO2008107072A1 (de) 2008-09-12
RU2009136990A (ru) 2011-04-20
TWI387668B (zh) 2013-03-01
CA2678753C (en) 2014-02-11
KR20090119928A (ko) 2009-11-20
US20100012154A1 (en) 2010-01-21
TW200902764A (en) 2009-01-16
JP5055388B2 (ja) 2012-10-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE102007023247B3 (de) Verfahren zur Entfernung von Magnetit und Kupfer enthaltenden Ablagerungen aus Behältern von Industrie- und Kraftwerksanlagen
EP1955335B1 (de) Verfahren zur dekontamination einer eine oxidschicht aufweisenden oberfläche einer komponente oder eines systems einer kerntechnischen anlage
DE2711056A1 (de) Verfahren zum passivieren von metallflaechen
DE3218605A1 (de) Verfahren zur entfernung von eisensulfid von metalloberflaechen
WO2013139835A1 (de) Verfahren zur entfernung radioaktiver verunreinigungen aus abwässern
DE1796165C3 (de) Verfahren und Beizlösung zum Entfernen von Oxiden von Werkstückoberflächen
DE10256884A1 (de) Verfahren zur Phosphatierung von Metalloberflächen mit verbesserter Phosphat-Rückgewinnung
EP1150923B1 (de) Verfahren zur entfernung von ablagerungen aus wasserführenden systemen und einrichtungen zur wasserversorgung
EP1472388A2 (de) Verfahren zum beizen von martensitischem oder ferritischem edelstahl
DE102004054471B3 (de) Reinigungsverfahren zur Entfernung von Magnetit enthaltenden Ablagerungen aus einem Druckbehälter eines Kraftwerks
DE1107046B (de) Verfahren zur Entrostung von aus Eisen und/oder Stahl bestehenden Gegenstaenden und Anlagen, insbesondere zur Reinigung von Kesselanlagen und Anordnung zum Ausueben des Verfahrens
DE1521732C3 (de) Verfahren zum Entfernen von Kupfer von eisenhaltigen Metalloberflächen und zum Passivieren derselben
WO2009090209A1 (de) Verfahren zur konditionierung radioaktiver ionenaustauscherharze
DE2930110A1 (de) Verfahren zur abtrennung von kupfer aus komplexbildner- und kupferhaltigen abwaessern
DE1621634A1 (de) Entnickelungsbad
DE1496907C (de) Verfahren zum kontinuierlichen elektrolytischen Entzundern von Nickel und Chrom enthaltenden Stählen
DE1107481B (de) Verfahren zur Vorbehandlung von Draehten zum Zwecke des Ziehens
AT302918B (de) Verfahren zur Behandlung von industriellen Abwässern, insbesondere von verbrauchten Beizbädern
DE1621611A1 (de) Verfahren und Loesung zum Beizen von Kupferlegierungen
DE3924100A1 (de) Verfahren zur entfernung von schwermetallen aus abwaessern
DE102004033438A1 (de) Verfahren zur Bereitstellung von wasserführenden Bauteilen aus bleihaltigen Kupferlegierungen mit verringerter Bleifreisetzung
DE1521732A1 (de) Passivierung einer Eisenmetalloberflaeche
DD244270A3 (de) Verfahren zur entfernung kupferreicher oxidbelaege aus waermetauschern
CH620710A5 (en) Process for chemical nickel-plating of workpieces having a catalytic surface, and installation for carrying out the process
EP0616051A1 (de) Reinigungsverfahren

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20090831

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20121121

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: AREVA GMBH

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20170904