Classifications

• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
  • C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
  • C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
  • C12N5/0679—Cells of the gastro-intestinal tract
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
  • C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
  • C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
  • C12N5/0603—Embryonic cells ; Embryoid bodies
  • C12N5/0606—Pluripotent embryonic cells, e.g. embryonic stem cells [ES]
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
  • C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
  • C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
  • C12N5/0607—Non-embryonic pluripotent stem cells, e.g. MASC
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
  • C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
  • C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
  • C12N5/0608—Germ cells
  • C12N5/0609—Oocytes, oogonia
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
  • C12N2501/10—Growth factors
  • C12N2501/11—Epidermal growth factor [EGF]
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
  • C12N2501/10—Growth factors
  • C12N2501/115—Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2)
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
  • C12N2501/10—Growth factors
  • C12N2501/155—Bone morphogenic proteins [BMP]; Osteogenins; Osteogenic factor; Bone inducing factor
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
  • C12N2501/30—Hormones
  • C12N2501/38—Hormones with nuclear receptors
  • C12N2501/385—Hormones with nuclear receptors of the family of the retinoic acid recptor, e.g. RAR, RXR; Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [PPAR]
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
  • C12N2501/40—Regulators of development
  • C12N2501/415—Wnt; Frizzeled
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2506/00—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells
  • C12N2506/02—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells from embryonic cells
  • C12N2506/025—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells from embryonic cells from extra-embryonic cells, e.g. trophoblast, placenta
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2506/00—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells
  • C12N2506/03—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells from non-embryonic pluripotent stem cells
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2506/00—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells
  • C12N2506/45—Differentiation of animal cells from one lineage to another; Differentiation of pluripotent cells from artificially induced pluripotent stem cells
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
  • C12N2513/00—3D culture

Definitions

• hFGOs human fundic-type gastric organoids
• the instant disclosure relates to methods for converting mammalian definitive endoderm (DE) cells into specific tissue(s) or organ(s) through directed differentiation.
• the disclosure relates to formation of gastric fundus tissue and/or organoids formed from differentiated definitive endoderm.
• FIG. 1 Wnt/ -catenin signaling is required for specification of the embryonic fundus in mice, a, Pdxl and Sox2 were expressed in the antrum (a), whereas Pdxl was absent in the fundus (f), identified by Atp4b-expressing parietal cells at E18.5.
• Insets la-c and 2a-c show boxed regions in control and cKO stomach, respectively, e, In the cKO stomach, Ctnnbl exhibited mosaic deletion, and parietal cells only differentiated in Ctnnbl -sufficient epithelium. Scale bars, 250 ⁇ (a), 200 ⁇ (c), and 500 ⁇ (d and e).
• FIG. ⁇ -catenin activation promotes fundus development from human foregut progenitor spheroids
• a Schematized diagram of differentiation protocol for both fundic and antral hGOs.
• b c, At day 9, CHIR-treated organoids exhibited reduction in PDX1, increase in IRX2, IRX3, and IRX5, and no change in gastric markers SOX2 or GATA4.
• FIG. Differentiation of mucous and endocrine cell lineages in hGOs.
• hFGOs contained MUC5AC -positive surface mucous cells and MUC6-positive mucous neck cells, c, d, hFGOs contained endocrine cells expressing the pan- endocrine marker SYP. Diverse hormone cell types were identified in hFGOs, including GHRL-, SST-, and histamine-expressing endocrine cells. The antral-specific G-cell marker GAST was expressed in hAGOs but not hFGOs; conversely, GHRL was enriched in hFGOs.
• FIG 4. Formation of chief cells in hFGOs.
• hFGOs had a both MISTl and Pepsinogen C (PGC) positive cells
• PPC Pepsinogen C
• b High magnification of boxed region in panel (a) showing a gland with a cluster of cells with apical PGC staining
• c hFGOs had significantly increased expression of chief cell markers PGA5 (1,000-fold), PGC (100-fold), and MISTl (>10-fold) as compared to hAGOs. **, p ⁇ 0.05; two-tailed Student's t- test.
• FIG. Identification of pathways that drive differentiation of functional parietal cells in hFGOs.
• hFGO-derived parietal cells resembled those found in the maturing mouse fundic epithelium in vivo
• d Transmission electron micrograph of an hFGO cell with canalicular structure reminiscent of parietal cells
• e The epithelium of human fundic glands and hFGO epithelium were organized into MUC5AC-expressing cells in the surface epithelium and ATP4B-expressing parietal cells in the glandular units
• f Analysis of luminal pH in organoids in response to histamine by luminal injection of SNARF-5F. The luminal pH in hFGOs rapidly dropped, while hAGOs exhibited no response.
• n 9, 9, 7, and 4 biological replicates in hFGOs (histamine), hFGOs (histamine and famotidine), hFGOs (histamine and omeprazole), and hAGOs (histamine), respectively; data representative of three independent experiments, g, Histamine induced acridine orange (AO) dye accumulation in a canalicular-type partem in isolated mouse gastric glands and in hFGOs after 60 minutes. Scale bars, 100 ⁇ (b), 10 ⁇ (c), 10 ⁇ (d), 100 ⁇ (e; human fundus), 20 ⁇ (e; hFGO), and 10 ⁇ (g). Error bars represent s.e.m.
• FIG. Defining molecular domains in the developing stomach in vivo.
• FIG 7. Analysis of ⁇ -catenin cKO embryos, a, By E12.4 and El 4.5, ectopic Pdxl expression was observed throughout the dorsal gastric epithelium, as well as the most proximal gastric epithelium of the cKO embryo, b, qPCR analysis of dissected regions (FIG 6, b) of El 4.5 cKO foregut showed significant up-regulation of Pdxl in the fundus and forestomach domains. Conversely, Irx2, Irx3, and Irx5 were markedly reduced in these proximal regions.
• FIG 8. Stable induction of fundic fate in hGOs and efficiency of protocol, a, Applicant investigated how long CHIR treatment was necessary to establish fundus identity. Brief CHIR treatment (d6-9) and subsequent growth of organoids in control growth medium until day 34 resulted in fundic organoids expressing the antral marker PDX1, suggesting that short CHIR treatment did not produce a stable fundic fate. Applicant then tested whether longer exposures to CHIR were required to retain fundic fate and found that only continuous treatment through at least day 29 could maintain low expression of the antral marker PDX1. *, p ⁇ 0.05 compared to control antral hGOs; two tailed Student's t-test.
• FIG. Region-specific cytodifferentiation in human gastric
• hFGOs contained abundant cells exhibiting granule partem consistent with mucous neck cells, the precursors to differentiated chief cells
• c Exogenous expression of NEUROG3 in hGOs derived from NEUROG3-deficient hESC line induced robust differentiation of SYP-positive endocrine cells. While both hAGOs and hFGOs formed GHRL- and SST-expressing endocrine cells, specification of GAST+ G-cells was observed only in hAGOs.
• FIG. 12 Analysis of murine chief cell development, a, Unlike parietal cells, which expressed functional markers (Atp4b) as early as late embryonic stages, chief cell gene products were not detectable until much later stages of development.
• FIG 13 Screen for pathways that promote differentiation of parietal cells in fundic hGOs.
• a To test for growth factors/small molecules capable of inducing parietal cell differentiation, hFGOs were exposed for two days (30-32) to the indicated agonist or antagonist and then analyzed at day 34. In a screening experiment of different pathways, only MEK inhibition with PD03 was found to robustly induce expression ⁇ 4 ⁇ / ⁇ .
• b Reduction or removal of EGF from the culture medium was not sufficient to reproduce the effect of MEK inhibition
• c The ability of PD03/BMP4 to induce parietal cell development was exclusive to fundic hGOs, as antral hGOs did not express fundic markers in response to PD03/BMP4.
• FIG 14. Live in vitro pH monitoring in gastric organoids, a, The dye
• SNAFR5F exhibits responsiveness over pH range of 5-8, which makes it well suited to detect physiologic changes in response to parietal cell- mediated acid secretion
• b Media and luminal pH measurements recorded before (closed circles) and 60 minutes following addition of histamine (open circles). Antral hGOs did not respond, while the fundic hGO luminal pH decreased in response to histamine. The acidification was inhibited by pre-treatment of organoids with either famotidine or omeprazole. Further, omeprazole was sufficient to raise the pH in fundic organoids prior to histamine exposure, suggesting a baseline acid secretion in the fundic organoids. Media pH did not change in any organoids.
• hFGOs contained parietal cell-dense glands in which acridine orange (AO) accumulated in nearly all of the cells lining the lumen of the gland, d, AO accumulation was observed in a canalicular-type pattern in parietal cells in hFGOs. Scale bars, 10 urn. Error bars represent s.d.
• AO acridine orange
• FIG 15. Serial passaging of human gastric organoids, a, Schematic representation of experiments to determine the presence of gastric stem cells in hGOs. b, When fragments were grown in culture medium containing only EGF, they did not grow or expand to form new organoids. However, addition of CHIR and FGF10 to the culture medium was sufficient to support the growth of individual fragments into newly formed organoids, c, Following two passages, hFGOs still expressed genes consistent with a gastric phenotype, including PGC, MUC6, MUC5AC, and GHRL.
• hFGOs contain cells with properties analogous to those of adult gastric stem cells, d, Although passaged hFGOs expressed markers associated with several differentiated gastric cell types, they did not express genes associated with parietal cells such as ATP4B. Further, differentiation of parietal cells could not be induced through MEK inhibition as they could prior to passaging. Error bars represent s.d.
• gastric fundus tissue means a fundic type of gastric epithelium found in the corpus that contains fundic cell types, including but not limited to acid-producing parietal cells and protease- producing chief cells.
• DE cell means one of the three primary germ layers produced by the process of gastrulation.
• wnt signalling pathway means the wnt/beta- catenin pathway and is a signal transduction pathway that is mediated by Wnt ligands and frizzled cell surface receptors that acts through the beta-catenin protein.
• activator with respect to a pathway, such as a "wnt pathway” means a substance that activates the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway such that Wnt/beta-catenin targets are increased.
• FGF signaling pathway activator means a substance that activates the FGF pathway such that FGF targets are increased.
• BMP signalling pathway inhibitor a
• growth factor means a substance capable of stimulating cellular processes including but not limited to growth, proliferation, morphogenesis or differentiation.
• fundic lineage means cell types found in fundic epithelium in the corpus stomach.
• SOX2+GATA+PDX1- epithelium means epithelium that expresses the listed proteins.
• stable expression of a marker means expression that does not change upon modification of the growth environment.
• totipotent stem cells are stem cells that can differentiate into embryonic and extra-embryonic cell types. Such cells can construct a complete, viable, organism. These cells are produced from the fusion of an egg and sperm cell. Cells produced by the first few divisions of the fertilized egg are also totipotent.
• pluripotent stem cells encompasses any cells that can differentiate into nearly all cells, i.e., cells derived from any of the three germ layers (germinal epithelium), including endoderm (interior stomach lining, gastrointestinal tract, the lungs), mesoderm (muscle, bone, blood, urogenital), and ectoderm (epidermal tissues and nervous system).
• PSCs can be the descendants of totipotent cells, derived from embryos (including embryonic germ cells) or obtained through induction of a non-pluripotent cell, such as an adult somatic cell, by forcing the expression of certain genes.
• iPSCs induced pluripotent stem cells
• iPS cells also commonly abbreviated as iPS cells
• iPS cells refers to a type of pluripotent stem cells artificially derived from a normally non-pluripotent cell, such as an adult somatic cell, by inducing a "forced" expression of certain genes.
• a precursor cell encompasses any cells that can be used in methods described herein, through which one or more precursor cells acquire the ability to renew itself or differentiate into one or more specialized cell types.
• a precursor cell is pluripotent or has the capacity to becoming pluripotent.
• the precursor cells are subjected to the treatment of external factors (e.g., growth factors) to acquire pluripotency.
• a precursor cell can be a totipotent stem cell; a pluripotent stem cell (induced or non-induced); a multipotent stem cell; and a unipotent stem cell.
• a precursor cell can be from an embryo, an infant, a child, or an adult. In some embodiments, a precursor cell can be a somatic cell subject to treatment such that pluripotency is conferred via genetic manipulation or protein/peptide treatment.
• cellular differentiation is the process by which a less specialized cell becomes a more specialized cell type.
• directed differentiation describes a process through which a less specialized cell becomes a particular specialized target cell type.
• the particularity of the specialized target cell type can be determined by any applicable methods that can be used to define or alter the destiny of the initial cell. Exemplary methods include but are not limited to genetic manipulation, chemical treatment, protein treatment, and nucleic acid treatment.
• cellular constituents are individual genes, proteins, mRNA expressing genes, and/or any other variable cellular component or protein activities such as the degree of protein modification (e.g., phosphorylation), for example, that is typically measured in biological experiments (e.g., by microarray or
• pluripotent stem cells are derived from embryonic stem cells, which are in turn derived from totipotent cells of the early mammalian embryo and are capable of unlimited, undifferentiated proliferation in vitro.
• Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent stem cells derived from the inner cell mass of the blastocyst, an early-stage embryo. Methods for deriving embryonic stem cells from blastocytes are well known in the art. Human embryonic stem cells H9 (H9- hESCs) are used in the exemplary embodiments described in the present application, but it would be understood by one of skill in the art that the methods and systems described herein are applicable to any stem cells.
• Additional stem cells that can be used in embodiments in accordance with the present invention include but are not limited to those provided by or described in the database hosted by the National Stem Cell Bank (NSCB), Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Center at the
• Exemplary embryonic stem cells that can be used in embodiments in accordance with the present invention include but are not limited to SA01 (SA001); SA02 (SA002); ES01 (HES-1); ES02 (HES-2); ES03 (HES-3); ES04 (HES- 4); ES05 (HES-5); ES06 (HES-6); BGOl (BGN-01); BG02 (BGN-02); BG03 (BGN-03); TE03 (13); TE04 (14); TE06 (16); UCOl (HSF1); UC06 (HSF6); WA01 (HI); WA07 (H7); WA09 (H9); WA13 (H13); WA14 (HI 4).
• embryonic stem cells More details on embryonic stem cells can be found in, for example,
• iPSCs Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
• iPSCs are derived by transfection of certain stem cell-associated genes into non-pluripotent cells, such as adult fibroblasts. Transfection is typically achieved through viral vectors, such as retroviruses. Transfected genes include the master transcriptional regulators Oct-3/4 (Pouf51) and Sox2, although it is suggested that other genes enhance the efficiency of induction. After 3- 4 weeks, small numbers of transfected cells begin to become morphologically and biochemically similar to pluripotent stem cells, and are typically isolated through morphological selection, doubling time, or through a reporter gene and antibiotic selection.
• iPSCs include but are not limited to first generation iPSCs, second generation iPSCs in mice, and human induced pluripotent stem cells.
• a retroviral system is used to transform human fibroblasts intopluripotent stem cells using four pivotal genes: Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc.
• a lentiviral system is used to transform somatic cells with OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, and LIN28.
• Genes whose expression are induced in iPSCs include but are not limited to Oct-3/4 (e.g., Pou5fl); certain members of the Sox gene family (e.g., Soxl, Sox2, Sox3, and Soxl5); certain members of the Klf family (e.g., Klfl, Klf2, Klf4, and Klf5), certain members of the Myc family (e.g., C-myc, L-myc, and N-myc), Nanog, and LIN28.
• Oct-3/4 e.g., Pou5fl
• Sox gene family e.g., Soxl, Sox2, Sox3, and Soxl5
• Klf family e.g., Klfl, Klf2, Klf4, and Klf5
• Myc family e.g., C-myc, L-myc, and N-myc
• Nanog LIN28.
• non-viral based technologies are employed to generate iPSCs.
• an adenovirus can be used to transport the requisite four genes into the DNA of skin and liver cells of mice, resulting in cells identical to embryonic stem cells. Since the adenovirus does not combine any of its own genes with the targeted host, the danger of creating tumors is eliminated. In some
• reprogramming can be accomplished via plasmid without any virus transfection system at all, although at very low efficiencies.
• direct delivery of proteins is used to generate iPSCs, thus eliminating the need for viruses or genetic modification.
• generation of mouse iPSCs is possible using a similar methodology: a repeated treatment of the cells with certain proteins channeled into the cells via poly-arginine anchors was sufficient to induce pluripotency.
• the expression of pluripotency induction genes can also be increased by treating somatic cellswith FGF2 under low oxygen conditions.
• embryonic stem cells More details on embryonic stem cells can be found in, for example,
• exemplary iPS cell lines include but not limited to iPS-DF19-9; iPS-DF19-9; iPS-DF4-3; iPS-DF6-9; iPS(Foreskin); iPS(IMR90); and iPS(IMR90).
• pluripotent cells are derived from a morula.
• pluripotent stem cells are stem cells.
• Stem cells used in these methods can include, but are not limited to, embryonic stem cells.
• Embryonic stem cells can be derived from the embryonic inner cell mass or from the embryonic gonadal ridges.
• Embryonic stem cells or germ cells can originate from a variety of animal species including, but not limited to, various mammalian species including humans.
• human embryonic stem cells are used to produce definitive endoderm.
• human embryonic germ cells are used to produce definitive endoderm.
• iPSCs are used to produce definitive endoderm.
• PSCs pluripotent stem cells
• Applicant first identified, and then recapitulated key events in embryonic fundus development to arrive at the claimed compositions.
• Applicant found that disruption of Wnt/ -catenin signaling in mouse embryos led to conversion of fundic to antral epithelium, while ⁇ - catenin activation in hPSC-derived foregut progenitors promoted the development of human fundic-type gastric organoids (hFGOs).
• hFGOs human fundic-type gastric organoids
• hFGOs to identify temporally distinct roles for multiple signaling pathways in epithelial morphogenesis and differentiation of fundic cell types, including chief cells and functional parietal cells. While hFGOs are a powerful new model for studying the development of the human fundus and its lineages, they also represent a critical new model system to study the molecular basis of human gastric physiology, pathophysiology, and drug discovery.
• an in vitro method of inducing formation of a gastric fundus tissue may comprise the steps of: [0051] a) contacting a mammalian definitive endoderm (DE) cell with a wnt pathway activator, an FGF signaling pathway activator (for example, FGF4), a BMP signalling pathway inhibitor (e.g., Noggin), and retinoic acid, for a first period.
• Wnt signalling may be activated either with a protein like Wnt3a, for example, or via a chemical like Chiron, for example, which inhibits GSK3 .
• the first period may be three days ⁇ 24 hours.
• the retinoic acid may be added for the third day of the first period ⁇ 24 hours.
• the first period may be carried out for a period of time sufficient to form a three-dimensional posterior foregut spheroid from the definitive endoderm.
• the second period may be three days ⁇ 24 hours.
• the second period may be carried out for a period of time sufficient to induce a fundic lineage comprising fundal hGOs (hFGOs).
• step b) culturing the hFGOs of step b) with a wnt pathway activator and a
• the third period may be, for example, 11 days ⁇ 24 hours.
• the fourth period may be, for example, 10 days ⁇ 24 hours.
• step e) contacting said hFGOs of step d with a MEK inhibitor for a fifth period.
• the MEK inhibitor may be, for example, PD0325901.
• the fifth period may be for a two-day period ⁇ 24 hours, or for a period of time sufficient to form a gastric fundus tissue comprising a functional fundic cell type.
• step e) may further comprise the step of contacting the fundal hGOs with an activator of BMP4 signalling.
• step e may be carried out for a period of time sufficient to develop SOX2+GATA+PDX1 - epithelium.
• the functional fundic cell type may be a parietal cell that expresses proton pump proteins and secretes acid. In one aspect, the functional fundic cell type may be a chief cell that secretes pepsinogen.
• step d and step e are carried out for a period of time sufficient to confer stable expression of lineage markers MUC5AC, MUC6, PGC, and GHRL.
• the definitive endoderm may be derived from a
• precursor cell selected from an embryonic stem cell, an embryonic germ cell, an induced pluripotent stem cell, a mesoderm cell, a definitive endoderm cell, a posterior endoderm cell, a posterior endoderm cell, and a hindgut cell, a definitive endoderm derived from a pluripotent stem cell, a definitive endoderm derived from a pluripotent stem cell selected from an embryonic stem cell, an adult stem cell, or an induced pluripotent stem cell.
• the definitive endoderm may be derived from contacting a pluripotent stem cell with one or more molecules selected from Activin, the BMP subgroups of the TGF-beta superfamily of growth factors; Nodal, Activin A, Activin B, BMP4, Wnt3a, and combinations thereof.
• Wnt/beta-catenin pathway activators There are many ways to activate the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway (see http://web.stanford.edu/group/nusselab/cgi-bin/wnt/). Suitable Some existing wnt signalling pathway activators include but are not limited to: [0062] Protein-based activators: Wnt ligands including but not limited to
• Porcupine inhibiting beta-catenin degredation APC and GSK3beta inhibition, activated beta-catenin, constitutively active TCF/Lef proteins.
• Chemical activators there are over 28 known chemicals that either activate or inhibit Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Some activators include but are not limited to GSK3-beta inhibitors CHIR99021, BIO, LY2090314, SB-216763, lithium, porcupine inhibitors IWP, LGK974, C59, SFRP inhibitor WAY-316606, beta-catenin activator DCA.
• the WNT pathway activator may be one or more
• Wntl molecules selected from Wntl, Wnt2, Wnt2b, Wnt3, Wnt3a, Wnt4, Wnt5a, Wnt5b, Wnt6, Wnt7a, Wnt7b, Wnt8a, Wnt8b, Wnt9a, Wnt9b, WntlOa, WntlOb, Wntl l, and Wntl6, for example, Wnt3a, or for example, Wnt3a at a concentration between about 50 to about 1500 ng/ml.
• Suitable FGF signalling pathway activators include: FGF ligands
• FGF2 4, 5, 8, et al. Activated forms of FGF receptors. Proteins and chemicals that stimulate the FGF receptor and signaling components downstream of the receptors including MAPK, MEK, ERK proteins and chemicals that modulate their activity. FGF signaling can be activated by inhibiting inhibitors of FGF signaling pathways including but not limited to Sprouty protein family members.
• the BMP signalling pathway inhibitor may be selected from Noggin, Dorsomorphin, LDN189, DMH-1, and combinations thereof, for example, wherein said precursor cell may be contacted with a BMP inhibitor at a concentration between about 50 to about 1500 ng/ml.
• the steps are conducted in vitro.
• composition comprising gastric tissue produced
• the gastric tissue may be characterized, for example, by being free of innervation and/or blood vessels.
• an in vitro method of inducing formation of a gastric fundus tissue may comprise the steps of contacting a fundal hGO (hFGO) with a wnt pathway activating agent and an EGF signalling pathway activating agent for a first period, and a MEK inhibitor for a second period, (wherein said MEK inhibitor may be PD0325901), wherein said first and second periods are carried out for a period of time sufficient to form a functional fundic cell type;
• hFGO fundal hGO
• MEK inhibitor may be PD0325901
• said hFGO are obtained by contacting a three-dimensional posterior foregut spheroid in a basement membrane matrix with a growth factor, a wnt pathway activating agent, an EGF signalling pathway activator, a BMP signalling pathway inhibitor, and retinoic acid for a period of time sufficient to convert said three-dimensional posterior foregut spheroid to said hFGO;
• a mammalian definitive endoderm (DE) cells obtained by contacting a mammalian definitive endoderm (DE) cells with a wnt pathway activating agent, an FGF signaling pathway activating agent, a BMP signalling pathway inhibitor, and retinoic acid.
• DE definitive endoderm
• Organoids have proven to be powerful experimental models that combine architectural complexity and cellular diversity with the tractability and scalability of traditional cell culture methods.
• Organoid generation through directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs; comprising both embryonic stem cells and induced PSCs) offers several advantages over other approaches including an unlimited source of starting material, no requirement for surgical acquisition of tissue, and ease of genetic manipulations.
• PSC-based methods permit direct investigation of mechanisms underlying normal and aberrant human development 3 .
• differentiating PSCs into specific organoid types depends on a robust molecular knowledge of normal organ development. For some organs, such as the stomach, there are large gaps in understanding of molecular pathways that drive embryonic development.
• the stomach is one of the most structurally diverse organs among mammals 4 .
• the gastric mucosa generally consists of two types of epithelial glands 5 6 .
• oxyntic glands comprise acid-secreting parietal cells, protease-producing chief cells, mucus-producing cells, and endocrine cells.
• the terms 'fundus' and 'antrum' are used to broadly describe these two histologic types of gastric epithelia.
• Applicant has previously developed a method to direct the
• hPSCs three-dimensional gastric tissue
• human gastric organoids human gastric organoids
• hAGOs antral hGOs
• Noguchi et. al. successfully differentiated mouse ESCs into organoids comprising various types of mouse gastric tissue 8 .
• this approach used mouse ESC aggregation and spontaneous differentiation resulting in organoids that were heterogeneous, evidenced by the presence of stratified epithelia.
• species differences make the mouse stomach suboptimal for modeling human gastric disease 9 .
• a robust and efficient PSC- derived model of the human fundus epithelium would represent a significant advance in the field of gastric biology.
• Embryonic organ development is guided by a series of instructive cues between neighboring tissues 10 11 , and differentiation of hPSCs into specific lineages has relied heavily on use of these signals to direct differentiation in vitro.
• Applicant previously identified a step-wise differentiation approach to generate hAGOs, whereby hPSCs were differentiated into definitive endoderm, patterned to posterior foregut, then specified into presumptive antral epithelium 7 .
• Applicant hypothesized that the fundus and antrum derive from a common population of posterior foregut progenitors, which could be directed toward the fundic lineage if provided with the appropriate signals.
• Applicant first had to identify signaling pathways that pattern the embryonic stomach along the proximal-distal axis.
• GSM326648-GSM32665012 and GSM80809-GMS8081613 dissected regions of the E14.5 foregut to demonstrate that expression of the transcription factors Irx2, Irx3, and Irx5 was greater than tenfold enriched in the embryonic fundus compared to antrum (FIG 6, b- c), indicating that their expression can further distinguish between regions of the glandular gastric epithelium.
• Ectopic Pdxl was initially restricted to the ventral half of the fundic epithelium, consistent with previously reported recombination activity using this Shh-cre line 16 , but it then expanded over time to include a majority of the proximal stomach and greater curvature by El 4.5 (FIG 7, a). Additionally, expression of the fundus markers Irx2, Irx3, and Irx5 were dramatically reduced in the cKO embryos (FIG 7, b).
• Parietal cells a fundic cell type marked by expression ofAtp4b, were reduced in the CKO stomach (FIG 1, d) and completely absent in ⁇ -catenin deficient epithelium (FIG 1, e). In contrast, the parietal cells that did develop were only observed in ⁇ -catenin-expressing epithelium (FIG 1, e and FIG 7, d-e). Taken together, these in vivo data support a model by which Wnt/ ⁇ - catenin signaling induces fundus specification and inhibits antral identity. Further, disruption of this early patterning coincides with subsequent cell autonomous loss of parietal cells, suggesting that cytodifferentiation is impaired secondary to developmental patterning defects.
• Applicant next investigated the role of Wnt p-catenin signaling in establishing fundic-antral partem of the developing human stomach.
• Applicant started with a previously described protocol for differentiating hPSCs into antrum-like gastric organoids, which recapitulates the normal stages of early gastric development with high fidelity 7 .
• Applicant then sought to determine whether CHIR-treated spheroids would further develop into more mature hGOs containing a fundus-like epithelium. Interestingly, a three-day pulse of CHIR from days 6-9 was not sufficient to irreversibly specify a fundic identity, as the hGOs ultimately reverted to a PDX1+ antral phenotype at later stages.
• CDX2 remained suppressed despite Wnt/ -catenin activation due to concomitant inhibition of BMP signaling, as replacing Noggin with BMP4 led to robust expression of the intestinal transcription factor (FIG 9, c).
• hAGOs underwent a similar progression of morphologic and cellular development?.
• CHIR-treated hFGOs grew at a similar rate and efficiency compared to hAGOs, as 75-90% of all spheroids plated grew into organoids (FIG 8, d).
• the organoids maintained their respective gastric identities throughout their development (FIG 8, b-c).
• hFGOs and hAGOs comprised CDH 1 +CTN B 1 +KRT8+ polarized, columnar epithelia that ubiquitously expressed the gastric-specific 17 claudin CLDN 18 (FIG
• hFGOs had a distinctive architecture with organized glands that bud from the organoid epithelium (FIG 2, d-e and FIG 10, a), while hAGOs had complex folding and primitive gland-like organization but rarely glandular buds 7 .
• the novel Wnt/ -catenin dependent mechanism of specifying fundus is conserved in humans and can be manipulated to generate three-dimensional hFGOs with a glandular epithelium that molecularly resembles the developing fundus.
• hFGOs Differentiated antral gastric cell types were first detected in hAGOs around day 27 and then increased by day 34 7 , analogous to the first few weeks of postnatal development in the mouse stomach 18 .
• day 34 hFGOs contained both MUC5AC+ surface mucous cells and MUC6+ mucous neck cells as expected, similar to the hAGOs (FIG 3, a-b and FIG 11, a).
• hFGOs also formed a variety of endocrine cell types (FIG
• zymogen granule-containing cells 22 were identified by TEM (FIG 4, d) but were rare. In contrast, cells with a more immature mucous granule partem were abundant (FIG 11, b). Since chief cells in vivo do not exhibit robust pepsinogen expression for the first few weeks of life (FIG 12, a-b), Applicant concluded that the chief cells were present in hFGOs but were immature. hFGOs therefore represent a robust platform to dissect the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms that regulate chief cell maturation.
• PCs the defining cell type of fundic glands that acidify the gastric lumen via the proton pump (consisting of ATP4A and ATP4B subunits).
• Identification of efficient methods to increase PC populations has remained elusive due to a lack of understanding of the signaling mechanisms that drive their development. Applicant therefore used PSC-derived hFGOs as a platform to functionally screen candidate signaling pathways for a role in regulating PC
• hFGOs produced a swift and marked decrease in luminal pH in response to histamine that was blocked by either the H2 antagonist famotidine or the H+K+- ATPase antagonist omeprazole (FIG 5, f and FIG 14, b).
• H2 antagonist famotidine or the H+K+- ATPase antagonist omeprazole (FIG 5, f and FIG 14, b).
• AO acridine orange
• hFGOs Re- growth of organoids from passaged hFGOs was dependent on high Wnt and high FGF culture medium, similar to what is used to grow primary gastric tissue organoids 24 ' 25 . Following two rounds of passaging, hFGOs maintained expression of lineage markers
• Applicant has defined a novel function of Wnt/ ⁇ - catenin signaling in specifying the fundic domain during stomach development in mice, and used Wnt modulation as the mechanistic basis to direct differentiation of hPSCs into three-dimensional human fundic organoids.
• Wnt-mediated fundus specification was led to the subsequent formation of PCs.
• the fundus- specific manipulations at each stage of this directed differentiation protocol led to robust PC induction (FIG 13, f).
• Previous reports identified that the mesenchymal factor Barxl indirectly acts to repress Wnt signaling and that helps to prevent intestinal gene expression in the stomach 14 15 .
• Wnt/ -catenin may have distinct roles in the epithelium versus mesenchyme.
• the mesenchymal role for Wnt/ -catenin could modulate other signaling pathways such as BMP 27 , which our data show synergizes with Wnt to promote intestinal specification from early endoderm (FIG 7 and FIG 9, c)
• BMP 27 our data show synergizes with Wnt to promote intestinal specification from early endoderm (FIG 7 and FIG 9, c)
• the human gastric organoid systems might be useful, in combination with animal models, to dissect how these signaling pathways interact in the mesenchyme and epithelium to coordinate early embryonic gastrointestinal development.
• the following genetic mouse strains were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, housed at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation animal facility, and maintained according to IACUC protocol (0B09074): Axin2:LacZ (stock no. 009120), Shh:Cre (stock no. 005622), and ⁇ -cateninfloxed (stock no. 004152).
• Human embryonic stem cell line WA01 (HI ; obtained from WiCell) was supplied by the Pluripotent Stem Cell Facility at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Cell identity was confirmed by short tandem repeat analysis (Microsatellite STR Analysis; Applied Biosystems), and cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination (MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit; Lonza).
• Pluripotent cells were maintained in feeder-free conditions on HESC-qualified Matrigel (BD Biosciences) in mTesRl media (Stem Cell Technologies). Colonies were passaged every four days using dispase (Invitrogen).
• DE was differentiated to posterior foregut endoderm by exposing cells to CHIR99021 (2 ⁇ ; Stemgent), FGF4 (500 ng/ml; R&D Systems), and Noggin (200 ng/ml; R&D systems) for three days in RPMI 1640 supplemented with NEAA and 2.0%) dFBS.
• Retinoic acid (2 ⁇ ; Sigma Aldrich) was added for the final day. Media was changed every day. This process resulted in the spontaneous formation of three-dimensional posterior foregut spheroids.
• Table 1 Differentiation protocol for fundic hGOs. Activin A (100 ng/ml; R&D Systems), CHIR99021 (2 uM; Stemgent), FGF4 (500 ng/ml; R&D systems), PD0325901 (2 uM; Stemgent), BMP4
• Posterior foregut spheroids were collected and transferred to a three- dimensional culture system as previously described 36 . Briefly, spheroids were suspended in 50 ⁇ Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and plated as a droplet into 24-well plates. The matrigel was allowed to solidify for 10 minutes in the tissue culture incubator, then overlay ed with basic gut media (BGM) containing growth factors and/or small molecule agonsists.
• BGM basic gut media
• BGM consisted of Advanced DMEM/F12 media (Gibco) supplemented with N2 (IX; Invitrogen), B27 (IX; Invitrogen), HEPES (10 ⁇ ; Gibco), L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, and EGF (100 ng/ml; R&D Systems).
• N2 IX; Invitrogen
• B27 IX; Invitrogen
• HEPES 10 ⁇ ; Gibco
• L-glutamine penicillin/streptomycin
• EGF 100 ng/ml; R&D Systems
• FGF10 50 ng/ml; R&D Systems
• FGF10 50 ng/ml; R&D Systems
• CHIR glandular morphogenesis driven by CHIR (data not shown).
• organoids were collected and re-plated at a dilution of 1 : 10-1 :20.
• hFGOs were grown to day 30, then exposed for two days to individual signaling pathway agonists and antagonists: DAPT (1 ⁇ ; Stemgent), SB431542 (10 ⁇ ; Stemgent), BMP4 (50 ng/ml; R&D Systems), PD0325901 (2 uM; Stemgent), Gastrin (10 nM; Sigma Aldrich), Dexamethasone (50 nM; Sigma Aldrich), and Wnt5a (50 ng/ml; R&D Systems). Following treatment, hFGOs were grown for two more days to day 34, then analyzed by qPCR.
• hMUC6 forward 5 ' -C AGC AGGAGGAGATC ACGTTC AAG-3 ' , reverse 5 ' -GTGGGTGTTTTCCTGTCTGTC ATC-3 ' ;
• Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C, then washed thoroughly in PBS.
• embryos were processed as previously described37. Briefly, they were permeabilized in Dent's Bleach (4: 1 : 1 EtOH: DMSO: 30% H202) for two hours at room temperature and rehydrated through series of methanol washes. Embryos were then blocked for one hour, incubated in primary antibody overnight at 4°C, washed in PBS, incubated in primary antibody overnight at 4°C, and thoroughly washed.
• For paraffin embedding tissues were dehydrated through series of ethanol washes, washed in xylene, then embedded in paraffin.
• slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer for 45 minutes in steamer. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C. Following primary antibody, slides were washed in PBS then incubated with secondary antibody (at dilution of 1:500) for one hour at room temperature. Secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were made in donkey and conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, 594, or 647.
• Antibodies used for immunofluorescent staining are listed with antigen, host species, manufacturer and catalogue number, and dilution used for staining.
• Atp4b rabbit, Santa Cruz sc84304, 1 :500; Cdhl, goat, R&D Systems AF648, 1 :500; Cdhl, mouse, BD Biosciences 610182, 1 :500; Cdx2, mouse, Biogenex MU392A, 1:500, Cldnl8, rabbit, Sigma HP AO 18446, 1 :200; Ctnnbl, rabbit, Santa Cruz sc7190, 1: 100; FoxFl, goat, R&D Systems F4798, 1 :500, Gastrin, rabbit, Dako A0568, 1 : 1,000; Gata4, goat, Santa Cruz scl237, 1 :200; Gif, rabbit, Sigma HP A040774, 1 : 100; Ghrl, goat, Santa Cruz scl0368, 1:200; His
• Confocal imaging was performed on Nikon AlRsi inverted confocal microscope.
• embryos were dehydrated in methanol and cleared in Murray's clear (2: 1 benzyl benzoate: benzyl alcohol) just prior to imaging. After staining, slides were mounted with Fluoromount G (SouthernBiotech), and air-dried overnight at room temperature.
• hGOs were processed as previously described7. Briefly, organoids were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde, washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, and incubated for one hour 4% osmium tetroxide. They were subsequently washed then dehydrated in ethanol series, and finally embedded in propylene oxide/LX112. Tissue was then sectioned and stained with 2% uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate. Images were visualized on Hitachi transmission electron microscope.
• Pepsinogen ELISA was performed using the Human Pepsinogen I (PGI) ELISA
• hGOs were grown in the chambered coverglass (Thermo Scientific) and the chamber was placed on an inverted confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 710), and experiments were performed under 5% C02 and 37°C conditions (incubation chamber, PeCon, Erbach, Germany).
• Histamine 100 ⁇ ; Sigma was added to media, while famotidine (100 ⁇ ; Sigma) or omeprazole (100 ⁇ ; Sigma) were pre-incubated at least 30 min before histamine. Images were analyzed using MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA). Background corrected 620-680/565-605 nm ratio values were converted to pH using a standard curve.
• a gastric fundus tissue is generated in vitro, comprising the following steps:
• a mammalian definitive endoderm (DE) cell is contacted with a wnt pathway activator, an FGF signaling pathway activator (for example, FGF4), a BMP signalling pathway inhibitor (e.g., Noggin), and retinoic acid, for a first period, wherein the first period is sufficient to form a three-dimensional posterior foregut spheroid from said definitive endoderm;
• a wnt pathway activator for example, FGF4
• BMP signalling pathway inhibitor e.g., Noggin
• retinoic acid for a first period, wherein the first period is sufficient to form a three-dimensional posterior foregut spheroid from said definitive endoderm
• a basement membrane matrix for example, Matrigel
• step b) the hFGOs of step b) are cultured in the presence of wnt pathway activator and EGF signalling pathway activator for a third period
• step c the hFGOs of step c are cultured with wnt singalling pathway
• Example 2 The method of Example 1, wherein said first period is three days ⁇ 24 hours and wherein said retinoic acid is added for the third day of said period ⁇ 24 hours
• Example 3 The method of any preceding example, wherein said
• second period is three days ⁇ 24 hours
• Example 4 The method of any preceding example, wherein said third period is 11 days ⁇ 24 hours
• Example 5 The method of any preceding example, wherein said fourth period is 10 days ⁇ 24 hours
• Example 6 The method of any preceding example, wherein said fifth period is a two day period ⁇ 24 hours
• Example 7 The method of any preceding example, wherein step e) further comprises the step of contacting said fundal hGOs with an activator of BMP4 signalling.
• Example 8 The method of any preceding example, wherein said
• functional fundic cell type is a parietal cell that expresses proton pump proteins and secretes acid.
• Example 9 The method of any preceding example, wherein said
• Example 10 The method of any preceding example, wherein said step e is carried out for a period of time sufficient to develop SOX2+GATA+PDX1 - epithelium.
• Example 11 The method of any preceding example, wherein said step d and step e are carried out for a period of time sufficient to confer stable expression of lineage markers MUC5AC, MUC6, PGC, and GHRL. [00175] Example 12.
• said definitive endoderm is derived from a precursor cell selected from an embryonic stem cell, an embryonic germ cell, an induced pluripotent stem cell, a mesoderm cell, a definitive endoderm cell, a posterior endoderm cell, a posterior endoderm cell, and a hindgut cell, a definitive endoderm derived from a pluripotent stem cell, a definitive endoderm derived from a pluripotent stem cell selected from an embryonic stem cell, an adult stem cell, or an induced pluripotent stem cell.
• Example 13 The method of any preceding example, wherein said definitive endoderm is derived from contacting a pluripotent stem cell with one or more molecules selected from Activin, the BMP subgroups of the TGF-beta superfamily of growth factors; Nodal, Activin A, Activin B, BMP4, Wnt3a, and combinations thereof.
• Activin the BMP subgroups of the TGF-beta superfamily of growth factors
• Example 14 The method of any preceding example, wherein said
• WNT pathway activator is one or more molecules selected from Wntl, Wnt2, Wnt2b, Wnt3, Wnt3a, Wnt4, Wnt5a, Wnt5b, Wnt6, Wnt7a, Wnt7b, Wnt8a, Wnt8b, Wnt9a, Wnt9b, WntlOa, WntlOb, Wntl 1, and Wntl 6, for example, Wnt3a, or for example, Wnt3a at a concentration between about 50 to about 1500 ng/ml.
• Example 15 The method of any preceding example, wherein said
• BMP signalling pathway inhibitor is selected from Noggin,
• the precursor cell is contacted with a BMP inhibitor at a concentration between about 50 to about 1500 ng/ml.
• the BMP inhibitor may be a protein and/or chemical capable of inhibiting the BMP signalling pathway.
• Example 16 The method of any preceding example, wherein said steps are conducted in vitro.
• Example 17 A composition comprising gastric tissue is produced according to any preceding Example. The gastric tissue is characterized by being free of innervation and/or blood vessels.
• Example 18 A gastric fundus tissue is formed via the following steps:
• a fundal hGO hFGO
• a wnt pathway activating agent and an EGF signalling pathway activating agent for a first period
• a MEK inhibitor for a second period
• said MEK inhibitor may be, for example, PD0325901
• said hFGO are obtained by contacting a three-dimensional posterior foregut spheroid in a basement membrane matrix with a growth factor, a wnt pathway activating agent, an EGF signalling pathway activator, a BMP signalling pathway inhibitor, and retinoic acid for a period of time sufficient to convert said three-dimensional posterior foregut spheroid to said hFGO;
• a mammalian definitive endoderm (DE) cells obtained by contacting a mammalian definitive endoderm (DE) cells with a wnt pathway activating agent, an FGF signaling pathway activating agent, a BMP signalling pathway inhibitor, and retinoic acid.
• DE definitive endoderm
• stomach mesenchymal transcription factor Barxl specifies gastric epithelial identity through inhibition of transient Wnt signaling. Developmental Cell 8, 611-622 (2005).
• stomach reveals heterogeneous gland populations in the gastric antrum.
• the transcription factor MIST1 is a novel human gastric chief cell marker whose expression is lost in metaplasia, dysplasia, and carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol. 177, 1514-1533 (2010).
• intestinal metaplasia as a premalignant lesion of gastric cancer. J Cancer Prev 20, 25-40 (2015).

Landscapes

• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• Biomedical Technology (AREA)
• Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
• Zoology (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Biotechnology (AREA)
• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
• Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
• Microbiology (AREA)
• Cell Biology (AREA)
• Biochemistry (AREA)
• General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
• Reproductive Health (AREA)
• Gynecology & Obstetrics (AREA)
• Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
• Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
• Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
• Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Priority Applications (11)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Related Child Applications (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=60203655

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (7)

Cited By (13)

Citations (4)

Family Cites Families (285)

• 2017
  • 2017-05-05 CN CN202310699246.1A patent/CN116790476A/zh active Pending
  • 2017-05-05 ES ES17793451T patent/ES2929758T3/es active Active
  • 2017-05-05 EP EP17793451.0A patent/EP3452578B1/en active Active
  • 2017-05-05 EP EP22189427.2A patent/EP4177335A1/en active Pending
  • 2017-05-05 CA CA3016641A patent/CA3016641A1/en active Pending
  • 2017-05-05 WO PCT/US2017/031309 patent/WO2017192997A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2017-05-05 JP JP2018550724A patent/JP6963882B2/ja active Active
  • 2017-05-05 US US16/084,599 patent/US11066650B2/en active Active
  • 2017-05-05 CN CN201780024903.5A patent/CN109415685B/zh active Active
• 2021
  • 2021-07-14 US US17/375,293 patent/US20220064602A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2021-10-15 JP JP2021169192A patent/JP7463326B2/ja active Active
• 2024
  • 2024-03-27 JP JP2024050953A patent/JP2024095710A/ja active Pending

Patent Citations (4)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events