US20140234279A1 - Feed additive composition - Google Patents

Feed additive composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140234279A1
US20140234279A1 US13/985,863 US201213985863A US2014234279A1 US 20140234279 A1 US20140234279 A1 US 20140234279A1 US 201213985863 A US201213985863 A US 201213985863A US 2014234279 A1 US2014234279 A1 US 2014234279A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
phytase
feed
amylase
additive composition
xylanase
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/985,863
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Luis Fernando Romero Millan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS
Original Assignee
DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS filed Critical DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS
Publication of US20140234279A1 publication Critical patent/US20140234279A1/en
Assigned to DUPONT NUTRITION BIOSCIENCES APS reassignment DUPONT NUTRITION BIOSCIENCES APS ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MILLAN, LUIS FERNANDO ROMERO
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A61K35/66—Microorganisms or materials therefrom
    • A61K35/74—Bacteria
    • A61K35/741—Probiotics
    • A23K1/009—
    • A23K1/1653—
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/10—Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
    • A23K10/16—Addition of microorganisms or extracts thereof, e.g. single-cell proteins, to feeding-stuff compositions
    • A23K10/18—Addition of microorganisms or extracts thereof, e.g. single-cell proteins, to feeding-stuff compositions of live microorganisms
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K20/00—Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/10—Organic substances
    • A23K20/189—Enzymes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K40/00—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K40/10—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs by agglomeration; by granulation, e.g. making powders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K40/00—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K40/30—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs by encapsulating; by coating
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K50/00—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/70—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for birds
    • A23K50/75—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for birds for poultry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K35/00—Medicinal preparations containing materials or reaction products thereof with undetermined constitution
    • A61K35/66—Microorganisms or materials therefrom
    • A61K35/74—Bacteria
    • A61K35/741—Probiotics
    • A61K35/742—Spore-forming bacteria, e.g. Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus subtilis, clostridium or Lactobacillus sporogenes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00—Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • A61K38/16—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/43—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/46—Hydrolases (3)
    • A61K38/465—Hydrolases (3) acting on ester bonds (3.1), e.g. lipases, ribonucleases
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00—Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • A61K38/16—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/43—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/46—Hydrolases (3)
    • A61K38/47—Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2), e.g. cellulases, lactases
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00—Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • A61K38/16—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/43—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/46—Hydrolases (3)
    • A61K38/48—Hydrolases (3) acting on peptide bonds (3.4)
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P1/00—Drugs for disorders of the alimentary tract or the digestive system
    • A61P1/04—Drugs for disorders of the alimentary tract or the digestive system for ulcers, gastritis or reflux esophagitis, e.g. antacids, inhibitors of acid secretion, mucosal protectants
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P33/00—Antiparasitic agents
    • A61P33/02—Antiprotozoals, e.g. for leishmaniasis, trichomoniasis, toxoplasmosis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P43/00—Drugs for specific purposes, not provided for in groups A61P1/00-A61P41/00
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/205—Bacterial isolates
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12R—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES C12C - C12Q, RELATING TO MICROORGANISMS
    • C12R2001/00—Microorganisms ; Processes using microorganisms
    • C12R2001/01—Bacteria or Actinomycetales ; using bacteria or Actinomycetales
    • C12R2001/07—Bacillus
    • C12R2001/125—Bacillus subtilis ; Hay bacillus; Grass bacillus
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y301/00—Hydrolases acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12Y301/03—Phosphoric monoester hydrolases (3.1.3)
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y302/00—Hydrolases acting on glycosyl compounds, i.e. glycosylases (3.2)
    • C12Y302/01—Glycosidases, i.e. enzymes hydrolysing O- and S-glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Y—ENZYMES
    • C12Y304/00—Hydrolases acting on peptide bonds, i.e. peptidases (3.4)

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods for improving feed compositions using a direct fed microbial in combination with a specific combination of enzymes, and to a feed additive composition comprising a direct fed microbial in combination with a specific combination of enzymes.
  • the present invention further relates to uses and kits.
  • Supplemental enzymes are used as additives to animal feed, particularly poultry and swine feeds, as a means to improve nutrient utilization and production performance characteristics.
  • Enzyme blends are available to improve the nutritional value of diets containing soybean meal, animal protein meals, or high fibre food by-products.
  • DFM direct fed microbials
  • the present invention relates to novel specific combinations which surprisingly significantly improve production performance characteristics of animals.
  • a seminal finding of the present invention is that a DFM in combination with a protease, xylanase, amylase and phytase has significant beneficial effects on the performance of an animal.
  • a seminal finding of the present invention is that a DFM in combination with a protease, xylanase, amylase and phytase has significant beneficial effects on the performance of an animal, including improving one or more of the following: feed conversion ratio (FCR), ability to digest a raw material (e.g. nutrient digestibility, such as amino acid digestibility), nitrogen retention, survival, carcass yield, growth rate, weight gain, feed efficiency animals resistance to necrotic enteritis, immune response of the subject, or the growth of beneficial bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of a subject.
  • FCR feed conversion ratio
  • Another surprising effect of the present invention is that it can reduce nutrient excretion in manure (e.g. reduce nitrogen and phosphorus) content of a subject's manure.
  • the present invention provides a feed additive composition
  • a feed additive composition comprising (or consisting essentially of or consisting of) a direct fed microbial in combination with a protease, a xylanase, an amylase and a phytase.
  • the present invention provides a method for improving the performance of a subject or for improving digestibility of a raw material in a feed (e.g. nutrient digestibility, such as amino acid digestibility), or for improving nitrogen retention, or for avoiding the negative effects of necrotic enteritis or for improving feed conversion ratio (FCR) or for improving weight gain in a subject or for improving feed efficiency in a subject or for modulating (e.g.
  • a feed e.g. nutrient digestibility, such as amino acid digestibility
  • FCR feed conversion ratio
  • a yet further aspect of the present invention is use of a direct fed microbial in combination with a protease, a xylanase, an amylase and a phytase for improving the performance of a subject or for improving digestibility of a raw material in a feed (e.g. nutrient digestibility, such as amino acid digestibility) or for improving nitrogen retention) or for avoiding the negative effects of necrotic enteritis or for improving feed conversion ratio (FCR) or for improving weight gain in a subject or for improving feed efficiency in a subject or for modulating (e.g. improving) the immune response of the subject or for promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of a subject or for reducing populations of pathogenic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of a subject, or for reducing nutrient excretion in manure.
  • a direct fed microbial in combination with a protease, a xylanase, an amylase and a phytase for improving the performance of
  • kits comprising a direct fed microbial, a protease, a xylanase, an amylase, a phytase (and optionally at least one vitamin and/or optionally at least one mineral) and instructions for administration.
  • the present invention provides a method of preparing a feed additive composition, comprising admixing a direct fed microbial with a protease, a xylanase, an amylase and a phytase and (optionally) packaging.
  • the present invention provides feed or feedstuff comprising a feed additive composition comprising (or consisting essentially of or consisting of) a direct fed microbial in combination with a protease, a xylanase, an amylase and a phytase.
  • a premix comprising a feed additive composition comprising (or consisting essentially of or consisting of) a direct fed microbial in combination with a protease, a xylanase, an amylase and a phytase, and at least one mineral and/or at least one vitamin.
  • the present invention provides a method of preparing a feedstuff comprising admixing a feed component with a feed additive composition comprising (or consisting essentially of or consisting of) a direct fed microbial in combination with a protease, a xylanase, an amylase and a phytase.
  • the present invention relates to a feed additive composition for preventing and/or treating coccidiosis and/or necrotic enteritis in a subject.
  • the present invention yet further provides a method of preventing and/or treating necrotic enteritis and/or coccidiosis wherein an effective amount of a feed additive composition according to the present invention is administered to a subject.
  • FIG. 1 shows that a combination of DFM (Enviva Pro® available from Danisco A/S) with a combination of a xylanase (e.g. an endo-xylanase from Trichoderma xylanase), an amylase (e.g. a Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase), a protease (e.g. Bacillus subtilis protease) and a phytase (e.g. 500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme XP (an E. coli phytase) available from Danisco A/S) significantly improved (reduced) necrotic enteritis lesion scores in the gut of the animals compared with the challenged control.
  • a xylanase e.g. an endo-xylanase from Trichoderma xylanase
  • an amylase e.g. a Bacillus licheniformis alpha-a
  • the xylanase, amylase and protease may formulated together in AxtraXAP® [containing 2000 XU/kg feed of xylanase; 200 AU/kg feed of amylase and 4000 PU/kg feed of protease] also available from Danisco A/S).
  • FIG. 2 shows that a combination of (Enviva Pro® available from Danisco A/S) with a combination of a xylanase (e.g. an endo-xylanase from Trichoderma xylanase), an amylase (e.g. a Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase), a protease (e.g. Bacillus subtilis protease) and a phytase (e.g. 500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme XP (an E.
  • a xylanase e.g. an endo-xylanase from Trichoderma xylanase
  • an amylase e.g. a Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase
  • a protease e.g. Bacillus subtilis protease
  • a phytase e.g. 500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme
  • BW gain Body weight gain in broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens compared with the challenged control—even resulting in a BW gain which was improved over a negative control (i.e. an unchallenged control). This was significantly better than any other combinations of enzymes such as either amylase and phytase or protease and phytase, and significantly better than DFM applied on the challenged control.
  • FIG. 3 shows a combination of (Enviva Pro® available from Danisco A/S) with a combination of a xylanase (e.g. an endo-xylanase from Trichoderma xylanase), an amylase (e.g. a Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase), a protease (e.g. Bacillus subtilis protease) and a phytase (e.g. 500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme XP (an E.
  • a xylanase e.g. an endo-xylanase from Trichoderma xylanase
  • an amylase e.g. a Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase
  • a protease e.g. Bacillus subtilis protease
  • a phytase e.g. 500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme
  • coli phytase available from Danisco A/S
  • FCR feed conversion ratio
  • xylanase, amylase and protease may formulated together in AxtraXAP® [containing 2000 XU/kg feed of xylanase; 200 AU/kg feed of amylase and 4000 PU/kg feed of protease] also available from Danisco A/S).
  • FIG. 4 shows relative mRNA expression of IFN-g used as marker of inflammation in the intestine, and shows that a combination of DFM (Enviva Pro®) with a combination of xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase (Avizyme 1502® available from Danisco A/S+500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme XP (an E. coli phytase) increased IFN-g expression at 11 days and reduced it at 20 days.
  • DFM Endviva Pro®
  • xylanase amylase
  • protease and phytase a combination of xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase
  • Phyzyme XP an E. coli phytase
  • FIG. 5 shows apparent ileal digestible energy (mCal/kg) and shows that a combination of DFM (Enviva Pro®) with a xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase (two different enzyme mixes were used the first was Avizyme 1502® available from Danisco A/S+500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme XP (an E. coli phytase); and the second was AxtraXAP [containing 2000 XU/kg feed of xylanase; 200 AU/kg feed of amylase and 4000 PU/kg feed of protease] also available from Danisco A/S+500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme XP (an E. coli phytase) significantly improved energy digestibility effects.
  • DFM Endviva Pro®
  • FIG. 6 shows amino acid digestibility significantly improved with a combination of DFM (Enviva Pro®) with a xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase.
  • DFM Endviva Pro®
  • the improvement of digestibility of the undigested fractions of amino acid at the ileal level with a combination of DMF with xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase was greater than the improvement of DFM alone or the combination of xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase without DFM.
  • FIG. 7 shows energy digestibility improved with a combination of DFM (Enviva Pro®) with a xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase.
  • FIG. 8 shows nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy AMEn of dietary treatments fed to 17 to 21-d-old broiler chickens.
  • FIG. 9 shows that a combination of DFM (Enviva Pro®) with a xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase (two different enzyme mixes were used the first was Avizyme 1502® available from Danisco A/S+500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme XP (an E. coli phytase); and the second was AxtraXAP also available from Danisco A/S+500 FTU/kg of Phyzyme XP (an E. coli phytase) significantly improved nitrogen retention.
  • DFM Endviva Pro®
  • FIG. 10 shows that a combination of DFM (Enviva Pro®) with a xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase (Avizyme 1502® available from Danisco A/S+Phyzyme XP (an E. coli phytase)) significantly reduces the mRNA abundance of MUC-2 in the ileal mucosal scrapings at day 14 treated with an overdosed coccidian vaccine at hatch, compared to the challenged and unchallenged control treatments.
  • FIG. 11 shows the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID No. 1) of a pepsin resistant alpha amylase from Bacillus licheniformis.
  • FIG. 12 shows the nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 2) of a pepsin resistant alpha amylase from Bacillus licheniformis.
  • FIG. 13 shows the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID No. 3) of a pepsin resistant alpha amylase from Trichoderma reesei.
  • FIG. 14 shows the nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID No. 4) of a pepsin resistant alpha amylase from Trichoderma reesei.
  • FIG. 15 shows feed conversion ratio of broiler chickens at 48 d of age.
  • FIG. 16 shows a heat map of expression profiles of genes of interest for all treatments for jejunum at 23 days of age.
  • CC+XAP Challenged Control+phytase+xylanase+amylase+protease
  • CC+EP+XAP Challenged Control+phytase+xylanase+amylase+protease+Enviva Pro.
  • FIG. 17 shows a heat map of expression profile of chicken alpha amylase for all treatments in pancreas at 23 days of age.
  • CC+XAP Challenged Control+phytase+xylanase+amylase+protease
  • CC+EP+XAP Challenged Control+phytase+xylanase+amylase+protease+Enviva Pro.
  • FIG. 19 shows feed conversion ratio (FCR) of broiler chickens in a necrotic enteritis challenge model (Pooled SEM: 0.015).
  • FIG. 20 shows relative proportion of Lactobacillus spp. at 21 d in jejunum in broiler chickens, ChSq ⁇ 0.0001.
  • each of the enzymes used in the present invention are exogenous to the DFM.
  • the enzymes are preferably added to or admixed with the DFM.
  • Amino acids are referred to herein using the name of the amino acid, the three letter abbreviation or the single letter abbreviation.
  • protein includes proteins, polypeptides, and peptides.
  • amino acid sequence is synonymous with the term “polypeptide” and/or the term “protein”. In some instances, the term “amino acid sequence” is synonymous with the term “peptide”. In some instances, the term “amino acid sequence” is synonymous with the term “enzyme”.
  • polypeptide proteins and “polypeptide” are used interchangeably herein.
  • the conventional one-letter and three-letter codes for amino acid residues may be used.
  • the 3-letter code for amino acids as defined in conformity with the IUPACIUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN). It is also understood that a polypeptide may be coded for by more than one nucleotide sequence due to the degeneracy of the genetic code.
  • the enzymes for use in the present invention can be produced either by solid or submerged culture, including batch, fed-batch and continuous-flow processes. Culturing is accomplished in a growth medium comprising an aqueous mineral salts medium, organic growth factors, the carbon and energy source material, molecular oxygen, and, of course, a starting inoculum of one or more particular microorganism species to be employed.
  • microorganism herein is used interchangeably with “microorganism”.
  • the DFM comprises a viable microorganism.
  • the DFM comprises a viable bacterium or a viable yeast or a viable fungi.
  • the DFM comprises a viable bacteria.
  • viable microorganism means a microorganism which is metabolically active or able to differentiate.
  • the DFM may be a spore forming bacterium and hence the term DFM may be comprised of or contain spores, e.g. bacterial spores. Therefore in one embodiment the term “viable microorganism” as used herein may include microbial spores, such as endospores or conidia.
  • the DFM in the feed additive composition according to the present invention is not comprised of or does not contain microbial spores, e.g. endospores or conidia.
  • the microorganism may be a naturally occurring microorganism or it may be a transformed microorganism.
  • the microorganism may also be a combination of suitable microorganisms.
  • the DFM according to the present invention may be one or more of the following: a bacterium, a yeast or a fungi.
  • the DFM according to the present invention is a probiotic microorganism.
  • direct fed microbial encompasses direct fed bacteria, direct fed yeast, direct fed yeast and combinations thereof.
  • the DFM is a direct fed bacterium.
  • the DFM is a combination comprising two or more bacteria, e.g. three or more or four or more; or the DFM is a combination comprising two or more bacterial strains, e.g. three or more or four or more.
  • the bacterium or bacteria is or are isolated.
  • the DFM may comprise a bacterium from one or more of the following genera: Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Bacillus, Pediococcus, Enterococcus, Leuconostoc, Carnobacterium, Propionibacterium, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium and Megasphaera and combinations thereof.
  • the DFM may be selected from the following Bacillus spp: Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
  • the DFM may be a combination comprising two or more Bacillus strains.
  • the DFM may be a combination of two or more the Bacillus subtilis strains 3A-P4 (PTA-6506); 15A-P4 (PTA-6507); 22C-P1 (PTA-6508); 2084 (NRRL B-500130); LSSA01 (NRRL-B-50104); BS27 (NRRL B-50105); BS 18 (NRRL B-50633); and BS 278 (NRRL B-50634).
  • Strains 3A-P4 (PTA-6506), 15A-P4 (PTA-6507) and 22C-P1 (PTA-6508) are publically available from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).
  • Strains 2084 (NRRL B-500130); LSSA01 (NRRL-B-50104); BS27 (NRRL B-50105) are publically available from the Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection (NRRL).
  • Strain Bacillus subtilis LSSA01 is sometimes referred to as B. subtilis 8.
  • Bacillus subtilis BS 18 and Bacillus subtilis BS 278 were deposited by Andy Madisen of W227 N752 Westmound Dr. Waukesha, Wis. 53186, USA or Danisco USA Inc. of W227 N752 Westmound Dr. Waukesha, Wis. 53186, USA under the Budapest Treaty at the Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection (NRRL) at 1815 North University Street, Peoria, Ill. 61604, United States of America, under deposit numbers NRRL B-50633 and NRRL B-50634, respectively on 9 Jan. 2012.
  • NRRL Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection
  • X X comprises X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
  • the DFM may be selected from the following Lactococcus spp: Lactococcus cremoris and Lactococcus lactis and combinations thereof.
  • the DFM may be selected from the following Lactobacillus spp: Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus kefiri, Lactobacillus bifidus, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus curvatus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus sakei, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus farciminis, Lactobacillus lactis, Lactobacillus delbreuckii, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus paraplantarum, Lactobacillus farciminis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri
  • the DFM may be selected from the following Bifidobacteria spp: Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidium, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, Bifidobacterium catenulatum, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Bifidobacterium adolescentis , and Bifidobacterium angulatum, and combinations of any thereof.
  • Bifidobacteria spp Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidium, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, Bifidobacterium catenulatum, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, B
  • the DFM may comprise a bacterium from one or more of the following species: Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Enterococcus, Enterococcus spp, and Pediococcus spp, Lactobacillus spp, Bifidobacterium spp, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Pediococsus acidilactici, Lactococcus lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bacillus subtilis, Propionibacterium thoenii, Lactobacillus farciminis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Megasphaera elsdenii, Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. animalis, Lactobacillus reuteri, Bacillus cereus, Lactobacillus salivarius ssp. Salivarius, Propionibacteria s, Lac
  • the direct fed bacterium used in the present invention may be of the same type (genus, species and strain) or may comprise a mixture of genera, species and/or strains.
  • the DFM according to the present invention may be one or more of the products or the microorganisms contained in those products as in the Table below:
  • the DFM may be Enviva Pro®.
  • Enviva Pro® is commercially available from Danisco A/S and is a combination of Bacillus strain 2084 Accession No. NRR1 B-50013, Bacillus strain LSSAO1 Accession No. NRRL B-50104 and Bacillus strain 15A-P4 ATCC Accession No. PTA-6507 (as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 7,754,469 B—incorporated herein by reference).
  • the DFM may comprise a yeast from the genera: Saccharomyces spp.
  • the DFM to be used in accordance with the present invention is a microorganism which is generally recognised as safe and, which is preferably GRAS approved.
  • the DFM used in accordance with the present invention is one which is suitable for animal consumption.
  • the viable DFM should remain effective through the normal “sell-by” or “expiration” date of the product during which the feed or feed additive composition is offered for sale by the retailer.
  • the desired lengths of time and normal shelf life will vary from feedstuff to feedstuff and those of ordinary skill in the art will recognise that shelf-life times will vary upon the type of feedstuff, the size of the feedstuff, storage temperatures, processing conditions, packaging material and packaging equipment.
  • the DFM is tolerant to heat, i.e. is thermotolerant. This is particularly the case where the feed is pelleted. Therefore in one embodiment the DFM may be a thermotolerant microorganism, such as a thermotolerant bacteria,_including for example Bacillus spp.
  • the DFM is a spore producing bacteria, such as Bacilli, e.g. Bacillus spp. Bacilli are able to from stable endospores when conditions for growth are unfavorable and are very resistant to heat, pH, moisture and disinfectants.
  • Bacilli e.g. Bacillus spp. Bacilli are able to from stable endospores when conditions for growth are unfavorable and are very resistant to heat, pH, moisture and disinfectants.
  • the DFM may decrease or prevent intestinal establishment of pathogenic microorganism (such as Clostridium perfringens and/or E. coli and/or Salmonella spp and/or Campylobacter spp.).
  • pathogenic microorganism such as Clostridium perfringens and/or E. coli and/or Salmonella spp and/or Campylobacter spp.
  • the DFM according to the present invention may be any suitable DFM.
  • the following assay “DFM ASSAY” may be used to determine the suitability of a microorganism to be a DFM.
  • a DFM selected as an inhibitory strain (or an antipathogen DFM) in accordance with the “DFM ASSAY” taught herein is a suitable DFM for use in accordance with the present invention, i.e. in the feed additive composition according to the present invention.
  • Tubes were seeded each with a representative pathogen from a representative cluster.
  • Colonies of (potential DFM) strains that produced a lowered OD compared with the control were classified as an inhibitory strain (or an antipathogen DFM).
  • the representative pathogen used in assay is one (or more) of the following: Clostridium , such as Clostridium perfringens and/or Clostridium difficile , and/or E. coli and/or Salmonella spp and/or Campylobacter spp.
  • the assay is conducted with one or more of Clostridium perfringens and/or Clostridium difficile and/or E. coli , preferably Clostridium perfringens and/or Clostridium difficile , more preferably Clostridium perfringens.
  • the DFM of the present invention is preferably an antipathogen.
  • antipathogen means the DFM counters an effect (negative effect) of a pathogen.
  • DFM assay determines if a DFM is an antipathogenic DFM the above mentioned DFM assay may be used.
  • a DFM is considered to be an antipathogen or antipathogenic DFM if it is classed as an inhibitory strain in the above mentioned “DFM assay”, for example when the pathogen is Clostridium perfringens.
  • the DFM used in accordance with the present invention is not Lactobacillus gasseri BNR 17 Strain Acc No. KCTC 10902BP as taught in WO2008/016214.
  • the DFM is not an inactivated microorganism.
  • the DFM as used here is a composition comprising one or more DFM microorganisms as described herein.
  • the composition may additionally comprise the enzymes of the present invention.
  • the composition can be fed to an animal as a direct-fed microbial (DFM).
  • DFM direct-fed microbial
  • One or more carrier(s) or other ingredients can be added to the DFM.
  • the DFM may be presented in various physical forms, for example, as a top dress, as a water soluble concentrate for use as a liquid drench or to be added to a milk replacer, gelatin capsule, or gels.
  • freeze-dried fermentation product is added to a carrier, such as whey, maltodextrin, sucrose, dextrose, limestone (calcium carbonate), rice hulls, yeast culture, dried starch, and/or sodium silico aluminate.
  • a carrier such as whey, maltodextrin, sucrose, dextrose, limestone (calcium carbonate), rice hulls, yeast culture, dried starch, and/or sodium silico aluminate.
  • a water soluble carrier such as whey, maltodextrin, sucrose, dextrose, dried starch, sodium silico aluminate
  • a liquid is added to form the drench or the supplement is added to milk or a milk replacer.
  • freeze-dried fermentation product is added to a carrier, such as whey, maltodextrin, sugar, limestone (calcium carbonate), rice hulls, yeast culture dried starch, and/or sodium silico aluminate.
  • a carrier such as whey, maltodextrin, sugar, limestone (calcium carbonate), rice hulls, yeast culture dried starch, and/or sodium silico aluminate.
  • the bacteria and carrier are enclosed in a degradable gelatin capsule.
  • freeze-dried fermentation product is added to a carrier, such as vegetable oil, sucrose, silicon dioxide, polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, butylated hydroxyanisole, citric acid, ethoxyquin, and/or artificial coloring to form the gel.
  • the DFM(s) may optionally be admixed with a dry formulation of additives including but not limited to growth substrates, enzymes, sugars, carbohydrates, extracts and growth promoting micro-ingredients.
  • the sugars could include the following: lactose; maltose; dextrose; maltodextrin; glucose; fructose; mannose; tagatose; sorbose; raffinose; and galactose.
  • the sugars range from 50-95%, either individually or in combination.
  • the extracts could include yeast or dried yeast fermentation solubles ranging from 5-50%.
  • the growth substrates could include: trypticase, ranging from 5-25%; sodium lactate, ranging from 5-30%; and, Tween 80, ranging from 1-5%.
  • the carbohydrates could include mannitol, sorbitol, adonitol and arabitol. The carbohydrates range from 5-50% individually or in combination.
  • the micro-ingredients could include the following: calcium carbonate, ranging from 0.5-5.0%; calcium chloride, ranging from 0.5-5.0%; dipotassium phosphate, ranging from 0.5-5.0%; calcium phosphate, ranging from 0.5-5.0%; manganese proteinate, ranging from 0.25-1.00%; and, manganese, ranging from 0.25-1.0%.
  • the culture(s) and carrier(s) (where used) can be added to a ribbon or paddle mixer and mixed for about 15 minutes, although the timing can be increased or decreased.
  • the components are blended such that a uniform mixture of the cultures and carriers result.
  • the final product is preferably a dry, flowable powder.
  • the DFM(s) or composition comprising same can then be added to animal feed or a feed premix, added to an animal's water, or administered in other ways known in the art (preferably simultaneously with the enzymes of the present invention).
  • a feed for an animal can be supplemented with one or more DFM(s) described herein or with a composition described herein.
  • a mixture of at least two strains is meant a mixture of two, three, four, five, six or even more strains. In some embodiments of a mixture of strains, the proportions can vary from 1% to 99%. Other embodiments of a mixture of strains are from 25% to 75%. Additional embodiments of a mixture of strains are approximately 50% for each strain. When a mixture comprises more than two strains, the strains can be present in substantially equal proportions or in different proportions in the mixture.
  • the DFM may be dosed appropriately.
  • dosages of DFM in the feed may be between about 1 ⁇ 10 3 CFU/g feed to about 1 ⁇ 10 9 CFU/g feed, suitably between about 1 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g feed to about 1 ⁇ 10 8 CFU/g feed, suitably between about 7.5 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g feed to about 1 ⁇ 10 7 CFU/g feed.
  • the DFM is dosed in the feedstuff at more than about 1 ⁇ 10 3 CFU/g feed, suitably more than about 1 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g feed, suitably more than about 7.5 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g feed.
  • dosages of DFM in the feed additive composition may be between about 1 ⁇ 10 5 CFU/g composition to about 1 ⁇ 10 13 CFU/g composition, suitably between about 1 ⁇ 10 6 CFU/g composition to about 1 ⁇ 10 12 CFU/g composition, suitably between about 3.75 ⁇ 10 7 CFU/g composition to about 1 ⁇ 10 11 CFU/g composition.
  • the DFM is dosed in the feed additive composition at more than about 1 ⁇ 10 5 CFU/g composition, suitably more than about 1 ⁇ 10 6 CFU/g composition, suitably more than about 3.75 ⁇ 10 7 CFU/g composition.
  • the DFM is dosed in the feed additive composition at more than about 2 ⁇ 10 5 CFU/g composition, suitably more than about 2 ⁇ 10 6 CFU/g composition, suitably more than about 3.75 ⁇ 10 7 CFU/g composition.
  • CFU means colony forming units and is a measure of viable cells in which a colony represents an aggregate of cells derived from a single progenitor cell.
  • Xylanase is the name given to a class of enzymes which degrade the linear polysaccharide beta-1,4-xylan into xylose, thus breaking down hemicellulose, one of the major components of plant cell walls.
  • the xylanase for use in the present invention may be any commercially available xylanase.
  • the xylanase may be an endo-1,4- ⁇ -d-xylanase (classified as E.C. 3.2.1.8) or a 1,4,0-xylosidase (classified as E.C. 3.2.1.37).
  • the xylanase in an endoxylanase e.g. an endo-1,4- ⁇ -d-xylanase.
  • the classification for an endo-1,4- ⁇ -d-xylanase is E.C. 3.2.1.8.
  • the present invention relates to a DFM in combination with an endoxylanase, e.g. an endo-1,4- ⁇ -d-xylanase, and another enzyme.
  • an endoxylanase e.g. an endo-1,4- ⁇ -d-xylanase
  • the xylanase for use in the present invention may be a xylanase from Bacillus, Trichoderma, Thermomyces, Aspergillus and Penicillium.
  • the xylanase may be the xylanase in Axtra XAP® or Avizyme 1502®, both commercially available products from Danisco A/S.
  • the xylanase is present in the feedstuff in range of about 500 XU/kg to about 16,000 XU/kg feed, more preferably about 750 XU/kg feed to about 8000 XU/kg feed, and even more preferably about 1000 XU/kg feed to about 4000 XU/kg feed
  • the xylanase is present in the feedstuff at more than about 500 XU/kg feed, suitably more than about 600 XU/kg feed, suitably more than about 700 XU/kg feed, suitably more than about 800 XU/kg feed, suitably more than about 900 XU/kg feed, suitably more than about 1000 XU/kg feed.
  • the xylanase is present in the feedstuff at less than about 16,000 XU/kg feed, suitably less than about 8000 XU/kg feed, suitably less than about 7000 XU/kg feed, suitably less than about 6000 XU/kg feed, suitably less than about 5000 XU/kg feed, suitably less than about 4000 XU/kg feed.
  • the xylanase is present in the feed additive composition in range of about 100 XU/g to about 320,000 XU/g composition, more preferably about 300 XU/g composition to about 160,000 XU/g composition, and even more preferably about 500 XU/g composition to about 50,000 XU/g composition, and even more preferably about 500 XU/g composition to about 40,000 XU/g composition.
  • the xylanase is present in the feed additive composition at more than about 100 XU/g composition, suitably more than about 200 XU/g composition, suitably more than about 300 XU/g composition, suitably more than about 400 XU/g composition, suitably more than about 500 XU/g composition.
  • the xylanase is present in the feed additive composition at less than about 320,000 XU/g composition, suitably less than about 160,000 XU/g composition, suitably less than about 50,000 XU/g composition, suitably less than about 40,000 XU/g composition, suitably less than about 30000 XU/g composition.
  • one xylanase unit is the amount of enzyme that releases 0.5 ⁇ mol of reducing sugar equivalents (as xylose by the Dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay-reducing sugar method) from a oat-spelt-xylan substrate per min at pH 5.3 and 50° C. (Bailey, M. J. Biely, P. and Poutanen, K., Journal of Biotechnology, Volume 23, (3), May 1992, 257-270).
  • DMS Dinitrosalicylic acid
  • the enzyme is classified using the E.C. classification above, and the E.C. classification designates an enzyme having that activity when tested in the assay taught herein for determining 1 XU.
  • Amylase is the name given to a class of enzymes capable of hydrolysing starch to shorter-chain oligosaccharides such as maltose.
  • the glucose moiety can then be more easily transferred from maltose to a monoglyceride or glycosylmonoglyceride than from the original starch molecule.
  • amylase includes ⁇ -amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.1), G4-forming amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.60), ⁇ -amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.2) and 7-amylases (E.C. 3.2.1.3).
  • amylase is an ⁇ -amylase.
  • ⁇ -Amylases are classified as (E.C. 3.2.1.1).
  • amylases of bacterial or fungal origin can include amylases of bacterial or fungal origin, chemically modified or protein engineered mutants are included.
  • the amylase may be an amylase, e.g. an ⁇ -amylase, from Bacillus licheniformis and/or an amylase, e.g. an ⁇ -amylase, from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
  • the ⁇ -amylase may be the ⁇ -amylase in Axtra XAP® or Avizyme 1502®, both commercially available products from Danisco A/S.
  • amylase may be a pepsin resistant ⁇ -amylase, such as a pepsin resistant Trichoderma (such as Trichoderma reesei ) alpha amylase.
  • a pepsin resistant ⁇ -amylase is taught in UK application number 1011513.7 (which is incorporated herein by reference) and PCT/IB2011/053018 (which is incorporated herein by reference).
  • amylase may be a pepsin resistant ⁇ -amylase comprising or consisting of an amino acid sequence:
  • the pepsin resistant alpha amylase may also be encoded by a nucleotide sequence which hybridises to SEQ ID No. 2 or SEQ ID No. 4 under stringent or highly stringent conditions.
  • the amylase may be a maltogenic alpha-amylase from Bacillus (see EP 120 693). This amylase is commercially available under the trade name Novamyl (Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark). Novamyl is described in detail in International Patent Publication WO 91/104669.
  • the amylase is present in the feedstuff in range of about 50 AU/kg to about 10,000 AU/kg feed, more preferably about 70 AU/kg feed to about 7500 AU/kg feed, more preferably about 70 AU/kg feed to about 5000 AU/kg feed and even more preferably about 100 AU/kg feed to about 2000 AU/kg feed.
  • the amylase is present in the feedstuff at more than about 50 AU/kg feed, suitably more than about 60 AU/kg feed, suitably more than about 70 AU/kg feed, suitably more than about 80 AU/kg feed, suitably more than about 90 AU/kg feed, suitably more than about 100 AU/kg feed.
  • the amylase is present in the feedstuff at less than about 10,000 AU/kg feed, suitably less than about 8000 AU/kg feed, suitably less than about 7000 AU/kg feed, suitably less than about 5000 AU/kg feed, suitably less than about 4000 AU/kg feed, suitably less than about 3000 AU/kg feed, suitably less than about 2000 AU/kg feed.
  • the amylase is present in the feed additive composition in range of about 10 AU/kg to about 200,000 AU/g composition, more preferably about 30 AU/g composition to about 100,000 AU/g composition, and even more preferably about 40 AU/g composition to about 50,000 AU/g composition, and even more preferably about 50 AU/g composition to about 20,000 AU/g composition.
  • the amylase is present in the feed additive composition at more than about 10 AU/g composition, suitably more than about 20 AU/g composition, suitably more than about 30 AU/g composition, suitably more than about 40 AU/g composition, suitably more than about 50 AU/g composition.
  • the amylase is present in the feed additive composition at less than about 200,000 AU/g composition, suitably less than about 100,000 AU/g composition, suitably less than about 50,000 AU/g composition, suitably less than about 40,000 AU/g composition, suitably less than about 30000 AU/g composition, suitably less than about 20000 AU/g composition.
  • one amylase unit is the amount of enzyme that releases 1 mmol of glucosidic linkages from a water insoluble cross-linked starch polymer substrate per min at pH 6.5 and 37° C. (this may be referred to herein as the assay for determining 1 AU).
  • 1 TAU ( ⁇ -amylase activity) is the amount of enzyme required to release (in the presence of excess ⁇ -glucosidase) 0.20 mmol of glucosidic linkages (expressed as p-nitrophenol equivalents) from a maltoheptaoside substrate per minute at pH 8.0 and 40° C. This may be referred to herein as the assay for determining 1 TAU unit.
  • the enzyme is classified using the E.C. classification above, and the E.C. classification designates an enzyme having that activity when tested in the assay taught herein for determining 1 AU.
  • protease as used herein is synonymous with peptidase or proteinase.
  • the protease for use in the present invention may be a subtilisin (E.C. 3.4.21.62) or a bacillolysin (E.C. 3.4.24.28) or an alkaline serine protease (E.C. 3.4.21.x) or a keratinase (E.C. 3.4.x.x).
  • the protease in accordance with the present invention is a subtilisin.
  • Suitable proteases include those of animal, vegetable or microbial origin. Chemically modified or protein engineered mutants are also suitable.
  • the protease may be a serine protease or a metalloprotease, e.g., an alkaline microbial protease or a trypsin-like protease.
  • alkaline proteases are subtilisins, especially those derived from Bacillus sp., e.g., subtilisin Novo, subtilisin Carlsberg, subtilisin 309 (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,841), subtilisin 147, and subtilisin 168 (see, e.g., WO 89/06279).
  • trypsin-like proteases are trypsin (e.g., of porcine or bovine origin), and Fusarium proteases (see, e.g., WO 89/06270 and WO 94/25583).
  • useful proteases also include but are not limited to the variants described in WO 92/19729 and WO 98/20115.
  • the protease may be a protease from B. subtilis.
  • the protease may be a Nocardiopsis protease available from Novozymes A/S.
  • the protease is present in the feedstuff in range of about 1000 U/kg to about 20,000 PU/kg feed, more preferably about 1500 PU/kg feed to about 10000 PU/kg feed, more preferably about 2000 PU/kg feed to about 6000 PU/kg feed.
  • the protease is present in the feedstuff at more than about 1000 PU/kg feed, suitably more than about 1500 PU/kg feed, suitably more than about 2000 PU/kg feed.
  • the protease is present in the feedstuff at less than about 20,000 PU/kg feed, suitably less than about 10000 PU/kg feed, suitably less than about 7000 PU/kg feed, suitably less than about 6000 PU/kg feed.
  • the protease is present in the feed additive composition in range of about 200 PU/g to about 400,000 PU/g composition, more preferably about 300 PU/g composition to about 200,000 PU/g composition, and even more preferably about 5000 PU/g composition to about 100,000 PU/g composition, and even more preferably about 700 PU/g composition to about 70,000 PU/g composition, and even more preferably about 1000 PU/g composition to about 60,000 PU/g composition.
  • the protease is present in the feed additive composition at more than about 200 PU/g composition, suitably more than about 300 PU/g composition, suitably more than about 400 PU/g composition, suitably more than about 500 PU/g composition, suitably more than about 750 PU/g composition, suitably more than about 1000 PU/g composition.
  • the protease is present in the feed additive composition at less than about 400,000 PU/g composition, suitably less than about 200,000 PU/g composition, suitably less than about 100,000 PU/g composition, suitably less than about 80,000 PU/g composition, suitably less than about 70000 PU/g composition, suitably less than about 60000 PU/g composition.
  • one protease unit is the amount of enzyme that liberates from the substrate (0.6% casein solution) one microgram of phenolic compound (expressed as tyrosine equivalents) in one minute at pH 7.5 (40 mM Na 2 PO 4 /lactic acid buffer) and 40° C. This may be referred to as the assay for determining 1 PU.
  • the enzyme is classified using the E.C. classification above, and the E.C. classification designates an enzyme having that activity when tested in the assay taught herein for determining 1 PU.
  • the phytase for use in the present invention may be classified a 6-phytase (classified as E.C. 3.1.3.26) or a 3-phytase (classified as E.C. 3.1.3.8).
  • the phytase may be a 6-phytase (E.C. 3.1.3.26).
  • Trichoderma reesei Finase EC ABVista 6-phytase E. coli gene expressed in Trichoderma reesei Natuphos BASF 3-phytase Aspergillus Niger Natuzyme Bioproton phytase (type Trichoderma longibrachiatum / not specified) Trichoderma reesei OPTIPHOS ® Huvepharma AD 6-phytase E.
  • consensus gene means that the DNA vector used to transform the organism contains a synthetic phytase gene based on a consensus sequence, a URA gene from the non-pathogenic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the origin of replication of the Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322.
  • the phytase is a Citrobacter phytase derived from e.g. Citrobacter freundii , preferably C. freundii NCIMB 41247 and variants thereof e.g. as disclosed in WO2006/038062 (incorporated herein by reference) and WO2006/038128 (incorporated herein by reference), Citrobacter braakii YH-15 as disclosed in WO 2004/085638, Citrobacter braakii ATCC 51113 as disclosed in WO2006/037328 (incorporated herein by reference), as well as variants thereof e.g.
  • Citrobacter amalonaticus preferably Citrobacter amalonaticus ATCC 25405 or Citrobacter amalonaticus ATCC 25407 as disclosed in WO2006037327 (incorporated herein by reference)
  • Citrobacter gillenii preferably Citrobacter gillenii DSM 13694 as disclosed in WO2006037327 (incorporated herein by reference)
  • Citrobacter intermedius Citrobacter koseri, Citrobacter murliniae, Citrobacter rodentium, Citrobacter sedlakii, Citrobacter werkmanii, Citrobacter youngae, Citrobacter species polypeptides or variants thereof.
  • the phytase may be a phytase from Citrobacter , e.g. from Citrobacter freundii , such as the phytase enzyme(s) taught in WO2006/038128, which reference is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the phytase is preferably E. coli phytase marketed under the name Phyzyme XPTM by Danisco A/S.
  • the phytase may be a Buttiauxella phytase, e.g. a Buttiauxella agrestis phytase, for example, the phytase enzymes taught in WO 2006/043178, WO 2008/097619, WO2009/129489, WO2008/092901, PCT/U52009/41011 or PCTAB2010/051804, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • the phytase may be a phytase from Hafnia , e.g. from Hafnia alvei , such as the phytase enzyme(s) taught in US2008263688, which reference is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the phytase may be a phytase from Aspergillus , e.g. from Apergillus orzyae.
  • the phytase may be a phytase from Penicillium , e.g. from Penicillium funiculosum.
  • the phytase is present in the feedstuff in range of about 200 FTU/kg to about 1000 FTU/kg feed, more preferably about 300 FTU/kg feed to about 750 FTU/kg feed, more preferably about 400 FTU/kg feed to about 500 FTU/kg feed.
  • the phytase is present in the feedstuff at more than about 200 FTU/kg feed, suitably more than about 300 FTU/kg feed, suitably more than about 400 FTU/kg feed.
  • the phytase is present in the feedstuff at less than about 1000 FTU/kg feed, suitably less than about 750 FTU/kg feed.
  • the phytase is present in the feed additive composition in range of about 40 FTU/g to about 40,000 FTU/g composition, more preferably about 80 FTU/g composition to about 20,000 FTU/g composition, and even more preferably about 100 FTU/g composition to about 10,000 FTU/g composition, and even more preferably about 200 FTU/g composition to about 10,000 FTU/g composition.
  • the phytase is present in the feed additive composition at more than about 40 FTU/g composition, suitably more than about 60 FTU/g composition, suitably more than about 100 FTU/g composition, suitably more than about 150 FTU/g composition, suitably more than about 200 FTU/g composition.
  • the phytase is present in the feed additive composition at less than about 40,000 FTU/g composition, suitably less than about 20,000 FTU/g composition, suitably less than about 15,000 FTU/g composition, suitably less than about 10,000 FTU/g composition.
  • 1 FTU (phytase unit) is defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 ⁇ mol of inorganic orthophosphate from a substrate in one minute under the reaction conditions defined in the ISO 2009 phytase assay—A standard assay for determining phytase activity and 1 FTU can be found at International Standard ISO/DIS 30024: 1-17, 2009.
  • the enzyme is classified using the E.C. classification above, and the E.C. classification designates an enzyme having that activity when tested in the assay taught herein for determining 1 FTU.
  • One advantage of the present invention is that the feed additive composition according to the present invention can avoid the negative effects of necrotic enteritis or can be used for improving the subject's resistance to necrotic enteritis.
  • phytase catalyses the sequential hydrolysis of phytate, a principal storage form of phosphorus in cereals and legumes, to less phosphorylated myo-inositol derivatives with concomitant release of inorganic phosphate.
  • Hydrolysis of phytate causes a reduction of endogenous losses of amino acids to the intestinal lumen.
  • a reduction of endogenous amino acid losses in the intestine reduces the availability of nitrogen for bacterial growth, which helps the activity of DFMs on inhibition of C. perfringens and other pathogenic bacteria.
  • proteases cause non-specific hydrolysis of dietary protein yielding a variety of polypeptides in the intestinal lumen. Animals finalise protein hydrolysis and absorb such amino acids.
  • pathogenic bacteria may take advantage of higher peptide availability in the lumen of jejunum and ileum.
  • DFMs inhibit the growth of entero-pathogens by for example competing for N sources, as well as by direct inhibition.
  • xylanase degrades the linear polysaccharide beta-1,4-xylan into xylose.
  • Amylase activity hydrolyses alpha-bonds of large alpha-linked polysaccharides such as starch yielding dextrins and oligosaccharides, which are mainly absorbed in the small intestine after hydrolysis to maltose and glucose in the gut wall.
  • rapid starch hydrolysis in the foregut and greater absorption of glucose in the duodenum deprives pathogenic bacteria from an important energy source (glucose) in the jejunum and ileum, which improves the DFM activity because of a competitive advantage against pathogens that cannot use pentoses as efficiently.
  • the four enzymes and DFMs surprisingly provide a significant improvement on the pathogen reduction and/or resistance to necrotic enteritis compared with other DFM and enzyme combinations and/or DFMs alone and/or enzyme(s) alone.
  • the specific combination of DFMs and the enzymes taught herein may advantageously reduce inflammation in the ileum. This can be seen by the downregulation of IFR-g expression in the ileum. The inventors have shown that modulation of immune response may improve performance.
  • the DFM and the enzymes may be formulated in any suitable way to ensure that the formulation comprises viable DFMs and active enzymes.
  • the DFM and enzymes may be formulated as a liquid, a dry powder or a granule.
  • dry powder or granules may be prepared by means known to those skilled in the art, such as, in top-spray fluid bed coater, in a buttom spray Wurster or by drum granulation (e.g. High sheer granulation), extrusion, pan coating or in a microingredients mixer.
  • drum granulation e.g. High sheer granulation
  • extrusion pan coating
  • microingredients mixer e.g. High sheer granulation
  • the DFM and/or the enzyme(s) may be coated, for example encapsulated.
  • the DFM and enzymes may be formulated within the same coating or encapsulated within the same capsule.
  • one or two or three or four of the enzymes may be formulated within the same coating or encapsulated within the same capsule and the DFM could be formulated in a coating separate to the one or more or all of the enzymes.
  • the DFM may be provided without any coating.
  • the DFM endospores may be simply admixed with one or two or three or four enzymes. In the latter case, the enzymes may be coated, e.g.
  • the enzymes may be coated, e.g. encapsulated.
  • the enzymes may be encapsulated as mixtures (i.e. comprising one or more, two or more, three or more or all) of enzymes or they may be encapsulated separately, e.g. as single enzymes. In one preferred embodiment all four enzymes may be coated, e.g. encapsulated, together.
  • the coating protects the enzymes from heat and may be considered a thermoprotectant.
  • the feed additive composition is formulated to a dry powder or granules as described in WO2007/044968 (referred to as TPT granules) or WO1997/016076 or WO1992/012645 (each of which is incorporated herein by reference).
  • the feed additive composition may be formulated to a granule for feed compositions comprising: a core; an active agent; and at least one coating, the active agent of the granule retaining at least 50% activity, at least 60% activity, at least 70% activity, at least 80% activity after conditions selected from one or more of a) a feed pelleting process, b) steam-heated feed pretreatment process, c) storage, d) storage as an ingredient in an unpelleted mixture, and e) storage as an ingredient in a feed base mix or a feed premix comprising at least one compound selected from trace minerals, organic acids, reducing sugars, vitamins, choline chloride, and compounds which result in an acidic or a basic feed base mix or feed premix.
  • At least one coating may comprise a moisture hydrating material that constitutes at least 55% w/w of the granule; and/or at least one coating may comprise two coatings.
  • the two coatings may be a moisture hydrating coating and a moisture barrier coating.
  • the moisture hydrating coating may be between 25% and 60% w/w of the granule and the moisture barrier coating may be between 2% and 15% w/w of the granule.
  • the moisture hydrating coating may be selected from inorganic salts, sucrose, starch, and maltodextrin and the moisture barrier coating may be selected from polymers, gums, whey and starch.
  • the granule may be produced using a feed pelleting process and the feed pretreatment process may be conducted between 70° C. and 95° C. for up to several minutes, such as between 85° C. and 95° C.
  • the feed additive composition may be formulated to a granule for animal feed comprising: a core; an active agent, the active agent of the granule retaining at least 80% activity after storage and after a steam-heated pelleting process where the granule is an ingredient; a moisture barrier coating; and a moisture hydrating coating that is at least 25% w/w of the granule, the granule having a water activity of less than 0.5 prior to the steam-heated pelleting process.
  • the granule may have a moisture barrier coating selected from polymers and gums and the moisture hydrating material may be an inorganic salt.
  • the moisture hydrating coating may be between 25% and 45% w/w of the granule and the moisture barrier coating may be between 2% and 10% w/w of the granule.
  • the granule may be produced using a steam-heated pelleting process which may be conducted between 85° C. and 95° C., for up to several minutes.
  • the DFM (e.g. DFM endospores for example) may be diluted using a diluent, such as starch powder, lime stone or the like.
  • the composition is in a liquid formulation suitable for consumption preferably such liquid consumption contains one or more of the following: a buffer, salt, sorbitol and/or glycerol.
  • the feed additive composition may be formulated by applying, e.g. spraying, the enzyme(s) onto a carrier substrate, such as ground wheat for example.
  • the feed additive composition according to the present invention may be formulated as a premix.
  • the premix may comprise one or more feed components, such as one or more minerals and/or one or more vitamins.
  • the DFM and/or enzymes for use in the present invention are formulated with at least one physiologically acceptable carrier selected from at least one of maltodextrin, limestone (calcium carbonate), cyclodextrin, wheat or a wheat component, sucrose, starch, Na 2 SO 4 , Talc, PVA, sorbitol, benzoate, sorbiate, glycerol, sucrose, propylene glycol, 1,3-propane diol, glucose, parabens, sodium chloride, citrate, acetate, phosphate, calcium, metabisulfite, formate and mixtures thereof.
  • at least one physiologically acceptable carrier selected from at least one of maltodextrin, limestone (calcium carbonate), cyclodextrin, wheat or a wheat component, sucrose, starch, Na 2 SO 4 , Talc, PVA, sorbitol, benzoate, sorbiate, glycerol, sucrose, propylene glycol, 1,3-propane di
  • the feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feed or feedstuff according to the present invention is packaged.
  • the feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feed or feedstuff is packaged in a bag, such as a paper bag.
  • the feed additive composition and/or premix and/or feed or feedstuff may be sealed in a container. Any suitable container may be used.
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention may be used as—or in the preparation of—a feed.
  • feed is used synonymously herein with “feedstuff”.
  • the feed may be in the form of a solution or as a solid—depending on the use and/or the mode of application and/or the mode of administration.
  • composition of the present invention may be used in conjunction with one or more of: a nutritionally acceptable carrier, a nutritionally acceptable diluent, a nutritionally acceptable excipient, a nutritionally acceptable adjuvant, a nutritionally active ingredient.
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention is admixed with a feed component to form a feedstuff.
  • feed component means all or part of the feedstuff. Part of the feedstuff may mean one constituent of the feedstuff or more than one constituent of the feedstuff, e.g. 2 or 3 or 4. In one embodiment the term “feed component” encompasses a premix or premix constituents.
  • the feed may be a fodder, or a premix thereof, a compound feed, or a premix thereof.
  • the feed additive composition according to the present invention may be admixed with a compound feed, a compound feed component or to a premix of a compound feed or to a fodder, a fodder component, or a premix of a fodder.
  • fodder means any food which is provided to an animal (rather than the animal having to forage for it themselves). Fodder encompasses plants that have been cut.
  • fodder includes hay, straw, silage, compressed and pelleted feeds, oils and mixed rations, and also sprouted grains and legumes.
  • Fodder may be obtained from one or more of the plants selected from: alfalfa (lucerne), barley, birdsfoot trefoil, brassicas, Chau moellier, kale, rapeseed (canola), rutabaga (swede), turnip, clover, alsike clover, red clover, subterranean clover, white clover, grass, false oat grass, fescue, Bermuda grass, brome, heath grass, meadow grasses (from naturally mixed grassland swards, orchard grass, rye grass, Timothy-grass, corn (maize), millet, oats, sorghum, soybeans, trees (pollard tree shoots for tree-hay), wheat, and legumes.
  • alfalfa lucerne
  • barley birdsfoot trefoil
  • brassicas Chau moellier
  • kale kale
  • rapeseed canola
  • rutabaga rutabaga
  • compound feed means a commercial feed in the form of a meal, a pellet, nuts, cake or a crumble.
  • Compound feeds may be blended from various raw materials and additives. These blends are formulated according to the specific requirements of the target animal.
  • Compound feeds can be complete feeds that provide all the daily required nutrients, concentrates that provide a part of the ration (protein, energy) or supplements that only provide additional micronutrients, such as minerals and vitamins.
  • the main ingredients used in compound feed are the feed grains, which include corn, soybeans, sorghum, oats, and barley.
  • a premix as referred to herein may be a composition composed of microingredients such as vitamins, minerals, chemical preservatives, antibiotics, fermentation products, and other essential ingredients. Premixes are usually compositions suitable for blending into commercial rations.
  • Any feedstuff of the present invention may comprise one or more feed materials selected from the group comprising a) cereals, such as small grains (e.g., wheat, barley, rye, oats and combinations thereof) and/or large grains such as maize or sorghum; b) by products from cereals, such as corn gluten meal, Distillers Dried Grain Solubles (DDGS), wheat bran, wheat middlings, wheat shorts, rice bran, rice hulls, oat hulls, palm kernel, and citrus pulp; c) protein obtained from sources such as soya, sunflower, peanut, lupin, peas, fava beans, cotton, canola, fish meal, dried plasma protein, meat and bone meal, potato protein, whey, copra, sesame; d) oils and fats obtained from vegetable and animal sources; e) minerals and vitamins.
  • cereals such as small grains (e.g., wheat, barley, rye, oats and combinations thereof) and/or large
  • a feedstuff of the present invention may contain at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50% or at least 60% by weight corn and soybean meal or corn and full fat soy, or wheat meal or sunflower meal.
  • a feedstuff of the present invention may comprise at least one high fibre feed material and/or at least one by-product of the at least one high fibre feed material to provide a high fibre feedstuff.
  • high fibre feed materials include: wheat, barley, rye, oats, by products from cereals, such as corn gluten meal, Distillers Dried Grain Solubles (DDGS), wheat bran, wheat middlings, wheat shorts, rice bran, rice hulls, oat hulls, palm kernel, and citrus pulp.
  • Some protein sources may also be regarded as high fibre: protein obtained from sources such as sunflower, lupin, fava beans and cotton.
  • the feed may be one or more of the following: a compound feed and premix, including pellets, nuts or (cattle) cake; a crop or crop residue: corn, soybeans, sorghum, oats, barley, corn stover, copra, straw, chaff, sugar beet waste; fish meal; freshly cut grass and other forage plants; meat and bone meal; molasses; oil cake and press cake; oligosaccharides; conserved forage plants: hay and silage; seaweed; seeds and grains, either whole or prepared by crushing, milling etc.; sprouted grains and legumes; yeast extract.
  • a compound feed and premix including pellets, nuts or (cattle) cake
  • a crop or crop residue corn, soybeans, sorghum, oats, barley, corn stover, copra, straw, chaff, sugar beet waste
  • fish meal freshly cut grass and other forage plants
  • meat and bone meal molasses
  • oil cake and press cake oligosaccharides
  • a pet food is plant or animal material intended for consumption by pets, such as dog food or cat food.
  • Pet food such as dog and cat food, may be either in a dry form, such as kibble for dogs, or wet canned form.
  • Cat food may contain the amino acid taurine.
  • feed in the present invention also encompasses in some embodiments fish food.
  • a fish food normally contains macro nutrients, trace elements and vitamins necessary to keep captive fish in good health.
  • Fish food may be in the form of a flake, pellet or tablet. Pelleted forms, some of which sink rapidly, are often used for larger fish or bottom feeding species.
  • Some fish foods also contain additives, such as beta carotene or sex hormones, to artificially enhance the color of ornamental fish.
  • feed in the present invention also encompasses in some embodiment bird food.
  • Bird food includes food that is used both in birdfeeders and to feed pet birds.
  • bird food comprises of a variety of seeds, but may also encompass suet (beef or mutton fat).
  • the term “contacted” refers to the indirect or direct application of the composition of the present invention to the product (e.g. the feed).
  • the application methods include, but are not limited to, treating the product in a material comprising the feed additive composition, direct application by mixing the feed additive composition with the product, spraying the feed additive composition onto the product surface or dipping the product into a preparation of the feed additive composition.
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention is preferably admixed with the product (e.g. feedstuff).
  • the feed additive composition may be included in the emulsion or raw ingredients of a feedstuff.
  • composition is made available on or to the surface of a product to be affected/treated. This allows the composition to impart one or more of the following favourable characteristics: performance benefits.
  • the feed additive compositions of the present invention may be applied to intersperse, coat and/or impregnate a product (e.g. feedstuff or raw ingredients of a feedstuff) with a controlled amount of DFM and enzymes.
  • a product e.g. feedstuff or raw ingredients of a feedstuff
  • the DFM and enzymes may be used simultaneously (e.g. when they are in admixture together or even when they are delivered by different routes) or sequentially (e.g. they may be delivered by different routes). In one embodiment preferably the DFM and enzymes are applied simultaneously. Preferably the DFM and enzymes are admixed prior to being delivered to a feedstuff or to a raw ingredient of a feedstuff.
  • the DFM in feed additive compositions according to the present invention can be added in suitable concentrations—such as for example in concentrations in the final feed product which offer a daily dose of between about 2 ⁇ 10 5 CFU to about 2 ⁇ 10 11 CFU, suitably between about 2 ⁇ 10 6 to about 1 ⁇ 10 10 , suitably between about 3.75 ⁇ 10 7 CFU to about 1 ⁇ 10 10 CFU.
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention will be thermally stable to heat treatment up to about 70° C.; up to about 85° C.; or up to about 95° C.
  • the heat treatment may be performed for up to about 1 minute; up to about 5 minutes; up to about 10 minutes; up to about 30 minutes; up to about 60 minutes.
  • thermally stable means that at least about 75% of the enzyme components and/or DFM that were present/active in the additive before heating to the specified temperature are still present/active after it cools to room temperature.
  • at least about 80% of the enzyme components and/or DFM that were present and active in the additive before heating to the specified temperature are still present and active after it cools to room temperature.
  • the feed additive composition is homogenized to produce a powder.
  • the feed additive composition is formulated to granules as described in WO2007/044968 (referred to as TPT granules) incorporated herein by reference.
  • the feed additive composition when formulated into granules the granules comprise a hydrated barrier salt coated over the protein core.
  • the advantage of such salt coating is improved thermo-tolerance, improved storage stability and protection against other feed additives otherwise having adverse effect on the enzyme and/or DFM.
  • the salt used for the salt coating has a water activity greater than 0.25 or constant humidity greater than 60% at 20° C.
  • the salt coating comprises a Na 2 SO 4 .
  • the method of preparing a feed additive composition may also comprise the further step of pelleting the powder.
  • the powder may be mixed with other components known in the art.
  • the powder, or mixture comprising the powder may be forced through a die and the resulting strands are cut into suitable pellets of variable length.
  • the pelleting step may include a steam treatment, or conditioning stage, prior to formation of the pellets.
  • the mixture comprising the powder may be placed in a conditioner, e.g. a mixer with steam injection.
  • the mixture is heated in the conditioner up to a specified temperature, such as from 60-100° C., typical temperatures would be 70° C., 80° C., 85° C., 90° C. or 95° C.
  • the residence time can be variable from seconds to minutes and even hours. Such as 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 15 seconds, 30 seconds, 1 minutes 2 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 1 hour.
  • feed additive composition of the present invention is suitable for addition to any appropriate feed material.
  • feed material refers to the basic feed material to be consumed by an animal. It will be further understood that this may comprise, for example, at least one or more unprocessed grains, and/or processed plant and/or animal material such as soybean meal or bone meal.
  • feedstuff refers to a feed material to which one or more feed additive compositions have been added.
  • the feedstuff may comprise feed materials comprising maize or corn, wheat, barley, triticale, rye, rice, tapioca, sorghum, and/or any of the by-products, as well as protein rich components like soybean mean, rape seed meal, canola meal, cotton seed meal, sunflower seed mean, animal-by-product meals and mixtures thereof. More preferably, the feedstuff may comprise animal fats and/or vegetable oils.
  • the feedstuff may also contain additional minerals such as, for example, calcium and/or additional vitamins.
  • the feedstuff is a corn soybean meal mix.
  • the feed is not pet food.
  • Feedstuff is typically produced in feed mills in which raw materials are first ground to a suitable particle size and then mixed with appropriate additives.
  • the feedstuff may then be produced as a mash or pellets; the later typically involves a method by which the temperature is raised to a target level and then the feed is passed through a die to produce pellets of a particular size. The pellets are allowed to cool. Subsequently liquid additives such as fat and enzyme may be added.
  • Production of feedstuff may also involve an additional step that includes extrusion or expansion prior to pelleting—in particular by suitable techniques that may include at least the use of steam.
  • the feedstuff may be a feedstuff for a monogastric animal, such as poultry (for example, broiler, layer, broiler breeders, turkey, duck, geese, water fowl), swine (all age categories), a pet (for example dogs, cats) or fish, preferably the feedstuff is for poultry.
  • poultry for example, broiler, layer, broiler breeders, turkey, duck, geese, water fowl
  • swine all age categories
  • a pet for example dogs, cats
  • fish preferably the feedstuff is for poultry.
  • the feedstuff is not for a layer.
  • a feedstuff for chickens e.g. broiler chickens may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the % ages given in the table below:
  • a feedstuff laying hens may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the % ages given in the table below:
  • a feedstuff for turkeys may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the % ages given in the table below:
  • Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Ingredient (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Wheat 33.6 42.3 52.4 61.6 Maize DDGS 7.0 7.0 7.0 Soyabean Meal 48% CP 44.6 36.6 27.2 19.2 Rapeseed Meal 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Soyabean Oil 4.4 4.2 3.9 3.6 L-Lysine HCl 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 DL-methionine 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 L-threonine 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Salt 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Limestone 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 Dicalcium Phosphate 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.0 Poultry Vitamins and 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Micro-minerals
  • a feedstuff for piglets may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the % ages given in the table below:
  • a feedstuff for grower/finisher pigs may be comprises of one or more of the ingredients listed in the table below, for example in the % ages given in the table below:
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention and other components and/or the feedstuff comprising same may be used in any suitable form.
  • the feed additive composition of the present invention may be used in the form of solid or liquid preparations or alternatives thereof.
  • solid preparations include powders, pastes, boluses, capsules, pellets, tablets, dusts, and granules which may be wettable, spray-dried or freeze-dried.
  • liquid preparations include, but are not limited to, aqueous, organic or aqueous-organic solutions, suspensions and emulsions.
  • DFM or feed additive compositions of the present invention may be mixed with feed or administered in the drinking water.
  • the dosage range for inclusion into water is about 1 ⁇ 10 3 CFU/animal/day to about 1 ⁇ 10 10 CFU/animal/day, and more preferably about 1 ⁇ 10 7 CFU/animal/day.
  • Suitable examples of forms include one or more of: powders, pastes, boluses, pellets, tablets, pills, capsules, ovules, solutions or suspensions, which may contain flavouring or colouring agents, for immediate-, delayed-, modified-, sustained-, pulsed- or controlled-release applications.
  • composition of the present invention may also contain one or more of: excipients such as microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, sodium citrate, calcium carbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate and glycine; disintegrants such as starch (preferably corn, potato or tapioca starch), sodium starch glycollate, croscarmellose sodium and certain complex silicates; granulation binders such as polyvinylpyrrolidone, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), sucrose, gelatin and acacia; lubricating agents such as magnesium stearate, stearic acid, glyceryl behenate and talc may be included.
  • excipients such as microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, sodium citrate, calcium carbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate and glycine
  • disintegrants such as starch (preferably corn, potato or tapioca starch), sodium starch glycollate, croscarmellose sodium and certain complex si
  • Examples of nutritionally acceptable carriers for use in preparing the forms include, for example, water, salt solutions, alcohol, silicone, waxes, petroleum jelly, vegetable oils, polyethylene glycols, propylene glycol, liposomes, sugars, gelatin, lactose, amylose, magnesium stearate, talc, surfactants, silicic acid, viscous paraffin, perfume oil, fatty acid monoglycerides and diglycerides, petroethral fatty acid esters, hydroxymethyl-cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and the like.
  • Preferred excipients for the forms include lactose, starch, a cellulose, milk sugar or high molecular weight polyethylene glycols.
  • composition of the present invention may be combined with various sweetening or flavouring agents, colouring matter or dyes, with emulsifying and/or suspending agents and with diluents such as water, propylene glycol and glycerin, and combinations thereof.
  • Non-hydroscopic whey is often used as a carrier for DFMs (particularly bacterial DFMs) and is a good medium to initiate growth.
  • Bacterial DFM containing pastes may be formulated with vegetable oil and inert gelling ingredients.
  • Fungal products may be formulated with grain by-products as carriers.
  • the feed additive composition according to the present invention is not in the form of a microparticle system, such as the microparticle system taught in WO2005/123034.
  • the DFM and/or feed additive composition according to the present invention may be designed for one-time dosing or may be designed for feeding on a daily basis.
  • composition and each component therein
  • the optimum amount of the composition (and each component therein) to be used in the combination of the present invention will depend on the product to be treated and/or the method of contacting the product with the composition and/or the intended use for the same.
  • the amount of DFM and enzymes used in the compositions should be a sufficient amount to be effective and to remain sufficiently effective in improving the performance of the animal fed feed products containing said composition. This length of time for effectiveness should extend up to at least the time of utilisation of the product (e.g. feed additive composition or feed containing same).
  • the ratio of DFM to each enzyme in the feed can be in the ranges given below:
  • DFM:amylase In range from 1.0 ⁇ 10 2 CFU DFM:1 AU enzyme to 2.0 ⁇ 10 10 CFU:1 AU enzyme; preferably in the range from 3.7 ⁇ 10 4 CFU DFM:1 AU enzyme to 1.0 ⁇ 10 8 CFU:1 AU enzyme.
  • DFM:protease CFU/PU: In range from 5.0 ⁇ 10 1 CFU DFM:1 PU enzyme to 1.0 ⁇ 10 9 CFU:1 PU enzyme; preferably in the range from 1.25 ⁇ 10 4 CFU DFM:1 PU enzyme to 5.0 ⁇ 10 6 CFU:1 PU enzyme.
  • a protease at at least 4000 PU/kg of feed a xylanase at at least 1000 XU/kg to 2000 XU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 1000 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at at least 2000 XU/kg of feed); an amylase; at least 1800 AU/kg or 200 TAU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 1800 AU/kg or Axtra XAP at at least 200 TAU/kg of feed); a phytase at at least 500 FTU/kg of feed; and Envivo Pro (DFM) at at least 75,000 CFU/g to 150,000 CFU/g of feed.
  • a xylanase at at least 1000 XU/kg to 2000 XU/kg of feed
  • an amylase at least 1800 AU/kg or 200 TAU/kg of feed
  • a phytase at at least 500 FTU/kg of feed e.g.
  • a protease at 4000 PU/kg of feed a xylanase at 1000 XU/kg to 2000 XU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 1000 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 2000 XU/kg of feed); an amylase; 1800 AU/kg or 200 TAU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 1800 AU/kg or Axtra XAP at 200 TAU/kg of feed); a phytase at 500 FTU/kg of feed; and Envivo Pro (DFM) at 75,000 CFU/g to 150,000 CFU/g of feed.
  • a xylanase at 1000 XU/kg to 2000 XU/kg of feed e.g. Avizyme at 1000 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 2000 XU/kg of feed
  • an amylase 1800 AU/kg or 200 TAU/kg of feed
  • a protease at 5000 PU/kg of feed a xylanase at 1250 XU/kg to 2500 XU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 1000 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 2500 XU/kg of feed); an amylase; 2250 AU/kg or 250 TAU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 1800 AU/kg or Axtra XAP at 250 TAU/kg of feed); a phytase at 625 FTU/kg of feed; and Envivo Pro (DFM) at 75,000 CFU/g to 150,000 CFU/g of feed.
  • a xylanase at 1250 XU/kg to 2500 XU/kg of feed e.g. Avizyme at 1000 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 2500 XU/kg of feed
  • an amylase 2250 AU/kg or 250 TAU/kg of feed (
  • a protease at 2000 PU/kg of feed a xylanase at 500 XU/kg to 1000 XU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 500 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 1000 XU/kg of feed); an amylase; 900 AU/kg or 100 TAU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 900 AU/kg or Axtra XAP at 100 TAU/kg of feed); a phytase at 500 FTU/kg of feed; and Envivo Pro (DFM) at 37,500 CFU/g to 75,000 CFU/g of feed.
  • a xylanase at 500 XU/kg to 1000 XU/kg of feed e.g. Avizyme at 500 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 1000 XU/kg of feed
  • an amylase 900 AU/kg or 100 TAU/kg of feed
  • a protease at 4000 PU/kg of feed a xylanase at 1000 XU/kg to 2000 XU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 1000 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 2000 XU/kg of feed); an amylase; 1800 AU/kg or 200 TAU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 1800 AU/kg or Axtra XAP at 200 TAU/kg of feed); a phytase at 500 FTU/kg of feed; and Envivo Pro (DFM) at 75,000 CFU/g to 150,000 CFU/g of feed.
  • a xylanase at 1000 XU/kg to 2000 XU/kg of feed e.g. Avizyme at 1000 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 2000 XU/kg of feed
  • an amylase 1800 AU/kg or 200 TAU/kg of feed
  • a protease at 2000 PU/kg of feed a xylanase at 500 XU/kg to 1000 XU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 500 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 1000 XU/kg of feed); an amylase; 900 AU/kg or 100 TAU/kg of feed (e.g. Avizyme at 900 AU/kg or Axtra XAP at 100 TAU/kg of feed); a phytase at 500 FTU/kg of feed; and Envivo Pro (DFM) at 37,500 CFU/g to 75,000 CFU/g of feed.
  • a xylanase at 500 XU/kg to 1000 XU/kg of feed e.g. Avizyme at 500 XU/kg of feed or Axtra XAP at 1000 XU/kg of feed
  • an amylase 900 AU/kg or 100 TAU/kg of feed
  • the DFM and enzyme(s) for use in the present invention may be used in combination with other components.
  • the present invention also relates to combinations.
  • the DFM in combination with a protease, xylanase, amylase and phytase may be referred to herein as “the feed additive composition of the present invention”.
  • the combination of the present invention comprises the feed additive composition of the present invention (or one or more of the constituents thereof) and another component which is suitable for animal consumption and is capable of providing a medical or physiological benefit to the consumer.
  • the “another component” is not a further enzyme or a further DFM.
  • the components may be prebiotics.
  • Prebiotics are typically non-digestible carbohydrate (oligo- or polysaccharides) or a sugar alcohol which is not degraded or absorbed in the upper digestive tract.
  • Known prebiotics used in commercial products and useful in accordance with the present invention include inulin (fructo-oligosaccharide, or FOS) and transgalacto-oligosaccharides (GOS or TOS).
  • Suitable prebiotics include palatinoseoligosaccharide, soybean oligosaccharide, alginate, xanthan, pectin, locust bean gum (LBG), inulin, guar gum, galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS), fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS), non-degradable starch, lactosaccharose, lactulose, lactitol, maltitol, maltodextrin, polydextrose (i.e.
  • Dietary fibres may include non-starch polysaccharides, such as arabinoxylans, cellulose and many other plant components, such as resistant dextrins, inulin, lignin, waxes, chitins, pectins, beta-glucans and oligosaccharides.
  • non-starch polysaccharides such as arabinoxylans, cellulose and many other plant components, such as resistant dextrins, inulin, lignin, waxes, chitins, pectins, beta-glucans and oligosaccharides.
  • the present invention relates to the combination of the feed additive composition (or one or more of the constituents thereof) according to the present invention with a prebiotic.
  • a feed additive composition comprising (or consisting essentially of or consisting of) a DFM in combination with a xylanase, an amylase, a phytase, a protease and a prebiotic.
  • the prebiotic may be administered simultaneously with (e.g. in admixture together with or delivered simultaneously by the same or different routes) or sequentially to (e.g. by the same or different routes) the feed additive composition (or constituents thereof) according to the present invention.
  • components of the combinations of the present invention include polydextrose, such as Litesse®, and/or a maltodextrin and/or lactitol. These other components may be optionally added to the feed additive composition to assist the drying process and help the survival of DFM.
  • suitable components include one or more of: thickeners, gelling agents, emulsifiers, binders, crystal modifiers, sweeteners (including artificial sweeteners), rheology modifiers, stabilisers, anti-oxidants, dyes, enzymes, carriers, vehicles, excipients, diluents, lubricating agents, flavouring agents, colouring matter, suspending agents, disintegrants, granulation binders etc.
  • sweeteners including artificial sweeteners
  • rheology modifiers stabilisers, anti-oxidants, dyes, enzymes, carriers, vehicles, excipients, diluents, lubricating agents, flavouring agents, colouring matter, suspending agents, disintegrants, granulation binders etc.
  • sweeteners including artificial sweeteners
  • rheology modifiers include one or more of: rheology modifiers, stabilisers, anti-oxidants, dyes, enzymes, carriers, vehicles, excipients, diluents, lubricating
  • the DFM and/or enzymes may be encapsulated.
  • the feed additive composition and/or DFM and/or enzymes is/are formulated as a dry powder or granule as described in WO2007/044968 (referred to as TPT granules)—reference incorporated herein by reference.
  • the DFM and/or enzymes for use in the present invention may be used in combination with one or more lipids.
  • the DFM and/or enzymes for use in the present invention may be used in combination with one or more lipid micelles.
  • the lipid micelle may be a simple lipid micelle or a complex lipid micelle.
  • the lipid micelle may be an aggregate of orientated molecules of amphipathic substances, such as a lipid and/or an oil.
  • thickener or gelling agent refers to a product that prevents separation by slowing or preventing the movement of particles, either droplets of immiscible liquids, air or insoluble solids. Thickening occurs when individual hydrated molecules cause an increase in viscosity, slowing the separation. Gelation occurs when the hydrated molecules link to form a three-dimensional network that traps the particles, thereby immobilising them.
  • stabiliser as used here is defined as an ingredient or combination of ingredients that keeps a product (e.g. a feed product) from changing over time.
  • Emulsifier refers to an ingredient (e.g. a feed ingredient) that prevents the separation of emulsions.
  • Emulsions are two immiscible substances, one present in droplet form, contained within the other.
  • Emulsions can consist of oil-in-water, where the droplet or dispersed phase is oil and the continuous phase is water; or water-in-oil, where the water becomes the dispersed phase and the continuous phase is oil.
  • Foams, which are gas-in-liquid, and suspensions, which are solid-in-liquid, can also be stabilised through the use of emulsifiers.
  • binder refers to an ingredient (e.g. a feed ingredient) that binds the product together through a physical or chemical reaction. During “gelation” for instance, water is absorbed, providing a binding effect. However, binders can absorb other liquids, such as oils, holding them within the product. In the context of the present invention binders would typically be used in solid or low-moisture products for instance baking products: pastries, doughnuts, bread and others.
  • Carriers or “vehicles” mean materials suitable for administration of the DFM and/or enzymes and include any such material known in the art such as, for example, any liquid, gel, solvent, liquid diluent, solubilizer, or the like, which is non-toxic and which does not interact with any components of the composition in a deleterious manner.
  • the present invention provides a method for preparing a feed additive composition
  • a method for preparing a feed additive composition comprising admixing a DFM, a xylanase, a protease, a phytase and a amylase with at least one physiologically acceptable carrier selected from at least one of maltodextrin, limestone (calcium carbonate), cyclodextrin, wheat or a wheat component, sucrose, starch, Na 2 SO 4 , Talc, PVA, sorbitol, benzoate, sorbiate, glycerol, sucrose, propylene glycol, 1,3-propane diol, glucose, parabens, sodium chloride, citrate, acetate, phosphate, calcium, metabisulfite, formate and mixtures thereof.
  • excipients include one or more of: microcrystalline cellulose and other celluloses, lactose, sodium citrate, calcium carbonate, dibasic calcium phosphate, glycine, starch, milk sugar and high molecular weight polyethylene glycols.
  • disintegrants include one or more of: starch (preferably corn, potato or tapioca starch), sodium starch glycollate, croscarmellose sodium and certain complex silicates.
  • granulation binders include one or more of: polyvinylpyrrolidone, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), sucrose, maltose, gelatin and acacia.
  • lubricating agents include one or more of: magnesium stearate, stearic acid, glyceryl behenate and talc.
  • diluents include one or more of: water, ethanol, propylene glycol and glycerin, and combinations thereof.
  • the other components may be used simultaneously (e.g. when they are in admixture together or even when they are delivered by different routes) or sequentially (e.g. they may be delivered by different routes).
  • the DFM remains viable.
  • the feed additive according to the present invention does not contain glucanase.
  • the feed additive according to the present invention does not contain sorbic acid.
  • the DFMs for use in the present invention may be in the form of concentrates. Typically these concentrates comprise a substantially high concentration of a DFM.
  • Feed additive compositions according to the present invention may have a content of viable cells (colony forming units, CFUs) which is in the range of at least 10 4 CFU/g (suitably including at least 10 5 CFU/g, such as at least 10 6 CFU/g, e.g. at least 10 7 CFU/g, at least 10 8 CFU/g, e.g. at least 10 9 CFU/g) to about 10 10 CFU/g (or even about 10 11 CFU/g or about 10 12 CFU/g).
  • viable cells colony forming units, CFUs
  • the feed additive compositions according to the present invention may have a content of viable cells in the range of at least 10 9 CFU/g to about 10 12 CFU/g, preferably at least 10 10 CFU/g to about 10 12 CFU/g.
  • Powders, granules and liquid compositions in the form of concentrates may be diluted with water or resuspended in water or other suitable diluents, for example, an appropriate growth medium such as milk or mineral or vegetable oils, to give compositions ready for use.
  • suitable diluents for example, an appropriate growth medium such as milk or mineral or vegetable oils
  • the DFM or feed additive composition of the present invention or the combinations of the present invention in the form of concentrates may be prepared according to methods known in the art.
  • the enzymes or feed is contacted by a composition in a concentrated form.
  • compositions of the present invention may be spray-dried or freeze-dried by methods known in the art.
  • Typical processes for making particles using a spray drying process involve a solid material which is dissolved in an appropriate solvent (e.g. a culture of a DFM in a fermentation medium).
  • an appropriate solvent e.g. a culture of a DFM in a fermentation medium.
  • the material can be suspended or emulsified in a non-solvent to form a suspension or emulsion.
  • Other ingredients (as discussed above) or components such as anti-microbial agents, stabilising agents, dyes and agents assisting with the drying process may optionally be added at this stage.
  • the solution then is atomised to form a fine mist of droplets.
  • the droplets immediately enter a drying chamber where they contact a drying gas.
  • the solvent is evaporated from the droplets into the drying gas to solidify the droplets, thereby forming particles.
  • the particles are then separated from the drying gas and collected.
  • subject means an animal that is to be or has been administered with a feed additive composition according to the present invention or a feedstuff comprising said feed additive composition according to the present invention.
  • subject means an animal.
  • the subject is a mammal, bird, fish or crustacean including for example livestock or a domesticated animal (e.g. a pet).
  • the “subject” is livestock.
  • livestock refers to any farmed animal.
  • livestock is one or more of cows or bulls (including calves), poultry, pigs (including piglets), poultry (including broilers, chickens and turkeys), birds, fish (including freshwater fish, such as salmon, cod, trout and carp, e.g. koi carp, and marine fish, such as sea bass), crustaceans (such as shrimps, mussels and scallops), horses (including race horses), sheep (including lambs).
  • livestock and/or poultry and/or chickens does not include egg layers.
  • the “subject” is a domesticated animal or pet or an animal maintained in a zoological environment.
  • domesticated animal or pet or animal maintained in a zoological environment refers to any relevant animal including canines (e.g. dogs), felines (e.g. cats), rodents (e.g. guinea pigs, rats, mice), birds, fish (including freshwater fish and marine fish), and horses.
  • canines e.g. dogs
  • felines e.g. cats
  • rodents e.g. guinea pigs, rats, mice
  • birds including freshwater fish and marine fish
  • fish including freshwater fish and marine fish
  • the subject may be challenged by an enteric pathogen.
  • a subject may have one or more enteric pathogens present in its gut or digestive tract.
  • a subject may have one or more enteric pathogens in its gut or digestive tract at a level which:
  • the enteric pathogen may be Clostridium perfringens for example.
  • animal performance may be determined by the feed efficiency and/or weight gain of the animal and/or by the feed conversion ratio and/or by the digestibility of a nutrient in a feed (e.g. amino acid digestibility) and/or digestible energy or metabolizable energy in a feed and/or by nitrogen retention and/or by animals ability to avoid the negative effects of necrotic enteritis and/or by the immune response of the subject.
  • a nutrient in a feed e.g. amino acid digestibility
  • digestible energy or metabolizable energy in a feed e.g. amino acid digestibility
  • animal performance is determined by feed efficiency and/or weight gain of the animal and/or by the feed conversion ratio.
  • improved animal performance it is meant that there is increased feed efficiency, and/or increased weight gain and/or reduced feed conversion ratio and/or improved digestibility of nutrients or energy in a feed and/or by improved nitrogen retention and/or by improved ability to avoid the negative effects of necrotic enteritis and/or by an improved immune response in the subject resulting from the use of feed additive composition of the present invention in feed in comparison to feed which does not comprise said feed additive composition.
  • improved animal performance it is meant that there is increased feed efficiency and/or increased weight gain and/or reduced feed conversion ratio.
  • feed efficiency refers to the amount of weight gain in an animal that occurs when the animal is fed ad-libitum or a specified amount of food during a period of time.
  • feed additive composition in feed results in an increased weight gain per unit of feed intake compared with an animal fed without said feed additive composition being present.
  • feed conversion ratio refers to the amount of feed fed to an animal to increase the weight of the animal by a specified amount.
  • An improved feed conversion ratio means a lower feed conversion ratio.
  • lower feed conversion ratio or “improved feed conversion ratio” it is meant that the use of a feed additive composition in feed results in a lower amount of feed being required to be fed to an animal to increase the weight of the animal by a specified amount compared to the amount of feed required to increase the weight of the animal by the same amount when the feed does not comprise said feed additive composition.
  • Nutrient digestibility as used herein means the fraction of a nutrient that disappears from the gastro-intestinal tract or a specified segment of the gastro-intestinal tract, e.g. the small intestine. Nutrient digestibility may be measured as the difference between what is administered to the subject and what comes out in the faeces of the subject, or between what is administered to the subject and what remains in the digesta on a specified segment of the gastro intestinal tract, e.g. the ileum.
  • Nutrient digestibility as used herein may be measured by the difference between the intake of a nutrient and the excreted nutrient by means of the total collection of excreta during a period of time; or with the use of an inert marker that is not absorbed by the animal, and allows the researcher calculating the amount of nutrient that disappeared in the entire gastro-intestinal tract or a segment of the gastro-intestinal tract.
  • an inert marker may be titanium dioxide, chromic oxide or acid insoluble ash.
  • Digestibility may be expressed as a percentage of the nutrient in the feed, or as mass units of digestible nutrient per mass units of nutrient in the feed.
  • Nutrient digestibility as used herein encompasses starch digestibility, fat digestibility, protein digestibility, and amino acid digestibility.
  • Energy digestibility means the gross energy of the feed consumed minus the gross energy of the faeces or the gross energy of the feed consumed minus the gross energy of the remaining digesta on a specified segment of the gastro-intestinal tract of the animal, e.g. the ileum.
  • Metabolizable energy refers to apparent metabolizable energy and means the gross energy of the feed consumed minus the gross energy contained in the faeces, urine, and gaseous products of digestion.
  • Energy digestibility and metabolizable energy may be measured as the difference between the intake of gross energy and the gross energy excreted in the faeces or the digesta present in specified segment of the gastro-intestinal tract using the same methods to measure the digestibility of nutrients, with appropriate corrections for nitrogen excretion to calculate metabolizable energy of feed.
  • Nitrogen retention means as subject's ability to retain nitrogen from the diet as body mass. A negative nitrogen balance occurs when the excretion of nitrogen exceeds the daily intake and is often seen when the muscle is being lost. A positive nitrogen balance is often associated with muscle growth, particularly in growing animals.
  • Nitrogen retention may be measured as the difference between the intake of nitrogen and the excreted nitrogen by means of the total collection of excreta and urine during a period of time. It is understood that excreted nitrogen includes undigested protein from the feed, endogenous proteinaceous secretions, microbial protein, and urinary nitrogen.
  • survival means the number of subject remaining alive.
  • improved survival may be another way of saying “reduced mortality”.
  • carcass yield means the amount of carcass as a proportion of the live body weight, after a commercial or experimental process of slaughter.
  • carcass means the body of an animal that has been slaughtered for food, with the head, entrails, part of the limbs, and feathers or skin removed.
  • meat yield as used herein means the amount of edible meat as a proportion of the live body weight, or the amount of a specified meat cut as a proportion of the live body weight.
  • the present invention further provides a method of increasing weight gain in a subject, e.g. poultry or swine, comprising feeding said subject a feedstuff comprising a feed additive composition according to the present invention.
  • An “increased weight gain” refers to an animal having increased body weight on being fed feed comprising a feed additive composition compared with an animal being fed a feed without said feed additive composition being present.
  • Necrotic enteritis is an acute or chronic enterotoxemia seen in chickens, turkeys and ducks worldwide, caused by Clostridium perfringens .
  • Necrotic enteritis is often characterised by a fibrino-necrotic enteritis, usually of the mid-small intestine. Mortality may be 5-50%, usually around 10%. Infection occurs by faecal-oral transmission. Spores of the causative organism are highly resistant. Predisposing factors include coccidiosis/coccidiasis, diet (high protein), in ducks possibly heavy strains, high viscosity diets (often associated with high rye and wheat inclusions in the diet), contaminated feed and/or water, other debilitating diseases.
  • the present invention relates to increasing the subject's resistance to necrotic enteritis.
  • the present invention relates to avoiding or reducing the negative effect of necrotic enteritis.
  • the term “resistance to” as used herein may encompasses the term “tolerance of”. Therefore in one embodiment the subject may not be resistant to necrotic enteritis but the subject may be able to tolerate the necrotic enteritis, i.e. without negative effects on performance of the subject.
  • the present invention relates to a feed additive composition according to the present invention for treating or preventing necrotic enteritis in a subject.
  • the subject will be one which has been or will be challenged with Clostridium perfringens and/or Eimeria species.
  • Such challenge may come from the environment, or the application of live microorganisms in the feed or drinking water, e.g. when live coccidia vaccines are used.
  • the present invention relates to a feed additive composition for preventing and/or treating coccidiosis and/or necrotic enteritis in a subject.
  • the present invention yet further provides a method of preventing and/or treating necrotic enteritis and/or coccidiosis wherein an effective amount of a feed additive composition according to the present invention is administered to a subject.
  • Immune response means one of the multiple ways in which DFMs modulate the immune system of animals, including increased antibody production, up-regulation of cell mediated immunity, up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and augmented toll-like receptor signalling. It is understood that immuno-stimulation of the gastro intestinal tract by DFMs may be advantageous to protect the host against disease, and that immuno-suppression of the gastro intestinal tract may be advantageous to the host because less nutrients and energy are used to support the immune function.
  • the immune response is a cellular immune response.
  • immune response is measure by looking at immune markers.
  • pathogenic bacteria means for example toxigenic clostridia species, e.g. Clostridium perfringens and/or E. coli and/or Salmonella spp and/or Campylobacter spp. In one embodiment the pathogenic bacteria may be Avian pathogenic E. coli species.
  • the present invention may reduce populations of pathogenic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of a subject.
  • the present invention relates to reducing nutrient excretion in manure. This has positive effects on reducing environmental hazards.
  • the present invention relates to reducing nitrogen and/or phosphorus content in the subject's manure. This, therefore, reduces the amount of nitrogen and/or phosphorus in the environment, which can be beneficial.
  • the DFM in the composition of the present invention can exert a probiotic culture effect. It is also within the scope of the present invention to add to the composition of the present invention further probiotic and/or prebiotics.
  • a non-digestible food ingredient that beneficially affects the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or the activity of one or a limited number of beneficial bacteria”.
  • probiotic culture defines live microorganisms (including bacteria or yeasts for example) which, when for example ingested or locally applied in sufficient numbers, beneficially affects the host organism, i.e. by conferring one or more demonstrable health benefits on the host organism.
  • Probiotics may improve the microbial balance in one or more mucosal surfaces.
  • the mucosal surface may be the intestine, the urinary tract, the respiratory tract or the skin.
  • probiotic as used herein also encompasses live microorganisms that can stimulate the beneficial branches of the immune system and at the same time decrease the inflammatory reactions in a mucosal surface, for example the gut.
  • the enzyme or DFM used in the present invention may be in an isolated form.
  • isolated means that the enzyme or DFM is at least substantially free from at least one other component with which the enzyme or DFM is naturally associated in nature and as found in nature.
  • the enzyme or DFM of the present invention may be provided in a form that is substantially free of one or more contaminants with which the substance might otherwise be associated. Thus, for example it may be substantially free of one or more potentially contaminating polypeptides and/or nucleic acid molecules.
  • the enzyme and/or DFM according to the present invention is in a purified form.
  • the term “purified” means that the enzyme and/or DFM is present at a high level.
  • the enzyme and/or DFM is desirably the predominant component present in a composition. Preferably, it is present at a level of at least about 90%, or at least about 95% or at least about 98%, said level being determined on a dry weight/dry weight basis with respect to the total composition under consideration.
  • the scope of the present invention encompasses nucleotide sequences encoding proteins having the specific properties as defined herein.
  • nucleotide sequence refers to an oligonucleotide sequence or polynucleotide sequence, and variant, homologues, fragments and derivatives thereof (such as portions thereof).
  • the nucleotide sequence may be of genomic or synthetic or recombinant origin, which may be double-stranded or single-stranded whether representing the sense or anti-sense strand.
  • nucleotide sequence in relation to the present invention includes genomic DNA, cDNA, synthetic DNA, and RNA. Preferably it means DNA, more preferably cDNA sequence coding for the present invention.
  • the nucleotide sequence when relating to and when encompassed by the per se scope of the present invention does not include the native nucleotide sequence according to the present invention when in its natural environment and when it is linked to its naturally associated sequence(s) that is/are also in its/their natural environment.
  • the “non-native nucleotide sequence” means an entire nucleotide sequence that is in its native environment and when operatively linked to an entire promoter with which it is naturally associated, which promoter is also in its native environment.
  • amino acid sequence encompassed by the scope of the present invention can be isolated and/or purified post expression of a nucleotide sequence in its native organism.
  • amino acid sequence encompassed by scope of the present invention may be expressed by a nucleotide sequence in its native organism but wherein the nucleotide sequence is not under the control of the promoter with which it is naturally associated within that organism.
  • the nucleotide sequence encompassed by the scope of the present invention is prepared using recombinant DNA techniques (i.e. recombinant DNA).
  • the nucleotide sequence could be synthesised, in whole or in part, using chemical methods well known in the art (see Caruthers M H et al., (1980) Nuc Acids Res Symp Ser 215-23 and Horn T et al., (1980) Nuc Acids Res Symp Ser 225-232).
  • a nucleotide sequence encoding either a protein which has the specific properties as defined herein or a protein which is suitable for modification may be identified and/or isolated and/or purified from any cell or organism producing said protein.
  • Various methods are well known within the art for the identification and/or isolation and/or purification of nucleotide sequences. By way of example, PCR amplification techniques to prepare more of a sequence may be used once a suitable sequence has been identified and/or isolated and/or purified.
  • a genomic DNA and/or cDNA library may be constructed using chromosomal DNA or messenger RNA from the organism producing the enzyme. If the amino acid sequence of the enzyme is known, labelled oligonucleotide probes may be synthesised and used to identify enzyme-encoding clones from the genomic library prepared from the organism. Alternatively, a labelled oligonucleotide probe containing sequences homologous to another known enzyme gene could be used to identify enzyme-encoding clones. In the latter case, hybridisation and washing conditions of lower stringency are used.
  • enzyme-encoding clones could be identified by inserting fragments of genomic DNA into an expression vector, such as a plasmid, transforming enzyme-negative bacteria with the resulting genomic DNA library, and then plating the transformed bacteria onto agar plates containing a substrate for enzyme (i.e. maltose), thereby allowing clones expressing the enzyme to be identified.
  • an expression vector such as a plasmid, transforming enzyme-negative bacteria with the resulting genomic DNA library
  • the nucleotide sequence encoding the enzyme may be prepared synthetically by established standard methods, e.g. the phosphoroamidite method described by Beucage S. L. et al., (1981) Tetrahedron Letters 22, p 1859-1869, or the method described by Matthes et al., (1984) EMBO J. 3, p 801-805.
  • the phosphoroamidite method oligonucleotides are synthesised, e.g. in an automatic DNA synthesiser, purified, annealed, ligated and cloned in appropriate vectors.
  • the nucleotide sequence may be of mixed genomic and synthetic origin, mixed synthetic and cDNA origin, or mixed genomic and cDNA origin, prepared by ligating fragments of synthetic, genomic or cDNA origin (as appropriate) in accordance with standard techniques. Each ligated fragment corresponds to various parts of the entire nucleotide sequence.
  • the DNA sequence may also be prepared by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers, for instance as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,202 or in Saiki R K et al., (Science (1988) 239, pp 487-491).
  • amino acid sequence is synonymous with the term “polypeptide” and/or the term “protein”. In some instances, the term “amino acid sequence” is synonymous with the term “peptide”. In some instances, the term “amino acid sequence” is synonymous with the term “enzyme”.
  • amino acid sequence may be prepared/isolated from a suitable source, or it may be made synthetically or it may be prepared by use of recombinant DNA techniques.
  • the protein encompassed in the present invention may be used in conjunction with other proteins, particularly enzymes.
  • the present invention also covers a combination of proteins wherein the combination comprises the protein/enzyme of the present invention and another protein/enzyme, which may be another protein/enzyme according to the present invention.
  • amino acid sequence when relating to and when encompassed by the per se scope of the present invention is not a native enzyme.
  • native enzyme means an entire enzyme that is in its native environment and when it has been expressed by its native nucleotide sequence.
  • the present invention also encompasses the use of sequences having a degree of sequence identity or sequence homology with amino acid sequence(s) of a polypeptide having the specific properties defined herein or of any nucleotide sequence encoding such a polypeptide (hereinafter referred to as a “homologous sequence(s)”).
  • a polypeptide having the specific properties defined herein or of any nucleotide sequence encoding such a polypeptide hereinafter referred to as a “homologous sequence(s)”.
  • the term “homologue” means an entity having a certain homology with the subject amino acid sequences and the subject nucleotide sequences.
  • the term “homology” can be equated with “identity”.
  • the homologous amino acid sequence and/or nucleotide sequence should provide and/or encode a polypeptide which retains the functional activity and/or enhances the activity of the enzyme.
  • a homologous sequence is taken to include an amino acid sequence which may be at least 75, 85 or 90% identical, preferably at least 95 or 98% identical to the subject sequence.
  • the homologues will comprise the same active sites etc. as the subject amino acid sequence.
  • homology can also be considered in terms of similarity (i.e. amino acid residues having similar chemical properties/functions), in the context of the present invention it is preferred to express homology in terms of sequence identity.
  • a homologous sequence is taken to include a nucleotide sequence which may be at least 75, 85 or 90% identical, preferably at least 95 or 98% identical to a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide of the present invention (the subject sequence).
  • the homologues will comprise the same sequences that code for the active sites etc. as the subject sequence.
  • homology can also be considered in terms of similarity (i.e. amino acid residues having similar chemical properties/functions), in the context of the present invention it is preferred to express homology in terms of sequence identity.
  • Homology comparisons can be conducted by eye, or more usually, with the aid of readily available sequence comparison programs. These commercially available computer programs can calculate % homology between two or more sequences.
  • % homology may be calculated over contiguous sequences, i.e. one sequence is aligned with the other sequence and each amino acid in one sequence is directly compared with the corresponding amino acid in the other sequence, one residue at a time. This is called an “ungapped” alignment. Typically, such ungapped alignments are performed only over a relatively short number of residues.
  • Calculation of maximum % homology therefore firstly requires the production of an optimal alignment, taking into consideration gap penalties.
  • a suitable computer program for carrying out such an alignment is the Vector NTI (Invitrogen Corp.).
  • software that can perform sequence comparisons include, but are not limited to, the BLAST package (see Ausubel et al 1999 Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, 4th Ed—Chapter 18), BLAST 2 (see FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999 174(2): 247-50; FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999 177(1): 187-8 and tatiana@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), FASTA (Altschul et al 1990 J. Mol. Biol. 403-410) and AlignX for example. At least BLAST, BLAST 2 and FASTA are available for offline and online searching (see Ausubel et al 1999, pages 7-58 to 7-60).
  • % homology can be measured in terms of identity
  • the alignment process itself is typically not based on an all-or-nothing pair comparison.
  • a scaled similarity score matrix is generally used that assigns scores to each pairwise comparison based on chemical similarity or evolutionary distance.
  • An example of such a matrix commonly used is the BLOSUM62 matrix—the default matrix for the BLAST suite of programs.
  • Vector NTI programs generally use either the public default values or a custom symbol comparison table if supplied (see user manual for further details). For some applications, it is preferred to use the default values for the Vector NTI package.
  • percentage homologies may be calculated using the multiple alignment feature in Vector NTI (Invitrogen Corp.), based on an algorithm, analogous to CLUSTAL (Higgins DG & Sharp P M (1988), Gene 73(1), 237-244).
  • % homology preferably % sequence identity.
  • the software typically does this as part of the sequence comparison and generates a numerical result.
  • CLUSTAL may be used with the gap penalty and gap extension set as defined above.
  • the degree of identity with regard to a nucleotide sequence is determined over at least 20 contiguous nucleotides, preferably over at least 30 contiguous nucleotides, preferably over at least 40 contiguous nucleotides, preferably over at least 50 contiguous nucleotides, preferably over at least 60 contiguous nucleotides, preferably over at least 100 contiguous nucleotides.
  • the degree of identity with regard to a nucleotide sequence may be determined over the whole sequence.
  • the present invention also encompasses sequences that are complementary to the nucleic acid sequences of the present invention or sequences that are capable of hybridising either to the sequences of the present invention or to sequences that are complementary thereto.
  • hybridisation shall include “the process by which a strand of nucleic acid joins with a complementary strand through base pairing” as well as the process of amplification as carried out in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technologies.
  • the present invention also encompasses the use of nucleotide sequences that are capable of hybridising to the sequences that are complementary to the sequences presented herein, or any derivative, fragment or derivative thereof.
  • variant also encompasses sequences that are complementary to sequences that are capable of hybridising to the nucleotide sequences presented herein.
  • the present invention covers nucleotide sequences that can hybridise to the nucleotide sequence of the present invention, or the complement thereof, under high stringent conditions (e.g. 65° C. and 0.1 ⁇ SSC).
  • high stringent conditions e.g. 65° C. and 0.1 ⁇ SSC.
  • Example 1 Clostridium perfringens Additional Treatment Challenge Phytase 1 enzyme 2 DFM 3 1 No 500 FTU/kg None None 2 Yes 500 FTU/kg None None 3 Yes 500 FTU/kg Amylase None (200 u/kg) 4 Yes 500 FTU/kg Protease None (5000 u/kg) 5 Yes 500 FTU/kg Xylanase 4 None (2000 u/kg) Amylase 4 (200 u/kg) Protease 4 (5000 u/kg) 6 Yes 500 FTU/kg None Enviva Pro (7.5 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g) 7 Yes 500 FTU/kg Amylase Enviva Pro (200 u/kg) (7.5 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g) 8 Yes 500 FTU/kg Protease Enviva Pro (5000 u/kg) (7.5 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g) 9 Yes 500 FTU/kg Xylanase 4 Enviva Pro (2000 u/kg) (7.5 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g) Amylase 4
  • Enviva Pro ® is combination of Bacillus subtilis strains Bs2084, LSSAO1 and 15AP4, provided by Danisco A/S. 4 Axtra XAP ® provided by Danisco A/S.
  • Bird weights by pen were recorded at study initiation, 23 d, 35 d, and termination (42 d). The pen was the unit of measure. Broiler diets were fed as crumbles (starter) or pellets (grower and finisher). Diets met or exceeded NRC standards (Table 2). The mixer was flushed to prevent cross contamination of diets. All treatment feeds were mixed using a Davis S-20 mixer and pelleted using a California Pellet Mill (cold pellet temperature 65-70 C). Samples were collected from each treatment diet from the beginning, middle, and end of each batch and blended together to confirm enzyme activities and Enviva Pro presence in feed.
  • Enzymes and Enviva Pro were provided by Danisco in the appropriate mixtures and levels for all experimental treatments. All diets contained 500 FTU of E. coli phytase in the background. The pens were arranged within the facility to prevent direct contact in order to avoid contamination. A change from starter to grower occurred on day 23. Grower diet was replaced with the finisher diet on day 35. At each feed change, feeders were removed from pens by block, weighed back, emptied, and refilled with the appropriate treatment diet. On the final day of the study feed was weighed. Pens were checked daily for mortality. When a bird was culled or found dead, the date and removal weight (kg) were recorded. A gross necropsy was performed on all dead or culled birds to determine the sex and probable cause of death. Signs of Necrotic Enteritis were noted.
  • All pens had approximately 4 inches of built up litter with a coating of fresh pine shavings. All birds were spray vaccinated prior to placement into pens with a commercial coccidiosis vaccine (Coccivac-B). On days 20, 21, and 22 all birds, except Treatment 1, were dosed with a broth culture of C. perfringens . A field isolate of C. perfringens known to cause NE and originating from a commercial broiler operation was utilized as the challenge organism. Fresh inoculum was used each day. The titration levels were approximately 1.0 ⁇ 10 8-9 . Each pen received the same amount of inoculum. The inoculum was administered by mixing into the feed found in the base of the tube feeder.
  • the challenged control treatment increased lesion scores compared to the unchallenged control treatment.
  • Addition of DFMs with a combination of a xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase reduced lesion scores compared to all other treatments.
  • Addition of DFMs in combination with the enzymes reduced lesion scores compared DFMs alone or enzymes by themselves.
  • FIG. 2 shows that a combination of the DFM (Enviva Pro®) with a combination of a xylanase, an amylase, a protease and a phytase significantly improved body weight gain (BW gain) in broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens compared with the challenged control—even resulting in BW gain which was improved over a negative control (i.e. an unchallenged control). This was significantly better than any other treatments.
  • DFM Endviva Pro®
  • Enviva Pro (DFM) with a xylanase, amylase, protease and phytase significantly improved (reduced) FCR (g BW gain/g feed intake) of broilers from hatch to 42 d compared to the challenged control, and enzymes by themselves and the other treatments.
  • Cobb 500 male broiler chicks were obtained from a commercial hatchery. A total of 26 chicks were randomly assigned to one of 8 replicate pens per treatment.
  • Floor pens (16 ft 2 /pen) were located in a curtain-sided house containing controlled heating, circulating fans, heat lamps and fresh wood shavings. Birds were exposed to fluorescent lighting in a 24 h light cycle for the first four days and then 16 light:8 hour dark cycle for the remainder of the experiment. Feed was provided in bell feeders and water supplied via nipple drinkers ad libitum.
  • a 5 ⁇ dose of Coccivac-B (Intervet) was administered manually with a syringe into the oral cavity of chicks at one day of age.
  • Example 2 Coccidiosis Additional Treatment vaccine Phytase 1 enzyme 2 DFM 3 1 5X 500 FTU/kg None None 2 5X 500 FTU/kg None Enviva Pro (7.5 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g) 3 5X 500 FTU/kg Xylanase 4 None (1000 u/kg) Amylase 4 (1800 u/kg) Protease 4 (5000 u/kg) 4 5X 500 FTU/kg Xylanase 4 Enviva Pro (1000 u/kg) (7.5 ⁇ 10 4 CFU/g) Amylase 4 (1800 u/kg) Protease 4 (5000 u/kg) 1 Phytase from E. coli .
  • Enviva Pro ® is combination of Bacillus subtilis strains Bs2084, LSSAO1 and 15AP4, provided by Danisco A/S. 4 Avizyme 1505XAP ® provided by Danisco A/S.
  • Chicks were fed diets with or without either Enviva Pro or xylanase, amylase, and protease (Avizyme 1502; Table 3). Enzymes and Enviva Pro were provided by Danisco in the appropriate mixtures and levels for all experimental treatments. All diets contained 500 FTU of E. coli phytase. The pens were arranged within the facility to prevent direct contact in order to avoid contamination.
  • All diets were corn-soybean meal-DDGS based diets. Starter diets were provided during the study (d1-20). Diets were pelleted (65-70° C.) and crumbled. Samples were collected from each treatment diet from the beginning, middle, and end of each batch and blended together to confirm enzyme activities and Enviva Pro presence in feed.
  • Body weights and feeder weights were recorded on day 1, 11, 20, 38 and 48 for calculation of feed intake, body weight gain and feed conversion. Mortality and culls were monitored on a daily basis and used to adjust for feed consumption and gain.
  • One bird from six replicate pens was euthanized by cervical dislocation for collection of mucosal scrapings on days 11 and 20.
  • Mucosal scrapings were collected from the ileum (Meckel's diverticulum to the ileo-cecal junction). The ileum was excised and cut along its length to expose the lumen and then flushed quickly and gently with PBS to remove digesta. The edge of a microscope slide was used to remove the mucosal layer by scraping along the length of the excised tissue section.
  • RNA from mucosal scraping was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) using a mechanical homogenizer for tissue disruption.
  • Total RNA (0.5 ⁇ g) was reverse transcribed to complementary DNA using iScript (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
  • the mRNA abundance of secreted inflammatory cytokine genes was assessed using chicken-specific primers.
  • TATA-BP, HPRT-1 and ⁇ -actin mRNA abundance was measured for data normalization using geNorm software.
  • the fold-change in mRNA abundance in gene expression was determined using the modified delta-delta Ct equation as described by Rudrappa and Humphrey (2007) J. Nutr. 137: 427-432 and log transformed for data analysis.
  • FIG. 4 shows mRNA abundance of interferon-gamma gene in ileal mucosal scrapings of broiler chickens.
  • Enviva Pro and xylanase, amylase, protease+phytase upregulated IFR-g expression in the ileum of 11-d-old-broilers that received 5 times a live coccidiosis vaccine at hatch compared to the negative control Enviva Pro+phytase, and xylanase, amylase, protease+phytase.
  • Enviva Pro+phytase, and the combination of Enviva Pro and xylanase, amylase, protease+phytase down regulated IFR-g expression in the ileum compared to the negative control.
  • FIG. 15 shows feed conversion ratio of broiler chickens at 48 d of age.
  • Age 48 d: Pooled SEM 0.041
  • Enviva Pro ® is combination of Bacillus subtilis strains Bs2084, LSSAO1 and 15AP4, provided by Danisco A/S. 4 Avizyme 1505 ® provided by Danisco A/S. 5 Axtra XAP ® provided by Danisco A/S.
  • Digesta from birds within a cage were pooled, resulting in six samples per dietary treatment. The digesta samples were frozen immediately after collection, lyophilised and processed. Digesta samples and diets were analysed for Ti, DM, GE, starch, fat, N and amino acids, excluding tryptophan, as per standard procedures. Calculation of ileal digestibility coefficients was performed as reported by Ravindran et al. (2005), based on the concentration of indigestible Ti.
  • the energy contribution of starch, fat and protein to ileal digestible energy was calculated based on mean gross energy of starch (4.2 kcal/g), fat (9.4 kcal/g), or protein (5.5 kcal/kg).
  • the improvement of digestible amino acids in response to enzymes and DFMs was expressed in relation to the amount of non-digested amino acids at the ileal level; the slope of that linear function was used as an indicator of the effects of the additives on amino acid digestibility.
  • Enviva Pro a DFM
  • an amylase, xylanase, protease and phytase exhibited commercially relevant increments of ileal digestible energy compared with the enzymes by themselves and the negative controls.
  • DFMs improved the effects of these exogenous enzymes on the energy digestibility of poultry diets.
  • Amylase 2 is through use of the amylase in AxtraXAP
  • Amylase 1 is through use of the amylase in Avizyme 1502.
  • FIG. 6 show increments of ileal amino acid digestibility for three dietary treatments versus the control treatment as function of ileal undigested amino acids in the control treatment using 21-d-old broiler chickens.
  • the figure presents the improvement on ileal amino acid digestibility of dietary treatments with respect to the undigested fraction of amino acids in the ileum of broilers in the control treatment.
  • Each point within a treatment represents one of the measured amino acids.
  • Enviva Pro on top of xylanase, amylase 2, protease+phytase increased the ileal digestibility of amino acids (+11.3%) compared to Enviva Pro+Phytase (+3.6%) and xylanase, amylase 2, protease+phytase by themselves (i.e. without DFM) (+4.7%).
  • DFMs improved the efficacy of these exogenous enzymes to increase amino acid digestibility of poultry diets.
  • FIG. 7 shows the improvement of ileal digestible energy with respect to the control treatment using 21-d-old broiler chickens.
  • the figure presents the increment of ileal digestible energy of each dietary treatment compared a negative control treatment with phytase. Additionally, the calculated contributions of energy from starch, fat or protein are presented. Addition of Enviva Pro in combination with xylanase, amylase 2, protease+phytase increased the ileal digestible energy compared to the Enviva Pro+phytase treatment and the xylanase, amylase 2, protease+phytase by themselves treatment. Addition of Enviva Pro in combination with xylanase, amylase 1, protease+phytase produced commercially important increments on ileal digestible energy versus the enzymes by themselves. These data indicate an improved ability of the 4 enzymes to increase the ileal digestible energy of broiler diets in the presence of DFMs.
  • Enviva Pro ® is combination of Bacillus subtilis strains Bs2084, LSSAO1 and 15AP4, provided by Danisco A/S. 4 Avizyme 1505 ® provided by Danisco A/S. 5 Axtra XAP ® provided by Danisco A/S.
  • a total of 144 birds were individually weighed and assigned on the basis of body weight to 36 cages (4 birds/cage). The 6 dietary treatments were then randomly assigned to six cages each. Birds received starter feed ad-libitum appropriate to the treatment from 0 to 21 days. Enzymes and Enviva Pro were provided by Danisco in the appropriate mixtures and levels for all experimental treatments. The pens were arranged within the facility to prevent direct contact in order to avoid contamination. Birds were fed starter diets (Table 6) in mash form throughout the experiment.
  • Feed intake and total excreta output were measured quantitatively per cage over four consecutive days (from day 17 to 20) for the determination of nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) and Nitrogen retention.
  • Daily excreta collections were pooled within a cage, mixed in a blender and sub-sampled. Each sub sample was lyophilized, ground to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve and stored in airtight plastic containers at ⁇ 4 C pending analysis. Processed samples were analysed for DM, GE and N, using standard procedures.
  • Enviva Pro in combinations with xylanase, amylase, protease+phytase increased the AMEn of diets in response to enzymes compared to the negative control diet.
  • Enviva Pro in combination with xylanase, amylase, protease+phytase increased the nitrogen retention of broiler chickens in response to enzymes compared to the negative control diet.
  • Ross 308 male broiler chicks were obtained from a commercial hatchery. A total of 10 chicks were randomly assigned to one of 6 replicate cages per treatment. Birds were exposed to fluorescent lighting in a 24 h light cycle for the first four days and then 16 light:8 hour dark cycle for the remainder of the experiment. Feed and water were supplied ad libitum. The experimental design consisted of the following treatments.
  • Enviva Pro ® is combination of Bacillus subtilis strains Bs2084, LSSAO1 and 15AP4, provided by Danisco A/S. 4 Avizyme 1505 ® provided by Danisco A/S.
  • coccidiosis vaccine (B, Intervet) was administered manually with a syringe into the oral cavity of chicks at one day of age.
  • Salinomycin Bio-cox
  • the pens were arranged within the facility to prevent direct contact in order to avoid cross contamination with Eimeria oocysts and DFMs.
  • Enzymes and Enviva Pro were provided by Danisco A/S in the appropriate mixtures and levels for all experimental treatments. All diets contained 500 FTU of E. coli phytase in the background.
  • Tissue samples were taken from broiler chicks from the trial presented in Example 1 at 23 days of age. Treatment specifications are presented in Table 1.
  • the jejunum, pancreas and liver were removed from 2 birds from every pen and the mucosa pooled resulting in eight samples per treatment.
  • the samples were rinsed in buffer solution (PBS) immersed in a tissue storage reagent (RNAlater) according to manufacturer's protocol and stored at ⁇ 80° C.
  • Total RNA was isolated from each tissue sample using a single step phenol-chloroform extraction method as described by Chomczynski and Saachi (1987; Anal. Biochem. 162:156-9).
  • RNA Concentration of the RNA was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm (Nanodrop) and monitored for integrity by gel electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gels. Only RNA of sufficient purity and having a ratio of absorption at 260 nm vs. 280 nm greater than 1.87 were considered for use.
  • Microarrays were manufactured using 70 base pair oligo-nucleotides (Opereon Biotechnologies Inc) according to the protocol described by Druyan et al. (2008; Poult. Sci. 87:2418-29).
  • the experimental design of the array was a complete interwoven loop design as described by Garosi et al. (2005; Br. J. Nutr. 93:425-32) which each sample is compared directly with the others in a multiple pair wise fashion allowing all treatments to be compared.
  • the samples were labelled according to the method described by Druyan et al. (2008; Poult. Sci.
  • Hybridisation was carried out using the Pronto Plus! Microarray Hybridisation Kit prior to the addition of Cy3 and Cy5 labelled cDNA probes and covered with a clean glass coverslip (Lifterslip) and left to hybridise for 16 hours. The microarrays were then scanned on a Scan Array Gx PLUS Microarray Scanner set to 65% laser power to acquire images.
  • RNA from individual samples was reversed transcribed to produce cDNA which was then used as a template for the qPCR amplifications as described by Druyan et al. (2008; Poult. Sci. 87:2418-29). Thermocycling parameters were optimised for each gene and each gene was amplified independently in duplicate within a single instrument run.
  • Data files were generated from the scanned images of the microarrays but extracting the intensity raw data for each slide and dye combination using ScanAlyze Softare. Intensity data files were then analysed using JMP Genomics including and initial log 2 transformation. Data normalisation was performed using locally-weighted regression and smoothing first within array and across all arrays. The resulting normalised log 2 intensities were analysed using a mixed model ANOVA.
  • Expression data was collected using the microarray platform and a “heat map” produced to visualise the data for the jejunum ( FIG. 16 ) and pancreas ( FIG. 17 ).
  • Relative expression levels of six genes of interest were converted to visual cues based on the scale seen in FIG. 16 .
  • Lowly expressed genes are marked with a minus sign (“ ⁇ ”), and highly expressed genes are marked with a plus sign (“+”); whereas a greater gray intensity depicts a greater difference from the mean expression level of the treatments.
  • the genes that were measured and their purported functions are seen in Table 11.
  • Real-time PCR was used to validate the gene expression shown in the heat map for sucrase-isomaltase (SI) and amylase 2A (AMY2a) and were highly correlated to the array data.
  • FIG. 16 shows a heat map of expression profiles of genes of interest for all treatments for jejunum at 23 days of age.
  • FIG. 17 shows a heat map of expression profile of chicken alpha amylase for all treatments in pancreas at 23 days of age.
  • PEPT1 oligo-peptide transport 1
  • xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase was increased further when in combination with Enviva Pro.
  • PEPT1 is part of a peptide transport system and is responsible for the uptake of a wide range of di- and tri-peptides.
  • Glucokinase (GCK) was down-regulated by the challenged control but the combination of amylase+phytase or xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase with Enviva Pro produced an up-regulation similar to the unchallenged control. The extent of the up-regulation was greater than when xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase were used with Enviva Pro.
  • sucrase iso-maltase (SI) where the combination of Enviva Pro with amylase+phytase or xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase produced a greater up-regulation than both the challenged and unchallenged control.
  • SI sucrase iso-maltase
  • ZO1 Tight Junction protein 1
  • the T-cell antigen CD3 (CD3D) was highly expressed in the challenged control.
  • the enzyme alone treatments did reduce expression somewhat but it was significantly down-regulated when in combination with Enviva Pro.
  • the combination of xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase produced the largest down-regulation of the enzyme treatments, and, when in combination with Enviva Pro, produced an even larger down-regulation close to that seen for the unchallenged control.
  • CD3D is a surface molecule found on T cells and plays an important role in signal transduction during T-cell receptor engagement and is part of the T-cell receptor/CD3 complex.
  • the alpha amylase (AMY2A) was highly expressed in the unchallenged and challenged controls but the addition of amylase+phytase or xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase resulted in reduced expression, which was further reduced when Enviva Pro was used in combination, particularly for xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase.
  • Chicken alpha amylase is mainly produced in the pancreas and has a major role in starch digestion.
  • glucokinase and sucrase isomerase with the combination of amylase+phytase, or xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase, and Enviva Pro suggests that there was increased absorption of glucose, and increased availability of sucrose and isomaltose in the brush border, which indicates a positive interaction between the enzyme and DFMs to increase carbohydrate absorption in the small intestine and thus increase energy availability from the diet.
  • Enviva Pro acts to increase intestinal integrity and thus benefit the health of the animal. Increased intestinal integrity, and thus absorptive capacity, may be one of the mechanisms by which the effectiveness of exogenous enzymes is increased when a DFM is present.
  • T cell antigen CD3 d in the challenged control indicates increased cell-mediated immune response due to the challenge.
  • birds will be undergoing sub-optimal performance because the immune response will demand energy that could be used for growth, and because some birds will experience a systemic disease response.
  • the increased expression of this immunological marker was markedly reversed when Enviva Pro was used alone or in combination with enzymes.
  • Down regulation of immune response in the intestine may be one of the mechanisms by which the effectiveness of exogenous enzymes in nutrient absorption and performance is increased when a DFM is present.
  • alpha amylase AY2A
  • xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase suggests that the chicken is reducing its production of endogenous amylase as a response to the exogenous enzymes supplied.
  • the additive effect seen with Enviva Pro and xylanase+amylase+protease+phytase suggest that the DFM is working synergistically with the exogenous enzymes to allow the bird to utilise the energy that it would have spent producing enzymes for digestion of starch in the diet.
  • a digestibility trial with broiler chickens was conducted to determine the effects of dietary enzymes and DFM treatments on energy utilisation.
  • a total of 288 day-old, male Ross 308 chicks were obtained from a commercial hatchery and brooded in raised wire battery pens until day 14. Birds were vaccinated with a live coccidia vaccine at hatch (Coccivac-B). Chicks were fed a corn-SBM-DDGS based starter diet. Chicks were provided experimental diets from day 14 until day 21. The feed and water were provided ad-libitum throughout the 21 day period. Six chicks were housed per pen in battery pens located within an environmentally controlled room, where they received supplemental heat starting at 35° C. on day-of-age and decreasing 2° C. weekly.
  • Example 7 Treatment Phytase 1 Additional enzyme 2 DFM 3, 4 1 None None None 2 500 Xylanase (2000 u/kg) None FTU/kg Amylase (200 u/kg) Protease (5000 u/kg) 3 None None Enviva Pro (1.5 ⁇ 10 5 FTU/g) 4 500 Xylanase (2000 u/kg) Enviva Pro FTU/kg Amylase (200 u/kg) (1.5 ⁇ 10 5 FTU/g) Protease (5000 u/kg) 5 None None GalliPro Tect (8 ⁇ 10 5 FTU/g) 6 500 Xylanase (2000 u/kg) GalliPro Tect FTU/kg Amylase (200 u/kg) (8 ⁇ 10 5 FTU/g) Protease (5000 u/kg) 1 Phytase from Buttiauxella.
  • Enviva Pro ® is a combination of Bacillus subtilis strains Bs2084, LSSAO1 and 15AP4, provided by Danisco A/S.
  • GalliPro Tect is a DFM comprised by one strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DSM17236).
  • Enzymes and DFMs were sourced and provided by Danisco in the appropriate mixtures and levels for all experimental treatments.
  • the pens were arranged within the facility to prevent direct contact in order to avoid cross contamination.
  • Birds were fed starter diets (Table 13) in mash form throughout the experimental period.
  • Example 7 TABLE 13 Experimental diet composition of Example 7. Ingredient (%) Starter Corn 52.94 Corn-DDGS 12.00 Soybean meal 48% 29.38 Animal/Vegetable Fat Blend 1.08 Salt 0.40 DL Methionine 0.22 Bio-Lys 0.44 Limestone 1.30 Dicalcium Phosphate 1.27 Choline chloride 60 0.10 Vit/Min Premix 0.63 TiO 2 0.25 Calculated Nutrient Composition (%) CP 22.25 ME, kcal/kg 2925 Calcium 0.90 Available phosphorus 0.38 Sodium 0.18 Digestible lysine 1.20 Digestible methionine 0.52 Digestible TSAA 0.85 Digestible threonine 0.75
  • AME Apparent metabolizable energy
  • Example 8 Clostridium perfringens Additional Treatment Challenge Phytase 1 enzyme 2 DFM 3 1 No 500 None None FTU/kg 2 Yes 500 None None FTU/kg 3 Yes 500 None Enviva Pro FTU/kg (7.5 ⁇ 10 4 FTU/g) 4 Yes 500 Xylanase 4 Enviva Pro FTU/kg (2000 u/kg) (7.5 ⁇ 10 4 FTU/g) Amylase 4 (200 u/kg) Protease 4 (5000 u/kg) 1 Phytase from E. coli . 2 Amylase from Bacillus licheniformis , xylanase from Trichoderma reesei , protease from Bacillus subtilis . 3 Enviva Pro ® is combination of Bacillus subtilis strains Bs2084, LSSAO1 and 15AP4, provided by Danisco A/S. 4 Axtra XAP ® provided by Danisco A/S.
  • Bird weights by pen were recorded at study initiation, 21 d and termination (42 d). The pen was the unit of measure. Broiler diets were fed as crumbles (starter) or pellets (grower and finisher). Diets met or exceeded NRC standards (Table 2). The mixer was flushed to prevent cross contamination of diets. All treatment feeds were mixed using a Davis S-20 mixer and pelleted using a California Pellet Mill (cold pellet temperature 65-70 C). Samples were collected from each treatment diet from the beginning, middle, and end of each batch and blended together to confirm enzyme activities and Enviva Pro presence in feed.
  • Example 8 TABLE 2 Experimental diet composition of Example 8. Ingredient (%) Starter Grower Finisher Maize 50.959 59.6156 62.7488 Maize DDGS 12 12 12 Soybean Meal 49% CP 30.7176 22.5873 19.4 Choline Chloride 0.06 0.06 0.06 Soy oil 3.0693 2.7035 2.84841 Lysine 0.21 0.2426 0.244 DL-methionine 0.1723 0.1566 0.1341 L-threonine 0.0387 0.0551 0.0564 Salt 0.4668 0.4692 0.47 Limestone 1.4467 1.4501 1.33389 Dicalcium phosphate 0.7346 0.5349 0.571 Vitamin and trace 0.125 0.125 0.125 mineral premix Calculated Nutrient Composition (%) CP 22.642 19.45 19.45 Energy, mcal/kg 12.761 12.012 12.012 Digestible lysine 1.327 1.124778 1.124778 Digestible methionine 0.53142 0.475425 0.475425 Digestible threonine
  • Grower diet was replaced with the finisher diet on day 35.
  • feeders were removed from pens by block, weighed back, emptied, and refilled with the appropriate treatment diet.
  • feed was weighed. Pens were checked daily for mortality. When a bird was culled or found dead, the date and removal weight (kg) were recorded. A gross necropsy was performed on all dead or culled birds to determine the sex and probable cause of death. Signs of Necrotic Enteritis were noted.
  • All pens had approximately 4 inches of built up litter with a coating of fresh pine shavings. All birds were spray vaccinated prior to placement into pens with a commercial coccidiosis vaccine (Coccivac-B). On days 18, 19, and 20 all birds, except Treatment 1, were dosed with a broth culture of C. perfringens . A field isolate of C. perfringens known to cause Necrotic Enteritis and originating from a commercial broiler operation was utilized as the challenge organism. Fresh inoculum was used each day. The titration levels were approximately 1.0 ⁇ 10 8-9 . Each pen received the same amount of inoculum. The inoculum was administered by mixing into the feed found in the base of the tube feeder.
  • Bacteria were harvested from the masticated solution by centrifugation at 12,000 ⁇ g for 10 minutes. The resultant bacterial pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of MRS broth+10% glycerol, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at ⁇ 20° C. until further analysis.
  • Genus level identifications were used for the analysis of the pyrosequencing data. The relative abundance of each genus was calculated and used for the analysis. The results were analysed using a categorical model analysis and then a Chi-square probability calculated using JMP 8.0.2 (SAS institute, Cary, N.C.), where each sample representing two birds was considered an experimental unit.
  • FIG. 19 shows feed conversion ratio (FCR) of broiler chickens in a necrotic enteritis challenge model (Pooled SEM: 0.015).
  • FIG. 20 shows relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. at 21 d in the jejunal mucosa of broiler chickens, ChSq ⁇ 0.0001.
  • Lactobacilli are widely used as probiotics for both human and animal use (Patterson and Burkeholder 2003 ; Poult Sci 82 (4) 627-31) and have been documented to improve gut health to a level that could be comparable to antibiotic growth promoters (Awad et al. 2009 Poult Sci 88 (1) 49-56).
  • the combination of Enviva Pro, xylanase, amylase, protease+phytase can improve gut health and positively impact feed efficiency.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Birds (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
  • Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)
US13/985,863 2011-02-18 2012-01-19 Feed additive composition Abandoned US20140234279A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1102857.8 2011-02-18
GBGB1102857.8A GB201102857D0 (en) 2011-02-18 2011-02-18 Feed additive composition
PCT/GB2012/050124 WO2012110778A2 (en) 2011-02-18 2012-01-19 Feed additive composition

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2012/050124 A-371-Of-International WO2012110778A2 (en) 2011-02-18 2012-01-19 Feed additive composition

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/181,427 Continuation US10695384B2 (en) 2011-02-18 2018-11-06 Feed additive composition

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140234279A1 true US20140234279A1 (en) 2014-08-21

Family

ID=43881323

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/985,863 Abandoned US20140234279A1 (en) 2011-02-18 2012-01-19 Feed additive composition
US16/181,427 Active US10695384B2 (en) 2011-02-18 2018-11-06 Feed additive composition

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/181,427 Active US10695384B2 (en) 2011-02-18 2018-11-06 Feed additive composition

Country Status (15)

Country Link
US (2) US20140234279A1 (es)
EP (1) EP2675286B1 (es)
JP (1) JP2014507946A (es)
CN (1) CN103533843A (es)
AR (1) AR084893A1 (es)
AU (2) AU2012216898A1 (es)
BR (1) BR112013020684B1 (es)
CA (1) CA2825618C (es)
DK (1) DK2675286T3 (es)
ES (1) ES2621137T3 (es)
GB (1) GB201102857D0 (es)
PL (1) PL2675286T3 (es)
TW (1) TW201234977A (es)
WO (1) WO2012110778A2 (es)
ZA (1) ZA201305269B (es)

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150290254A1 (en) * 2013-12-31 2015-10-15 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Novel blends of bacillus strains and enzymes
WO2016060934A1 (en) * 2014-10-08 2016-04-21 Novozymes A/S Bacillus strains with fast germination and antimicrobial activity against clostridium perfringens
WO2016134985A1 (en) * 2015-02-24 2016-09-01 Novozymes A/S Xylanase granules
WO2016164732A3 (en) * 2015-04-10 2016-12-15 Syngenta Participations Ag Animal feed compositions and methods of use
WO2017083196A1 (en) 2015-11-09 2017-05-18 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Feed additive composition
WO2018165252A1 (en) 2017-03-07 2018-09-13 Bioresource International, Inc. Feed additive formulation and methods of making and using the same
US10178871B2 (en) * 2017-04-21 2019-01-15 Ne Plus Enterprises, Llc Herbaceous selenium-enriched SOD non-antibiotic feed and method of manufacture thereof
US10357521B2 (en) 2015-05-14 2019-07-23 University Of Puerto Rico Methods for restoring microbiota of newborns
CN111212902A (zh) * 2017-08-17 2020-05-29 里昂高等师范学院 刺激生长的乳杆菌菌株
CN111802513A (zh) * 2019-04-11 2020-10-23 河北维尔利动物药业集团有限公司 禽蓄饲料用葡萄糖氧化酶益生菌添加剂的制备方法
WO2021041357A1 (en) * 2019-08-30 2021-03-04 Bioresource International, Inc. Feed additive formulation for fish and methods of making and using the same
US20210084934A1 (en) * 2019-09-19 2021-03-25 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Feed additive for increasing vitamine e absorption
US11123410B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2021-09-21 Amanzo Enzyme Inc. Intestinal flora improvement agent
US11166989B2 (en) 2015-01-23 2021-11-09 Novozymes A/S Bacillus strains improving health and performance of production animals
US11167016B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2021-11-09 Amanoenzyme Inc. Intestinal flora improvement agent
US11179427B2 (en) 2013-01-21 2021-11-23 Eth Zurich Baby food composition comprising viable propionic acid-producing bacteria
US20220061354A1 (en) * 2020-08-28 2022-03-03 Kerry Luxembourg S.à.r.l. Feed composition supplemented with a protease combination
US11331351B2 (en) 2015-01-23 2022-05-17 Novozymes A/S Bacillus strains improving health and performance of production animals
US20220151267A1 (en) * 2019-04-16 2022-05-19 Locus Ip Company, Llc Microbe-Based Emulsifying Food Additives
CN114672446A (zh) * 2022-05-31 2022-06-28 广东海洋大学 一种丁酸梭菌制剂的制备方法及应用
US11406672B2 (en) 2018-03-14 2022-08-09 Sustainable Community Development, Llc Probiotic composition and feed additive
CN114903118A (zh) * 2022-05-17 2022-08-16 广西富鹏农牧有限公司 一种饲料发酵剂及其应用
US11473052B2 (en) 2015-01-23 2022-10-18 Novozymes A/S Bacillus subtilis subspecies
EP3344063B1 (en) 2015-09-01 2022-11-02 DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS Methods of increasing fat soluble vitamin uptake in feed
US11492587B2 (en) 2017-01-31 2022-11-08 Kansas State University Research Foundation Microbial cells, methods of producing the same, and uses thereof
US11564667B2 (en) 2015-12-28 2023-01-31 New York University Device and method of restoring microbiota of newborns
US11793216B2 (en) 2017-10-12 2023-10-24 Syngenta Participations Ag Animal feed compositions and methods of use
US11814617B2 (en) 2017-10-20 2023-11-14 Kansas State University Research Foundation Methods of producing ensiled plant materials using Megasphaera elsdenii
CN117264915A (zh) * 2023-10-07 2023-12-22 广东粤猪宝农牧科技有限公司 一种高粱型饲料专用复合酶及其在禽畜养殖饲料中的应用
BE1030801B1 (nl) * 2022-08-23 2024-03-26 Nu3Guts Bv Voederadditief voor het verhogen van de metaboliseerbare energie uit voeder in vee
WO2024121327A1 (en) * 2022-12-08 2024-06-13 Novozymes A/S Co-granulate for animal feed

Families Citing this family (53)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB201011513D0 (en) * 2010-07-08 2010-08-25 Danisco Method
IN2014CN04408A (es) * 2011-11-17 2015-09-04 Dsm Ip Assets Bv
WO2013102430A1 (en) * 2012-01-05 2013-07-11 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Method of feeding
MX2015001260A (es) * 2012-08-03 2015-05-08 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Composicion de aditivo alimenticio.
GB201213801D0 (en) * 2012-08-03 2012-09-12 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Feed additive composition
EP2935609A1 (en) 2012-12-21 2015-10-28 Novozymes, Inc. Methods for producing heterologous polypeptides in mutants of trichoderma
US10006073B2 (en) * 2013-05-24 2018-06-26 Chr, Hansen A/S Use of Bacillus composition for increasing the amount of available sugars in animal feed
US9888708B2 (en) 2013-10-15 2018-02-13 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Systems and methods for producing fermented milk replacer and methods of feeding same to animals
EP3119209A2 (en) * 2014-02-25 2017-01-25 DSM IP Assets B.V. A method for improving maize digestibility in bovine animals
KR101735574B1 (ko) 2014-05-13 2017-05-24 정명준 가금류용 유산균 발효 조성물 및 이의 제조방법
CN104232507A (zh) * 2014-07-22 2014-12-24 桐乡市五丰饲料有限公司 一种复合微生态制剂及其在饲料中的应用
EP3393269A4 (en) * 2015-12-22 2019-07-17 Cargill, Incorporated FERMENTED PLANT PROTEIN COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
KR101905322B1 (ko) * 2016-05-11 2018-10-08 경희대학교 산학협력단 유산균을 포함하는 면역 증강용 조성물
KR101898138B1 (ko) * 2016-05-12 2018-09-12 주식회사 이뮤너스 면역 조절 t 세포를 유도하는 락토코커스 락티스 bfe920 균주를 포함하는 수산양식 기능성 사료 첨가제
US11173184B2 (en) * 2016-05-31 2021-11-16 Evonik Operations Gmbh Bacillus subtilis strain with probiotic activity
WO2017219106A1 (pt) * 2016-06-24 2017-12-28 Yessinergy Holding S/A Composição imunomoduladora e promotora de crescimento e de controle da população de bactérias indesejáveis da microbiota intestinal e seu uso
EP3825399A1 (en) 2016-06-30 2021-05-26 Danisco US Inc. Aspartic proteases
CN106360030A (zh) * 2016-08-25 2017-02-01 广西河池市明达特种养殖专业合作社 一种豚鼠抗病饲料及其制作方法
BR112019011873A2 (pt) 2016-12-16 2019-10-29 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps componentes à base de bacillus para inibição ou re-tardamento do crescimento de enterococcus spp. em animais
US20190330577A1 (en) 2016-12-21 2019-10-31 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Methods of using thermostable serine proteases
CN107022537A (zh) * 2017-03-03 2017-08-08 陈燕芳 一种角蛋白酶复合物及其制备方法与应用
BR112019018983A2 (pt) 2017-03-15 2020-04-14 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps métodos de uso de uma serina protease archaeal
WO2018169750A1 (en) 2017-03-15 2018-09-20 Danisco Us Inc Trypsin-like serine proteases and uses thereof
EP3596210A1 (en) 2017-03-15 2020-01-22 DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS Trypsin-like serine proteases and uses thereof cross-reference to related application
AU2018278202B2 (en) 2017-05-30 2024-05-09 Agrivida, Inc. Immunomodulating transgenic plants and related methods
MX2020001605A (es) * 2017-08-14 2020-08-03 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Uso de inoculantes y enzimas para aumentar la liberacion de nutrientes en dietas animales.
BR112020001577B1 (pt) * 2017-09-01 2023-12-26 Novozymes A/S Aditivo de ração animal, formulação líquida, ração animal, métodos para melhoria de um ou mais parâmetros de desempenho de um animal, para preparação de uma ração animal, para o tratamento de proteínas, para aumento da digestibilidade e/ou solubilidade da proteína, para melhoria do valor nutricional de uma ração animal e para produção de um polipeptídeo, e, uso do aditivo de ração animal
WO2019123233A1 (en) * 2017-12-18 2019-06-27 Integene (Pty) Limited Water additive and composition
KR102177029B1 (ko) * 2018-01-05 2020-11-10 (주)벨벳케어 애완동물 조제약 투약보조용 겔 유도형 조성물 및 그를 이용한 투약방법
JP2021517140A (ja) * 2018-03-09 2021-07-15 バイオーム ヘルス エルエルシー マイクロバイオームの均衡をとるのに使用するための組成物
KR20210006375A (ko) * 2018-04-23 2021-01-18 에보니크 오퍼레이션즈 게엠베하 신바이오틱 조성물
BR112021000116A2 (pt) 2018-07-06 2021-04-06 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Aditivos de alimento contendo xilanase para alimento de animal à base de cereal
CN109125357A (zh) * 2018-10-24 2019-01-04 南京益恒寿生命科技有限公司 一种治疗肠易激综合症的益生菌－粪菌液复合液
JP7569523B2 (ja) 2018-11-20 2024-10-18 インターナショナル エヌアンドエイチ デンマーク エーピーエス 改変ロバスト高Ｔｍ－フィターゼ分岐群ポリペプチド及びその断片
KR102035261B1 (ko) * 2019-04-22 2019-10-22 신경섭 사료 첨가제 조성물
CN114466594A (zh) 2019-07-09 2022-05-10 杜邦营养生物科学有限公司 脂肪包衣的微粒状酶组合物
WO2021034660A1 (en) * 2019-08-16 2021-02-25 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Compositions for gut health comprising combinations of lactobacillus strains
WO2021046073A1 (en) 2019-09-05 2021-03-11 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Feed composition
KR102407123B1 (ko) * 2019-10-29 2022-06-13 주은바이오주식회사농업회사법인 홍국균을 포함하는 생균제 조성물
EP4061935A1 (en) 2019-11-20 2022-09-28 DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS Thermostable phytase variants
KR102173806B1 (ko) * 2019-11-20 2020-11-03 건국대학교 글로컬산학협력단 락토바실러스 플랜타럼 ku18 및 이를 포함하는 사일리지 제조용 미생물 첨가제
CN110841063A (zh) * 2019-12-12 2020-02-28 武汉新华扬生物股份有限公司 一种肉鸡高效抗艾美尔球虫组合物及其制备方法、应用
MX2022007446A (es) 2019-12-19 2022-08-25 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Formulaciones dietéticas.
BR112022015553A2 (pt) 2020-02-07 2022-10-04 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Composições de ração para saúde animal
CN115915956A (zh) 2020-02-28 2023-04-04 杜邦营养生物科学有限公司 饲料组合物
WO2022081947A1 (en) 2020-10-16 2022-04-21 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Feed compositions for animal health
KR102546934B1 (ko) * 2021-04-02 2023-06-23 대한민국 락토바실러스 람노서스 kcc-51 균주 및 이를 포함하는 조성물
IL311750A (en) 2021-09-27 2024-05-01 Int N& H Denmark Aps Feed additive preparations and methods of using them
WO2023055850A1 (en) 2021-09-29 2023-04-06 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Optimized water line delivery of microbes
CN114514966A (zh) * 2022-04-07 2022-05-20 江苏傲农生物科技有限公司 一种改善肉鸡胸肌品质且降低腹脂沉积的添加剂及其应用
WO2023225510A1 (en) 2022-05-17 2023-11-23 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Feed additive comprising enzyme combinations
CN115152893A (zh) * 2022-07-04 2022-10-11 广西农业职业技术大学 一种清远麻羽雏鸡用复合益生菌组合物及其制备方法
CN118575739B (zh) * 2024-08-01 2024-10-18 西南林业大学 促进蒜头果幼苗生长的种植管理方法

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6221406B1 (en) * 1996-05-13 2001-04-24 Beate Meschonat Enzyme pre-granules for granular fodder
US6500426B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2002-12-31 Rudolf Carolus Maria Barendse Carbohydrate-based enzyme-containing granules for use in animal feed
US6562340B1 (en) * 1993-12-17 2003-05-13 Genencor International, Inc. Enzyme feed additive and animal feed including it
US6805886B2 (en) * 1999-03-26 2004-10-19 Eggland's Best, Inc. Feed composition for egg-laying fowl
US20050255092A1 (en) * 2004-05-14 2005-11-17 Rehberger Thomas G Method and composition for reducing E. coli disease and enhancing performance

Family Cites Families (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1011513A (en) 1963-01-16 1965-12-01 Wayne Kerr Lab Ltd Improvements in or relating to amplitude modulation measuring apparatus
DK135983D0 (da) 1983-03-25 1983-03-25 Novo Industri As Maltogen amylaseenzymprodukt og fremgangsmade til dets fremstilling og anvendelse
US4683202A (en) 1985-03-28 1987-07-28 Cetus Corporation Process for amplifying nucleic acid sequences
DK6488D0 (da) 1988-01-07 1988-01-07 Novo Industri As Enzymer
DE68924654T2 (de) 1988-01-07 1996-04-04 Novonordisk As Spezifische Protease.
US6287841B1 (en) 1988-02-11 2001-09-11 Genencor International, Inc. High alkaline serine protease
DK474589D0 (da) 1989-09-27 1989-09-27 Novo Nordisk As Fremgangsmaade til fremstilling af bageriprodukter
ES2170748T3 (es) * 1990-10-05 2002-08-16 Genencor Int Procedimientos para el tratamiento de tejidos que contienen algodon con celulasa.
DK13491D0 (da) 1991-01-25 1991-01-25 Novo Nordisk As Anvendelse af et enzymholdigt granulat og fremgangsmaade til fremstilling af et forderstof i tabletform
DE69226182T2 (de) 1991-05-01 1999-01-21 Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd Stabilisierte enzyme und waschmittelzusammensetzungen
DK52393D0 (es) 1993-05-05 1993-05-05 Novo Nordisk As
EP0858266A1 (en) 1995-11-02 1998-08-19 Novo Nordisk A/S Feed enzyme preparations
KR100561826B1 (ko) 1996-11-04 2006-03-16 노보자임스 에이/에스 섭틸라제 변종과 조성물
CO5070700A1 (es) 1998-06-05 2001-08-28 Basf Ag Genes novedosos de (adp-ribosa) polimerasa
CN1622761A (zh) * 2002-01-25 2005-06-01 Dsmip资产公司 热稳定酶组合物
WO2004085638A1 (en) 2003-03-25 2004-10-07 Republic Of National Fisheries Research And Development Institute Phytase produced from citrobacter braakii
ITMI20041255A1 (it) 2004-06-22 2004-09-22 Univ Degli Studi Milano Sistemi microparticellari per somministrazione orale di sostanze biologicamente attive
JP5221137B2 (ja) 2004-10-04 2013-06-26 ノボザイムス アクティーゼルスカブ フィターゼ活性を有するポリペプチド及びそれをコードするポリヌクレオチド
GB0422052D0 (en) 2004-10-04 2004-11-03 Dansico As Enzymes
AR050895A1 (es) 2004-10-04 2006-11-29 Novozymes As Polipeptidos que tienen actividad de fitasa y polinucleotidos que los codifican
EP1797178B1 (en) 2004-10-04 2012-09-12 DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS Citrobacter freundii phytase and homologues
GB0423139D0 (en) 2004-10-18 2004-11-17 Danisco Enzymes
ZA200803025B (en) 2005-10-12 2010-07-28 Genencor Int Stable, durable granules with active agents
US7754469B2 (en) * 2005-11-30 2010-07-13 Agtech Products, Inc Microorganisms and methods for treating poultry
ES2531434T3 (es) 2006-04-04 2015-03-16 Novozymes A/S Variantes de fitasa
WO2008016214A1 (en) 2006-08-04 2008-02-07 Bioneer Corporation Lactic acid bacteria isolated from mother's milk with probiotic activity and inhibitory activity against body weight augmentation
EP2109356A2 (en) 2007-01-30 2009-10-21 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having phytase activty and polynucleotides encoding same
MX307871B (es) 2007-02-07 2013-03-13 Danisco Us Inc Genencor Div Hidrolisis de almidon utilizando fitasa con una alfa amilasa.
JP5643083B2 (ja) 2007-03-26 2014-12-17 ノボザイムス アクティーゼルスカブ ハフニア・フィターゼ
US20090100040A1 (en) 2007-04-03 2009-04-16 Scott Sheppard Lawful interception of broadband data traffic
CN100581386C (zh) * 2007-06-19 2010-01-20 张观清 一种用于生产无公害保健鸡蛋的核心饲料和全价饲料
CN101181016B (zh) * 2007-12-13 2012-09-05 济南和美华饲料有限公司 提高产蛋性能的蛋鸡饲料
US8021654B2 (en) 2008-03-14 2011-09-20 Danisco A/S Methods of treating pigs with Bacillus strains
ES2835955T3 (es) 2008-04-18 2021-06-23 Danisco Us Inc Variantes de fitasa de Buttiauxella sp.
US7932495B2 (en) 2008-09-02 2011-04-26 ICT Integrated Circuit Testing Gesellschaft für Halbleiterprüftechnik mbH Fast wafer inspection system
AU2011231562B2 (en) 2010-03-26 2015-10-22 Novozymes A/S Thermostable phytase variants

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6562340B1 (en) * 1993-12-17 2003-05-13 Genencor International, Inc. Enzyme feed additive and animal feed including it
US6221406B1 (en) * 1996-05-13 2001-04-24 Beate Meschonat Enzyme pre-granules for granular fodder
US6500426B1 (en) * 1997-06-04 2002-12-31 Rudolf Carolus Maria Barendse Carbohydrate-based enzyme-containing granules for use in animal feed
US6805886B2 (en) * 1999-03-26 2004-10-19 Eggland's Best, Inc. Feed composition for egg-laying fowl
US20050255092A1 (en) * 2004-05-14 2005-11-17 Rehberger Thomas G Method and composition for reducing E. coli disease and enhancing performance

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Chen et al, Enzyme and Microbiology Technology,k 21:91-96, 1997 *

Cited By (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11179427B2 (en) 2013-01-21 2021-11-23 Eth Zurich Baby food composition comprising viable propionic acid-producing bacteria
US10463701B2 (en) * 2013-12-31 2019-11-05 DuPont Nutrition BioScience ApS Blends of Bacillus strains and enzymes
US20150290254A1 (en) * 2013-12-31 2015-10-15 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Novel blends of bacillus strains and enzymes
WO2016060934A1 (en) * 2014-10-08 2016-04-21 Novozymes A/S Bacillus strains with fast germination and antimicrobial activity against clostridium perfringens
US11331351B2 (en) 2015-01-23 2022-05-17 Novozymes A/S Bacillus strains improving health and performance of production animals
US11166989B2 (en) 2015-01-23 2021-11-09 Novozymes A/S Bacillus strains improving health and performance of production animals
US11801272B2 (en) 2015-01-23 2023-10-31 Novozymes A/S Bacillus strains improving health and performance of production animals
US11473052B2 (en) 2015-01-23 2022-10-18 Novozymes A/S Bacillus subtilis subspecies
WO2016134985A1 (en) * 2015-02-24 2016-09-01 Novozymes A/S Xylanase granules
US11806388B2 (en) 2015-04-10 2023-11-07 Syngenta Participations Ag Animal feed compositions and methods of use
WO2016164732A3 (en) * 2015-04-10 2016-12-15 Syngenta Participations Ag Animal feed compositions and methods of use
US11154594B2 (en) 2015-04-10 2021-10-26 Syngenta Participations Ag Animal feed compositions and methods of use
US10357521B2 (en) 2015-05-14 2019-07-23 University Of Puerto Rico Methods for restoring microbiota of newborns
EP3344063B1 (en) 2015-09-01 2022-11-02 DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS Methods of increasing fat soluble vitamin uptake in feed
RU2754276C2 (ru) * 2015-11-09 2021-08-31 ДюПон НЬЮТРИШН БАЙОСАЙЕНСИЗ АпС Композиция кормовой добавки
CN108366582A (zh) * 2015-11-09 2018-08-03 杜邦营养生物科学有限公司 饲料添加剂组合物
WO2017083196A1 (en) 2015-11-09 2017-05-18 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Feed additive composition
US11564667B2 (en) 2015-12-28 2023-01-31 New York University Device and method of restoring microbiota of newborns
US11833192B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2023-12-05 Amano Enzyme Inc. Method for improving intestinal flora
US11123410B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2021-09-21 Amanzo Enzyme Inc. Intestinal flora improvement agent
US11167016B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2021-11-09 Amanoenzyme Inc. Intestinal flora improvement agent
US11492587B2 (en) 2017-01-31 2022-11-08 Kansas State University Research Foundation Microbial cells, methods of producing the same, and uses thereof
US11260084B2 (en) * 2017-03-07 2022-03-01 Bioresource International, Inc. Feed additive formulation and methods of making and using the same
CN110430763A (zh) * 2017-03-07 2019-11-08 国际生物资源有限公司 饲料添加剂配方及其制备和使用方法
US20220133816A1 (en) * 2017-03-07 2022-05-05 Bioresource International, Inc. Feed additive formulation and methods of making and using the same
WO2018165252A1 (en) 2017-03-07 2018-09-13 Bioresource International, Inc. Feed additive formulation and methods of making and using the same
EP3592154A4 (en) * 2017-03-07 2021-01-06 Bioresource International, Inc. FORMULATION OF FOOD ADDITIVES AND ITS MANUFACTURING AND USE PROCESSES
US10178871B2 (en) * 2017-04-21 2019-01-15 Ne Plus Enterprises, Llc Herbaceous selenium-enriched SOD non-antibiotic feed and method of manufacture thereof
CN111212902A (zh) * 2017-08-17 2020-05-29 里昂高等师范学院 刺激生长的乳杆菌菌株
US11497779B2 (en) * 2017-08-17 2022-11-15 Ecole Normale Superieure De Lyon Growth-stimulating Lactobacillus strains
US11793216B2 (en) 2017-10-12 2023-10-24 Syngenta Participations Ag Animal feed compositions and methods of use
US11814617B2 (en) 2017-10-20 2023-11-14 Kansas State University Research Foundation Methods of producing ensiled plant materials using Megasphaera elsdenii
US11406672B2 (en) 2018-03-14 2022-08-09 Sustainable Community Development, Llc Probiotic composition and feed additive
CN111802513A (zh) * 2019-04-11 2020-10-23 河北维尔利动物药业集团有限公司 禽蓄饲料用葡萄糖氧化酶益生菌添加剂的制备方法
US20220151267A1 (en) * 2019-04-16 2022-05-19 Locus Ip Company, Llc Microbe-Based Emulsifying Food Additives
WO2021041357A1 (en) * 2019-08-30 2021-03-04 Bioresource International, Inc. Feed additive formulation for fish and methods of making and using the same
US20210084934A1 (en) * 2019-09-19 2021-03-25 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Feed additive for increasing vitamine e absorption
US20220061354A1 (en) * 2020-08-28 2022-03-03 Kerry Luxembourg S.à.r.l. Feed composition supplemented with a protease combination
US11926855B2 (en) * 2020-08-28 2024-03-12 Kerry Group Services International Limited Feed composition supplemented with a protease combination
CN114903118A (zh) * 2022-05-17 2022-08-16 广西富鹏农牧有限公司 一种饲料发酵剂及其应用
CN114672446A (zh) * 2022-05-31 2022-06-28 广东海洋大学 一种丁酸梭菌制剂的制备方法及应用
BE1030801B1 (nl) * 2022-08-23 2024-03-26 Nu3Guts Bv Voederadditief voor het verhogen van de metaboliseerbare energie uit voeder in vee
WO2024121327A1 (en) * 2022-12-08 2024-06-13 Novozymes A/S Co-granulate for animal feed
CN117264915A (zh) * 2023-10-07 2023-12-22 广东粤猪宝农牧科技有限公司 一种高粱型饲料专用复合酶及其在禽畜养殖饲料中的应用

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2014507946A (ja) 2014-04-03
AU2012216898A1 (en) 2013-07-18
AR084893A1 (es) 2013-07-10
EP2675286B1 (en) 2017-01-11
BR112013020684A2 (pt) 2016-10-25
WO2012110778A2 (en) 2012-08-23
AU2016201761B2 (en) 2017-08-10
AU2016201761A1 (en) 2016-04-07
BR112013020684B1 (pt) 2020-11-10
GB201102857D0 (en) 2011-04-06
WO2012110778A3 (en) 2012-10-26
ZA201305269B (en) 2014-09-25
CN103533843A (zh) 2014-01-22
US20190076488A1 (en) 2019-03-14
CA2825618A1 (en) 2012-08-23
CA2825618C (en) 2019-03-12
US10695384B2 (en) 2020-06-30
DK2675286T3 (en) 2017-04-24
ES2621137T3 (es) 2017-07-03
EP2675286A2 (en) 2013-12-25
PL2675286T3 (pl) 2017-08-31
TW201234977A (en) 2012-09-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10695384B2 (en) Feed additive composition
US11172693B2 (en) Feed additive composition
US11235035B2 (en) Feed additive composition
US20200276279A1 (en) Feed additive composition
CA3004522C (en) Feed additive composition
CN114828642A (zh) 用于消化道健康的组合物

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DUPONT NUTRITION BIOSCIENCES APS, DENMARK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MILLAN, LUIS FERNANDO ROMERO;REEL/FRAME:033880/0760

Effective date: 20140915

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION