US20090238762A1 - Method for treating joint damage - Google Patents

Method for treating joint damage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090238762A1
US20090238762A1 US11/665,525 US66552506A US2009238762A1 US 20090238762 A1 US20090238762 A1 US 20090238762A1 US 66552506 A US66552506 A US 66552506A US 2009238762 A1 US2009238762 A1 US 2009238762A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
antibody
subject
administered
joint damage
medicament
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/665,525
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Mark Totoritis
Timothy Mark Shaw
Sunil Agarwal
David Yocum
Ariella Kelman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
F Hoffmann La Roche AG
Genentech Inc
Biogen Inc
Original Assignee
F Hoffmann La Roche AG
Genentech Inc
Biogen Idec Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=37807774&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20090238762(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by F Hoffmann La Roche AG, Genentech Inc, Biogen Idec Inc filed Critical F Hoffmann La Roche AG
Priority to US11/665,525 priority Critical patent/US20090238762A1/en
Assigned to BIOGEN IDEC, INC. reassignment BIOGEN IDEC, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TOTORITIS, MARK
Assigned to GENENTECH, INC. reassignment GENENTECH, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KELMAN, ARIELLA, AGARWAL, SUNIL, YOCUM, DAVID
Assigned to F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG reassignment F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SHAW, TIMOTHY MARK
Publication of US20090238762A1 publication Critical patent/US20090238762A1/en
Assigned to BIOGEN INC. reassignment BIOGEN INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BIOGEN IDEC INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/18—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
    • C07K16/28—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
    • C07K16/2887—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants against CD20
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/395—Antibodies; Immunoglobulins; Immune serum, e.g. antilymphocytic serum
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33—Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/495—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with two or more nitrogen atoms as the only ring heteroatoms, e.g. piperazine or tetrazines
    • A61K31/505—Pyrimidines; Hydrogenated pyrimidines, e.g. trimethoprim
    • A61K31/519—Pyrimidines; Hydrogenated pyrimidines, e.g. trimethoprim ortho- or peri-condensed with heterocyclic rings
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/395—Antibodies; Immunoglobulins; Immune serum, e.g. antilymphocytic serum
    • A61K39/39533—Antibodies; Immunoglobulins; Immune serum, e.g. antilymphocytic serum against materials from animals
    • A61K39/3955—Antibodies; Immunoglobulins; Immune serum, e.g. antilymphocytic serum against materials from animals against proteinaceous materials, e.g. enzymes, hormones, lymphokines
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K45/00—Medicinal preparations containing active ingredients not provided for in groups A61K31/00 - A61K41/00
    • A61K45/06—Mixtures of active ingredients without chemical characterisation, e.g. antiphlogistics and cardiaca
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/51—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
    • A61K47/68—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an antibody, an immunoglobulin or a fragment thereof, e.g. an Fc-fragment
    • A61K47/6835—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an antibody, an immunoglobulin or a fragment thereof, e.g. an Fc-fragment the modifying agent being an antibody or an immunoglobulin bearing at least one antigen-binding site
    • A61K47/6849—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an antibody, an immunoglobulin or a fragment thereof, e.g. an Fc-fragment the modifying agent being an antibody or an immunoglobulin bearing at least one antigen-binding site the antibody targeting a receptor, a cell surface antigen or a cell surface determinant
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012—Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0053—Mouth and digestive tract, i.e. intraoral and peroral administration
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20—Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P1/00—Drugs for disorders of the alimentary tract or the digestive system
    • A61P1/04—Drugs for disorders of the alimentary tract or the digestive system for ulcers, gastritis or reflux esophagitis, e.g. antacids, inhibitors of acid secretion, mucosal protectants
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P17/00—Drugs for dermatological disorders
    • A61P17/06—Antipsoriatics
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P19/00—Drugs for skeletal disorders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P19/00—Drugs for skeletal disorders
    • A61P19/02—Drugs for skeletal disorders for joint disorders, e.g. arthritis, arthrosis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P29/00—Non-central analgesic, antipyretic or antiinflammatory agents, e.g. antirheumatic agents; Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAID]
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P37/00—Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P37/00—Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
    • A61P37/02—Immunomodulators
    • A61P37/06—Immunosuppressants, e.g. drugs for graft rejection
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P43/00—Drugs for specific purposes, not provided for in groups A61P1/00-A61P41/00
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/18—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
    • C07K16/28—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/18—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
    • C07K16/28—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
    • C07K16/2896—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants against molecules with a "CD"-designation, not provided for elsewhere
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K2039/505—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies comprising antibodies
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/20—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by taxonomic origin
    • C07K2317/24—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by taxonomic origin containing regions, domains or residues from different species, e.g. chimeric, humanized or veneered
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/50—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by immunoglobulin fragments
    • C07K2317/56—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by immunoglobulin fragments variable (Fv) region, i.e. VH and/or VL
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/50—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by immunoglobulin fragments
    • C07K2317/56—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by immunoglobulin fragments variable (Fv) region, i.e. VH and/or VL
    • C07K2317/565—Complementarity determining region [CDR]
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/70—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by effect upon binding to a cell or to an antigen
    • C07K2317/76—Antagonist effect on antigen, e.g. neutralization or inhibition of binding

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns methods for treating joint damage in subjects suffering therefrom.
  • Inflammatory arthritis is a prominent clinical manifestation in diverse autoimmune disorders including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome and polymyositis. Most of these patients develop joint deformities on physical examination but typically only RA and PsA patients manifest bone erosions on imaging studies.
  • RA rheumatoid arthritis
  • PsA psoriatic arthritis
  • SLE systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Sjögren's syndrome Sjögren's syndrome
  • polymyositis Most of these patients develop joint deformities on physical examination but typically only RA and PsA patients manifest bone erosions on imaging studies.
  • RA is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects approximately 0.5 to 1% of the adult population in northern Europe and North America, and a slightly lower proportion in other parts of the world. Alamonosa and Drosos, Autoimmun. Rev., 4: 130-136 (2005). It is a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by chronic inflammation in the synovial membrane of affected joints, which ultimately leads to loss of daily function due to chronic pain and fatigue. The majority of patients also experience progressive deterioration of cartilage and bone in the affected joints, which may eventually lead to permanent disability. The long-term prognosis of RA is poor, with approximately 50% of patients experiencing significant functional disability within 10 years from the time of diagnosis. Keystone, Rheumatology, 44 (Suppl.
  • RA chronic inflammatory bone diseases
  • cytokines Teitelbaum Science, 289:1504-1508 (2000); Goldring and Gravallese Arthritis Res. 2(1):33-37 (2000).
  • These cytokines can act directly on cells in the osteoclast lineage or indirectly by affecting the production of the essential osteoclast differentiation factor, receptor activator of NF ⁇ B ligand (RANKL), I and/or its soluble decoy receptor, osteoprotegerin (OPG), by osteoblast/stromal cells.
  • RNKL receptor activator of NF ⁇ B ligand
  • OPG osteoprotegerin
  • TNF-alpha is a major mediator of inflammation, whose importance in the pathogenesis of various forms of bone loss is supported by several lines of experimental and clinical evidence (Feldmann et al. Cell 85(3):307-310 (1996).
  • TNF-alpha is not essential for osteoclastogenesis (Douni et al. J. Inflamm. 47:27-38 (1996)), erosive arthritis (Campbell et al. J. Clin. Invest. 107(12):1519-1527 (2001)), or osteolysis (Childs et al. J. Bon. Min. Res. 16:338-347 (2001)), as these can occur in the absence of TNF-alpha.
  • RA immune response
  • an immune response is thought to be initiated/perpetuated by one or several antigens presenting in the synovial compartment, producing an influx of acute inflammatory cells and lymphocytes into the joint.
  • Successive waves of inflammation lead to the formation of an invasive and erosive tissue called pannus.
  • TNF-alpha tumor necrosis factor-alpha
  • IL-1 interleukin-1
  • B cells The precise contributions of B cells to the immunopathogenesis of RA are not completely characterized. However, there are several possible mechanisms by which B cells may participate in the disease process. Silverman and Carson, Arthritis Res. Ther., 5 Suppl. 4: S1-6 (2003).
  • B cells were thought to contribute to the disease process in RA predominantly by serving as the precursors of autoantibody-producing cells.
  • a number of autoantibody specificities have been identified including antibodies to Type II collagen, and proteoglycans, as well as rheumatoid factors.
  • the generation of large quantities of antibody leads to immune complex formation and the activation of the complement cascade. This in turn amplifies the immune response and may culminate in local cell lysis.
  • Increased RF synthesis and complement consumption has been correlated with disease activity. The presence of RF itself is associated with a more severe form of RA and the presence of extra-articular features.
  • B cells are highly efficient antigen-presenting cells (APC).
  • APC antigen-presenting cells
  • RF-positive B cells may be particularly potent APCs, since their surface immunoglobulin would readily allow capture of any immune complexes regardless of the antigens present within them. Many antigens may thus be processed for presentation to T cells. In addition, it has been recently suggested that this may also allow RF-positive B cells to self-perpetuate. Edwards et al., Immunology, 97: 188-196 (1999).
  • T cells For activation of T cells, two signals need to be delivered to the cell; one via the T-cell receptor (TCR), which recognizes the processed peptide in the presence of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigen, and a second, via co-stimulatory molecules.
  • TCR T-cell receptor
  • MHC major histocompatibility complex
  • B cells When activated, B cells express co-stimulatory molecules on their surface and can thus provide the second signal for T-cell activation and the generation of effector cells.
  • B cells may promote their own function as well as that of other cells by producing cytokines. Harris et al., Nat. Immunol., 1: 475-482 (2000). TNF-alpha and IL-1, lymphotoxin-alpha, IL-6, and IL-10 are amongst some of the cytokines that B cells may produce in the RA synovium.
  • T-cell activation is considered to be a key component in the pathogenesis of RA
  • SCID severe combined immunodeficiency disorders
  • Radiographic damage is one of the goals of RA treatment (Edmonds et al., Arthritis Rheum. 36: 336-340 (1993)). Controlled clinical trials of 6 or 12 months' duration have documented that the progression of radiographic damage scores was more rapid in the placebo group than in groups that received methotrexate (MTX) (Sharp et al., Arthritis Rheum. 43: 495-505 (2000)), leflunomide (Sharp et al., supra), sulfasalazine (SSZ) (Sharp et al., supra), prednisolone (Kirwan et al., N. Engl. J.
  • MTX methotrexate
  • SSZ sulfasalazine
  • Radiographic damage Determining whether there has been increased structural damage in an individual patient during the interval between paired radiographs obtained at the beginning and end of a 6- or 12-month clinical trial has been difficult, for several reasons.
  • the rate of radiographic damage is not uniform within a population of RA patients; a few patients may have rapidly progressing damage, but many may have little or no progression, especially if the tie interval is relatively short.
  • the methods for scoring radiographic damage e.g., Sharp (Sharp et al., Arthritis Rheum., 14: 706-720 (1971); Sharp et al., Arthritis Rheum., 28: 1326-1335 (1985)), Larsen (Larsen et al., Acta Radiol.
  • the recorded score is an approximation of the true damage, and for many subjects, the smallest detectable difference between repeat scores of the same radiographs is larger than the actual change that has occurred during the interval between the baseline and final radiographs. If the reader is blinded to the temporal sequence of the films, these unavoidable scoring errors may be in either direction, leading to apparent “healing” when the score decreases or to apparent rapid progression when reading error increases the difference between films.
  • the positive and negative reading errors offset each other, and small but real differences between treatment groups can be detected.
  • ACR American College of Rheumatology
  • ACR20 composite criteria for improvement
  • ACR20 composite criteria for improvement
  • ACR20 composite criteria for improvement
  • All of these measures have large values for the smallest detectable difference, but by requiring simultaneous improvement in 5 of the 7 aspects of the same process (disease activity), the randomness of the 7 measurement errors is constrained and it is easier to attribute real improvement to the individual.
  • Radiologic parameters of joint destruction are seen as a key outcome measure in descriptions of disease outcome.
  • OMERACT Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials
  • radiology was chosen as part of the core set of outcome measures for longitudinal observational studies (Wolfe et al., Arthritis Rheum., 41 Supp 9: S204 (1998) abstract).
  • Radiology is also part of the WHO/ILAR (World Health Organization/International League of Associations for Rheumatology) required core set of measures for long-term clinical trials (Tugwell and Boers, J. Rheumatol., 20: 528-530 (1993)).
  • the scoring systems used differ in the number of joints being scored, the presence of independent scores for erosions (ERO) and joint space narrowing (JSN), the maximum score per joint, and the weighing of a radiologic abnormality. As yet, there is no consensus on the scoring method of preference. During the first 3 years of follow-up in a cohort study of patients with early arthritis, JSN and ERO were found to differ in their contribution to the measured progression in radiologic damage of the hands and feet (Van der Heijde et al., Arthritis Rheum., 35: 26-34 (1992)).
  • Etanercept is a fully human fusion protein that inhibits tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and the subsequent inflammatory cytokine cascade. Etanercept has been shown to be safe and effective in rapidly reducing disease activity in adults with RA and in sustaining that improvement (Bathon et al., N. Eng. J. Med., 343: 1586-1593 (2000); Moreland et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 337: 141-147 (1997); Moreland et al., Ann. Intern. Med., 130: 478-486 (1999); Weinblatt et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 340: 253-259 (1999); Moreland et al., J.
  • TNF tumor necrosis factor
  • DMARDs Loss of function and radiographic change occur early in the course of the disease. These changes can be delayed or prevented with the use of certain DMARDs. Although several DMARDs are initially clinically effective and well tolerated, many of these drugs become less effective or exhibit increased toxicity over time. Based on its efficacy and tolerability, MTX has become the standard therapy by which other treatments are measured (Bathon et al., N. Eng. J. Med., 343: 1586-1593 (2000); Albert et al., J. Rheumatol., 27: 644-652 (2000)).
  • infliximab and methotrexate The effect of infliximab and methotrexate on radiographic progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis is reported in Van der Heijde et al., Annals Rheumatic Diseases 64: 417 (2005).
  • Infliximab treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis leads to changes in markers of inflammation and bone turnover associated with clinical efficacy (Visvanathan et al., Annals Rheumatic Diseases 64: 319 (2005)).
  • infliximab was well tolerated and effective in a large cohort of patients with AS during a 24-week study period.
  • the effect of infliximab therapy on spinal inflammation was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 279 patients with AS (Van der Heijde et al., Annals Rheumatic Diseases 64: 317 (2005)).
  • the manner in which the treatment effect on spinal radiographic progression in patients with AS should be measured is addressed by van der Heijde et al., Arthritis Rheum. 52: 1979-1985 (2005).
  • the association between baseline radiographic damage and improvement in physical function after treatment of patients having rheumatoid arthritis with infliximab is described by Breedveld et al., Annals Rheumatic Diseases 64:52-55 (2005). Structural damage was assessed using the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp score. The authors conclude that greater joint damage at baseline was associated with poorer physical function at baseline and less improvement in physical function after treatment, underlining the importance of early intervention to slow the progression of joint destruction.
  • Lymphocytes are one of many types of white blood cells produced in the bone marrow during the process of hematopoiesis. There are two major populations of lymphocytes: B lymphocytes (B cells) and T lymphocytes (T cells). The lymphocytes of particular interest herein are B cells.
  • B cells mature within the bone marrow and leave the marrow expressing an antigen-binding antibody on their cell surface.
  • a naive B cell first encounters the antigen for which its membrane-bound antibody is specific, the cell begins to divide rapidly and its progeny differentiate into memory B cells and effector cells called “plasma cells”.
  • Memory B cells have a longer life span and continue to express membrane-bound antibody with the same specificity as the original parent cell.
  • Plasma cells do not produce membrane-bound antibody, but instead produce the antibody in a form that can be secreted. Secreted antibodies are the major effector molecules of humoral immunity.
  • the CD20 antigen (also called human B-lymphocyte-restricted differentiation antigen, Bp35, or B1) is a four-pass, glycosylated integral membrane protein with a molecular weight of approximately 35 kD located on pre-B and mature B lymphocytes. Valentine et al., J. Biol. Chem. 264(19):11282-11287 (1989) and Einfeld et al., EMBO J. 7(3):711-717 (1988). The antigen is also expressed on greater than 90% of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) (Anderson et al.
  • NHL B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
  • CD20 regulates an early step(s) in the activation process for cell-cycle initiation and differentiation (Tedder et al., supra), and possibly functions as a calcium-ion channel. Tedder et al., J. Cell. Biochem. 14D: 195 (1990). CD20 undergoes phosphorylation in activated B cells (Riley and Sliwkowski Semin Oncol, 27(12), 17-24 (2000)).
  • CD20 appears on the surface of B-lymphocytes at the pre-B-cell stage and is found on mature and memory B cells, but not plasma cells (Stashenko et al. J Immunol 1980; 125:1678-1685 (1980)); Clark and Ledbetter Adv Cancer Res 52, 81-149 (1989)).
  • CD20 has calcium-channel activity and may have a role in the development of B cells.
  • the relationship between lysis of peripheral CD20 + B cells in vitro and rituximab activity in vivo is unclear.
  • Rituximab displays antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in vitro (Reff et al. Blood 83:435-445 (1994)).
  • this antigen can serve as a candidate for “targeting” of such lymphomas.
  • targeting can be generalized as follows: antibodies specific to the CD20 surface antigen of B cells are administered to a patient. These anti-CD20 antibodies specifically bind to the CD20 antigen of (ostensibly) both normal and malignant B cells; the antibody bound to the CD20 surface antigen may lead to the destruction and depletion of neoplastic B cells. Additionally, chemical agents or radioactive labels having the potential to destroy the tumor can be conjugated to the anti-CD20 antibody such that the agent is specifically “delivered” to the neoplastic B cells. Irrespective of the approach, a primary goal is to destroy the tumor; the specific approach can be determined by the particular anti-CD20 antibody that is utilized, and thus, the available approaches to targeting the CD20 antigen can vary considerably.
  • the rituximab (RITUXAN®) antibody is a genetically engineered chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen.
  • Rituximab is the antibody called “C2B8” in U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,137 issued Apr. 7, 1998 (Anderson et al.).
  • Rituximab is indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade or follicular, CD20-positive, B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
  • In vitro mechanism-of-action studies have demonstrated that rituximab binds human complement and lyses lymphoid B-cell lines through CDC.
  • rituximab sensitizes drug-resistant human B-cell lymphoma cell lines to the cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin, CDDP, VP-16, diphtheria toxin, and ricin (Demidem et al., Cancer Chemotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals 12(3):177-186 (1997)).
  • doxorubicin doxorubicin
  • CDDP CDDP
  • VP-16 diphtheria toxin
  • ricin diphtheria toxin
  • ricin ricin
  • Rituximab was approved in the United States in November 1997 for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade or follicular CD20 + B-cell NHL at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 weekly for four doses.
  • FDA Food and Drug Administration
  • additional claims for the treatment of low-grade NHL include re-treatment (weekly for four doses) and an additional dosing regimen (weekly for eight doses).
  • rituximab either as monotherapy or in combination with immunosuppressant or chemotherapeutic drugs.
  • Patients have also been treated with rituximab as maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. Hainsworth et al., J. Clin. Oncol.
  • rituximab has been used in the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant plasma cell disorders. Treon and Anderson, Semin. Oncol. 27: 79-85 (2000).
  • Rituximab has also been studied in a variety of non-malignant autoimmune disorders, in which B cells and autoantibodies appear to play a role in disease pathophysiology. Edwards et al., Biochem Soc. Trans. 30:824-828 (2002). Rituximab has been reported to potentially relieve signs and symptoms of, for example, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Leandro et al., Ann. Rheum. Dis. 61:883-888 (2002); Edwards et al., Arthritis Rheum., 46 (Suppl. 9): S46 (2002); Stahl et al., Ann. Rheum. Dis., 62 (Suppl.
  • RA rheumatoid arthritis
  • a Phase II study (WA16291) has been conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), providing 48-week follow-up data on safety and efficacy of Rituximab.
  • RA rheumatoid arthritis
  • a total of 161 patients were evenly randomized to four treatment arms: methotrexate, rituximab alone, rituximab plus methotrexate, and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide (CTX).
  • CTX cyclophosphamide
  • the treatment regimen of rituximab was one gram administered intravenously on days 1 and 15.
  • rituximab The reported safety profile of rituximab in a small number of patients with neurologic disorders, including autoimmune neuropathy (Pestronk et al., supra), opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (Pranzatelli et al., supra), and RRMS (Cross et al., supra), was similar to that reported in oncology or RA.
  • Patents and patent publications concerning CD20 antibodies and CD20-binding molecules include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,776,456, 5,736,137, 5,843,439, 6,399,061, and 6,682,734, as well as US 2002/0197255, US 2003/0021781, US 2003/0082172, US 2003/0095963, US 2003/0147885 (Anderson et al.); U.S. Pat. No.
  • rituximab was found to be a well-tolerated, effective remission induction agent for severe ANCA-associated vasculitis, when used in a dose of 375 mg/m 2 ⁇ 4 along with oral prednisone 1 mg/kg/day, which was reduced by week 4 to 40 mg/day, and to complete discontinuation over the following 16 weeks.
  • Four patients were re-treated with rituximab alone for recurring/rising ANCA titers.
  • no additional immunosuppressive agents seem to be necessary for remission induction and maintenance of sustained remission (6 months or longer).
  • ANCA-associated vasculitis were administered rituximab along with immunosuppressive medicaments such as intravenous cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, or leflunomide, with apparent efficacy.
  • immunosuppressive medicaments such as intravenous cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, or leflunomide, with apparent efficacy.
  • a potential secondary endpoint includes change in modified Sharp radiographic total score, erosion score, and joint space narrowing score, which may be analyzed using continuous or categorical methodology, as appropriate. Exploratory endpoints and analysis may involve radiographic analyses including the proportion of patients with no erosive progression, which may be assessed at weeks 24 and beyond. See also US 2005/00001862 published Aug.
  • the present invention involves administration of a CD20 antagonist that provides a safe and active treatment regimen in subjects with joint damage, including selection of an efficacious dosing regimen and scheduled or unscheduled re-treatment.
  • This antagonist is effective both in initial therapy and in the management of refractory disease.
  • the present invention concerns a method for treating joint damage in a subject comprising administering a CD20 antibody to the subject and giving the subject, at least about one month after the administration, a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of CD20 antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage.
  • the invention in another aspect, relates to a method of monitoring the treatment of joint damage in a subject comprising administering an effective amount of a CD20 antibody to the subject and measuring by radiography after at least about one month from the administration whether the joint damage has been reduced over baseline prior to the administration, wherein a decrease versus baseline in the subject after treatment indicates the CD20 antibody is having an effect on the joint damage.
  • the degree of reduction versus baseline is measured a second time after the administration of the CD20 antibody.
  • the invention provides a method of determining whether to continue administering a CD20 antibody to a subject with joint damage comprising measuring by radiography reduction in joint damage in the subject after administration of the CD20 antibody a first time, measuring by radiography reduction in joint damage in the subject after administration of the CD20 antibody a second time, comparing the radiography scores in the subject at the first time and at the second time, and if the score is less at the second time than at the first time, continuing administration of the CD20 antibody.
  • the invention is directed to an article of manufacture comprising:
  • a package insert with instructions for treating joint damage in a subject wherein the instructions indicate that the subject is administered the CD20 antibody and is then subjected, at least one about month after the administration, to a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of CD20 antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage.
  • the article further comprises a container comprising a second medicament, wherein the CD20 antibody is a first medicament, further comprising instructions on the package insert for treating the subject with an effective amount of the second medicament.
  • a method for treating joint damage in a subject comprising administering a CD20 antibody to the subject, and giving the subject, at least about 52 weeks after the administration, a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of CD20 antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage.
  • the invention provides a method of monitoring the treatment of joint damage in a subject comprising administering an effective amount of a CD20 antibody to the subject and measuring by radiography after at least about 52 weeks from the administration whether the joint damage has been reduced over baseline prior to the administration, wherein a decrease versus baseline in the subject after treatment indicates the CD20 antibody is having an effect on the joint damage.
  • the invention provides an article of manufacture comprising:
  • a package insert with instructions for treating joint damage in a subject wherein the instructions indicate that the subject is administered the CD20 antibody and is then subjected, at least about 52 weeks after the administration, to a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of CD20 antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage.
  • the invention provides a method for the treatment of joint damage in a subject, wherein (a) the subject has exhibited an inadequate response to one or more anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; (b) the subject received at least one prior course of treatment with a CD20 antibody, and (c) the treatment comprises administering at least one further course of treatment with a CD20 antibody.
  • TNF anti-tumor necrosis factor
  • FIG. 1 shows the study design to treat RA patients with control (placebo plus MTX) or rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX (Example 1 herein).
  • FIG. 2 shows the ACR responses at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 3 shows the ACR20 responses over six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 4 shows the changes in 328DS at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 5 shows EULAR responses at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 6 shows EULAR remission or low disease at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 7 shows the median C-reactive protein (CRP) over six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 8 shows the proportion of RA patients with clinically relevant improvement in function at six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 9 shows the percentage change in ACR score set at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 10 shows the change in FACIT-F at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 11 shows the changes in SF-36 categories (mental and physical health) at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 12 shows the total rheumatoid factor at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 13 shows the mean change in Sharp-Genant total score at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 14 shows the mean change in Sharp-Genant erosion score at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 15 shows the mean change in Sharp-Genant joint space narrowing (JSN) score at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • JSN Sharp-Genant joint space narrowing
  • FIG. 16 shows the proportion of RA patients with no change in erosion score at six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 17 shows the change in radiographic endpoints at week 24 (exploratory endpoint) for RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 18 shows mean percent change in ACR core set parameters at week 24 for RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 19 shows the median CD 19 at six months of RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 20 shows the most commonly reported adverse events in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 21 shows adverse events leading to withdrawal in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 22 shows events occurring during/within 24 hours of infusions in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 23 shows acute infusion reactions in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 24 shows serious adverse events occurring during/within 24 hours of infusions in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 25 shows system organ class—infections and infestations in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 26 shows serious infections in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 27 shows the infection rate in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 28 shows HACA in the study of RA patients over six months, wherein the patients are treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 29 shows IgG levels over six months in RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 30 shows IgA levels over six months in RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 31 shows IgM levels over six months in RA patients treated with control or with rituximab (1000 mg ⁇ 2) plus MTX.
  • FIG. 32A is a sequence alignment comparing the amino acid sequences of the light chain variable domain (V L ) of each of murine 2H7 (SEQ ID NO: 1), humanized 2H7.v16 variant (SEQ ID NO:2), and the human kappa light chain subgroup I (SEQ ID NO:3).
  • the CDRs of V L of 2H7 and hu2H7.v16 are as follows: CDR1 (SEQ ID NO:4), CDR2 (SEQ ID NO:5), and CDR3 (SEQ ID NO:6).
  • FIG. 32B is a sequence alignment comparing the amino acid sequences of the heavy chain variable domain (V H ) of each of murine 2H7 (SEQ ID NO:7), humanized 2H7.v16 variant (SEQ ID NO:8), and the human consensus sequence of the heavy chain subgroup III (SEQ ID NO:9).
  • the CDRs of V H of 2H7 and hu2H7.v16 are as follows: CDR1 (SEQ ID NO: 10), CDR2 (SEQ ID NO:11), and CDR3 (SEQ ID NO:12).
  • FIG. 32A and FIG. 32B the CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 in each chain are enclosed within brackets, flanked by the framework regions, FR1-FR4, as indicated.
  • 2H7 refers to the murine 2H7 antibody.
  • the asterisks in between two rows of sequences indicate the positions that are different between the two sequences. Residue numbering is according to Kabat et al. Sequences of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (1991), with insertions shown as a, b, c, d, and e.
  • FIG. 33 shows the amino acid sequence of the mature 2H7.v16 L chain (SEQ ID NO: 13)
  • FIG. 34 shows the amino acid sequence of the mature 2H7.v16H chain (SEQ ID NO: 14).
  • FIG. 35 shows the amino acid sequence of the mature 2H7.v31H chain (SEQ ID NO:15).
  • the L chain of 2H7.v31 is the same as for 2H7.v16.
  • FIG. 36 is a sequence alignment comparing the light-chain amino acid sequences of the humanized 2H7.v16 variant (SEQ ID NO:2) and humanized 2H7.v138 variant (SEQ ID NO:28).
  • FIG. 37 is a sequence alignment comparing the heavy-chain amino acid sequences of the humanized 2H7.v16 variant (SEQ ID NO:8) and humanized 2H7.v138 variant (SEQ ID NO:29).
  • FIG. 38 shows an alignment of the mature 2H7.v16 and 2H7.v511 light chains (SEQ ID NOS: 13 and 30, respectively), with Kabat variable-domain residue numbering and Eu constant-domain residue numbering.
  • FIG. 39 shows an alignment of the mature 2H7.v16 and 2H7.v511 heavy chains (SEQ ID NOS:14 and 31, respectively), with Kabat variable-domain residue numbering and Eu constant-domain residue numbering.
  • FIG. 40A shows the sequence of the humanized 2H7.v114 variable light-chain domain (SEQ ID NO:32);
  • FIG. 40B shows the sequence of the humanized 2H7.v114 variable heavy-chain domain (SEQ ID NO:33); and
  • FIG. 40C shows the sequence of the humanized 2H7.v114 full-length heavy chain (SEQ ID NO:34), with Kabat variable-domain residue numbering and Eu constant-domain residue numbering.
  • FIG. 41 illustrates the patient disposition of the REFLEX clinical trial at 56 weeks, including ongoing treatments of subgroups of patients selected from the treatment and placebo arms of the Phase III REFLEX clinical trial.
  • FIG. 42 Change in radiographic endpoints at week 56.
  • FIG. 43 Mean change in total Sharp-Genant score over time.
  • FIG. 44 Cumulative distribution of change in total Sharp-Genant score.
  • FIG. 45 Sensitivity analyses: change in total Sharp-Genant score.
  • FIG. 46 Patients with no radiographic changes at week 56.
  • a “B cell” is a lymphocyte that matures within the bone marrow, and includes a naive B cell, memory B cell, or effector B cell (plasma cells).
  • the B cell herein is a normal or non-malignant B cell.
  • B-cell surface marker or “B-cell surface antigen” herein is an antigen expressed on the surface of a B cell that can be targeted with an antagonist that binds thereto.
  • Exemplary B-cell surface markers include the CD10, CD19, CD20, CD21, CD22, CD23, CD24, CD37, CD40, CD53, CD72, CD73, CD74, CDw75, CDw76, CD77, CDw78, CD79a, CD79b, CD80, CD81, CD82, CD83, CDw84, CD85 and CD86 leukocyte surface markers (for descriptions, see The Leukocyte Antigen Facts Book, 2 nd Edition. 1997, ed. Barclay et al. Academic Press, Harcourt Brace & Co., New York).
  • B-cell surface markers include RP105, FcRH2, B-cell CR2, CCR6, P2 ⁇ 5, HLA-DOB, CXCR5, FCER2, BR3, Btig, NAG14, SLGC16270, FcRH1, IRTA2, ATWD578, FcRH3, IRTA1, FcRH6, BCMA, and 239287.
  • the B-cell surface marker of particular interest is preferentially expressed on B cells compared to other non-B-cell tissues of a mammal and may be expressed on both precursor B cells and mature B cells.
  • the preferred B-cell surface markers herein are CD20 and CD22.
  • CD20 antigen is an about 35-kDa, non-glycosylated phosphoprotein found on the surface of greater than 90% of B cells from peripheral blood or lymphoid organs. CD20 is present on both normal B cells as well as malignant B cells, but is not expressed on stem cells. Other names for CD20 in the literature include “B-lymphocyte-restricted antigen” and “Bp35”. The CD20 antigen is described in Clark et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci . (USA) 82:1766 (1985), for example.
  • CD22 antigen also known as BL-CAM or Lyb8
  • CD22 antigen is a type I integral membrane glycoprotein with molecular weight of about 130 (reduced) to 140 kD (unreduced). It is expressed in both the cytoplasm and cell membrane of B-lymphocytes.
  • CD22 antigen appears early in B-cell lymphocyte differentiation at approximately the same stage as the CD19 antigen. Unlike other B-cell markers, CD22 membrane expression is limited to the late differentiation stages comprised between mature B cells (CD22+) and plasma cells (CD22 ⁇ ).
  • the CD22 antigen is described, for example, in Wilson et al., J. Exp. Med. 173:137 (1991) and Wilson et al., J. Immunol. 150:5013 (1993).
  • an “antagonist” is a molecule that, upon binding to CD20 on B cells, destroys or depletes B cells in a mammal and/or interferes with one or more B-cell functions, e.g. by reducing or preventing a humoral response elicited by the B cell.
  • the antagonist preferably is able to deplete B cells (i.e. reduce circulating B-cell levels) in a mammal treated therewith. Such depletion may be achieved via various mechanisms such as ADCC and/or CDC, inhibition of B-cell proliferation and/or induction of B-cell death (e.g. via apoptosis).
  • Antagonists included within the scope of the present invention include antibodies, synthetic or native-sequence peptides, immunoadhesins, and small-molecule antagonists that bind to CD20, optionally conjugated with or fused to another molecule.
  • the preferred antagonist comprises an antibody.
  • an “antibody antagonist” herein is an antibody that, upon binding to a B-cell surface marker on B cells, destroys or depletes B cells in a mammal and/or interferes with one or more B-cell functions, e.g., by reducing or preventing a humoral response elicited by the B cell.
  • the antibody antagonist preferably is able to deplete B cells (i.e., reduce circulating B-cell levels) in a mammal treated therewith. Such depletion may be achieved via various mechanisms such as ADCC and/or CDC, inhibition of B-cell proliferation and/or induction of B-cell death (e.g., via apoptosis).
  • antibody herein is used in the broadest sense and specifically covers monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies (e.g. bispecific antibodies) formed from at least two intact antibodies, and antibody fragments so long as they exhibit the desired biological activity.
  • Antibody fragments comprise a portion of an intact antibody, preferably comprising the antigen binding region thereof.
  • Examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab′) 2 , and Fv fragments; diabodies; linear antibodies; single-chain antibody molecules; and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments.
  • an “intact antibody” is one comprising heavy and light variable domains as well as an Fc region.
  • an “antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker” is a molecule that, upon binding to a B-cell surface marker, destroys or depletes B cells in a mammal and/or interferes with one or more B-cell functions, e.g. by reducing or preventing a humoral response elicited by the B cell.
  • the antibody preferably is able to deplete B cells (i.e. reduce circulating B-cell levels) in a mammal treated therewith. Such depletion may be achieved via various mechanisms such as ADCC and/or CDC, inhibition of B-cell proliferation and/or induction of B-cell death (e.g. via apoptosis).
  • the B-cell surface marker is CD20 or CD22, so that the antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker is an antibody that binds to CD20 or CD22, respectively, or a “CD20 antibody” or “CD22 antibody,” respectively.
  • CD22 antibodies include the ones described in EP 1,476,120 (Tedder and Italiano), EP 1,485,130 (Tedder), and EP 1,504,035 (Popplewell et al.), as well as those described in US 2004/0258682 (Leung et al.).
  • the antibody is a CD20 antibody.
  • a particularly preferred embodiment is a CD20 or CD22 antibody, preferably a CD20 antibody.
  • CD20 antibodies examples include: “C2B8,” which is now called “rituximab” (“RITUXAN®/MABTHERA®”) (U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,137); the yttrium-[90]-labelled 2B8 murine antibody designated “Y2B8” or “Ibritumomab Tiuxetan” (ZEVALIN®)) commercially available from Biogen Idec, Inc. (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,137; 2B8 deposited with ATCC under accession no. HB11388 on Jun.
  • a humanized 2H7 e.g., WO 2004/056312 (Lowman et al.) and as set forth below
  • HUMAX-CD20TM fully human, high-affinity antibody targeted at the CD20 molecule in the cell membrane of B-cells (Genmab, Denmark; see, for example, Glennie and van de Winkel, Drug Discovery Today 8: 503-510 (2003) and Cragg et al., Blood 101: 1045-1052 (2003))
  • the human monoclonal antibodies set forth in WO 2004/035607 and WO 2005/103081 Teeling et al., GenMab/Medarex
  • the antibodies having complex N-glycoside-linked sugar chains bound to the Fc region described in US 2004/0093621 Shiara et al.
  • monoclonal antibodies and antigen-binding fragments binding to CD20 e.g., WO 2005/000901, Tedder et al.
  • the preferred CD20 antibodies herein are chimeric, humanized, or human CD20 antibodies, more preferably rituximab, a humanized 2H7, chimeric or humanized A20 antibody (Immunomedics), HUMAX-CD20TM human CD20 antibody (Genmab), and immunoglobulins/proteins binding to CD20 (Trubion Pharm Inc.).
  • rituximab or “RITUXAN®” herein refer to the genetically engineered chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen and designated “C2B8” in U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,137, including fragments thereof which retain the ability to bind CD20.
  • a “humanized 2H7” refers to a humanized CD20 antibody, or an antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprising one, two, three, four, five, or six of the following CDR sequences:
  • VVYYSXXYWYFDV wherein the X at position 6 is N, A, Y, W, or D, and the X at position 7 is S or R (SEQ ID NO:38), for example, SEQ ID NO: 12 ( FIG. 32B ).
  • the humanized 2H7 antibodies herein include those with heavy-chain amino acid sequences containing a C-terminal lysine and those without.
  • the CDR sequences above are generally present within human variable light- and variable heavy-framework sequences, such as substantially the human consensus FR residues of human light-chain kappa subgroup I (V L 6I), and substantially the human consensus FR residues of human heavy-chain subgroup III (V H III). See also WO 2004/056312 (Lowman et al.).
  • variable heavy region may be joined to a human IgG chain constant region, wherein the region may be, for example, IgG1 or IgG3, including native-sequence and non-native-sequence constant regions.
  • such antibody comprises the variable heavy-domain sequence of SEQ ID NO:8 (v16, as shown in FIG. 32B ), optionally also comprising the variable light-domain sequence of SEQ ID NO:2 (v16, as shown in FIG. 32A ), which optionally comprises one or more amino acid substitution(s) at positions 56, 100, and/or 100a, e.g., D56A, N100A, or N100Y, and/or S100aR in the variable heavy domain and one or more amino acid substitution(s) at positions 32 and/or 92, e.g. M32L and/or S92A, in the variable light domain.
  • the antibody is an intact antibody comprising the light-chain amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 13 or 30, and heavy-chain amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 14, 15, 29, 31, 34, or 39, the sequence of SEQ ID NO:39 being given below.
  • a preferred humanized 2H7 antibody is ocrelizumab (Genentech, Inc.).
  • the antibody herein may further comprise at least one amino acid substitution in the Fc region that improves ADCC activity, such as one wherein the amino acid substitutions are at positions 298, 333, and 334, preferably S298A, E333A, and K334A, using Eu numbering of heavy-chain residues. See also U.S. Pat. No. 6,737,056, L. Presta.
  • any of these antibodies may comprise at least one substitution in the Fc region that improves FcRn binding or serum half-life, for example, a substitution at heavy-chain position 434, such as N434W. See also U.S. Pat. No. 6,737,056, L. Presta.
  • any of these antibodies may further comprise at least one amino acid substitution in the Fc region that increases CDC activity, for example, comprising at least a substitution at position 326, preferably K326A or K326W. See also U.S. Pat. No. 6,528,624, Idusogie et al.
  • Some preferred humanized 2H7 variants are those comprising the variable light domain of SEQ ID NO:2 and the variable heavy domain of SEQ ID NO:8, including those with or without substitutions in an Fc region (if present), and those comprising a variable heavy domain with alteration in SEQ ID NO:8 of N100A; or D56A and N100A; or D56A, N100Y, and S100aR; and a variable light domain with alteration in SEQ ID NO:2 of M32L; or S92A; or M32L and S92A.
  • M34 in the variable heavy domain of 2H7.v16 has been identified as a potential source of antibody stability and is another potential candidate for substitution.
  • variable region of variants based on 2H7.v16 comprise the amino acid sequences of v16 except at the positions of amino acid substitutions that are indicated in the table below. Unless otherwise indicated, the 2H7 variants will have the same light chain as that of v16.
  • V H 2H7 Heavy chain Light chain Version
  • V L 2H7 Heavy chain Light chain Version
  • One preferred humanized 2H7 comprises 2H7.v16 variable light-domain sequence:
  • humanized 2H7.v16 antibody is an intact antibody, it may comprise the light-chain amino acid sequence:
  • Another preferred humanized 2H7 antibody comprises 2H7.v511 variable light-domain sequence:
  • humanized 2H7.v511 antibody is an intact antibody, it may comprise the light-chain amino acid sequence:
  • FIGS. 38 and 39 which align the mature light and heavy chains, respectively, of humanized 2H7.v511 with humanized 2H7.v16 using the C-terminal lysine sequence for the heavy chain.
  • humanized 2H7.v31 antibody is an intact antibody, it may comprise the light-chain amino acid sequence:
  • a preferred embodiment herein is where the antibody is humanized 2H7 comprising the variable domain sequences in SEQ ID NOS:2 and 8 (version 16). Another preferred embodiment herein is where the antibody is humanized 2H7 comprising the variable domain sequences in SEQ ID NOS:39 and 40 (version 511). Further preferred is where the antibody is humanized 2H7 comprising the variable domain sequences in SEQ ID NOS:32 and 33 (see FIG. 40 reversion 114), such as one comprising the variable light-chain domain in SEQ ID NO:32 and the heavy-chain amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:34.
  • the antibody is humanized 2H7 comprising a variable heavy-chain domain with alteration N100A, or D56A and N100A, or D56A, N100Y, and S100aR in SEQ ID NO:8 and a variable light-chain domain with alteration M32L, or S92A, or M32L and S92A in SEQ ID NO:2.
  • Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and “ADCC” refer to a cell-mediated reaction in which nonspecific cytotoxic cells that express Fc receptors (FcRs) (e.g. Natural Killer (NK) cells, neutrophils, and macrophages) recognize bound antibody on a target cell and subsequently cause lysis of the target cell.
  • FcRs Fc receptors
  • FcR expression on hematopoietic cells in summarized is Table 3 on page 464 of Ravetch and Kinet, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9:457-492 (1991).
  • ADCC activity of a molecule of interest may be assessed in vitro, such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,362 or 5,821,337.
  • Useful effector cells for such assays include peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and Natural Killer (NK) cells.
  • PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cells
  • NK Natural Killer
  • ADCC activity of the molecule of interest may be assessed in vivo, e.g., in a animal model such as that disclosed in Clynes et al. PNAS ( USA ) 95:652-656 (1998).
  • Human effector cells are leukocytes that express one or more FcRs and perform effector functions. Preferably, the cells express at least Fc ⁇ RIII and carry out ADCC effector function. Examples of human leukocytes that mediate ADCC include peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, cytotoxic T cells and neutrophils; with PBMCs and NK cells being preferred.
  • PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cells
  • NK natural killer cells
  • monocytes monocytes
  • cytotoxic T cells and neutrophils cytotoxic T cells and neutrophils
  • Fc receptor or “FcR” are used to describe a receptor that binds to the Fc region of an antibody.
  • the preferred FcR is a native-sequence human FcR.
  • a preferred FcR is one that binds an IgG antibody (a gamma receptor) and includes receptors of the Fc ⁇ RI, Fc ⁇ RII, and Fc ⁇ RIII subclasses, including allelic variants and alternatively spliced forms of these receptors.
  • Fc ⁇ RII receptors include Fc ⁇ RIIA (an “activating receptor”) and Fc ⁇ RIIB (an “inhibiting receptor”), which have similar amino acid sequences that differ primarily in the cytoplasmic domains thereof.
  • Activating receptor Fc ⁇ RIIA contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) in its cytoplasmic domain.
  • Inhibiting receptor Fc ⁇ RIIB contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM) in its cytoplasmic domain.
  • ITAM immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif
  • ITIM immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif
  • FcR FcR
  • FcRn neonatal receptor
  • “Complement-dependent cytotoxicity” or “CDC” refers to the ability of a molecule to lyse a target in the presence of complement.
  • the complement activation pathway is initiated by the binding of the first component of the complement system (C1q) to a molecule (e.g. an antibody) complexed with a cognate antigen.
  • a CDC assay e.g. as described in Gazzano-Santoro et al., J. Immunol. Methods 202:163 (1996), may be performed.
  • “Growth-inhibitory” antibodies are those that prevent or reduce proliferation of a cell expressing an antigen to which the antibody binds.
  • the antibody may prevent or reduce proliferation of B cells in vitro and/or in vivo.
  • Antibodies that “induce apoptosis” are those that induce programmed cell death, e.g. of a B cell, as determined by standard apoptosis assays, such as binding of annexin V, fragmentation of DNA, cell shrinkage, dilation of endoplasmic reticulum, cell fragmentation, and/or formation of membrane vesicles (called apoptotic bodies).
  • “Native antibodies” are usually heterotetrameric glycoproteins of about 150,000 daltons, composed of two identical light (L) chains and two identical heavy (H) chains. Each light chain is linked to a heavy chain by one covalent disulfide bond, while the number of disulfide linkages varies among the heavy chains of different immunoglobulin isotypes. Each heavy and light chain also has regularly spaced intrachain disulfide bridges. Each heavy chain has at one end a variable domain (V H ) followed by a number of constant domains.
  • V H variable domain
  • Each light chain has a variable domain at one end (V L ) and a constant domain at its other end; the constant domain of the light chain is aligned with the first constant domain of the heavy chain, and the light chain variable domain is aligned with the variable domain of the heavy chain. Particular amino acid residues are believed to form an interface between the light chain and heavy chain variable domains.
  • variable refers to the fact that certain portions of the variable domains differ extensively in sequence among antibodies and are used in the binding and specificity of each particular antibody for its particular antigen. However, the variability is not evenly distributed throughout the variable domains of antibodies. It is concentrated in three segments called hypervariable regions both in the light chain and the heavy chain variable domains. The more highly conserved portions of variable domains are called the framework regions (FRs).
  • the variable domains of native heavy and light chains each comprise four FRs, largely adopting a ⁇ -sheet configuration, connected by three hypervariable regions, which form loops connecting, and in some cases forming part of, the ⁇ -sheet structure.
  • the hypervariable regions in each chain are held together in close proximity by the FRs and, with the hypervariable regions from the other chain, contribute to the formation of the antigen-binding site of antibodies (see Kabat et al., Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (1991)).
  • the constant domains are not involved directly in binding an antibody to an antigen, but exhibit various effector functions, such as participation of the antibody in ADCC.
  • Papain digestion of antibodies produces two identical antigen-binding fragments, called “Fab” fragments, each with a single antigen-binding site, and a residual “Fc” fragment, whose name reflects its ability to crystallize readily. Pepsin treatment yields an F(ab′) 2 fragment that has two antigen-binding sites and is still capable of cross-linking antigen.
  • “Fv” is the minimum antibody fragment that contains a complete antigen-recognition and antigen-binding site. This region consists of a dimer of one heavy chain and one light chain variable domain in tight, non-covalent association. It is in this configuration that the three hypervariable regions of each variable domain interact to define an antigen-binding site on the surface of the V H -V L dimer. Collectively, the six hypervariable regions confer antigen-binding specificity to the antibody. However, even a single variable domain (or half of an Fv comprising only three hypervariable regions specific for an antigen) has the ability to recognize and bind antigen, although at a lower affinity than the entire binding site.
  • the Fab fragment also contains the constant domain of the light chain and the first constant domain (CH1) of the heavy chain.
  • Fab′ fragments differ from Fab fragments by the addition of a few residues at the carboxy terminus of the heavy chain CH1 domain including one or more cysteines from the antibody hinge region.
  • Fab′-SH is the designation herein for Fab′ in which the cysteine residue(s) of the constant domains bear at least one free thiol group.
  • F(ab′) 2 antibody fragments originally were produced as pairs of Fab′ fragments that have hinge cysteines between them. Other chemical couplings of antibody fragments are also known.
  • the “light chains” of antibodies (immunoglobulins) from any vertebrate species can be assigned to one of two clearly distinct types, called kappa ( ⁇ ) and lambda ( ⁇ ), based on the amino acid sequences of their constant domains.
  • antibodies can be assigned to different classes. There are five major classes of intact antibodies: IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM, and several of these may be further divided into subclasses (isotypes), e.g., IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA, and IgA2.
  • the heavy chain constant domains that correspond to the different classes of antibodies are called ⁇ , ⁇ , ⁇ , ⁇ , and ⁇ , respectively.
  • the subunit structures and three-dimensional configurations of different classes of immunoglobulins are well known.
  • Single-chain Fv or “scFv” antibody fragments comprise the V H and V L domains of antibody, wherein these domains are present in a single polypeptide chain.
  • the Fv polypeptide further comprises a polypeptide linker between the V H and V L domains that enables the scFv to form the desired structure for antigen binding.
  • diabodies refers to small antibody fragments with two antigen-binding sites, which fragments comprise a heavy-chain variable domain (V H ) connected to a light-chain variable domain (V L ) in the same polypeptide chain (V H -V L ).
  • V H heavy-chain variable domain
  • V L light-chain variable domain
  • the domains are forced to pair with the complementary domains of another chain and create two antigen-binding sites.
  • Diabodies are described more fully in, for example, EP 404,097; WO 93/11161; and Hollinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:6444-6448 (1993).
  • the term “monoclonal antibody” as used herein refers to an antibody obtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical and/or bind the same epitope, except for possible variants that may arise during production of the monoclonal antibody, such variants generally being present in minor amounts.
  • each monoclonal antibody is directed against a single determinant on the antigen.
  • the monoclonal antibodies are advantageous in that they are uncontaminated by other immunoglobulins.
  • the modifier “monoclonal” indicates the character of the antibody as being obtained from a substantially homogeneous population of antibodies, and is not to be construed as requiring production of the antibody by any particular method.
  • the monoclonal antibodies to be used in accordance with the present invention may be made by the hybridoma method first described by Kohler et al., Nature, 256:495 (1975), or may be made by recombinant DNA methods (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567).
  • the “monoclonal antibodies” may also be isolated from phage antibody libraries using the techniques described in Clackson et al., Nature, 352:624-628 (1991) and Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol., 222:581-597 (1991), for example.
  • the monoclonal antibodies herein specifically include “chimeric” antibodies (immunoglobulins) in which a portion of the heavy and/or light chain is identical with or homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies derived from a particular species or belonging to a particular antibody class or subclass, while the remainder of the chain(s) is identical with or homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies derived from another species or belonging to another antibody class or subclass, as well as fragments of such antibodies, so long as they exhibit the desired biological activity (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567; Morrison et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:6851-6855 (1984)).
  • chimeric antibodies immunoglobulins in which a portion of the heavy and/or light chain is identical with or homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies derived from a particular species or belonging to a particular antibody class or subclass, while the remainder of the chain(s) is identical with or homologous to corresponding sequences
  • Chimeric antibodies of interest herein include “primatized” antibodies comprising variable domain antigen-binding sequences derived from a non-human primate (e.g. Old World Monkey, such as baboon, rhesus or cynomolgus monkey) and human constant region sequences (U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,780).
  • a non-human primate e.g. Old World Monkey, such as baboon, rhesus or cynomolgus monkey
  • human constant region sequences U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,780
  • “Humanized” forms of non-human (e.g., murine) antibodies are chimeric antibodies that contain minimal sequence derived from non-human immunoglobulin.
  • humanized antibodies are human immunoglobulins (recipient antibody) in which residues from a hypervariable region of the recipient are replaced by residues from a hypervariable region of a non-human species (donor antibody) such as mouse, rat, rabbit or nonhuman primate having the desired specificity, affinity, and capacity.
  • donor antibody such as mouse, rat, rabbit or nonhuman primate having the desired specificity, affinity, and capacity.
  • framework region (FR) residues of the human immunoglobulin are replaced by corresponding non-human residues.
  • humanized antibodies may comprise residues that are not found in the recipient antibody or in the donor antibody. These modifications are made to further refine antibody performance.
  • the humanized antibody will comprise substantially all of at least one, and typically two, variable domains, in which all or substantially all of the hypervariable loops correspond to those of a non-human immunoglobulin and all or substantially all of the FRs are those of a human immunoglobulin sequence, except for FR substitution(s) as noted above.
  • the humanized antibody optionally also will comprise at least a portion of an immunoglobulin constant region, typically that of a human immunoglobulin. For further details, see Jones et al., Nature 321:522-525 (1986); Riechmann et al., Nature 332:323-329 (1988); and Presta, Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2:593-596 (1992).
  • hypervariable region when used herein refers to the amino acid residues of an antibody that are responsible for antigen binding.
  • the hypervariable region comprises amino acid residues from a “complementarity determining region” or “CDR” (e.g. residues 24-34 (L1), 50-56 (L2) and 89-97 (L3) in the light chain variable domain and 31-35 (H1), 50-65 (H2) and 95-102 (H3) in the heavy chain variable domain; Kabat et al., Sequences of proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (1991)) and/or those residues from a “hypervariable loop” (e.g.
  • “Framework” or “FR” residues are those variable domain residues other than the hypervariable region residues as herein defined.
  • naked antibody is an antibody (as herein defined) that is not conjugated to a heterologous molecule, such as a cytotoxic moiety, polymer, or radiolabel.
  • an “isolated” antibody is one that has been identified and separated and/or recovered from a component of its natural environment. Contaminant components of its natural environment are materials that would interfere with diagnostic or therapeutic uses for the antibody, and may include enzymes, hormones, and other proteinaceous or non-proteinaceous solutes.
  • the antibody will be purified (1) to greater than 95% by weight of antibody as determined by the Lowry method, and most preferably more than 99% by weight, (2) to a degree sufficient to obtain at least 15 residues of N-terminal or internal amino acid sequence by use of a spinning cup sequenator, or (3) to homogeneity by SDS-PAGE under reducing or nonreducing conditions using Coomassie blue or, preferably, silver stain.
  • Isolated antibody includes the antibody in situ within recombinant cells since at least one component of the antibody's natural environment will not be present. Ordinarily, however, isolated antibody will be prepared by at least one purification step.
  • Joint damage is used in the broadest sense and refers to damage or partial or complete destruction to any part of one or more joints, including the connective tissue and cartilage, where damage includes structural and/or functional damage of any cause, and may or may not cause joint pain/arthalgia. It includes, without limitation, joint damage associated with or resulting from inflammatory joint disease as well as non-inflammatory joint disease.
  • This damage may be caused by any condition, such as an autoimmune disease such as lupus (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus), arthritis (e.g., acute and chronic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis including juvenile-onset rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or juvenile RA (JRA), and stages such as rheumatoid synovitis, gout or gouty arthritis, acute immunological arthritis, chronic inflammatory arthritis, degenerative arthritis, type II collagen-induced arthritis, infectious arthritis, septic arthritis, Lyme arthritis, proliferative arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, Still's disease, vertebral arthritis, osteoarthritis, arthritis chronica progrediente, arthritis deformans, polyarthritis chronica primaria, reactive arthritis, menopausal arthritis, estrogen-depletion arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis/rheumatoid spondylitis), rheumatic
  • joints are points of contact between elements of a skeleton (of a vertebrate such as an animal) with the parts that surround and support it and include, but are not limited to, for example, hips, joints between the vertebrae of the spine, joints between the spine and pelvis (sacroiliac joints), joints where the tendons and ligaments attach to bones, joints between the ribs and spine, shoulders, knees, feet, elbows, hands, fingers, ankles and toes, but especially joints in the hands and feet.
  • a “subject” herein is a human subject, including a patient, eligible for treatment who is experiencing or has experienced one or more signs, symptoms, or other indicators of joint damage, has been diagnosed with joint damage, whether, for example, newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed and now experiencing a recurrence or relapse, or is at risk for developing joint damage, no matter the cause.
  • the subject may have been previously treated with CD20 antibody or not so treated.
  • a subject eligible for treatment of joint damage may optionally be identified as one who has been screened, as in the blood, for elevated levels of infiltrating CD20 cells or is screened using an assay to detect auto-antibodies, wherein autoantibody production is assessed qualitatively, and preferably quantitatively.
  • the subject may be na ⁇ ve to a second medicament being used when the treatment is started, i.e., the subject has not been previously treated with, for example, an immunosuppressive agent such as methotrexate at “baseline” (i.e., at a set point in time before the administration of a first dose of CD20 antibody in the treatment method herein, such as the day of screening the subject before treatment is commenced).
  • an immunosuppressive agent such as methotrexate at “baseline” (i.e., at a set point in time before the administration of a first dose of CD20 antibody in the treatment method herein, such as the day of screening the subject before treatment is commenced).
  • baseline i.e., at a set point in time before the administration of a first dose of CD20 antibody in the treatment method herein, such as the day of screening the subject before treatment is commenced.
  • Such subjects are generally considered to be candidates for treatment with such second medicament.
  • Treatment of a subject herein refers to both therapeutic treatment and prophylactic or preventative measures.
  • Those in need of treatment include those already with joint damage as well as those in which the joint damage or the progress of joint damage is to be prevented.
  • the subject may have been diagnosed as having the joint damage or may be predisposed or susceptible to the joint damage, or may have limited joint damage, which is likely to progress in the absence of treatment.
  • Treatment is successful herein if the joint damage is alleviated or healed, or progression of joint or structural damage is halted or slowed down as compared to prior to administration.
  • Successful treatment further includes complete or partial prevention of the development of joint damage. For purposes herein, slowing down or reducing joint damage or the progression of joint damage is the same as arrest, decrease, or reversal in the joint damage.
  • Clinical improvement refers to prevention of further progress of joint damage or any improvement in joint damage as a result of treatment, as determined by other than radiographic testing.
  • clinical improvement may, for example, be determined by assessing the number of tender or swollen joints, the Psoriasis Assessment Severity Index, a global clinical assessment of the subject, assessing erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or assessing the amount of C-reactive protein level.
  • a subject is in “remission” if he/she has no symptoms of active joint damage, such as those detectable by the methods disclosed herein, and has had no progression of joint damage as assessed at baseline or at a certain point of time during treatment.
  • Those who are not in remission include, for example, those experiencing a worsening or progression of joint damage.
  • Such subjects experiencing a return of symptoms, including active joint damage are those who have “relapsed” or had a “recurrence.”
  • a “symptom” of joint damage is any morbid phenomenon or departure from the normal in structure, function, or sensation, experienced by the subject and indicative of joint damage, such as those noted above, including tender or swollen joints.
  • an effective amount refers to an amount of the antibody or antagonist that is effective for treating joint damage, including an amount that is effective in achieving a reduction in joint damage as compared to baseline prior to administration of such amount as determined by radiographic testing.
  • An effective amount of other medicaments such as second medicaments is an amount of such medicament effective to treat joint damage or other undesirable effects, including side-effects or symptoms or other conditions accompanying joint damage, including an underlying disease or disorder.
  • Total modified Sharp score means a score obtained for assessment of radiographs using the method according to Sharp, as modified by Genant, Am. J. Med., 30: 3547 (1983). The primary assessment will be the change in the total Sharp-Genant score from screening. The Sharp-Genant score combines an erosion score and a joint space narrowing score of both hands and feet. Joint damage is measured in this test scoring by a mean change of less than the score at baseline (when patient is screened or tested before first administration of CD20 antagonist herein).
  • rheumatoid arthritis refers to a recognized disease state which may be diagnosed according to the 2000 revised American Rheumatoid Association criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis, or any similar criteria.
  • Physiological indicators of RA include, symmetric joint swelling which is characteristic though not invariable in rheumatoid arthritis. Fusiform swelling of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hands as well as metacarpophalangeal (MCP), wrists, elbows, knees, ankles and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints are commonly affected and swelling is easily detected.
  • PIP proximal interphalangeal
  • MCP metacarpophalangeal
  • MTP metatarsophalangeal
  • Pain on passive motion is the most sensitive test for joint inflammation, and inflammation and structural deformity often limits the range of motion for the affected joint. Typical visible changes include ulnar deviation of the fingers at the MCP joints, hyperextension or hyperflexion of the MCP and PIP joints, flexion contractures of the elbows, and subluxation of the carpal bones and toes.
  • the subject with rheumatoid arthritis may be resistant to DMARDs, in that the DMARDs are not effective or fully effective in treating symptoms.
  • candidates for therapy according to this invention include those who have experienced an inadequate response to previous or current treatment with TNF inhibitors such as etanercept, infliximab and/or adalimumab because of toxicity or inadequate efficacy (for example, etanercept for 3 months at 25 mg twice a week or at least 4 infusions of infliximab at 3 mg/kg).
  • TNF inhibitors such as etanercept, infliximab and/or adalimumab because of toxicity or inadequate efficacy (for example, etanercept for 3 months at 25 mg twice a week or at least 4 infusions of infliximab at 3 mg/kg).
  • a patient with “active rheumatoid arthritis” means a patient with active and not latent symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Subjects with “early active rheumatoid arthritis” are those subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed
  • Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory joint disease characterized by extensive bone resorption. Also disclosed herein, blood samples from PsA patients, particularly those with bone erosions on plain radiographs, exhibit a marked increase in osteoclast precursors (OCP) compared to healthy controls.
  • OCP osteoclast precursors
  • Antibody exposure refers to contact with or exposure to the antibody herein in one or more doses administered over a period of time of about 1 day to about 5 weeks.
  • the doses may be given at one time or at a fixed or at irregular time intervals over this period of exposure, such as, for example, one dose weekly for four weeks or two doses separated by a time interval of about 13-17 days.
  • Initial and later antibody exposures are separated in time from each other as described in detail herein.
  • An exposure not being administered or provided until a certain time “from the initial exposure” or from any prior exposure means that the time for the second or later exposure is measured from the time any of the doses from the prior exposure were administered, if more than one dose was administered in that exposure.
  • the second exposure is not given until at least about 16-54 weeks as measured from the time the first or the second dose was administered within that prior exposure.
  • the second exposure may be measured from the time of the first, second, or third dose within the prior exposure.
  • “from the initial exposure” or from any prior disclosure is measured from the time of the first dose.
  • immunosuppressive agent refers to substances that act to suppress or mask the immune system of the mammal being treated herein. This would include substances that suppress cytokine production, down-regulate or suppress self-antigen expression, or mask the MHC antigens. Examples of such agents include 2-amino-6-aryl-5-substituted pyrimidines (see U.S. Pat. No.
  • non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs NSAIDs
  • ganciclovir tacrolimus, glucocorticoids such as cortisol or aldosterone
  • anti-inflammatory agents such as a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, or a leukotriene receptor antagonist
  • purine antagonists such as azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
  • alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide; bromocryptine; danazol; dapsone; glutaraldehyde (which masks the MHC antigens, as described in U.S. Pat. No.
  • anti-idiotypic antibodies for MHC antigens and MHC fragments include cyclosporin A; steroids such as corticosteroids or glucocorticosteroids or glucocorticoid analogs, e.g., prednisone, methylprednisolone, including SOLU-MEDROL® methylprednisolone sodium succinate, and dexamethasone; dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors such as methotrexate (oral or subcutaneous); anti-malarial agents such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine; sulfasalazine; leflunomide; cytokine antagonists such as cytokine antibodies or cytokine receptor antibodies including anti-interferon-alpha, -beta, or -gamma antibodies, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antibodies (infliximab (REMICADE®) or adalimumab),
  • steroids such as
  • TGF-beta transforming growth factor-beta
  • streptodomase RNA or DNA from the host
  • FK506 transforming growth factor-beta
  • RS-61443 chlorambucil
  • deoxyspergualin rapamycin
  • T-cell receptor Cohen et al., U.S. Pat. No.
  • T-cell receptor fragments Offner et al., Science, 251: 430-432 (1991); WO 90/11294; Ianeway, Nature, 341: 482 (1989); and WO 91/01133
  • BAFF antagonists such as BAFF antibodies and BR3 antibodies and zTNF4 antagonists (for review, see Mackay and Mackay, Trends Immunol., 23:113-5 (2002))
  • biologic agents that interfere with T cell helper signals such as anti-CD40 receptor or anti-CD40 ligand (CD154), including blocking antibodies to CD40-CD40 ligand (e.g., Durie et al., Science, 261: 1328-30 (1993); Mohan et al., J.
  • Some immunosuppressive agents herein are also DMARDs, such as methotrexate. Examples of preferred immunosuppressive agents herein include cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, azathioprine, leflunomide, MMF, or methotrexate.
  • cytokine is a generic term for proteins released by one cell population that act on another cell as intercellular mediators.
  • cytokines are lymphokines, monokines; interleukins (ILs) such as IL-1, IL-1 ⁇ , IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-11, IL-12, IL-15, including PROLEUKIN® rIL-2; a tumor necrosis factor such as TNF- ⁇ or TNF- ⁇ ; and other polypeptide factors including LIF and kit ligand (KL).
  • ILs interleukins
  • cytokine includes proteins from natural sources or from recombinant cell culture and biologically active equivalents of the native-sequence cytokines, including synthetically produced small-molecule entities and pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives and salts thereof.
  • a “cytokine antagonist” is a molecule that inhibits or antagonizes such cytokines by any mechanism, including, for example, antibodies to the cytokine, antibodies to the cytokine receptor, and immunoadhesins.
  • hormone refers to polypeptide hormones, which are generally secreted by glandular organs with ducts. Included among the hormones are, for example, growth hormone such as human growth hormone, N-methionyl human growth hormone, and bovine growth hormone; parathyroid hormone; thyroxine; insulin; proinsulin; relaxin; estradiol; hormone-replacement therapy; androgens such as calusterone, dromostanolone propionate, epitiostanol, mepitiostane, or testolactone; prorelaxin; glycoprotein hormones such as follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH); prolactin, placental lactogen, mouse gonadotropin-associated peptide, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; inhibin; activin; mullerian-inhibiting substance; and thrombopoietin. As used herein, the term hormone includes proteins from natural sources or from
  • growth factor refers to proteins that promote growth, and include, for example, hepatic growth factor; fibroblast growth factor; vascular endothelial growth factor; nerve growth factors such as NGF- ⁇ ; platelet-derived growth factor; transforming growth factors (TGFs) such as TGF- ⁇ and TGF- ⁇ ; insulin-like growth factor-I and -II; erythropoietin (EPO); osteoinductive factors; interferons such as interferon- ⁇ , - ⁇ , and - ⁇ , and colony stimulating factors (CSFs) such as macrophage-CSF (M-CSF); granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF); and granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF).
  • TGFs transforming growth factors
  • EPO erythropoietin
  • osteoinductive factors interferons such as interferon- ⁇ , - ⁇ , and - ⁇ , and colony stimulating factors (CSFs) such as macrophage-CSF (
  • integrin refers to a receptor protein that allows cells both to bind to and to respond to the extracellular matrix and is involved in a variety of cellular functions such as wound healing, cell differentiation, homing of tumor cells and apoptosis. They are part of a large family of cell adhesion receptors that are involved in cell-extracellular matrix and cell-cell interactions.
  • Functional integrins consist of two transmembrane glycoprotein subunits, called alpha and beta, that are non-covalently bound. The alpha subunits all share some homology to each other, as do the beta subunits.
  • the receptors always contain one alpha chain and one beta chain. Examples include Alpha6beta1, Alpha3beta1, Alpha7beta1, LFA-1 etc.
  • the term “integrin” includes proteins from natural sources or from recombinant cell culture and biologically active equivalents of the native-sequence integrin, including synthetically produced small-molecule entities and pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives and salts thereof.
  • TNF-alpha tumor necrosis factor alpha
  • TNF-alpha inhibitor an agent that inhibits, to some extent, a biological function of TNF-alpha, generally through binding to TNF-alpha and neutralizing its activity.
  • TNF inhibitors specifically contemplated herein are etanercept (ENBREL®), infliximab (REMICADE®), and adalimumab (HUMIRATM).
  • DMARDs examples include hydroxycloroquine, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, etanercept, infliximab (plus oral and subcutaneous methotrexate), azathioprine, D-penicillamine, gold salts (oral), gold salts (intramuscular), minocycline, cyclosporine including cyclosporine A and topical cyclosporine, staphylococcal protein A (Goodyear and Silverman, J. Exp. Med., 197, (9), p 1125-39 (2003)), including salts and derivatives thereof, etc.
  • a preferred DMARD herein is methotrexate.
  • non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs include aspirin, acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, indomethacin, sulindac, tolmetin, phenylbutazone, diclofenac, ketoprofen, benorylate, mefenamic acid, methotrexate, fenbufen, azapropazone; COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib (CELEBREX®; 4-(5-(4-methylphenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide, valdecoxib (BEXTRA®), meloxicam (MOBIC®), GR 253035 (Glaxo Wellcome); and MK966 (Merck Sharp & Dohme), including salts and derivatives thereof, etc.
  • they are aspirin, naproxen
  • integrin antagonists or antibodies examples include an LFA-1 antibody, such as efalizumab (RAPTIVA®) commercially available from Genentech, or an alpha 4 integrin antibody such as natalizumab (ANTEGREN®) available from Biogen, or diazacyclic phenylalanine derivatives (WO 2003/89410), phenylalanine derivatives (WO 2003/70709, WO 2002/28830, WO 2002/16329 and WO 2003/53926), phenylpropionic acid derivatives (WO 2003/10135), enamine derivatives (WO 2001/79173), propanoic acid derivatives (WO 2000/37444), alkanoic acid derivatives (WO 2000/32575), substituted phenyl derivatives (U.S.
  • LFA-1 antibody such as efalizumab (RAPTIVA®) commercially available from Genentech
  • ANTEGREN® alpha 4 integrin antibody
  • phenylalanine derivatives WO 2003/70709,
  • Corticosteroid refers to any one of several synthetic or naturally occurring substances with the general chemical structure of steroids that mimic or augment the effects of the naturally occurring corticosteroids.
  • synthetic corticosteroids include prednisone, prednisolone (including methylprednisolone, such as SOLU-MEDROL® methylprednisolone sodium succinate), dexamethasone or dexamethasone triamcinolone, hydrocortisone, and betamethasone.
  • the preferred corticosteroids herein are prednisone, methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone, or dexamethasone.
  • BAFF BAFF polypeptide
  • TALL-1 TALL-1 polypeptide
  • a biological activity of BAFF can be selected from the group consisting of promoting B-cell survival, promoting B-cell maturation and binding to BR3.
  • Variants of BAFF will preferably have at least 80% or any successive integer up to 100% including, more preferably, at least 90%, and even more preferably, at least 95% amino acid sequence identity with a native sequence of a BAFF polypeptide.
  • a “native-sequence” BAFF polypeptide comprises a polypeptide having the same amino acid sequence as the corresponding BAFF polypeptide derived from nature.
  • BAFF exists in a soluble form following cleavage from the cell surface by furin-type proteases.
  • Such native-sequence BAFF polypeptides can be isolated from nature or can be produced by recombinant and/or synthetic means.
  • non-sequence BAFF polypeptide or “native BAFF” specifically encompasses naturally occurring truncated or secreted forms (e.g., an extracellular domain sequence), naturally occurring variant forms (e.g., alternatively spliced forms), and naturally occurring allelic variants of the polypeptide.
  • BAFF includes those polypeptides described in Shu et al., J. Leukocyte Biol., 65:680 (1999); GenBank Accession No. AF136293; WO 1998/18921 published May 7, 1998; EP 869,180 published Oct. 7, 1998; WO 1998/27114 published Jun. 25, 1998; WO 1999/12964 published Mar. 18, 1999; WO 1999/33980 published Jul.
  • BAFF antagonist as used herein is used in the broadest sense, and includes any molecule that (1) binds a native-sequence BAFF polypeptide or binds a native-sequence of BR3 to partially or fully block BR3 interaction with BAFF polypeptide, and (2) partially or fully blocks, inhibits, or neutralizes native-sequence BAFF activity.
  • the BAFF receptor to be blocked is the BR3 receptor.
  • Native BAFF activity promotes, among other things, B-cell survival and/or B-cell maturation.
  • the inhibition, blockage or neutralization of BAFF activity results in a reduction in the number of B cells.
  • a BAFF antagonist according to this invention will partially or fully block, inhibit, or neutralize one or more biological activities of a BAFF polypeptide, in vitro and/or in vivo.
  • a biologically active BAFF potentiates any one or a combination of the following events in vitro and/or in vivo: an increased survival of B cells, an increased level of IgG and/or IgM, an increased numbers of plasma cells, and processing of NF- ⁇ b2/100 to p52 NF-Kb in splenic B cells (e.g., Batten et al., J. Exp. Med. 192:1453-1465 (2000); Moore et al., Science 285:260-263 (1999); Kayagaki et al. Immunity 17:515-524 (2002)).
  • a BAFF antagonist can function in a direct or indirect manner to partially or fully block, inhibit or neutralize BAFF signaling, in vitro or in vivo.
  • the BAFF antagonist can directly bind BAFF.
  • BAFF antibodies that bind within a region of human BAFF comprising residues 162-275 and/or a neighboring residue of a residue selected from the group consisting of 162, 163, 206, 211, 231, 233, 264 and 265 of human BAFF such that the antibody sterically hinders BAFF binding to BR3 are contemplated, where such residue numbers refer to SEQ ID NO: 16.
  • a direct binder is a polypeptide comprising any portion of a BAFF receptor that binds BAFF such as an extracellular domain of a BAFF receptor, or fragments and variants thereof that bind native BAFF.
  • BAFF antagonists include the polypeptides having a sequence of a polypeptide comprising the sequence of Formula I:
  • X 1 , X 3 , X 5 , X 7 , X 8 , X 9 , X 10 , X 11 , X 12 , X 14 , X 15 and X 17 are any amino acid except cysteine; and wherein X 16 is an amino acid selected from the group consisting of L, F, I and V; and wherein the polypeptide does not comprise a cysteine within seven amino acid residues N-terminal to the most N-terminal cysteine C and C-terminal to the most C-terminal cysteine C of Formula I.
  • a polypeptide comprising the sequence of Formula I has the two Cs joined by disulfide bonding; X 5 LX 7 X 8 forming the conformation of a type 1 beta turn structure with the center of the turn between L and X 7 ; and has a positive value for the dihedral angle phi of X 8 .
  • X 10 is selected from the group consisting of W, F, V, L, I, Y, M and a non-polar amino amino acid.
  • X 10 is W.
  • X 3 is an amino acid selected from the group consisting of M, V, L, I, Y, F, W and a non-polar amino acid.
  • X 5 is selected from the group consisting of V, L, P, S, I, A and R.
  • X 7 is selected from the group consisting of V, T, I and L.
  • X 8 is selected from the group consisting of R, K, G, N, H and a D-amino acid.
  • X 9 is selected from the group consisting of H, K, A, R and Q.
  • X 11 is I or V.
  • X 12 is selected from the group consisting of P, A, D, E and S.
  • X 16 is L.
  • the sequence of Formula I is a sequence selected from the group consisting of ECFDLLVRAWVPCSVLK (SEQ ID NO: 19), ECFDLLVRHWVPCGLLR (SEQ ID NO:20), ECFDLLVRRWVPCEMLG (SEQ ID NO:21), ECFDLLVRSWVPCHMLR (SEQ ID NO:22), ECFDLLVRHWVACGLLR (SEQ ID NO:23), and QCFDRLNAWVPCSVLK (SEQ ID NO:24).
  • the BAFF antagonist comprises any one of the amino acid sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23.
  • BAFF antagonists include the polypeptides having a sequence of a polypeptide comprising the sequence of Formula II:
  • a polypeptide comprising the sequence of Formula II has a disulfide bond between the two Cs and has the conformation of X 5 LX 7 X 8 forming a type I beta turn structure with the center of the turn between L and X 7 ; and has a positive value for the dihedral angle phi of X 8 .
  • X 3 is an amino acid selected from the group consisting of M, A, V, L, I, Y, F, W and a non-polar amino acid.
  • X 5 is selected from the group consisting of V, L, P, S, I, A and R.
  • X 8 is selected from the group consisting of R, K, G, N, H and D-amino acid.
  • Xg is selected from the group consisting of H, K, A, R and Q.
  • the BAFF receptor from which the extracellular domain or BAFF-binding fragment or BAFF-binding variant thereof is derived is TAC1, BR3 or BCMA.
  • the BAFF antagonist can bind an extracellular domain of a native-sequence BR3 at its BAFF binding region to partially or fully block, inhibit or neutralize BAFF binding to BR3 in vitro, in situ, or in vivo.
  • such indirect antagonist is an anti-BR3 antibody that binds in a region of BR3 comprising residues 23-38 of human BR3 as defined below (SEQ ID NO:26) or a neighboring region of those residues such that binding of human BR3 to BAFF is sterically hindered.
  • a BAFF antagonist according to this invention includes BAFF antibodies and immunoadhesins comprising an extracellular domain of a BAFF receptor, or fragments and variants thereof that bind native BAFF.
  • the BAFF receptor from which the extracellular domain or BAFF-binding fragment or BAFF-binding variant thereof is derived is TAC1, BR3 or BCMA.
  • the immunoadhesin comprises an amino acid sequence of that of Formula I or Formula II as set forth above, including an amino acid sequence selected from any one of the group consisting of SEQ ID NOS: 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24.
  • the BAFF antagonist binds to a BAFF polypeptide or a BR3 polypeptide with a binding affinity of 100nM or less. According to another embodiment, the BAFF antagonist binds to a BAFF polypeptide or a BR3 polypeptide with a binding affinity of 10 nM or less. According to yet another embodiment, the BAFF antagonist binds to a BAFF polypeptide or a BR3 polypeptide with a binding affinity of 1 nM or less.
  • BR3 BR3 polypeptide
  • BR3 receptor when used herein encompass “native-sequence BR3 polypeptides” and “BR3 variants” (which are further defined herein). “BR3” is a designation given to those polypeptides comprising the following amino acid sequence and homologs thereof, and variants or fragments thereof that bind native BAFF:
  • the BR3 polypeptides of the invention can be isolated from a variety of sources, such as from human tissue types or from another source, or prepared by recombinant and/or synthetic methods.
  • the term BR3 includes the BR3 polypeptides described in WO 2002/24909 and WO 2003/14294.
  • a “native-sequence” BR3 polypeptide or “native BR3” comprises a polypeptide having the same amino acid sequence as the corresponding BR3 polypeptide derived from nature. Such native-sequence BR3 polypeptides can be isolated from nature or can be produced by recombinant and/or synthetic means.
  • the term “native-sequence BR3 polypeptide” specifically encompasses naturally occurring truncated, soluble or secreted forms (e.g., an extracellular domain sequence), naturally occurring variant forms (e.g., alternatively spliced forms) and naturally occurring allelic variants of the polypeptide.
  • the BR3 polypeptides of the invention include the BR3 polypeptide comprising or consisting of the contiguous sequence of amino acid residues 1 to 184 of a human BR3 (SEQ ID NO:26).
  • a BR3 “extracellular domain” or “ECD” refers to a form of the BR3 polypeptide that is essentially free of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains.
  • ECD forms of BR3 include a polypeptide comprising any one of the amino acid sequences selected from the group consisting of amino acids 1-77, 2-62, 2-71, 1-61, 7-71, 23-38 and 2-63 of human BR3.
  • the invention contemplates BAFF antagonists that are polypeptides comprising any one of the above-mentioned ECD forms of human BR3 and variants and fragments thereof that bind a native BAFF.
  • Mini-BR3 is a 26-residue core region of the BAFF-binding domain of BR3, i.e., the amino acid sequence: TPCVPAECFD LLVRHCVACG LLRTPR (SEQ ID NO:27)
  • BR3 variant means a BR3 polypeptide having at least about 80% amino acid sequence identity with the amino acid sequence of a native-sequence, full-length BR3 or BR3ECD and binds a native-sequence BAFF polypeptide.
  • the BR3 variant includes a single cysteine-rich domain.
  • Such BR3 variant polypeptides include, for instance, BR3 polypeptides wherein one or more amino acid residues are added, or deleted, at the N- and/or C-terminus, as well as within one or more internal domains, of the full-length amino acid sequence. Fragments of the BR3 ECD that bind a native sequence BAFF polypeptide are also contemplated.
  • a BR3 variant polypeptide will have at least about 80% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 81% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 82% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 83% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 84% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 85% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 86% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 87% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 88% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 89% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 90% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 91% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 92% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 93% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 94% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 95% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 96% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 97% amino acid sequence identity, at least about 98% amino acid sequence identity or at least about 99% amino acid sequence identity with a human BR3 polypeptide or a specified fragment thereof (e.g., ECD).
  • ECD amino acid sequence identity
  • BR3 variant polypeptides do not encompass the native BR3 polypeptide sequence. According to another embodiment, BR3 variant polypeptides are at least about 10 amino acids in length, at least about 20 amino acids in length, at least about 30 amino acids in length, at least about 40 amino acids in length, at least about 50 amino acids in length, at least about 60 amino acids in length, or at least about 70 amino acids in length.
  • the BAFF antagonists herein are immunoadhesins comprising a portion of BR3, TACI or BCMA that binds BAFF, or variants thereof that bind BAFF.
  • the BAFF antagonist is a BAFF antibody.
  • a “BAFF antibody” is an antibody that binds BAFF, and preferably binds BAFF within a region of human BAFF comprising residues 162-275 of the human BAFF sequence disclosed herein under the “BAFF” definition (SEQ ID NO:16).
  • the BAFF antagonist is BR3 antibody.
  • a “BR3 antibody” is an antibody that binds BR3, and is preferably one that binds BR3 within a region of human BR3 comprising residues 23-38 of the human BR3 sequence disclosed herein under the “BR3” definition (SEQ ID NO:26).
  • SEQ ID NO:26 the amino acid positions of human BAFF and human BR3 referred to herein are according to the sequence numbering under human BAFF and human BR3, SEQ ID NOS:16 and 26, respectively, disclosed herein under the “BAFF” and “BR3” definitions.
  • BAFF-binding polypeptides or BAFF antibodies can be found in, e.g., WO 2002/092620, WO 2003/014294, Gordon et al., Biochemistry 42(20):5977-5983 (2003), Kelley et al., J. Biol. Chem. 279 (16):16727-16735 (2004), WO 1998/18921, WO 2001/12812, WO 2000/68378 and WO 2000/40716.
  • a “package insert” is used to refer to instructions customarily included in commercial packages of therapeutic products, that contain information about the indications, usage, dosage, administration, contraindications, other therapeutic products to be combined with the packaged product, and/or warnings concerning the use of such therapeutic products, etc.
  • a “medicament” is an active drug to treat the joint damage or its symptoms or side effects.
  • the present invention provides a method of treating joint damage in a subject such as a patient comprising administering an antagonist, preferably an antibody, that binds to a B-cell surface marker (more preferably a CD20 antibody) to the subject and assessing by radiographic x-ray if the subject has shown a reduction in joint damage upon treatment.
  • an antagonist preferably an antibody
  • a B-cell surface marker more preferably a CD20 antibody
  • the invention contemplates a method for treating joint damage in a subject comprising administering an antagonist that binds to a B-cell surface marker to the subject and giving the subject, at least about one month after the administration, a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of antagonist administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage, indicating that the subject has been successfully treated for the joint damage.
  • the invention also contemplates a method for treating joint damage in a subject comprising administering an antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker to the subject and giving the subject, at least about one month after the administration, a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage, indicating that the subject has been successfully treated for the joint damage.
  • the invention further contemplates a method for treating joint damage in a subject comprising administering a CD20 antibody to the subject and giving the subject, at least about one month after the administration, a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of CD20 antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage, indicating that the subject has been successfully treated for the joint damage.
  • the radiographic testing after administering the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody occurs at least about two months, more preferably at least about 10 weeks, still more preferably at least about three months, further preferably at least about four months, still more preferably at least about five months, further more preferably at least about 24 weeks, or at least about six months, and most preferably at least about 52 weeks after administering the antagonist or antibody.
  • the test measures a total modified Sharp score.
  • the subject is retreated in that the method further comprises administering to the subject an antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody in an amount effective to achieve a continued or maintained reduction in joint damage as compared to the effect of a prior administration of the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody.
  • the subject may be administered a second dosing of the antagonist or antibody and is evaluated by radiographic testing at least about one month (and preferably more than about two months, more preferably about 24 weeks or about 6 months) after such second dosing to determine if the second dosing is effective (i.e., an effective amount of the antagonist or antibody is administered) to maintain the effects of the first dosing or improve the reduction in joint damage as compared to the effect of the first dosing.
  • This re-treatment regimen can be repeated as long as desired or necessary to achieve or maintain reduction in joint damage, which indicates successful treatment of the joint damage.
  • the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody is additionally (continued to be) administered to the subject even if there is not a clinical improvement in the subject at the time of the radiographic testing after a prior administration, such as the first administration of the antagonist or antibody.
  • the clinical improvement is determined by assessing the number of tender or swollen joints, the Psoriasis Assessment Severity Index, a global clinical assessment of the subject, assessing erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or assessing the amount of C-reactive protein level.
  • the second antagonist or antibody exposure for re-treatment is the next time the subject is treated with the antagonist or, for example, CD20 antibody after the initial antibody exposure, there being no intervening antagonist or, e.g., CD20 antibody treatment or exposure between the initial and second exposures.
  • Such re-treatment may be scheduled or unscheduled, but is preferably a scheduled redosing, particularly to protect organs such as kidneys from damage.
  • the second antibody exposure is about 0.5 to 4 grams, more preferably about 1.5 to 3.5 grams, still more preferably about 1.5 to 2.5 grams, the second exposure not being provided until from about 20 to 35 weeks (preferably about 23 to 30, more preferably about 23 to 28 weeks) from the initial exposure.
  • the method contemplates administering to the subject an effective amount of the antagonist or, for example, CD20 antibody to provide a third antagonist or antibody exposure (if antibody, more preferably CD20 antibody) preferably of about 0.5 to 4 grams, more preferably about 1.5 to 3.5 grams, still more preferably about 1.5 to 2.5 grams), the third exposure not being provided until from about 46 to 60 weeks (preferably about 46 to 55, more preferably about 46 to 52 weeks) from the initial exposure.
  • a third antagonist or antibody exposure is provided until at least about 70-75 weeks from the initial exposure, and still more preferably no further antagonist or antibody exposure is provided until about 74 to 80 weeks from the initial exposure.
  • any one or more of the antibody exposures herein may be provided to the subject as a single dose of antibody, or as separate doses, for example, about 1-4 separate doses of the antibody (e.g., constituting a first and second dose, or a first, second, and third dose, or a first, second, third, and fourth dose, etc).
  • the particular number of doses (whether one, two or three or more) employed for each antibody exposure is dependent, for example, on the type of joint damage treated, the type of antibody employed, whether, what type, and how much and how many of a second medicament is employed as noted below, and the method and frequency of administration.
  • the later dose (for example, second or third dose) is preferably administered from about 1 to 20 days, more preferably from about 6 to 16 days, and most preferably from about 14 to 16 days from the time the previous dose was administered.
  • the separate doses are preferably administered within a total period of between about 1 day and 4 weeks, more preferably between about 1 and 20 days (e.g., within a period of 6-18 days).
  • the separate doses are administered about weekly, with the second dose being administered about one week from the first dose and any third or subsequent dose being administered about one week from the second dose.
  • Each such separate dose of the antibody is preferably about 0.5 to 1.5 grams, more preferably about 0.75 to 1.3 grams.
  • a method of treating joint damage in a subject comprising administering an effective amount of an antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker (e.g., a CD20 antibody) to the subject to provide an initial antibody exposure followed by a second antibody exposure, wherein the second exposure is not provided until from about 16 to 54 weeks from the initial exposure and each of the antibody exposures is provided to the subject as a single dose or as two or three separate doses of antibody.
  • a B-cell surface marker e.g., a CD20 antibody
  • the antibody exposures are of about 0.5 to 4 grams each, and most preferably the amounts given above.
  • the subject is provided at least about three exposures of the antibody, for example, from about 3 to 60 exposures, and more particularly about 3 to 40 exposures, most particularly, about 3 to 20 exposures. Preferably, such exposures are administered at intervals each of 24 weeks.
  • each antibody exposure is provided as a single dose of the antibody. In an alternative embodiment, each antibody exposure is provided as separate doses of the antibody. However, not every antibody exposure need be provided as a single dose or as separate doses.
  • about 2-3 grams of the CD20 antibody is administered as the initial exposure. If about 3 grams are administered, then about 1 gram of the CD20 antibody is administered weekly for about three weeks as the initial exposure. If about 2 grams of the CD20 antibody is administered as the initial exposure, then about 1 gram of the CD20 antibody is administered followed in about two weeks by another about 1 gram of the antibody as the initial exposure.
  • the second exposure is at about 24 weeks or six months from the initial exposure and is administered in an amount of about 2 grams. In an alternative preferred aspect, the second exposure is at about 24 weeks or six months from the initial exposure and is administered as about 1 gram of the antibody followed in about two weeks by another about 1 gram of the antibody.
  • the subject is in remission after the initial or any later antagonist or antibody exposures. More preferably, the multi-exposure method herein involves scheduled re-dosing or re-treating such that the subject is in remission when provided the second, and preferably all antagonist or antibody exposures. Such re-dosing is scheduled to prevent any relapse, recurrence, or organ damage, rather than to treat it therapeutically. Most preferably, the subject is in remission for at least about 24 weeks or six months, and still most preferably at least about nine months, and even still most preferably at least about 52 weeks or one year since the last antagonist or antibody exposure used in the re-treatment method.
  • the subject is treated with the same antagonist or antibody, such as CD20 antibody, for at least two antagonist or antibody exposures, and preferably for each antagonist or antibody exposure.
  • the initial and second antagonist or antibody exposures are preferably with the same antagonist or antibody, and more preferably all antagonist or antibody exposures are with the same antagonist or antibody, i.e., treatment for the first two exposures, and preferably all exposures, is with one type of antagonist or antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker, such as CD20 antibody, e.g., all with rituximab or all with the same humanized 2H7.
  • the antagonist such as CD20 or B-cell surface marker antibody
  • the antagonist may be unconjugated, such as a naked antibody, or may be conjugated with another molecule for further effectiveness, such as, for example, to improve half-life.
  • the preferred CD20 antibody herein is a chimeric, humanized, or human CD20 antibody, more preferably rituximab, a humanized 2H7 (e.g. comprising the variable domain sequences in SEQ ID Nos.
  • 2 and 8 or is humanized 2H7 comprising the variable domain sequences in SEQ ID NOS:39 and 40, or comprising the variable domain sequences in SEQ ID NOS:32 and 33, or comprising a variable heavy-chain domain with alteration N100A, or D56A and N100A, or D56A, N100Y, and S100aR in SEQ ID NO:8 and a variable light-chain domain with alteration M32L, or S92A, or M32L and S92A in SEQ ID NO:2), chimeric or humanized A20 antibody (Immunomedics), HUMAX-CD20 human CD20 antibody (Genmab), or single-chain proteins binding to CD20 (Trubion Pharm Inc.). Still more preferred is rituximab or a humanized 2H7.
  • the subject has never been previously treated with one or more drug(s), such as with an anti-TNF-alpha inhibitor, e.g., an anti-TNF-alpha or anti-TNF-alpha receptor antibody, to treat, for example, arthritis, or with immunosuppressive agent(s) to treat the joint damage or an underlying cause such as an autoimmune disorder, and/or has never been previously treated with an antagonist (for example, antibody) to a B-cell surface marker (e.g. never been previously treated with a CD20 antibody).
  • an anti-TNF-alpha inhibitor e.g., an anti-TNF-alpha or anti-TNF-alpha receptor antibody
  • an antagonist for example, antibody
  • the subject has never been previously treated with an anti-alpha 4 integrin antibody or co-stimulation modulator, a biologic agent, a DMARD other than MTX, except for azathioprine and/or leflunomide, a cell-depleting therapy, including investigational agents (e.g., CAMPATH, anti-CD4, anti-CD5, anti-CD3, anti-CD19, anti-CD11a, anti-CD22, or BLys/BAFF), a live/attenuated vaccine within 28 days prior to baseline, or intra-articular or parenteral glucocorticoids within 4 weeks prior to baseline.
  • investigational agents e.g., CAMPATH, anti-CD4, anti-CD5, anti-CD3, anti-CD19, anti-CD11a, anti-CD22, or BLys/BAFF
  • a live/attenuated vaccine within 28 days prior to baseline, or intra-articular or parenteral glucocorticoids within 4 weeks prior to baseline.
  • the subject may have had a relapse with the joint damage or suffered organ damage such as kidney damage before being treated in any of the methods above, including after the initial or a later antagonist or antibody exposure.
  • the subject has not relapsed with the joint damage and more preferably has not had such a relapse before at least the initial treatment.
  • the antagonist for example, CD20 antibody
  • the antagonist is the only medicament administered to the subject to treat the joint damage.
  • the antagonist e.g., CD20 antibody
  • the subject does not have a malignancy, including solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, or carcinoma in situ (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that have been excised and cured).
  • the subject does not have rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  • the subject does not have rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA (including but not limited to vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis or Felty's syndrome).
  • the subject does have secondary Sjögren's syndrome or secondary limited cutaneous vasculitis.
  • the subject does not have functional class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in RA.
  • the subject does not have inflammatory joint disease other than RA (including, but not limited to, gout, reactive arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, Lyme disease), or other systemic autoimmune disorder (including, but not limited to, systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma, inflammatory myopathy, mixed connective tissue disease, or any overlap syndrome).
  • RA juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  • JRA juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  • JRA juvenile RA
  • the subject does not have significant and/or uncontrolled cardiac or pulmonary disease (including obstructive pulmonary disease), or significant concomitant disease, including but not limited to, nervous system, renal, hepatic, endocrine or gastrointestinal disorders., nor primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of, or currently active), including known history of HIV infection.
  • the subject does not have any neurological (congenital or acquired), vascular or systemic disorder which could affect any of the efficacy assessments, in particular, joint pain and swelling (e.g., Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy, diabetic neuropathy).
  • the subject does not have multiple sclerosis.
  • the subject does not have lupus or Sjögren's syndrome. In still another embodiment, the subject does not have an autoimmune disease.
  • the joint damage is not associated with an autoimmune disease or with an autoimmune disease other than arthritis, or with a risk of developing an autoimmune disease or an autoimmune disease other than arthritis.
  • an “autoimmune disease” herein is a disease or disorder arising from and directed against an individual's own tissues or organs or a co-segregate or manifestation thereof or resulting condition therefrom.
  • B cells demonstrate a pathogenic effect in human autoimmune diseases through a multitude of mechanistic pathways, including autoantibody production, immune complex formation, dendritic and T-cell activation, cytokine synthesis, direct chemokine release, and providing a nidus for ectopic neo-lymphogenesis. Each of these pathways participates to different degrees in the pathology of autoimmune diseases.
  • the joint damage is caused by arthritis, aseptic joint loosening of orthopedic implants, non-union of a fracture, spondyloarthropathies, psoriasis, or Crohn's disease. More preferably, the joint damage is caused by arthritis, which is more preferably rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or psoriatic arthritis.
  • the antagonist is an antibody
  • the antibody is administered intravenously or subcutaneously.
  • the antibody is administered in a dose of about 0.4 to 4 grams, more preferably about 1.5 to 3.5 grams, still more preferably about 1.5 to 2.5 grams.
  • the antibody is preferably administered in a dose of about 0.4 to 1.3 grams at a frequency of one to four doses within a period of about one month, more preferably about 500 mg to 1.2 grams, still more preferably about 500 mg or about 750 mg to about 1.1 grams, and more preferably the antibody is administered in two to three doses. Still more preferably, the antibody is administered within a period of about 2 to 3 weeks.
  • the subject is rheumatoid factor negative. In another aspect, the subject is rheumatoid factor positive.
  • the subject was administered methotrexate prior to the baseline or start of treatment. More preferably, the methotrexate was administered at a dose of about 10-25 mg/week. Also, preferably, the methotrexate was administered for at least about 12 weeks prior to the baseline, and still more preferably the methotrexate was administered at a stable dose the last four weeks prior to the baseline. In other embodiments, the methotrexate was administered perorally or parenterally.
  • the joint damage is caused by rheumatoid arthritis and the subject has exhibited an inadequate response to one or more anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, and/or methotrexate is administered to the subject along with the antagonist, for example, CD20 antibody, and/or the antagonist is a CD20 antibody that is administered at a dose of about 1000 mg ⁇ 2 on days 1 and 15 intravenously at the start of the treatment.
  • TNF anti-tumor necrosis factor
  • the invention provides a method of monitoring the treatment of joint damage in a subject comprising administering an effective amount of an antagonist to a B-cell surface marker (such as an antibody thereto, including a CD20 antibody) to the subject and measuring by radiography after at least about one month from the administration whether the joint damage has been reduced over baseline prior to the administration, wherein a decrease versus baseline in the subject after treatment indicates the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody is having an effect on the joint damage.
  • the degree of reduction versus baseline is measured a second time after the administration of the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody.
  • the measurement is taken after at least about 24 weeks from the administration.
  • Also included herein is a method of monitoring the treatment of joint damage in a subject comprising administering an effective amount of an antagonist to a B-cell surface marker (such as an antibody thereto, including a CD20 antibody) to the subject and measuring by radiography after at least about 52 weeks from the administration whether the joint damage has been reduced over baseline prior to the administration, wherein a decrease versus baseline in the subject after treatment indicates the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody is having an effect on the joint damage.
  • the degree of reduction versus baseline is measured a second time after the administration of the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody.
  • the invention provides a method of determining whether to continue administering an antagonist to a B-cell surface marker (such as an antibody thereto, including a CD20 antibody) to a subject with joint damage comprising measuring by radiography reduction in joint damage in the subject after administration of the antagonist such as CD20 antibody a first time, measuring by radiography reduction in joint damage in the subject after administration of the antagonist such as CD20 antibody a second time, comparing the radiography scores in the subject at the first time and at the second time, and if the score is less at the second time than at the first time, continuing administration of the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody.
  • a B-cell surface marker such as an antibody thereto, including a CD20 antibody
  • a step is included in the treatment method to test for the subject's response to treatment after the administration step to determine that the level of response is effective to treat the joint damage.
  • a step is included to test the radiographic score after administration and compare it to a baseline radiographic score obtained before administration to determine if treatment is effective by measuring if, and by how much, it has been changed. This test may be repeated at various scheduled or unscheduled time intervals after the administration to determine maintenance of any partial or complete remission.
  • the methods herein comprise a step of testing the subject, before administration, to see if one or more biomarkers or symptoms are present for joint damage, as set forth above.
  • a step may be included to check the subject's clinical history, as detailed above, for example, to rule out infections or malignancy as causes, for example, primary causes, of the subject's condition, prior to administering the antibody or antagonist to the subject.
  • the joint damage is primary (i.e., the leading disease), and is not secondary, such as secondary to infection or malignancy, whether solid or liquid tumors.
  • no other medicament than the antagonist such as CD20 antibody is administered to the subject to treat the joint damage.
  • a second medicament may be one or more medicaments, and include, for example, an immunosuppressive agent, cytokine antagonist such as a cytokine antibody, growth factor, hormone, integrin, integrin antagonist or antibody, or any combination thereof.
  • an immunosuppressive agent such as a cytokine antibody, growth factor, hormone, integrin, integrin antagonist or antibody, or any combination thereof.
  • the type of such second medicament depends on various factors, including the type of joint damage, the severity of the joint damage, the condition and age of the subject, the type and dose of first medicament employed, etc.
  • additional medicaments include an interferon class drug such as interferon-alpha (e.g., from Amarillo Biosciences, Inc.), IFN-beta-1a (REBIF® and AVONEX®) or IFN-beta-1b (BETASERON®), an oligopeptide such as glatiramer acetate (COPAXONE®), an agent blocking CD40-CD40 ligand, an immunosuppressive agent (such as mitoxantrone (NOVANTRONE®), methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, leflunomide, and azathioprine), intravenous immunoglobulin (gamma globulin), lymphocyte-depleting therapy (e.g., mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, CAMPATHTM antibodies, anti-CD4, cladribine, a polypeptide construct with at least two domains comprising a de-immunized, autoreactive antigen
  • TNF inhibitor such as an antibody to TNF-alpha, DMARD, NSAID, plasmapheresis or plasma exchange, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (BACTRIMTM, SEPTRATM), mycophenolate mofetil, H2-blockers or proton-pump inhibitors (during the use of potentially ulcerogenic immunosuppressive therapy), levothyroxine, cyclosporin A (e.g.
  • somatastatin analogue such as somatastatin analogue, a DMARD or NSAID, cytokine antagonist such as antibody, anti-metabolite, immunosuppressive agent, rehabilitative surgery, radioiodine, thyroidectomy, BAFF antagonist such as BAFF or BR3 antibodies or immunoadhesins, anti-CD40 receptor or anti-CD40 ligand (CD154), anti-IL-6 receptor antagonist/antibody, another B-cell surface antagonist or antibody such as a humanized 2H7 or other humanized or human CD20 antibody with rituximab; IL-1 blockers, such as rHUIL-1Ra (Amgen-Synergen) and tiaprofenic acid I-1B inhibitor (Hoechst); and co-stimulatory modifiers, such as ORENCIA® (abatacept) (Bristol-Myers Squibb); enlimomab (anti-ICAM-1 monoclonal antibody); CDO-855 (humanized antibody, which
  • Preferred such medicaments are an antibiotic, anti-integrin, gamma globulin, a pain-control agent, an integrin antagonist, anti-CD4, cladribine, trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole, an H2-blocker, a proton-pump inhibitor, cyclosporine, cholesterol-lowering drug of the statin class, estradiol, testosterone, androgen, hormone-replacement drug, a TNF inhibitor such as a TNF-alpha inhibitor, DMARD, NSAID (to treat, for example, musculoskeletal symptoms), levothyroxine, cyclosporin A, somatastatin analogue, cytokine antagonist (including cytokine-receptor antagonist), anti-metabolite, BAFF antagonist such as BAFF antibody or BR3 antibody, especially a BAFF antibody, immunosuppressive agent such as methotrexate or a corticosteroid, a bisphosphonate, a hormone, and another B-cell surface marker
  • the more preferred such medicaments are an antibiotic, an immunosuppressive agent such as methotrexate or a corticosteroid, a DMARD, a pain-control agent, an integrin antagonist, a NSAID, a cytokine antagonist, a bisphosphonate, or a hormone, or a combination thereof.
  • the second medicament is a DMARD, which is preferably selected from the group consisting of auranofin, chloroquine, D-penicillamine, injectable gold, oral gold, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, myocrisin and methotrexate.
  • the second medicament is a NSAID, which is preferably selected from the group consisting of: pentasa, mesalazine, asacol, codeine phosphate, benorylate, fenbufen, naprosyn, diclofenac, etodolac and indomethacin, aspirin and ibuprofen.
  • NSAID preferably selected from the group consisting of: pentasa, mesalazine, asacol, codeine phosphate, benorylate, fenbufen, naprosyn, diclofenac, etodolac and indomethacin, aspirin and ibuprofen.
  • the second medicament is a pain-control agent, which is preferably selected from the group consisting of: paracetamol and dextropropoxyphene.
  • the second medicament is an immunosuppressive agent, which is preferably selected from the group consisting of etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, leflunomide, anakinra, azathioprine, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide.
  • an immunosuppressive agent which is preferably selected from the group consisting of etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, leflunomide, anakinra, azathioprine, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide.
  • the second medicament is selected from the group consisting of OPG, etanercept, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, kinaret, raptiva, osteoprotegerin (OPG), RANKFc, anti-RANKL, pamidronate, alendronate, actonel, zolendronate, clodronate, methotrexate, azulfidine, hydroxychloroquine, doxycycline, leflunomide, sulfasalazine (SSZ), prednisolone, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, prednisone and methylprednisolone.
  • OPG osteoprotegerin
  • RANKFc osteoprotegerin
  • anti-RANKL pamidronate
  • alendronate actonel
  • zolendronate clodronate
  • methotrexate azulfidine
  • hydroxychloroquine d
  • the second medicament is selected from the group consisting of infliximab, an infliximab/methotrexate (MTX) combination, etanercept, a corticosteroid, cyclosporin A, azathioprine, auranofin, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), combination of prednisolone, MTX, and SSZ, combinations of MTX, SSZ, and HCQ, the combination of cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and HCQ, and the combination of adalimumab with MTX.
  • MTX infliximab/methotrexate
  • the second medicament is a corticosteroid, preferably it is prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone, or dexamethasone. Also, preferably, the corticosteroid is administered in lower amounts than are used if the CD20 antibody is not administered to a subject treated with a corticosteroid. Most preferably, the second medicament is methotrexate.
  • second medicaments may be used in combination with each other or by themselves with the first medicament, so that the expression “second medicament” as used herein does not mean it is the only medicament besides the first medicament, respectively.
  • the second medicament need not be one medicament, but may constitute or comprise more than one such drug.
  • second medicaments as set forth herein are generally used in the same dosages and with administration routes as used hereinbefore or about from 1 to 99% of the heretofore-employed dosages. If such second medicaments are used at all, preferably, they are used in lower amounts than if the first medicament were not present, especially in subsequent dosings beyond the initial dosing with the first medicament, so as to eliminate or reduce side effects caused thereby.
  • a second medicament is administered in an effective amount with an antagonist or antibody exposure
  • it may be administered with any exposure, for example, only with one exposure, or with more than one exposure.
  • the second medicament is administered with the initial exposure.
  • the second medicament is administered with the initial and second exposures.
  • the second medicament is administered with all exposures. It is preferred that after the initial exposure, such as of steroid, the amount of such second medicament is reduced or eliminated so as to reduce the exposure of the subject to an agent with side effects such as prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, and cyclophosphamide.
  • the combined administration of a second medicament includes co-administration (concurrent administration), using separate formulations or a single pharmaceutical formulation, and consecutive administration in either order, wherein preferably there is a time period while both (or all) active agents (medicaments) simultaneously exert their biological activities.
  • the antibody or antagonist herein is administered by any suitable means, including parenteral, topical, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intrapulmonary, intranasal, and/or intralesional administration.
  • Parenteral infusions include intramuscular, intravenous (i.v.), intraarterial, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous administration.
  • Intrathecal administration is also contemplated (see, e.g., US 2002/0009444, Grillo-Lopez, A concerning intrathecal delivery of a CD20 antibody).
  • the antibody or antagonist may suitably be administered by pulse infusion, e.g., with declining doses of the antibody or antagonist.
  • the dosing is given intravenously or subcutaneously, and more preferably by intravenous infusion(s).
  • each exposure may be provided using the same or a different administration means.
  • each exposure is by intravenous administration.
  • each exposure is given by subcutaneous administration.
  • the exposures are given by both intravenous and subcutaneous administration.
  • the CD20 antibody is administered as a slow intravenous infusion rather than an intravenous push or bolus.
  • a steroid such as prednisolone or methylprednisolone (e.g., about 80-120 mg i.v., more specifically about 100 mg i.v.) is administered about 30 minutes prior to any infusion of the CD20 antibody.
  • the CD20 antibody is, for example, infused through a dedicated line.
  • such infusion is preferably commenced at a rate of about 50 mg/hour. This may be escalated, e.g., at a rate of about 50 mg/hour increments every about 30 minutes to a maximum of about 400 mg/hour. However, if the subject is experiencing an infusion-related reaction, the infusion rate is preferably reduced, e.g., to half the current rate, e.g., from 100 mg/hour to 50 mg/hour. Preferably, the infusion of such dose of CD20 antibody (e.g., an about 1000-mg total dose) is completed at about 255 minutes (4 hours 15 min.).
  • the subjects receive a prophylactic treatment of acetaminophen/paracetamol (e.g., about 1 g) and diphenhydramine HCl (e.g., about 50 mg or equivalent dose of similar agent) by mouth about 30 to 60 minutes prior to the start of an infusion.
  • acetaminophen/paracetamol e.g., about 1 g
  • diphenhydramine HCl e.g., about 50 mg or equivalent dose of similar agent
  • the second or subsequent CD20 antibody infusions in this infusion embodiment are preferably commenced at a higher rate than the initial infusion, e.g., at about 100 mg/hour.
  • This rate may be escalated, e.g., at a rate of about 100 mg/hour increments every about 30 minutes to a maximum of about 400 mg/hour.
  • Subjects who experience an infusion-related reaction preferably have the infusion rate reduced to half that rate, e.g., from 100 mg/hour to 50 mg/hour.
  • the infusion of such second or subsequent dose of CD20 antibody is completed by about 195 minutes (3 hours 15 minutes).
  • a method for treating joint damage in a subject comprising administering an antagonist to a B-cell surface marker, such as an antibody thereto, for example, CD20 antibody, to the subject, and giving the subject, at least about 52 weeks after the administration, a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage, indicating that the subject has been successfully treated.
  • a B-cell surface marker such as an antibody thereto, for example, CD20 antibody
  • the test measures a total modified Sharp score.
  • the antagonist is a CD20 antibody. More preferably, the CD20 antibody is rituximab or is humanized 2H7 comprising the variable domain sequences in SEQ ID Nos.
  • the joint damage is caused by arthritis, preferably RA, and more preferably early active RA.
  • the subject has not been previously treated with an immunosuppressive agent before the administration of a first dose of antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody in the treatment method.
  • the antagonist or antibody is administered in a dose of about 0.4 to 4 grams, and more preferably the antagonist or antibody is administered in a dose of about 0.4 to 1.3 grams at a frequency of one to four doses within a period of about one month.
  • the dose is about 500 mg to 1.2 grams, and in other embodiments is about 750 mg to 1.1 grams.
  • the antagonist or antibody is preferably administered in two to three doses, and/or is administered within a period of about 2 to 3 weeks.
  • such method further comprises re-treating the subject by providing an additional administration to the subject of the antagonist such as a CD20 antibody in an amount effective to achieve a continued or maintained reduction in joint damage as compared to the effect of a prior administration of the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody.
  • the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody is additionally administered to the subject even if there is no clinical improvement in the subject at the time of the radiographic testing after a prior administration.
  • the re-treatment may be commenced at least about 24 weeks after the first administration of the antagonist such as CD20 antibody, and one or more further re-treatments is optionally commenced.
  • the further re-treatment is commenced at least about 24 weeks after the second administration of the antagonist such as CD20 antibody.
  • joint damage has been reduced after the re-treatment as compared to the joint damage extent after the first radiographic assessment.
  • a second medicament is administered in an effective amount, wherein the antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody is a first medicament.
  • the second medicament is more than one medicament.
  • the second medicament is an antibiotic, an immunosuppressive agent, a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), a pain-control agent, an integrin antagonist, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), a cytokine antagonist, a bisphosphonate, or a hormone, or a combination thereof, most preferably methotrexate.
  • the subject may be rheumatoid factor negative or positive.
  • the antagonist such as CD20 antibody is administered intravenously or subcutaneously, most preferably intravenously.
  • the methods and articles of manufacture of the present invention use, or incorporate, an antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker, especially one that binds to CD20. Accordingly, methods for generating such antibodies will be described here.
  • CD20 antigen to be used for production of, or screening for, antibody(ies) may be, e.g., a soluble form of CD20 or a portion thereof, containing the desired epitope.
  • cells expressing CD20 at their cell surface can be used to generate, or screen for, antibody(ies).
  • Other forms of CD20 useful for generating antibodies will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • Polyclonal antibodies are preferably raised in animals by multiple subcutaneous (s.c.) or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of the relevant antigen and an adjuvant. It may be useful to conjugate the relevant antigen to a protein that is immunogenic in the species to be immunized, e.g., keyhole limpet hemocyanin, serum albumin, bovine thyroglobulin, or soybean trypsin inhibitor using a bifunctional or derivatizing agent, for example, maleimidobenzoyl sulfosuccinimide ester (conjugation through cysteine residues), N-hydroxysuccinimide (through lysine residues), glutaraldehyde, succinic anhydride, SOCl 2 , or R 1 N ⁇ C ⁇ NR, where R and R 1 are different alkyl groups.
  • a protein that is immunogenic in the species to be immunized e.g., keyhole limpet hemocyanin, serum albumin, bo
  • Animals are immunized against the antigen, immunogenic conjugates, or derivatives by combining, e.g., 100 ⁇ g or 5 ⁇ g of the protein or conjugate (for rabbits or mice, respectively) with 3 volumes of Freund's complete adjuvant and injecting the solution intradermally at multiple sites.
  • the animals are boosted with 1 ⁇ 5 to 1/10 the original amount of peptide or conjugate in Freund's complete adjuvant by subcutaneous injection at multiple sites.
  • Seven to 14 days later the animals are bled and the serum is assayed for antibody titer. Animals are boosted until the titer plateaus.
  • the animal is boosted with the conjugate of the same antigen, but conjugated to a different protein and/or through a different cross-linking reagent.
  • Conjugates also can be made in recombinant cell culture as protein fusions.
  • aggregating agents such as alum are suitably used to enhance the immune response.
  • Monoclonal antibodies are obtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical and/or bind the same epitope except for possible variants that arise during production of the monoclonal antibody, such variants generally being present in minor amounts.
  • the modifier “monoclonal” indicates the character of the antibody as not being a mixture of discrete or polyclonal antibodies.
  • the monoclonal antibodies may be made using the hybridoma method first described by Kohler et al., Nature, 256:495 (1975), or may be made by recombinant DNA methods (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567).
  • a mouse or other appropriate host animal such as a hamster
  • lymphocytes that produce or are capable of producing antibodies that will specifically bind to the protein used for immunization.
  • lymphocytes may be immunized in vitro. Lymphocytes then are fused with myeloma cells using a suitable fusing agent, such as polyethylene glycol, to form a hybridoma cell (Goding, Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice , pp. 59-103 (Academic Press, 1986)).
  • the hybridoma cells thus prepared are seeded and grown in a suitable culture medium that preferably contains one or more substances that inhibit the growth or survival of the unfused, parental myeloma cells.
  • a suitable culture medium that preferably contains one or more substances that inhibit the growth or survival of the unfused, parental myeloma cells.
  • the culture medium for the hybridomas typically will include hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and thymidine (HAT medium), which substances prevent the growth of HGPRT-deficient cells.
  • Preferred myeloma cells are those that fuse efficiently, support stable high-level production of antibody by the selected antibody-producing cells, and are sensitive to a medium such as HAT medium.
  • preferred myeloma cell lines are murine myeloma lines, such as those derived from MOPC-21 and MPC-11 mouse tumors available from the Salk Institute Cell Distribution Center, San Diego, Calif. USA, and SP-2 or X63-Ag8-653 cells available from the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md. USA.
  • Human myeloma and mouse-human heteromyeloma cell lines also have been described for the production of human monoclonal antibodies (Kozbor, J. Immunol., 133:3001 (1984); Brodeur et al., Monoclonal Antibody Production Techniques and Applications , pp. 51-63 (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1987)).
  • Culture medium in which hybridoma cells are growing is assayed for production of monoclonal antibodies directed against the antigen.
  • the binding specificity of monoclonal antibodies produced by hybridoma cells is determined by immunoprecipitation or by an in vitro binding assay, such as radioimmunoassay (RIA) or enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA).
  • RIA radioimmunoassay
  • ELISA enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay
  • the binding affinity of the monoclonal antibody can, for example, be determined by the Scatchard analysis of Munson et al., Anal. Biochem., 107:220 (1980).
  • the clones may be subcloned by limiting dilution procedures and grown by standard methods (Goding, Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice , pp. 59-103 (Academic Press, 1986)). Suitable culture media for this purpose include, for example, D-MEM or RPMI-1640 medium.
  • the hybridoma cells may be grown in vivo as ascites tumors in an animal.
  • the monoclonal antibodies secreted by the subclones are suitably separated from the culture medium, ascites fluid, or serum by conventional immunoglobulin purification procedures such as, for example, protein A-SEPHAROSETM, hydroxylapatite chromatography, gel electrophoresis, dialysis, or affinity chromatography.
  • DNA encoding the monoclonal antibodies is readily isolated and sequenced using conventional procedures (e.g., by using oligonucleotide probes that are capable of binding specifically to genes encoding the heavy and light chains of murine antibodies).
  • the hybridoma cells serve as a preferred source of such DNA.
  • the DNA may be placed into expression vectors, which are then transfected into host cells such as E. coli cells, simian COS cells, Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, or myeloma cells that do not otherwise produce immunoglobulin protein, to obtain the synthesis of monoclonal antibodies in the recombinant host cells.
  • antibodies or antibody fragments can be isolated from antibody phage libraries generated using the techniques described in McCafferty et al., Nature, 348:552-554 (1990). Clackson et al., Nature, 352:624-628 (1991) and Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol., 222:581-597 (1991) describe the isolation of murine and human antibodies, respectively, using phage libraries.
  • the DNA also may be modified, for example, by substituting the coding sequence for human heavy- and light chain constant domains in place of the homologous murine sequences (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567; Morrison, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:6851 (1984)), or by covalently joining to the immunoglobulin coding sequence all or part of the coding sequence for a non-immunoglobulin polypeptide.
  • non-immunoglobulin polypeptides are substituted for the constant domains of an antibody, or they are substituted for the variable domains of one antigen-combining site of an antibody to create a chimeric bivalent antibody comprising one antigen-combining site having specificity for an antigen and another antigen-combining site having specificity for a different antigen.
  • antibodies comprising a variant Fc region with high affinity for Fc ⁇ R are useful for treating diseases where an enhanced efficacy of effector cell function is desired, such as autoimmune diseases, as set forth, for example, in US 2005/0037000 and WO 2004/63351 (Macrogenics, Inc. STAVENHAGEN et al.).
  • a humanized antibody has one or more amino acid residues introduced into it from a source that is non-human. These non-human amino acid residues are often referred to as “import” residues, which are typically taken from an “import” variable domain.
  • Humanization can be essentially performed following the method of Winter and co-workers (Jones et al., Nature, 321:522-525 (1986); Riechmann et al., Nature, 332:323-327 (1988); Verhoeyen et al., Science, 239:1534-1536 (1988)), by substituting hypervariable region sequences for the corresponding sequences of a human antibody.
  • humanized antibodies are chimeric antibodies (U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567) wherein substantially less than an intact human variable domain has been substituted by the corresponding sequence from a non-human species.
  • humanized antibodies are typically human antibodies in which some hypervariable region residues and possibly some FR residues are substituted by residues from analogous sites in rodent antibodies.
  • variable domains both light and heavy
  • sequence of the variable domain of a rodent antibody is screened against the entire library of known human variable-domain sequences.
  • the human sequence that is closest to that of the rodent is then accepted as the human framework region (FR) for the humanized antibody (Sims et al., J. Immunol., 151:2296 (1993); Chothia et al., J. Mol. Biol., 196:901 (1987)).
  • Another method uses a particular framework region derived from the consensus sequence of all human antibodies of a particular subgroup of light or heavy chain variable regions.
  • the same framework may be used for several different humanized antibodies (Carter et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:4285 (1992); Presta et al., J. Immunol., 151:2623 (1993)).
  • humanized antibodies are prepared by a process of analysis of the parental sequences and various conceptual humanized products using three-dimensional models of the parental and humanized sequences.
  • Three-dimensional immunoglobulin models are commonly available and are familiar to those skilled in the art.
  • Computer programs are available that illustrate and display probable three-dimensional conformational structures of selected candidate immunoglobulin sequences. Inspection of these displays permits analysis of the likely role of the residues in the functioning of the candidate immunoglobulin sequence, i.e., the analysis of residues that influence the ability of the candidate immunoglobulin to bind its antigen.
  • FR residues can be selected and combined from the recipient and import sequences so that the desired antibody characteristic, such as increased affinity for the target antigen(s), is achieved.
  • the hypervariable region residues are directly and most substantially involved in influencing antigen binding.
  • human antibodies can be generated.
  • transgenic animals e.g., mice
  • transgenic animals e.g., mice
  • J H antibody heavy chain joining region
  • transfer of the human germ-line immunoglobulin gene array in such germ-line mutant mice will result in the production of human antibodies upon antigen challenge. See, e.g., Jakobovits et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  • phage display technology can be used to produce human antibodies and antibody fragments in vitro, from immunoglobulin variable (V) domain gene repertoires from unimmunized donors.
  • V domain genes are cloned in-frame into either a major or minor coat protein gene of a filamentous bacteriophage, such as M13 or fd, and displayed as functional antibody fragments on the surface of the phage particle. Because the filamentous particle contains a single-stranded DNA copy of the phage genome, selections based on the functional properties of the antibody also result in selection of the gene encoding the antibody exhibiting those properties.
  • the phage mimics some of the properties of the B cell.
  • Phage display can be performed in a variety of formats; for their review see, e.g., Johnson et al., Current Opinion in Structural Biology 3:564-571 (1993).
  • V-gene segments can be used for phage display. Clackson et al., Nature, 352:624-628 (1991) isolated a diverse array of anti-oxazolone antibodies from a small random combinatorial library of V genes derived from the spleens of immunized mice.
  • a repertoire of V genes from unimmunized human donors can be constructed and antibodies to a diverse array of antigens (including self-antigens) can be isolated essentially following the techniques described by Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol. 222:581-597 (1991), or Griffith et al., EMBO J. 12:725-734 (1993). See, also, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,565,332 and 5,573,905.
  • Human antibodies may also be generated by in vitro activated B cells (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,567,610 and 5,229,275).
  • antibody fragments Traditionally, these fragments were derived via proteolytic digestion of intact antibodies (see, e.g., Morimoto et al., Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods 24:107-117 (1992) and Brennan et al., Science, 229:81 (1985)). However, these fragments can now be produced directly by recombinant host cells. For example, the antibody fragments can be isolated from the antibody phage libraries discussed above. Alternatively, Fab′-SH fragments can be directly recovered from E. coli and chemically coupled to form F(ab′) 2 fragments (Carter et al., Bio/Technology 10:163-167 (1992)).
  • F(ab′) 2 fragments can be isolated directly from recombinant host cell culture.
  • the antibody of choice is a single chain Fv fragment (scFv). See WO 93/16185; U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,894; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,587,458.
  • the antibody fragment may also be a “linear antibody”, e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,870 for example. Such linear antibody fragments may be monospecific or bispecific.
  • Bispecific antibodies are antibodies that have binding specificities for at least two different epitopes. Exemplary bispecific antibodies may bind to two different epitopes of the CD20 antigen. Other such antibodies may bind CD20 and further bind a second B-cell surface marker. Alternatively, an anti-CD20 binding arm may be combined with an arm that binds to a triggering molecule on a leukocyte such as a T-cell receptor molecule (e.g. CD2 or CD3), or Fc receptors for IgG (Fc ⁇ R), such as Fc ⁇ RI (CD64), Fc ⁇ RII (CD32) and Fc ⁇ RIII (CD16) so as to focus cellular defense mechanisms to the B cell. Bispecific antibodies may also be used to localize certain agents to the B cell. These antibodies possess a CD20-binding arm and an arm that binds the agent (e.g. methotrexate). Bispecific antibodies can be prepared as full-length antibodies or antibody fragments (e.g. F(ab′) 2 bispecific antibodies).
  • bispecific antibodies are known in the art. Traditional production of full length bispecific antibodies is based on the co-expression of two immunoglobulin heavy chain-light chain pairs, where the two chains have different specificities (Millstein et al., Nature, 305:537-539 (1983)). Because of the random assortment of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains, these hybridomas (quadromas) produce a potential mixture of 10 different antibody molecules, of which only one has the correct bispecific structure. Purification of the correct molecule, which is usually done by affinity chromatography steps, is rather cumbersome, and the product yields are low. Similar procedures are disclosed in WO 93/08829, and in Traunecker et al., EMBO J., 10:3655-3659 (1991).
  • antibody variable domains with the desired binding specificities are fused to immunoglobulin constant domain sequences.
  • the fusion preferably is with an immunoglobulin heavy chain constant domain, comprising at least part of the hinge, CH2, and CH3 regions. It is preferred to have the first heavy chain constant region (CH1) containing the site necessary for light chain binding, present in at least one of the fusions.
  • DNAs encoding the immunoglobulin heavy chain fusions and, if desired, the immunoglobulin light chain are inserted into separate expression vectors, and are co-transfected into a suitable host organism.
  • the bispecific antibodies are composed of a hybrid immunoglobulin heavy chain with a first binding specificity in one arm, and a hybrid immunoglobulin heavy chain-light chain pair (providing a second binding specificity) in the other arm. It was found that this asymmetric structure facilitates the separation of the desired bispecific compound from unwanted immunoglobulin chain combinations, as the presence of an immunoglobulin light chain in only one half of the bispecific molecule provides for a facile way of separation. This approach is disclosed in WO 94/04690. For further details of generating bispecific antibodies see, for example, Suresh et al., Methods in Enzymology, 121:210 (1986).
  • the interface between a pair of antibody molecules can be engineered to maximize the percentage of heterodimers that are recovered from recombinant cell culture.
  • the preferred interface comprises at least a part of the C H 3 domain of an antibody constant domain.
  • one or more small amino acid side chains from the interface of the first antibody molecule are replaced with larger side chains (e.g. tyrosine or tryptophan).
  • Compensatory “cavities” of identical or similar size to the large side chain(s) are created on the interface of the second antibody molecule by replacing large amino acid side chains with smaller ones (e.g. alanine or threonine). This provides a mechanism for increasing the yield of the heterodimer over other unwanted end-products such as homodimers.
  • Bispecific antibodies include cross-linked or “heteroconjugate” antibodies.
  • one of the antibodies in the heteroconjugate can be coupled to avidin, the other to biotin.
  • Such antibodies have, for example, been proposed to target immune system cells to unwanted cells (U.S. Pat. No. 4,676,980), and for treatment of HIV infection (WO 91/00360, WO 92/200373, and EP 03089).
  • Heteroconjugate antibodies may be made using any convenient cross-linking methods. Suitable cross-linking agents are well known in the art, and are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,676,980, along with a number of cross-linking techniques.
  • bispecific antibodies can be prepared using chemical linkage.
  • Brennan et al., Science, 229: 81 (1985) describe a procedure wherein intact antibodies are proteolytically cleaved to generate F(ab′) 2 fragments. These fragments are reduced in the presence of the dithiol complexing agent sodium arsenite to stabilize vicinal dithiols and prevent intermolecular disulfide formation.
  • the Fab′ fragments generated are then converted to thionitrobenzoate (TNB) derivatives.
  • One of the Fab′-TNB derivatives is then reconverted to the Fab′-thiol by reduction with mercaptoethylamine and is mixed with an equimolar amount of the other Fab′-TNB derivative to form the bispecific antibody.
  • the bispecific antibodies produced can be used as agents for the selective immobilization of enzymes.
  • bispecific antibodies have been produced using leucine zippers.
  • the leucine zipper peptides from the Fos and Jun proteins were linked to the Fab′ portions of two different antibodies by gene fusion.
  • the antibody homodimers were reduced at the hinge region to form monomers and then re-oxidized to form the antibody heterodimers. This method can also be utilized for the production of antibody homodimers.
  • the fragments comprise a heavy chain variable domain (V H ) connected to a light chain variable domain (V L ) by a linker that is too short to allow pairing between the two domains on the same chain. Accordingly, the V H and V L domains of one fragment are forced to pair with the complementary V L and V H domains of another fragment, thereby forming two antigen-binding sites.
  • V H and V L domains of one fragment are forced to pair with the complementary V L and V H domains of another fragment, thereby forming two antigen-binding sites.
  • sFv single-chain Fv
  • Antibodies with more than two valencies are contemplated.
  • trispecific antibodies can be prepared. Tutt et al., J. Immunol. 147: 60 (1991).
  • the antibody may be conjugated to another molecule, for example, to increase half-life or stability or otherwise improve the pharmacokinetics of the antibody.
  • the antibody may be linked to one of a variety of non-proteinaceous polymers, e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), polypropylene glycol, polyoxyalkylenes, or copolymers of polyethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol.
  • PEG polyethylene glycol
  • Antibody fragments, such as Fab′, linked to one or more PEG molecules are an especially preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • Liposomes containing the antibody are prepared by methods known in the art, such as described in Epstein et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82:3688 (1985); Hwang et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77:4030 (1980); U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,485,045 and 4,544,545; and WO 97/38731 published Oct. 23, 1997. Liposomes with enhanced circulation time are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,013,556.
  • Particularly useful liposomes can be generated by the reverse phase evaporation method with a lipid composition comprising phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and PEG-derivatized phosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-PE). Liposomes are extruded through filters of defined pore size to yield liposomes with the desired diameter.
  • Fab′ fragments of an antibody of the present invention can be conjugated to the liposomes as described in Martin et al. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 286-288 (1982) via a disulfide interchange reaction.
  • Amino acid sequence modification(s) of protein or peptide antibodies described herein are contemplated. For example, it may be desirable to improve the binding affinity and/or other biological properties of the antibody.
  • Amino acid sequence variants of the antibody are prepared by introducing appropriate nucleotide changes into the antibody nucleic acid, or by peptide synthesis. Such modifications include, for example, deletions from, and/or insertions into and/or substitutions of, residues within the amino acid sequences of the antibody. Any combination of deletion, insertion, and substitution is made to arrive at the final construct, provided that the final construct possesses the desired characteristics.
  • the amino acid changes also may alter post-translational processes of the antibody, such as changing the number or position of glycosylation sites.
  • a useful method for identification of certain residues or regions of the antibody that are preferred locations for mutagenesis is called “alanine scanning mutagenesis” as described by Cunningham and Wells, Science, 244:1081-1085 (1989).
  • a residue or group of target residues are identified (e.g., charged residues such as arg, asp, his, lys, and glu) and replaced by a neutral or negatively charged amino acid (most preferably alanine or polyalanine) to affect the interaction of the amino acids with antigen.
  • Those amino acid locations demonstrating functional sensitivity to the substitutions then are refined by introducing further or other variants at, or for, the sites of substitution.
  • the site for introducing an amino acid sequence variation is predetermined, the nature of the mutation per se need not be predetermined. For example, to analyze the performance of a mutation at a given site, ala scanning or random mutagenesis is conducted at the target codon or region and the expressed antibody variants are screened for the desired activity.
  • Amino acid sequence insertions include amino- and/or carboxyl-terminal fusions ranging in length from one residue to polypeptides containing a hundred or more residues, as well as intrasequence insertions of single or multiple amino acid residues.
  • terminal insertions include an antibody with an N-terminal methionyl residue or the antibody fused to a polypeptide or polymer.
  • Other insertional variants of the antibody molecule include the fusion to the N- or C-terminus of the antibody of an enzyme, or a polypeptide that increases the serum half-life of the antibody.
  • variants are an amino acid substitution variant. These variants have at least one amino acid residue in the antibody molecule replaced by different residue.
  • the sites of greatest interest for substitutional mutagenesis of antibodies include the hypervariable regions, but FR alterations are also contemplated. Conservative substitutions are shown in the table below under the heading of “preferred substitutions”. If such substitutions result in a change in biological activity, then more substantial changes, denominated “exemplary substitutions” in the table below, or as further described below in reference to amino acid classes, may be introduced and the products screened.
  • Substantial modifications in the biological properties of the antibody are accomplished by selecting substitutions that differ significantly in their effect on maintaining (a) the structure of the polypeptide backbone in the area of the substitution, for example, as a sheet or helical conformation, (b) the charge or hydrophobicity of the molecule at the target site, or (c) the bulk of the side chain.
  • Amino acids may be grouped according to similarities in the properties of their side chains (in A. L. Lehninger, in Biochemistry, second ed., pp. 73-75, Worth Publishers, New York (1975)):
  • Naturally occurring residues may be divided into groups based on common side-chain properties:
  • Non-conservative substitutions will entail exchanging a member of one of these classes for another class.
  • cysteine residue not involved in maintaining the proper conformation of the antibody also may be substituted, generally with serine, to improve the oxidative stability of the molecule and prevent aberrant crosslinking.
  • cysteine bond(s) may be added to the antibody to improve its stability (particularly where the antibody is an antibody fragment such as an Fv fragment).
  • a particularly preferred type of substitutional variant involves substituting one or more hypervariable region residues of a parent antibody.
  • the resulting variant(s) selected for further development will have improved biological properties relative to the parent antibody from which they are generated.
  • a convenient way for generating such substitutional variants is affinity maturation using phage display. Briefly, several hypervariable region sites (e.g. 6-7 sites) are mutated to generate all possible amino substitutions at each site.
  • the antibody variants thus generated are displayed in a monovalent fashion from filamentous phage particles as fusions to the gene III product of M13 packaged within each particle. The phage-displayed variants are then screened for their biological activity (e.g. binding affinity) as herein disclosed.
  • alanine scanning mutagenesis can be performed to identify hypervariable region residues contributing significantly to antigen binding.
  • Another type of amino acid variant of the antibody alters the original glycosylation pattern of the antibody. Such altering includes deleting one or more carbohydrate moieties found in the antibody, and/or adding one or more glycosylation sites that are not present in the antibody.
  • N-linked refers to the attachment of the carbohydrate moiety to the side chain of an asparagine residue.
  • the tripeptide sequences asparagine-X-serine and asparagine-X-threonine, where X is any amino acid except proline, are the recognition sequences for enzymatic attachment of the carbohydrate moiety to the asparagine side chain.
  • O-linked glycosylation refers to the attachment of one of the sugars N-aceylgalactosamine, galactose, or xylose to a hydroxyamino acid, most commonly serine or threonine, although 5-hydroxyproline or 5-hydroxylysine may also be used.
  • glycosylation sites to the antibody is conveniently accomplished by altering the amino acid sequence such that it contains one or more of the above-described tripeptide sequences (for N-linked glycosylation sites).
  • the alteration may also be made by the addition of, or substitution by, one or more serine or threonine residues to the sequence of the original antibody (for O-linked glycosylation sites).
  • the carbohydrate attached thereto may be altered.
  • antibodies with a mature carbohydrate structure that lacks fucose attached to an Fc region of the antibody are described in US Pat Appl No US 2003/0157108 (Presta, L.). See also US 2004/0093621 (Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd).
  • Antibodies with a bisecting N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) in the carbohydrate attached to an Fc region of the antibody are referenced in WO 2003/011878, Jean-Mairet et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,602,684, Umana et al.
  • Antibodies with at least one galactose residue in the oligosaccharide attached to an Fc region of the antibody are reported in WO 1997/30087, Patel et al. See, also, WO 1998/58964 (Raju, S.) and WO 1999/22764 (Raju, S.) concerning antibodies with altered carbohydrate attached to the Fc region thereof. See also US 2005/0123546 (Umana et al.) on antigen-binding molecules with modified glycosylation.
  • the preferred glycosylation variant herein comprises an Fc region, wherein a carbohydrate structure attached to the Fc region lacks fucose.
  • Such variants have improved ADCC function.
  • the Fc region further comprises one or more amino acid substitutions therein which further improve ADCC, for example, substitutions at positions 298, 333, and/or 334 of the Fc region (Eu numbering of residues).
  • Examples of publications related to “defucosylated” or “fucose-deficient” antibodies include: US 2003/0157108; WO 2000/61739; WO 2001/29246; US 2003/0115614; US 2002/0164328; US 2004/0093621; US 2004/0132140; US 2004/0110704; US 2004/0110282; US 2004/0109865; WO 2003/085119; WO 2003/084570; WO 2005/035586; WO 2005/035778; WO2005/053742; Okazaki et al. J. Mol. Biol. 336:1239-1249 (2004); Yamane-Ohnuki et al. Biotech. Bioeng. 87: 614 (2004).
  • Examples of cell lines producing defucosylated antibodies include Lec13 CHO cells deficient in protein fucosylation (Ripka et al. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 249:533-545 (1986); US Pat Appl No US 2003/0157108 A1, Presta, L; and WO 2004/056312 A1, Adams et al., especially at Example 11), and knockout cell lines, such as alpha-1,6-fucosyltransferase gene, FUT8, knockout CHO cells (Yamane-Ohnuki et al. Biotech. Bioeng. 87: 614 (2004)).
  • Nucleic acid molecules encoding amino acid sequence variants of the antibody are prepared by a variety of methods known in the art. These methods include, but are not limited to, isolation from a natural source (in the case of naturally occurring amino acid sequence variants) or preparation by oligonucleotide-mediated (or site-directed) mutagenesis, PCR mutagenesis, and cassette mutagenesis of an earlier prepared variant or a non-variant version of the antibody.
  • the antibody of the invention may be desirable to modify the antibody of the invention with respect to effector function, e.g. so as to enhance ADCC and/or CDC of the antibody.
  • This may be achieved by introducing one or more amino acid substitutions in an Fc region of an antibody.
  • cysteine residue(s) may be introduced in the Fc region, thereby allowing interchain disulfide bond formation in this region.
  • the homodimeric antibody thus generated may have improved internalization capability and/or increased complement-mediated cell killing and ADCC. See Caron et al., J. Exp Med. 176:1191-1195 (1992) and Shopes, J. Immunol. 148:2918-2922 (1992).
  • Homodimeric antibodies may also be prepared using heterobifunctional cross-linkers as described in Wolff et al. Cancer Research 53:2560-2565 (1993).
  • an antibody can be engineered that has dual Fc regions and may thereby have enhanced complement lysis and ADCC capabilities. See Stevenson et al. Anti - Cancer Drug Design 3:219-230 (1989).
  • WO 00/42072 (Presta, L.) describes antibodies with improved ADCC function in the presence of human effector cells, where the antibodies comprise amino acid substitutions in the Fc region thereof.
  • the antibody with improved ADCC comprises substitutions at positions 298, 333, and/or 334 of the Fc region.
  • the altered Fc region is a human IgG1 Fc region comprising or consisting of substitutions at one, two or three of these positions.
  • Antibodies with altered C1q binding and/or CDC are described in WO 99/51642, U.S. Pat. No. 6,194,551B1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,242,195B1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,528,624B1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,538,124 (Idusogie et al.).
  • the antibodies comprise an amino acid substitution at one or more of amino acid positions 270, 322, 326, 327, 329, 313, 333 and/or 334 of the Fc region thereof.
  • a salvage receptor binding epitope refers to an epitope of the Fc region of an IgG molecule (e.g., IgG 1 , IgG 2 , IgG 3 , or IgG 4 ) that is responsible for increasing the in vivo serum half-life of the IgG molecule.
  • IgG 1 , IgG 2 , IgG 3 , or IgG 4 an epitope of the Fc region of an IgG molecule that is responsible for increasing the in vivo serum half-life of the IgG molecule.
  • Antibodies with substitutions in an Fc region thereof and increased serum half-lives are also described in WO00/42072 (Presta, L.).
  • Therapeutic formulations of the antibodies used in accordance with the present invention are prepared for storage by mixing an antibody having the desired degree of purity with optional pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients or stabilizers ( Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 16th edition, Osol, A. Ed. (1980)), in the form of lyophilized formulations or aqueous solutions.
  • Acceptable carriers, excipients, or stabilizers are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed, and include buffers such as phosphate, citrate, and other organic acids; antioxidants including ascorbic acid and methionine; preservatives (such as octadecyldimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride; hexamethonium chloride; benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride; phenol, butyl or benzyl alcohol; alkyl parabens such as methyl or propyl paraben; catechol; resorcinol; cyclohexanol; 3-pentanol; and m-cresol); low molecular weight (less than about 10 residues) polypeptides; proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, or immunoglobulins; hydrophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone; amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, asparagine, histidine,
  • Exemplary anti-CD20 antibody formulations are described in WO98/56418.
  • This publication describes a liquid multidose formulation comprising 40 mg/mL rituximab, 25 mM acetate, 150 mM trehalose, 0.9% benzyl alcohol, 0.02% polysorbate 20 at pH 5.0 that has a minimum shelf life of two years storage at 2-8° C.
  • Another anti-CD20 formulation of interest comprises 10 mg/mL rituximab in 9.0 mg/mL sodium chloride, 7.35 mg/mL sodium citrate dihydrate, 0.7 mg/mL polysorbate 80, and Sterile Water for Injection, pH 6.5.
  • Lyophilized formulations adapted for subcutaneous administration are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,267,958 (Andya et al.). Such lyophilized formulations may be reconstituted with a suitable diluent to a high protein concentration and the reconstituted formulation may be administered subcutaneously to the mammal to be treated herein.
  • the formulation herein may also contain more than one active compound (a second medicament as noted above) as necessary, preferably those with complementary activities that do not adversely affect each other.
  • a second medicament as noted above
  • the type and effective amounts of such medicaments depend, for example, on the amount of antibody present in the formulation, and clinical parameters of the subjects. The preferred such medicaments are noted above.
  • the active ingredients may also be entrapped in microcapsules prepared, for example, by coacervation techniques or by interfacial polymerization, for example, hydroxymethylcellulose or gelatin-microcapsules and poly-(methylmethacylate) microcapsules, respectively, in colloidal drug delivery systems (for example, liposomes, albumin microspheres, microemulsions, nano-particles and nanocapsules) or in macroemulsions.
  • colloidal drug delivery systems for example, liposomes, albumin microspheres, microemulsions, nano-particles and nanocapsules
  • Sustained-release preparations may be prepared. Suitable examples of sustained-release preparations include semi-permeable matrices of solid hydrophobic polymers containing the antibody, which matrices are in the form of shaped articles, e.g. films, or microcapsules. Examples of sustained-release matrices include polyesters, hydrogels (for example, poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate), or poly(vinylalcohol)), polylactides (U.S. Pat. No.
  • copolymers of L-glutamic acid and ⁇ ethyl-L-glutamate copolymers of L-glutamic acid and ⁇ ethyl-L-glutamate, non-degradable ethylene-vinyl acetate, degradable lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers such as the LUPRON DEPOTM (injectable microspheres composed of lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer and leuprolide acetate), and poly-D-( ⁇ )-3-hydroxybutyric acid.
  • LUPRON DEPOTM injectable microspheres composed of lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer and leuprolide acetate
  • poly-D-( ⁇ )-3-hydroxybutyric acid poly-D-( ⁇ )-3-hydroxybutyric acid.
  • the formulations to be used for in vivo administration must be sterile. This is readily accomplished by filtration through sterile filtration membranes.
  • articles of manufacture containing materials useful for the treatment of joint damage described above are provided.
  • the invention provides an article of manufacture comprising: (a) a container comprising an antagonist such as an antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker (e.g., a CD20 antibody) (preferably the container comprises the antibody and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent within the container); and (b) a package insert with instructions for treating joint damage in a subject, wherein the instructions indicate that the subject is administered the antagonist or antibody (e.g., CD20 antibody) and is then subjected, at least about one month after the administration, to a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of antagonist or antibody such as CD20 antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage, indicating that the subject has been successfully treated.
  • a B-cell surface marker e.g., a CD20 antibody
  • the article of manufacture herein further comprises a container comprising a second medicament, wherein the antagonist or antibody is a first medicament, and which article further comprises instructions on the package insert for treating the subject with the second medicament, in an effective amount.
  • the second medicament may be any of those set forth above, with an exemplary second medicament being those set forth above, including an antibiotic, an immunosuppressive agent, a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), a pain-control agent, an integrin antagonist, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), a cytokine antagonist, bisphosphonate, or a hormone, or a combination thereof, more preferably a DMARD, NSAID, pain-control agent, or immunosuppressive agent.
  • the second medicament is methotrexate.
  • the package insert is on or associated with the container.
  • Suitable containers include, for example, bottles, vials, syringes, etc.
  • the containers may be formed from a variety of materials such as glass or plastic.
  • the container holds or contains a composition that is effective for treating the joint damage and may have a sterile access port (for example the container may be an intravenous solution bag or a vial having a stopper pierceable by a hypodermic injection needle).
  • At least one active agent in the composition is the antagonist or antibody.
  • the label or package insert indicates that the composition is used for treating joint damage in a subject eligible for treatment with specific guidance regarding dosing amounts and intervals of antagonist or antibody and any other medicament being provided.
  • the article of manufacture may further comprise an additional container comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent buffer, such as bacteriostatic water for injection (BWFI), phosphate-buffered saline, Ringer's solution, and/or dextrose solution.
  • a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent buffer such as bacteriostatic water for injection (BWFI), phosphate-buffered saline, Ringer's solution, and/or dextrose solution.
  • BWFI bacteriostatic water for injection
  • phosphate-buffered saline such as bacteriostatic water for injection (BWFI), phosphate-buffered saline, Ringer's solution, and/or dextrose solution.
  • BWFI bacteriostatic water for injection
  • phosphate-buffered saline such as bacteriostatic water for injection (BWFI), phosphate-buffered saline, Ringer's solution, and/or dextrose solution.
  • an article of manufacture comprises: (a) a container comprising an antagonist such as an antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker (e.g., a CD20 antibody) (preferably the container comprises the antibody and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent within the container); and (b) a package insert with instructions for treating joint damage in a subject, wherein the instructions indicate that the subject is administered the antagonist or antibody (e.g., CD20 antibody) and is then subjected, at least about 52 weeks after the administration, to a radiographic test that measures a reduction in the joint damage as compared to baseline prior to the administration, wherein the amount of CD20 antibody administered is effective in achieving a reduction in the joint damage, indicating that the subject has been successfully treated.
  • an antagonist such as an antibody that binds to a B-cell surface marker (e.g., a CD20 antibody)
  • the container comprises the antibody and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent within the container
  • the article comprises a container comprising a second medicament, wherein the antagonist or antibody (such as CD20 antibody) is a first medicament, further comprising instructions on the package insert for treating the subject with the second medicament in an effective amount.
  • this second medicament is methotrexate.
  • FIGS. 1-12 The efficacy outcomes of the study are shown in FIGS. 1-12 .
  • the mean change in ACR core set parameters is shown in FIG. 18 .
  • FIGS. 19-31 The safety analysis of the study is shown in FIGS. 19-31 .
  • FIG. 41 further illustrates the patient disposition of the REFLEX clinical trial at 56 weeks, including ongoing treatments of subgroups of patients selected from the treatment and placebo arms of the Phase III REFLEX clinical trial.
  • the efficacy of rituximab treatment is further illustrated by the mean change in total Sharp-Genant score over time. As shown in FIG. 43 , the improvement has continued from week 24 to week 56.
  • FIG. 44 shows the cumulative distribution of change in total Sharp-Genant score.
  • FIG. 45 shows the results of sensitivity analyses, expressed by the change in total Sharp-Genant score.
  • the rituximab+MTX treatment arm has been consistently superior over the placebo+MTX treatment arm.
  • FIG. 46 shows the percentage of patients who showed no radiographic changes at the week 56 observation point in their joint condition, as measured by erosion score and Genant-modified Sharp score, respectively.
  • An important outcome to assess in RA includes the inhibition of progression of structural joint damage and the improvement in physical function. This outcome is particularly important for patients who have recently been diagnosed with RA, since early impact on these has potentially higher long-term benefit. Genovese et al., Arthritis Rheum. 46: 1443-1450 (2002). A population of early RA patients would therefore be an appropriate population to study for these important outcomes.
  • the current gold standard therapy for early RA is MTX. Consequently, selecting a population of MTX-na ⁇ ve patients and comparing rituximab plus MTX to MTX alone provides a comparison of this new treatment approach against the current gold standard for these patients.
  • This study is a randomized Phase III controlled soluble-blind, parallel-group multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rituximab in combination with MTX compared to MTX alone, in MTX-na ⁇ ve patients with active RA.
  • Group A rituximab 500 mg i.v. ⁇ 2 plus MTX (7.5 mg escalated to 20 mg p.o.)
  • Group B rituximab 1000 mg i.v. ⁇ 2 plus MTX (7.5 mg escalated to 20 mg p.o.)
  • Group C Placebo rituximab i.v. ⁇ 2 plus MTX (7.5 mg escalated to 20 mg p.o.)
  • a second course of rituximab plus MTX or placebo plus MTX will be administered as soon as feasibly possible when the following is achieved:
  • All patients will receive pre-medication with 100 mg i.v. methylprednisolone prior to each infusion. All patients will also receive a stable dose of folate (at least 5 mg/week) given as either a single dose or as a divided weekly dose.
  • Randomization will be stratified by region (US or ROW) and rheumatoid factor (positive or negative) to ensure balanced allocation of patients across region and RF status between treatment arms.
  • Radiographic assessments will be conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52. Radiographic assessments will also be conducted at 2 and 3 years after the first dose of study medication.
  • patients who do not have a 20% improvement in both swollen and tender joint counts may receive rescue therapy with an increased dose of MTX or one non-biologic DMARD.
  • Radiographs for these patients are to be taken in line with the original schedule of assessments, relative to the original day of randomization.
  • Approximately 852 patients will be recruited into this study and will be randomized equally into three treatment groups. Patients will be stratified by region (US or Rest of World (ROW)) and RF status (positive RF at least 20 IU/mL or negative RF less than 20 IU/mL). The overall proportion of RF-negative patients will be limited to 20% of the total sample size. Recruitment will be competitive with no more than 70% and no less than 30% being enrolled in either region. There will be no replacement of patients should a patient's treatment be discontinued for any reason.
  • the target population for this study is patients with early active RA, who are na ⁇ ve to MTX.
  • the end of treatment is defined as the 3-year time point, following which there will be an additional period of at least a year of SFU.
  • Rituximab 500 mg or 1000 mg
  • MTX or placebo plus MTX will be administered by IV infusion on days 1 and 15. Patients may be eligible for re-treatment (two doses 14 days apart) with a maximum frequency of one re-treatment every 24 weeks. Patients originally randomized to receive rituximab plus MTX will receive re-treatment at the same dose throughout the study. From week 104 patients originally randomized to placebo plus MTX may be eligible to receive rituximab (500 mg) plus MTX. Premedication with 100 mg i.v. methylprednisolone is to be administered prior to each infusion.
  • Methotrexate tablets (7.5 mg/week escalated to 20 mg/week) will be administered orally to all groups.
  • Patients will receive folate or equivalent (at least 5 mg/week) given as either a single dose or as a divided weekly dose.
  • Patients may continue to receive any background glucocorticoid (at least 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent).
  • Analgesics may be used for pain as required.
  • the primary endpoint is the change from screening in total modified Sharp score at week 52 using the modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
  • the radiographic secondary endpoints are:
  • the radiographic exploratory endpoints are:
  • Radiographic assessments will be made as follows: separate radiographs of each hand posterior-anterior (PA) and each foot anterior-posterior (AP) will be taken as per schedule of assessments. At the screening visit the readability and quality of the radiographs (as can be found in a procedure manual for radiographic examinations of the hands, wrist and feet) must be confirmed before the patient leaves the site. Radiographs for RF-negative patients at the screening visit will be checked for radiographic evidence of at least one joint with a definite erosion attributable to RA by the central reading site. All radiographs will be assessed using the method according to Sharp, as modified by Genant, Am. J. Med., 30: 35-47 (1983). The primary assessment will be the change from screening in the total modified Sharp score at week 52.
  • the total modified Sharp score combines an erosion score and a joint space narrowing score of both hands and feet.
  • the maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48.
  • the maximum total modified Sharp score achievable is 290.
  • the change in score at week 52 is to be calculated as:
  • Radiographs will be taken of the hands and feet to compute a total modified Sharp score. Before starting the trial all radiology departments will participate in training sessions to standardize radiographs. This will include standardization for validation procedures for equipment, films, cassettes, placement of hands/feet and procedures for obtaining consistent radiographs.
  • the change in total modified Sharp score is expected to be skewed and hence not normally distributed. Therefore, the change in total modified Sharp score at week 52 will be tested between treatment groups using a non-parametric test statistic stratifying for region and RF status. However, if the data are shown to be approximately normally distributed, the data will be analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with region, RF status, and treatment groups as exploratory terms in the model.
  • ANOVA analysis of variance
  • Closure principle will be used to adjust multiple comparisons in primary endpoint.
  • the first comparison will be between each of the three treatment arms using a Kruskal-Wallis test statistic.
  • the primary comparisons will be considered to be the individual rituximab dose group vs. the placebo group, using the Van Elteren test statistic.
  • week 24 radiographic data will be used to linearly extrapolate that patient's week 52 result. Those patients who withdraw prematurely from the study prior to week 52 will be included as part of the week 52 analysis of radiographic data. Any patient who has no post screening radiographic data will be excluded from the modified ITT population and hence from the primary endpoint analysis.
  • change in modified total Sharp score at weeks 24 and 104 will be analyzed in the same manner as specified for the primary endpoint.
  • the change in modified Sharp erosion score at week 52 will be analyzed in the same manner as specified for the primary endpoint.
  • change in modified Sharp erosion score at weeks 24 and 104 will be analyzed.
  • Change in modified joint space narrowing score at week 52 will be analyzed in the same manner as specified for the primary endpoint.
  • change in modified joint space narrowing score at weeks 24 and 104 will be analyzed.
  • the proportion of patients without radiographic progression at week 52 (defined as a change in total modified Sharp score of less than or equal to 0) will be assessed as follows: The difference in the proportions will be tested using a Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) test statistic stratifying for region and RF status. In addition, the proportion of patients without radiographic progression at weeks 24 and 104 will be analyzed.
  • CSH Cochran-Mantel Haenszel
  • Original radiographs will be sent to the central reading site, where they will be quality controlled. Should the initial radiograph be of unacceptable quality, the center will be advised as to what amendments are needed and instructed to obtain a second radiograph.
  • Radiographs of hands/wrists and feet taken at weeks 24, 52, 104, and 152 All patients randomized in the study who have received at least part of a dose of rituximab (including those who have withdrawn into safety follow-up) will have radiographs of hands/wrists and feet taken at weeks 24, 52, 104, and 152. Patients are to be strongly encouraged to return for all radiographic assessments irrespective of their point of withdrawal from the study. Radiographs of these patients are to be taken in line with the original schedule of assessments, relative to the original day of randomization.
  • Additional secondary and exploratory endpoints will be for signs and symptoms, physical function, remission, and patient-reported outcomes.
  • the change in total modified Sharp score at week 52 will be tested between treatment groups using a non-parametric test statistic stratifying for region and RF status. However, if the data is shown to be approximately normally distributed, the data will be analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with region, RF status and treatment groups as exploratory terms in the model.
  • ANOVA analysis of variance
  • the minimum period of 24 weeks between courses is recommended based on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab.
  • the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab appear to demonstrate that, at this time (week 24), drug levels are below the level of detection and there is evidence of returning peripheral CD 19+ cells. This is paralleled by an apparent increase in disease activity after this time point, and therefore represents a reasonable point from which further courses could be given.
  • rituximab or a humanized 2H7 antibody substituted for rituximab in combination with MTX will be efficacious in meeting the primary endpoint in the prevention of progression in structural joint damage as set forth in this Example, It is also expected that the regimen of this study will meet one or more of the secondary radiographic endpoints.
  • a first dose of rituximab or humanized 2H7 at 500 mg ⁇ 2 or 100 mg ⁇ 2 with methotrexate
  • will reduce joint damage from baseline before first administration of CD20 antibody
  • at least about one month from baseline or start of treatment at least about 24 weeks from baseline, more preferably at least about 52 weeks from baseline, and at further time points up to 104 weeks from baseline.
  • the patients can be efficaciously re-treated at 24 weeks or 52 weeks from baseline to maintain this prevention of progression of joint damage.
  • the CD20 antibody would be administered initially within about the 2-week time period, followed by another treatment at about 4-8 months, followed by another treatment at about one year from initial treatment (measured from the time any one of the doses was given), followed by treatment at about two years from initial treatment, with expected success, in about one-half-gram or one-gram ⁇ 2-4 dosing for each treatment, administered together, about weekly, or about every other week over about two to four weeks.
  • the results of this treatment would be expected to be much better than those of the control with placebo.
  • This re-treatment protocol is expected to be successfully used for several years with little or no adverse effects.
  • rituximab or another CD20 antibody will meet the primary endpoint as a monotherapy using the same regimen at the same dose or a higher dose without a second medicament such as MTX, and that re-treatment using the same regimen at the same dose or a higher dose would be successful as a monotherapy.
  • This example describes a phase III randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of retreatment with rituximab in subjects with RA receiving background methotrexate.
  • the primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of retreatment with rituximab in subjects with active RA who are receiving MTX and who have had an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors.
  • the study consists of four parts: screening, treatment period (open-label rituximab for first course and, for eligible subjects, double-blind, randomized retreatment), safety follow-up (SFU), and B-cell follow-up.
  • Subjects must have had inadequate response to treatment with one or more TNF inhibitors because of toxicity or inadequate efficacy.
  • Approximately 555 subjects will enter the treatment period at approximately 150 investigational sites in the United States.
  • RF-positive and RF-negative subjects will be enrolled and will be allocated equally between treatment arms, with the overall proportion of RF-negative subjects limited to 20% of the total sample size.
  • MTX for leflunomide, adalimumab, and infliximab for ⁇ 8 weeks and etanercept for ⁇ 4 weeks. All subjects will continue to receive MTX 10-25 mg/wk, at a stable dose for the study duration.
  • the screening visit can occur up to 56 days prior to receiving the first dose of study treatment depending on washout requirements.
  • a course of rituximab is defined as two 1000 mg intravenous (IV) doses given 14 days apart, with pre-medication with methylprednisolone 100 mg IV prior to each dose of rituximab. All subjects will also receive a stable dose of folate ( ⁇ 5 mg/wk). All subjects should continue to receive any background corticosteroids ( ⁇ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) or oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at a stable dose.
  • any background corticosteroids ⁇ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent
  • NSAIDs oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • the first dose of rituximab should be given within 24 hours following baseline assessments. However, if necessary, up to 72 hours will be allowed between baseline assessments and the first dose of study drug.
  • subjects who have active disease based on a disease activity score in 28 joints DAS 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) of ⁇ 2.6 will be considered eligible for retreatment and will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive retreatment with one additional course of rituximab (Group A) or placebo (Group B).
  • Subjects who do not meet the criteria for a second course of rituximab during Weeks 24-40 will continue to be followed for safety and efficacy.
  • Subjects who meet the criteria for retreatment during Weeks 24-40 and refuse retreatment, for any reason will be withdrawn from the treatment period and will enter into the SFU period.
  • DAS 28-ESR scores will be calculated by the investigator at regularly scheduled visits (Prevoo et al. Arthritis Rheum 38:44-48 (1995); DAS-score.n1 2005 DAS-score.n1 2005: home of the DAS. Department of Rheumatology University Medical Center Nijmegan—the Netherlands. [cited 1 Sep. 2005]. Available from: http://www.das-score.n1/www.das-score.n/index.html).
  • the treatment period is 72 weeks long (Day 1 to Week 72). All subjects who withdraw from the treatment period at any time or who receive retreatment with rituximab/placebo between Weeks 24-40 and complete the treatment period should return for SFU assessments at SFU Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 after withdrawal or completion. All subjects will be followed for at least 48 weeks after their last dose of rituximab. All subjects who receive only one course of rituximab treatment (i.e., those that do not qualify for retreatment during the study) and complete the treatment period will not return for SFU.
  • B-cell recovery is defined as peripheral B-cell counts that have returned to baseline values or the lower limit of normal (LLN), whichever is lower.
  • TJCs tender joint counts
  • SJCs swollen joint counts
  • the purpose of retreatment with rituximab is to prevent flare, promote sustained control of disease, and potentially prevent disease progression.
  • the criterion of DAS 28-ESR ⁇ 2.6 for retreatment will ensure that subjects with clinically significant disease activity are retreated.
  • the DAS 28-ESR will be calculated using the number of swollen and tender joints, the ESR, and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]).
  • the primary endpoint of this study is the proportion of retreated subjects with an ACR20 at Week 48 relative to baseline (Day 1), not relative to time of retreatment.
  • Baseline (Day 1), not time of retreatment was chosen in order to evaluate the overall benefit of retreatment with rituximab in subjects with moderate to severe RA.
  • retreatment with RTX results in maintenance of effect to a slight improvement at Week 48 relative to Week 24, in comparison with a deterioration in placebo-treated subjects.
  • ACR20 responses at Week 48 relative to a Week 24 baseline for both groups may be insignificant. Thus, this study is not designed to evaluate improvement from the time of retreatment.
  • the primary outcome measure is the proportion of retreated subjects with an ACR20 response at Week 48 relative to baseline (Day 1).
  • the secondary outcome measures are as follows:
  • the exploratory outcome measures are:
  • site personnel Upon completion of all screening evaluations and verification that the subject has met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, site personnel will contact the interactive voice response system (ivrs) to obtain the subject number and confirm subject enrollment for study drug inventory management. All enrolled subjects will receive rituximab as their initial course of treatment.
  • ivrs interactive voice response system
  • subjects who are eligible for retreatment will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either Group A (rituximab retreatment) or Group B (placebo; see Table 1). If a subject meets the eligibility criteria for retreatment during Weeks 24-40, site personnel will contact IVRS to initiate randomization of the subject and to obtain the study drug kit number.
  • Randomization will be stratified by study center, baseline RF status (RF positive, RF negative), and Week 24 improvements in tender and swollen joint count ( ⁇ 20% improvement or ⁇ 20% improvement).
  • baseline RF status RF positive, RF negative
  • Week 24 improvements in tender and swollen joint count ⁇ 20% improvement or ⁇ 20% improvement.
  • the treatment assignment codes and the kit treatment codes will be requested from the IVRS provider. Documentation of the transfer and the data included in the transfer will be kept on file.
  • Peripheral CD19 B-cell counts will be blinded to site personnel and Genentech until the time of database lock for the primary endpoint at Week 48 for all subjects enrolled in the trial. Therefore, all subjects who have completed the treatment period and SFU prior to database lock will be assumed to be peripherally depleted and will remain in B-cell follow-up.
  • the Efficacy Assessor (or designee) should be a rheumatologist or skilled arthritis assessor.
  • the Efficacy Assessor must not be the Principal Investigator.
  • the Efficacy Assessor will only have access to efficacy data and will be responsible for completing the joint counts and Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS only.
  • individual subjects should be evaluated by the same joint assessor for all study visits. During a study visit, all subject-reported outcomes should be completed prior to all other assessments.
  • the Safety Assessor (or designee) should be a rheumatologist and will have access to both safety and efficacy data.
  • the Safety Assessor may be the Principal Investigator.
  • the Safety Assessor will have access to source documents, laboratory results, and Case Report Forms (CRFs) and will be responsible for calculating the DAS 28-ESR and making treatment decisions based on a subject's clinical response and laboratory parameters.
  • the Safety Assessor will not complete any efficacy assessments or record the results of any efficacy assessments on behalf of the Efficacy Assessor.
  • Rituximab for use in this study is a sterile, clear, colorless, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV administration.
  • Rituximab is supplied at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in 500 mg (50 mL) single-use vials.
  • the product is formulated for IV administration in 9.0 mg/mL sodium chloride, 7.35 mg/mL sodium citrate dihydrate, 0.7 mg/mL polysorbate 80, and Sterile Water for Injection. The pH is adjusted to 6.5.
  • All enrolled subjects will receive a course of rituximab (1000 mg rituximab by IV infusion on Days 1 and 15) as their initial treatment.
  • subjects eligible for retreatment will be randomized to Group A to receive an additional course (two doses) of rituximab 1000 mg IV 14 days apart or to Group B to receive a course (two doses) of placebo 1000 mg IV 14 days apart.
  • Premedication with 1000 mg oral acetaminophen and 50 mg oral diphenhydramine is recommended for all subjects, and 100 mg IV methylprednisolone to be completed within 30-60 minutes prior to each rituximab/placebo infusion is required.
  • All subjects will continue to receive MTX at a stable dose of 10-25 mg/wk and receive a stable dose of folate ( ⁇ 5 mg/week) given as either a single dose or as a divided weekly dose.
  • Rituximab/placebo infusions should be administered to subjects under the close supervision of the investigator or designee in a hospital or clinic where full resuscitation facilities are immediately available. Although rituximab may be administered on an outpatient basis, subjects may be hospitalized for observation at the discretion of the investigator. Rituximab/placebo should be administered as a slow IV infusion. Do not administer as an IV push or bolus. At the end of each infusion, the IV line should remain in place for at least 1 hour to allow administration of IV drugs if necessary. If no adverse event occurs during this time, the IV line may be removed.
  • rituximab solutions for infusions may be stored at 2° C.-8° C. (36° F.-46° F.) for 24 hours.
  • Rituximab solutions for infusion have been shown to be stable for an additional 24 hours at room temperature (23° C. or 73° F.).
  • diluted solutions should be refrigerated (2° C.-8° C.). No incompatibilities between rituximab and polyvinyl chloride or polyethylene bags have been observed.
  • DAS 28-ESR will be calculated using the joint count and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS) from the current visit and the ESR from the current or the previous visit only if the ESR from the current visit is unavailable.
  • VAS Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
  • Subjects who meet the following criteria at any visit during Weeks 24-40 are eligible to receive retreatment with study drug (rituximab or placebo):
  • subjects who qualify for retreatment by DAS 28-ESR ⁇ 2.6 during Weeks 24-40 must also meet the following criteria in order to be retreated based on results from the previous visit if current results are unavailable:
  • Rituximab dose modification is not permitted during this study.
  • the rate of infusion may be adjusted. If a subject experiences an infusion-related reaction requiring an interruption in the infusion and the investigator determines that the infusion should not be restarted, the subject should be withdrawn from the study treatment period and enrolled into the SFU.
  • Additional analgesics may be used for pain as required. However, subjects should not take analgesics within 12 hours prior to a visit where efficacy assessments will be performed. Adjustments to the analgesic regimen may be made, but the change must be documented in the appropriate CRFs.
  • Intra-articular injections of corticosteroid are discouraged, particularly during the first 48 weeks; however, they may be used on a limited basis to manage a subject's RA activity during the study. No more than one joint per 24-week period should be injected, and the same joint should not be injected more than once in any 48-week period. No single injection should exceed 40 mg triamcinolone (or equivalent), and the total dose of corticosteroid should not exceed 80 mg triamcinolone (or equivalent) during any 48-week period.
  • subjects may continue to receive a background corticosteroid with a dose of ⁇ 10 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent).
  • prednisone or equivalent
  • appropriate doses should be administered for a maximum of 2 weeks and should be tapered down to the previous level as rapidly as medically possible.
  • IV or intramuscular corticosteroids are not permitted in the study, other than those specified in the protocol treatments.
  • Subjects must remain on a stable dose of MTX for ⁇ 4 weeks before Day 1 and during the study, unless modification is necessary for toxicity.
  • subjects who have not achieved a 20% improvement in both TJCs and SJCs compared with baseline may initiate rescue treatment with one non-biologic DMARD, the choice of which is at the discretion of their treating physician. Subjects who receive rescue will not be withdrawn from the study.
  • Subject-reported data e.g., Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Assessment of Pain
  • Subject-reported data may only be recorded by the study nurse/investigator on behalf of the subject if the subject has difficulty writing during the visit or is unable to read. This must be documented clearly in the subject notes.
  • the subject's overall assessment of his or her disease activity during the last 24 hours should be described using the 100-mm horizontal VAS where the left-hand extreme of the line represents no disease activity (symptom free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme represents maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis disease activity).
  • the subject's assessment of his or her level of pain during the last 24 hours should be described using the 100-mm horizontal VAS where the left-hand extreme of the line represents no pain and the right-hand extreme represents unbearable pain.
  • the Stanford HAQ disability index is a subject-reported questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. The questionnaire will be scored based on instructions from Stanford University Medical Center (Fries et al. Arthritis Rheum 23:137-145 (1980)).
  • the FACIT-F will be used to assess fatigue. It is a 13-item questionnaire in which subjects are requested to score each question on a 0-4 scale. The assessment was originally developed for chronic illnesses and is now validated for subjects with RA (Cella et al. J Rheumatology 32(5):811-819 (2005)).
  • the SF-36 is a generic health-related quality of life instrument that has been widely tested for its psychometric properties and is widely used in clinical and epidemiological studies (Ware et al. How to Score Version Two of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, R.I.: Qualitymetric Incorporated, 2000).
  • the SF-36 (Version 2) is provided by the Medical Outcomes Trust (Boston, Mass., USA).
  • joints for swelling and 68 joints for tenderness should be performed by a rheumatologist or skilled joint assessor. Joints will be evaluated and classified as swollen or not swollen and tender or not tender based on pressure and joint manipulation upon physical examination. Joints with total joint prosthesis or arthrodesis should not be evaluated; however, all other joints should be evaluated.
  • the joints to be evaluated for swelling and tenderness are provided below:
  • DAS Disease Activity Score
  • the physician's assessment of a subject's disease activity during the last 24 hours should be described using the 100-mm horizontal VAS where the left-hand extreme of the line represents no disease activity (symptom free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme represents maximum disease activity. This should be completed by the Efficacy Assessor who may or may not be a physician.
  • CRP will be analyzed at a central laboratory.
  • ESR will be determined using the Westergren method at the local laboratory.
  • a DAS 28-ESR ⁇ 2.6 has been selected as a threshold for retreatment in this trial.
  • Subjects with a DAS 28-ESR ⁇ 2.6 during Weeks 24-40 may be eligible to receive a second course of study drug (rituximab or placebo).
  • a general physical examination (including the cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal and neurological systems) should be performed at the times indicated in the Schedule of Assessments. Any persisting abnormalities should be stated each time the examination is performed. Diagnosis of new abnormalities should be recorded as an adverse event if appropriate.
  • ECGs Twelve lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) should be performed at the times indicated in the Schedule of Assessments.
  • Posterior-anterior and lateral chest radiographs should be obtained at screening and reviewed by the investigator or designee. At screening, if chest radiographs have been taken within the past 12 weeks that show no clinically significant abnormality and there are no signs or symptoms suggestive of pulmonary disease that would exclude the subject from the trial, then chest radiograph does not need to be repeated.
  • a subject fails a laboratory exclusion criterion at screening the investigator may repeat the test up to twice within the screening period. If the subject fails the laboratory criterion a third time, they will be considered a screen failure. A blood sample or laboratory test will not be considered as re-tested if the sample was redrawn because of sample handling problems, breakage, or sample integrity. A subject who fails screening may be re-screened.
  • a subject may be re-screened if they did not meet all the eligibility criteria within 56 days of the original screening visit.
  • a subject who undergoes re-screening must repeat the entire screening process and be re-consented prior to any study-specific procedures. Subjects may be re-screened only once.
  • assessments during the treatment period should be performed within the specified time window for each visit. Assessments and procedures scheduled on days when rituximab is administered should be performed prior to the rituximab infusion, unless otherwise indicated. For this study, Day 1 is the day of initial rituximab infusion. The Day 1 visit should be performed on a day that will allow subsequent visits (e.g., Day 15 visit) to occur without delay. Subject-reported assessments should be performed prior to other clinical assessments. For subjects eligible for retreatment, the visit at which the subject meets the eligibility criteria for retreatment is considered the qualifying visit.
  • B-cell recovery is defined as peripheral CD19 + counts that have returned to baseline values or the LLN, whichever is lower.
  • Subjects eligible for retreatment during Weeks 24-40 will be randomized to receive an additional course of study drug. Subjects should complete all Treatment Day 1 assessments that have not been performed during the qualifying visit. Assessments performed from the qualifying visit do not need to be repeated.
  • the subject should return for the infusion within 72 hours of the qualifying visit.
  • the subject After the retreatment course (Retreatment Days 1 and 15), the subject should return to their next scheduled visit based on the schedule of assessments from the point at which the subject qualified for retreatment. For example, if a subject qualified for retreatment at the Week 32 visit, after the retreatment course (Retreatment Days 1 and 15), the subject's next scheduled visit should be the Week 40 visit.
  • Subjects who withdraw early from the treatment period for any reason will be asked to return for an early treatment withdrawal visit (up to 14 days after withdrawal) and then to return at 4 weeks after the withdrawal visit and then every 12 weeks for at least 48 weeks from the time the subject withdraws.
  • the following assessments will be performed at the early treatment withdrawal visit:
  • SFU Safety follow up assessments will be performed at SFU Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 after early withdrawal or completion of the treatment period as defined for the following subjects:
  • peripheral B-cell (CD19 + ) counts At the last SFU visit, subjects whose peripheral B-cell (CD19 + ) counts have not recovered will enter the B-cell follow-up period. B-cell recovery is defined as peripheral CD19 + counts that have returned to baseline values or the LLN, whichever is lower. For all serious infectious adverse events reported, CBC with differentials, quantitative Ig and CD19 counts should be determined within 1 week of onset.
  • B-cell recovery is defined as peripheral CD19 + counts that have returned to baseline values or the LLN, whichever is lower.
  • Blood, serum, and urine samples will be obtained at specified timepoints. Instructions for processing, storing, and shipping samples to Genentech and the central clinical laboratory will be provided in the laboratory manuals. Standard assays will be used for hematology, serology, chemistry, serum ⁇ -hCG, flow cytometry, immunology, and urinalysis.
  • Rituximab pharmacokinetic ELISA measures the rituximab levels in human serum samples. It uses affinity-purified polyclonal goat anti-rituximab as the capture reagent and goat antibody to mouse IgG F(ab) 2 conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as the detection reagent.
  • HRP horseradish peroxidase
  • the anti-rituximab HACA ELISA is a bridging assay, which uses rituximab as the capture reagent and biotinylated rituximab and streptavidin-HRP for detection.
  • the assay uses a calibrator curve prepared with affinity-purified polyclonal goat antibodies to rituximab and is confirmed by immunodepletion with rituximab. Results from this assay will be reported relative to this polyclonal antibody in terms of relative units (RU)/mL.
  • Subjects may withdraw or be discontinued from the treatment period at any time, but should return to the study center within 14 days for an early treatment withdrawal visit, SFU and potentially B-cell follow-up. Subjects who have discontinued from the treatment period will be followed for safety assessments. Every effort should be made to obtain these assessments for subjects who discontinue early. The primary reason for early discontinuation must be recorded on the appropriate CRF page.
  • This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of one course of retreatment with rituximab or placebo for eligible subjects and the safety of rituximab treatment in subjects with active RA who are receiving MTX and who had a previous or current inadequate response to one or more anti-TNF therapies.
  • the eligibility of a subject for retreatment is based on the DAS 28-ESR remission criterion (DAS 28-ESR ⁇ 2.6). Approximately 555 subjects will be enrolled.
  • the study is open-label for the first course of treatment (with rituximab) and blinded for subjects eligible for a retreatment course (study drug). During Weeks 24-40, subjects who meet the retreatment criteria will be randomized to a 2:1 ratio to either rituximab or placebo.
  • the primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects with an ACR20 response at Week 48 relative to baseline (Day 1).
  • the analysis of unblinded data will commence once the Week 48 assessments from all subjects are in the database and the database is cleaned and frozen.
  • the number of subjects enrolled will be tabulated by center.
  • reasons for discontinuation will be summarized. Key eligibility criteria violations, other major protocol deviations, and the number of subjects who complete each scheduled dose will be summarized.
  • the number of subjects randomized will be tabulated by center and treatment group.
  • the disposition of subjects will be summarized by treatment group with respect to subject randomization, treatment, and completion of the study.
  • Key eligibility criteria violations, other major protocol deviations, and the number of subjects who complete each scheduled dose will be summarized by treatment group.
  • reasons for discontinuation will be summarized and listed by treatment group.
  • Baseline of the treatment groups will be assessed for comparability with respect to demographics (i.e., age, sex, race/ethnicity) and baseline characteristics (e.g., body weight, duration of RA, baseline RF status, baseline SJC/TJC, baseline DAS 28-ESR, and number of prior TNF therapies).
  • the baseline value of any variable will be defined as the last available value prior to the first administration of rituximab (Day 1).
  • Safety will be assessed through the summary of adverse events, deaths, laboratory test results, vital signs, and HACAs. These summaries will be produced as overall summary for the open-label treatment segment and by treatment group for the placebo-controlled, retreatment segment. Safety analyses will be based on subjects who received any amount of study drug. Subjects will be analyzed according to the actual treatment received.
  • Adverse events will be tabulated according to system organ class, treatment arm, and NCl CTCAE grade. Adverse event tabulations for serious adverse events, infection-related adverse events, rituximab-related infusion reactions, and adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation will be based on all treated subjects and tabulated following the first infusion of the initial rituximab course and the retreatment course.
  • the intent-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who are randomized into the placebo-controlled retreatment segment and receive any study drug.
  • the ITT population is the primary analysis population for the primary and secondary endpoints. Subjects will be analyzed according to their randomized treatment.
  • the primary endpoint is the proportion of retreated subjects with an ACR20 response at Week 48 compared with baseline (Day 1).
  • CRP will be used in the calculation of ACR20. If CRP is missing or not performed, ESR will be used.
  • ACR20 response rates will also be analyzed using logistic regression and testing for an association between ACR20 response at Week 48 and treatment arm while controlling for baseline RF status using a logistic regression model.
  • the parameter estimates from the model will be examined by tabulating the standard errors, Wald statistics, and odds ratios with the corresponding 95% CIs and p-values.
  • Sensitivity analyses will also be performed adjusting for potential explanatory terms for ACR20 response (e.g., baseline SJC).
  • PK Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from serum concentrations of rituximab, including maximum serum concentration (C max ), time of maximum serum concentration (T max ), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), systemic clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V) and half-life (t 1/2 ), will be estimated for all subjects using population PK model. Due to the sparse sampling, the distribution phase may not be well characterized. PK data from this study will be combined with data from other studies for population PK analysis.
  • the population PK analyses will include an exploratory analysis to identify baseline covariates that affect the pharmacokinetics of rituximab in this patient population.
  • Baseline covariates to be examined will include demographics and other subject characteristics, such as disease severity and selected laboratory measures.
  • Safety assessments will consist of monitoring and recording protocol-defined adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs); measurement of protocol-specified laboratory (hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis) variables; measurement of protocol-specified vital signs; and other protocol-specified tests that are deemed critical to the safety evaluation of the study drug.
  • AEs protocol-defined adverse events
  • SAEs serious adverse events
  • An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational (medicinal) product or other protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of attribution.
  • An AE should be classified as an SAE if it meets the following criteria:
  • Severity refers to the grade of a specific AE, e.g., mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), or severe (Grade 3) myocardial infarction.
  • serious is a regulatory definition and is based on subject or event outcome or action criteria usually associated with events that pose a threat to a subject's life or functioning. Seriousness (not severity) serves as the guide for defining regulatory reporting obligations from the Sponsor to applicable regulatory authorities.
  • Severity and seriousness should be independently assessed when recording AEs and SAEs on the CRF.
  • Each recorded AE or SAE will be described by its duration (i.e., start and end dates), severity (see Table 2), regulatory seriousness criteria if applicable, suspected relationship to the investigational product (see following guidance), and actions taken.
  • the AE grading (severity) scale found in the NCI CTCAE, V3.0, will be used for AE reporting.
  • RA should be recorded as an AE or SAE only if judged by the investigator to have unexpectedly worsened in severity and/or frequency or changed in nature any time during the study.
  • AE or SAE CRF page it is important to convey the concept that the condition has changed by including applicable descriptors (e.g., “accelerated rheumatoid arthritis”).
  • Example 2 The protocol in Example 2 is followed except that the patients are treated for joint damage caused by psoriatic arthritis. It is expected that similar results will be observed (using rituximab or a humanized 2H7 antibody) as for rheumatoid arthritis, i.e., that progression in structural joint damage will be prevented upon a first dose of CD20 antibody (with or without methotrexate depending on, e.g., dosages as can be adjusted appropriately) at least about one month from baseline or start of treatment, preferably at least 24 weeks from baseline, more preferably at least 52 weeks from baseline, and at further time points up to 104 weeks from baseline.
  • a first dose of CD20 antibody with or without methotrexate depending on, e.g., dosages as can be adjusted appropriately
  • the CD20 antibody would be administered initially within about the 2-week time period, followed by another treatment at about 4-8 months, followed by another treatment at about one year from initial treatment (measured from the time any one of the doses was given), followed by treatment at about two years from initial treatment, with expected success, in about one-half-gram or one-gram ⁇ 2-4 dosing for each treatment, administered together, about weekly, or about every other week over about two to four weeks.
  • the results of this treatment would be expected to be much better than those of the control with placebo.
  • This re-treatment protocol is expected to be successfully used for several years with little or no adverse effects.
  • Example 2 results would be successful if the patients have joint damage as a result of osteoarthritis or Crohn's disease, whether rituximab or another CD20 antibody such as humanized 2H7 is used, and whether an immunosuppressive agent is used or not, with adjustment of doses as would be known to those skilled in the art. Further, if such patients are initially treated with CD20 antibody and then re-treated with such antibody about six months or about one year after first being treated, otherwise using the same dosing and other protocol of Example 2, it is expected that they will continue to experience prevention of progression of joint damage for an extended period of time.
  • rituximab or other CD20 antibody will be at least as effective as the conventional treatment regimen for induction and maintenance of joint damage remission, offering substantial advantages over standard therapy by virtue of its superior side-effect profile, e.g., much less toxic than steroids, and better at restoring tolerance.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Endocrinology (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Pain & Pain Management (AREA)
  • Transplantation (AREA)
  • Dermatology (AREA)
  • Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)
US11/665,525 2005-11-15 2006-11-14 Method for treating joint damage Abandoned US20090238762A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/665,525 US20090238762A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2006-11-14 Method for treating joint damage

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US73729105P 2005-11-15 2005-11-15
US86446306P 2006-11-06 2006-11-06
US11/665,525 US20090238762A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2006-11-14 Method for treating joint damage
PCT/US2006/044290 WO2007059188A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2006-11-14 Method for treating joint damage

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2006/044290 A-371-Of-International WO2007059188A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2006-11-14 Method for treating joint damage

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/055,485 Continuation US20160176974A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2016-02-26 Method for treating joint damage

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090238762A1 true US20090238762A1 (en) 2009-09-24

Family

ID=37807774

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/665,525 Abandoned US20090238762A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2006-11-14 Method for treating joint damage
US15/055,485 Abandoned US20160176974A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2016-02-26 Method for treating joint damage
US16/384,333 Active US10450379B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2019-04-15 Method for treating joint damage
US16/526,727 Active US10654940B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2019-07-30 Method for treating joint damage
US16/866,757 Abandoned US20210024643A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2020-05-05 Method for treating joint damage

Family Applications After (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/055,485 Abandoned US20160176974A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2016-02-26 Method for treating joint damage
US16/384,333 Active US10450379B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2019-04-15 Method for treating joint damage
US16/526,727 Active US10654940B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2019-07-30 Method for treating joint damage
US16/866,757 Abandoned US20210024643A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2020-05-05 Method for treating joint damage

Country Status (30)

Country Link
US (5) US20090238762A1 (he)
EP (1) EP1951304B1 (he)
JP (4) JP2009515979A (he)
KR (5) KR20150105493A (he)
CN (2) CN101365487B (he)
AR (1) AR058838A1 (he)
AU (1) AU2006315498B2 (he)
BR (1) BRPI0618577A8 (he)
CA (2) CA2627886C (he)
CR (1) CR10005A (he)
DK (1) DK1951304T3 (he)
EC (1) ECSP088514A (he)
ES (1) ES2526616T3 (he)
HK (2) HK1123209A1 (he)
HR (1) HRP20150018T1 (he)
IL (1) IL191118B (he)
MA (1) MA30047B1 (he)
MX (1) MX2008006113A (he)
MY (2) MY149159A (he)
NO (1) NO20082658L (he)
NZ (1) NZ567709A (he)
PL (1) PL1951304T3 (he)
PT (1) PT1951304E (he)
RS (1) RS53767B1 (he)
RU (1) RU2457860C2 (he)
SI (1) SI1951304T1 (he)
TW (1) TWI380826B (he)
UA (1) UA94726C2 (he)
WO (1) WO2007059188A1 (he)
ZA (1) ZA200804288B (he)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080213280A1 (en) * 2003-04-09 2008-09-04 Genentech, Inc. Therapy of autoimmune disease in a patient with an inadequate response to a tnf-alpha inhibitor
US20100233159A1 (en) * 2006-05-25 2010-09-16 Relton Jane K Methods of treating stroke
US20100325148A1 (en) * 2009-06-19 2010-12-23 Ingenix, Inc. System and Method for Generation of Attribute Driven Temporal Clustering
WO2012106497A2 (en) * 2011-02-03 2012-08-09 Santarus, Inc. Selection and treatment of subjects
WO2013142336A1 (en) * 2012-03-21 2013-09-26 Miller Leonard B Combination therapy to improve joint, tendon, and ligament healing
US8545843B2 (en) 1999-05-07 2013-10-01 Genentech, Inc. Treatment of vasculitis
US8557240B2 (en) 1999-06-01 2013-10-15 Biogen Idec Ma Inc. Method for the treatment of inflammatory disorders
US9289506B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2016-03-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Surface binding of nanoparticle based drug delivery to tissue
US9644030B2 (en) 2001-04-13 2017-05-09 Biogen Ma Inc. Antibodies to VLA-1
US10160808B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2018-12-25 Santarus, Inc. Anti-VLA1 (CD49A) antibody pharmaceutical compositions
US10450379B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2019-10-22 Genetech, Inc. Method for treating joint damage

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SG10202008722QA (en) 2003-11-05 2020-10-29 Roche Glycart Ag Cd20 antibodies with increased fc receptor binding affinity and effector function
US8465741B2 (en) * 2006-12-20 2013-06-18 Mmrglobal, Inc. Antibodies and methods for making and using them
AU2013202392B2 (en) * 2006-12-20 2016-02-25 Mmrglobal, Inc. Antibodies and methods for making and using them
GB0718684D0 (en) * 2007-09-24 2007-10-31 Roche Products Ltd Treatment method
PT2219675E (pt) 2007-11-12 2013-11-18 Ares Trading Sa Formulações para proteínas de fusão de taci-imunoglobulina
AR073295A1 (es) 2008-09-16 2010-10-28 Genentech Inc Metodos para tratar la esclerosis multiple progresiva. articulo de fabricacion.
WO2010075249A2 (en) 2008-12-22 2010-07-01 Genentech, Inc. A method for treating rheumatoid arthritis with b-cell antagonists
US10087236B2 (en) 2009-12-02 2018-10-02 Academia Sinica Methods for modifying human antibodies by glycan engineering
US11377485B2 (en) 2009-12-02 2022-07-05 Academia Sinica Methods for modifying human antibodies by glycan engineering
KR20180019247A (ko) 2010-11-05 2018-02-23 노파르티스 아게 Ｉｌ-１７ 길항제를 사용한 류마티스성 관절염의 치료 방법
CN105682666B (zh) 2013-09-06 2021-06-01 中央研究院 使用醣脂激活人类iNKT细胞
KR102576850B1 (ko) 2014-05-27 2023-09-11 아카데미아 시니카 박테로이드 기원의 푸코시다제 및 이의 사용 방법
JP7062361B2 (ja) 2014-05-27 2022-05-06 アカデミア シニカ 抗ｈｅｒ２糖操作抗体群およびその使用
CA2950415A1 (en) 2014-05-27 2015-12-03 Academia Sinica Anti-cd20 glycoantibodies and uses thereof
KR102494193B1 (ko) 2014-05-28 2023-01-31 아카데미아 시니카 항-ｔｎｆ-알파 글리코항체 및 이의 용도
EP3500594A4 (en) 2016-08-22 2020-03-11 Cho Pharma Inc. ANTIBODIES, BINDING FRAGMENTS AND METHOD FOR USE
RU2724469C2 (ru) 2018-10-31 2020-06-23 Закрытое Акционерное Общество "Биокад" Моноклональное антитело, которое специфически связывается с cd20
CN115103633B (zh) * 2019-12-05 2023-09-12 伊麦吉纳博公司 使用多种成像剂的成像方法
RU2749852C1 (ru) * 2020-06-25 2021-06-17 федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Северо-Западный государственный медицинский университет им. И.И. Мечникова" Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации Способ лечения пациентов после травматических повреждений вращательной манжеты плечевого сустава
CN112669929B (zh) * 2020-12-30 2021-08-03 深圳大学 克罗恩病英夫利昔单抗药效预测方法及终端设备
RU2748130C1 (ru) * 2021-01-19 2021-05-19 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр реабилитации и курортологии» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации (ФГБУ «НМИЦ РК» Минздрава России) Способ отбора пациентов для экстраполяционной роботизированной механотерапии при повреждениях вращательной манжеты плеча

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7708994B2 (en) * 2003-04-09 2010-05-04 Genentech, Inc. Therapy of autoimmune disease in a patient with an inadequate response to a TNF-α inhibitor

Family Cites Families (169)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3773919A (en) 1969-10-23 1973-11-20 Du Pont Polylactide-drug mixtures
IL47062A (en) 1975-04-10 1979-07-25 Yeda Res & Dev Process for diminishing antigenicity of tissues to be usedas transplants by treatment with glutaraldehyde
US4665077A (en) 1979-03-19 1987-05-12 The Upjohn Company Method for treating rejection of organ or skin grafts with 6-aryl pyrimidine compounds
US4485045A (en) 1981-07-06 1984-11-27 Research Corporation Synthetic phosphatidyl cholines useful in forming liposomes
US4816567A (en) 1983-04-08 1989-03-28 Genentech, Inc. Recombinant immunoglobin preparations
US4544545A (en) 1983-06-20 1985-10-01 Trustees University Of Massachusetts Liposomes containing modified cholesterol for organ targeting
US4676980A (en) 1985-09-23 1987-06-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Department Of Health And Human Services Target specific cross-linked heteroantibodies
US6893625B1 (en) 1986-10-27 2005-05-17 Royalty Pharma Finance Trust Chimeric antibody with specificity to human B cell surface antigen
IL85035A0 (en) 1987-01-08 1988-06-30 Int Genetic Eng Polynucleotide molecule,a chimeric antibody with specificity for human b cell surface antigen,a process for the preparation and methods utilizing the same
WO1989008114A1 (en) 1988-02-25 1989-09-08 The General Hospital Corporation Rapid immunoselection cloning method
US5506126A (en) 1988-02-25 1996-04-09 The General Hospital Corporation Rapid immunoselection cloning method
IL85746A (en) 1988-03-15 1994-05-30 Yeda Res & Dev Preparations comprising t-lymphocyte cells treated with 8-methoxypsoralen or cell membranes separated therefrom for preventing or treating autoimmune diseases
US4861579A (en) 1988-03-17 1989-08-29 American Cyanamid Company Suppression of B-lymphocytes in mammals by administration of anti-B-lymphocyte antibodies
GB8823869D0 (en) 1988-10-12 1988-11-16 Medical Res Council Production of antibodies
US5175384A (en) 1988-12-05 1992-12-29 Genpharm International Transgenic mice depleted in mature t-cells and methods for making transgenic mice
WO1990008187A1 (en) 1989-01-19 1990-07-26 Dana Farber Cancer Institute Soluble two domain cd2 protein
DE3920358A1 (de) 1989-06-22 1991-01-17 Behringwerke Ag Bispezifische und oligospezifische, mono- und oligovalente antikoerperkonstrukte, ihre herstellung und verwendung
AU652540B2 (en) 1989-07-19 1994-09-01 Xoma Corporation T cell receptor peptides as therapeutics for autoimmune and malignant disease
US5013556A (en) 1989-10-20 1991-05-07 Liposome Technology, Inc. Liposomes with enhanced circulation time
US5571894A (en) 1991-02-05 1996-11-05 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Recombinant antibodies specific for a growth factor receptor
JPH06507398A (ja) 1991-05-14 1994-08-25 リプリジェン　コーポレーション Ｈｉｖ感染治療のための異種複合抗体
WO1992022653A1 (en) 1991-06-14 1992-12-23 Genentech, Inc. Method for making humanized antibodies
MX9204374A (es) 1991-07-25 1993-03-01 Idec Pharma Corp Anticuerpo recombinante y metodo para su produccion.
ES2136092T3 (es) 1991-09-23 1999-11-16 Medical Res Council Procedimientos para la produccion de anticuerpos humanizados.
US5587458A (en) 1991-10-07 1996-12-24 Aronex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Anti-erbB-2 antibodies, combinations thereof, and therapeutic and diagnostic uses thereof
WO1993008829A1 (en) 1991-11-04 1993-05-13 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions that mediate killing of hiv-infected cells
EP0617706B1 (en) 1991-11-25 2001-10-17 Enzon, Inc. Multivalent antigen-binding proteins
CA2372813A1 (en) 1992-02-06 1993-08-19 L.L. Houston Biosynthetic binding protein for cancer marker
WO1993016177A1 (en) 1992-02-11 1993-08-19 Cell Genesys, Inc. Homogenotization of gene-targeting events
US5573905A (en) 1992-03-30 1996-11-12 The Scripps Research Institute Encoded combinatorial chemical libraries
JP3353209B2 (ja) 1992-04-03 2002-12-03 ジェネンテク，インコーポレイテッド αｖβ３インテグリンに対する抗体
CA2138366C (en) * 1992-06-30 1998-09-22 Kristine Hovancik Methods for the treatment of arthritis using phosphonates and nsaids
WO1994004690A1 (en) 1992-08-17 1994-03-03 Genentech, Inc. Bispecific immunoadhesins
US5736137A (en) 1992-11-13 1998-04-07 Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation Therapeutic application of chimeric and radiolabeled antibodies to human B lymphocyte restricted differentiation antigen for treatment of B cell lymphoma
DE69329503T2 (de) 1992-11-13 2001-05-03 Idec Pharma Corp Therapeutische Verwendung von chimerischen und markierten Antikörpern, die gegen ein Differenzierung-Antigen gerichtet sind, dessen Expression auf menschliche B Lymphozyt beschränkt ist, für die Behandlung von B-Zell-Lymphoma
US7744877B2 (en) 1992-11-13 2010-06-29 Biogen Idec Inc. Expression and use of anti-CD20 Antibodies
US5417972A (en) 1993-08-02 1995-05-23 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Method of killing B-cells in a complement independent and an ADCC independent manner using antibodies which specifically bind CDIM
US5595721A (en) 1993-09-16 1997-01-21 Coulter Pharmaceutical, Inc. Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20
US5637597A (en) 1993-10-21 1997-06-10 Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Carbostyril derivatives for inhibiting production of interleukin-8
DE69534530T2 (de) 1994-08-12 2006-07-06 Immunomedics, Inc. Für b-zell-lymphom und leukämiezellen spezifische immunkonjugate und humane antikörper
US6214388B1 (en) 1994-11-09 2001-04-10 The Regents Of The University Of California Immunoliposomes that optimize internalization into target cells
US5731168A (en) 1995-03-01 1998-03-24 Genentech, Inc. Method for making heteromultimeric polypeptides
US5641870A (en) 1995-04-20 1997-06-24 Genentech, Inc. Low pH hydrophobic interaction chromatography for antibody purification
US5739277A (en) 1995-04-14 1998-04-14 Genentech Inc. Altered polypeptides with increased half-life
US6267958B1 (en) 1995-07-27 2001-07-31 Genentech, Inc. Protein formulation
GB9603256D0 (en) 1996-02-16 1996-04-17 Wellcome Found Antibodies
DE69729283T2 (de) 1996-03-20 2005-05-25 Immunomedics, Inc. GLYKOSYLIERTE IgG ANTIKÖRPER
US20010056066A1 (en) 1996-07-26 2001-12-27 Smithkline Beecham Corporation Method of treating immune cell mediated systemic diseases
JP2001503263A (ja) 1996-10-25 2001-03-13 ヒューマン ジノーム サイエンシーズ，インコーポレイテッド ニュートロカインα
WO1998027114A2 (en) 1996-12-17 1998-06-25 Schering Corporation Mammalian cell surface antigens; related reagents
US6183744B1 (en) 1997-03-24 2001-02-06 Immunomedics, Inc. Immunotherapy of B-cell malignancies using anti-CD22 antibodies
US6306393B1 (en) 1997-03-24 2001-10-23 Immunomedics, Inc. Immunotherapy of B-cell malignancies using anti-CD22 antibodies
CA2232743A1 (en) 1997-04-02 1998-10-02 Smithkline Beecham Corporation A tnf homologue, tl5
US6171586B1 (en) 1997-06-13 2001-01-09 Genentech, Inc. Antibody formulation
DK0999853T3 (da) 1997-06-13 2003-04-22 Genentech Inc Stabiliseret antostofformulering
AU757627B2 (en) 1997-06-24 2003-02-27 Genentech Inc. Methods and compositions for galactosylated glycoproteins
WO1999002567A2 (en) 1997-07-08 1999-01-21 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Compositions and methods for producing homoconjugates of antibodies which induce growth arrest or apoptosis of tumor cells
PL339740A1 (en) 1997-09-12 2001-01-02 Biogen Kay - a novel immune system protein
ATE419009T1 (de) 1997-10-31 2009-01-15 Genentech Inc Methoden und zusammensetzungen bestehend aus glykoprotein-glykoformen
AU2093499A (en) 1997-12-30 1999-07-19 Chiron Corporation Members of tnf and tnfr families
DE69937291T2 (de) 1998-04-02 2008-07-10 Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco Antikörpervarianten und fragmente davon
US6194551B1 (en) 1998-04-02 2001-02-27 Genentech, Inc. Polypeptide variants
US6528624B1 (en) 1998-04-02 2003-03-04 Genentech, Inc. Polypeptide variants
US6242195B1 (en) 1998-04-02 2001-06-05 Genentech, Inc. Methods for determining binding of an analyte to a receptor
DK2180007T4 (da) 1998-04-20 2017-11-27 Roche Glycart Ag Glycosyleringsteknik for antistoffer til forbedring af antistofafhængig cellecytotoxicitet
GB9811969D0 (en) 1998-06-03 1998-07-29 Celltech Therapeutics Ltd Chemical compounds
ATE414536T1 (de) 1998-08-11 2008-12-15 Biogen Idec Inc Kombinationstherapien gegen b-zell-lymphome beinhaltend die verabreichung von anti-cd20- antikörpern
DE19836659A1 (de) 1998-08-13 2000-02-17 Hoechst Schering Agrevo Gmbh Herbizide Mittel für tolerante oder resistente Baumwollkulturen
US6196979B1 (en) 1998-08-24 2001-03-06 Burstein Technologies, Inc. Cassette and applicator for biological and chemical sample collection
US7029652B2 (en) * 1998-09-16 2006-04-18 The Regents Of The University Of California Method of treating tumors
GB9821061D0 (en) 1998-09-28 1998-11-18 Celltech Therapeutics Ltd Chemical compounds
US6224866B1 (en) 1998-10-07 2001-05-01 Biocrystal Ltd. Immunotherapy of B cell involvement in progression of solid, nonlymphoid tumors
JP2002529429A (ja) 1998-11-09 2002-09-10 アイデック・ファーマシューティカルズ・コーポレイション Ｂｍｔまたはｐｂｓｃ移植を受ける患者のキメラ化抗ｃｄ２０抗体による治療。
EP1949910A1 (en) 1998-11-09 2008-07-30 Biogen Idec, Inc. Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) using chimeric anti-CD20 antibody.
GB9826174D0 (en) 1998-11-30 1999-01-20 Celltech Therapeutics Ltd Chemical compounds
GB9828074D0 (en) 1998-12-18 1999-02-17 Glaxo Group Ltd Therapeutically useful compounds
CZ303272B6 (cs) 1999-01-07 2012-07-11 Zymogenetics, Inc. Farmaceutický prostredek obsahující fúzní protein, izolovaná molekula polynukleotidu, expresní vektor, kultivovaná bunka, zpusob prípravy polypeptidu a izolovaný polypeptid
KR20060067983A (ko) 1999-01-15 2006-06-20 제넨테크, 인크. 효과기 기능이 변화된 폴리펩티드 변이체
US6737056B1 (en) 1999-01-15 2004-05-18 Genentech, Inc. Polypeptide variants with altered effector function
US6897044B1 (en) 1999-01-28 2005-05-24 Biogen Idec, Inc. Production of tetravalent antibodies
US6383276B1 (en) 1999-03-12 2002-05-07 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Azomethine compound and oily magenta ink
US6565927B1 (en) 1999-04-07 2003-05-20 Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University Method for treatment of surfaces with ultraviolet light
EP2275541B1 (en) 1999-04-09 2016-03-23 Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. Method for controlling the activity of immunologically functional molecule
US6475987B1 (en) 1999-05-06 2002-11-05 National Jewish Medical And Research Center Tall-1 receptor homologues
MXPA01011279A (es) 1999-05-07 2002-07-02 Genentech Inc Tratamiento de enfermedades autoinmunes con antagonistas que se unene a los marcadores de superficie, de celulas b.
EP1194167B1 (en) 1999-06-09 2009-08-19 Immunomedics, Inc. Immunotherapy of autoimmune disorders using antibodies which target b-cells
ITMI991299A1 (it) 1999-06-11 2000-12-11 Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche Uso di anticorpi contro antigeni di superficie per il trattamento della malattia trapianto contro ospite
DE19930748C2 (de) 1999-07-02 2001-05-17 Infineon Technologies Ag Verfahren zur Herstellung von EEPROM- und DRAM-Grabenspeicherzellbereichen auf einem Chip
CA2379274A1 (en) 1999-07-12 2001-01-18 Genentech, Inc. Blocking immune response to a foreign antigen using an antagonist which binds to cd20
US8557244B1 (en) 1999-08-11 2013-10-15 Biogen Idec Inc. Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkins lymphoma with anti-CD20 antibody
JP2003513012A (ja) 1999-08-11 2003-04-08 アイデック ファーマスーティカルズ コーポレイション 抗ｃｄ２０抗体による骨髄病変を伴う非ホジキンリンパ腫を有する患者の治療
US6451284B1 (en) 1999-08-11 2002-09-17 Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation Clinical parameters for determining hematologic toxicity prior to radioimmunotheraphy
BR0013391A (pt) 1999-08-17 2002-07-09 Biogen Inc Uso do receptor baff (bcma) como um agente imunoregulador
AU6929100A (en) 1999-08-23 2001-03-19 Biocrystal Limited Methods and compositions for immunotherapy of b cell involvement in promotion ofa disease condition comprising multiple sclerosis
US7504256B1 (en) 1999-10-19 2009-03-17 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. Process for producing polypeptide
WO2001034194A1 (en) 1999-11-08 2001-05-17 Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation Treatment of b cell malignancies using anti-cd40l antibodies in combination with anti-cd20 antibodies and/or chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy
US20020006404A1 (en) 1999-11-08 2002-01-17 Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation Treatment of cell malignancies using combination of B cell depleting antibody and immune modulating antibody related applications
US20020028178A1 (en) 2000-07-12 2002-03-07 Nabil Hanna Treatment of B cell malignancies using combination of B cell depleting antibody and immune modulating antibody related applications
DE60127656T2 (de) 2000-02-25 2007-12-20 Immunex Corp., Seattle Integrin antagonisten
AU2001247737A1 (en) 2000-03-24 2001-10-08 Chiron Corporation Methods of therapy for non-hodgkin's lymphoma using a combination of an antibodyto cd20 and interleuking-2
US20030185796A1 (en) 2000-03-24 2003-10-02 Chiron Corporation Methods of therapy for non-hodgkin's lymphoma
CN1981868A (zh) 2000-03-31 2007-06-20 拜奥根Idec公司 抗细胞因子抗体或拮抗剂与抗－cd20在b细胞淋巴瘤治疗中的联合应用
EP1272647B1 (en) 2000-04-11 2014-11-12 Genentech, Inc. Multivalent antibodies and uses therefor
WO2001079173A2 (en) 2000-04-17 2001-10-25 Celltech R & D Limited Enamine derivatives as cell adhesion molecules
WO2001080884A1 (en) 2000-04-25 2001-11-01 Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation Intrathecal administration of rituximab for treatment of central nervous system lymphomas
EP2052742A1 (en) 2000-06-20 2009-04-29 Biogen Idec Inc. Treatment of B-cell associated diseases such as malignancies and autoimmune diseases using a cold anti-CD20 antibody/radiolabeled anti-CD22 antibody combination
WO2001097843A2 (en) 2000-06-22 2001-12-27 University Of Iowa Research Foundation Methods for enhancing antibody-induced cell lysis and treating cancer
US6960597B2 (en) 2000-06-30 2005-11-01 Orth-Mcneil Pharmaceutical, Inc. Aza-bridged-bicyclic amino acid derivatives as α4 integrin antagonists
WO2002022212A2 (en) * 2000-09-18 2002-03-21 Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation Combination therapy for treatment of autoimmune diseases using b cell depleting/immunoregulatory antibody combination
AU2001290303A1 (en) 2000-09-29 2002-04-15 Ajinomoto Co., Inc. Novel phenylalanine derivatives
US7064191B2 (en) 2000-10-06 2006-06-20 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. Process for purifying antibody
US6946292B2 (en) 2000-10-06 2005-09-20 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. Cells producing antibody compositions with increased antibody dependent cytotoxic activity
WO2002034790A1 (en) 2000-10-20 2002-05-02 Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation Variant igg3 rituxan r and therapeutic use thereof
KR100923514B1 (ko) 2000-12-28 2009-10-27 알투스 파마슈티컬스 인코포레이티드 전항체 및 이의 단편의 결정과 이의 제조 및 사용 방법
US20030133939A1 (en) 2001-01-17 2003-07-17 Genecraft, Inc. Binding domain-immunoglobulin fusion proteins
CA2433877C (en) 2001-01-17 2014-11-18 Genecraft, Inc. Binding domain-immunoglobulin fusion proteins
NZ545176A (en) 2001-01-29 2008-05-30 Biogen Idec Inc Modified antibodies reactive with CD20 and methods of use
WO2002096948A2 (en) 2001-01-29 2002-12-05 Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation Engineered tetravalent antibodies and methods of use
US20030103971A1 (en) 2001-11-09 2003-06-05 Kandasamy Hariharan Immunoregulatory antibodies and uses thereof
US20020197256A1 (en) 2001-04-02 2002-12-26 Genentech, Inc. Combination therapy
EP1383800A4 (en) 2001-04-02 2004-09-22 Idec Pharma Corp RECOMBINANT ANTIBODIES CO-EXPRESSED WITH GNTIII
WO2003061694A1 (en) 2001-05-10 2003-07-31 Seattle Genetics, Inc. Immunosuppression of the humoral immune response by anti-cd20 antibodies
JP4516719B2 (ja) 2001-05-11 2010-08-04 アムジエン・インコーポレーテツド Ｔａｌｌ−１と結合するペプチド及び関連分子
JP2005515161A (ja) 2001-06-14 2005-05-26 インターミューン インコーポレイテッド γ−インターフェロンおよびＢ細胞特異的抗体の併用療法
US7321026B2 (en) 2001-06-27 2008-01-22 Skytech Technology Limited Framework-patched immunoglobulins
WO2003010135A1 (fr) 2001-07-26 2003-02-06 Ajinomoto Co., Inc. Nouveaux derives de l'acide phenylpropionique
HUP0500992A3 (en) 2001-08-03 2007-11-28 Genentech Inc Tacis and br3 polypeptides and uses thereof
NZ592087A (en) 2001-08-03 2012-11-30 Roche Glycart Ag Antibody glycosylation variants having increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity
EP2131198B1 (en) 2001-09-20 2013-03-27 Board of Regents, The University of Texas System Measuring circulating therapeutic antibody, antigen and antigen/antibody complexes using ELISA assays
GB2380127A (en) 2001-09-26 2003-04-02 Isis Innovation Treatment of chronic joint inflammation
AU2002337935B2 (en) 2001-10-25 2008-05-01 Genentech, Inc. Glycoprotein compositions
WO2003049694A2 (en) 2001-12-07 2003-06-19 Chiron Corporation Methods of therapy for non-hodgkin's lymphoma
WO2003053926A1 (fr) 2001-12-13 2003-07-03 Ajinomoto Co.,Inc. Nouveau derive de phenylalanine
US20040093621A1 (en) 2001-12-25 2004-05-13 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd Antibody composition which specifically binds to CD20
US7323440B2 (en) 2002-02-13 2008-01-29 Micromet Ag De-immunized MOG (poly)peptide constructs
CA2476166C (en) 2002-02-14 2011-11-15 Immunomedics, Inc. Anti-cd20 antibodies and fusion proteins thereof and methods of use
JP4470219B2 (ja) 2002-02-20 2010-06-02 味の素株式会社 新規フェニルアラニン誘導体
WO2003072036A2 (en) 2002-02-21 2003-09-04 Duke University Treatment methods using anti-cd22 antibodies
US20030180292A1 (en) 2002-03-14 2003-09-25 Idec Pharmaceuticals Treatment of B cell malignancies using anti-CD40L antibodies in combination with anti-CD20 antibodies and/or chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy
JP4832719B2 (ja) 2002-04-09 2011-12-07 協和発酵キリン株式会社 ＦｃγＲＩＩＩａ多型患者に適応する抗体組成物含有医薬
WO2003085107A1 (fr) 2002-04-09 2003-10-16 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. Cellules à génome modifié
ES2362419T3 (es) 2002-04-09 2011-07-05 Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. Células con depresión o deleción de la actividad de la proteína que participa en el transporte de gdp-fucosa.
EP1498490A4 (en) 2002-04-09 2006-11-29 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Kk PROCESS FOR PREPARING ANTIBODY COMPOSITION
AU2003236017B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2009-03-26 Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. Drug containing antibody composition
EP1498491A4 (en) 2002-04-09 2006-12-13 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Kk METHOD FOR INCREASING THE ACTIVITY OF AN ANTIBODY COMPOSITION FOR BINDING TO THE FC GAMMA RECEPTOR IIIA
JPWO2003089410A1 (ja) 2002-04-19 2005-08-25 協和醗酵工業株式会社 フェニルアラニン誘導体
GB0210121D0 (en) 2002-05-02 2002-06-12 Celltech R&D Ltd Biological products
US20030219818A1 (en) 2002-05-10 2003-11-27 Bohen Sean P. Methods and compositions for determining neoplastic disease responsiveness to antibody therapy
US20050180972A1 (en) 2002-07-31 2005-08-18 Wahl Alan F. Anti-CD20 antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of cancer and immune disorders
MXPA05004022A (es) 2002-10-17 2005-10-05 Genmab As Anticuerpos monoclonales humanos contra cd20.
PT1572744E (pt) 2002-12-16 2010-09-07 Genentech Inc Variantes de imunoglobulina e utilizações destas
US7534427B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2009-05-19 Immunomedics, Inc. Immunotherapy of B cell malignancies and autoimmune diseases using unconjugated antibodies and conjugated antibodies and antibody combinations and fusion proteins
EP2368578A1 (en) 2003-01-09 2011-09-28 Macrogenics, Inc. Identification and engineering of antibodies with variant Fc regions and methods of using same
AU2004230567A1 (en) 2003-04-18 2004-10-28 Merck Patent Gmbh Antimicrobial pigments
AU2004252067B2 (en) 2003-05-09 2012-04-12 Duke University CD20-specific antibodies and methods of employing same
AR044388A1 (es) 2003-05-20 2005-09-07 Applied Molecular Evolution Moleculas de union a cd20
US7167933B2 (en) 2003-07-02 2007-01-23 Seiko Epson Corporation Data transferring apparatus for transferring liquid ejection data and a liquid ejecting apparatus
CA2534898A1 (en) 2003-08-08 2005-02-17 Immunomedics, Inc. Bispecific antibodies for inducing apoptosis of tumor and diseased cells
US8147832B2 (en) 2003-08-14 2012-04-03 Merck Patent Gmbh CD20-binding polypeptide compositions and methods
EP1688439A4 (en) 2003-10-08 2007-12-19 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Kk HYBRID PROTEIN COMPOSITION
EP1705251A4 (en) 2003-10-09 2009-10-28 Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co Ltd PROCESS FOR PRODUCING ANTIBODY COMPOSITION BY RNA INHIBITION OF FUNCTION OF $ G (A) 1,6-FUCOSYLTRANSFERASE
SG10202008722QA (en) 2003-11-05 2020-10-29 Roche Glycart Ag Cd20 antibodies with increased fc receptor binding affinity and effector function
WO2005053742A1 (ja) 2003-12-04 2005-06-16 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. 抗体組成物を含有する医薬
EP1696955A2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2006-09-06 Genentech, Inc. Detection of cd20 in therapy of autoimmune diseases
CN1918178B (zh) 2004-01-12 2012-08-22 应用分子进化公司 Fc区变体
WO2005103081A2 (en) * 2004-04-20 2005-11-03 Genmab A/S Human monoclonal antibodies against cd20
US7630892B2 (en) 2004-09-10 2009-12-08 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for transducer-based text normalization and inverse text normalization
MY149159A (en) 2005-11-15 2013-07-31 Hoffmann La Roche Method for treating joint damage
MX2009007764A (es) 2007-06-08 2009-09-10 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma Formulacion de nevirapina de liberacion prolongada.

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7708994B2 (en) * 2003-04-09 2010-05-04 Genentech, Inc. Therapy of autoimmune disease in a patient with an inadequate response to a TNF-α inhibitor
US7976838B2 (en) * 2003-04-09 2011-07-12 Genentech, Inc. Therapy of autoimmune disease in a patient with an inadequate response to a TNF-α inhibitor
US20110300136A1 (en) * 2003-04-09 2011-12-08 Genentech, Inc. Therapy of autoimmune disease in a patient with an inadequate response to a tnf-alpha inhibitor

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8545843B2 (en) 1999-05-07 2013-10-01 Genentech, Inc. Treatment of vasculitis
US9993550B2 (en) 1999-05-07 2018-06-12 Genentech, Inc. Treatment of pemphigus
US8557240B2 (en) 1999-06-01 2013-10-15 Biogen Idec Ma Inc. Method for the treatment of inflammatory disorders
US9902774B2 (en) 1999-06-01 2018-02-27 Biogen Ma Inc. Method for the treatment of inflammatory disorders
US9644030B2 (en) 2001-04-13 2017-05-09 Biogen Ma Inc. Antibodies to VLA-1
US7976838B2 (en) 2003-04-09 2011-07-12 Genentech, Inc. Therapy of autoimmune disease in a patient with an inadequate response to a TNF-α inhibitor
US20080213280A1 (en) * 2003-04-09 2008-09-04 Genentech, Inc. Therapy of autoimmune disease in a patient with an inadequate response to a tnf-alpha inhibitor
US10450379B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2019-10-22 Genetech, Inc. Method for treating joint damage
US10654940B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2020-05-19 Genentech, Inc. Method for treating joint damage
US10119979B2 (en) 2006-05-25 2018-11-06 Biogen Ma Inc. Methods of treating stroke and traumatic brain injury using humanized AQC2 anti-VLA-1 antibodies
US20100233159A1 (en) * 2006-05-25 2010-09-16 Relton Jane K Methods of treating stroke
US20100325148A1 (en) * 2009-06-19 2010-12-23 Ingenix, Inc. System and Method for Generation of Attribute Driven Temporal Clustering
US9753994B2 (en) * 2009-06-19 2017-09-05 Optuminsight, Inc. System and method for generation of attribute driven temporal clustering
WO2012106497A3 (en) * 2011-02-03 2012-10-11 Santarus, Inc. Selection and treatment of subjects
CN103370081A (zh) * 2011-02-03 2013-10-23 桑塔鲁斯股份有限公司 受试者的选择和治疗
WO2012106497A2 (en) * 2011-02-03 2012-08-09 Santarus, Inc. Selection and treatment of subjects
US10160808B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2018-12-25 Santarus, Inc. Anti-VLA1 (CD49A) antibody pharmaceutical compositions
WO2013142336A1 (en) * 2012-03-21 2013-09-26 Miller Leonard B Combination therapy to improve joint, tendon, and ligament healing
US9289506B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2016-03-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Surface binding of nanoparticle based drug delivery to tissue
US10226427B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2019-03-12 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Surface binding of nanoparticle based drug delivery to tissue

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
HK1123209A1 (en) 2009-06-12
AU2006315498B2 (en) 2012-08-16
KR20190009425A (ko) 2019-01-28
US20160176974A1 (en) 2016-06-23
CN103212070A (zh) 2013-07-24
CR10005A (es) 2008-09-22
JP2013056945A (ja) 2013-03-28
NO20082658L (no) 2008-08-15
CA2627886A1 (en) 2007-05-24
NZ567709A (en) 2011-07-29
IL191118B (he) 2018-08-30
WO2007059188A1 (en) 2007-05-24
ES2526616T3 (es) 2015-01-13
US10450379B2 (en) 2019-10-22
KR20080105025A (ko) 2008-12-03
US10654940B2 (en) 2020-05-19
MY149159A (en) 2013-07-31
SI1951304T1 (sl) 2015-02-27
TW200735889A (en) 2007-10-01
PT1951304E (pt) 2015-01-02
DK1951304T3 (en) 2014-11-24
KR20180056797A (ko) 2018-05-29
BRPI0618577A2 (pt) 2011-09-06
MY162988A (en) 2017-07-31
JP6132443B2 (ja) 2017-05-24
MX2008006113A (es) 2008-05-31
RS53767B1 (en) 2015-06-30
CA2627886C (en) 2019-01-08
AR058838A1 (es) 2008-02-27
CN101365487A (zh) 2009-02-11
JP2014218518A (ja) 2014-11-20
JP2009515979A (ja) 2009-04-16
PL1951304T3 (pl) 2015-03-31
HRP20150018T1 (hr) 2015-03-27
US20190270824A1 (en) 2019-09-05
TWI380826B (zh) 2013-01-01
BRPI0618577A8 (pt) 2016-12-20
ECSP088514A (es) 2008-10-31
EP1951304A1 (en) 2008-08-06
KR20150105493A (ko) 2015-09-16
US20210024643A1 (en) 2021-01-28
MA30047B1 (fr) 2008-12-01
US20190382501A1 (en) 2019-12-19
IL191118A0 (en) 2008-12-29
JP2017039775A (ja) 2017-02-23
RU2457860C2 (ru) 2012-08-10
ZA200804288B (en) 2010-10-27
CN101365487B (zh) 2013-04-17
UA94726C2 (ru) 2011-06-10
CA2783210C (en) 2016-10-04
EP1951304B1 (en) 2014-10-22
RU2008123794A (ru) 2009-12-27
HK1128004A1 (en) 2009-10-16
AU2006315498A1 (en) 2007-05-24
CA2783210A1 (en) 2007-05-24
KR20140099927A (ko) 2014-08-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10654940B2 (en) Method for treating joint damage
US20060024295A1 (en) Method for treating lupus
US20070025987A1 (en) Method for Treating Vasculitis
JP2008501706A5 (he)
TOTORITIS et al. Patent 2627886 Summary
TOTORITIS et al. Sommaire du brevet 2783210
TOTORITIS et al. Patent 2783210 Summary
AU2012227327A1 (en) Method for treating joint damage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG, SWITZERLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SHAW, TIMOTHY MARK;REEL/FRAME:022772/0389

Effective date: 20090512

Owner name: BIOGEN IDEC, INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TOTORITIS, MARK;REEL/FRAME:022772/0341

Effective date: 20090526

Owner name: GENENTECH, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AGARWAL, SUNIL;YOCUM, DAVID;KELMAN, ARIELLA;REEL/FRAME:022772/0368;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090511 TO 20090513

AS Assignment

Owner name: BIOGEN INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:BIOGEN IDEC INC.;REEL/FRAME:035552/0202

Effective date: 20150323

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION