EP1668310A1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schützen von schiffen vor endphasengelenkten flugkörpern - Google Patents
Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schützen von schiffen vor endphasengelenkten flugkörpernInfo
- Publication number
- EP1668310A1 EP1668310A1 EP04764698A EP04764698A EP1668310A1 EP 1668310 A1 EP1668310 A1 EP 1668310A1 EP 04764698 A EP04764698 A EP 04764698A EP 04764698 A EP04764698 A EP 04764698A EP 1668310 A1 EP1668310 A1 EP 1668310A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- decoy
- ship
- ammunition
- sensors
- missile
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 42
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 claims description 33
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920000049 Carbon (fiber) Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000006096 absorbing agent Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004917 carbon fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005253 cladding Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims 8
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 12
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000015842 Hesperis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000012633 Iberis amara Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000030560 Styx Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005422 blasting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011982 device technology Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004146 energy storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012067 mathematical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004570 mortar (masonry) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036632 reaction speed Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
- F41H11/02—Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/04—Aiming or laying means for dispersing fire from a battery ; for controlling spread of shots; for coordinating fire from spaced weapons
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H3/00—Camouflage, i.e. means or methods for concealment or disguise
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H3/00—Camouflage, i.e. means or methods for concealment or disguise
- F41H3/02—Flexible, e.g. fabric covers, e.g. screens, nets characterised by their material or structure
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41J—TARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
- F41J2/00—Reflecting targets, e.g. radar-reflector targets; Active targets transmitting electromagnetic or acoustic waves
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for protecting ships against end-phase guided missiles with a target data analysis system according to claim 1 and a protection system device according to claim 13.
- Modern maritime missiles have radar (RF), infrared (IR) or DUAL MODE (RF / IR) sensors for the final phase guidance. Appropriate "intelligent" data analysis enables these missiles to differentiate between targets and false targets.
- RF radar
- IR infrared
- IR DUAL MODE
- missile-inherent data analyzes meanwhile include all relevant temporal, spatial, spectral and kinematic features, such as:
- RF / IR signature analysis dual mode homing heads
- imaging methods imaging IR
- FFT analyzes signal frequency analysis
- DE 38 35 887 A1 describes a cartridge for producing dummy targets, in particular for use in tanks for protection against sensor-guided ammunition.
- the dummy target cartridge is designed as dual-mode ammunition, it contains grain reflectors for imitating the radar signature of a tank and incendiary devices for imitating the infrared signature of a tank. Grain reflectors and incendiary devices are distributed by means of an explosive charge so that a tank signature results in both spectral ranges.
- An infrared active mass for the creation of a false target is described for example in DE 43 27 976 C1. This is a flare mass based on red phosphorus, which preferably emits in the medium-wave range when it burns up. These flares - installed in appropriate decoy ammunition - can be used, for example, to protect tanks, ships and drilling platforms.
- DE 196 17 701 A1 also describes a method for providing a dummy target for the protection of land, air or water vehicles for defense against guided missiles operating in dual mode or in series, one emitting radiation in the IR range and one RF radiation backscattering active mass in the correct position as a false target are simultaneously activated.
- EP 1 336 814 A2 discloses a RADAR counter measure system for protecting ships by deploying corner reflectors defined in azimuth and elevation in the flight path of an approaching missile.
- DE 199 43 396 discloses decoys and a method for providing an apparent target, for example for protecting ships, for defense against missiles, both in the infrared or
- Radar range as well as a seeker operating simultaneously or serially in both wavelength ranges, one in the IR range
- Ratio of dipole mass to flare active mass of approximately 3.4: 1 to 6: 1 is used; and flares are used which have a sinking speed which is about 0.5 to 1.5 m / s higher than the dipoles.
- HERRMANN Helmut wt 2/89 Camouflaging and Deceiving in the Navy ' discloses a method for protecting ships against final-phase guided missiles with a target data analysis system. This publication also describes that the missile moving in the direction of the ship to be protected is detected by suitable sensors, localized and its expected flight path is calculated by means of a computer.
- HERRMANN For a successful defense of the missile, the approach direction, azimuth and elevation as well as the distance must be known according to HERRMANN.
- HERRMANN describes the dependence of the effective use of chaff on the ship's course, wind strength and wind direction, as well as the direction of the missile threat.
- HERRMANN also describes the use and consideration of the ship's own data
- a computer calculates an optimal ship course and an optimal ship trip to support the separation of the decoy body structure, which is supported by the fire control computer, from the ship to be protected.
- decoys are deployed either as decoy rockets or according to the mortar principle from rigid launcher systems, so that exact positioning is not possible. Even when firing from directional decoy throwing systems, the required temporal and spatial staggering of the decoys with the methods and devices described so far is extremely difficult, since sequential deployment with spontaneously selectable firing intervals (in response to the current threat situation) and spontaneously selectable shooting distances cannot be achieved.
- An effective decoy method or system must ensure that, depending on Missile Type Missile Attack Direction Missile Distance Missile Speed Ship Aspect Signature Direction of Ship Vessel Speed Superimposed Ship Movement (Rolling, Nodding) Wind Speed Wind Direction
- a decoy structure or pattern can be generated within a very short time, which is completely flexible in terms of shape and size, as well as in terms of distance, height, direction of use and staggered timing, and in particular takes account of the conditions at sea with sometimes considerable seas and strong winds.
- This decoy structure must correspond to the ship's signature in all spectral, spatial and temporal criteria relevant to the missile seekers.
- the exchangeable body structure must be composed of individual decoy ammunitions in order to be able to guarantee the greatest possible flexibility and variation with regard to the shape and size of the decoy body structure.
- the decoys comprise decoy ammunitions that have either RF and / or IR and / or combined RF / IR active masses in order to be able to emulate the RF and IR signature of the ship,
- the method according to the invention uses decoy ammunition whose apparent target diameter is about 10 m to 20 m each corresponds in order to be able to reproduce the spatial signature of the ship to be protected,
- the decoys can be deployed in such a way that the arrangement of individual decoy ammunitions, in particular patterns staggered in width and height, produces a ship-like expansion and movement of the decoy structure, which separates from the ship to be protected.
- the present invention relates to a method for protecting ships from end-phase guided missiles with a target data analysis system, wherein (1) the missile moving in the direction of the ship to be protected is detected by suitable sensors, localized and its expected trajectory is calculated using a computer;
- the type of target data analysis carried out by the missile is detected by means of suitable sensors and algorithms and the missile is classified with regard to its type of target data analysis;
- At least one decoy launcher is controlled by the fire control computer and the firing of decoy ammunition is initiated, the fire control computer using the evaluated sensor data to deploy the decoys with respect to:
- the fire control computer calculates an optimal ship course and an optimal ship journey to support the separation of the fire control computer-based decoy body from the ship to be protected; in which
- the ship's own data are recorded by the navigation system and the gyro stabilization system of the ship to be protected or by means of separate acceleration sensors, in particular pitch, roll or gyro sensors, wherein
- a specific decoy pattern is generated as a function of the detected missile and the attack structure, the suitable decoy pattern for the respective type of threat, characterized by the type of missile and approach behavior, being stored in a database and called up by the fire control computer after recognition of the type of missile and the attack structure, to build up a corresponding decoy pattern.
- RF and / or IR and / or UV sensors are used to detect the approaching missile.
- the ship's reconnaissance radars are preferably used.
- the wind measurement sensors of the ship's wind measurement system are preferably used to record the wind direction and wind speed.
- the ship's own data are recorded by the navigation system and the gyro stabilization system on board the ship to be protected or by means of separate acceleration sensors, in particular pitching and rolling movements.
- standardized interfaces in particular NTDS, RS232, RS422, ETHERNET, IR, or BLUETOOTH interfaces are used as data interfaces.
- a personal computer, a microcontroller control or a PLC control is preferably used as the fire control computer, the fire control computer transmitting the determined data for deploying the decoy structure to the decoy launcher via a standardized data interface, in particular via a CAN bus (Controller Area Network Bus) ,
- CAN bus Controller Area Network Bus
- radio frequency reflector in particular a
- Radar reflector preferably an angle reflector, preferably a Radar reflector with eight triple-surface angle reflectors (tri-hedrals), particularly preferably a corner reflector known per se; preferably in the form of nets or foils.
- angle reflector preferably a Radar reflector with eight triple-surface angle reflectors (tri-hedrals), particularly preferably a corner reflector known per se; preferably in the form of nets or foils.
- the protection system device which is suitable for carrying out the method according to the present invention, is equipped with: at least one computer;
- Sensors for detecting end-phase guided missiles approaching a ship to be protected which have a target data analysis system for distinguishing between real and false targets;
- Sensors for detecting the direction of approach, distance and speed of the missiles a wind measuring device for wind speed and wind direction;
- Motion and / or navigation sensors for recording the ship's own data cruise speed, direction, roll and pitch movements; at least one fire control computer, in particular fire control computer and computer forming a unit; and wherein the fire control computer communicates with the sensors via data interfaces; at least one decoy launcher arranged on the ship in azimuth and elevation, which is equipped with decoy ammunition, the ammunition types comprising RF, IR, and combined RF / IR ammunition and deployable corner reflectors; in which
- the computer has a database in which suitable decoy body patterns for the respective missile type and the respective attack structure are stored, which make it possible, depending on the detected missile and the attack structure, to generate a specific decoy body pattern in order to effectively isolate a ship from the recognized threat protect.
- suitable decoy launcher can, for example, the following
- Components include: a firing platform as the carrier of each
- Firing platform an azimuth drive for lateral movement of the firing platform, a base platform for receiving the drives,
- Mine blasting shock - STEALTH cladding to reduce the intrinsic signature in the RF and IR range, preferably formed from inclined metal or carbon fiber surfaces; and - a suitable interface which transmits the delay time of the decoy ammunition (s) from firing to activation of the active charge immediately before firing from the decoy launcher to the decoy ammunition (s), preferably designed as an electrical plug-in connection or as an inductive connection via two corresponding coils.
- FIG. 1 shows an exemplary protection system device in a schematic view
- FIG. 2a shows an exemplary exchange body structure deployed according to the invention in a schematic plan view as a countermeasure to an attacking RF-guided missile;
- FIG. 2b shows an exemplary exchange body structure deployed according to the invention in a schematic side view as a countermeasure to an IR-guided missile
- FIG. 8 shows a schematic flow diagram of the decoy body system according to the invention.
- 9 shows the essential elements of the device according to the invention.
- Fig. 10 is a schematic representation of the formation of a decoy pattern at the target coordinates.
- Fig. 1 shows a schematic view of a protection system device according to the invention.
- a missile attacking the ship to be protected is detected, located and identified by means of suitable sensors (FIG. 1, A), these sensors preferably comprising RF, IR and / or UV sensors (for example EloUM systems such as FL1800, MSP, MILDS or the like).
- sensors for example EloUM systems such as FL1800, MSP, MILDS or the like.
- the current wind speed and wind direction are continuously recorded by means of suitable sensors (FIG. 1, A), this sensor system being implemented in the example by the ship's own wind measurement system.
- the ship's own data are also recorded using suitable sensors.
- the cruising speed, direction of travel, rolling movements and pitching movements of the ship to be protected are recorded (FIG. 1A), this sensor system being taken over by the ship's navigation and gyro stabilization system in the exemplary embodiment.
- the measurements of these parameters can also be implemented by separate devices for determining the roll and pitch movements of the ship.
- the determined sensor data are transmitted to a fire control computer by means of suitable data interfaces (FIG. 1, B), whereby these Data interfaces in the present exemplary embodiment are designed as RS232 interfaces.
- NTDS e.g. NTDS, RS 422, ETHERNET, IR or BLUETOOTH interfaces.
- a decoy launcher in FIG. 1, C is controlled with the aid of a suitable fire control computer, in the example a PC.
- the control of the decoy launcher and the firing of the decoy ammunition takes place in the example with regard to: the type of the different decoy ammunition (RF, IR, combined RF / IR), the number of different decoy ammunition types (RF , IR, RF / IR), the time interval between firing between successive decoy ammunitions, - the firing direction in azimuth (including the compensation of rolling and pitching movements of the ship) of each decoy ammunition, the firing direction in elevation (including the compensation of rolling and pitching movements of the Ship) of each decoy ammunition,
- this fire control computer in the example by a personal computer is realized.
- a microcontroller control or a PLC control can also be used as a fire control computer.
- the calculated data from the fire control computer regarding the optimum ship course and ship speed are transmitted to the command station of the ship using an RS 232 data interface.
- RS 232 data interface e.g., NTDS, RS 422, ETHERNET, IR and BLUETOOTH interfaces.
- the transmission of the fire control computer data to one or more decoy projectors takes place in the present exemplary embodiment via CAN bus interfaces.
- the decoy launcher used as an example can be rotated in at least two axes (azimuth and elevation) (FIG. 1, C).
- the decoy ammunitions are fired in a directional manner in elevation and azimuth.
- the decoy launcher used in the example includes the following components: a firing platform as a carrier for the individual decoy ammunition, an electrical firing device which fires the individual decoy ammunition at any adjustable time interval, an elevation drive designed as an electric drive for vertical movement of the firing platform, and an azimuth drive designed as an electric drive for lateral movement of the firing platform,
- a base platform for accommodating the drives, a shock absorber on the base platform for damping rapid ship movements, e.g. due to mine blast shocks,
- STEALTH cladding to reduce the intrinsic signature in the RF and IR range, preferably made of inclined metal and / or carbon fiber surfaces, a suitable interface that the delay time (the decoy ammunition (s) from firing to activation of the active charge) immediately before transmits the firing from the decoy launcher to the decoy ammunition (s), exemplified as an electrical plug connection or as an inductive connection via two corresponding coils;
- the decoy ammunitions have integrated, electronically freely programmable delay elements in which the delay times transmitted by the launcher or by the fire control computer are stored, so that the activation of the active masses is initiated after the delay time has elapsed (FIGS. 1, D), these delay elements in the exemplary embodiment are designed as a microcontroller circuit, the decoy ammunition having its own energy store, by means of which the energy supply to the programmable delay element and the energy supply to the active mass initiation and distribution takes place in the decoy ammunition (FIG. 1, D), this Energy storage in the example case can be realized by rechargeable capacitors, by rechargeable batteries or by batteries.
- FIGS. 2a and 2b show, by way of example, a top view and a side view of a possible exchange body structure with an approaching RF-guided missile (FIG. 2a) and an IR-guided missile approaching the ship to be protected.
- FIGS. 2a and 2b show, by way of example, a top view and a side view of a possible exchange body structure with an approaching RF-guided missile (FIG. 2a) and an IR-guided missile approaching the ship to be protected.
- Missiles for fighting sea targets have sensors for target detection and target tracking, which operate in the electromagnetic wavelength ranges: ultraviolet (UV), visual / electro-optical range (EO), LASER (e.g. 1.06 ⁇ m and 10.6 ⁇ m), infrared (IR) as well as RADAR (e.g. I / J-Band and mmW).
- UV ultraviolet
- EO visual / electro-optical range
- LASER e.g. 1.06 ⁇ m and 10.6 ⁇ m
- IR infrared
- RADAR e.g. I / J-Band and mmW
- the specific threat situation is defined by the following parameters:
- Missile type including sensor type, target tracking algorithm, etc.
- Approach speed of the missile ⁇ Distance of the missile Cruise speed of the ship Ship type (geometry)
- Ship signature radar, infrared
- FIGS. 3 to 7 show an example of some decoy body patterns required for missile defense, staggered in time and space, which are composed of individual decoy bodies (represented as circles / spheres), which are stored in a computer database and which are matched to the respective missile type and the associated attack structure are.
- Fig. 3 shows a decoy pattern, which can protect the flanks of a ship on both sides from flying missiles. The decoy pattern is shown in plan view.
- FIG. 4 shows a top view of an umbrella-like decoy pattern, which is suitable, for example, for warding off frontal and diagonally frontal attacks.
- a decoy pattern in the form of a tower for defense against head-on guided search missiles is shown in side view.
- Fig. 6 shows a schematic representation of a side view of a camouflage wall, which is also used for flank protection.
- FIG. 7 shows a side view of a decoy pattern which is used to ward off attacks from above, so-called top attacks.
- a decoy system which uses a tactical computer to calculate the decoy pattern that is optimal for the specific threat situation for missile defense with regard to the required number of decoys (n) and their spatial and temporal target coordinates (x n , y n , z n , t n ) and then realizes the exact spatial (x ⁇ , y ⁇ , z n ) and temporal (t n ) positioning of the decoy using a decoy throwing system.
- the essence of the invention lies in the fact that almost any pattern of decoy clouds can be formed even under the conditions of a rough sea.
- FIGS. 9 and 10 show the functional chain and the schematic structure of the system:
- the wind data (wind speed and wind direction) and the ship's own data (speed, course, pitch and roll movement)) are recorded and forwarded to a central computer (FIG. 9, reference number 2).
- Approaching missiles are detected by warning sensors and the respective type of missile as well as its approach direction and distance are determined. This data is also forwarded to the central computer 2.
- a correlation database (threat table), the specific and relevant missile defense data of the detected missile type are queried.
- the optimal decoy pattern is now individually determined with regard to the number of decoys necessary for missile defense and their spatial and temporal target coordinates (x n , y n , z n , t n ) determined (for examples see Fig. 1 ... 5). If no data about the missile is available in the correlation database, a generic decoy pattern is used, which is also stored in a database for specific threat situations and missiles (for example a “camouflage wall” according to FIG. 6).
- a device is used according to the invention which has the following components (see FIG. 9): a) sensors for detecting the roll and pitch movement of the ship in relation to an artificial horizon b) computer for calculating the Launch data c) A 2-axis, in azimuth and elevation directional unit d) A launch platform with a variety of individually controllable launch elements e) Decoy ammunition equipped with programmable delay elements, which are programmed via a data interface from the launch platform so that the Effective development when the target coordinates (x n , y n , z n ) are reached.
- FIG. 10 the decoy pattern shown in FIG. 10 (FIG.
- n 4 decoys.
- the spatial (x n , y n , z n ) and the temporal target coordinates (t n ) are clearly defined with respect to the decoy throwing system installed on the ship (FIG. 10, reference number 2) (TK (x n , y n , z n , t n )).
- the ship's own movements, rolling and pitching are recorded by a gyro stabilization system, preferably by an inclinometer.
- the computer calculates the staggered time ( ⁇ t) and the given ballistics from the target coordinates (x n , y n , z n , t n ) of the decoys (at the same exit speed v 0 ) using a mathematical approximation method, for example the 'Runge-Kutta method ' , the launch azimuth ⁇ n , the launch elevation ⁇ ⁇ and the required flight time and thus the effective distance d n of the individual decoy ammunition.
- a mathematical approximation method for example the 'Runge-Kutta method ' , the launch azimuth ⁇ n , the launch elevation ⁇ ⁇ and the required flight time and thus the effective distance d n of the individual decoy ammunition.
- the calculated data are converted and transmitted by control systems, preferably servo controllers, into machine commands for the described 2-axis throwers that can move in azimuth and elevation (FIG. 9, reference number 3).
- the projector which can be moved in two axes, is realized by means of electrical, hydraulic or pneumatic directional drives.
- An electric drive is preferably used, which either acts directly on the launch platform or preferably transmits the movement indirectly to the launch platform via a gear.
- the strength of the drives for the azimuth straightening movement and the elevation straightening movement is adapted to the weights and moments to be moved.
- the drives are designed so that an angular speed of more than 50 s or an angular acceleration of more than 507s 2 (positive and negative acceleration) is reached.
- the directional range is designed in such a way that, taking into account the conditions of the launch platform, a shot direction in azimuth from 0 ° to 360 ° and an elevation shot direction from 0 ° to 90 ° is achieved.
- Programmable firing limits have been implemented so that firing the decoy ammunition in the direction of the superstructure of the ship should be prevented.
- program memories based on EPROM are preferably used.
- a launch platform with a variety of individually controllable launch elements (FIG. 9, reference number 4)
- the launch platform is designed in such a way that it is possible to fire at least 20 individual decoys. Each decoy ammunition can preferably be fired individually. In addition, it has been realized that the launching time of the decoy ammunition is programmed to the desired effective distance via the launch platform.
- the interface to the decoy ammunition can be implemented via contacts, but is preferably implemented by an inductive interface in order to prevent corrosion influences on the data transmission.
- Decoy ammunition with programmable delay elements which can be programmed via a data interface from the launch platform (Fig. 9, reference number 5)
- the decoy ammunitions are designed so that they all have the same exit speed (vo). This is necessary to ensure the correct and exact placement of the decoys based on the ballistic calculations of the computer.
- the maximum flight distance is preferably at least 100 m.
- the v 0 is designed according to the ammunition weight, the drag coefficient (Cw) and the front surface (A).
- the decoy ammunitions each have a programmable delay element, so that the flight times until the effective deployment are variable at the target coordinates (x n , y n , z ⁇ ) and can be programmed via the launch platform immediately before the launch.
- the interfaces to the launch platform are preferably inductive, that is to say they are each implemented via a coil system.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10346001A DE10346001B4 (de) | 2003-10-02 | 2003-10-02 | Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern |
PCT/EP2004/009736 WO2005033616A1 (de) | 2003-10-02 | 2004-09-01 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schützen von schiffen vor endphasengelenkten flugkörpern |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1668310A1 true EP1668310A1 (de) | 2006-06-14 |
EP1668310B1 EP1668310B1 (de) | 2011-05-11 |
Family
ID=34399213
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04764698A Active EP1668310B1 (de) | 2003-10-02 | 2004-09-01 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schützen von schiffen vor endphasengelenkten flugkörpern |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7886646B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1668310B1 (de) |
KR (1) | KR101182772B1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE10346001B4 (de) |
DK (1) | DK1668310T3 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2005033616A1 (de) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
RU183038U1 (ru) * | 2018-04-11 | 2018-09-07 | Федеральное Государственное Казенное Военное Образовательное Учреждение Высшего Образования Военный Учебно-Научный Центр Сухопутных Войск "Общевойсковая Академия Вооруженных Сил Российской Федерации" | Генератор постановки над наземным объектом управляемой водной пено-аэрозольной маски-помехи средствам наведения ВТО |
Families Citing this family (47)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SE525000C2 (sv) * | 2003-03-04 | 2004-11-09 | Totalfoersvarets Forskningsins | Sätt att bringa en projektil i kastbana att verka i en önskad punkt vid en beräknad tidpunkt |
US8130137B1 (en) | 2005-07-26 | 2012-03-06 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Template updated boost algorithm |
US20090217811A1 (en) | 2006-01-17 | 2009-09-03 | David William Leeming | Textile armour |
DE102006004912A1 (de) | 2006-01-20 | 2007-07-26 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | System zum Schutz insbesondere großer fliegender Plattformen vor infrarot- bzw. radargelenkter Bedrohungen |
DE102006017107A1 (de) | 2006-04-10 | 2007-10-11 | Oerlikon Contraves Ag | Schutzeinrichtung und Schutzmaßnahme für eine Radaranlage |
DE102007007403A1 (de) * | 2007-02-12 | 2008-08-21 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz gegen fliegende Angriffsmunitionskörper |
CN101680946B (zh) | 2007-05-14 | 2014-01-08 | 雷斯昂公司 | 用于从雷达跟踪数据选择目标的方法和装置 |
DE102008023520C5 (de) * | 2008-05-15 | 2016-12-29 | Airbus Defence and Space GmbH | Verfahren zur Klassifikation von RAM-Geschossen |
DE102008046432A1 (de) * | 2008-09-09 | 2010-03-11 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Abwehr von sich einem Schiff unter oder auf dem Wasser nähernden Objekten |
EP2204632A1 (de) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-07 | Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast-natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO | Ausbringverfahren von Scheinzielen, ein Scheinziel-Ausbringsystem und ein Computerprogrammprodukt |
US8106340B1 (en) * | 2009-03-02 | 2012-01-31 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Generalized midcourse missile guidance |
DE102009011447B9 (de) * | 2009-03-03 | 2012-08-16 | Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren zum Zünden eines Gefechtskopfs einer Granate und Fahrzeug |
EP2414767A1 (de) * | 2009-03-31 | 2012-02-08 | BAE Systems PLC | Zuordnung von waffen zu bedrohungen |
EP2348276A1 (de) * | 2010-01-20 | 2011-07-27 | Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Erzeugung und Abschätzung situationsabhängiger Risikoprofile, und zur Einleitung geeigneter Massnahmen zum Schutz eines Fahrzeuges |
IL204620A0 (en) * | 2010-03-21 | 2010-12-30 | Israel Aerospace Ind Ltd | Defense system |
DE102010032458A1 (de) | 2010-06-11 | 2011-12-15 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Aktive Täuschkörper gegen Radarquellen sowie Verfahren zum Schutz von Objekten mit Hilfe derartiger Täuschkörper |
DE102010036026A1 (de) | 2010-08-31 | 2012-03-01 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Effektivität einer Nebelwand zur Erzeugung einer wirksamen Nebelwolke |
WO2012028257A1 (de) | 2010-08-31 | 2012-03-08 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur erzeugung einer wirksamen nebelwand bzw. nebelwolke |
DE102011014599B4 (de) * | 2011-03-22 | 2016-12-08 | Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren zum Schützen eines Objekts vor einem Angriff eines anfliegenden Flugobjekts |
DE102011052616A1 (de) * | 2011-03-28 | 2012-10-04 | Peter Huber | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Verteidigung eines Zielobjekts gegen mindestens einen angreifenden Flugkörper |
CN102261869A (zh) * | 2011-06-15 | 2011-11-30 | 北京机械设备研究所 | 一种拦截低空慢速小目标单兵数字化火控装置 |
US9170070B2 (en) | 2012-03-02 | 2015-10-27 | Orbital Atk, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats |
US9551552B2 (en) | 2012-03-02 | 2017-01-24 | Orbital Atk, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats |
US9501055B2 (en) | 2012-03-02 | 2016-11-22 | Orbital Atk, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats |
US11947349B2 (en) | 2012-03-02 | 2024-04-02 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats |
US11313650B2 (en) | 2012-03-02 | 2022-04-26 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats |
US9250043B1 (en) | 2012-08-13 | 2016-02-02 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | System and method for early intercept ballistic missile defense |
CN102998717B (zh) * | 2012-11-26 | 2015-06-10 | 北京空间飞行器总体设计部 | 一种火星表面可重复使用浮空探测器系统的设计方法 |
CN103575167B (zh) * | 2013-11-07 | 2014-12-03 | 北京机械设备研究所 | 一种民用拦截弹弹道修正方法 |
DE102015002737B4 (de) | 2015-03-05 | 2023-05-25 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bereitstellen eines Scheinzieles zum Schutz eines Fahrzeuges und/oder Objektes vor radargelenkten Suchköpfen |
DE102015011058A1 (de) | 2015-08-27 | 2017-03-02 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | System zur Abwehr von Bedrohungen |
DE102015120030A1 (de) * | 2015-09-17 | 2017-03-23 | Rheinmetall Defence Electronics Gmbh | Fernbedienbare Waffenstation und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer fernbedienbaren Waffenstation |
DE102016109727A1 (de) * | 2016-05-25 | 2017-11-30 | Rheinmetall Defence Electronics Gmbh | Trägerplattform zum Tragen von militärischen Nutzlasten |
US10473761B2 (en) * | 2016-08-11 | 2019-11-12 | Rodradar Ltd. | Wire and pylon classification based on trajectory tracking |
RU175624U1 (ru) * | 2016-09-19 | 2017-12-12 | Федеральное Государственное Казенное Военное Образовательное Учреждение Высшего Образования Военный Учебно-Научный Центр Сухопутных Войск "Общевойсковая Академия Вооруженных Сил Российской Федерации" | Комплект боеприпасов-кассет для управляемого внезапного резкоконтрастного распятнения или аэрозольного образования в зоне расположения маскируемого объекта |
DE102018110241A1 (de) * | 2018-04-27 | 2019-10-31 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz eines Fahrzeugs vor einer Bedrohung |
US10778943B2 (en) * | 2018-07-17 | 2020-09-15 | C-Tonomy, LLC | Autonomous surveillance duo |
DE102018131524A1 (de) * | 2018-12-10 | 2020-06-10 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Verfahren zum Schutz von beweglichen oder unbeweglichen Objekten vor sich nähernden lasergelenkten Bedrohungen |
US10970852B2 (en) | 2019-04-01 | 2021-04-06 | Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc. | Systems and methods for multi-signature countermeasure testing |
US12006067B2 (en) * | 2019-05-30 | 2024-06-11 | Launch On Demand Corporation | Launch on demand |
DE102019117801A1 (de) | 2019-07-02 | 2021-01-07 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Scheinziel, System und Verfahren zum Schützen eines Objekts |
DE102020201732A1 (de) | 2020-02-12 | 2021-08-12 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Verfahren zur Minimierung eines Detonationsschadens auf einem Wasserfahrzeug |
KR102134580B1 (ko) * | 2020-04-16 | 2020-07-16 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | 차세대 함정용 전투체계의 계층별 표적 정보 데이터베이스 관리 시스템 |
KR102551654B1 (ko) * | 2021-03-03 | 2023-07-05 | 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 | 고위협 표적 인식 방법 및 그를 위한 장치 |
KR102494974B1 (ko) * | 2021-04-16 | 2023-02-06 | 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 | 함정에서 기상 정보를 활용한 함포의 탄착 정확도 오차 개선을 위한 사격 제원 산출 시스템 및 그 방법 |
DE102021117084A1 (de) * | 2021-07-02 | 2023-01-05 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Verfahren zum Schutz eines Objekts vor einem radargelenkten Flugkörper |
CN114353784B (zh) * | 2022-03-17 | 2022-06-07 | 西北工业大学 | 一种基于运动矢量的制导炮弹空中姿态辨识方法 |
Family Cites Families (66)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US422306A (en) | 1890-02-25 | Door-hanger | ||
FR2383419A1 (fr) | 1977-03-07 | 1978-10-06 | Lacroix E | Valise lance-leurres pour la deception des systemes de guidage d'armes |
DE2847233C2 (de) | 1978-10-30 | 1983-12-01 | Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh, 6000 Frankfurt | Verfahren zum Auffinden und Identifizieren horizontnaher modulierter Strahlungsquellen |
DE3019743C2 (de) | 1980-05-23 | 1987-05-07 | Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., 5000 Köln | Fahrzeug mit einer Plattform für eine Ziellinienstabilisierung in Verbindung mit einem Inertialsystem |
DE3229819C2 (de) | 1982-08-11 | 1985-02-14 | Bodenseewerk Gerätetechnik GmbH, 7770 Überlingen | Integriertes Navigations- und Feuerleitsystem für Kampfpanzer |
US4470199A (en) | 1983-02-24 | 1984-09-11 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for aligning aircraft instruments bearing platforms |
US4531299A (en) | 1984-03-21 | 1985-07-30 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Analog inclination data system |
DE3421692C2 (de) | 1984-06-12 | 1986-10-02 | Buck Chemisch-Technische Werke GmbH & Co, 7347 Bad Überkingen | Verfahren und Wurfkörper zum Erzeugen eines IR-Scheinziels |
SE458151B (sv) * | 1984-09-04 | 1989-02-27 | Bofors Ab | Saett att optimera maaltaeckningen foer ett automatkanonluftvaern |
US4673250A (en) | 1985-08-09 | 1987-06-16 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | CO2 laser weapon countermeasure |
DE3612183A1 (de) * | 1986-04-11 | 1987-10-22 | Wegmann & Co | Verfahren zur ablenkung von durch radar- und/oder infrarotstrahlung gelenkten flugkoerpern, insbesondere zum schutz von seeschiffen und schiffsverbaenden sowie einrichtung zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens |
DE3733681C1 (de) | 1987-10-05 | 1994-07-28 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Vorrichtung mit Infrarot-Suchkopf zur Entdeckung und Bekämpfung feindlicher Hubschrauber |
DE3733962A1 (de) | 1987-10-08 | 1989-04-27 | Wegmann & Co | Verfahren zur automatischen zielklassifizierung durch land- und wasserkampffahrzeuge sowie einrichtung zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens |
GB8729382D0 (en) | 1987-12-16 | 1988-01-27 | Secr Defence | Electronic tilt measuring system |
DE3828766C2 (de) | 1988-08-25 | 1997-04-10 | Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag | Elektrooptisches System zur Erkennung von Flugkörpern |
DE3835887C2 (de) * | 1988-10-21 | 1997-10-02 | Rheinmetall Ind Ag | Patrone zur Scheinzielerzeugung |
US4852456A (en) * | 1988-10-26 | 1989-08-01 | Northrop Corporation | Decoy system |
US6231002B1 (en) | 1990-03-12 | 2001-05-15 | The Boeing Company | System and method for defending a vehicle |
DE4014192A1 (de) | 1990-05-03 | 1991-11-07 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Mobile start- und lenkanlage fuer flugkoerper |
DE4014194A1 (de) | 1990-05-03 | 1991-11-07 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Flugkoerper-startanlage |
US5061930A (en) | 1990-06-12 | 1991-10-29 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Multi-mode missile seeker system |
DE4115384C2 (de) * | 1991-05-10 | 1994-07-07 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Verfahren zum Schützen von eine IR-Strahlung abgebenden Objekten |
JPH0772680B2 (ja) | 1992-02-05 | 1995-08-02 | 防衛庁技術研究本部長 | 近接防御装置 |
US5229540A (en) | 1992-05-26 | 1993-07-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Tank alerting system |
DE4229509C2 (de) | 1992-09-04 | 1994-07-14 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Schützen von Radarstationen gegen Anti-Radar-Flugkörper |
DE4238038C1 (de) | 1992-11-11 | 1994-06-16 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Verfahren zum Bereitstellen eines Scheinzielkörpers |
US5549477A (en) | 1992-11-17 | 1996-08-27 | Honeywell Inc. | Integrated aircraft survivability equipment in-flight simulation |
US5574458A (en) | 1992-11-17 | 1996-11-12 | Honeywell Inc. | Automatic RF countermeasures dispensing module controller |
DE9320382U1 (de) | 1993-07-07 | 1994-06-01 | BST Schutztechnik GmbH, 85521 Ottobrunn | Selbstschutzanlage für Gefechtsfeldfahrzeuge |
DE4327976C1 (de) * | 1993-08-19 | 1995-01-05 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Flaremasse zur Scheinzielerzeugung |
DE4401587A1 (de) | 1994-01-20 | 1995-07-27 | Wegmann & Co Gmbh | Kampffahrzeug sowie Transportsystem zu seiner Verladung in Transportflugzeuge |
DE4423728A1 (de) | 1994-06-25 | 1996-01-04 | Inst Baustoff Und Umweltschutz | Verfahren zur Behandlung und umweltverträglichen Verwertung von Asbestzementprodukten |
DE4426014B4 (de) | 1994-07-22 | 2004-09-30 | Diehl Stiftung & Co.Kg | System zum Schutz eines Zieles gegen Flugkörper |
GB9506618D0 (en) * | 1994-10-07 | 1995-05-24 | Myers Lorraine P | Trolley handle |
DE4437729C1 (de) * | 1994-10-21 | 1996-04-25 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Verfahren zum Schützen von eine IR-Strahlung abgebenden Objekten, insbesondere Schiffen, gegen Flugkörper |
DE4444635C2 (de) | 1994-12-15 | 1996-10-31 | Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag | Einrichtung zur Selbstverteidigung gegen Flugkörper |
DE19546873C1 (de) * | 1995-12-15 | 1997-05-15 | Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag | Verfahren zum Bestimmen der Entfernung eines durch die Atmosphäre fliegenden Objektes und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens |
DE19601165A1 (de) | 1996-01-15 | 1997-07-17 | Bodenseewerk Geraetetech | Täuschkörper zum Ablenken von zielsuchenden Lenkflugkörpern |
GB2342983B (en) | 1996-01-15 | 2000-08-23 | Bodenseewerk Geraetetech | Counter measure system for an aircraft |
US5635662A (en) * | 1996-02-07 | 1997-06-03 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Method and apparatus for avoiding detection by a threat projectile |
DE19604745C1 (de) | 1996-02-09 | 1999-11-18 | Rheinmetall Ind Ag | Verfahren und Anordnung zur Täuschung einer endphasengelenkten Munition |
DE19617701C2 (de) * | 1996-05-03 | 2000-01-13 | Buck Werke Gmbh & Co I K | Verfahren zum Bereitstellen eines Scheinziels |
DE19638968A1 (de) * | 1996-09-23 | 1998-03-26 | Reinhold Ficht | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bekämpfung anfliegender Flugkörper |
US5703314A (en) | 1996-11-20 | 1997-12-30 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Infrared projector countermeasure system |
US5814754A (en) * | 1997-01-09 | 1998-09-29 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | False target deployment system |
FR2780774B1 (fr) | 1998-07-03 | 2001-03-09 | Alkan Sa | Dispositif d'autoprotection passive pour engin mobile tel qu'un helicoptere |
RU2151360C1 (ru) | 1998-09-29 | 2000-06-20 | Государственное унитарное предприятие "Уральское конструкторское бюро транспортного машиностроения" | Подвижная боевая машина с комплексом противодействия управляемому, самонаводящемуся оружию и артиллерийскому оружию с лазерными дальномерами |
DE19936587C2 (de) | 1999-08-04 | 2003-08-21 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Munition oder pyrotechnisches Gerät zum Ausbringen von Submunitionen |
DE19949196A1 (de) | 1999-10-13 | 2001-04-19 | Pia Maria Martin | Schutzvorrichtung |
DE19951767C2 (de) | 1999-10-27 | 2002-06-27 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Dual-Mode-Täuschkörper |
AUPQ413299A0 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 1999-12-09 | Metal Storm Limited | Forming temporary airborne images |
US6414622B1 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2002-07-02 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Anti-radar missile (ARM) countermeasure method |
DE10024320C2 (de) | 2000-05-17 | 2002-09-05 | Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh | Radareinrichtung für den Objekt-Selbstschutz |
US6480140B1 (en) | 2000-06-09 | 2002-11-12 | Jonathan B. Rosefsky | Apparatus and method for providing a deception response system |
DE10050479A1 (de) * | 2000-10-12 | 2002-04-18 | Bodenseewerk Geraetetech | Schutzsystem für Objekte, insbesondere für Kampfpanzer |
FR2821413A1 (fr) | 2001-02-28 | 2002-08-30 | Alain Denes | Dispositif depliable et son procede de deploiement |
DE10117007A1 (de) * | 2001-04-04 | 2002-10-17 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz von mobilen militärischen Einrichtungen |
US6497169B1 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2002-12-24 | Raytheon Company | Method for automatic weapon allocation and scheduling against attacking threats |
DE10119970B4 (de) * | 2001-04-24 | 2005-06-30 | Blohm + Voss Gmbh | Verfahren zur Erfassung einer Schiffssignatur |
IL147984A (en) | 2002-02-04 | 2005-11-20 | Rafael Armament Dev Authority | System for operating a decoy against threats of anincoming airborne body |
US7086318B1 (en) * | 2002-03-13 | 2006-08-08 | Bae Systems Land & Armaments L.P. | Anti-tank guided missile weapon |
AU2003272193A1 (en) * | 2002-04-22 | 2004-01-19 | Neal Solomon | System, method and apparatus for automated collective mobile robotic vehicles used in remote sensing surveillance |
DE10230939A1 (de) | 2002-07-09 | 2004-02-12 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz von Gefechtsfeldfahrzeugen |
US20040046688A1 (en) | 2002-09-06 | 2004-03-11 | Bigge Mark W. | Mobile surveillance vehicle system |
DE10254786A1 (de) * | 2002-11-22 | 2004-06-03 | Rheinmetall W & M Gmbh | Integration eines grosskalibrigen Geschützes auf einem Schiff |
WO2006041504A1 (en) * | 2004-06-10 | 2006-04-20 | Bae Systems | System and method for providing a cooperative network for applying countermeasures to airborne threats |
-
2003
- 2003-10-02 DE DE10346001A patent/DE10346001B4/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-09-01 EP EP04764698A patent/EP1668310B1/de active Active
- 2004-09-01 DK DK04764698.9T patent/DK1668310T3/da active
- 2004-09-01 US US10/574,532 patent/US7886646B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-01 KR KR1020067008505A patent/KR101182772B1/ko active IP Right Grant
- 2004-09-01 WO PCT/EP2004/009736 patent/WO2005033616A1/de active Application Filing
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2005033616A1 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
RU183038U1 (ru) * | 2018-04-11 | 2018-09-07 | Федеральное Государственное Казенное Военное Образовательное Учреждение Высшего Образования Военный Учебно-Научный Центр Сухопутных Войск "Общевойсковая Академия Вооруженных Сил Российской Федерации" | Генератор постановки над наземным объектом управляемой водной пено-аэрозольной маски-помехи средствам наведения ВТО |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7886646B2 (en) | 2011-02-15 |
DK1668310T3 (da) | 2011-08-29 |
DE10346001B4 (de) | 2006-01-26 |
EP1668310B1 (de) | 2011-05-11 |
KR101182772B1 (ko) | 2012-09-13 |
KR20060118454A (ko) | 2006-11-23 |
DE10346001A1 (de) | 2005-05-04 |
US20070159379A1 (en) | 2007-07-12 |
WO2005033616A1 (de) | 2005-04-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1668310B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schützen von schiffen vor endphasengelenkten flugkörpern | |
DE2858203C2 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Ausbringen eines Scheinzieles | |
EP3341674B1 (de) | System zur abwehr von bedrohungen | |
EP0240819B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Ablenkung von durch Radar- und/oder Infrarotstrahlung gelenkten Flugkörpern, insbesondere zum Schutz von Seeschiffen und Schiffsverbänden sowie Einrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
EP1907784B1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Täuschung Infrarot -, Radar- als auch dual mode -gelenkter Flugkörper | |
DE10230939A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz von Gefechtsfeldfahrzeugen | |
EP3265742A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum bereitstellen eines scheinzieles zum schutz eines fahrzeuges und / oder objektes vor radargelenkten suchköpfen | |
WO2009006981A1 (de) | Verfahren und abschussvorrichtung zum schutz eines objektes vor einer bedrohung, insbesondere einem flugkörper, sowie munition | |
DE2538665A1 (de) | Verfahren und einrichtung zum streuwurf von bomben | |
DE69006564T2 (de) | Automatisches waffensystem für die flächenverteidigung. | |
WO1990004750A1 (de) | Patrone zur scheinzielerzeugung | |
EP0547391A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Erfolgswahrscheinlichkeit bei der Flugkörperabwehr mittels eines fernzerlegbaren Geschosses | |
DE4115384A1 (de) | Verfahren zum schuetzen von eine ir-strahlung abgebenden objekten und wurfkoerper zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens | |
EP3376154B1 (de) | Verfahren zum schutz eines marschflugkörpers | |
DE3013405A1 (de) | Verfahren zum vermeiden des nachrichtens von abschussgeraeten fuer ballistische flugkoerper | |
DE2522927C2 (de) | System zur taeuschung, ablenkung und vernichtung von lenkwaffen | |
DE3543769A1 (de) | Mine zur abwehr von bewegten objekten | |
DE19704070A1 (de) | Tarn- und/oder Täuscheinrichtung | |
DE102011089584B4 (de) | Waffensystem, insbesondere Verfahren zur effektiven Bekämpfung von Schiffszielen | |
EP3894779A1 (de) | Verfahren zum schutz von beweglichen oder unbeweglichen objekten vor sich nähernden lasergelenkten bedrohungen | |
DE102019109360A1 (de) | Inventionssystem zur Abwehr von RAM-Zielen und/oder UAVs sowie Verfahren zur Abwehr von RAM-Zielen und/oder UAVs | |
DE102018113614A1 (de) | Flugabwehreffektor mit einem Turm und mit mindestens einem Such- und/oder Folgeradar | |
DE2815206C2 (de) | Verfahren, Lenkflugkörper sowie Waffensystem zur Bekämpfung von Bodenzielen | |
DE102020103249B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Schützen eines Helikopters durch Nebelwurf und Helikopter mit Nebelschutzsystem | |
DE3438305A1 (de) | Unbemanntes fluggeraet fuer die bekaempfung von bodenzielen |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060323 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE DK FR GB IT |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: RHEINMETALL WAFFE MUNITION GMBH |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE DK FR GB IT |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070425 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE DK FR GB IT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502004012507 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110622 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20120214 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502004012507 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120214 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502004012507 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DREISS PATENTANWAELTE PARTG MBB, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502004012507 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DREISS PATENTANWAELTE PARTG MBB, DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230920 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230928 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20230925 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230920 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230927 Year of fee payment: 20 |