EP0365782B1 - Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Gruppensteuerung von Aufzügen mit Doppelkabinen - Google Patents

Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Gruppensteuerung von Aufzügen mit Doppelkabinen Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0365782B1
EP0365782B1 EP89115629A EP89115629A EP0365782B1 EP 0365782 B1 EP0365782 B1 EP 0365782B1 EP 89115629 A EP89115629 A EP 89115629A EP 89115629 A EP89115629 A EP 89115629A EP 0365782 B1 EP0365782 B1 EP 0365782B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
costs
cage
double
operating costs
call
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP89115629A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0365782A1 (de
Inventor
Johannes C. Van Straaten
Miroslav Kostka
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Inventio AG
Original Assignee
Inventio AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Inventio AG filed Critical Inventio AG
Priority to AT89115629T priority Critical patent/ATE96124T1/de
Publication of EP0365782A1 publication Critical patent/EP0365782A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0365782B1 publication Critical patent/EP0365782B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
    • B66B1/24—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration
    • B66B1/2408—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration where the allocation of a call to an elevator car is of importance, i.e. by means of a supervisory or group controller
    • B66B1/2458—For elevator systems with multiple shafts and a single car per shaft
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/10—Details with respect to the type of call input
    • B66B2201/102—Up or down call input
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20—Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/211—Waiting time, i.e. response time
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20—Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/212—Travel time
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20—Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/222—Taking into account the number of passengers present in the elevator car to be allocated
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/30—Details of the elevator system configuration
    • B66B2201/306—Multi-deck elevator cars
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S187/00—Elevator, industrial lift truck, or stationary lift for vehicle
    • Y10S187/902—Control for double-decker car

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and a device for group control of elevators with double cabins, according to the preambles of claims 1 and 10, wherein to determine the elevator that is optimally usable for the operation of a floor call on a floor E in a scanning position ⁇ as the lost time of all
  • passengers involved with defined operating costs serve as a decision criterion and these operating costs are calculated and stored separately for each elevator, within the framework of a cost calculation cycle for each scanning position ⁇ - regardless of whether there is a floor call or not - and subsequently for all elevators together as part of one Cost comparison cycle are compared in order to allocate the elevator with the lowest operating costs to the relevant scanning position ⁇ as a favorite for the operation of a possible floor call by means of a control device and also to assign the Z to provide a certain single cabin of the corresponding double cabin for the scanning position to be operated.
  • Such group controls are intended to make it possible to allocate the double cabins to the floor calls in such a way that minimum average waiting times and minimum average destination travel times of the passengers are achieved.
  • This loss also called service costs, is stored in a cost memory.
  • an allocation instruction which designates the floor to which the relevant car is optimally assigned in time can be stored in an allocation memory of the elevator with the lowest operating costs.
  • the lower operating costs of the individual cabins of a double cabin are then stored in the cost storage of the elevator in question and are compared by floors with the lower operating costs of the other double cabins in the elevator group. In such controls, the floor calls are not assigned to the optimal double cabin, but to the optimal individual cabin. A uniform distribution of the passengers to the double cabins in the elevator group is therefore impaired during normal operation of the elevator system.
  • the invention is based on the object, starting from Swiss Patent No. 660 585, to a method and a device create, in group controls for elevators with double cabins, the two degrees of freedom given by the single cabins of each double cabin and the double cabins of each group to be fully used for call control.
  • the usability of a double cabin with regard to a floor call should not only be determined by the position and direction of this floor call as well as the load and operating states of the two single cabins, but also by the different types of call operation resulting from the possibility of operating two adjacent calls at the same time the two single cabins result.
  • the mutual cost effects of the two single cabins must therefore be taken into account.
  • the method and equipment should be designed in such a way that they can be easily and quickly adapted to different operating and traffic conditions and that the required computing effort is minimal.
  • the invention proposes with the features characterized in claims 1 and 10, taking into account the mutual influence of the partial operating costs calculated separately for each single cabin, total operating costs (e.g. recursively) for each double cabin in the elevator group for all scanning positions to calculate, whereby if there are allocation instructions for the same floor calls of two adjacent floors (congruence) and / or coincidences of cabin calls and scanning positions, the total operating costs to be saved are reduced, the total operating costs of all elevators are compared using a comparison device, each in An allocation instruction can be stored in an allocation memory of the elevator with the lowest total operating costs, which indicates the floor to which the respective double cabin is optimally assigned in time, and by means of an Au selection based on criteria chains of Each double cabin is assigned a specific single cabin to the floor call in such a way that the servicing of cabin calls and rectified floor calls on the same floor, of rectified floor calls from two adjacent floors and of car calls and rectified floor calls from two adjacent floors is promoted so that overlaps of "own" stop positions, ie stop a
  • the double cabin with the lowest total operating costs is allocated to a floor call, with a single floor call and non-existent coincidence and / or congruence
  • the less loaded cabin or optionally also the one in the direction of travel " front "or" rear "cabin is allocated to the floor call and the stopping on the same floor with cabin call and rectified floor call and / or on adjacent floors with rectified floor calls or cabins and rectified floor calls is promoted in such a way that there are fewer stops
  • the individual double cabins den Distribute total traffic evenly among each other, the two single cabins of a double cabin are filled evenly, which reduces waiting times on the floors and reduces travel times, while waiting times in the non-operating cabin for any intermediate stops for the "absolutely n necessary "minimum remain limited and the delivery rate is increased.
  • this solution is characterized in that priorities for the operating behavior of the elevators can be achieved through the adjustable parameters, so that, for example, in both single cabins the same load is aimed for, or that the load balancing only becomes effective when the imbalance of the two single cabins can be set.
  • 1, 1 denotes an elevator shaft of an elevator a, an elevator group consisting of, for example, three elevators a, b and c.
  • a conveyor machine 2 drives, via a conveyor cable 3, a double cabin 4, which is guided in the elevator shaft 1 and is formed from two single cabins 5, 6 arranged in a common car frame, sixteen floors E1 to E16 being operated according to the elevator system chosen as an example.
  • the distance between the two single cabins 5, 6 is selected so that it corresponds to the distance between two adjacent floors.
  • the carrier 2 is controlled by a drive control known from European Patent No.
  • the setpoint generation, the control functions and the initiation of the stop being implemented by means of a microcomputer system 7, and with 8 the measuring and actuating elements of the drive control which are symbolized are connected to the microcomputer system 7 via a first interface IF 1.
  • Each single cabin 5, 6 of the double cabin 4 has a load measuring device 9, the respective operating state Z the cabin signaling device 10 and cabin call transmitter 11.
  • the devices 9, 10 are connected to the microcomputer system 7 via the first interface IF 1.
  • the car call transmitter 11 and the floor call transmitter 12 provided on the floors are connected to the microcomputer system 7, for example, via an input device 13 which has become known with European Patent No. 0 062 141 and a second interface IF 2.
  • the microcomputer system 7 consists of a storey call memory RAM 1, two cabin call memories RAM 2, RAM 3 assigned to the single cabins 5, 6 of the double cabin 4, a load memory RAM 4 storing the current load P M of each single cabin 5, 6, two the operating state Z of the single cabins 5 , 6 storing memories RAM 5, RAM 6, two tabular partial cost memories RAM 7, RAM 8 assigned to the single cabins of the elevator, a first total cost memory RAM 9, a second total cost memory RAM 10, a single cabin / call assignment memory RAM 11, one with the elevator the lowest operating costs per scanner position and direction of operation, characterizing the double cabin / call allocation memory RAM 12, a program memory EPROM, a power failure-proof data memory DBRAM and a microprocessor CPU which is connected via a bus B to the memories RAM 1 to RAM 12, EPROM and DBRAM.
  • R1 and R2 denote a first and a second scanner of a scanner, the scanner R1, R2 being registers by means of which addresses corresponding to the floor numbers and the direction of travel are formed.
  • the cost memories RAM 7 to RAM 10 each have one or more storage locations which can be assigned to the individual possible cabin positions.
  • R3 and R4 denote the selectors corresponding to the individual cabins in the form of a register which, when the cabin is moving, indicates the address of the floor on which the cabin can still stop. At a standstill, R3 and R4 point to the floor where a call can be answered or to a possible cabin position (for "blind" floors).
  • the selector addresses are assigned target paths which are compared with a target path generated in a setpoint generator. If these paths are identical and a stop command is present, the delay phase is initiated. If there is no stop command, the selectors R3 and R4 are switched to the next floor.
  • the microcomputer systems 7 of the individual elevators a, b, c are via a comparison device 14 known from European Patent No. 0 050 304 and a third interface IF 3 as well as via a Partyline transmission system 15 and known from European Patent No. 0 050 305 a fourth interface IF 4 connected to one another and in this way form the group control according to the invention.
  • the first scanner R1 assigned to the elevator in question begins with one cycle, hereinafter referred to as the KBZ cost calculation cycle, starting from the "rear" selector position in the direction of travel of the cabin (in the case of no direction of travel starting with the lower cabin), with the circulation also being possible in a different direction or sequence.
  • the event may occur at elevator a (time I).
  • the microprocessor CPU of the microcomputer system 7 With each scanning position, the microprocessor CPU of the microcomputer system 7 now creates one for each single cabin 5, 6 and for the double cabin 4 according to the patent claims the time loss of all passengers involved is calculated as a sum, also known as operating costs K, the individual cost components being determined by the group control for elevators with double cabins, which works according to the following principle.
  • the second scanners R2 simultaneously begin one round for all elevators a, b, c, hereinafter referred to as the KVZ cost comparison cycle, starting from the first floor (time III).
  • the cost comparison cycles KVZ start, for example, five to ten times a second.
  • the modified total service costs K gm contained in the total cost memories RAM 10 of the elevators a, b, c are fed to the comparison device 14 and compared with one another, wherein in the allocation memory RAM 12 of the elevator a, b, c with the lowest modified total -Operating costs K gm an allocation instruction can be stored in the form of a logical "1", which designates the floor to which the elevator a, b, c in question is optimally assigned in terms of time. For example, based on the comparison in the scanning position 9, a reassignment may take place by deleting an assignment instruction for elevator b and enrolling one for elevator a (FIG. 1).
  • deck allocation algorithm DZA it can be said that it is based on hierarchically ordered chains of criteria, the criteria of highest priority being combined in a group “compulsory allocation” and the criteria of lower priority in a group “free allocation”.
  • the deck assignments for the "Forced Allocation” group are mandatory, based on the following descending priority: coincidence "cabin call floor call”; Not operating a scanner position ( ⁇ ) with single cab 5, 6 at full load; Not operating a scanner position ( ⁇ ) with single cab 5, 6 in the "non-operating" operating mode.
  • the cost comparison is then continued from scanner position 10 in order to be interrupted again at scanner position 9 (downward) by the occurrence of an event in elevator c, for example a change in the selector position (time IV).
  • the cost comparison cycle KVZ continues and its termination with scanning position 2 (downward).
  • a further cost calculation cycle KBZ for elevator a triggered for example by a car call, runs between times VIII and IX, whereupon the next cost comparison cycle KVZ is started at time X.
  • the entire cost comparison cycle can (selectable) also run uninterrupted (regardless of incoming events).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Elevator Control (AREA)
  • Forklifts And Lifting Vehicles (AREA)
  • Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
EP89115629A 1988-10-28 1989-08-24 Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Gruppensteuerung von Aufzügen mit Doppelkabinen Expired - Lifetime EP0365782B1 (de)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT89115629T ATE96124T1 (de) 1988-10-28 1989-08-24 Verfahren und einrichtung zur gruppensteuerung von aufzuegen mit doppelkabinen.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH403288 1988-10-28
CH4032/88 1988-10-28

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0365782A1 EP0365782A1 (de) 1990-05-02
EP0365782B1 true EP0365782B1 (de) 1993-10-20

Family

ID=4268537

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89115629A Expired - Lifetime EP0365782B1 (de) 1988-10-28 1989-08-24 Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Gruppensteuerung von Aufzügen mit Doppelkabinen

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US4993518A (fi)
EP (1) EP0365782B1 (fi)
JP (1) JP2736136B2 (fi)
AT (1) ATE96124T1 (fi)
CA (1) CA2001607C (fi)
DE (1) DE58905966D1 (fi)
ES (1) ES2047073T3 (fi)
FI (1) FI97215C (fi)

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE59102469D1 (de) * 1990-06-01 1994-09-15 Inventio Ag Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit Doppelkabinen mit Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen.
US5625176A (en) * 1995-06-26 1997-04-29 Otis Elevator Company Crowd service enhancements with multi-deck elevators
FI111929B (fi) * 1997-01-23 2003-10-15 Kone Corp Hissiryhmän ohjaus
JP3889108B2 (ja) * 1997-02-28 2007-03-07 東芝エレベータ株式会社 乗り場機器パラメータ設定装置
FI107379B (fi) 1997-12-23 2001-07-31 Kone Corp Geneettinen menetelmä hissiryhmän ulkokutsujen allokoimiseksi
SG126669A1 (en) * 1998-02-02 2006-11-29 Inventio Ag Double-decker or multi-decker elevator
JP2001310876A (ja) * 2000-04-19 2001-11-06 Otis Elevator Co ダブルデッキエレベータシステムの制御装置および制御方法
US6439349B1 (en) 2000-12-21 2002-08-27 Thyssen Elevator Capital Corp. Method and apparatus for assigning new hall calls to one of a plurality of elevator cars
FI112062B (fi) * 2002-03-05 2003-10-31 Kone Corp Menetelmä matkustajien allokoimiseksi hissiryhmässä
WO2006092865A1 (ja) * 2005-03-03 2006-09-08 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha トリプルデッキエレベータ用設備計画支援装置
ES2352035T3 (es) * 2005-08-04 2011-02-15 Inventio Ag Procedimiento para asignar un usuario a una instalación de ascensores.
JP2007084242A (ja) * 2005-09-21 2007-04-05 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd エレベータの群管理制御装置
FI118381B (fi) * 2006-06-19 2007-10-31 Kone Corp Hissijärjestelmä
JP2008024413A (ja) * 2006-07-20 2008-02-07 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd エレベータ群管理制御装置
WO2009021016A1 (en) 2007-08-06 2009-02-12 Thyssenkrupp Elevator Capital Corporation Control for limiting elevator passenger tympanic pressure and method for the same
US8151943B2 (en) 2007-08-21 2012-04-10 De Groot Pieter J Method of controlling intelligent destination elevators with selected operation modes
FI119686B (fi) * 2007-10-11 2009-02-13 Kone Corp Hissijärjestelmä
EP2307300B1 (de) 2008-07-31 2012-10-31 Inventio AG Verfahren zur steuerung einer aufzugsanlage mit rücksicht auf behinderten und privilegierten nutzer
JP5347492B2 (ja) * 2008-12-25 2013-11-20 フジテック株式会社 エレベータの群管理制御方法及び装置
US9695009B2 (en) * 2012-05-01 2017-07-04 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Elevator system
EP2874932B1 (en) * 2012-09-11 2018-11-07 KONE Corporation Elevator system
JP6505887B1 (ja) * 2018-02-16 2019-04-24 東芝エレベータ株式会社 エレベータ群管理装置

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH625767A5 (fi) * 1978-01-17 1981-10-15 Inventio Ag
CH632723A5 (de) * 1978-08-22 1982-10-29 Inventio Ag Einrichtung zur auswahl einer aufzugskabine fuer direktfahrten bei einer mittels gruppensteuerung gesteuerten aufzugsgruppe.
CH649517A5 (de) * 1979-09-27 1985-05-31 Inventio Ag Antriebssteuereinrichtung fuer einen aufzug.
CH648001A5 (de) * 1979-12-21 1985-02-28 Inventio Ag Gruppensteuerung fuer aufzuege.
CH651950A5 (de) * 1980-10-20 1985-10-15 Inventio Ag Multiprozessoranordnung.
CH651951A5 (de) * 1980-10-20 1985-10-15 Inventio Ag Einrichtung zur steuerung des zugriffes von prozessoren auf eine datenleitung.
CH653155A5 (de) * 1981-03-26 1985-12-13 Inventio Ag Schaltungsanordnung zur eingabe von steuerbefehlen in ein mikrocomputersystem.
CH660585A5 (de) * 1983-08-12 1987-05-15 Inventio Ag Gruppensteuerung fuer aufzuege mit doppelkabinen.
ATE34154T1 (de) * 1984-10-09 1988-05-15 Inventio Ag Einrichtung zur steuerung von aufzuegen mit doppelkabinen.
US4632224A (en) * 1985-04-12 1986-12-30 Otis Elevator Company Multicompartment elevator call assigning
DE3762040D1 (de) * 1986-04-11 1990-05-03 Inventio Ag Gruppensteuerung fuer aufzuege.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2001607A1 (en) 1990-04-28
CA2001607C (en) 1999-01-05
DE58905966D1 (de) 1993-11-25
FI97215C (fi) 1996-11-11
FI97215B (fi) 1996-07-31
JP2736136B2 (ja) 1998-04-02
ATE96124T1 (de) 1993-11-15
ES2047073T3 (es) 1994-02-16
JPH02169478A (ja) 1990-06-29
US4993518A (en) 1991-02-19
FI895103A0 (fi) 1989-10-27
EP0365782A1 (de) 1990-05-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0365782B1 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Gruppensteuerung von Aufzügen mit Doppelkabinen
EP0443188B1 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zur sofortigen Zielrufzuteilung bei Aufzugsgrupppen, aufgrund von Bedienungskosten und von variablen Bonus-/Malus-Faktoren
DE3611173C2 (de) Fahrstuhlanlage mit mehreren Doppelabteil-Kabinen
EP1418147B1 (de) Steuerungsvorrichtung für eine Aufzugsanlage mit Mehrfachkabine
EP0091554B1 (de) Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit einer Einrichtung für die Steuerung des Abwärtsspitzenverkehrs
EP0032213B1 (de) Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge
EP0246395B1 (de) Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge
EP2370334B1 (de) Aufzugssteuerung einer aufzugsanlage
DE60308837T2 (de) Verfahren zur zuteilung von benutzern in einer aufzugsgruppe
EP1276691B1 (de) Zielrufsteuerung für aufzüge
EP3099616B1 (de) Verfahren zum betreiben eines aufzugsystems
EP0312730B1 (de) Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit lastabhängiger Steuerung der Kabinen
EP0356731B1 (de) Gruppensteuerung mit Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen
EP0134892B1 (de) Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit Doppelkabinen
EP0459169B1 (de) Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit Doppelkabinen mit Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen
EP0440967A1 (de) Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit vom Rufeingabeort auf einem Stockwerk abhängiger Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen
DE2459887A1 (de) Steuervorrichtung fuer aufzuege
DE2512950A1 (de) Aufzugssteuerung
DE2411861C2 (de) Verfahren zum Verteilen von Stockwerksrufen auf eine Anzahl von Aufzugskabinen
EP1193207A1 (de) Verfahren zur Steuerung einer Aufzugsanlage mit Mehrfachkabinen.
DE2411824C2 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Aufzugsanlage
EP0308590A1 (de) Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen
EP0508094B1 (de) Verfahren gegen örtliches Ansammeln von Aufzugskabinen bei einer Aufzugsgruppe mit variablem Verkehrsaufkommen
EP3774627A1 (de) Verfahren zum betreiben einer aufzugsanlage
EP1522518B1 (de) Aufzugsanlage und Verfahren zur Steuerung einer Aufzugsanlage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900927

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19911209

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 96124

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19931115

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 58905966

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19931125

ET Fr: translation filed
GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 19931118

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2047073

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 89115629.1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20071116

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20080828

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080822

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20080813

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20080814

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080813

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20080826

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20080821

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20080815

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20090823

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20090825

NLV7 Nl: ceased due to reaching the maximum lifetime of a patent

Effective date: 20090824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090823

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090825