EP1370720B1 - Procede de reglage/surveillance de production d'un metier a tricoter circulaire et dispositif de reglage/surveillance de production - Google Patents

Procede de reglage/surveillance de production d'un metier a tricoter circulaire et dispositif de reglage/surveillance de production Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1370720B1
EP1370720B1 EP02730006A EP02730006A EP1370720B1 EP 1370720 B1 EP1370720 B1 EP 1370720B1 EP 02730006 A EP02730006 A EP 02730006A EP 02730006 A EP02730006 A EP 02730006A EP 1370720 B1 EP1370720 B1 EP 1370720B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
yarn
knitting
feeding devices
knitting machine
feeding
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP02730006A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1370720A1 (fr
Inventor
Lars Helge Gottfrid Tholander
Kurt Arne Gunnar Jacobsson
Friedrich Weber
Ludwig Ketterer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Memminger IRO GmbH
Iro AB
Original Assignee
Memminger IRO GmbH
Iro AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Memminger IRO GmbH, Iro AB filed Critical Memminger IRO GmbH
Publication of EP1370720A1 publication Critical patent/EP1370720A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1370720B1 publication Critical patent/EP1370720B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B15/00Details of, or auxiliary devices incorporated in, weft knitting machines, restricted to machines of this kind
    • D04B15/38Devices for supplying, feeding, or guiding threads to needles
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B15/00Details of, or auxiliary devices incorporated in, weft knitting machines, restricted to machines of this kind
    • D04B15/94Driving-gear not otherwise provided for
    • D04B15/99Driving-gear not otherwise provided for electrically controlled
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B35/00Details of, or auxiliary devices incorporated in, knitting machines, not otherwise provided for
    • D04B35/10Indicating, warning, or safety devices, e.g. stop motions
    • D04B35/12Indicating, warning, or safety devices, e.g. stop motions responsive to thread consumption

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method according to the preamble of claim 1 and to a device according to the preamble of claim 11.
  • the respective amount of yarn is determined and evaluated centrally via measurements of the yarn speeds by means of special sensors in the yarn path.
  • the amounts of yarn in the masterpiece are used to compare with the knitted goods to detect and indicate erroneous usages, improper yarn speeds, and incorrect machine operation cycles.
  • non-positive delivery devices of different types with different yarn conveying principles and, if necessary, from different manufacturers are used for different yarn qualities used the same knitting machine.
  • the monitoring and determination of individual yarn quantities is not yet possible with acceptable control engineering and equipment expense.
  • continuous, sequential or final information on the yarn quantities of such equipped knitting machines would be important to the operator and the skilled person to assess and optimize production efficiency, to anticipate drifting of production parameters in production, to upgrade, convert and Adjustment to save time and effort, and to achieve quality optimization and consistently high quality with little waste.
  • the running speed of each thread in the knitting system is kept constant at or equal to the running speed determined by a self-learning cycle based on a masterpiece.
  • a driven actuator for example a roller, pulls the yarn from a supply reel so that the yarn delivery is carried out during the production operation with a constant yarn quantity.
  • the actuator determines the entry speed of the thread.
  • the actuators correspond to positive delivery devices.
  • the actuators are equal to each other and work with mutually equal delivery principles.
  • a sensing roller is provided as a sensor on each thread, which measures the incoming thread quantity and reports to a control unit or a microprocessor, which is also provided for the drive control of the respective actuator.
  • the thread quantity scanning roller means an undesirable additional mechanical Load on the thread and provides inaccurate results due to the inevitable slip in practice inaccurate.
  • EP 0 752 631 A EP 0 950 742 A
  • EP 0 600 268 A EP 0 420 836 A
  • EP 0 385 988 A Further prior art is contained in: EP 0 752 631 A, EP 0 950 742 A, EP 0 600 268 A, EP 0 420 836 A, EP 0 385 988 A.
  • the invention has for its object to provide a method of the type mentioned above and an apparatus for performing the method, which despite non-positive yarn delivery of delivery devices of different types, which operate according to different delivery principles, a simple and comfortable production monitoring / adjustment is possible.
  • each individual yarn quantity is continuously measured on the basis of sampled actual rotational signals of the delivery device, resulting from the actual rotational signals taking into account the storage body circumferential length sufficiently accurate yarn quantity information without the absolute need to use separate sensors for this purpose. It will be used anyway from the operation of the delivery device resulting actual rotation signals.
  • non-positive delivery devices are used on the knitting machine, which supply yarns of different qualities and / or elasticities according to at least two different yarn conveying principles, and possibly originate from different manufacturers.
  • the individual yarn quantities are precisely determined, which provide information for production monitoring / adjustment.
  • One reason for different types of delivery equipment is that different yarn tensions and / or yarn speeds must be mastered, for which one type is better suited than another type.
  • the process does not primarily measure the individual amounts of yarn in order to obtain the total amount of yarn, but to show certain error conditions based on the quantities of yarn in order to easily monitor and optimize the production. As a by-product is then determined with little additional effort and the total amount of yarn.
  • the method is useful for circular knitting machines; but can also be used in flat knitting machines.
  • the process is designed to ensure that the actual amount of yarn delivered, in particular for non-positive delivery equipment, allows for proper operation in the knitting system, on the delivery device and in the yarn path and on trends to fault condition and even to certain fault conditions.
  • the operation for each delivery device and the associated knitting system can be closely monitored, critical production conditions and even their causes can be determined, and measures can be taken during production or thereafter to correct error conditions.
  • the method can be extended by automatically correcting an error condition determined on the basis of the yarn quantity comparison, which is usually attributable to a specific type of error, for example in a closed setting control loop which uses the comparison result as the control variable.
  • Such adjustments can be made to the knitting systems or the delivery devices or their peripheral accessories, because they only influence the amount of yarn represented as a selection and an error condition resulting from them can be ideally represented by an impermissible amount of yarn change with respect to the amount of masterpiece yarn. It is important to even match the tolerance range used for the comparison in its width to yarn quality and / or yarn path parameters.
  • each delivery device is, as it were, fictitiously removed from inventory with regard to the yarn quality elasticity and relative position with respect to the knitting systems to be supplied by it and assigned to the knitting system processing this yarn.
  • the upgrade or conversion of the knitting machine is greatly simplified, time is saved and reduces the workload.
  • the apparatus sets the necessary link between the delivery equipment and the circular knitting machine for efficient production. whereby tedious adjustment work on the delivery devices and / or in the machine control can be reduced to a minimum. It is obvious that knitwear-specific allocation patterns are stored and used again when needed or a mapping pattern formed in the user interface for a knitted fabric can be transferred to any further knitting machine producing the same knitwear.
  • input / display section of the unit for example, a keyboard or the like. And / or designed as a touchscreen display can be used.
  • the yarn amounts are measured with sampled actual rotation signals, e.g. calculated and compared with corresponding Sollgarnmengen. Since each comparison is made only for yarn quantities of a delivery device type among various types of delivery devices, the yarn quantities of various delivery device types can be measured quite differently so that a yarn quantity measurement of one delivery device type initially does not correspond to the same yarn quantity measurement of another type. Only when the total amount of yarn or a knitting yarn quantity is to be determined, will be a conversion or conversion to the same length or weight units. Thus, according to the method, to determine an individual error condition or trend, any comparison with the masterpiece could be based on the sampled actual rotational signals, e.g. be carried out on the basis of the signal type and / or number of signals and / or signal frequency, before real yarn quantities or yarn weights are determined.
  • the process is primarily geared towards knitwear production in circular knitting machines, in which different types of delivery devices work simultaneously or sequentially, with one non-positive delivery of yarn and at least two different yarn delivery principles. For example, less elastic yarn is supplied by a delivery device having a storage body driven for rotation, while more elastic yarn is supplied by a stationary storage body delivery device and a rotation driven winding member. These different types are also selectively used depending on the yarn tension and / or yarn speed.
  • Such a circular knitting machine assembly is advantageous, for example, for so-called Bodystockings or jacquard knitwear, but may also be useful for other high-quality knitwear, in which different yarn qualities and / or different elastic yarns are processed. This could also be done on flat knitting machines.
  • an actual rotation signal is scanned in a delivery device with a rotation-driven storage body per revolution of the storage body, this represents a quantity of yarn corresponding to the circumferential length of the storage body.
  • this is also possible to sample a predetermined number of actual rotation signals per revolution of the storage body, each of which represents the same circumferential partial length of the storage body. In terms of control technology, this is simple, e.g. performed by sensing the rotation of the drive motor.
  • the width of the tolerance range used for the individual comparison is favorable, for example, to set the width of the tolerance range used for the individual comparison to be greater with a more elastic yarn than with a less elastic yarn, since yarn path parameters have a greater influence on a more elastic yarn.
  • an individual yarn quantity comparison can be carried out not only within a tolerance range, but successively or in parallel in several tolerance ranges of increasing width.
  • a narrow tolerance range from the comparison with the Masterpiece Garnmengenverlauf initially a trend can be mapped to derive an alarm signal when needed, which causes the specialized staff to monitor the yarn path, the delivery device or the knitting system.
  • the next wider tolerance range can be used to derive an adjustment measure when exceeded.
  • the qualified personnel then make manual adjustments in the yarn path, on the delivery device or on the knitting system, or such adjustments are even initiated automatically.
  • the largest tolerance range is used, for example, to switch off the knitting machine, because this indicates an immediately unrecoverable error condition.
  • yarn path conditions e.g. based on the yarn tension, continuously monitored and used for example to adjust the width for the comparison tolerance range used and / or for editing the sampled actual rotation signals.
  • the yarn tension which is also important for the control of the drive motor, could be measured at the take-off side, and e.g. be used to adjust the actual rotation signals in view of very precise yarn quantity measurements.
  • the operations of the knitting systems associated with the knitting systems in the production of a knitted fabric can be represented on the basis of their individual yarn quantities in comparison with masterpiece yarn quantities, preferably within e.g. of the yarn quality and / or the respective Garn personallyzel dependent tolerance ranges. This can be conveniently realized with the image amount representing the yarn amount.
  • the bars are associated with the addressed or identified delivery devices and their knitting systems. A condition out of tolerance can be visually highlighted and e.g. be made with a flashing signal or even acoustically.
  • the device is then conveniently positioned in a housing adjacent to the knitting machine or in a section of the knitting machine foot.
  • the production monitor / adjuster may be integrated with its display and the input / display section in the knitting machine controller. This is useful to use the same controls and the display of the controller can.
  • the device also expediently configures a user interface in which the total amount of yarn / amounts of single yarn or weights for one or more knitwear produced can be represented in lengths and / or weight units.
  • the knitting machine Since there is a lot of data to be transferred and processed quickly for the production monitoring / setting, many connection points are required for data acquisition and processing, the wiring effort is low and high operational reliability must be ensured, it is advisable to use the knitting machine with its control, production monitoring / Adjustment device and the delivery devices to connect with their peripheral accessories in a data bus system, preferably in a fast CAN bus system.
  • the delivery devices can be fixed or optionally connected to the bus via interface adapters.
  • the adapters are designed, at least for some of the delivery devices used, to derive the required actual rotational signals for the yarn quantity measurement directly at the delivery device or from pulses otherwise available for operation.
  • a circular knitting machine RM schematically indicated with its cylinder 1 and the machine control MC in FIG. 1 is equipped with a production monitoring / adjusting device LR.
  • several knitting systems 2 are provided, for example, the knitting systems (1) to (12).
  • Selected ones of the knitting systems (1) to (12) are each at least one delivery device R, E, S from here e.g. three different types operatively associated (indicated by solid lines), the assembly of the individual knitting systems may vary with the delivery devices, depending on the knitwear and / or the processed yarn quality and / or color and / or elasticity.
  • the operationally assigned delivery devices are indicated in groups 3.
  • the knitting machine RM is, for example, upgraded for the production of bodystockings. However, it may also be a circular knitting machine of a jacquard type.
  • the delivery devices are non-positive delivery devices that deliver the respective yarn according to at least two different yarn conveying principles. All delivery devices are, e.g.
  • the production monitoring / adjustment device LR comprising a computerized unit 4 'with an input / display section 4, a computer section C and at least one display D in which different user interfaces are configurable, for example an indicated user interface UF for displaying the Mongammenge M a knitwear KF or a knitwear series.
  • the production monitoring / adjustment device LR can be arranged in a separate housing W next to the circular knitting machine RM and connected to the knitting machine control MC, or be accommodated, for example, in a detail not further highlighted in the knitting machine foot K.
  • the production monitor / adjuster LR may be integrated with the knitting machine controller MC to utilize its input / display section and / or display D.
  • the arrow 5 indicated by dashed lines symbolizes that information, assignment patterns, setting commands or, for example, the total amount of yarn M are transferable to a control and monitoring center, not shown, or by an online connection to other, same knitwear KF producing knitting machines can be transmitted, or by a hand controller or an electronic data carrier to other similar knitting machines are available.
  • Non-positive yarn delivery means that there is no fixed correlation between the operating speed of the cylinder and the speed with which the respective delivery device delivers the yarn, but the respective yarn tension is kept substantially constant, but the individual yarn quantity varies compared to positive delivery, where the yarn tension varies, but the delivered quantity remains constant.
  • FIG. 2 for example, four delivery devices E, S, R and optionally S are operatively associated with the knitting system (1). These delivery devices could optionally be operatively associated with the various knitting systems (1) to (12) on the cylinder 1 in FIG.
  • the delivery device E pulls the yarn Y from a supply B, for example by a braking device 6, stores yarn turns on the storage body 7 and delivers the yarn tangentially via a tension scanning device 8 and a yarn guiding device 9 to the knitting system (1) which a needle 10 is shown.
  • An adapter A samples actual rotational signals s1, for example from the drive motor of the storage body 7.
  • These actual rotation signals s1 are optionally processed in an electronic device 11 controlled by the device 8 in response to the measured yarn tension, and then transmitted via an electronic device 12 and a signal line 13 ', for example in a bus system, to the production monitoring / adjustment device LR that makes it the individual Amount of yarn m1 of the delivery device E calculated and optionally converted into certain units.
  • the production monitoring / adjustment device LR is linked to the knitting machine control MC and receives therefrom, for example, so-called Trig signals tr.
  • the next delivery unit S of the group 3 is equipped with a rotatably driven storage body 7 'and also supplies the knitting system (1) with another yarn Y.
  • the yarn Y runs tangentially to the storage body 7' and is pulled off overhead by a central eyelet.
  • the rotation of the drive motor of the storage body 7 'monitoring adapter sensor A' are scanned from the possibly extended motor shaft actual rotation signals s2 and transmitted here in a daisy-chain DS to the production monitoring / adjustment LR.
  • the respective yarn turns can move with slippage.
  • the delivery device R is a type with a stationary storage body 7 ", on which by means of a rotatably driven take-up element 7" 'contiguous or separated yarn turns are temporarily stored, the overhead of the storage body 7 "subtracted and in the case shown to the needle 10 of the knitting system (1).
  • the drive motor of the takeup element 7 '" is contained in a housing 15 which carries on a housing extension 14 a counting sensor device CS which derives actual rotational signals s3 from the yarn rotating at the time of withdrawal and in the daisy chain DS via the adapter Sensor A 'of the delivery device S to the production monitoring / adjustment device LR transmits.
  • the daisy-chain DS with a connection 13 extends further to a delivery device S indicated only by dashed lines which may belong to the reserve 3 'which is ready for operation.
  • On the daisy chain are connected to the sampled actual rotational signals s2, s3 and n s the necessary information for the respective individual yarn amounts to m m2 of the delivery device S, R, S n to the monitoring / adjusting LR transmitted.
  • the production monitoring / adjustment device LR each individual yarn amount from the beginning of production and / or the current yarn flow and / or Retrogammenge M for the production series belonging produced knitwear, namely, for example, via the trig signals tr in association with the machine.
  • a masterpiece of the knitted fabric to be manufactured can be used as a production reference.
  • the masterpiece is actually made or fictitious calculated and characterized by the individual individual yarn quantities of the entire masterpiece and / or the individual yarn quantities per machine cycle or machine part cycle and / or the individual yarn quantities up to a predetermined one, for example, with a particular allocation pattern of the delivery devices to selected knitting systems Time within the production of the masterpieces.
  • the Masterpiece is created under operating conditions optimized in terms of quality.
  • Each knitted fabric KF produced thereby is continuously or sequentially compared on the basis of the individual yarn amounts m1 to m n with the master piece.
  • An inadmissibly falling amount of yarn may be an indication that in the knitting system, the mesh size has been reduced by contamination or wear or the like. Or in Garnweg a braking, guiding or Umlenkkondition upstream and / or downstream of the delivery device by contamination or the like. Too strong has become.
  • different adjustment measures may be required in the yarn path. Conversely, this applies to inadmissibly increasing individual Yarn quantities compared to the corresponding Masterpiece yarn quantities. From the individual yarn quantities, the Automatgammenge for each knitted fabric or the total yarn weight can also be determined or predicted with regard to the desired production number, the total amount of yarn or autonomousgammati and, for example, for the calculation of production efficiency, for the logistics of yarn supply or the control of operational yarn stock.
  • the adapter A of the delivery device type E counts, for example, several pulses per motor revolution, each pulse representing a certain amount of yarn.
  • the adapter sensor A 'of the delivery device type S counts e.g. each motor revolution with one pulse, each pulse representing a yarn amount corresponding to the circumferential length of the storage body.
  • the counter sensor device CS of the delivery device type R counts e.g. several pulses per drawn yarn turn, each pulse representing a particular amount of turn yarn.
  • the individual yarn quantities are continuously added up to the delivery devices at each working knitting system and compared with the corresponding yarn sets of the masterpieces to monitor that each knitted fabric produced corresponds as closely as possible to the masterpiece. This will be explained with reference to FIG. 4.
  • FIG. 4 schematically shows a user interface UF2 configured in the display D, on which a field is provided for each knitting system SYST (1) to (12).
  • the user interface UF2 is called up at the input / display section 4.
  • the respective knit KF is identified, possibly with specifications.
  • the fields are separated by dividing lines 22 and can be shown by scrolling one after the other, to several or individually.
  • Each operating knitting system is identified in a field 21.
  • the masterpiece P is shown with zero sets of yarn m1 'to m n ' through a centerline 23 and at least one Tolerance range T1, T2, T1 ', T2' added.
  • Horizontal bars 24 contain the deviations between each m1 to m n and m1 'to m n '.
  • the yarn quantities m1 'to m n ' of the masterpiece are associated, for example, with the current time in the production cycle of a knitwear.
  • the positive or negative deviations are shown at m1 to m n in the beams 24 and monitored within the respective tolerance range T1, T1 ', T2, T2'.
  • the bars 24 are further provided, for example, with identifications S (1), R (12), E (1) for the operatively associated delivery devices.
  • Identical delivery device types are shown, for example, in bars 24 with the same gray tone.
  • an individual yarn quantity for example that of the delivery device E (1), exceeds the tolerance range T1, as indicated at 25, then this excess is visually and / or acoustically highlighted or reported or, if appropriate, an adjustment measure is initiated and initiated.
  • the adjustment measure could also be derived and caused only when exceeding the second tolerance range T2, or even a shutdown signal.
  • the target yarn amounts m1 'to m n ' are stored in the production monitor / adjuster for all working knitting systems.
  • the individual yarn amounts m1 to m n are calculated from the over the transmission links 13, 13 'or a data transmission; and the target yarn amounts superimposed.
  • the production monitoring / adjustment device LR is also used to upgrade the circular knitting machine RM. This will be explained with reference to FIG. 3.
  • a different user interface UF1 is configured in the display D, which contains a plurality of fields 16, 17, 18, 19 with subfields 20, 26.
  • the available delivery devices installed in the fields 16 on the knitting machine are shown under AF in addressed form.
  • three groups are provided, namely all delivery devices S identified by address numbers (1) to (16), further the delivery devices E identified with address numbers (1) to (16), and finally the delivery devices R identified with address numbers (1) to (16). 16).
  • field 17 represents further information and / or is used to fictitiously translate the delivery devices not required for the knitwear identified in field 26.
  • the knitting systems are shown with each other in field 18 with SYST (1) to (16).
  • subfields 20 are provided for each knitting system.
  • the delivery devices of the desired types are sequentially delivered to each knitting system, e.g. assigned to the yarn coming there for processing. This is indicated for the knitting system (1) to which the delivery devices S (1), R (12) and E (1) are assigned.
  • the delivery devices associated with the respective knitting system are then either darkened or deleted in field 16. In this way, the selected knitting systems are sequentially stocked. Unallocated delivery devices of the different types either remain in the fields 16 or are automatically set in the field 17.
  • the associated delivery devices are also activated operationally for use.
  • the final allocation pattern which is indicated in part in FIG. 3, is stored after completion and associated with the knitted fabric KF. If the masterpiece has already been created or calculated with this assignment pattern, the masterpiece assignment pattern belonging to the knitwear KF can also be called up directly in one go for upgrading.
  • the assignment pattern can also be given either via a hand controller or an electronic data carrier or an online connection to each other, also equipped with the production monitoring / adjustment LR circular knitting machine to simplify the upgrade there as well.
  • the system is variable. Based on the individual amounts of thread and the masterpiece can also be used in each case a delivery device E with its amount of thread as Masterfeeder, after which the delivery devices of the same type with their individual yarn quantities. Then, the comparison is made between the yarn amount of the master feeder and the individual yarn amounts of all the delivery devices of the same type.
  • a delivery device E with its amount of thread as Masterfeeder, after which the delivery devices of the same type with their individual yarn quantities. Then, the comparison is made between the yarn amount of the master feeder and the individual yarn amounts of all the delivery devices of the same type.
  • the masterfeeder monitoring principle is useful to monitor that the same amount of yarn is fed to each operating knitting system, using the Masterfeeder yarn quantity profile in the Masterpiece as a permanent reference for the production monitoring and setting comparisons.
  • the total amount of yarn M mentioned with reference to Fig. 1 may be the total amount of knitwear or the total production of these knitwear. It is possible to separately evaluate, display and store the individual total yarn amounts for each type of delivery device, or even compare them to optimize production efficiency.
  • each working knitting system (1) to (12) can knit a yarn or alternately several yarns at a time.
  • the masterpiece could be knit with relatively strong yarn to get accurate yarn quantity information.
  • the yarns processed in the knitwear produced may be more elastic or stretchable or more difficult to process than the yarns used for the masterpiece;
  • the yarn elongation occurring during processing can then be taken into account, for example, by the width of the respectively used tolerance range.
  • brake conditioner gauges may be provided upstream and / or downstream of the delivery device and connected to the production monitoring / adjustment device to assess yarn path conditions or changes in yarn path conditions.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Knitting Machines (AREA)

Claims (18)

  1. Procédé de réglage/surveillance de production d'un métier à tricoter (RM), en particulier un métier à tricoter circulaire, comportant plusieurs appareils d'alimentation (S, E, R) et pourvu de plusieurs systèmes de tricotage qui traitent chacun au moins un fil (Y) provenant d'une réserve (B) et fourni par un appareil d'alimentation, pour former un article tricoté (KF), grâce à la recherche des quantités de fil (m1-mn) des appareils d'alimentation qui sont fournies individuellement dans chaque article produit, étant précisé qu'il est prévu sur le métier à tricoter au moins un appareil d'alimentation par système de tricotage fonctionnant, caractérisé en ce que des fils sont fournis à des systèmes de tricotage actifs ((1)-(12)) par plusieurs appareils d'alimentation à alimentation non positive (S, E, R) et suivant au moins deux principes d'amenée de fil différents, et en ce que les quantités de fil individuelles (m1-mn) sont mesurées en permanence sur les appareils d'alimentation à l'aide de signaux de rotation réels (S1-Sn) obtenus par balayage.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, selon lequel les quantités de fil individuelles (m1-mn) mesurées sont comparées à des quantités de fil théoriques correspondantes (m1'-mn') d'un modèle, par exemple, et des informations et/ou des mesures de réglage sont dérivées des comparaisons, caractérisé en ce que pour dériver les informations et/ou les mesures de réglage pour un même échantillon d'affectation des appareils d'alimentation aux métiers à tricoter pour le modèle (P) et l'article tricoté (KF), les quantités de fil individuelles (m1-mn) des articles tricotés sont comparées aux quantités de fil théoriques correspondantes (m1'-mn') à l'intérieur d'au moins une plage de tolérance (T1, T2, T1', T2') dont la largeur est adaptée au moins à des paramètres de qualité de fil et/ou à des paramètres de trajectoire de fil.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'une multiplicité (3, 3') d'appareils d'alimentation (S, E, R) qui fournissent du fil suivant au moins deux principes d'amenée de fil différents et de manière non positive sont installés de manière opérationnelle sur le métier à tricoter, en ce que parmi cette multiplicité, plusieurs ou tous les appareils d'alimentation sont sélectionnés suivant des paramètres de fonctionnement prédéfinis, au niveau de systèmes de tricotage actifs ((1)-(12)), et sont associés de manière opérationnelle aux systèmes de tricotage respectifs, et en ce qu'un modèle d'affectation représentant la sélection et l'affectation est consigné de manière à pouvoir être retrouvé.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que pour fixer une quantité de fil totale et/ou un poids de fil (M), les quantités de fil individuelles (m1-mn) mesurées sont converties ou transformées en unités de quantité ou de poids identiques.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'un système de tricotage actif ((1)-(12)) est approvisionné en au moins un fil moins élastique par un appareil d'alimentation (E, S) avec un corps de stockage entraîné en rotation (7', 7), et le même ou un autre système de tricotage actif est approvisionné en fil plus élastique par un appareil d'alimentation (R) avec un corps de stockage stationnaire (7") et un organe d'enroulement entraîné en rotation (7"'), avec une tension et/ou une vitesse de fil différentes.
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 5, caractérisé en ce que pour un appareil d'alimentation (S, E) avec un corps de stockage entraîné en rotation (7, 7'), à chaque rotation du corps de stockage au moins un signal de rotation réel (s1, s2) qui représente une quantité de fil correspondant à la longueur circonférentielle du corps de stockage, ou un nombre prédéfini de signaux de rotation réels (s1, s2) qui correspondent à des quantités de fil représentant des longueurs circonférentielles partielles égales du corps de stockage, sont obtenus par balayage et sont analysés en vue de la mesure des quantités de fil individuelles (m1, m2), de préférence grâce à un balayage direct ou indirect de la rotation réelle du moteur d'entraînement.
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 5, caractérisé en ce que pour un appareil d'alimentation (R) avec un corps de stockage stationnaire (7"), une multiplicité de signaux de rotation réels (3) qui représentent des longueurs partielles de spire de fil égales sont balayés et sont analysés en vue de la mesure de la quantité de fil individuelle (m3), de préférence à l'aide d'impulsions produites à partir de la rotation du fil déroulé du corps de stockage (7").
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que pour un fil, la largeur de la plage de tolérance (T1, T2, T1', T2') qui est réglée pour la comparaison n'est pas la même que pour un fil présentant une autre élasticité et amené avec une autre tension et/ou vitesse.
  9. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que chaque comparaison de quantité de fil est effectuée dans plusieurs plages de tolérance (T1, T2, T1', T2') de largeur croissante, de préférence avec une largeur faible pour dériver un signal d'alarme (25), avec une largeur plus grande pour dériver une mesure de réglage, et avec une largeur encore plus grande pour dériver une mesure d'arrêt.
  10. Procédé selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que des conditions de freinage de fil, de guidage ou de déviation sont déterminées pour chaque appareil d'alimentation (E, S, R) et sont utilisées de préférence pour adapter la plage de tolérance (T1, T2).
  11. Dispositif de réglage/surveillance de production (LR) pour la mise en oeuvre d'un procédé selon la revendication 1, pour un métier à tricoter (RM), en particulier un métier à tricoter circulaire, pourvu de plusieurs systèmes de tricotage ((1)-(12)), de plusieurs appareils d'alimentation (E, S, R) et d'une unité informatisée (4') avec une section d'entrée/affichage (4) et au moins un affichage (D) dans lequel différentes interfaces utilisateur (UF1-UFn) peuvent être configurées, étant précisé que sur au moins une interface utilisateur (UF2), des quantités de fil (m1-mn) fournies aux systèmes de tricotage actifs ((1)-(12)) peuvent être visualisées, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins une interface utilisateur (UF2) peut être configurée, sur laquelle grâce à la section d'entrée/affichage (4), sur une multiplicité (3, 3') d'appareils d'alimentation (S, E, R) disposés de manière opérationnelle sur le métier à tricoter circulaire (R) et reliés à l'unité (4'), chaque appareil d'alimentation individuel, pour une amenée de fil non positive suivant au moins deux principes d'amenée de fil différents, est apte à être affecté de manière opérationnelle à ce système de tricotage suivant le principe d'amenée de fil optionnel pour un système de tricotage défini ((1)-(12)) et le modèle d'affectation est consigné pour pouvoir être retrouvé.
  12. Dispositif de réglage/surveillance de production selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins une autre interface utilisateur (UF1) peut être configurée, sur laquelle le fonctionnement des appareils d'alimentation (E, S, R) affectés aux systèmes de tricotage ((1)-(12)) peut être visualisé en permanence lors de la production d'un article tricoté (KF) à l'aide des quantités de fil individuelles (m1-mn) mesurées, dans des comparaisons avec des quantités de fil de modèle (m1'-mn') de ces appareils qui sont mises en mémoire, et peut être différencié suivant le type d'appareil d'alimentation et le système de tricotage, de préférence à l'intérieur de plages de tolérances (T1, T2, T1', T2') individuelles qui dépendent par exemple de la qualité du fil et/ou du principe d'amenée de fil.
  13. Dispositif de réglage/surveillance de production selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce que l'unité (4') est disposée dans son propre boîtier (W) près du métier à tricoter circulaire (R) ou dans une partie du pied (K) dudit métier.
  14. Dispositif de réglage/surveillance de production selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce que l'unité (4') est intégrée, de préférence avec son affichage (D) et la section d'entrée/affichage (4), dans la commande de métier à tricoter circulaire (MC).
  15. Dispositif de réglage/surveillance de production selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce que parmi la multiplicité (3, 3') d'appareils d'alimentation à alimentation non positive prévus sur le métier à tricoter circulaire (RM), des appareils d'alimentation (E, S) à corps de stockage aptes à être entraînés en rotation (7, 7') sont prévus par exemple pour des fils moins élastiques ou dans une plage de tension ou de vitesse, et des appareils d'alimentation (R) à corps de stockage stationnaire (7"), à élément d'enroulement apte à être entraîné en rotation (7"') et à dispositif à capteur compteur de spires de fil (CS) situé côté déroulement sont prévus par exemple pour les fils plus élastiques ou dans une autre plage de tension ou de vitesse de fils, et sont aptes à être visualisés dans l'interface utilisateur (UF1), par exemple dans une zone existante (17) située près d'une zone (15) identifiant les systèmes de tricotage ((1)-(12)).
  16. Dispositif de réglage/surveillance de production selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce que des appareils d'alimentation sont équipés d'adaptateurs de signaux de rotation réels (A, A') qui sont reliés à l'unité (4'), qui comptent les pulsations et qui génèrent à partir de chaque corps de stockage entraîné en rotation (7, 7') des signaux de rotation réels (S1, S2) représentant des tours de moteur complets en corrélation avec des quantités partielles de fil ou des incréments de tours de moteur réguliers, et il est prévu des appareils d'alimentation qui génèrent des pulsations du dispositif à capteur compteur de spires de fil (S) situé sur le côté déroulement d'un corps de stockage stationnaire (7").
  17. Dispositif de réglage/surveillance de production selon l'une au moins des revendications 11 à 16, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins une autre interface utilisateur (UF) peut être configurée, sur laquelle la quantité de fil (M) fournie par chaque appareil d'alimentation pour un ou plusieurs articles tricotés (KF) peut être visualisée en unité de longueurs et/ou de poids.
  18. Dispositif de réglage/surveillance de production selon l'une au moins des revendications 11 à 17, caractérisé en ce que le métier à tricoter (MR) avec sa commande de machine (MC), le dispositif de réglage/ surveillance de production (LR) et les appareils d'alimentation (E, S, R) sont reliés par un système de bus (BS), de préférence un système de bus CAN et/ou une connexion en guirlande (DC), les appareils d'alimentation étant reliés au système de bus par l'intermédiaire d'adaptateurs d'interface de bus (A, A').
EP02730006A 2001-03-16 2002-03-13 Procede de reglage/surveillance de production d'un metier a tricoter circulaire et dispositif de reglage/surveillance de production Expired - Lifetime EP1370720B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10112795A DE10112795A1 (de) 2001-03-16 2001-03-16 Verfahren zur Produktionsüberwachungs/Einstellung einer Strickmaschine, und Produktionsüberwachungs/Einstellungs-Vorrichtung
DE10112795 2001-03-16
PCT/EP2002/002787 WO2002081801A1 (fr) 2001-03-16 2002-03-13 Procede de reglage/surveillance de production d'un metier a tricoter circulaire et dispositif de reglage/surveillance de production

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1370720A1 EP1370720A1 (fr) 2003-12-17
EP1370720B1 true EP1370720B1 (fr) 2006-11-02

Family

ID=7677769

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02730006A Expired - Lifetime EP1370720B1 (fr) 2001-03-16 2002-03-13 Procede de reglage/surveillance de production d'un metier a tricoter circulaire et dispositif de reglage/surveillance de production

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US6832496B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1370720B1 (fr)
KR (1) KR100536624B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN100408745C (fr)
DE (2) DE10112795A1 (fr)
TW (1) TW517037B (fr)
WO (1) WO2002081801A1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102012103535B3 (de) * 2012-04-20 2013-10-10 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine
DE102012025607A1 (de) 2012-04-20 2013-10-24 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine
DE102013110988A1 (de) 2013-10-02 2015-04-02 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine sowie Strickmaschine
DE102015104903B3 (de) * 2015-03-30 2016-06-16 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine sowie Strickmaschine

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005057352B3 (de) * 2005-12-01 2007-08-23 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Bestimmung der Fadenmenge an einer Strickmaschine
WO2008058550A1 (fr) * 2006-11-13 2008-05-22 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Procédé et dispositif de surveillance d'aiguilles
DE102007041171A1 (de) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-05 Sipra Patententwicklungs- Und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Mbh Verfahren und Strickmaschine zur Herstellung einer Maschenware aus im wesentlichen unverdrehtem Fasermaterial
ITMI20111030A1 (it) 2011-06-08 2012-12-09 Santoni & C Spa Procedimento per regolare la taglia di articoli tessili in produzione su macchine tessili circolari per maglieria o calzetteria
HRP20220881T1 (hr) * 2015-03-12 2022-10-28 Btsr International S.P.A. Postupak i sustav za rukovanje i upravljanje dodavanjem najmanje jedne niti u stroj za kružno pletenje ili u stroj za čarape kao funkcija radnih koraka stroja
CN108532119A (zh) * 2018-04-24 2018-09-14 武汉纺织大学 一种全自动立体伸缩式袜机转模与检测装置
US11828009B2 (en) * 2018-05-16 2023-11-28 Fabdesigns, Inc. System and method of unspooling a material into a textile machine
CN109208162B (zh) * 2018-08-17 2021-04-27 华尔科技集团股份有限公司 一种纺织进线调节方法
CN108914357B (zh) * 2018-09-07 2023-08-04 广东天海花边有限公司 一种纬编大圆机自动调节式积极送纱系统及其控制方法
DE102019104681B3 (de) * 2019-02-25 2020-04-23 Memminger-IRO Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Verfahren und System mit Fadenliefergeräten zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine
TWI694190B (zh) * 2019-03-14 2020-05-21 佰龍機械廠股份有限公司 圓編機自動調校的布樣文件發佈系統
FR3094380B1 (fr) * 2019-03-28 2022-01-07 Safran Aircraft Engines Contrôle du positionnement et de la continuité de fils dans un métier à tisser
CN115142187A (zh) * 2022-07-06 2022-10-04 圣东尼(上海)针织机器有限公司 针织大圆机织造质量优化控制系统

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1083113B (it) * 1977-05-18 1985-05-21 Marchisio Giovanni & C S A S Macchina circolare per maglieria con dispositivo di regolazione della velocita di alimentazione dei fili
CH653717A5 (en) 1981-08-31 1986-01-15 Tecan Ag Method for the run-through measurement of textile threads in textile machines and apparatus for carrying it out
GB8410640D0 (en) * 1984-04-26 1984-05-31 Iropa Textile Accessories Positive feed
SE450186B (sv) 1986-07-07 1987-06-09 Rydborn S A O Sett och anordning for overvakning av att flera efter varandra foljande signaler har huvudsakligen samma vagform
SE462757B (sv) 1987-04-16 1990-08-27 Iro Ab Oevervakningssystem foer stickmaskiner
IT1242051B (it) 1990-04-20 1994-02-02 Tiziano Barea Perfezionamenti relativi al controllo del corretto assorbimento dei fili utilizzati in una macchina tessile,in particolare per maglieria o calzetteria
FR2669045B1 (fr) 1990-11-14 1993-02-12 Fatel Telematique Procede et systeme de controle du fonctionnement d'une machine textile.
IT1243970B (it) * 1990-12-04 1994-06-28 Flavio Barea Metodo e dispositivo per il controllo automatico della quantita' di filo alimentato ad una macchina tessile operante su di esso, in modo discontinuo.
DE4240628C2 (de) 1992-12-03 2000-11-09 Sipra Patent Beteiligung Überwachungseinrichtung an einer Textilmaschine
JPH07126965A (ja) * 1993-11-04 1995-05-16 Fukuhara Seiki Seisakusho:Kk 丸編機のステッチ量自動調整装置および方法
IT1275465B (it) 1995-07-03 1997-08-07 Tiziano Barea Dispositivo di controllo dell'alimentazione di una pluralita' di fili o filati ad una macchina tessile avente mezzi sensori codificati e metodo per il suo controllo
DE19701257A1 (de) 1997-01-17 1998-07-23 Hannecke Wolf D Kunststoff Säulenpräsentationssystem in Modulbauweise zur Schaustellung von Waren oder Prospektmaterial und insbesondere von dünnen Gegenständen
US6151925A (en) * 1998-01-30 2000-11-28 International Machinery Sales, Inc. Methods and systems for positively feeding yarn to circular knitting machines
IT1314900B1 (it) 2000-06-27 2003-01-16 Sangiacomo Spa Metodo di misura e controllo continuativi della tensione e/oscorrimento dei fili alimentati in macchine per lavorazioni a maglia.

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102012103535B3 (de) * 2012-04-20 2013-10-10 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine
DE102012025607A1 (de) 2012-04-20 2013-10-24 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine
DE102013110988A1 (de) 2013-10-02 2015-04-02 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine sowie Strickmaschine
EP2857567A1 (fr) 2013-10-02 2015-04-08 Memminger-IRO GmbH Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de la production d'une machine à tricoter
DE102015104903B3 (de) * 2015-03-30 2016-06-16 Memminger-Iro Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine sowie Strickmaschine
EP3075690A1 (fr) 2015-03-30 2016-10-05 Memminger-IRO GmbH Procede et dispositif de surveillance de la production d'une machine a tricoter et machine a tricoter

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1370720A1 (fr) 2003-12-17
DE50208598D1 (de) 2006-12-14
US6832496B2 (en) 2004-12-21
KR20040007467A (ko) 2004-01-24
CN100408745C (zh) 2008-08-06
WO2002081801A1 (fr) 2002-10-17
KR100536624B1 (ko) 2005-12-14
TW517037B (en) 2003-01-11
CN1503862A (zh) 2004-06-09
US20040154339A1 (en) 2004-08-12
DE10112795A1 (de) 2002-09-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1370720B1 (fr) Procede de reglage/surveillance de production d'un metier a tricoter circulaire et dispositif de reglage/surveillance de production
DE10234545B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Liefern von Fäden
DE69916693T3 (de) Vorrichtung zum Steuern der Fadenlieferung zu einer Textilmaschine und Verfahren zum Steuern des Betriebs der Maschine und der Produktion
DE2736416C3 (de) Vorrichtung zum Zuführen von Garn zu einer Strickmaschine
DE3429207C2 (de) Fadenliefervorrichtung für fadenverbrauchende Textilmaschinen
EP2857567B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de la production d'une machine à tricoter
DE3111113A1 (de) "regelvorrichtung fuer den motor einer das gewirk beeinflussenden drehvorrichtung, wie teilkettbaum, bei einer kettenwirkmaschine"
DE19923802B4 (de) Rundstrickmaschine zur Herstellung von Strickwaren mit wahlweise unterschiedlichen Eigenschaften und Verfahren zu ihrer Einstellung
EP0423067A1 (fr) Ourdissoir à cônes et procédé d'ourdissage
WO2005038105A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de fabrication d'un fil fantaisie retordu
EP0291710B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour surveiller la partie rattachée du fil sur un métier à filer à bout libre
EP0307769B1 (fr) Métier à tricoter avec dispositif de changement de fils
DE10032705B4 (de) Fadenliefereinrichtung für Textilmaschinen
DE2432938B2 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur fadenlaengenmessung in einer textilmaschine mit mehreren wickelstationen
EP3075690B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de surveillance de la production d'une machine a tricoter et machine a tricoter
DE4213842C2 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Überwachung der Funktion der Nadeln einer Textilmaschine
DE102012103535B3 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Überwachung der Produktion einer Strickmaschine
DE3724823A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur einstellung einer maschendichte auf einer rundstrickmaschine
DE102017203161B4 (de) Flechtmaschine
DE102004017045B3 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Fadenpositivlieferung
DE3813216C2 (fr)
DE102004003032A1 (de) Verfahren zum Herstellen eines Effektgarnes
DE1804038A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Steuerung von Kett-Wirkmaschinen
EP0584304B1 (fr) Procede a surveiller les cycles de mouvements dans une machine a bobiner et machine a bobiner correspondante
DE202010014519U1 (de) Musterbaumanordnung und Kettenwirkmaschine

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030916

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE IT TR

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE IT TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20061102

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 50208598

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20061214

Kind code of ref document: P

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20070803

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20180322

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20180313

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20180322

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 50208598

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190313