EP0852326A1 - Batterie d'armes, en particulier pour unités de tir anti-aériennes - Google Patents

Batterie d'armes, en particulier pour unités de tir anti-aériennes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0852326A1
EP0852326A1 EP97112897A EP97112897A EP0852326A1 EP 0852326 A1 EP0852326 A1 EP 0852326A1 EP 97112897 A EP97112897 A EP 97112897A EP 97112897 A EP97112897 A EP 97112897A EP 0852326 A1 EP0852326 A1 EP 0852326A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
battery according
fire
target
directors
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP97112897A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0852326B1 (fr
Inventor
Heinz Piccolruaz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rheinmetall Air Defence AG
Original Assignee
Oerlikon Contraves AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Oerlikon Contraves AG filed Critical Oerlikon Contraves AG
Publication of EP0852326A1 publication Critical patent/EP0852326A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0852326B1 publication Critical patent/EP0852326B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/04—Aiming or laying means for dispersing fire from a battery ; for controlling spread of shots; for coordinating fire from spaced weapons
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G5/00—Elevating or traversing control systems for guns
    • F41G5/08—Ground-based tracking-systems for aerial targets

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a weapon battery, in particular for flab fire units, wherein each fire unit has at least one sensor for recording target data, one Director for the calculation of the trajectory of a target and at least one effector for the combat target.
  • EP-B-0 551 667 discloses a weapon battery consisting of several guided missile launching stations.
  • the missile launching stations hereinafter also called fire units, have means for detecting a target and are connected to a central unit.
  • Each fire unit sends data relating to the position and speed of the currently pursued target to the central unit via the connections. This data is sent back by radio to all fire units immediately after receipt by the central unit.
  • Each fire unit contains a computerized control device that has a target sensor and tracker. The first sensor, which detects a specific target, communicates this to the other fire units, which are then locked out of the target's treatment, but continue to pursue it. This action is subject to a higher-level control algorithm, with the necessary calculations being carried out by the fire units.
  • the disadvantages of the weapon battery described above are based on the fact that the Fire units exchange their target messages via the central unit, so that at their Failure the whole system is shut down. In addition, the transfer of data be disturbed by radio. Furthermore, it is disadvantageous that a certain Cannot fight target at the same time with more than one fire unit.
  • Guided missiles are also suitable for longer operating distances and flying heights than barrel weapons.
  • barrel weapons are quick to defend against thanks to their short reaction time
  • Low-flying aircraft superior to guided missiles So that a low-flying aircraft can be used in rough terrain cannot sneak up unnoticed, the coordination of the fire units is special here valuable.
  • the above-mentioned network has the disadvantage that the data is transmitted from the sensors the data network flows to the directors, but not in the opposite direction. This is it is not possible for a sensor that has already detected a target to be another sensor can help to understand this goal as well. Nor is it possible for the directors can coordinate their operations because the one director cannot know which Target is fought by the other director. So it can happen that one target out of several Throwers are fought while another remains unmolested.
  • the invention has for its object a weapon battery of the type mentioned propose that does not have the disadvantages mentioned above and not only steering but also uses tube weapons, the latter tube weapons especially for the defense against Low-flying aircraft are suitable.
  • the combat plan is independent of each director calculated by the other directors from the available data, whereby at the calculation also includes information about the position and usability of all fire units be taken into account.
  • the proposed triangulative measurement of the target by passive sensors is especially cheap and effective because the target is not through electronic countermeasures can protect against it.
  • Another advantage over the prior art is that the use of unprocessed measurements instead of pre-processed estimates.
  • 1 denotes a sensor which measures the position and possibly also the radial speed of a target.
  • the sensor 1 can be a search sensor that measures many targets imprecisely or a follow-up sensor that measures a single target precisely. However, it can also be both.
  • the sensor 1 is connected to a director 2 who calculates and extrapolates the trajectory of a target and decides on the use of the sensor 1 and an effector 3, 4 , the effector 3 ( FIG. 1a ) being a thrower and the effector 4 ( Fig.1b ) is a gun.
  • the parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 are preferably far apart.
  • the director 2 is permanently manned because he does not emit radiation from active measuring devices or projectiles and can therefore be camouflaged better than sensor 1 and effector 3, 4 .
  • the spatial spacing protects the sensor 1 from the vibrations, the smoke and the heat of the effector 3, 4 .
  • FIG. 2 four sensors 5 are connected to two directors 7 via a data network 6 . 8 effectors in the form of throwers are designated, each effector 8 communicates with each director 7 in conjunction.
  • the mode of operation of this weapon battery is briefly described above in the prior art.
  • fire units are provided, each of which is formed from a sensor 10 , a director 11 and a launcher 12 .
  • the fire units are connected to one another via a central unit 13 .
  • the operation of this weapon battery is described above in the prior art.
  • each consisting of a director 24 and at least one sensor 25 and at least a first effector 26, or at least a second effector 27 are designated 20, 21, 22 and 23 four fire units exist.
  • the first fire unit 20 has a further effector in the form of the second effector 27 and the second fire unit 21 has a first effector 26 .
  • the third fire unit 22 has a second sensor 25
  • the fourth fire unit 23 has a further sensor 28 .
  • the directors 24 are connected directly and bidirectionally to their associated sensors 25 and can use them optimally, for example with the help of information from other sensors. Some of these sensors can be positioned upstream in such a way that they do not primarily serve to use the effectors 26, 27 , but rather to pre-warn and instruct the other sensors.
  • the directors 24 of the fire units 20, 21, 22, 23 are directly and preferably bidirectionally connected to one another by a ring structure 29 .
  • each fire unit 20, 21, 22, 23 forwards the data it acquires or receives to the next fire unit 20, 21, 22, 23 .
  • Each director 24 communicates with each other so that each of its sensors 25 can work with each other.
  • a sensor that has not yet detected a target can be instructed by another sensor that has already detected it.
  • two sensors which are pursuing the same target purely passively, to determine the distance of the target by triangulation without the target being warned by the reception of active radiation. If the target were to protect themselves by emitting interference signals, these interference signals would only improve the accuracy of the passive measurement.
  • FIG. 5a and 5b are indicated at 30 a representing a target aircraft with 31, 32 has two sensors, which can be either equal to or as shown be unequal.
  • a first and a second ellipse 33, 34 represent areas of the passive sensors 31 , 32 , in which one of the two suspects the target, as long as one sensor does not yet know what the other knows.
  • the ellipses 31, 32 are actually much slimmer than shown in Fig . 5b , because the angle information is usually much more accurate than the distance information in passive measurement.
  • a third, smaller ellipse 35 represents the area in which both sensors 31, 32 suspect the target when they work together.
  • the cooperation can consist, for example, of the sensors 31, 32 feeding their raw measurement data into a Kalman filter, which is provided, for example, in at least one director 24 .
  • a Kalman filter which is provided, for example, in at least one director 24 .
  • the weapon battery described with reference to FIGS. 4, 5a and 5b works as follows: on the basis of the information available, a combat plan is created which defines which target is fired at by which effector from which time when (for example, tube weapon 26 of the first fire unit 20 ) .
  • the combat plan is designed and continuously updated through a multi-dimensional and iterative optimization in such a way that the expected total combat success of all fire units is and remains maximum, taking into account the target change times and the limits of the ammunition stores, etc.
  • This expected combat success can, for example, be defined as an expected value the number of kills or as the survival probability of the protected object or as a weighted average of both. In contrast to the prior art mentioned first, this does not preclude the same target from being fought by more than one fire unit at the same time.
  • Each director 24 independently of the other directors, calculates the air situation and combat plan based on the information available. This also includes information about the position and usability of all fire units 20, 21, 22, 23 . Normally, all information will be available to all directors 24 so that all directors 24 can calculate and execute the same battle plan. This democratic coordination is efficient and only becomes weakly sub-optional if some information is not available to all directors 24 due to the failure of individual data connections.
EP19970112897 1996-12-09 1997-07-26 Batterie d'armes pour unités de tir anti-aériennes Expired - Lifetime EP0852326B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH301096 1996-12-09
CH3010/96 1996-12-09
CH301096 1996-12-09

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0852326A1 true EP0852326A1 (fr) 1998-07-08
EP0852326B1 EP0852326B1 (fr) 2002-07-17

Family

ID=4246606

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19970112897 Expired - Lifetime EP0852326B1 (fr) 1996-12-09 1997-07-26 Batterie d'armes pour unités de tir anti-aériennes

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0852326B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE59707722D1 (fr)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0977003A1 (fr) * 1998-07-31 2000-02-02 Oerlikon Contraves Ag Procédé pour combattre au moins une cible aérienne au moyen d'un groupe de tir, groupe de tir comprenant au moins deux unités de tir et utilisation du groupe de tir
FR2837955A1 (fr) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-03 Giat Ind Sa Systeme de traitement des informations sur un champ de bataille
EP1450125A1 (fr) * 2003-02-12 2004-08-25 Oerlikon Contraves Ag Procédé et dispositif pour combattre une cible
FR2873221A1 (fr) * 2004-07-16 2006-01-20 Dcn Sa Systeme de traitement et de gestion des informations tactiques d'evolution d'une plateforme de combat
FR2879730A1 (fr) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-23 Giat Ind Sa Procede de commande de ralliement d'un systeme d'arme d'une plate-forme de tir et plate-forme mettant en oeuvre un tel procede
WO2006126966A2 (fr) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Systeme et procede permettant d'afficher une cible
CN102706217A (zh) * 2012-04-17 2012-10-03 北京理工大学 一种控制多枚导弹攻击角度和攻击时间的方法
CN102980449A (zh) * 2012-12-25 2013-03-20 北京理工大学 一种多枚导弹协同作战的控制方法
EP2482026B1 (fr) 2011-01-26 2018-05-02 Diehl Defence GmbH & Co. KG Procédé de défense contre l'attaque d'un missile

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3235266A1 (de) * 1982-09-23 1984-03-29 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Kopplernetzwerk zum verkoppeln mehrerer teilnehmersender mit mehreren teilnehmerempfaengern
GB2136097A (en) * 1979-03-30 1984-09-12 Siemens Ag Target-tracking Interception Control Systems
EP0249679A2 (fr) * 1986-04-18 1987-12-23 MaK System Gesellschaft mbH Dispositif de conduite de tir pour système d'armes d'un véhicule blindé
EP0327029A2 (fr) * 1988-02-01 1989-08-09 ESG Elektronik-System- Gesellschaft mbH Dispositif de conduite de tir
EP0383043A1 (fr) * 1989-02-16 1990-08-22 Oerlikon-Contraves AG Système de conduite de tir naval, modulaire et maillé avec un dispositif de compensation d'erreurs de pointage
EP0431892A2 (fr) * 1989-12-07 1991-06-12 Hughes Aircraft Company Réseau distribué de lanceur pour missiles à radar actif
EP0551667A1 (fr) * 1992-01-15 1993-07-21 British Aerospace Public Limited Company Armes
US5443227A (en) * 1993-10-15 1995-08-22 Hughes Aircraft Company Switching control for multiple fiber-guided missile systems

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2136097A (en) * 1979-03-30 1984-09-12 Siemens Ag Target-tracking Interception Control Systems
DE3235266A1 (de) * 1982-09-23 1984-03-29 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Kopplernetzwerk zum verkoppeln mehrerer teilnehmersender mit mehreren teilnehmerempfaengern
EP0249679A2 (fr) * 1986-04-18 1987-12-23 MaK System Gesellschaft mbH Dispositif de conduite de tir pour système d'armes d'un véhicule blindé
EP0327029A2 (fr) * 1988-02-01 1989-08-09 ESG Elektronik-System- Gesellschaft mbH Dispositif de conduite de tir
EP0383043A1 (fr) * 1989-02-16 1990-08-22 Oerlikon-Contraves AG Système de conduite de tir naval, modulaire et maillé avec un dispositif de compensation d'erreurs de pointage
EP0431892A2 (fr) * 1989-12-07 1991-06-12 Hughes Aircraft Company Réseau distribué de lanceur pour missiles à radar actif
EP0551667A1 (fr) * 1992-01-15 1993-07-21 British Aerospace Public Limited Company Armes
US5443227A (en) * 1993-10-15 1995-08-22 Hughes Aircraft Company Switching control for multiple fiber-guided missile systems

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0977003A1 (fr) * 1998-07-31 2000-02-02 Oerlikon Contraves Ag Procédé pour combattre au moins une cible aérienne au moyen d'un groupe de tir, groupe de tir comprenant au moins deux unités de tir et utilisation du groupe de tir
US6467388B1 (en) 1998-07-31 2002-10-22 Oerlikon Contraves Ag Method for engaging at least one aerial target by means of a firing group, firing group of at least two firing units, and utilization of the firing group
FR2837955A1 (fr) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-03 Giat Ind Sa Systeme de traitement des informations sur un champ de bataille
WO2003083400A1 (fr) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-09 Giat Industries Systeme de traitement des informations sur un champ de bataille
EP1450125A1 (fr) * 2003-02-12 2004-08-25 Oerlikon Contraves Ag Procédé et dispositif pour combattre une cible
FR2873221A1 (fr) * 2004-07-16 2006-01-20 Dcn Sa Systeme de traitement et de gestion des informations tactiques d'evolution d'une plateforme de combat
FR2879730A1 (fr) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-23 Giat Ind Sa Procede de commande de ralliement d'un systeme d'arme d'une plate-forme de tir et plate-forme mettant en oeuvre un tel procede
EP1679483A1 (fr) * 2004-12-21 2006-07-12 Giat Industries Procédé de commande de ralliement d'un système d'arme d'une plate-forme de tir et plate-forme de tir mettant en oeuvre un tel procédé
WO2006126966A2 (fr) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Systeme et procede permettant d'afficher une cible
WO2006126966A3 (fr) * 2005-05-25 2007-09-20 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Systeme et procede permettant d'afficher une cible
GB2440882A (en) * 2005-05-25 2008-02-13 Bae Systems Bofors Ab System and process for displaying a target
GB2440882B (en) * 2005-05-25 2008-11-19 Bae Systems Bofors Ab System and process for displaying a target
US8624781B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2014-01-07 Bae Systems Bofors Ab System and process for displaying a target
EP2482026B1 (fr) 2011-01-26 2018-05-02 Diehl Defence GmbH & Co. KG Procédé de défense contre l'attaque d'un missile
CN102706217A (zh) * 2012-04-17 2012-10-03 北京理工大学 一种控制多枚导弹攻击角度和攻击时间的方法
CN102706217B (zh) * 2012-04-17 2014-07-02 北京理工大学 一种控制多枚导弹攻击角度和攻击时间的方法
CN102980449A (zh) * 2012-12-25 2013-03-20 北京理工大学 一种多枚导弹协同作战的控制方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE59707722D1 (de) 2002-08-22
EP0852326B1 (fr) 2002-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69829776T2 (de) System und verfahren zur simulation der wirkung flächendeckender waffen
EP0977003A1 (fr) Procédé pour combattre au moins une cible aérienne au moyen d'un groupe de tir, groupe de tir comprenant au moins deux unités de tir et utilisation du groupe de tir
DE69721876T2 (de) Lenkungssystem für Luft-Luft-Flugkörper
EP0852326B1 (fr) Batterie d'armes pour unités de tir anti-aériennes
DE102010005199A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ortsbestimmung eines fliegenden Ziels
DE2650380A1 (de) Verfahren zur endphasenlenkung von ballistischen geschossen
DE102015002737B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bereitstellen eines Scheinzieles zum Schutz eines Fahrzeuges und/oder Objektes vor radargelenkten Suchköpfen
DE3531596C2 (de) Verfahren zum Bekämpfen eines Zieles mit einem Geschütz
DE2912587C1 (de) Feuerleiteinrichtung,insbesondere fuer ein mobiles Flugabwehrsystem
EP0411073A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'amelioration de la precision du tir
EP0547391A1 (fr) Procédé pour élever la probabilité de succès pour une défence anti-aérienne utilisant des projectiles à dispersion télé-commandée
DE102005001558B4 (de) Verfahren zur Überwachung und Steuerung von Abschussvorgängen eines Kampffahrzeugs
DE102017011407A1 (de) System und verfahren zur personenkoordinierten zielfindung eines lenkflugkörpers
EP1314950A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour l'évaluation des erreurs de pointage d'un système d'arme et utilisation du procédé
WO2022083822A1 (fr) Détermination de solution de guidage de tir d'arme d'artillerie
EP3034983B2 (fr) Arme
EP3060872B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'une arme orientable d'un véhicule dans le cadre d'exercices de tir
DE19716025A1 (de) Plattform mit abschießbaren, zielverfolgenden Flugkörpern, insbesondere Kampfflugzeug
EP1450125A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour combattre une cible
DE3837842C1 (en) Method and sensor system for attacking helicopters
EP0862042B1 (fr) Procédé pour la formation d'équipes d'artilleurs, installation pour la mise en oeuvre du procédé et utilisation de cette installation
WO2000057123A1 (fr) Procede de simulation de tir
DE102020007996A1 (de) Fürhrungssystem zur Ausrichtung einer Rohrwaffe
WO2021160498A1 (fr) Procédé pour réduire au minimum les dommages de détonation subis par une embarcation
EP0862041A1 (fr) Procédé et installation pour l'estimation et l'affichage d'une erreur de tir

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI NL

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19980810

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: CH DE FR GB LI NL

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI NL

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: OERLIKON CONTRAVES AG

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010725

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: WEAPON BATTERY FOR ANTI-AIRCRAFT FIRE UNITS

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI NL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59707722

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020822

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: OK PAT AG PATENTE MARKEN LIZENZEN

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20020814

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20030422

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20110721

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 59707722

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 59707722

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 59707722

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE

Effective date: 20120523

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 59707722

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE

Effective date: 20111220

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 59707722

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: RHEINMETALL AIR DEFENCE AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: OERLIKON-CONTRAVES AG, ZUERICH, CH

Effective date: 20120523

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20120726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120726

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 59707722

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130709

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20140721

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20140721

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20140721

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20140721

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 59707722

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20150801

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150731

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160202

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20160331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150731

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150801