WO2019056710A1 - 供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质 - Google Patents

供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质 Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019056710A1
WO2019056710A1 PCT/CN2018/077668 CN2018077668W WO2019056710A1 WO 2019056710 A1 WO2019056710 A1 WO 2019056710A1 CN 2018077668 W CN2018077668 W CN 2018077668W WO 2019056710 A1 WO2019056710 A1 WO 2019056710A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
supplier
suppliers
branch
refers
outsourcing
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2018/077668
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
吴雅诗
Original Assignee
平安科技（深圳）有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 filed Critical 平安科技（深圳）有限公司
Publication of WO2019056710A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019056710A1/zh

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24—Querying
    • G06F16/248—Presentation of query results
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24—Querying
    • G06F16/245—Query processing
    • G06F16/2457—Query processing with adaptation to user needs
    • G06F16/24578—Query processing with adaptation to user needs using ranking

Definitions

  • the present application relates to the field of vendor management, and in particular, to a vendor recommendation method, apparatus, and computer readable storage medium.
  • the present application proposes a vendor recommendation method, apparatus, and computer readable storage medium, which can comprehensively evaluate each supplier according to historical data, and recommend an optimal supplier that meets the requirements to the demand department.
  • the present application proposes a vendor recommendation method, which includes the following steps:
  • the personnel requirements including a plurality of suppliers specified by the user
  • the present application further provides an electronic device, including: a memory, a processor, and a memory recommendation program stored on the processor, the vendor The following steps are implemented when the recommended program is executed by the processor:
  • the personnel requirements including a plurality of suppliers specified by the user
  • the present application further provides a computer readable storage medium having a vendor recommendation program stored thereon, the vendor recommendation program being executable by at least one processor, such as Any of the above vendor recommended methods.
  • the vendor recommendation method, the electronic device and the computer readable storage medium proposed by the present application score each supplier according to historical data in the supplier database, and recommend the compliance to the demand department according to the score level.
  • the demanding department issues the optimal supplier requirements for the personnel requirements.
  • the specified indicators of each supplier can be dynamically displayed to the users of the demand department for reference, and the supplier recommendation efficiency is improved.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an application environment of a preferred embodiment of a vendor recommendation method of the present application
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a hardware architecture of a preferred embodiment of an electronic device of the present application
  • Figure 3 is a comprehensive evaluation form of supplier M
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the vendor recommendation procedure of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic flow chart of a first preferred embodiment of a vendor recommendation method of the present application.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic flow chart of a second preferred embodiment of the vendor recommendation method of the present application.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic flow chart of a third preferred embodiment of the vendor recommendation method of the present application.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an application environment of a preferred embodiment of the vendor recommendation method of the present application.
  • the vendor recommendation method is applied to an electronic device 1 that is connected to one or more clients 3 via a network 2, and the electronic device 1 can access a provider through the network 2.
  • the electronic device 1 is provided with a vendor recommendation program 10 and an outsourcing management system 20, which may be a terminal device having a computing function, such as a server, a smart phone, a tablet computer, a portable computer, a desktop computer, etc., in some embodiments.
  • the server may be a rack server, a blade server, a tower server, or a rack server.
  • the network 2 may be a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and a metropolitan area network (MAN), and may be a wired network or a fiber network. (Optical Fiber Network), can also be a wireless network. In other embodiments, the network 2 may also be a network such as an intranet or an Internet.
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • MAN metropolitan area network
  • Optical Fiber Network can also be a wireless network.
  • the network 2 may also be a network such as an intranet or an Internet.
  • the client 3 can be a desktop computer, a notebook, a tablet computer, a smart phone, a terminal device that can communicate with the electronic device 1 through the network 2, and has a display function, and the client terminal 3 has a client program installed thereon.
  • the department user can access the outsourcing management system 20 through the client.
  • the supplier database 4 includes: the number of outsourcing personnel in each branch office and each department, all historical data of suppliers working with all branches of a group and all branches of each branch, such as the name of each supplier, the type of response demand, and the response. Demand time, recommender information, etc.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a hardware architecture of a preferred embodiment of the electronic device 1 of the present application.
  • the electronic device 1 may include, but is not limited to, a memory 11, a processor 12, a network interface 13, and a communication bus 14.
  • the memory 11 includes at least one type of readable storage medium.
  • the at least one type of readable storage medium may be a non-volatile storage medium such as a flash memory, a hard disk, a multimedia card, a card type memory (eg, SD or DX memory, etc.), a magnetic memory, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, or the like.
  • the memory 11 may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device 1, such as a hard disk of the electronic device 1.
  • the memory 11 may also be an external storage device of the electronic device 1, such as a plug-in hard disk equipped on the electronic device 1, a smart memory card (SMC), and a secure digital ( Secure Digital, SD) cards, flash cards, etc.
  • SMC smart memory card
  • Secure Digital Secure Digital
  • the readable storage medium of the memory 11 is generally used to store a vendor recommendation program 10 installed on the electronic device 1 and various types of data and the like.
  • the memory 11 can also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is about to be output.
  • the processor 12 in some embodiments, may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), microprocessor or other data processing chip for running program code or processing data stored in the memory 11, such as performing vendor recommendations. Program 10 and so on.
  • CPU Central Processing Unit
  • microprocessor or other data processing chip for running program code or processing data stored in the memory 11, such as performing vendor recommendations. Program 10 and so on.
  • the network interface 13 can optionally include a standard wired interface, a wireless interface (such as a WI-FI interface), and is typically used to establish a communication connection between the electronic device 1 and other electronic devices.
  • a standard wired interface such as a WI-FI interface
  • Communication bus 14 is used to implement connection communication between these components.
  • Figure 2 only shows the vendor recommendation device 1 with components 11-14, but it should be understood that not all illustrated components may be implemented, and more or fewer components may be implemented instead. .
  • the electronic device 1 may further include a user interface, and the user interface may include an input unit such as a keyboard, etc., optionally, the user interface may further include a standard wired interface and a wireless interface.
  • the electronic device 1 may further comprise a display, which may also be referred to as a display screen or display unit as appropriate.
  • a display may also be referred to as a display screen or display unit as appropriate.
  • it may be an LED display, a liquid crystal display, a touch liquid crystal display, an OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode) touch sensor, or the like.
  • the display is used to display information processed in the electronic device 1 and a user interface for displaying visualizations.
  • the vendor recommendation program 10 is stored in the memory 11; when the processor 12 executes the vendor recommendation program 10 stored in the memory 11, the following steps are implemented:
  • the solution of the application is described by taking the personnel requirements issued by the demand department as an example. It should be noted that the solution of the present application is not limited to the personnel requirements issued by the demand department, and can also be used for the requirements of the released materials, spare parts and the like. Taking a group as an example, the group includes a number of subsidiaries, each of which includes multiple departments. The group has an outsourcer management system 20 that is used internally. Users of each department publish personnel requirements on the outsourcer management system 20, According to the personnel requirements issued by the demand department, the supplier responds to the outsourcer management system through the client, and recommends the resume to meet the needs of the demand department for the demand department to screen.
  • the user of the department A accesses the outsourcer management system 20 through the client, and issues the personnel requirements on the outsourcer management system 20, for example, the demand position is a JAVA development engineer, and the position demand should be Meet the requirements such as: master's degree, computer related major, 3 years of work experience, under 40 years old, etc. It is understandable that if the department A has a long-term cooperation supplier, users of the department can specify a number of familiar ones ( For example, 10 suppliers), from these 10 suppliers, select the final partner.
  • the electronic device 1 will respond to the historical data of each supplier demand in the supplier database 4 (in response to the demand position in the personnel demand) And respond to the number of positions), search and filter out the 10 suppliers who responded to the demand position in the personnel demand and responded to the position, and then scored the 10 selected suppliers.
  • the historical data of the 10 suppliers specified by department A in the near future (within three months), such as the type of personnel demand response: JAVA development, JAVA testing, front-end development, etc., personnel demand response
  • the historical data and the predetermined scoring rules score the above 10 suppliers. When each demand department determines to hire a person recommended by a supplier, and the person arrives at the post, the demand department will rate the supplier's service. (1 to 10 points), as the basis for subsequent evaluation of the supplier.
  • the predetermined scoring rules include:
  • the number of people is weighted, and the plurality of suppliers are respectively scored in each branch;
  • the scores of the plurality of suppliers in the head office are calculated according to the scores of the plurality of suppliers by the respective branch companies, and the ratio of the outsourcing number of each branch company to the total outsourcing ratio of the head office is used as a weight.
  • the rating formula of the branch company S to the supplier M is:
  • Q s S refers Branch scored supplier
  • N i refers to the departmental outsourcing subsidiary S
  • T i S refers to the total number of branches and departments
  • R i S refers to the branch departments for the last month
  • the rating of supplier M i refers to the various departments of branch S.
  • Q refers to the group's rating of suppliers
  • N j refers to the number of outsourcing of each branch of the group
  • T j refers to the total number of branches of the group
  • Q j refers to the score of the branch of the group to supplier M
  • j refers to the branches of the group.
  • the scores of the above 10 suppliers are continuously calculated, and the ranking is sorted according to the score, and the sorting result is displayed to the user of the demand department A through the first display area of the client display interface. Users of demand department A can click on any of the above 10 suppliers to view the specific content of the supplier.
  • the electronic device 1 calculates the indicators of the supplier M according to the historical data of the supplier M on the supplier M in the supplier database 4 , including the number of demand responses c (the average demand response time, the average demand response time of the supplier), which reflects the supplier M's response efficiency (the indicator is calculated only when the supplier's first recommended resume is returned), reflecting the supplier.
  • the template of the supplier comprehensive evaluation form in the system 20 generates a comprehensive evaluation form of the supplier M (as shown in FIG. 3), and displays the first display area of the client display interface to the user of the demand department A.
  • the system automatically records The total number of demand responses, and the number of responses is recorded according to the required job skills, and saved to the supplier database 4, the calculation formula of some indicators is as follows:
  • W is the average response time needs suppliers M
  • X i is the response time for each requirement
  • Z i each time for the release requirements
  • n is the total number of suppliers demand response M
  • R is the average secondary response time of the supplier M demand
  • R i is the average secondary response time of the single demand
  • n is the total demand response of the supplier M
  • x j is the time when the supplier responds to the demand for the jth time
  • Y j -1 refers to the return time of the resume of the supplier M recommended by the demand department j-1
  • j is the response number of the supplier M to a demand
  • j 2,3,4,5,...
  • the indicators that are fancy are not necessarily the same.
  • the demand department needs to find a suitable outsourcer in a short period of time, then the demand department can choose to view indicators that reflect the efficiency of a supplier's demand response.
  • the user of demand department A chooses to view the indicators reflecting the demand response efficiency of each supplier, responds to the click operation of the selected indicators, and reads each selected indicator from the comprehensive evaluation table of each supplier (demand response times, average demand response)
  • the specific content of time and average demand secondary response time is displayed in the form of one or more presets (column, scatter plot, line graph, etc.) through the second display area of the client display interface.
  • first display area and the second display area represent different positions on the client display interface, the first preset time, the second preset time, a predetermined score rule, and a preset
  • the parameters, rules, and templates that need to be set in advance, such as one or more graphics, can be adjusted by the user according to the actual situation.
  • the electronic device 1 of the present embodiment calculates the content and the score of each indicator according to the historical data of each supplier within a preset time period, and recommends the highest-rated supplier to the demand department according to the level of the score, and selects according to the user of the demand department.
  • the indicator dynamically displays the contents of the corresponding indicators of each supplier to the users in the demand department, so that the users of the demand department can more intuitively understand the specific conditions of each supplier and improve the recommendation efficiency of the supplier.
  • the vendor recommendation program 10 can also be partitioned into one or more modules, one or more modules being stored in the memory 11 and executed by the processor 12 to complete the application.
  • a module as referred to in this application refers to a series of computer program instructions that are capable of performing a particular function.
  • FIG. 4 it is a block diagram of the vendor recommendation program 10 in FIG.
  • the vendor recommendation program 10 can be divided into: a receiving module 110, a computing module 120, and a display module 130.
  • the functions or operating steps implemented by the modules 110-130 are similar to the above, and are not described in detail herein. Illustratively, for example:
  • the receiving module 110 is configured to receive, by the user of the demand department, a personnel requirement issued by the client in the outsourcing management system, where the personnel requirement includes multiple suppliers specified by the user;
  • the calculating module 120 is configured to read, according to the multiple suppliers specified by the user, historical data of the plurality of suppliers in a first preset time from a supplier database, according to the historical data and a predetermined rating. The rules rate the plurality of suppliers;
  • the display module 130 is configured to sort the plurality of suppliers according to the scoring result, and display the sorting result to the user through a first display area of the client display interface.
  • the present application also provides a supplier recommendation method.
  • a supplier recommendation method Referring to Figure 5, there is shown a flow chart of a first preferred embodiment of the vendor recommendation method of the present application. The method can be performed by a device that can be implemented by software and/or hardware.
  • the vendor recommendation method includes:
  • Step S10 Receiving, by the client in the demand department, the personnel requirement issued by the client in the outsourcing management system, where the personnel requirement includes: a requirement position and a requirement that the required position should meet, the requirement includes: a person qualification, a work experience, Title, age, and multiple suppliers specified by the user;
  • Step S20 reading historical data of the plurality of suppliers in a first preset time from the supplier database according to the plurality of suppliers specified by the user, according to the historical data and a predetermined scoring rule. Rate the plurality of suppliers;
  • Step S30 Sort the plurality of suppliers according to the scoring result, and display the sorting result to the user through a first display area of the client display interface.
  • the solution of the application is described by taking the personnel requirements issued by the demand department as an example. It should be noted that the solution of the present application is not limited to the personnel requirements issued by the demand department, and can also be used for the requirements of the released materials, spare parts and the like.
  • a group consists of a number of subordinate companies, each of which includes multiple departments. The group has an outsourcer management system for internal use. Users in each department publish personnel requirements on the outsourcer management system. The suppliers will release according to the demand department. The staff needs to respond to the outsourcer management system through the client, and recommend a resume that meets the needs of the staff to the demand department for screening by the demand department.
  • the user of the department A accesses the outsourcer management system through the client, and issues the personnel requirements on the outsourcer management system.
  • the demand position is a JAVA development engineer, and the position requirement should meet the requirements.
  • master's degree, computer related major, 3 years of work experience, under 40 years old, etc. it can be understood that if the department A has a long-term cooperation supplier, the user of the department can specify a number of familiar (such as 10 Home) suppliers, from which the final suppliers are selected.
  • the user of the demand department A can also not specify the supplier when publishing the personnel demand, then the historical data will be responded to by the supplier demand in the supplier database (responding to the demand position in the personnel demand and responding to the demand) The number of positions), searched and selected 10 suppliers who responded to the demand position in the personnel demand and responded to the number of positions, and then rated the 10 suppliers selected.
  • the historical data of the 10 suppliers specified by department A in the near future are read from the supplier database, such as the type of personnel demand response: JAVA development, JAVA testing, front-end development, etc.
  • the response time of personnel demand, the number of personnel recommended by each supplier in the final interview, the number of employees in the department, the number of confirmed posts, the number of late arrivals and the number of historical violations, each demand department scores the satisfaction of each supplier, using the The above 10 suppliers are scored by historical data and predetermined scoring rules.
  • the demand department determines to hire a person recommended by a supplier, and the person arrives at the post, the demand department will rate the supplier's service ( 1 to 10 points), as a basis for subsequent evaluation of the supplier.
  • the predetermined scoring rules include:
  • the ratio is a weight, and the plurality of suppliers are respectively scored in each branch;
  • the scores of the plurality of suppliers in the head office are calculated according to the scores of the plurality of suppliers by the respective branch companies, and the ratio of the outsourcing number of each branch company to the total outsourcing ratio of the head office is used as a weight.
  • the rating formula of the branch company S to the supplier M is:
  • Q s S refers Branch scored supplier
  • N i refers to the departmental outsourcing subsidiary S
  • T i S refers to the total number of branches and departments
  • R i S refers to the branch departments for the last month
  • the rating of supplier M i refers to the various departments of branch S.
  • Q refers to the group's rating of suppliers
  • N j refers to the number of outsourcing of each branch of the group
  • T j refers to the total number of branches of the group
  • Q j refers to the score of the branch of the group to supplier M
  • j refers to the branches of the group.
  • the scores of the respective suppliers cannot be calculated.
  • the preset scoring rule may be further replaced by: calculating a preset number of indicators of each vendor according to historical data of the first preset time of the multiple suppliers; and based on preset indicators and scores The mapping relationship acquires a preset number of scores corresponding to the preset number of indicators of the plurality of vendors; and, respectively, calculates an average value of the preset number of the plurality of vendors as the scores of the multiple suppliers.
  • the preset quantity indicators include: an average demand response time, an interview pass rate, an arrival rate, an outsourcing staff late arrival rate, and the like, and respectively calculate the content of each indicator.
  • the average demand response time of a supplier is 10 days
  • the outsourcing staff's interview pass rate is 80%
  • the outsourcing staff's arrival rate is 90%
  • the outsourcing staff's late arrival rate is 30%, according to the preset indicators.
  • the mapping relationship of the scores, the score of the average demand response time map with the response within 10 days is determined to be 10 points
  • the score of the 80% interview pass rate map is 8 points
  • the score of 90% of the arrival rate map is 10 points.
  • the score, which is mapped to the 20% outsourcing staff lateness rate is 8 points
  • the average value (9 points) of the plurality of scores corresponding to the above indicators is taken as the final score of the supplier.
  • the scores of the above 10 suppliers are continuously calculated, and the ranking is sorted according to the score, and the sorting result is displayed to the user of the demand department A through the first display area of the client display interface.
  • the supplier recommendation method proposed in this embodiment classifies each supplier according to the historical data of the supplier in the supplier database that meets the user requirements, and recommends the requirements of the personnel required by the demand department to the demand department according to the level of the score. The best supplier.
  • FIG. 6 a flow chart of a second preferred embodiment of the vendor recommendation method of the present application is shown.
  • the vendor recommendation method includes steps S10-S40.
  • the steps S10-S30 are substantially the same as those in the first preferred embodiment, and are not described herein again.
  • Step S40 in response to the user selecting a supplier's click operation on the client display interface, displaying the supplier's comprehensive evaluation form to the user in the first display area of the client display interface, the comprehensive evaluation
  • the table includes the contents of each indicator reflecting the supplier's response efficiency and outsourcing quality.
  • the user of the demand department A may need to know the specific situation of the supplier, and the user can click on any of the above 10 suppliers to view the specific content of the supplier.
  • the user of the demand department A wants to view the specific information of the supplier M, click the supplier M, and calculate the indicators of the supplier M according to the historical data of the supplier M in the supplier database for one month, including reflecting the supply.
  • the response number c of the response efficiency of the quotient M, the average demand response time, and the average response time of the demand (the indicator is calculated only when the supplier's first recommended resume is returned), reflecting the quality of the supplier M outsourcing.
  • the template of the comprehensive evaluation form generates a comprehensive evaluation form of the supplier M (as shown in FIG. 3), and displays the first display area of the client display interface to the user of the demand department A.
  • the system automatically records the total number of demand responses.
  • some indicators are calculated as follows:
  • W is the average response time needs suppliers M
  • X i is the response time for each requirement
  • Z i each time for the release requirements
  • n is the total number of suppliers demand response M
  • R is the average secondary response time of the supplier M demand
  • R i is the average secondary response time of the single demand
  • n is the total demand response of the supplier M
  • x j is the time when the supplier responds to the demand for the jth time
  • Y j -1 refers to the return time of the resume of the supplier M recommended by the demand department j-1
  • j is the response number of the supplier M to a demand
  • j 2,3,4,5,...
  • the vendor recommendation method proposed in this embodiment recommends the optimal supplier that meets the requirements of the personnel required by the demand department according to the level of the score, and can also present a single to the user.
  • the specific situation of the supplier helps the demand department to understand each supplier more intuitively.
  • FIG. 7 a flow chart of a third preferred embodiment of the vendor recommendation method of the present application is shown.
  • the vendor recommendation method includes steps S10, S20, S30, and S50.
  • the steps S10-S30 are substantially the same as those in the first preferred embodiment, and are not described herein again.
  • Step S50 in response to the click operation of the user selecting a plurality of indicators on the client display interface, reading the statistical data corresponding to the plurality of indicators from the supplier database, and calculating the plurality of indicators.
  • the second display area of the client display interface displays the status of each of the plurality of vendors in a preset one or more graphs.
  • the indicators that are fancy are not necessarily the same.
  • the demand department needs to find a suitable outsourcer in a short period of time, then the demand department can choose to view indicators that reflect the efficiency of a supplier's demand response.
  • the user of demand department A chooses to view the indicators reflecting the demand response efficiency of each supplier, responds to the click operation of the selected indicators, and reads each selected indicator from the comprehensive evaluation table of each supplier (demand response times, average demand response)
  • the specific content of time and average demand secondary response time is displayed in the form of one or more presets (column, scatter plot, line graph, etc.) through the second display area of the client display interface.
  • the first display area and the second display area represent different positions on the client display interface, the first preset time, the second preset time, and the predetermined A good scoring rule, a preset one or more graphics, and other parameters, rules, and templates that need to be set in advance, and the user can adjust according to actual conditions.
  • the vendor recommendation method proposed in this embodiment may also dynamically display the specific conditions of multiple vendors' indicators in the form of icons in the form of icons according to the specific needs of the demand department. It makes it easier for demand departments to screen suppliers more efficiently.
  • the present application also provides a computer readable storage medium storing a vendor recommendation program, the vendor recommendation program being executable by at least one processor to cause the at least one processor Perform the following steps:
  • the personnel requirements include: the demand position and the requirements that the demand position should meet, the requirements include: personnel qualifications, work experience, job title, age and The plurality of suppliers specified by the user;
  • Reading according to the plurality of suppliers specified by the user, historical data of the plurality of suppliers in a first preset time from the supplier database, according to the historical data and a predetermined scoring rule Score by multiple vendors;
  • the foregoing embodiment method can be implemented by means of software plus a necessary general hardware platform, and of course, can also be through hardware, but in many cases, the former is better.
  • Implementation Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application, which is essential or contributes to the prior art, may be embodied in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium (such as ROM/RAM, disk,
  • the optical disc includes a number of instructions for causing a terminal device (which may be a mobile phone, a computer, a server, an air conditioner, or a network device, etc.) to perform the methods described in various embodiments of the present application.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)

Abstract

本申请公开了一种供应商推荐方法，该方法包括：接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括用户指定的多个供应商；根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及，按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面展示给所述用户。本申请根据各供应商的历史数据对各个供应商进行综合评价，并向需求部门推荐符合要求的最优供应商。本申请还公开了一种电子装置及计算机可读存储介质。

Description

供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质
本申请要求于2017年9月25日提交中国专利局、申请号为201710875611.4、发明名称为“供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质”的中国专利申请的优先权，其全部内容通过引用结合在申请中。
技术领域
本申请涉及供应商管理领域，尤其涉及一种供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质。
背景技术
随着公司规模扩大，为了保证公司高效运转，不管是人员需求、还是物资需求，与其他供应商的合作不可或缺。规模较大的公司利用外包管理系统对供应商进行管理，然而，外包管理系统中供应商较多，一家公司与多家供应商合作，同时一家供应商也可能为多家公司服务，因此由于信息不对称，了解每家供应商费时费力，并且缺乏数据支撑，需求部门可以选择多家比较了解的供应商作为备选供应商，但难以在第一时间决定选哪家供应商进行合作，容易导致决策失误和资源浪费，甚至会直接影响到企业的战略规划。
因此亟待有一种供应商推荐方法，可以快速高效地向需求部门推荐最优的供应商。
发明内容
有鉴于此，本申请提出一种供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质，能够根据历史数据对各个供应商进行综合评价，并向需求部门推荐符合要求的最优供应商。
首先，为实现上述目的，本申请提出一种供应商推荐方法，该方法包括如下步骤：
接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括用户指定的多个供应商；
根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
此外，为实现上述目的，本申请还提供一种电子装置，该电子装置包括：存储器、处理器，所述存储器上存储有可在所述处理器上运行的供应商推荐程序，所述供应商推荐程序被所述处理器执行时实现如下步骤：
接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括用户指定的多个供应商；
根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
进一步地，为实现上述目的，本申请还提供一种计算机可读存储介质，该计算机可读存储介质上存储有供应商推荐程序，所述供应商推荐程序可被至少一个处理器执行，实现如上述的供应商推荐方法中的任意步骤。
相较于现有技术，本申请所提出的供应商推荐方法、电子装置及计算机可读存储介质，根据供应商数据库中的历史数据对各个供应商进行评分，并按照评分高低向需求部门推荐符合需求部门发布的人员需求要求的最优供应商，同时，还可以根据需求部门用户的选择，向用户动态展示各个供应商的指定指标，供需求部门用户进行参考，提高供应商推荐效率。
附图说明
图1是本申请供应商推荐方法较佳实施例的应用环境示意图；
图2是本申请电子装置较佳实施例的硬件架构示意图；
图3是供应商M的综合评价表；
图4是图2中供应商推荐程序较佳实施例的模块示意图；
图5是本申请供应商推荐方法第一个较佳实施例的流程示意图；
图6是本申请供应商推荐方法第二个较佳实施例的流程示意图；
图7是本申请供应商推荐方法第三个较佳实施例的流程示意图。
本申请目的的实现、功能特点及优点将结合实施例，参照附图做进一步说明。
具体实施方式
应当理解，此处所描述的具体实施例仅用以解释本申请，并不用于限定本申请。基于本申请中的实施例，本领域普通技术人员在没有做出创造性劳动前提下所获得的所有其他实施例，都属于本申请保护的范围。
需要说明的是，各个实施例之间的技术方案可以相互结合，但是必须是以本领域普通技术人员能够实现为基础，当技术方案的结合出现相互矛盾或无法实现时应当认为这种技术方案的结合不存在，也不在本申请要求的保护范围之内。
如图1所示，是本申请供应商推荐方法较佳实施例的应用环境示意图。
在本实施例中，所述供应商推荐方法应用于一种电子装置1，所述电子装置1通过网络2与一个或多个客户端3相连，所述电子装置1可以通过网络2访问供应商数据库4，并与供应商数据库4进行数据传输。
电子装置1上安装有供应商推荐程序10及外包管理系统20，该电子装置1可以是服务器、智能手机、平板电脑、便携计算机、桌上型计算机等具有运 算功能的终端设备，在一些实施例中，所述服务器可以是机架式服务器、刀片式服务器、塔式服务器或机柜式服务器等。
网络2可以为局域网(Local Area Network，LAN)、广域网(Wide Area Network，WAN)和城域网(Metropolitan Area Network，MAN)等等类型的网络2，可以为有线网络(Wired network)，光纤网络(Optical Fiber Network)，也可以为无线网络(wireless network)。在其他实施例中，网络2还可以是企业内部网(Intranet)、互联网(Internet)等网络。
客户端3可以为桌上型计算机、笔记本、平板电脑、智能手机、可以通过网络2与电子装置1进行通信、且具备显示功能的终端设备，所述客户端3上安装有客户端程序，需求部门用户可通过客户端访问外包管理系统20。
供应商数据库4中包括：各分公司、各部门外包人员数量，与某集团所有分公司及各分公司所有部门合作的供应商的所有历史数据，如各供应商的名称、响应需求类型、响应需求时间、推荐人员信息等。
如图2所示，是本申请电子装置1较佳实施例的硬件架构示意图。
本实施例中，电子装置1可包括，但不仅限于，存储器11、处理器12、网络接口13及通信总线14。
其中，存储器11至少包括一种类型的可读存储介质。所述至少一种类型的可读存储介质可为如闪存、硬盘、多媒体卡、卡型存储器(例如，SD或DX存储器等)、磁性存储器、磁盘、光盘等的非易失性存储介质。在一些实施例中，存储器11可以是所述电子装置1的内部存储单元，例如该电子装置1的硬盘。在另一些实施例中，存储器11也可以是所述电子装置1的外部存储设备，例如所述电子装置1上配备的插接式硬盘，智能存储卡(Smart Media Card,SMC)，安全数字(Secure Digital,SD)卡，闪存卡(Flash Card)等。
在本实施例中，所述存储器11的可读存储介质通常用于存储安装于所述电子装置1的供应商推荐程序10及各类数据等。所述存储器11还可以用于暂时地存储已经输出或者将要输出的数据。
处理器12在一些实施例中可以是一中央处理器(Central Processing Unit,CPU)，微处理器或其他数据处理芯片，用于运行存储器11中存储的程序代码或处理数据，例如执行供应商推荐程序10等。
网络接口13可选地可以包括标准的有线接口、无线接口(如WI-FI接口)，通常用于在该电子装置1与其他电子设备之间建立通信连接。
通信总线14用于实现这些组件之间的连接通信。
需要指出的是，图2仅示出了具有组件11-14的供应商推荐装置1，但是应理解的是，并不要求实施所有示出的组件，可以替代的实施更多或者更少的组件。
可选地，该电子装置1还可以包括用户接口，用户接口可以包括输入单元比如键盘(Keyboard)等，可选地用户接口还可以包括标准的有线接口、无线接口。
可选地，该电子装置1还可以包括显示器，显示器也可以适当的称为显 示屏或显示单元。在一些实施例中可以是LED显示器、液晶显示器、触控式液晶显示器以及OLED(Organic Light-Emitting Diode，有机发光二极管)触摸器等。显示器用于显示在电子装置1中处理的信息以及用于显示可视化的用户界面。
在图2所示的装置实施例中，存储器11中存储有供应商推荐程序10；处理器12执行存储器11中存储的供应商推荐程序10时实现如下步骤：
接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统20发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括用户指定的多个供应商；
根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从供应商数据库4中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
本实施例中，以需求部门发布的人员需求为例对本申请的方案进行说明。需要说明的是，本申请的方案并不限于需求部门发布的人员需求，还可用于发布的物料、零配件等的需求。以某集团为例，该集团旗下包括多家下属公司，每个下属公司包括多个部门，该集团有内部使用的外包商管理系统20，各部门用户在外包商管理系统20上发布人员需求，供应商会根据需求部门发布的人员需求，通过客户端在外包商管理系统上进行响应，向需求部门推荐符合人员需求的简历，供需求部门筛选。
当需求部门A有人员需求时，该部门A的用户通过客户端访问外包商管理系统20，并在该外包商管理系统20上发布人员需求，例如，需求职位为JAVA开发工程师，该职位需求应满足要求如：硕士研究生学历、计算机相关专业、3年工作经验、40岁以下等，可以理解的是，若该部门A有长期合作的供应商，该部门的用户可以指定其熟悉的多家(例如10家)供应商，从这10家供应商中挑选出最终合作的供应商。
可以理解的是，需求部门A的用户在发布人员需求时，不会指定供应商，那么，电子装置1将通过供应商数据库4中各供应商需求响应历史数据(响应该人员需求中的需求职位及响应该职位的次数)，搜索并筛选出响应过该人员需求中需求职位，且响应该职位次数靠前的10家供应商，然后对筛选出的10家供应商进行评分。
接下来，从供应商数据库4中读取出部门A指定的10家供应商近期(三个月内)的历史数据，如人员需求响应类型：JAVA开发、JAVA测试、前端开发等，人员需求响应次数，人员需求响应时间，各供应商推荐的人员最终在各部门面试通过人员数、确认到岗数、到岗人员迟到数及历史违规次数，各需求部门对各个供应商的满意度评分，利用该历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对上述10家供应商进行评分，当每个需求部门确定录用某供应商推荐的人员、且该人员到岗后，需求部门会对该供应商的服务进行评分(1～10分)， 作为后续对该供应商评分的依据。其中，所述预先确定的评分规则包括：
从所述供应商数据库4中读取第二预设时间内所述需求部门所属分公司各部门对所述多个供应商的评分，以当前各部门外包人数占各部门所属分公司的总外包人数比率为权重，分别计算所述多个供应商在各个分公司评分；及
根据所述各个分公司对所述多个供应商的评分，以各个分公司外包人数占总公司的总外包人数比率为权重，计算所述多个供应商在所述总公司的评分。
以上述10家供应商中的供应商M为例，该分公司S对供应商M的评分公式为：
Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-000001
其中，Q s指分公司S对供应商的打分，N i指分公司S各部门外包人数，T i指分公司S各部门总人数，R i指分公司S各部门上个月最后一次对供应商M的评分，i指分公司S的各个部门。
然后计算该集团旗下所有分公司对供应商M的评分，公式如下：
Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-000002
其中，Q指该集团对供应商的打分，N j指该集团各分公司外包人数，T j指该集团各分公司总人数，Q j指该集团各分公司对供应商M的评分，j指该集团各分公司。
根据上述公式继续计算得到上述10家供应商的评分后，按照评分高低进行排序，并将排序结果通过客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给需求部门A的用户。需求部门A的用户可点击上述10个供应商中的任意一个供应商，以查看该供应商的具体内容。
具体地，当需求部门A的用户想查看供应商M的具体信息，点击供应商M，电子装置1根据供应商数据库4中供应商M上一个月的历史数据，计算供应商M的各项指标，包括反映供应商M响应效率的需求响应次数c(、平均需求响应时间、需求平均二次响应时间(供应商第一次推荐的人员简历被退回的情况下才计算该指标)，反映供应商M外包质量的外包人员的面试通过率、实际到岗率、迟到率及违规次数m及供应商满意度平均得分(即，上述集团对供应商的评分)等指标，并调用预先存储在外包管理系统20中供应商综合评价表的模板，生成供应商M的综合评价表(如图3所示)，通过客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给需求部门A的用户。其中，系统自动记录需求响应总次数，同时根据需求职位技能细分记录响应次数，并保存至供应商数据库4，部分指标的计算公式如下：
Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-000003
其中，W为供应商M的平均需求响应时间，X i为每个需求的响应时间，Z i为 每个需求的发布时间，n为供应商M响应需求总数；
Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-000004
其中，R为供应商M需求平均二次响应时间，R i为单个需求平均二次响应时间，n为供应商M响应需求总数，x j指供应商第j次响应某需求的时间，Y j-1指需求部门第j-1次退回供应商M推荐人员简历的退回时间，j为供应商M对某需求的响应次数，j＝2,3,4,5，…。
可以理解的是，不同部门在筛选供应商时，看中的指标不一定相同。例如，需求部门需在短时间内找到合适的外包人员，那么该需求部门可以选择查看反映个供应商需求响应效率的指标。当需求部门A的用户选择查看反映各供应商的需求响应效率的指标，响应选择指标的点击操作，并从各个供应商的综合评价表中读取各所选指标(需求响应次数、平均需求响应时间、平均需求二次响应时间)的具体内容，以预设的一个或多个图形(柱状图、散点图、折线图等)的形式，通过客户端显示界面的第二显示区域展示给需求部门A的用户。
需要说明的是，所述第一显示区域和所述第二显示区域表示在客户端显示界面的不同位置，所述第一预设时间、第二预设时间、预先确定好的评分规则、预设的一个或多个图形等需要预先设置的参数、规则、模板，用户可以根据实际情况进行调整。
本实施例提出的电子装置1，根据各供应商预设时间内的历史数据，计算各个指标内容及评分情况，根据评分高低向需求部门推荐评分最高的供应商，同时根据需求部门的用户选择的指标，向需求部门的用户动态展示各供应商的相应指标的内容，便于需求部门的用户更直观地了解各供应商的具体情况，提高供应商的推荐效率。
在其他实施例中，供应商推荐程序10还可以被分割为一个或者多个模块，一个或者多个模块被存储于存储器11中，并由处理器12执行，以完成本申请。本申请所称的模块是指能够完成特定功能的一系列计算机程序指令段。例如，参照图4所示，为图2中供应商推荐程序10的模块示意图。
所述供应商推荐程序10可以被分割为：接收模块110、计算模块120及展示模块130，所述模块110-130所实现的功能或操作步骤均与上文类似，此处不再详述，示例性地，例如其中：
接收模块110，用于接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括用户指定的多个供应商；
计算模块120，用于根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
展示模块130，用于按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
此外，本申请还提供一种供应商推荐方法。参照图5所示，为本申请供应商推荐方法第一个较佳实施例的流程图。该方法可以由一个装置执行，该装置可以由软件和/或硬件实现。
在本实施例中，所述供应商推荐方法包括：
步骤S10，接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统,发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括：需求职位及所述需求职位应满足的要求，所述要求包括：人员学历、工作经验、职称、年龄及所述用户指定的多个供应商；
步骤S20，根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从所述供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
步骤S30，按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
本实施例中，以需求部门发布的人员需求为例对本申请的方案进行说明。需要说明的是，本申请的方案并不限于需求部门发布的人员需求，还可用于发布的物料、零配件等的需求。例如，某集团旗下包括多家下属公司，每个下属公司包括多个部门，该集团有内部使用的外包商管理系统，各部门用户在外包商管理系统上发布人员需求，供应商会根据需求部门发布的人员需求，通过客户端在外包商管理系统上进行响应，向需求部门推荐符合人员需求的简历，供需求部门筛选。
当需求部门A有人员需求时，该部门A的用户通过客户端访问外包商管理系统，并在该外包商管理系统上发布人员需求，例如，需求职位为JAVA开发工程师，该职位需求应满足要求如：硕士研究生学历、计算机相关专业、3年工作经验、40岁以下等，可以理解的是，若该部门A有长期合作的供应商，该部门的用户可以指定其熟悉的多家(例如10家)供应商，从这10家供应商中挑选出最终合作的供应商。
可以理解的是，需求部门A的用户在发布人员需求时，也可以不指定供应商，那么，将通过供应商数据库中各供应商需求响应历史数据(响应该人员需求中的需求职位及响应该职位的次数)，搜索并筛选出响应过该人员需求中需求职位，且响应该职位次数靠前的10家供应商，然后对筛选出的10家供应商进行评分。
接下来，从供应商数据库中读取出部门A指定的10家供应商近期(三个月内)的历史数据，如人员需求响应类型：JAVA开发、JAVA测试、前端开发等，人员需求响应次数，人员需求响应时间，各供应商推荐的人员最终在各部门面试通过人员数、确认到岗数、到岗人员迟到数及历史违规次数，各需求部门对各个供应商的满意度评分，利用该历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对上述10家供应商进行评分，当每个需求部门确定录用某供应商推荐的人员、且该人员到岗后，需求部门会对该供应商的服务进行评分(1～10分)，作为后续对该供应商评分的依据。其中，所述预先确定的评分规则包括：
从所述供应商数据库中读取第二预设时间内所述需求部门所属分公司各部门对所述多个供应商的评分，以当前各部门外包人数占各部门所属分公司的总外包人数比率为权重，分别计算所述多个供应商在各个分公司评分；及
根据所述各个分公司对所述多个供应商的评分，以各个分公司外包人数占总公司的总外包人数比率为权重，计算所述多个供应商在所述总公司的评分。
以上述10家供应商中的供应商M为例，该分公司S对供应商M的评分公式为：
Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-000005
其中，Q s指分公司S对供应商的打分，N i指分公司S各部门外包人数，T i指分公司S各部门总人数，R i指分公司S各部门上个月最后一次对供应商M的评分，i指分公司S的各个部门。
然后计算该集团旗下所有分公司对供应商M的评分，公式如下：
Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-000006
其中，Q指该集团对供应商的打分，N j指该集团各分公司外包人数，T j指该集团各分公司总人数，Q j指该集团各分公司对供应商M的评分，j指该集团各分公司。
可选地，若无法获取第二预设时间内所述需求部门所属分公司各部门对所述多个供应商的评分，则无法计算各个供应商的评分。所述预设的评分规则还可以替换为：根据所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，分别计算各个供应商的预设数量的指标；基于预设的各指标与评分的映射关系获取所述多个供应商预设数量个指标对应的预设数量个评分；及，分别计算多个供应商预设数量个评分的平均值，作为所述多个供应商的评分。
具体地，所述预设数量的指标包括：平均需求响应时间、面试通过率、到岗率、外包人员迟到率等，分别计算各指标内容。例如，某一供应商的平均需求响应时间为10天，外包人员的面试通过率为80％，外包人员的到岗率为90％，外包人员迟到率为30％，根据预设的各指标与评分的映射关系，确定与10天内做出响应的平均需求响应时间映射的评分为10分，与80％的面试通过率映射的评分为8分，与90％的到岗率映射的评分为10分，与20％的外包人员迟到率映射的评分为8分，取上述各指标对应的多个评分的平均值(9分)，作为该供应商的最终评分。
根据上述公式继续计算得到上述10家供应商的评分后，按照评分高低进行排序，并将排序结果通过客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给需求部门A的用户。
本实施例提出的供应商推荐方法，根据满足用户要求的供应商在供应商数据库中的历史数据，对各个供应商进行评分，并按照评分高低向需求部门推荐符合需求部门发布的人员需求要求的最优供应商。
参照图6所示，为本申请供应商推荐方法第二个较佳实施例的流程图。
在本实施例中，所述供应商推荐方法包括步骤S10-S40。其中，步骤S10-S30与第一个较佳实施例中内容大致相同，这里不再赘述。
步骤S40，响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面选择供应商的点击操作，在所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域向所述用户展示该供应商的综合评价表，所述综合评价表中包括反映该供应商响应效率及外包质量的各个指标内容。
可以理解的是，需求部门A的用户可能需要了解供应商的具体情况，用户可通过点击上述10个供应商中的任意一个供应商，以查看该供应商的具体内容。
具体地，当需求部门A的用户想查看供应商M的具体信息，点击供应商M，根据供应商数据库中供应商M上一个月的历史数据，计算供应商M的各项指标，包括反映供应商M响应效率的需求响应次数c(、平均需求响应时间、需求平均二次响应时间(供应商第一次推荐的人员简历被退回的情况下才计算该指标)，反映供应商M外包质量的外包人员的面试通过率、实际到岗率、迟到率及违规次数m及供应商满意度平均得分(即，上述集团对供应商的评分)等指标，并调用预先存储在外包管理系统中供应商综合评价表的模板，生成供应商M的综合评价表(如图3所示)，通过客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给需求部门A的用户。其中，系统自动记录需求响应总次数，同时根据需求职位技能细分记录响应次数，并保存至供应商数据库，部分指标的计算公式如下：
Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-000007
其中，W为供应商M的平均需求响应时间，X i为每个需求的响应时间，Z i为每个需求的发布时间，n为供应商M响应需求总数；
Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-000008
其中，R为供应商M需求平均二次响应时间，R i为单个需求平均二次响应时间，n为供应商M响应需求总数，x j指供应商第j次响应某需求的时间，Y j-1指需求部门第j-1次退回供应商M推荐人员简历的退回时间，j为供应商M对某需求的响应次数，j＝2,3,4,5，…。
相较于第一个较佳实施例，本实施例提出的供应商推荐方法，按照评分高低向需求部门推荐符合需求部门发布的人员需求要求的最优供应商，同时，还可以向用户展示单个供应商的具体情况，有助于需求部门更直观地了解各供应商。
参照图7所示，为本申请供应商推荐方法第三个较佳实施例的流程图。
在本实施例中，所述供应商推荐方法包括步骤S10、S20、S30及S50。 其中，步骤S10-S30与第一个较佳实施例中内容大致相同，这里不再赘述。
步骤S50，响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面上选择多个指标的点击操作，从所述供应商数据库中读取所述多个指标对应的统计数据计算所述多个指标，在所述客户端显示界面的第二显示区域，以预设的一个或多个图形展示所述多个供应商的各指标的情况。
可以理解的是，不同部门在筛选供应商时，看中的指标不一定相同。例如，需求部门需在短时间内找到合适的外包人员，那么该需求部门可以选择查看反映个供应商需求响应效率的指标。当需求部门A的用户选择查看反映各供应商的需求响应效率的指标，响应选择指标的点击操作，并从各个供应商的综合评价表中读取各所选指标(需求响应次数、平均需求响应时间、平均需求二次响应时间)的具体内容，以预设的一个或多个图形(柱状图、散点图、折线图等)的形式，通过客户端显示界面的第二显示区域展示给需求部门A的用户。
需要说明的是，上述各实施例中，所述第一显示区域和所述第二显示区域表示在客户端显示界面的不同位置，所述第一预设时间、第二预设时间、预先确定好的评分规则、预设的一个或多个图形等需要预先设置的参数、规则、模板，用户可以根据实际情况进行调整。
相较于上述两个实施例，本实施例提出的供应商推荐方法，还可以根据需求部门的具体需要，向需求部门的用户以图标的形式，动态展示多个供应商各指标的具体情况，便于需求部门更高效地筛选供应商。
此外，本申请还提供一种计算机可读存储介质，所述计算机可读存储介质存储有供应商推荐程序，所述供应商推荐程序可被至少一个处理器执行，以使所述至少一个处理器执行以下步骤：
接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括：需求职位及所述需求职位应满足的要求，所述要求包括：人员学历、工作经验、职称、年龄及所述用户指定的多个供应商；
根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从所述供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
本申请之计算机可读存储介质的具体实施方式与上述供应商推荐方法的具体实施方式大致相同，在此不再赘述。
上述本申请实施例序号仅仅为了描述，不代表实施例的优劣。
通过以上的实施方式的描述，本领域的技术人员可以清楚地了解到上述实施例方法可借助软件加必需的通用硬件平台的方式来实现，当然也可以通过硬件，但很多情况下前者是更佳的实施方式。基于这样的理解，本申请的 技术方案本质上或者说对现有技术做出贡献的部分可以以软件产品的形式体现出来，该计算机软件产品存储在一个存储介质(如ROM/RAM、磁碟、光盘)中，包括若干指令用以使得一台终端设备(可以是手机，计算机，服务器，空调器，或者网络设备等)执行本申请各个实施例所述的方法。
以上仅为本申请的优选实施例，并非因此限制本申请的专利范围，凡是利用本申请说明书及附图内容所作的等效结构或等效流程变换，或直接或间接运用在其他相关的技术领域，均同理包括在本申请的专利保护范围内。

Claims (20)

  1. 一种供应商推荐方法，应用于电子装置，其特征在于，该方法包括如下步骤：
    接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括用户指定的多个供应商；
    根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
    按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
  2. 如权利要求1所述的供应商推荐方法，其特征在于，所述预先确定的评分规则包括：
    从所述供应商数据库中读取第二预设时间内所述需求部门所属分公司各部门对所述多个供应商的评分，以当前各部门外包人数占各部门所属分公司的总外包人数比率为权重，分别计算所述多个供应商在各个分公司评分，公式如下：
    Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-100001
    其中，Q j指分公司对供应商的打分，N i指分公司各部门外包人数，T i指分公司各部门总人数，R i指分公司各部门上个月最后一次对供应商M的评分，i指分公司的各个部门；及
    根据所述各个分公司对所述多个供应商的评分，以各个分公司外包人数占总公司的总外包人数比率为权重，计算所述多个供应商在所述总公司的评分，公式如下：
    Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-100002
    其中，Q指总公司对供应商的打分，N j指各分公司外包人数，T j指各分公司总人数，Q j指各分公司对供应商M的评分，j指总公司旗下的各分公司。
  3. 如权利要求1所述的供应商推荐方法，其特征在于，该方法还包括以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面选择供应商的点击操作，在所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域向所述用户展示该供应商的综合评价表，所述综合评价表中包括反映该供应商响应效率及外包质量的各个指标内容。
  4. 如权利要求2所述的供应商推荐方法，其特征在于，该方法还包括以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面选择供应商的点击操作，在所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域向所述用户展示该供应商的综合评价表，所述 综合评价表中包括反映该供应商响应效率及外包质量的各个指标内容。
  5. 如权利要求1所述的供应商推荐方法，其特征在于，该方法还包括以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面上选择多个指标的点击操作，从所述供应商数据库中读取所述多个指标对应的统计数据计算所述多个指标，在所述客户端显示界面的第二显示区域，以预设的一个或多个图形展示所述多个供应商的各指标的情况。
  6. 如权利要求2所述的供应商推荐方法，其特征在于，该方法还包括以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面上选择多个指标的点击操作，从所述供应商数据库中读取所述多个指标对应的统计数据计算所述多个指标，在所述客户端显示界面的第二显示区域，以预设的一个或多个图形展示所述多个供应商的各指标的情况。
  7. 如权利要求2或4或6所述的供应商推荐方法，其特征在于，所述预先确定的评分规则可以替换为：
    根据所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，分别计算各个供应商的预设数量的指标；
    基于预设的各指标与评分的映射关系获取所述多个供应商预设数量个指标对应的预设数量个评分；及
    分别计算多个供应商预设数量个评分的平均值，作为所述多个供应商的评分。
  8. 一种电子装置，其特征在于，该装置包括存储器、处理器，所述存储器上存储有可在所述处理器上运行的供应商推荐程序，所述供应商推荐程序被所述处理器执行时实现如下步骤：
    接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括用户指定的多个供应商；
    根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
    按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
  9. 如权利要求8所述的电子装置，其特征在于，所述预先确定的评分规则包括：
    从所述供应商数据库中读取第二预设时间内所述需求部门所属分公司各部门对所述多个供应商的评分，以当前各部门外包人数占各部门所属分公司的总外包人数比率为权重，分别计算所述多个供应商在各个分公司评分，公式如下：
    Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-100003
    其中，Q j指分公司对供应商的打分，N i指分公司各部门外包人数，T i指分公司各部门总人数，R i指分公司各部门上个月最后一次对供应商M的评分，i指分公司的各个部门；及
    根据所述各个分公司对所述多个供应商的评分，以各个分公司外包人数占总公司的总外包人数比率为权重，计算所述多个供应商在所述总公司的评分，公式如下：
    Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-100004
    其中，Q指总公司对供应商的打分，N j指各分公司外包人数，T j指各分公司总人数，Q j指各分公司对供应商M的评分，j指总公司旗下的各分公司。
  10. 如权利要求8所述的电子装置，其特征在于，所述供应商推荐程序被处理器时，还执行以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面选择供应商的点击操作，在所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域向所述用户展示该供应商的综合评价表，所述综合评价表中包括反映该供应商响应效率及外包质量的各个指标内容。
  11. 如权利要求9所述的电子装置，其特征在于，所述供应商推荐程序被处理器时，还执行以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面选择供应商的点击操作，在所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域向所述用户展示该供应商的综合评价表，所述综合评价表中包括反映该供应商响应效率及外包质量的各个指标内容。
  12. 如权利要求8所述的电子装置，其特征在于，所述供应商推荐程序被处理器时，还执行以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面上选择多个指标的点击操作，从所述供应商数据库中读取所述多个指标对应的统计数据计算所述多个指标，在所述客户端显示界面的第二显示区域，以预设的一个或多个图形展示所述多个供应商的各指标的情况。
  13. 如权利要求9所述的电子装置，其特征在于，所述供应商推荐程序被处理器时，还执行以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面上选择多个指标的点击操作，从所述供应商数据库中读取所述多个指标对应的统计数据计算所述多个指标，在所述客户端显示界面的第二显示区域，以预设的一个或多个图形展示所述多个供应商的各指标的情况。
  14. 如权利要求9或11或13所述的电子装置，其特征在于，所述预先确定的评分规则可以替换为：
    根据所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，分别计算各个供应商的预设数量的指标；
    基于预设的各指标与评分的映射关系获取所述多个供应商预设数量个指标对应的预设数量个评分；及
    分别计算多个供应商预设数量个评分的平均值，作为所述多个供应商的评分。
  15. 一种计算机可读存储介质，所述计算机可读存储介质存储有供应商推荐程序，所述供应商推荐程序可被至少一个处理器执行，以实现如下步骤：
    接收需求部门的用户通过客户端在外包管理系统发布的人员需求，所述人员需求包括用户指定的多个供应商；
    根据所述用户指定的多个供应商，从供应商数据库中读取所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，按照所述历史数据及预先确定的评分规则对所述多个供应商进行评分；及
    按照所述评分结果对所述多个供应商进行排序，并将所述排序结果通过所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域展示给所述用户。
  16. 如权利要求15所述的计算机可读存储介质，其特征在于，所述预先确定的评分规则包括：
    从所述供应商数据库中读取第二预设时间内所述需求部门所属分公司各部门对所述多个供应商的评分，以当前各部门外包人数占各部门所属分公司的总外包人数比率为权重，分别计算所述多个供应商在各个分公司评分，公式如下：
    Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-100005
    其中，Q j指分公司对供应商的打分，N i指分公司各部门外包人数，T i指分公司各部门总人数，R i指分公司各部门上个月最后一次对供应商M的评分，i指分公司的各个部门；及
    根据所述各个分公司对所述多个供应商的评分，以各个分公司外包人数占总公司的总外包人数比率为权重，计算所述多个供应商在所述总公司的评分，公式如下：
    Figure PCTCN2018077668-appb-100006
    其中，Q指总公司对供应商的打分，N j指各分公司外包人数，T j指各分公司总人数，Q j指各分公司对供应商M的评分，j指总公司旗下的各分公司。
  17. 如权利要求15所述的计算机可读存储介质，其特征在于，所述供应商推荐程序被处理器时，还执行以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面选择供应商的点击操作，在所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域向所述用户展示该供应商的综合评价表，所述综合评价表中包括反映该供应商响应效率及外包质量的各个指标内容。
  18. 如权利要求16所述的计算机可读存储介质，其特征在于，所述供应商推荐程序被处理器时，还执行以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面选择供应商的点击操作，在所述客户端显示界面的第一显示区域向所述用户展示该供应商的综合评价表，所述 综合评价表中包括反映该供应商响应效率及外包质量的各个指标内容。
  19. 如权利要求16或17所述的计算机可读存储介质，其特征在于，所述供应商推荐程序被处理器时，还执行以下步骤：
    响应所述用户在所述客户端显示界面上选择多个指标的点击操作，从所述供应商数据库中读取所述多个指标对应的统计数据计算所述多个指标，在所述客户端显示界面的第二显示区域，以预设的一个或多个图形展示所述多个供应商的各指标的情况。
  20. 如权利要求16或18所述的计算机可读存储介质，其特征在于，所述预先确定的评分规则可以替换为：
    根据所述多个供应商第一预设时间内的历史数据，分别计算各个供应商的预设数量的指标；
    基于预设的各指标与评分的映射关系获取所述多个供应商预设数量个指标对应的预设数量个评分；及
    分别计算多个供应商预设数量个评分的平均值，作为所述多个供应商的评分。
PCT/CN2018/077668 2017-09-25 2018-02-28 供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质 WO2019056710A1 (zh)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710875611.4A CN108415921B (zh) 2017-09-25 2017-09-25 供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质
CN201710875611.4 2017-09-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019056710A1 true WO2019056710A1 (zh) 2019-03-28

Family

ID=63125165

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2018/077668 WO2019056710A1 (zh) 2017-09-25 2018-02-28 供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108415921B (zh)
WO (1) WO2019056710A1 (zh)

Families Citing this family (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110990442B (zh) * 2018-09-30 2023-08-25 北京国双科技有限公司 一种供需双方择优选择的方法及装置
CN109544092A (zh) * 2018-10-11 2019-03-29 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于数据分析选择供应商的方法、装置和计算机设备
CN109523340A (zh) * 2018-10-11 2019-03-26 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于大数据的供应商能力的参考方法、装置、计算机设备
CN109544088A (zh) * 2018-10-11 2019-03-29 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于数据分析选择供应商的方法、装置和计算机设备
CN109492988B (zh) * 2018-10-11 2023-07-21 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 简历限制推送方法、装置、计算机设备和存储介质
CN109615161A (zh) * 2018-10-23 2019-04-12 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 供应商积极性判断的数据处理方法、装置和计算机设备
CN109583692A (zh) * 2018-10-23 2019-04-05 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于网络监控的外包风险管控方法、装置及计算机设备
CN109558428A (zh) * 2018-10-23 2019-04-02 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 基于数据排序选择供应商的方法、装置和计算机设备
CN109584030A (zh) * 2018-10-31 2019-04-05 平安直通咨询有限公司 机构推荐方法、装置及存储介质
CN109858865A (zh) * 2018-11-09 2019-06-07 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 智能获取差别对待用人部门的方法、装置和计算机设备
CN109543104A (zh) * 2018-11-14 2019-03-29 深圳市云歌人工智能技术有限公司 确定服务提供方的方法、系统以及存储介质
CN109800951A (zh) * 2018-12-17 2019-05-24 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 评估简历质量的方法、装置、计算机设备和存储介质
CN109840801A (zh) * 2018-12-26 2019-06-04 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 对供应商进行排名的方法、装置、计算机设备和存储介质
CN109816311A (zh) * 2019-01-22 2019-05-28 浙江数链科技有限公司 物流承运商推荐方法和装置
CN110297857A (zh) * 2019-07-05 2019-10-01 刘大谋 一种智能化用户终端服务平台及展示方法
CN110389964A (zh) * 2019-07-17 2019-10-29 邢吉龙 环保工程方案自动化设计系统及设计方法
CN110689219A (zh) * 2019-08-16 2020-01-14 中国平安财产保险股份有限公司 基于大数据的用户行为评价展示方法、装置、设备及介质
CN110795633A (zh) * 2019-10-31 2020-02-14 中电工业互联网有限公司 一种smt厂商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质
CN111814056A (zh) * 2020-07-31 2020-10-23 平安金融管理学院(中国·深圳) 基于信息处理的供应商推荐方法及相关设备
CN112016958B (zh) * 2020-08-18 2024-03-22 中移（杭州）信息技术有限公司 产品选择方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
CN112184499A (zh) * 2020-10-15 2021-01-05 上海航天计算机技术研究所 基于多系统协作的合同生成方法和系统
CN112308406B (zh) * 2020-10-29 2024-06-11 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 数据排序方法、装置、设备及计算机可读存储介质
CN112948667A (zh) * 2021-02-03 2021-06-11 北京优易惠技术有限公司 一种基于招投标的供应商推荐系统及方法
CN113434560A (zh) * 2021-05-28 2021-09-24 深圳思为科技有限公司 排序方法、电子设备及相关产品
CN113283880A (zh) * 2021-06-22 2021-08-20 新奥数能科技有限公司 一种子企业获取代运维商的方法和装置
CN113592407B (zh) * 2021-08-10 2022-03-29 深圳职业技术学院 一种商品售卖及配送方法和系统
CN113837793A (zh) * 2021-08-25 2021-12-24 杭州杰牌传动科技有限公司 一种供应商推荐方法、装置、存储介质及终端
CN114066063A (zh) * 2021-11-18 2022-02-18 安徽达尔智能控制系统股份有限公司 一种出租车网约车信号交互方法、系统

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140114729A1 (en) * 2012-10-18 2014-04-24 Tata Consultancy Services Limited Assessing outsourcing engagements
CN104299085A (zh) * 2014-10-13 2015-01-21 宁波高新区阶梯科技有限公司 一种服务外包管理的协作平台和方法
CN105956896A (zh) * 2016-04-15 2016-09-21 郑州悉知信息科技股份有限公司 一种采购方法、服务器及终端设备
CN107171843A (zh) * 2017-05-23 2017-09-15 上海海事大学 一种理想云服务提供商的选择方法及系统

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1691025A (zh) * 2004-04-29 2005-11-02 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 供应商绩效评核管理系统及方法
US9959353B2 (en) * 2015-04-28 2018-05-01 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Determining a company rank utilizing on-line social network data
CN106504015A (zh) * 2016-10-17 2017-03-15 鞍钢集团矿业有限公司 一种结合bp神经网络的企业领域供应商推荐方法
CN106709670A (zh) * 2017-01-21 2017-05-24 北方民族大学 一种自控阀企业配件供应商排序方法
CN107045674A (zh) * 2017-03-31 2017-08-15 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 基于可量化指标体系的供应商评价方法

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140114729A1 (en) * 2012-10-18 2014-04-24 Tata Consultancy Services Limited Assessing outsourcing engagements
CN104299085A (zh) * 2014-10-13 2015-01-21 宁波高新区阶梯科技有限公司 一种服务外包管理的协作平台和方法
CN105956896A (zh) * 2016-04-15 2016-09-21 郑州悉知信息科技股份有限公司 一种采购方法、服务器及终端设备
CN107171843A (zh) * 2017-05-23 2017-09-15 上海海事大学 一种理想云服务提供商的选择方法及系统

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108415921A (zh) 2018-08-17
CN108415921B (zh) 2021-08-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2019056710A1 (zh) 供应商推荐方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质
US11853935B2 (en) Automated recommendations for task automation
US11182401B1 (en) Digital processing systems and methods for multi-board mirroring with automatic selection in collaborative work systems
WO2019091103A1 (zh) 简历筛选方法、电子装置及可读存储介质
Ellis et al. Value management practices of leading UK cost consultants
US8977615B2 (en) Zoom interface component for integrated rating system
US20080319782A1 (en) Methods of collecting and visualizing group information
US20150161555A1 (en) Scheduling tasks to operators
US20160098666A1 (en) Transferring Employees in Operational Workforce Planning
US20180293525A1 (en) Store service workbench
US20160098653A1 (en) Risk Analysis to Improve Operational Workforce Planning
KR102194683B1 (ko) 법률 상담 스케쥴 관리 방법 및 장치
US20140164044A1 (en) Use of enhanced user status to facilitate document workflow solutions
Wijnhoven et al. Reducing waste in administrative services with lean principles
US20160098668A1 (en) Operational Workforce Planning
JPH1011498A (ja) 営業マネジメント支援システム
Jansen-Vullers et al. Quantifying the performance of workflows
US20190266544A1 (en) Techniques for managing process-flows across an enterprise
CN111191999A (zh) 产品研发管理方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
US11113322B2 (en) Dynamically generating strategic planning datasets based on collecting, aggregating, and filtering distributed data collections
JP2003331113A (ja) ビジネスプロセスの自律改善システム及び方法
JP2006172329A (ja) 業務実績評価システム、及び業務実績評価プログラム
US20230351325A1 (en) Parts procurement support device, parts procurement support system, and parts procurement support method
US20240220997A1 (en) Computerized-method and real-time information sharing (rtis) platform for maintaining a dynamic knowledge base
KR20140100596A (ko) 신뢰도에 따른 건설정보 통합 제공 시스템 및 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18857603

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

32PN Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established

Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205A DATED 21/09/2020)

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18857603

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1