WO2005103757A1 - Blindspot-sensorsystem - Google Patents
Blindspot-sensorsystem Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2005103757A1 WO2005103757A1 PCT/EP2005/051699 EP2005051699W WO2005103757A1 WO 2005103757 A1 WO2005103757 A1 WO 2005103757A1 EP 2005051699 W EP2005051699 W EP 2005051699W WO 2005103757 A1 WO2005103757 A1 WO 2005103757A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- blind spot
- sensor system
- radar
- fmcw
- spot sensor
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/02—Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
- G01S13/06—Systems determining position data of a target
- G01S13/08—Systems for measuring distance only
- G01S13/32—Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/9315—Monitoring blind spots
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/9327—Sensor installation details
- G01S2013/93274—Sensor installation details on the side of the vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/88—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
- G01S13/93—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
- G01S13/931—Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of land vehicles
- G01S2013/9327—Sensor installation details
- G01S2013/93275—Sensor installation details in the bumper area
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a blind spot sensor system for the detection and / or classification of objects in a defined monitoring area of a motor vehicle by means of radar technology, comprising at least a first means for transmitting a first radar beam and a second means for transmitting a second radar beam.
- Another solution is to detect the relevant objects using sensors and to inform the driver based on the processed sensor information.
- the sensors used for this differ in the physical detection principles and their measured object properties. Solutions based on infrared laser diodes, camera-based solutions with appropriate image processing or radar-based systems are known.
- the different sensors have different advantages and disadvantages that are relevant for the application and must be taken into account when designing a blind spot system.
- boundary conditions such as system integration, system monitoring area, price, performance, etc. must be taken into account.
- Road users who actively participate in road traffic are classified as relevant for a blind spot system.
- Static objects and objects that do not actively participate in road traffic are not considered relevant by the blind spot system. If there is a relevant object within the surveillance area, a blind spot system should signal this. On the other hand, if the object is not relevant, there should be no system reaction.
- the monitoring area in which the objects are to be recognized, is typically defined by a zone starting behind the exterior mirror of a vehicle (cf., highlighted area in FIG. 1). This zone sweeps over the adjacent lane and extends up to a maximum distance behind the vehicle equipped with a blind spot system.
- the monitoring area covers the "blind spot" of the exterior mirrors of the vehicle.
- the vehicle that is to say the right and left wing mirrors, with such a blind spot system, since said problems can occur both when changing lanes to the left lane and to the right lane.
- the classification of a detected object as relevant or irrelevant can, among other things, preferably depend on the state of motion of the object relative to the vehicle.
- a vehicle equipped with a blind spot system (referred to as "host car” in FIG. 2 and the other figures) moves in a coordinate system along the x-axis with positive speed, then objects are - as exemplified in FIG 3 - to be classified as relevant or irrelevant, the speeds v 0 and i mentioned there being application quantities in each case.
- the system functionality of a "blind spot monitoring” application thus consists in informing the driver of a motor vehicle of the existence of a relevant object to be warned on an adjacent lane in the area that is difficult for the driver to see, to the side behind and next to his own vehicle, i.e. within the monitoring area defined above.
- the intention of the system function is therefore to assist the driver, especially during a lane change process.
- Typical use cases of a "blind spot monitoring" system are described below and the desired system reaction is illustrated.
- the vehicle equipped with a blind spot system (each shown in dark) is on a multi-lane roadway and is overtaken by a vehicle (each shown in light) in the left lane.
- Figures 4.1. until 4.6. indicate the chronological sequence of the scenario, the activated or deactivated "warning lamps" above the individual figures representing a preferably desired system reaction.
- the object to be detected enters the monitoring area in the direction of travel from behind, remains in the area for a certain time and then leaves it in the direction of travel to the front.
- Objects entering the surveillance area from behind can therefore cause a short system reaction time.
- FIG. 5 shows a further application, namely the overtaking process in the right lane.
- the vehicle equipped with a blind spot system (shown in dark in FIGS. 5.1 to 5.6) drives past a relevant object on the right (for example, a moving vehicle - shown in light) that is in the left neighboring lane.
- the relevant object enters the monitoring area from the front in the direction of travel.
- a warning only makes sense if the overtaken vehicle is in the monitoring area for a certain minimum time.
- Another scenario in which blind spot functionality is desirable is the case in which a relevant object approaches the monitoring area to the side (cf. FIG. 6).
- a vehicle equipped with a blind spot system (“host car”) is overtaken by an object on the track after the next. Since there is no relevant object in the surveillance area at any time, a blind spot system should not emit any warning impulse when determining the horizontal position of the surveillance area.
- a blind spot surveillance system should also not issue a warning, since there is again no relevant object in the surveillance area.
- Another scenario that can occur frequently is the case in which an irrelevant object enters the monitoring area of the "blind spot detection" system.
- FIG. 9 shows the approach to a roadway or road boundary, that is to say to a static object such as that of a guardrail or a wall.
- a blind spot system should be able to detect the road boundary and classify it as irrelevant, to carry out an object classification. Again, a warning should not be generated in such a scenario.
- the object of the invention is to provide a blind spot sensor system that meets the requirements mentioned at the beginning.
- the blind spot sensor system should:
- a classification of the driving environment of the vehicle can optionally be useful for the system function.
- the required performance must be designed in such a way that false alarm and false alarm rates are kept within a tolerable range.
- blind spot sensor system should be suitable for the automotive environment; meet the usual requirements regarding robustness, infrastructure, environmental conditions, size, integrability, etc.
- the invention is based on generic blind spot sensor systems for the detection and / or classification of objects in a defined monitoring area of a motor vehicle, comprising at least a first means for emitting a first radar beam and a second means for emitting a second radar beam, in that the radial field of view of the first radar beam (beam I) is inclined towards the direction of travel (v x ) of the motor vehicle and the radial field of view of the second radar beam (beam II) is oriented essentially perpendicular to the direction of travel (v x ) in such a way that the fields of vision the radar beams (I and II) overlap at least partially and together cover essentially the dimensions of the surveillance area; wherein at least the first radar beam (beam I) can be operated both in the CW and in the FMCW modulation mode.
- the implementation of a blind spot sensor system with at least two, in some cases specially operated, radar sensors has the following particularly relevant advantages:
- a high detection probability for the objects to be detected (trucks, cars, crash barriers, etc.), which have an adequate structure and at least largely consist of metal;
- radar sensors can also be installed invisibly behind "transparent" materials such as plastics, etc. for radar beams, and also have proven robustness and infrastructure, the present invention is particularly suitable as an application in modern motor vehicles.
- the CW and FMCW modulation modes alternate sequentially.
- several FMCW modulation modes alternate with at least one CW modulation mode, in particular five FMCW modes to form one CW mode.
- FMCW modulation modes be followed by at least two CW modulation modes, preferably five FMCW to two CW modes.
- the means for emitting the first and second radar beams are implemented by a 2-beam sensor.
- the advantage of close-range communication is offset by the disadvantage of relatively large installation spaces.
- 1-beam sensors can be combined in any way.
- the first radar beam (beam I) expediently has a width of 30 ° to 50 °, in particular 40 ° and a tilt to the longitudinal axis of the motor vehicle of 2 ° to 13 °, in particular 5 ° or 10 °
- the second radar beam (beam II ) a width of 70 ° to 140 °, in particular of 80 ° or 130 ° and a tilt to the longitudinal axis of the motor vehicle of 2 ° to 53 °, in particular of 5 °, 20 ° or 50 °.
- the present invention is particularly suitable for the detection and / or classification of objects in a defined monitoring area of a motor vehicle.
- FIG. 1 shows the typical monitoring area of a "blind spot monitoring system
- FIG. 10 shows the exemplary arrangement of two partially overlapping viewing areas of the radar sensors of a "blind spot monitoring" system according to the invention
- 16 shows object recognition and positioning when approaching from behind; 17 shows the FMCW peaks in beam I corresponding to the scenario shown in FIG. 14;
- 21 shows the detected object speed and object distance in the beams I + II during the motorway scenario according to FIG. 14;
- FIG. 23 shows the radar signals corresponding to the scenario shown in FIG. 22 when approaching a guardrail and approaching a truck;
- 25 shows the radar signals corresponding to the scenario shown in FIG. 24 when driving past a guardrail and driving in parallel with a car;
- 26 shows the classification of objects that enter the monitoring area from the front
- FIG. 30 shows the radar signals corresponding to the scenario shown in FIG. 29 when approaching a guardrail
- FIG. 31 shows the individual FMCW spectra of the viewing area in beam II in the guardrail scenario according to FIG. 29;
- 35 shows the individual FMCW spectra of the viewing area in beam II in the guardrail-concrete wall scenario according to FIG. 33;
- 36 shows the individual FMCW spectra of the visual range in beam I in the guardrail-concrete wall scenario according to FIG. 33;
- FIG. 38 shows the radar signals corresponding to the scenario shown in FIG. 14, in which the vehicle is overtaken by a truck with a trailer in the adjacent lane.
- Beam I covers a sector of approximately 40 ° in the horizontal plane of the adjacent lane. It is tilted about 10 ° with respect to the longitudinal direction of the vehicle. Beam II has a sector of approximately 130 ° and is oriented perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the vehicle.
- the surveillance area to be covered, in which the objects are to be detected and classified, is highlighted.
- the beam widths and beam orientations selected here are based on the desired monitoring area ( sets) designed.
- a differently defined monitoring area would require an adjustment of the beam width and beam orientation.
- the basic design and configuration of the two beam areas would be the same. It is necessary in order to be able to use the strategies / solutions of the partial requirements for signal evaluation described below.
- the proposed sensor system is based on the preferred use of 24 GHz, possibly also 77 GHz, radar sensors. Radar radiation with a corresponding wavelength of a few millimeters has the advantageous property of being able to pass through a large number of plastic materials without any noticeable influence. Since the majority of motor vehicle bumpers are currently made of plastic, this offers the possibility of installing the blind spot sensor system according to the invention behind the rear bumper. It is therefore invisible and protected from external influences such as stone chips. At the same time, this is a not inconsiderable advantage in system integration compared to other sensor concepts such as video, infrared, laser.
- the required field of view of the radar beams allows both a two-beam sensor and two single-beam sensors to be used.
- the first variant has the clear advantage that only one housing with the appropriate infrastructure is required. However, the required field of view then places narrow limits on the installation location of the sensor.
- FIG. 11 shows typical installation situations for the proposed sensor configuration.
- This sensor configuration was primarily chosen for two reasons.
- the system should e.g. can be integrated into a car.
- the required antenna area limits the dimensions of the sensor. For example, for a two-beam sensor shown in FIG. 11.1 with the field of view shown in FIG. 10, the antenna area required is approximately 150 ⁇ 60 mm. Due to the required alignment of the sensor and its size, there are only limited suitable locations in a conventional car.
- Sensor system. 12.1 shows the classic arrangement known from the prior art with only one radar beam.
- Fig. 12.2. 13 to 12.6 show beam arrangements according to the invention in which the signal processing strategies described below can be applied, further details and specifications of the individual arrangements shown in FIGS. 12.1 to 12.6 being laid down in FIG. 13.
- Detection, classification and pattern recognition strategies which can be used alternatively or cumulatively in the implementation of the blind spot sensor system according to the invention are described in detail below, and their use is discussed on the basis of a partial requirement which is based in each case.
- Partial requirement A - separation of object and environment / object positioning.
- Object detection and classification should preferably be carried out with the aid of a two-beam radar sensor.
- the sensor has no angular resolution within the two beam lobes, they only measure radial distances and speeds in the field of view of the radar lobes. Nevertheless, the objects should be positioned in relation to a specified monitoring area.
- the separation of the relevant objects from the environment places a further requirement, since in the typical application there is a pronounced multi-target environment (e.g. vehicle next to guardrail):
- the blind spot system guides the object positioning and the object recognition by means of a targeted arrangement. and design of the two fields of vision of the sensor (s).
- the blind spot sensor system is especially designed for use on multi-lane, usually structurally limited, lanes (e.g. freeway with guardrail delimitation).
- a typical car-like scenario will be discussed for clarification.
- the vehicle equipped with the blind spot sensor system (host car) drives in the right lane of a two-lane highway, the second lane of which is delimited by a guardrail.
- the vehicle is gradually being overtaken by five vehicles.
- 14 shows a schematic representation of the scenario.
- FIG. 15 shows the FMCW peaks in beam II corresponding to the scenario shown in FIG. 14, ie the detected frequency maxima (peaks) in the FMCW radar spectrum of beam II are shown, peaks representing the overtaking Vehicles are to be assigned, are marked with vehicle, so that the remaining peaks of the guardrail are to be assigned.
- the individual frequency position is proportional to the radial object distance and the speed of the respective reflection point on the object.
- the senor Since the sensor only measures radial sizes and there are many targets with comparable distance and relative speed in the monitoring area, it is only then possible to separate the relevant (vehicles) from the irrelevant objects (such as guardrail posts) with the help of the beam IT, if in the present scenario the radial distance of the relevant objects is significantly smaller than the smallest radial distance of the irrelevant objects.
- the strategy is to select the guardrail adjacent to the adjacent lane by carefully selecting the area of vision. fade out of beam I and its orientation in relation to the vehicle.
- the detection area of beam I is selected so that it primarily monitors the adjacent lane and is therefore not influenced by the guardrail or similar irrelevant objects.
- Objects that are detected with a defined radial distance in beam I are in the adjacent lane and are to be classified as possible relevant objects.
- the geometrical relationships are illustrated schematically in FIG. 16.
- the indicated radii r max and r min depend on the choice of the beam width and the orientation of the beam I.
- the sector between r ma ⁇ and r m ⁇ n represents an area in which the targets can be recognized and their signals are tracked in the radar spectra.
- the decision whether the object is on the neighboring o- of the next track is then made if the object track is less than the radial distance r m i n. Then the positioning takes place based on the radial position determination in beam II.
- the geometry of the beam lobes of beams I and II makes it clear that both beams are required in order to be able to position an object in relation to the monitoring area. Due to the area overlap, objects from beam I are followed in beam area II until they leave the monitoring area.
- the system described carries out early object detection using the beam I. This makes sense since objects with a high relative speed approach the system from behind, that is to say from the direction of view of beam I, in the application described. It is precisely in this direction that the system must be able to reliably recognize objects with a high relative speed.
- beam I almost exclusively recognizes the relevant objects (e.g. vehicles passing by in the adjacent lane). However, due to the beam orientation, these objects are only seen up to a minimal radial distance. This minimum distance is not sufficient to use only
- Beam I to be able to make statements about the object position relative to the monitoring area.
- Beam I therefore serves to identify objects that are approaching from behind on the adjacent track at an early stage. Since the beam areas overlap, objects approaching from behind on the adjacent track are detected in both beam areas.
- Sub-requirement B Reliable detection of objects with a high differential speed.
- the system must be able to detect objects that are behind the equipped vehicle ("host car") from behind with a relatively high difference. Feed the reference speed (about> 40 km / h), to be recognized reliably:
- the radar sensor used for beam I at least offers the possibility of modulation switching, i.e. it can be operated in both CW and FMCW modulation modes. Both types of modulation have specific advantages and complement each other in their ability to recognize objects, to separate them and to determine their radial position and speed.
- the senor In CW mode, the sensor is only able to measure the speed of objects in the monitoring area of the sensor. The sensor therefore only measures the presence of objects and their relative speed. An object can only be separated based on different speeds.
- the speed measurement range is limited to the range that is reasonable for the application (approx. 0 ... 30 m / s).
- the spatial monitoring area in CW mode is determined on the one hand by the opening angle of the antenna and the sensitivity of the sensor (compared to FMCW mode there is no fixed maximum radial detection area!).
- the radial field of view for relevant objects is larger than the maximum field of vision in which a radial position can be determined.
- the FMCW mode has the advantage that both radial object distances and radial relative speeds of Objects in the surveillance area can be determined at the same time.
- the radial monitoring area is limited by the object speed and the radial distance.
- V the maximum distance
- r [llix (depending on the sensor design).
- r max - k * v 0 ) (k> 0) is therefore correspondingly smaller.
- the FMCW signal evaluation has the disadvantage of ambiguities in a multi-target environment. If there are more than one object in the monitoring area of the sensor, the radial distances and speeds of the objects cannot be clearly determined in a single FMCW measurement cycle. As a result, the FMCW data can be misinterpreted and virtual objects (ghost targets) formed.
- the FMCW mode basically offers the possibility of separating objects according to distance and speed.
- the high sensitivity of the CW mode allows the speed of objects (especially objects with a high relative speed) to be determined at a very early point in time.
- Signal processing of the FMCW mode can be specifically sensitized to the presence of objects with the detected object speed in the CW mode. In this way, the position and speed of objects can be reliably determined at a very early point in time and ambiguities in FMCW signal processing can be avoided.
- 19 and 20 show the measured FMCW and CW frequency maxima during the scenario as a function of time.
- the frequency maxima in CW mode represent the radial
- the FMCW signal evaluation can be used to search specifically for objects with the CW speed. In this way, the radial distance of these objects is determined at a point in time at which it would not be reliably possible in a single FMCW data evaluation.
- FIG. 21 shows the result of the CW and FMCW data analysis as a function of time during the discussed highway scenario.
- the two diagrams show both the determined object speed based on the CW data and the speed based on the FMCW data. Both methods complement each other in their ability to detect and classify objects. Due to the measuring principle, the CW mode is not able to recognize objects that have no relative speed to the sensor.
- a typical object that is important for a blind spot application is the lane boundary (guardrail).
- the vehicle moves parallel to this lane boundary. As a result, it is not visible in beam I in CW mode.
- the guardrail is recognized as a static object in FMCW mode and can be used for a blind spot application.
- Sub-requirement C - Object and driving situation classification into relevant and irrelevant objects In addition to the detection and positioning of the objects relative to the surveillance area, the system must be able to classify objects. As shown by way of example in FIG. 3, the relevance of an object can be determined, among other things, by the relative speed:
- the situation is much more complicated when an object approaches the monitoring area from the front or from the side.
- the direct measurement of the relative speed is problematic or not without a measurement. dell the driving environment or other means, such as a forward radar beam, possible.
- FIG. 22 shows a second typical motorway scenario in which the vehicle equipped with the system first approaches a crash barrier and then a truck.
- FIG. 23 shows the radar signals corresponding to the scenario shown in FIG. 22 when approaching a guardrail and the
- the top diagram shows the FMCW peak positions and intensity of beam I as a function of time; the lower one shows the corresponding information for ray II.
- FIG. 24 shows a third typical motorway scenario, in which the vehicle equipped with the system first drives past a guardrail and then runs in parallel with a car.
- FIG. 25 shows those shown in FIG. 24
- the upper diagram again shows the FMCW peak positions and intensity of the beam I as a function of time; the lower one the corresponding information for beam II.
- the guardrail and cars or trucks occur in the scenarios shown in FIGS. 22 and 23 or 24 and 25 in the front overlaps. security area. Since both objects approach the surveillance area from the front, no object detection or speed determination in the beam area I can take place.
- the system must nevertheless be able to decide between the two guardrail (irrelevant object) and truck (relevant object) objects.
- the following strategies are preferably implemented according to the invention. If it is in the detektier- th beam in the object II to a static object, this object will be detected after a time t m ⁇ n in beam I. This time period is defined by the vehicle's own speed and the lateral distance between the two beam clubs. As illustrated in FIG. 26, the following relationship therefore applies: dx StrM _I _beam _11
- an object is detected in beam II without this object having already passed through beam region I, then after the vehicle has traveled the distance dx S trahi_ ⁇ _strahi_ ⁇ , objects are searched for in predefined radial distance in beam I, such an object is searched , which also has a positive relative speed, can be concluded that it is a static object and can therefore be classified as irrelevant.
- Partial requirement D - pattern recognition in the radar spectrum In order to obtain additional information about the detected objects, a pattern recognition is carried out in the detected FMCW spectra of the two radar lobes:
- the information from the two sensor viewing areas (beam I; beam II) is fused in order to increase the robustness of the classification or to differentiate between different classes.
- FIG. 27 shows a fourth motorway scenario.
- the vehicle (“host car”) is first overtaken by a truck in the next left lane. Then a car drives past the vehicle on the track after next. Finally, the vehicle drives along a guardrail that begins in the monitoring area.
- FIG. 28 shows the recorded FMCW spectra as a function of time for the scenario described in FIG. 27.
- the FMCW spectra are searched for features typical of the object to be classified.
- the following features are taken into account in the evaluation of the FMCW spectra and illustrated using the example of a guardrail recognition (see FIGS. 29 to 32):
- a guardrail usually consists of a horizontal metal structure that is supported by means of regularly arranged metal posts.
- a main reflex greater intensity in the spectrum
- FIG. 31 main reflex (greatest intensity in the spectrum)
- beam I due to the geometric conditions, only a number of regularly arranged reflections can be seen due to the guardrail posts (see FIG.
- the guardrail With the help of the minimum distance to the guardrail, which can be determined based on the information in beam II and the airspeed, the position of the reflex points in beam I can be predetermined. If you combine the information from beams I and II, you can advantageously obtain reliable information about the presence and position of a guard rail in the surveillance area.
- the main reflection point of the guardrail remains stationary at a relative speed of 0 m / s according to the distance to the guardrail.
- the structure is visible for a correspondingly long time due to the spatial extension of the guardrail.
- FMCW measurements [(frequency ramp with positive slope (lower curve in Fig. 31) frequency ramp with negative slope (upper curve in Fig. 31)) taking into account the airspeed and direction of movement - characteristic of a guard rail is, for example, the agreement of the two FMCW measurements for the Main reflex as well as the speed-dependent shift of the reflex points which can be assigned to the guardrail posts.
- the guardrail is characterized by a large number of characteristic reflex points in the spectrum— terized. These reflex points can all be assigned to the target guardrail.
- the characteristics of the object classification are either derived from the transfer of the physical / geometric object properties to its FMCW radar-specific effect, or are generated by reference data based on typical measurements of the respective object classes.
- FIG. 33 shows a sixth typical motorway scenario in which the vehicle (“host car”) first moves parallel to a guardrail and then parallel to a concrete wall. The difference can be clearly seen in the FMCW spectra of the two beam areas (cf. Fig. 34). If the vehicle moves along a concrete wall, the reflections due to the guardrail posts are missing. The main reflex, however, is present in both cases.
- FIGS. 35 and 36 Spectra of a single measurement cycle of the two viewing areas are considered and these are compared with the guardrail scenario (see FIGS. 35 and 36). Finally, based on the scenario shown in FIG. 14, FIGS. 37 and 38 each show two overtaking scenarios in which the vehicle equipped with the blind spot sensor system (“host car”) is two
- the width of the structure and its intensity distribution are characteristic of the respective object class truck or car and are used in the classification.
- the present invention has proven itself particularly as an application of a blind spot sensor system based on radar sensors (approximately 24 GHz or 77 GHz) suitable for emitting at least a first and a second radar beam with the following properties:
- Two radar beams with two partially overlapping viewing areas (beam I / beam II); Viewing area I is inclined towards the direction of travel and monitors the adjacent lane; Viewing area II is essentially oriented perpendicular to the direction of travel and covers the monitoring area of the system with a wide sector area; the viewing areas have an overlap area and are tilted towards each other; Switchable radar modulation principle of the sensor (s) primarily in the beam area I (FMCW and CW) (at least however FMCW, in order to be able to determine radial distance and speed); - Bi — static design of the radar sensor (s); Radial fields of view of the sensor (s) together cover at least the dimensions of the monitoring area.
- Switchable radar modulation principle of the sensor primarily in the beam area I (FMCW and CW) (at least however FMCW, in order to be able to determine radial distance and speed)
- - Bi static design of the radar sensor (s)
- Radial fields of view of the sensor (s) together cover at least the dimensions of the
- the present invention is therefore particularly suitable for use in an assistance system, for example for changing lanes, of modern motor vehicles of any kind.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/587,200 US7504986B2 (en) | 2004-04-22 | 2005-04-18 | Blind spot sensor system |
JP2007508903A JP2007533991A (ja) | 2004-04-22 | 2005-04-18 | ブラインドスポットセンサシステム |
MXPA06012152A MXPA06012152A (es) | 2004-04-22 | 2005-04-18 | Sistema de deteccion de angulo muerto. |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004019651.6 | 2004-04-22 | ||
DE102004019651A DE102004019651A1 (de) | 2004-04-22 | 2004-04-22 | Blindspot-Sensorsystem |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2005103757A1 true WO2005103757A1 (de) | 2005-11-03 |
Family
ID=34964812
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/051699 WO2005103757A1 (de) | 2004-04-22 | 2005-04-18 | Blindspot-sensorsystem |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7504986B2 (de) |
JP (1) | JP2007533991A (de) |
DE (1) | DE102004019651A1 (de) |
MX (1) | MXPA06012152A (de) |
WO (1) | WO2005103757A1 (de) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008084408A2 (en) | 2007-01-09 | 2008-07-17 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Surroundings monitoring apparatus for a motor vehicle |
JP2009517635A (ja) * | 2005-11-29 | 2009-04-30 | ヴァレオ・シャルター・ウント・ゼンゾーレン・ゲーエムベーハー | レーダーシステム駆動方法およびレーダーシステム |
WO2009059861A1 (de) | 2007-11-07 | 2009-05-14 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Überwachungseinrichtung für den toten winkel bei fahrzeugen sowie verfahren |
WO2010017791A1 (de) * | 2008-08-12 | 2010-02-18 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Verfahren zur erkennung ausgedehnter statischer objekte |
NL2001991C (nl) * | 2008-09-17 | 2010-03-18 | Holland Safety Systems | Inrichting voor het vermijden van verkeersongelukken. |
CN102713989A (zh) * | 2010-03-17 | 2012-10-03 | 本田技研工业株式会社 | 车辆周围监测装置 |
CN104442812A (zh) * | 2013-10-16 | 2015-03-25 | 陈武强 | 一种汽车变道辅助探测装置及探测办法 |
US9002631B2 (en) | 2007-03-08 | 2015-04-07 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Vicinity environment estimation device with blind region prediction, road detection and intervehicle communication |
CN115166722A (zh) * | 2022-09-05 | 2022-10-11 | 湖南众天云科技有限公司 | 用于路侧单元的无盲区单杆多传感器检测装置及控制方法 |
Families Citing this family (59)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102004019651A1 (de) * | 2004-04-22 | 2005-11-17 | Siemens Ag | Blindspot-Sensorsystem |
DE102005041535A1 (de) * | 2005-08-31 | 2007-03-01 | Siemens Ag | Night-Vision-System, bei dem die Umgebung mittels einer Aufnahmevorrichtung aufgenommen und mittels einer Anzeige zumindest teilweise dargestellt wird |
JP4304517B2 (ja) * | 2005-11-09 | 2009-07-29 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 物体検出装置 |
US7501976B2 (en) * | 2006-11-07 | 2009-03-10 | Dan Manor | Monopulse traffic sensor and method |
DE102006055344A1 (de) * | 2006-11-23 | 2008-05-29 | Vdo Automotive Ag | Verfahren zur drahtlosen Kommunikation zwischen Fahrzeugen |
US7612658B2 (en) * | 2007-04-11 | 2009-11-03 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | System and method of modifying programmable blind spot detection sensor ranges with vision sensor input |
JP2009198402A (ja) * | 2008-02-22 | 2009-09-03 | Toyota Motor Corp | 衝突検出装置 |
EP2119617A1 (de) * | 2008-05-12 | 2009-11-18 | IVECO S.p.A. | Fahrzeugfahrhilfesystem zur Unterstützung beim Wechseln der Fahrspur |
US8103412B2 (en) * | 2008-06-13 | 2012-01-24 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for controlling blind spot monitoring and cross traffic alert based on driver status |
JP2010204032A (ja) * | 2009-03-05 | 2010-09-16 | Fuji Heavy Ind Ltd | 車両用レーダ装置 |
JP5297232B2 (ja) * | 2009-03-05 | 2013-09-25 | 富士重工業株式会社 | 車載レーダ用アンテナ |
US8723124B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2014-05-13 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Spectrum measuring apparatus for mover |
JP5099262B2 (ja) | 2009-05-29 | 2012-12-19 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | スペクトル測定装置 |
US8755048B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2014-06-17 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Spectrum measuring apparatus for mover |
JP4877364B2 (ja) | 2009-07-10 | 2012-02-15 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 物体検出装置 |
DE102009041557A1 (de) * | 2009-09-15 | 2010-06-17 | Daimler Ag | Fahrzeug mit aktiver Totwinkelbeleuchtung und Verfahren |
DE102009052591A1 (de) | 2009-11-10 | 2011-05-12 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Verfahren zum Erfassen eines Objekts in einem Totwinkelbereich eines Fahrzeugs und Fahrassistenzsystem zur Erfassung eines Objekts in einem Totwinkelbereich eines Fahrzeugs |
DE102010012626A1 (de) | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Kraftfahrzeug mit einer Radareinrichtung und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Radareinrichtung |
US20110291874A1 (en) * | 2010-06-01 | 2011-12-01 | De Mersseman Bernard | Vehicle radar system and method for detecting objects |
DE102010024328B4 (de) | 2010-06-18 | 2017-12-07 | Audi Ag | Radarvorrichtung mit situationsadaptiver Modulationsumschaltung und Steuerungsverfahren |
US20120194377A1 (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2012-08-02 | Denso Corporation | Antenna apparatus, radar apparatus and on-vehicle radar system |
WO2012169052A1 (ja) * | 2011-06-09 | 2012-12-13 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 他車両検出装置及び他車両検出方法 |
DE102011077384A1 (de) | 2011-06-10 | 2012-12-13 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Warnen eines Fahrers eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
DE102011078641A1 (de) * | 2011-07-05 | 2013-01-10 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Radarsystem für Kraftfahrzeuge sowie Kraftfahrzeug mit einem Radarsystem |
FR2993845B1 (fr) * | 2012-07-25 | 2014-08-15 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | Systeme d’assistance au changement de voie pour un vehicule |
DE102012215014A1 (de) | 2012-08-23 | 2014-02-27 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Verfahren zur Überwachung eines toten Winkels und Fahrassistenzsystem |
DE102012111318A1 (de) * | 2012-11-23 | 2014-05-28 | Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. | Fahrassistenzsystem eines Fahrzeugs |
USD837232S1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2019-01-01 | Waymo Llc | Display screen or a portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD746836S1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2016-01-05 | Google Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with transitional graphical user interface |
USD733722S1 (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2015-07-07 | Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
EP2972467B1 (de) * | 2013-03-15 | 2020-02-19 | Veoneer US, Inc. | Fahrzeugradarsystem mit totpunkterkennung |
EP3041720B1 (de) | 2013-09-05 | 2019-12-04 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Verbesserte spurwechselwarnung mit informationen von hinteren radarsensoren |
JP6394138B2 (ja) * | 2014-07-16 | 2018-09-26 | 株式会社デンソー | 車載レーダ装置および報知システム |
KR20160053270A (ko) * | 2014-10-31 | 2016-05-13 | 주식회사 만도 | 타켓 물체 감지 방법 및 레이더 장치 |
DE102015108759A1 (de) * | 2015-06-03 | 2016-12-08 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Verfahren zum Klassifizieren eines länglich ausgedehnten stationären Objektes in einem seitlichen Umgebungsbereich eines Kraftfahrzeugs, Fahrerassistenzsystem sowie Kraftfahrzeug |
CN105216797B (zh) * | 2015-08-21 | 2018-09-21 | 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 | 超车方法及系统 |
DE102015220312A1 (de) * | 2015-10-19 | 2017-04-20 | Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh | Verfahren zur Warnung eines Fahrers vor toten Winkeln und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens |
SE538908C2 (sv) * | 2015-10-22 | 2017-02-07 | Uniquesec Ab | Testing method with virtual radar signatures for an automotive safety radar system |
JP2017114155A (ja) * | 2015-12-21 | 2017-06-29 | 三菱自動車工業株式会社 | 運転支援装置 |
US9931981B2 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2018-04-03 | Denso International America, Inc. | Methods and systems for blind spot monitoring with rotatable blind spot sensor |
US9975480B2 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2018-05-22 | Denso International America, Inc. | Methods and systems for blind spot monitoring with adaptive alert zone |
US9994151B2 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2018-06-12 | Denso International America, Inc. | Methods and systems for blind spot monitoring with adaptive alert zone |
US9947226B2 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2018-04-17 | Denso International America, Inc. | Methods and systems for blind spot monitoring with dynamic detection range |
JP6344424B2 (ja) * | 2016-04-19 | 2018-06-20 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 周辺情報検出センサの取付構造 |
US9925920B2 (en) * | 2016-05-24 | 2018-03-27 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Extended lane blind spot detection |
JP2017227468A (ja) * | 2016-06-20 | 2017-12-28 | 株式会社デンソーテン | レーダ装置および上下軸ずれ検知方法 |
CN106314327A (zh) * | 2016-08-30 | 2017-01-11 | 陈武强 | 防地面误测误报的汽车超声波盲区探测装置及探测方法 |
US9947227B1 (en) | 2016-10-13 | 2018-04-17 | Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh | Method of warning a driver of blind angles and a device for implementing the method |
DE102016222919A1 (de) | 2016-11-21 | 2018-05-24 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Warneinrichtung in einem Fahrzeug |
JP6832166B2 (ja) * | 2017-01-17 | 2021-02-24 | 株式会社デンソーテン | レーダ装置および車速補正方法 |
US10902728B2 (en) * | 2017-04-26 | 2021-01-26 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Blind spot object detection |
CN106985745A (zh) * | 2017-05-05 | 2017-07-28 | 上海为彪汽配制造有限公司 | 一种车辆盲点监测装置 |
CN110395179A (zh) * | 2018-04-24 | 2019-11-01 | 宝沃汽车(中国)有限公司 | 盲区超车监测装置、确定驾驶意图的方法、装置及车辆 |
FR3085143B1 (fr) * | 2018-08-23 | 2020-07-17 | Continental Automotive France | Procede de detection d'approche d'un objet sur un cote lateral d'un vehicule en deplacement et dispositif de detection associe embarque |
CN110390839B (zh) * | 2019-07-23 | 2020-06-30 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | 考虑多车交互区域重叠面积的车辆换道方法 |
DE102019130295A1 (de) | 2019-11-11 | 2021-05-12 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Abstandssensors eines Fahrzeugs mit Anpassung eines Sendesignals in Abhängigkeit von einer Klassifizierung eines Objekts, Recheneinrichtung sowie Sensorvorrichtung |
DE102020116236A1 (de) | 2020-06-19 | 2021-12-23 | Audi Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zur Ermittlung eines Geschwindigkeitsvektors eines Umfeldobjekts in einem Kraftfahrzeug und Kraftfahrzeug |
EP3951420A1 (de) * | 2020-08-07 | 2022-02-09 | Aptiv Technologies Limited | Objektdetektionssystem mit einem seitenkommunikationskanal |
CN112590984B (zh) * | 2020-12-03 | 2022-07-29 | 江门市大长江集团有限公司 | 摩托车后视镜防撞报警装置、方法和计算机设备 |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2613080A1 (fr) * | 1987-03-26 | 1988-09-30 | Galland Jean Claude | Procede et dispositifs de detection directionnelle a seuil de distance |
EP0740166A1 (de) * | 1995-04-21 | 1996-10-30 | Trw Inc. | Kompaktes fahrzeuggestütztes System mit Mehrfachantennen zum rückwärtigen und seitlichen Erkennen von Hindernissen |
WO1998032029A1 (en) * | 1997-01-17 | 1998-07-23 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Vehicle collision radar with randomized fsk waveform |
EP0899583A2 (de) * | 1997-08-30 | 1999-03-03 | Ford Motor Company Limited | Antennengruppe für Kraftfahrzeug-Kollisionswarneinrichtungen |
EP0939322A2 (de) * | 1992-12-31 | 1999-09-01 | Rockwell International Corporation | Computerisiertes Radarverfahren zur Messung von Abständen und Relativgeschwindigkeiten zwischen einem Fahrzeug und vor ihm befindlichen Hindernissen |
EP0974851A2 (de) * | 1998-07-23 | 2000-01-26 | Eaton VORAD Technologies, L.L.C. | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Regen-Clutter-Beseitigung für eine Radarsystem |
US6121916A (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2000-09-19 | Eaton-Vorad Technologies, L.L.C. | Method and apparatus for recognizing stationary objects with a moving side-looking radar |
US20020147534A1 (en) * | 2000-08-16 | 2002-10-10 | Delcheccolo Michael Joseph | Near object detection system |
US20030001772A1 (en) * | 2000-08-16 | 2003-01-02 | Woodington Walter Gordon | Radar detection method and apparatus |
WO2004068164A2 (de) * | 2003-01-30 | 2004-08-12 | Schefenacker Vision Systems Germany Gmbh & Co. Kg | Gefahrenerkennungssystem für fahrzeuge mit mindestens einer seitlichen und rückwärtigen umgebungserfassung |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19832079A1 (de) * | 1998-07-16 | 2000-01-20 | Volkswagen Ag | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erfassung von Objekten im Umfeld eines Kraftfahrzeuges |
WO2001011388A1 (en) * | 1999-08-06 | 2001-02-15 | Roadrisk Technologies, Llc | Methods and apparatus for stationary object detection |
EP1870729A3 (de) * | 2000-08-16 | 2011-03-30 | Valeo Radar Systems, Inc. | Radarsysteme und -verfahren für Kraftfahrzeuge |
EP1391748A4 (de) * | 2001-05-30 | 2007-01-31 | Hitachi Ltd | Radareinrichtung |
AU2002361692A1 (en) * | 2001-12-14 | 2003-06-30 | Raytheon Company | Back-up aid indicator |
JP4043276B2 (ja) * | 2002-04-24 | 2008-02-06 | 株式会社日立製作所 | レーダ装置 |
JP3983158B2 (ja) * | 2002-11-25 | 2007-09-26 | 富士通株式会社 | 電波レーダの信号処理方法 |
DE102004019651A1 (de) * | 2004-04-22 | 2005-11-17 | Siemens Ag | Blindspot-Sensorsystem |
US7403153B2 (en) * | 2004-12-15 | 2008-07-22 | Valeo Raytheon Systems, Inc. | System and method for reducing a radar interference signal |
DE602005014679D1 (de) * | 2005-02-08 | 2009-07-09 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Zieldetektionseinrichtung |
JP2007232498A (ja) * | 2006-02-28 | 2007-09-13 | Hitachi Ltd | 障害物検知システム |
JP4977443B2 (ja) * | 2006-10-31 | 2012-07-18 | 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 | レーダ装置及びレーダ検出方法 |
-
2004
- 2004-04-22 DE DE102004019651A patent/DE102004019651A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2005
- 2005-04-18 WO PCT/EP2005/051699 patent/WO2005103757A1/de active Application Filing
- 2005-04-18 MX MXPA06012152A patent/MXPA06012152A/es active IP Right Grant
- 2005-04-18 US US11/587,200 patent/US7504986B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-04-18 JP JP2007508903A patent/JP2007533991A/ja active Pending
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2613080A1 (fr) * | 1987-03-26 | 1988-09-30 | Galland Jean Claude | Procede et dispositifs de detection directionnelle a seuil de distance |
EP0939322A2 (de) * | 1992-12-31 | 1999-09-01 | Rockwell International Corporation | Computerisiertes Radarverfahren zur Messung von Abständen und Relativgeschwindigkeiten zwischen einem Fahrzeug und vor ihm befindlichen Hindernissen |
EP0740166A1 (de) * | 1995-04-21 | 1996-10-30 | Trw Inc. | Kompaktes fahrzeuggestütztes System mit Mehrfachantennen zum rückwärtigen und seitlichen Erkennen von Hindernissen |
WO1998032029A1 (en) * | 1997-01-17 | 1998-07-23 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Vehicle collision radar with randomized fsk waveform |
EP0899583A2 (de) * | 1997-08-30 | 1999-03-03 | Ford Motor Company Limited | Antennengruppe für Kraftfahrzeug-Kollisionswarneinrichtungen |
EP0974851A2 (de) * | 1998-07-23 | 2000-01-26 | Eaton VORAD Technologies, L.L.C. | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Regen-Clutter-Beseitigung für eine Radarsystem |
US6121916A (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2000-09-19 | Eaton-Vorad Technologies, L.L.C. | Method and apparatus for recognizing stationary objects with a moving side-looking radar |
US20020147534A1 (en) * | 2000-08-16 | 2002-10-10 | Delcheccolo Michael Joseph | Near object detection system |
US20030001772A1 (en) * | 2000-08-16 | 2003-01-02 | Woodington Walter Gordon | Radar detection method and apparatus |
WO2004068164A2 (de) * | 2003-01-30 | 2004-08-12 | Schefenacker Vision Systems Germany Gmbh & Co. Kg | Gefahrenerkennungssystem für fahrzeuge mit mindestens einer seitlichen und rückwärtigen umgebungserfassung |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
"A METHOD TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF AN AUTOMOTICE SIDE DETECTIONSYSTEM", RESEARCH DISCLOSURE, KENNETH MASON PUBLICATIONS, WESTBOURNE, GB, no. 397, May 1997 (1997-05-01), pages 357, XP000726474, ISSN: 0374-4353 * |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2009517635A (ja) * | 2005-11-29 | 2009-04-30 | ヴァレオ・シャルター・ウント・ゼンゾーレン・ゲーエムベーハー | レーダーシステム駆動方法およびレーダーシステム |
US8094000B2 (en) | 2007-01-09 | 2012-01-10 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Surroundings monitoring apparatus for a motor vehicle |
JP2008171082A (ja) * | 2007-01-09 | 2008-07-24 | Toyota Motor Corp | 周辺監視装置 |
WO2008084408A3 (en) * | 2007-01-09 | 2008-09-04 | Toyota Motor Co Ltd | Surroundings monitoring apparatus for a motor vehicle |
WO2008084408A2 (en) | 2007-01-09 | 2008-07-17 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Surroundings monitoring apparatus for a motor vehicle |
JP4518080B2 (ja) * | 2007-01-09 | 2010-08-04 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 周辺監視装置 |
US9002631B2 (en) | 2007-03-08 | 2015-04-07 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Vicinity environment estimation device with blind region prediction, road detection and intervehicle communication |
WO2009059861A1 (de) | 2007-11-07 | 2009-05-14 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Überwachungseinrichtung für den toten winkel bei fahrzeugen sowie verfahren |
DE102007053033A1 (de) | 2007-11-07 | 2009-05-14 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Überwachungseinrichtung für den toten Winkel bei Fahrzeugen sowie Verfahren |
WO2010017791A1 (de) * | 2008-08-12 | 2010-02-18 | Continental Automotive Gmbh | Verfahren zur erkennung ausgedehnter statischer objekte |
EP2165883A1 (de) * | 2008-09-17 | 2010-03-24 | TRM Curé Beheer BV | Vorrichtung zur Vermeidung von Verkehrsunfällen |
NL2001991C (nl) * | 2008-09-17 | 2010-03-18 | Holland Safety Systems | Inrichting voor het vermijden van verkeersongelukken. |
CN102713989A (zh) * | 2010-03-17 | 2012-10-03 | 本田技研工业株式会社 | 车辆周围监测装置 |
CN104442812A (zh) * | 2013-10-16 | 2015-03-25 | 陈武强 | 一种汽车变道辅助探测装置及探测办法 |
CN104442812B (zh) * | 2013-10-16 | 2017-11-03 | 陈武强 | 一种汽车变道辅助探测方法 |
CN115166722A (zh) * | 2022-09-05 | 2022-10-11 | 湖南众天云科技有限公司 | 用于路侧单元的无盲区单杆多传感器检测装置及控制方法 |
CN115166722B (zh) * | 2022-09-05 | 2022-12-13 | 湖南众天云科技有限公司 | 用于路侧单元的无盲区单杆多传感器检测装置及控制方法 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7504986B2 (en) | 2009-03-17 |
JP2007533991A (ja) | 2007-11-22 |
US20070179712A1 (en) | 2007-08-02 |
MXPA06012152A (es) | 2007-01-31 |
DE102004019651A1 (de) | 2005-11-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2005103757A1 (de) | Blindspot-sensorsystem | |
DE19806150C1 (de) | Fahrzeug mit Objekterfassungseinrichtung | |
EP2145290B1 (de) | Kraftfahrzeug | |
DE102004016025B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Klassifizierung eines Objektstandorts eines 3D-Objekts an einer Seite eines Transportfahrzeugs | |
DE10392601B4 (de) | Verkehrsmittel mit einer 3D-Entfernungsbildkamera und Verfahren zu dessen Betrieb | |
EP1557694B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Klassifizierung von Objekten | |
EP1557693B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Verfolgung von Objekten | |
DE102004004492A1 (de) | Radarsystem für Kraftfahrzeuge | |
DE102017221691A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Eigenlokalisierung eines Fahrzeugs | |
DE10007501A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erfassung und Überwachung einer Mehrzahl von vorausfahrenden Fahrzeugen | |
DE102008038731A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Erkennung ausgedehnter statischer Objekte | |
EP2746803B1 (de) | Verfahren und anordnung zur erfassung von verkehrsverstössen in einem ampelbereich durch heckanmessung mit einem radargerät | |
EP1928687A1 (de) | Verfahren und fahrerassistenzsystem zur sensorbasierten anfahrtsteuerung eines kraftfahrzeugs | |
DE102011003881A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Unterstützung eines Fahrers eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
EP2804014B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Fahrzeugmerkmals | |
DE10036042B4 (de) | Multisensorielle Fahrspurzuordnung | |
WO2008028568A1 (de) | Fahrer-assistenzsystem mit objekterkennung | |
EP2145289B1 (de) | Kraftfahrzeug | |
DE102018118150A1 (de) | System zum Steuern einer Verkehrsführung an einer Kreuzung | |
EP3151035A1 (de) | Verfahren zum betrieb von radarsensoren in einem kraftfahrzeug und kraftfahrzeug | |
EP3411729A1 (de) | Verfahren zur erkennung und identifikation eines fahrmanövers eines verkehrsteilnehmers und kraftfahrzeug | |
DE10125426A1 (de) | Warnsystem und Verfahren zur Überwachung eines toten Winkels für ein Fahrzeug | |
DE102005003191A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Umfelderfassung eines bewegbaren Objektes | |
DE102006007150A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Parklückenvermessung | |
WO2017080787A1 (de) | Seitliche leitplankenerkennung über einen abstandssensor im kfz |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: PA/a/2006/012152 Country of ref document: MX |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2007508903 Country of ref document: JP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 11587200 Country of ref document: US Ref document number: 2007179712 Country of ref document: US |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 11587200 Country of ref document: US |