EP1727064A1 - Automatic trace determination apparatus and method - Google Patents

Automatic trace determination apparatus and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1727064A1
EP1727064A1 EP06252599A EP06252599A EP1727064A1 EP 1727064 A1 EP1727064 A1 EP 1727064A1 EP 06252599 A EP06252599 A EP 06252599A EP 06252599 A EP06252599 A EP 06252599A EP 1727064 A1 EP1727064 A1 EP 1727064A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
routes
route
obstacle
candidate
trace
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP06252599A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Tamotsu c/o Shinko Elecric Ind. Co. Ltd Kitamura
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shinko Electric Industries Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shinko Electric Industries Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shinko Electric Industries Co Ltd filed Critical Shinko Electric Industries Co Ltd
Publication of EP1727064A1 publication Critical patent/EP1727064A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/30—Circuit design
    • G06F30/39—Circuit design at the physical level
    • G06F30/394—Routing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an automatic trace determination apparatus and an automatic trace determination method for determining trace routes, on a substrate and that do not intersect with obstacles on the substrate, automatically by computation.
  • LSIs large-scale integrated circuits
  • PCBs printed-circuit boards
  • a labyrinth search method is described, for example, in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. H11-161694 , Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2001-350813 , Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2001-044288 , and Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. H10-209288 .
  • trace routes on a substrate are set so as to secure clearance from other traces or obstacles and so as not to intersect with the obstacles by diverting the trace route around such obstacles at 90 degrees or, in some cases, 45 degrees, which is an angle formed by the trace route and the verge of the substrate.
  • Such a setting technique can be implemented, in particular, for LSIs, PCBs and the like, which have peculiar pattern characteristics in that disposed positions and the shapes of the obstacles in the LSIs, PCBs and the like have a certain regularity.
  • a designer typically designs the trace routes of the semiconductor packages on a virtual plane by trial and error depending on the designer's skill, experience and intuition, for example, by using a CAD system.
  • manual trace design by trial and error as the required traces become more complicated, the effort, time and difficulty for achieving the optimal traces is increased. Further, unevenness in quality of finished products is also increased.
  • the manual trace design by trial and error requires at least more than ten hours' work and it is not economical to spend more time on trace designing, the designer has to compromise with a certain design quality.
  • automatization of trace design of the semiconductor packages will be one of the most important tasks in the future.
  • an object of the present invention to provide an automatic trace determination apparatus and an automatic trace determination method that can determine trace routes on a substrate, that do not intersect with obstacles on the substrate, automatically and in a short time, as well as a computer program for allowing a computer to perform this automatic trace determination process.
  • each of the tentative routes when an obstacle exists on a straight line connecting between two points that are to be a starting point and an end point of a trace, first, tentative routes, each of which includes at least a straight route from the starting point that is tangent to the obstacle and a straight route from the end point that is tangent to the obstacle, are set.
  • each of the tentative routes when a plurality of obstacles exist on the straight line between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point of the trace, each of the tentative routes further includes a straight route that is tangent only to two of the obstacles and does not intersect with any obstacle other than such two obstacles.
  • the straight routes that are tangent to two of the obstacles are set with respect to each pair of the two of the obstacles.
  • the tentative route that has the shortest distance between the starting point and the end point of the trace is determined as an optimal trace route.
  • Fig. 1 is a principle block diagram of an automatic trace determination apparatus according to the present invention.
  • An automatic trace determination apparatus 1 for determining a trace route on a substrate, that does not intersect with at least one obstacle on the substrate, automatically by computation comprises:
  • the automatic trace determination apparatus further comprises decision means (not shown) for deciding whether the obstacle exists or not on the straight line connecting between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point of the trace on the substrate.
  • decision means for deciding whether the obstacle exists or not on the straight line connecting between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point of the trace on the substrate.
  • obstacle information is input to the first candidate route setting means 11 and, based on such obstacle information and trace design data, the first candidate route setting means 11 sets the candidate starting routes and the candidate ending routes.
  • the obstacle information is input not only to the first candidate route setting means 11 but also to the second candidate route setting means 12 and, based on such obstacle information and trace position data, the first candidate route setting means 11 sets the candidate starting routes and the candidate ending routes and the second candidate route setting means 12 sets the candidate intermediate routes.
  • the optimal route is corrected so that clearance between such an optimal route and the obstacle can be secured.
  • the clearance to be secured may be taken into account in advance and, then, the above-mentioned processes may be performed.
  • the automatic trace determination means may further comprise virtual obstacle setting means (not shown) for setting a virtual obstacle by enlarging the obstacle existing on the straight line connecting between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point of the trace to take a predetermined clearance into account.
  • virtual obstacle information from the virtual obstacle setting means is input to the first candidate route setting means 11 and the second candidate route setting means 12.
  • the first candidate route setting means 11 sets the candidate starting routes and the candidate ending routes and the second candidate route setting means 12 sets the candidate intermediate routes.
  • a point on such optimal route in the neighborhood of the obstacle bypassed by such optimal route is set as a new starting point of the trace to further perform the processes by the first candidate route setting means 11, the second candidate route setting means 12, the candidate tentative route setting means 13 and the optimal route determination means 14.
  • the above-mentioned point on such optimal route in the neighborhood of the obstacle bypassed by such optimal route that is set as the new starting point of the trace is, for example, a point of contact between the optimal route and the obstacle concerned.
  • the first candidate route setting means 11, the second candidate route setting means 12, the tentative route setting means 13, the optimal route determination means 14, the decision means and the virtual obstacle setting means in the automatic trace determination apparatus 1 can be implemented in the form of a software program that can be operated by an arithmetic processing unit such as a computer.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow chart showing an operational flow of an automatic trace determination method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • step S101 when a trace is intended to be disposed on a substrate, assuming a straight line connecting between two points that are to be a starting point and an end point of this trace, it is decided whether at least one obstacle exists on this straight line or not.
  • step S101 if it is decided that the at least one obstacle exists on the straight line connecting between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point of the trace, in step S102, straight routes that are tangent to such obstacle from the above-mentioned starting point of the trace are set as candidate starting routes. It can be said that the candidate starting routes are tangential lines from one point to one object and, therefore, at least two candidate routes should exist.
  • step S103 straight routes that are tangent to such an obstacle from the above-mentioned end point of the trace are set as candidate ending routes.
  • candidate ending routes Similarly to the candidate starting routes described above, at least two candidate ending routes should exist.
  • the above-mentioned steps S102 and S103 may be performed in a reversed order.
  • step S104 it is decided whether a plurality of obstacles exist on the straight line connecting between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point of the trace or not. If it is decided that a plurality of obstacles exist on the straight line connecting between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point of the trace, the process proceeds to step S105 and, if only one obstacle exists, the process proceeds to step S106.
  • a process for deciding whether the plurality of obstacles exist or not in step S104 may be included in the process for deciding existence of the at least one obstacle in step S101 and these processes may be performed simultaneously.
  • information about the number of obstacles may be stored and, after steps S102 and S103 are performed, based on the information about the number of obstacles, it may be determined whether to perform step S105 or perform step S106 while not performing step S105.
  • step S105 straight routes that are tangent to only two obstacles and that do not intersect with any obstacle other than such two obstacles are set as candidate intermediate routes.
  • the candidate intermediate routes set in step S105 are generated for each pair of the two obstacles selected from the plurality of obstacles.
  • step S106 tentative routes, each of which includes at least any one of the candidate starting routes and any one of the candidate ending routes, are set.
  • each of the tentative routes further includes "any one of the candidate intermediate routes" selected for each pair of the two obstacles as described above.
  • “any one of the candidate intermediate routes” for such one pair is included in the tentative routes.
  • two pairs of two adjacent obstacles and one pair of two obstacles located on both sides of one obstacle exist.
  • the candidate intermediate routes with respect to the two pairs of two adjacent obstacles exist absolutely but, with respect to the one pair of two obstacles located on both sides of one obstacle, the candidate intermediate routes may not exist, for example, in the case such as when the obstacle located between the two obstacles is very large.
  • "any one of the candidate intermediate routes" with respect to each of at least two pairs is included in the tentative routes.
  • step S106 when one obstacle exists on the straight line connecting between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point of the trace, any one of the candidate starting routes and any one of the candidate ending routes are combined together and set as the tentative routes.
  • any one of the candidate starting routes, any one of the candidate ending routes, and any one of the candidate intermediate routes selected with respect to each pair of obstacles are combined together and set as the tentative routes.
  • step S107 among the plurality of tentative routes obtained in step S106, the tentative route having the shortest distance between the two points that are to be the starting point and the end point is determined as an optimal trace route.
  • a point on such optimal route in the neighborhood of the virtual obstacles bypassed by such optimal route is set as a new starting point of the trace to further perform the above-mentioned process.
  • the point on the above-mentioned optimal route in the neighborhood of the obstacles by such optimal route that is set as the new starting point of the trace is, for example, a point of contact between the optimal route and the obstacle concerned.
  • the processes of the steps S101 - S107 in the automatic trace determination process are performed by a processor such as a computer.
  • a processor such as a computer.
  • information about elements that may obstruct the trace such as planes, gates, marks, internal components or other traces in a package and so on or, in particular, information about shapes, disposed positions or angles of the obstacles and various data about vias, balls, bonding pads (B/P) or flip chip pads (F/C), design data, rules for clearance and the like is input to the processor in advance.
  • the above-mentioned processor uses the above-mentioned input data to start the process from step S101.
  • steps S101 - S107 the optimal route position of the trace that does not intersect with the obstacles existing on the substrate is determined automatically by computation.
  • Figs. 3 - 7 are diagrams for describing a first specific example of determination of an optimal trace route by an automatic trace determination apparatus in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the candidate starting routes A1 and A2 that are set with respect to the obstacle Q having the polygonal shape are straight routes that intersect with the obstacle Q only at vertexes a1 and a2, respectively, among those that pass through various vertexes of the obstacle Q from the starting point S.
  • straight routes that are tangent to the obstacle Q from the end point E of the trace are set as candidate ending routes.
  • the candidate ending routes B1 and B2 that are set with respect to the obstacle Q having a polygonal shape are straight routes that intersect with the obstacle Q only at vertexes b1 and b2, respectively, among those that pass through various vertexes of the obstacle Q from the end point E.
  • tentative routes are set so that each of the tentative routes includes any one of the candidate starting routes A1 and A2 and any one of the candidate ending routes B1 and B2.
  • a tentative route K1 consisting of the candidate starting route A1, the candidate ending route B1 and a candidate route X1 connecting between A1 and B1 along the obstacle Q, and a tentative route K2 consisting of the candidate starting route A2 and the candidate ending route B2 are set.
  • a tentative route including the candidate ending route B1 and the candidate starting route A2 is not set, because the distance from the starting point S to the end point E of such tentative route is longer than the distance from the starting point S to the end point E of the tentative route K2.
  • the tentative routes K1 and K2 are obtained with respect to the one obstacle Q. Therefore, next, the lengths of the tentative routes K1 and K2 between the two points that are to be the starting point S and the end point E of the trace are compared. In the shown example, the tentative route K2, which is shorter than the tentative route K1, is determined as an optimal trace route. Here, up to this point, requirements for clearance of the trace are not taken into account. Therefore, the optimal route obtained as described above is corrected so that the clearance between such optimal route and the obstacle can be secured to eventually obtain an optimal route K'2 of the trace as shown in Fig. 7.
  • Fig. 8 is a diagram for describing a specific example of a process for deriving candidate starting routes with respect to an obstacle having a polygonal shape in an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 9 is a diagram for describing a process for deriving candidate ending routes with respect to an obstacle having a polygonal shape in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a straight line L connecting between a starting point S and an end point E is set as an intersection check reference line.
  • This intersection check reference line L is a straight line that divides an obstacle having a polygonal shape into left and right parts. With respect to the both left and right parts divided by this intersection check reference line L, angles between each straight route passing through each vertex of the obstacle Q from the starting point S and the intersection check reference line L are checked.
  • a straight route A1 on the left side of the intersection check reference line L and a straight route A2 on the right side of the intersection check reference line L form the largest angles with the intersection check reference line L and, therefore, these are determined as candidate starting routes.
  • the straight line L connecting between the starting point S and the end point E is set as the intersection check reference line.
  • This intersection check reference line L is a straight line that divides the obstacle Q into the left and right parts and, with respect to the both left and right parts divided by this intersection check reference line L, angles between each straight route passing through each vertex of the obstacle Q from the end point E and the intersection check reference line L are checked.
  • a straight route B1 on the left side of the intersection check reference line L and a straight route B2 on the right side of the intersection check reference line L form the largest angles with the intersection check reference line L and, therefore, these are determined as candidate ending routes.
  • Figs. 10 - 15 are diagrams for describing a second specific example of determination of an optimal trace route by an automatic trace determination apparatus in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a plurality of (in particular, two in this figure) obstacles Q1 and Q2 exist between a point S, which is to be a starting point of a trace, and a point E, which is to be an end point.
  • the obstacles Q1 and Q2 have polygonal shapes.
  • candidate starting routes A1 and A2 and candidate ending routes B1 and B2 are set.
  • the specific process for deriving the candidate starting routes and the candidate ending routes has already been described above.
  • a plurality (two in the shown example) of obstacles exist on the straight line L connecting between the two points, which are to be the starting point S and the end point E of the trace and, therefore, as shown in Fig. 12, straight routes that are tangent only to the two obstacles Q1 and Q2 and that do not intersect with any obstacle other than such two obstacles Q1 and Q2 are set as candidate intermediate routes.
  • the candidate intermediate routes C1, C2, C3 and C4 that are set with respect to the obstacles Q1 and Q2 having the polygonal shapes are straight routes that intersect with such the two obstacles Q1 and Q2 only at vertexes d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6 and d7 and that do not intersect with any obstacle other than such two obstacles Q1 and Q2, among those that pass through various vertexes of such two obstacles Q1 and Q2.
  • the candidate starting routes A1 and A2 the candidate intermediate routes C1, C2, C3 and C4, and the candidate ending routes B1 and B2 are obtained with respect to the two obstacles Q1 and Q2.
  • each of the tentative routes includes at least any one of the candidate starting routes A1 and A2 and any one of the candidate ending routes B1, B2 and B3.
  • each of the tentative routes includes any one of the candidate starting routes A1 and A2, any one of the candidate ending routes B1 and B2 and, further, any one of the candidate intermediate routes C1, C2, C3 and C4 with respect to the two obstacles Q1 and Q2.
  • the candidate ending route B3 from the end point E is tangent not to the obstacle Q2 but to the obstacle Q1 at the vertex d5.
  • the tentative route including the candidate starting route A2, the candidate intermediate route C3 and the candidate ending route B2, the tentative route including the candidate starting route A2, the candidate intermediate route C4 and the candidate ending route B1, and the tentative route including the candidate starting route A2 and the candidate ending route B3 pass through the vertex d5.
  • each of these tentative routes includes the candidate starting route A2
  • the vertex d5 of the obstacle Q1 and the end point E can be interconnected directly by the candidate ending route B3 with a shorter distance in comparison with the case in which these points are interconnected by the route via the candidate intermediate route C3 and the candidate ending route B2 or the route via the candidate intermediate route C4 and the candidate ending route B1.
  • the tentative route has the shortest length as described above
  • the candidate intermediate routes C3 and C4 passing through the vertex d5 are excluded from the elements of the tentative traces.
  • the unpreferable elements can be excluded in advance so as to reduce in advance the amount of computation of "the process for selecting the shortest tentative route" that will be performed after setting the tentative routes.
  • the candidate starting route A1 and A2 the candidate intermediate routes C1 and C2, and the candidate ending route B1, B2 and B3 are obtained with respect to the two obstacles Q1 and Q2.
  • candidate tentative routes are set by using these candidate starting routes, candidate intermediate routes and candidate ending routes. More specifically, as shown in Fig. 14, "a tentative route K1 consisting of: the candidate starting route A1; the candidate intermediate route C1; the candidate ending route B1; and a candidate route X1 connecting between the candidate intermediate route C1 and the candidate ending route B1 along the obstacle Q2", "a tentative route K2 consisting of: the candidate starting route A1; the candidate intermediate route C3: a candidate route X2 connecting between the candidate starting route A1 and the candidate intermediate route C3 along the obstacle Q1; the candidate ending route B2; and a candidate route X3 connecting between the candidate intermediate route C3 and the candidate ending route B2 along the obstacle Q2", and "a tentative route K3 consisting of: the candidate starting route A2; the candidate ending route B3; and a candidate route X4 connecting between the candidate starting route A2 and the candidate ending route B3 along the obstacle Q1" are set.
  • the tentative routes including the intermediate route C3 and the tentative routes including the intermediate route C4 are not set because distances from the starting point S to the end point E along such tentative routes are apparently longer than from the starting point S to the end point E along the tentative route K3.
  • the tentative routes K1, K2 and K3 are obtained with respect to the two obstacles Q1 and Q2. Therefore, next, the lengths of the tentative routes K1, K2 and K3 between the two points that are to be the starting point S and the end point E of the trace are compared.
  • the tentative route K2 is decided to be the shortest and it is determined as an optimal trace route.
  • the optimal route obtained as described above is corrected so that the clearance between such optimal route and the obstacle can be secured to eventually obtain an optimal route K'2 of the trace as shown in Fig. 15.
  • the candidate intermediate routes C3 and C4 passing through the vertex d5 are excluded from the elements of the tentative routes in advance so as to further reduce the amount of computation.
  • the tentative routes including the candidate intermediate routes C3 and C4 may be set and, then, the shortest tentative route may be selected from these tentative routes.
  • Figs. 16 - 18 are diagrams for describing a process for deriving candidate intermediate routes with respect to obstacles having polygonal shapes in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the straight routes that intersect only with such one obstacle only at the vertexes of such one obstacle are set as candidate tentative intermediate routes.
  • the straight routes from concave vertexes of the obstacles are not included in the candidate tentative intermediate routes. This is because straight routes drawn from concave vertexes of an obstacle never satisfy requirements for "straight routes tangent to the obstacle".
  • the straight routes from a concave vertex p4 of the obstacle Q1 and from a concave vertex q2 of the obstacle Q2 never satisfy requirements for "straight routes tangent to the obstacle" and, therefore, these straight routes are not set as the candidate tentative intermediate routes.
  • the candidate tentative intermediate routes D1 and F1, D3 and F4, D6 and F8, and D2 and F7, which are drawn from both of the two obstacles Q1 and Q2 are set as candidate intermediate routes C1, C2, C3 and C4.
  • Figs. 19 - 23 are diagrams for describing a third specific example of determination of an optimal trace route by an automatic trace determination apparatus in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • an obstacle Q1 exists on a straight line L connecting between a point S, which is to be a starting point of a trace, and a point E, which is to be an end point, and an obstacle Q2 exists in the neighborhood of this straight line L.
  • the obstacles Q1 and Q2 similarly to those in the embodiments described above, it is assumed that the obstacles Q1 and Q2 have polygonal shapes.
  • this determined optimal route may, in turn, intersect with the other obstacle.
  • a point on the optimal route in the neighborhood of the obstacle bypassed by such optimal route is set as "a new starting point of a trace" to perform the processes for setting candidate routes, setting tentative routes and determining an optimal route described above again.
  • the point on the optimal route in the neighborhood of the obstacle bypassed by such optimal route is, for example, a point of contact between the optimal route and the obstacle concerned.
  • an optimal route K4 bypassing the obstacle Q1 will, in turn, intersect with the obstacle Q2 at a vertex b1.
  • the obstacle Q2 exists on a straight line connecting between a vertex a1 of the obstacle Q1 bypassed by the optimal route K4 and the end point E. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 21, the vertex a1 of the obstacle Q1 is set as a new starting point S' of the trace and, then, an optimal route bypassing the obstacle Q2 that exists on a straight line L' connecting between the starting point S' and the end point E are determined by performing the processes for setting candidate routes, setting tentative routes and determining an optimal route described above again. An optimal route K'4 shown in Fig. 21 is determined newly.
  • the optimal route K'4 connects between the starting point S and the end point E without intersection with the obstacles Q1 and Q2.
  • other routes may connect between the starting point S and the end point E without intersection with the obstacles Q1 and Q2 and, for example, a route K5 shown in Fig. 22 may be one of such routes.
  • a route K5 shown in Fig. 22 may be one of such routes.
  • the route K'4 which is shorter than the route K5, is determined as an optimal trace route.
  • the optimal route K'4 obtained as described above is corrected so that the clearance between the optimal route K'4 and the obstacles Q1 and Q2 can be secured to eventually obtain an optimal route K"4 of the trace as shown in Fig. 23.
  • the optimal route is corrected so that the clearance between this optimal route and obstacles can be secured.
  • the clearance to be secured may be taken into account in advance and, then, the above-mentioned processes may be performed.
  • obstacles existing on a straight line connecting between two points, which are to be a starting point and an end point of a trace may be enlarged to take a predetermined clearance into account and such enlarged obstacles may be set as virtual obstacles and, then, the processes for setting the candidate routes, setting the tentative routes and determining the optimal route may be performed while replacing data about the obstacles with data about the above-mentioned virtual obstacles.
  • an optimal route obtained according to the present invention consists of a plurality of successive straight-line segments.
  • sharp corners between the straight-line segments curve smoothly in terms of electrical characteristics and durability of the trace.
  • Fig. 24 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an automatic trace determination apparatus of an embodiment of the present invention that operates according to a program that is stored on a storage medium.
  • a program for allowing a computer to perform automatic trace determination according to the present invention is stored on a storage medium (an external storage medium such as a flexible disk, a CD-ROM and the like) 110 and, for example, it is installed in a computer configured as described below to operate as an automatic trace determination apparatus.
  • a storage medium an external storage medium such as a flexible disk, a CD-ROM and the like
  • a CPU 111 controls the automatic trace determination apparatus entirely.
  • This CPU 111 is connected with a ROM 113, a RAM 114, a HD (hard disk drive) 115, an input device 116 such as a mouse, a keyboard and the like, an external storage medium drive 117, and a display device 118 such as a LCD, a CRT and the like through a bus 112.
  • a control program for the CPU 111 is stored in the ROM 113.
  • the computer program for performing the automatic trace determination process according to the present invention (an automatic trace determination process program) is installed (stored) from the storage medium 110 on the HD 115. Further, in the RAM 114, a working area for the CPU 111 to perform the automatic trace determination process and an area for storing a portion of the automatic trace determination process program are secured. Moreover, in the HD 115, input data, final data and, further, an OS (operating system) and the like are stored in advance.
  • the CPU 111 reads the control program from the ROM 110 and, further, reads the OS from the HD 115 to start the OS. As a result, the computer is ready to install the automatic trace determination program from the storage medium 110.
  • the storage medium 110 is mounted on the external storage medium drive 117 and a control command is input from the input device 116 to the CPU 111 to read the automatic trace determination process program stored in the storage medium 110 and store it in the HD 115 and the like.
  • the automatic trace determination process program is installed on the computer.
  • the computer operates as the automatic trace determination apparatus.
  • An operator can perform the automatic trace determination process described above by manipulating the input device 116 according to working details and procedures through an interaction indicated on the display device 118.
  • "Data about optimal routes of traces" obtained as a result of the process may be, for example, stored on the HD 115 for utilization in the future, or the results of the process may be indicated on the display device 118 visually.
  • the program stored in the storage medium 110 is installed on the HD 115 in the computer of Fig. 24, the present invention is not limited to such implementation and the program may be installed on the computer through an information transmission medium such as a LAN and the like or the program may be installed in advance in the HD 115 built into the computer.
  • an optimal position of a trace route that does not intersect with obstacles existing on a substrate can be determined automatically in a short time by computation using a computer and the like.
  • a trace that can satisfy requirements for clearance and bypass obstacles can be designed by computation using a computer according to design rules without being restricted by shapes, disposed positions and angles and the like of the obstacles existing on a substrate.
  • an optimal trace route that can satisfy requirements for clearance can be searched for automatically in a short time without being restricted by shapes and disposed positions and angles of the obstacles and regardless of angles, starting and ending positions of the trace intended to be provided. Therefore, to say nothing of in semiconductor integrated circuits such as LSIs and PCBs, in PBGA and EBGA semiconductor packages or in various circuit boards such as MCMs and SIPs, the present invention can determine trace routes that do not intersect with obstacles existing on a substrate.
  • the optimal trace routes have shorter wiring length and, therefore, they can be more economical and they can be manufactured more easily and they have a lower rate of occurrence errors in the manufacturing process. Further, the optimal trace routes are also electrically stable.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Design And Manufacture Of Integrated Circuits (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
EP06252599A 2005-05-25 2006-05-18 Automatic trace determination apparatus and method Withdrawn EP1727064A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005152805A JP4592494B2 (ja) 2005-05-25 2005-05-25 自動配線決定装置

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1727064A1 true EP1727064A1 (en) 2006-11-29

Family

ID=36602613

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06252599A Withdrawn EP1727064A1 (en) 2005-05-25 2006-05-18 Automatic trace determination apparatus and method

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US7673269B2 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
EP (1) EP1727064A1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
JP (1) JP4592494B2 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109509238A (zh) * 2018-07-25 2019-03-22 克立司帝控制系统（上海）股份有限公司 电子地图的编辑方法及系统
CN113885507A (zh) * 2021-10-20 2022-01-04 北京京东乾石科技有限公司 障碍物确定方法和装置

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4637043B2 (ja) * 2006-03-23 2011-02-23 新光電気工業株式会社 自動配線整形方法および自動配線整形装置
JP2008009851A (ja) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-17 Shinko Electric Ind Co Ltd 自動配線整形方法
JP4965307B2 (ja) * 2007-03-27 2012-07-04 王 淑珍 基板の配線位置決定方法
JP2009015366A (ja) * 2007-06-29 2009-01-22 Shinko Electric Ind Co Ltd 自動配線設計方法
JP2009032189A (ja) * 2007-07-30 2009-02-12 Toyota Motor Corp ロボットの動作経路生成装置
US8482565B2 (en) * 2009-05-15 2013-07-09 Microsoft Corporation Interactive connector routing between obstacles
KR101203897B1 (ko) 2011-02-25 2012-11-23 동국대학교 산학협력단 이동체（ｍｏｂｉｌｅ ｂｏｄｙ）를 위한 셀?기반 경로 계획 장치 및 방법
US9541401B1 (en) * 2013-02-13 2017-01-10 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method and system for determining shortest oceanic routes
US10572622B2 (en) * 2016-11-28 2020-02-25 Mentor Graphics Corporation Interconnect reuse resolution with bump compensation in a package design
JP6838028B2 (ja) * 2018-10-31 2021-03-03 ファナック株式会社 自動プログラム修正装置および自動プログラム修正方法
US11525691B2 (en) * 2019-09-20 2022-12-13 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. System and method for autonomous motion planning
CN111177294B (zh) * 2019-12-26 2021-04-27 北京工业大学 基于车辆轨迹数据求解交叉口中介中心性的方法
CN113936493B (zh) * 2020-03-04 2022-11-04 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 用于自动驾驶的图像处理方法、装置、计算机设备和介质
CN114692019B (zh) * 2022-03-28 2025-04-04 北京金山云网络技术有限公司 导航路线确定方法、装置、存储介质以及电子设备

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5245550A (en) * 1991-01-25 1993-09-14 Hitachi, Ltd. Apparatus for wire routing of VLSI

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07152814A (ja) * 1993-11-30 1995-06-16 Fujitsu Ltd 空線分による経路探索方法
JP3538158B2 (ja) 1994-03-18 2004-06-14 富士通株式会社 自動配線装置
JP3192057B2 (ja) * 1994-03-18 2001-07-23 富士通株式会社 配線プログラム生成方法及びその装置
JP3229235B2 (ja) * 1997-01-27 2001-11-19 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション 配線整形方法及び装置、禁止領域半径決定方法及び装置
JP4044642B2 (ja) * 1996-05-29 2008-02-06 富士通株式会社 経路形成システム及び方法及びコンピュータに経路形成の処理を行わせるためのプログラムを格納した記録媒体
JP3157732B2 (ja) * 1997-01-14 2001-04-16 日立ソフトウエアエンジニアリング株式会社 対話型配線パターン作成システム
JP3027949B2 (ja) 1997-01-17 2000-04-04 日本電気株式会社 半導体集積回路の自動配線方法
US6330707B1 (en) * 1997-09-29 2001-12-11 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Automatic routing method
JP2938068B2 (ja) 1997-09-29 1999-08-23 松下電器産業株式会社 自動配線設計における配線経路探索方法及び配線経路探索プログラムを記憶した記憶媒体
JP3453535B2 (ja) * 1999-08-03 2003-10-06 松下電器産業株式会社 自動配線設計における配線経路探索方法及び配線経路探索プログラムを記録した記録媒体
JP3724996B2 (ja) * 2000-02-14 2005-12-07 松下電器産業株式会社 半導体集積回路装置

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5245550A (en) * 1991-01-25 1993-09-14 Hitachi, Ltd. Apparatus for wire routing of VLSI

Non-Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ALI A K H ET AL: "A 2-D and 3-D robot path planning algorithm based on quadtree and octree representation of workspace", IEEE, 11 April 1988 (1988-04-11), pages 391 - 396, XP010075194 *
CLARKSON KENNETH L: "APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS FOR SHORTEST PATH MOTION PLANNING", CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING 19TH. 1987 ACM, NEW YORK, NY, USA, 1987, pages 56 - 65, XP002389215 *
ELLIS HOROWITZ ET AL: "EXERCISES", COMPUTER ALGORITHMS, COMPUTER SCIENCE PRESS, NEW YORK, NY, US, 1998, pages 241 - 275, XP002392397 *
J. MITCHELL: "Geometric Shortest Path and Network Optimization", 1998, pages 1 - 62, XP002389214, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.ams.sunysb.edu/~jsbm/papers/survey.ps.gz> [retrieved on 20060707] *
KAPOOR S ET AL: "Efficient algorithms for Euclidean shortest path and visibility problems with polygonal obstacles", PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY ACM NEW YORK, NY, USA, 1988, pages 172 - 182, XP002389217, ISBN: 0-89791-270-5 *
M SHARIR ET AL.: "On Shortest Paths in Polyhedral Spaces", PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 1984, ACM PRESS NEW YORK, pages 144 - 153, XP002389216, ISBN: 0-89791-133-4 *
SUH S -H ET AL: "A variational dynamic programming approach to robot-path planning with a distance-safety criterion", IEEE JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION USA, vol. 4, no. 3, June 1988 (1988-06-01), pages 334 - 349, XP002389279, ISSN: 0882-4967 *
T. DAYAN: "RUBBER-BAND BASED TOPOLOGICAL ROUTER, Front Page and pp. 9-27", 1997, SANTA CRUZ, XP002389280, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/surf/papers/talsDissertation.pdf> [retrieved on 20060707] *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109509238A (zh) * 2018-07-25 2019-03-22 克立司帝控制系统（上海）股份有限公司 电子地图的编辑方法及系统
CN113885507A (zh) * 2021-10-20 2022-01-04 北京京东乾石科技有限公司 障碍物确定方法和装置
CN113885507B (zh) * 2021-10-20 2024-08-20 北京京东乾石科技有限公司 障碍物确定方法和装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7673269B2 (en) 2010-03-02
US20060271898A1 (en) 2006-11-30
JP2006331017A (ja) 2006-12-07
JP4592494B2 (ja) 2010-12-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7673269B2 (en) Automatic trace determination apparatus and method
EP1645980A2 (en) Method and apparatus for automatically determining optimal trace positions on a substrate
US7721243B2 (en) Method and apparatus for routing
US7454736B2 (en) Automatic trace determination apparatus and computer program thereof
JP2002083006A (ja) 半導体パッケージの自動配線方法
CN116029254A (zh) 一种基于路径优化的集成电路版图自动布线方法及系统
US6662351B2 (en) Wiring editing method, for semiconductor package, capable of easily editing offset of wiring pattern
US7546569B2 (en) Automatic trace determination method
JP4859513B2 (ja) 配線設計方法及びその設計装置
US7543263B2 (en) Automatic trace shaping method
JP4425044B2 (ja) 半導体パッケージにおける自動配線方法および装置ならびに自動識別装置
US7073142B2 (en) Wiring diagram verifying method, program, and apparatus
JP4311244B2 (ja) 配線経路決定方法及びシステム
US7627846B2 (en) Method and apparatus for automatically shaping traces on surface of substrate of semiconductor package by using computation
US20090007049A1 (en) Automatic trace design method
JP2566061B2 (ja) エリアデータからパスデータへの変換方法
US20080209367A1 (en) Reliability design method
JP2009130228A (ja) レイアウト設計方法、レイアウト設計プログラム、及びレイアウト設計装置
JP2927319B2 (ja) 配線情報加工方式
JP2010123063A (ja) 自動配線整形方法およびこのコンピュータプログラム
JP2000231577A (ja) 部品配置装置および部品配置方法
JP2986279B2 (ja) 配線方法およびプリント基板設計システム
JP2009025969A (ja) 自動配線整形方法およびそのコンピュータプログラム
JP2007094511A (ja) Ｌｓｉ設計支援装置及びｌｓｉ設計支援方法
JP2003188257A (ja) 半導体チップの端子位置検査方法および装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

AKX Designation fees paid
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8566

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20070530