WO2005102545A2 - System and method of removing chamber residues from a plasma processing system in a dry cleaning process - Google Patents
System and method of removing chamber residues from a plasma processing system in a dry cleaning process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2005102545A2 WO2005102545A2 PCT/US2005/002689 US2005002689W WO2005102545A2 WO 2005102545 A2 WO2005102545 A2 WO 2005102545A2 US 2005002689 W US2005002689 W US 2005002689W WO 2005102545 A2 WO2005102545 A2 WO 2005102545A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- chamber
- gas
- plasma
- introducing
- dry cleaning
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32431—Constructional details of the reactor
- H01J37/32798—Further details of plasma apparatus not provided for in groups H01J37/3244 - H01J37/32788; special provisions for cleaning or maintenance of the apparatus
- H01J37/32853—Hygiene
- H01J37/32862—In situ cleaning of vessels and/or internal parts
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B7/00—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass
- B08B7/0035—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass by radiant energy, e.g. UV, laser, light beam or the like
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C16/00—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
- C23C16/44—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
- C23C16/4401—Means for minimising impurities, e.g. dust, moisture or residual gas, in the reaction chamber
- C23C16/4405—Cleaning of reactor or parts inside the reactor by using reactive gases
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32009—Arrangements for generation of plasma specially adapted for examination or treatment of objects, e.g. plasma sources
- H01J37/32082—Radio frequency generated discharge
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J2237/00—Discharge tubes exposing object to beam, e.g. for analysis treatment, etching, imaging
- H01J2237/02—Details
- H01J2237/022—Avoiding or removing foreign or contaminating particles, debris or deposits on sample or tube
Definitions
- the present invention is related to plasma processing, particularly to removing chamber residues from a plasma processing system in a dry cleaning process.
- Plasma processing systems are used in the manufacture and processing of semiconductors, integrated circuits, displays, and other devices to both remove and deposit materials on a substrate such as a semiconductor wafer.
- Halogen-containing and carbon-containing gases are commonly used to etch dielectric layers such as oxides and newer low-dielectric constant (k) materials. These gases are known to generate fluoro-carbon polymer reaction products, that can deposit on internal surfaces of a process chamber including chamber components and chamber walls. Over time, these residues can accumulate in the process chamber and may eventually flake off, thereby generating particle contamination in the process chamber and on processed substrates. Furthermore, these residues and fluorine radicals in the process environment begin to participate in the etch process in ways that can affect the etch rate, etch profile, critical-dimension control, wafer uniformity and selectivity. This is commonly referred to as the fluorine/polymer memory effect.
- an object of the present invention is to solve or reduce the above-noted problems associated with in-situ chamber dry cleaning processes.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide an improved dry cleaning process.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide an effective dry cleaning process that can be performed without having a wafer present in the processing chamber.
- a method for removing a chamber residue from a plasma processing system in a dry cleaning process.
- the dry cleaning process includes introducing a process gas including a gas containing carbon and oxygen into a process chamber of the plasma processing system, generating a plasma from the process gas, exposing the chamber residue to the plasma in a dry cleaning process to form a volatile reaction product, and exhausting the reaction product from the process chamber.
- the plasma processing system may be monitored to determine status of the dry cleaning process, and based upon the status from the monitoring, the method includes either continuing the exposing and monitoring, or stopping the dry cleaning process.
- the dry cleaning process can be a waterless dry cleaning (WDC) process.
- WDC waterless dry cleaning
- a substrate may present on a substrate holder in the process chamber during the dry cleaning process.
- FIGS. 1-4 show plasma processing systems according to embodiments of the invention
- FIGS. 5-7 show of changes in light emission from performing WDC processes in a plasma processing system according to embodiments of the invention.
- FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a method of removing a chamber residue from a process chamber of a plasma processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a method of monitoring and controlling the plasma processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 10 is a graph showing signal intensity as a function of processing time for monitoring status of a plasma processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIGS. 1-4 show plasma processing systems according to embodiments of the invention.
- FIG. 1 shows a plasma processing system according to one embodiment of the invention.
- the plasma processing system 1 includes a process chamber 10 having a pedestal 5 for mounting a substrate holder 20 for supporting a substrate 25, a gas injection system 40 for introducing a process gas 15 to the process chamber 10, a chamber monitoring system 100, and a vacuum pumping system 50.
- the chamber monitoring system 100 can, for example, be an optical monitoring system for monitoring light emission from a plasma in the process chamber 10, a particle monitoring system for monitoring particle levels in the process chamber 10, or a mass sensor for monitoring the gaseous environment in the process chamber 10.
- the process gas 15 can, for example, be a halogen-containing and carbon-containing etch gas for etching the substrate 25 in a manufacturing process where a microelectronic device is formed, or a gas for removing a chamber residue from the process chamber 10 in a plasma dry cleaning process.
- the process gas for removing the chamber residue can include a gas containing carbon and oxygen.
- the gas injection system 40 allows independent control over the delivery of the process gas 15 to the process chamber 10 from ex-situ gas sources.
- the process gas 15 can be introduced to the processing region 60 through a gas injection plenum (not shown), a series of baffle plates (not shown), and a multi-orifice showerhead gas injection plate 65, and the pressure in the process chamber adjusted.
- controller 55 is used to control the vacuum pumping system 50 and gas injection system 40.
- Substrate 25 is transferred into and out of chamber 10 through a slot valve and chamber feed-through via a robotic substrate transfer system where it is received by substrate lift pins housed within substrate holder 20 and mechanically translated by devices housed therein. Once the substrate 25 is received from the substrate transfer system, it is lowered to an upper surface of the substrate holder 20.
- the substrate 25 can, for example, include semiconductor substrates such as silicon (Si) and compound semiconductors (e.g., GaAs), liquid crystal display (LCD) substrates, glass substrates, and ceramic materials such as silicon nitride (SiN), silicon carbide (SiC), and alumina (AI 2 O 3 ).
- the plasma processing system 1 can be configured to process substrates of various sizes, for example 200 mm substrates, 300 mm substrates, or larger substrates.
- the substrate 25 can be affixed to the substrate holder 20 via an electrostatic clamp or a mechanical clamp.
- the substrate holder 20 can further include a cooling system including a re-circulating coolant flow that receives heat from the substrate holder 20 and transfers heat to a heat exchanger system.
- the substrate holder 20 may include a recirculating fluid flow that supplies heat to the substrate holder 20 from a heat exchanger system.
- gas may be delivered to the backside of the substrate to improve the gas-gap thermal conductance between the substrate 25 and the substrate holder 20. Such a system is utilized when temperature control of the substrate is required at elevated or reduced temperatures.
- the substrate holder 20 can contain a heating element 30.
- the heating element 30 can, for example, be a resistive heating element.
- Vacuum pump system 50 can include a turbo-molecular vacuum pump (TMP) capable of a pumping speed up to 5,000 liters per second (and greater), and a gate valve for throttling the chamber pressure.
- TMPs are useful for low pressure processing, typically less than 800 mTorr.
- a mechanical booster pump and dry roughing pump can be used.
- the plasma processing system 1 is capable of forming and sustaining a plasma in the process chamber 10.
- the plasma processing system 1 can, for example, be utilized for performing a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition process (PECVD), or a plasma etch process.
- the substrate holder 20 can further serve as an electrode through which radio frequency (RF) power is coupled to plasma in the processing region 60.
- RF radio frequency
- a metal electrode in the substrate holder 20 can be electrically biased at a RF voltage via the transmission of RF power from a RF generator 45 through an impedance match network 35 to the substrate holder 20.
- the RF bias serves to excite electrons and, thereby, form and sustain a plasma.
- plasma is utilized to either deposit material to a substrate 25 (i.e., the processing system 1 can act as a PECVD reactor), or to remove material from the exposed surface of the substrate 25 (i.e., the processing system 1 can act as a reactive ion etching (RIE) reactor).
- RIE reactive ion etching
- a typical frequency for the RF bias can be between about 0.5 MHz and about 200 MHz and can be 2 MHz.
- the impedance match network 35 serves to maximize the transfer of RF power to plasma in processing chamber 10 by minimizing the reflected power.
- Match network topologies e.g., L-type, ⁇ -type, T-type
- automatic control methods are known in the art.
- RF power can be applied to the substrate holder 20 at multiple frequencies.
- the controller 55 includes a microprocessor, a memory, and a digital I/O port capable of generating control voltages sufficient to communicate and activate inputs to the plasma processing system 1 as well as monitor outputs from the plasma processing system 1.
- controller 55 is coupled to and exchanges information with the process chamber 10, the RF generator 45, the impedance match network 35, the gas injection system 40, the chamber monitoring system 100, and the vacuum pump system 50.
- a program stored in the memory can be utilized to control the aforementioned components of a processing system 1 according to a stored process recipe.
- controller 55 is a digital signal processor (DSP); model number TMS320, available from Texas Instruments, Dallas, Texas.
- FIG. 2 shows a plasma processing system according to one embodiment of the invention.
- the plasma processing system 1 of FIG. 2 further includes a mechanically or electrically rotating DC magnetic field system 70, in order to potentially increase plasma density and/or improve plasma processing uniformity, in addition to those components described with reference to FIG. 1.
- the controller 55 is coupled to the rotating magnetic field system 70 in order to regulate the speed of rotation and field strength.
- FIG. 3 shows a plasma processing system according to one embodiment of the invention.
- the plasma processing system 1 of FIG. 3 includes an multi- orifice showerhead gas injection plate 65 that can also serve as an upper plate electrode to which RF power is coupled from an RF generator 80 through an impedance match network 75.
- a typical frequency for the application of RF power to the upper electrode can be between about 10 MHz and about 200 MHz and can be 60 MHz.
- a typical frequency for the application of power to the lower electrode can be between about 0.1 MHz and about 30 MHz and can be 2 MHz.
- the controller 55 is coupled to the RF generator 80 and the impedance match network 75 in order to control the application of RF power to the upper electrode 65.
- the substrate holder 20 in FIG. 3 can be electrically grounded.
- a DC bias can be applied to the substrate holder 20.
- the substrate holder 20 can be electrically isolated from the plasma processing system 1 and a floating potential may beiformed on the substrate holder 20 and on the substrate 25 when the plasma is on.
- FIG. 4 shows a plasma processing system according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- the plasma processing system of FIG. 2 is modified to further include an inductive coil 95 to which RF power is coupled via an RF generator 85 through an impedance match network 90.
- RF power is inductively coupled from the inductive coil 95 through a dielectric window to the processing region 60.
- a typical frequency for the application of RF power to the inductive coil 80 can be between about 10 MHz and about 100 MHz and can be 13.56 MHz.
- a typical frequency for the application of power to the substrate holder 20 can be between about 0.1 MHz and about 30 MHz and can be 13.56 MHz.
- a slotted Faraday shield can be employed to reduce capacitive coupling between the inductive coil 95 and plasma.
- the controller 55 is coupled to the RF generator 85 and the impedance match network 90 in order to control the application of power to the inductive coil 95.
- the substrate holder 20 in FIG. 4 can be electrically grounded.
- a DC bias can be applied to the substrate holder 20.
- the substrate holder 20 can be electrically isolated from the plasma processing system 1 and a floating potential may be formed on the substrate holder 20 and on the substrate 25 when the plasma is on.
- the plasma is formed using electron cyclotron resonance (ECR).
- ECR electron cyclotron resonance
- the plasma is formed from the launching of a Helicon wave.
- the plasma is formed from a propagating surface wave.
- a method for removing a chamber residue from a plasma processing system utilizing a plasma and a process gas that includes a gas containing carbon and oxygen.
- the dry cleaning process can be carried out after processing at least one production substrate (wafer), and the dry cleaning process may be performed without a substrate on the substrate holder (wafer chuck).
- This is referred to as a waferless dry cleaning (WDC) process.
- WDC waferless dry cleaning
- a WDC process can effectively remove residues from the substrate holder, as well as other chamber components and the chamber walls.
- the absence of wafer loading and unloading time periods during the cleaning process can reduce cleaning times and increase manufacturing throughput.
- the present invention also provides improved chamber cleaning over conventional dry cleaning processes even when a (non-production) substrate may be present on the substrate holder during the dry cleaning process in order to shield the substrate holder from the plasma environment as will be further described below.
- the dry cleaning process can be performed after each manufacturing process or, alternately, after more than one manufacturing process has been performed in the process chamber. After a dry cleaning process, when the next manufacturing substrate is transferred to the process chamber and processed, the substrate can face similar chamber conditions as the previous manufacturing substrate did. Thus, substrate to substrate variations can be minimized.
- the gas containing carbon and oxygen can be selected from a wide variety of gases, including carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), an alcohol (ROH), an aldehyde (RCHO), and a ketone (R ⁇ ORa).
- the alcohol can contain linear carbon chains, for example, methanol (CH 3 OH), ethanol (CH 3 CH 2 OH), propanol (CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 OH), and branched carbon chains, for example 2-propanol ((CH 3 ) 2 CHOH) and tert-butyl alcohol ((CH 3 ) 3 COH).
- the process gas can further contain at least one of hydrogen (H 2 ), ammonia (NH 3 ), water (H 2 O), nitrogen (N 2 ), and an inert gas such as argon (Ar), helium (He), or xenon (Xe).
- an inert gas such as argon (Ar), helium (He), or xenon (Xe).
- the term "at least one of a, b, c ... orx” refers to any one of the listed elements, or any combination of more than one listed element.
- the dry cleaning process can be carried out for a predetermined amount of time that is known to result in a clean chamber or, alternately, the end of the dry cleaning process can be determined using endpoint detection methods.
- an acceptable level of cleanliness may vary depending on the production process to be performed in the process chamber.
- One possible method of endpoint detection is to use an optical monitoring system to monitor a portion of the emitted light spectrum from the plasma region that indicates when all (or substantially all) of the chamber residue has been removed from the process chamber, thereby providing information on the status of the dry cleaning process.
- portions of the spectrum that indicate such a removal have wavelengths of 482.5 nm (carbon monoxide, CO), 775.5 nm (fluorine, F), and 440 nm (silicon tetrafluoride, SiF ), and can be measured using Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES).
- Fluorine light emission at 775.5 nm can indicate relative amount of fluorine radicals in the plasma environment (i.e., fluorine memory effect) and the amount of a fluorine-containing chamber residue in the process chamber.
- CO emission at 482.5 nm can be related to release of polymer residue from chamber components and other surfaces in the process chamber. After emission levels corresponding to those frequencies cross a specified threshold (e.g., drop to substantially zero or decrease below a particular level), the dry cleaning process can be considered to be complete.
- Another method of endpoint detection includes using a mass sensor to monitor the gaseous environment in the process chamber. Still another method of endpoint detection is to monitor operating parameters of the plasma processing system, including RF generator peak-to-peak voltage and capacitor position in the impedance match network. Yet another method of endpoint detection is to monitor particle levels in the process chamber using a particle monitoring system.
- FIGS. 5-7 show changes in light emission from performing WDC processes in a plasma processing system according to embodiments of the invention. These figures demonstrate the effectiveness of the present invention in removing residue from the chamber interior.
- the plasma processing system used to generate the data of Figures 5-7 is schematically shown in the above- described FIG. 3.
- the plasma conditions included a chamber pressure of 100 mTorr, an upper electrode RF power of 750 W at 60 MHz, and a lower electrode RF power of 250 W at 2 MHz.
- Plasma light emission was monitored from the processing region to evaluate the WDC processes for different process gases and process gas mixtures.
- Each curve in FIGS. 5-7 shows the difference between an initial light emission measurement taken of a chamber and a light emission measurement taken after 3 cycles of an etch and dry cleaning process are performed.
- an initial light emission was detected, using a 3 minute OES scan, from a plasma containing an Ar + O 2 process gas (in the presence of a clean Si wafer on the substrate holder). Then the following process sequence was performed three times: a) performing a plasma etch process developed for a low-k material or a planarizing material in the presence of a Si substrate (wafer) on the substrate holder, and b) performing a 30 sec WDC plasma process.
- the plasma etch process results in chamber residue being deposited on the chamber interior.
- FIG. 5 shows changes in fluorine signal at 775.5 nm according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 5 correspond to WDC processes utilizing a CO gas flow rate of 500 standard cubic centimeters per minute (seem) and Ar gas flow rates of 0 seem, 250 seem, 500 seem, and 1000 seem.
- a WDC process utilizing a Ar + O 2 plasma cleaning process with an Ar gas flow rate of 750 seem and O 2 gas flow rate 750 seem is also shown.
- the results in FIG. 5 show that WDC processes utilizing pure CO gas or CO + Ar gases resulted in reduced fluorine signals, and therefore reduced chamber deposits, in the process chamber, when compared to the conventional Ar + O 2 dry cleaning plasma process.
- Ar was used with CO, equal gas flows of CO and Ar (500 seem each) resulted in the lowest fluorine signal.
- FIG. 6 shows changes in fluorine signal at 775.5 nm according to an embodiment of the invention.
- the curves in FIG. 6 correspond to WDC processes utilizing a CO gas flow rates of 500 seem and 0 2 gas flow rates of 0 seem, 250 seem, 500 seem, and 750 seem.
- the results in FIG. 6 show that a WDC processes at a chamber pressure of 100 mTorr utilizing pure CO without any additional O 2 , was most effective in reducing the fluorine signal in the process chamber.
- FIG. 6 shows that a WDC process performed at a chamber pressure of 600 mTorr, utilizing a CO gas flow rate of 500 seem and O 2 gas flow rate of 750 seem, yielded similar fluorine signal as pure CO at a chamber pressure of 100 mTorr.
- FIG. 7 shows changes in CO signal at 482.5 nm according to an embodiment of the invention.
- the results in FIG. 7 show that a WDC process utilizing pure CO gas yields CO light emission that is comparable to the conventional Ar + O 2 dry cleaning plasma process.
- FIG. 7 shows the effects of not performing a WDC process (no discharge), and the effects of performing a WDC process using pure H 2 gas.
- the process parameter space for the dry cleaning process can, for example, utilize a chamber pressure between about 10 mTorr and about 5 Torr.
- the chamber pressure can be between about 20 mTorr and about 1 Torr and can be about 100 mTorr.
- a typical frequency for the RF power on the upper and lower electrodes in FIG. 3 can be between about 1 MHz and about 100 MHz.
- the upper electrode RF power can be between about 100 W to about 4,000 W, preferably about 750 W at 60 MHz.
- the lower electrode RF power can be between about 0 W and about 4,000 W, can be about 250 W at 2 MHz.
- a process gas flow rate of between about 100 seem and about 5,000 seem can be used. Furthermore, a gas flow rate between about 100 seem and about 2,000 seem can be used for the gas containing carbon and oxygen, a gas flow rate of between about 20 seem and about 1 ,000 seem can be used for H 2 , H 2 O, NH 3 , and N 2 , and a gas flow rate of less than about 2,000 seem can be used for an inert gas.
- the chamber pressure and the composition of the process gas can be varied during the plasma cleaning process.
- the time duration for the plasma cleaning should be sufficiently long to substantially reduce the amount of fluoro-carbon chamber residue in the process chamber.
- the time duration for the cleaning process can, for example, be between about 2 seconds and about 240 seconds. Alternately, the time duration can be between about 15 seconds and about 40 seconds.
- FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a method of removing a chamber residue from a process chamber of a plasma processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- the cleaning process 800 is started.
- a process gas including a gas containing carbon and oxygen is introduced in a process chamber of the plasma processing system.
- a plasma is generated from the process gas.
- the chamber residue is exposed to the plasma in a dry cleaning process to form a volatile reaction product.
- the reaction product is exhausted from the processing system, and at 812, the process is stopped.
- FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a method of monitoring and controlling the plasma processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- the process 900 may be the monitoring and controlling of the dry cleaning process 800 that is described above.
- the process is started.
- the plasma processing system is monitored by a chamber monitoring system.
- the monitoring can, for example, be based on a light emission signal or a light absorption signal from a gas in the processing environment, a mass signal from the cleaning gas and/or a volatile reaction product, a particle level, or a process parameter.
- the chamber residue is removed from the process chamber (including from chamber components and other surfaces within the process chamber). This can alter the monitored signal as the process continues in the process chamber.
- This change in the signal can be detected by the monitoring system and correlated to the status of the process chamber.
- the process 900 is continued at 904, or if the signal in 906 has reached a threshold value, a decision is made in 908 whether to continue the process 800 or to stop the process in 910.
- a signal intensity can be monitored to determine an endpoint of a cleaning process. Correlation of a signal intensity to an endpoint of a dry cleaning process can be carried out by a test process that is performed while detecting a signal intensity and monitoring status of a process chamber. Status of a process chamber can, for example, be evaluated by inspecting a chamber component during the test process and correlating the inspected results to a detected threshold intensity recorded when a desired endpoint of the dry cleaning process is observed.
- the threshold intensity may be a fixed intensity value, or a ratio of measured signal intensity and initial signal intensity (measured at the start of the process).
- FIG. 10 is a graph showing signal intensity as a function of processing time for monitoring status of a plasma processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- the signal can, for example, be a light emission signal (e.g., a fluorine signal at 482.5 nm, a CO signal at 775.5 nm, or a silicon tetrafluoride signal at 440 nm), a mass signal from a cleaning gas and/or a reaction product (e.g., SiF ), a plasma parameter, or a particle level.
- the detected signal intensity generally decreases as the dry cleaning process takes place, due to removal of a chamber residue from the process chamber and decreasing amount of the chamber residue in the process chamber.
- a threshold intensity 1080 is detected at time 1090 when the chamber component is known to be at an acceptable clean level for a desired process. It is to be understood that an acceptable clean level may vary depending on the production process to be performed in the chamber.
- the controller compares at 906 the detected signal intensity with prior stored signal intensity, and determines whether the detected signal intensity has reached the predetermined threshold intensity. When the signal threshold intensity is not yet detected, the monitoring returns to 904, and the process continues. When the threshold signal intensity is detected, a decision is made in 908 whether to continue the process in 904, or to stop the process in 908. Alternately, the decision in 908 to continue the process may include adjustment of process parameters to enter a second phase of a process, which is then monitored until a second threshold value is reached. For example, temperature and/or cleaning gas concentration could be lowered to effect a more gentle cleaning environment.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Drying Of Semiconductors (AREA)
- Chemical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
- Cleaning Or Drying Semiconductors (AREA)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2007506148A JP4801045B2 (ja) | 2004-03-31 | 2005-01-28 | ドライクリーニングプロセスのプラズマ処理システムからチャンバ残渣を除去する方法 |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10/813,390 US7959970B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2004-03-31 | System and method of removing chamber residues from a plasma processing system in a dry cleaning process |
| US10/813,390 | 2004-03-31 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2005102545A2 true WO2005102545A2 (en) | 2005-11-03 |
| WO2005102545A3 WO2005102545A3 (en) | 2006-10-12 |
Family
ID=35059487
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2005/002689 Ceased WO2005102545A2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2005-01-28 | System and method of removing chamber residues from a plasma processing system in a dry cleaning process |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US7959970B2 (enExample) |
| JP (1) | JP4801045B2 (enExample) |
| TW (1) | TWI291997B (enExample) |
| WO (1) | WO2005102545A2 (enExample) |
Families Citing this family (27)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002286636A (ja) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-10-03 | Advantest Corp | 化学物質検出方法及び装置 |
| JP2005033173A (ja) * | 2003-06-16 | 2005-02-03 | Renesas Technology Corp | 半導体集積回路装置の製造方法 |
| KR100605942B1 (ko) * | 2004-07-16 | 2006-08-02 | 동부일렉트로닉스 주식회사 | 반도체 소자용 금속 배선의 후처리 방법 |
| US7862683B2 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2011-01-04 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Chamber dry cleaning |
| JP2007287935A (ja) * | 2006-04-17 | 2007-11-01 | Toshiba Corp | 気相成長装置とそれを用いた半導体装置の製造方法 |
| US8292698B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-10-23 | Lam Research Corporation | On-line chamber cleaning using dry ice blasting |
| US20100024840A1 (en) * | 2008-07-29 | 2010-02-04 | Chang-Lin Hsieh | Chamber plasma-cleaning process scheme |
| KR101794069B1 (ko) * | 2010-05-26 | 2017-12-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | 반도체 제조설비 및 그의 시즈닝 공정 최적화 방법 |
| DE102011056538A1 (de) * | 2011-12-16 | 2013-06-20 | Aixtron Se | Verfahren zum Entfernen unerwünschter Rückstände aus einem MOCVD-Reaktor sowie zugehörige Vorrichtung |
| US9048066B2 (en) | 2012-07-03 | 2015-06-02 | Spts Technologies Limited | Method of etching |
| TW201443984A (zh) * | 2013-02-05 | 2014-11-16 | Hitachi Int Electric Inc | 清洗方法、半導體裝置之製造方法、基板處理裝置、以及記錄媒體及清洗結束判定方法 |
| US9824865B2 (en) * | 2014-03-05 | 2017-11-21 | Lam Research Corporation | Waferless clean in dielectric etch process |
| US9478390B2 (en) * | 2014-06-30 | 2016-10-25 | Fei Company | Integrated light optics and gas delivery in a charged particle lens |
| JP6661283B2 (ja) * | 2015-05-14 | 2020-03-11 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | クリーニング方法及びプラズマ処理方法 |
| US20170133284A1 (en) * | 2015-11-05 | 2017-05-11 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Smart in-situ chamber clean |
| JP6638334B2 (ja) * | 2015-11-05 | 2020-01-29 | 栗田工業株式会社 | プラズマ処理装置部品のクリーニング方法及びクリーニング装置 |
| JP6638360B2 (ja) * | 2015-12-08 | 2020-01-29 | 栗田工業株式会社 | プラズマ処理装置のクリーニング方法及びクリーニング装置 |
| WO2017172536A1 (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2017-10-05 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Controlling dry etch process characteristics using waferless dry clean optical emission spectroscopy |
| US10436717B2 (en) | 2016-11-18 | 2019-10-08 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Compositional optical emission spectroscopy for detection of particle induced arcs in a fabrication process |
| JP2018107264A (ja) * | 2016-12-26 | 2018-07-05 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | 消耗判定方法及びプラズマ処理装置 |
| KR20190121864A (ko) | 2017-03-17 | 2019-10-28 | 도쿄엘렉트론가부시키가이샤 | 에칭 메트릭 향상을 위한 표면 개질 제어 |
| US10410845B2 (en) | 2017-11-22 | 2019-09-10 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Using bias RF pulsing to effectively clean electrostatic chuck (ESC) |
| JP2020077750A (ja) * | 2018-11-07 | 2020-05-21 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | クリーニング方法及び成膜方法 |
| US12032302B2 (en) | 2021-03-26 | 2024-07-09 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Method and device for cleaning substrates |
| US12306044B2 (en) | 2022-09-20 | 2025-05-20 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Optical emission spectroscopy for advanced process characterization |
| US12362158B2 (en) | 2022-10-25 | 2025-07-15 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Method for OES data collection and endpoint detection |
| US12158374B2 (en) | 2022-10-25 | 2024-12-03 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Time-resolved OES data collection |
Family Cites Families (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5403434A (en) * | 1994-01-06 | 1995-04-04 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Low-temperature in-situ dry cleaning process for semiconductor wafer |
| TW394989B (en) * | 1997-10-29 | 2000-06-21 | Matsushita Electronics Corp | Semiconductor device manufacturing and reaction room environment control method for dry etching device |
| US5993679A (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 1999-11-30 | Anelva Corporation | Method of cleaning metallic films built up within thin film deposition apparatus |
| JP2000195830A (ja) | 1998-12-28 | 2000-07-14 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | 半導体製造装置、半導体製造装置のクリ―ニング方法、半導体装置の製造方法及び半導体装置 |
| JP2002289535A (ja) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-10-04 | Seiko Epson Corp | プラズマ気相化学堆積装置のクリーニング方法 |
| US20020148816A1 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2002-10-17 | Jung Chang Bo | Method and apparatus for fabricating printed circuit board using atmospheric pressure capillary discharge plasma shower |
| US6545245B2 (en) * | 2001-05-02 | 2003-04-08 | United Microelectronics Corp. | Method for dry cleaning metal etching chamber |
| JP2003282465A (ja) * | 2002-03-26 | 2003-10-03 | Hitachi Ltd | 半導体装置の製造方法 |
| JP2004005923A (ja) * | 2002-03-29 | 2004-01-08 | Fujitsu Ltd | 磁気ヘッドの製造方法および磁気ヘッド、パターン形成方法 |
| US20040018715A1 (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2004-01-29 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of cleaning a surface of a material layer |
| US7097716B2 (en) * | 2002-10-17 | 2006-08-29 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for performing fluorocarbon chamber cleaning to eliminate fluorine memory effect |
| US7122125B2 (en) * | 2002-11-04 | 2006-10-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Controlled polymerization on plasma reactor wall |
| US7041608B2 (en) * | 2004-02-06 | 2006-05-09 | Eastman Kodak Company | Providing fluorocarbon layers on conductive electrodes in making electronic devices such as OLED devices |
-
2004
- 2004-03-31 US US10/813,390 patent/US7959970B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2005
- 2005-01-28 JP JP2007506148A patent/JP4801045B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-01-28 WO PCT/US2005/002689 patent/WO2005102545A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-03-31 TW TW094110240A patent/TWI291997B/zh not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2007531996A (ja) | 2007-11-08 |
| US7959970B2 (en) | 2011-06-14 |
| WO2005102545A3 (en) | 2006-10-12 |
| JP4801045B2 (ja) | 2011-10-26 |
| TWI291997B (en) | 2008-01-01 |
| US20050224458A1 (en) | 2005-10-13 |
| TW200600607A (en) | 2006-01-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7959970B2 (en) | System and method of removing chamber residues from a plasma processing system in a dry cleaning process | |
| KR101057877B1 (ko) | 플라즈마 세정 방법 및 플라즈마 cvd 방법 | |
| US7465357B2 (en) | Computer-readable medium that contains software for executing a method for cleaning a CVD chamber | |
| KR100881045B1 (ko) | 챔버 내 잔여물의 2단계 플라즈마 세정 | |
| CN100411118C (zh) | 蚀刻用的高压无晶片自动清洗 | |
| US7344993B2 (en) | Low-pressure removal of photoresist and etch residue | |
| US6994769B2 (en) | In-situ cleaning of a polymer coated plasma processing chamber | |
| KR101226297B1 (ko) | 포토레지스트 및 에칭 찌꺼기를 저압 제거하는 애싱 방법 | |
| US6776851B1 (en) | In-situ cleaning of a polymer coated plasma processing chamber | |
| JP2006287228A (ja) | セルフクリーニングが可能な半導体処理装置 | |
| JP2020065079A (ja) | プラズマ処理装置および大気開放方法 | |
| US20060090773A1 (en) | Sulfur hexafluoride remote plasma source clean | |
| JP5548028B2 (ja) | 堆積チャンバのリモートクリーニング方法 |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2007506148 Country of ref document: JP |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: DE |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |