US20140102693A1 - Situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery - Google Patents

Situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140102693A1
US20140102693A1 US14/109,859 US201314109859A US2014102693A1 US 20140102693 A1 US20140102693 A1 US 20140102693A1 US 201314109859 A US201314109859 A US 201314109859A US 2014102693 A1 US2014102693 A1 US 2014102693A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
formation
organic
water
rich rock
hydrocarbons
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/109,859
Inventor
Robert D. Kaminsky
William A. Symington
Jesse D. Yeakel
Michele M. Thomas
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US14/109,859 priority Critical patent/US20140102693A1/en
Publication of US20140102693A1 publication Critical patent/US20140102693A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/16Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
    • E21B43/24Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection
    • E21B43/2401Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection by means of electricity
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B41/00Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
    • E21B41/005Waste disposal systems
    • E21B41/0057Disposal of a fluid by injection into a subterranean formation
    • E21B41/0064Carbon dioxide sequestration
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/16Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
    • E21B43/24Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection
    • E21B43/241Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection combined with solution mining of non-hydrocarbon minerals, e.g. solvent pyrolysis of oil shale
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q99/00Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/40Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of hydrocarbon recovery. More specifically, the present invention relates to the production of hydrocarbon fluids and the recovery of water-soluble minerals, such as nahcolite and/or soda ash, from an organic-rich rock formation, such as an oil shale formation.
  • water-soluble minerals such as nahcolite and/or soda ash
  • Kerogen is a solid, carbonaceous material.
  • oil shale a solid, carbonaceous material.
  • the mixture may be referred to as oil shale. This is true whether or not the mineral is, in fact, technically shale, that is, a rock formed from compacted clay.
  • kerogen produces oil, gas and some water.
  • Oil shale formations are typically found at relatively shallow depths ( ⁇ about 3,000 feet) in various areas world-wide and of the United States, including for example Wyoming, Colorado and Utah. Many such formations are known to have extremely limited permeability.
  • Kerogen may be converted to mobile hydrocarbons by heating the oil shale to temperatures generally in excess of 270° C. (518° F.). The rate of conversion increases sharply with increasing temperature. When kerogen is heated, chemical reactions break the larger molecules forming the solid kerogen into smaller molecules of oil and gas. The thermal conversion process is referred to as pyrolysis or retorting.
  • the heat injection wells were equipped with electrical heating elements.
  • the elements were surrounded by sand or cement or other heat-conductive material.
  • Each heat injection well transmitted heat into the surrounding oil shale while preventing any inflow of fluid.
  • fluid producing wells were also completed in near proximity to the heat injection wells. As kerogen was pyrolyzed upon heat conduction into the rock matrix, the resulting oil and gas would be recovered through the adjacent production wells.
  • the WO 2005/010320 process involves the use of electrically conductive fractures to heat the oil shale.
  • a heat source is constructed using wellbores and then hydraulically fracturing the oil shale.
  • the fractures are filled with an electrically conductive material which forms a heating element.
  • Calcined petroleum coke is a suitable conductant material.
  • the fractures are created in a vertical orientation along longitudinal, horizontal planes formed by horizontal wellbores. Electricity is conducted through the conductive fractures from the heel to the toe of each well.
  • the electrical circuit is completed by an additional horizontal well that intersects one or more of the vertical fractures near the toe to supply the opposite polarity. Modeling suggests that temperatures in the immediate vicinity of the fracture exceed 600° C. Thermal conduction heats and artificially matures the oil shale to conversion temperatures in excess of 300° C.
  • the WO 2005/045192 process involves the circulation of supercritical naphtha through fractures. This means that the oil shale is heated by circulating a dense, hot hydrocarbon vapor through sets of closely-spaced hydraulic fractures. In this instance, the fractures are horizontally formed and conventionally propped. Fracture temperatures of 320°-400° C. are maintained for five to ten years. Vaporized naphtha is typically the preferred heating medium due to its high volumetric heat capacity, ready availability and relatively low degradation rate at the heating temperature. In the WO 2005/045192 process, as the kerogen matures, fluid pressure will drive the generated oil to the heated fractures, where it will be produced with the cycling hydrocarbon vapor.
  • Nahcolite is a natural mineral (NaHCO 3 ), and is commonly known as baking soda or sodium bicarbonate.
  • the mineral can be associated with oil shale deposits such as those located in parts of the Piceance Basin in Colorado.
  • Nahcolite resources in the Piceance Basin are estimated by the United States Geological Survey at over 29 billon metric tons. (J. R. Dyni, “Stratigraphy and Nahcolite Resources of the Saline Facies of the Green River Formation in Northwest Colorado,” in D. K. Murray (ed.), Guidebook to the Energy Resources of the Piceance Creek Basin Colo., Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists—1974 Guidebook, pp. 111-122 (1974)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Nahcolite typically occurs as finely disseminated crystals and nodules within oil shale beds. It also occurs in several discrete beds mixed with variable amounts of oil shale and sometimes associated with halite. Much of the nahcolite in the Piceance Basin occurs as either non-bedded crystalline aggregates scattered through the oil shale, or as laterally continuous units of fine crystals disseminated in the oil shale.
  • the sodium bicarbonate processed from nahcolite has value for use in food (as baking soda), in pharmaceutical products, in flue gas clean-up (such as SO 2 removal), and in fire extinguishers.
  • Sodium bicarbonate can be converted to sodium carbonate (Na 2 CO 3 ; also known as soda ash). The conversion takes place in the presence of heat according to the following chemical reaction:
  • Sodium carbonate, or soda ash is a large-scale commodity chemical. Soda ash is used in glass making, chemical manufacture, and the manufacture of detergents. Much of the sodium bicarbonate produced via mining is converted in surface facilities to soda ash.
  • Nahcolite can be recovered from oil shale via solution mining.
  • M. Prats, P. J. Closmann, A. T. Ireson, and G. Drinkard, “Soluble-Salt Processes for In-Situ Recovery of Hydrocarbons from Oil Shale,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 1078-1088 (September 1977) The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the process involves injecting hot water under pressure into the subsurface. Sodium bicarbonate is fairly soluble in water.
  • the produced sodium bicarbonate solution is processed through a facility in order to generate three dry products: sodium bicarbonate, light soda ash, and dense soda ash.
  • the processes start by crystallizing sodium bicarbonate out of solution via cooling.
  • Light soda ash is produced by drying wet sodium bicarbonate at 600-800° F. This results in decomposition to a low bulk density (30-35 lbs/ft 3 ) powder.
  • Dense soda ash is formed by crystallizing soda ash out of a supersaturated solution. This results in granules with a bulk density of about 63 lbs/ft 3 .
  • the benefit of producing three products is that each has a different market.
  • the facility can shift the distribution of products based on current market conditions. Typically, sodium bicarbonate and light soda ash command higher prices, but the markets are more limited than for dense soda ash.
  • NaTec Another company involved in Nahcolite mining operations is NaTec, Ltd. NaTec is the listed assignee of U.S. Pat. No. 4,815,790 which issued in 1989, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the patent is entitled “Nahcolite Solution Mining Process.” The patent discloses a process for creating sodium bicarbonate using a “hot aqueous liquor.” This process also produced sodium bicarbonate solution which was then processed through a facility to generate three dry products: sodium bicarbonate, light soda ash, and dense soda ash. It is noted that much of the nahcolite was converted to a soda ash product at the surface facilities.
  • the '518 patent lists a variety of other perceived advantages to removing nahcolite (and dawsonite) prior to kerogen retorting.
  • Vinegar states that removing the nahcolite “may reduce mass within the formation and increase a permeability of the formation. Reducing the mass within the formation may reduce the heat required to heat to temperatures needed for the in situ conversion process. Reducing the mass within the formation may also increase a speed at which a heat front within the formation moves. Increasing the speed of the heat front may reduce a time needed for production to begin.” (See col. 324, ln. 40-48).
  • the invention includes an in situ method of recovering natural resources.
  • the method includes (a) heating in situ an organic-rich rock formation that contains both formation hydrocarbons and one or more formation water-soluble minerals, wherein the heating of the organic-rich rock formation both pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and makes available one or more migratory contaminant species previously bound in the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the method may further include producing at least a portion of the hydrocarbon fluids from the organic-rich rock formation, but wherein at least a portion of the one or more migratory contaminant species remain in the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the method may further include injecting an aqueous fluid into the organic-rich rock formation, wherein the injected aqueous fluid dissolves at least a portion of one or more water-soluble minerals and the one or more migratory contaminant species to form a first aqueous solution.
  • the method may further include producing the first aqueous solution from the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the method may further include processing the first aqueous solution in a surface facility to remove a portion of the one or more water-soluble minerals and processing the first aqueous solution in the surface facility to remove at least some of the one or more migratory contaminant species.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an illustrative oil shale development area. A plurality of wellbores is shown completed in an oil shale formation. A fluid processing area is also shown schematically.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a series of steps that may be undertaken in the production of hydrocarbon fluids and the recovery of nahcolite from an oil shale formation, in accordance with one aspect of the present methods.
  • FIG. 3 is a bar chart comparing the volume of an oil shale sample before and after an in situ, retorting process.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a solution mining and/or groundwater clean-up operation.
  • hydrocarbon(s) refers to organic material with molecular structures containing carbon and hydrogen. Hydrocarbons may also include other elements, such as, but not limited to, halogens, metallic elements, nitrogen, oxygen, and/or sulfur.
  • hydrocarbon fluids refers to hydrocarbons that are gases or liquids. Hydrocarbon fluids may include, for example, shale oil, pyrolysis oil, pyrolysis gas, a pyrolysis product of coal, and other hydrocarbons that are in a gaseous or liquid state.
  • produced fluids and “production fluid” refer to liquids and/or gases removed from an organic-rich rock formation and may include hydrocarbon fluids, shale oil, pyrolysis oil, pyrolysis gas, a pyrolysis product of coal, synthesis gas, and water (steam).
  • Produced fluids may include hydrocarbon fluids as well as non-hydrocarbon fluids.
  • Heavy hydrocarbons refers to hydrocarbon fluids that are highly viscous at ambient conditions (15° C. and 1 atm pressure). Heavy hydrocarbons may include highly viscous hydrocarbon fluids such as heavy oil, tar, and/or asphalt. Heavy hydrocarbons may include carbon and hydrogen, as well as smaller concentrations of sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen. Additional elements may also be present in heavy hydrocarbons in trace amounts. Heavy hydrocarbons may be classified by API gravity. Heavy hydrocarbons generally have an API gravity below about 20 degrees. Heavy oil, for example, generally has an API gravity of about 10-20 degrees, whereas tar generally has an API gravity below about 10 degrees. The viscosity of heavy hydrocarbons is generally greater than about 100 centipoise at 15° C. Heavy hydrocarbons may also include aromatics or other complex ring hydrocarbons.
  • solid hydrocarbons refers to any hydrocarbon material that is found naturally in substantially solid form at formation conditions. Non-limiting examples include kerogen, coal, shungites, asphaltites, and natural mineral waxes.
  • formation hydrocarbons refers to both heavy hydrocarbons and solid hydrocarbons that are contained in a formation. Formation hydrocarbons may be, but are not limited to, kerogen, coal, bitumen, natural mineral waxes, and asphaltites.
  • tar refers to a viscous hydrocarbon that generally has a viscosity greater than about 10,000 centipoise at 15° C.
  • the specific gravity of tar generally is greater than 1.000.
  • Tar may have an API gravity less than 10 degrees.
  • kerogen refers to a solid, insoluble hydrocarbon that principally contains carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur. Oil shale contains kerogen.
  • bitumen refers to a non-crystalline solid or viscous hydrocarbon material that is substantially soluble in carbon disulfide.
  • oil refers to a fluid containing a mixture of condensable hydrocarbons.
  • organic-rich rock refers to any rock matrix holding formation hydrocarbons (i.e. solid hydrocarbons and/or heavy hydrocarbons).
  • Rock matrices may include, but are not limited to, sedimentary rocks, shales, stone silt, sands, silicilytes, carbonates, and diatomites.
  • formation refers to one or more hydrocarbon containing layers, one or more non-hydrocarbon layers, an overburden, and/or an underburden of any subsurface geologic formation.
  • An “overburden” and/or an “underburden” includes one or more different types of substantially impermeable materials.
  • overburden and/or underburden may include rock, shale, mudstone, or wet/tight carbonate (i.e., an impermeable carbonate without hydrocarbons).
  • an overburden and/or an underburden may include a hydrocarbon containing layer or hydrocarbon containing layers that are relatively impermeable and are not subjected to temperatures during in situ conversion processing that result in significant characteristic changes of the hydrocarbon containing layers of the overburden and/or underburden.
  • an underburden may contain shale or mudstone.
  • the overburden and/or underburden may be somewhat permeable.
  • organic-rich rock formation refers to any formation containing organic-rich rock.
  • water-soluble minerals refers to minerals that are soluble in water.
  • Water-soluble minerals include, for example, nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate), dawsonite (NaAl(CO 3 )(OH) 2 ), or combinations thereof.
  • formation water-soluble minerals refers to water-soluble minerals that are found naturally in a formation.
  • Migratory contaminant species refers to species that are both soluble or moveable in water or an aqueous fluid and are considered to be harmful or of concern to human health or the environment.
  • Migratory contaminant species may include inorganic and organic contaminants.
  • Organic contaminants may include saturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, and oxygenated hydrocarbons.
  • Inorganic contaminants may include metal contaminants, and ionic contaminants of various types that may significantly alter pH or the formation fluid chemistry.
  • Aromatic hydrocarbons may include, for example, benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, and tri-methylbenzene, and various types of polyaromatic hydrocarbons such as anthracenes, naphthalenes, chrysenes and pyrenes.
  • Oxygenated hydrocarbons may include, for example, alcohols, ketones, phenols, and organic acids such as carboxylic acid.
  • Metal contaminants may include, for example, arsenic, boron, chromium, cobalt, molybdenum, mercury, selenium, lead, vanadium, nickel or zinc.
  • Ionic contaminants include, for example, sulfides, sulfates, chlorides, fluorides, ammonia, nitrates, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, lithium, boron, and strontium.
  • wellbore refers to a hole in a formation made by drilling or insertion of a conduit into the formation.
  • a wellbore may have a substantially circular cross section, or other cross-sectional shapes (e.g., circles, ovals, squares, rectangles, triangles, slits, or other regular or irregular shapes).
  • wellbore when referring to an opening in the formation, may be used interchangeably with the term “wellbore.”
  • pyrolysis refers to the breaking of chemical bonds due to the application of heat.
  • pyrolysis may include transforming a compound into one or more other substances by heat alone or by heat in combination with an oxidant.
  • Pyrolysis may include modifying the nature of the compound by addition of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, or carbon monoxide. Heat may be transferred to a section of the formation to cause pyrolysis.
  • the term “cracking” refers to a process involving decomposition and molecular recombination of organic compounds to produce a greater number of molecules than were initially present. In cracking, a series of reactions take place accompanied by a transfer of hydrogen atoms between molecules. For example, naphtha may undergo a thermal cracking reaction to form ethene and H 2 among other molecules.
  • the term “sequestration” refers to storing a fluid that is a by-product of a process rather than discharging the fluid to the atmosphere or open environment.
  • the term “subsidence” refers to a downward movement of a portion of a formation relative to an initial elevation of the surface.
  • the term “thickness” of a layer refers to the thickness of a cross section of a layer, wherein the cross section is normal to a face of the layer.
  • thermal fracture refers to fractures created in a formation caused directly or indirectly by expansion or contraction of a formation and/or fluids within the formation, which is in turn caused by increasing/decreasing the temperature of the formation and/or fluids within the formation, and/or by increasing/decreasing a pressure of fluids within the formation due to heating. Thermal fractures may propagate into or form in neighboring regions significantly cooler than the heated zone.
  • hydroaulic fracture refers to a fracture at least partially propagated along a plane in a formation, wherein the fracture is created through injection of fluids into a formation.
  • the fracture may include proppant material.
  • the present invention provides an in situ method for generating and recovering both hydrocarbon fluids and water-soluble minerals (e.g., sodium minerals) from an organic-rich rock formation (e.g., oil shale formations).
  • oil shale formations such as the Parachute Creek Member of the Green River Formation located in the Piceance Basin in Colorado, the oil shale holds both kerogen and nahcolite. It may be desirable in multi-mineral leasing areas, such as those managed by the United States Bureau of Land Management, that the production of shale oil from kerogen does not squander or waste the value of the in situ nahcolite.
  • the present invention provides for the production of shale oil, followed by the recovery of water-soluble minerals, particularly nahcolite or decomposition products of nahcolite, for example, soda ash.
  • water-soluble minerals particularly nahcolite or decomposition products of nahcolite, for example, soda ash.
  • shale oil and nahcolite or nahcolite derivates are co-produced.
  • the value of the water-soluble minerals is preserved.
  • Sodium bicarbonate can be converted to sodium carbonate (Na 2 CO 3 ; also known as soda ash). The conversion takes place in the presence of heat according to the following chemical reaction formula:
  • the water generated via nahcolite decomposition may be in the vapor state but can condense to liquid water as it migrates away from the heated region. Water may also be generated via decomposition of other minerals, such as dawsonite, decomposition of kerogen, and expulsion of bound water from clays.
  • Sodium carbonate, or soda ash is a large-scale commodity chemical. Soda ash is used in glass making, chemical manufacture, and the manufacture of detergents. Much of the sodium bicarbonate produced via mining is converted in surface facilities to soda ash. The decomposition of sodium bicarbonate to sodium carbonate can occur at relatively low temperatures; however, the process is pressure sensitive. As pressure increases, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the vapor phase increases and retards the decomposition. Templeton studied this effect and found that the decomposition temperature increases as follows:
  • Nahcolite can be recovered from oil shale via solution mining. The process involves injecting hot water under pressure into the subsurface. Sodium bicarbonate is fairly soluble in water. Solubility increases with temperature as follows:
  • FIG. 1 presents a perspective view of an illustrative oil shale development area 10 .
  • a surface 12 of the development area 10 is indicated.
  • an organic-rich rock formation 16 below the surface is an organic-rich rock formation 16 .
  • the illustrative formation 16 contains formation hydrocarbons (such as, for example, kerogen) and valuable water-soluble minerals (such as, for example, nahcolite).
  • the representative formation 16 may be any organic-rich rock formation, including a rock matrix containing coal or tar sands, for example.
  • the rock matrix making up the formation may be permeable, semi-permeable or non-permeable.
  • the present inventions may be practiced in oil shale development areas initially having very limited or effectively no fluid permeability.
  • each of the wellbores 14 is completed in the oil shale formation 16 .
  • the completions may be either open or cased hole.
  • the well completions may also include propped or unpropped hydraulic fractures.
  • wellbores 14 In the view of FIG. 1 , only seven wellbores 14 are shown. However, it is understood that in an oil shale development project, numerous additional wellbores 14 will most likely be drilled.
  • the wellbores 14 may be located in relatively close proximity, being from 10 feet to up to 300 feet in separation. Alternatively, the wellbores may be spaced from 30 to 200 feet or 50 to 100 feet.
  • the wellbores 14 are also completed at shallow depths, being from 200 to 5,000 feet at total depth. Alternatively, the wellbores may be completed at depths from 1,000 to 4,000 feet, or 1,500 to 3,500 feet.
  • the oil shale formation targeted for in situ retorting is at a depth greater than 200 feet below the surface.
  • the oil shale formation targeted for in situ retorting is at a depth greater than 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300 or 1500 feet below the surface. In alternative embodiments, the oil shale formation targeted for in situ retorting is at a depth between 200 and 5,000 feet, alternatively between 1,000 and 4,000 ft, 1,200 and 3,700 feet, or 1,500 and 3,500 feet below the surface.
  • the wellbores 14 will be selected for certain functions and may be designated as heat injection wells, water injection wells, oil production wells or water-soluble mineral solution production wells. In one aspect, the wellbores 14 are dimensioned to serve two, three, or all four of these purposes. Suitable tools and equipment may be sequentially run into and removed from the wellbores 14 to serve the various purposes.
  • a fluid processing facility 20 is also shown schematically.
  • the fluid processing facility 20 is equipped to receive fluids produced from the organic-rich rock formation 16 through one or more pipelines or flow lines 22 .
  • the fluid processing facility 20 may include equipment suitable for receiving and separating oil, gas, and water produced from the heated formation.
  • the fluid processing facility 20 may further include equipment for separating out dissolved water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species, including, for example, dissolved organic contaminants, metal contaminants, or ionic contaminants in the produced water recovered from the organic-rich rock formation 16 .
  • the contaminants may include, for example, aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, xylene, tri-methylbenzene, and polyaromatic hydrocarbons such as anthracene, naphthalene, chrysene and pyrene.
  • Metal contaminants may include species containing arsenic, boron, chromium, mercury, selenium, lead, vanadium, nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, or zinc.
  • Ionic contaminant species may include, for example, sulfates, chlorides, fluorides, lithium, potassium, aluminum, ammonia, and nitrates.
  • the contaminants may be removed in surface facilities by various means.
  • One such method is via an adsorbent material such as activated carbon, activated alumina, silica gel, clay, or fuller's earth.
  • Another such method is to employ bio-oxidation to treat the organic contaminants.
  • one optional step in the method is to assess the hydrological connectivity of the oil shale zone with aquifers to determine the risk to ground water.
  • the dissolved water-soluble minerals removed from the oil shale formation are preferably ones with chemical compositions that include sodium.
  • sodium minerals include nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate), or dawsonite (NaAl(CO 3 )(OH) 2 ), or combinations thereof.
  • the soluble minerals are generated via decomposition of other minerals due to the oil shale heating.
  • the original soluble mineral is nahcolite
  • the decomposed mineral is soda ash.
  • the dissolved water-soluble minerals may be removed from the produced fluid in one aspect by precipitation caused by altering the temperature of the solution.
  • the soda ash sodium carbonate
  • nahcolite sodium bicarbonate
  • the equipment for separating out water dissolved minerals and contaminants are in other facilities.
  • FIG. 2 presents a flow chart demonstrating a method of in situ thermal recovery of oil and gas from an organic-rich rock formation 100 , in one embodiment. It is understood that the order of some of the steps from FIG. 2 may be changed, and that the sequence of steps is merely for illustration.
  • the oil shale (or other organic-rich rock) formation 16 is identified within the development area 10 .
  • This step is shown in box 110 .
  • the targeted development area within the oil shale formation may be identified by measuring or modeling the depth, thickness and organic richness of the oil shale as well as evaluating the position of the organic-rich rock formation relative to other rock types, structural features (e.g. faults, anticlines or synclines), or hydrogeological units (i.e. aquifers). This is accomplished by creating and interpreting maps and/or models of depth, thickness, organic richness and other data from available tests and sources. This may involve performing geological surface surveys, studying outcrops, performing seismic surveys, and/or drilling boreholes to obtain subsurface rock samples.
  • Rock samples may be analyzed to assess kerogen content and fluid hydrocarbon generating capability.
  • the richness of the organic-rich rock formation may be ascertained from well or outcrop samples using a variety of data including but not limited to organic carbon content, hydrogen index, or modified Fischer assay analyses.
  • Subsurface permeability may also be assessed via rock samples, outcrops, or studies of ground water flow. Furthermore the connectivity of the development area to ground water sources may be assessed.
  • a plurality of wellbores 14 is formed across the targeted development area 10 .
  • This step is shown schematically in box 115 .
  • the purposes of the wellbores 14 are set forth above and need not be repeated. However, it is noted that for purposes of the wellbore formation step of box 115 , only a portion of the total initial heat injection wells and hydrocarbon production wells need be completed.
  • wellbores 14 are placed in a pattern such that untreated pillars of oil shale are left to support the overburden and prevent subsidence.
  • the heating step is represented generally by box 130 .
  • the heating of a production zone takes place over a period of months, or even four or more years.
  • the formation may be heated for one to fifteen years, alternatively, 3 to 10 years, 1.5 to 7 years or 2 to 5 years.
  • the bulk of the target zone of the formation may be heated to between 270 to 800° C.
  • the bulk of the target zone of the formation may be heated to between 300 to 400° C.
  • the bulk of the target zone is ultimately heated to a temperature below 400° C. (752° F.).
  • the rock formation 16 may optionally be fractured to aid heat transfer or hydrocarbon fluid production.
  • the optional fracturing step is shown in box 125 .
  • Fracturing may also be accomplished by creating thermal fractures within the formation through application of heating.
  • a process known as hydraulic fracturing may be used.
  • Thermal fracture formation is caused by thermal expansion of the rock and fluids and by chemical expansion of the transforming kerogen into oil and gas. Thermal fracturing can occur both in the immediate region undergoing heating, and in cooler neighboring regions.
  • the thermal fracturing in the neighboring regions is due to propagation of fractures and tension stresses developed due to the expansion in the hotter zones.
  • Thermal fractures increase permeability and aid fluid flow within the formation.
  • Hydraulic fracturing is a process known in the art of oil and gas recovery where a fracture fluid is pressurized within the wellbore above the fracture pressure of the formation, thus developing fracture planes within the formation to relieve the pressure generated within the wellbore. Hydraulic fractures may be used to create additional permeability and/or be used to provide an extended geometry for an extended heat source, such as in the WO 2005/010320 method.
  • FIG. 3 provides a bar chart comparing one ton of Green River oil shale before 50 and after 51 a simulated in situ, retorting process.
  • the simulated process was carried out at 2,400 psi and 750° F.
  • a total of 15.3 ft 3 of rock matrix 52 existed.
  • This matrix comprised 7.2 ft 3 of mineral 53 , i.e., shale, and 8.1 ft 3 of kerogen 54 imbedded within the shale.
  • the material expanded to 26.1 ft 3 55 .
  • the formation 16 is heated to a temperature sufficient to pyrolyze at least a portion of the oil shale in order to pyrolyze the kerogen and to create hydrocarbon fluids.
  • the resulting liquids and hydrocarbon gases may be refined into products which resemble common commercial petroleum products.
  • Such liquid products include transportation fuels such as diesel, jet fuel and naphtha.
  • Generated gases include light alkanes, light alkenes, H 2 , CO 2 , CO, and NH 3 . Conversion of the oil shale will create permeability in the oil shale section in rocks that were originally impermeable.
  • the heating process shown by box 135 , occurs over a lengthy period of time.
  • the heating period is from three months to four or more years.
  • the formation 16 is heated to a temperature sufficient to convert at least a portion of nahcolite, if present, to soda ash. Heat used to mature the oil shale and recover oil and gas will also convert nahcolite to sodium carbonate (soda ash), a related sodium mineral. The process of converting nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate) to soda ash (sodium carbonate) has been described above.
  • certain wells 14 may be designated as oil and gas production wells. This step is depicted by box 140 .
  • Oil and gas production might not be initiated until it is determined that the kerogen has been sufficiently retorted to allow maximum recovery of oil and gas from the formation 16 .
  • dedicated production wells are not drilled until after heat injection wells (box 130 ) have been in operation for a period of several weeks or months.
  • box 140 may include the formation of additional wellbores 14 .
  • oil and/or gas is produced from the wellbores 14 .
  • the oil and/or gas production process is shown at box 145 .
  • the water-soluble minerals, such as nahcolite and converted soda ash remain substantially trapped in the rock formation 16 as finely disseminated crystals or nodules within the oil shale beds, and are not produced.
  • some nahcolite and/or soda ash may be dissolved in the water created during heating within the formation.
  • the impact of heating oil shale to produce oil and gas prior to producing nahcolite is to convert the nahcolite to a more recoverable form (soda ash), and provide permeability facilitating its subsequent recovery.
  • Water-soluble mineral recovery may take place as soon as the retorted oil is produced, or it may be left for a period of years for later recovery. If desired, the soda ash can be readily converted back to nahcolite on the surface. The ease with which this conversion can be accomplished makes the two minerals effectively interchangeable.
  • Box 150 presents a typical next step in the oil and gas recovery method 100 .
  • certain wellbores 14 are designated as water or aqueous fluid injection wells.
  • Aqueous fluids are solutions of water that may contain other species. The other species may be present to alter the pH. Alternatively, the other species may reflect the availability of brackish water not saturated in the species wished to be leached from the subsurface.
  • an aqueous fluid is meant to refer to water including other species and water that does not include other species.
  • the water injection wells are selected from some or all of the wellbores used for heat injection or for oil and/or gas production.
  • the scope of the step of box 150 may include the drilling of yet additional wellbores 14 for use as dedicated water injection wells. In this respect, it may be desirable to complete water injection wells along a periphery of the development area 10 in order to create a boundary of high pressure.
  • water or an aqueous fluid is injected through the water injection wells and into the oil shale formation 16 .
  • This step is shown at box 160 .
  • the water may be in the form of steam or pressurized hot water.
  • the injected water may be cool and becomes heated as it contacts the previously heated formation.
  • the injection process may further induce fracturing. This process may create fingered caverns and brecciated zones in the nahcolite-bearing intervals some distance, for example up to 200 feet out, from the water injection wellbores.
  • a gas cap such as nitrogen, may be maintained at the top of each “cavern” to prevent vertical growth.
  • water injection wells may not be necessary if a sufficiently strong connected aquifer is present. In this case, drawing on production wells may allow existing subsurface waters to flow into the heated formation and serve the purpose of water injection.
  • the injection of water into the organic-rich rock formation 16 causes the water to contact water-soluble minerals and various migratory contaminant species.
  • the water-soluble minerals are soda ash and any unconverted nahcolite.
  • a water-soluble mineral solution is formed.
  • Sodium carbonate, or soda ash is soluble in water and is readily recovered by solution mining.
  • Saturated sodium carbonate solutions may have about 32 wt. % Na 2 CO 3 in water at temperatures between 30° C. and 140° C., about 23 wt. % at 200° C., and about 8.4 wt. % at 300° C.
  • certain wellbores 14 may also designate certain wellbores 14 as water or water-soluble mineral solution production wells. These wells may be the same as wells used to previously produce hydrocarbons or inject heat. These recovery wells will produce an aqueous solution of dissolved water-soluble minerals and other species, including, for example, migratory contaminant species. For example, the solution may be one primarily of dissolved soda ash. This step is shown in box 165 . Alternatively, single wellbores may be used to both inject water and then to recover a sodium mineral solution. Thus, box 165 includes the option of using the same wellbores 14 for both water injection and solution production (box 165 ).
  • hydrocarbons from pyrolyzed oil shale will generally leave behind some migratory contaminant species which are at least partially water-soluble. Depending on the hydrological connectivity of the pyrolyzed shale oil to shallower zones, these components may eventually migrate into ground water in concentrations which are environmentally unacceptable.
  • the types of potential migratory contaminant species depend on the nature of the oil shale pyrolysis and the composition of the oil shale being converted. If the pyrolysis is performed in the absence of oxygen or air, the contaminant species may include aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g.
  • Temporary control of the migration of the migratory contaminant species, especially during the pyrolysis process, can be obtained via placement of the injection and production wells 14 such that fluid flow out of the heated zone is minimized. Typically, this involves placing injection wells at the periphery of the heated zone so as to cause pressure gradients which prevent flow from inside the heated zone from leaving the zone.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an illustrative oil shale formation that is within or connected to ground water aquifers and the formation leaching operation.
  • Four separate oil shale formation zones are depicted ( 23 , 24 , 25 & 26 ) within the oil shale formation.
  • the water aquifers are below the ground surface 27 , and are categorized as an upper aquifer 20 and a lower aquifer 22 .
  • Intermediate between the upper and lower aquifers is an aquitard 21 . It can be seen that certain zones of the formation are both aquifers or aquitards and oil shale zones.
  • a plurality of wells ( 28 , 29 , 30 , & 31 ) is shown traversing vertically downward through the aquifers.
  • One of the wells is serving as a water injection well 31
  • another is serving as a water production well 30 .
  • water is circulated 32 through at least the lower aquifer 22 .
  • FIG. 4 shows diagrammatically the water circulation 32 through an oil shale volume that was heated 33 , that resides within or is connected to an aquifer 22 , and from which hydrocarbon fluids were previously recovered.
  • Introduction of water via the water injection well 31 forces water into the previously heated oil shale 33 and water-soluble minerals and migratory contaminants species are swept to the water production well 30 .
  • the water is then processed in a facility 34 wherein the water-soluble minerals (e.g. nahcolite or soda ash) and the migratory contaminants are substantially removed from the water stream. Water is then reinjected into the oil shale volume 33 and the formation leaching is repeated.
  • the water-soluble minerals e.g. nahcolite or soda ash
  • This leaching with water is intended to continue until levels of migratory contaminant species are at environmentally acceptable levels within the previously heated oil shale zone 33 .
  • This may require 1 cycle, 2 cycles, 5 cycles or 10 cycles of formation leaching, where a single cycle indicates injection and production of approximately one pore volume of water. It is understood that there may be numerous water injection and water production wells in an actual oil shale development.
  • the system may include monitoring wells ( 28 & 29 ) which can be utilized during the oil shale heating phase, the shale oil production phase, the leaching phase, or during any combination of these phases to monitor for migratory contaminant species and/or water-soluble minerals.
  • ⁇ barriers can be placed around the heated zone. These barriers may involve freeze walls or grout walls. Freeze walls involve circulating refrigerant through peripheral wells to freeze native water in the vicinity. Shell has discussed freeze walls for oil shale production in a number of patents, including U.S. Pat. No. 6,880,633. The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Grout walls involve injecting cement into the formation to fill permeable pathways.
  • some embodiments of the invention include an in situ method of recovering natural resources.
  • the natural resources may be recovered from an organic-rich rock formation, including, for example, an oil shale formation.
  • the organic-rich rock formation may include formation hydrocarbons, including, for example, kerogen, coal, and heavy hydrocarbons.
  • the natural resources may include hydrocarbon fluids, including, for example products of the pyrolysis of formation hydrocarbons such as shale oil.
  • the natural resources may also include water-soluble minerals, including, for example, nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate) and dawsonite (NaAl(CO 3 )(OH) 2 ).
  • Some embodiments of the invention include in situ heating an organic-rich rock formation that contains both formation hydrocarbons and formation water-soluble minerals prior to substantial removal of the formation water-soluble minerals from the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the oil shale may be heated prior to substantial removal of the nahcolite by solution mining.
  • Substantial removal of a water-soluble mineral means the degree of removal of a water-soluble mineral that occurs from any commercial solution mining operation as known in the art.
  • Substantial removal of a water-soluble mineral may be approximated as removal of greater than 5 weight percent of the total amount of a particular water-soluble mineral present in the zone targeted for hydrocarbon fluid production in the organic-rich rock formation.
  • in situ heating of the organic-rich rock formation to pyrolyze formation hydrocarbons may be commenced prior to removal of greater than 3 weight percent, alternatively 7 weight percent, 10 weight percent or 13 weight percent of the formation water-soluble minerals from the organic-rich rock formation.
  • heating of the organic-rich rock formation pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids.
  • the formation hydrocarbons may be pyrolyzed in situ by raising the organic-rich rock formation, or zones within the formation, to a pyrolyzation temperature.
  • the heating rate of the formation may be slowly raised through the pyrolysis temperature range.
  • an in situ conversion process for formation hydrocarbons may include heating at least a portion of an organic-rich rock formation to raise the average temperature of the zone above about 270° C.
  • the portion may be heated such that an average temperature of the selected zone may be less than about 375° C. or, in some embodiments, less than about 400° C.
  • the formation may be heated such that a temperature within the formation reaches (at least) an initial pyrolyzation temperature (e.g., a temperature at the lower end of the temperature range where pyrolyzation occurs in a reasonable, e.g., days, weeks or months, period of time).
  • the pyrolysis temperature range may vary depending on the types of formation hydrocarbons within the formation, the heating methodology, and distribution of heating sources.
  • a pyrolysis temperature range may include temperatures between about 250° C. and about 900° C.
  • a pyrolysis temperature range may include temperatures between about 270° C. to about 400° C.
  • the hydrocarbon fluids may include a pyrolysis oil component (or condensable component) and a pyrolysis gas component (or non-condensable component).
  • Condensable hydrocarbons produced from the formation will typically include paraffins, cycloalkanes, mono-aromatics, and di-aromatics as major components.
  • Such condensable hydrocarbons may also include other components such as tri-aromatics and other hydro carbon species.
  • a majority of the hydrocarbons in the produced fluid may have a carbon number of less than approximately 25.
  • less than about 15 weight % of the hydrocarbons in the fluid may have a carbon number greater than approximately 25.
  • the non-condensable hydrocarbons may include, but are not limited to, hydrocarbons having carbon numbers less than 5.
  • the API gravity of the condensable hydrocarbons in the produced fluid may be approximately 20 or above (e.g., 25, 30, 40, 50, etc.).
  • the hydrogen to carbon atomic ratio in produced fluid may be at least approximately 1.7 (e.g., 1.8, 1.9, etc.).
  • heating of the organic-rich rock formation both pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and makes available migratory contaminant species previously bound in the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the migratory contaminant species may be formed through pyrolysis of the formation hydrocarbon, may be liberated from the formation itself upon heating, or may be made accessible through the creation of increased permeability upon heating of the formation.
  • the migratory contaminant species may be soluble in water or aqueous fluids present in or injected into the organic-rich rock formation.
  • Some embodiments include producing at least a portion of the hydrocarbon fluids from the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the hydrocarbon fluids may be produced through production wells.
  • Production wells may be cased or uncased wells and drilled and completed through methods known in the art.
  • At least a portion of the migratory contaminant species remain in the organic-rich rock formation after the hydrocarbon fluids are produced.
  • the aqueous solution may then be produced from the organic-rich rock formation through, for example, solution production wells.
  • the aqueous fluid may be adjusted to increase the solubility of the migratory contaminant species and/or the water-soluble minerals.
  • the adjustment may include the addition of an acid or base to adjust the pH of the solution.
  • Some embodiments include processing the aqueous solution in a surface facility to remove at least some of the migratory contaminant species.
  • the migratory contaminant species may be removed through use of, for example, an adsorbent material, reverse osmosis, chemical oxidation, bio-oxidation, and/or ion exchange. Examples of these processes are individually known in the art.
  • Exemplary adsorbent materials may include activated carbon, clay, or fuller's earth.
  • the migratory contaminant species include one or more of aromatic hydrocarbons, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, oxygenated hydrocarbons, metal contaminants, and ionic contaminants.
  • the migratory contaminant species include one or more of benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, tri-methylbenzene, and polyaromatic hydrocarbon species.
  • the migratory contaminant species include one or more of metal contaminants containing arsenic, boron, chromium, mercury, selenium, lead, vanadium, nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc.
  • Some embodiments of the invention include assessing the connectivity of the organic-rich rock formation to aquifers. This may be done to determine if, or to what extent, in situ pyrolysis of formation hydrocarbons in the organic-rich rock formation may create migratory species with the propensity to migrate into an aquifer. If the organic-rich rock formation is hydrologically connected to an aquifer, precautions may be taken to reduce or prevent species generated or liberated during pyrolysis from entering the aquifer. Alternatively, the organic-rich rock formation may be flushed with water or an aqueous fluid after pyrolysis as described herein to remove water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species.
  • the organic-rich rock formation may be substantially hydrologically unconnected to any source of ground water. In such a case, flushing the organic-rich rock formation may not be desirable for removal of migratory contaminant species but may nevertheless be desirable for recovery of water-soluble minerals.
  • a mass of at least a portion of the formation may be reduced due, for example, to pyrolysis of formation hydrocarbons and the production of hydrocarbon fluids from the formation.
  • the permeability and porosity of at least a portion of the formation may increase.
  • removing water during the heating may also increase the permeability and porosity of at least a portion of the formation.
  • Certain embodiments may include increasing the permeability of at least a portion of an organic-rich rock formation to greater than about 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 20 and/or 50 Darcy. In addition, certain embodiments may include substantially uniformly increasing the permeability of at least a portion of an organic-rich rock formation. Some embodiments may include increasing the porosity of at least a portion of an organic-rich rock formation substantially uniformly.
  • Certain systems and methods described herein may be used to treat formation hydrocarbons in at least a portion of a relatively low permeability formation (e.g., in “tight” formations that contain formation hydrocarbons).
  • Such formation hydrocarbons may be heated to pyrolyze at least some of the formation hydrocarbons in a selected zone of the formation. Heating may also increase the permeability of at least a portion of the selected zone. Hydrocarbon fluids generated from pyrolysis may be produced from the formation, thereby further increasing the formation permeability.
  • heating a portion of an organic-rich rock formation in situ to a temperature less than an upper pyrolysis temperature may increase permeability of the heated portion.
  • permeability may increase due to formation of fractures within the heated portion caused by application of heat.
  • water may be removed due to vaporization. The vaporized water may escape and/or be removed from the formation. Removal of water may also increase the permeability of the heated portion.
  • permeability of the heated portion may also increase as a result of production of hydrocarbon fluids from pyrolysis of at least some of the formation hydrocarbons within the heated portion on a macroscopic scale.
  • the permeability of a selected zone within a heated portion of an organic-rich rock formation may be substantially uniform.
  • heating by conduction may be substantially uniform, and thus a permeability created by conductive heating may also be substantially uniform.
  • Permeability of a selected zone within the heated portion of the organic-rich rock formation may also rapidly increase while the selected zone is heated by conduction.
  • permeability of an impermeable organic-rich rock formation may be less than about 0.1 millidarcy before heating.
  • pyrolyzing at least a portion of organic-rich rock formation may increase a permeability within a selected zone of the portion to greater than about 10 millidarcies, 100 millidarcies, 1 Darcy, 10 Darcies, 20 Darcies, or 50 Darcies. Therefore, a permeability of a selected zone of the portion may increase by a factor of more than about 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, or 100,000.
  • the organic-rich rock formation has an initial total permeability less than 1 millidarcy, alternatively less than 0.1 or 0.01 millidarcies, before heating the organic-rich rock formation. In one embodiment, the organic-rich rock formation has a post heating total permeability of greater than 1 millidarcy, alternatively, greater than 10, 50 or 100 millidarcies, after heating the organic-rich rock formation.
  • heating the organic-rich formation includes generating soda ash by decomposition of nahcolite.
  • the method may include processing an aqueous solution containing water-soluble minerals in a surface facility to remove a portion of the water-soluble minerals.
  • the processing step may include removing the water-soluble minerals by precipitation caused by altering the temperature of the aqueous solution.
  • the water-soluble minerals include sodium.
  • the water-soluble minerals may include nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate), dawsonite (NaAl(CO 3 )(OH) 2 ), or combinations thereof.
  • the surface processing may further include converting the soda ash back to sodium bicarbonate (nahcolite) in the surface facility by reaction with CO 2 .
  • the aqueous solution may be reinjected into a subsurface formation after a portion of the water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species are removed and then the solution may be sequestered in the subsurface formation.
  • the subsurface formation may be the same as or different from the organic-rich rock formation.
  • heating the organic-rich rock formation includes generating soda ash by decomposition of nahcolite present in the formation.
  • CO 2 is generated.
  • Some embodiments include monitoring for the presence of the formed CO 2 and, alternatively, estimating the extent of the heating of the organic-rich rock formation from the CO 2 monitoring. The estimated extent may include estimating the distribution of heating in the formation, estimating the overall volume which has reached a given temperature, or estimating the rate of progression of a heat front in the formation.
  • Estimations may be calculated based on (i) measured or estimated stoichiometries, decomposition thermodynamics and/or kinetics of nahcolite, kerogen, and/or other carbonate minerals and (ii) measured or estimated distributions of nahcolite kerogen and/or other carbonates in the formation. Additionally, heat transfer models and/or simulations may be employed based on the heat input rates to the formation and assumed heat transfer characteristics of the formation and then the models and/or simulations refined based on the measured CO 2 data and calculations. Alternatively, the CO 2 monitoring data may be correlated to the extent of heating through use of a computer model based on nahcolite conversion to soda ash.
  • the amount of the CO 2 formed may be tracked in a nahcolite conversion process to determine the extent to which soda ash is present.
  • the estimates of the extent of heating based on CO 2 data and calculations may be used to refine heat transfer models of the organic-rich rock formation and/or simulations of the generation and production of hydrocarbon fluids from the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the heating estimates may be used to adjust the rate at which heat is input into the organic-rich rock formation at one or more locations or production fluids are produced from the formation.
  • the heating of the organic-rich rock formation may be accomplished through use of heater wells.
  • the heater wells may include, for example, electrical resistance heating elements.
  • the production of hydrocarbon fluids from the formation may be accomplished through use of production wells.
  • the adjustment of the rate at which heat is input into the organic-rich rock formation or adjusting the rate at which production fluids are produced from the formation may be accomplished through one or more of adjusting the heat input to a heater well, adjusting the flow rate from a production well, adjusting the back pressure of a production well, or combinations thereof.
  • the heating of the organic-rich rock formation may be accomplished through use of heater wells.
  • the heater wells may include, for example, electrical resistance heating elements.
  • the production of hydrocarbon fluids from the formation may be accomplished through use of production wells.
  • the injecting of the aqueous fluid may be accomplished through use of injection wells.
  • the production of the aqueous solution may be accomplished through use of solution production wells.
  • the different types of wells may be used for multiple purposes.
  • the production wells may also be used as injection wells for injecting water into the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the production wells may also be used as solution production wells for producing the aqueous solution from the organic-rich rock formation. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • the method includes an in situ method of recovering natural resources including heating an organic-rich rock formation in situ.
  • the formation may be substantially impermeable to fluid flow initially, contain formation hydrocarbons, and water-soluble minerals.
  • the heating occurs prior to substantial removal of the formation water-soluble minerals.
  • the heating pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and thereby create permeability within a matured (pyrolyzed) organic-rich rock zone in of the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the hydrocarbon fluids may be produced from the formation.
  • the method may include leaving a second portion of the formation hydrocarbons substantially unpyrolyzed, thereby preserving an unmatured organic-rich rock zone.
  • the unmatured organic-rich rock zones may be shaped as pillars running substantially the entire thickness of the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the heating rate and distribution of heating of the formation may be designed and implemented to leave sufficient unmatured pillars to prevent subsidence.
  • the method may include converting at least a portion of the formation water-soluble minerals to a different water-soluble mineral. For example, naturally occurring nahcolite may be decomposed to soda ash through heating. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • the method may include flushing the matured organic-rich rock zone and the unmatured organic-rich rock zone with an aqueous fluid.
  • the aqueous fluid may be used to dissolve water-soluble minerals and migratory contaminant species as discussed herein.
  • the flushing may optionally be completed after a substantial portion of the hydrocarbon fluids have been produced from the matured organic-rich rock zone.
  • the resulting aqueous solution may then be produced from the organic-rich rock formation to the surface for processing as discussed herein.
  • the flushing step may be delayed after the hydrocarbon fluid production step.
  • the flushing may be delayed to allow heat generated from the heating step to migrate deeper into surrounding unmatured organic-rich rock zones to convert nahcolite within the surrounding unmatured organic-rich rock zones to soda ash.
  • the flushing may be delayed to allow heat generated from the heating step to generate permeability within the surrounding unmatured organic-rich rock zones.
  • the flushing may be delayed based on current and/or forecast market prices of sodium bicarbonate, soda ash, or both as further discussed herein. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • One embodiment may include an in situ method of recovering natural resources including heating the organic-rich rock formation in situ, where the formation contains formation water-soluble minerals.
  • the heating may occur prior to substantial removal of the water-soluble minerals.
  • the heating may both pyrolyze at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and generate water which migrates and at least partially dissolves the formation water-soluble minerals in situ to form an aqueous fluid within the formation.
  • the generated water may be produced from one or more occurrences.
  • the generated water may be produced by decomposition of formation water-soluble minerals, pyrolyzation of formation hydrocarbons, dehydration of formation clays, or combinations thereof. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • Some embodiments further include producing a production fluid from the organic-rich rock formation where the production fluid contains the hydrocarbon fluids and the aqueous fluid.
  • the aqueous fluid may contain water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species.
  • the production fluid may be separated into a hydrocarbon stream and an aqueous stream at a surface facility. Thereafter the water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species may be recovered from the aqueous stream.
  • One embodiment includes an in situ method of recovering natural resources, including assessing the market price for a water-soluble mineral and comparing the market price for the water-soluble mineral to a cost-to-produce criterion.
  • the method may utilize a market price that is representative of the current market price, the forecasted market price, or a combination thereof.
  • the market price may be a listed commodity price, the price used in an existing or potential contractual arrangement or another measure of the current or potential value of the water-soluble mineral or a commodity or consumer product containing the water-soluble mineral or derivatives thereof.
  • the water-soluble mineral may be a sodium mineral, including, for example, nahcolite or soda ash.
  • the cost-to-produce criterion may be any criterion that reflects a measurement of the cost to produce the water-soluble mineral of interest or derivatives thereof.
  • the cost-to-produce criterion may include the cost to solution mine the water-soluble mineral of interest.
  • the cost-to-produce criterion may include a measure of the cost to produce the water-soluble mineral before heating the organic-rich rock formation to pyrolyze formation hydrocarbons as compared to the cost to produce the water-soluble mineral after heating the organic-rich rock formation to pyrolyze formation hydrocarbons.
  • the method may include determining that the market price of the water-soluble-mineral is less than the cost-to-produce criterion.
  • an operator may opt to forego producing the water-soluble minerals before pyrolyzing the formation hydrocarbons in the organic-rich rock formation, thus delaying production of the water-soluble minerals to a later time.
  • the resulting multi-mineral production scheme may be more economic than producing the water-soluble minerals before pyrolyzation.
  • An embodiment may include an in situ method of recovering natural resources, including providing produced fluid processing facilities which are sized to process a first hydrocarbon fluid production rate produced during an initial production period together with a first CO 2 production rate produced during the initial production period.
  • the first CO 2 production rate may include CO 2 generated from dissociation of nahcolite to form soda ash.
  • the method may be used to adequately size produced fluid processing facilities where the operator plans to pyrolyze formation hydrocarbons without removing the naturally occurring nahcolite before pyrolyzation.
  • the method may enable one to economically produce hydrocarbon fluids from an organic-rich rock formation without the necessity of removing the nahcolite beforehand, thus improving the overall project economics.
  • This embodiment may also be practiced by designing and/or constructing a system that includes the produced fluid processing facilities. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • Methods to remove CO 2 , as well as other so-called acid gases (such as H 2 S), from produced hydrocarbon gas include the use of chemical reaction processes and of physical solvent processes.
  • Chemical reaction processes typically involve contacting the gas stream with an aqueous amine solution at high pressure and/or low temperature. This causes the acid gas species to chemically react with the amines and go into solution. By raising the temperature and/or lowering the pressure the chemical reaction can be reversed and a concentrated stream of acid gases can be recovered.
  • An alternative chemical reaction process involves hot carbonate solutions, typically potassium carbonate. The hot carbonate solution is regenerated and the concentrated stream of acid gases is recovered by contacting the solution with steam.
  • Physical solvent processes typically involve contacting the gas stream with a glycol at high pressure and/or low temperature.
  • reducing the pressure or raising the temperature allows regeneration of the solvent and recovery of the acid gases.
  • Certain amines or glycols may be more or less selective in the types of acid gas species removed. Sizing of any of these processes requires determining the amount of chemical to circulate, the rate of circulation, the energy input for regeneration, and the size and type of gas-chemical contacting equipment. Contacting equipment typically involves packed or multi-tray countercurrent towers. Optimal sizing for each of these aspects is highly dependent on the rate at which gas is being produced from the formation and the concentration of the acid gases in the gas stream. Less commonly, cryogenic distillation is utilized to remove acid gases. This method takes advantage of the differences in the boiling points of the gas components.
  • the initial production period may include a one year period beginning from the point of the first heating of the organic-rich rock formation. Alternatively, the initial production period may include a two, three, four or a five year period beginning from the point of the first heating of the organic-rich rock formation.
  • the first hydrocarbon fluid production rate may be the maximum daily hydrocarbon fluid production rate reached during the initial production period. Alternatively, the first hydrocarbon fluid production rate may be the maximum hourly, monthly or yearly hydrocarbon fluid production rate reached during the initial production period.
  • the first CO 2 production rate may be the maximum daily CO 2 production rate reached during the initial production period. Alternatively, the first CO 2 production rate may be the maximum hourly, monthly or yearly CO 2 production rate reached during the initial production period. This embodiment may be combined with other aspects of the invention discussed herein.
  • the current invention proposes to recover the value of the water-soluble minerals such as nahcolite after heating an oil shale zone and producing at least some of the shale oil.
  • the current invention proposes to recover the value of the water-soluble minerals such as nahcolite after heating an oil shale zone and producing at least some of the shale oil.
  • the shale oil can be significantly more valuable than the water-soluble mineral components. Thus, recovering the shale oil value earlier can improve the net present value of the development of a lease under development.
  • Removing water-soluble minerals early in the process may disrupt the ability to produce the oil shale by certain methods. For instance, removal of the soluble minerals can hinder the ability to produce hydraulic fractures in the formation and make the shale more prone to cavern formation and subsidence. Subsidence can cause substantial stresses on the wellbore completions and lead to early and sudden failures.
  • Solution mining after kerogen conversion can be combined with leaching of migratory contaminant species, including, for example, water-soluble organic components, heavy metal components and ionic species left over from producing the oil shale.
  • leaching of migratory contaminant species including, for example, water-soluble organic components, heavy metal components and ionic species left over from producing the oil shale.
  • the removal of such components may be environmentally necessary if the shale oil zone is connected to a ground water source.
  • the alkali nature of sodium carbonate solutions can aid the washing of organics from the shale oil zone.
  • Project and field coordination can be simplified by separating the oil shale and mineral removal activities. Moreover, certain wells and facilities can be reused from the in situ shale oil development for the mineral removal.
  • the conversion of nahcolite to soda ash, with resultant CO 2 generation, during the oil shale heating can be used to monitor the progression of the oil shale maturation.
  • the production of generated CO 2 can be analyzed to help assess the position of the heat front and the nature of the generated permeability.
  • the heating behavior of oil shale can be correlated to the amount of CO 2 present in the produced fluid return stream based on estimates of the amount of nahcolite present in situ.
  • CO 2 concentrations may more greatly reflect generation from the kerogen converting to oil and gas and perhaps from dawsonite decomposition.
  • the CO 2 generation also reflects other carbonate mineral dissociation.
  • Analyzing the isotopic nature of the CO 2 can be used to distinguish between CO 2 gas from organic and inorganic sources.
  • Organic-sourced gas tends to be lighter (i.e., enriched in 12 C vs. 13 C) than inorganic-sourced gas. (See, for example, Laughrey, C. D. and Balassare, F.
  • CO 2 concentrations can be measured in a number of ways known in the art including gas chromatography, mass spectrography, infrared spectrography, Raman spectrography, photoacoustic spectrography, gas density measurements, and various chemical-specific reactions. Isotopic concentrations are typically measured via a combination of mass spectrography and gas chromatography.
  • Extracting the water-soluble minerals after the oil shale maturation may increase their recovery since the maturation process increases permeability and connectivity in the formation. Thus, originally isolated concentrations of soluble minerals may become accessible to the injected water.
  • the sodium minerals are produced as soda ash, rather than sodium bicarbonate. Produced nahcolite is often converted to soda ash in a facility and thus a step is saved with the in situ conversion.
  • Dyni estimates the total nahcolite resource in the Piceance Basin at 32 billion short tons. This makes it the second largest sodium carbonate deposit in the world behind the trona deposits of southwest Wyoming (103 billion short tons). Resource density in the basin center areas varies from 170-490 million short tons per square mile.
  • thermal recovery of oil and gas be conducted before solution mining of nahcolite or other water-soluble minerals.
  • solution mining can generate large voids in a rock formation and collapse breccias in an oil shale development unit. These voids and brecciated zones may pose problems for in situ and mining recovery of oil shale.
  • sodium carbonate may further decompose into sodium oxide and CO 2 , according to the following reaction.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

A method of producing hydrocarbon fluids from a subsurface organic-rich rock formation, for example an oil shale formation, in which the oil shale formation contains water-soluble minerals, for example nahcolite, is provided. In one embodiment, the method includes the step of heating the organic-rich rock formation in situ. Optionally, this heating step may be performed prior to any substantial removal of water-soluble minerals from the organic-rich rock formation. In accordance with the method, the heating of the organic-rich rock formation both pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons, for example kerogen, to create hydrocarbon fluids, and converts at least a portion of the water-soluble minerals, for example, converts nahcolite to soda ash. Thereafter, the hydrocarbon fluids are produced from the formation.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/636,345 filed Dec. 11, 2009, which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/726,651 filed on Mar. 22, 2007, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/793,841 filed on Apr. 21, 2006, the entirety of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to the field of hydrocarbon recovery. More specifically, the present invention relates to the production of hydrocarbon fluids and the recovery of water-soluble minerals, such as nahcolite and/or soda ash, from an organic-rich rock formation, such as an oil shale formation.
  • 2. Background of the Invention
  • Certain geological formations are known to contain an organic matter known as “kerogen.” Kerogen is a solid, carbonaceous material. When kerogen is imbedded in mineral formations, the mixture may be referred to as oil shale. This is true whether or not the mineral is, in fact, technically shale, that is, a rock formed from compacted clay. Upon heating, kerogen produces oil, gas and some water. Oil shale formations are typically found at relatively shallow depths (<about 3,000 feet) in various areas world-wide and of the United States, including for example Wyoming, Colorado and Utah. Many such formations are known to have extremely limited permeability.
  • Kerogen may be converted to mobile hydrocarbons by heating the oil shale to temperatures generally in excess of 270° C. (518° F.). The rate of conversion increases sharply with increasing temperature. When kerogen is heated, chemical reactions break the larger molecules forming the solid kerogen into smaller molecules of oil and gas. The thermal conversion process is referred to as pyrolysis or retorting.
  • Attempts have been made for many years to extract oil from oil shale formations. Near-surface oil shales have been mined and retorted at the surface for over a century. In 1862, James Young began processing Scottish oil shales. The industry lasted for about 100 years. Commercial oil shale retorting has also been conducted in other countries such as Australia, Brazil, China, Estonia, France, Russia, South Africa, Spain, and Sweden. However, the practice has been mostly discontinued in recent years because it proved to be uneconomical or because of environmental constraints on spent shale disposal. (T. F. Yen, and G. V. Chilingarian, “Oil Shale,” Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 292). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Further, surface retorting requires mining of the oil shale, which limits application to shallow formations.
  • Research on oil shale production was generally carried out through the 1900's. In 1947, U.S. Pat. No. 2,732,195 issued to Ljungstrom, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. That patent, entitled “Method of Treating Oil Shale and Recovery of Oil and Other Mineral Products Therefrom,” proposed the application of heat at high temperatures to the oil shale formation in situ. Ljungstrom coined the phrase “heat supply channels” to describe bore holes drilled into the formation. The bore holes received an electrical heat conductor which transferred heat to the surrounding oil shale. Thus, the heat supply channels served as heat injection wells.
  • The heat injection wells were equipped with electrical heating elements. The elements, in turn, were surrounded by sand or cement or other heat-conductive material. Each heat injection well transmitted heat into the surrounding oil shale while preventing any inflow of fluid. Along with the heat injection wells, fluid producing wells were also completed in near proximity to the heat injection wells. As kerogen was pyrolyzed upon heat conduction into the rock matrix, the resulting oil and gas would be recovered through the adjacent production wells.
  • Ljungstrom applied his approach of thermal conduction from heated wellbores through the Swedish Shale Oil Company. A full-scale plant was developed that operated from 1944 into the 1950's. (G. Salamonsson, “The Ljungstrom In Situ Method for Shale-Oil Recovery,” 2nd Oil Shale and Cannel Coal Conference, v. 2, Glasgow, Scotland, Institute of Petroleum, London, p. 260-280 (1951)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Since 1947, various patents have been issued offering modifications and improvements to Ljungstrom's ideas. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 3,468,376 issued to Slusser, et al. in 1969 entitled “Thermal Conversion of Oil Shale into Recoverable Hydrocarbons”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The '376 Slusser, et al. patent suggested a process for circulating a heated pyrolyzing fluid through a flow channel. Abrasive particles were added to the circulating fluid to erode a layer of pyrolyzed oil shale being formed adjacent to the flow channel. This provided a channel for the flow of converted kerogen.
  • It was recognized in the Slusser, et al. patent that “[t]here are two mechanisms involved in the transport of heat through the oil shale.” First, heat is transferred through the solid mass of oil shale by conduction. Second, heat is transferred by convection through fluid flow of pyrolyzed kerogen within the oil shale.” Slusser, et al. noted that typically the transfer of heat by conduction is a relatively slow process due to the oil shale being an inherently poor conductor of heat. If significant permeability does exist or is created, convective heat transfer by fluids traveling through fine channels in the oil shale can contribute to the overall rate of heat transfer.
  • Various means for heating the rock matrix and imbedded kerogen have been proposed. U.S. Pat. No. 4,140,180, assigned to the ITT Research Institute in Chicago, Ill. and issued in 1979, suggested the application of in situ heat using radio frequency (RF) electrical energy. The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In doing so, the '180 patent listed and described other methodologies for applying pyrolyzing heat using electrical energy. The patent stated that, as of that time, “there is no . . . acceptable economical way to extract the hydrocarbon constituents.”
  • Techniques for in situ retorting of oil shale were developed and pilot tested with the Green River oil shale in the United States in the 1970's and 1980's. In situ processing offers advantages because it reduces costs associated with material handling and disposal of spent shale. In a number of the in situ pilots, the oil shale was first rubblized. Thereafter, combustion was carried out by air injection. A rubble bed with substantially uniform fragment size and substantially uniform distribution of void volume was a key success factor in combustion sweep efficiency. Fragment size was of the order of several inches.
  • Nevertheless, attempts to economically extract shale oil continued. In 1989, U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,118 issued to Shell Oil Company, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. That patent, entitled “Conductively Heating a Subterranean Oil Shale to Create Permeability and Subsequently Produce Oil,” declared that “[c]ontrary to the implications of . . . prior teachings and beliefs . . . the presently described conductive heating process is economically feasible for use even in a substantially impermeable subterranean oil shale.” (col. 6, ln. 50-54). The '118 patent proposed controlling the rate of heat conduction within the rock surrounding each heat injection well to provide a uniform heat front. The process was limited to formations having a specified grade and thickness.
  • Additional history behind shale oil retorting and recovery can be found in patent publication WO 2005/010320 entitled “Methods of Treating a Subterranean Formation to Convert Organic Matter into Producible Hydrocarbons,” and in WO 2005/045192 entitled “Hydrocarbon Recovery from Impermeable Oil Shales.” The Background and technical disclosures of these two patent publications are incorporated herein by reference.
  • The WO 2005/010320 process involves the use of electrically conductive fractures to heat the oil shale. A heat source is constructed using wellbores and then hydraulically fracturing the oil shale. The fractures are filled with an electrically conductive material which forms a heating element. Calcined petroleum coke is a suitable conductant material. Preferably, the fractures are created in a vertical orientation along longitudinal, horizontal planes formed by horizontal wellbores. Electricity is conducted through the conductive fractures from the heel to the toe of each well. The electrical circuit is completed by an additional horizontal well that intersects one or more of the vertical fractures near the toe to supply the opposite polarity. Modeling suggests that temperatures in the immediate vicinity of the fracture exceed 600° C. Thermal conduction heats and artificially matures the oil shale to conversion temperatures in excess of 300° C.
  • The WO 2005/045192 process involves the circulation of supercritical naphtha through fractures. This means that the oil shale is heated by circulating a dense, hot hydrocarbon vapor through sets of closely-spaced hydraulic fractures. In this instance, the fractures are horizontally formed and conventionally propped. Fracture temperatures of 320°-400° C. are maintained for five to ten years. Vaporized naphtha is typically the preferred heating medium due to its high volumetric heat capacity, ready availability and relatively low degradation rate at the heating temperature. In the WO 2005/045192 process, as the kerogen matures, fluid pressure will drive the generated oil to the heated fractures, where it will be produced with the cycling hydrocarbon vapor.
  • In some oil shale formations, additional minerals of commercial value are present within the rock. One such mineral is nahcolite. Nahcolite is a natural mineral (NaHCO3), and is commonly known as baking soda or sodium bicarbonate. The mineral can be associated with oil shale deposits such as those located in parts of the Piceance Basin in Colorado. Nahcolite resources in the Piceance Basin are estimated by the United States Geological Survey at over 29 billon metric tons. (J. R. Dyni, “Stratigraphy and Nahcolite Resources of the Saline Facies of the Green River Formation in Northwest Colorado,” in D. K. Murray (ed.), Guidebook to the Energy Resources of the Piceance Creek Basin Colo., Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists—1974 Guidebook, pp. 111-122 (1974)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Nahcolite typically occurs as finely disseminated crystals and nodules within oil shale beds. It also occurs in several discrete beds mixed with variable amounts of oil shale and sometimes associated with halite. Much of the nahcolite in the Piceance Basin occurs as either non-bedded crystalline aggregates scattered through the oil shale, or as laterally continuous units of fine crystals disseminated in the oil shale. The sodium bicarbonate processed from nahcolite has value for use in food (as baking soda), in pharmaceutical products, in flue gas clean-up (such as SO2 removal), and in fire extinguishers.
  • Sodium bicarbonate can be converted to sodium carbonate (Na2CO3; also known as soda ash). The conversion takes place in the presence of heat according to the following chemical reaction:

  • 2NaHCO3
    Figure US20140102693A1-20140417-P00001
    Na2CO3+CO2+H2O
  • Sodium carbonate, or soda ash, is a large-scale commodity chemical. Soda ash is used in glass making, chemical manufacture, and the manufacture of detergents. Much of the sodium bicarbonate produced via mining is converted in surface facilities to soda ash.
  • Nahcolite can be recovered from oil shale via solution mining. (M. Prats, P. J. Closmann, A. T. Ireson, and G. Drinkard, “Soluble-Salt Processes for In-Situ Recovery of Hydrocarbons from Oil Shale,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 1078-1088 (September 1977)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The process involves injecting hot water under pressure into the subsurface. Sodium bicarbonate is fairly soluble in water.
  • American Soda previously developed a facility in the Piceance region of Colorado for solution mining of Nahcolite. The facility was operational in 2000. American Soda's production operations are described in the 2004 publication M. Ramey and M. Hardy, “The History and Performance of Vertical Well Solution Mining of Nahcolite (NaHCO3) in the Piceance Basin, Northwestern, Colorado, USA”, Solution Mining Research Institute: Fall 2004 Technical Meeting (Berlin, Germany) (2004). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. American Soda's solution mining technology is also discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,609,761 issued in 2003. The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. According to the paper, the well field included 26 solution mining wells which produced nahcolite brine to a processing facility. Water at 350-420° F. was injected into the formation to remove the nahcolite at a depth of 2,200 to 2,600 feet.
  • By late 2004, the American Soda facility had produced 2.6 million tons of nahcolite. The facility converted the sodium bicarbonate to sodium carbonate, produced liquid CO2, and concentrated the sodium carbonate solution via evaporation. The solution was then pumped to a second facility 44 miles away. The conversion of sodium bicarbonate to sodium carbonate was necessary to prevent solid precipitation in the pipeline as the solution cooled during transit. Sodium carbonate is much more soluble than sodium bicarbonate at the flow temperatures. The solution at the second facility was then reconverted back to sodium bicarbonate via contacting the solution with CO2 to precipitate the sodium bicarbonate. The sodium bicarbonate was then sold and shipped from the facility.
  • Other companies such as White River Nahcolite Minerals and American Alkali have studied Nahcolite solution mining and processing. (R. L. Day, “Solution Mining of Colorado Nahcolite,” Wyoming State Geological Survey Public Information Circular 40, Proceedings of the First International Soda Ash Conference, Volume II (Rock Springs, Wyo., Jun. 10-12, 1997) pp. 121-130 (1998); K. R. Nielsen, “Colorado Nahcolite: A Low Cost Source of Sodium Chemicals,” Seventh Annual Canadian Conference on Markets for Industrial Minerals (Vancouver, Canada, Oct. 17-18, 1995) 1-9). The entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. In the disclosed processes, the produced sodium bicarbonate solution is processed through a facility in order to generate three dry products: sodium bicarbonate, light soda ash, and dense soda ash. The processes start by crystallizing sodium bicarbonate out of solution via cooling. Light soda ash is produced by drying wet sodium bicarbonate at 600-800° F. This results in decomposition to a low bulk density (30-35 lbs/ft3) powder. Dense soda ash is formed by crystallizing soda ash out of a supersaturated solution. This results in granules with a bulk density of about 63 lbs/ft3. The benefit of producing three products is that each has a different market. The facility can shift the distribution of products based on current market conditions. Typically, sodium bicarbonate and light soda ash command higher prices, but the markets are more limited than for dense soda ash.
  • Another company involved in Nahcolite mining operations is NaTec, Ltd. NaTec is the listed assignee of U.S. Pat. No. 4,815,790 which issued in 1989, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The patent is entitled “Nahcolite Solution Mining Process.” The patent discloses a process for creating sodium bicarbonate using a “hot aqueous liquor.” This process also produced sodium bicarbonate solution which was then processed through a facility to generate three dry products: sodium bicarbonate, light soda ash, and dense soda ash. It is noted that much of the nahcolite was converted to a soda ash product at the surface facilities.
  • Because nahcolite and oil shale occur together in certain oil shale deposits such as the Piceance Basin, the recovery of either mineral impacts the fate of the other. It has been proposed that nahcolite can be removed through solution mining prior to the in situ production of shale oil. This was discussed by Prats, M., et al. in the 1977 articled cited above. This was also proposed by Shell as early as 1972 in U.S. Pat. No. 3,700,280, entitled “Method of Producing Oil from an Oil Shale Formation Containing Nahcolite and Dawsonite”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. See also U.S. Pat. No. 3,759,574 entitled “Method of Producing Hydrocarbons from an Oil Shale Formation”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The concept of nahcolite removal involves leaching the nahcolite (and other water-soluble minerals such as halite and, to a lesser degree, dawsonite) to create permeability in the otherwise fairly impermeable oil shale. After the permeability is created, hot steam is injected into the formation to convert the kerogen bound in the oil shale to liquid (oil) and hydrocarbon gas. The oil and gas is then recovered via production wells.
  • Recently, U.S. Pat. No. 6,997,518 issued to Vinegar, et al. in 2006, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. This patent is entitled “In Situ Thermal Processing and Solution Mining of an Oil Shale Formation.” The '518 patent proposes developing nahcolite prior to in situ conversion of the oil shale using downhole heat sources. Such heat sources include electric heaters and downhole flameless combustors. Vinegar argues that removing the nahcolite prior to shale oil production is beneficial since it reduces the energy needed to convert the kerogen. The decomposition reaction of nahcolite is endothermic plus the nahcolite has thermal capacity and, hence, drains energy otherwise useable for heating the oil shale. Additionally, in certain areas regulatory conditions require that the oil shale be developed in such a way as to preserve the value of the nahcolite.
  • The '518 patent lists a variety of other perceived advantages to removing nahcolite (and dawsonite) prior to kerogen retorting. For instance, Vinegar states that removing the nahcolite “may reduce mass within the formation and increase a permeability of the formation. Reducing the mass within the formation may reduce the heat required to heat to temperatures needed for the in situ conversion process. Reducing the mass within the formation may also increase a speed at which a heat front within the formation moves. Increasing the speed of the heat front may reduce a time needed for production to begin.” (See col. 324, ln. 40-48).
  • A need exists for improved processes for the production of shale oil which preserves the value of the nahcolite in-place. In addition, a need exists for improved methods for co-developing shale oil and nahcolite in soda ash form. Still further, a need exists for a process by which the nahcolite may be recovered after heating an oil shale zone and producing the shale oil.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In one embodiment, the invention includes an in situ method of recovering natural resources. The method includes (a) heating in situ an organic-rich rock formation that contains both formation hydrocarbons and one or more formation water-soluble minerals, wherein the heating of the organic-rich rock formation both pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and makes available one or more migratory contaminant species previously bound in the organic-rich rock formation. The method may further include producing at least a portion of the hydrocarbon fluids from the organic-rich rock formation, but wherein at least a portion of the one or more migratory contaminant species remain in the organic-rich rock formation. The method may further include injecting an aqueous fluid into the organic-rich rock formation, wherein the injected aqueous fluid dissolves at least a portion of one or more water-soluble minerals and the one or more migratory contaminant species to form a first aqueous solution. The method may further include producing the first aqueous solution from the organic-rich rock formation. The method may further include processing the first aqueous solution in a surface facility to remove a portion of the one or more water-soluble minerals and processing the first aqueous solution in the surface facility to remove at least some of the one or more migratory contaminant species.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • So that the features of the present invention can be better understood, certain drawings, graphs and flow charts are appended hereto. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only selected embodiments of the inventions and are therefore not to be considered limiting of scope, for the inventions may admit to other equally effective embodiments and applications.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an illustrative oil shale development area. A plurality of wellbores is shown completed in an oil shale formation. A fluid processing area is also shown schematically.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a series of steps that may be undertaken in the production of hydrocarbon fluids and the recovery of nahcolite from an oil shale formation, in accordance with one aspect of the present methods.
  • FIG. 3 is a bar chart comparing the volume of an oil shale sample before and after an in situ, retorting process.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a solution mining and/or groundwater clean-up operation.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS Definitions
  • As used herein, the term “hydrocarbon(s)” refers to organic material with molecular structures containing carbon and hydrogen. Hydrocarbons may also include other elements, such as, but not limited to, halogens, metallic elements, nitrogen, oxygen, and/or sulfur.
  • As used herein, the term “hydrocarbon fluids” refers to hydrocarbons that are gases or liquids. Hydrocarbon fluids may include, for example, shale oil, pyrolysis oil, pyrolysis gas, a pyrolysis product of coal, and other hydrocarbons that are in a gaseous or liquid state.
  • As used herein, the terms “produced fluids” and “production fluid” refer to liquids and/or gases removed from an organic-rich rock formation and may include hydrocarbon fluids, shale oil, pyrolysis oil, pyrolysis gas, a pyrolysis product of coal, synthesis gas, and water (steam). Produced fluids may include hydrocarbon fluids as well as non-hydrocarbon fluids.
  • As used herein, the term “heavy hydrocarbons” refers to hydrocarbon fluids that are highly viscous at ambient conditions (15° C. and 1 atm pressure). Heavy hydrocarbons may include highly viscous hydrocarbon fluids such as heavy oil, tar, and/or asphalt. Heavy hydrocarbons may include carbon and hydrogen, as well as smaller concentrations of sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen. Additional elements may also be present in heavy hydrocarbons in trace amounts. Heavy hydrocarbons may be classified by API gravity. Heavy hydrocarbons generally have an API gravity below about 20 degrees. Heavy oil, for example, generally has an API gravity of about 10-20 degrees, whereas tar generally has an API gravity below about 10 degrees. The viscosity of heavy hydrocarbons is generally greater than about 100 centipoise at 15° C. Heavy hydrocarbons may also include aromatics or other complex ring hydrocarbons.
  • As used herein, the term “solid hydrocarbons” refers to any hydrocarbon material that is found naturally in substantially solid form at formation conditions. Non-limiting examples include kerogen, coal, shungites, asphaltites, and natural mineral waxes.
  • As used herein, the term “formation hydrocarbons” refers to both heavy hydrocarbons and solid hydrocarbons that are contained in a formation. Formation hydrocarbons may be, but are not limited to, kerogen, coal, bitumen, natural mineral waxes, and asphaltites.
  • As used herein, the term “tar” refers to a viscous hydrocarbon that generally has a viscosity greater than about 10,000 centipoise at 15° C. The specific gravity of tar generally is greater than 1.000. Tar may have an API gravity less than 10 degrees.
  • As used herein, the term “kerogen” refers to a solid, insoluble hydrocarbon that principally contains carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur. Oil shale contains kerogen.
  • As used herein, the term “bitumen” refers to a non-crystalline solid or viscous hydrocarbon material that is substantially soluble in carbon disulfide.
  • As used herein, the term “oil” refers to a fluid containing a mixture of condensable hydrocarbons.
  • As used herein, the term “organic-rich rock” refers to any rock matrix holding formation hydrocarbons (i.e. solid hydrocarbons and/or heavy hydrocarbons). Rock matrices may include, but are not limited to, sedimentary rocks, shales, stone silt, sands, silicilytes, carbonates, and diatomites.
  • As used herein, the term “formation” refers to one or more hydrocarbon containing layers, one or more non-hydrocarbon layers, an overburden, and/or an underburden of any subsurface geologic formation. An “overburden” and/or an “underburden” includes one or more different types of substantially impermeable materials. For example, overburden and/or underburden may include rock, shale, mudstone, or wet/tight carbonate (i.e., an impermeable carbonate without hydrocarbons). In some embodiments of in situ conversion processes, an overburden and/or an underburden may include a hydrocarbon containing layer or hydrocarbon containing layers that are relatively impermeable and are not subjected to temperatures during in situ conversion processing that result in significant characteristic changes of the hydrocarbon containing layers of the overburden and/or underburden. For example, an underburden may contain shale or mudstone. In some cases, the overburden and/or underburden may be somewhat permeable.
  • As used herein, the term “organic-rich rock formation” refers to any formation containing organic-rich rock.
  • As used herein, the term “water-soluble minerals” refers to minerals that are soluble in water. Water-soluble minerals include, for example, nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate), dawsonite (NaAl(CO3)(OH)2), or combinations thereof.
  • As used herein, the term “formation water-soluble minerals” refers to water-soluble minerals that are found naturally in a formation.
  • As used herein, the term “migratory contaminant species” refers to species that are both soluble or moveable in water or an aqueous fluid and are considered to be harmful or of concern to human health or the environment. Migratory contaminant species may include inorganic and organic contaminants. Organic contaminants may include saturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, and oxygenated hydrocarbons. Inorganic contaminants may include metal contaminants, and ionic contaminants of various types that may significantly alter pH or the formation fluid chemistry. Aromatic hydrocarbons may include, for example, benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, and tri-methylbenzene, and various types of polyaromatic hydrocarbons such as anthracenes, naphthalenes, chrysenes and pyrenes. Oxygenated hydrocarbons may include, for example, alcohols, ketones, phenols, and organic acids such as carboxylic acid. Metal contaminants may include, for example, arsenic, boron, chromium, cobalt, molybdenum, mercury, selenium, lead, vanadium, nickel or zinc. Ionic contaminants include, for example, sulfides, sulfates, chlorides, fluorides, ammonia, nitrates, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, lithium, boron, and strontium.
  • As used herein, the term “wellbore” refers to a hole in a formation made by drilling or insertion of a conduit into the formation. A wellbore may have a substantially circular cross section, or other cross-sectional shapes (e.g., circles, ovals, squares, rectangles, triangles, slits, or other regular or irregular shapes). As used herein, the term “well”, when referring to an opening in the formation, may be used interchangeably with the term “wellbore.”
  • As used herein, the term “pyrolysis” refers to the breaking of chemical bonds due to the application of heat. For example, pyrolysis may include transforming a compound into one or more other substances by heat alone or by heat in combination with an oxidant.
  • Pyrolysis may include modifying the nature of the compound by addition of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, or carbon monoxide. Heat may be transferred to a section of the formation to cause pyrolysis.
  • As used herein, the term “cracking” refers to a process involving decomposition and molecular recombination of organic compounds to produce a greater number of molecules than were initially present. In cracking, a series of reactions take place accompanied by a transfer of hydrogen atoms between molecules. For example, naphtha may undergo a thermal cracking reaction to form ethene and H2 among other molecules.
  • As used herein, the term “sequestration” refers to storing a fluid that is a by-product of a process rather than discharging the fluid to the atmosphere or open environment.
  • As used herein, the term “subsidence” refers to a downward movement of a portion of a formation relative to an initial elevation of the surface.
  • As used herein, the term “thickness” of a layer refers to the thickness of a cross section of a layer, wherein the cross section is normal to a face of the layer.
  • As used herein, the term “thermal fracture” refers to fractures created in a formation caused directly or indirectly by expansion or contraction of a formation and/or fluids within the formation, which is in turn caused by increasing/decreasing the temperature of the formation and/or fluids within the formation, and/or by increasing/decreasing a pressure of fluids within the formation due to heating. Thermal fractures may propagate into or form in neighboring regions significantly cooler than the heated zone.
  • As used herein, the term “hydraulic fracture” refers to a fracture at least partially propagated along a plane in a formation, wherein the fracture is created through injection of fluids into a formation. The fracture may include proppant material.
  • DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
  • The inventions are described herein in connection with certain specific embodiments. However, to the extent that the following detailed description is specific to a particular embodiment or a particular use, this is intended to be illustrative only, and is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
  • The present invention provides an in situ method for generating and recovering both hydrocarbon fluids and water-soluble minerals (e.g., sodium minerals) from an organic-rich rock formation (e.g., oil shale formations). In some oil shale formations such as the Parachute Creek Member of the Green River Formation located in the Piceance Basin in Colorado, the oil shale holds both kerogen and nahcolite. It may be desirable in multi-mineral leasing areas, such as those managed by the United States Bureau of Land Management, that the production of shale oil from kerogen does not squander or waste the value of the in situ nahcolite. Thus, in one aspect, the present invention provides for the production of shale oil, followed by the recovery of water-soluble minerals, particularly nahcolite or decomposition products of nahcolite, for example, soda ash. In another aspect, shale oil and nahcolite (or nahcolite derivates) are co-produced. In either aspect, the value of the water-soluble minerals is preserved.
  • Sodium bicarbonate can be converted to sodium carbonate (Na2CO3; also known as soda ash). The conversion takes place in the presence of heat according to the following chemical reaction formula:

  • 2NaHCO3
    Figure US20140102693A1-20140417-P00001
    Na2CO3+CO2+H2O
  • The water generated via nahcolite decomposition may be in the vapor state but can condense to liquid water as it migrates away from the heated region. Water may also be generated via decomposition of other minerals, such as dawsonite, decomposition of kerogen, and expulsion of bound water from clays.
  • Sodium carbonate, or soda ash, is a large-scale commodity chemical. Soda ash is used in glass making, chemical manufacture, and the manufacture of detergents. Much of the sodium bicarbonate produced via mining is converted in surface facilities to soda ash. The decomposition of sodium bicarbonate to sodium carbonate can occur at relatively low temperatures; however, the process is pressure sensitive. As pressure increases, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the vapor phase increases and retards the decomposition. Templeton studied this effect and found that the decomposition temperature increases as follows:
  • from ˜200° F. at atmospheric pressure, to
  • ˜360° F. at 1000 psia, to
  • ˜385° F. at 2000 psia, and to
  • ˜405° F. at 3000 psia.
  • (Templeton, C. C., “Pressure-Temperature Relationship for Decomposition of Sodium Bicarbonate from 200 to 600° F.,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 23(1), pp. 7-11 (1978)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Dawsonite decomposes via the following reaction:

  • 2NaAl(OH)2CO3
    Figure US20140102693A1-20140417-P00001
    Na2CO3+Al2O3+CO2+2H2O
  • Nahcolite can be recovered from oil shale via solution mining. The process involves injecting hot water under pressure into the subsurface. Sodium bicarbonate is fairly soluble in water. Solubility increases with temperature as follows:
  • ˜0.1 lb NaHCO3/lb water at 100° F.,
  • ˜0.2 lb NaHCO3/lb water at 200° F.,
  • ˜0.4 lb NaHCO3/lb water 300° F., and
  • ˜0.8 lb NaHCO3/lb water 400° F.
  • Applicant believes that certain in situ oil shale retorting processes, including the WO 2005/045192 and WO 2005/010320 processes disclosed in the above-referenced international patent publications, will materially improve the accessibility of the nahcolite and therefore increase the value derived from solution mining.
  • It is noted that at very high temperatures, soda ash will decompose to sodium oxide according to the following reaction:

  • Na2CO3→Na2O+CO2
  • In a swept atmosphere this will occur at about 800° C. In a CO2 atmosphere the decomposition is strongly suppressed even at 1000° C. (Newkirk, A. E. and Aliferis, I., “Drying and Decomposition of Sodium Carbonate,” Analytical Chemistry, 30(5), pp. 982-984 (1958)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In solution sodium carbonate can decompose at much lower temperatures to sodium hydroxide:

  • Na2CO3+H2O
    Figure US20140102693A1-20140417-P00001
    2NaOH+CO2
  • This reaction, however, is very much an equilibrium reaction and unless the CO2 is continually removed, the conversion is limited. (Thomas, A. M., “Thermal Decomposition of Sodium Carbonate Solutions”, Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 8(1), pp. 51-54 (1963)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Indeed, sodium hydroxide reacts readily with acid gases (such as CO2, H25 and SO2) to produce Na2CO3. This reverse reaction is commonly used in the chemical industry for scrubbing CO2 from gas streams. (Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (4th ed.), “Alkali and Chlorine Products,” pp. 1025-1039). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIG. 1 presents a perspective view of an illustrative oil shale development area 10. A surface 12 of the development area 10 is indicated. Below the surface is an organic-rich rock formation 16. The illustrative formation 16 contains formation hydrocarbons (such as, for example, kerogen) and valuable water-soluble minerals (such as, for example, nahcolite). It is understood that the representative formation 16 may be any organic-rich rock formation, including a rock matrix containing coal or tar sands, for example. In addition, the rock matrix making up the formation may be permeable, semi-permeable or non-permeable. Preferably, the present inventions may be practiced in oil shale development areas initially having very limited or effectively no fluid permeability.
  • In order to access formation 16 and recover natural resources therefrom, a plurality of wellbores is formed. Wellbores are shown at 14 in FIG. 1. The representative wellbores 14 are essentially vertical in orientation relative to the surface 12. However, it is understood that some or all of the wellbores 14 could deviate into an obtuse or even horizontal orientation. In the arrangement of FIG. 1, each of the wellbores 14 is completed in the oil shale formation 16. The completions may be either open or cased hole. The well completions may also include propped or unpropped hydraulic fractures.
  • In the view of FIG. 1, only seven wellbores 14 are shown. However, it is understood that in an oil shale development project, numerous additional wellbores 14 will most likely be drilled. The wellbores 14 may be located in relatively close proximity, being from 10 feet to up to 300 feet in separation. Alternatively, the wellbores may be spaced from 30 to 200 feet or 50 to 100 feet. Typically, the wellbores 14 are also completed at shallow depths, being from 200 to 5,000 feet at total depth. Alternatively, the wellbores may be completed at depths from 1,000 to 4,000 feet, or 1,500 to 3,500 feet. In some embodiments the oil shale formation targeted for in situ retorting is at a depth greater than 200 feet below the surface. In alternative embodiments, the oil shale formation targeted for in situ retorting is at a depth greater than 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300 or 1500 feet below the surface. In alternative embodiments, the oil shale formation targeted for in situ retorting is at a depth between 200 and 5,000 feet, alternatively between 1,000 and 4,000 ft, 1,200 and 3,700 feet, or 1,500 and 3,500 feet below the surface.
  • The wellbores 14 will be selected for certain functions and may be designated as heat injection wells, water injection wells, oil production wells or water-soluble mineral solution production wells. In one aspect, the wellbores 14 are dimensioned to serve two, three, or all four of these purposes. Suitable tools and equipment may be sequentially run into and removed from the wellbores 14 to serve the various purposes.
  • A fluid processing facility 20 is also shown schematically. The fluid processing facility 20 is equipped to receive fluids produced from the organic-rich rock formation 16 through one or more pipelines or flow lines 22. The fluid processing facility 20 may include equipment suitable for receiving and separating oil, gas, and water produced from the heated formation. The fluid processing facility 20 may further include equipment for separating out dissolved water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species, including, for example, dissolved organic contaminants, metal contaminants, or ionic contaminants in the produced water recovered from the organic-rich rock formation 16. The contaminants may include, for example, aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, xylene, tri-methylbenzene, and polyaromatic hydrocarbons such as anthracene, naphthalene, chrysene and pyrene. Metal contaminants may include species containing arsenic, boron, chromium, mercury, selenium, lead, vanadium, nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, or zinc. Ionic contaminant species may include, for example, sulfates, chlorides, fluorides, lithium, potassium, aluminum, ammonia, and nitrates.
  • The contaminants may be removed in surface facilities by various means. One such method is via an adsorbent material such as activated carbon, activated alumina, silica gel, clay, or fuller's earth. Another such method is to employ bio-oxidation to treat the organic contaminants. Because of the potential for ground water contaminants, one optional step in the method is to assess the hydrological connectivity of the oil shale zone with aquifers to determine the risk to ground water.
  • The dissolved water-soluble minerals removed from the oil shale formation are preferably ones with chemical compositions that include sodium. Examples of sodium minerals include nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate), or dawsonite (NaAl(CO3)(OH)2), or combinations thereof. In some instances, the soluble minerals are generated via decomposition of other minerals due to the oil shale heating. Preferably, the original soluble mineral is nahcolite, and the decomposed mineral is soda ash.
  • The dissolved water-soluble minerals may be removed from the produced fluid in one aspect by precipitation caused by altering the temperature of the solution. The soda ash (sodium carbonate) may be converted back to nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate) in surface facilities via reaction with CO2.
  • Alternatively, the equipment for separating out water dissolved minerals and contaminants are in other facilities.
  • In order to recover oil, gas, and sodium (or other) water-soluble minerals, a series of steps are undertaken. FIG. 2 presents a flow chart demonstrating a method of in situ thermal recovery of oil and gas from an organic-rich rock formation 100, in one embodiment. It is understood that the order of some of the steps from FIG. 2 may be changed, and that the sequence of steps is merely for illustration.
  • First, the oil shale (or other organic-rich rock) formation 16 is identified within the development area 10. This step is shown in box 110. The targeted development area within the oil shale formation may be identified by measuring or modeling the depth, thickness and organic richness of the oil shale as well as evaluating the position of the organic-rich rock formation relative to other rock types, structural features (e.g. faults, anticlines or synclines), or hydrogeological units (i.e. aquifers). This is accomplished by creating and interpreting maps and/or models of depth, thickness, organic richness and other data from available tests and sources. This may involve performing geological surface surveys, studying outcrops, performing seismic surveys, and/or drilling boreholes to obtain subsurface rock samples. Rock samples may be analyzed to assess kerogen content and fluid hydrocarbon generating capability. The richness of the organic-rich rock formation may be ascertained from well or outcrop samples using a variety of data including but not limited to organic carbon content, hydrogen index, or modified Fischer assay analyses. Subsurface permeability may also be assessed via rock samples, outcrops, or studies of ground water flow. Furthermore the connectivity of the development area to ground water sources may be assessed.
  • Next, a plurality of wellbores 14 is formed across the targeted development area 10. This step is shown schematically in box 115. The purposes of the wellbores 14 are set forth above and need not be repeated. However, it is noted that for purposes of the wellbore formation step of box 115, only a portion of the total initial heat injection wells and hydrocarbon production wells need be completed.
  • It is understood that petroleum engineers will develop a strategy for the best depth and arrangement for the wellbores 14, depending upon anticipated reservoir characteristics, economic constraints, and work scheduling constraints. In addition, engineering staff will determine what wellbores 14 shall be used for initial formation 16 heating. This selection step is represented by box 120. In one aspect, wellbores are placed in a pattern such that untreated pillars of oil shale are left to support the overburden and prevent subsidence.
  • There are various methods for applying heat to the organic-rich rock formation 16. One such method involves the use of electrical resistive heating elements in a cased or uncased wellbore. Other methods include the use of circulated hot fluids, downhole combustors, in situ combustion, radio-frequency (RF) electrical energy, or microwave energy. Still others include injecting a hot fluid into the oil shale formation to directly heat it. The present methods are not limited to the heating technique employed. The heating step is represented generally by box 130. Preferably, for in situ processes the heating of a production zone takes place over a period of months, or even four or more years. Alternatively, the formation may be heated for one to fifteen years, alternatively, 3 to 10 years, 1.5 to 7 years or 2 to 5 years. The bulk of the target zone of the formation may be heated to between 270 to 800° C. Alternatively, the bulk of the target zone of the formation may be heated to between 300 to 400° C. Preferably, the bulk of the target zone is ultimately heated to a temperature below 400° C. (752° F.).
  • In connection with the heating step 130, the rock formation 16 may optionally be fractured to aid heat transfer or hydrocarbon fluid production. The optional fracturing step is shown in box 125. Fracturing may also be accomplished by creating thermal fractures within the formation through application of heating. Alternatively, a process known as hydraulic fracturing may be used. By heating the organic-rich rock and transforming the kerogen to oil and gas, the permeability is increased via thermal fracture formation and subsequent production of a portion of the hydrocarbon fluids generated from the kerogen. Thermal fracture formation is caused by thermal expansion of the rock and fluids and by chemical expansion of the transforming kerogen into oil and gas. Thermal fracturing can occur both in the immediate region undergoing heating, and in cooler neighboring regions. The thermal fracturing in the neighboring regions is due to propagation of fractures and tension stresses developed due to the expansion in the hotter zones. Thermal fractures increase permeability and aid fluid flow within the formation. Hydraulic fracturing is a process known in the art of oil and gas recovery where a fracture fluid is pressurized within the wellbore above the fracture pressure of the formation, thus developing fracture planes within the formation to relieve the pressure generated within the wellbore. Hydraulic fractures may be used to create additional permeability and/or be used to provide an extended geometry for an extended heat source, such as in the WO 2005/010320 method.
  • Any in situ method that effectively produces oil and gas from oil shale will create permeability in what was originally a very low permeability rock. The extent to which this will occur is illustrated by the large amount of expansion that must be accommodated if fluids generated from kerogen are unable to flow. The concept is illustrated in FIG. 3.
  • FIG. 3 provides a bar chart comparing one ton of Green River oil shale before 50 and after 51 a simulated in situ, retorting process. The simulated process was carried out at 2,400 psi and 750° F. Before the conversion, a total of 15.3 ft3 of rock matrix 52 existed. This matrix comprised 7.2 ft3 of mineral 53, i.e., shale, and 8.1 ft3 of kerogen 54 imbedded within the shale. As a result of the conversion the material expanded to 26.1 ft3 55. This represented 7.2 ft3 of mineral 56 (the same number as before the conversion), 6.6 ft3 of hydrocarbon liquid 57, i.e., oil, 9.4 ft3 of hydrocarbon gas 58, and 2.9 ft3 of coke 59. It can be seen that substantial volume expansion occurred during the conversion process. This, in turn, increases permeability of the rock structure.
  • The formation 16 is heated to a temperature sufficient to pyrolyze at least a portion of the oil shale in order to pyrolyze the kerogen and to create hydrocarbon fluids. The resulting liquids and hydrocarbon gases may be refined into products which resemble common commercial petroleum products. Such liquid products include transportation fuels such as diesel, jet fuel and naphtha. Generated gases include light alkanes, light alkenes, H2, CO2, CO, and NH3. Conversion of the oil shale will create permeability in the oil shale section in rocks that were originally impermeable. Preferably, the heating process, shown by box 135, occurs over a lengthy period of time. In one aspect, the heating period is from three months to four or more years. Also as part of box 135, the formation 16 is heated to a temperature sufficient to convert at least a portion of nahcolite, if present, to soda ash. Heat used to mature the oil shale and recover oil and gas will also convert nahcolite to sodium carbonate (soda ash), a related sodium mineral. The process of converting nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate) to soda ash (sodium carbonate) has been described above.
  • As part of the hydrocarbon fluid production process 100, certain wells 14 may be designated as oil and gas production wells. This step is depicted by box 140. Oil and gas production might not be initiated until it is determined that the kerogen has been sufficiently retorted to allow maximum recovery of oil and gas from the formation 16. In some instances, dedicated production wells are not drilled until after heat injection wells (box 130) have been in operation for a period of several weeks or months. Thus, box 140 may include the formation of additional wellbores 14.
  • After certain wellbores 14 have been designated as oil and gas production wells, oil and/or gas is produced from the wellbores 14. The oil and/or gas production process is shown at box 145. At this stage (box 145), the water-soluble minerals, such as nahcolite and converted soda ash remain substantially trapped in the rock formation 16 as finely disseminated crystals or nodules within the oil shale beds, and are not produced. However, some nahcolite and/or soda ash may be dissolved in the water created during heating within the formation.
  • The impact of heating oil shale to produce oil and gas prior to producing nahcolite is to convert the nahcolite to a more recoverable form (soda ash), and provide permeability facilitating its subsequent recovery. Water-soluble mineral recovery may take place as soon as the retorted oil is produced, or it may be left for a period of years for later recovery. If desired, the soda ash can be readily converted back to nahcolite on the surface. The ease with which this conversion can be accomplished makes the two minerals effectively interchangeable.
  • Box 150 presents a typical next step in the oil and gas recovery method 100. Here, certain wellbores 14 are designated as water or aqueous fluid injection wells. Aqueous fluids are solutions of water that may contain other species. The other species may be present to alter the pH. Alternatively, the other species may reflect the availability of brackish water not saturated in the species wished to be leached from the subsurface. As used herein, an aqueous fluid is meant to refer to water including other species and water that does not include other species. Preferably, the water injection wells are selected from some or all of the wellbores used for heat injection or for oil and/or gas production. However, the scope of the step of box 150 may include the drilling of yet additional wellbores 14 for use as dedicated water injection wells. In this respect, it may be desirable to complete water injection wells along a periphery of the development area 10 in order to create a boundary of high pressure.
  • Next, water or an aqueous fluid is injected through the water injection wells and into the oil shale formation 16. This step is shown at box 160. The water may be in the form of steam or pressurized hot water. Alternatively the injected water may be cool and becomes heated as it contacts the previously heated formation. The injection process may further induce fracturing. This process may create fingered caverns and brecciated zones in the nahcolite-bearing intervals some distance, for example up to 200 feet out, from the water injection wellbores. In one aspect, a gas cap, such as nitrogen, may be maintained at the top of each “cavern” to prevent vertical growth.
  • In some cases water injection wells may not be necessary if a sufficiently strong connected aquifer is present. In this case, drawing on production wells may allow existing subsurface waters to flow into the heated formation and serve the purpose of water injection.
  • The injection of water into the organic-rich rock formation 16 causes the water to contact water-soluble minerals and various migratory contaminant species. Preferably the water-soluble minerals are soda ash and any unconverted nahcolite. As the heated water sweeps through the rock formation 16, a water-soluble mineral solution is formed. Sodium carbonate, or soda ash, is soluble in water and is readily recovered by solution mining. Saturated sodium carbonate solutions may have about 32 wt. % Na2CO3 in water at temperatures between 30° C. and 140° C., about 23 wt. % at 200° C., and about 8.4 wt. % at 300° C.
  • Along with the designation of certain wellbores 14 as water injection wells, the design engineers may also designate certain wellbores 14 as water or water-soluble mineral solution production wells. These wells may be the same as wells used to previously produce hydrocarbons or inject heat. These recovery wells will produce an aqueous solution of dissolved water-soluble minerals and other species, including, for example, migratory contaminant species. For example, the solution may be one primarily of dissolved soda ash. This step is shown in box 165. Alternatively, single wellbores may be used to both inject water and then to recover a sodium mineral solution. Thus, box 165 includes the option of using the same wellbores 14 for both water injection and solution production (box 165).
  • It is also noted that producing hydrocarbons from pyrolyzed oil shale will generally leave behind some migratory contaminant species which are at least partially water-soluble. Depending on the hydrological connectivity of the pyrolyzed shale oil to shallower zones, these components may eventually migrate into ground water in concentrations which are environmentally unacceptable. The types of potential migratory contaminant species depend on the nature of the oil shale pyrolysis and the composition of the oil shale being converted. If the pyrolysis is performed in the absence of oxygen or air, the contaminant species may include aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. anthracene, pyrene, naphthalene, chrysene), metal contaminants (e.g. As, Co, Pb, Mo, Ni, and Zn), and other species such as sulfates, ammonia, Al, K, Mg, chlorides, flourides and phenols. If oxygen or air is employed, contaminant species may also include ketones, alcohols, and cyanides.
  • Temporary control of the migration of the migratory contaminant species, especially during the pyrolysis process, can be obtained via placement of the injection and production wells 14 such that fluid flow out of the heated zone is minimized. Typically, this involves placing injection wells at the periphery of the heated zone so as to cause pressure gradients which prevent flow from inside the heated zone from leaving the zone.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an illustrative oil shale formation that is within or connected to ground water aquifers and the formation leaching operation. Four separate oil shale formation zones are depicted (23, 24, 25 & 26) within the oil shale formation. The water aquifers are below the ground surface 27, and are categorized as an upper aquifer 20 and a lower aquifer 22. Intermediate between the upper and lower aquifers is an aquitard 21. It can be seen that certain zones of the formation are both aquifers or aquitards and oil shale zones. A plurality of wells (28, 29, 30, & 31) is shown traversing vertically downward through the aquifers. One of the wells is serving as a water injection well 31, while another is serving as a water production well 30. In this way, water is circulated 32 through at least the lower aquifer 22.
  • FIG. 4 shows diagrammatically the water circulation 32 through an oil shale volume that was heated 33, that resides within or is connected to an aquifer 22, and from which hydrocarbon fluids were previously recovered. Introduction of water via the water injection well 31 forces water into the previously heated oil shale 33 and water-soluble minerals and migratory contaminants species are swept to the water production well 30. The water is then processed in a facility 34 wherein the water-soluble minerals (e.g. nahcolite or soda ash) and the migratory contaminants are substantially removed from the water stream. Water is then reinjected into the oil shale volume 33 and the formation leaching is repeated. This leaching with water is intended to continue until levels of migratory contaminant species are at environmentally acceptable levels within the previously heated oil shale zone 33. This may require 1 cycle, 2 cycles, 5 cycles or 10 cycles of formation leaching, where a single cycle indicates injection and production of approximately one pore volume of water. It is understood that there may be numerous water injection and water production wells in an actual oil shale development. Moreover, the system may include monitoring wells (28 & 29) which can be utilized during the oil shale heating phase, the shale oil production phase, the leaching phase, or during any combination of these phases to monitor for migratory contaminant species and/or water-soluble minerals.
  • Alternatively, physical barriers can be placed around the heated zone. These barriers may involve freeze walls or grout walls. Freeze walls involve circulating refrigerant through peripheral wells to freeze native water in the vicinity. Shell has discussed freeze walls for oil shale production in a number of patents, including U.S. Pat. No. 6,880,633. The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Grout walls involve injecting cement into the formation to fill permeable pathways.
  • As discussed herein, some embodiments of the invention include an in situ method of recovering natural resources. The natural resources may be recovered from an organic-rich rock formation, including, for example, an oil shale formation. The organic-rich rock formation may include formation hydrocarbons, including, for example, kerogen, coal, and heavy hydrocarbons. In some embodiments of the invention the natural resources may include hydrocarbon fluids, including, for example products of the pyrolysis of formation hydrocarbons such as shale oil. In some embodiments of the invention the natural resources may also include water-soluble minerals, including, for example, nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate) and dawsonite (NaAl(CO3)(OH)2).
  • Some embodiments of the invention include in situ heating an organic-rich rock formation that contains both formation hydrocarbons and formation water-soluble minerals prior to substantial removal of the formation water-soluble minerals from the organic-rich rock formation. In some embodiments of the invention there is no need to partially, substantially or completely remove the water-soluble minerals prior to in situ heating. For example, in an oil shale formation that contains naturally occurring nahcolite, the oil shale may be heated prior to substantial removal of the nahcolite by solution mining. Substantial removal of a water-soluble mineral means the degree of removal of a water-soluble mineral that occurs from any commercial solution mining operation as known in the art. Substantial removal of a water-soluble mineral may be approximated as removal of greater than 5 weight percent of the total amount of a particular water-soluble mineral present in the zone targeted for hydrocarbon fluid production in the organic-rich rock formation. In alternative embodiments, in situ heating of the organic-rich rock formation to pyrolyze formation hydrocarbons may be commenced prior to removal of greater than 3 weight percent, alternatively 7 weight percent, 10 weight percent or 13 weight percent of the formation water-soluble minerals from the organic-rich rock formation.
  • In some embodiments of the invention heating of the organic-rich rock formation pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids. The formation hydrocarbons may be pyrolyzed in situ by raising the organic-rich rock formation, or zones within the formation, to a pyrolyzation temperature. In alternative embodiments, the heating rate of the formation may be slowly raised through the pyrolysis temperature range. For example, an in situ conversion process for formation hydrocarbons may include heating at least a portion of an organic-rich rock formation to raise the average temperature of the zone above about 270° C. by a rate less than a selected amount (e.g., about 10° C., 5° C., 3° C., 1° C., 0.5° C., or 0.1° C.) per day. In a further embodiment the portion may be heated such that an average temperature of the selected zone may be less than about 375° C. or, in some embodiments, less than about 400° C. The formation may be heated such that a temperature within the formation reaches (at least) an initial pyrolyzation temperature (e.g., a temperature at the lower end of the temperature range where pyrolyzation occurs in a reasonable, e.g., days, weeks or months, period of time). The pyrolysis temperature range may vary depending on the types of formation hydrocarbons within the formation, the heating methodology, and distribution of heating sources. For example, a pyrolysis temperature range may include temperatures between about 250° C. and about 900° C. In an alternative embodiment, a pyrolysis temperature range may include temperatures between about 270° C. to about 400° C.
  • In some embodiments, the hydrocarbon fluids may include a pyrolysis oil component (or condensable component) and a pyrolysis gas component (or non-condensable component). Condensable hydrocarbons produced from the formation will typically include paraffins, cycloalkanes, mono-aromatics, and di-aromatics as major components. Such condensable hydrocarbons may also include other components such as tri-aromatics and other hydro carbon species.
  • In certain embodiments, a majority of the hydrocarbons in the produced fluid may have a carbon number of less than approximately 25. Alternatively, less than about 15 weight % of the hydrocarbons in the fluid may have a carbon number greater than approximately 25. The non-condensable hydrocarbons may include, but are not limited to, hydrocarbons having carbon numbers less than 5.
  • In certain embodiments, the API gravity of the condensable hydrocarbons in the produced fluid may be approximately 20 or above (e.g., 25, 30, 40, 50, etc.). In certain embodiments, the hydrogen to carbon atomic ratio in produced fluid may be at least approximately 1.7 (e.g., 1.8, 1.9, etc.).
  • In some embodiments of the invention heating of the organic-rich rock formation both pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and makes available migratory contaminant species previously bound in the organic-rich rock formation. The migratory contaminant species may be formed through pyrolysis of the formation hydrocarbon, may be liberated from the formation itself upon heating, or may be made accessible through the creation of increased permeability upon heating of the formation. The migratory contaminant species may be soluble in water or aqueous fluids present in or injected into the organic-rich rock formation.
  • Some embodiments include producing at least a portion of the hydrocarbon fluids from the organic-rich rock formation. The hydrocarbon fluids may be produced through production wells. Production wells may be cased or uncased wells and drilled and completed through methods known in the art.
  • In some embodiments, at least a portion of the migratory contaminant species remain in the organic-rich rock formation after the hydrocarbon fluids are produced. In such case, it may be desirable to inject an aqueous fluid into the organic-rich rock formation and have the injected aqueous fluid dissolve at least a portion of the water-soluble minerals and/or the migratory contaminant species to form an aqueous solution. The aqueous solution may then be produced from the organic-rich rock formation through, for example, solution production wells. The aqueous fluid may be adjusted to increase the solubility of the migratory contaminant species and/or the water-soluble minerals. The adjustment may include the addition of an acid or base to adjust the pH of the solution.
  • Some embodiments include processing the aqueous solution in a surface facility to remove at least some of the migratory contaminant species. The migratory contaminant species may be removed through use of, for example, an adsorbent material, reverse osmosis, chemical oxidation, bio-oxidation, and/or ion exchange. Examples of these processes are individually known in the art. Exemplary adsorbent materials may include activated carbon, clay, or fuller's earth.
  • In one embodiment, the migratory contaminant species include one or more of aromatic hydrocarbons, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, oxygenated hydrocarbons, metal contaminants, and ionic contaminants. In an alternative embodiment, the migratory contaminant species include one or more of benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, tri-methylbenzene, and polyaromatic hydrocarbon species. In an alternative embodiment, the migratory contaminant species include one or more of metal contaminants containing arsenic, boron, chromium, mercury, selenium, lead, vanadium, nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc.
  • Some embodiments of the invention include assessing the connectivity of the organic-rich rock formation to aquifers. This may be done to determine if, or to what extent, in situ pyrolysis of formation hydrocarbons in the organic-rich rock formation may create migratory species with the propensity to migrate into an aquifer. If the organic-rich rock formation is hydrologically connected to an aquifer, precautions may be taken to reduce or prevent species generated or liberated during pyrolysis from entering the aquifer. Alternatively, the organic-rich rock formation may be flushed with water or an aqueous fluid after pyrolysis as described herein to remove water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species. In other embodiments, the organic-rich rock formation may be substantially hydrologically unconnected to any source of ground water. In such a case, flushing the organic-rich rock formation may not be desirable for removal of migratory contaminant species but may nevertheless be desirable for recovery of water-soluble minerals.
  • In certain embodiments a mass of at least a portion of the formation may be reduced due, for example, to pyrolysis of formation hydrocarbons and the production of hydrocarbon fluids from the formation. As such, the permeability and porosity of at least a portion of the formation may increase. In addition, removing water during the heating may also increase the permeability and porosity of at least a portion of the formation.
  • Certain embodiments may include increasing the permeability of at least a portion of an organic-rich rock formation to greater than about 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 20 and/or 50 Darcy. In addition, certain embodiments may include substantially uniformly increasing the permeability of at least a portion of an organic-rich rock formation. Some embodiments may include increasing the porosity of at least a portion of an organic-rich rock formation substantially uniformly.
  • Certain systems and methods described herein may be used to treat formation hydrocarbons in at least a portion of a relatively low permeability formation (e.g., in “tight” formations that contain formation hydrocarbons). Such formation hydrocarbons may be heated to pyrolyze at least some of the formation hydrocarbons in a selected zone of the formation. Heating may also increase the permeability of at least a portion of the selected zone. Hydrocarbon fluids generated from pyrolysis may be produced from the formation, thereby further increasing the formation permeability.
  • In an embodiment, heating a portion of an organic-rich rock formation in situ to a temperature less than an upper pyrolysis temperature may increase permeability of the heated portion. For example, permeability may increase due to formation of fractures within the heated portion caused by application of heat. As the temperature of the heated portion increases, water may be removed due to vaporization. The vaporized water may escape and/or be removed from the formation. Removal of water may also increase the permeability of the heated portion. In addition, permeability of the heated portion may also increase as a result of production of hydrocarbon fluids from pyrolysis of at least some of the formation hydrocarbons within the heated portion on a macroscopic scale. In an embodiment, the permeability of a selected zone within a heated portion of an organic-rich rock formation may be substantially uniform. For example, heating by conduction may be substantially uniform, and thus a permeability created by conductive heating may also be substantially uniform.
  • Permeability of a selected zone within the heated portion of the organic-rich rock formation may also rapidly increase while the selected zone is heated by conduction. For example, permeability of an impermeable organic-rich rock formation may be less than about 0.1 millidarcy before heating. In some embodiments, pyrolyzing at least a portion of organic-rich rock formation may increase a permeability within a selected zone of the portion to greater than about 10 millidarcies, 100 millidarcies, 1 Darcy, 10 Darcies, 20 Darcies, or 50 Darcies. Therefore, a permeability of a selected zone of the portion may increase by a factor of more than about 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, or 100,000. In one embodiment, the organic-rich rock formation has an initial total permeability less than 1 millidarcy, alternatively less than 0.1 or 0.01 millidarcies, before heating the organic-rich rock formation. In one embodiment, the organic-rich rock formation has a post heating total permeability of greater than 1 millidarcy, alternatively, greater than 10, 50 or 100 millidarcies, after heating the organic-rich rock formation.
  • In some embodiments, heating the organic-rich formation includes generating soda ash by decomposition of nahcolite. In some embodiments the method may include processing an aqueous solution containing water-soluble minerals in a surface facility to remove a portion of the water-soluble minerals. The processing step may include removing the water-soluble minerals by precipitation caused by altering the temperature of the aqueous solution. In some embodiments, the water-soluble minerals include sodium. Alternatively, the water-soluble minerals may include nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate), dawsonite (NaAl(CO3)(OH)2), or combinations thereof. The surface processing may further include converting the soda ash back to sodium bicarbonate (nahcolite) in the surface facility by reaction with CO2. After partial or complete removal of the water-soluble minerals, the aqueous solution may be reinjected into a subsurface formation after a portion of the water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species are removed and then the solution may be sequestered in the subsurface formation. The subsurface formation may be the same as or different from the organic-rich rock formation.
  • In some embodiments, heating the organic-rich rock formation includes generating soda ash by decomposition of nahcolite present in the formation. In the decomposition process CO2 is generated. Some embodiments include monitoring for the presence of the formed CO2 and, alternatively, estimating the extent of the heating of the organic-rich rock formation from the CO2 monitoring. The estimated extent may include estimating the distribution of heating in the formation, estimating the overall volume which has reached a given temperature, or estimating the rate of progression of a heat front in the formation. Estimations may be calculated based on (i) measured or estimated stoichiometries, decomposition thermodynamics and/or kinetics of nahcolite, kerogen, and/or other carbonate minerals and (ii) measured or estimated distributions of nahcolite kerogen and/or other carbonates in the formation. Additionally, heat transfer models and/or simulations may be employed based on the heat input rates to the formation and assumed heat transfer characteristics of the formation and then the models and/or simulations refined based on the measured CO2 data and calculations. Alternatively, the CO2 monitoring data may be correlated to the extent of heating through use of a computer model based on nahcolite conversion to soda ash. The amount of the CO2 formed may be tracked in a nahcolite conversion process to determine the extent to which soda ash is present. The estimates of the extent of heating based on CO2 data and calculations may be used to refine heat transfer models of the organic-rich rock formation and/or simulations of the generation and production of hydrocarbon fluids from the organic-rich rock formation. The heating estimates may be used to adjust the rate at which heat is input into the organic-rich rock formation at one or more locations or production fluids are produced from the formation.
  • The heating of the organic-rich rock formation may be accomplished through use of heater wells. The heater wells may include, for example, electrical resistance heating elements. The production of hydrocarbon fluids from the formation may be accomplished through use of production wells. The adjustment of the rate at which heat is input into the organic-rich rock formation or adjusting the rate at which production fluids are produced from the formation may be accomplished through one or more of adjusting the heat input to a heater well, adjusting the flow rate from a production well, adjusting the back pressure of a production well, or combinations thereof.
  • There may be several different types of wells used in embodiments of the invention. For example, the heating of the organic-rich rock formation may be accomplished through use of heater wells. The heater wells may include, for example, electrical resistance heating elements. The production of hydrocarbon fluids from the formation may be accomplished through use of production wells. The injecting of the aqueous fluid may be accomplished through use of injection wells. The production of the aqueous solution may be accomplished through use of solution production wells. The different types of wells may be used for multiple purposes. For example, the production wells may also be used as injection wells for injecting water into the organic-rich rock formation. Alternatively, the production wells may also be used as solution production wells for producing the aqueous solution from the organic-rich rock formation. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • In one embodiment, the method includes an in situ method of recovering natural resources including heating an organic-rich rock formation in situ. The formation may be substantially impermeable to fluid flow initially, contain formation hydrocarbons, and water-soluble minerals. In some embodiments the heating occurs prior to substantial removal of the formation water-soluble minerals. The heating pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and thereby create permeability within a matured (pyrolyzed) organic-rich rock zone in of the organic-rich rock formation. The hydrocarbon fluids may be produced from the formation. The method may include leaving a second portion of the formation hydrocarbons substantially unpyrolyzed, thereby preserving an unmatured organic-rich rock zone. In some embodiments, the unmatured organic-rich rock zones may be shaped as pillars running substantially the entire thickness of the organic-rich rock formation. The heating rate and distribution of heating of the formation may be designed and implemented to leave sufficient unmatured pillars to prevent subsidence. Further, the method may include converting at least a portion of the formation water-soluble minerals to a different water-soluble mineral. For example, naturally occurring nahcolite may be decomposed to soda ash through heating. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • The method may include flushing the matured organic-rich rock zone and the unmatured organic-rich rock zone with an aqueous fluid. The aqueous fluid may be used to dissolve water-soluble minerals and migratory contaminant species as discussed herein. The flushing may optionally be completed after a substantial portion of the hydrocarbon fluids have been produced from the matured organic-rich rock zone. The resulting aqueous solution may then be produced from the organic-rich rock formation to the surface for processing as discussed herein. In some embodiments, the flushing step may be delayed after the hydrocarbon fluid production step. The flushing may be delayed to allow heat generated from the heating step to migrate deeper into surrounding unmatured organic-rich rock zones to convert nahcolite within the surrounding unmatured organic-rich rock zones to soda ash. Alternatively, the flushing may be delayed to allow heat generated from the heating step to generate permeability within the surrounding unmatured organic-rich rock zones. Further, the flushing may be delayed based on current and/or forecast market prices of sodium bicarbonate, soda ash, or both as further discussed herein. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • One embodiment may include an in situ method of recovering natural resources including heating the organic-rich rock formation in situ, where the formation contains formation water-soluble minerals. The heating may occur prior to substantial removal of the water-soluble minerals. The heating may both pyrolyze at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and generate water which migrates and at least partially dissolves the formation water-soluble minerals in situ to form an aqueous fluid within the formation. The generated water may be produced from one or more occurrences. For example, the generated water may be produced by decomposition of formation water-soluble minerals, pyrolyzation of formation hydrocarbons, dehydration of formation clays, or combinations thereof. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • Some embodiments further include producing a production fluid from the organic-rich rock formation where the production fluid contains the hydrocarbon fluids and the aqueous fluid. The aqueous fluid may contain water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species. In such case, the production fluid may be separated into a hydrocarbon stream and an aqueous stream at a surface facility. Thereafter the water-soluble minerals and/or migratory contaminant species may be recovered from the aqueous stream. This embodiment may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention discussed herein.
  • One embodiment includes an in situ method of recovering natural resources, including assessing the market price for a water-soluble mineral and comparing the market price for the water-soluble mineral to a cost-to-produce criterion. For example, the method may utilize a market price that is representative of the current market price, the forecasted market price, or a combination thereof. There are many potential market prices that may be used in the method. For example, the market price may be a listed commodity price, the price used in an existing or potential contractual arrangement or another measure of the current or potential value of the water-soluble mineral or a commodity or consumer product containing the water-soluble mineral or derivatives thereof. The water-soluble mineral may be a sodium mineral, including, for example, nahcolite or soda ash. The cost-to-produce criterion may be any criterion that reflects a measurement of the cost to produce the water-soluble mineral of interest or derivatives thereof. For example, the cost-to-produce criterion may include the cost to solution mine the water-soluble mineral of interest. The cost-to-produce criterion may include a measure of the cost to produce the water-soluble mineral before heating the organic-rich rock formation to pyrolyze formation hydrocarbons as compared to the cost to produce the water-soluble mineral after heating the organic-rich rock formation to pyrolyze formation hydrocarbons. The method may include determining that the market price of the water-soluble-mineral is less than the cost-to-produce criterion. In such case, an operator may opt to forego producing the water-soluble minerals before pyrolyzing the formation hydrocarbons in the organic-rich rock formation, thus delaying production of the water-soluble minerals to a later time. The resulting multi-mineral production scheme may be more economic than producing the water-soluble minerals before pyrolyzation. This embodiment may be combined with other embodiments and aspects of the invention discussed herein.
  • An embodiment may include an in situ method of recovering natural resources, including providing produced fluid processing facilities which are sized to process a first hydrocarbon fluid production rate produced during an initial production period together with a first CO2 production rate produced during the initial production period. The first CO2 production rate may include CO2 generated from dissociation of nahcolite to form soda ash. Thus the method may be used to adequately size produced fluid processing facilities where the operator plans to pyrolyze formation hydrocarbons without removing the naturally occurring nahcolite before pyrolyzation. The method may enable one to economically produce hydrocarbon fluids from an organic-rich rock formation without the necessity of removing the nahcolite beforehand, thus improving the overall project economics. This embodiment may also be practiced by designing and/or constructing a system that includes the produced fluid processing facilities. This method may be combined with any of the other aspects of the invention as discussed herein.
  • Methods to remove CO2, as well as other so-called acid gases (such as H2S), from produced hydrocarbon gas include the use of chemical reaction processes and of physical solvent processes. Chemical reaction processes typically involve contacting the gas stream with an aqueous amine solution at high pressure and/or low temperature. This causes the acid gas species to chemically react with the amines and go into solution. By raising the temperature and/or lowering the pressure the chemical reaction can be reversed and a concentrated stream of acid gases can be recovered. An alternative chemical reaction process involves hot carbonate solutions, typically potassium carbonate. The hot carbonate solution is regenerated and the concentrated stream of acid gases is recovered by contacting the solution with steam. Physical solvent processes typically involve contacting the gas stream with a glycol at high pressure and/or low temperature. Like the amine processes, reducing the pressure or raising the temperature allows regeneration of the solvent and recovery of the acid gases. Certain amines or glycols may be more or less selective in the types of acid gas species removed. Sizing of any of these processes requires determining the amount of chemical to circulate, the rate of circulation, the energy input for regeneration, and the size and type of gas-chemical contacting equipment. Contacting equipment typically involves packed or multi-tray countercurrent towers. Optimal sizing for each of these aspects is highly dependent on the rate at which gas is being produced from the formation and the concentration of the acid gases in the gas stream. Less commonly, cryogenic distillation is utilized to remove acid gases. This method takes advantage of the differences in the boiling points of the gas components.
  • In different embodiments, the initial production period may include a one year period beginning from the point of the first heating of the organic-rich rock formation. Alternatively, the initial production period may include a two, three, four or a five year period beginning from the point of the first heating of the organic-rich rock formation. In different embodiments, the first hydrocarbon fluid production rate may be the maximum daily hydrocarbon fluid production rate reached during the initial production period. Alternatively, the first hydrocarbon fluid production rate may be the maximum hourly, monthly or yearly hydrocarbon fluid production rate reached during the initial production period. In different embodiments, the first CO2 production rate may be the maximum daily CO2 production rate reached during the initial production period. Alternatively, the first CO2 production rate may be the maximum hourly, monthly or yearly CO2 production rate reached during the initial production period. This embodiment may be combined with other aspects of the invention discussed herein.
  • It can be seen that the current invention proposes to recover the value of the water-soluble minerals such as nahcolite after heating an oil shale zone and producing at least some of the shale oil. There may be a one or more benefits to this approach, including:
  • (1) The shale oil can be significantly more valuable than the water-soluble mineral components. Thus, recovering the shale oil value earlier can improve the net present value of the development of a lease under development.
  • (2) Removing water-soluble minerals early in the process may disrupt the ability to produce the oil shale by certain methods. For instance, removal of the soluble minerals can hinder the ability to produce hydraulic fractures in the formation and make the shale more prone to cavern formation and subsidence. Subsidence can cause substantial stresses on the wellbore completions and lead to early and sudden failures.
  • (3) Solution mining after kerogen conversion can be combined with leaching of migratory contaminant species, including, for example, water-soluble organic components, heavy metal components and ionic species left over from producing the oil shale. The removal of such components may be environmentally necessary if the shale oil zone is connected to a ground water source. The alkali nature of sodium carbonate solutions can aid the washing of organics from the shale oil zone.
  • (4) Project and field coordination can be simplified by separating the oil shale and mineral removal activities. Moreover, certain wells and facilities can be reused from the in situ shale oil development for the mineral removal.
  • (5) The conversion of nahcolite to soda ash, with resultant CO2 generation, during the oil shale heating can be used to monitor the progression of the oil shale maturation. As the nahcolite converts to soda ash, the production of generated CO2 can be analyzed to help assess the position of the heat front and the nature of the generated permeability. At lower temperatures (<˜250° C.), the CO2 generation in certain areas will be dominated by nahcolite decomposition. The heating behavior of oil shale can be correlated to the amount of CO2 present in the produced fluid return stream based on estimates of the amount of nahcolite present in situ. At higher temperatures, CO2 concentrations may more greatly reflect generation from the kerogen converting to oil and gas and perhaps from dawsonite decomposition. At even higher temperatures (>˜400° C.), the CO2 generation also reflects other carbonate mineral dissociation. Analyzing the isotopic nature of the CO2 (typically via mass spectrography) can be used to distinguish between CO2 gas from organic and inorganic sources. Organic-sourced gas tends to be lighter (i.e., enriched in 12C vs. 13C) than inorganic-sourced gas. (See, for example, Laughrey, C. D. and Balassare, F. J., “Some Applications of Isotope Geochemistry for Determining Sources of Stray Carbon Dioxide Gas”, Environmental Geosciences, 10(3), pp. 107-122, (2003)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. CO2 concentrations can be measured in a number of ways known in the art including gas chromatography, mass spectrography, infrared spectrography, Raman spectrography, photoacoustic spectrography, gas density measurements, and various chemical-specific reactions. Isotopic concentrations are typically measured via a combination of mass spectrography and gas chromatography.
  • (6) Extracting the water-soluble minerals after the oil shale maturation may increase their recovery since the maturation process increases permeability and connectivity in the formation. Thus, originally isolated concentrations of soluble minerals may become accessible to the injected water.
  • (7) The sodium minerals are produced as soda ash, rather than sodium bicarbonate. Produced nahcolite is often converted to soda ash in a facility and thus a step is saved with the in situ conversion.
  • (8) In addition to the benefits described above, if in situ conversion of the oil shale necessitates a ground water cleanup by intentional leaching, there may be additional synergies between cleanup operations and facilities and mineral solution mining operations and facilities.
  • The above-described processes may be of merit in connection with the recovery of hydrocarbons and nahcolite in the Piceance Basin of Colorado. Some have estimated that in some oil shale of the Western United States, up to 1 million barrels of oil may be recoverable per surface acre. One study has estimated the oil shale resource within the nahcolite-bearing portions of the oil shale formations of the Piceance Basin to be 400 billion barrels of shale oil in place. Pitman, J. K., Pierce, F. W. and Grundy, W. D., “Thickness, Oil-Yield and Kriged Resource Estimates for the Eocene Green River Formation, Piceance Creek Basin, Colo., United States Geological Survey Oil and Gas Investigations Chart OC-132, 6 sheets (1989)). The entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Dyni estimates the total nahcolite resource in the Piceance Basin at 32 billion short tons. This makes it the second largest sodium carbonate deposit in the world behind the trona deposits of southwest Wyoming (103 billion short tons). Resource density in the basin center areas varies from 170-490 million short tons per square mile.
  • As noted, it is preferred that thermal recovery of oil and gas be conducted before solution mining of nahcolite or other water-soluble minerals. In addition to the reasons discussed above, it is noted that solution mining can generate large voids in a rock formation and collapse breccias in an oil shale development unit. These voids and brecciated zones may pose problems for in situ and mining recovery of oil shale.
  • Also, when solution mining occurs first (as others have proposed), it becomes necessary to remove large amounts of water prior to oil shale heating. There are also inefficiencies associated with heating void filling water or gas.
  • In addition, heated fracture methods of in situ conversion of oil shale may not be possible within solution-mined areas. These recovery processes may require the construction of hydraulic fractures and the placement of a suitable proppant within those fractures. Voids and breccia may permit too much leak-off of fracture fluids, making pressure maintenance (required to form the fracture) and proppant placement difficult or impossible. In the virgin oil shale where nahcolite is present, the formation is tight and can maintain high pressure with minimal bleed off. Solution mining will probably change the fracturing behavior of the formation dramatically. At the least, solution mining may create the development of unpredictable fluid pathways resulting in lost production in the subsurface.
  • Finally, it is noted that, if heated to high enough temperature, sodium carbonate may further decompose into sodium oxide and CO2, according to the following reaction.

  • Na2CO3→Na2O+CO2
  • One may track the amount of CO2 generated in a nahcolite conversion process to determine the extent to which soda ash might be present or even sodium oxide. This is based upon a previously developed model which estimates the amount of nahcolite originally within the rock formation.
  • Certain features of the present invention are described in terms of a set of numerical upper limits and a set of numerical lower limits. It should be appreciated that ranges formed by any combination of these limits are within the scope of the invention unless otherwise indicated. Although some of the dependent claims have single dependencies in accordance with U.S. practice, each of the features in any of such dependent claims can be combined with each of the features of one or more of the other dependent claims dependent upon the same independent claim or claims.
  • While it will be apparent that the invention herein described is well calculated to achieve the benefits and advantages set forth above, it will be appreciated that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation and change without departing from the spirit thereof.

Claims (19)

What is claimed is:
1. An in situ method of recovering natural resources, comprising:
(a) heating in situ an organic-rich rock formation that contains both formation hydrocarbons and one or more formation water-soluble minerals,
wherein the heating of the organic-rich rock formation both pyrolyzes at least a portion of the formation hydrocarbons to create hydrocarbon fluids and makes available one or more migratory contaminant species previously bound in the organic-rich rock formation;
(b) producing at least a portion of the hydrocarbon fluids from the organic-rich rock formation, but wherein at least a portion of the one or more migratory contaminant species remain in the organic-rich rock formation;
(c) injecting an aqueous fluid into the organic-rich rock formation, wherein the injected aqueous fluid dissolves at least a portion of one or more water-soluble minerals and the one or more migratory contaminant species to form a first aqueous solution;
(d) producing the first aqueous solution from the organic-rich rock formation;
(e) processing the first aqueous solution in a surface facility to remove a portion of the one or more water-soluble minerals; and
(f) processing the first aqueous solution in the surface facility to remove at least some of the one or more migratory contaminant species.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the heating step (a) results in at least a portion of the organic-rich rock formation reaching a temperature of 270° C. or greater.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the formation hydrocarbons include solid hydrocarbons.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the organic-rich rock formation is an oil shale formation.
5. The method of claim 2, wherein the formation hydrocarbons include heavy hydrocarbons.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the organic-rich rock formation has an initial total permeability less than 1 millidarcy before the heating step (a).
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the organic-rich rock formation has a post heating total permeability of greater than 10 millidarcies after the heating step (a) and before the injecting step (c).
8. The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more migratory contaminant species include one or more of aromatic hydrocarbons, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, oxygenated hydrocarbons, metal contaminants, and ionic contaminants.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the one or more migratory contaminant species include one or more of benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, tri-methylbenzene, and polyaromatic hydrocarbon species.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the one or more migratory contaminant species include one or more of metal contaminants containing arsenic, boron, chromium, mercury, selenium, lead, vanadium, nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc.
11. The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more water-soluble minerals include sodium.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the one or more formation water-soluble minerals comprise nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate), soda ash (sodium carbonate), dawsonite (NaAl(CO3)(OH)2), or combinations thereof.
13. The method of claim 4, wherein the heating step (a) is initiated prior to substantial removal of the one or more formation water-soluble minerals from the organic-rich rock formation.
14. The method of claim 4, wherein the heating step (a) is initiated prior to removal of greater than 7 weight percent of the initially present one or more formation water-soluble minerals from the organic-rich rock formation.
15. The method of claim 4, wherein the processing step (e) includes removing the one or more water-soluble minerals by precipitation caused by altering the temperature of the first aqueous solution.
16. The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more formation water-soluble minerals include nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate) and the one or more water-soluble minerals include soda ash (sodium carbonate).
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the heating step (a) includes generating the soda ash by decomposition of the nahcolite.
18. The method of claim 4, wherein the heating step (a) is accomplished through introducing heat into heater wells penetrating at least partially through the organic-rich rock formation.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the heater wells include electrical resistance heating elements.
US14/109,859 2006-04-21 2013-12-17 Situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery Abandoned US20140102693A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/109,859 US20140102693A1 (en) 2006-04-21 2013-12-17 Situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US79384106P 2006-04-21 2006-04-21
US11/726,651 US7644993B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2007-03-22 In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery
US12/636,345 US8641150B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2009-12-11 In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery
US14/109,859 US20140102693A1 (en) 2006-04-21 2013-12-17 Situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/636,345 Division US8641150B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2009-12-11 In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140102693A1 true US20140102693A1 (en) 2014-04-17

Family

ID=36443564

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/726,651 Expired - Fee Related US7644993B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2007-03-22 In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery
US12/636,345 Expired - Fee Related US8641150B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2009-12-11 In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery
US14/109,859 Abandoned US20140102693A1 (en) 2006-04-21 2013-12-17 Situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/726,651 Expired - Fee Related US7644993B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2007-03-22 In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery
US12/636,345 Expired - Fee Related US8641150B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2009-12-11 In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (3) US7644993B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2007126676A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (59)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7086468B2 (en) 2000-04-24 2006-08-08 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation using heat sources positioned within open wellbores
US7631691B2 (en) * 2003-06-24 2009-12-15 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methods of treating a subterranean formation to convert organic matter into producible hydrocarbons
US20080087420A1 (en) * 2006-10-13 2008-04-17 Kaminsky Robert D Optimized well spacing for in situ shale oil development
US7527094B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2009-05-05 Shell Oil Company Double barrier system for an in situ conversion process
CA2626962C (en) * 2005-10-24 2014-07-08 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Methods of producing alkylated hydrocarbons from an in situ heat treatment process liquid
US7644993B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2010-01-12 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery
RU2008145876A (en) 2006-04-21 2010-05-27 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. (NL) HEATERS WITH RESTRICTION OF TEMPERATURE WHICH USE PHASE TRANSFORMATION OF FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL
WO2008048454A2 (en) * 2006-10-13 2008-04-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Combined development of oil shale by in situ heating with a deeper hydrocarbon resource
AU2007313388B2 (en) * 2006-10-13 2013-01-31 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Heating an organic-rich rock formation in situ to produce products with improved properties
BRPI0719868A2 (en) * 2006-10-13 2014-06-10 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co Methods for lowering the temperature of a subsurface formation, and for forming a frozen wall into a subsurface formation
WO2008048455A2 (en) 2006-10-13 2008-04-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Enhanced shale oil production by in situ heating using hydraulically fractured producing wells
CA2666947C (en) 2006-10-20 2016-04-26 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Heating tar sands formations while controlling pressure
AU2008227167B2 (en) 2007-03-22 2013-08-01 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Granular electrical connections for in situ formation heating
WO2008115356A1 (en) 2007-03-22 2008-09-25 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Resistive heater for in situ formation heating
WO2008131179A1 (en) 2007-04-20 2008-10-30 Shell Oil Company In situ heat treatment from multiple layers of a tar sands formation
CA2680695C (en) * 2007-05-15 2013-09-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Downhole burners for in situ conversion of organic-rich rock formations
BRPI0810752A2 (en) * 2007-05-15 2014-10-21 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co METHODS FOR IN SITU HEATING OF A RICH ROCK FORMATION IN ORGANIC COMPOUND, IN SITU HEATING OF A TARGETED XISTO TRAINING AND TO PRODUCE A FLUID OF HYDROCARBON, SQUARE FOR A RACHOSETUS ORGANIC BUILDING , AND FIELD TO PRODUCE A HYDROCARBON FLUID FROM A TRAINING RICH IN A TARGET ORGANIC COMPOUND.
US8146664B2 (en) * 2007-05-25 2012-04-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Utilization of low BTU gas generated during in situ heating of organic-rich rock
BRPI0810590A2 (en) 2007-05-25 2014-10-21 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co IN SITU METHOD OF PRODUCING HYDROCARBON FLUIDS FROM A ROCK FORMATION RICH IN ORGANIC MATTER
JP5379805B2 (en) 2007-10-19 2013-12-25 シエル・インターナシヨネイル・リサーチ・マーチヤツピイ・ベー・ウイ Three-phase heater with common upper soil compartment for heating the ground surface underlayer
US8082995B2 (en) * 2007-12-10 2011-12-27 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Optimization of untreated oil shale geometry to control subsidence
US8256992B2 (en) 2008-02-29 2012-09-04 Seqenergy, Llc Underground sequestration system and method
WO2009146158A1 (en) 2008-04-18 2009-12-03 Shell Oil Company Using mines and tunnels for treating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
CA2722452C (en) * 2008-05-23 2014-09-30 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Field management for substantially constant composition gas generation
JP2012509417A (en) 2008-10-13 2012-04-19 シエル・インターナシヨナル・リサーチ・マートスハツペイ・ベー・ヴエー Use of self-regulating nuclear reactors in the treatment of surface subsurface layers.
US8256991B2 (en) 2008-10-20 2012-09-04 Seqenergy, Llc Engineered, scalable underground storage system and method
WO2010068578A1 (en) * 2008-12-09 2010-06-17 Katana Energy Llc Zero discharge produced water treatment system with minerals recovery, agricultural production and aquaculture
AU2010216407B2 (en) * 2009-02-23 2014-11-20 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Water treatment following shale oil production by in situ heating
US8967261B2 (en) * 2009-02-25 2015-03-03 Peter James Cassidy Oil shale processing
US8448707B2 (en) 2009-04-10 2013-05-28 Shell Oil Company Non-conducting heater casings
US8540020B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2013-09-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Converting organic matter from a subterranean formation into producible hydrocarbons by controlling production operations based on availability of one or more production resources
CA2704689C (en) * 2009-05-20 2015-11-17 Conocophillips Company In-situ upgrading of heavy crude oil in a production well using radio frequency or microwave radiation and a catalyst
CA2704575C (en) 2009-05-20 2016-01-19 Conocophillips Company Wellhead hydrocarbon upgrading using microwaves
US8555970B2 (en) * 2009-05-20 2013-10-15 Conocophillips Company Accelerating the start-up phase for a steam assisted gravity drainage operation using radio frequency or microwave radiation
US8316934B2 (en) * 2009-06-30 2012-11-27 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Isotopic identification of production by individual formations in commingled gas wells
US9920596B2 (en) * 2009-11-23 2018-03-20 Conocophillips Company Coal bed methane recovery
US8863839B2 (en) * 2009-12-17 2014-10-21 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Enhanced convection for in situ pyrolysis of organic-rich rock formations
US9127538B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2015-09-08 Shell Oil Company Methodologies for treatment of hydrocarbon formations using staged pyrolyzation
US8631866B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-01-21 Shell Oil Company Leak detection in circulated fluid systems for heating subsurface formations
US8875788B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-11-04 Shell Oil Company Low temperature inductive heating of subsurface formations
US9127523B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2015-09-08 Shell Oil Company Barrier methods for use in subsurface hydrocarbon formations
CA2806174C (en) 2010-08-30 2017-01-31 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Olefin reduction for in situ pyrolysis oil generation
CA2806173C (en) 2010-08-30 2017-01-31 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Wellbore mechanical integrity for in situ pyrolysis
CA2815641C (en) 2010-12-16 2016-04-12 Landmark Graphics Corporation Method and system of plotting correlated data
US9016370B2 (en) 2011-04-08 2015-04-28 Shell Oil Company Partial solution mining of hydrocarbon containing layers prior to in situ heat treatment
WO2013052561A2 (en) 2011-10-07 2013-04-11 Shell Oil Company Thermal expansion accommodation for circulated fluid systems used to heat subsurface formations
US9080441B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2015-07-14 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Multiple electrical connections to optimize heating for in situ pyrolysis
US9097818B2 (en) * 2012-02-06 2015-08-04 Baker Hughes Incorporated Kerogen porosity volume and pore size distribution using NMR
AU2013256823B2 (en) 2012-05-04 2015-09-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Systems and methods of detecting an intersection between a wellbore and a subterranean structure that includes a marker material
US9365777B2 (en) * 2012-06-13 2016-06-14 Red Leaf Resources, Inc. Methods of operation for reduced residual hydrocarbon accumulation in oil shale processing
CN103321623B (en) * 2013-06-17 2015-09-23 吉林大学 Oil shale underground in situ heating simulation chamber
GB2515547A (en) * 2013-06-27 2014-12-31 Statoil Petroleum As Increasing hydrocarbon production from reservoirs
CA2923681A1 (en) 2013-10-22 2015-04-30 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Systems and methods for regulating an in situ pyrolysis process
US9394772B2 (en) 2013-11-07 2016-07-19 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Systems and methods for in situ resistive heating of organic matter in a subterranean formation
US9618446B2 (en) 2014-01-28 2017-04-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Fluidic speed of sound measurement using photoacoustics
US9644466B2 (en) 2014-11-21 2017-05-09 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method of recovering hydrocarbons within a subsurface formation using electric current
CN107818188B (en) * 2016-09-14 2021-07-27 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Simulation prediction method for in-situ exploitation of fluid heating oil shale
CN109113699B (en) * 2018-07-12 2021-03-30 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Shale oil in-situ lightening development method, device and system
CN112308264B (en) * 2019-07-26 2021-08-31 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method and device for predicting optimal development mode of shale oil in-situ conversion

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030131994A1 (en) * 2001-04-24 2003-07-17 Vinegar Harold J. In situ thermal processing and solution mining of an oil shale formation

Family Cites Families (344)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US363419A (en) 1887-05-24 Friedrich hermann poetscii
US2732195A (en) 1956-01-24 Ljungstrom
US895612A (en) 1902-06-11 1908-08-11 Delos R Baker Apparatus for extracting the volatilizable contents of sedimentary strata.
US1342780A (en) 1919-06-09 1920-06-08 Dwight G Vedder Method and apparatus for shutting water out of oil-wells
US1422204A (en) 1919-12-19 1922-07-11 Wilson W Hoover Method for working oil shales
US1872906A (en) 1925-08-08 1932-08-23 Henry L Doherty Method of developing oil fields
US1666488A (en) * 1927-02-05 1928-04-17 Crawshaw Richard Apparatus for extracting oil from shale
US1701884A (en) * 1927-09-30 1929-02-12 John E Hogle Oil-well heater
US2033560A (en) * 1932-11-12 1936-03-10 Technicraft Engineering Corp Refrigerating packer
US2033561A (en) * 1932-11-12 1936-03-10 Technicraft Engineering Corp Method of packing wells
US2634961A (en) * 1946-01-07 1953-04-14 Svensk Skifferolje Aktiebolage Method of electrothermal production of shale oil
US2534737A (en) 1947-06-14 1950-12-19 Standard Oil Dev Co Core analysis and apparatus therefor
US2584605A (en) * 1948-04-14 1952-02-05 Edmund S Merriam Thermal drive method for recovery of oil
US2780450A (en) * 1952-03-07 1957-02-05 Svenska Skifferolje Ab Method of recovering oil and gases from non-consolidated bituminous geological formations by a heating treatment in situ
US2777679A (en) * 1952-03-07 1957-01-15 Svenska Skifferolje Ab Recovering sub-surface bituminous deposits by creating a frozen barrier and heating in situ
US2795279A (en) 1952-04-17 1957-06-11 Electrotherm Res Corp Method of underground electrolinking and electrocarbonization of mineral fuels
US2812160A (en) 1953-06-30 1957-11-05 Exxon Research Engineering Co Recovery of uncontaminated cores
US2813583A (en) 1954-12-06 1957-11-19 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for recovery of petroleum from sands and shale
US2923535A (en) * 1955-02-11 1960-02-02 Svenska Skifferolje Ab Situ recovery from carbonaceous deposits
US2887160A (en) 1955-08-01 1959-05-19 California Research Corp Apparatus for well stimulation by gas-air burners
US2847071A (en) 1955-09-20 1958-08-12 California Research Corp Methods of igniting a gas air-burner utilizing pelletized phosphorus
US2895555A (en) 1956-10-02 1959-07-21 California Research Corp Gas-air burner with check valve
US3127936A (en) * 1957-07-26 1964-04-07 Svenska Skifferolje Ab Method of in situ heating of subsurface preferably fuel containing deposits
GB855408A (en) 1958-03-05 1960-11-30 Geoffrey Cotton Improved methods of and apparatus for excavating wells, shafts, tunnels and similar excavations
US3004601A (en) 1958-05-09 1961-10-17 Albert G Bodine Method and apparatus for augmenting oil recovery from wells by refrigeration
US3013609A (en) 1958-06-11 1961-12-19 Texaco Inc Method for producing hydrocarbons in an in situ combustion operation
US2974937A (en) * 1958-11-03 1961-03-14 Jersey Prod Res Co Petroleum recovery from carbonaceous formations
US2944803A (en) 1959-02-24 1960-07-12 Dow Chemical Co Treatment of subterranean formations containing water-soluble minerals
US2952450A (en) 1959-04-30 1960-09-13 Phillips Petroleum Co In situ exploitation of lignite using steam
US3095031A (en) 1959-12-09 1963-06-25 Eurenius Malte Oscar Burners for use in bore holes in the ground
US3137347A (en) 1960-05-09 1964-06-16 Phillips Petroleum Co In situ electrolinking of oil shale
US3106244A (en) 1960-06-20 1963-10-08 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for producing oil shale in situ by electrocarbonization
US3109482A (en) 1961-03-02 1963-11-05 Pure Oil Co Well-bore gas burner
US3170815A (en) * 1961-08-10 1965-02-23 Dow Chemical Co Removal of calcium sulfate deposits
US3183675A (en) 1961-11-02 1965-05-18 Conch Int Methane Ltd Method of freezing an earth formation
US3436919A (en) * 1961-12-04 1969-04-08 Continental Oil Co Underground sealing
US3183971A (en) 1962-01-12 1965-05-18 Shell Oil Co Prestressing a pipe string in a well cementing method
US3149672A (en) 1962-05-04 1964-09-22 Jersey Prod Res Co Method and apparatus for electrical heating of oil-bearing formations
US3180411A (en) * 1962-05-18 1965-04-27 Phillips Petroleum Co Protection of well casing for in situ combustion
US3194315A (en) 1962-06-26 1965-07-13 Charles D Golson Apparatus for isolating zones in wells
US3225829A (en) 1962-10-24 1965-12-28 Chevron Res Apparatus for burning a combustible mixture in a well
US3288648A (en) 1963-02-04 1966-11-29 Pan American Petroleum Corp Process for producing electrical energy from geological liquid hydrocarbon formation
US3205942A (en) 1963-02-07 1965-09-14 Socony Mobil Oil Co Inc Method for recovery of hydrocarbons by in situ heating of oil shale
US3256935A (en) 1963-03-21 1966-06-21 Socony Mobil Oil Co Inc Method and system for petroleum recovery
US3241611A (en) * 1963-04-10 1966-03-22 Equity Oil Company Recovery of petroleum products from oil shale
GB959945A (en) 1963-04-18 1964-06-03 Conch Int Methane Ltd Constructing a frozen wall within the ground
US3263211A (en) 1963-06-24 1966-07-26 Jr William A Heidman Automatic safety flasher signal for automobiles
US3241615A (en) * 1963-06-27 1966-03-22 Chevron Res Downhole burner for wells
US3295328A (en) * 1963-12-05 1967-01-03 Phillips Petroleum Co Reservoir for storage of volatile liquids and method of forming the same
US3285335A (en) 1963-12-11 1966-11-15 Exxon Research Engineering Co In situ pyrolysis of oil shale formations
US3254721A (en) 1963-12-20 1966-06-07 Gulf Research Development Co Down-hole fluid fuel burner
US3294167A (en) 1964-04-13 1966-12-27 Shell Oil Co Thermal oil recovery
US3228869A (en) * 1964-05-19 1966-01-11 Union Oil Co Oil shale retorting with shale oil recycle
US3271962A (en) 1964-07-16 1966-09-13 Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co Mining process
US3284281A (en) 1964-08-31 1966-11-08 Phillips Petroleum Co Production of oil from oil shale through fractures
US3376403A (en) * 1964-11-12 1968-04-02 Mini Petrolului Bottom-hole electric heater
US3323840A (en) 1965-02-01 1967-06-06 Halliburton Co Aeration blanket
US3358756A (en) 1965-03-12 1967-12-19 Shell Oil Co Method for in situ recovery of solid or semi-solid petroleum deposits
US3372550A (en) * 1966-05-03 1968-03-12 Carl E. Schroeder Method of and apparatus for freezing water-bearing materials
US3400762A (en) 1966-07-08 1968-09-10 Phillips Petroleum Co In situ thermal recovery of oil from an oil shale
US3516787A (en) * 1966-08-10 1970-06-23 Sinclair Research Inc Recovery of oil and aluminum from oil shale
US3382922A (en) 1966-08-31 1968-05-14 Phillips Petroleum Co Production of oil shale by in situ pyrolysis
US3468376A (en) 1967-02-10 1969-09-23 Mobil Oil Corp Thermal conversion of oil shale into recoverable hydrocarbons
US3521709A (en) 1967-04-03 1970-07-28 Phillips Petroleum Co Producing oil from oil shale by heating with hot gases
US3515213A (en) 1967-04-19 1970-06-02 Shell Oil Co Shale oil recovery process using heated oil-miscible fluids
US3439744A (en) * 1967-06-23 1969-04-22 Shell Oil Co Selective formation plugging
US3528501A (en) 1967-08-04 1970-09-15 Phillips Petroleum Co Recovery of oil from oil shale
US3516495A (en) 1967-11-29 1970-06-23 Exxon Research Engineering Co Recovery of shale oil
US3528252A (en) 1968-01-29 1970-09-15 Charles P Gail Arrangement for solidifications of earth formations
US3559737A (en) * 1968-05-06 1971-02-02 James F Ralstin Underground fluid storage in permeable formations
US3513914A (en) 1968-09-30 1970-05-26 Shell Oil Co Method for producing shale oil from an oil shale formation
US3502372A (en) * 1968-10-23 1970-03-24 Shell Oil Co Process of recovering oil and dawsonite from oil shale
US3501201A (en) * 1968-10-30 1970-03-17 Shell Oil Co Method of producing shale oil from a subterranean oil shale formation
US3500913A (en) * 1968-10-30 1970-03-17 Shell Oil Co Method of recovering liquefiable components from a subterranean earth formation
US3759329A (en) 1969-05-09 1973-09-18 Shuffman O Cryo-thermal process for fracturing rock formations
US3572838A (en) 1969-07-07 1971-03-30 Shell Oil Co Recovery of aluminum compounds and oil from oil shale formations
US3599714A (en) 1969-09-08 1971-08-17 Roger L Messman Method of recovering hydrocarbons by in situ combustion
US3547193A (en) 1969-10-08 1970-12-15 Electrothermic Co Method and apparatus for recovery of minerals from sub-surface formations using electricity
US3642066A (en) * 1969-11-13 1972-02-15 Electrothermic Co Electrical method and apparatus for the recovery of oil
US3602310A (en) 1970-01-15 1971-08-31 Tenneco Oil Co Method of increasing the permeability of a subterranean hydrocarbon bearing formation
US3661423A (en) 1970-02-12 1972-05-09 Occidental Petroleum Corp In situ process for recovery of carbonaceous materials from subterranean deposits
US3613785A (en) 1970-02-16 1971-10-19 Shell Oil Co Process for horizontally fracturing subsurface earth formations
US3724225A (en) 1970-02-25 1973-04-03 Exxon Research Engineering Co Separation of carbon dioxide from a natural gas stream
US3695354A (en) 1970-03-30 1972-10-03 Shell Oil Co Halogenating extraction of oil from oil shale
US3620300A (en) 1970-04-20 1971-11-16 Electrothermic Co Method and apparatus for electrically heating a subsurface formation
US3692111A (en) 1970-07-14 1972-09-19 Shell Oil Co Stair-step thermal recovery of oil
US3779601A (en) 1970-09-24 1973-12-18 Shell Oil Co Method of producing hydrocarbons from an oil shale formation containing nahcolite
US3759574A (en) 1970-09-24 1973-09-18 Shell Oil Co Method of producing hydrocarbons from an oil shale formation
US3943722A (en) * 1970-12-31 1976-03-16 Union Carbide Canada Limited Ground freezing method
US3730270A (en) 1971-03-23 1973-05-01 Marathon Oil Co Shale oil recovery from fractured oil shale
US3700280A (en) 1971-04-28 1972-10-24 Shell Oil Co Method of producing oil from an oil shale formation containing nahcolite and dawsonite
US3741306A (en) 1971-04-28 1973-06-26 Shell Oil Co Method of producing hydrocarbons from oil shale formations
US3729965A (en) 1971-04-29 1973-05-01 K Gartner Multiple part key for conventional locks
US4340934A (en) 1971-09-07 1982-07-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of generating subsurface characteristic models
US3739851A (en) 1971-11-24 1973-06-19 Shell Oil Co Method of producing oil from an oil shale formation
US3759328A (en) 1972-05-11 1973-09-18 Shell Oil Co Laterally expanding oil shale permeabilization
US3882937A (en) 1973-09-04 1975-05-13 Union Oil Co Method and apparatus for refrigerating wells by gas expansion
US3882941A (en) 1973-12-17 1975-05-13 Cities Service Res & Dev Co In situ production of bitumen from oil shale
US4037655A (en) 1974-04-19 1977-07-26 Electroflood Company Method for secondary recovery of oil
US3880238A (en) 1974-07-18 1975-04-29 Shell Oil Co Solvent/non-solvent pyrolysis of subterranean oil shale
US4014575A (en) * 1974-07-26 1977-03-29 Occidental Petroleum Corporation System for fuel and products of oil shale retort
GB1454324A (en) 1974-08-14 1976-11-03 Iniex Recovering combustible gases from underground deposits of coal or bituminous shale
US3888307A (en) 1974-08-29 1975-06-10 Shell Oil Co Heating through fractures to expand a shale oil pyrolyzing cavern
US3958636A (en) 1975-01-23 1976-05-25 Atlantic Richfield Company Production of bitumen from a tar sand formation
US4071278A (en) * 1975-01-27 1978-01-31 Carpenter Neil L Leaching methods and apparatus
CA994694A (en) 1975-03-06 1976-08-10 Charles B. Fisher Induction heating of underground hydrocarbon deposits
US3924680A (en) 1975-04-23 1975-12-09 In Situ Technology Inc Method of pyrolysis of coal in situ
US4008769A (en) * 1975-04-30 1977-02-22 Mobil Oil Corporation Oil recovery by microemulsion injection
US4003432A (en) * 1975-05-16 1977-01-18 Texaco Development Corporation Method of recovery of bitumen from tar sand formations
US3967853A (en) 1975-06-05 1976-07-06 Shell Oil Company Producing shale oil from a cavity-surrounded central well
US3950029A (en) 1975-06-12 1976-04-13 Mobil Oil Corporation In situ retorting of oil shale
GB1463444A (en) 1975-06-13 1977-02-02
US4005750A (en) * 1975-07-01 1977-02-01 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Energy Research And Development Administration Method for selectively orienting induced fractures in subterranean earth formations
US4069868A (en) 1975-07-14 1978-01-24 In Situ Technology, Inc. Methods of fluidized production of coal in situ
US4007786A (en) * 1975-07-28 1977-02-15 Texaco Inc. Secondary recovery of oil by steam stimulation plus the production of electrical energy and mechanical power
BE832017A (en) 1975-07-31 1975-11-17 NEW PROCESS FOR EXPLOITATION OF A COAL OR LIGNITE DEPOSIT BY UNDERGROUND GASING UNDER HIGH PRESSURE
GB1478880A (en) 1975-09-26 1977-07-06 Moppes & Sons Ltd L Van Reaming shells for drilling apparatus
US4057510A (en) 1975-09-29 1977-11-08 Texaco Inc. Production of nitrogen rich gas mixtures
US3978920A (en) 1975-10-24 1976-09-07 Cities Service Company In situ combustion process for multi-stratum reservoirs
US4047760A (en) 1975-11-28 1977-09-13 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. In situ recovery of shale oil
US3999607A (en) 1976-01-22 1976-12-28 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Recovery of hydrocarbons from coal
US4030549A (en) 1976-01-26 1977-06-21 Cities Service Company Recovery of geothermal energy
US4008762A (en) * 1976-02-26 1977-02-22 Fisher Sidney T Extraction of hydrocarbons in situ from underground hydrocarbon deposits
US4487257A (en) 1976-06-17 1984-12-11 Raytheon Company Apparatus and method for production of organic products from kerogen
US4067390A (en) * 1976-07-06 1978-01-10 Technology Application Services Corporation Apparatus and method for the recovery of fuel products from subterranean deposits of carbonaceous matter using a plasma arc
US4043393A (en) 1976-07-29 1977-08-23 Fisher Sidney T Extraction from underground coal deposits
US4065183A (en) 1976-11-15 1977-12-27 Trw Inc. Recovery system for oil shale deposits
US4096034A (en) 1976-12-16 1978-06-20 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Holddown structure for a nuclear reactor core
US4202168A (en) 1977-04-28 1980-05-13 Gulf Research & Development Company Method for the recovery of power from LHV gas
GB1559948A (en) 1977-05-23 1980-01-30 British Petroleum Co Treatment of a viscous oil reservoir
NZ185520A (en) 1977-06-17 1981-10-19 N Carpenter Gas pressure generation in oil bearing formation by electrolysis
US4169506A (en) 1977-07-15 1979-10-02 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) In situ retorting of oil shale and energy recovery
US4140180A (en) 1977-08-29 1979-02-20 Iit Research Institute Method for in situ heat processing of hydrocarbonaceous formations
US4320801A (en) * 1977-09-30 1982-03-23 Raytheon Company In situ processing of organic ore bodies
US4125159A (en) 1977-10-17 1978-11-14 Vann Roy Randell Method and apparatus for isolating and treating subsurface stratas
US4149595A (en) 1977-12-27 1979-04-17 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. In situ oil shale retort with variations in surface area corresponding to kerogen content of formation within retort site
US4167291A (en) 1977-12-29 1979-09-11 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Method of forming an in situ oil shale retort with void volume as function of kerogen content of formation within retort site
US4163475A (en) 1978-04-21 1979-08-07 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Determining the locus of a processing zone in an in situ oil shale retort
US4160479A (en) 1978-04-24 1979-07-10 Richardson Reginald D Heavy oil recovery process
US4185693A (en) * 1978-06-07 1980-01-29 Conoco, Inc. Oil shale retorting from a high porosity cavern
US4186801A (en) * 1978-12-18 1980-02-05 Gulf Research And Development Company In situ combustion process for the recovery of liquid carbonaceous fuels from subterranean formations
US4472935A (en) 1978-08-03 1984-09-25 Gulf Research & Development Company Method and apparatus for the recovery of power from LHV gas
US4265310A (en) 1978-10-03 1981-05-05 Continental Oil Company Fracture preheat oil recovery process
CA1102234A (en) 1978-11-16 1981-06-02 David A. Redford Gaseous and solvent additives for steam injection for thermal recovery of bitumen from tar sands
US4362213A (en) 1978-12-29 1982-12-07 Hydrocarbon Research, Inc. Method of in situ oil extraction using hot solvent vapor injection
US4358222A (en) 1979-01-16 1982-11-09 Landau Richard E Methods for forming supported cavities by surface cooling
US4239283A (en) 1979-03-05 1980-12-16 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. In situ oil shale retort with intermediate gas control
CA1130201A (en) 1979-07-10 1982-08-24 Esso Resources Canada Limited Method for continuously producing viscous hydrocarbons by gravity drainage while injecting heated fluids
US4372615A (en) * 1979-09-14 1983-02-08 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Method of rubbling oil shale
US4318723A (en) * 1979-11-14 1982-03-09 Koch Process Systems, Inc. Cryogenic distillative separation of acid gases from methane
US4246966A (en) * 1979-11-19 1981-01-27 Stoddard Xerxes T Production and wet oxidation of heavy crude oil for generation of power
US4272127A (en) 1979-12-03 1981-06-09 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Subsidence control at boundaries of an in situ oil shale retort development region
US4250230A (en) * 1979-12-10 1981-02-10 In Situ Technology, Inc. Generating electricity from coal in situ
US4319635A (en) * 1980-02-29 1982-03-16 P. H. Jones Hydrogeology, Inc. Method for enhanced oil recovery by geopressured waterflood
US4375302A (en) 1980-03-03 1983-03-01 Nicholas Kalmar Process for the in situ recovery of both petroleum and inorganic mineral content of an oil shale deposit
US4324291A (en) 1980-04-28 1982-04-13 Texaco Inc. Viscous oil recovery method
US4285401A (en) 1980-06-09 1981-08-25 Kobe, Inc. Electric and hydraulic powered thermal stimulation and recovery system and method for subterranean wells
US4397502A (en) 1981-02-09 1983-08-09 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Two-pass method for developing a system of in situ oil shale retorts
US4369842A (en) 1981-02-09 1983-01-25 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Analyzing oil shale retort off-gas for carbon dioxide to determine the combustion zone temperature
US4368921A (en) * 1981-03-02 1983-01-18 Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. Non-subsidence method for developing an in situ oil shale retort
US4546829A (en) 1981-03-10 1985-10-15 Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc. Enhanced oil recovery process
US4382469A (en) 1981-03-10 1983-05-10 Electro-Petroleum, Inc. Method of in situ gasification
US4384614A (en) 1981-05-11 1983-05-24 Justheim Pertroleum Company Method of retorting oil shale by velocity flow of super-heated air
US4401162A (en) 1981-10-13 1983-08-30 Synfuel (An Indiana Limited Partnership) In situ oil shale process
US4417449A (en) 1982-01-15 1983-11-29 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Process for separating carbon dioxide and acid gases from a carbonaceous off-gas
US5055030A (en) 1982-03-04 1991-10-08 Phillips Petroleum Company Method for the recovery of hydrocarbons
US4585063A (en) 1982-04-16 1986-04-29 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Oil shale retorting and retort water purification process
US4495056A (en) * 1982-04-16 1985-01-22 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Oil shale retorting and retort water purification process
US4412585A (en) 1982-05-03 1983-11-01 Cities Service Company Electrothermal process for recovering hydrocarbons
US4468376A (en) 1982-05-03 1984-08-28 Texaco Development Corporation Disposal process for halogenated organic material
US4485869A (en) 1982-10-22 1984-12-04 Iit Research Institute Recovery of liquid hydrocarbons from oil shale by electromagnetic heating in situ
US4537067A (en) 1982-11-18 1985-08-27 Wilson Industries, Inc. Inertial borehole survey system
US4474238A (en) 1982-11-30 1984-10-02 Phillips Petroleum Company Method and apparatus for treatment of subsurface formations
US4483398A (en) 1983-01-14 1984-11-20 Exxon Production Research Co. In-situ retorting of oil shale
US4886118A (en) 1983-03-21 1989-12-12 Shell Oil Company Conductively heating a subterranean oil shale to create permeability and subsequently produce oil
US4640352A (en) * 1983-03-21 1987-02-03 Shell Oil Company In-situ steam drive oil recovery process
US4545435A (en) 1983-04-29 1985-10-08 Iit Research Institute Conduction heating of hydrocarbonaceous formations
US4730671A (en) * 1983-06-30 1988-03-15 Atlantic Richfield Company Viscous oil recovery using high electrical conductive layers
GB2136034B (en) 1983-09-08 1986-05-14 Zakiewicz Bohdan M Dr Recovering hydrocarbons from mineral oil deposits
US4511382A (en) 1983-09-15 1985-04-16 Exxon Production Research Co. Method of separating acid gases, particularly carbon dioxide, from methane by the addition of a light gas such as helium
US4533372A (en) 1983-12-23 1985-08-06 Exxon Production Research Co. Method and apparatus for separating carbon dioxide and other acid gases from methane by the use of distillation and a controlled freezing zone
US4567945A (en) * 1983-12-27 1986-02-04 Atlantic Richfield Co. Electrode well method and apparatus
US4487260A (en) 1984-03-01 1984-12-11 Texaco Inc. In situ production of hydrocarbons including shale oil
US4552214A (en) 1984-03-22 1985-11-12 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Pulsed in situ retorting in an array of oil shale retorts
US4532991A (en) 1984-03-22 1985-08-06 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Pulsed retorting with continuous shale oil upgrading
US4637464A (en) * 1984-03-22 1987-01-20 Amoco Corporation In situ retorting of oil shale with pulsed water purge
US5055180A (en) 1984-04-20 1991-10-08 Electromagnetic Energy Corporation Method and apparatus for recovering fractions from hydrocarbon materials, facilitating the removal and cleansing of hydrocarbon fluids, insulating storage vessels, and cleansing storage vessels and pipelines
FR2565273B1 (en) 1984-06-01 1986-10-17 Air Liquide SOIL FREEZING PROCESS AND INSTALLATION
US4929341A (en) 1984-07-24 1990-05-29 Source Technology Earth Oils, Inc. Process and system for recovering oil from oil bearing soil such as shale and tar sands and oil produced by such process
US4589491A (en) 1984-08-24 1986-05-20 Atlantic Richfield Company Cold fluid enhancement of hydraulic fracture well linkage
US4602144A (en) 1984-09-18 1986-07-22 Pace Incorporated Temperature controlled solder extractor electrically heated tip assembly
US4633948A (en) * 1984-10-25 1987-01-06 Shell Oil Company Steam drive from fractured horizontal wells
US4704514A (en) 1985-01-11 1987-11-03 Egmond Cor F Van Heating rate variant elongated electrical resistance heater
US4747642A (en) 1985-02-14 1988-05-31 Amoco Corporation Control of subsidence during underground gasification of coal
US4626665A (en) 1985-06-24 1986-12-02 Shell Oil Company Metal oversheathed electrical resistance heater
US4589973A (en) 1985-07-15 1986-05-20 Breckinridge Minerals, Inc. Process for recovering oil from raw oil shale using added pulverized coal
US4634315A (en) * 1985-08-22 1987-01-06 Terra Tek, Inc. Forced refreezing method for the formation of high strength ice structures
US4671863A (en) 1985-10-28 1987-06-09 Tejeda Alvaro R Reversible electrolytic system for softening and dealkalizing water
US4706751A (en) 1986-01-31 1987-11-17 S-Cal Research Corp. Heavy oil recovery process
US4694907A (en) 1986-02-21 1987-09-22 Carbotek, Inc. Thermally-enhanced oil recovery method and apparatus
US4705108A (en) 1986-05-27 1987-11-10 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method for in situ heating of hydrocarbonaceous formations
US4754808A (en) 1986-06-20 1988-07-05 Conoco Inc. Methods for obtaining well-to-well flow communication
US4737267A (en) 1986-11-12 1988-04-12 Duo-Ex Coproration Oil shale processing apparatus and method
CA1288043C (en) 1986-12-15 1991-08-27 Peter Van Meurs Conductively heating a subterranean oil shale to create permeabilityand subsequently produce oil
US4779680A (en) 1987-05-13 1988-10-25 Marathon Oil Company Hydraulic fracturing process using a polymer gel
US4817711A (en) 1987-05-27 1989-04-04 Jeambey Calhoun G System for recovery of petroleum from petroleum impregnated media
US4776638A (en) 1987-07-13 1988-10-11 University Of Kentucky Research Foundation Method and apparatus for conversion of coal in situ
US4828031A (en) 1987-10-13 1989-05-09 Chevron Research Company In situ chemical stimulation of diatomite formations
DE3810951A1 (en) 1988-03-31 1989-10-12 Klein Schanzlin & Becker Ag METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING ENERGY FROM OIL SOURCES
US4815790A (en) 1988-05-13 1989-03-28 Natec, Ltd. Nahcolite solution mining process
FR2632350B1 (en) 1988-06-03 1990-09-14 Inst Francais Du Petrole ASSISTED RECOVERY OF HEAVY HYDROCARBONS FROM A SUBTERRANEAN WELLBORE FORMATION HAVING A PORTION WITH SUBSTANTIALLY HORIZONTAL AREA
US4923493A (en) 1988-08-19 1990-05-08 Exxon Production Research Company Method and apparatus for cryogenic separation of carbon dioxide and other acid gases from methane
US4928765A (en) 1988-09-27 1990-05-29 Ramex Syn-Fuels International Method and apparatus for shale gas recovery
US4974425A (en) 1988-12-08 1990-12-04 Concept Rkk, Limited Closed cryogenic barrier for containment of hazardous material migration in the earth
US4860544A (en) 1988-12-08 1989-08-29 Concept R.K.K. Limited Closed cryogenic barrier for containment of hazardous material migration in the earth
EP0387846A1 (en) 1989-03-14 1990-09-19 Uentech Corporation Power sources for downhole electrical heating
US5050386A (en) 1989-08-16 1991-09-24 Rkk, Limited Method and apparatus for containment of hazardous material migration in the earth
US4926941A (en) 1989-10-10 1990-05-22 Shell Oil Company Method of producing tar sand deposits containing conductive layers
US5036918A (en) 1989-12-06 1991-08-06 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for improving sustained solids-free production from heavy oil reservoirs
US5082055A (en) * 1990-01-24 1992-01-21 Indugas, Inc. Gas fired radiant tube heater
US5085276A (en) * 1990-08-29 1992-02-04 Chevron Research And Technology Company Production of oil from low permeability formations by sequential steam fracturing
US5217076A (en) 1990-12-04 1993-06-08 Masek John A Method and apparatus for improved recovery of oil from porous, subsurface deposits (targevcir oricess)
US5120338A (en) 1991-03-14 1992-06-09 Exxon Production Research Company Method for separating a multi-component feed stream using distillation and controlled freezing zone
IL101001A (en) 1992-01-29 1995-01-24 Moshe Gewertz Method for the exploitation of oil shales
US5392854A (en) * 1992-06-12 1995-02-28 Shell Oil Company Oil recovery process
US5255742A (en) 1992-06-12 1993-10-26 Shell Oil Company Heat injection process
US5297626A (en) * 1992-06-12 1994-03-29 Shell Oil Company Oil recovery process
US5236039A (en) 1992-06-17 1993-08-17 General Electric Company Balanced-line RF electrode system for use in RF ground heating to recover oil from oil shale
US5275063A (en) * 1992-07-27 1994-01-04 Exxon Production Research Company Measurement of hydration behavior of geologic materials
US5305829A (en) 1992-09-25 1994-04-26 Chevron Research And Technology Company Oil production from diatomite formations by fracture steamdrive
US5297420A (en) * 1993-05-19 1994-03-29 Mobil Oil Corporation Apparatus and method for measuring relative permeability and capillary pressure of porous rock
US5377756A (en) * 1993-10-28 1995-01-03 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for producing low permeability reservoirs using a single well
US5411089A (en) 1993-12-20 1995-05-02 Shell Oil Company Heat injection process
US5416257A (en) 1994-02-18 1995-05-16 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Open frozen barrier flow control and remediation of hazardous soil
US5621844A (en) 1995-03-01 1997-04-15 Uentech Corporation Electrical heating of mineral well deposits using downhole impedance transformation networks
US5697218A (en) 1995-06-07 1997-12-16 Shnell; James H. System for geothermal production of electricity
GB2318598B (en) * 1995-06-20 1999-11-24 B J Services Company Usa Insulated and/or concentric coiled tubing
US5730550A (en) * 1995-08-15 1998-03-24 Board Of Trustees Operating Michigan State University Method for placement of a permeable remediation zone in situ
US5620049A (en) 1995-12-14 1997-04-15 Atlantic Richfield Company Method for increasing the production of petroleum from a subterranean formation penetrated by a wellbore
DK0870100T3 (en) 1995-12-27 2000-07-17 Shell Int Research Flameless combustion device
FR2744224B1 (en) 1996-01-26 1998-04-17 Inst Francais Du Petrole METHOD FOR SIMULATING THE FILLING OF A SEDIMENTARY BASIN
US5838634A (en) 1996-04-04 1998-11-17 Exxon Production Research Company Method of generating 3-D geologic models incorporating geologic and geophysical constraints
US6056057A (en) 1996-10-15 2000-05-02 Shell Oil Company Heater well method and apparatus
US6079499A (en) 1996-10-15 2000-06-27 Shell Oil Company Heater well method and apparatus
US5905657A (en) 1996-12-19 1999-05-18 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Performing geoscience interpretation with simulated data
US5907662A (en) 1997-01-30 1999-05-25 Regents Of The University Of California Electrode wells for powerline-frequency electrical heating of soils
FR2761110B1 (en) 1997-03-18 1999-05-28 Elf Aquitaine EFFLUENT PRODUCTION WELL INSTALLATION
US6158517A (en) 1997-05-07 2000-12-12 Tarim Associates For Scientific Mineral And Oil Exploration Artificial aquifers in hydrologic cells for primary and enhanced oil recoveries, for exploitation of heavy oil, tar sands and gas hydrates
US6023554A (en) * 1997-05-20 2000-02-08 Shell Oil Company Electrical heater
TW366409B (en) 1997-07-01 1999-08-11 Exxon Production Research Co Process for liquefying a natural gas stream containing at least one freezable component
US5868202A (en) * 1997-09-22 1999-02-09 Tarim Associates For Scientific Mineral And Oil Exploration Ag Hydrologic cells for recovery of hydrocarbons or thermal energy from coal, oil-shale, tar-sands and oil-bearing formations
DE19747125C2 (en) 1997-10-24 1999-09-30 Siemens Ag Procedure for setting controller parameters of a state controller
US6055803A (en) 1997-12-08 2000-05-02 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Gas turbine heat recovery steam generator and method of operation
US6540018B1 (en) 1998-03-06 2003-04-01 Shell Oil Company Method and apparatus for heating a wellbore
US6247358B1 (en) 1998-05-27 2001-06-19 Petroleo Brasilleiro S.A. Petrobas Method for the evaluation of shale reactivity
US6016867A (en) 1998-06-24 2000-01-25 World Energy Systems, Incorporated Upgrading and recovery of heavy crude oils and natural bitumens by in situ hydrovisbreaking
US6609761B1 (en) 1999-01-08 2003-08-26 American Soda, Llp Sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate production from nahcolitic oil shale
US6246963B1 (en) 1999-01-29 2001-06-12 Timothy A. Cross Method for predicting stratigraphy
US6754588B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2004-06-22 Platte River Associates, Inc. Method of predicting three-dimensional stratigraphy using inverse optimization techniques
US6148911A (en) 1999-03-30 2000-11-21 Atlantic Richfield Company Method of treating subterranean gas hydrate formations
US6480790B1 (en) 1999-10-29 2002-11-12 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Process for constructing three-dimensional geologic models having adjustable geologic interfaces
US6764108B2 (en) 1999-12-03 2004-07-20 Siderca S.A.I.C. Assembly of hollow torque transmitting sucker rods
US6298652B1 (en) * 1999-12-13 2001-10-09 Exxon Mobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method for utilizing gas reserves with low methane concentrations and high inert gas concentrations for fueling gas turbines
US6585784B1 (en) * 1999-12-13 2003-07-01 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Method for utilizing gas reserves with low methane concentrations for fueling gas turbines
US6589303B1 (en) 1999-12-23 2003-07-08 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Hydrogen production by process including membrane gas separation
US20020013687A1 (en) * 2000-03-27 2002-01-31 Ortoleva Peter J. Methods and systems for simulation-enhanced fracture detections in sedimentary basins
US6918444B2 (en) 2000-04-19 2005-07-19 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for production of hydrocarbons from organic-rich rock
US6715546B2 (en) 2000-04-24 2004-04-06 Shell Oil Company In situ production of synthesis gas from a hydrocarbon containing formation through a heat source wellbore
US7096953B2 (en) 2000-04-24 2006-08-29 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a coal formation using a movable heating element
US7086468B2 (en) * 2000-04-24 2006-08-08 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation using heat sources positioned within open wellbores
US7011154B2 (en) 2000-04-24 2006-03-14 Shell Oil Company In situ recovery from a kerogen and liquid hydrocarbon containing formation
US6585046B2 (en) * 2000-08-28 2003-07-01 Baker Hughes Incorporated Live well heater cable
FR2815124A1 (en) 2000-09-30 2002-04-12 Schlumberger Services Petrol METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE HYDROCARBON SATURATION OF A FORMATION
US6668922B2 (en) 2001-02-16 2003-12-30 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of optimizing the design, stimulation and evaluation of matrix treatment in a reservoir
US6607036B2 (en) 2001-03-01 2003-08-19 Intevep, S.A. Method for heating subterranean formation, particularly for heating reservoir fluids in near well bore zone
US6991036B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2006-01-31 Shell Oil Company Thermal processing of a relatively permeable formation
EA009350B1 (en) 2001-04-24 2007-12-28 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. Method for in situ recovery from a tar sands formation and a blending agent
US6782947B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2004-08-31 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a relatively impermeable formation to increase permeability of the formation
WO2003025098A2 (en) 2001-09-17 2003-03-27 Southwest Research Institute Pretreatment processes for heavy oil and carbonaceous materials
GB0123409D0 (en) 2001-09-28 2001-11-21 Atkinson Stephen Method for the recovery of hydrocarbons from hydrates
US7165615B2 (en) * 2001-10-24 2007-01-23 Shell Oil Company In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using conductor-in-conduit heat sources with an electrically conductive material in the overburden
MXPA04003711A (en) * 2001-10-24 2005-09-08 Shell Int Research Isolation of soil with a frozen barrier prior to conductive thermal treatment of the soil.
US6969123B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2005-11-29 Shell Oil Company Upgrading and mining of coal
US7077199B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2006-07-18 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of an oil reservoir formation
US7104319B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2006-09-12 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a heavy oil diatomite formation
WO2003036024A2 (en) 2001-10-24 2003-05-01 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Method and system for in situ heating a hydrocarbon containing formation by a u-shaped opening
US6832485B2 (en) 2001-11-26 2004-12-21 Ormat Industries Ltd. Method of and apparatus for producing power using a reformer and gas turbine unit
US6684948B1 (en) * 2002-01-15 2004-02-03 Marshall T. Savage Apparatus and method for heating subterranean formations using fuel cells
SE521571C2 (en) * 2002-02-07 2003-11-11 Greenfish Ab Integrated closed recirculation system for wastewater treatment in aquaculture.
US20030178195A1 (en) 2002-03-20 2003-09-25 Agee Mark A. Method and system for recovery and conversion of subsurface gas hydrates
US6896707B2 (en) 2002-07-02 2005-05-24 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Methods of adjusting the Wobbe Index of a fuel and compositions thereof
US6709573B2 (en) * 2002-07-12 2004-03-23 Anthon L. Smith Process for the recovery of hydrocarbon fractions from hydrocarbonaceous solids
US6820689B2 (en) 2002-07-18 2004-11-23 Production Resources, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating pollution free electrical energy from hydrocarbons
US8238730B2 (en) 2002-10-24 2012-08-07 Shell Oil Company High voltage temperature limited heaters
US20040200618A1 (en) 2002-12-04 2004-10-14 Piekenbrock Eugene J. Method of sequestering carbon dioxide while producing natural gas
US7181380B2 (en) * 2002-12-20 2007-02-20 Geomechanics International, Inc. System and process for optimal selection of hydrocarbon well completion type and design
US7048051B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2006-05-23 Gen Syn Fuels Recovery of products from oil shale
US6796139B2 (en) 2003-02-27 2004-09-28 Layne Christensen Company Method and apparatus for artificial ground freezing
AU2004235350B8 (en) 2003-04-24 2013-03-07 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Thermal processes for subsurface formations
US7331385B2 (en) * 2003-06-24 2008-02-19 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methods of treating a subterranean formation to convert organic matter into producible hydrocarbons
US7631691B2 (en) 2003-06-24 2009-12-15 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methods of treating a subterranean formation to convert organic matter into producible hydrocarbons
US20080087420A1 (en) 2006-10-13 2008-04-17 Kaminsky Robert D Optimized well spacing for in situ shale oil development
AU2004288130B2 (en) 2003-11-03 2009-12-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Hydrocarbon recovery from impermeable oil shales
US6988549B1 (en) * 2003-11-14 2006-01-24 John A Babcock SAGD-plus
US7207384B2 (en) 2004-03-12 2007-04-24 Stinger Wellhead Protection, Inc. Wellhead and control stack pressure test plug tool
CA2563583C (en) 2004-04-23 2013-06-18 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Temperature limited heaters used to heat subsurface formations
US20050252832A1 (en) 2004-05-14 2005-11-17 Doyle James A Process and apparatus for converting oil shale or oil sand (tar sand) to oil
US20050252833A1 (en) 2004-05-14 2005-11-17 Doyle James A Process and apparatus for converting oil shale or oil sand (tar sand) to oil
US7198107B2 (en) 2004-05-14 2007-04-03 James Q. Maguire In-situ method of producing oil shale and gas (methane) hydrates, on-shore and off-shore
US7322415B2 (en) * 2004-07-29 2008-01-29 Tyco Thermal Controls Llc Subterranean electro-thermal heating system and method
US7941307B2 (en) 2004-11-10 2011-05-10 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for calibrating a model of in-situ formation stress distribution
US7527094B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2009-05-05 Shell Oil Company Double barrier system for an in situ conversion process
WO2006116533A2 (en) 2005-04-27 2006-11-02 Hw Process Technologies, Inc. Treating produced waters
CA2560223A1 (en) 2005-09-20 2007-03-20 Alphonsus Forgeron Recovery of hydrocarbons using electrical stimulation
US7243618B2 (en) 2005-10-13 2007-07-17 Gurevich Arkadiy M Steam generator with hybrid circulation
CA2626962C (en) 2005-10-24 2014-07-08 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Methods of producing alkylated hydrocarbons from an in situ heat treatment process liquid
US7360600B2 (en) 2005-12-21 2008-04-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Subsurface safety valves and methods of use
US7743826B2 (en) 2006-01-20 2010-06-29 American Shale Oil, Llc In situ method and system for extraction of oil from shale
US7484561B2 (en) * 2006-02-21 2009-02-03 Pyrophase, Inc. Electro thermal in situ energy storage for intermittent energy sources to recover fuel from hydro carbonaceous earth formations
US7654320B2 (en) * 2006-04-07 2010-02-02 Occidental Energy Ventures Corp. System and method for processing a mixture of hydrocarbon and CO2 gas produced from a hydrocarbon reservoir
US7644993B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2010-01-12 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery
RU2008145876A (en) 2006-04-21 2010-05-27 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. (NL) HEATERS WITH RESTRICTION OF TEMPERATURE WHICH USE PHASE TRANSFORMATION OF FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL
BRPI0719868A2 (en) 2006-10-13 2014-06-10 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co Methods for lowering the temperature of a subsurface formation, and for forming a frozen wall into a subsurface formation
AU2007313388B2 (en) 2006-10-13 2013-01-31 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Heating an organic-rich rock formation in situ to produce products with improved properties
WO2008048454A2 (en) 2006-10-13 2008-04-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Combined development of oil shale by in situ heating with a deeper hydrocarbon resource
US20100095742A1 (en) 2006-10-13 2010-04-22 Symington William A Testing Apparatus For Applying A Stress To A Test Sample
WO2008048455A2 (en) 2006-10-13 2008-04-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Enhanced shale oil production by in situ heating using hydraulically fractured producing wells
US20080127632A1 (en) 2006-11-30 2008-06-05 General Electric Company Carbon dioxide capture systems and methods
US7617869B2 (en) 2007-02-05 2009-11-17 Superior Graphite Co. Methods for extracting oil from tar sand
AU2008227167B2 (en) 2007-03-22 2013-08-01 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Granular electrical connections for in situ formation heating
WO2008115356A1 (en) 2007-03-22 2008-09-25 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Resistive heater for in situ formation heating
BRPI0810752A2 (en) 2007-05-15 2014-10-21 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co METHODS FOR IN SITU HEATING OF A RICH ROCK FORMATION IN ORGANIC COMPOUND, IN SITU HEATING OF A TARGETED XISTO TRAINING AND TO PRODUCE A FLUID OF HYDROCARBON, SQUARE FOR A RACHOSETUS ORGANIC BUILDING , AND FIELD TO PRODUCE A HYDROCARBON FLUID FROM A TRAINING RICH IN A TARGET ORGANIC COMPOUND.
CA2680695C (en) * 2007-05-15 2013-09-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Downhole burners for in situ conversion of organic-rich rock formations
US8146664B2 (en) 2007-05-25 2012-04-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Utilization of low BTU gas generated during in situ heating of organic-rich rock
BRPI0810590A2 (en) 2007-05-25 2014-10-21 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co IN SITU METHOD OF PRODUCING HYDROCARBON FLUIDS FROM A ROCK FORMATION RICH IN ORGANIC MATTER
US7905288B2 (en) * 2007-11-27 2011-03-15 Los Alamos National Security, Llc Olefin metathesis for kerogen upgrading
US8082995B2 (en) 2007-12-10 2011-12-27 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Optimization of untreated oil shale geometry to control subsidence
CN101981272B (en) * 2008-03-28 2014-06-11 埃克森美孚上游研究公司 Low emission power generation and hydrocarbon recovery systems and methods
CN104098070B (en) * 2008-03-28 2016-04-13 埃克森美孚上游研究公司 Low emission power generation and hydrocarbon recovery system and method
CA2722452C (en) 2008-05-23 2014-09-30 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Field management for substantially constant composition gas generation
WO2010047859A1 (en) 2008-10-20 2010-04-29 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method for modeling deformation in subsurface strata
AU2009310318A1 (en) 2008-10-29 2010-05-06 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Electrically conductive methods for heating a subsurface formation to convert organic matter into hydrocarbon fluids
AU2010216407B2 (en) 2009-02-23 2014-11-20 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Water treatment following shale oil production by in situ heating
US8540020B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2013-09-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Converting organic matter from a subterranean formation into producible hydrocarbons by controlling production operations based on availability of one or more production resources

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030131994A1 (en) * 2001-04-24 2003-07-17 Vinegar Harold J. In situ thermal processing and solution mining of an oil shale formation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20070246994A1 (en) 2007-10-25
US7644993B2 (en) 2010-01-12
US20100089575A1 (en) 2010-04-15
US8641150B2 (en) 2014-02-04
WO2007126676A2 (en) 2007-11-08
WO2007126676A3 (en) 2008-02-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8641150B2 (en) In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery
CA2663823C (en) Enhanced shale oil production by in situ heating using hydraulically fractured producing wells
CA2664321C (en) Combined development of oil shale by in situ heating with a deeper hydrocarbon resource
US7516787B2 (en) Method of developing a subsurface freeze zone using formation fractures
AU2010332234B2 (en) Enhanced convection for in situ pyrolysis of organic-rich rock formations
US20130292114A1 (en) Methods For Containment and Improved Recovery in Heated Hydrocarbon Containing Formations By Optimal Placement of Fractures and Production Wells
AU2013206729B2 (en) Improved method of developing a subsurface freeze zone using formation fractures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION