US20110002889A1 - Cultures with Improved Phage Resistance - Google Patents

Cultures with Improved Phage Resistance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110002889A1
US20110002889A1 US12/529,421 US52942108A US2011002889A1 US 20110002889 A1 US20110002889 A1 US 20110002889A1 US 52942108 A US52942108 A US 52942108A US 2011002889 A1 US2011002889 A1 US 2011002889A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
crispr
bacteriophage
nucleic acid
sequence
phage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/529,421
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Rodolphe Barrangou
Christophe Fremaux
Philippe Horvath
Dennis Romero
Patrick Boyaval
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
DuPont Nutrition Biosciences ApS
Original Assignee
Danisco AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Danisco AS filed Critical Danisco AS
Priority to US12/529,421 priority Critical patent/US20110002889A1/en
Publication of US20110002889A1 publication Critical patent/US20110002889A1/en
Assigned to DANISCO A/S reassignment DANISCO A/S ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FREMAUX, CHRISTOPHE, HORVATH, PHILIPPE, BOYAVAL, PATRICK, BARRANGOU, RODOLPHE, ROMERO, DENNIS
Assigned to DUPONT NUTRITION BIOSCIENCES APS reassignment DUPONT NUTRITION BIOSCIENCES APS CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DANISCO A/S
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/74—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for prokaryotic hosts other than E. coli, e.g. Lactobacillus, Micromonospora
    • C12N15/746—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for prokaryotic hosts other than E. coli, e.g. Lactobacillus, Micromonospora for lactic acid bacteria (Streptococcus; Lactococcus; Lactobacillus; Pediococcus; Enterococcus; Leuconostoc; Propionibacterium; Bifidobacterium; Sporolactobacillus)
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23C—DAIRY PRODUCTS, e.g. MILK, BUTTER OR CHEESE; MILK OR CHEESE SUBSTITUTES; MAKING THEREOF
    • A23C9/00—Milk preparations; Milk powder or milk powder preparations
    • A23C9/12—Fermented milk preparations; Treatment using microorganisms or enzymes
    • A23C9/123—Fermented milk preparations; Treatment using microorganisms or enzymes using only microorganisms of the genus lactobacteriaceae; Yoghurt
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23C—DAIRY PRODUCTS, e.g. MILK, BUTTER OR CHEESE; MILK OR CHEESE SUBSTITUTES; MAKING THEREOF
    • A23C9/00—Milk preparations; Milk powder or milk powder preparations
    • A23C9/12—Fermented milk preparations; Treatment using microorganisms or enzymes
    • A23C9/123—Fermented milk preparations; Treatment using microorganisms or enzymes using only microorganisms of the genus lactobacteriaceae; Yoghurt
    • A23C9/1238—Fermented milk preparations; Treatment using microorganisms or enzymes using only microorganisms of the genus lactobacteriaceae; Yoghurt using specific L. bulgaricus or S. thermophilus microorganisms; using entrapped or encapsulated yoghurt bacteria; Physical or chemical treatment of L. bulgaricus or S. thermophilus cultures; Fermentation only with L. bulgaricus or only with S. thermophilus
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/70—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving virus or bacteriophage
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23C—DAIRY PRODUCTS, e.g. MILK, BUTTER OR CHEESE; MILK OR CHEESE SUBSTITUTES; MAKING THEREOF
    • A23C2220/00—Biochemical treatment
    • A23C2220/20—Treatment with microorganisms
    • A23C2220/202—Genetic engineering of microorganisms used in dairy technology
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23V—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2400/00—Lactic or propionic acid bacteria
    • A23V2400/21—Streptococcus, lactococcus
    • A23V2400/249—Thermophilus
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2795/00—Bacteriophages
    • C12N2795/00011—Details

Definitions

  • the present invention provides methods and compositions related to modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides compositions and methods for the use of one or more cas genes or proteins for modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions that find use in the development and use of strain combinations and starter culture rotations.
  • the present invention provides methods for labelling and/or identifying bacteria.
  • the present invention provides methods for the use of CRISPR loci to determine the potential virulence of a phage against a cell and the use of CRISPR-cas to modulate the genetic sequence of a phage for increased virulence level.
  • the present invention provides means and compositions for the development and use of phages as biocontrol agents.
  • Cultures, and starter cultures in particular are used extensively in the food industry in the manufacture of fermented products including milk products (e.g., yogurt, buttermilk, and cheese), meat products, bakery products, wine, and vegetable products.
  • milk products e.g., yogurt, buttermilk, and cheese
  • the preparation of cultures is labor intensive, occupying much space and equipment, and there is a considerable risk of contamination with spoilage bacteria and/or phages during the propagation steps.
  • the failure of bacterial cultures due to bacteriophage (phage) infection and multiplication is a major problem with the industrial use of bacterial cultures.
  • phage bacteriophage
  • There are many different types of phages and new strains continue to emerge.
  • there is a need for methods and compositions for tracking bacteria used in such cultures Indeed, despite advances in culture development, there is a continuing need to improve cultures for use in industry.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions related to modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides compositions and methods for the use of one or more cas genes or proteins for modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions that find use in the development and use of strain combinations and starter culture rotations.
  • the present invention provides methods for labelling and/or identifying bacteria.
  • the present invention provides methods for the use of CRISPR loci to determine the potential virulence of a phage against a cell and the use of CRISPR-cas to modulate the genetic sequence of a phage for increased virulence level.
  • the present invention provides means and compositions for the development and use of phages as biocontrol agents.
  • the present invention provides methods for generating at least one bacteriophage resistant variant strain, comprising the steps of: (a) exposing a parent bacterial strain comprising at least a portion of a CRISPR locus to at least one nucleic acid sequence to produce a mixture of bacteria comprising at least one bacteriophage resistant variant strain comprising a modified CRISPR locus; (b) selecting a bacteriophage resistant variant strain from the mixture of bacteria; (c) selecting the bacteriophage resistant variant strains comprising an additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR locus from the bacteriophage resistant strains selected in step (b); and (d) isolating at least one bacteriophage resistant variant strain, wherein the strain comprises an additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR locus.
  • the methods further comprise the step of comparing the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof of the parent bacterial strain and the modified CRISPR locus of the bacteriophage resistant variant strain to identify bacteriophage resistant variant strains comprising at least one additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR locus that is absent from the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterial strain.
  • the methods further comprise the step of selecting bacteriophage resistant variant strains comprising an additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR locus.
  • the parent bacterial strain is exposed to two or more nucleic acid sequences.
  • the parent bacterial strain is simultaneously exposed to two or more nucleic acid sequences, while in some alternative embodiments, the parent bacterial strain is sequentially exposed to two or more nucleic acid sequences. In some particularly preferred embodiments, the parent bacterial strain is exposed to the nucleic acid sequence through infection by at least one bacteriophage comprising the nucleic acid sequence. In some further preferred embodiments, the at least one bacteriophage is selected from the group of virus families consisting of: Corticoviridae, Cystoviridae, Inoviridae, Leviviridae, Microviridae, Myoviridae, Podoviridae, Siphoviridae, and Tectiviridae.
  • the at least one bacteriophage is a naturally occurring bacteriophage, while in other preferred embodiments, the at least one bacteriophage is a mutated bacteriophage obtained through selective pressure using a bacteriophage resistant bacterial strain.
  • the parent bacterial strain is exposed to the nucleic acid through a natural mechanism of nucleic acid uptake.
  • the natural mechanism of nucleic acid uptake comprises natural competence.
  • the bacteriophage resistant strain is a bacteriophage insensitive mutant.
  • the parent bacterial strain is a bacteriophage insensitive mutant.
  • the 5′ end and/or the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterial strain is compared with the modified CRISPR locus of the bacteriophage resistant variant strain.
  • the 5′ and/or the 3′ end of the at least the first CRISPR repeat or at least the first CRISPR spacer of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterial strain is compared with the modified CRISPR locus of the bacteriophage resistant variant strain.
  • the bacteriophage resistant variant strain comprises at least one additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR locus.
  • At least a portion of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterial strain and at least a portion of the modified CRISPR locus of the bacteriophage resistant variant strain are compared by amplifying at least a portion of the CRISPR locus and at least a portion of the modified CRISPR locus, to produce an amplified CRISPR locus sequence and an amplified modified CRISPR locus sequence.
  • amplifying is conducted using the polymerase chain reaction.
  • the methods further comprise the step of sequencing the amplified CRISPR locus sequence and the amplified modified CRISPR sequence locus.
  • the additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR locus is an additional repeat-spacer unit. In some preferred embodiments, the additional repeat-spacer unit comprises at least about 44 nucleotides.
  • additional repeat-spacer unit is comprises between about 44 and about 119 nucleotides. However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to these specific size ranges, as other sizes find use in the present invention, as described herein.
  • the additional repeat-spacer unit comprises at least one nucleotide sequence that has at least about 95% identity to a CRISPR repeat in the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterial strain.
  • the additional repeat-spacer unit comprises at least one nucleotide sequence that has at least about 95% identity to a nucleotide sequence in the genome of at least one bacteriophage.
  • the parent bacterial strain is an industrially useful strain.
  • the parent bacterial strain is susceptible to infection by at least one bacteriophage.
  • the parent bacterial strain comprises a culture selected from starter cultures, probiotic cultures, and dietary supplement cultures.
  • the parent bacterial strain comprises a strain obtained from a culture.
  • the culture is a starter culture, a probiotic culture, and/or a dietary supplement culture.
  • the parent bacterial strain is selected from Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella, Erwinia, Yersinia, Bacillus, Vibrio, Legionella, Pseudomonas, Neisseria, Bordetella, Helicobacter, Listeria, Agrobacterium, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Treponema, Borrelia, Francisella, Brucella, Campylobacter, Klebsiella, Frankia, Bartonella, Rickettsia, Shewanella, Serratia, Enterobacter, Proteui, Providencia, Brochothrix, Bifidobacterium, Brevibacterium, Propionibacterium, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc , and Oenococcus.
  • the present invention also provides at least one bacteriophage resistant variant strain obtained using the methods set forth herein.
  • the present invention provides bacteriophage resistant variant strains, wherein the bacteriophage resistant variant strain is an industrially useful strain.
  • the bacteriophage resistant variant strain comprises an industrially useful strain that is at least one component of a starter culture, probiotic culture, dietary supplement culture, and/or other useful cultures.
  • the present invention also provides compositions comprising a bacteriophage resistant variant strain produced using the methods set forth herein.
  • the present invention provides compositions comprising at least two bacteriophage resistant variant strains produced using the methods set forth herein.
  • the present invention also provides foods and/or feeds comprising at least one of these compositions.
  • the present invention also provides methods for preparing food and/or feed comprising adding at least one of these compositions to the food or feed.
  • the present invention also provides starter cultures, probiotic cultures, dietary supplement cultures, and other useful cultures that comprise at least one of these compositions.
  • the present invention also provides fermentation methods comprising adding at least one of these compositions to a starter culture.
  • the present invention provides fermentation methods comprising adding at least one of these compositions to a fermentation medium, under conditions such that fermentation of the components of the fermentation medium occur.
  • the fermentation is unaffected by the presence of bacteriophages.
  • the fermentation medium is a food product.
  • the food product is a dairy product.
  • the dairy product is milk.
  • at least two different compositions comprising two or more bacteriophage resistant variant strains are sequentially exposed to the fermentation medium.
  • the present invention also provides methods for reducing the detrimental bacteriophage population in a fermentation medium comprising exposing a fermentation medium to at least one bacteriophage resistant variant strain produced using the methods set forth herein, under conditions such that the bacteriophage population is reduced.
  • the present invention also provides methods for generating at least one bacteriophage resistant variant strain, comprising the steps of: (a) exposing a parent bacterial strain comprising at least a portion of a CRISPR locus to at least one nucleic acid sequence to produce a mixture of bacteria comprising at least one bacteriophage resistant variant strain comprising a modified CRISPR locus; (b) selecting a bacteriophage resistant variant strain from the mixture of bacteria; (c) comparing the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof of the parent bacterial strain and the modified CRISPR locus of the bacteriophage resistant variant strain to identify bacteriophage resistant variant strains comprising at least one additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR locus that is absent from the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterial strain; (d) selecting the bacteriophage resistant variant strains comprising an additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR locus; (e) analyzing the at least one additional nucleic acid fragment in the modified CRISPR loc
  • the present invention also provides methods for generating CRISPR-escape phage mutants comprising: (a) obtaining: at least one parent phage and a phage-resistant bacterial strain comprising at least one CRISPR locus, wherein the CRISPR locus comprises a nucleic acid sequence that is at least about 95% identical to at least one protospacer sequence in the genome of the at least one parent phage; (b) exposing the at least one parent phage to the phage-resistant bacterial strain, under conditions such that at least one phage variant is produced; and (c) selecting the at least one phage variant, wherein the at least one phage variant exhibits the ability to infect the phage-resistant bacterial strain and is a CRISPR-escape phage mutant.
  • the phage-resistant bacterial strain is a bacteriophage-resistant variant strain obtained using the methods set forth herein.
  • the methods further comprise the step of comparing at least a portion of the at least one protospacer sequence and a CRISPR motif positioned near the at least one protospacer sequence in the phage variant with the at least one protospacer sequence and CRISPR motif of the parent phage.
  • the methods further comprise the step of selecting the variant phages that infect the phage resistant bacterial strain, wherein the variant phages comprise the CRISPR-escape phage mutants, and wherein the CRISPR-escape phages comprise at least one mutation in the at least one protospacer sequence and/or in the CRISPR motif of the CRISPR-escape phage mutants.
  • the methods are iteratively repeated one or more times using the CRISPR-escape phage mutants and different CRISPR phage-resistant bacterial strain comprising at least one CRISPR locus, wherein the CRISPR locus comprises a nucleic acid sequence that is at least about 95% identical to at least one protospacer sequence in the genome of the CRISPR-escape phage mutants.
  • at least one bacteriophage is selected from the group of virus families consisting of: Corticoviridae, Cystoviridae, Inoviridae, Leviviridae, Microviridae, Myoviridae, Podoviridae, Siphoviridae, and Tectiviridae.
  • the phage-resistant bacterial strain is selected from Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella, Erwinia, Yersinia, Bacillus, Vibrio, Legionella, Pseudomonas, Neisseria, Bordetella, Helicobacter, Listeria, Agrobacterium, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Camplyobacter, Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Treponema, Borrelia, Francisella, Brucella, Klebsiella, Frankia, Bartonella, Rickettsia, Shewanella, Serratia, Enterobacter, Proteus, Providencia, Brochothrix, Bifidobacterium, Brevibacterium, Propionibacterium, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Streptococcus , and Oenococcus.
  • the present invention also provides CRISPR-escape phage mutants obtained using the methods set forth herein.
  • the CRISPR-escape phage mutants comprise two or more mutations present in at least two protospacer sequences and/or in the CRISPR motif.
  • the present invention also provides CRISPR-escape phage mutants, wherein the genome of the CRISPR-escape phage mutants is genetically engineered to comprise mutations in at least one protospacer and/or the CRISPR motif.
  • at least one CRISPR motif is mutated in the CRISPR-escape phage mutants, while in some alternative embodiments, at least one CRISPR motif is deleted in the CRISPR-escape phage mutants.
  • the present invention also provides compositions comprising at least one CRISPR-escape phage mutants.
  • the present invention also provides methods for controlling bacterial populations in a product comprising exposing compositions comprising at least one CRISPR-escape phage mutant to a fermentation medium, wherein the fermentation medium contains at least one population of undesirable bacteria, under conditions such that the population of the undesirable bacteria is reduced, and the fermentation medium is used to generate the product.
  • the product is selected from foods, feeds, cosmetics, personal care products, health care products, veterinary products, and dietary supplements.
  • the methods are repeated at least once and the different compositions and/or compositions comprising different CRISPR-escape phage mutants are used in rotation.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions for the use of one or more cas genes or proteins for modulating resistance in a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides compositions and methods for the use of a recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats together with at least one CRISPR spacer, wherein at least one CRISPR spacer is heterologous to at least one cas gene and/or at least two CRISPR repeats to modulate resistance against a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides at least one nucleic acid sequence comprising at least one cas gene.
  • the present invention provides at least one nucleic acid sequence comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats. In some embodiments, the present invention provides a nucleic acid sequence comprising at least one cas gene and at least one CRISPR spacer. In yet further embodiments, the present invention provides a nucleic acid sequence comprising at least one cas gene, at least one CRISPR spacer and at least two CRISPR repeats. In further embodiments, the present invention provides a recombinant nucleic acid sequence comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats together with at least one CRISPR spacer, wherein the CRISPR spacer is heterologous to the at least one cas gene and/or the at least two CRISPR repeats.
  • the present invention also provides constructs comprising one or more of the nucleic acid sequences described herein.
  • the present invention provides vectors comprising one or more of the nucleic acid sequences or one or more of the constructs described herein.
  • the present invention provides cells comprising the nucleic acid sequence or the construct or the vector described herein.
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating (e.g., conferring or increasing) the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: (i) identifying a sequence (e.g., a conserved sequence) in an organism (in some embodiments, this is a sequence that is essential to the function or survival of the organism); (ii) preparing a CRISPR spacer which is homologous to the identified sequence; (iii) preparing a nucleic acid (e.g., a recombinant nucleic acid) comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats together with the CRISPR spacer; and (iv) introducing the nucleic acid into a cell thus to render the cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • a sequence e.g., a conserved sequence
  • CRISPR spacer which is homologous to the identified sequence
  • preparing a nucleic acid e.g.,
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating (e.g., conferring or increasing) the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: (i) identifying one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers in an organism resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof; (ii) preparing a recombinant nucleic acid comprising at least one cas gene or protein and at least two CRISPR repeats together with the identified one or more spacers; and (iii) introducing the recombinant nucleic acid into a cell thus to render the cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating (e.g., conferring or increasing) the resistance of a cell comprising at least one or more cas genes or proteins and two or more CRISPR repeats against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: (i) identifying one or more CRISPR spacers in an organism resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof; and (ii) modifying the sequence of one or more CRISPR spacer(s) in the cell such that the CRISPR spacer(s) has homology to the CRISPR spacer(s) in the organism.
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating (e.g., reducing or decreasing) the resistance of a cell comprising at least one or more cas genes or proteins and two or more CRISPR repeats against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: (i) identifying one or more CRISPR spacers in an organism that is substantially resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof; and (ii) modifying the sequence of at least one or more CRISPR spacer(s) in the cell such that the CRISPR spacer(s) has a reduced degree of homology to the spacer(s) in the organism.
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating (e.g., reducing or decreasing) the resistance of a cell comprising at least one or more cas genes or proteins and two or more CRISPR repeats against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising modifying the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or two or more CRISPR repeats in the cell.
  • the present invention also provides methods for identifying a CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer for use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: (i) preparing a cell comprising at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene or protein; (ii) identifying at least one CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacers in an organism that is substantially resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof; (iii) modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer in the cell such that the CRISPR spacer has homology to the spacer of the organism; and (iv) determining if the cell modulates resistance against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof, wherein modulation of the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is indicative that the CRISPR spacer modulates the resistance of the cell.
  • the present invention also provides methods for identifying a cas gene for use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: (i) preparing a cell comprising at least one CRISPR spacer and at least two CRISPR repeats; (ii) engineering the cell such that it comprises at least one cas gene; and (iii) determining if the cell modulates resistance against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof, wherein modulation of the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is indicative that the cas gene can be used to modulate the resistance of the cell.
  • the present invention also provides methods for identifying a CRISPR repeat for use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: (i) preparing a cell comprising at least one CRISPR spacer and at least one cas gene; (ii) engineering the cell such that it contains the CRISPR repeat; and (iii) determining if the cell modulates resistance against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof, wherein modulation of the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is indicative that the CRISPR repeat can be used to modulate resistance.
  • the present invention also provides methods for identifying a functional combination of a cas gene and a CRISPR repeat comprising the steps of: (a) determining the sequences of the cas gene and the CRISPR repeat; (b) identifying one or more clusters of cas genes as determined by sequence comparison analysis; (c) identifying one or more clusters of CRISPR repeats; and (d) combining those cas gene and CRISPR repeat sequences that fall within the same cluster, wherein the combination of the cas gene and CRISPR repeat sequences within the same cluster is indicative that the combination is a functional combination.
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating the lysotype of a bacterial cell comprising one or more cas genes or proteins and two or more CRISPR repeats comprising the steps of: (i) identifying one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers in the genomic sequence of a bacteriophage against which resistance is to be modulated; and (ii) modifying the sequence of one or more CRISPR spacers of the bacterial cell such that the CRISPR spacer(s) of the bacterial cell has homology to the pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) of the bacteriophage against which resistance is to be modulated.
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating (e.g., conferring or increasing) the resistance of a bacterial cell against a bacteriophage comprising the steps of: (i) identifying a sequence (e.g., a conserved sequence) in a bacteriophage (preferably, a sequence essential to the function or survival of the bacteriophage); (ii) preparing a CRISPR spacer which is homologous to the identified sequence; (iii) preparing a nucleic acid comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats together with the CRISPR spacer; and (iv) introducing the nucleic acid into the bacterial cell thus to render the bacterial cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • a sequence e.g., a conserved sequence
  • CRISPR spacer which is homologous to the identified sequence
  • nucleic acid comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats together with the CRISPR spacer
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating (e.g., conferring or increasing) the resistance of a bacterial cell against a target nucleic acid or transcription product in a bacteriophage thereof comprising the steps of: (i) identifying one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers in a bacteriophage genome that is capable of providing resistance to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof; (ii) preparing a recombinant nucleic acid comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats together with the identified one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers; and (iii) introducing the recombinant nucleic acid into the bacterial cell thus to render the bacterial cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention also provides methods for modulating the resistance of a bacterial cell comprising one or more cas genes or proteins and two or more CRISPR repeats against a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof in a bacteriophage comprising the steps of: (i) identifying one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers in a bacteriophage that is capable of providing resistance to a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof; (ii) identifying one or more CRISPR spacers in a bacterial cell in which resistance is to be modulated; and (iii) modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer(s) in the bacterial cell in which resistance is to be modulated such that the CRISPR spacer(s) has a higher degree of homology to the pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) of the bacteriophage against which resistance is to be modulated.
  • the present invention also provides methods for determining the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations and one or more CRISPR spacers in the cell.
  • the present invention also provides cells obtained or obtained using the method(s) provided herein.
  • the present invention provides CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers obtained or obtainable by the method(s) described herein.
  • the present invention provides cas genes obtained or obtainable by the method(s) described herein. In some further embodiments, the present invention provides CRISPR repeats obtained or obtainable by the method(s) described herein. In yet further embodiments, the present invention provides functional combinations obtained or obtainable by the method(s) described herein. In still further embodiments, the present invention provides recombinant CRISPR loci comprising at least one CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer, and/or at least one cas gene, and/or at least one CRISPR repeat and/or a functional combination.
  • the present invention provides methods for the use of cells, at least one CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer, at least one cas gene, at least one CRISPR repeat, or a functional combination thereof for modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides cell cultures comprising at least one cell, at least one CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer, at least one cas gene, at least one CRISPR repeat or a functional combination for modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides food products and/or feed comprising cultures provided herein.
  • the present invention provides processes for preparing a food product and/or feed comprising cultures provided herein.
  • the present invention provides food products and/or feed obtained or obtainable by the methods provided herein.
  • the present invention provides methods for the use of the cultures provided herein for preparing food products and/or feed.
  • the present invention further provides nucleotide sequences comprising or consisting of the sequences set forth in any of SEQ ID NOS:7-10 and SEQ ID NOS:359-405, as well as variants, fragments, homologues and derivatives thereof.
  • the present invention also provides amino acids encoded by the nucleotide sequences set forth herein.
  • the present invention provides constructs and/or vectors comprising one or more of the nucleotide sequences provided herein.
  • the present invention also provides host cells comprising at least one of the constructs and/or nucleotide sequences provided herein.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins are used in combination with two or more CRISPR repeats. In some further embodiments, the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or the two or more CRISPR repeats are derived from the same cell. In some additional embodiments, the one or more cas genes or proteins and the two or more CRISPR repeats naturally co-occur in the same cell. In some still further embodiments, the one or more cas genes or proteins are used in combination with one or more CRISPR spacers.
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) is derived from a different organism than the cell from which the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or the two or more CRISPR repeats are derived.
  • the spacer is obtained from a cell which is resistant to a target nucleic acid.
  • the CRISPR spacer is a synthetic nucleic acid sequence.
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) have homology to the target nucleic acid.
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) have 100% identity to the target nucleic acid over at least the length of the CRISPR spacer core.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins are used in combination with at least one or more CRISPR spacers and at least two or more CRISPR repeats.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is derived from bacteriophage DNA.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is derived from at least one plasmid.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is derived from at least one mobile genetic element DNA.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is derived from a transposable element and/or an insertion sequence.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is derived from an antibiotic/antimicrobial resistance gene.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is derived from a nucleic acid encoding at least one virulence factor.
  • the virulence factor comprises toxins, internalins, hemolysins, and/or other virulence factors.
  • the one or more cas genes and the two or more CRISPR repeats are derived from the same cell. In some alternative embodiments, the one or more cas genes and the two or more CRISPR repeats naturally co-occur in the same cell. In yet further embodiments, the CRISPR spacers are derived from a different organism than the cell from which the one or more cas genes and/or the two or more CRISPR repeats are derived. In some embodiments, the cell is a recipient cell or a host cell.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or the two or more CRISPR repeats are derived from the same cell.
  • the spacers are derived from a different organism than the cell comprising the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or the two or more CRISPR repeats.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins and the two or more CRISPR repeats naturally co-occur in the same cell.
  • the modification comprises inserting one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers into the cell.
  • the modification comprises genetically engineering the CRISPR spacer of the cell.
  • the spacer of the cell has 100% homology to the CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer of the organism.
  • all or part of the spacer in the cell is modified.
  • the modification comprises the modification of a recombinant spacer.
  • the modification occurs through spontaneous mutation or mutagenesis.
  • at least one or more CRISPR spacer(s) in the cell are deleted.
  • at least one or more CRISPR repeat(s) in the cell are deleted.
  • one or more cas genes are deleted.
  • CRISPR and/or one or more cas genes are deleted.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or two or more CRISPR repeats in the cell are deleted.
  • the nucleotide sequences of the cas gene and the CRISPR repeat are derived from the same or different strains.
  • the nucleotide sequences of the cas gene and the CRISPR repeat are derived from the same or different species.
  • nucleotide sequences of the cas gene and the CRISPR repeat are derived from the same or different genera. In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequences of the cas gene and the CRISPR repeat are derived from the same or different organisms.
  • the target nucleic acid in the bacteriophage is a highly conserved nucleic acid sequence.
  • the target nucleic acid in the bacteriophage encodes a host specificity protein.
  • the target nucleic acid in the bacteriophage encodes a protein that is essential for survival, replication or growth of the bacteriophage.
  • the target nucleic acid in the bacteriophage encodes a helicase, a primase, a head or tail structural protein, a protein with a conserved domain (e.g., holin, lysin, etc.) or at least one conserved sequence amongst important phage genes.
  • the method for determining the resistance of a cell to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprises the additional step of comparing the sequence of the one or more CRISPR spacers in the cell with the sequence of the target nucleic acid. In some alternative embodiments, the method for determining the resistance of a cell to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprises the additional step of determining the resistance profile of the cell.
  • the culture is a starter culture or a probiotic culture.
  • the present invention also provides “labelled bacteria” that are resistant to phage (i.e., “bacteriophage-insensitive mutants”; “BIMs”).
  • the present invention provides bacteria comprising one or more sequences originating from at least one bacteriophage genome that is/are integrated into the CRISPR locus of the bacteria. This phage-derived sequence provides a label, which is identifiable by its location and/or sequence and/or adjacent sequence.
  • the present invention provides duplicated sequences (e.g., duplicated CRISPR repeats) that originate from a parent bacterium and are also integrated iteratively, sequentially, simultaneously or substantially simultaneously along with the sequence originating from the bacteriophage genome.
  • duplicated sequences e.g., duplicated CRISPR repeats
  • the present invention provides methods that facilitate the integration of one or more different bacteriophage sequences into the CRISPR locus of the bacterial strain.
  • the integration of different bacteriophage sequences in the CRISPR locus of the bacterial strain is a random event.
  • the integration of different bacteriophage sequences in the CRISPR locus of the bacterial strain is not a random event. Thus, it is not always the same locus of the bacteriophage genome which is integrated into the CRISPR locus of the bacterium. However, once it is integrated it is maintained and thus becomes a robust tag to label and/or track the bacterium.
  • the one or more sequences originating from the bacteriophage genome are not only new to the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium but are also a label that is unique to each bacterium.
  • labelling e.g., tagging
  • identifying bacteria e.g., identifying bacteria
  • the methods of the present invention are “natural” and do not result in the production of genetically modified organisms.
  • the present invention provides methods for labelling bacteria comprising the steps of: (a) exposing a parent bacterium to a bacteriophage; (b) selecting a bacteriophage insensitive mutant; (c) comparing a CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the bacteriophage insensitive mutant; and (d) selecting a labelled bacterium comprising an additional DNA fragment in the CRISPR locus that is not present in the parent bacterium.
  • the present invention also provides labelled bacteria obtained using the methods of the present invention.
  • the present invention provides cell cultures comprising at least one labelled bacterial strain.
  • the present invention provides food and/or feed comprising labelled bacteria, including but not limited to cell cultures comprising such labelled bacteria.
  • the present invention also provides methods for preparing food and/or feed comprising at least one labelled bacterial strain. In some embodiments, the methods comprise adding at least one labelled bacterial strain or cell culture to the food and/or feed.
  • the present invention also provides methods for generating CRISPR variants comprising the steps of: (a) exposing a parent bacterium to a bacteriophage; (b) selecting a bacteriophage resistant bacterium (i.e., a “bacteriophage insensitive mutant); (c) comparing the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the bacteriophage insensitive mutant; (d) selecting a labelled bacterium comprising an additional DNA fragment in the CRISPR locus that is not present in the parent bacterium; and (e) isolating and/or cloning and/or sequencing the additional DNA fragment.
  • the present invention also provides CRISPR variants produced using the methods set forth herein.
  • the CRISPR variants are phage resistant mutant strains that have a modified CRISPR locus with an additional spacer.
  • the present invention also provides methods for the use of at least one nucleotide sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage for tagging and/or identifying bacteria, wherein the nucleotide sequence is integrated within the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • the present invention provides methods for the use of at least one nucleotide sequence for labelling and/or identifying a bacterium, wherein the nucleotide sequence is obtained or obtainable by: (a) exposing a parent bacterium to a bacteriophage; (b) selecting a bacteriophage insensitive mutant; (c) comparing a CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the bacteriophage insensitive mutant; and (d) selecting a labelled bacterium comprising an additional DNA fragment in the CRISPR locus that is not present in the parent bacterium.
  • the present invention provides methods for identifying a labelled bacterium comprising the step of screening the bacterium for an additional DNA fragment within a CRISPR locus of the bacterium is also provided in a further aspect of the present invention.
  • the present invention provides methods for identifying labelled bacteria comprising the steps of: (a) screening the bacteria for an additional DNA fragment in a CRISPR locus; (b) determining the nucleotide sequence of the additional DNA fragment; (c) comparing the nucleotide sequence of the additional DNA fragment with a database of labelled bacteria obtained or obtainable by the method of the present invention; and (d) identifying a nucleotide sequence in the database of labelled bacteria that matches the additional DNA fragment.
  • the 5′ end and/or the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium is compared with the labelled bacteria.
  • at least the first CRISPR repeat or the first CRISPR spacer (e.g., the first CRISPR spacer core) at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus is compared.
  • at least the last CRISPR repeat or the last CRISPR spacer (e.g., the last CRISPR spacer core) at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus is/are compared.
  • the methods of the present invention comprise the step of selecting a labelled bacterium comprising an additional DNA fragment at the 5′ end and/or at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus that is not present in the parent bacterium.
  • the methods further comprise exposing the parent bacterium to two or more bacteriophages either simultaneously or sequentially.
  • the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the bacteriophage insensitive mutant are compared by amplifying the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and/or bacteriophage insensitive mutant.
  • the amplification is performed using PCR.
  • the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the bacteriophage insensitive mutant are compared by sequencing the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and/or the bacteriophage insensitive mutant. In some preferred embodiments, the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the bacteriophage insensitive mutant are compared by amplifying and then sequencing the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and/or the bacteriophage insensitive mutant. In some alternative preferred embodiments, the additional DNA fragment is at least 44 nucleotides in length. In some additional preferred embodiments, the labelled bacteria comprise two or three or more additional DNA fragments is selected.
  • the additional DNA fragment comprises at least one nucleotide sequence that has at least about 95% identity, or preferably, 100% identity to a CRISPR repeat in the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium. In still further embodiments, the additional DNA fragment comprises at least one nucleotide sequence that has at least about 95% identity, and in some embodiments, preferably about 100% identity to a nucleotide sequence in the genome of the bacteriophage used for the selection of the labelled bacterium.
  • the present invention also provides at least one additional DNA fragment that comprises a first nucleotide sequence and a second nucleotide sequence wherein at least one of the nucleotide sequences have at least about 95% identity, or in some preferred embodiments, about 100% identity to a nucleotide sequence in the genome of the bacteriophage used for the selection of the labelled bacteria.
  • the present invention provides parent bacteria that are suitable for use as starter cultures, probiotic cultures and/or dietary supplements.
  • the parent bacteria are selected any suitable genus, including but not limited to Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella, Erwinia, Yersinia, Bacillus, Vibrio, Legionella, Pseudomonas, Neisseria, Bordetella, Helicobacter, Listeria, Agrobacterium, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Treponema, Borrelia, Francisella, Brucella, Bifidobacterium, Brevibacterium, Propionibacterium, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc , and Oenococcus .
  • the bacteriophage is selected from a suitable virus family, including but not limited to Corticoviridae, Cystoviridae, Inoviridae, Leviviridae, Microviridae, Myoviridae, Podoviridae, Siphoviridae, and Tectiviridae.
  • the present invention provides cell cultures that are selected from starter cultures, probiotic cultures and/or dietary supplements.
  • the present invention provides methods for identifying labelled bacteria, comprising the step of comparing at least one additional DNA fragment with a bacteriophage sequence database and/or a bacterial sequence database.
  • the present invention also provides S. thermophilus strains comprising a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage, wherein the sequence comprises the CRISPR spacer from Streptococcus thermophilus strain DGCC7778, referred to herein as SEQ ID NO:680 (caacacattcaacagattaatgaagaatac; SEQ ID NO:680).
  • the present invention provides S. thermophilus strains comprising a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage, wherein the sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:680 downstream (e.g., directly downstream) of the first CRISPR repeat in at least one CRISPR locus.
  • the present invention provides S. thermophilus strains comprising a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage, wherein the sequence comprises CRISPR spacer (5′-3′) from Streptococcus thermophilus strain DGCC7778 (tccactcacgtacaaatagtgagtgtactc; SEQ ID NO:681).
  • the present invention provides S. thermophilus strains comprising a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage, wherein the sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:681 downstream (e.g., directly downstream) of the first CRISPR repeat in at least one CRISPR locus.
  • the present invention provides S. thermophilus strains comprising a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage, wherein the sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:683:
  • the present invention provides S. thermophilus strains comprising a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage, wherein the sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:683 downstream (e.g., directly downstream) of the first CRISPR repeat in at least one CRISPR locus.
  • S. thermophilus strains comprising a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage, wherein the sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:685 (i.e., 5′-TACGTTTGAAAAGAATATCAAATCAATGA-3′).
  • the present invention provides S. thermophilus strains comprising a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage, wherein the sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:685 downstream (e.g., directly downstream) of the first CRISPR repeat in at least one CRISPR locus.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions that find use in the development and use of strain combinations and starter culture rotations.
  • the use of one or more CRISPR BIMs simultaneously in a starter cultures i.e., a combination of BIMs
  • the use of one or more CRISPR BIMs in a rotation scheme is provided.
  • the use of one or more CRISPR BIMs combinations in a rotation scheme is provided.
  • the present invention also provides means to analyze target organism CRISPRs, in order to allow comparisons between spacer sequences against biocontrol phage genome. In some embodiments, the present invention provides means to predict phage virulence and selection of at least one biocontrol phage against at least one target microorganism.
  • the present invention also provides methods and compositions to utilize CRISPR-cas (i.e., natural mutagenesis, in some preferred embodiments) to construct at least one phage resistant CRISPR variant of at least target microorganism which is then used to generate mutant phage that circumvent CRISPR-cas resistance via mutation within the phage corresponding to a sequence selected from spacer sequences, pseudospacer sequences, proximal sequence, recognition motifs, etc., to enhance the virulence of the phage.
  • CRISPR-cas i.e., natural mutagenesis, in some preferred embodiments
  • phage with enhanced virulence find use as biocontrol agents.
  • the present invention provides compositions and methods suitable for the production of phage having enhanced virulence, as compared to the parent phage.
  • at least one cloned spacer is introduced into an active CRISPR-cas locus, to produce a phage-resistant cell variant for use in the generation of mutant phage.
  • the methods comprise introducing a sequence that serves as a specific target of a phage genome sequence (e.g., a region that is highly susceptible as a spacer target or recognition sequence for spacer host incorporation).
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions for the direct engineering of phage, such that the genome sequence corresponding to the spacer is mutated accordingly.
  • the present invention also provides methods to direct the evolution of a given phage using the acquired CRISPR phage resistance of a corresponding host strain to create a more virulent, therefore effiective, biocontrol agent.
  • FIG. 1 provides a schematic showing that the integration of a CRISPR spacer into the CRISPR locus of S. thermophilus provides resistance against a bacteriophage to which the CRISPR spacer shows identity.
  • the parent DGCC7710 is phage sensitive, and the BIM DGCC7710RH1 is phage resistant.
  • the BIM DGCC7710RH1 has a new spacer (Sn) in the CRISPR locus, which shows 100% identity to phage sequence.
  • step (B) the strain is challenged with phage 858 and a phage resistant mutant is selected.
  • the CRISPR1 locus of the mutant has an additional spacer which shares 100% identity with region 31.921-31.950 bp of the phage.
  • FIG. 2 provides a schematic showing that integration of a CRISPR spacer into the CRISPR locus of S. thermophilus provides resistance against a bacteriophage to which the CRISPR spacer shows identity.
  • the parent DGCC7710 is phage sensitive, and the BIM DGCC7710RH2 is phage resistant.
  • the BIM DGCC7710RH2 has a new spacer (Sn) in the CRISPR locus, which shows 100% identity to phage sequence.
  • step (B) the strain is challenged with phage 858 and a phage resistant mutant is selected.
  • step (C) the experiment was independently repeated and another mutant was selected.
  • the CRISPR1 locus of the mutant has an additional spacer (different from that in RH1) which shares 100% identity with region 17.125-17.244 bp of the phage.
  • FIG. 3 provides a graphical representation illustrating the preparation of the CASTM KO construct in which the cas1 gene is disrupted by homologous recombination.
  • FIG. 4 provides a graphical representation of the preparation of the RT construct using a restriction enzyme to generate the RT construct from the S1S2 construct.
  • a ligase was used to patch together the two end pieces, thus generating a new construct that has RT, but no spacers.
  • FIG. 5 provides a graphical representation of the integration of the RT construct.
  • FIG. 6 provides a graphical representation illustrating the S1S2 construct engineering using specific primers and iterative PCR reactions.
  • the first panel illustrates all primers used and the set up for the first two PCR reactions (reaction #1 with primers P1 and P2 and reaction #2 with primers P2 and P3).
  • the second panel shows the PCR products obtained from the first two PCR reactions, with the product from reaction #1 on the left and the product from reaction #2 on the right.
  • the third panel shows the third PCR reaction, using a combination of the products from the first two PCRs as the template for the third PCR reaction, and primer P1 from the first reaction along with primer P4 from the second reaction.
  • the fourth panel shows the product of PCR#3, which technically generates the S1 S2 construct.
  • FIG. 7 provides a graphical representation of the details for primer design for primers 2 and 3, which contain key sequences for the experiment, derived from spacers identical to phage sequences (the PCR products derived from these PCR primers will generate the spacers that will ultimately provide resistance to the phages).
  • FIG. 8 provides a graphical representation of the integration of the S1S2 construct.
  • FIG. 9 provides a graphical representation showing an overview of the S. thermophilus CRISPR1 locus, the newly acquired spacers in phage-resistant mutants, and corresponding phage sensitivity.
  • the CRISPR1 locus of DGCC7710 (WT) is at the top.
  • the repeat/spacer region of WT is in the middle: repeats (black diamonds), spacers (numbered gray boxes), leader (L, white box) and terminal repeat (T, black diamond).
  • the spacer content on the leader side of the locus in phage-resistant mutants is detailed on the left, with newly acquired spacers (white boxes, S1-S14).
  • EOP efficiency of plaquing
  • FIG. 10 provides CRISPR spacer engineering, cas gene inactivation and corresponding phage sensitivity I, mutant WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ; II, mutant WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ⁇ CRISPR1 where CRISPR1 was deleted; III, mutant WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ::pR where CRISPR1 was displaced and replaced with a unique repeat; IV, WT ⁇ 2972 +S4 ::pS1S2, mutant of strain WT ⁇ 2972 +S4 where CRISPR1 was displaced and replaced with a version containing S1 and S2; V, WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ::pcas5- with cas5 inactivated; VI, WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ::paS7- with cas7 inactivated.
  • pOR1 indicates the integrated plasmid (12).
  • the phage sensitivity of each strain to phages 858 and 2972 is represented at the bottom as
  • FIG. 11 provides a schematic showing the construction of the S1 S2 construct.
  • FIG. 12 provides a schematic showing the construction of WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ⁇ CRISPR1.
  • FIG. 13 provides an alignment of CRISPR spacer S1 with the corresponding genomic region of phage 858 and the two mutant phages that have circumvented the CRISPR resistance of strain WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 .
  • FIG. 14 provides a schematic representation of the construction of a first level phage resistant variant.
  • Each variant has a single additional spacer within its CRISPR. Additional spacers are unrelated to each of the others (e.g., each has a different sequence). All spacers originate from phage P.
  • FIG. 15 provides a schematic representation of second level of phage resistant variants presenting increased resistance to phages.
  • Final variants (A1.n and A2.n) originate from strain A and have a sequential integration of additional spacers within its CRISPR, with all spacers being different from each of the others and originating from phage P.
  • FIG. 16 provides a schematic representation of second level of phage resistant variants presenting enlarged resistance to phages.
  • Final variant (A1 pqr ) originates from strain A and has a sequential integration of additional spacers within its CRISPR originating from 3 different phages (i.e., from phage P, Q and R).
  • FIG. 17 provides a schematic representation of the CRISPR1 locus (Panel A) and of the CRISPR3 locus (Panel B) of S. thermophilus strains described in Examples 7 to Example 16. Strain names are given on the left side of the Figure. Black arrows represent CRISPR repeats, “R” stands for Repeat and “RT” stands for Terminal Repeat. Grey arrows numbered from 1 to 32 in part A and from 1 to 12 in part B represent CRISPR1 spacers and CRISPR3 spacers, respectively, as they are in DGCC7710. White arrows numbered from S4 to S35 represent CRISPR additional spacers specific to the described strains.
  • FIG. 18 provides a schematic showing an embodiment of the present invention, in which a tagging sequence and a CRISPR repeat are integrated at one end of the CRISPR locus.
  • the CRISPR locus and elements including repeats (R), spacers (S), the upstream leader and downstream trailer, with the terminal repeat (RT) adjacent to the trailer, and cas genes in the vicinity (4 cas genes named cas1 to cas4 herein, not drawn to scale) are indicated.
  • the cas genes can be on either end, or split and present on both ends.
  • cas genes may be located on any of the two DNA strands.
  • Panel B shows the phage sequence, with a fragment of the sequence (Sn) being used as an additional spacer (i.e., tagging sequence).
  • Panel C shows insertion of a new spacer (Sn) (i.e., tagging sequence) at one end of the CRISPR locus (close to the leader in this example at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus), between two repeats.
  • Panel D provides a comparison of the CRISPR locus content between the parent and the mutant bacterium (i.e., labelled bacterium), with a new spacer (Sn) (i.e., tagging sequence) integrated at one end of the CRISPR locus (close to the leader in this example), between repeats.
  • the new spacer (Sn) constitutes the tagging sequence which is specific for the mutant bacterium (i.e., labelled bacterium). In some embodiments, use of this method results in the addition of one or more spacers from the phage sequence.
  • FIG. 19 provides a schematic showing an embodiment of the present invention, in which two tagging sequences and two CRISPR repeats are integrated at one end of the CRISPR locus.
  • CRISPR locus and elements including repeats (R), spacers (S), the upstream leader and downstream trailer, with the terminal repeat (RT) adjacent to the trailer, and cas genes in the vicinity (4 cas genes named cas1 to cas4 herein, not drawn to scale) are indicated.
  • the cas genes can be on either end, or split and present on both ends. cas genes may be located on any of the two DNA strands.
  • Panel B shows the phage sequence in black, with two fragments of the sequence (Sn and Sn′) being used as additional spacers (i.e., tagging sequences).
  • Panel C shows the insertion of the new spacers (i.e., tagging sequences) (Sn and Sn′) at the same end of the CRISPR locus (close to the leader in this example at the 5′ end), each of which is in between two repeats.
  • Panel B provides a comparison of the CRISPR locus content between the parent and the mutant bacterium (i.e., labelled bacterium), with two new spacers (Sn and Sn′) integrated at the same end of the CRISPR locus (close to the leader in this example at the 5′ end), with each located in between repeats.
  • the new spacers Sn and Sn′ constitute the tagging sequence which is specific of the mutant. In some embodiments, this method results in the addition of one or more spacers from the phage sequence.
  • FIG. 20 provides a graph showing the evolution of phage count in milk containing 10′ pfu/ml of D2972 during fermentation with DGCC7710 (black diamonds) or with DGCC9836 (open squares). Milk was 10% (w/v) milk powder in water. The incubation temperature was 42° C.
  • FIG. 21 provides a graph showing the evolution of the cumulated phage count on WT phi2972 +S20 and WT phi2972 +S21 in milk containing 10 7 pfu/ml of D2972 during fermentation inoculated with WT phi2972 +S20 (dashed) or with WT phi2972 +S21 (light grey) or with both WT phi2972 +S20 and WT phi2972 +S21 (dark grey). Milk was 10% (w/v) milk powder in water. The incubation temperature was 42° C.
  • FIG. 22 provides a Web Logo for the CRISPR1 motif NNAGAAW (SEQ ID NO:696).
  • FIG. 23 provides an alignment of selected CRISPR3 protospacers and flanking regions and the web logo for the CRISPR3 motif NGGNG (SEQ ID NO:723).
  • S42 DGCC7710 phi2972 +S40 phi3821 +S41S42 (SEQ ID NO:724)
  • S41 DGCC7710 phi2972 +S40 phi3821 +S41S42 (SEQ ID NO:699)
  • S41 DGCC7710 phi858 +S1S2deltaCRISPR1 phi848 +S43 SEQ ID NO:700
  • S78 LMD-9 phi4241 +S78 SEQ ID NO:701
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions related to modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides compositions and methods for the use of one or more cas genes or proteins for modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions that find use in the development and use of strain combinations and starter culture rotations.
  • the present invention provides methods for labelling and/or identifying bacteria.
  • the present invention provides methods for the use of CRISPR loci to determine the potential virulence of a phage against a cell and the use of CRISPR-cas to modulate the genetic sequence of a phage for increased virulence level.
  • the present invention provides means and compositions for the development and use of phages as biocontrol agents.
  • Streptococcus thermophilus is a low G+C Gram-positive bacterial species that is a key species exploited in the formulation of dairy culture systems for the production of yogurt and cheese. Comparative genomics analyses of closely related S. thermophilus strains have previously revealed that genetic polymorphism primarily occurs at hypervariable loci, such as the eps and rps operons, as well as two clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) loci (See e.g., Jansen et al., Mol. Microbiol., 43:1565 [2002]; Bolotin et al., Microbiol., 151:2551 [2005]; and Bolotin et al., Nat.
  • CRISPR clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
  • CRISPR loci typically consist of several non-contiguous direct repeats separated by stretches of variable sequences called spacers, and are often times adjacent to cas genes (CRISPR-associated). Although the function of CRISPR loci has not been established biologically, in silico analyses of the spacers have revealed sequence homology with foreign elements, including bacteriophage and plasmid sequences (See e.g., Bolotin et al., Microbiol., supra; Mojica et al., supra; and Pourcel et al., supra).
  • Bacteriophages are arguably the most abundant biological entity on the planet (See, Breitbart and Rohwer, Trends Microbiol., 13:278 [2005]). Their ubiquitous distribution and abundance have an important impact on microbial ecology and the evolution of bacterial genomes (See, Chibani-Chemoufi et al., J. Bacteriol., 186:3677 [2004]). Consequently, bacteria have developed a variety of natural defense mechanisms that target diverse steps of the phage life cycle, notably blocking adsorption, preventing DNA injection, restricting the incoming DNA and abortive infection systems.
  • naturally occurring refers to elements and/or process that occur in nature.
  • the terms “construct,” “conjugate,” “cassette,” and “hybrid,” include a nucleotide sequence directly or indirectly attached to another sequence (e.g., a regulatory sequence, such as a promoter).
  • a regulatory sequence such as a promoter
  • the present invention provides constructs comprising a nucleotide sequence operably linked to such a regulatory sequence.
  • operably linked refers to a juxtaposition wherein the components described are in a relationship permitting them to function in their intended manner.
  • a regulatory sequence “operably linked” to a coding sequence is ligated in such a way that expression of the coding sequence is achieved under condition compatible with the control sequences.
  • regulatory sequences includes promoters and enhancers and other expression regulation signals.
  • promoter is used in the normal sense of the art, e.g. an RNA polymerase binding site.
  • constructs comprise or express a marker, which allows for the selection of the nucleotide sequence construct in, for example, a bacterium.
  • markers exist which may be used, for example those markers that provide for antibiotic/antimicrobial resistance.
  • the construct comprises a vector (e.g., a plasmid).
  • the present invention provides vectors comprising one or more of the constructs or sequences described herein.
  • the term “vector” includes expression vectors, transformation vectors, and shuttle vectors.
  • transformation vector means a construct capable of being transferred from one entity to another entity, which may be of the same species or may be a different species. Constructs that are capable of being transferred from one species to another are sometimes referred to as “shuttle vectors.
  • the vectors are transformed into a suitable host cell as described herein.
  • the vectors are plasmid or phage vectors provided with an origin of replication, optionally a promoter for the expression of the polynucleotide, and optionally a regulator of the promoter.
  • the vectors contain one or more selectable marker nucleotide sequences. The most suitable selection systems for industrial micro-organisms are those formed by the group of selection markers which do not require a mutation in the host organism.
  • the vectors are used in vitro (e.g., for the production of RNA or used to transfect or transform a host cell).
  • polynucleotides are incorporated into a recombinant vector (typically a replicable vector), such as a cloning or expression vector.
  • a recombinant vector typically a replicable vector
  • the vector finds use in the replication of the nucleic acid in a compatible host cell.
  • nucleic acid e.g., a phage, construct or vector
  • transduction, transformation, calcium phosphate transfection, DEAE-dextran mediated transfection, cationic lipid-mediated transfection, electroporation, transduction or infection may find use.
  • any suitable method known in the art finds use in the present invention.
  • cells containing exogenous nucleic acid are selected for using any suitable method known in the art.
  • introducing means one or more of transforming, transfecting, conjugating or transducing.
  • bacterial strains e.g., parent bacterial strains, variant bacterial strains, etc.
  • phage nucleic acid is introduced into the cells of the bacterial strain.
  • nucleic acid sequence refers to any nucleic acid sequence, including DNA, RNA, genomic, synthetic, recombinant (e.g., cDNA). It is intended that the terms encompass double-stranded and/or single-stranded sequences, whether representing the sense or antisense strand or combinations thereof. Recombinant nucleic acid sequences are prepared by use of any suitable recombinant DNA techniques. In some embodiments, as described herein, nucleic acid sequences provided include gene sequences that encode CRISPR, Cas, and other sequences.
  • the present invention encompasses nucleic acid sequences that encode various CRISPR sequences, including but not limited to spacers, pseudo-spacers, leaders, etc., as well as cas sequences, and other bacterial and phage (“bacteriophage”) nucleic acid sequences.
  • nucleic acid molecule encoding refers to the order or sequence of deoxyribonucleotides along a strand of deoxyribonucleic acid. The order of these deoxyribonucleotides determines the order of amino acids along the polypeptide (protein) chain. The DNA sequence thus codes for the amino acid sequence.
  • nucleic acid is introduced into recipient cells upon infection of the cells by bacteriophage(s).
  • the nucleic acid sequences and the nucleic acids provided herein are isolated or substantially purified.
  • isolated or “substantially purified” is intended that the nucleic acid molecules, or biologically active fragments or variants, homologues, or derivatives thereof are substantially or essentially free from components normally found in association with the nucleic acid in its natural state.
  • components include, but are not limited to other cellular material, culture media, materials from recombinant production, and various chemicals used in chemically synthesising the nucleic acids.
  • an “isolated” nucleic acid sequence or nucleic acid is typically free of nucleic acid sequences that flank the nucleic acid of interest in the genomic DNA of the organism from which the nucleic acid was derived (e.g., coding sequences present at the 5′ or 3′ ends).
  • the molecule may include some additional bases or moieties that do not deleteriously affect the basic characteristics of the composition.
  • the term “modification” refers to changes made within nucleic acid and/or amino acid sequences. In some embodiments, modifications are accomplished using genetic engineering (e.g., recombinant) methods, while in other embodiments, modifications are made using naturally-occurring genetic mechanisms. It is intended that all or part of a sequence will be modified using the methods of the present invention.
  • the nucleic acids modified include one or more naturally-occurring or recombinantly produced CRISPR spacers, cas genes or proteins, CRISPR repeats, CRISPR loci, as well as bacteriophage nucleic acids.
  • any suitable method known in the art finds use in the present invention, including but not limited to use of PCR, cloning, site-directed mutagenesis, etc. Indeed, commercially available kits find use in the present invention.
  • synthetic oligonucleotides are used.
  • methods such as homologous recombination find use (e.g., for insertion or deletion of CRISPR spacers).
  • genetic engineering includes the activation of one or more nucleic acid sequences (e.g., CRISPR loci, CRISPR repeats, CRISPR spacers, cas genes or proteins, functional combinations of cas genes or proteins and CRISPR repeats, or combinations thereof).
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers are inserted into at least one CRISPR locus.
  • the modification does not interrupt one or more cas genes of the at least one CRISPR locus.
  • the one or more cas genes remain intact.
  • the modification does not interrupt one or more CRISPR repeats of the at least one CRISPR locus.
  • the one or more CRISPR repeats remain intact.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers are inserted into or within at least one CRISPR locus.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers are inserted at the 5′ end of at least one CRISPR locus.
  • the modification comprises inserting at least one CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacers into a cell (e.g., a recipient cell). In some other embodiments, the modification comprises inserting one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers into (e.g., to modify or replace) one or more CRISPR spacers of a recipient cell. In some embodiments, the CRISPR spacers of the cell are the same, while in other embodiments, they are different. In some embodiments, the modification comprises inserting at least one CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer from a donor organism into a recipient cell.
  • the modification comprises inserting one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers from a donor organism into a recipient cell under conditions suitable to modify or replace one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers of the recipient cell.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers from a donor organism are inserted into one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats of the cell.
  • at least one functional CRISPR repeat-cas combination remains intact in the cell.
  • insertion occurs adjacent to one or more (preferably two or more) CRISPR spacers or pseudo-spacers.
  • adjacent means “next to” in its broadest sense and includes “directly adjacent.”
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers from an organism are inserted “directly adjacent” to one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers of the recipient cell. (i.e., the CRISPR spacer(s) or pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) is inserted such that there are no intervening nucleotides between the spacers).
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) or pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) are inserted such that there are at least about 2, about 3, about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, about 10, about 15, about 20, about 25, about 30, about 35, about 40, about 45, about 50, about 55, about 60, about 65, about 70, about 75, about 80, about 85, about 90, about 95, about 100, about 200, about 300, about 400, about 500, about 600, about 700, about 800, about 900, about 1000, about 10,000, 1 about 00,000, or about 1,000,000 or more intervening nucleotides between the spacers.
  • the intervening nucleotide is referred to as a “leader sequence.”
  • the leader sequence can be of a different length in different bacteria.
  • the leader sequence is at least about 20, about 25, about 30, about 35, about 40, about 45, about 50, about 55, about 60, about 65, about 70, about 75, about 80, about 85, about 90, about 95, about 100, about 200, about 300, about 400, or about 500 or more nucleotides in length.
  • the leader sequence is between the last cas gene (at the 3′ end) and the first CRISPR repeat (at the 5′ end) of the CRISPR locus.
  • the leader sequence is between about 20-500 nucleotides in length.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers from a donor organism are inserted adjacent to one or more cas genes of a recipient cell, wherein the cas genes are the same or different.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers from a donor organism are inserted adjacent to the same or different spacers of the recipient cell.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers such as one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers from a donor organism—are each inserted adjacent to the same or different CRISPR repeats of the cell.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers such as one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers from a donor organism—are each inserted adjacent to the same or different cas genes of the recipient cell.
  • sequence of the one or more CRISPR spacer(s) from a donor organism are provided under conditions that the recipient cell is modified such that the CRISPR spacer has homology to the CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer of the donor organism. In some embodiments, the CRISPR spacer has 100% homology to the CRISPR spacer of the donor organism.
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) or pseudo CRISPR spacers comprise DNA or RNA of genomic, synthetic or recombinant origin.
  • the CRISPR spacer (s) or pseudo CRISPR spacers are double-stranded, while in other embodiments, they are single-stranded, whether representing the sense or antisense strand or combinations thereof. It is contemplated that the CRISPR spacer (s) or pseudo CRISPR spacers be prepared by use of recombinant DNA techniques (e.g. recombinant DNA), as described herein.
  • the modification comprises inserting one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers from a donor organism that is/are substantially resistant to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof into one or more CRISPR loci of a substantially sensitive cell.
  • the insertion occurs at or between a functional combination of at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene in a substantially sensitive cell.
  • the modification comprises modifying (e.g., mutating) the DNA of a recipient cell (e.g., plasmid DNA or genomic DNA), such that one or more cas genes are created in the DNA of the cell.
  • the cas genes are cloned into a construct, a plasmid or a vector, etc., which is then transformed into the cell, using any suitable method.
  • the modification comprises modifying (e.g., mutating) the DNA of a recipient cell (e.g., such as plasmid DNA or genomic DNA), such that one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats are created in the DNA of the cell.
  • a recipient cell e.g., such as plasmid DNA or genomic DNA
  • the CRISPR repeats are cloned into a construct, a plasmid or a vector, etc., which is then transformed into the cell, using any suitable method.
  • the modification comprises modifying (e.g., mutating) the DNA of a recipient cell (e.g., plasmid DNA or genomic DNA), such that one or more cas-CRISPR repeat functional combinations are created in the DNA of the cell.
  • a recipient cell e.g., plasmid DNA or genomic DNA
  • the cas-CRISPR repeat functional combinations may be cloned into a construct, a plasmid or a vector, which is then transformed into the cell, using any suitable method.
  • the modification comprises modifying (e.g., mutating) the DNA of a recipient cell (e.g., plasmid DNA or genomic DNA), such that one or more CRISPR spacers are created in the DNA of the cell.
  • a recipient cell e.g., plasmid DNA or genomic DNA
  • the CRISPR spacers may be cloned into a construct, a plasmid or a vector, which is then transformed into the cell, using any suitable method.
  • a CRISPR spacer is flanked by two CRISPR repeats (i.e., a CRISPR spacer has at least one CRISPR repeat on each side).
  • the modification comprises inserting one or more CRISPR spacers (e.g., heterologous CRISPR spacers) in the vicinity of (e.g., adjacent to/directly adjacent to) one or more cas genes and/or the leader sequence.
  • CRISPR spacers e.g., heterologous CRISPR spacers
  • the organization of the naturally occurring CRISPR locus is maintained following insertion of the one or more CRISPR spacers.
  • target nucleic acid refers to any nucleic acid sequence or transcription product thereof, against which resistance in a cell (e.g., a recipient cell) is modulated.
  • the resistance is directed against the target nucleic acid sequence per se.
  • this confers resistance to a cell against a donor organism from which the target nucleic acid(s) is derivable.
  • the insertion of a pseudo-CRISPR spacer derived from a bacteriophage or a CRISPR spacer(s) which is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) into a recipient cell confers resistance to the bacteriophage.
  • insertion between two CRISPR repeats of a pseudo-CRISPR spacer derived from a bacteriophage or CRISPR spacer(s) that is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) into a recipient cell confers resistance to the bacteriophage.
  • a method for modulating the resistance of a recipient cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof is provided.
  • the present invention also provides methods for determining the resistance profile of a cell against a target nucleic acid.
  • the term “resistance profile” means one or more entities against which the cell is sensitive or resistant. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the resistance profile of a cell reflects that the cell is resistant to a first bacteriophage, sensitive to a second bacteriophage, resistant to a first mobile genetic element, and sensitive to a first antibiotic resistance gene, etc.
  • one or more cas genes or proteins, one or more CRISPR repeats, one or more cas genes, one or more cas-CRISPR repeat functional combinations, one or more CRISPR spacers, and/or one or more CRISPR spacers etc., within a cell are detected and/or sequenced so as to predict/determine the likely resistance profile of a particular cell.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers within a cell are detected or sequenced so as to predict/determine the likely resistance profile of a particular cell.
  • Suitable detection methods include, but are not limited to PCR, DNA-DNA hybridization, DNA-RNA hybridization, DNA microarrays, etc. Indeed, it is intended that any suitable method will find use in the present invention.
  • the likely resistance profile of a particular bacterial cell to one or more bacteriophage is used as a lysotype predictor for microbial selection.
  • one or more Cas genes and/or one or more CRISPR repeats are sequenced in addition to one or more CRISPR spacers, in order to verify the compatibility of the cas gene-CRISPR repeat combination or to identify new pairs of compatible cas/repeat combinations.
  • modulating resistance refers suppressing, reducing, decreasing, inducing, conferring, restoring, elevating, increasing or otherwise affecting the resistance of a cell to a target nucleic acid, as taken in context.
  • the term “resistance” is not meant to imply that a cell is 100% resistant to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof, but includes cells that are tolerant of the target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the term “resistance to target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof” means that resistance is conferred against a cell or an organism (e.g., phage) that comprises or produces the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the minimal component required for conferring immunity or resistance against a target nucleic acid or expression product thereof is at least one cas gene (or one Cas protein) and at least two CRISPR repeats flanking a spacer.
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating (e.g. conferring or increasing) the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: identifying a sequence (e.g., a conserved sequence) in an organism (preferably, a sequence essential to the function or survival of the organism); preparing a CRISPR spacer which comprises a sequence homologous (e.g., 100% identical), to the identified sequence; preparing a nucleic acid comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats together with the CRISPR spacer; and (iv) transforming a cell with the nucleic acid thus to render the cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • a sequence e.g., a conserved sequence
  • CRISPR spacer which comprises a sequence homologous (e.g., 100% identical)
  • conserved sequence in the context of identifying a conserved sequence in an organism does not necessarily have to be conserved in its strictest sense, as the knowledge of one sequence from a given organism is sufficient. Furthermore, the sequence does not need to be part of an essential entity. However, in some embodiments, the conserved sequence is a sequence that is essential for function and/or survival and/or replication and/or infectivity and the like of an organism or a cell. In some embodiments, the conserved sequence comprises a helicase, a primase a head or tail structural protein, a protein with a conserved domain (e.g., holing, lysine, and others), or conserved sequences amongst important phage genes.
  • conserved sequence comprises a helicase, a primase a head or tail structural protein, a protein with a conserved domain (e.g., holing, lysine, and others), or conserved sequences amongst important phage genes.
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating (e.g., conferring or increasing) the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: identifying one or more CRISPR spacers in an organism resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof; preparing a recombinant nucleic acid comprising at least one cas gene or protein and at least two CRISPR repeats together with the identified one or more spacers; and transforming a cell with the recombinant nucleic acid thus to render the recipient cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating (e.g., conferring or increasing) the resistance of a cell comprising at least one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: identifying one or more CRISPR spacers in an organism resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof; and modifying the sequence of one or more CRISPR spacer(s) in the cell such that the CRISPR spacer(s) has homology to the CRISPR spacer(s) in the organism.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers in a recipient cell are modified (e.g., genetically engineered) such that the CRISPR spacer(s) have homology to one or more CRISPR spacer(s) in a donor organism that is substantially resistant to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof, in order to render the cell resistant to the target nucleic acid.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats in the cell are a functional combination as described herein.
  • the genetic engineering methods include any suitable methods known in the art, including but not limited to, adding (e.g., inserting), deleting (e.g., removing) or modifying (e.g., mutating) the sequence of the one or more CRISPR spacers and/or one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers in a cell, such that the CRISPR spacer has homology (e.g., increased homology after the genetic engineering) to one or more CRISPR spacers of a donor organism.
  • This engineering step results in a cell that was substantially sensitive to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof being substantially resistant to the target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods for decreasing or reducing the resistance of a recipient cell comprising at least one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the methods comprise the steps of: identifying one or more CRISPR spacers in an organism that is substantially resistant to the target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof; and modifying the sequence of one or more CRISPR spacer(s) in the cell such that the CRISPR spacer(s) has a reduced degree of homology to the CRISPR spacer(s) in the organism.
  • the methods for modulating comprise the steps of: identifying a CRISPR spacer or a pseudo CRISPR spacer in an organism comprising a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof against which resistance is to be modulated; and identifying the CRISPR spacer in the organism in which resistance is to be modulated; and (iii) adapting the sequence of the CRISPR spacer in the organism in which resistance is to be modulated such that the CRISPR spacer has a lower degree of homology to the CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer of the organism comprising the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof against which resistance is to be modulated.
  • One or more CRISPR spacers in a substantially resistant cell are engineered in order to render the cell sensitive to a target nucleic acid.
  • the genetic engineering methods that find use include, but are not limited to, the addition (e.g., insertion), deletion (e.g., removal) or modification of one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations or portions or fragments thereof in the substantially resistant cell and/or the addition (e.g., insertion), deletion (e.g., removal) or modification of one or more CRISPR spacers or portions or fragments thereof in the substantially resistant cell.
  • This engineering step results in a cell that was substantially resistant to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof becoming substantially sensitive to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers, one or more cas genes or proteins, one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats, and/or one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations from a substantially resistant cell will be removed, deleted or modified such that resistance is no longer conferred.
  • cells that are sensitive to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof are prepared such that their levels within a given culture (e.g., a starter culture) may be modulated (e.g., decreased) as desired.
  • starter cultures comprising two or more bacterial strains are developed such that all members of the culture are sensitive to the same agent (e.g., the same bacteriophage).
  • the culture is contacted with the same single agent in order to kill all members of the culture.
  • the sensitivity of cells are modulated to one or more agents (e.g., phages), such that the agent kills only a certain proportion of the cells in a given culture (e.g., about 10, about 20, about 30, about 40, about 50, about 60, about 70, about 80, about 90, or about 95% of the cells in the culture).
  • a recipient cell is engineered such that it comprises a CRISPR spacer or a sequence corresponding to a pseudo CRISPR spacer, thereby rendering the cell resistant to a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the cell is engineered such that the CRISPR spacer or sequence corresponding to the pseudo CRISPR spacer is used together with a functional cas gene-CRISPR repeat combination, as described herein.
  • a cell that is resistant to a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is engineered such that the CRISPR spacer conferring the immunity against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is inserted into a cell that comprises a functional cas gene-CRISPR repeat combination, thereby rendering the cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the sequence of one or more CRISPR spacers or pseudo CRISPR spacers of a cell that is resistant to a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is determined.
  • a recipient cell is then engineered such that it comprises the sequence of the CRISPR spacer and a functional cas gene-CRISPR repeat combination, thereby rendering the cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • a CRISPR spacer from a recipient cell and a functional cas gene-CRISPR repeat combination from the same or different cell are prepared.
  • a further recipient cell is then engineered such that is comprises the CRISPR spacer sequence and functional cas gene-CRISPR repeat combination thereby rendering the cell resistant to the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the resistance is directed against a transcription product of the target nucleic acid sequence (e.g., a transcript of the target nucleic acid sequence, in particular an RNA or mRNA), a transcript (e.g., a sense or an antisense RNA transcript), or a polypeptide transcription product.
  • a transcription product of the target nucleic acid sequence e.g., a transcript of the target nucleic acid sequence, in particular an RNA or mRNA
  • a transcript e.g., a sense or an antisense RNA transcript
  • a polypeptide transcription product e.g., a transcript of the target nucleic acid sequence, in particular an RNA or mRNA
  • a transcript e.g., a sense or an antisense RNA transcript
  • this confers resistance to a cell against a donor organism from which the transcription product is derived.
  • the target nucleotide sequence comprises DNA or RNA of genomic, synthetic or recombinant origin.
  • the nucleotide sequence is double-stranded, while in other embodiment it is single-stranded, whether representing the sense or antisense strand or combinations thereof.
  • the nucleotide sequence is prepared by use of recombinant DNA techniques (e.g., recombinant DNA).
  • the nucleotide sequence is the same as a naturally occurring form, while in other embodiments it is derived therefrom.
  • the target nucleic acid sequence is derived from a gene.
  • the target nucleic acid sequence is derived from a variant, homologue, fragment or derivative of a gene.
  • the target nucleic sequence is or is derived from bacteriophage.
  • the target nucleic sequence is derived from plasmid DNA.
  • the target nucleic sequence is derived from a mobile genetic element.
  • the target nucleic sequence is derived from a transposable element or an insertion sequence.
  • the target nucleic sequence is derived from a gene that confers resistance.
  • the target nucleic sequence is derived from a gene that confers resistance to an antibiotic or antimicrobial.
  • the target nucleic sequence is derived from a virulence factor.
  • the target nucleic sequence is derived from a toxin, an internalin or a hemolysin.
  • the target nucleic sequence or a transcription product thereof is derived from one or more bacteria.
  • the resistance of bacterial cells is modulated using the methods and compositions of the present invention.
  • the target nucleotide sequence is derived from a gene associated with resistance to plasmid transfer in bacteria.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers in the cell are modified such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has homology to the CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer contained in the plasmid DNA of the bacterial cell, thereby providing resistance against the particular plasmid(s). Thus, the transfer of foreign DNA into the cell is prevented.
  • particular regions within the plasmid DNA are targeted, so as to provide immunity against plasmid DNA.
  • sequences within the plasmid's origin of replication or sequences within genes coding for replication proteins are targeted.
  • the present invention provides methods comprising the steps of: identifying a CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer derived from the plasmid DNA of a bacterial cell against which resistance is to be modulated; and modifying the sequence of a CRISPR spacer in the cell in which resistance is to be modulated, such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has homology to the CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer contained in the plasmid DNA of the bacterial cell.
  • the present invention provides methods for conferring resistance to a cell against plasmid transfer, comprising the steps of: identifying a CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer derived from plasmid DNA; identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas gene combinations in a cell that is substantially sensitive to the plasmid; and engineering the one or more CRISPR loci in the substantially sensitive cell such that they comprise one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers from the plasmid, thereby rendering the cell resistant.
  • the target nucleotide sequence is derived from a gene associated with rresistance to one or more mobile genetic elements.
  • particular CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers derived from one or more mobile genetic elements are added within a CRISPR locus of a cell so as to provide resistance against mobile genetic elements (e.g., transposable elements and insertion sequences), thus preventing transfer of foreign DNA and genetic drift.
  • particular regions within transposons and insertion sequences are targeted so as to provide immunity against mobile genetic elements.
  • targets include, but are not limited to conjugative transposons (Tn916), class II transposons (Tn501), insertion sequences (IS26), and transposase genes.
  • the present invention provides methods comprising the steps of: identifying a CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer derived from one or more mobile genetic elements of a cell against which resistance is to be modulated; and modifying the sequence of a CRISPR spacer in a cell in which resistance is to be modulated such that the CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer of the cell has homology to the CRISPR spacer contained in the mobile genetic element(s) of the cell.
  • the present invention provides methods for conferring resistance to a cell against one or more mobile genetic elements comprising the steps of: identifying a CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer derived from one or more mobile genetic elements; identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations in a cell that is substantially sensitive to the one or more mobile genetic elements; and engineering the one or more CRISPR loci in the substantially sensitive cell such that they comprise or have homology to one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers from the one or more mobile genetic elements to render the cell resistant.
  • the target nucleotide sequence is derived from a gene associated with resistance to antibiotics and/or antimicrobials.
  • antimicrobial refers to any composition that kills or inhibits the growth or reproduction of microorganisms. It is intended that the term encompass antibiotics (i.e., compositions produced by other microorganisms), as well as synthetically produced compositions.
  • Antimicrobial resistance genes include, but are not limited to bla tem , bla rob , bla shv , aadB, aacC1, aacC2, aacC3, aacA4, mecA, vanA, vanH, vanX, satA, aacA-aphH, vat, vga, msrA sul, and/or int.
  • the antimicrobial resistance genes include those that are obtained from bacterial species that include but are not limited to the genera Escherichia, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Proteus, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Haemophilus , and Moraxella .
  • the antimicrobial resistance genes also include those that are obtained from bacterial species that include but are not limited to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae , and Moraxella catarrhalis .
  • targets also include vanR, (i.e., vancomycin resistance), tetR (i.e., tetracycline resistance), and/or resistance factors that provide beta-lactamase resistance.
  • the present invention provides methods comprising the steps of: identifying one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers derived from a cell that comprises one or more antimicrobial resistance genes or markers; and modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer in a cell that does not comprise or does not express the antimicrobial resistance genes or markers such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has homology to the one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers contained in the cell that comprises one or more antimicrobial resistance genes or markers.
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating the acquisition of antimicrobial resistance markers in a cell comprising the steps of: identifying one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers derived from a cell that comprises one or more antimicrobial resistance genes or markers; identifying one or more CRISPR loci in a cell that does not comprise or does not express the antimicrobial resistance genes or markers; and modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer in the cell that does not comprise or does not express the antimicrobial resistance genes or markers such that the CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers has homology to the CRISPR spacer contained in the cell resistant to the transfer of genes conferring resistance to one or more antimicrobials.
  • the target nucleotide sequence is derived from at least one gene associated with virulence factor(s).
  • particular CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers derived from genes encoding virulence factors are added within a bacterial CRISPR locus to provide resistance against the transfer of genes conferring virulence into the bacteria.
  • factors that commonly contribute to microbial virulence are targeted, such as toxins, internalins, hemolysins and other virulence factors.
  • the present invention also provides methods comprising the steps of: identifying one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers derived from a cell that comprises one or more virulence factors; and modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer in a cell that does not comprise or does not express the virulence factor(s) or marker(s) such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has homology to the one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers contained in the cell that comprises one or more virulence factors.
  • the present invention provides methods for conferring resistance to a cell against one or more virulence factor(s) or marker(s) comprising the steps of: identifying a CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer derived from one or more virulence factor(s) or marker(s); identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations in a cell that is substantially sensitive to the one or more virulence factor(s) or marker(s); and engineering the one or more CRISPR loci in the substantially sensitive cell such that they comprise one or more CRISPR spacers and/or pseudo CRISPR spacers from the one or more virulence factor(s) or marker(s) to render the cell resistant.
  • the present invention encompasses the use of variants, homologues, derivatives and fragments thereof, including variants, homologues, derivatives and fragments of CRISPR loci, CRISPR spacers, pseudo CRISR spacers, cas genes or proteins, CRISPR repeats, functional CRISPR repeat-cas gene combinations and target nucleic acid sequences or transcription products thereof.
  • variant is used to mean a naturally occurring polypeptide or nucleotide sequences which differs from a wild-type sequence.
  • fragment indicates that a polypeptide or nucleotide sequence comprises a fraction of a wild-type sequence. It may comprise one or more large contiguous sections of sequence or a plurality of small sections. The sequence may also comprise other elements of sequence, for example, it may be a fusion protein with another protein. Preferably the sequence comprises at least 50%, more preferably at least 65%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, more preferably at least 96%, more preferably at least 97%, more preferably at least 98%, most preferably at least 99% of the wild-type sequence.
  • the fragment retains 50%, more preferably 60%, more preferably 70%, more preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more preferably 95%, more preferably 96%, more preferably 97%, more preferably 98%, or most preferably 99% activity of the wild-type polypeptide or nucleotide sequence.
  • a CRISPR spacer or pseudo CRISPR spacer comprises at least 50%, more preferably at least 65%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, more preferably at least 96%, more preferably at least 97%, more preferably at least 98%, most preferably at least 99% of the wild-type sequence.
  • a CRISPR spacer retains 50%, more preferably 60%, more preferably 70%, more preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more preferably 95%, more preferably 96%, more preferably 97%, more preferably 98%, or most preferably 99% activity of the wild-type polypeptide or nucleotide sequence.
  • a cas gene comprises at least 50%, more preferably at least 65%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, more preferably at least 96%, more preferably at least 97%, more preferably at least 98%, most preferably at least 99% of the wild-type sequence.
  • a cas gene retains 50%, more preferably 60%, more preferably 70%, more preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more preferably 95%, more preferably 96%, more preferably 97%, more preferably 98%, or most preferably 99% activity of the wild-type polypeptide or nucleotide sequence.
  • a Cas protein comprises at least 50%, more preferably at least 65%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, more preferably at least 96%, more preferably at least 97%, more preferably at least 98%, most preferably at least 99% of the wild-type sequence.
  • a Cas protein retains 50%, more preferably 60%, more preferably 70%, more preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more preferably 95%, more preferably 96%, more preferably 97%, more preferably 98%, or most preferably 99% activity of the wild-type polypeptide or nucleotide sequence.
  • a CRISPR repeat comprises at least 50%, more preferably at least 65%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, more preferably at least 96%, more preferably at least 97%, more preferably at least 98%, most preferably at least 99% of the wild-type sequence.
  • a CRISPR repeat retains 50%, more preferably 60%, more preferably 70%, more preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more preferably 95%, more preferably 96%, more preferably 97%, more preferably 98%, or most preferably 99% activity of the wild-type polypeptide or nucleotide sequence.
  • a functional CRISPR repeat-cas combination comprises at least 50%, more preferably at least 65%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, more preferably at least 96%, more preferably at least 97%, more preferably at least 98%, most preferably at least 99% of the wild-type sequence.
  • functional CRISPR repeat-cas combination retains 50%, more preferably 60%, more preferably 70%, more preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more preferably 95%, more preferably 96%, more preferably 97%, more preferably 98%, or most preferably 99% activity of the wild-type polypeptide or nucleotide sequence.
  • a target nucleic acid sequence comprises at least 50%, more preferably at least 65%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, more preferably at least 96%, more preferably at least 97%, more preferably at least 98%, most preferably at least 99% of the wild-type sequence.
  • a target nucleic acid sequence retains 50%, more preferably 60%, more preferably 70%, more preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more preferably 95%, more preferably 96%, more preferably 97%, more preferably 98%, or most preferably 99% activity of the wild-type polypeptide or nucleotide sequence.
  • the fragment is a functional fragment.
  • a “functional fragment” of a molecule is understood a fragment retaining or possessing substantially the same biological activity as the intact molecule. In all instances, a functional fragment of a molecule retains at least 10% and at least about 25%, about 50%, about 75%, about 80%, about 85%, about 90%, about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, or about 99% of the biological activity of the intact molecule.
  • homologue means an entity having a certain homology with the subject amino acid sequences and the subject nucleotide sequences.
  • identity can be equated with “identity”.
  • a homologous sequence is taken to include an amino acid sequence, which may be at least 75, 85 or 90% identical, preferably at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% identical to the subject sequence.
  • homology can also be considered in terms of similarity (i.e. amino acid residues having similar chemical properties/functions), in the context of the present invention it is preferred to express homology in terms of sequence identity.
  • a homologous sequence is taken to include a nucleotide sequence, which may be at least 75, 85 or 90% identical, preferably at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% identical to the subject sequence.
  • homology can also be considered in terms of similarity (i.e. amino acid residues having similar chemical properties/functions), in the context of the present invention it is preferred to express homology in terms of sequence identity.
  • Homology comparisons may be conducted by eye, or more usually, with the aid of readily available sequence comparison programs. These commercially available computer programs can calculate % homology between two or more sequences.
  • Percent (%) homology may be calculated over contiguous sequences (i.e. one sequence is aligned with the other sequence and each amino acid in one sequence is directly compared with the corresponding amino acid in the other sequence, one residue at a time). This is called an “ungapped” alignment. Typically, such ungapped alignments are performed only over a relatively short number of residues.
  • BLAST and FASTA are available for offline and online searching (see Ausubel et al., 1999 ibid, pages 7-58 to 7-60). However, for some applications, it is preferred to use the GCG Bestfit program.
  • a new tool, called BLAST 2 Sequences is also available for comparing protein and nucleotide sequence (see FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999 174(2): 247-50; FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999 177(1): 187-8).
  • a scaled similarity score matrix is generally used that assigns scores to each pairwise comparison based on chemical similarity or evolutionary distance.
  • An example of such a matrix commonly used is the BLOSUM62 matrix—the default matrix for the BLAST suite of programs.
  • GCG Wisconsin programs generally use either the public default values or a custom symbol comparison table if supplied (see user manual for further details). For some applications, it is preferred to use the public default values for the GCG package, or in the case of other software, the default matrix—such as BLOSUM62.
  • % homology preferably % sequence identity.
  • the software typically does this as part of the sequence comparison and generates a numerical result.
  • the degree of identity with regard to an amino acid sequence is determined over at least 5 contiguous amino acids, determined over at least 10 contiguous amino acids, over at least 15 contiguous amino acids, over at least 20 contiguous amino acids, over at least 30 contiguous amino acids, over at least 40 contiguous amino acids, over at least 50 contiguous amino acids, or over at least 60 contiguous amino acids.
  • sequences may also have deletions, insertions or substitutions of amino acid residues, which produce a silent change and result in a functionally equivalent substance.
  • Deliberate amino acid substitutions may be made on the basis of similarity in polarity, charge, solubility, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and/or the amphipathic nature of the residues as long as the secondary binding activity of the substance is retained.
  • negatively charged amino acids include aspartic acid and glutamic acid; positively charged amino acids include lysine and arginine; and amino acids with uncharged polar head groups having similar hydrophilicity values include leucine, isoleucine, valine, glycine, alanine, asparagine, glutamine, serine, threonine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine.
  • the present invention also encompasses homologous substitution (substitution and replacement are both used herein to mean the interchange of an existing amino acid residue, with an alternative residue) may occur i.e. like-for-like substitution—such as basic for basic, acidic for acidic, polar for polar etc.
  • Non-homologous substitution may also occur i.e.
  • Z ornithine
  • B diaminobutyric acid ornithine
  • O norleucine ornithine
  • pyriylalanine thienylalanine
  • naphthylalanine phenylglycine
  • Replacements may also be made by unnatural amino acids include; alpha* and alpha-disubstituted* amino acids, N-alkyl amino acids*, lactic acid*, halide derivatives of natural amino acids—such as trifluorotyrosine*, p-Cl-phenylalanine*, p-Br-phenylalanine*, p-I-phenylalanine*, L-allyl-glycine*, B-alanine*, L- ⁇ -amino butyric acid*, L- ⁇ -amino butyric acid*, L- ⁇ -amino isobutyric acid*, L- ⁇ -amino caproic acid#, 7-amino heptanoic acid*, L-methionine sulfone#*, L-norleucine*, L-norvaline*, p-nitro-L-phenylalanine*, L-hydroxyproline#, L-thioproline*, methyl derivatives of
  • Variant amino acid sequences include suitable spacer groups that are suitable for insertion inserted between any two amino acid residues of the sequence including alkyl groups—such as methyl, ethyl or propyl groups—in addition to amino acid spacers—such as glycine or ⁇ -alanine residues.
  • alkyl groups such as methyl, ethyl or propyl groups
  • amino acid spacers such as glycine or ⁇ -alanine residues.
  • a further form of variation involves the presence of one or more amino acid residues in peptoid form will be well understood by those skilled in the art.
  • the peptoid form is used to refer to variant amino acid residues wherein the ⁇ -carbon substituent group is on the residue's nitrogen atom rather than the ⁇ -carbon. Processes for preparing peptides in the peptoid form are well known in the art.
  • the nucleotide sequences for use in the present invention may include within them synthetic or modified nucleotides.
  • a number of different types of modification to oligonucleotides are known in the art. These include methylphosphonate and phosphorothioate backbones and/or the addition of acridine or polylysine chains at the 3′ and/or 5′ ends of the molecule.
  • the nucleotide sequences may be modified by any method available in the art. Such modifications may be carried out to enhance the in vivo activity or life span of nucleotide sequences useful in the present invention.
  • CRISPRs Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
  • SPIDRs Sacer Interspersed Direct Repeats
  • the CRISPR locus is a distinct class of interspersed short sequence repeats (SSRs) that were first recognized in E. coli (Ishino et al., J. Bacteriol., 169:5429-5433 [1987]; and Nakata et al., J. Bacteriol., 171:3553-3556 [1989]).
  • SSRs interspersed short sequence repeats
  • the CRISPR loci differ from other SSRs by the structure of the repeats, which have been termed short regularly spaced repeats (SRSRs) (Janssen et al., OMICS J. Integ. Biol., 6:23-33 [2002]; and Mojica et al., Mol. Microbiol., 36:244-246 [2000]).
  • the repeats are short elements that occur in clusters that are always regularly spaced by unique intervening sequences with a constant length (Mojica et al., [2000], supra). Although the repeat sequences are highly conserved between strains, the number of interspersed repeats and the sequences of the spacer regions differ from strain to strain (van Embden et al., J. Bacteriol., 182:2393-2401 [2000]).
  • CRISPR loci consist of short and highly conserved partially palindromic DNA repeats typically of 24 to 40 bp, containing inner and terminal inverted repeats of up to 11 bp. These repeats have been reported to occur from 1 to 140 times. Although isolated elements have been detected, they are generally arranged in clusters (up to about 20 or more per genome) of repeated units spaced by unique intervening 20-58 by sequences. To date, up to 20 distinct CRISPR loci have been found within a single chromosome.
  • CRISPRs are generally homogenous within a given genome with most of them being identical. However, there are examples of heterogeneity in, for example, the Archaea (Mojica et al., [2000], supra).
  • CRISPR locus refers to the DNA segment which includes all of the CRISPR repeats, starting with the first nucleotide of the first CRISPR repeat and ending with the last nucleotide of the last (terminal) CRISPR repeat.
  • CRISPR loci Although the biological function of CRISPR loci is unknown, some hypotheses have been proposed. For example, it has been proposed that they may be involved in the attachment of the chromosome to a cellular structure, or in the chromosome replication and replicon partitioning (Jansen et al., OMICS 6:23-33 [2002]; Jansen et al., Mol. Microbiol., 43:1565-1575 [2002]; and Pourcel et al., Microbiol., 151:653-663 [2005]). Mojica et al. (Mojica et al., J. Mol.).
  • Streptococcus thermophilus LMG18311 contains 3 CRISPR loci; the 36-bp repeated sequences are different in CRISPR1 (34 repeats), CRISPR2 (5 repeats), and CRISPR3 (a single sequence). Nevertheless, they are perfectly conserved within each locus.
  • CRISPR1 and CRISPR2 repeats are respectively interspaced by 33 and 4 sequences of 30 bp in length. All these interspacing sequences are different from each other. They are also different from those found in strain CNRZ1066 (41 interspacing sequences within CRISPR1) and in strain LMD-9 (16 within CRISPR1 and 8 within CRISPR3), which both are S. thermophilus.
  • CRISPR loci are identified using dotplots (e.g., by using the Dotter computer program).
  • any suitable method known in the art finds use in analyzing sequence similarity. For example, analysis may be performed using NCBI BLAST with a microbial genomes database and GenBank, as known in the art.
  • nucleotide sequences including those provided herein are included in databases (e.g., GenBank or the JGI genome website).
  • upstream means in the 5′ direction and “downstream” means in the 3′ direction.
  • the methods of the present invention utilize amplification procedures (See e.g., Mojica et al., [2005], supra; and Pourcel et al., [2005], supra).
  • Amplification of the desired region of DNA may be achieved by any method known in the art, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
  • PCR polymerase chain reaction
  • “Amplification” refers to the production of additional copies of a nucleic acid sequence. This is generally carried out using PCR technologies well known in the art.
  • the “polymerase chain reaction” (“PCR”) is well-known to those in the art.
  • oligonucleotide primers are designed for use in PCR reactions to amplify all or part of a CRISPR locus.
  • primer refers to an oligonucleotide, whether occurring naturally as in a purified restriction digest or produced synthetically, which is capable of acting as a point of initiation of synthesis when placed under conditions in which synthesis of a primer extension product which is complementary to a nucleic acid strand is induced (i.e., in the presence of nucleotides and an inducing agent—such as DNA polymerase and at a suitable temperature and pH).
  • the primer is single stranded for maximum efficiency in amplification, although in other embodiments, the primer is double stranded.
  • the primer is an oligodeoxyribonucleotide.
  • the primer must be sufficiently long to prime the synthesis of extension products in the presence of the inducing agent.
  • the exact length of the primers depends on many factors, including temperature, source of primer, and the use of the method.
  • PCR primers are typically at least about 10 nucleotides in length, and most typically at least about 20 nucleotides in length.
  • Methods for designing and conducting PCR are well known in the art, and include, but are not limited to methods using paired primers, nested primers, single specific primers, degenerate primers, gene-specific primers, vector-specific primers, partially mismatched primers, etc.
  • a CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from a parent bacterium and a labelled bacterium are compared using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the labelled bacterium are compared by amplifying the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof.
  • cycling amplification methods e.g., PCR, ligase chain reaction, etc.
  • other methods including but not limited to isothermal amplification methods find use in the present invention.
  • Well-known isothermal amplification methods that find use in the present invention include, but are not limited to strand displacement amplification (SDA), Q-beta-replicase, nucleic acid-based sequence amplification (NASBA), and self-sustained sequence replication.
  • SDA strand displacement amplification
  • NASBA nucleic acid-based sequence amplification
  • self-sustained sequence replication include, but are not limited to strand displacement amplification (SDA), Q-beta-replicase, nucleic acid-based sequence amplification (NASBA), and self-sustained sequence replication.
  • the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the labelled bacterium are compared by sequencing the of the present invention, the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the labelled bacterium are compared by amplifying and then sequencing the CRISPR loci or a portion thereof.
  • one end of the CRISPR loci are compared, while in other embodiments, both the 5′ and 3′ ends of the loci are compared.
  • one end (e.g., the 5′ end) of the CRISPR loci are compared.
  • At least the last CRISPR repeat at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus and/or at least the last CRISPR spacer (e.g., the last CRISPR spacer core) at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus and/or at least the first CRISPR repeat at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus and/or at least the first CRISPR spacer (e.g., the first CRISPR spacer core) at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are compared.
  • At least the first CRISPR repeat at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus and/or at least the first CRISPR spacer (e.g., the first CRISPR spacer core) at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are compared.
  • at least the last CRISPR spacer (e.g., the last CRISPR spacer core) at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus and/or at least the first CRISPR spacer (e.g., the first CRISPR spacer core) at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are compared.
  • at least the first CRISPR spacer (e.g., the first CRISPR spacer core) at the 5′ ends of the CRISPR loci are compared.
  • the CRISPR loci comprise DNA, while in other embodiments, the CRISPR loci comprise RNA.
  • the nucleic acid is of genomic origin, while in other embodiments, it is of synthetic or recombinant origin.
  • the CRISPR loci are double-stranded, while in other embodiments, they are single-stranded, whether representing the sense or antisense strand or combinations thereof.
  • CRISPR loci are prepared by use of recombinant DNA techniques (e.g., recombinant DNA), as described herein.
  • the present invention also provides methods for generating CRISPR variants. These variants are expressed, isolated, cloned, and/or sequenced using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the CRISPR variants are phage resistant mutant strains that have a modified CRISPR locus with an additional spacer.
  • these variants find use as targets for detection/identification purposes, or for engineering resistance against nucleic acid molecules.
  • these variants find use in the development of biocontrol agents.
  • the CRISPR locus is oriented as described below.
  • the CRISPR leader is a conserved DNA segment of defined size.
  • the orientation of the S. thermophilus CRISPR1 locus is established using the following characteristics:
  • CRISPR-associated sequences genes located downstream of 4 cas genes (genes str0657, str0658, str0659, and str0660 within CNRZ1066 chromosome sequence);
  • This repeat sequence has the potential to form a hairpin secondary structure, although it is not fully palindromic, and the reverse complementary sequence; (5′-GTTGTACAGTTACTTAAATCTTGAGAGTACAAAAAC-3; SEQ ID NO:695) is different from the direct sequence (5′-GTTTTTGTACTCTCAAGATTTAAGTAACTGTACAAC-3; SEQ ID NO:1).
  • the 5′ end of the direct sequence is richer in nucleotides G and T than the 5′ end of the reverse complementary sequence.
  • G-T base pairing is better than A-C base pairing, the hairpin structure is generally stronger on the direct strand; and
  • the position of the terminal repeat is the end repeat which shows sequence variation at its 3′ end is generally the terminal repeat.
  • the CRISPR leader is a conserved DNA segment of defined size which is located immediately upstream of the first repeat.
  • the leader sequence of S. thermophilus CRISPR1 is the DNA segment starting immediately after the stop codon of gene str0660, and ending just before the first repeat.
  • the CRISPR leader is located at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus.
  • the CRISPR leader is located immediately upstream of the first CRISPR repeat of the CRISPR locus.
  • the CRISPR trailer is a conserved DNA segment of defined size, which is located immediately downstream of the terminal repeat.
  • the trailer sequence of S. thermophilus CRISPR1 is the DNA segment starting immediately after the terminal repeat, and ending just before the stop codon of gene str0661 (located on the opposite DNA strand).
  • the CRISPR trailer is located at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus.
  • the CRISPR trailer is located immediately downstream of the terminal repeat.
  • CRISPR leader and CRISPR trailer sequences in the CRISPR1 locus of Streptococcus thermophilus strain CNRZ1066 are:
  • CRISPR leader (SEQ ID NO: 688) 5′-CAAGGACAGTTATTGATTTTATAATCACTATGTGGGTATAAAAA CGTCAAAATTTCATTTGAG-3′
  • CRISPR trailer (SEQ ID NO: 691) 5′-TTGATTCAACATAAAAAGCCAGTTCAATTGAACTTGGCTTT-3′
  • the CRISPR leader corresponds to positions 625038 to 625100
  • the CRISPR trailer corresponds to positions 627845 to 627885 in the full genome (CP000024) of S. thermophilus.
  • the term “upstream” means in the 5′ direction and “downstream” means in the 3′ direction.
  • portion thereof in the context of a CRISPR locus means at least about 10 nucleotides, about 20 nucleotides, about 24 nucleotides, about 30 nucleotides, about 40 nucleotides, about 44 nucleotides, about 50 nucleotides, about 60 nucleotides, about 70 nucleotides, about 80 nucleotides, about 90 nucleotides, about 98 nucleotides or even about 100 or more nucleotides (e.g., at least about 44-98 nucleotides) of a CRISPR locus.
  • the term “portion thereof” means at least about 10 nucleotides, about 20 nucleotides, about 24 nucleotides, about 30 nucleotides, about 40 nucleotides, about 44 nucleotides, about 50 nucleotides, about 60 nucleotides, about 70 nucleotides, about 80 nucleotides, about 90 nucleotides, about 98 nucleotides or about 100 or more nucleotides (e.g., at least about 44-98 nucleotides) from one or both ends (i.e., the 5′ and/or 3′ ends) of a CRISPR locus.
  • the term “portion thereof” refers to at least about the first 44 nucleotides at the 5′ end of a CRISPR locus or about the last 44 nucleotides at the 3′ end of a CRISPR locus.
  • the term “portion thereof” in the context of a CRISPR locus means at least the first about 10 nucleotides, about 20 nucleotides, about 24 nucleotides, about 30 nucleotides, about 40 nucleotides, about 44 nucleotides, about 50 nucleotides, about 60 nucleotides, about 70 nucleotides, about 80 nucleotides, about 90 nucleotides, about 98 nucleotides, or about 100 or more nucleotides (e.g., at least about 44-98 nucleotides) downstream from the first nucleotide of the first CRISPR repeat at the 5′ end of a CRISPR locus or upstream from the last nucleotide of the last CRISPR repeat at the 3′ end of a CRISPR locus.
  • nucleotides e.g., at least about 44-98 nucleotides
  • the term “portion thereof” refers to the at least about the first 44 nucleotides downstream from the first nucleotide of the first CRISPR repeat at the 5′ end of a CRISPR locus or at least about 44 nucleotides upstream from the last nucleotide of the last CRISPR repeat at the 3′ end of a CRISPR locus.
  • the minimum size of the duplicated sequence is about 24 nucleotides and minimum size of the tagging sequence is about 20 nucleotides.
  • the term “portion thereof” in the context of a CRISPR locus means at least 44 nucleotides.
  • the maximum size of the duplicated sequence is about 40 nucleotides and the maximum size of the tagging sequence is about 58 nucleotides.
  • the term “portion thereof” when used in the context of a CRISPR locus means at least about 98 nucleotides. In some preferred embodiments, the term “portion thereof” in the context of a CRISPR locus means at least about 44-98 nucleotides.
  • nucleotides e.g., at least about 44-98 nucleotides downstream from the first nucleotide of the first CRISPR repeat at the 5′ end of a CRISPR locus or upstream from the last nucleo
  • At least about the first 44 nucleotides downstream from the first nucleotide of the first CRISPR repeat at the 5′ end of a CRISPR locus or about at least 44 nucleotides upstream from the last nucleotide of the last CRISPR repeat at the 3′ end of a CRISPR locus are compared.
  • the minimum size of the duplicated sequence is about 24 nucleotides and minimum size of the tagging sequence is about 20 nucleotides. In some preferred embodiments, at least 44 nucleotides are compared. In some alternative embodiments, the maximum size of the duplicated sequence is about 40 nucleotides and the maximum size of the tagging sequence is about 58 nucleotides. In some preferred embodiments, at least 98 nucleotides are compared. In some alternative preferred embodiments, at least about 44-98 nucleotides are compared.
  • CRISPR repeat has the conventional meaning as used in the art (i.e., multiple short direct repeats, which show no or very little sequence variation within a given CRISPR locus). As used herein, in context, “CRISPR repeat” is synonymous with the term “CRISPR.”
  • a CRISPR locus comprises one or more CRISPR repeats than there are CRISPR spacers.
  • the CRISPR repeat corresponds to the repeated sequence within a CRISPR locus.
  • the typical repeat sequence of the S. thermophilus CRISPR1 sequence is:
  • Genbank accession numbers of CRISPR1 sequences include: CP000023, CP000024, DQ072985, DQ072986, DQ072987, DQ072988, DQ072989, DQ072990, DQ072991, DQ072992, DQ072993, DQ072994, DQ072995, DQ072996, DQ072997, DQ072998, DQ072999, DQ073000, DQ073001, DQ073002, DQ073003, DQ073004, DQ073005, DQ073006, DQ073007, DQ073008, and AAGS01000003.
  • a duplicated sequence is derived, derivable, obtained or obtainable from a parent bacterium.
  • the sequence comprises the genomic DNA of a parent bacterium.
  • the duplicated CRISPR repeat e.g., in the same CRISPR locus
  • the number of nucleotides in a repeat is generally about 20 to about 40 base pairs (e.g., 36 base pairs), but in other embodiments is about 20 to about 39 base pairs, about 20 to about 37 base pairs, about 20 to about 35 base pairs, about 20 to about 33 base pairs, about 20 to about 30 base pairs, about 21 to about 40 base pairs, about 21 to about 39 base pairs, about 21 to about 37 base pairs, about 23 to about 40 base pairs, about 23 to about 39 base pairs, about 23 to about 37 base pairs, about 25 to about 40 base pairs, about 25 to about 39 base pairs, about 25 to about 37 base pairs, about 25 to about 35 base pairs, or about 28 or 29 base pairs.
  • base pairs e.g., 36 base pairs
  • the number of nucleotides in a repeat is generally about 20 to about 40 base pairs (e.g., 36 base pairs), but in other embodiments is about 20 to about 39 base pairs, about 20 to about 37 base pairs, about 20 to about 35 base pairs, about 20 to about 33 base pairs, about 20 to about 30
  • the number of nucleotides in a repeat is generally about 20 to about 40 base pairs, but may be about 20 to about 39 base pairs, about 20 to about 37 base pairs, about 20 to about 35 base pairs, about 20 to about 33 base pairs, about 20 to about 30 base pairs, about 21 to about 40 base pairs, about 21 to about 39 base pairs, about 21 to about 37 base pairs, about 23 to about 40 base pairs, about 23 to about 39 base pairs, about 23 to about 37 base pairs, about 25 to about 40 base pairs, about 25 to about 39 base pairs, about 25 to about 37 base pairs, about 25 to about 35 base pairs, or about 28 or 29 base pairs.
  • the number of repeats may range from about 1 to about 140, from about 1 to about 100, from about 2 to about 100, from about 5 to about 100, from about 10 to about 100, from about 15 to about 100, from about 20 to about 100, from about 25 to about 100, from about 30 to about 100, from about 35 to about 100, from about 40 to about 100, from about 45 to about 100, from about 50 to about 100, from about 1 to about 135, from about 1 to about 130, from about 1 to about 125, from about 1 to about 120, from about 1 to about 115, from about 1 to about 110, from about 1 to about 105, from about 1 to about 100, from about 1 to about 95, from about 1 to about 90, from about 1 to about 80, from about 1 to about 70, from about 1 to about 60, from about 1 to about 50, from about 10 to about 140, from about 10 to about 130, from about 10 to about 120, from about 10 to about 110, from about 10 to about 95, from about 10 to about 90, from about 20 to about 80, from about 30 to about 70
  • the number of nucleotides in a repeat is about 20 to about 39 base pairs, about 20 to about 37 base pairs, about 20 to about 35 base pairs, about 20 to about 33 base pairs, about 20 to about 30 base pairs, about 21 to about 40 base pairs, about 21 to about 39 base pairs, about 21 to about 37 base pairs, about 23 to about 40 base pairs, about 23 to about 39 base pairs, about 23 to about 37 base pairs, about 25 to about 40 base pairs, about 25 to about 39 base pairs, about 25 to about 37 base pairs, about 25 to about 35 base pairs, or about 28 or 29 base pairs.
  • the number of repeats ranges from about 1 to about 144, from about 1 to about 100, from about 2 to about 100, from about 5 to about 100, from about 10 to about 100, from about 15 to about 100, from about 20 to about 100, from about 25 to about 100, from about 30 to about 100, from about 35 to about 100, from about 40 to about 100, from about 45 to about 100, from about 50 to about 100, from about 1 to about 135, from about 1 to about 130, from about 1 to about 125, from about 1 to about 120, from about 1 to about 115, from about 1 to about 110, from about 1 to about 105, from about 1 to about 100, from about 1 to about 95, from about 1 to about 90, from about 1 to about 80, from about 1 to about 70, from about 1 to about 60, from about 1 to about 50, from about 10 to about 140, from about 10 to about 130, from about 10 to about 120, from about 10 to about 110, from about 10 to about 95, from about 10 to about 90, from about 20 to about 80, from about 1 to about
  • the number of repeats ranges from about 2 to about 140, from about 2 to about 100, from about 2 to about 100, from about 5 to about 100, from about 10 to about 100, from about 15 to about 100, from about 20 to about 100, from about 25 to about 100, from about 30 to about 100, from about 35 to about 100, from about 40 to about 100, from about 45 to about 100, from about 50 to about 100.
  • the number of repeats ranges from about 2 to about 135, from about 2 to about 130, from about 2 to about 125, from about 2 to about 120, from about 2 to about 115, from about 2 to about 110, from about 2 to about 105, from about 2 to about 100, from about 2 to about 95, from about 2 to about 90, from about 2 to about 80, from about 2 to about 70, from about 2 to about 60, from about 2 to about 50, from about 2 to about 40, from about 2 to about 30, from about 2 to about 20, from about 2 to about 10, from about 2 to about 9, from about 2 to about 8, from about 2 to about 7, from about 2 to about 6, from about 2 to about 5, from about 2 to about 4, or from about 2 to about 3.
  • the CRISPR repeats comprise DNA, while in other embodiments, the CRISPR repeats comprise RNA.
  • the nucleic acid is of genomic origin, while in other embodiments, it is of synthetic or recombinant origin.
  • the CRISPR repeat genes are double-stranded or single-stranded whether representing the sense or antisense strand or combinations thereof.
  • CRISPR repeat genes are prepared by use of recombinant DNA techniques (e.g., recombinant DNA), as described herein.
  • one or more of the CRISPR repeats are used to engineer a cell (e.g., a recipient cell).
  • one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats are used to engineer a cell (e.g., a recipient cell), that in combination with one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more CRISPR spacers modulates the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the CRISPR repeat(s) are inserted into the DNA of a cell (e.g., plasmid and/or genomic DNA of a recipient cell), using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the CRISPR repeat(s) find use as a template upon which to modify (e.g., mutate) the DNA of a cell (e.g., plasmid and/or genomic DNA of a recipient cell), such that CRISPR repeat(s) are created or engineered in the DNA of the cell.
  • the CRISPR repeat(s) are present in at least one construct, at least one plasmid, and/or at least one vector, etc.
  • the CRISPR repeats are introduced into the cell using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the present invention provides methods for identifying a CRISPR repeat for use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: (i) preparing a cell comprising at least one CRISPR spacer and at least one cas gene; (ii) engineering the cell such that it contains a CRISPR repeat; and (iii) determining if the cell modulates resistance against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof, wherein modulation of the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is indicative that the CRISPR repeat can be used to modulate resistance.
  • one or more cas genes or proteins are used together with or in combination with one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats and optionally one or more CRISPR spacers.
  • the cas gene(s) or protein(s) and CRISPR repeat(s) form a functional combination as described below.
  • the CRISPR repeats comprise any of the nucleotides set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1-22.
  • SEQ ID NOS:1-12 are from S. thermophilus
  • SEQ ID NOS:13-16 are from Streptococcus agalactiae
  • SEQ NO:17 is from S. mutans
  • SEQ ID NOS:18-22 are from S. pyogenes .
  • CRISPR spacer encompasses non-repetitive spacer sequences that are found between multiple short direct repeats (i.e., CRISPR repeats) of CRISPR loci.
  • a “CRISPR spacer” refers to the nucleic acid segment that is flanked by two CRISPR repeats. It has been found that CRISPR spacer sequences often have significant similarities to a variety of mobile DNA molecules (e.g., bacteriophages and plasmids).
  • CRISPR spacers are located in between two identical CRISPR repeats.
  • CRISPR spacers are identified by sequence analysis at the DNA stretches located in between two CRISPR repeats.
  • CRISPR spacer is naturally present in between two identical multiple short direct repeats that are palindromic.
  • the CRISPR spacer is homologous to the target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof or an identified sequence.
  • homology can also be considered in terms of similarity, in the context of the present invention it is preferred to express homology in terms of sequence identity.
  • a homologous sequence is taken to include a CRISPR spacer, which may be at least about 70, about 75, about 80, about 85, or about 90% identical, or at least about 91, about 92, about 93, about 94, about 95, about 96, about 97, about 98, or about 99% identical to the target nucleic acid sequence or a transcription product thereof or an identified sequence.
  • the CRISPR spacer is about 100% identical to the target nucleic acid sequence. It is also noted that the number of CRISPR spacers at a given CRISPR loci or locus can vary between species.
  • the number of spacers ranges from about 1 to about 140, from about 1 to about 100, from about 2 to about 100, from about 5 to about 100, from about 10 to about 100, from about 15 to about 100, from about 20 to about 100, from about 25 to about 100, from about 30 to about 100, from about 35 to about 100, from about 40 to about 100, from about 45 to about 100, or from about 50 to about 100.
  • the number of spacers ranges from about 1 to about 135, from about 1 to about 130, from about 1 to about 125, from about 1 to about 120, from about 1 to about 115, from about 1 to about 110, from about 1 to about 105, from about 1 to about 100, from about 1 to about 95, from about 1 to about 90, from about 1 to about 80, from about 1 to about 70, from about 1 to about 60, from about 1 to about 50, from about 1 to about 40, from about 1 to about 30, from about 1 to about 20, from about 1 to about 10, from about 1 to about 9, from about 1 to about 8, from about 1 to about 7, from about 1 to about 6, from about 1 to about 5, from about 1 to about 4, from about 1 to about 3, or from about 1 to about 2.
  • CRISPR spacers are identified by sequence analysis as the DNA stretches located in between two repeats.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions that facilitate the use of one or more cas genes or proteins in combination with one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats suitable to confer specificity of immunity to at least one CRISPR spacer in a recipient cell.
  • at least one cas genes or proteins and at least one CRISPR repeat are used in functional combinations to confer specificity of immunity to at least one CRISPR spacer in a cell.
  • the term “specificity of immunity” means that immunity is conferred against a specific nucleic acid sequence or transcription product thereof, using a specific CRISPR spacer or pseudo-CRISPR spacer sequence. As indicated herein, a given CRISPR spacer does not confer resistance against any nucleic acid sequence or transcription product thereof but only to those sequences against which the CRISPR spacer or pseudo-CRISPR spacer is homologous (e.g., those that are about 100% identical).
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) are obtained from a donor organism that is different from the recipient cell.
  • the donor and recipient cells are different bacterial strains, species, and/or genera.
  • at least one cas genes or proteins and/or at least one CRISPR repeats are obtained from a different organism than the recipient organism.
  • at least two CRISPR repeats are transferred.
  • the CRISPR spacers are obtained from an organism that is heterologous to the recipient or a further donor cell from which the at least one cas genes and/or proteins, and/or at least one CRISPR repeat are obtained.
  • the CRISPR spacers are obtained from an organism that is homologous to the recipient or a further donor cell from which the at least one cas genes and/or proteins, and/or at least one CRISPR repeat are obtained.
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) is/are designed and produced using recombinant methods known in the art. Indeed, it is intended that the CRISPR spacers be produced using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the CRISPR spacers are heterologous to the recipient cell from which at least one cas genes or proteins and/or the at least one, and in some embodiments, preferably, two or more, CRISPR repeats are obtained. In some alternative embodiments, the CRISPR spacers are homologous to the recipient cell from which at least one cas genes or proteins and/or the at least one, and in some embodiments, preferably, two or more, CRISPR repeats are obtained. Indeed, it is intended that any of the elements utilized in the methods be heterologous or homologous.
  • the CRISPR spacer is not naturally associated with the CRISPR repeat and/or cas genes and/or functional CRISPR repeat-cas gene combination. Indeed, it is intended that any combination of heterologous and homologous elements find use in the present invention.
  • the donor and recipient cells are heterologous, while in further embodiments, they are homologous. It is also intended that the elements contained within the donor and recipient cells be homologous and/or heterologous.
  • the elements e.g., CRISPR spacers
  • At least one CRISPR spacer is used to engineer a cell (e.g., a recipient cell).
  • one or more CRISPR spacers are used in combination with one or more cas genes or proteins and/or one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats (in some preferred embodiments, one or more functional combinations thereof are used) to modulate the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof, to produce an engineered cell.
  • CRISPR spacers are used as a template upon which to modify (e.g., mutate) the plasmid and/or genomic DNA of a cell (e.g., a recipient cell), such that CRISPR spacers are created in the DNA of the cell.
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) is/are cloned into at least one construct, plasmid or other vector, with which the recipient cell is then transformed, using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the present invention provides methods for identifying a CRISPR spacer for use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof, comprising the steps of: preparing a cell comprising at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene or protein; identifying at least one CRISPR spacer in an organism (e.g., a donor organism); modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer of the cell such that it has homology to the CRISPR spacer of the donor organism comprising the target nucleic acid; and determining whether the cell modulates resistance against the target nucleic acid, wherein modulation of the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is indicative that the CRISPR spacer modulates the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid.
  • an organism e.g., a donor organism
  • modulation of the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is indicative that the CRISPR spacer modulates the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic
  • the CRISPR spacers comprise or consist of the nucleotide sequence set forth any one or more of in any of SEQ ID NO:23-460 and/or SEQ ID NOS:522-665.
  • SEQ ID NOS:23-339, 359-408, 522-665 are from S. thermophilus
  • SEQ ID NOS:340-358 are from S. vestibularis
  • SEQ ID NOS:409-446 are from S. agalactiae
  • SEQ ID NOS:447-452 are from S. mutans
  • SEQ ID NOS:453-460 are from S. pyogenes .
  • CRISPR spacers are flanked by two CRISPR repeats (i.e., a CRISPR spacer has at least one CRISPR repeat on each side).
  • a CRISPR spacer has at least one CRISPR repeat on each side.
  • one or more of the first 100 CRISPR spacers from the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are modified, while in other embodiments, one or more of the first 50 CRISPR spacers from the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are modified.
  • one or more of the first 40 CRISPR spacers from the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are modified, while in some still further embodiments, one or more of the first 30 CRISPR spacers from the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are modified, and in yet additional embodiments, one or more of the first 20 CRISPR spacers from the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are modified, and in still more embodiments, one or more of the first 15 CRISPR spacers from the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are modified. In some preferred embodiments, one or more of the first 10 CRISPR spacers from the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus are modified. As indicated herein, different bacteria have different numbers of CRISPR spacers, thus in some embodiments, various spacers are modified.
  • the CRISPR spacer is typically represented by a defined predominant length, although the size may vary.
  • CRISPR types described to date have been found to contain a predominant spacer length of between about 20 bp and about 58 bp.
  • CRISPR spacer core refers to the length of the shortest observed spacer within a CRISPR type.
  • CRISPR1 S. thermophilus CRISPR Type 1
  • the dominant spacer length is 30 bp, with a minority of spacers between 28 bp and 32 bp in size.
  • the CRISPR spacer core is defined as a continuous stretch of 28 bp.
  • the CRISPR spacer core is homologous to the target nucleic acid, a transcription product thereof, or an identified sequence over the length of the core sequence.
  • homology is expressed in terms of sequence identity.
  • a homologous sequence encompasses a CRISPR spacer core, which may be at least about 90% identical, or at least about 91, about 92, about 93, about 94, about 95, about 96, about 97, about 98 or about 99% identical to the target nucleic acid sequence, a transcription product thereof, or an identified sequence over the length of the core sequence.
  • the CRISPR spacer core is about 100% identical to the target nucleic acid sequence, transcription product thereof, or an identified sequence over the length of the core sequence.
  • the CRISPR sequences of various S. thermophilus strains were analyzed. Differences in the number and type of spacers were observed primarily at the CRISPR1 locus. Notably, phage sensitivity appeared to be correlated with CRISPR1 spacer content. Specifically, the spacer content was nearly identical between parental strains and phage-resistant derivatives, except for additional spacers present in the latter. These findings suggested a potential relationship between the presence of additional spacers and the differences observed in the phage sensitivity of a given strain. This observation prompted the investigation of the origin and function of additional spacers present in phage-resistant mutants.
  • the term “pseudo-CRISPR spacer” refers to a nucleic acid sequence present in an organism (e.g., a donor organism, including but not limited to bacteriophage), which is preferably essential for function and/or survival and/or replication and/or infectivity, etc., and which comprises a CRISPR spacer sequence.
  • the pseudo-CRISPR spacers find use in producing CRISPR spacer sequences that are complementary to or homologous to the pseudo-CRISPR spacer. In some particularly preferred embodiments, these sequences find use in modulating resistance.
  • At least one pseudo-CRISPR spacer and CRISPR spacer(s) that is/are complementary or homologous to at least one pseudo-CRISPR spacer(s) are used to engineer a recipient cell.
  • at least one pseudo-CRISPR spacers or CRISPR spacer(s) that is/are complementary or homologous to the at least one pseudo-CRISPR spacer(s) are used in combination with one or more cas genes or proteins and/or one or more CRISPR repeats (e.g., one or more functional combinations thereof), to engineer a recipient cell, such that the resistance of the recipient cell is modulated against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the pseudo-CRISPR spacers or CRISPR spacer(s) that is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo-CRISPR spacer(s) are inserted into the plasmid and/or genomic DNA of a recipient cell using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the pseudo-CRISPR spacers are used as a template upon which to modify (e.g., mutate) the plasmid and/or genomic DNA of a recipient cell, such that CRISPR spacers are created in the plasmid and/or genomic DNA of the cell.
  • the pseudo-CRISPR spacers or CRISPR spacer(s) that is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo-CRISPR spacer(s) are cloned into a construct, plasmid and/or vector, etc. is/are introduced into the host cell using any suitable method known in the art.
  • cas gene has the conventional meaning as used in the art and refers to one or more cas genes that are generally coupled, associated or close to or in the vicinity of flanking CRISPR loci.
  • a comprehensive review of the Cas protein family is presented by Haft et al. (Haft et al., PLoS. Comput. Biol., 1(6): e60 [2005]), in which 41 newly recognized CRISPR-associated (cas) gene families are described, in addition to the four previously known gene families.
  • CRISPR systems belong to different classes, with different repeat patterns, sets of genes, and species ranges.
  • the number of cas genes at a given CRISPR locus can vary between species.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions for the use of one or more cas genes or proteins, alone or in any combination with one or more CRISPR spacers for modulating resistance in a cell (e.g., a recipient cell) against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • one or more of the cas genes and/or proteins naturally occur in a recipient cell and one or more heterologous spacers is/are integrated or inserted adjacent to the one or more of the cas genes or proteins.
  • one or more of the cas genes and/or proteins is/are heterologous to the recipient cell and one or more of the spacers is/are homologous or heterologous.
  • the spacers are integrated or inserted adjacent to the one or more of the cas gene or proteins.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions for the use of one or more cas genes or proteins and at least two CRISPR repeats for modulating resistance in a cell (e.g., a recipient cell) against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions for the use of one or more cas genes or proteins, at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one CRISPR spacer for modulating resistance in a cell (e.g., a recipient cell) against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • CRISPR structures are typically found in the vicinity of four genes named cas1 to cas4.
  • the most common arrangement of these genes is cas3-cas4-cas 1-cas2.
  • the Cas3 protein appears to be a helicase, whereas Cas4 resembles the RecB family of exonucleases and contains a cysteine-rich motif, suggestive of DNA binding.
  • Cas1 is generally highly basic and is the only Cas protein found consistently in all species that contain CRISPR loci. Cast remains to be characterized.
  • cas1-4 are typically characterized by their close proximity to the CRISPR loci and their broad distribution across bacterial and archaeal species. Although not all cas1-4 genes associate with all CRISPR loci, they are all found in multiple subtypes.
  • cas1B cas1B
  • cas5 cas5
  • cas6 cas5 and cas6
  • the cas gene is selected from cas1, cas2, cas3, cas4, cas1B, cas5 and/or cas6.
  • the cas gene is cas1.
  • the cas gene is selected from cas1, cas2, cas3, cas4, cas1B, cas5 and/or cas6 fragments, variants, homologues and/or derivatives thereof.
  • a combination of two or more cas genes find use, including any suitable combinations, including those provided in WO 07/025,097, incorporated herein by reference.
  • a plurality of cas genes is provided.
  • the cas genes comprise DNA, while in other embodiments, the cas comprise RNA.
  • the nucleic acid is of genomic origin, while in other embodiments, it is of synthetic or recombinant origin.
  • the cas genes are double-stranded or single-stranded whether representing the sense or antisense strand or combinations thereof.
  • cas genes are prepared by use of recombinant DNA techniques (e.g., recombinant DNA), as described herein.
  • the cas gene comprises a fragment of a cas gene (i.e., this fragment of the cas gene comprises a portion of a wild-type sequence).
  • the sequence comprises at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, or least about 99% of the wild-type sequence.
  • the cas gene is the cas gene that is closest to the leader sequence or the first CRISPR repeat at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus-such as cas4 or cash.
  • the Cas protein is selected from Cas1, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas1B, Cas5 and/or Cas6, as well as fragments, variants, homologues and/or derivatives thereof.
  • the Cas protein is selected from Cas1, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas1B, Cas5 and/or Cas6, and combinations thereof, as described in WO 07/025,097.
  • the Cas protein is selected from one or more of Cas1, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas1B, Cas5 and/or Cas6 or a plurality of same and/or different Cas proteins, in any suitable number and/or combination.
  • Cas protein also encompasses a plurality of Cas proteins (e.g., between about 2 and about 12 Cas proteins, more preferably, between about 3 and about 11 Cas proteins, more preferably, between about 4 and about 10 Cas proteins, more preferably, between about 4 and about 9 Cas proteins, more preferably, between about 4 and about 8 Cas proteins, and more preferably, between about 4 and about 7 proteins genes; such as 4, 5, 6, or 7 Cas proteins).
  • Cas proteins e.g., between about 2 and about 12 Cas proteins, more preferably, between about 3 and about 11 Cas proteins, more preferably, between about 4 and about 10 Cas proteins, more preferably, between about 4 and about 9 Cas proteins, more preferably, between about 4 and about 8 Cas proteins, and more preferably, between about 4 and about 7 proteins genes; such as 4, 5, 6, or 7 Cas proteins).
  • the Cas proteins are encoded by cas genes comprising DNA, while in other embodiments, the cas comprise RNA.
  • the nucleic acid is of genomic origin, while in other embodiments, it is of synthetic or recombinant origin.
  • the cas genes encoding the Cas proteins are double-stranded or single-stranded whether representing the sense or antisense strand or combinations thereof.
  • cas genes are prepared by use of recombinant DNA techniques (e.g., recombinant DNA), as described herein.
  • the present invention also provides methods for identifying a cas gene for use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: preparing a cell comprising at least one CRISPR spacer and at least two CRISPR repeats; engineering the cell such that it comprises at least one cas gene; and determining whether the cell modulates resistance against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof, wherein modulation of the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof is indicative that the cas gene is useful in modulating the resistance of the cell.
  • the present invention provides methods and one or more of the cas genes useful in the engineering of cells (e.g., recipient cells).
  • one or more cas genes are used to engineer a cell (e.g., a recipient cell), that in combination with one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats and one or more CRISPR spacers finds use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the cas gene(s) is/are inserted into the DNA of a cell (e.g., plasmid and/or genomic DNA of a recipient cell) using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the cas genes are used as a template upon which to modify (e.g., mutate) the DNA of a cell (e.g., plasmid and/or genomic DNA of a recipient cell), such that cas genes are created or formed in the DNA of the cell.
  • the cas genes are present in at least one construct, at least one plasmid, and/or at least one vector which is/are then introduced into the cell, using any suitable method known in the art.
  • the cas genes comprise at least one cas cluster selected from any one or more of SEQ ID NOS:461, 466, 473, 478, 488, 493, 498, 504, 509, and 517.
  • the cas genes comprise any one or more of SEQ ID NOS:462-465, 467-472, 474-477, 479-487, 489-492, 494-497, 499-503, 505-508, 510-517, used alone or together in any suitable combination.
  • the cluster(s) is/are used in combination with one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats and optionally one or more CRISPR spacers.
  • one or more cas genes or proteins is/are used in suitable combinations.
  • cas genes or proteins are always associated with a given repeated sequence within a particular CRISPR locus.
  • cas genes or proteins appear to be specific for a given DNA repeat (i.e., cas genes or proteins and the repeated sequence form a functional pair).
  • the term “functional” means that the combination is able to confer resistance to a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof when used together with a CRISPR spacer that aligns with or is homologous to a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the terms “functional CRISPR repeat-cas combination” and “functional CRISPR repeat-cas gene combination” includes a functional combination in which cas is a cas gene or a Cas protein.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or the one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats are derived from the same cell (e.g., the same recipient cell).
  • the term “derivable” is synonymous with the term “obtainable,” as used in context.
  • the term “derivable” is also synonymous with “derived,” as used in context, as it is not intended that the present invention be specifically limited to elements that are “derived.”
  • the term “derived” is synonymous with the term “obtained,” as used in context.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or the one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats are derived from the same CRISPR locus within a genome or plasmid, preferably a genome or plasmid of the same strain, species or genera.
  • one or more cas genes or proteins and/or one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats are derived from the same CRISPR locus within a single genome or plasmid, preferably a single genome or plasmid of the same strain, species or genera.
  • one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats naturally co-occur.
  • the one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats naturally co-occur in the same cell (e.g., recipient cell).
  • one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats naturally co-occur in the same genome of a cell (e.g., recipient cell).
  • one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats naturally co-occur in the same genome of a strain, species or genera.
  • the present invention provides any suitable combination of nucleic acids consisting essentially of at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene or protein.
  • the term “consists essentially of” refers to a combination of at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene or protein and excluding at least one further component of a CRISPR locus (e.g., the absence of one or more CRISPR spacer(s) and/or the absence of one or more common leader sequence(s) of a CRISPR locus).
  • the term “consists essentially of” refers to a combination of at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene or protein only and excluding all other components of a CRISPR locus (e.g., a naturally occurring CRISPR locus).
  • the term “consists essentially of” refers to a combination of at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene or protein only and excluding at least one further component of a CRISPR locus, preferably excluding at least one further component of a naturally occurring CRISPR locus.
  • the term “consists essentially of” refers to a combination of at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene or protein, with the proviso that at least one further component of the natural CRISPR locus is absent (e.g., substantially absent).
  • the present invention provides any suitable combination of at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene or protein, with the proviso that all other components of the CRISPR locus are absent (e.g., substantially absent), preferably that all other components of the CRISPR locus of the natural combination of CRISPR repeat(s) and cas gene(s) are absent.
  • one or more cas genes or proteins are used in combination or together with one or more CRISPR spacers.
  • one or more cas genes or proteins are used in combination or together with at least one or more CRISPR spacers and at least one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats.
  • the CRISPR spacer(s) are or are derived from an organism (e.g., a donor organism) that is different than the cell (e.g., the recipient cell) from which the one or more cas genes or proteins and/or the one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats are derived.
  • CRISPR repeats(s) and cas gene(s) or protein(s), particularly functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations are provided.
  • the combination comprise, consist or consist essentially of at least any of about 9, about 10, about 11, about 12, about 13, about 14, about 15, about 16, about 17, about 18, about 19, or about 20 CRISPR repeat(s) in combination with any of about 1, about 2, about 3, about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, about 10, about 11, about 12, about 13, about 14, about 15, about 16, about 17, about 18, about 19, or about 20 cas genes or proteins (e.g., 16 CRISPR repeat and 12 cas genes or proteins or 18 CRISPR repeats and 20 cas genes or proteins or any other combinations thereof).
  • the present invention provides CRISPR repeat(s) and cas gene(s) arranged in various ways, as provided in WO 07/025,097.
  • the combination of a cas gene and a CRISPR repeat comprises more than one cas gene, it will be understood that the CRISPR repeat is inserted at the 3′ end of the cas genes, the 5′ end of the cas genes, or in between the cas genes, provided that at least one of the cas genes remains functional.
  • a first CRISPR repeat-cas gene or protein combination (comprising at least one cas gene or protein and at least two CRISPR repeats, wherein both are derived from the same CRISPR locus within a genome) are used in combination with a second CRISPR repeat-cas gene or protein combination (comprising at least one cas gene or protein and at least two CRISPR repeats, wherein both are derived from the same or a different CRISPR locus within a genome).
  • the first and second combinations are derived from the same or different CRISPR loci within a genome.
  • the first and second CRISPR repeat-cas gene or protein combinations are from different genomes (e.g., from different genomes within the same cluster), as described in further detail herein.
  • a first and/or a second CRISPR repeat-cas gene or protein combination (comprising at least one cas gene and at least two CRISPR repeats derived from the same CRISPR locus within a genome) are used in combination with about 3, about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, or about 10 or more CRISPR repeat-cas gene or protein combinations (each comprising at least one cas gene or protein and at least two CRISPR repeats derived from the same or a different CRISPR loci within a genome).
  • the combinations are derived from the same or different CRISPR loci within a genome.
  • the combinations are from different genomes (e.g., different genomes within the same cluster), as described in further detail herein.
  • the CRISPR-repeat-cas gene or protein combination to confer resistance
  • the CRISPR-repeat(s) and cas gene(s) or protein(s) naturally co-occur within a given CRISPR locus of a genome.
  • the CRISPR-repeat(s) and cas gene(s) or protein(s) naturally co-occur within the same CRISPR locus of a genome.
  • these functional combinations taken together confer resistance against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention provides methods for identifying a functional combination of a cas gene or protein and a CRISPR repeat comprising the steps of: analyzing the sequences (e.g., nucleic acid or protein sequences) of the cas gene or protein and the CRISPR repeat; identifying one or more clusters of cas genes or proteins; identifying one or more clusters of CRISPR repeats; and combining those cas gene or protein and CRISPR repeat sequences that fall within the same cluster.
  • sequences e.g., nucleic acid or protein sequences
  • the present invention provides methods for identifying a functional combination of a cas gene or protein and a CRISPR repeat for use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof comprising the steps of: preparing a cell comprising a combination of one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats; engineering the cell such that it contains one or more CRISPR spacers; and determining if the cell modulates resistance against a target nucleic acid, wherein modulation of the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof is indicative that the combination can be used to modulate the resistance of the cell against the target nucleic acid.
  • the sequences of the cas gene and/or protein and/or the CRISPR repeat are or derived from the same or different strains, species, genera, and/or organisms.
  • the combination comprises DNA and/or RNA of genomic, recombinant, and/or synthetic origin.
  • the CRISPR repeat(s) comprise(s) DNA and/or RNA of genomic, recombinant and/or synthetic origin.
  • the cas gene(s) comprise(s) DNA and/or RNA of genomic, recombinant and/or synthetic origin. Indeed it is intended that the present invention encompass any combination of DNA and/or RNA for each of the elements (e.g., cas gene and/or CRISPR repeat).
  • the elements are analyzed using any suitable method known in the art. In some preferred embodiments, the analysis is conducted using dotplot analysis.
  • the CRISPR repeat and/or cas gene are double-stranded, while in other embodiments, either are single-stranded, whether representing the sense or antisense strand or combinations thereof.
  • one or more of the functional combinations described herein are used to engineer a cell (e.g., a recipient cell).
  • one or more functional combinations are used to engineer a cell (e.g., a recipient cell), that in combination with one or more CRISPR spacers find use in modulating the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the functional combinations are inserted into the DNA of a recipient cell (e.g., as plasmid or genomic DNA of a cell) using any suitable methods known in the art.
  • the functional combinations are used as a template upon which to modify (e.g., mutate) the DNA of a recipient cell (e.g., plasmid DNA or genomic DNA), such that functional combinations are created in the DNA of the cell.
  • a recipient cell e.g., plasmid DNA or genomic DNA
  • functional combinations are cloned into a construct, plasmid, or vector, etc., which is then transformed into the cell, using methods such as those described herein and known in the art.
  • the functional combination is obtained or obtainable by a method comprising the steps of: analyzing the sequences of a cas gene and a CRISPR repeat; identifying one or more clusters of cas genes; identifying one or more clusters of CRISPR repeats; and combining those cas gene and CRISPR repeat sequences that fall within the same cluster, wherein the combination of the cas gene and CRISPR repeat sequences within the same cluster is indicative that the combination is a functional combination.
  • CRISPR repeat-cas combinations between any cells (e.g., any strains, species or genera of cells), as this does not necessarily result in functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations.
  • the CRISPR repeat-cas combination(s) for the CRISPR repeat-cas combination(s) to be functional, they need to be compatible.
  • the clusters do not follow the “organism” phylogeny. Specifically, within one organism, there may be more than one CRISPR. These CRISPR(s) can belong to different clusters, even though they are present in the same organism. As a result, it is believed that a functional CRISPR repeat-cas combination requires that the combination be switched within a cluster as opposed to within an organism.
  • cluster does not refer to a cluster of genes located at the same locus (typically forming an operon) but to the output from sequence comparison analysis (e.g., multiple sequence comparison analysis and/or multiple sequence alignments and/or dot plot analysis). Accordingly, in some embodiments, cluster analysis of CRISPR loci is performed using various methods that are known in the art (e.g., such as dot-plot analysis as described herein) or multiple alignment followed by dendrogram calculation. In some embodiments, the cluster is a class, a family or a group of sequences.
  • the use of naturally co-occurring CRISPR repeat-cas combination(s) provides for the interchange of the combination both within and between a given species, thereby making it possible to engineer the resistance of one strain using the combination from a different strain.
  • bacteriophage has its conventional meaning as understood in the art (i.e., a virus that selectively infects one or more bacterial species). Many bacteriophages are specific to a particular genus or species or strain of bacteria. In some preferred embodiments, the phages are capable of infecting parent bacteria and/or host cells. In some embodiments, bacteriophages are virulent to the parent bacterium. In some embodiments, the phage are lytic, while in other embodiments, the phage are lysogenic.
  • a lytic bacteriophage is one that follows the lytic pathway through completion of the lytic cycle, rather than entering the lysogenic pathway.
  • a lytic bacteriophage undergoes viral replication leading to lysis of the cell membrane, destruction of the cell, and release of progeny bacteriophage particles capable of infecting other cells.
  • a lysogenic bacteriophage is one capable of entering the lysogenic pathway, in which the bacteriophage becomes a dormant, passive part of the cell's genome through prior to completion of its lytic cycle.
  • Bacteriophages that find use in the present invention include, but are not limited to bacteriophages that belong to any of the following virus families: Corticoviridae, Cystoviridae, Inoviridae, Leviviridae, Microviridae, Myoviridae, Podoviridae, Siphoviridae, or Tectiviridae.
  • bacteriophage that infect bacteria that are pathogenic to plants and/or animals (including humans) find particular use.
  • the resistance of a cell against a bacteriophage is modulated.
  • the bacteriophage of the present invention include, but are not limited to, those bacteriophage capable of infecting a bacterium that naturally comprises one or more CRISPR loci.
  • CRISPR loci have been identified in more than 40 prokaryotes (See e.g., Jansen et al., Mol.
  • the bacteriophage include, but are not limited to, those bacteriophage capable of infecting bacteria belonging to the following genera: Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella, Erwinia, Yersinia, Bacillus, Vibrio, Legionella, Pseudomonas, Neisseria, Bordetella, Helicobacter, Listeria, Agrobacterium, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Treponema, Borrelia, Francisella, Brucella and Xanthomonas.
  • the bacteriophage include, but are not limited to, those bacteriophage capable of infecting (or transducing) lactic acid bacteria, Bifidobacterium, Brevibacterium, Propionibacterium, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus (e.g., L. acidophilus ), Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc , and Oenococcus.
  • the bacteriophage include, but are not limited to, those bacteriophage capable of infecting Lactococcus lacti (e.g., L. lactis subsp. lactis and L. lactis subsp. cremoris , and L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis ), Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.
  • Lactococcus lacti e.g., L. lactis subsp. lactis and L. lactis subsp. cremoris , and L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis
  • Streptococcus thermophilus e.g., Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.
  • Lactobacillus helveticus Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus johnsonii or Bifidobacterium longum.
  • the bacteriophages include, but are not limited to, those bacteriophage capable of infecting any fermentative bacteria susceptible to disruption by bacteriophage infection, including but not limited to processes for the production of antibiotics, amino acids, and solvents.
  • Products produced by fermentation which have been known to experience bacteriophage infection, and the corresponding infected fermentation bacteria include cheddar and cottage cheese ( Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris ), yogurt ( Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus ), Swiss cheese ( S.
  • thermophilus Lactobacillus lactis, Lactobacillus helveticus ), blue cheese ( Leuconostoc cremoris ), Italian cheese ( L. bulgaricus, S. thermophilus ), viili ( Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis, Leuconostoc cremoris ), yakult ( Lactobacillus casei ), casein ( Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris ), natto ( Bacillus subtilis var.
  • the bacteria that find use in the present invention include, but are not limited to S. thermophilus, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and/or L. acidophilus.
  • the bacteriophages include, but are not limited to, those bacteriophages capable of infecting bacteria that comprise one or more heterologous CRISPR loci.
  • the bacteria comprise one or more heterologous CRISPR loci, and/or one or more heterologous cas genes, and/or one or more heterologous CRISPR repeats, and/or one or more heterologous CRISPR spacers.
  • Infection of bacteria by phage results from the injection or transfer of phage DNA into cells.
  • infection leads to expression (i.e., transcription and translation) of the bacteriophage nucleic acid within the cell and continuation of the bacteriophage life cycle.
  • recombinant sequences within the phage genome e.g., reporter nucleic acids
  • CRISPR spacer sequences in prokaryotes often have significant similarities to a variety of DNA molecules, including such genetic elements as chromosomes, bacteriophages, and conjugative plasmids. It has been reported that cells carrying these CRISPR spacers are unable to be infected by DNA molecules containing sequences homologous to the spacers (See, Mojica et al., [2005]).
  • one or more particular pseudo-spacers derived from bacteriophage DNA or CRISPR spacer(s) which is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo-CRISPR spacer(s) are added within a CRISPR locus of a cell (e.g., a recipient cell), in order to modulate (e.g., provide) resistance against a particular bacteriophage, thus substantially preventing phage attack.
  • particular regions within the phage genome are targeted to prepare the pseudo-spacers, including but not limited to genes coding for host specificity proteins, including those that provide particular phage-host recognition, such as helicases, primase, head or tail structural proteins, proteins with a conserved domain (e.g., holing, lysine, and others) or conserved sequences amongst important phage genes.
  • host specificity proteins including those that provide particular phage-host recognition, such as helicases, primase, head or tail structural proteins, proteins with a conserved domain (e.g., holing, lysine, and others) or conserved sequences amongst important phage genes.
  • Any nucleic acid originating from the phage genome may confer immunity against the phage when inserted, for example, between two repeats in an active CRISPR locus.
  • immunity is more “efficient” when the CRISPR spacer corresponds to an internal sequence of a phage gene.
  • immunity is made even more “efficient” when the gene encodes an “essential” protein (e.g. the antireceptor).
  • the present invention provides methods for conferring resistance to a cell (e.g., a bacterial cell) against a bacteriophage comprising the steps of: (a) providing one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers from at least one bacteriophage; (b) identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations in at least one cell that is substantially sensitive to the bacteriophage; and (c) engineering the one or more CRISPR loci in the substantially sensitive cell such that they comprise one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers from a bacteriophage or one or more CRISPR spacer(s) which is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) to render the cell resistant.
  • the present invention provides methods for conferring resistance to a cell (e.g., a bacterial cell) against a bacteriophage comprising the steps of: (a) providing one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers from at least one bacteriophage; (b) identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations in at least one cell that is substantially sensitive to the bacteriophage; and (c) inserting one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers from the bacteriophage or one or more CRISPR spacer(s) which is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) into the substantially sensitive cell such that the cell is rendered substantially resistant to the bacteriophage.
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating the lysotype of a bacterial cell comprising the steps of: (a) providing one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers from at least one bacteriophage; (b) identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations in at least one cell that is substantially sensitive to the bacteriophage; and (c) engineering the one or more CRISPR loci in the substantially sensitive cell such that they comprise one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers from a bacteriophage or one or more CRISPR spacer(s) which is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo CRISPR spacer(s).
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating the lysotype of a bacterial cell comprising the steps of: (a) providing one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers from at least one bacteriophage; (b) identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations in at least one cell that is substantially sensitive to the bacteriophage; and (c) inserting one or more one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers from the bacteriophage or one or more CRISPR spacer(s) which is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) into the substantially sensitive cell.
  • the present invention provides methods for conferring resistance to a cell (e.g., a bacterial cell) against a bacteriophage comprising the steps of: (i) identifying a pseudo CRISPR spacer in a bacteriophage comprising a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof against which resistance is to be modulated; and (ii) modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer of the cell such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has homology to the pseudo CRISPR spacer of the bacteriophage comprising the target nucleic acid.
  • the present invention provides methods for conferring resistance to a cell (e.g., a bacterial cell) against a bacteriophage comprising the steps of: (i) identifying a pseudo CRISPR spacer in a bacteriophage comprising a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof against which resistance is to be modulated; and (ii) modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer of the cell such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has 100% homology or identity to the pseudo CRISPR spacer of the bacteriophage comprising the target nucleic acid.
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating the lysotype of a bacterial cell comprising the steps of: comprising the steps of: (i) identifying a pseudo CRISPR spacer in a bacteriophage comprising a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof against which resistance is to be modulated; and (ii) modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer of the cell such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has homology to the pseudo CRISPR spacer of the bacteriophage comprising the target nucleic acid.
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating the lysotype of a bacterial cell comprising the steps of: (i) identifying a pseudo CRISPR spacer in a bacteriophage comprising a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof against which resistance is to be modulated; and (ii) modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer of the cell such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has 100% homology or identity to the pseudo CRISPR spacer of the bacteriophage comprising the target nucleic acid.
  • the CRISPR spacer of the bacterial cell has 100% homology or identity to a sequence (e.g., as a pseudo CRISPR spacer) in the bacteriophage comprising the target nucleic acid.
  • the CRISPR spacer of the bacterial cell forms a component part of a CRISPR locus comprising a functional CRISPR repeat-cas combination as described herein.
  • the target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof in the bacteriophage is a highly conserved nucleic acid sequence.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof in the bacteriophage is a gene coding for a host specificity protein.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof in the bacteriophage encodes an enzyme that is essential for survival, replication and/or growth of the bacteriophage.
  • the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof in the bacteriophage encodes a helicase, a primase, a head or tail structural protein, or a protein with a conserved domain (e.g., holing, lysine, etc.).
  • bacterial cells are prepared that have “reduced susceptibility to bacteriophage multiplication or infection.” As used herein, this term refers to the bacteria as having a low or no susceptibility to bacteriophage multiplication or infection when compared to the wild-type bacteria when cultured (e.g., in a dairy medium).
  • some bacterial cells exhibit “low susceptibility to bacteriophage multiplication.” This term refers to the level of bacteriophage multiplication in a bacterium being below a level, which would cause a deleterious effect to a culture in a given period of time. Such deleterious effects on a culture include, but are not limited to, no coagulation of milk during production of fermented milk products (e.g., yogurt or cheese), inadequate or slow lowering of the pH during production of fermented milk products (e.g., yogurt or cheese), slow ripening of cheese, and/or deterioration of a food's texture to the point where it is unappetizing or unsuitable for consumption.
  • fermented milk products e.g., yogurt or cheese
  • inadequate or slow lowering of the pH during production of fermented milk products e.g., yogurt or cheese
  • slow ripening of cheese e.g., yogurt or cheese
  • the bacterial susceptibility towards a bacteriophage of the present invention is generally expressed in comparison to the wild-type bacteria.
  • the level of bacteriophage multiplication in a culture is measured after about 14 hours incubation of the culture, more preferably after about 12 hours, even more preferably after about 7 hours, still more preferably after about 6 hours, yet more preferably after about 5 hours, and most preferably after about 4 hours.
  • the present invention provides methods for conferring sensitivity to a cell (e.g., a bacterial cell) against a bacteriophage comprising the steps of: (a) providing a pseudo CRISPR spacer from at least one bacteriophage; (b) identifying one or more functional CRISPR repeat-cas combinations in a cell that is substantially resistant to the bacteriophage; and (c) engineering the one or more CRISPR loci in the substantially sensitive cell such that they comprise one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers or one or more CRISPR spacer(s) which is/are complementary or homologous to the one or more pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) that have a reduced degree of homology as compared to the one or more CRISPR loci in the substantially resistant cell.
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating (e.g., reducing) the lysotype of a cell (e.g., a bacterial cell), comprising one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats comprising the steps of: (i) identifying a pseudo CRISPR spacer in a bacteriophage against which resistance is to be modulated; and (ii) modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer of the cell such that the CRISPR spacer of the cell has a reduced degree of homology to the pseudo CRISPR spacer of the bacteriophage comprising the target nucleic acid.
  • a cell e.g., a bacterial cell
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating (e.g., reducing) the lysotype of a cell (e.g., a bacterial cell), comprising one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats comprising the steps of: (i)
  • the present invention provides methods for modulating (e.g., reducing or decreasing) the resistance of a bacterial cell comprising one or more cas genes or proteins and one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats against a bacteriophage comprising the steps of: (i) identifying one or more pseudo CRISPR spacers in a bacteriophage against which resistance is to be modulated; (ii) identifying a CRISPR spacer in the bacterial cell in which resistance is to be modulated that is homologous to the pseudo CRISPR spacer(s); and (iii) modifying the sequence of the CRISPR spacer in the bacterial cell in which resistance is to be modulated such that the CRISPR spacer has a lower degree of homology to the pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) of the bacteriophage against which resistance is to be modulated.
  • the CRISPR spacer of the cell has a reduced degree of homology (e.g., about 1, about 2, about 3, about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, about 10, about 15, about 20, about 25, about 30, about 35, about 40, about 45, about 50, about 55, about 60, about 65, about 70, about 75, about 80, about 90, or about 95% reduction in homology) as compared to the pseudo CRISPR spacer(s) of the bacteriophage against which resistance is to be modulated.
  • a reduced degree of homology e.g., about 1, about 2, about 3, about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, about 10, about 15, about 20, about 25, about 30, about 35, about 40, about 45, about 50, about 55, about 60, about 65, about 70, about 75, about 80, about 90, or about 95% reduction in homology
  • bacterial cells are prepared using the methods of the present invention such that the cells have an “increased susceptibility to bacteriophage multiplication.”
  • this term refers to bacteria that have an increased or higher susceptibility to bacteriophage multiplication when compared to the wild-type bacteria when cultured (e.g., in a dairy medium).
  • the term “high susceptibility to bacteriophage multiplication” refers to the level of bacteriophage multiplication in a bacterium being above a level, which would cause a deleterious effect to a culture in a given period of time.
  • Such deleterious effects on a culture include, but are not limited to, no coagulation of milk during production of fermented milk products (e.g., yogurt or cheese), inadequate or slow lowering of the pH during production of fermented milk products (e.g., yogurt or cheese), slow ripening of cheese, and/or deterioration of a food's texture to the point where it is unappetizing or unsuitable for consumption.
  • the bacterial susceptibility towards a bacteriophage of the present invention is generally expressed in comparison to the wild-type bacteria.
  • the level of bacteriophage multiplication in a culture is measured after about 14 hours incubation of the culture, more preferably after about 12 hours, even more preferably after about 7 hours, still more preferably after about 6 hours, yet more preferably after about 5 hours, and most preferably after about 4 hours.
  • a CRISPR spacer is flanked by two CRISPR repeats (i.e., a CRISPR spacer has at least one CRISPR repeat on each side).
  • the parent bacterium e.g., “parental bacterial strain”
  • the parental bacterial strain is exposed (e.g., iteratively, sequentially, simultaneously or substantially simultaneously) to more than one bacteriophage (e.g., a mixture of one or more phages).
  • the parental bacterial strain is sensitive to each of the bacteriophages that it is exposed to in the mixture, while in other embodiments, the bacterial strain is sensitive to some of the bacteriophages, but resistant to others.
  • the term “tagging sequence” refers to the portion of an additional DNA fragment that is derived from the genome of one or more bacteriophage (e.g., the plus strand of the genome of the one or more bacteriophage) that the parent bacterium is exposed to in accordance with the methods of the present invention and is used as a label or a tag (e.g., providing a unique label or a unique tag).
  • the tagging sequence is typically a sequence that is a naturally occurring sequence in the bacteriophage.
  • the tagging sequence has at least about 90%, about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98% or about 99% identity to the naturally occurring sequence in the bacteriophage (e.g., the genome of the bacteriophage from which it is derived).
  • the tagging sequence has about 100% identity to the naturally occurring sequence in the bacteriophage (e.g., the genome of the bacteriophage from which it is derived).
  • the tagging sequence has less than about 40%, about 30%, about 20%, about 10%, about 5%, about 4%, about 3%, about 2%, about 1%, or about 0% identity to any other CRISPR spacers or CRISPR spacer cores in the one or more CRISPR loci of the labelled bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence has less than about 40%, about 30%, about 20%, about 10%, about 5%, about 4%, about 3%, about 2%, about 1%, or about 0% identity to any other sequence in the one or more CRISPR loci of the labelled bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence has a sequence that is identical to a sequence (e.g., as a CRISPR spacer) in the CRISPR locus of the bacterium. In some further embodiments, the tagging sequence has a sequence that is identical to a sequence (e.g., a CRISPR spacer) in the CRISPR locus of the bacterium aside from one or more single nucleotide polymorphisms (e.g., one or two single nucleotide polymorphisms).
  • the tagging sequence is at least about 20 nucleotides in length, while in some particularly preferred embodiments it is about 20 to about 58 nucleotides in length
  • At least one tagging sequence is integrated into the parent bacterium.
  • at least one duplicated sequence e.g., a duplicated CRISPR repeat sequence
  • the parent bacterium's genome or one or more of the parent bacterium's plasmids e.g., megaplasmids
  • the at least one duplicated sequence is copied or replicated from the genome of the parent bacterium.
  • typically the CRISPR repeat sequence in a CRISPR locus is duplicated and the tagging sequence is integrated in the bacterium's genome immediately after (i.e., downstream) the new duplicated CRISPR repeat.
  • the at least one duplicated sequence is a CRISPR repeat sequence that has at least about 90%, about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, or about 99% identity to the CRISPR repeats in the one or more CRISPR loci of the parent bacterium and/or labelled bacterium.
  • the at least one duplicated sequence is a CRISPR repeat sequence that has at least about 100% identity to the CRISPR repeats in the one or more CRISPR loci of the parent bacterium and/or labelled bacterium.
  • the duplicated sequence is at least about 24 nucleotides in length, while in some particularly preferred embodiments it is about 24 to about 40 nucleotides in length.
  • At least one tagging sequence and at least one duplicated sequence are integrated into the parent bacterium. It is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular mechanism or theory. However, it is believed that each time a tagging sequence is integrated into the genome of the parent bacterium, this is accompanied by the iterative, sequential, simultaneous or substantially simultaneous integration of at least one duplicated sequence. Accordingly, at least one pair of sequences comprising the tagging sequence and the duplicated sequence are integrated into the parent bacterium, thereby resulting in a labelled bacterium.
  • At least one tagging sequence and at least one duplicated sequence integrate adjacent to each other. More preferably, at least one tagging sequence and at least one duplicated sequence are integrated directly adjacent to each other such that there are no intervening nucleotides between the sequences.
  • the duplicated sequence is attached, linked or fused to one end (e.g., the 5′ or the 3′ end) of the tagging sequence.
  • the duplicated sequence is attached, linked or fused to the 5′ end of the tagging sequence.
  • the duplicated sequence is the first sequence at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus and the tagging sequence will be the second (e.g., the next) sequence in the CRISPR locus, downstream of the duplicated sequence.
  • the sequences are directly attached, directly linked or directly fused such that there are no intervening nucleotides between the duplicated sequence and the tagging sequence.
  • a duplicated sequence and a tagging sequence pair are integrated into the genome of the parent bacterium to give rise to a labelled bacterium.
  • the duplicated sequence is derived, derivable, obtained or obtainable from the parent bacterium's genome and the tagging sequence is derived, derivable, obtained or obtainable from the genome of the bacteriophage that is used to infect the parent bacterium.
  • multiple pairs of sequences are integrated into the genome of the parent bacterium.
  • the multiple pairs comprise a first pair comprising a duplicated sequence and a tagging sequence, and a second pair comprising a second duplicated sequence and a second tagging sequence.
  • the second duplicated sequence typically comprises the same sequence (e.g., greater than about 95%, about 96,%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about 100% identity) as the first duplicated sequence.
  • the tagging sequence typically comprises a different sequence (e.g., less than about 40%, about 30%, about 20%, about 10%, about 5%, about 4%, about 3%, about 2%, about 1%, or about 0% identity) to the first tagging sequence.
  • a different sequence e.g., less than about 40%, about 30%, about 20%, about 10%, about 5%, about 4%, about 3%, about 2%, about 1%, or about 0% identity
  • the configuration of the multiple pairs typically comprises:
  • the tagging sequence integrates adjacent to: (i) a duplicated sequence that is homologous (e.g., identical) to a naturally occurring sequence in the parent bacterium; (ii) a duplicated sequence that is homologous (e.g., identical) to a naturally occurring sequence in the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium; or (iii) most preferably, a duplicated sequence that is homologous (e.g., identical) to a naturally occurring CRISPR repeat in the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence in each of the labelled bacterium presents a different nucleotide sequence, thereby creating a sequence that is unique to each bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence that is integrated into a parent bacterium is apparently randomly selected from the genome of the bacteriophage.
  • the present invention be limited to random integration events.
  • this surprising finding is utilized in the context of the present invention by virtue of the fact that the randomly selected tagging sequence provides a unique tag or label in the labelled bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence that is integrated in independent/distinct experiments is of a different sequence, thereby resulting in a unique label in the labelled bacterium following each exposure.
  • the randomly selected tagging sequence is identified in the labelled bacterium by virtue of one or more of the following properties of the tagging sequence:
  • the tagging sequence is typically located at one and/or both ends (e.g., the 5′ and/or 3′ end, more preferably, the 5′ end) of the CRISPR locus of the labelled bacterium
  • the tagging sequence has a high degree of homology or identity (e.g., 100% identity) to a sequence in the bacteriophage genome that the parent bacterium was exposed to; and/or
  • the tagging sequence is fused, linked or attached to (e.g., directly fused, linked or attached to) at least one sequence (e.g., a CRISPR repeat) that is duplicated from the genome of the parent bacterium.
  • this additional pair of sequences is located at one and/or both ends (e.g., the 5′ and/or 3′ end, preferably, the 5′ end) of the CRISPR locus of the labelled bacterium.
  • one or more tagging sequences and/or the one or more duplicated sequences integrate into the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • one or more duplicated-sequence-tagging sequence pairs as described herein integrate into the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence(s) and/or the duplicated sequence(s) integrate within the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence(s) and/or the duplicated sequence(s) integrate at one or both ends of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence(s) and/or the duplicated sequence(s) integrate at both ends of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium such that the sequences are at the 5′ end and the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus.
  • One of the duplicated sequences will typically be the first sequence at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus and the tagging sequence will be immediately downstream of the duplicated sequence.
  • the other duplicated sequence will be the last sequence at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus and the tagging sequence will be immediately upstream of the duplicated sequence.
  • the tagging sequence(s) and/or the duplicated sequence(s) integrate into one or more CRISPR loci.
  • the tagging sequence(s) and/or the duplicated sequence(s) integrate at one end of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium such that the sequence(s) are at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus.
  • the duplicated sequence will be the last sequence at the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus and the tagging sequence will be immediately upstream of the duplicated sequence.
  • the tagging sequence(s) and/or the duplicated sequence(s) integrate at one end of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium such that the sequences are at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus.
  • the duplicated sequence is the first sequence at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus and the tagging sequence is immediately downstream of the duplicated sequence.
  • the tagging sequence(s) is a strain specific tag in the sense that the tagging sequence that is integrated or inserted from the bacteriophage into the parent bacterium is different each time the parent bacterium (e.g., the same parent bacterium) is exposed to the bacteriophage (e.g., the same bacteriophage).
  • the tagging sequence find use as a unique tag for a given bacterial strain.
  • the tagging sequence(s) and/or the duplicated sequence(s) integrate into one or more different CRISPR loci, while in other embodiments, two or more different tagging sequence(s) and/or duplicated sequence(s) integrate into one CRISPR locus, and is still further embodiments, two or more different tagging sequence(s) and/or duplicated sequence(s) each integrate into two or more different CRISPR loci.
  • Each of the tagging sequences from each of the bacteriophage and/or each of the duplicated sequences (e.g., the duplicated CRISPR repeat) from the parent bacterium may integrate into the same CRISPR locus.
  • each of the tagging sequences and/or each of the duplicated sequences integrate at one or both ends of the same CRISPR locus. In some further embodiments, each of the tagging sequences and/or each of the duplicated sequences integrate at the 5′ and/or the 3′ end of the same CRISPR locus. Preferably, each of the tagging sequences and/or each of the duplicated sequences integrate at the 5′ end of the same CRISPR locus. In some additional embodiments, each of the tagging sequences and/or each of the duplicated sequences from the parent bacterium integrate iteratively, simultaneously or substantially simultaneously.
  • each of the tagging sequences and/or each of the duplicated sequences integrate sequentially, whereby the first tagging sequence and/or the first duplicated sequence is integrated into the parent bacterium.
  • a second tagging sequence from a second bacteriophage and/or another duplicated sequence then integrates into the parent bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence and/or the duplicated sequence integrate into the chromosomal DNA of the parent bacterium.
  • each of the tagging sequences and/or each of the duplicated sequences integrate into one end (e.g., the 5′ end) of the same CRISPR locus adjacent (e.g., next to) each other.
  • each of the tagging sequences and/or duplicated sequences integrate sequentially, whereby the first sequences are integrated into the parent bacterium at one end (e.g., within or at the 5′ and/or the 3′ end) of the CRISPR locus.
  • a second tagging sequence and/or duplicated sequence may then integrate into the parent bacterium adjacent (e.g., directly adjacent) to the first pair of sequences.
  • the second sequences integrate into the parent bacterium adjacent (e.g., directly adjacent) to the 5′ or the 3′ end of the first sequences.
  • the second sequences integrate into the parent bacterium adjacent (e.g., directly adjacent) to the 3′ end of the first sequences and so on.
  • each of the sequences integrate adjacent (e.g., next to) each other within or at the 3′ end and/or at the 5′ end of the same CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • each of the sequences integrate adjacent (e.g., next to) each other at the 5′ end of the same CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • each of the sequences integrate adjacent (e.g., next to) each other upstream of the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium. More preferably, each of the sequences integrate adjacent (e.g., next to) each other upstream of the 5′ CRISPR repeat of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium. Most preferably, each of the sequences integrate adjacent (e.g., next to) each other upstream of the first 5′ CRISPR repeat of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • labelled bacteria and “labelled bacterium” refers to a parent bacterium, parent bacteria, or parental bacterial strain in which one or more CRISPR loci or a portion thereof have been modified (e.g., mutated) in such a way that it is insensitive to the one or more bacteriophage that it has been exposed to.
  • the labelled bacterium is exposed to more than one bacteriophage (e.g., either iteratively, sequentially or simultaneously), such that it accumulates one or more genomic modifications within one or more CRISPR loci in such a way that it becomes insensitive to each of the bacteriophages to which it has been exposed
  • a bacteriophage injects or transfers its nucleic acid into the cell with the phage nucleic acid existing independently of the cell's genome.
  • infection results in the expression (i.e., transcription and translation) of the bacteriophage nucleic acid within the cell and continuation of the bacteriophage life cycle.
  • the labelled bacterium following exposure to the bacteriophage, has a reduced or no susceptibility to bacteriophage infection and/or multiplication when compared to the parent bacterium.
  • the term “reduced susceptibility to bacteriophage infection and/or multiplication” means that the level of bacteriophage infection and/or multiplication in the labelled bacterium does not cause a deleterious effect to the labelled bacterium.
  • a parent bacterium is not killed following exposure to the bacteriophage, due to mutation of the parent bacterium in such a way that it becomes insensitive to the bacteriophage.
  • the labelled bacterium is insensitive or substantially insensitive to further infection and/or multiplication by the bacteriophage. In additional embodiments, the labelled bacterium is insensitive or substantially insensitive to one or more of the mechanisms that the bacteriophage uses to infect and/or multiply in a bacterium. In still further embodiments, the labelled bacterium is insensitive or substantially insensitive to all of the mechanisms that the bacteriophage uses to infect and/or multiply in a bacterium. In yet additional embodiments, the labelled bacterium develops one or more mechanisms that attenuate, inactivate or destroy the bacteriophage during the infection cycle. In some further embodiments, the present invention provides labelled strains selected by standard screening procedures that are known in the art to isolate bacteriophage insensitive mutants.
  • a labelled bacterium comprising a tagging sequence in the CRISPR locus that is not present in the parent bacterium is selected following the comparison of the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the labelled bacterium.
  • a labelled bacterium comprising an additional DNA fragment within or at the 5′ and/or the 3′ end of the CRISPR locus that is not present in the parent bacterium is selected. More preferably, a labelled bacterium comprising a tagging sequence adjacent (e.g., directly adjacent) the 3′ end of a newly duplicated sequence in the CRISPR locus of the labelled bacterium that is not present in the parent bacterium is selected. Most preferably, a labelled bacterium comprising a tagging sequence adjacent (e.g., directly adjacent) the 3′ end of the first CRISPR repeat of the CRISPR locus in the labelled bacterium that is not present in the parent bacterium is selected.
  • the tagging sequence (e.g., the one or more tagging sequences) is isolated and/or cloned. In some further embodiments, the tagging sequence (e.g., the one or more tagging sequences) is sequenced.
  • these embodiments provide advantages, as they not only provide information about the location of the tagging sequence within the CRISPR locus, but also the specific sequence thereof, as well. In some embodiments, this information is stored in a database, thereby providing a unique label for the given bacterium and also a means for subsequently tracking and/or identifying the bacterium.
  • the tagging sequence alone finds use in identifying bacteria. Using various methods that are known in the art and described herein, the sequence and/or location of the tagging sequence are determined. This sequence is then matched against, for example, a bacterial sequence database and/or a bacteriophage sequence database and/or a database or labels/tags in order to identify the bacterium.
  • the term “donor organism” refers to an organism or cell from which the CRISPR repeat and/or cas gene and/or combination(s) thereof and/or CRISPR spacers are derived. These can be the same or different. In some embodiments, the term “donor organism” refers to an organism or cell from which the one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats and/or one or more cas gene and/or combination(s) thereof and/or CRISPR spacers are derived. These can be the same or different. In some embodiments, the CRISPR spacer and/or pseudo CRISPR spacer is synthetically derived.
  • the donor organism or cell comprises one or more CRISPR spacers, which confers the specific of immunity against a target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the donor organism or cell from which the cas gene and/or CRISPR repeat and/or combination thereof is derived is also the recipient cell/organism for the recombinant CRISPR locus. These can be the same or different.
  • the donor organism or cell from which the CRISPR spacer is derived is also the recipient cell/organism for the recombinant CRISPR locus. These can be the same or different.
  • the donor organism typically comprises a CRISPR spacer which confers the specific immunity against the target nucleic acid or transcription product thereof.
  • the organism is a bacterial cell while in other embodiments it is a bacteriophage.
  • host cell refers to any cell that comprises the combination, the construct or the vector and the like according to the present invention.
  • host cells are transformed or transfected with a nucleotide sequence contained in a vector (e.g., a cloning vector).
  • a nucleotide sequence may be carried in a vector for the replication and/or expression of the nucleotide sequence.
  • the cells are chosen to be compatible with the vector and in some embodiments, prokaryotic (e.g., bacterial) cells.
  • the term “recipient cell” refers to any cell in which resistance against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof is modulated or is to be modulated.
  • the recipient cell refers to any cell comprising the recombinant nucleic acid according to the present invention.
  • the recipient cell comprises one or more, preferably, two or more CRISPR repeats and one or more cas genes or proteins.
  • the CRISPR repeats and the cas genes or proteins form a functional combination in the recipient cell, as described herein.
  • the recipient cell comprises one or more modified CRISPR repeats and/or one or more modified cas genes or proteins.
  • the modified CRISPR repeats and/or the modified cas genes or proteins form a functional combination in the recipient cell, as described herein.
  • the recipient cell comprises one or more genetically engineered CRISPR repeats and/or one or more genetically engineered cas genes or proteins.
  • the genetically engineered CRISPR repeats and/or the genetically engineered cas genes or proteins form a functional combination in the recipient cell, as described herein.
  • the recipient cell comprises one or more recombinant CRISPR repeats and/or one or more recombinant cas genes or proteins.
  • the recombinant CRISPR repeats and/or the recombinant cas genes or proteins form a functional combination in the recipient cell, as described herein.
  • the recipient cell comprises one or more naturally occurring CRISPR repeats and one or more naturally occurring cas genes or proteins.
  • the CRISPR repeats(s) and the cas gene(s) or proteins form a functional combination.
  • the recipient cell comprises combinations of one or more modified, genetically engineered, recombinant or naturally occurring CRISPR repeats and one or more modified, genetically engineered, recombinant or naturally occurring cas genes or proteins.
  • the one or more modified, genetically engineered, recombinant or naturally occurring CRISPR spacer(s) or the one or more modified, genetically engineered, recombinant or naturally occurring cas gene(s) or proteins form a functional combination.
  • the recipient cell is a prokaryotic cell. In some preferred embodiments, the recipient cell is a bacterial cell. Suitable bacterial cells are described herein. In some embodiments, the bacterial cell is selected from a lactic acid bacteria species, a Bifidobacterium species, a Brevibacterium species, a Propionibacterium species, a Lactococcus species, a Streptococcus species, a Lactobacillus species including the Enterococcus species, Pediococcus species, a Leuconostoc species and Oenococcus species. Suitable species include, but are not limited to Lactococcus lactis , including Lactococcus lactis subsp.
  • the bacterial cell is used for the fermentation of meat (including beef, pork, and poultry) including, but not limited to, lactic acid bacteria, Pediococcus cerevisiae, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis, Micrococcus species, Lactobacillus sakei, Lactobacillus curvatus, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Staphylococcus xylosus and Staphylococcus vitulinus and mixtures thereof, as known in the art.
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • meat including beef, pork, and poultry
  • the bacterial cell is used for the fermentation of vegetables (e.g., carrots, cucumbers, tomatoes, peppers, and cabbage) including, but not limited to, Lactobacillus plantatum, Lactobacillus brevis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Pediococcus pentosaceus , and mixtures thereof, as known in the art.
  • the bacterial cell is used for the fermentation of dough formed from cereals (e.g., wheat, rye, rice, oats, barley, and corn).
  • the bacterial cell is used for the production of wine. Typically, this is achieved by the fermentation of fruit juice, typically grape juice.
  • the bacterial cell is used for the fermentation of milk to produce cheese (e.g., Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus helveticus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium , and Enterococcus , etc. and mixtures thereof), as known in the art.
  • cheese e.g., Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus helveticus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis bio
  • the bacterial cell is used for the fermentation of egg (e.g., Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus plantarum , and mixtures thereof), as known in the art. In some further embodiments, the bacterial cell is used in cosmetic or pharmaceutical compositions.
  • egg e.g., Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus plantarum , and mixtures thereof.
  • the bacterial cell is used in cosmetic or pharmaceutical compositions.
  • the cell in which resistance is to be modulated is a bacterium that naturally comprises one or more CRISPR loci.
  • CRISPR loci have been identified in more than 40 prokaryotes (See, Haft et al., 2005, supra) including, but not limited to Aeropyrum, Pyrobaculum, Sulfolobus, Archaeoglobus, Halocarcula, Methanobacterium, Methanococcus, Methanosarcina, Methanopyrus, Pyrococcus, Picrophilus, Thermoplasma, Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Streptomyces, Aquifex, Porphyromonas, Chlorobium, Thermus, Bacillus, Listeria, Staphylococcus, Clostridium, Thermoanaerobacter, Mycoplasma, Fusobacterium, Azarcus, Chromobacterium, Neisseria, Nitrosomonas, Desulfovibrio, Geobacter, Myx
  • parent bacterium refers to any bacterium/bacteria/strains that is/are exposed to one or more bacteriophage(s).
  • the bacteriophage are virulent for the parent bacterial strain, while in other embodiments, they are non-virulent.
  • the parent bacteria are sensitive to the virulent phage.
  • the parental strain is infected by the bacteriophage.
  • the infection by phage renders the parent bacterium/bacteria/strain or a subpopulation thereof insensitive to further infection by the bacteriophage.
  • the infection of a “parent bacterium” by one or more bacteriophage results in the creation of a labelled strain that can be selected based on its insensitivity to the bacteriophage.
  • “bacteriophage resistant mutant” are bacteria that are tagged or labelled according to the methods of the present invention.
  • the parent bacteria are wild-type bacterial strains.
  • the parent bacteria are wild-type strains of bacteria that have not been previously infected with any bacteriophage.
  • the parent bacteria are wild-type strains of bacteria that have not been previously tagged or labelled, while in some alternative embodiments, the patent bacteria are bacteriophage resistant mutants that have been previously tagged or labelled.
  • the parent bacterium is selected from any bacterium that naturally comprises one or more CRISPR loci.
  • CRISPR loci have been identified in more than 40 prokaryotes (See, Haft et al., [2005], supra) including, but not limited to Aeropyrum, Pyrobaculum, Sulfolobus, Archaeoglobus, Halocarcula, Methanobacterium, Methanococcus, Methanosarcina, Methanopyrus, Pyrococcus, Picrophilus, Thermoplasma, Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Streptomyces, Aquifex, Porphyromonas, Chlorobium, Thermus, Bacillus, Listeria, Staphylococcus, Clostridium, Thermoanaerobacter, Mycoplasma, Fusobacterium, Azarcus, Chromobacterium, Neisseria, Nitrosomonas, Desulfovibrio, Geobacter
  • the parent bacterium comprises one or more heterologous CRISPR spacers, one or more heterologous CRISPR repeats, and/or one or more heterologous cas genes. In some alternative embodiments, the parent bacterium comprises one or more heterologous CRISPR loci, preferably, one or more complete CRISPR loci. In some further embodiments, the parent bacterium naturally comprises one or more CRISPR loci and also comprises one or more heterologous CRISPR spacers, one or more heterologous CRISPR repeats, and/or one or more heterologous cas genes. In some additional embodiments, the parent bacterium naturally comprises one or more CRISPR loci and also comprises one or more heterologous CRISPR loci, preferably, one or more complete CRISPR loci.
  • the phage-resistant subpopulation created by exposure of the parent bacteria to at least one phage is a pure culture.
  • the present invention be limited to pure cultures of bacterial strains, variants, or phage.
  • the present invention encompasses mixed cultures of cells and phage.
  • the mixed culture is a mix of different mutants corresponding to different integration events at the same and/or at different CRISPR loci.
  • preferred parental bacterial genera are Streptococcus and Lactobacillus . Indeed, it is intended that any bacterial species will find use in the present invention, including but not limited to Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella, Erwinia, Yersinia, Bacillus, Vibrio, Legionella, Pseudomonas, Neisseria, Bordetella, Helicobacter, Listeria, Agrobacterium, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Treponema, Borrelia, Francisella, Brucella, Bifidobacterium, Brevibacterium, Propionibacterium, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Oenococcus , and/or Xanthomonas .
  • the parent bacteria are or are derived from lactic acid bacteria, including but not limited to Bifidobacterium, Brevibacterium, Propionibacterium, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus (e.g., L. acidophilus ), Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc , and/or Oenococcus .
  • the parent bacteria are or are derived from Lactococcus lactis (e.g., L. lactis subsp. lactis and L. lactis subsp. cremoris , and L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis ), L.
  • the parent bacterium is a “food-grade bacterium” (i.e., a bacterium that is used and generally regarded as safe for use in the preparation and/or production of food and/or feed).
  • the parent bacterium is suitable for use as a starter culture, a probiotic culture, and/or a dietary supplement.
  • the parent bacterium finds use in the fermentation of meat (e.g., beef, pork, lamb, and poultry) including, but not limited to, lactic acid bacteria, Pediococcus cerevisiae, Lactobacillus plantarum, L. brevis, L. sakei, L.
  • the parent bacterium finds use in the fermentation of vegetables (e.g., carrots, cucumbers, tomatoes, peppers, and cabbage) including, but not limited to, L. plantatum, L.
  • the parent bacterium finds use in the fermentation of dough formed from cereals (e.g., wheat, rye, rice, oats, barley, and corn).
  • the parent bacterium finds use in the production of wine through fermentation of fruit juice (e.g., grape juice).
  • parent bacterium finds use in the fermentation of milk (e.g., L.
  • the parent bacterium find use in the production of cheese, including but not limited to L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, L. helveticus, L. lactis subsp. lactis, L lactis subsp. cremoris, L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis, S.
  • thermophilus Bifidobacterium Enterococcus , etc., and mixtures thereof (See e.g., Knorr, supra, and Pederson, supra, at 135-51).
  • the parent bacterium finds use in the fermentation of eggs, including but not limited to Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus plantarum , and mixtures thereof (See, Knorr, supra).
  • the parent bacterium is finds use in fermentation to produce various products, including but not limited to cheddar and cottage cheese (e.g., L. lactis subsp. lactis, L. lactis subsp. cremoris ), yogurt ( L. delbrueckii subsp.
  • the parent bacterial species are selected from S. thermophilus, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and/or L. acidophilus.
  • the parent bacteria find use in methods including but not limited to antibiotic production, amino acid production, solvent production, and the production of other economically useful materials.
  • the parent bacteria find use in cosmetic, therapeutic, and/or pharmaceutical compositions.
  • the compositions have particular activities, including but not limited to regenerating the skin, including but not limited to anti-wrinkle properties, erasing old scars, repairing burn-damaged tissues, promoting skin healing, eliminating pigmentary spots, etc.
  • the compositions either promote or inhibit the growth of nails, hair or hairs.
  • the compositions comprise at least one microbial culture and/or labelled bacterium and/or a cell culture produced using the methods and compositions of the present invention
  • the parent bacteria are bacteriophage insensitive mutants.
  • the parent bacteria are insensitive to one or more bacteriophage.
  • the parent bacterium is not a bacteriophage insensitive mutant for the bacteriophage that it is to be exposed to during use of the present invention.
  • Starter cultures are used extensively in the food industry in the manufacture of fermented products including milk products (e.g., yoghurt and cheese), as well as meat products, bakery products, wine and vegetable products.
  • milk products e.g., yoghurt and cheese
  • meat products e.g., bakery products, wine and vegetable products.
  • Starter cultures used in the manufacture of many fermented milk, cheese and butter products include cultures of bacteria, generally classified as lactic acid bacteria. Such bacterial starter cultures impart specific features to various dairy products by performing a number of functions.
  • mother cultures Commercial non-concentrated cultures of bacteria are referred to in industry as “mother cultures,” and are propagated at the production site, for example a dairy, before being added to an edible starting material, such as milk, for fermentation.
  • the starter culture propagated at the production site for inoculation into an edible starting material is referred to as the “bulk starter.”
  • Suitable starter cultures for use in the present invention include any organism which is of use in the food, cosmetic or pharmaceutical industry (i.e., “industrially useful cultures” or “industrially useful strains”).
  • Starter cultures are prepared by techniques well known in the art (See e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,621,058, incorporated herein by reference).
  • starter cultures are prepared by the introduction of an inoculum, for example a bacterium, to a growth medium (e.g., a fermentation medium or product) to produce an inoculated medium and incubating the inoculated medium to produce a starter culture.
  • an inoculum for example a bacterium
  • a growth medium e.g., a fermentation medium or product
  • Dried starter cultures are prepared by techniques well known in the art (See e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,423,079 and 4,140,800). Any suitable form of dried starter cultures find use in the present invention, including solid preparations (e.g., tablets, pellets, capsules, dusts, granules and powders) which are wettable, spray-dried, freeze-dried or lyophilized.
  • the dried starter cultures for use in the present invention are in either a deep frozen pellet form or freeze-dried powder form.
  • Dried starter cultures in a deep frozen pellet or freeze-dried powder form are prepared according to any suitable method known in the art.
  • the starter cultures used in the present invention are in the form of concentrates which comprise a substantially high concentration of one or more bacterial strains.
  • the concentrates are diluted with water or resuspended in water or other suitable diluents, (e.g., an appropriate growth medium, mineral oil, or vegetable oil).
  • suitable diluents e.g., an appropriate growth medium, mineral oil, or vegetable oil.
  • the dried starter cultures of the present invention in the form of concentrates are prepared according to the methods known in the art (e.g., centrifugation, filtration or a combination of such techniques).
  • the starter culture is suitable for use in the dairy industry.
  • the starter culture is often selected from a lactic acid bacteria species, a Bifidobacterium species, a Brevibacterium species, a Propionibacterium species.
  • Suitable starter cultures of the lactic acid bacteria group include commonly used strains of a Lactococcus species, a Streptococcus species, a Lactobacillus species including the Lactobacillus acidophilus, Enterococcus species, Pediococcus species, a Leuconostoc species and Oenococcus species.
  • Lactococcus species include the widely used Lactococcus lactis , including Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris.
  • lactic acid bacteria species include Leuconostoc sp., Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Lactobacillus helveticus .
  • probiotic strains e.g., Lactococcus species
  • Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris Lactococcus lactis, Leuconostoc sp.
  • Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar Streptococcus thermophilus
  • Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Lactobacillus helveticus .
  • probiotic strains such as Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei are added during manufacturing to enhance flavour or to promote health.
  • Cultures of lactic acid bacteria commonly used in the manufacture of cheddar and monterey jack cheeses include Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris or combinations thereof.
  • Thermophilic cultures of lactic acid bacteria commonly used in the manufacture of Italian cheeses such as pasta filata or parmesan include Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus .
  • Other Lactobacillus species e.g., Lactobacillus helveticus ) are added during manufacturing to obtain a desired flavour.
  • the starter culture organism comprises or consists of a genetically modified strain prepared according to the methods provided herein, of one of the above lactic acid bacteria strains or any other starter culture strain.
  • the selection of organisms for the starter culture of the invention will depend on the particular type of products to be prepared and treated. Thus, for example, for cheese and butter manufacturing, mesophillic cultures of Lactococcus species, Leuconostoc species and Lactobacillus species are widely used, whereas for yoghurt and other fermented milk products, thermophillic strains of Streptococcus species and of Lactobacillus species are typically used.
  • the starter culture is a dried starter culture, a dehydrated starter culture, a frozen starter culture, or a concentrated starter culture. In some embodiments, the starter culture is used in direct inoculation of fermentation medium or product.
  • the starter culture comprises a pure culture (i.e., comprising only one bacterial strain). In some alternative embodiments, the starter culture is a mixed culture (i.e., comprising at least two different bacterial strains).
  • Particularly suitable starter cultures in particular dried starter cultures, for use in the present invention comprise lactic acid bacteria.
  • lactic acid bacteria refers to Gram positive, microaerophillic or anaerobic bacteria which ferment sugar with the production of acids including lactic acid as the predominantly produced acid, acetic acid, formic acid and propionic acid.
  • the industrially most useful lactic acid bacteria are found among Lactococcus species, such as Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus species, Bifidobacterium species, Streptococcus species, Leuconostoc species, Pediococcus species and Propionibacterium species.
  • the starter cultures of the present invention may comprise one or more lactic acid bacteria species such as, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus or combinations thereof.
  • Lactic acid bacteria starter cultures are commonly used in the food industry as mixed strain cultures comprising one or more species.
  • mixed strain cultures such as yoghurt starter cultures comprising strains of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus
  • yoghurt starter cultures comprising strains of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus
  • a symbiotic relationship exists between the species wherein the production of lactic acid is greater compared to cultures of single strain lactic acid bacteria (See e.g., Rajagopal et al., J. Dairy Sci., 73:894-899 [1990]).
  • Suitable products for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, a foodstuffs, cosmetic products or pharmaceutical products. Any product, which is prepared from, or comprises, a culture is contemplated in accordance with the present invention. These include, but are not limited to, fruits, legumes, fodder crops and vegetables including derived products, grain and grain-derived products, dairy foods and dairy food-derived products, meat, poultry, seafood, cosmetic and pharmaceutical products.
  • the term “food” is used in a broad sense and includes feeds, foodstuffs, food ingredients, food supplements, and functional foods.
  • the term “food ingredient” includes a formulation, which is or can be added to foods and includes formulations which can be used at low levels in a wide variety of products that require, for example, acidifying or emulsifying.
  • the term “functional food” means a food which is capable of providing not only a nutritional effect and/or a taste satisfaction, but is also capable of delivering a further beneficial effect to consumer. Although there is no legal definition of a functional food, most of the parties with an interest in this area agree that there are foods marketed as having specific health effects.
  • the term “food” covers food for humans as well as food for animals (i.e., a feed). In a preferred aspect, the food is for human consumption.
  • the cells described herein comprise or are added to a food ingredient, a food supplement, or a functional food.
  • the food is in a liquid form (e.g., a solution), gel, emulsion, or solid, as called for by the mode of application and/or administration.
  • the cells described herein find use in the preparation of food products such as one or more of: confectionery products, dairy products, meat products, poultry products, fish products and bakery products.
  • the bacteria find use as ingredients to soft drinks, fruit juices, beverages comprising whey protein, health teas, cocoa drinks, milk drinks, lactic acid bacteria drinks, yoghurt, drinking yoghurt, and wine, etc.
  • a method of preparing a food comprising admixing the cells according to the present invention with a food ingredient (such as a starting material for a food).
  • a food ingredient such as a starting material for a food.
  • a food as described herein is a dairy product.
  • the dairy product is yoghurt, cheese (e.g., acid curd cheese, hard cheese, semi-hard cheese, cottage cheese, etc.), buttermilk, quark, sour cream, kefir, crème fraiche, fermented whey-based beverage, koumiss, milk drink, or yoghurt drink.
  • the term term “food” is very broad sense, as it is intended to cover food for humans as well as food for non-human animals (i.e., feed). In some preferred embodiments, the food is for human consumption.
  • feed includes raw and processed plant material and non-plant material. The term encompasses any feed suitable for consumption by an animal, including, but not limited to livestock, poultry, fish, crustacean, and/or pets.
  • phage resistance involving the CRISPR-cas genes as well as their role in resistance to incoming alien DNA and on the role of the spacers inserted within the CRISPR on the specificity of this resistance, have been elucidated.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions for the development of phage-resistant strains and starter cultures.
  • a parental strain “A” is exposed to phage “P” and a phage resistant variant (Variant “A1.0”) selected.
  • Variant A1.0 is analyzed (for example by PCR, and/or DNA sequencing) to confirm the presence of an additional inserted spacer within a CRISPR locus.
  • spacer Sp1.0 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage P, and gives resistance to phage P and related phages (“related phages” are those containing the sequence of the spacer in their genomes, and define a family of phages).
  • variant A2.0 Independently from the first phage exposure, the same parental strain A is exposed to the same phage P and a second phage resistant variant (Variant A2.0) is selected.
  • Variant A2.0 is selected in order to also have an additional spacer inserted (Spacer Sp2.0) within a CRISPR locus but with the sequence of spacer Sp2.0 being different from that of spacer Sp1.0.
  • spacer Sp2.0 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage P, and gives resistance to phage P and related phages.
  • variant A3.0 to variant Ax.0 are generated through the exposure of the same strain A to the same phage P.
  • All the “A” variants are selected in order to also have an additional spacer inserted (Spacer Sp3.0 to Spx.0) within a CRISPR locus but with the sequence of all the “Sp” spacers being different from each of the others.
  • “Sp” spacers are fragments of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage P, and all give resistance to phage P and related phages.
  • the level of resistance will be approximately that of a single mutation occurring within the phage genome within the sequence corresponding to the spacer (i.e., roughly 10 ⁇ 4 to 10 ⁇ 6 ). Consequently, phage resistant strains that accumulate different spacers within the CRISPR locus have an increased level of resistance to the phage containing the sequence of these spacers within their genome (i.e., since multiple single mutations need to occur within the phage genome).
  • the second level variants are produced by isolating a mutated phage through exposure of variant A1.0 to phage P.
  • this mutated phage (phage P1.0) has a mutation (deletion, point mutation, etc.) in its genome within the region containing the sequence of spacer Sp1.0.
  • Variant A1.0 is sensitive to phage P1.0. Then, variant A1.0 is exposed to phage P1.0 and a phage resistant variant (Variant A1.1) selected (See, FIG. 15 ).
  • Variant A1.1 is also selected such that it has an additional spacer inserted (Spacer Sp1.1) within a CRISPR locus but with the sequence of spacer Sp1.1 being different from that of spacers Sp1.0, Sp2.0 to Spx.0.
  • spacer Sp1.1 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage P1.0, and will give resistance to phage P1.0 and related phages.
  • Variant A1.1 is resistant to phage P1.0 and preferably, has an increased resistance to phage P because of the accumulation of spacer Sp1.0 and Sp1.1.
  • a newly mutated phage (phage P1.1) is generated through exposure of variant A 1.1 to phage P1.0. Then, upon exposure of variant A1.1 to phage P1.1 a new variant A 1.2 is obtained that contains one new additional spacer (Sp1.2).
  • This spacer gives resistance to phage P1.1 and preferably increases the resistance to phage P1.0 and P (i.e., due to the accumulation of spacers Sp1.0, Sp1.1, Sp1.2).
  • different spacers e.g., 2, 3 or 4 are iteratively accumulated within strain A through variant A1, then variant A1.1, then variant A1.2, etc to obtain a variant highly resistant to phages (variant A1.n).
  • additional different spacers can be accumulated in the same strain through variant A2, then variant A2.1, then variant A2.2, etc to generate another variant of strain A highly resistant to phages (variant A2.n) in parallel.
  • strains that are resistant to more than one family of phages are provided.
  • phages P, Q, and R are representative phages from three families of phages able to infect strain A.
  • variants resistant to all three phage families are produced.
  • phage P is used to generate variant A1 p (containing spacer Sp1) that is resistant to phage P.
  • variant A1 p is exposed to phage Q and a phage resistant variant (Variant A1 pq ) is selected.
  • Variant A1 pq has one additional spacer (Sq1) inserted within a CRISPR locus.
  • spacer Sq1 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage Q, and gives resistance to phage Q and related phages.
  • Variant A1 pq is resistant to both P and Q phages.
  • variant A1 pq is exposed to phage R and a phage resistant variant (Variant A1 pqr ) is selected.
  • Variant A1 pqr has a third additional spacer (Sr1) inserted within a CRISPR locus.
  • Sr1 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage R, and also gives resistance to phage R and related phages.
  • Variant A1 pqr is resistant to all three phages. In some particularly preferred embodiments, the variant is also resistant to related phages.
  • the above methods are used in combination to produce increased and expanded resistance to phages.
  • these variants have high resistances to multiple phage families.
  • strains are produced that are resistant to particular phages or families of phages that are problematic in particular factories and/or fermenters.
  • the present invention is based, in part, on the surprising finding that cas genes or proteins are required for immunity against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the present invention be limited to any particular mechanism, function, nor means of action.
  • one or more cas genes or proteins are associated with two or more CRISPR repeats within CRISPR loci.
  • cas genes or proteins appear to be specific for a given DNA CRISPR repeat, meaning that cas genes or proteins and the repeated sequence form a functional pair.
  • one or more CRISPR spacers find use together with one or more of these functional pairs (i.e., CRISPR repeats and cas genes) in order to modulate the resistance of a cell against a target nucleic acid or a transcription product thereof.
  • the CRISPR repeat(s) and the cas gene(s) or proteins form a functional combination (i.e., the CRISPR repeat(s) and the cas gene(s) or proteins are compatible).
  • the present invention provides cas genes/proteins that influence resistance of bacteria to phages.
  • the present invention provides at least two CRISPR repeats and at least one cas gene/protein useful in predicting, determining and/or modifying bacterial resistance to phages.
  • the present invention provides methods for modifying the lysotype (i.e., the resistance/sensitivity to various phages) of bacteria. Consequently, identification and detection of CRISPR loci in cells and phages provides means to determine, predict and modify the resistance profile of cells, as well as phage-host interactions.
  • the application of one or more CRISPR loci, two or more CRISPR repeats, one or more cas genes or proteins and/or one or more CRISPR spacers in genetic engineering provides means to produce resistant or sensitive variants of cells for use within a wide variety of applications in the biotechnology industry.
  • phages are natural parasites of bacteria that may develop during fermentation. Upon infection by phages, bacteria are killed, which impairs the fermentation process. In dairy fermentation, these phage infections often have major economic impacts, ranging from a reduced quality of the fermented product up to the complete loss of the product.
  • set of isogenic strains defines strains that are identical from a chromosomal point of view but that each differs by the presence of one or more phage resistance mechanisms that are plasmid-borne.
  • a strain which is ideally of a different lysotype (i.e., with a different spectrum of sensitivity to phages) is used in replacement for the fermentation. Due to this different lysotype, the second strain is not affected by the phages that stay dormant in the environment. Most of the population of dormant phages are then be washed out by successive fermentation and sanitation, and eradicated by the time the first strain is used again for the fermentation, if the system works as intended.
  • the present invention provides improved methods and compositions suitable for addressing these problems in the fermentation industry. Indeed, the present invention provides methods and compositions for the fermentation industry, and in particular the dairy industry with a selection of strains suitable to fulfill the needs of phage defence rotation strategies. In addition, the present invention provides methods and compositions suitable to customize strains having lysotypes that are adapted to a particular phage environment. In particular, the present invention provides methods and compositions suitable for directing the evolution of a given strain to various lysotypes, in order to produce strains that differ from each others only by their spectrum of phage sensitivity (lysotype). This difference of lysotype is a function of the CRISPR-cas system, as described herein.
  • different lysotypes are obtained through the “modulation” of phage resistance.
  • strains of this type have identical metabolism (e.g., of carbon, nitrogen, etc.) and thus identical functionalities (e.g., acidification, flavour, texture, etc.). This provides means for amplifying the construction of starter rotation.
  • industrial processability of the phage resistant strain are identical (e.g., nutrition needs, resistance to processing operation, etc.), thus reducing the need of development of specific production processes.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions suitable for minimizing fermentation failures due to phage attack.
  • methods and compositions are provided for the production of highly phage resistant starter cultures, by the association of multiple phage resistant strains differing by their lysotype.
  • methods and compositions are provided to produce starter cultures with strictly identical industrial functionalities to be used in rotation dairy fermentation.
  • methods and compositions are provided that are suitable to replace existing starters by preventing frequent phage attacks in dairy plants, by introducing a new bacterial strain that is resistant to the phages involved in these phage attack.
  • these methods and compositions are used iteratively, in order to combat sequential phage attacks.
  • the starter culture is a mixed bacterial culture.
  • the starter comprises equal amounts of multiple (i.e., at least 2) phage resistant variants that only differ in their CRISPRs and their sensitivity to phages.
  • these variants are of the first level of phage resistant variants (e.g., variants A1.0 plus A2.0, as described above).
  • the variants are selected from those in the second level of phage resistant variants (e.g., variants A1.4 plus A2.4, as described above).
  • the variants are selected among the third level of phage resistant variants. In such mixed bacterial cultures, when one of the variants is attacked by a given phage the other variants are not be attacked by the phage, due to their different phage sensitivities and the fermentation is not adversely affected.
  • a principal starter and a back-up starter are used.
  • the principal starter is composed of a single strain.
  • this strain is of the first level of phage resistant variants, while in other preferred embodiments the strain is of the second level, and in still other more preferred embodiments, the strain is of the third level.
  • the back up starter is based on a phage resistant variant obtained independently from the same parental strain. This second phage resistant variant differs from the other variant by its CRISPRs and is of the first level of phage resistant variants, while in other preferred embodiments the strain is of the second level, and in still other more preferred embodiments, the strain is of the third level.
  • the principal starter is made of variant A1.4 and the back-up starter is made of strain A2.4. Upon first appearance of a phage during fermentation with the principal starter, this starter is discarded and replaced by the back up starter.
  • a third starter is also prepared as the back up starter that will serve as a back up for the back up.
  • the starters are each made of multiply phage-resistant variants.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions suitable in rotation strategies.
  • the starters instead of discarding the starter often attacked by phages, the starters are used in a cyclic way even if phage attack is observed. This strategy limits the number of starters to be developed.
  • the starters are each made of multiple phage resistant strains instead of a single one. This provides increased robustness to emerging phage.
  • customized starters are provided.
  • the phage resistant variants are produced to specifically combat phages that are present in a given fermentation plant or facility.
  • a method for identifying eg. typing a labelled bacterium.
  • the identification step is performed by amplifying (eg. PCR amplifying) the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof.
  • a first primer may be designed to hybridize to a sequence that is located upstream of the first CRISPR repeat of a CRISPR locus.
  • the first primer may hybridize to part of the common leader sequence of the CRISPR locus.
  • the first primer may hybridize to a neighboring gene that is located upstream of the CRISPR locus.
  • the second primer may hybridize downstream from at least the first CRISPR spacer or the at least first CRISPR spacer core.
  • the second primer may hybridize as far as in the trailer or even in a downstream neighboring gene.
  • the second primer hybridizes within the CRISPR locus.
  • the second primer hybridizes at least partially to a downstream CRISPR spacer or CRISPR spacer core.
  • the tagging sequence may be identified using various methods that are known in the art.
  • the tagging sequence may be identified by determining the amplification product restriction pattern. Accordingly, once the DNA comprising the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof has been amplified, it may be digested (eg. cut) with one or more restriction enzymes.
  • restriction enzymes refers to enzymes (eg. bacterial enzymes), each of which cut double-stranded DNA at or near a specific nucleotide sequence. Restriction enzymes are well known in the art and may be readily obtained, for example, from variety of commercial sources (for example, New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.). Similarly, methods for using restriction enzymes are also generally well known and routine in the art. Restriction enzymes that produce between 10 and 24 fragments of DNA when cutting the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof may be used. Examples of such enzymes include, but are not limited to, Alul, Msel, and Tsp5091. Fragments of DNA obtained using restriction enzymes may be detected, for example, as bands by gel electrophoresis. Restriction enzymes may be used to create Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs).
  • RFLPs Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms
  • RFLPs are generated by cutting (“restricting”) a DNA molecule with a restriction endonuclease. Many hundreds of such enzymes have been isolated, as naturally made by bacteria. In essence, bacteria use such enzymes as a defensive system, to recognise and then cleave (restrict) any foreign DNA molecules that might enter the bacterial cell (e.g., a viral infection).
  • restriction enzymes Each of the many hundreds of different restriction enzymes has been found to cut (i.e., “cleave” or “restrict”) DNA at a different sequence of the 4 basic nucleotides (A, T, G, C) that make up all DNA molecules, e.g., one enzyme might specifically and only recognise the sequence A-A-T-G-A-C, while another might specifically and only recognise the sequence G-T-A-C-T-A, etc.
  • recognition sequences may vary in length, from as few as 4 nucleotides to as many as 21 nucleotides. The larger the recognition sequence, the fewer restriction fragments will result, as the larger the recognition site, the lower the probability that it will repeatedly be found throughout the DNA.
  • the tagging sequence may be identified by determining or also determining the difference in size of the amplification product.
  • Separation may be achieved by any method suitable for separating DNA, including, but not limited to, gel electrophoresis, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), mass spectroscopy, and use of a microfluidic device.
  • the amplification products or DNA fragments are separated by agarose gel electrophoresis.
  • Gel electrophoresis separates different sized charged molecules by their rate of movement through a stationary gel under the influence of an electric current.
  • These separated amplification products or DNA fragments can easily be visualised, for example, by staining with ethidium bromide and by viewing the gel under UV illumination.
  • the banding pattern reflects the sizes of the restriction digested DNA or the amplification products.
  • the tagging sequence may be identified by sequencing the amplification products.
  • the sequence of the amplified products may be obtained by any method known in the art, including automatic and manual sequencing methods. See, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.; Roe et al. (1996) DNA Isolation and Sequencing (Essential Techniques Series, John Wiley & Sons).
  • Hybridisation methods are also within the scope of the present invention, either using a nucleic acid molecule as a probe, or a nucleic acid molecule capable of hybridising to a particular nucleotide sequence. See, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.).
  • the hybridisation probe(s) may be genomic DNA fragments, PCR-amplified products, or other oligonucleotides, and may comprise all or part of a known nucleotide sequence.
  • it may be labelled with a detectable group such as 32 P, or any other detectable marker, such as other radioisotopes, a fluorescent compound, an enzyme, or an enzyme co-factor.
  • the term “labelled,” with regard to the probe is intended to encompass direct labelling of the probe by coupling (i.e., physically linking) a detectable substance to the probe, as well as indirect labelling of the probe by reactivity with another reagent that is directly labelled. Examples of indirect labelling include end-labelling of a DNA probe with biotin such that it can be detected with fluorescently labelled streptavidin.
  • Methods that encompass hybridisation techniques to detect or differentiate bacterial strains are also encompassed. These include, but are not limited to, Southern blotting (see, for example, Van Embden et al. (1993) J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:406-409), shift mobility assays (see, for example, U.S. Published Application No. 20030219778), sequencing assays using oligonucleotide arrays (see, for example, Pease et al. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5022-5026), spoligotyping (see, for example, Kamerbeek et al. (1997) J. Clin. Microbiol.
  • FISH Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization
  • the tagging sequence that is identified may be compared to with a phage sequence database and/or a bacterial sequence database. Typically, the tagging sequence will match with one or more sequences in the phage sequence database but not with the bacterial sequence database.
  • a database of labels may be created allowing for the specific identification of bacteria that have been labeled.
  • a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage e.g., in the manufacture of a labelled bacterium
  • said sequence is integrated at one end of the CRISPR locus of the parent bacterium.
  • a sequence obtained or obtainable from a bacteriophage eg. in the manufacture of a labelled bacterium
  • said sequence comprises: (i) at least one sequence that is homologous (eg. identical) to a CRISPR repeat in the CRISPR locus of said bacterium; and (ii) a tagging sequence.
  • a sequence for labelling and/or identifying a bacterium (eg. in the manufacture of a labelled bacterium), wherein said sequence is obtained or obtainable by: (a) exposing a parent bacterium to a bacteriophage; (b) selecting a bacteriophage insensitive mutant; (c) comparing the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof from the parent bacterium and the bacteriophage insensitive mutant; and (d) selecting a sequence in the CRISPR locus or a portion thereof of the bacteriophage insensitive mutant that is not present in the parent bacterium.
  • CRISPR has been shown to provide resistance against incoming nucleic acid in prokaryotes. Specifically, it was shown that CRISPR spacers showing homology to viral DNA (e.g., bacteriophage nucleic acid) provide resistance against the virus sharing sequence identity with at least one spacer sequence. However, it is also contemplated that the CRISPR system, including cas genes and/or proteins along with spacers, repeats, leader and trailer to cells not currently containing CRISPR loci will find use in providing resistance against nucleic acid de novo. Indeed in some embodiments, such manipulations find use with various eukaryotes, including but not limited to humans, other animals, fungi, etc.
  • the CRISPR system be transferred into eukaryotic cells utilizing any suitable method known in the art, including, but not limited to transformation via plasmids.
  • the CRISPR loci, as well as necessary transcription/translation signals are included in the plasmid DNA, to all for expression and function of the sequences in eukaryotic cells.
  • the spacer sequences are engineered such that they have identity with viral sequences of interest infect the host involved.
  • these methods and compositions provide resistance to the host cell against viruses that share sequence identity with the CRISPR spacer introduced into the cell.
  • the viruses include, but are not limited to HIV, orthomyxoviruses, paramyxoviruses, pseudomyxoviruses, RSV, influenza, rubeola, varicella, rubella, coronaviruses, hepatitis viruses, caliciviruses, poxviruses, herpesviruses, adenoviruses, papovaviruses, papillomaviruses, enteroviruses, arboviruses, rhabdoviruses, arenaviruses, arboviruses, rhinoviruses, reoviruses, coronaviruses, reoviruses, rotaviruses, retroviruses, etc.
  • specific targeting of highly conserved nucleic acid sequences in CRISPR spacers provides increased resistance against such viruses in eukaryotic cells.
  • the eukaryotic cells are human cells.
  • a phage-host model system was selected, consisting of a phage-sensitive wild-type S. thermophilus strain widely used in the dairy industry, DGCC7710 (WT) and two distinct, but closely related virulent bacteriophages isolated from industrial yogurt samples, namely phage 858 and phage 2972 (Levesque et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71:4057 [2005]).
  • WT DGCC7710
  • phage 858 and phage 2972 Two distinct, but closely related virulent bacteriophages isolated from industrial yogurt samples, namely phage 858 and phage 2972 (Levesque et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71:4057 [2005]).
  • phage-resistant mutants were independently generated by challenging the WT strain with phage 858, phage 2972 or simultaneously with both, and their CRISPR loci were analyzed.
  • CRISPR spacer content defines phage resistance
  • the CRISPR1 locus was altered by adding and deleting spacers, and the strain sensitivity to phages was tested. All constructs were generated and integrated into the S. thermophilus chromosome using methods known in the art (See e.g., Russell and Klaenhammer, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67:4361 [2001]). The spacers and repeats in the CRISPR1 locus of strain WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 were removed and replaced with a single repeat without any spacer.
  • strain WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ⁇ CRISPR1 WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ::pR
  • a variant that contains the integration vector with a single repeat inserted between the cas genes and the native CRISPR1 locus was created (See, FIG. 10 ).
  • strain WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 :: pR was sensitive to phage 858, although spacers S1 and S2 remained present on the chromosome (See, FIG. 10 ).
  • the WT ⁇ 2972 +S4 ::pS1S2 construct lost the resistance to phage 2972, although spacer S4 is present in the chromosome (See, FIG. 10 ).
  • cas5 cas5
  • cas7 cas7
  • str0657/stu0657 and str0660/stu0660 See, Bolotin et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 22:1554 [2004]; and Bolotin et al., Microbiol., 151:2551 [2005]).
  • the cas5 inactivation resulted in loss of the phage resistance (See, FIG. 10 ).
  • Cas5 acts as a nuclease, since it contains a HNH-type nuclease motif.
  • Phage variants derived from phage 858 that retained the ability to infect WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 were further analyzed.
  • sequences of the genome region corresponding to additional spacers S1 and S2 in two virulent phage variants were investigated.
  • the genome sequence of the phage variant was mutated and two distinct single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified in the sequence corresponding to spacer S1 (See, FIG. 13 ).
  • prokaryotes appear to have evolved a nucleic-acid based “immunity” system whereby specificity is dictated by the CRISPR spacer content, while the resistance is provided by the Cas enzymatic machinery. Additionally, it was speculated that some of the cas genes that do not directly provide resistance are actually involved in the insertion of additional CRISPR spacers and repeats, as part of an adaptive “immune” response. This nucleic-acid based system contrasts with amino-acid based counterparts in eukaryotes whereby adaptative immunity is not inheritable.
  • CRISPR spacers supports the use of CRISPR loci as targets for evolutionary, typing and comparative genomic studies (See, Pourcel et al., supra; Groenen et al., Mol. Microbiol., 10:1057 [1993]; Mongodin et al., J. Bacteriol., 187:4935 [2005]; and DeBoy et al., J. Bacteriol., 188:2364 [2006]). Because this system is reactive to the phage environment, it likely plays a significant role in prokaryotic evolution and ecology and provides a historical perspective of phage exposure, as well as a predictive tool for phage sensitivity. However, it is not intended that the present invention be limited to any particular mechanism.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions for utilizing the CRISPR/cas system as a virus defense means, and also potentially to reduce the dissemination of mobile genetic elements and the acquisition of undesirable traits such as antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence markers.
  • the integrated phage sequences within CRISPR loci also provide additional anchor points to facilitate recombination during subsequent phage infections, thus increasing the gene pool to which phages have access (See, Hendrix et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2192 [1999]).
  • CRISPR loci are found in the majority of bacterial genera, and are ubiquitous in Archaea (See, Jansen et al., supra; Lillestol et al., supra; and Goode and Bickerton J. Mol. Evol., 62:718 [2006]), they provide new insights in the relationship and co-directed evolution between prokaryotes and their predators.
  • the present invention also provides methods and compositions for the development of phages as biocontrol agents.
  • bacteria can become resistant to phage attack by incorporating phage derived sequences (spacers) into an active CRISPR loci. Phage can escape this resistance by mutation within the genome sequence corresponding to the spacer or the CRISPR motif recognition sequence that corresponds to a given Cas-CRISPR system.
  • spacers phage derived sequences
  • the present invention provides phages that have been altered within CRISPR target sequences and/or putative CRISPR recognition sites that direct spacer insertion.
  • the present invention provides phages that have been synthetically designed such that the CRISPR motif sequence for a given Cas-CRISPR system has been eliminated.
  • These “altered” phages, applied as a cocktail or in a “sequential rotation scheme” reduce the ability of target bacteria to adapt resistance via the CRISPR system.
  • the present invention provides a diverse set of virulent phage for use as biocontrol agents. In particularly preferred embodiments, this diversity is targeted at the CRISPR directed mechanism of phage resistance, such that the ability of the host organism to rapidly evolve against phage attack (via CRISPR) is severely reduced or eliminated.
  • the administration of the diverse phage, either as a cocktail or in a sequential rotation further reduces the possibility of the host organism to adapt or evolve CRISPR-directed phage resistance.
  • Phages are natural antimicrobial agents that have been extensively studied as an alternative therapeutic agent to antibiotics. This interest has been recently renewed, due to the proliferation of multiple-antibiotic resistant pathogens. As with antibiotics, bacteria have developed multiple mechanisms to overcome phage attack.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions involving the use of Cas-CRISPR in mediating phage resistance to generate a diverse phage population, to create synthetic phages devoid of CRISPR motif sequences, as well as methods for administering such phage that will reduce the ability of a target organism to develop resistance against the phage.
  • Cas-CRISPR systems have been described in a wide range of organisms which include examples of pathogenic genera.
  • bacteria escaping lysis can be found to contain new spacer sequence(s) within a CRISPR locus.
  • the new spacer is typically of a defined length that is characteristic for a given CRISPR locus and derived from the attacking phage genome to which it confers resistance.
  • phage can escape the mechanism.
  • Analysis of “escape-phages” indicated that the genomes were mutated in or proximal to the corresponding spacer sequence found in the resistant host variant. Furthermore, the “escape-phages” are fully virulent to the CRISPR-mediated host variant from which they were derived.
  • One unique aspect of therapeutic phage distinguishing it from traditional antibiotics, is the ability to propagate exponentially in conjunction with the infected bacteria. While this can be advantageous from a pharmacological perspective, it also provides unique opportunities for the phage to evolve towards adaptive response of the targeted bacteria to phage attack.
  • Bacteria have developed several defense mechanisms against virulent phage. As indicated herein, the Cas-CRISPR loci play a role in conferring bacterial phage resistance. Following phage infection, analysis of surviving bacteria found that some isolates had inserted a new spacer element within their resident CRISPR locus, the sequence of which was identical to that found in the corresponding phage genome. When challenged with phage, these first generation CRISPR-mediated phage resistant variants give rise to plaques; the phage of which were found to be fully infective on both parent and derivative.
  • CRISPR-escape phage Analysis of these “CRISPR-escape” phage indicated that their genomes were mutated in the sequence corresponding to the CRISPR spacer harbored by the phage resistant variant or in a proximal sequence believed to direct spacer insertion and identified as the CRISPR motif specific to a given Cas-CRISPR system. Therefore the “CRISPR-escape” phage is potentially more virulent than the parent and first-generation variants, as this phage is capable of infecting both the parent strain and the first generation CRISPR variant.
  • CRISPR loci have been identified in several genera/species of bacteria that include examples of known pathogens and spoilage microorganisms. Also as described herein, the present invention provides methods and compositions for utilization of CRISPR loci in combination with Cas proteins to confer “immunity” to invading foreign DNA, in particular, bacteriophages. Also as described herein, bacterial strains harbouring “active” CRISPR-cas loci containing a spacer that is identical to a corresponding sequence within a phage genome (i.e., a “protospacer”), confers upon that bacterial strain, resistance to the phage. In some preferred embodiments, the genome sequences of the biocontrol phage are known.
  • the isolated target microorganism is examined for the presence of CRISPR loci.
  • PCR using specific primers for conserved sequences that flank CRISPR loci of the target microorganism finds use.
  • amplification product(s) are sequenced compared with the genome sequence of the biocontrol phage.
  • the generation of CRISPR phage resistant variants and analysis of the spacer/protospacer provides means to identify the specific CRISPR motif. Once identified, the sequence information is used to design and synthesize a phage devoid of the CRISPR motif. Thus, the resulting phage is insensitive to CRSPR-cas mediated resistance.
  • biocontrol phage has a greater degree of virulence and efficacy as a biocontrol agent.
  • the present invention provides methods and compositions suitable for use in the food, feed, medical and veterinary industries to generate phage with broader host range and method of application for more effective biocontrol of bacteria.
  • the present invention provides means to produce a sufficient number of altered phage (in response to CRISPR) to significantly reduce the ability of the native bacteria to evolve an effective CRISPR-mediated resistance.
  • the present invention also provides methods of application/administration designed such that the rate of evolution by the native bacteria is significantly reduced.
  • the present invention utilizes, unless otherwise indicated, conventional techniques of chemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, recombinant DNA and immunology, which are within the capabilities of a person of ordinary skill in the art. Such techniques are well known to those of skill in the art.
  • DGCC7710 is also referred to as “WT”; DGCC7710RH1 is also referred to as “DGCC7710-RH1” and “RH1”; DGCC7710RH2 is also referred to as “DGCC7710-RH2” and “RH-2”; DGCC7778cas1 is also referred to as “DGCC7778cas1KO,” “CAS1KO,” and “cas1 KO”; DGCC7778cas4 is also referred to as “DGCC7778cas4KO”; DGCC7778 is also referred to as “WT ⁇ 858+S1S2”; DGCC7778RT is also referred to as “WT ⁇ 858+S1S2::pR”; DGCC7778RT′ is also referred to as “WT ⁇ 858+S1S2 ⁇ CRISPR1”; DGCC7710-R2 is also referred to as “WT ⁇ 2972+S4”; and DGCC77
  • thermophilus ST0089 is an industrially important strain used in the manufacture of yogurt. It is genetically amenable to manipulation, and susceptible to the well-known virulent phage 2972.
  • the CRISPR loci were determined in strain ST0089. This was determined preferentially by sequencing the entire genome of ST0089. Alternatively, the CRISPR loci are identified via PCR using primer sets with sequences identical to S. thermophilus CRISPR elements previously identified.
  • CRISPR loci sequences were determined as well as the proximal regions containing the relevant cas genes.
  • At least one particular CRISPR-cas locus was selected for further manipulation. Functionality of this locus was ascertained through in silico analysis of the spacer regions and their homologies to phage DNA sequences (i.e., absence and/or presence of spacer sequences and correlation to phage infectivity with strain ST0089). In the absence of this correlation, functionality was assumed, based on the presence of all documented elements (i.e., repeats, spacers, leader sequences, and cas genes that putatively encode full length proteins).
  • a suitable spacer sequence(s) was chosen from the genome of phage 2972.
  • the criteria used to select the spacer were generally based on the length of the spacers within the selected CRISPR locus and the identity (preferably approximately 100%) to the phage sequence. Indeed, any suitable phage sequence finds use in various embodiments of the present invention.
  • a CRISPR unit consisting of a phage 2972 spacer sequence, flanked by two repeating elements (identical to the selected CRISPR locus) was chemically synthesized.
  • this synthetic “CRISPR unit” is approximately 100 bp in length and is too short for ensuring integration into the CRISPR locus.
  • flanking DNA was constructed along with the CRISPR unit.
  • a construct emulates the addition of a new spacer onto the existing CRISPR.
  • the entire CRISPR locus is replaced with the synthetic CRISPR unit.
  • the resulting CRISPR integrant was verified through DNA sequencing of the CRISPR locus prior to biological testing.
  • phage sensitivity patterns of the CRISPR integrant against phage 2972 were tested and compared with the parental strain.
  • the constructed CRISPR integrant successfully demonstrated the direct correlation between the presence of a specific spacer within the proper context of CRISPR-cas.
  • a spacer homologous to a phage DNA into a recipient cell was performed.
  • a new CRISPR spacer was designed from phage DNA (with 100% identity to phage DNA) within the anti-receptor gene and inserted into the cell in a CRISPR locus.
  • the anti-receptor gene was targeted because CRISPR spacers from other strains have been found to show similarity to phage anti-receptor genes.
  • Four strains bearing spacers showing identity to phage anti-receptor genes were resistant to the particular phage. The mutant was exposed to phage and found to be resistant.
  • a plasmid comprising a CRISPR spacer was prepared using the methods set forth herein. Attempts to transfer this plasmid into cells that contain the same spacer were unsuccessful However, plasmids that do not contain the spacer can be transformed into cells. FIGS. 11 and 12 illustrate these results.
  • CRISPR-cas combinations present in two different strains were exchanged. This exchange of spacers was shown to modify their phenotypes (phage sensitivity/resistance). As indicated herein when S1 S2 is introduced into a strain with S4, phage sensitivity was switched (See, FIG. 10 ).
  • cas-CRISPR-repeat combinations are prepared. Not only are cas genes or proteins required, but specific cas-CRISPR repeat pairs are required for functionality. When cas genes or proteins are provided from another CRISPR locus, the strain remains sensitive to the phage.
  • cas genes from a functional CRISPR-cas unit were deleted. Cas genes are necessary for immunity to be provided. Cas mutants are still sensitive to the phage, despite the presence of the spacer identical to phage DNA.
  • cas5 originally known as cas1
  • cas7 originally known as cas4 were deleted. Cas5 was shown to be required for resistance.
  • cas7 was shown to be required for integration of new spacers.
  • cas genes are provided in trans to the host. Where the cas gene is knocked out, immunity is restored.
  • Streptococcus thermophilus strain DGCC7710 (deposited at the French “Collection Nationale de Cultures de Microorganismes” under number CNCM I-2423) possesses at least 3 CRISPR loci: CRISPR1, CRISPR2, and CRISPR3.
  • CRISPR1 is located at the same chromosomal locus: between str0660 (or stu0660) and str0661 (or stu0661).
  • CRISPR1 is also located at the same chromosomal locus, between highly similar genes.
  • CRISPR1 of strain DGCC7710 contains 33 repeats (including the terminal repeat), and thus 32 spacers.
  • S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710RH1 was isolated as a natural phage resistant mutant using DGCC7710 as the parental strain, and phage D858 as the virulent phage. D858, a bacteriophage belonging to the Siphoviridae family of viruses was used.
  • CRISPR1 of strain DGCC7710-RH1 contains 34 repeats (including the terminal repeat), and thus 33 spacers.
  • thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH1 possesses one additional new spacer (and one additional repeat which flanks the new spacer) at one end of the CRISPR locus (i.e., close to the leader, at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus). All the other spacers of CRISPR1 locus remained unchanged.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence (5′-3′) of strain DGCC7710-RH1 is provided below:
  • the leader has the sequence:
  • the integrated sequence (GTTTTTGTACTCTCAAGATTTAAGTAACTGTACAACtcaacaattgcaacatcttataacccactt; SEQ ID NO:689) comprising a CRISPR repeat is shown in upper case and a CRISPR spacer (i.e., tagging sequence) in lower case; both are shown above in gray.
  • the terminal repeat and trailer sequences of the CRISPR repeat are shown below:
  • Terminal repeat 5′ gtttttgtactctcaagatttaagtaactg tacagt 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 691)
  • Trailer sequence 5′ ttgattcaacataaaaagccagttcaatt gaacttggcttt 3′
  • the sequence of the new spacer 5-TCAACAATTGCAACATCTTATAACCCACTT (SEQ ID NO:534) exists within the D858 phage genome.
  • the sequence of the spacer is found between positions 31921 and 31950 bp (i.e., on the plus strand) of D858's genome (and has 100% identity to the D858 genomic sequence over 30 nucleotides):
  • the new spacer that is integrated into the CRISPR1 locus of S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH1 confers resistance to phage D858 to this strain, as shown in FIG. 1 and Table 2-1.
  • S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2 was isolated as a natural phage resistant mutant using S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710 as the parental strain, and phage D858 as the virulent phage.
  • CRISPR1 of S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2 contains 34 repeats (including the terminal repeat), and thus 33 spacers.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence of S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2 possesses one additional new spacer (and one additional repeat which flanks the new spacer) at one end of the CRISPR locus (i.e., close to the leader, at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus). All the other spacers of CRISPR1 locus remained unchanged.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence (5′-3′) of strain DGCC7710-RH2 is shown below:
  • the leader sequence is:
  • the integrated sequence comprising a CRISPR repeat is shown in upper case and a CRISPR spacer (i.e., tagging sequence) in lower case; both are shown above in gray (GTTTTTGTACTCTCAAGATTTAAGTAACTGTACAACttacgtttgaaaagaatatcaaatcaatga; SEQ ID NO:694).
  • the terminal repeat and trailer sequences of the CRISPR repeat are shown below:
  • Terminal repeat 5′-gtttttgtactctcaagatttaagtaactg tacagt-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 691)
  • Trailer sequence 5′-ttgattcaacataaaaagccagttcaatt gaacttggcttt-3′
  • sequence of the spacer (SEQ ID NO:535) is found between positions 17215 and 17244 bp (i.e., on the plus strand) of D858's genome (and has 100% identity to the D858 genomic sequence over 30 nucleotides):
  • the new spacer that is integrated into the CRISPR1 locus of S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2 confers resistance against phage D858 to S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2, as shown in FIG. 2 and Table 2-1 (See also, FIG. 10 ).
  • thermophilus DGCC7710 parent strain sensitive to phages 858 and 2972 S. thermophilus DGCC7778 CRISPR mutant resistant to 858 S. thermophilus DGCC7778cas1KO S. thermophilus DGCC7778cas4KO S. thermophilus DGCC7778RT S. thermophilus DGCC7778RT′ S. thermophilus DGCC7710R2CRISPR mutant resistant to 2972 S. thermophilus DGCC7710R2S1S2 E. coli EC1,000 provided pOR128 (See, Russell and Klaenhammer, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67:43691-4364 [2001]) Escherichia coli pCR2.1TOPO provided pTOPO (See, Invitrogen catalog #K4500-01)
  • pTOPO a plasmid used for sub-cloning of the various constructs
  • pTOPOcas1ko contains an integral fragment of cas1 pTOPOcas4ko contains an integral fragment of cas4 pTOPOS1S2 contains the S1S2 spacer construct
  • pTOPO RT contains the RT terminal repeat construct
  • pOR128 is a plasmid used for integration of the various constructs in the chromosome of S. thermophilus strains.
  • pORIcas/ko contains an integral fragment of cas1 pORIcas4ko contains an integral fragment of cas4 pORIS1S2 contains the S1S2 spacer construct purist contains the RT terminal repeat construct
  • Cas1 (SEQ ID NO: 670) 5′-caaatggatagagaaacgc-3′ and (SEQ ID NO: 671) 5′-ctgataaggtgttcgttgtcc-3′
  • Cas4 (SEQ ID NO: 672) 5′-ggagcagatggaatacaagaaagg-3′ and (SEQ ID NO: 673) 5′-gagagactaggttgtctcagca-3′ S1S2 and RT (SEQ ID NO: 666)
  • P1 5′-acaaacaacagagaagtatctcattg-3′
  • P2 5′-aacgagtacactcactatttgtacg-3′
  • P3 5′-tccactcacgtacaatagtgagtgtactcgttttgtattctc aagattt
  • Phage preparation, purification and tests were carried out using methods known in the art (See e.g., Duplessis et al., Virol., 340:192-208 [2005]; and Levesque et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71:4057-4068 [2005]).
  • S. thermophilus strains were grown at 37° C. or 42° C. in M17 (Difco) supplemented with 0.5% lactose or sucrose.
  • M17 Difco
  • lactose or sucrose 0.5% lactose or sucrose.
  • 10 mM CaCl 2 were added to the medium prior to phage infection, as known in the art (See e.g., Duplessis et al., supra; and Levesque et al., supra).
  • Enzymes used to carry out restriction digests and PCR were purchased from Invitrogen and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCRs were carried out on an Eppendorf Mastercycler Gradient thermocycler as known in the art (See e.g., Barrangou et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68:2877-2884 [2002]).
  • the construct was inserted just after cas4, as shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the parent DGCC7778 is resistant to phage 858.
  • the parent has two spacers (S1 and D2) which are identical to phage 858 DNA.
  • the resulting strain (RT) lost resistance to phage 858.
  • FIG. 3 the parent DGCC7778 was engineered such that the cas1 gene is disrupted, resulting in a loss of resistance, meaning that cas1 is needed to confer resistance.
  • the parent DGCC7778 was engineered such that the cas4 gene is disrupted.
  • the S1S2 construct was integrated into the parent DGCC7710, as shown in FIGS. 6-8 .
  • S. thermophilus phage-resistant mutants were obtained by challenging the wild-type host strain DGCC7710 (also called “RD534”) with phage 2972 and/or phage 858 (Levesque et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71:4057 [2005]).
  • the host strain was grown at 42° C. in 10 ml of M17 broth supplemented with 0.5% lactose (LM17). When the optical density (600 nm) reached 0.3, phages and calcium chloride 10 mM were added at a final concentration of 10 7 pfu/ml and 50 mM, respectively.
  • the phage-containing culture was incubated at 42° C. for 24 hours and monitored for lysis. Then, 100 ⁇ l of the lysate were inoculated into 10 ml of fresh LM17. The remaining lysate was centrifuged and the pellet was inoculated into another tube containing 10 ml of fresh LM17. These two cultures were incubated at 42° C. for 16 hours. Finally, these cultures were diluted and plated on LM17. Isolated colonies were tested for phage sensitivity as known in the art (See, Moineau et al., Can. J. Microbiol., 38:875 [1992]).
  • the CRISPR loci of the resistant isolates were verified by sequencing PCR products, and using relevant phage genome information known in the art (See, Levesque et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71:4057 [2005]).
  • Enzymes used to carry out restriction digests and PCR were purchased from Invitrogen and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCRs were carried out on an Eppendorf Mastercycler Gradient thermocycler, using methods known in the art.
  • DNA from mutant WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 was used as a template to amplify two distinct PCR fragments using P1 (5′-acaaacaacagagaagtatctcattg-3′; SEQ ID NO:666) and P2 (5′-aacgagtacactcactatttgtacg-3′; SEQ ID NO:667) in one reaction, and P3 (5′-tccactcacgtacaaatagtgagtgtactcgttttttgtattctcaagattttaagtaactgtacagtttgattcaacataaaaaag-3′′; SEQ ID NO:668) and P4 (5′-ctttccttcatcctcgcttggtt-3′; SEQ ID NO:669) in another reaction. Both PCR products were subsequently used as templates in another PCR reaction using primers P1 and P4 to generate the
  • the S1S2 construct was sub-cloned into the Invitrogen pCR2.1-TOPO system. This construct was digested with NotI and HindIII and subsequently cloned into pOR1 at the NotI and HindIII sites, providing the pS1S2 construct. Integration of pS1S2 into the CRISPR1 locus of WT ⁇ 2972 +S4 occurred via homologous recombination at the 3′ end of cas7, to generate WT ⁇ 2972 +S4 ::pS1S2.
  • the pR construct was generated using the pS1 S2 construct as a template. Specifically, the S1 S2 construct subcloned into pCR2.1-TOPO was digested using BsrGI, which cuts within the CRISPR repeat. Then, the digest was religated and a plasmid containing a single repeat and no spacer was used subsequently for cloning into pOR1 using NotI and HindIII, generating pR.
  • the mutant WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 :: pR was subsequently grown in the absence of erythromycin, and antibiotic-sensitive variants were analyzed to find a mutant that had a complete deletion of the CRISPR1 locus.
  • the deletion was derived from homologous recombination occurring at the 3′ end of ORF (as opposed to a recombination event occurring at the 3′ end of cas7, which would have resulted in restoration of the WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 strain), generating WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ⁇ CRISPR1 (See, FIG. 12 ), a mutant where the CRISPR1 locus is deleted (See also, FIG. 10 )
  • a 801-bp internal piece of cas5 was amplified by PCR using primers 5′-caaatggatagagaaacgc-3′ (SEQ ID NO:670) and 5′-ctgataaggtgttcgttgtcc-3′ (SEQ ID NO:671) and subcloned into E. coli pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen).
  • This construct was digested with EcoRV and HindIII and subsequently cloned into pOR1 at the EcoRV and HindIII sites. Integration of this construct into the cas5 gene of WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 occurred via homologous recombination of the internal piece of the gene, resulting into WT ⁇ 858 +S1S2 ::pcas5-.
  • a 672-bp internal piece of cas7 was amplified by PCR using primers 5′-ggagcagatggaatacaagaaagg-3′ (SEQ ID NO:672) and 5′-gagagactaggttgtctcagca-3′ (SEQ ID NO:673) and subcloned into E. coli pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen). This construct was digested with EcoRV and HindIII and subsequently cloned into pOR1 at the EcoRV and HindIII sites.
  • Additional sequence as used herein is defined as a spacer sequence associated with CRISPR repeat sequence. More particularly, the “additional sequence” originates partly from a donor phage able to infect the targeted bacterium and partly from the duplication of the CRISPR repeat sequence. The introduction of the donor phage DNA into the bacterial cell results from the infection of the cell by the donor phage. The selection of cells that contain additional sequence is made through selection pressure with the donor phage such that the selected modified cells are resistant to the phage.
  • a parental strain was exposed to a donor phage and a phage resistant variant of the parental strain (i.e., a variant strain) selected.
  • the variant strain was analyzed (e.g., by PCR and/or DNA sequencing) to confirm the presence of an additional sequence within a CRISPR locus.
  • the nucleotide sequence of the additional sequence was determined.
  • the additional sequence is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the donor phage associated (fused) to a CRISPR repeat sequence, and confers resistance to the donor phage.
  • the parental strain was pre-cultivated overnight in a milk based medium at 42° C.
  • a milk-based medium was then inoculated at 0.1% (v/v) with the pre-culture of the parental strain and with a suspension of the donor phage at an MOI of 10.
  • dilutions of the culture were plated on a nutritional medium, in order to obtain isolated colonies. Isolates were then tested for their resistance to the donor phage (any suitable method known in the art find use in these experiments).
  • Variant strains were then analyzed for the presence of an additional sequence within one of their CRISPR loci.
  • CRISPR loci were amplified by PCR and the nucleotide sequences of the resulting PCR products were determined by DNA sequencing using standard PCR and sequencing methods known in the art. These sequence were then compared to that of the parental strain using standard methods known in the art.
  • DGCC7710 was used as the parental strain and D2972 was used as a donor phage.
  • the parental S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710 was exposed to the donor phage D2972 as described above.
  • a variant strain named WT ⁇ 2972 +S6 was obtained (See, Table 7-1).
  • Table 7-1 also includes results for variant strains described in other Examples.
  • the EOP is expressed relatively to phage D2972. Positioning of the additional sequence in the phage genome is given relatively to phage D2972, unless specified otherwise.
  • the sequence of the PCR product was determined and compared to that of the CRISPR1 locus of DGCC7710. Compared to DGCC7710, WT phi2972 +S6 was found to differ by the addition of a single spacer sequence of 30 bp at the 5′ end of its CRISPR1 region and by the duplication of the repeat sequence, as shown in FIG. 14 . Comparison of the additional sequence with the sequence of D2972 genome shows that the new spacer sequence is 100% identical to that of the D2972 genome from nucleotide 34521 to nucleotide 34492.
  • WT phi858 +S1S2 :: pcas5 was used as the parental strain and D858 was used as a donor phage.
  • the resulting variant strain named WT phi858 +S1S2 ::pcas5 phi858 +S19 was resistant to D858, with an EOP reduced by 5 logs.
  • DNA was extracted from WT phi858 +S1S2 ::pcas5 phi858 +S19 and its CRISPR3 locus was analyzed by PCR using one forward primer (CR3_leadF1, 5′-CTGAGATTAATAGTGCGATTACG; SEQ ID NO:676) and one reverse primer (CR3_trailR2,5′-GCTGGATATTCGTATAACATGTC; SEQ ID NO:677).
  • the sequence of the PCR product was determined and compared to that of the CRISPR3 locus of WT phi858 +S1S2 ::pcas5.
  • WT phi858 +S1S2 ::pcas5 phi858 +S19 differs by the addition of a single spacer sequence of 30 bp at the 5′ end of its CRISPR3 region and by the duplication of the repeat sequence. Comparison of the additional sequence with the sequence of D858 genome showed that the new spacer sequence is 100% identical to that of the D858 genome from nucleotide 33824 to nucleotide 33853.
  • DGCC7809 was used as the parental strain and D3743 was used as the donor phage.
  • the resulting variant strain named DGCC7809 phiD37434 S28 (See, Table 7-2) was resistant to D3743 with an EOP reduced by 8 logs.
  • DNA was extracted from DGCC7809 phiD3743 +S28 and its CRISPR3 locus was analyzed by PCR using one forward primer (CR3_leadF1, 5′-CTGAGATTAATAGTGCGATTACG; SEQ ID NO:676) and one reverse primer (CR3_trailR2,5′-GCTGGATATTCGTATAACATGTC; SEQ ID NO:677).
  • the sequence of the PCR product was determined and compared to that of the CRISPR3 locus of ST0189.
  • DGCC7809 phiD3743 +S28 differs by the addition of a single spacer sequence of 29 bp at the 5′ end of its CRISPR3 region and by the duplication of the repeat sequence.
  • the sequence of the phage D3743 is unknown; however comparison of the additional sequence with the sequence of other streptococcal phage genome shows that the new spacer sequence is 100% identical to that of the phage DT1 genome from nucleotide 6967 to nucleotide 6996.
  • DGCC3198 was used as the parental strain and D4241 was used as the donor phage.
  • the resulting variant strain named DGCC3198 phi4241 +S29 (See, Table 7-2) was resistant to D4241 with an EOP reduced by 8 logs.
  • DNA was extracted from DGCC3198 phi241 +S1 and its CRISPR1 locus was analyzed by PCR using one forward primer (either YC70 and/or SPIDR-ups (5′-gTCTTTAgAAACTgTgACACC-3′; SEQ ID NO:674) and of one reverse primer (either YC31 and/or SPIDR-dws (5′-TAAACAgAgCCTCCCTATCC; SEQ ID NO:675).
  • the sequence of the PCR product was determined and compared to that of the CRISPR1 locus of DGCC3198.
  • DGCC3198 phi4241 +S29 differs by the addition of a single spacer sequence of 30 bp at the 5′ end of its CRISPR1 region and by the duplication of the repeat sequence.
  • the sequence of the phage D4241 is unknown; however comparison of the additional sequence with the sequence of other streptococcal phage genome shows that the new spacer sequence is 100% identical to that of the DT1 phage genome from nucleotide 3484 to nucleotide 3455.
  • Table 7-2 provides a description of CRISPR-modified variant strains from DGCC7809 and from DGCC3198.
  • EOP is expressed relatively to the donor phages. Positioning of the additional sequence in the phage genome is given relatively to the phage DT1.
  • the parental strain was submitted to the same donor phage.
  • a single phage resistant variant was isolated as described in Example 7 and then analyzed. Additional sequences in each of the variant strains were compared to each other.
  • the spectrum of sensitivity of the variant strains to donor phage and other phages was determined using classical microbiological methods known in the art. The sensitivity spectra of the various strains were then compared. The selected variant strains were those presenting different additional sequence(s) and different spectra of phage sensitivity.
  • WT phi2972 +S4 , WT phi2972 +S20 , WT phi2972 +S21 and WT phi2972 +S22 differ by the addition of a spacer sequence of 30 bp at the 5′ end of its CRISPR1 region and by the duplication of the repeat sequence, as shown in FIG. 17 ).
  • Example 7 natural methods used to provoke the insertion of a second additional sequence in CRISPR locus are described.
  • the variant strain becomes resistant or at least less sensitive to this phage. Therefore, the method described in Example 7 is no more efficient for the insertion of additional sequences in the CRISPR locus of this variant strain.
  • the method cannot be applied to variant strain WT phi2972 +S6 (as a parental strain) using D2972 as a donor phage, because WT phi2972 +S6 has significantly decreased sensitivity to D2972 (See, Example 7).
  • this problem was overcome by the use of a mutated donor phage derived from D2972 that includes at least one specific modification within its genome (i.e., a “mutated phage”).
  • This mutated phage was selected by exposing the donor phage to the variant strain, such that the modification (i.e., mutation) of the parental phage rendered it virulent for the variant strain.
  • the mutated phage had a mutation in its genome within the region containing the sequence of the additional spacer that is part of the additional sequence in the variant strain.
  • the variant strain was sensitive to this mutated phage.
  • the variant strain was exposed to the mutated phage and a new phage resistant variant (2 nd generation variant) of the variant strain was selected.
  • the 2 nd generation variant was analyzed using suitable methods known in the art (e.g., PCR and sequencing), to confirm the presence of an additional sequence within a CRISPR locus.
  • the nucleotide sequence of the additional sequence was determined.
  • the additional sequence was found to contain a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the mutated phage which gives resistance to the mutated phage.
  • the variant strain was pre-cultivated overnight in an appropriate milk-based medium at 42° C.
  • a suitable milk-based medium was then inoculated with the pre-culture of the variant strain at a concentration of about 10 6 cfu/ml and with a suspension of the donor phage at an MOI greater than 100.
  • the culture was incubated over night at 42° C., and then centrifuged.
  • the supernatant was harvested and filtered using a 0.45 ⁇ m filter. Dilutions of the filtrated supernatant were used to inoculate a nutritive agar media seeded with the variant strain in order to obtain isolated phage plaques, using any suitable method known in the art.
  • Isolated plaques were cultivated on the variant strain in liquid nutritive media, using any suitable method known in the art.
  • a suspension of the mutated phage was obtained by filtering the culture through a 0.45 ⁇ m filter.
  • the mutated phage was then used as described above (See, Example 7) to provoke the insertion of a second additional spacer sequence in the CRISPR locus of the variant strain.
  • WT phi2972 +S6 See, Example 7, and Table 7-1
  • D4724 was used as the donor phage.
  • the variant strain WT phi2972 +S6 was cultivated in the presence of high concentration of phage D2972.
  • a mutated phage named D4724 was isolated by plaquing the supernatant from this culture on strain WT phi2972 +S6 using the methods described above. The virulence of the mutated phage D4724 on WT phi2972 +S6 was verified.
  • the variant strain WT phi2972 +S6 was exposed to the mutated phage D4724 in a culture as described in Example 7.
  • a phage resistant variant strain named WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S15 See, Table 7-1) was obtained.
  • this variant strain exhibited an increased resistance to D2972, as the efficiency of plaquing (EOP) of D2972 on WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S15 was reduced by more than 8 logs (instead of 4 logs); in addition, its resistance was also enlarged compare to WT phi2972 +S6 as its displays some resistance to D4724 (See, Table 9-1).
  • EOP plaquing
  • DNA was extracted from WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S15 and its CRISPR1 locus was analyzed by PCR as described above using the same combinations of primers as described above.
  • the sequence of the PCR product was determined and compared to that of the CRISPR1 locus of WT phi2972 +S6 .
  • WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S15 differs by the addition of a spacer sequence of 30 bp at the 5′ end of its CRISPR1 region and by the duplication of the repeat sequence, as shown in FIG. 17 .
  • Comparison of this additional spacer sequence with the sequence of D2972 genome showed that the second additional spacer sequence is 100% identical to that of the D2972 genome from nucleotide 1113 to nucleotide 1142.
  • WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S17 and WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S24 variant strains were isolated and analyzed (See, Table 7-1). As compared to WT phi2972 +S6 , these variant strains exhibited an increased resistance to D2972, as the efficiency of plaguing (EOP) of D2972 on WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S17 and WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S24 was reduced by more than 8 logs for both variant strains; and their resistance was also enlarged, as compared to WT phi2972 +S6 as they displayed some resistance to D4724 (See Table 9-1).
  • EOP plaguing
  • these variant strains display additional spacer sequences in CRISPR1 that are 100% identical to that of the genome of D2972 from nucleotide 33968 to nucleotide 33997 and nucleotide 30803 to nucleotide 30832, respectively.
  • WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S15 was used as the parental strain and D4733 was used as the donor phage.
  • the methods described above were used to generate the mutated phage D4733 from phage D4724.
  • phage D4733 was used to obtain a phage resistant variant strain from WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S15 .
  • the resulting variant strain was named WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S15 phi4733 +S16 (See, Table 7-1).
  • This variant strain contains one additional sequence including a spacer sequence that is 100% identical to a sequence from D2972 genome, nucleotide 29923 to nucleotide 29894.
  • Table 9-1 provides a description of the phage resistance of some CRISPR-modified variant strains from DGCC7710. In this Table, “nd” indicates that results were not determined.
  • WT phi2972 +S4 was used as the parental strain and D4720 was used as the donor phage.
  • mutated phage D4720 was generated from phage D2972.
  • Phage D4720 was used to obtain a phage resistant variant from WT phi2972 +S4 .
  • the resulting variant strain was named WT phi2972 +S4 phi4720 +S17 (See Table 7-1).
  • This variant strain contains one additional sequence including a spacer sequence that is 100% identical to a sequence from D2972 genome from nucleotide 33968 to 33997.
  • phages or phage-containing samples
  • Phages (or samples) that are virulent to the parental strain were then tested against the variant strain using the same methods.
  • One phage (or sample) that was virulent to the variant strain was selected as a second donor phage.
  • the one virulent phage was purified to homogeneity on the variant strain using classical microbiological methods known in the art.
  • the sequence of the second donor phage was determined.
  • the second donor phage was then used as described above (See, Example 7) to provoke the insertion of a second additional sequence in the CRISPR locus of the variant strain.
  • WT phi2972 +S4 See, Example 8 and Table 7-1
  • D858 was used as the donor phage.
  • strain DGCC7710 was found to be sensitive to both phage D2972 and phage D858.
  • D858 was found to be virulent against variant strain WT phi2972 +S4 . Phage D858 was therefore chosen as a second donor phage in some experiments.
  • the variant strain WT phi2972 +S4 was exposed to the second donor phage D858, as described in Example 7.
  • a phage resistant variant strain named WT phi2972 +S4 phi858 +S18 (See, Table 7-1) was obtained that is resistant to D858 (See Table 9-1).
  • This strain exhibits an increased resistance to D2972, as the efficiency of plaquing of D2972 on WT phi2972 +S4 phi858 +S18 was reduced by more than 8 logs (compared to 5 logs for WT phi2972 +S4 ; See Table 9-1).
  • DNA was extracted from WT phi2972 +S4 phi858 +S18 and its CRISPR1 locus was analyzed by PCR using the same methods and primers as described above.
  • the sequence of the PCR product was determined and compared to that of the CRISPR locus of WT phi2972 +S4 .
  • WT phi2972 +S4 phi858 +S18 differs by the addition of a spacer sequence of 30 bp at the 5′ end of its CRISPR1 region and by the duplication of the repeat sequence, as shown in FIG. 17 .
  • Comparison of this additional spacer sequence with the sequence of D858 genome showed that the second additional spacer sequence is 100% identical to that of the D858 genome from nucleotide 30338 to nucleotide 30367.
  • WT phi2972 +S4 phi4720 +S25 was also obtained using this method in independent experimental work.
  • This variant strain contains one additional sequence including a spacer sequence that is 100% identical to a sequence from D858 genome from nucleotide 33886 to 33915. It exhibits an increased resistance to D2972, as the efficiency of plaquing of D2972 on WT phi2972 +S4 phi4724 +S25 was reduced by more than 7 logs (See, Table 9-1).
  • a multi-phage resistant strain is described through the iterative addition of phage sequences in CRISPR loci, as addition of 2 phage sequences in the CRISPR loci is not enough to confer resistance to all phages to a given strain.
  • strain WT phi2972 +S4 phi858 +S18 (described in Example 10) was found to be sensitive to multiple other phages.
  • the parental strain was submitted to a first phage to select a variant strain, then the variant strain was submitted to a second phage to select a second generation variant strain that is resistant to both phages. Then, the last variant strain was submitted iteratively to the phages to which it was still sensitive, until a final variant strain was obtained that was resistant to all available phages.
  • a set of 10 reference phages were identified that are representative of the diversity of phages that are able to develop on strain DGCC7710, namely phages D858, D1126, D2766, D2972, D3288, D3821, D4083, D4752, D4753, and N1495.
  • DGCC7710 was exposed to phage D2972 to generate the variant strain DGCC9705.
  • DGCC9705 was found to be resistant to phage D2766 and D4752 in addition to phage D2972, but was still sensitive to the other phages as shown in Table 11-1.
  • DGCC9705 is described in Table 11-1 and in FIG. 17 .
  • DGCC9705 presents 1 additional sequence in CRISPR1 and 1 additional sequence in CRISPR3. Analysis of the sequence of the CRISPR1 locus and of the CRISPR3 locus was done accordingly to the methods described in Example 7. The sequence of the PCR products were determined and compared to that of the CRISPR1 and 3 loci of DGCC7710. DGCC9705 presents 1 additional spacer in its CRISPR1 locus and one additional spacer in its CRISPR3 locus. The spacer sequences are identical to sequences from phage D2972 Using the same methods, DGCC9705 was then exposed to phage D3821 and variant strain DGCC9726 was then isolated.
  • DGCC9726 has resistance to phages D858, D3821, D4083 and N1495 (See, Table 11-1).
  • DGCC9726 has 1 additional spacer sequence in its CRISPR1 locus as compared to DGCC9705 (See, Table 7-1 and FIG. 17 ). The additional spacer sequence is identical to a sequence from D2972.
  • strain DGCC9726 was isolated.
  • Strain DGCC9733 is additionally resistant to phage D3288 and D1126 (See, Table 11-1).
  • DGCC9733 has 1 additional spacer sequence in its CRISPR1 locus comparatively to DGCC9726 (See, Table 7-1 and FIG. 17 ).
  • This spacer sequence has some identity (25/30 base pair identity) to a sequence of the streptococcal phage 7201.
  • DGCC9836 was isolated that is resistant to all phages (See, Table 11-1).
  • DGCC9836 has 2 additional spacer sequences in its CRISPR1 locus and 2 additional spacer sequences in its CRISPR3 locus (See, Table 7-1 and FIG. 17 ).
  • One spacer sequence is identical to a sequence in phage D2972 and the 3 other spacer sequences are identical to sequences in phage D858.
  • Table 11-1 provides data regarding the phage sensitivity of the CRISPR-modified variant strain DGCC9836 and intermediate CRISPR-modified variant strains.
  • S indicates sensitivity
  • R indicates resistance.
  • DGCC7710 was used as the parental strain and D858 and D2972 were used as the donor phages. Upon testing of various phages, strain DGCC7710 was found to be sensitive to both phage D2972 and phage D858. However, D2972 and D858 presented different host spectra when tested on strain DGCC7778, suggesting that the two phages were different.
  • the parental strain DGCC7710 was exposed to a mix of phage D858 and D2972 as described in Example 7.
  • a phage resistant variant strain named WT phi858phi2972 +S9S10S11S12 (See, Table 7-1) was obtained. It exhibits resistance to D858, as the efficiency of plaquing of D858 on WT phi858phi2972 +S9S10S11S12 was reduced by more than 7 logs, as well as resistance to D2972, as the efficiency of plaquing of D2972 on WT phi858phi2972 +S9S10S11S12 was reduced by more than 7 logs.
  • strain WT phi858phi2972 +S13S14 (See, Table 7-1) was also obtained following these methods. It exhibits resistance to D858, as the efficiency of plaquing of D858 on WT phi858phi2972 +S13S14 was reduced by 7 logs, and resistance to D2972, as the efficiency of plaquing of D2972 on WT phi858phi2972 +S13S14 was reduced by 8 logs.
  • Comparison of the additional spacer sequences with the sequence of D2972 genome showed that the additional spacer sequences are 100% identical to that of the D2972 from nucleotide 33602 to nucleotide 33631, and from nucleotide 4830 to nucleotide 4801.
  • strain DGCC7710 is an industrial strain used in milk fermentation.
  • Strain WT phi2972 +S20 is described in Table 7-1 and in Example 8 and displays in its CRISPR1 locus an additional spacer, as compared to strain DGCC7710.
  • Strain WT phi2972 +S20 exhibits improved resistance to D2972, as compared to DGCC7710.
  • WT phi2972 +S26S57 is another variant exhibiting some resistance to D2972 (described in Table 7-1) and displays 2 additional spacers in its CRISPR1 locus.
  • variant strain WT phi2972 +S20 is more appropriate than the parental strain DGCC7710 for milk acidification in the presence of phages. Furthermore, fermentation of milk with WT phi2972 +S26S27 in the presence of D2972 allowed clotting of milk until the last sub-culture without phage development. In addition, variation of impedance increased to more than 2500 ⁇ S also until the last sub-culture. This demonstrates that the variant strain WT phi2972 +S26S27 is more appropriate than the parental strain DGCC7710 and even more appropriate than WT phi2972 +S20 for milk acidification in the presence of phages. The experiments were duplicated; the results are presented in Table 13-1.
  • strain DGCC9836 is an even more evolved variant strain of DGCC7710 that is the result of multiple phage challenge. This strain presents 5 additional spacers in its CRISPR1 locus and 3 additional spacers in its CRISPR3 locus (See, Example 11 and FIG. 17 ). DGCC9836 is resistant to all tested phages.
  • this Example illustrates the simultaneous use of more than one variant strains (i.e., a combination of variant strains). Indeed, mixtures of strains exhibiting the same functionalities, yet different phage sensitivity patterns find use in such applications. For example, 2 or 3 or even more variant strains as described herein find use in such applications. Using a combination of variant strains with different added spacer sequences in their CRISPR loci allows the fermentation to more easily resist any emerging mutant phages.
  • strain WT phi2972 +S21 alone a combination of 3 strains (namely WT phi2972 +S20 , WT phi2972 +S21 and WT phi2972 +S22 ) used in milk fermentation in the presence of phage D2972.
  • Strains WT phi2972 +S2 °, WT phi2972 +S21 and WT phi2972 +S22 are described in Table 7-1 and in Example 8. They are independent variant strains of DGCC7710. Each variant strain displays in its CRISPR1 locus a distinct additional spacer sequence (which originated from phage D2972) as compared to strain DGCC7710.
  • the variant strains were used in rotation. In some experiments, the strains had the same functionalities, but different phage sensitivity patterns. Thus, in this Example, experiments conducted on the iterative/subsequent use of several different strains (i.e., CRISPR-modified variant strains) sequentially in a rotation scheme are described.
  • the first milk fermentation was conducted with strain WT phi2972 +S20
  • strain WT phi2972 +S22 was used for the second fermentation
  • strain WT phi2972 +S21 was used for the third fermentation.
  • the fourth fermentation was then again done using strain WT phi2972 +S20 ; followed by a fermentation with strain WT phi2972 +S22 , then strain WT phi2972 +S21 , and so on.
  • Strains WT phi2972 +S20 ; WT phi2972 +S21 and WT phi2972 +S22 are described above in Table 7-1. They are independent variant strains of strain DGCC7710. Each variant strain displays a distinct additional spacer sequence in its CRISPR1 locus, as compared to strain DGCC7710, which originated from phage D2972.
  • DGCC9836 (described in Example 11 and in FIG. 17 ) was used to perform milk fermentation in the presence of phage D2972, in comparison to fermentations made with its parental strain DGCC7710 in the presence of D2972.
  • Ten-percent milk powder medium (w/v) was seeded with about 10 6 cfu/ml of a pre-culture of the tested strain and with 10 7 pfu/ml of phage D2972. The culture was incubated at 42° C. for 24 h. At various time points, an aliquot was taken and the phage population was measured using double-layer agar plate seeded with DGCC7710 using standard methods known in the art. The results are presented in FIG. 20 .
  • phage D2972 developed to reach a population of above 10 8 pfu/ml.
  • the D2972 phage population gradually decreased to very low level (120 pfu/ml) after 6 hours of incubation, and was almost undetectable after 24 hours of incubation. This last result suggests that phages were destroyed during the process of fermentation with the variant strain DGCC9836.
  • variant strain to destroy phages, as well as not being sensitive to the phages represents an additional benefit, as compared to the traditional starter culture rotation program for which the strains are not sensitive, but are harmless to phages. Indeed, by using variant strains, eradication of dormant phages will occur through the combination of washing out the phages (as for rotation using traditional starter culture) and of destroying the phages.
  • variant strains presenting some but incomplete resistance to phage D2972 were associated in milk fermentation in the presence of D2972.
  • Selected variant strains included and WT phi2972 +S20 and WT phi2972 +S21 , as described in Example 8 and in Table 7-1. These strains display EOP reductions for the phage D2972 of about 5 logs.
  • Milk fermentations were performed as described above (bacterial inoculation rate of 10 6 cfu/ml; phage inoculation rate of 10 7 pfu/ml). Milk fermentations were made either with WT phi2972 +S20 or with WT phi2972 +S21 or a mix of the two strains. At various time points, the population of phages was recorded.
  • phage population was measure using double-layer agar plate seeded either with WT phi2972 +S20 or with WT phi2972 +S21 , using standard methods known in the art.
  • the results are presented in FIG. 21 , which indicates the sum of phages detected on WT phi2972 +S20 and on WT phi2972 +S21 for each of the milk fermentations.
  • the number of detected phages at inoculation time was about 100 pfu/ml (due to the 5 logs of EOP reduction).
  • S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710 (deposited at the French “Collection Nationale de Cultures de Microorganismes” under number CNCM1-2423) possesses at least 3 CRISPR loci: CRISPR1, CRISPR2, and CRISPR3.
  • CRISPR1 is located at the same chromosomal locus: between str0660 (or stu0660) and str0661 (or stu0661) (See, FIG. 18 ).
  • CRISPR1 is also located at the same chromosomal locus, between highly similar genes.
  • CRISPR1 of strain DGCC7710 contains 33 repeats (including the terminal repeat), and thus 32 spacers (See, FIG. 19 ). All of these spacers are different from each other. Most of these spacers have not previously been described as being within CRISPR loci, but four spacers close to the CRISPR1 trailer are identical to known CRISPR1 spacers.
  • the 28 th spacer of DGCC7710 is 100% identical to the 31 st CRISPR1 spacer of strain CNRZ1575 (Genbank accession number DQ072991); the 30 th spacer of DGCC7710 is 100% identical to the 27 th CRISPR1 spacer of strain CNRZ703 (Genbank accession number DQ072990); the 31 st spacer of DGCC7710 is 100% identical to the 28 th CRISPR1 spacer of strain CNRZ703 (Genbank accession number DQ072990); and the 32 nd spacer of DGCC7710 is 100% identical to the 30 th CRISPR1 spacer of strain CNRZ703 (Genbank accession number DQ072990).
  • the CRISPR1 sequence (5′-3′) of strain DGCC7710 is shown in SEQ ID NO:678, below:
  • the phage used in these experiments is a bacteriophage belonging to the Siphoviridae family of viruses. Its genome sequence has been completely determined, it apparently remains to be published. This phage is virulent to S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710 .
  • S. thermophilus strain DGCC7778 was isolated as a natural phage resistant mutant using DGCC7710 as the parental strain, and phage D858 as the virulent phage.
  • the CRISPR1 of strain DGCC7778 contains 35 repeats (including the terminal repeat), and thus 34 spacers.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence of DGCC7778 When compared to the CRISPR1 sequence of DGCC7710, the CRISPR1 sequence of DGCC7778 possesses two additional, adjacent, new spacers (and of course two additional repeats which flank the new spacers) at one end of the CRISPR locus (i.e., close to the leader). All the other spacers of the CRISPR1 locus are unchanged.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence (5′-3′) of strain DGCC7778 is shown in SEQ ID NO:679, below:
  • the first spacer (5′-caacacattcaacagattaatgaagaatac-3′; SEQ ID NO:680) and the second spacer (5′-tccactcacgtacaaatagtgagtgtactc-3; SEQ ID NO:681) constitute the strain-specific tag which identifies this labelled strain. It was determined that the sequence of both new spacers exists within the D858 phage genome. The sequence of the second new spacer is found between positions 25471 and 25442 bp (i.e., on the minus strand) of D858's genome, with one mismatch (96.7% of identical nucleotides over 30 nucleotides):
  • the sequence of the first spacer is found between positions 31481 and 31410 bp (i.e., on the plus strand) of D858's genome (100% of identical nucleotides over 30 nucleotides):
  • This spacer was derived from the D858 genome, but a replication error or reverse transcription error likely occurred during the insertion process, leading to a point mutation. Due to the imperfect match (i.e., the 1 mismatch) between this newly acquired spacer and the targeted phage sequence, the efficiency of resistance of this intermediate strain to phage D858 was low. A second event of spacer insertion occurred in this intermediate strain (more resistant to phage D858 than parental strain DGCC7710, but not “fully” resistant because of the mismatch), leading to the insertion of a second new spacer (i.e., spacer “1” as found in DGCC7778) at the same end of CRISPR1 locus, together with one repeat.
  • a second new spacer i.e., spacer “1” as found in DGCC7778
  • DGCC7778 This second insertion gave rise to a new bacteriophage insensitive mutant, which was isolated and named DGCC7778.
  • DGCC7778 is more resistant to D858 than the intermediate strain, and of course much more resistant than parental strain DGCC7710, due to the presence of spacer “1,” which is 100% identical to the targeted phage sequence.
  • Strain DGCC7710 was infected/challenged by phage D858 by inoculating pasteurised milk with strain DGCC7710 at about 2.10 6 cfu/ml and with phage D858 at about 1.10 5 pfu/ml.
  • the inoculated milk was cultivated for 12 hours at 35° C.
  • viable bacteria i.e., those that are likely to be bacteriophage insensitive mutants
  • non-selective medium milk agar plates
  • the DNA extract was amplified using PCR as known in the art (See e.g., Bolotin et al. [2005], supra) using combination of one forward primer (either yc70 and/or SPIDR-ups [5′-gTCTTTAgAAACTgTgACACC]; SEQ ID NO:674) and of one reverse primer (either yc31 and/or SPIDR-dws [5′-TAAACAgAgCCTCCCTATCC]; SEQ ID NO:675).
  • the sequence of the PCR products was determined and compared to that of the CRISPR locus of DGCC7710.
  • S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH1 was isolated as a natural phage resistant mutant using DGCC7710 as the parent strain and phage D858 as the virulent phage.
  • the CRISPR1 of strain DGCC7710-RH1 contains 34 repeats (including the terminal repeat), and thus 33 spacers.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence of S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH1 possesses one additional new spacer (i.e., tagging sequence) (and of course one additional repeat which flanks the new spacer) at one end of the CRISPR locus (i.e., close to the leader, at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus). All of the other spacers of CRISPR1 locus are unchanged.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence (5′-3′) of strain DGCC7710-RH1 is:
  • the leader sequence is 5′ caaggacagttattgattttataatcactatgtgggtataaaacgtcaaaatttcatttgag 3′ (SEQ ID NO:688).
  • the integrated sequence (GTITTTGTACTCTCAAGATTTAAGTAACTGTACAACtcaacaattgcaacatcttataacccactt; SEQ ID NO:689) is shown in gray, comprising a CRISPR Repeat (upper case) and a CRISPR spacer (i.e., tagging sequence), which is shown in lower case.
  • terminal repeat 5′ gtttttgtactctcaagatttaagtaactgtacagt 3′ (SEQ ID NO:3)
  • trailer sequence 5′ ttgattcaacataaaaagccagttcaattgaacttggcttt3′ (SEQ ID NO:691) are shown.
  • the spacer (5′-tcaacaattgcaacatcttataacccactt-3′; SEQ ID NO:534) constitutes the strain-specific tagging sequence which identifies this mutant strain (i.e., the labelled bacterium).
  • the sequence of the new spacer i.e., tagging sequence exists within the D858 phage genome.
  • the sequence of the spacer is found between positions 31921 and 31950 bp (i.e., on the plus strand) of the D858 genome (and has 100% identity to the D858 genomic sequence over 30 nucleotides):
  • the new spacer i.e., tagging sequence
  • the new spacer that is integrated into the CRISPR1 locus of Streptococcus thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH1 confers to this strain a new resistance to phage D858.
  • S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2 was isolated as a natural phage resistant mutant using S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710 as the parental strain, and phage D858 as the virulent phage.
  • the CRISPR1 of S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2 contains 34 repeats (including the terminal repeat), and thus 33 spacers.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence of S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710 contains 34 repeats (including the terminal repeat), and thus 33 spacers.
  • thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2 possesses one additional new spacer (i.e., tagging sequence) (and of course one additional repeat which flanks the new spacer) at one end of the CRISPR locus (i.e., close to the leader, at the 5′ end of the CRISPR locus). All the other spacers of CRISPR1 locus are unchanged.
  • the CRISPR1 sequence (5′-3′) of strain DGCC7710-RH2 is:
  • the leader sequence is 5′ caaggacagttattgattttataatcactatgtgggtataaaacgtcaaaatttcatttgag 3′ (SEQ ID NO:688).
  • the integrated sequence (GTTTITGTACTCTCAAGATTTAAGTAACTGTACAACttacgtttgaaaagaatatcaaatcaatga; SEQ ID NO:694) is shown in gray, comprising a CRISPR Repeat (upper case) and a CRISPR spacer (i.e., tagging sequence), which is shown in lower case.
  • the terminal repeat (5′ gtttttgtactctcaagatttaagtaactgtacagt (SEQ ID NO:3)
  • trailer sequence 5′ ttgattcaacataaaaagccagttcaattgaacttggcttt3′ (SEQ ID NO:691) are shown.
  • the spacer (5′-ttacgtttgaaaagaatatcaaatcaatga-3′; SEQ ID NO:697) constitutes the strain-specific tag which identifies this mutant strain (i.e., labelled bacterium).
  • the sequence of the new spacer was shown to exist within D858 phage genome. The sequence of the spacer is found between positions 17215 and 17244 bp (i.e., on the plus strand) of D858's genome (and has 100% identity to the D858 genomic sequence over 30 nucleotides):
  • the new spacer integrated into the CRISPR1 locus of S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2 confers a new resistance to phage D858 to S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710-RH2.
  • Phage resistant host variants are first constructed as described in the Examples above.
  • a parental strain “A” is exposed to phage “P” and a phage resistant variant (Variant “A1.0”) selected.
  • Variant A1.0 is analyzed (for example by PCR, and/or DNA sequencing) to confirm the presence of an additional inserted spacer within a CRISPR locus.
  • the nucleotide sequence of the additional spacer (Spacer Sp1.0) is then determined.
  • spacer Sp1.0 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage P, and gives resistance to phage P and related phages (“related phages” are those containing the sequence of the spacer in their genomes, and define a family of phages).
  • variant A2.0 Independently from the first phage exposure, the same parental strain A is exposed to the same phage P and a second phage resistant variant (Variant A2.0) is selected.
  • Variant A2.0 is selected in order to also have an additional spacer inserted (Spacer Sp2.0) within a CRISPR locus but with the sequence of spacer Sp2.0 being different from that of spacer Sp1.0.
  • spacer Sp2.0 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage P, and gives resistance to phage P and related phages.
  • variant A3.0 to variant Ax.0 are generated through the exposure of the same strain A to the same phage P.
  • All the “A” variants are selected in order to also have an additional spacer inserted (Spacer Sp3.0 to Spx.0) within a CRISPR locus but with the sequence of all the “Sp” spacers being different from each of the others.
  • “Sp” spacers are fragments of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage P, and all give resistance to phage P and related phages.
  • the level of resistance will be approximately that of a single mutation occurring within the phage genome within the sequence corresponding to the spacer (i.e., roughly 10 ⁇ 4 to 10 ⁇ 6 ).
  • the mutated phage are generated through exposure of variant A1.0 to phage P.
  • the mutated “CRISPR-escape” phage (P1.0) harbors at least one mutation within its genome corresponding to the sequence of spacer Sp1.0 (e.g., deletion(s), point mutation(s), etc.), or in some preferred embodiments, the region flanking Sp1.0, plus or minus 20 bp corresponding to the CRISPR motif.
  • Variant A1.0 would be sensitive to phage P1.0.
  • independently generated phage P resistant variants (Variant A2.0, A3.0, to Ax.0) that harbor unique spacers (Sp2.0, Sp3.0, to Spx.0, respectively) are likewise challenged with phage P to generate the corresponding mutant phages (P2.0, P3.0, to Px.0, respectively).
  • a pool of mutant virulent phage whose genomes have been specifically mutated to a sequence anticipated to be a CRISPR spacer, can be generated.
  • phage D2792 represents a fully virulent biocontrol phage against S. thermophilus strain DGCC7710 (WT).
  • WT thermophilus strain
  • analysis of the CRISPR locus of related strains WT phi2972 +S6 , WT phi2972 +S4 , W phi2972 +S20 , WT phi2972 +S21 , and WT phi2972 +S22 indicate the presence of a spacer sequence that is similar to sequences found in phage D2972 which indicate that phage D2972 has reduced virulence upon these strains. Plaquing data (See, Table 7-1) confirms the reduced virulence of phage D2972 on these strains.
  • strain DGCC7710 was exposed to phage D2972 to generate resistant variant WT phi2972 +S6 .
  • strain WT phi2972 +S6 was exposed to phage D2972, it was possible to isolate mutant phage, such as D4724. This D4724 phage was found to be fully virulent upon DGCC7710 and WT phi2972 +S6
  • WT phi2972 +S6 was exposed to phage D4724, to generate resistant variant WT phi2972 +S6 phi4724 +S15 .
  • mutant phages were identified such as D4733, that are fully virulent towards DGCC7710 and WT phi2972 +S6 .
  • successive iterations are used to generate phage with the desired level of virulence.
  • mutant phage 858-A and 858-B derived from parent phage D858 are shown.
  • the mutations correspond to spacer S1 from WT ⁇ 858+S1S2 challenged with phage D858.
  • Fully virulent phage mutants where the mutation is identified in the CRISPR motif are shown in Table 20-1.
  • Table 20-1 nucleotide sequences in wild-type and mutant phages that correspond to the newly acquired spacers by the S. thermophilus strains are shown.
  • the AGAAW motif is highlighted in grey.
  • Each mutation is in bold and underlined. *, indicates a deletion.
  • This Table provides sequences for phage resistant CRISPR variant and virulent phage mutant pairs: DGCC7710 ⁇ 858 +S3 /phage 2972.S3C, DGCC7710 ⁇ 2972 +S4 /phage 2972.S4A or phage 2972.S4C, DGCC7710 ⁇ 2972 +S6 /phage 2972.S6A, and DGCC7710 ⁇ 2972 +S4 ⁇ 858 +S32 /phage 858.S32A or phage 858.S32D.
  • the new spacer corresponds to SEQ ID NO:535 (DGCC7710 ⁇ 858 +S3 ).
  • CRISPR-mediated phage resistant variants followed by isolation of mutated (“CRISPR-escape”) phage capable of overcoming the cas-CRISPR mechanism, it is possible to create phage that have “pre-adapted” with multiple mutations against potential CRISPR-mediated resistance.
  • the second level variants are produced by isolating a mutated phage through exposure of variant A1.0 to phage P.
  • this mutated phage (phage P1.0) has a mutation (deletion, point mutation, etc.) in its genome within the region containing the sequence of spacer Sp1.0 or within the region flanking Sp1.0, plus or minus 20 bp corresponding to the CRISPR motif.
  • Variant A1.0 is sensitive to phage P1.0. Then, variant A1.0 is exposed to phage P1.0 and a phage resistant variant (Variant A1.1) selected (See, FIG. 15 ).
  • Variant A1.1 is also selected such that it has an additional spacer inserted (Spacer Sp1.1) within a CRISPR locus but with the sequence of spacer Sp1.1 being different from that of spacers Sp1.0, Sp2.0 to Spx.0.
  • spacer Sp1.1 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage P1.0, and will give resistance to phage P1.0 and related phages.
  • Variant A1.1 is resistant to phage P1.0 and preferably, has an increased resistance to phage P because of the accumulation of spacer Sp1.0 and Sp1.1.
  • a newly mutated phage (phage P1.1) is generated through exposure of variant A1.1 to phage P1.0. Then, upon exposure of variant A1.1 to phage P1.1 a new variant A1.2 is obtained that contains one new additional spacer (Sp1.2).
  • This spacer gives resistance to phage P1.1 and preferably increases the resistance to phage P1.0 and P (i.e., due to the accumulation of spacers Sp1.0, Sp1.1, Sp1.2).
  • Phage P1.1 is fully infective towards parental strain A, as well as variants A1.0 and A1.1.
  • different spacers are iteratively accumulated within strain A through variant A1, then variant A1.1, then variant A1.2, etc to obtain a variant highly resistant to phages (variant A1.n).
  • additional different spacers can be accumulated in the same strain through variant A2, then variant A2.1, then variant A2.2, etc to generate another variant of strain A highly resistant to phages (variant A2.n) in parallel. The same strategy finds use with variants A3.0 to Ax.0.
  • mutant “CRISPR-escape” phage e.g., exposure of variant A 1.1 to phage P1.1 creating new variant A1.2 that contains one new additional spacer (Sp1.2) from which a mutant phage is isolated (P1.2) that is fully virulent on variant A1.2, A1.1, A1.0 and parent strain A.
  • combinatorial mutations are accumulated by iterative construction of bacterial variants combining different spacers (e.g., Sp2.0. Sp3.0 to Spx.0), exposure to the corresponding first level mutant phage (P2.0, P3.0 to Px.0), and isolation of second level mutant phages.
  • spacers e.g., Sp2.0. Sp3.0 to Spx.0
  • first level mutant phage P2.0, P3.0 to Px.0
  • isolation of second level mutant phages isolation of second level mutant phages.
  • Table 22-1 An example of iterative combinatorial mutations creating CRISPR phage resistant variants and mutant “CRISPR-escape” phage is shown in Table 22-1.
  • This table provides a list of new spacers found in CRISPR1 and the corresponding region in phages 2972, 858, or DT1.
  • the “a” indicates DNA regions that are 100% identical between phages 858 and 2972.
  • the “5′ Position” refers to the 5′ position of the proto-spacer in the phage genome. Underlined and shaded nucleotides in the proto-spacer sequence indicate mismatches between the phage and the spacer. An asterisk (*) indicates a deletion.
  • 3′ Flanking Region indicates the 3′ flanking sequence in the phage genome. Mismatches in the AGAAW motif are underlined and shaded in grey.
  • the transcription modules are “E” (early expressed genes); “M” (middle expressed genes); and “L” (late expressed genes).
  • DGCC7710 was exposed to phage 2972 to create CRISPR phage resistant variant DGCC7710 ⁇ 2972 +S6 from which CRISPR-escape mutant phage 2972.S6B was generated. Exposure of DGCC7710 ⁇ 2972 +S6 to phage 2972.S6B created CRISPR phage resistant variant DGCC7710 ⁇ 2972 ⁇ S6 ⁇ 2972.S6B +S20 from which CRISPR-escape mutant phage 2972.S20A was isolated.
  • strains that are resistant to more than one family of phages are provided.
  • phages P, Q, and R are representative phages from three families of phages able to infect strain A.
  • variants resistant to all three phage families are produced.
  • phage P is used to generate variant A1 p (containing spacer Sp1) that is resistant to phage P.
  • variant A1 p is exposed to phage Q and a phage resistant variant (Variant A1 pq ) is selected.
  • Variant A1 pq has one additional spacer (Sq1) inserted within a CRISPR locus.
  • spacer Sq1 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage Q, and gives resistance to phage Q and related phages.
  • Variant A1 pq is resistant to both P and Q phages.
  • variant A1 pq is exposed to phage R and a phage resistant variant (Variant A1 pqr ) is selected.
  • Variant A1 pqr has a third additional spacer (Sr1) inserted within a CRISPR locus.
  • Sr1 is a fragment of approximately 30 nucleotides in size from the phage R, and also gives resistance to phage R and related phages.
  • Variant A1 pqr is resistant to all three phages. In some particularly preferred embodiments, the variant is also resistant to related phages.
  • CRISPR-escape phages find use as biocontrol/therapeutic phages. As described above, through the process of creating CRISPR-mediated phage resistant variants, exposure to phage and isolation of virulent “CRISPR-escape” phage, a mixture of phage species that harbor single and/or multiple mutations targeted against single and/or multiple phage genome sequences that are potential CRISPR spacer targets is generated.
  • target host bacteria can become resistant to phage through the incorporation of a single or multiple spacers and that the Cas-CRISPR mechanism can be overcome through a mutation within the phage genome corresponding to such spacers, the use of a mixture of phage harboring various mutations reduces the rate of an individual bacterium to successfully acquire new spacers and proliferate.
  • analysis of the protospacer and flanking regions facilitates identification of the CRISPR motif for a specific CRISPR.
  • CRISPR 1 phage-resistant variants containing spacers S1-S33 were generated following challenge with phage 2972 or 858. Alignment of the protospacer and flanking regions, from the genome of phages 2972 or 858 that correspond to spacers S1-S33, using the software program Clustal X, identified the CRISPR 1 motif as NNAGAAW (SEQ ID NO:696), and is visualized using WebLogo ( FIG. 22 ).
  • CRISPR 3 phage resistant variants were derived from DGCC7710 following challenge with phages 858 and 3821, and LMD-9 following challenge with phage 4241. Alignment of the protospacers and flanking region from the respective phage genomes with the corresponding spacers of the respective CRISPR 3 phage resistant variants, identified the CRISPR 3 motif as NGGNG (SEQ ID NO:723) ( FIG. 23 ).
  • Analysis for the presence of a specific CRISPR motif provides means to identify the location of putative protospacers within a genome or other specified sequence (e.g., a plasmid or another mobile genetic element).
  • sequenced phages 858, 2972, and DT1 analysis for the distribution of the AGAAW CRISPR 1 motif identified the location of potential protospacers within the respective genomes.
  • each AGAAW motif was eliminated in the process of chemically synthesizing a genome as described for phage OX 174, as known in the art.
  • the phage became insensitive to the Cas-CRISPR 1 resistance system.
  • a DNA molecule, devoid of specific CRISPR motifs is insensitive to the corresponding Cas-CRISPR system.
  • phages and “cocktails” of multiple phage types find use in rotation strategies (e.g., defined sequential administration of phage).
  • rotation strategies e.g., defined sequential administration of phage.
  • multiple virulent phage, each harboring a different spacer mutation in a defined sequential manner are used.
  • each phage is applied individually and in a defined sequence and rotation (P.10>P2.0>P3.0>P1.0, P2.0> etc) so as to minimize the probability of the target bacteria developing CRISPR-mediated resistance to the phage.
  • a set of phage cocktails i.e., each phage within the cocktail as well as each cocktail possesses a unique combination of mutations finds use in sequence and rotation.
  • the phage and/or cocktail is comprised of a single phage family, while in other embodiments, the phage and/or cocktail is comprised of multiple phage families.
  • This Example provides various functional combinations that find use in the present invention.
  • SEQ ID NO:461 to SEQ ID NO:465 and SEQ ID NO:473 to SEQ ID NO:477 all of which are S. thermophilus sequences, as set forth below:
  • SEQ ID NO:466 to SEQ ID NO:472 SEQ ID NO:478 to SEQ ID NO:487 (all of which are S. thermophilus sequences), as shown below:
  • SEQ ID NOS:488-497 are from S. agalactiae
  • SEQ ID NOS:498-503 are from S. mutans
  • SEQ ID NOS:504-508, 517-521 are from S. pyogenes .
  • SEQ ID NO:509 SEQ ID NO:516 (all of which are from S. pyogenes ), as shown below:

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Food Preservation Except Freezing, Refrigeration, And Drying (AREA)
US12/529,421 2007-03-02 2008-02-29 Cultures with Improved Phage Resistance Abandoned US20110002889A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/529,421 US20110002889A1 (en) 2007-03-02 2008-02-29 Cultures with Improved Phage Resistance

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US90472107P 2007-03-02 2007-03-02
US12/529,421 US20110002889A1 (en) 2007-03-02 2008-02-29 Cultures with Improved Phage Resistance
PCT/US2008/002714 WO2008108989A2 (en) 2007-03-02 2008-02-29 Cultures with improved phage resistance

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2008/002714 A-371-Of-International WO2008108989A2 (en) 2007-03-02 2008-02-29 Cultures with improved phage resistance

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/570,994 Division US9951342B2 (en) 2007-03-02 2014-12-15 Cultures with improved phage resistance

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110002889A1 true US20110002889A1 (en) 2011-01-06

Family

ID=39736496

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/529,421 Abandoned US20110002889A1 (en) 2007-03-02 2008-02-29 Cultures with Improved Phage Resistance
US14/570,994 Active 2028-03-03 US9951342B2 (en) 2007-03-02 2014-12-15 Cultures with improved phage resistance

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/570,994 Active 2028-03-03 US9951342B2 (en) 2007-03-02 2014-12-15 Cultures with improved phage resistance

Country Status (20)

Country Link
US (2) US20110002889A1 (zh)
EP (3) EP2126130B1 (zh)
JP (2) JP5932207B2 (zh)
CN (2) CN101688241B (zh)
AU (1) AU2008223544B2 (zh)
BR (1) BRPI0808704B1 (zh)
CY (1) CY1116417T1 (zh)
DK (2) DK2126130T3 (zh)
ES (2) ES2541693T3 (zh)
HK (1) HK1142930A1 (zh)
HR (1) HRP20150676T1 (zh)
HU (1) HUE025412T2 (zh)
MX (1) MX2009009071A (zh)
NZ (2) NZ579002A (zh)
PL (1) PL2126130T3 (zh)
PT (1) PT2126130E (zh)
RU (2) RU2531343C2 (zh)
SI (1) SI2126130T1 (zh)
TR (1) TR201905633T4 (zh)
WO (1) WO2008108989A2 (zh)

Cited By (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110236530A1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2011-09-29 Danisco A/S Genetic Cluster of Strains of Streptococcus Thermophilus Having Unique Rheological Properties for Dairy Fermentation
WO2014113493A1 (en) * 2013-01-16 2014-07-24 Emory University Cas9-nucleic acid complexes and uses related thereto
US9234213B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-01-12 System Biosciences, Llc Compositions and methods directed to CRISPR/Cas genomic engineering systems
US20160024510A1 (en) * 2013-02-07 2016-01-28 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US9260752B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-02-16 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compositions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US9512446B1 (en) 2015-08-28 2016-12-06 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases
US9567603B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-02-14 The General Hospital Corporation Using RNA-guided FokI nucleases (RFNs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
WO2017040348A1 (en) 2015-08-28 2017-03-09 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered crispr-cas9 nucleases
US9834791B2 (en) 2013-11-07 2017-12-05 Editas Medicine, Inc. CRISPR-related methods and compositions with governing gRNAS
US9885026B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2018-02-06 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Modified cascade ribonucleoproteins and uses thereof
US9902973B2 (en) 2013-04-11 2018-02-27 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Methods of modifying a target nucleic acid with an argonaute
US9926546B2 (en) 2015-08-28 2018-03-27 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases
US10000772B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2018-06-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10011850B2 (en) 2013-06-21 2018-07-03 The General Hospital Corporation Using RNA-guided FokI Nucleases (RFNs) to increase specificity for RNA-Guided Genome Editing
WO2018195545A2 (en) 2017-04-21 2018-10-25 The General Hospital Corporation Variants of cpf1 (cas12a) with altered pam specificity
WO2018218206A1 (en) 2017-05-25 2018-11-29 The General Hospital Corporation Bipartite base editor (bbe) architectures and type-ii-c-cas9 zinc finger editing
US10300138B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2019-05-28 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US10463049B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2019-11-05 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US10526589B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-01-07 The General Hospital Corporation Multiplex guide RNAs
US10655123B2 (en) 2014-03-05 2020-05-19 National University Corporation Kobe University Genomic sequence modification method for specifically converting nucleic acid bases of targeted DNA sequence, and molecular complex for use in same
US10731181B2 (en) 2012-12-06 2020-08-04 Sigma, Aldrich Co. LLC CRISPR-based genome modification and regulation
WO2020163396A1 (en) 2019-02-04 2020-08-13 The General Hospital Corporation Adenine dna base editor variants with reduced off-target rna editing
US10760075B2 (en) 2018-04-30 2020-09-01 Snipr Biome Aps Treating and preventing microbial infections
US10767173B2 (en) 2015-09-09 2020-09-08 National University Corporation Kobe University Method for converting genome sequence of gram-positive bacterium by specifically converting nucleic acid base of targeted DNA sequence, and molecular complex used in same
US10920215B2 (en) 2014-11-04 2021-02-16 National University Corporation Kobe University Method for modifying genome sequence to introduce specific mutation to targeted DNA sequence by base-removal reaction, and molecular complex used therein
WO2021055875A1 (en) * 2019-09-18 2021-03-25 Ancilia, Inc. Compositions and methods for microbiome modulation
US10966752B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2021-04-06 Conmed Corporation Single lumen gas sealed trocar for maintaining stable cavity pressure without allowing instrument access therethrough during endoscopic surgical procedures
WO2021151972A1 (en) * 2020-01-30 2021-08-05 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Rotation scheme for bacterial cultures in food product fermentation
US11135273B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2021-10-05 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US11220693B2 (en) 2015-11-27 2022-01-11 National University Corporation Kobe University Method for converting monocot plant genome sequence in which nucleic acid base in targeted DNA sequence is specifically converted, and molecular complex used therein
EP4198124A1 (en) 2021-12-15 2023-06-21 Versitech Limited Engineered cas9-nucleases and method of use thereof
US11845953B2 (en) 2017-03-22 2023-12-19 National University Corporation Kobe University Method for converting nucleic acid sequence of cell specifically converting nucleic acid base of targeted DNA using cell endogenous DNA modifying enzyme, and molecular complex used therein
EP4100742A4 (en) * 2020-02-03 2024-03-20 Technion Res & Dev Foundation METHOD FOR ISOLATION OF A MICRO-ORGANISM
US11998579B2 (en) * 2016-01-03 2024-06-04 Glaxosmithkline Biologicals Sa Immunogenic composition

Families Citing this family (145)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9404098B2 (en) 2008-11-06 2016-08-02 University Of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. Method for cleaving a target RNA using a Cas6 polypeptide
CA2814810A1 (en) 2010-10-20 2012-04-26 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Lactococcus crispr-cas sequences
US10687975B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2020-06-23 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system to facilitate the growth of desired bacteria in a human's mouth
US10086018B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2018-10-02 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of colorectal cancer in a human being
US9987224B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2018-06-05 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for preventing migraine headaches, cluster headaches and dizziness
US10842834B2 (en) 2016-01-06 2020-11-24 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of developing liver cancer in an individual diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
US10010568B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2018-07-03 Katherine Rose Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of a spirochetes infection in a human being
US10835560B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2020-11-17 Joseph E. Kovarik Reducing the likelihood of skin cancer in an individual human being
US11273187B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2022-03-15 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of developing depression in an individual
US10085938B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2018-10-02 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for preventing sore throat in humans
US10111913B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2018-10-30 Joseph E. Kovarik Method of reducing the likelihood of skin cancer in an individual human being
US11419903B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2022-08-23 Seed Health, Inc. Method and system for reducing the likelihood of osteoporosis
US10583033B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2020-03-10 Katherine Rose Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of a porphyromonas gingivalis infection in a human being
US11357722B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2022-06-14 Seed Health, Inc. Method and system for preventing sore throat in humans
US11844720B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2023-12-19 Seed Health, Inc. Method and system to reduce the likelihood of dental caries and halitosis
US10512661B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2019-12-24 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of developing liver cancer in an individual diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
US10548761B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2020-02-04 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of colorectal cancer in a human being
US11523934B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2022-12-13 Seed Health, Inc. Method and system to facilitate the growth of desired bacteria in a human's mouth
US11191665B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2021-12-07 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of a porphyromonas gingivalis infection in a human being
US11951140B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2024-04-09 Seed Health, Inc. Modulation of an individual's gut microbiome to address osteoporosis and bone disease
US10245288B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2019-04-02 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for reducing the likelihood of developing NASH in an individual diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
US11951139B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2024-04-09 Seed Health, Inc. Method and system for reducing the likelihood of osteoporosis
US20140113376A1 (en) 2011-06-01 2014-04-24 Rotem Sorek Compositions and methods for downregulating prokaryotic genes
EP2734621B1 (en) 2011-07-22 2019-09-04 President and Fellows of Harvard College Evaluation and improvement of nuclease cleavage specificity
US11021737B2 (en) 2011-12-22 2021-06-01 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Compositions and methods for analyte detection
US9637739B2 (en) * 2012-03-20 2017-05-02 Vilnius University RNA-directed DNA cleavage by the Cas9-crRNA complex
WO2013141680A1 (en) * 2012-03-20 2013-09-26 Vilnius University RNA-DIRECTED DNA CLEAVAGE BY THE Cas9-crRNA COMPLEX
CN116064532A (zh) 2012-10-23 2023-05-05 基因工具股份有限公司 用于切割靶dna的组合物及其用途
EP2931892B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2018-09-12 The Broad Institute, Inc. Methods, models, systems, and apparatus for identifying target sequences for cas enzymes or crispr-cas systems for target sequences and conveying results thereof
US8697359B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-04-15 The Broad Institute, Inc. CRISPR-Cas systems and methods for altering expression of gene products
DK3327127T3 (da) 2012-12-12 2021-06-28 Broad Inst Inc Fremføring, modificering og optimering af systemer, fremgangsmåder og sammensætninger til sekvensmanipulation og terapeutiske anvendelser
IL307735A (en) 2012-12-12 2023-12-01 Broad Inst Inc Systems engineering, methods and optimal guiding components for sequence manipulation
ES2576128T3 (es) 2012-12-12 2016-07-05 The Broad Institute, Inc. Modificación por tecnología genética y optimización de sistemas, métodos y composiciones para la manipulación de secuencias con dominios funcionales
EP4286404A3 (en) 2012-12-12 2024-02-14 The Broad Institute Inc. Crispr-cas component systems, methods and compositions for sequence manipulation
US20140310830A1 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-10-16 Feng Zhang CRISPR-Cas Nickase Systems, Methods And Compositions For Sequence Manipulation in Eukaryotes
AU2013359212B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2017-01-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Engineering and optimization of improved systems, methods and enzyme compositions for sequence manipulation
IL308158A (en) 2012-12-17 2023-12-01 Harvard College RNA-guided human genome engineering
EP3578666A1 (en) 2013-03-12 2019-12-11 President and Fellows of Harvard College Method of generating a three-dimensional nucleic acid containing matrix
MX2015016798A (es) 2013-06-04 2016-10-26 Harvard College Regulacion transcripcional guiada por acido ribonucleico.
US9267135B2 (en) 2013-06-04 2016-02-23 President And Fellows Of Harvard College RNA-guided transcriptional regulation
EP3011033B1 (en) 2013-06-17 2020-02-19 The Broad Institute, Inc. Functional genomics using crispr-cas systems, compositions methods, screens and applications thereof
DK3011031T3 (da) 2013-06-17 2020-12-21 Broad Inst Inc Fremføring og anvendelse af crispr-cas-systemerne, vektorer og sammensætninger til levermålretning og -terapi
CA2915834A1 (en) 2013-06-17 2014-12-24 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Delivery, engineering and optimization of tandem guide systems, methods and compositions for sequence manipulation
WO2014204729A1 (en) 2013-06-17 2014-12-24 The Broad Institute Inc. Delivery, use and therapeutic applications of the crispr-cas systems and compositions for targeting disorders and diseases using viral components
EP4245853A3 (en) 2013-06-17 2023-10-18 The Broad Institute, Inc. Optimized crispr-cas double nickase systems, methods and compositions for sequence manipulation
EP3666892A1 (en) 2013-07-10 2020-06-17 President and Fellows of Harvard College Orthogonal cas9 proteins for rna-guided gene regulation and editing
EP2826379A1 (en) 2013-07-17 2015-01-21 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences ApS Streptococcus thermophilus strains
CN103388006B (zh) * 2013-07-26 2015-10-28 华东师范大学 一种基因定点突变的构建方法
US10563225B2 (en) 2013-07-26 2020-02-18 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Genome engineering
US9163284B2 (en) 2013-08-09 2015-10-20 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Methods for identifying a target site of a Cas9 nuclease
US9359599B2 (en) 2013-08-22 2016-06-07 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Engineered transcription activator-like effector (TALE) domains and uses thereof
US9322037B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2016-04-26 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Cas9-FokI fusion proteins and uses thereof
US9737604B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2017-08-22 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Use of cationic lipids to deliver CAS9
US9340800B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2016-05-17 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Extended DNA-sensing GRNAS
DE202014010413U1 (de) 2013-09-18 2015-12-08 Kymab Limited Zellen und Organismen
WO2015065964A1 (en) 2013-10-28 2015-05-07 The Broad Institute Inc. Functional genomics using crispr-cas systems, compositions, methods, screens and applications thereof
WO2015066119A1 (en) 2013-10-30 2015-05-07 North Carolina State University Compositions and methods related to a type-ii crispr-cas system in lactobacillus buchneri
US10787684B2 (en) 2013-11-19 2020-09-29 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Large gene excision and insertion
US9074199B1 (en) 2013-11-19 2015-07-07 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Mutant Cas9 proteins
NL2011912C2 (en) * 2013-12-06 2015-06-09 Univ Delft Tech Novel genome alteration system for microorganisms.
WO2015089351A1 (en) 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 The Broad Institute Inc. Compositions and methods of use of crispr-cas systems in nucleotide repeat disorders
WO2015089364A1 (en) 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 The Broad Institute Inc. Crystal structure of a crispr-cas system, and uses thereof
WO2015089486A2 (en) 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 The Broad Institute Inc. Systems, methods and compositions for sequence manipulation with optimized functional crispr-cas systems
AU2014361781B2 (en) 2013-12-12 2021-04-01 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Delivery, use and therapeutic applications of the CRISPR -Cas systems and compositions for genome editing
EP3080260B1 (en) 2013-12-12 2019-03-06 The Broad Institute, Inc. Crispr-cas systems and methods for altering expression of gene products, structural information and inducible modular cas enzymes
US20150165054A1 (en) 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Methods for correcting caspase-9 point mutations
US11839632B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2023-12-12 Seed Health, Inc. Topical application of CRISPR-modified bacteria to treat acne vulgaris
US11826388B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2023-11-28 Seed Health, Inc. Topical application of Lactobacillus crispatus to ameliorate barrier damage and inflammation
US11980643B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2024-05-14 Seed Health, Inc. Method and system to modify an individual's gut-brain axis to provide neurocognitive protection
US11833177B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2023-12-05 Seed Health, Inc. Probiotic to enhance an individual's skin microbiome
US11969445B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2024-04-30 Seed Health, Inc. Probiotic composition and method for controlling excess weight, obesity, NAFLD and NASH
US10787654B2 (en) 2014-01-24 2020-09-29 North Carolina State University Methods and compositions for sequence guiding Cas9 targeting
US10041135B2 (en) 2014-02-20 2018-08-07 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Phage insensitive Streptococcus thermophilus
US11028388B2 (en) 2014-03-05 2021-06-08 Editas Medicine, Inc. CRISPR/Cas-related methods and compositions for treating Usher syndrome and retinitis pigmentosa
US11339437B2 (en) 2014-03-10 2022-05-24 Editas Medicine, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating CEP290-associated disease
ES2745769T3 (es) 2014-03-10 2020-03-03 Editas Medicine Inc Procedimientos y composiciones relacionados con CRISPR/CAS para tratar la amaurosis congénita de Leber 10 (LCA10)
US11141493B2 (en) 2014-03-10 2021-10-12 Editas Medicine, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating CEP290-associated disease
US11242525B2 (en) 2014-03-26 2022-02-08 Editas Medicine, Inc. CRISPR/CAS-related methods and compositions for treating sickle cell disease
CN106460003A (zh) 2014-04-08 2017-02-22 北卡罗来纳州立大学 用于使用crispr相关基因rna引导阻遏转录的方法和组合物
IL286474B2 (en) 2014-06-23 2023-11-01 Massachusetts Gen Hospital Genome-wide random identification of DSBS assessed by sequencing (guide-sequence)
US10077453B2 (en) 2014-07-30 2018-09-18 President And Fellows Of Harvard College CAS9 proteins including ligand-dependent inteins
EP3186375A4 (en) 2014-08-28 2019-03-13 North Carolina State University NEW CAS9 PROTEINS AND GUIDING ELEMENTS FOR DNA TARGETING AND THE GENOME EDITION
EP3224353B9 (en) * 2014-11-26 2023-08-09 Technology Innovation Momentum Fund (Israel) Limited Partnership Targeted elimination of bacterial genes
EP3230451B1 (en) 2014-12-12 2021-04-07 The Broad Institute, Inc. Protected guide rnas (pgrnas)
KR101761581B1 (ko) 2014-12-30 2017-07-26 주식회사 인트론바이오테크놀로지 신규한 장침입성 대장균 박테리오파지 Ｅｓｃ-ＣＯＰ-4 및 이의 장침입성 대장균 증식 억제 용도
KR101649851B1 (ko) * 2014-12-30 2016-08-30 주식회사 인트론바이오테크놀로지 신규한 시가독소생산 F18형 대장균 박테리오파지 Ｅｓｃ-ＣＯＰ-1 및 이의 시가독소생산 F18형 대장균 증식 억제 용도
KR20170126875A (ko) 2015-01-28 2017-11-20 파이어니어 하이 부렛드 인터내쇼날 인코포레이팃드 Crispr 하이브리드 dna/rna 폴리뉴클레오티드 및 사용 방법
WO2016141224A1 (en) 2015-03-03 2016-09-09 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered crispr-cas9 nucleases with altered pam specificity
SG11201708653RA (en) 2015-04-24 2017-11-29 Editas Medicine Inc Evaluation of cas9 molecule/guide rna molecule complexes
EP4039816A1 (en) * 2015-05-29 2022-08-10 North Carolina State University Methods for screening bacteria, archaea, algae, and yeast using crispr nucleic acids
EP3307872B1 (en) * 2015-06-15 2023-09-27 North Carolina State University Methods and compositions for efficient delivery of nucleic acids and rna-based antimicrobials
WO2016205759A1 (en) 2015-06-18 2016-12-22 The Broad Institute Inc. Engineering and optimization of systems, methods, enzymes and guide scaffolds of cas9 orthologs and variants for sequence manipulation
TWI813532B (zh) 2015-06-18 2023-09-01 美商博得學院股份有限公司 降低脱靶效應的ｃｒｉｓｐｒ酶突變
AU2016319110B2 (en) 2015-09-11 2022-01-27 The General Hospital Corporation Full interrogation of nuclease DSBs and sequencing (FIND-seq)
EP3356533A1 (en) 2015-09-28 2018-08-08 North Carolina State University Methods and compositions for sequence specific antimicrobials
AU2016331185A1 (en) 2015-09-30 2018-04-26 The General Hospital Corporation Comprehensive in vitro reporting of cleavage events by sequencing (CIRCLE-seq)
JP7067793B2 (ja) 2015-10-23 2022-05-16 プレジデント アンド フェローズ オブ ハーバード カレッジ 核酸塩基編集因子およびその使用
EP3371329A4 (en) 2015-11-03 2019-06-19 President and Fellows of Harvard College METHOD AND DEVICE FOR VOLUMETRIC IMAGING OF A THREE-DIMENSIONAL NUCLEIC ACID-CONTAINING MATRIX
US10933128B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2021-03-02 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for protecting honey bees from pesticides
US10675347B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2020-06-09 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for protecting honey bees from fipronil pesticides
US11529412B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2022-12-20 Seed Health, Inc. Method and system for protecting honey bees from pesticides
US10568916B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2020-02-25 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for protecting honey bees, bats and butterflies from neonicotinoid pesticides
US10086024B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2018-10-02 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for protecting honey bees, bats and butterflies from neonicotinoid pesticides
US11542466B2 (en) 2015-12-22 2023-01-03 North Carolina State University Methods and compositions for delivery of CRISPR based antimicrobials
CN105567218A (zh) * 2015-12-25 2016-05-11 哈尔滨工业大学 红色发光材料铕配位聚合物、其制备方法及基于该聚合物的复合光能转换薄膜的制备方法
WO2017165862A1 (en) 2016-03-25 2017-09-28 Editas Medicine, Inc. Systems and methods for treating alpha 1-antitrypsin (a1at) deficiency
CA3022290A1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Hybridization chain reaction methods for in situ molecular detection
US20190249149A1 (en) * 2016-05-15 2019-08-15 The Regents Of The University Of California Compositions and methods for treating acne
PT3272867T (pt) 2016-06-02 2019-12-04 Sigma Aldrich Co Llc Utilização de proteínas de ligação ao dna programáveis para intensificar a modificação de genoma direcionada
CA3032822A1 (en) 2016-08-02 2018-02-08 Editas Medicine, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating cep290 associated disease
JP7231935B2 (ja) 2016-08-03 2023-03-08 プレジデント アンド フェローズ オブ ハーバード カレッジ アデノシン核酸塩基編集因子およびそれらの使用
AU2017308889B2 (en) 2016-08-09 2023-11-09 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Programmable Cas9-recombinase fusion proteins and uses thereof
US11542509B2 (en) 2016-08-24 2023-01-03 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins using base editing
KR20240007715A (ko) 2016-10-14 2024-01-16 프레지던트 앤드 펠로우즈 오브 하바드 칼리지 핵염기 에디터의 aav 전달
WO2018071892A1 (en) 2016-10-14 2018-04-19 Joung J Keith Epigenetically regulated site-specific nucleases
WO2018119359A1 (en) 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Editing of ccr5 receptor gene to protect against hiv infection
US11898179B2 (en) 2017-03-09 2024-02-13 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Suppression of pain by gene editing
EP3592777A1 (en) 2017-03-10 2020-01-15 President and Fellows of Harvard College Cytosine to guanine base editor
EP3596217A1 (en) 2017-03-14 2020-01-22 Editas Medicine, Inc. Systems and methods for the treatment of hemoglobinopathies
KR20190130613A (ko) 2017-03-23 2019-11-22 프레지던트 앤드 펠로우즈 오브 하바드 칼리지 핵산 프로그램가능한 dna 결합 단백질을 포함하는 핵염기 편집제
US11732251B2 (en) * 2017-04-24 2023-08-22 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Anti-CRISPR polynucleotides and polypeptides and methods of use
WO2018209158A2 (en) 2017-05-10 2018-11-15 Editas Medicine, Inc. Crispr/rna-guided nuclease systems and methods
WO2018209320A1 (en) 2017-05-12 2018-11-15 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Aptazyme-embedded guide rnas for use with crispr-cas9 in genome editing and transcriptional activation
JP2020534795A (ja) 2017-07-28 2020-12-03 プレジデント アンド フェローズ オブ ハーバード カレッジ ファージによって支援される連続的進化（ｐａｃｅ）を用いて塩基編集因子を進化させるための方法および組成物
AU2018320865B2 (en) 2017-08-23 2023-09-14 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificity
WO2019139645A2 (en) 2017-08-30 2019-07-18 President And Fellows Of Harvard College High efficiency base editors comprising gam
EP3694993A4 (en) 2017-10-11 2021-10-13 The General Hospital Corporation METHOD OF DETECTING A SITE-SPECIFIC AND UNDESIRED GENOMIC DESAMINATION INDUCED BY BASE EDITING TECHNOLOGIES
WO2019079347A1 (en) 2017-10-16 2019-04-25 The Broad Institute, Inc. USES OF BASIC EDITORS ADENOSINE
CN107723280B (zh) * 2017-11-10 2019-09-17 扬州大学 波罗的海希瓦氏菌噬菌体SppYZU01及其用途
CN112313241A (zh) 2018-04-17 2021-02-02 总医院公司 核酸结合、修饰、和切割试剂的底物偏好和位点的灵敏体外试验
CN108588245A (zh) * 2018-04-19 2018-09-28 上海市质量监督检验技术研究院 乳酸菌饮料中嗜酸乳杆菌成分的荧光定量pcr检测方法、检测试剂盒及应用
EP3788152A4 (en) * 2018-05-04 2022-03-09 Locus Biosciences, Inc. METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR KILLING A TARGET BACTERIA
US10711267B2 (en) 2018-10-01 2020-07-14 North Carolina State University Recombinant type I CRISPR-Cas system
US11851663B2 (en) 2018-10-14 2023-12-26 Snipr Biome Aps Single-vector type I vectors
US20220099672A1 (en) * 2019-01-31 2022-03-31 Locus IP Company,LLC Method for Treating and/or Preventing Bacteriophage Lysis During Fermentation
EP3935179A4 (en) * 2019-03-07 2022-11-23 The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York RNA-GUIDED DNA INTEGRATION USING TN7-LIKE TRANSPOSONS
EP3942040A1 (en) 2019-03-19 2022-01-26 The Broad Institute, Inc. Methods and compositions for editing nucleotide sequences
CN110129279B (zh) * 2019-04-24 2022-02-18 昆明理工大学 一种粪肠球菌噬菌体及其分离、纯化、富集和应用
CN110904054A (zh) * 2019-09-29 2020-03-24 中国科学院大学 一种沙门氏菌噬菌体see-1及其应用
WO2021226558A1 (en) 2020-05-08 2021-11-11 The Broad Institute, Inc. Methods and compositions for simultaneous editing of both strands of a target double-stranded nucleotide sequence
CN112063593B (zh) * 2020-09-17 2021-08-31 扬州大学 一种致病性弧菌噬菌体VmYZU10474及其应用
WO2022140630A1 (en) * 2020-12-23 2022-06-30 Locus Biosciences, Inc. Altering the normal balance of microbial populations
WO2023006885A1 (en) 2021-07-29 2023-02-02 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Compositions and methods for producing fermented plant-based compositions having cream flavor
WO2023006883A1 (en) 2021-07-29 2023-02-02 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Compositions and methods for producing fermented dairy compositions having cream flavor
WO2023082047A1 (en) 2021-11-09 2023-05-19 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Compositions and methods for producing fermented dairy prod-ucts for storage at ambient temperature

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2225783A (en) * 1939-04-07 1940-12-24 Lloyd B Jensen Sausage treatment
US3024116A (en) * 1959-02-24 1962-03-06 Libby Mcneill And Libby Food processing
US3403032A (en) * 1967-10-04 1968-09-24 Agriculture Usa Pure culture fermentation process for pickled cucumbers
US3897307A (en) * 1974-10-23 1975-07-29 Hansens Lab Inc Stabilized dry cultures of lactic acid-producing bacteria
US3932674A (en) * 1974-11-29 1976-01-13 The United States Of America Controlled bulk vegetable fermentation
US4140800A (en) * 1977-06-13 1979-02-20 Leo Kline Freeze-dried natural sour dough starter
US4423079A (en) * 1980-07-14 1983-12-27 Leo Kline Growth promoting compositions for Lactobacillus sanfrancisco and method of preparation
US4621058A (en) * 1983-04-11 1986-11-04 Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. Method of preparing cheese starter media
US5593885A (en) * 1990-09-05 1997-01-14 North Carolina State University Phage defense rotation strategy
US20030219778A1 (en) * 2000-08-29 2003-11-27 Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais - Ufmg Method for the diagnosis, identification and characterization of M. tuberculosis and other mycobacteria by shift mobility assay

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU823423A1 (ru) * 1979-06-18 1981-04-23 Алтайский Филиал Всесоюзного Научно- Исследовательского Института Масло-Дельной И Сыродельной Промышленности Штамм 122-АНТАгОНиСТ пОСТОРОННЕй МиКРОфлОРыСыРА
US20060153811A1 (en) * 2005-01-10 2006-07-13 Jackson Lee E Use of viruses and virus-resistant microorganisms for controlling microorganism populations
WO2007025097A2 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-03-01 Danisco A/S Use
DK2426220T3 (en) * 2006-05-19 2016-09-26 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Labeled microorganisms, and methods for labeling

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2225783A (en) * 1939-04-07 1940-12-24 Lloyd B Jensen Sausage treatment
US3024116A (en) * 1959-02-24 1962-03-06 Libby Mcneill And Libby Food processing
US3403032A (en) * 1967-10-04 1968-09-24 Agriculture Usa Pure culture fermentation process for pickled cucumbers
US3897307A (en) * 1974-10-23 1975-07-29 Hansens Lab Inc Stabilized dry cultures of lactic acid-producing bacteria
US3932674A (en) * 1974-11-29 1976-01-13 The United States Of America Controlled bulk vegetable fermentation
US4140800A (en) * 1977-06-13 1979-02-20 Leo Kline Freeze-dried natural sour dough starter
US4423079A (en) * 1980-07-14 1983-12-27 Leo Kline Growth promoting compositions for Lactobacillus sanfrancisco and method of preparation
US4621058A (en) * 1983-04-11 1986-11-04 Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. Method of preparing cheese starter media
US5593885A (en) * 1990-09-05 1997-01-14 North Carolina State University Phage defense rotation strategy
US20030219778A1 (en) * 2000-08-29 2003-11-27 Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais - Ufmg Method for the diagnosis, identification and characterization of M. tuberculosis and other mycobacteria by shift mobility assay

Cited By (167)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8771766B2 (en) * 2008-12-12 2014-07-08 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Genetic cluster of strains of Streptococcus thermophilus having unique rheological properties for dairy fermentation
US9149049B2 (en) 2008-12-12 2015-10-06 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Genetic cluster of strains of streptococcus thermophilus having unique rheological properties for dairy fermentation
US20110236530A1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2011-09-29 Danisco A/S Genetic Cluster of Strains of Streptococcus Thermophilus Having Unique Rheological Properties for Dairy Fermentation
US9885026B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2018-02-06 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Modified cascade ribonucleoproteins and uses thereof
US11939604B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2024-03-26 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Modified cascade ribonucleoproteins and uses thereof
US10954498B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2021-03-23 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Modified cascade ribonucleoproteins and uses thereof
US10711257B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2020-07-14 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Modified cascade ribonucleoproteins and uses thereof
US10435678B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2019-10-08 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Modified cascade ribonucleoproteins and uses thereof
US11274318B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2022-03-15 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10550407B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-02-04 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11970711B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2024-04-30 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11814645B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2023-11-14 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11674159B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2023-06-13 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11634730B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2023-04-25 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11549127B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2023-01-10 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11479794B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2022-10-25 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11473108B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2022-10-18 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11401532B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2022-08-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11332761B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2022-05-17 The Regenis of Wie University of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11293034B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2022-04-05 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11242543B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2022-02-08 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11186849B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-11-30 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10000772B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2018-06-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11028412B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-06-08 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11008590B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-05-18 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11008589B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-05-18 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10113167B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2018-10-30 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US11001863B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-05-11 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10988782B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-04-27 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10988780B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-04-27 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10982231B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-04-20 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10982230B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-04-20 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10900054B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2021-01-26 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10793878B1 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-10-06 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10227611B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-03-12 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10266850B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-04-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10774344B1 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-09-15 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10301651B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-05-28 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10752920B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-08-25 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10308961B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-06-04 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10337029B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-07-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10351878B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-07-16 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10358659B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-07-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10358658B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-07-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10519467B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-12-31 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10407697B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-09-10 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10385360B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-08-20 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10400253B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-09-03 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions or RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10676759B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-06-09 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10669560B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-06-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10415061B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-09-17 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10421980B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-09-24 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10428352B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-10-01 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10640791B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-05-05 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10443076B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-10-15 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10626419B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-04-21 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10487341B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-11-26 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10612045B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-04-07 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10513712B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2019-12-24 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10597680B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-03-24 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10526619B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-01-07 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10577631B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-03-03 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10570419B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-02-25 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10563227B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-02-18 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10533190B2 (en) 2012-05-25 2020-01-14 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for RNA-directed target DNA modification and for RNA-directed modulation of transcription
US10731181B2 (en) 2012-12-06 2020-08-04 Sigma, Aldrich Co. LLC CRISPR-based genome modification and regulation
US10745716B2 (en) 2012-12-06 2020-08-18 Sigma-Aldrich Co. Llc CRISPR-based genome modification and regulation
US11312945B2 (en) 2013-01-16 2022-04-26 Emory University CAS9-nucleic acid complexes and uses related thereto
US10544405B2 (en) 2013-01-16 2020-01-28 Emory University Cas9-nucleic acid complexes and uses related thereto
WO2014113493A1 (en) * 2013-01-16 2014-07-24 Emory University Cas9-nucleic acid complexes and uses related thereto
US11135273B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2021-10-05 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US10660943B2 (en) * 2013-02-07 2020-05-26 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US11497797B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2022-11-15 The Rockfeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US11491210B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2022-11-08 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US11491209B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2022-11-08 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US11918631B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2024-03-05 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US11452765B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2022-09-27 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US20160024510A1 (en) * 2013-02-07 2016-01-28 The Rockefeller University Sequence specific antimicrobials
US9260752B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-02-16 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compositions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US9909122B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-03-06 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compositions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US9410198B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-08-09 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compostions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US11312953B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2022-04-26 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compositions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US10125361B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-11-13 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compositions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US9725714B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2017-08-08 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compositions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US9803194B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2017-10-31 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compositions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US9809814B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2017-11-07 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Compositions and methods of nucleic acid-targeting nucleic acids
US11098326B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2021-08-24 The General Hospital Corporation Using RNA-guided FokI nucleases (RFNs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US10526589B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-01-07 The General Hospital Corporation Multiplex guide RNAs
US9567604B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-02-14 The General Hospital Corporation Using truncated guide RNAs (tru-gRNAs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US9567603B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-02-14 The General Hospital Corporation Using RNA-guided FokI nucleases (RFNs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US11920152B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2024-03-05 The General Hospital Corporation Increasing specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US10760064B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-09-01 The General Hospital Corporation RNA-guided targeting of genetic and epigenomic regulatory proteins to specific genomic loci
US10544433B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-01-28 The General Hospital Corporation Using RNA-guided FokI nucleases (RFNs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US11634731B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2023-04-25 The General Hospital Corporation Using truncated guide RNAs (tru-gRNAs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US9738908B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-08-22 System Biosciences, Llc CRISPR/Cas systems for genomic modification and gene modulation
US10378027B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-08-13 The General Hospital Corporation RNA-guided targeting of genetic and epigenomic regulatory proteins to specific genomic loci
US10202619B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-02-12 System Biosciences, Llc Compositions and methods directed to CRISPR/Cas genomic engineering systems
US10844403B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-11-24 The General Hospital Corporation Increasing specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US11168338B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2021-11-09 The General Hospital Corporation RNA-guided targeting of genetic and epigenomic regulatory proteins to specific genomic loci
US10119133B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-11-06 The General Hospital Corporation Using truncated guide RNAs (tru-gRNAs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US10138476B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-11-27 The General Hospital Corporation Using RNA-guided FokI nucleases (RFNs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US10415059B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-09-17 The General Hospital Corporation Using truncated guide RNAs (tru-gRNAs) to increase specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US9234213B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-01-12 System Biosciences, Llc Compositions and methods directed to CRISPR/Cas genomic engineering systems
US9885033B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-02-06 The General Hospital Corporation Increasing specificity for RNA-guided genome editing
US9902973B2 (en) 2013-04-11 2018-02-27 Caribou Biosciences, Inc. Methods of modifying a target nucleic acid with an argonaute
US10011850B2 (en) 2013-06-21 2018-07-03 The General Hospital Corporation Using RNA-guided FokI Nucleases (RFNs) to increase specificity for RNA-Guided Genome Editing
US11390887B2 (en) 2013-11-07 2022-07-19 Editas Medicine, Inc. CRISPR-related methods and compositions with governing gRNAS
US9834791B2 (en) 2013-11-07 2017-12-05 Editas Medicine, Inc. CRISPR-related methods and compositions with governing gRNAS
US10190137B2 (en) 2013-11-07 2019-01-29 Editas Medicine, Inc. CRISPR-related methods and compositions with governing gRNAS
US10640788B2 (en) 2013-11-07 2020-05-05 Editas Medicine, Inc. CRISPR-related methods and compositions with governing gRNAs
US10655123B2 (en) 2014-03-05 2020-05-19 National University Corporation Kobe University Genomic sequence modification method for specifically converting nucleic acid bases of targeted DNA sequence, and molecular complex for use in same
US11718846B2 (en) 2014-03-05 2023-08-08 National University Corporation Kobe University Genomic sequence modification method for specifically converting nucleic acid bases of targeted DNA sequence, and molecular complex for use in same
US10920215B2 (en) 2014-11-04 2021-02-16 National University Corporation Kobe University Method for modifying genome sequence to introduce specific mutation to targeted DNA sequence by base-removal reaction, and molecular complex used therein
US10463049B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2019-11-05 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US10524477B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2020-01-07 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US11612617B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2023-03-28 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US11547716B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2023-01-10 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US11400110B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2022-08-02 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US11517582B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2022-12-06 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US11147830B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2021-10-19 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US10561148B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2020-02-18 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US10506812B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2019-12-17 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US11844760B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2023-12-19 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US10624349B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2020-04-21 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US11642363B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2023-05-09 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
US10582712B2 (en) 2015-05-06 2020-03-10 Snipr Technologies Limited Altering microbial populations and modifying microbiota
WO2017040348A1 (en) 2015-08-28 2017-03-09 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered crispr-cas9 nucleases
US11060078B2 (en) 2015-08-28 2021-07-13 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases
US10633642B2 (en) 2015-08-28 2020-04-28 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases
US10526591B2 (en) 2015-08-28 2020-01-07 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases
US9926546B2 (en) 2015-08-28 2018-03-27 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases
US9512446B1 (en) 2015-08-28 2016-12-06 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases
US10093910B2 (en) 2015-08-28 2018-10-09 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases
EP4036236A1 (en) 2015-08-28 2022-08-03 The General Hospital Corporation Engineered crispr-cas9 nucleases
US10767173B2 (en) 2015-09-09 2020-09-08 National University Corporation Kobe University Method for converting genome sequence of gram-positive bacterium by specifically converting nucleic acid base of targeted DNA sequence, and molecular complex used in same
US11220693B2 (en) 2015-11-27 2022-01-11 National University Corporation Kobe University Method for converting monocot plant genome sequence in which nucleic acid base in targeted DNA sequence is specifically converted, and molecular complex used therein
US11998579B2 (en) * 2016-01-03 2024-06-04 Glaxosmithkline Biologicals Sa Immunogenic composition
US10596255B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2020-03-24 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US11351252B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2022-06-07 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US11471530B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2022-10-18 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US10603379B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2020-03-31 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US10300139B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2019-05-28 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US10953090B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2021-03-23 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US10765740B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2020-09-08 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US11291723B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2022-04-05 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US11141481B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2021-10-12 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US10300138B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2019-05-28 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US10363308B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2019-07-30 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US11471531B2 (en) 2016-06-05 2022-10-18 Snipr Technologies Limited Selectively altering microbiota for immune modulation
US10966752B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2021-04-06 Conmed Corporation Single lumen gas sealed trocar for maintaining stable cavity pressure without allowing instrument access therethrough during endoscopic surgical procedures
US11974774B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2024-05-07 Conmed Corporation Separable two-part single lumen gas sealed access port for use during endoscopic surgical procedures
US11026717B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2021-06-08 Conmed Corporation Separable two-part single lumen gas sealed access port for use during endoscopic surgical procedures
US11845953B2 (en) 2017-03-22 2023-12-19 National University Corporation Kobe University Method for converting nucleic acid sequence of cell specifically converting nucleic acid base of targeted DNA using cell endogenous DNA modifying enzyme, and molecular complex used therein
WO2018195545A2 (en) 2017-04-21 2018-10-25 The General Hospital Corporation Variants of cpf1 (cas12a) with altered pam specificity
WO2018218206A1 (en) 2017-05-25 2018-11-29 The General Hospital Corporation Bipartite base editor (bbe) architectures and type-ii-c-cas9 zinc finger editing
WO2018218166A1 (en) 2017-05-25 2018-11-29 The General Hospital Corporation Using split deaminases to limit unwanted off-target base editor deamination
US11788085B2 (en) 2018-04-30 2023-10-17 Snipr Biome Aps Treating and preventing microbial infections
US11421227B2 (en) 2018-04-30 2022-08-23 Snipr Biome Aps Treating and preventing microbial infections
US10760075B2 (en) 2018-04-30 2020-09-01 Snipr Biome Aps Treating and preventing microbial infections
US10920222B2 (en) 2018-04-30 2021-02-16 Snipr Biome Aps Treating and preventing microbial infections
US11643653B2 (en) 2018-04-30 2023-05-09 Snipr Biome Aps Treating and preventing microbial infections
US11485973B2 (en) 2018-04-30 2022-11-01 Snipr Biome Aps Treating and preventing microbial infections
WO2020163396A1 (en) 2019-02-04 2020-08-13 The General Hospital Corporation Adenine dna base editor variants with reduced off-target rna editing
WO2021055875A1 (en) * 2019-09-18 2021-03-25 Ancilia, Inc. Compositions and methods for microbiome modulation
WO2021151972A1 (en) * 2020-01-30 2021-08-05 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Rotation scheme for bacterial cultures in food product fermentation
EP4100742A4 (en) * 2020-02-03 2024-03-20 Technion Res & Dev Foundation METHOD FOR ISOLATION OF A MICRO-ORGANISM
EP4198124A1 (en) 2021-12-15 2023-06-21 Versitech Limited Engineered cas9-nucleases and method of use thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2008223544A1 (en) 2008-09-12
BRPI0808704A2 (pt) 2021-04-13
PT2126130E (pt) 2015-08-03
EP2489275B1 (en) 2016-09-21
CN104531672B (zh) 2020-01-10
AU2008223544A2 (en) 2009-09-17
WO2008108989A3 (en) 2009-03-05
ES2719789T3 (es) 2019-07-16
JP5932207B2 (ja) 2016-06-08
HK1142930A1 (zh) 2010-12-17
CN101688241B (zh) 2015-01-21
TR201905633T4 (tr) 2019-05-21
ES2541693T3 (es) 2015-07-23
RU2687148C1 (ru) 2019-05-07
HUE025412T2 (en) 2016-02-29
DK2860267T3 (en) 2019-04-23
JP2013027395A (ja) 2013-02-07
RU2531343C2 (ru) 2014-10-20
JP2010519929A (ja) 2010-06-10
EP2860267A1 (en) 2015-04-15
EP2860267B1 (en) 2019-01-16
SI2126130T1 (sl) 2015-10-30
CY1116417T1 (el) 2017-02-08
US20150093473A1 (en) 2015-04-02
CN104531672A (zh) 2015-04-22
MX2009009071A (es) 2009-09-24
EP2489275A1 (en) 2012-08-22
EP2126130A2 (en) 2009-12-02
NZ579002A (en) 2012-03-30
EP2126130B1 (en) 2015-03-25
HRP20150676T1 (hr) 2015-09-25
NZ592231A (en) 2012-07-27
PL2126130T3 (pl) 2015-10-30
AU2008223544B2 (en) 2014-06-05
CN101688241A (zh) 2010-03-31
WO2008108989A2 (en) 2008-09-12
DK2126130T3 (en) 2015-06-29
US9951342B2 (en) 2018-04-24
BRPI0808704B1 (pt) 2022-01-18
RU2009136452A (ru) 2011-04-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9951342B2 (en) Cultures with improved phage resistance
US10640778B2 (en) Method of modulating cell resistance
AU2017224999A1 (en) Use
AU2012244264A1 (en) Use
AU2014216054B2 (en) Cultures with improved phage resistance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DANISCO A/S, DENMARK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BARRANGOU, RODOLPHE;FREMAUX, CHRISTOPHE;HORVATH, PHILIPPE;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20110103 TO 20110106;REEL/FRAME:025743/0743

AS Assignment

Owner name: DUPONT NUTRITION BIOSCIENCES APS, DENMARK

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DANISCO A/S;REEL/FRAME:029252/0312

Effective date: 20120514

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION