EP2347943B1 - Signalling system - Google Patents

Signalling system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2347943B1
EP2347943B1 EP11250031.9A EP11250031A EP2347943B1 EP 2347943 B1 EP2347943 B1 EP 2347943B1 EP 11250031 A EP11250031 A EP 11250031A EP 2347943 B1 EP2347943 B1 EP 2347943B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
controller
field
interlocking
points
control logic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP11250031.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2347943A2 (en
EP2347943A3 (en
Inventor
Naoki Shibata
Keiji Maekawa
Hiroshi Taoka
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Publication of EP2347943A2 publication Critical patent/EP2347943A2/en
Publication of EP2347943A3 publication Critical patent/EP2347943A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2347943B1 publication Critical patent/EP2347943B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
    • B61L23/04—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for monitoring the mechanical state of the route
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L19/00—Arrangements for interlocking between points and signals by means of a single interlocking device, e.g. central control
    • B61L19/06—Interlocking devices having electrical operation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
    • B61L23/08—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for controlling traffic in one direction only
    • B61L23/14—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for controlling traffic in one direction only automatically operated
    • B61L23/16—Track circuits specially adapted for section blocking
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L25/00—Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or trains or setting of track apparatus
    • B61L25/06—Indicating or recording the setting of track apparatus, e.g. of points, of signals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a signalling system for railway, and particularly, to a signalling system configured to connect an interlocking device for railway and a wayside signalling device through a network.
  • an interlocking device in which an interlocking controller centrally processes state information from the wayside equipment.
  • the communications between the interlocking controller and the field controllers are networked, a format, in which the interlocking controller processes the route control at the center, is mainly used.
  • the central processing-type interlocking device even if there are field controllers including arithmetic processing units that control the wayside equipment, the field controllers only execute a process of interpreting a control message transmitted through the network to perform control output, and the interlocking controller executes all central processing of determining the occupation of track section of a track circuit, instructing switching of points, changing a signal indication, and the like.
  • the field controllers cannot receive the control message if the interlocking controller stops, and correct control output becomes unclear.
  • all signals inside the premises show stop indications for safety control, and the operations of the trains stop.
  • Much time is required to restore the normal schedule due to the time before recovery and the disordered schedule after the recovery, and the stop of the train operations is an incident that the railway company wants to avoid. Therefore, it is desirable not to completely stop the operations of the trains even if the interlocking controller at the center stops.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a signalling system that realizes operations in a degenerate mode for continuing route control only by field controllers, even if communication from an interlocking controller to the field controllers is interrupted.
  • a signalling system of the present invention realizes route control by field controllers, the field controllers having a transmission path for transmitting and receiving state information between the field controllers constituting a route, having wayside equipment control logic for realizing the route control of a train based on the received state information, having first wayside equipment control logic used when communication from an interlocking controller to the field controllers continues, having second wayside equipment control logic for continuing the route control when the communication from the interlocking controller to the field controllers is interrupted, and switching the control logic from the first wayside equipment control logic to the second wayside equipment control logic to continue the route control if the interrupt of communication with the interlocking controller is detected.
  • a signalling system that realizes operations in a degenerate mode for continuing route control only by field controllers is realized even if communication from an interlocking controller to the field controllers is interrupted after termination of the interlocking controller. Therefore, the operation stop time and the schedule recovery time can be reduced, and the operating rate of the signalling system can be improved.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of the signalling system according to a first embodiment of the present invention and shows a state in which the interlocking controller is terminated.
  • FIG. 2 shows a state in which the interlocking controller operates normally in the signalling system of FIG. 1 .
  • the interlocking controller and each field controller including an arithmetic processing unit are connected through a network.
  • the field controllers are also connected to each other through the network.
  • the interconnected field controllers at least include field controllers that constitute a route.
  • an interlocking controller 10 calculates control output of the next control period based on a status message 30 (such as track section information from a track circuit, a switching direction of points, and an indication of a signal) transmitted by field controllers 21 to 23 to the interlocking controller 10 and transmits a control message 40 to the field controllers 21 to 23.
  • a status message 30 such as track section information from a track circuit, a switching direction of points, and an indication of a signal
  • the field controllers 21 to 23 decipher the control message 40 and output instructed control output.
  • the field controllers 21 to 23 then set the output result as the status message 30 again and transmit the status message 30 to the interlocking controller 10.
  • the field controllers 21 to 23 are installed in a station apparatus room in some cases and installed approximate to wayside equipment in other cases.
  • the operation described above is carried out as a normal control mode in the embodiments of the present invention if the interlocking controller 10 operates normally. If the interlocking controller 10 is terminated, the termination is detected. A degenerate mode is set, and only the field controllers realize simple route control without the interlocking controller.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a logic block structure in the field controller 20.
  • An arithmetic processing unit includes: an interlocking controller termination determination unit and logic switching unit 20a that receives a control message from the interlocking controller to determine the termination of the interlocking controller to switch wayside equipment control logic; wayside equipment control logic of normal control mode 20b; and wayside equipment control logic of degenerate mode 20c.
  • a control input/output unit 20d carries out input of track section information of the track circuit and control output to points and a signal through the interlocking controller termination determination unit and logic switching unit 20a.
  • the interlocking controller termination determination unit and logic switching unit 20a determines with which of the wayside equipment control logic of normal control mode 20b and the wayside equipment control logic of degenerate mode 20c the controllers will be operated.
  • the interlocking controller termination determination unit and logic switching unit 20a switches the control logic.
  • the control input/output unit 20d includes a circuit constituted by a relay, a switch, and a sensor.
  • the arithmetic processing unit (CPU) activates the relay and the switch to control the wayside equipment and imports the status of the relay and the switch by a sensor to recognize the status of the wayside equipment.
  • the field controller transmits the status message 30 of the field controller to related field controllers.
  • the status message 30 is transmitted to the field controller of points 22 and the field controller of signal 23.
  • the status message 30 is transmitted to the field controller of signal 23.
  • the status message 30 is transmitted to the field controller of points 22.
  • the field controllers control the control output in accordance with preset wayside equipment control logic based on the status message 30 received by the wayside equipment control logic of degenerate mode.
  • FIGS. 4A and 4B are diagrams showing interlocking tables as an example of the control logic.
  • the interlocking controller 10 holds the interlocking table in the control logic of normal control mode, and the operations of the wayside equipment are controlled in accordance with the interlocking table based on information from the wayside equipment.
  • the field controllers hold a necessary interlocking table in the control logic of degenerate mode, and the field controllers control the operations of the wayside equipment based on information of the wayside equipment from other field controllers.
  • track circuits 2T and 3AT need to be unoccupied, and a point 2 needs to be locked at a normal position to output an advance indication to the signal of a route 1RA. Furthermore, track section information of a track circuit 1T needs to be acquired for approach locking.
  • the signal of the route 1RA acquires status information of track circuits 1T, 2T, and 3AT and status information of the point 2 to control the signal indication.
  • FIGS. 5 to 7 are diagrams showing switching conditions of the field controllers of track circuit, points, and signal to the degenerate mode and operations after the transition to the degenerate mode.
  • the mode transitions of the field controllers will be described in FIGS. 5 to 7 .
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a switching condition to the degenerate mode of the field controller of track circuit 21.
  • the field controller of track circuit 21 in the normal control mode (101) transmits track circuit information to the interlocking controller 10 (102). If the communication with the interlocking controller is interrupted (103, Yes), it triggers mode switching to the degenerate mode (104), and the track circuit information is transmitted to related wayside equipment (points and signal, 105).
  • the transmission of the track circuit information to the related wayside equipment may be unicast transmission for one-to-one transmission to the wayside equipment, multicast transmission for transmission to all wayside equipment within a transmission target group, or broadcast transmission for transmission to all devices connected to the network. If the communication with the interlocking controller is not interrupted (103, No), the normal control mode continues (101).
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a switching condition to the degenerate mode of the field controller of points 22.
  • the field controller of points 22 in the normal control mode (201) transmits point state information to the interlocking controller (202). If communication with the interlocking controller is interrupted (203, Yes), it triggers the points to be locked (204).
  • the mode moves to the degenerate mode (206).
  • the point state information is transmitted to the related signal (207).
  • the points are controlled in accordance with a locking condition of the interlocking table (208). If the communication with the interlocking controller is not interrupted (203, No) or if the track circuit information is not received (205, No), the normal control mode continues (201).
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a switching condition to the degenerate mode of the field controller of signal 23.
  • the field controller of signal 23 in the normal control mode (301) transmits signal state information to the controller (302).
  • the communication with the interlocking controller is interrupted (303, Yes)
  • the stop indication if the track circuit information is received from the field controller of track circuit 21 (305, Yes), the mode moves to the degenerate mode (306).
  • the signal state information is transmitted to the related points (307).
  • the signal indication is controlled in accordance with a signal control condition of the interlocking table (308). If the communication with the interlocking controller is not interrupted (303, No) or if the track circuit information is not received (305, No), the normal control mode continues (301).
  • FIGS. 8 to 10 are diagrams showing conditions for returning from the degenerate mode to the normal control mode of the field controllers of track circuit, points, and signal and operations after the transition to the normal control mode.
  • the mode transitions of the field controllers will be described in FIGS. 8 to 10 .
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a condition for returning from the degenerate mode to the normal control mode of the field controller of track circuit 21.
  • the track circuit information is transmitted to related equipment (112).
  • the communication with the interlocking controller is restored (113, Yes)
  • if the normal control mode restoration is received from the related signal 114, Yes
  • the normal control mode is restored (115)
  • the transmission of the track circuit information to the related wayside equipment is terminated (116). If the communication with the interlocking controller is not restored (113, No) or if the communication control mode restoration is not received from the related signal (114, No), the degenerate mode continues (111).
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a condition for returning from the degenerate mode to the normal control mode of the field controller of points 22.
  • the point state information is transmitted to the related signal (212).
  • the normal control mode is restored (215), and the transmission of the point state information to the related signal is terminated (216).
  • An instruction of the interlocking controller is then followed (217). If the communication with the interlocking controller is not restored (213, No) or if the communication control mode restoration is not received from the related signal (214, No), the degenerate mode continues (211).
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a condition for returning from the degenerate mode to the normal control mode of the field controller of signal 23.
  • the signal indication is controlled in accordance with the signal control condition of the interlocking table (312), and the signal state information is transmitted to the related points (313).
  • the communication with the interlocking controller is restored (314, Yes)
  • the instruction of the interlocking controller is below the signal indication (315, Yes)
  • the normal control mode is restored (316)
  • the related wayside equipment is notified of the restoration of the normal control mode (317)
  • the transmission of the signal state information to the related points is terminated (318).
  • FIGS. 11A to 11C are diagrams showing block configurations of logic in the field controllers according to a second embodiment of the present invention.
  • the normal control mode control logic 21b may be designed to transmit the track circuit information not only to the interlocking controller 10, but also to the related field controllers 22 and 23, and the receiving field controllers may discard the track circuit information in modes other than the degenerate mode.
  • the degenerate mode does not have to be set in the field controller of track circuit 21, and the logic can be simplified.
  • the field controller of points 22 in the first embodiment may be configured to be locked in a state at the time of detection of the communication interrupt if the communication with the controller is interrupted, and the lock may be continued until the communication with the controller is restored.
  • the points cannot be switched while the interlocking controller is stopped.
  • the degenerate mode does not have to be set in the field controller of points 22, and the logic can be simplified only by the normal control mode control logic 22b.
  • the point state information may be transmitted to the signal related to the interlocking controller along with the deletion of the degenerate mode, and the point state information may be discarded in the field controller of signal 23 in modes other than the degenerate mode.
  • the field controller of signal 23 can obtain the point state information in the degenerate mode.
  • the track circuit information from the field controller of track circuit 21 is discarded. This can prevent the track circuit information from the field controller of track circuit 21 from affecting the normal control mode.
  • a status message discard circuit 23f discards status messages (track circuit information and point state information) transmitted from the field controllers of track circuit and points 21 and 22 in the normal control mode. This can prevent the status messages of the field controllers of track circuit and points 21 and 22 in the second embodiment from affecting the normal control mode.
  • FIGS. 12A to 12C are diagrams showing block configurations of logic in the field controllers according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
  • the field controller of points 22 of the second embodiment only the point lock and the approach locking may be made effective by control logic of point lock and approach locking 22b', regardless of the mode.
  • the point lock based on the track circuit information from the field controller of track circuit 21 in the control mode makes the response faster than the reception of a point locking instruction from the interlocking controller.
  • the logic of approach locking is activated when the signal indication is changed.
  • the field controller of signal 23 does not transmit the signal state information in the normal control mode
  • the field controller of points 22 does not receive the change in the signal indication during normal control.
  • the interlocking controller has the logic of approach locking during normal operation and transmits the control message to the points, and the field controller of points 22 just performs the control output in accordance with the control message. Therefore, the control is not affected in the normal control mode of the field controller of points 22.
  • FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a block configuration of logic in the field controller of points 22 according to a fourth embodiment.
  • Station passing route configuration logic 22g is added to wayside equipment control logic during degenerate mode 22c.
  • the field controller of track circuit 21 may be any of the field controllers of track circuit 21 in the first to third embodiments.
  • the field controller of signal 23 may also be any of the field controllers of signal 23 in the first to third embodiments.
  • FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an operation of the field controller of points 22 in the degenerate mode according to the fourth embodiment.
  • the point state information is first acquired (401), and whether the direction of the points is a set station passing route direction is checked (402). If the point direction is not the station passing direction (402, No), whether the points are locked is checked (403). If the points are not locked (403, No), the points are switched to the station passing route direction (404), and the points are controlled in accordance with the locking condition of the interlocking table based on the state information of other wayside equipment control devices (405).
  • the point direction is the station passing direction (402, Yes) or if the points are locked (403, Yes), the points are not switched to the station passing direction, and the points are controlled in accordance with the locking condition of the interlocking table (405). After the control of the points, the point state is transmitted to the related signal. The process returns to the point state information acquisition (401), and the same process continues.
  • the station passing route can be constituted regardless of the point switching direction during the degenerate mode transition, and the trains passing through the station can be operated.
  • FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a configuration of the signalling system according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention and shows a state in which the interlocking controller is terminated.
  • FIG. 16 shows a state in which the interlocking controller operates normally in the signalling system of FIG. 15 .
  • routing data 50 for several hours is transmitted to the field controllers of points and signal 22 and 23 if the interlocking controller 10 operates normally. If the interlocking controller 10 is terminated, the field controllers 22 and 23 detect the termination, and simple route control is realized only by the field controllers, without the interlocking controller in the degenerate mode.
  • FIGS. 17A and 17B are diagrams showing logic block structures in the field controllers of points and signal 22 and 23 according to the fifth embodiment.
  • the field controller of track circuit 21 may be any of the field controllers of track circuit 21 in the first to third embodiments.
  • the arithmetic processing unit includes: an interlocking controller termination determination unit and logic switching unit 22a that receives the control message 40 from the interlocking controller 10 to determine the termination of the interlocking controller 10 to switch the wayside equipment control logic; the wayside equipment control logic of normal control mode 22b; and wayside equipment control logic of degenerate mode 22c' including train passing detection logic 22j.
  • the arithmetic processing unit (CPU) also includes a routing data receiver 22h that receives the routing data 50 from the interlocking controller 10 and a routing data storage 22i that stores the routing data 50. The routing data 50 stored in the routing data storage 22i is used by the wayside equipment control logic of degenerate mode 22c' including the train passing detection logic 22j.
  • FIG. 18 shows an example of the routing data 50 received and stored by the field controllers of points and signal 22 and 23. Routes corresponding to the order of passing trains are described. The data may include only the routes in one line as long as the order can be determined.
  • FIGS. 19 and 20 are diagrams showing how the control logics of generate mode 22c' and 23c' of the field controllers of points and signal 22 and 23 use the routing data 50 to execute a switching process and a signal indicating process. The contents of the processes will be described with reference to FIGS. 19 and 20 .
  • FIG. 19 is a diagram showing the switching process using the routing data 50 of the field controller of points 22.
  • the routing data 50 is first acquired in the degenerate mode control logic 22c' (501).
  • the next route direction is checked in the acquired routing data 50 (502).
  • the point direction is checked (503), and whether the point direction and the next route direction match is determined (504).
  • the determination (507) is repeated until the train passes. If the train has passed (Yes), the information of the current route is discarded, and the information of the next route is selected (508). After the selection of the next routing data, the next route direction is checked again (502), and the same process continues.
  • FIG. 20 is a diagram showing the indication process using the routing data 50 of the field controller of signal 23.
  • the routing data 50 is first acquired in the degenerate mode control logic 23c' (601).
  • the next route direction is checked in the acquired routing data 50 (602). After the check of the next route direction, whether the track section is clear is determined from the status information of the related wayside equipment (603).
  • the stop indication is displayed (604), and the determination (603) is repeated until the track section is clear. If the track section is clear (Yes), the advance indication is displayed (605), and whether the train has passed is determined based on train passing detection logic 23j (606). If the train has not passed (No), the determination (606) is repeated until the train passes. If the train has passed (Yes), the information of the current route is discarded, and the information of the next route is selected (607). After the selection of the next routing data, the next route direction is checked again (602), and the same process continues.
  • operations of a normal schedule can be continued for several hours even if the interlocking controller is stopped.
  • the routing data of one day may be stored, instead of the routing data for several hours.
  • the operations of the normal schedule can be carried out only by the wayside equipment control device. If the schedule is disordered, operations can be carried out based on a new schedule by receiving new routing data from the interlocking controller or by directly receiving routing data from the operation management device through wired transmission or wireless transmission.
  • the routing data 50 may be stored only in the field controller of points 22, and the train passing detection logic 22j may be used to determine the passage of the train to change the route.
  • the field controller of track circuit 21 may be any of the field controllers of track circuit 21 in the first to third embodiments.
  • the field controller of signal 23 may also be any of the field controllers of signal 23 in the first to third embodiments.
  • the routing data receiver 23h, the routing data storage 23i, and the train passing detection logic 23j in the degenerate mode control logic may not be included in the field controller of signal 23, and the configuration and logic of the field controller of signal 23 can be simplified. Storing the routing data only in the points can prevent a situation in which the signal continues to show the stop indication when the routing data stored in the field controllers of points and signal are different and the constituted routes do not match.
  • FIGS. 21A and 21B are diagrams showing block configurations of logic in the field controllers according to a seventh embodiment of the present invention.
  • Switch instruction logic 23k is additionally included in the degenerate mode control logic 23c' of the field controller of signal 23, and a control message 41 as a switch instruction can be outputted to the field controller of points 22 in the degenerate mode.
  • the routing data receiver 22h, the routing data storage 22i, and the train passing detection logic 22j are deleted in the field controller of points 22, and degenerate mode control logic 22c" is switched by the control message 41 from the field controller of signal 23.
  • the field controller of track circuit 21 may be any of the field controllers of track circuit 21 in the first to third embodiments.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
EP11250031.9A 2010-01-13 2011-01-12 Signalling system Not-in-force EP2347943B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010004962 2010-01-13
JP2010115294A JP5355495B2 (ja) 2010-01-13 2010-05-19 信号保安システム

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2347943A2 EP2347943A2 (en) 2011-07-27
EP2347943A3 EP2347943A3 (en) 2012-03-07
EP2347943B1 true EP2347943B1 (en) 2013-07-24

Family

ID=43836591

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11250031.9A Not-in-force EP2347943B1 (en) 2010-01-13 2011-01-12 Signalling system

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2347943B1 (ja)
JP (1) JP5355495B2 (ja)
KR (1) KR101216865B1 (ja)
CN (1) CN102126509B (ja)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3947102A4 (en) * 2019-03-29 2023-01-11 L & T Technology Services Limited SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN A TECHNICAL SIGNALING ROOM (SER) AND WAYSIDE DEVICES

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5885654B2 (ja) * 2012-12-28 2016-03-15 株式会社東芝 列車制御システム
JP6583846B2 (ja) * 2014-04-30 2019-10-02 日本信号株式会社 停止位置表示システム
EP2974939B1 (en) * 2014-07-17 2023-06-07 Hitachi, Ltd. Train management system
WO2017208421A1 (ja) * 2016-06-02 2017-12-07 株式会社京三製作所 電子連動システム
FR3056542B1 (fr) 2016-09-28 2021-09-17 Alstom Transp Tech Equipement de controle d'au moins un equipement a la voie d'un reseau ferroviaire et systeme ferroviaire associe
JP6630254B2 (ja) * 2016-09-29 2020-01-15 株式会社京三製作所 電子連動装置
FR3137890A1 (fr) * 2022-07-12 2024-01-19 Sage S Rail Système anti-talonnage des appareils de voie

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH352000A (de) * 1956-03-06 1961-02-15 Siemens Ag Schaltungsanordnung in Eisenbahnsicherungsanlagen zur Gleisüberwachung mit Hilfe von isolierten Schienen und Schienenkontakten
US3740548A (en) * 1971-06-25 1973-06-19 Westinghouse Electric Corp Control of an interlocking in a vehicle control system
GB2022893B (en) * 1978-06-10 1983-01-12 Westinghouse Brake & Signal Fault detection
JP2705818B2 (ja) 1989-01-12 1998-01-28 日本信号株式会社 電子連動装置におけるてっ査鎖錠装置
JP3820322B2 (ja) * 1998-11-30 2006-09-13 株式会社日立製作所 設備分散型電子連動装置
JP4290933B2 (ja) * 2002-07-11 2009-07-08 株式会社日立製作所 連動・ａｔｃ統合型装置
CN1586960A (zh) * 2004-10-11 2005-03-02 兰州大成自动化工程有限公司 铁路车站信号应急联锁系统
JP4755473B2 (ja) 2005-09-30 2011-08-24 東日本旅客鉄道株式会社 信号制御システム
JP5023685B2 (ja) * 2005-12-22 2012-09-12 株式会社日立製作所 信号保安システム
CN1986314B (zh) * 2005-12-22 2012-07-25 株式会社日立制作所 信号保安系统
JP4555781B2 (ja) * 2006-01-12 2010-10-06 財団法人鉄道総合技術研究所 分散型連動システムにおける監視方式

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3947102A4 (en) * 2019-03-29 2023-01-11 L & T Technology Services Limited SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN A TECHNICAL SIGNALING ROOM (SER) AND WAYSIDE DEVICES

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2347943A2 (en) 2011-07-27
JP2011162177A (ja) 2011-08-25
CN102126509B (zh) 2014-05-14
JP5355495B2 (ja) 2013-11-27
EP2347943A3 (en) 2012-03-07
KR101216865B1 (ko) 2012-12-28
CN102126509A (zh) 2011-07-20
KR20110083533A (ko) 2011-07-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2347943B1 (en) Signalling system
US20110060938A1 (en) Computer interlocking system and code bit level redundancy method therefor
US20190329805A1 (en) Interlocking protection device for turnout switching and turnout system
CA2990542C (en) Devices, systems, and methods for relaying voice messages to operator control units of remote control locomotives
CN110085333B (zh) 一种适用于小型反应堆的保护系统
EP1897286B1 (en) Communication network system
JP5467749B2 (ja) 移動閉塞方式ａｔｃ論理装置を用いた常用系信号とバックアップ系信号を有するバックアップ機能を備えた信号システム
JP6462220B2 (ja) 鉄道用設備監視システム
CN107959586B (zh) 一种基于云平台的船端集成导航系统网络架构
JP4987419B2 (ja) 列車制御ネットワークシステムおよび駅中間小型端末装置と駅中間制御装置
KR101114576B1 (ko) 통합형 전자폐색제어장치
JP4698565B2 (ja) 電子軌道端末装置
KR100607123B1 (ko) 직렬통신 인터페이스 방식 열차 진로 제어시스템
JP4717729B2 (ja) 監視制御装置
CN105376130A (zh) 中继系统以及中继装置
JP6584917B2 (ja) 鉄道制御システム
JP5757113B2 (ja) 信号伝送システム、該システムに用いられる信号伝送方法及び信号伝送制御プログラム
JP2019038382A (ja) 列車検知装置、地上装置、および動作制御方法
JP2013226926A (ja) 鉄道保安システム
JP4716861B2 (ja) データ処理システム
JPH06183348A (ja) 運行管理装置
JPH10248181A (ja) 分散形監視制御システム
JP6538335B2 (ja) データ転送回路および転送方法
JPH0817399B2 (ja) 直列制御装置
JP2011223513A (ja) ネットワーク装置、バスマスタ切り替え方法及びプログラム

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110131

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B61L 19/06 20060101AFI20120203BHEP

Ipc: B61L 23/16 20060101ALI20120203BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B61L 19/06 20060101AFI20130117BHEP

Ipc: B61L 23/16 20060101ALI20130117BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 623225

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011002449

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 623225

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130724

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130724

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131024

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131124

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130626

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131125

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131025

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011002449

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140112

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140131

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20150106

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20150107

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20150108

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110112

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602011002449

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20160112

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20160930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160112

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130724