EP2272784B1 - Grue pour envelopper une charge suspendue à un câble porteur - Google Patents

Grue pour envelopper une charge suspendue à un câble porteur Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2272784B1
EP2272784B1 EP10005289.3A EP10005289A EP2272784B1 EP 2272784 B1 EP2272784 B1 EP 2272784B1 EP 10005289 A EP10005289 A EP 10005289A EP 2272784 B1 EP2272784 B1 EP 2272784B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
load
crane
gear
variables
angle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10005289.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2272784A1 (fr
Inventor
Klaus Dr. Dipl.-Ing. Schneider
Oliver Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sawodny
Jörg Neupert
Eckhard Arnold
Karl Lukas Knierim
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Liebherr Werk Nenzing GmbH
Original Assignee
Liebherr Werk Nenzing GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Liebherr Werk Nenzing GmbH filed Critical Liebherr Werk Nenzing GmbH
Publication of EP2272784A1 publication Critical patent/EP2272784A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2272784B1 publication Critical patent/EP2272784B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66C—CRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
    • B66C13/00—Other constructional features or details
    • B66C13/04—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack
    • B66C13/06—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads
    • B66C13/063—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads electrical

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a crane for handling a load suspended on a load rope with a slewing gear for rotating the crane, a luffing mechanism for luffing the boom and a hoist for lowering or lifting the load hanging on the load rope.
  • the crane has a control unit for calculating the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoist on.
  • the control unit in this case comprises a load oscillation damping, which damps a commuting of the load during a movement of the crane by suitable control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoist.
  • Such a crane is for example off DE 100 64 182 known.
  • the calculation of the appropriate control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoist for load oscillation damping is complex and relatively inaccurate.
  • a crane according to the preamble of claim 1 in which the calculation of the control commands for the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoisting gear on the basis of specified in Cartesian coordinates target movement of the load.
  • the load oscillation damping of the crane takes place via a filter and damping terms.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a crane for handling a load suspended on a load rope with an improved crane control.
  • the crane according to the invention comprises a slewing gear for turning the crane, a luffing gear for luffing the boom and a hoist for lowering or lifting the load suspended on the load rope.
  • the crane has a crane control with a control unit for calculating the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoist on.
  • the control unit comprises a load oscillation damping.
  • the control unit is embodied such that the calculation of the control commands for the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoisting gear takes place on the basis of a desired movement of the load specified in Cartesian coordinates. This has the advantage that the calculation based on the desired movement in Cartesian coordinates is considerably simplified and improved. In particular, based on the desired movement of the load in Cartesian coordinates a simpler or more effective load oscillation damping can be realized.
  • the load oscillation damping of the control unit is based on the inversion of a physical model of the load hanging on the load rope and the crane, wherein the inverted physical model converts a predetermined movement of the load rope suspended in the load cable in Cartesian coordinates in control signals for the slewing, luffing and / or hoist.
  • the physical model encompasses the dynamics of the load hanging on the load rope, in particular the pendulum vibration dynamics, so that via the inversion of the model an extremely effective Load swing damping is realized.
  • the calculation in Cartesian coordinates allows a quasi-static decoupling of the stroke movement in the z direction from the movements in the horizontal, ie in the x and y direction. This allows easier inversion of the model.
  • the crane according to the invention advantageously comprises one or more sensors for determining one or more measured variables for the position and / or movement of the load and / or the crane, in particular for determining one or more of the parameters rope angle radial, rope angle tangential, rocking angle, rotation angle, rope length and their Derivatives, where the measurand or measures are in the inversion of the physical model.
  • several of these variables advantageously all of these variables, enter into the inversion of the physical model.
  • the feedback of the measured state variables allows an inversion of the physical model, which otherwise would only be at great expense or not at all invertible.
  • the crane according to the invention further advantageously comprises one or more sensors for determining one or more measured variables for the position and / or movement of the load and / or the crane, in particular for determining one or more of the parameters rope angle radial, rope angle tangential, rocking angle, rotation angle, rope length and their derivatives, wherein the measured variable or the measured variables are fed back into the control unit.
  • the feedback of the measured state variables is also independent of the inversion of the model of great advantage to stabilize the control.
  • a first transformation unit which calculates the actual position and / or actual movement of the load in Cartesian coordinates on the basis of the measured variable or the measured variables, in particular one or more of the variables position in x, y and z, velocity in x, y and z, acceleration in x and y, jerk in x and y.
  • the first transformation unit thus permits a comparison of the actual position and / or actual movement of the load with the desired position present in Cartesian coordinates and / or the desired movement of the load.
  • the actual speed of the load and possibly higher derivatives in Cartesian coordinates are advantageously calculated.
  • the sensor signals correspond to measured values in crane coordinates or in rope coordinates such.
  • B the sizes rope angle radially, rope angle tangential, rocking angle, rotation angle and pitch and their derivatives, from which the actual position and / or actual movement of the load is calculated in Cartesian coordinates by the first transformation unit.
  • the rocking angle and the angle of rotation are present as measured variables in crane coordinates.
  • the cable angles are in the form of cable coordinates, which are measured with respect to a vertical axis directed downwards from the boom head.
  • the first transformation unit requires a transformation of these coordinate systems into Cartesian coordinates of the load.
  • the crane according to the present invention advantageously comprises one or more cable angle sensors, wherein the measured values of the cable angle sensor (s) are fed back into the control unit.
  • the cable angle sensors thereby enable a return of the pendulum movement in the control unit and in particular in the pendulum damping. This results in a closed control loop, by which the control unit according to the invention and in particular the load oscillation damping is stabilized.
  • the first transformation unit calculates the actual position and / or the actual movement of the load in Cartesian coordinates on the basis of the measured values measured by the cable angle sensor (s).
  • the derivation of the actual position and optionally further derivations can be included in the calculation of the actual position and / or actual movement of the load.
  • the rocking angle, the angle of rotation and / or the length of the cable and, if appropriate, its derivatives can be taken into account as measured variables.
  • the crane control advantageously further comprises an input unit for inputting control commands by an operator and / or by an automation system, wherein a second transformation unit is provided between input unit and control unit, which calculates the target movement of the load in Cartesian coordinates on the basis of the control commands.
  • the input of the control commands thus continues to be in crane coordinates.
  • the crane coordinates thereby advantageously comprise the angle of rotation of the crane, the rocking angle of the boom or the projection and the lifting height. These coordinates represent the natural coordinate system of the crane according to the invention, so that an input of the control commands in these coordinates is intuitively possible.
  • the second transformation unit therefore transforms a desired movement of the load in crane coordinates into a desired movement of the load in Cartesian coordinates.
  • an input of the desired movement of the load in Cartesian coordinates is possible.
  • an input in Cartesian coordinates may be easier for the operator, especially if they are e.g. stops at the hub.
  • the second transformation unit can thus be omitted.
  • the crane according to the invention has one or more sensors for determining measured variables with respect to the position and / or movement of cranes, in particular for determining the rocking angle and / or the rotational angle, wherein the second transformation unit is initialized on the basis of the measured variable or the measured variables.
  • the initialization of the second transformation unit based on the measured variable or measured variables can be z. B. in each case when switching on the crane control.
  • the crane control of the crane according to the invention further advantageously comprises a path plan module which generates trajectories from the control commands of the input unit, which serve as input variables for the control unit.
  • the path planning module therefore calculates a desired movement of the load from the control commands entered by an operator.
  • the trajectories are generated in crane coordinates, so that the second transformation unit is arranged between the track plan module and the control unit.
  • the crane coordinates are advantageously the cylindrical coordinates of the crane, ie the angle of rotation, the rocking angle or the discharge and the lifting height. In these coordinates, the generation of the trajectories is particularly easy, since the system restrictions are present in these coordinates.
  • the trajectories in the railway plan module are generated optimally from the control commands taking into account the system limitations.
  • control unit further takes into account the dynamics of the load hanging on the load rope to dampen vibrations of the load. This can be done in particular in the load oscillation damping of the control unit to dampen pendulum vibrations of the load. In addition, if necessary, vibrations of the load in the stroke direction can also be taken into account and damped.
  • control unit is based on the inversion of a physical model of the load hanging on the load rope and the crane.
  • the physical model advantageously describes the movement of the load as a function of the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoisting gear.
  • the inversion of the model results in the control of the respective works on the basis of a target trajectory of the load.
  • the model takes into account advantageously the vibration dynamics of the load hanging on the load rope. This results in an effective damping of vibrations of the load, in particular an effective load oscillation damping.
  • the control unit can be easily adapted to different cranes.
  • the physical model is non-linear. This is important because many of the key effects in load swing damping are nonlinear.
  • the model allows in Cartesian coordinates a quasi-static decoupling of the vertical movement of the load.
  • This quasi-static decoupling of the vertical movement of the load in the lifting direction of the Movement of the load in horizontal directions makes a simplified and improved calculation of the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoist possible. In particular, this allows a simpler load oscillation damping.
  • the quasi-static decoupling of the vertical movement of the load also makes it possible to control the vertical movement of the load directly, while the horizontal movement is controlled by the load swing damping.
  • the control unit controls the hoist directly on the basis of control commands of an operator and / or an automation system, while the control of the slewing and the luffing takes place via the load swing damping.
  • the control system according to the invention can be realized simpler and cheaper.
  • higher safety standards are met, since the lifting movement has different safety requirements than the movement of the load in the horizontal direction.
  • the operator and / or the automation system can therefore according to the invention directly control the speed of the hoist, while for the control of the slewing gear and the luffing gear from the inputs of the operator and / or the automation system, first a target movement of the load is generated, from which the Lastpendeldämpfung calculates a control of the hoist and the luffing, which avoids or dampens load oscillations.
  • z. B. act to hydraulic drives.
  • the luffing can z. B. be realized via a hydraulic cylinder, or via a retractor, which moves the boom via a stranding.
  • the present invention further comprises, in addition to the crane, a crane control for controlling the slewing gear, the luffing gear and / or the hoisting gear of a crane.
  • the crane control has a control unit for calculating the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoist on.
  • the control unit points advantageously further on a load oscillation damping.
  • the control unit is designed such that the calculation of the control commands for the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoisting gear is effected on the basis of a setpoint load movement indicated in Cartesian coordinates.
  • the crane control is advantageously carried out as already shown above with respect to the crane.
  • the crane control is a computer-implemented crane control.
  • the present invention further comprises a corresponding method for controlling a crane.
  • the present invention comprises a method for controlling a crane for handling a load suspended on a load rope with a slewing gear for turning the crane, a luffing mechanism for luffing the boom and a hoist for lowering or lifting the load hanging on the rope, wherein the Calculation of the control commands for the control of slewing gear, luffing gear and / or hoist on the basis of specified in cartesian coordinates target load movement takes place.
  • the calculation of the control commands based on a specified in Cartesian coordinates Solllastterrorism allows a simplified and improved control.
  • a load oscillation damping can be made by which oscillating movements of the load are damped.
  • the load oscillation damping takes place advantageously taking into account the dynamics of the load hanging on the load rope, in particular taking into account the pendulum dynamics of the load rope hanging load to dampen spherical oscillations of the load by a suitable control of slewing and luffing gear.
  • the method is carried out in the same manner as was described in more detail above with respect to the crane or crane control.
  • the method according to the invention is a method for controlling a crane, as has been described above.
  • the essential control tasks in the automation of crane operation according to the method of controlling a crane according to the invention are load-swing damping and load-speed following control.
  • a nonlinear dynamic crane model is used, which combines the equations of motion of the cable-guided load and the simplified drive dynamics.
  • a linearizing tax law is obtained by state feedback.
  • the generation of smooth and realizable reference trajectories is formulated as an optimal control problem.
  • the control system is integrated into the software of a crane, in particular a mobile harbor crane.
  • trajectory succession is solved by deriving control laws that linearize the nonlinear crane system based on state information (state feedback linearization).
  • state feedback linearization When designing the control, the flatness characteristic of the MIMO system is verified and used.
  • the resulting linearized system is additionally stabilized by asymptotic output controls. Due to the model-based controller design, all parameters are represented analytically, and the control concept can be easily adapted to different configurations and crane types.
  • model-based, non-linear design techniques requires sufficiently smooth reference trajectories that are feasible with respect to the input and state constraints of the system. Therefore, the follow-up problem is formulated as an optimal control problem solved online to generate the viable reference trajectories for the exactly linearized system. Trajectory generation can be considered as Model Predictive Control (MPC).
  • MPC Model Predictive Control
  • the formulation of the problem of optimal control in the flat coordinates reduces the effort in the numerical solution.
  • a dynamic model of the crane is derived from the equations of motion of the load suspended from a cable and from approximations of the drive dynamics. Subsequently, the differential flatness of the crane model is shown and a non-linear flatness-based control law is derived. The formulation and numerical solution of the problem of trajectory generation as an optimal control problem is shown. The measurement results from the implementation of the control strategy on a mobile harbor crane are presented in the last section.
  • the present invention is used in a crane with a boom 1, which is pivoted about a horizontal rocking axis on the tower 2 of the crane. To rock the boom 1 while a boom cylinder between the tower and the boom is arranged.
  • the tower is rotatable about a vertical axis of rotation.
  • the tower is arranged on an upper carriage, which is rotatable about a slewing gear with respect to a lower carriage about the vertical axis of rotation.
  • the hoist is arranged to lift the load.
  • the hoist rope is guided by the lifting hoist arranged on the superstructure via deflection rollers on the tower top and on the jib tip 3 to the load.
  • the undercarriage has in the embodiment of a chassis, so that the crane is movable. This is in the embodiment of a mobile harbor crane. This has z. B. a load capacity of up to 200 t, a maximum radius of 60 m and a rope length of up to 80 m.
  • the dynamic model of the jib crane is derived by subdividing the entire system into two subsystems, see Fig. 1 ,
  • the first subsystem is the rigid crane structure 5 consisting of the crane tower 2 and the boom 1. This submodel has two degrees of freedom. The angle of rotation ⁇ s and the righting angle ⁇ l .
  • the second subsystem 6 represents the load hanging on the rope.
  • the suspension point is the tip of the boom.
  • crane structure acts on the cable-guided load by movements of the boom tip, which leads to spherical load pendulum movements.
  • the physical model of the crane structure uses the input signals 7 for the drives to describe the movement 8 of the cantilever tip, the physical model of the crane rope-dependent load describes the movement of the load 9 by means of the movement 8 of the cantilever tip, where the model takes into account pendulum movements of the load.
  • the crane structure is set in motion by hydraulic motors for rotary motion and a hydraulic cylinder for rocking the boom.
  • the hydraulic pump has a first-order lag behavior and the rotational speed ⁇ s is proportional to the oil flow delivered by the pump
  • the parameters of equation (1) are the time constant T s , the proportional constant K s between the input signal u s and the oil flow rate, the transmission ratio i s and the engine volume V.
  • the derivation of the dynamic model of the rocking motion is again based on the assumption of the first order lag behavior between the input signal u l and the pump flow rate.
  • the dynamics of the hydraulic cylinder can be neglected, but the actuator kinematics must be considered.
  • the second subsystem represents a spherical pendulum attached to the cantilever tip.
  • Pendulum motions can be triggered either by movements of the crane structure (first subsystem) or by external forces.
  • the load position in relation to the cantilever tip of the Cardan rope angles ⁇ t and ⁇ r and the rope length l R depends.
  • the Euler / Lagrange formalism is used.
  • Equation (6) The coefficients a i , b i, and c j (0 ⁇ i ⁇ 11, 0 ⁇ j ⁇ 9) are complex expressions that depend on the system parameters, the pitch angle ⁇ 1, and the generalized coordinates (3).
  • equations (4) - (6) show the complexity of the dynamic submodel with coupling terms such as centrifugal and Coriolis accelerations.
  • a third input F R which is the force of the winch, is taken into account. With the winch, the rope length and thus the height of the load with the mass m L can be changed.
  • the outputs of the nonlinear system are the three elements of the load position in Cartesian coordinates.
  • l B is the length of the boom
  • l T is the height of the attachment point of the boom
  • l P is the length of the spherical pendulum.
  • the pendulum length l P depends on the rope length l R and on the angle of elevation ⁇ l
  • an input unit 10 is provided through which an operator can input control commands, e.g. B. via hand lever.
  • the control commands can also be generated by a higher-level automation system, which autonomously controls the crane.
  • 11 reference trajectories are generated in a path plan module 11.
  • ⁇ t and ⁇ r are the target speeds of the load associated with the turning and rocking motion of the crane.
  • ⁇ z denotes the target stroke speed of the load.
  • the reference trajectories y t, ref and y r, ref are generated based on a model predictive control (MPC) 12.
  • MPC model predictive control
  • the transformation P implemented by a second transformation unit 14 takes into account not only the position but also higher-order derivatives.
  • the reference trajectory for the height of the load y z, ref is generated from the hand lever signal ⁇ z by an integrating filter 13 of sufficient order.
  • the tax law which consists of a linearizing and a stabilizing part, calculates the input signals of the jib crane. The calculation takes place in a calculation unit 15 of the control unit.
  • the tax jurisdiction is based on a flatness-based approach.
  • the control unit controls the drives of the crane 20.
  • Sensors arranged on the crane measure a state x of the crane and load system, the measurement signals being fed back into the controller via a first transformation unit 16.
  • Equation (20) ⁇ z is also replaced by the new input v z .
  • the relative degree of output y z is two
  • the reference trajectory y z, ref must contain the third and fourth derivative of the reference position. Therefore, the filter used to generate this trajectory is of fourth order.
  • the elements of the feedback matrices are determined by Polvorgabe.
  • the poles are adjusted to the system dynamics by look-up tables that depend on the rope length.
  • the output vectors ⁇ i are determined by the transformation T (x).
  • This transformation T (x) is implemented by the first transformation unit 16 according to the present invention. The transformation is based on the Byrnes / Isidori normal form representation.
  • the basic idea is to formulate the problem of trajectory generation as a limited optimal control problem with finite horizon (open loop) for the integrator chains.
  • the inputs of these integrator chains form the formal control variables for the optimal control problem.
  • the optimal control problem is formulated in the variables ⁇ t, ref , ⁇ r, ref .
  • the transformation by the second transformation unit P is then made to the optimum reference trajectories in Cartesian coordinates y r, ref, to convert y R ref.
  • the model predictive trajectory generation algorithm deals with system variable constraints such as optimal control problem limitations. Restrictions result from the limited working space of the crane, which is given by the minimum and maximum outreach. In addition, limitations of radial velocity / acceleration and angular velocity / acceleration for the cantilever tip result from limitations of the hydraulic actuators. The maximum radial speed of the cantilever tip hangs as in Fig. 5 shown off the projection due to the cylinder kinematics and safety reasons.
  • the boom tip constraints are designed as limitations on load movement in each direction in the optimal control problem. y r . ref . min - y ⁇ r . ref . Max y r - y ⁇ r . ref . Max - y ⁇ t . ref .
  • the maximum radial speed, as in Fig. 5 shown depends on the projection, is approximated by piecewise linear functions.
  • y r . ref and y r . ref used to avoid high-frequency excitations of the system
  • a standard quadratic objective function evaluates the quadratic deviation of the angular and radial position and velocity from their reference predictions as well as the rate of change of the input variables over the finite time horizon [ t 0 , t f ] .
  • the optimization horizon is a setting parameter and should cover the essential dynamics of the system, which is determined by the period of load swinging.
  • Reference forecasts are generated from the manual lever signals of the crane operator for the target load speed in tangential and radial directions ( ⁇ t , ⁇ r ).
  • the continuous, constrained, linear-quadratic optimal control problem is discretized with K time steps and approximated by a quadratic program (QP) in the control and state variables that can be solved by a standard interior point algorithm.
  • QP quadratic program
  • the structure of the model equations in a Riccati-type approach is used to obtain a solution of Newton's step equation with O (K) operations, ie the computational effort increases linearly with the forecast horizon.
  • the illustrated control concept was implemented in a mobile harbor crane.
  • the first scenario is a pure rocking motion.
  • the load is converted by the rocker of the boom from a radius of 31 m to a radius of 17 m.
  • the radial position of the load y r which is the distance between the crane mast and the load in the direction of the cantilever, follows the reference trajectory y r, ref very precisely.
  • the follow - up behavior of the regulated crane in Cartesian coordinates is in Fig. 7 shown.
  • the second maneuver is a rotation from zero to 400 °.
  • Fig. 8 shows the trajectory tracking behavior for the angular load position, velocity and acceleration.
  • the linearizing and stabilizing controller allows the load to follow very accurately without significantly overshooting this reference trajectory.
  • the residual load oscillation is also sufficiently small.
  • the radial displacement of the load due to centrifugal forces during a rotary motion.
  • the radial displacement is compensated by the Wipp Kunststoff Kunststoff u l .
  • the radial load position is nearly constant with errors between the reference trajectory and the measured load position of less than ⁇ 0.5 m, see Fig. 9 ,
  • the controller concept is designed in Cartesian coordinates based on the flatness property of the nonlinear system with respect to the output vector Fig. 10 the measured load position in the x and y directions and their reference trajectories during the rotation.
  • the quality of control is as good as the quality in the rotational and rocker direction, since the Cartesian representation ( y x , y y ) is equivalent to the polar representation ( y t , y r ), where y t is the rotation angle and y r is the radius are the burden.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Control And Safety Of Cranes (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Grue pour le transbordement d'une charge suspendue à un câble porteur, comportant un mécanisme de rotation pour faire tourner la grue, un mécanisme de basculement pour monter la flèche et un mécanisme de levage pour abaisser ou lever la charge suspendue au câble porteur, comportant une unité de commande pour calculer l'actionnement du mécanisme de rotation, du mécanisme de basculement et/ou du mécanisme de levage, dans laquelle l'unité de commande comprend un système d'amortissement d'une charge pendulaire et le calcul des commandes d'actionnement pour l'actionnement du mécanisme de rotation, du mécanisme de basculement et/ou du mécanisme de levage est effectué sur la base d'un mouvement de consigne de la charge indiqué en coordonnées cartésiennes,
    caractérisée en ce que
    l'amortissement d'une charge pendulaire de l'unité de commande est basé sur l'inversion d'un modèle physique de la charge suspendue au câble porteur et de la grue, le modèle physique inversé transformant un mouvement prédéfini de la charge suspendue au câble porteur en coordonnées cartésiennes dans des signaux d'actionnement pour le mécanisme de rotation, le mécanisme de basculement et/ou le mécanisme de levage, le calcul en coordonnées cartésiennes permettant un découplage quasi-statique du mouvement de levage dans la direction z des mouvements dans les directions x et y.
  2. Grue selon la revendication 1, comportant un ou plusieurs capteurs pour la détermination d'une ou plusieurs grandeurs de mesure concernant la position et/ou le mouvement de la charge et/ou de la grue, en particulier pour la détermination d'une ou plusieurs des grandeurs angle du câble radial, angle du câble tangentiel, angle de basculement, angle de rotation, longueur du câble ainsi que leurs dérivés, la grandeur de mesure ou les grandeurs de mesure étant inclues dans l'inversion du modèle physique.
  3. Grue selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comportant un ou plusieurs capteurs pour la détermination d'une ou plusieurs grandeurs de mesure concernant la position et/ou le mouvement de la charge et/ou de la grue, en particulier pour la détermination d'une ou plusieurs des grandeurs angle du câble radial, angle du câble tangentiel, angle de basculement, angle de rotation, longueur du câble ainsi que leurs dérivés, la grandeur de mesure ou les grandeurs de mesure étant renvoyées dans l'unité de commande.
  4. Grue selon la revendication 3, dans laquelle une première unité de transformation est prévue qui sur la base de la grandeur de mesure ou des grandeurs de mesure calcule la position réelle et/ou le mouvement réel de la charge en coordonnées cartésiennes, en particulier une ou plusieurs des grandeurs position en x, y et z, vitesse en x, y et z, accélération en x et y, secousse en x et y.
  5. Grue selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comportant un ou plusieurs capteurs de l'angle du câble, les valeurs mesurées du ou des capteurs de l'angle du câble étant renvoyés dans l'unité de commande.
  6. Grue selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comportant une unité d'entrée pour l'entrée des instructions de commande par un opérateur, une deuxième unité de transformation étant prévue entre l'unité d'entrée et l'unité de commande, qui sur la base des instructions de commande calcule le mouvement de consigne de la charge en coordonnées cartésiennes.
  7. Grue selon la revendication 6, comportant un ou plusieurs capteurs pour la détermination de grandeurs de mesure concernant la position et/ou le mouvement de la grue, en particulier pour la détermination de l'angle de basculement et/ou de l'angle de rotation, la deuxième unité de transformation étant initialisée à l'aide de la grandeur de mesure ou des grandeurs de mesure.
  8. Grue selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comportant un module de planification de parcours, qui à partir des instructions de commande d'un opérateur et/ou d'un système d'automation génère des trajectoires qui servent de grandeurs d'entrée pour l'unité de commande.
  9. Grue selon la revendication 8, dans laquelle les trajectoires sont générées en coordonnées de grue et la deuxième unité de transformation est agencée entre le module de planification de parcours et l'unité de commande.
  10. Grue selon la revendication 8 ou 9, dans laquelle les trajectoires sont générées de manière optimale dans le module de planification de parcours à partir des instructions de commande en tenant compte des contraintes du système.
  11. Grue selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle l'unité de commande actionne le mécanisme de levage directement à l'aide des instructions de commande d'un opérateur et/ou d'un système d'automation, tandis que l'actionnement du mécanisme de rotation et du mécanisme de basculement est effectué via l'amortissement d'une charge pendulaire.
  12. Procédé pour l'actionnement d'une grue selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 11, dans lequel le calcul des instructions d'actionnement pour actionner le mécanisme de rotation, le mécanisme de basculement et/ou le mécanisme de levage est effectuée sur la base d'un mouvement de consigne de la charge indiqué en coordonnées cartésiennes.
EP10005289.3A 2009-07-08 2010-05-20 Grue pour envelopper une charge suspendue à un câble porteur Active EP2272784B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE200910032267 DE102009032267A1 (de) 2009-07-08 2009-07-08 Kran zum Umschlagen einer an einem Lastseil hängenden Last

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2272784A1 EP2272784A1 (fr) 2011-01-12
EP2272784B1 true EP2272784B1 (fr) 2017-03-22

Family

ID=42983326

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10005289.3A Active EP2272784B1 (fr) 2009-07-08 2010-05-20 Grue pour envelopper une charge suspendue à un câble porteur

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US8839967B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2272784B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5868580B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR20110004776A (fr)
CN (1) CN101985343B (fr)
DE (1) DE102009032267A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2628861T3 (fr)

Families Citing this family (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7389773B2 (en) 2005-08-18 2008-06-24 Honeywell International Inc. Emissions sensors for fuel control in engines
FI120789B (fi) * 2008-06-23 2010-03-15 Konecranes Oyj Menetelmä nopeussäädettävän nostinkäytön moottorin pyörimisnopeuden ohjaamiseksi ja nostinkäyttö
US8060290B2 (en) 2008-07-17 2011-11-15 Honeywell International Inc. Configurable automotive controller
US8620461B2 (en) 2009-09-24 2013-12-31 Honeywell International, Inc. Method and system for updating tuning parameters of a controller
US8504175B2 (en) * 2010-06-02 2013-08-06 Honeywell International Inc. Using model predictive control to optimize variable trajectories and system control
KR101242152B1 (ko) * 2011-03-17 2013-03-11 현대로템 주식회사 크레인 제어장치
ES2447018T3 (es) 2011-08-26 2014-03-11 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh Aparato de control de grúa
US9677493B2 (en) 2011-09-19 2017-06-13 Honeywell Spol, S.R.O. Coordinated engine and emissions control system
US20130111905A1 (en) 2011-11-04 2013-05-09 Honeywell Spol. S.R.O. Integrated optimization and control of an engine and aftertreatment system
US9650934B2 (en) 2011-11-04 2017-05-16 Honeywell spol.s.r.o. Engine and aftertreatment optimization system
CN102542361B (zh) * 2012-01-11 2016-03-02 中联重科股份有限公司 起重机吊装物路径规划方法
DE102012004802A1 (de) * 2012-03-09 2013-09-12 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh Kransteuerung mit Aufteilung einer kinematisch beschränkten Größe des Hubwerks
FI20135085L (fi) * 2013-01-29 2014-07-30 John Deere Forestry Oy Menetelmä ja järjestelmä työkoneen puomiston ohjaamiseksi kärkiohjauksella
ES2676452T3 (es) * 2013-07-05 2018-07-19 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh Controlador de grúa
DE102013012019B4 (de) 2013-07-19 2019-10-24 Tadano Faun Gmbh Kran, insbesondere Mobilkran
NL2012258C2 (en) * 2014-02-13 2015-08-17 Itrec Bv Damping device, damping system, vessel equipped with damping system and damping method.
DE102014008094A1 (de) * 2014-06-02 2015-12-03 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh Verfahren zum Steuern der Ausrichtung einer Kranlast und Auslegekran
CN104140042B (zh) * 2014-07-08 2017-01-18 西安宝德自动化股份有限公司 一种减小塔式起重机载荷摆角的控制方法
US10822208B2 (en) * 2014-12-23 2020-11-03 Manitowoc Crane Companies, Llc Crane 3D workspace spatial techniques for crane operation in proximity of obstacles
CN104555733B (zh) * 2014-12-26 2016-07-27 中联重科股份有限公司 吊重摆动控制方法、设备、系统以及工程机械
EP3051367B1 (fr) 2015-01-28 2020-11-25 Honeywell spol s.r.o. Approche et système de manipulation de contraintes pour des perturbations mesurées avec une prévisualisation incertaine
EP3056706A1 (fr) 2015-02-16 2016-08-17 Honeywell International Inc. Approche de modélisation de système de post-traitement et d'identification de modèle
EP3091212A1 (fr) 2015-05-06 2016-11-09 Honeywell International Inc. Approche d'identification pour modèles de valeurs moyennes de moteurs à combustion interne
EP3734375B1 (fr) 2015-07-31 2023-04-05 Garrett Transportation I Inc. Résolveur de programme quadratique pour mpc utilisant une commande variable
US10272779B2 (en) 2015-08-05 2019-04-30 Garrett Transportation I Inc. System and approach for dynamic vehicle speed optimization
CN105152019A (zh) * 2015-09-11 2015-12-16 苏州市新瑞奇节电科技有限公司 一种车间用吊车定位系统
US10415492B2 (en) 2016-01-29 2019-09-17 Garrett Transportation I Inc. Engine system with inferential sensor
US10124750B2 (en) 2016-04-26 2018-11-13 Honeywell International Inc. Vehicle security module system
US10036338B2 (en) 2016-04-26 2018-07-31 Honeywell International Inc. Condition-based powertrain control system
WO2018101918A1 (fr) 2016-11-29 2018-06-07 Honeywell International Inc. Capteur de flux inférentiel
DE102016015388A1 (de) * 2016-12-22 2018-06-28 Liebherr-Werk Ehingen Gmbh Verfahren zur assistierten Ausführung von Kranbewegungen eines Krans sowie Kran
CN107215792B (zh) * 2017-07-11 2019-12-17 长沙海川自动化设备有限公司 群塔防撞控制方法、控制装置
CN107235419A (zh) * 2017-07-11 2017-10-10 长沙海川自动化设备有限公司 塔式起重机安全监控系统及具有其的塔式起重机
EP3461783B1 (fr) * 2017-09-29 2019-11-13 B&R Industrial Automation GmbH Équipement de levage et procédé de commande d'un équipement de levage
US11057213B2 (en) 2017-10-13 2021-07-06 Garrett Transportation I, Inc. Authentication system for electronic control unit on a bus
KR102306145B1 (ko) * 2017-12-14 2021-09-27 가부시키가이샤 마에다세이사쿠쇼 이동식 크레인의 붐 선회각도 검출장치
JP7119674B2 (ja) * 2018-07-11 2022-08-17 株式会社タダノ クレーン
JP7151532B2 (ja) * 2019-02-14 2022-10-12 株式会社タダノ クレーンおよびクレーンの経路生成システム
AT16885U1 (de) * 2019-03-28 2020-11-15 Palfinger Ag Kran mit Kransteuerung
CN110723650A (zh) * 2019-10-30 2020-01-24 湖南三一塔式起重机械有限公司 一种分散集成控制系统、方法及工程机械
CN111460591A (zh) * 2020-03-31 2020-07-28 合肥工业大学 基于子区间理论的大不确定性起重机系统变幅角预测方法
CN112817328B (zh) * 2020-12-31 2022-08-02 青岛理工大学 一种四旋翼变绳长吊挂系统的路径规划与减摆控制方法
RU2754644C1 (ru) * 2021-02-26 2021-09-06 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «Крановые технологии» Способ повышения безопасности управления грузоподъемным краном и система управления для осуществления этого способа
CN114545779B (zh) * 2022-03-08 2023-11-03 南京理工大学 一种基于直驱泵的快速起竖系统自调节积分鲁棒控制方法

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007039408A1 (de) * 2007-05-16 2008-11-20 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh Kransteuerung, Kran und Verfahren

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997045357A1 (fr) * 1996-05-24 1997-12-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Procede et systeme pour eviter les oscillations en charge d'un appareil deplaçant une charge suspendue et executant des mouvements rotatifs
US6039193A (en) * 1999-01-14 2000-03-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Integrated and automated control of a crane's rider block tagline system
US6631300B1 (en) * 1999-11-05 2003-10-07 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Nonlinear active control of dynamical systems
JP3501103B2 (ja) * 2000-05-24 2004-03-02 コベルコ建機株式会社 船上クレーン装置の吊り動作制御方法及び装置
US6496765B1 (en) * 2000-06-28 2002-12-17 Sandia Corporation Control system and method for payload control in mobile platform cranes
DE10064182A1 (de) 2000-10-19 2002-05-08 Liebherr Werk Nenzing Kran oder Bagger zum Umschlagen von einer an einem Lastseil hängenden Last mit Lastpendelungsdämpfung
US7426423B2 (en) * 2003-05-30 2008-09-16 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing—GmbH Crane or excavator for handling a cable-suspended load provided with optimised motion guidance
US7831333B2 (en) * 2006-03-14 2010-11-09 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh Method for the automatic transfer of a load hanging at a load rope of a crane or excavator with a load oscillation damping and a trajectory planner

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007039408A1 (de) * 2007-05-16 2008-11-20 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing Gmbh Kransteuerung, Kran und Verfahren

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101985343B (zh) 2015-06-03
JP2011016661A (ja) 2011-01-27
CN101985343A (zh) 2011-03-16
DE102009032267A1 (de) 2011-01-13
US20110006025A1 (en) 2011-01-13
ES2628861T3 (es) 2017-08-04
EP2272784A1 (fr) 2011-01-12
KR20110004776A (ko) 2011-01-14
US8839967B2 (en) 2014-09-23
JP5868580B2 (ja) 2016-02-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2272784B1 (fr) Grue pour envelopper une charge suspendue à un câble porteur
EP3649072B1 (fr) Grue et procédé de commande d'une telle grue
EP3784616A1 (fr) Grue et procédé pour commander une grue de ce type
EP2502871B1 (fr) Commande de grue, grue et procédé
EP2272785B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un entraînement de grue
EP1326798B1 (fr) Grue ou excavateur pour retourner une charge suspendue a un cable porteur avec amortissement du mouvement pendulaire de la charge
EP3556969B1 (fr) Pompe à béton
DE60221232T2 (de) Schwingungsminderungssteuerung eines krans unter bedienerbefehl
EP1628902B1 (fr) Grue ou excavatrice destinee a la manipulation d'une charge suspendue a un cable presentant un systeme de guidage optimise
EP3408208B1 (fr) Grue et procédé de commande de ladite grue
EP2272786B1 (fr) Commande de grue pour la commande d'un dispositif de levage de grue
DE102014008094A1 (de) Verfahren zum Steuern der Ausrichtung einer Kranlast und Auslegekran
EP2636636B1 (fr) Commande de grue avec répartition de la grandeur du dispositif de levage réduite par cinématique
EP3409636B1 (fr) Procédé permettant d'amortir des vibrations de torsion d'un élément de réception de charge d'un dispositif de levage
EP3556967B1 (fr) Manipulateur de grande taille, en particulier pour pompes à béton
DE102006048988A1 (de) Steuerungssystem für einen Auslegerkran
DE102007038016A1 (de) Drehleiter
DE102015100669A1 (de) Anti-pendel-steuerverfahren mit einstellbarer unterstützung für den transport einer schwebenden last
EP4013713B1 (fr) Grue et procédé de commande d'une telle grue
DE10029579A1 (de) Verfahren zur Orientierung der Last in Krananlagen
EP1992583B1 (fr) Grue avec commande de grue
WO1997045357A1 (fr) Procede et systeme pour eviter les oscillations en charge d'un appareil deplaçant une charge suspendue et executant des mouvements rotatifs
WO2023025643A1 (fr) Grue à tour pivotante, procédé et unité de commande pour faire fonctionner une grue à tour pivotante, chariot roulant et mécanisme de roulement pour chariot
AT17596U1 (de) Verfahren zum Steuern und/oder Regeln eines fahrzeuggebundenen Hebezeuges

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110708

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20150923

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20161221

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 877525

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170415

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502010013327

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170622

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170623

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2628861

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20170804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170622

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170722

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170724

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502010013327

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180102

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170520

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 877525

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170520

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170322

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20200602

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20200529

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20220802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210521

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200520

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230525

Year of fee payment: 14