EP3556969B1 - Pompe à béton - Google Patents

Pompe à béton Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3556969B1
EP3556969B1 EP19167399.5A EP19167399A EP3556969B1 EP 3556969 B1 EP3556969 B1 EP 3556969B1 EP 19167399 A EP19167399 A EP 19167399A EP 3556969 B1 EP3556969 B1 EP 3556969B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
concrete
delivery
distribution boom
pump
disturbance variable
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP19167399.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3556969A1 (fr
Inventor
Julian Wanner
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h. c. Oliver Sawodny
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Liebherr Mischtecknik GmbH
Original Assignee
Liebherr Mischtecknik GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Liebherr Mischtecknik GmbH filed Critical Liebherr Mischtecknik GmbH
Publication of EP3556969A1 publication Critical patent/EP3556969A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3556969B1 publication Critical patent/EP3556969B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66C—CRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
    • B66C23/00—Cranes comprising essentially a beam, boom, or triangular structure acting as a cantilever and mounted for translatory of swinging movements in vertical or horizontal planes or a combination of such movements, e.g. jib-cranes, derricks, tower cranes
    • B66C23/62—Constructional features or details
    • B66C23/64—Jibs
    • B66C23/68—Jibs foldable or otherwise adjustable in configuration
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66C—CRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
    • B66C13/00—Other constructional features or details
    • B66C13/04—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack
    • B66C13/06—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads
    • B66C13/066—Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads for minimising vibration of a boom
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04G—SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; BUILDING IMPLEMENTS OR AIDS, OR THEIR USE; HANDLING BUILDING MATERIALS ON THE SITE; REPAIRING, BREAKING-UP OR OTHER WORK ON EXISTING BUILDINGS
    • E04G21/00—Preparing, conveying, or working-up building materials or building elements in situ; Other devices or measures for constructional work
    • E04G21/02—Conveying or working-up concrete or similar masses able to be heaped or cast
    • E04G21/04—Devices for both conveying and distributing
    • E04G21/0418—Devices for both conveying and distributing with distribution hose
    • E04G21/0436—Devices for both conveying and distributing with distribution hose on a mobile support, e.g. truck
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04G—SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; BUILDING IMPLEMENTS OR AIDS, OR THEIR USE; HANDLING BUILDING MATERIALS ON THE SITE; REPAIRING, BREAKING-UP OR OTHER WORK ON EXISTING BUILDINGS
    • E04G21/00—Preparing, conveying, or working-up building materials or building elements in situ; Other devices or measures for constructional work
    • E04G21/02—Conveying or working-up concrete or similar masses able to be heaped or cast
    • E04G21/04—Devices for both conveying and distributing
    • E04G21/0418—Devices for both conveying and distributing with distribution hose
    • E04G21/0445—Devices for both conveying and distributing with distribution hose with booms
    • E04G21/0454—Devices for both conveying and distributing with distribution hose with booms with boom vibration damper mechanisms

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a concrete pump with a feed pump, a concrete line and an articulated arm forming a distribution boom, along which the concrete line is guided, the articulated arm having a rotary stand which can be rotated about a vertical axis and/or at least one which can be pivoted about a horizontal axis by means of a joint Segment, wherein the turntable can be moved about the vertical axis via an actuator and / or the at least one segment can be pivoted about the horizontal axis via an actuator, the concrete pump further having a control for controlling the actuators of the distribution boom, the control being a Disturbance input to reduce the vibrations of the placing boom induced by concrete delivery.
  • the concrete pump is a truck-mounted concrete pump.
  • the control device comprises a pressure measuring device on the delivery line of the concrete, in which two pressure sensors are preferably provided distributed over the delivery line and can determine pressure differences in the delivery line. For example, by measuring the delivery pressure at two measuring points, the development of a pressure difference and the course of such a pressure wave through the delivery line can be estimated.
  • Pamphlet JP 2000 282687 A describes a concrete pump in which the pump frequency is changed in order to avoid excessive excitation of the vibrations of the placing boom.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a concrete pump with an improved disturbance variable feed-in.
  • the present invention comprises a concrete pump with a feed pump, a concrete line and an articulated arm forming a distribution boom, along which the concrete line is guided, the articulated arm having a turntable rotatable about a vertical axis and/or at least one means a joint has a segment that can be pivoted about a horizontal axis, wherein the rotary stand can be moved about the vertical axis via an actuator and / or the at least one segment can be pivoted about the horizontal axis via an actuator, and wherein the concrete pump continues to provide a control Control of the actuators of the distribution boom, the control comprising a disturbance variable feed-in to reduce the vibrations of the distribution boom induced by the concrete delivery.
  • the first aspect is characterized in that the disturbance variables are applied on the basis of a physical model of the concrete delivery, which describes the flow-related disturbance forces of the concrete delivery on the placing boom.
  • the use of the physical model and the determination of the disruptive forces on the placing boom based on it results in a significantly improved reduction in vibrations induced by concrete delivery.
  • the physical model describes frictional forces of the concrete on the inner wall of the concrete pipe and/or inertial forces due to the concrete flow deflection in the pipe bends. These two forces essentially determine the disruptive forces acting on the articulated arm.
  • At least one operating parameter of the feed pump is included in the disturbance variable feed-in.
  • This can be, for example, one or more of the following operating parameters: pumping frequency, cylinder speed of the cylinders of the feed pump and/or the cylinder position of the cylinders of the feed pump.
  • the physical model of concrete delivery takes into account the current position of the placing boom and in particular the articulation angles of the joints.
  • the current position of the distribution boom is preferably determined on the basis of sensors assigned to the swivel joints for indirect or direct measurement of the respective angle of rotation of the joints of the articulated arm.
  • the determination of the disruptive forces of the concrete delivery on the placing boom is preferably carried out without measuring the vibration state of the placing boom or the segments.
  • the position of the placing boom and in particular the articulation angles of the joints are preferably included in the description of the concrete flow deflection by the physical model.
  • the physical model can take into account the hydrostatic pressure loss of the flow, taking into account the current position of the placing boom.
  • At least one material property of the pumped fluid that is included in the modeling by the physical model is determined from operating parameters of the delivery pump and/or the concrete delivery. This can improve the accuracy of the model.
  • At least the viscosity of the pumped fluid is determined, in particular from the concrete pressure and the flow velocity of the concrete.
  • the density of the pumped fluid can be determined by the static concrete pressure. Alternatively, a stored average value for the density of concrete can be used for the density of the pumped fluid.
  • the disturbance variable connection is further based on a physical model of the placing boom, which is coupled to the physical model of the concrete delivery in order to determine the influence of the disturbance forces determined by the physical model of the concrete delivery on the entire placing boom.
  • the physical model of the distribution boom used for this preferably takes into account the elastic deformation of at least one of the segments.
  • the vibrations of the placing boom induced by the conveying of concrete are reduced by switching on the disturbance variables by controlling the actuators of the articulated arm.
  • the disturbance variable feed-in takes place as a feedforward control without feedback of the dynamic state of the distribution boom.
  • the pilot control is based on a control of a virtual model of the distribution boom.
  • the disturbance variable connection preferably regulates the virtual model of the placing boom, which is coupled to the model of the concrete delivery as part of the determination of the disturbance forces.
  • this control can be carried out in such a way that the influence of the disruptive forces is compensated for at least one point on the articulated arm.
  • the disturbance variable control controls the actuators of the articulated arm in such a way that the influence of the disturbance forces on the tip of the distribution boom is reduced and preferably eliminated.
  • the feed pump is preferably a double piston pump.
  • a double piston pump includes two pistons that work in push-pull to pump the concrete.
  • Such feed pumps are known.
  • the damping of induced vibrations by the disturbance variable feed-in according to the present invention is based on controlling the actuators of the articulated arm.
  • the feed pump is preferably controlled independently of the disturbance variable input.
  • the disturbance variable connection can be based solely on controlling the actuators of the articulated arm.
  • control in addition to the input of disturbance variables, also includes a regulation which is based on a measurement and/or feedback of the position and/or the vibration state of the distribution boom.
  • control includes vibration damping for damping horizontal and/or vertical vibrations of the distribution boom, which is based on a measurement and/or feedback of the position and the vibration state of the distribution boom.
  • vibration damping can be designed in such a way that it dampens natural vibrations of the distribution boom.
  • the vibration damping is preferably based on a physical model of the distribution boom.
  • this physical model can be the same model that is also used to determine the influence of the disruptive forces of concrete delivery on the placing boom.
  • control and/or vibration damping is preferably designed in such a way that it only intervenes when the state of the distribution boom deviates from the state of the virtual model, which is regulated as part of the disturbance variable feed-in.
  • the present invention comprises a concrete pump with a feed pump, a concrete line and an articulated arm forming a distribution boom, along which the concrete line is guided, the articulated arm having a turntable rotatable about a vertical axis and/or at least one means a joint has a segment that can be pivoted about a horizontal axis, wherein the rotary stand can be moved about the vertical axis via an actuator and / or the at least one segment can be pivoted about the horizontal axis via an actuator, and wherein the concrete pump also has a control for controlling the actuators of the distribution boom, the control comprising a disturbance variable feed-in to reduce the vibrations of the distribution boom induced by the concrete delivery, which takes the concrete pressure into account.
  • the second aspect is characterized in that the disturbance variable feed-in determines the concrete pressure at the inlet of the concrete line based on the operating parameters of the feed pump.
  • the indirect determination of the concrete pressure according to the invention based on operating parameters of the feed pump has the considerable advantage that pressure sensors on the concrete line, which are extremely susceptible to wear, can be dispensed with.
  • the determination of the concrete pressure at the inlet of the concrete line is preferably based on the hydraulic pressure of the delivery cylinders of the delivery pump and the piston area ratio of the delivery pump.
  • the concrete pressure can thereby be determined using a measured value that can be reliably determined in the hydraulic system of the feed pump.
  • the first and second aspects of the present invention can each be used independently of one another.
  • the disturbance variable input based on a physical model of concrete delivery can also take place according to the first aspect without determining the concrete pressure according to the second aspect.
  • a determination of the concrete pressure according to the second aspect can also be used in a disturbance variable feed-in, which is based on a different principle than the disturbance variable feed-in according to the first aspect.
  • first and second aspects are preferably used in combination.
  • the disturbance variable feed-in takes into account the frequency of the feed pump and/or the position and/or speed of the feed pistons of the feed pump.
  • the disturbance variable feed-in takes into account the frequency of the feed pump and/or the position and/or speed of the feed pistons of the feed pump.
  • these are easily accessible operating parameters of the feed pump, which can be determined either by measurement or from the control of the feed pump, and from which operating variables for concrete delivery can be determined.
  • the disturbance variable connection can determine the flow speed of the concrete in the concrete pipe from the speed of the delivery pistons of the delivery pump.
  • This feature of the present invention can also be used independently of the first and second aspects of the present invention, in particular as a further development of a concrete pump according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • the concrete pump comprises at least one yaw rate sensor, which is arranged on a segment of the articulated arm, wherein the control for the input of disturbance variables and/or vibration damping determines a oscillation state of the entire distribution boom based on the measured values of the yaw rate sensor from the vibrations of the individual segments .
  • the concrete pump comprises at least one rotation rate sensor, which is arranged on a segment of the articulated arm, with the control for feeding in disturbance variables and/or vibration damping taking place without the use of geodetic sensors and/or deformation sensors.
  • the concrete pump comprises at least one rotation rate sensor, which is arranged in a front region of a segment which is arranged between the rotating stand and a segment forming the mast tip in the articulated arm.
  • the signal from the rotation rate sensor is preferably used to determine vibrations of the segment on which it is arranged.
  • the front region of a segment in the sense of the present invention is preferred the front 25% of the length of the respective segment, ie the one facing the top of the mast, is considered, more preferably the front 10% of the length of the length.
  • rotation rate sensors are arranged on at least two segments.
  • the signals from these rotation rate sensors are preferably used to determine vibrations of the segments on which they are arranged.
  • the vibration damping determines a vibration state of the segments and/or the entire arm based on the measured values of the at least two rotation rate sensors.
  • the rotation rate sensors are preferably each arranged in a front region of the segments. This improves the detection of vibrations in these segments.
  • the at least two segments on which the yaw rate sensors are arranged are arranged between the turret and a segment forming the mast tip in the articulated arm. More preferably, a further rotation rate sensor is arranged on the segment forming the mast tip, which is preferably used to determine vibrations of the mast tip.
  • the articulated arm further comprises sensors assigned to the swivel joints for indirectly or directly measuring the respective angle of rotation of the joint, with the measurement signals from the sensors being incorporated into the control of the articulated arm.
  • sensors are preferably provided in addition to the yaw rate sensors and can be used in particular to compensate for a drift in the measured values, which cannot be avoided due to the design of yaw rate sensors.
  • the measurement signals from the sensors are primarily used for vibration damping. Alternatively or additionally, the measurement signals from the sensors can be used to determine the current position of the articulated arm, and in particular can be used for position control of the articulated arm.
  • the disturbance variable input and/or vibration damping takes place using a physical model of the distribution boom, in which the flexibility of at least one segment is described by a virtual joint arranged within this segment.
  • At least the flexibility of the segment arranged directly on the rotating stand is taken into account by a corresponding virtual joint, since the vibrations of this segment have the greatest influence on the vibration state of the articulated arm.
  • the flexibility of the last segment, which forms the mast tip can be taken into account. This is usually the least stable and therefore the most flexible.
  • the virtual joint can also be provided in another segment.
  • the flexibility of several and more preferably all segments is preferably described by at least one virtual joint arranged within the respective segment.
  • the physical model is a rigid body model with actuated joints.
  • the model preferably describes several and more preferably all segments of the articulated arm, and thus simultaneously reflects the position of the articulated arm.
  • the ability to oscillate at least one and preferably several and more preferably all segments is then described by at least one virtual joint in the rigid bodies describing the actual segments.
  • a spring element and a damper element are assigned to the virtual joint.
  • the spring constant and the damper constant are preferably chosen so that the virtual joint describes the size of the deflection and/or torsion and/or the first natural frequency of the real segment.
  • the virtual joint can therefore be viewed as a first description of the segment's first natural oscillation in terms of frequency and amplitude.
  • less than 10, more preferably less than 5, more preferably less than 3 and, in a possible embodiment, exactly one virtual joint are provided within the segment. This reduces the complexity of the model.
  • a virtual joint with only one axis of rotation is sufficient.
  • a virtual joint with a horizontal axis of rotation can be used to dampen vertical vibrations.
  • the virtual joint has at least two and preferably three degrees of freedom of movement.
  • the vibration damping takes into account torsion of at least one segment and/or the articulated arm.
  • the torsion of at least one segment and/or the articulated arm is taken into account by using a physical model of the articulated arm, which describes a torsion of the articulated arm and/or one or more segments of the articulated arm. This is more preferably done via a virtual swivel joint, like this was described above, and which extends in the longitudinal direction of the segment.
  • the articulated arm comprises at least two yaw rate sensors arranged on different segments, the torsion being determined from a comparison of the measured values of the yaw rate sensors.
  • the measured values of a first yaw rate sensor which is arranged within the articulated arm closest to the turret
  • a second yaw rate sensor which is arranged within the articulated arm closest to the mast tip
  • the measured values of a first yaw rate sensor which is arranged on a first segment
  • a second yaw rate sensor which is arranged on a segment following the first segment within the articulated arm, in order to determine the torsion of the articulated arm between the to determine both rotation rate sensors and in particular the torsion of the first or second segment.
  • the yaw rate sensors can each be arranged in a front region of the segments.
  • the articulated arm can comprise at least two yaw rate sensors arranged at different positions of the same segment, the torsion of the segment being determined from a comparison of the measured values of the yaw rate sensors.
  • the rotation rate sensors are preferably arranged in a front and a rear area of the segment.
  • At least one of the yaw rate sensors which is used to determine the torsion, can be arranged on the turntable and/or in a rear region of the segment arranged directly on the turntable, and/or at least one of the rotation rate sensors, which is used to determine the torsion, can be arranged on the last segment of the articulated arm and in particular in the area of the mast tip.
  • the rotation rate sensors whose measured values are used to determine the torsion, preferably have at least two sensitivity directions, in particular a first horizontal sensitivity direction and a second sensitivity direction running in a vertical plane. This means that the torsion can be determined relatively easily through comparison.
  • the rotation rate sensors whose measured values are included in the vibration damping according to the invention, preferably have at least two sensitivity directions, in particular a first horizontal sensitivity direction and a second sensitivity direction running in a vertical plane.
  • the control of the articulated arm includes an observer who estimates the state of the articulated arm.
  • the observer can include a physical model of the articulated arm and estimate its condition based on the model and based on measured values from sensors.
  • the estimate is preferably carried out on the basis of the measured values from sensors, as already described above, in particular on the basis of at least one angle of rotation sensor and/or sensors assigned to the joints for indirectly or directly detecting the angle of rotation of the joints.
  • the observer preferably uses a physical model of the articulated arm, as described in more detail above, in particular a physical model which is also used to determine the influence of the disturbing forces on the articulated arm through the input of disturbance variables.
  • the observer preferably estimates the position and/or the vibration state of the articulated arm.
  • a state is determined, this includes in particular an estimate of the state by an observer.
  • the vibration damping could take place solely as a pilot control.
  • the vibration damping preferably includes regulation by feedback of at least one variable obtained using a measurement signal.
  • the vibration damping comprises a control which takes place by feedback of at least one of the following variables: speed and position of one or more of the joints, speeds and positions of the bending and/or torsion of one or more of the segments.
  • variable or variables that are returned by the control are preferably estimated by an observer.
  • the observer can be used for this, which was described in more detail above.
  • an estimation of the system state and/or the vibration damping and/or the determination of the influence of the disturbing forces on the articulated arm is carried out on the basis of a linearization of a physical model, and in particular on the basis of a linearization of the physical model, as it is was described above.
  • the estimation is carried out by an observer and/or the control and/or the input of disturbance variables, as described above, on the basis of linearization.
  • the linearization preferably takes place around the equilibrium position of the current position of the articulated arm.
  • the linearization can be carried out by the control depending on the current position of the articulated arm.
  • control comprises a pilot control, which calculates control signals from a setpoint specified by an operator, through which the desired mast movement is carried out and vibration excitation of the articulated arm is reduced.
  • the pilot control is preferably designed in such a way that the natural frequencies of the articulated arm are suppressed.
  • the natural frequencies of the articulated arm which are taken into account by the pilot control, can be determined depending on the current position of the articulated arm.
  • the control comprises axis controllers assigned to the respective joints, the control generating control signals for the target angular speed of the axes, on the basis of which the axis controller assigned to the respective joint generates control signals for the respective actuator, the axis controller preferably being on an inverse Deflection kinematics are based and/or include an inverse nonlinearity.
  • the articulated arm comprises a turntable which can be rotated about a vertical axis and at least two segments which can be pivoted about horizontal axes by means of joints, the turntable being movable about the vertical axis via an actuator and the segments being pivotable about the horizontal axes via actuators are. More preferably, the articulated arm comprises at least three and more preferably at least four segments.
  • the control and in particular the disturbance variable feed-in and/or the vibration damping preferably controls all actuators of the segments and/or the turret.
  • At least vertical vibration damping and/or disturbance variable feed-in takes place.
  • the vibration damping and/or disturbance variable control appropriately controls the actuators through which the segments of the articulated arm are rotated about their horizontal axes of rotation.
  • At least horizontal vibration damping and/or disturbance variable feed-in takes place.
  • the vibration damping and/or disturbance input controls the actuator of the lathe accordingly.
  • the actuators are preferably hydraulic actuators.
  • the hydraulic actuators are preferably driven via a hydraulic pump, which is driven via the drive motor of the concrete pump.
  • Hydraulic cylinders are preferably used as actuators for pivoting the segments.
  • a hydraulic motor is preferably used as the actuator for rotating the lathe.
  • the segments of the articulated arm can be folded into a transport position via the joints, with the individual segments preferably running essentially parallel in the transport position.
  • the control comprises a geometry control, which generates the actuators of the joints of the articulated arm based on a user's specifications, which are preferably done via hand levers, and/or based on a predetermined trajectory of the mast tip, which is preferably generated automatically a corresponding movement of the mast tip.
  • the present invention further comprises a control according to claim 14.
  • the control preferably comprises a microprocessor and a memory in which control software is stored, which, when executed by the microprocessor, implements the above-described structure and/or the above-described functionality of the control according to the invention.
  • the controller also has one or more inputs via which it is connected to sensors, in particular the sensors described above, and/or one or more outputs via which it controls the actuators described above.
  • the disturbance variable connection and/or vibration damping according to the invention is preferably carried out automatically by the control of the concrete pump.
  • the present invention further comprises control software according to claim 13.
  • the control software implements the control according to the invention.
  • the control software can be stored in memory and/or represent a computer program product.
  • the concrete pump according to the invention is a truck-mounted concrete pump.
  • the concrete pump preferably includes a chassis via which it can be moved.
  • the chassis preferably includes several wheeled axles.
  • the present invention further comprises a method according to claim 15.
  • the disturbance variable connection takes place on the basis of a physical model of the concrete delivery, which describes the flow-related disturbance forces of the concrete delivery on the placing boom.
  • the method according to the invention provides that the concrete pressure at the inlet of the concrete line is determined based on operating parameters of the feed pump, in particular based on the hydraulic pressure of the feed cylinders and the piston area ratio of the feed pump.
  • New construction methods, materials and electronic systems have meant that concrete pumps have continued to develop over the past few decades.
  • the use of multi-link articulated arms with increasingly longer segments enables improved accessibility to areas that are difficult to access.
  • increasing the number and length of the segments also increases the weight and dimensions of the vehicle. The result is restrictions on road travel, handling and functionality of the concrete pump.
  • a special phenomenon of large manipulators is the ability of the placing boom to oscillate.
  • the vibrations make it difficult for the operator to control the mast and for the end hose operator to distribute the concrete.
  • the ability to vibrate is linked to the slenderness and inertia of the segments and the elastic properties of the material.
  • the vibration excitation arises from the movement of the articulated mast and the concrete delivery.
  • the double piston pump typically used to convey concrete transmits impulse-like disturbing forces to the placing boom and thus causes continuous vibration excitation.
  • excitation close to the natural frequencies of the mast is also possible.
  • the aim of the present invention is to dampen vibrations of the placing boom to improve the manageability and functionality of the concrete pump.
  • the EP 2 103 760 B1 proposes a model-based vibration damping using a modal model.
  • the control algorithm estimates the state of the system using an observer and feeds back the estimated signal via control gains.
  • the gains are retrieved from a list and interpolated depending on the mast position.
  • the method is based on a modal model that is obtained through modal transformation and subsequent model reduction to the first vibration modes.
  • the individual states of the model are therefore modal coordinates and have no physical interpretation.
  • the method has the disadvantage that, in addition to the control gains, the observer's reduced, modal model also depends on the current mast position.
  • the modal model must therefore be regenerated for each mast position or is only valid for certain mast positions.
  • the vibration damping proposed below avoids these problems through a different type of modeling.
  • the model reduction is physically motivated and leads to physically interpretable, elastic coordinates.
  • the sensor combination used to dampen vibrations also differs.
  • the WO 2014165889 A1 presents vibration damping based on the feedback of position and deformation signals of the mast segments.
  • the position is recorded using an inertial measuring unit and the deformation using strain gauges.
  • the inertial measuring unit includes a rotation rate sensor and an acceleration sensor, which are only used in combination and for position estimation (see claim 2).
  • the method has the advantage that the vibration of the segments is recorded independently of the traversing movement. This eliminates the need for additional signal processing to separate traversing movement and superimposed structural vibration.
  • strain gauges has the disadvantage that installation is complex and has to be carried out in highly stressed areas of the segment.
  • the sensor is very temperature sensitive and requires a lot of calibration effort.
  • the vibration damping proposed below avoids these disadvantages by choosing a rotation rate sensor to detect vibrations in the distribution boom.
  • the WO 2016 131977 A1 uses inertial measuring units to control the position of the mast tip.
  • the measuring units are attached to the segments in the middle of the bar.
  • the acceleration and yaw rate signals from the sensors are fused using a rigid body approach and estimate the position of the mast tip.
  • the acceleration signal from the sensor at the top of the mast is integrated twice and merged with the existing estimate.
  • An absolute determination of the position is not possible due to the rigid body approach used and the double integration. Instead, the dynamic components of the mast tip position are calculated using a high-pass filter and fed back using a PID controller.
  • a subordinate position control at the joint level prevents drift effects of the mast tip.
  • the fusion algorithm only includes the reconstruction of the position of the mast tip. Because of the positioning The inertial measuring units and the rigid body approach used only estimate the inclination of the segments and not the vibration state of the placing boom. This differs from the model-based approach to estimating and controlling the vibration state of the placing boom presented below. The vibration state of the entire mast is taken into account. In contrast to the position control of the mast tip, the number of sensors used can be reduced and limited to the use of yaw rate sensors.
  • the EP 1 537 282 B1 (Putzmeister ) suggests geodetic angle sensors to determine the position and dampen vibrations of the placing boom.
  • the sensors are attached to the segments and provide the respective absolute inclination. Taking the kinematics into account, the signals are divided into a low-frequency component for coordinate control and a high-frequency component for vibration damping.
  • the tilt sensors typically used react sensitively to translational acceleration peaks. The application for vibration damping, taking into account traversing movement and concrete delivery, is therefore very limited.
  • the EP 2 778 466 A1 provides vibration damping in the horizontal plane.
  • the EP 1 122 380 B1 suggests a control device for periodically varying or modulating the pump frequency. Varying or modulating the pump frequency prevents excitation frequencies near the mast's natural frequency from occurring. The result is reduced vibration excitation of the placing boom. The process changes the delivery of concrete in order to dampen the vibrations in the placing boom. This differs from the disturbance input shown below, which uses the actuators of the placing boom and leaves the concrete delivery unaffected.
  • the EP 1 537 282 B1 (Putzmeister ) names a disturbance variable controller for reducing vibrations in the placing boom.
  • the procedure is not a disturbance variable feed-in, since not a disturbance variable, but a measured variable from the placing boom is used to dampen vibrations.
  • the measured variable is the dynamic portion of the position detection of the mast. It is amplified by a controller and fed back to the actuators of the placing boom.
  • the method therefore represents classic, feedback-based vibration damping and does not involve the addition of disturbance variables.
  • Fig. 1 The relevant elements of the truck-mounted concrete pump are shown. This has an undercarriage with a chassis with several tire axles, through which the truck-mounted concrete pump can be moved on the road. Front and rear support cylinders 9 and 10 are provided on the undercarriage, which are arranged on fold-out and / or telescopic struts 10 and 12. Furthermore, a transfer case 11 is shown.
  • the undercarriage carries a pump group 1 at the rear and an articulated arm via a mast block 2, along which a delivery line (not shown) is guided.
  • the articulated arm consists of a rotating stand 3 and four segments 4 to 7 (any number of segments possible), which are coupled via joints A to E.
  • Joint A on the vehicle enables the rotation of the turntable 3 about the vertical axis
  • joints B to E enable the pivoting of the segments 4 to 7 about horizontal tilting axes.
  • the actuator system of the concrete pump consists of hydraulic cylinders 14 to 17 at the respective joints B to E and a hydraulic motor for the swivel joint A of the lathe.
  • the hydraulic cylinders 14 to 17 enable the movement of the placing boom in the vertical plane.
  • the hydraulic motor rotates the entire mast around the vertical axis.
  • the mast top 22 (TCP) is the top of the distribution boom.
  • a delivery line is attached to the distribution mast and conveys concrete to the top of the mast 22. From there, the concrete is guided to an operator via a hose section 8.
  • the required delivery pressure is generated by a double piston pump in the pump unit 1.
  • Fig. 2 The planned structure of the vibration damping is divided into: Fig. 2 Subsystems shown: geometry control, feedforward control, regulation (with observer) and disturbance variable feed-in.
  • the geometry control is used to generate movement paths for the placing boom.
  • the trajectories are a time function for the position, speed, acceleration and/or jerk of the joint axes of the placing boom. They are adapted to the dynamics of the system in the feedforward control and given to the control system as a setpoint.
  • the regulation which in Fig. 4 is reproduced again, is divided into two parts: the axis control ( Fig. 5 ) and the control for damping the vibrations and position control with the controller and the observer.
  • the process includes active vibration damping to reduce vibrations in the placing boom.
  • active vibration damping takes the desired target movement into account and only dampens the resulting structural vibrations. The vibrations due to concrete delivery are also reduced.
  • the goal of vibration damping is to reduce vibrations throughout the entire placing boom.
  • the vibrational state of the entire Arms estimated from the vibrations of the individual segments.
  • the placing boom has variable natural frequencies depending on the position and inclination of the segments.
  • the vibration damping takes into account this variability of the natural frequencies depending on the position of the mast.
  • the first natural frequencies have the greatest influence on the vibration behavior.
  • the vibration state of the distribution boom is detected by rotation rate sensors 18 to 21.
  • the sensors are mounted on one or more segments 4 to 7 and measure the rotation rate around the joint axes.
  • the advantage of these sensors for detecting vibrations is that, in contrast to conventional sensors (e.g. strain gauges), they can be easily installed.
  • the sensor can be attached to all outside and inside sides of the segment.
  • the MEMS-based rotation rate sensors are also cost-effective, robust and low-maintenance.
  • the rotation rate sensor 18 to 21 is mounted in the front area of the respective segments 4 to 7 in order to optimally record the structural vibrations. Due to the serial kinematics of the manipulator, the measured rotation rate of a segment also contains the oscillation of the previous segment. This circumstance will be taken into account in the draft regulation.
  • the position of the placing boom is determined by a direct or indirect measurement of the relative joint angles between the segments.
  • the relative joint angles can be recorded using rotary angle sensors.
  • the draft regulation is based on a mathematical model of the placing boom.
  • the mechanical system is represented by a dynamic model.
  • the placing boom is modeled by a rigid body model with actuated joints B to E. Additional virtual joints take the flexibility in the segments into account. An additional virtual joint with spring and damper elements is introduced for each segment. The spring and damping constants are chosen so that the deflection and the first natural frequency of the real segment are preserved.
  • the distribution boom model is made up of several segments. The rigidity of the overall structure results from the rigidity of the individual segments. Since the overall structure is made up of several segments, higher natural frequencies are also reproduced.
  • This type of modeling represents a physically motivated discretization of the infinitely dimensional, elastic placing boom.
  • the advantage is that well-developed and efficient rigid body formalisms can be used for modeling.
  • the resulting model also has a relatively low system order. Unlike a modal model reduction, the system state of the virtual joints is still a physical variable. It describes the concentrated deflection and vibration of the segment.
  • the observer reconstructs the system state x ⁇ using the inputs and outputs of the system .
  • the inputs of the system u are the setpoints of the hydraulics.
  • the outputs y are the measured values of the position and vibration state of the placing boom.
  • the model-based observer also ensures that the measurement signal from the yaw rate sensors is divided into the separate components of the joint movement and the vibration.
  • the control system specifically dampens the structural vibrations without influencing the target movement.
  • the observer gain L is determined by a suitable method such as B. Pole specification or selected by a Kalman filter.
  • the poles are positioned in the complex half-plane in such a way that the damping of the system increases.
  • the vibrations in the placing boom are thus dampened.
  • the controller receives the estimated state of the observer x ⁇ , amplifies the signals and supplies them to the hydraulics as setpoints (see Fig. 4 ).
  • the control gain K is determined by a suitable method such as B. pole specification or optimization-based method (LQR).
  • the observer and controller design process described above applies to a specific equilibrium position of the placing boom. To change the position of the mast, the design process is repeated and adapted to the current position. By tracking the control parameters, the functionality of the vibration damping is guaranteed for every mast position.
  • Vibration damping can also be used for vibrations in the horizontal plane.
  • the hydraulic motor on the mast trestle serves as an actuator.
  • the mast position around the vertical axis is recorded by an angle sensor.
  • the rotation angle sensors for vibration measurement are designed or extended by a detection direction in the horizontal plane and torsion.
  • the sensors are mounted on one or more segments and measure the rotation rate around the vertical axis and the longitudinal axis.
  • the dynamic model of the placing boom (Section 5.3.3) is supplemented by a horizontal component.
  • the virtual joints in the segments are designed as multi-axis swivel joints that record bending in the horizontal plane and torsion.
  • the rotation around the vertical axis is taken into account by a joint on the lathe.
  • the type and structure of the model remain the same as in Section 5.3.3.
  • an observer and a feedback amplifier are designed for the linearized extended model. Either separate horizontal vibration damping or combined vertical and horizontal vibration damping can be implemented.
  • the model-based observer ensures that the measurement signal from the yaw rate sensors is divided into the separate parts of the vertical axis movement and the vibration.
  • the control system specifically dampens the structural vibrations of horizontal bending and torsion without influencing the target movement.
  • the operator's movement specifications are explicitly taken into account by the vibration damping. This means that the desired movement is permitted by the control and only the superimposed structural vibrations are dampened.
  • a pilot control is also provided. This calculates control signals from the operator's setpoint that carry out the desired mast movement and do not stimulate any vibration.
  • a notch filter is used which, depending on the current mast position, suppresses the natural frequencies of the placing boom during the movement (see Fig. 3 ).
  • the setpoint signals for the hydraulics are implemented by a subordinate axis control on the cylinders.
  • the axis control converts a target angular velocity specification u of the joints into the actual translational velocity of the cylinders.
  • the deflection kinematics and non-linearities of the hydraulics are taken into account by a pilot control (see Fig. 5 ).
  • Either the pressure, the cylinder position or the cylinder speed can be used as the feedback measurement variable.
  • the cylinder speed can also be calculated from the position using separate signal processing.
  • the cylinders transmit the force F u to the placing boom and thus generate movement of the joints.
  • the axis control is decentralized and subordinate to each joint separately.
  • the aim of the disturbance variable connection is therefore to reduce vibrations in the placing boom on the basis of characteristic measured variables of concrete delivery.
  • the measured variables describe the condition of the concrete delivery and not the vibration condition of the placing boom.
  • Typical measured variables for concrete delivery are the pressure at the inlet of the delivery line, the frequency of the pumping process and the position and speed of the delivery piston.
  • the measured variables are used to reconstruct the disruptive forces on the placing boom using a model of concrete delivery and are then increasingly applied to the actuators.
  • the reinforcement can be designed in such a way that the influence of the disruptive forces on a specific point on the placing boom is eliminated.
  • the top of the mast is chosen to keep the position of the end hose steady and constant.
  • the modeling of concrete delivery depicts the flow of concrete in the delivery line from the delivery pump in the vehicle to the end hose at the top of the mast.
  • the flow-related disruptive forces of concrete delivery on the placing boom are calculated.
  • the creation of the disruptive forces is primarily due to frictional forces on the inner pipe wall and inertial forces caused by the concrete flow deflection in the pipe bends.
  • the unsteady, periodic delivery creates impulse-like forces that are transmitted to the placing boom via the pipe fastenings.
  • the forces depend on a variety of factors. The The biggest influence is the rheological properties and the composition of the concrete. Depending on the type and consistency of the concrete, there are very different vibration excitations in the placing boom. Another factor is the so-called wall effect. Due to the viscosity and inhomogeneous composition of the fluid, a boundary layer with a low yield point and viscosity forms in the wall area during delivery. The boundary layer acts like a lubricating film and reduces the friction forces in the wall area.
  • the approach uses an equivalent Newtonian fluid to model the frictional and inertial forces of the fluid on the pipe wall.
  • the material properties of the equivalent fluid are determined from the measured variables of concrete delivery.
  • at least the viscosity of the equivalent fluid is determined from the concrete pressure and the flow velocity of the concrete.
  • a stored average value for the density of concrete is used as the density of the equivalent fluid.
  • the output variables of the model are the concentrated disturbance forces F d in each joint of the concrete pump (see Fig. 6 ).
  • the effect of the concentrated disturbance forces F d is calculated via a coupling with a mechanical model of the placing boom.
  • the mechanical model takes into account the dynamic and elastic deformation of the segments under the influence of the disruptive forces across the entire placing boom.
  • the coupled model of concrete delivery and placing boom is used to design a model-supported dynamic disturbance variable feed-in.
  • the model is expanded to include a control loop to reduce the disturbance variables in the placing boom (see disturbance model control loop in Fig. 8 ).
  • the real route is not controlled, but only the “virtual” model. This has advantages for the draft regulation, as no route uncertainties or disturbances occur.
  • the entire state vector is available without the use of an observer.
  • the control is designed in such a way that the influence of disruptive forces on the top of the mast is minimized.
  • the manipulated variable of the virtual control loop u d is now applied to the actuators. This results in a pilot control that does not require feedback of the dynamic state of the placing boom.
  • the disturbance input is combined with traditional vibration damping to compensate for vibrations from the mast's movement and uncertainties in the modeling.
  • the vibration damping is based on the measurement and feedback of the position and vibration state of the placing boom.
  • the control is designed so that the manipulated variables of the disturbance variable feed u d act unhindered on the system.
  • the vibration damping only intervenes if the conditions of the real route differ from the conditions of the virtual model.
  • the hydraulic pressure of the delivery cylinders can also be measured.
  • the corresponding concrete pressure results from a conversion using the piston area ratio.
  • the flow speed of the concrete can also be determined from the speed of the delivery cylinders.
  • the basic idea of the method is to estimate the disruptive forces from the measured values of the placing boom.
  • the periodicity of concrete delivery is used to set up a modal model of the disruptive forces.
  • the model is composed of the fundamental frequency and its multiples.
  • the individual states reproduce the oscillation shape of the disturbance variable as modal coordinates.
  • a modal coordinate has no physical meaning, but only reflects the proportion of the respective frequency in the wave form of the disturbance variable.
  • the disturbance forces are estimated by a disturbance observer or asymptotic disturbance compensation from the measurement values of the placing boom.
  • the estimation procedures are based on the inner model principle.
  • the principle defines that a stable control loop can only be completely resolved when a disturbance occurs can suppress if it has an internal model of the interference signal.
  • the model is boundary-stable and is composed only of complex conjugate pairs of poles of the conveying frequencies on the imaginary axis of the complex half-plane.
  • the initial state of the modal model is adapted from the measurement signals from the distribution boom using the interference observer or asymptotic interference compensation. This corresponds to an estimate of the unknown amplitude and phase position of the disturbing forces. The more frequencies the model contains, the more accurately the waveform of the disturbance can be represented.
  • the larger number of frequencies requires more time to learn the given waveform.
  • a transient motion occurs, the amplitude of which increases with the number of frequencies.
  • the number of frequencies must be chosen so that, on the one hand, the interference is reproduced with sufficient accuracy and, on the other hand, the transient response occurs briefly and with a low amplitude.
  • the reconstructed disturbance variables are applied to the actuators of the placing boom via a control system (see Fig. 9 ).
  • the disturbance input is combined with vibration damping based on the measured variables of the placing boom y to ensure the stability of the system.
  • the states of the system are estimated based on the boom model and the disturbance model by the disturbance observer.
  • the measured variables include the mast position and the vibration condition of the placing boom.
  • the regulator in Fig. 9 thus amplifies the estimated disturbance variables and states of the system.
  • the disturbance input can be designed in such a way that the influence of the disturbance forces on the top of the mast is minimized.
  • the disturbance observer or asymptotic disturbance compensation learns the disturbance forces from the measured values y of the dynamic vibration state of the placing boom. This allows the number of sensors for the Concrete delivery can be reduced.
  • the required measurement variable is the pump frequency, which can be determined in the software via the switching times of the delivery cylinders. Another advantage of the method is its robustness against changes in route parameters and variations in concrete properties.
  • the disturbance inputs described above apply to a specific equilibrium position of the placing boom.
  • the design process is repeated and adapted to the current position.
  • the functionality of the disturbance variable feed-in is guaranteed for each mast position.
  • the setpoint signals for the hydraulics are implemented by a subordinate axis control on the cylinders.
  • the axis control converts a target angular velocity specification of the joints into the actual translational velocity of the cylinders.
  • the deflection kinematics and non-linearities of the hydraulics are taken into account through a pilot control.
  • feedback of the pressure or the cylinder position or speed can be implemented.
  • the axis control is implemented decentrally and is therefore subordinate to each joint separately.
  • the operator's movement specifications are explicitly taken into account through the input of disturbance variables and vibration damping. This means that the desired movement is permitted by the control and only the superimposed structural vibrations are dampened.
  • a pilot control is also provided. This calculates control signals ⁇ target from the operator's setpoint, which carry out the desired mast movement and do not stimulate any vibration.
  • a notch filter is used which, depending on the current mast position, suppresses the natural frequencies of the placing boom during the movement.
  • the feedforward control is for the disturbance variable feed-ins presented in the 8 and 9 marked by a signal block.
  • the pilot control signal ⁇ shall is also taken into account in the disturbance model control loop.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • On-Site Construction Work That Accompanies The Preparation And Application Of Concrete (AREA)
  • Reciprocating Pumps (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Pompe à béton, en particulier pompe à béton automotrice, avec une pompe de refoulement, un tube de béton et un bras articulé formant un mât de distribution, le long duquel le tube de béton est guidé,
    dans laquelle le bras articulé présente un support de rotation (3) pouvant tourner autour d'un axe vertical (A) et/ou au moins un segment (4 - 7) pouvant pivoter autour d'un axe horizontal au moyen d'une articulation (B - E), dans laquelle le support de rotation (3) peut être déplacé autour de l'axe vertical par l'intermédiaire d'un actionneur et/ou l'au moins un segment (4 - 7) peut être pivoté autour de l'axe horizontal par l'intermédiaire d'un actionneur (14 - 17), dans laquelle la pompe à béton présente par ailleurs une commande destinée à piloter les actionneurs (14 - 17) du mât de distribution, dans laquelle la commande comprend une compensation de perturbations destinée à réduire les oscillations du mât de distribution induites par le refoulement de béton, dans laquelle
    la compensation de perturbations est effectuée sur la base d'un modèle physique du refoulement de béton, lequel décrit les forces de perturbation liées à l'écoulement du refoulement de béton sur le mât de distribution,
    dans laquelle le modèle physique décrit des forces de friction du béton sur la paroi intérieure du tube de béton et/ou des forces d'inertie en raison du renvoi de flux de béton dans les coudes de tubes et/ou dans laquelle au moins un paramètre de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1) est intégré dans la compensation de perturbations.
  2. Pompe à béton selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle le modèle physique du refoulement de béton tient compte de la position instantanée du mât de distribution et en particulier des angles d'inflexion des articulations (B - E), dans laquelle de manière préférée la position du mât de distribution et en particulier les angles d'inflexion des articulations (B - E) sont intégrés dans la description du renvoi de flux de béton, et/ou dans laquelle la définition des forces de perturbation du refoulement de béton sur le mât de distribution se fait dans une mesure de l'état d'oscillation du mât de distribution ou des segments (4 - 7), et/ou dans laquelle le modèle physique tient compte de la perte de pression hydrostatique de l'écoulement en tenant compte de la position instantanée du mât de distribution.
  3. Pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle au moins une propriété de matière intégrée dans la modélisation du fluide pompé est définie à partir de paramètres de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1) et/ou du refoulement de béton, dans laquelle de manière préférée la viscosité est définie, en particulier à partir de la pression de béton et de la vitesse d'écoulement du béton.
  4. Pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la compensation de perturbations repose par ailleurs sur un modèle physique du mât de distribution, lequel est couplé au modèle physique du refoulement de béton pour définir l'incidence des forces de perturbation définies par le modèle physique du refoulement de béton sur la totalité du mât de distribution, dans laquelle le modèle physique du mât de distribution tient compte de manière préférée de la déformation élastique d'au moins un des segments (4 - 7).
  5. Pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la compensation de perturbations se fait en tant que précommande sans rétroaction de l'état dynamique du mât de distribution, de manière préférée sur la base d'une régulation d'un modèle virtuel du mât de distribution.
  6. Pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la compensation de perturbations pilote les actionneurs de telle sorte que l'incidence des forces de perturbation est réduite et de manière préférée est éliminée sur la pointe (22) du mât de distribution.
  7. Pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la commande comprend, outre la compensation de perturbations, par ailleurs une régulation, laquelle repose sur une mesure et/ou une rétroaction de la position et/ou de l'état d'oscillation du mât de distribution, dans laquelle la régulation comprend de manière préférée un amortissement d'oscillation destiné à amortir des oscillations horizontales et/ou verticales du mât de distribution.
  8. Pompe à béton selon la revendication 7, dans laquelle l'amortissement d'oscillation repose sur le même modèle physique du mât de distribution, lequel sert également à définir l'incidence des forces de perturbation du refoulement de béton sur le mât de distribution, dans laquelle l'amortissement d'oscillation agit de manière préférée alors seulement lorsque l'état du mât de distribution diverge de l'état du modèle virtuel, lequel est régulé dans le cadre de la compensation de perturbations.
  9. Pompe à béton en particulier selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, avec une pompe de refoulement (1), un tube de béton et un bras d'articulation formant un mât de distribution, le long duquel le tube de béton est guidé,
    dans laquelle le bras d'articulation présente un support de rotation (3) pouvant tourner autour d'un axe vertical (A) et/ou au moins un segment (4 - 7) central pouvant pivoter autour d'un axe horizontal au moyen d'une articulation (B - E), dans laquelle le support de rotation (3) peut être déplacé autour de l'axe vertical par l'intermédiaire d'un actionneur et/ou l'au moins un segment (4 - 7) peut être pivoté autour de l'axe horizontal par l'intermédiaire d'un actionneur (14-17),
    dans laquelle la pompe à béton présente par ailleurs une commande destinée à piloter les actionneurs du mât de distribution, dans laquelle la commande comprend une compensation de perturbations destinée à réduire les oscillations du mât de distribution induites par le refoulement de béton, laquelle tient compte de la pression de béton,
    caractérisée en ce
    que la compensation de perturbations définit la pression de béton sur l'entrée du tube de béton sur la base de paramètres de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1), en particulier sur la base de la pression hydraulique des cylindres de refoulement et sur la base du rapport de surface de piston de la pompe de refoulement.
  10. Pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la compensation de perturbations tient compte de la fréquence de la pompe de refoulement (1) et/ou de la position et de la vitesse des pistons de refoulement de la pompe de refoulement.
  11. Pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes avec au moins un gyromètre (18 - 21), lequel est disposé sur un segment (4 - 7), dans laquelle la commande destinée à la compensation de perturbations et/ou à l'amortissement d'oscillations définir, sur la base des valeurs de mesure du gyromètre (18 - 21), à partir des oscillations des divers segments (4 - 7), un état d'oscillation de la totalité du mât de distribution et/ou se fait sans l'utilisation de capteurs géodésiques, et/ou au moins un gyromètre (18 - 20) est disposé dans une zone avant d'un segment (4 - 6), lequel est disposé entre le support de rotation (3) et un segment (7) formant la pointe de mât (22) dans le bras d'articulation.
  12. Pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la compensation de perturbations et/ou l'amortissement d'oscillations se font sans utiliser un modèle physique du mât de distribution, dans lequel la flexibilité d'au moins un segment (4 - 7) est décrite par une articulation virtuelle disposée à l'intérieur dudit segment (4 - 7), dans laquelle un élément de ressort et un élément d'amortisseur sont associés de manière préférée à l'articulation virtuelle, dans laquelle la constante de ressort et la constante d'amortisseur sont choisies de manière davantage préférée de telle sorte que l'articulation virtuelle décrit la flexion, la torsion et/ou la première fréquence propre du segment (4 - 7) réel.
  13. Logiciel de commande pour une pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 12, dans lequel le logiciel de commande met en oeuvre, lors de son exécution, une commande destinée à piloter les actionneurs du mât de distribution de la pompe à béton avec une compensation de perturbations destinée à réduire les oscillations du mât de distribution induites par le refoulement de béton,
    dans lequel la compensation de perturbations
    a) se fait sur la base d'un modèle physique du refoulement de béton, lequel décrit les forces de perturbation liées à l'écoulement du refoulement de béton sur le mât de distribution,
    dans lequel le modèle physique décrit des forces de friction du béton sur la paroi intérieure du tube de béton et/ou des forces d'inertie en raison du renvoi de flux de béton dans les coudes de tube et/ou dans lequel au moins un paramètre de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1) est intégré dans la compensation de perturbations, et/ou
    b) définit la pression de béton sur l'entrée du tube de béton en raison de paramètres de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1), en particulier sur la base de la pression hydraulique des cylindres de refoulement et su rapport de surface de piston de la pompe de refoulement.
  14. Commande destinée à piloter les actionneurs du mât de distribution d'une pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 12, dans laquelle la commande comprend une compensation de perturbations destinée à réduire les oscillations du mât de distribution induites par le refoulement de béton,
    dans laquelle la compensation de perturbations
    a) se fait sur la base d'un modèle physique du refoulement de béton, lequel décrit les forces de perturbation liées à l'écoulement du refoulement de béton sur le mât de distribution,
    dans laquelle le modèle physique écrit des forces de friction du béton sur la paroi intérieure du tube de béton et/ou des forces d'inertie en raison du renvoi de flux de béton dans les coudes de tube et/ou dans laquelle au moins un paramètre de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1) est intégré dans la compensation de perturbations,
    et/ou
    b) définit la pression de béton sur l'entrée du tube de béton en raison de paramètres de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1), en particulier sur la base de la pression hydraulique des cylindres de refoulement et du rapport de surface de piston de la pompe de refoulement.
  15. Procédé destiné à piloter les actionneurs du mât de distribution d'une pompe à béton selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 12, dans lequel la compensation de perturbations
    a) se fait sur la base d'un modèle physique du refoulement de béton, lequel décrit les forces de perturbation liées à l'écoulement du refoulement de béton sur le mât de distribution,
    dans lequel le modèle physique décrit des forces de friction du béton sur la paroi intérieure du tube de béton et/ou des forces d'inertie en raison du renvoi de flux de béton dans les coudes de tube, et/ou dans lequel au moins un paramètre de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1) est intégré dans la compensation de perturbations,
    et/ou
    b) définit la pression de béton sur l'entrée du tube de béton en raison de paramètres de fonctionnement de la pompe de refoulement (1), en particulier en raison de la pression hydraulique des cylindres de refoulement et du rapport de surface de piston de la pompe de refoulement.
EP19167399.5A 2018-04-17 2019-04-04 Pompe à béton Active EP3556969B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102018109057.9A DE102018109057A1 (de) 2018-04-17 2018-04-17 Betonpumpe

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3556969A1 EP3556969A1 (fr) 2019-10-23
EP3556969B1 true EP3556969B1 (fr) 2023-11-08

Family

ID=66092246

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19167399.5A Active EP3556969B1 (fr) 2018-04-17 2019-04-04 Pompe à béton

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3556969B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102018109057A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2969925T3 (fr)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102019105814A1 (de) 2019-03-07 2020-09-10 Liebherr-Mischtechnik Gmbh Gelenkarm-Steuerung einer Betonpumpe
DE102019105817A1 (de) 2019-03-07 2020-09-10 Liebherr-Mischtechnik Gmbh Gelenkarm-Steuerung einer Betonpumpe
DE102019105871A1 (de) 2019-03-07 2020-09-10 Liebherr-Mischtechnik Gmbh Gelenkarm-Steuerung einer Betonpumpe
CN112049426B (zh) * 2020-08-31 2022-02-25 三一汽车制造有限公司 臂架控制系统、方法和作业车辆
DE102021107142A1 (de) 2021-03-23 2022-09-29 Putzmeister Engineering Gmbh Standsicherheitsüberwachung für ein Dickstofffördersystem
DE102021107139A1 (de) 2021-03-23 2022-09-29 Putzmeister Engineering Gmbh Betriebsüberwachung für ein Dickstofffördersystem
CN115142678B (zh) * 2021-03-31 2024-02-06 三一汽车制造有限公司 臂架装置及工程机械
CN112942839B (zh) * 2021-04-20 2022-04-01 江苏理工学院 一种移动式混凝土自动浇筑机的控制方法
DE102021134513A1 (de) 2021-12-23 2023-06-29 Putzmeister Engineering Gmbh Dickstofffördersystem
CN114562111B (zh) * 2022-02-14 2023-09-08 三一汽车制造有限公司 臂架位置确定方法、装置、设备及作业机械
CN114819158B (zh) * 2022-03-24 2023-04-07 浙江大学 基于分布式负载口独立控制阀组的混凝土泵车臂架运动抑振方法
CN114756063A (zh) * 2022-03-30 2022-07-15 徐州徐工施维英机械有限公司 一种臂架轨迹规划的控制方法及泵车
CN117005691B (zh) * 2023-08-08 2024-01-30 河北吉达重工机械股份有限公司 一种混凝土布料机

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4120905B2 (ja) * 1999-03-31 2008-07-16 石川島建機株式会社 ブーム付コンクリートポンプ車の運転制御装置
DE10004779A1 (de) 2000-02-03 2001-08-09 Putzmeister Ag Dickstoffförderer mit Verteilermast sowie Verfahren zum pulsierenden Pumpen von Dickstoffen
DE10101570B4 (de) 2001-01-15 2008-12-04 Schwing Gmbh Großmanipulator mit Schwingungsdämpfung
DE10240180A1 (de) 2002-08-27 2004-03-11 Putzmeister Ag Vorrichtung zur Betätigung eines Knickmasts
DE102005042721A1 (de) * 2005-09-08 2007-03-15 Iveco Magirus Ag Gelenkleiter oder Hubbühne mit Bahnsteuerung und aktiver Schwingungsdämpfung
ITUD20080057A1 (it) 2008-03-17 2009-09-18 Cifa Spa Procedimento di controllo delle vibrazioni di un braccio articolato per il pompaggio di calcestruzzo, e relativo dispositivo
US9651112B2 (en) 2011-10-20 2017-05-16 Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Vibration suppression method, controller, device of boom and pump truck
AT514116A1 (de) 2013-04-09 2014-10-15 Ttcontrol Gmbh Regelsystem und Verfahren zum Steuern der Orientierung eines Segments eines Manipulators
WO2015031821A1 (fr) * 2013-08-30 2015-03-05 Eaton Corporation Procédé et système de commande pour l'utilisation d'une paire de soupapes de dosage à commande hydraulique indépendantes pour réduire des oscillations de flèche
CN105317217B (zh) * 2014-06-17 2017-08-29 中联重科股份有限公司 臂架回转振动抑制设备、系统、方法及工程机械
DE102015102368A1 (de) 2015-02-19 2016-08-25 Schwing Gmbh Positionsregelung Mastspitze

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2969925T3 (es) 2024-05-23
EP3556969A1 (fr) 2019-10-23
DE102018109057A1 (de) 2019-10-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3556969B1 (fr) Pompe à béton
EP3556967B1 (fr) Manipulateur de grande taille, en particulier pour pompes à béton
EP3556968A1 (fr) Pompe à béton
EP1537282B1 (fr) Manipulateur de grande taille avec un mât articulé et avec un dispositif de réglage pour commander ledit mât
EP3649072B1 (fr) Grue et procédé de commande d'une telle grue
EP1326798B1 (fr) Grue ou excavateur pour retourner une charge suspendue a un cable porteur avec amortissement du mouvement pendulaire de la charge
EP1882795B1 (fr) Grand manipulateur pourvu d'un amortisseur de vibrations
EP3065530B1 (fr) Dispositif pour distribuer des substances actives liquides et/ou solides et procédé de commande d'un tel dispositif
WO2020001991A1 (fr) Grue et procédé pour commander une grue de ce type
EP2272784B1 (fr) Grue pour envelopper une charge suspendue à un câble porteur
DE102005042721A1 (de) Gelenkleiter oder Hubbühne mit Bahnsteuerung und aktiver Schwingungsdämpfung
EP3705664B1 (fr) Commande à bras articulaire d'une pompe à béton
EP3259221A1 (fr) Régulation de position d'une pointe de mât
EP3705663B1 (fr) Commande à bras articulaire d'une pompe à béton
DE102015208577A1 (de) Verfahren zur Ansteuerung eines Knickmasts in einem Großmanipulator
EP3705662B1 (fr) Commande à bras articulaire d'une pompe à béton
DE102015100669A1 (de) Anti-pendel-steuerverfahren mit einstellbarer unterstützung für den transport einer schwebenden last
DE102018104491A1 (de) Großmanipulator mit Schwingungsdämpfer
DE102016004466A1 (de) Verfahren zum Bewegen des letzten Gliedes einer kinematischen Kette sowie Vorrichtung und Arbeitsmaschine zum Durchführen des Verfahrens
DE60123506T2 (de) Drehleiter-Regelung
DE10029579A1 (de) Verfahren zur Orientierung der Last in Krananlagen
DE102005025536A1 (de) Mobile Arbeitsmaschinen, insbesondere hydraulisch angetriebene Erdbaumaschinen, und Verfahren zur Erd- und Schüttgutbewegung
DE60006120T2 (de) Verbessertes strömungsabriss- und rückgewinnungssteuerungssystem
EP2052885B1 (fr) Procédé et système destinés à influencer le mouvement d'une caisse d'un véhicule automobile ou d'un véhicule, pouvant être commandée ou réglée dans ses déroulements de mouvements
EP3257374B1 (fr) Système de réglage et/ou de commande, machine agricole et procédé de commande et/ou de réglage d'une machine agricole

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200421

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20220527

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B66C 23/68 20060101ALI20230616BHEP

Ipc: B25J 9/00 20060101ALI20230616BHEP

Ipc: B66C 13/06 20060101ALI20230616BHEP

Ipc: E04G 21/04 20060101AFI20230616BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230703

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502019009851

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20231108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240308

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240308

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240209

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240208

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2969925

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20240523

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240208

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240425

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240501

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240503

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20240423

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240423

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502019009851

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20240402

Year of fee payment: 6

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20240809