EP3259221A1 - Régulation de position d'une pointe de mât - Google Patents

Régulation de position d'une pointe de mât

Info

Publication number
EP3259221A1
EP3259221A1 EP16708951.5A EP16708951A EP3259221A1 EP 3259221 A1 EP3259221 A1 EP 3259221A1 EP 16708951 A EP16708951 A EP 16708951A EP 3259221 A1 EP3259221 A1 EP 3259221A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mast
large manipulator
manipulator according
sensor
segment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16708951.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3259221B1 (fr
Inventor
Johannes HENIKL
Wolfgang KEMMETMÜLLER
Andreas Kugi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Friedrich Wilhelm Schwing GmbH
Original Assignee
Friedrich Wilhelm Schwing GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Friedrich Wilhelm Schwing GmbH filed Critical Friedrich Wilhelm Schwing GmbH
Publication of EP3259221A1 publication Critical patent/EP3259221A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3259221B1 publication Critical patent/EP3259221B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66CCRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
    • B66C13/00Other constructional features or details
    • B66C13/04Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack
    • B66C13/06Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads
    • B66C13/066Auxiliary devices for controlling movements of suspended loads, or preventing cable slack for minimising or preventing longitudinal or transverse swinging of loads for minimising vibration of a boom
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66CCRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
    • B66C13/00Other constructional features or details
    • B66C13/18Control systems or devices
    • B66C13/46Position indicators for suspended loads or for crane elements
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04GSCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; BUILDING IMPLEMENTS OR AIDS, OR THEIR USE; HANDLING BUILDING MATERIALS ON THE SITE; REPAIRING, BREAKING-UP OR OTHER WORK ON EXISTING BUILDINGS
    • E04G21/00Preparing, conveying, or working-up building materials or building elements in situ; Other devices or measures for constructional work
    • E04G21/02Conveying or working-up concrete or similar masses able to be heaped or cast
    • E04G21/04Devices for both conveying and distributing
    • E04G21/0418Devices for both conveying and distributing with distribution hose
    • E04G21/0445Devices for both conveying and distributing with distribution hose with booms
    • E04G21/0463Devices for both conveying and distributing with distribution hose with booms with boom control mechanisms, e.g. to automate concrete distribution

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a large manipulator with a foldable mast arm having a rotatable about a vertical axis turntable and a plurality of mast segments, wherein the mast segments are limited to articulated joints about horizontal bending axes relative to an adjacent mast segment or the turntable by means of a respective drive unit pivotally limited and at Mastarm means for measuring the inclination are arranged, and a truck-mounted concrete pump with a large manipulator according to the invention.
  • the height of the mast top relative to the height of the vehicle can be detected by inclination sensors mounted on all mast segments.
  • the kite's position can be calculated using a kinematic description of the system.
  • the deformation of the pole segments is implicitly taken into account by the use of inclination sensors.
  • the tilt sensors typically used can not distinguish between a change in inclination and a translational acceleration of the sensor. For dynamic movements, these therefore provide incorrect measured values. They are therefore not suitable for the implementation of a position control.
  • a large manipulator is to be provided in which a vertical movement of a boom tip of a truck-mounted concrete pump during the pumping operation can be effectively reduced, which among other things leads to a significant relief for the leader of the end hose.
  • the large manipulator according to the invention comprises a folding mast arm having a rotatable about a vertical axis turntable and a plurality of mast segments, wherein the mast segments are limited to articulated joints about horizontal bending axes relative to an adjacent mast segment or the turntable by means of a respective drive unit pivotally limited.
  • the large manipulator according to the invention is characterized in that it has at least one inertial sensor for measuring the inclination and / or the acceleration of at least one pole segment.
  • the large manipulator according to the invention thus has the advantage over the prior art that a statically and dynamically accurate measurement of the vertical movements of the mast tip can be achieved by it.
  • an inertial sensor is preferably an acceleration sensor which detects the vertical acceleration at the location of the sensor.
  • the inertial sensor is a combined sensor which has a rotation rate sensor in addition to a two-axis acceleration sensor.
  • the axis of the rotation rate sensor is orthogonal to the acceleration axes. Since translational movements have only a very small influence on the rotation rate sensor, the measurement signals of the rotation rate sensor can be used to detect and correct a falsification of the determined from the measurement signals of the acceleration sensor inclination angle.
  • the inclination angle can be determined by temporal integration of the measured rate of rotation, wherein the determined by the acceleration sensors inclination angle is used for stationary balancing.
  • a gyroscope measures the rate of rotation of the inclination, which is not influenced by the translatory movement becomes.
  • an observer in the form of an extended Kalman filter or an approach with complementary filters can be used to combine the measuring signals of the acceleration sensors and the yaw rate sensor.
  • At least one inertial sensor can be arranged on each pole segment. As a result, the measurement accuracy and reliability can be further improved.
  • the inertial sensors are arranged substantially in the middle of a mast segment. Due to the slim design of the mast arm, the individual mast segments have in operation due to the static and dynamic forces not negligible elastic deformations. Due to the arrangement of the sensors in the middle of the mast segments, the difference of the measured inclinations of two successive mast segments in addition to the exact joint angle also includes a portion of the elastic deformation. As a result, the kinematics of the mast arm can be considered approximately as rigid body problem. Ideally, each pole segment has an inertial sensor, which is arranged approximately in the middle of the respective pole segment.
  • the inertial sensor is arranged on the last pole segment.
  • the mast segment is meant according to the invention, which is located furthest away from the turntable and at the outer end of which preferably a hose end is attached.
  • the inertial sensor on the last pole segment is not arranged in the middle. Since the influence of the beam curvature of the last mast segment on the height of the mast tip is small in relation to that of the preceding mast segments, such an arrangement leads to a sufficiently accurate measurement result.
  • the mast arm at the top of the mast has an intertial sensor. As a result, the measurement of the height of the mast tip during rapid movements with large accelerations can be further improved.
  • two sensors can be arranged on the last pole segment.
  • a sensor is in Located substantially in the middle and another sensor at the mast top, so at the outer end of the mast segment.
  • a sensor is arranged.
  • at least one of the articulated joints of the mast arm is associated with an angle sensor which detects the angular position of this articulated joint.
  • each articulated joint is associated with an angle sensor.
  • the large manipulator (by means of a suitable computer) with advantage for calculating the height of the mast top from the detected angular positions of the articulated joints in combination with the detected by means of the last mast segment, in particular at the mast top, arranged inertial acceleration can be established.
  • the angle sensors are not inertial sensors, but sensors with geometric resolution (with mechanical, resistive, inductive, optical or magnetic action principle).
  • the angular sensors serve to determine the (static) position of the mast arm.
  • the height of the mast top can first be determined via the angular positions of the articulated joints. In order to optimize the accuracy, the deflection of the mast segments can be taken into account.
  • the measurement signals ie the measurement signal of the vertical acceleration and the height measurement signal determined by means of the angle of inclination, may preferably be combined with one another by suitably selected, preferably complementary, filters.
  • the over the inclinations of the mast segments determined height of the mast tip is filtered with a low pass with a suitable cutoff frequency to filter out high-frequency dynamic noise.
  • the two-time integrated vertical acceleration signal is filtered with a complementary high pass with the same cutoff frequency.
  • the two filtered signals are then combined and give an accurate reading of the height of the mast top.
  • their function can also be realized by an observer or a Kalman filter.
  • the large manipulator according to the invention preferably has a position controller.
  • the position controller can be realized effectively acting control of the height of the mast tip, whereby an induced vertical movement of the mast tip is compensated.
  • the height of the mast tip can in principle be manipulated with each joint. While a great manipulability is given for inclinations of the associated mast segment near the horizontal for the relevant joint, this disappears at inclinations close to the vertical.
  • the user with a single joystick, which has at least two adjustment directions for the mast tip specifically specify a stretching or shortening while maintaining the height or a lifting or lowering movement while maintaining the radius.
  • an algorithm is used to calculate actuating signals for the hydraulic actuators of the individual joints, which initiate the desired movement.
  • the position controller preferably feeds back the deviation of the measured height of the mast tip from its nominal value as a specification of a lifting or lowering movement of the mast tip for example Cartesian or cylindrical control on the system.
  • a control circuit for vibration damping of the mast is implemented on the basis of a control of the joint angle.
  • This control circuit preferably has a computer unit which calculates the height of the mast top on the basis of a kinematic description of the mast and the measurements of the inclination angle of the individual mast segments with respect to the earth's gravity field.
  • the angular velocities of the individual articulated joints are considered as manipulated variables of this vibration damping control loop.
  • the position control according to the invention is preferably superimposed on the vibration damping.
  • the position control preferably has a proportional / integral differential controller (PID controller). Based on a control deviation (actual / setpoint value of the height of the mast tip), the controller determines a control output, which is specified as the nominal movement of the mast tip in the form of a lifting or lowering movement.
  • the algorithm determines therefrom the control signals which are applied to the control inputs of the individual mast joints, ie in practice the control inputs of the proportional hydraulic valves of the hydraulic drives.
  • the algorithm is designed such that based on the orientation of the individual mast arms and / or the distance of the individual mast joints to the turntable weighting takes place, with which the weighted on the control inputs of the individual mast joints control signals are weighted.
  • the weighting increases, the farther the joint is from the turntable or the closer the joint is arranged on the jib tip.
  • the control of the mast joints farther away from the turntable offers the advantage that the mass to be moved is lower and thus can be counteracted faster and more effectively a change in position.
  • the weighting increases horizontally, the individual mast arms run. The regulation should preferably act on the horizontally extending mast arms in order to be able to influence the height of the cantilever tip effectively.
  • the algorithm or the weighting according to the invention is therefore expediently carried out in such a way that, in principle, the last master arm is subjected to the largest actuating signal if it has an approximately horizontal course. However, if the last boom arm is essentially vertical, then another boom arm with a horizontal course receives a larger weighting and is loaded with a correspondingly larger actuating signal.
  • the sensor and control concept according to the invention can be realized as a total effective control of the height of the cantilever tip.
  • the setpoint for the height of the mast top is preferably determined in practical operation by the method of the operator and therefore results from the rest position for the current position of the mast arm.
  • the large manipulator according to the invention is preferably used for the distribution of thick matter. In particular, it serves to convey concrete.
  • the subject of the invention is a truck-mounted concrete pump.
  • the truck-mounted concrete pump according to the invention has a vehicle frame, a slurry pump arranged on the vehicle frame, in particular a concrete pump, and a large-scale manipulator with the inertial sensors described above.
  • FIGS. show a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • the invention is not limited to the embodiments shown.
  • the invention includes, as far as is technically feasible, any combination of the technical features that are listed in the claims or described in the description as being relevant to the invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a mast arm according to the invention in a first embodiment
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a mast arm according to the invention in a second embodiment
  • Fig. 3 is a schematic view of a mast arm according to the invention in a third embodiment.
  • Fig. 4 is a schematic view of a mast arm according to the invention in a fourth embodiment.
  • Fig. 5 is a schematic control circuit according to a
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a mast arm 10 according to the invention with means 34, 36, 38 for inclination measurement in a first embodiment.
  • the large manipulator has a folding mast arm 10 with a pivotable about a vertical axis turntable 12 and a plurality of mast segments 14, 1 6, 18.
  • the mast segments 14, 1 6, 18 are at buckles 20, 22, 24 about each horizontal bending axes relative to an adjacent mast segment 14, 1 6, 18 or the turntable 12 by means of a respective drive unit 26, 28, 30 pivotally limited.
  • the mast arm 10 preferably has between three and five mast segments 14, 1 6, 18.
  • the large manipulator according to the invention has at least one inertial sensor 34, 36, 38 for detecting the inclination of the pole segments 14, 16, 18 with respect to the earth.
  • the inertial sensors 34, 36, 38 each preferably consist of a two-axis acceleration sensor and a rotation rate sensor. Ideally, the axis of the rotation rate sensor is orthogonal to the acceleration axes of the acceleration sensor. Since the translatory movements have only a very small influence on the yaw rate sensors, their measurements are used to detect and correct distortions of the angles of inclination determined from the acceleration measurements. As a result, a measurement error is reduced during movements of the mast.
  • the mast arm 10 according to the invention shown in FIG. 1 has an inertial sensor 34, 36, 38 on each mast segment 14, 16, 18.
  • the inertial sensors 34, 36, 38 are arranged substantially in the middle of the pole segments 14, 16, 18.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of a mast arm 10 according to the invention with means for tilt measurement in a second embodiment.
  • the mast segments 14, 16, 18 each have an inertial sensor 34, 36, 38, which are arranged substantially in the middle thereof.
  • an additional measurement of the accelerations takes place directly at the mast tip 32.
  • the double temporal integration of the portion of the acceleration in the vertical direction produces a measurement signal which is a good match with the dynamic components of the motion sequence in the higher frequency band.
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of a mast arm 10 according to the invention with means for tilt measurement in a third embodiment.
  • the mast segments 14, 16 each have an inertial sensor 34, 36, which are arranged substantially in the middle thereof.
  • the mast segment 18 has an inertial sensor 40 at its outer end, the mast top 32. Since the influence of the beam curvature of the last mast segment 18 on the height of the mast tip is small in relation to those of the preceding mast segments 14, 16, such an arrangement leads to a sufficiently accurate measurement result.
  • An additional sensor 38 can thus be dispensed with.
  • FIG. 4 shows a schematic view of a mast arm 10 according to the invention in a fourth embodiment.
  • the mast segments 14, 16, 18 each have an angle sensor 48, 50, 52.
  • the angle sensors 48, 50, 52 detect the angular positions of the individual articulated joints 20, 22, 24.
  • An inertial sensor 40 which detects the vertical acceleration of the masthead 32, is also arranged on the masthead 32.
  • the vibration damping according to the invention, a position control based on a PID controller 46 and a module 47 for controlling the lifting or lowering movement of the mast top 32 superimposed.
  • a position control based on a PID controller 46 and a module 47 for controlling the lifting or lowering movement of the mast top 32 superimposed.
  • the position control determines based on the deviation (deviation of the actual value of the height of the mast tip 32 of the setpoint) a controller output A, which is specified as a desired value in the form of a lifting or lowering movement of the mast tip for the module 47.
  • the setpoint for the height of the mast top 32 is determined in practical operation by the method of the operator and therefore results from the rest position for the current position of the mast arm 10.
  • An exact calculation of the rest position of the height of the mast tip 32 based on the current steady state values Joint angle is due to the complexity of the overall system and the only inaccurate knowledge of the model parameters for practical operation not possible and not necessary. Therefore, a simple high pass filter 44 with a suitably chosen cutoff frequency is used for the PID controller 46 to determine the control deviation.
  • a displacement of the height from the original position by the controller intervention is prevented by the underlying vibration damping control, which includes a regulation of the joint positions. Due to the illustrated scheme, vertical Movements of the mast top 32, such as a truck-mounted concrete pump during the pumping operation, can be effectively reduced.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Manipulator (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un manipulateur de grande taille ayant un bras de mât (10) dépliable qui présente un chariot orientable (12) rotatif autour d'un axe haut et une pluralité de segments de mât (14, 16, 18), les segments de mât (14, 16, 18) pouvant pivoter de manière limitée au niveau d'articulations (20, 22, 24) sur des axes d'articulation respectivement horizontaux par rapport à un segment de mât (14, 16, 18) adjacent ou au chariot orientable (12) au moyen d'un ensemble d'entraînement (26, 28, 30). L'invention vise à perfectionner un tel manipulateur de grande taille de sorte que la dynamique du système puisse être mesurée d'un point de vue technique et évaluée du point de vue du réglage. Cela permet d'obtenir un manipulateur de grande taille avec lequel un mouvement vertical de la pointe de mât (32) peut être réduit. L'objectif de l'invention est atteint par le fait que le manipulateur de grande taille présente au moins un capteur inertiel (34, 36, 38, 40) pour mesurer l'inclinaison et/ou l'accélération d'au moins un des segments de mat (14, 16, 18). L'invention concerne en outre une pompe à béton automotrice.
EP16708951.5A 2015-02-19 2016-02-19 Contrôle de la position d'une pointe de mât Active EP3259221B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102015102368.7A DE102015102368A1 (de) 2015-02-19 2015-02-19 Positionsregelung Mastspitze
PCT/EP2016/053596 WO2016131977A1 (fr) 2015-02-19 2016-02-19 Régulation de position d'une pointe de mât

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3259221A1 true EP3259221A1 (fr) 2017-12-27
EP3259221B1 EP3259221B1 (fr) 2020-02-12

Family

ID=55521673

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16708951.5A Active EP3259221B1 (fr) 2015-02-19 2016-02-19 Contrôle de la position d'une pointe de mât

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US10407282B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3259221B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN107406237B (fr)
DE (1) DE102015102368A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2016131977A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015108473A1 (de) * 2015-05-28 2016-12-01 Schwing Gmbh Großmanipulator mit schnell ein- und ausfaltbarem Knickmast
EP4306718A3 (fr) 2016-09-19 2024-06-12 Somero Enterprises, Inc. Système de lissage de béton avec tête de lissage montée sur flèche
US10315850B2 (en) 2017-07-13 2019-06-11 1875452 Alberta Ltd. Proppant conveyor systems and methods of use
CN107727151A (zh) * 2017-11-10 2018-02-23 公安部上海消防研究所 一种举高消防车臂架运动状态动态测试装置
DE102018104491A1 (de) * 2018-02-27 2019-08-29 Putzmeister Engineering Gmbh Großmanipulator mit Schwingungsdämpfer
DE102018109057A1 (de) 2018-04-17 2019-10-17 Liebherr-Mischtechnik Gmbh Betonpumpe
DE102018109088A1 (de) * 2018-04-17 2019-10-17 Liebherr-Mischtechnik Gmbh Großmanipulator, insbesondere für Betonpumpen
DE102018109098A1 (de) * 2018-04-17 2019-10-17 Liebherr-Mischtechnik Gmbh Betonpumpe
CN108867747B (zh) * 2018-09-10 2023-10-03 江苏徐工工程机械研究院有限公司 工程机械作业臂架自动回位调节系统、方法及工程机械
CN110465942A (zh) * 2019-07-26 2019-11-19 深圳前海达闼云端智能科技有限公司 位姿补偿方法、装置、存储介质和电子设备
CN110549335A (zh) * 2019-08-16 2019-12-10 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 一种关节减速比自动标定方法、控制系统及其机器人
CN112720450B (zh) * 2019-10-28 2022-07-19 深圳市大族机器人有限公司 机器人关节角度检验方法、装置、设备及介质
FI131037B1 (fi) * 2020-06-03 2024-08-08 Ponsse Oyj Työkoneen puomiston ohjaaminen
EP3978420B1 (fr) * 2020-09-30 2024-03-27 STILL GmbH Procédé d'amortissement des vibrations de torsion d'un mât de levage dans un chariot de manutention et chariot de manutention
CN112900878A (zh) * 2021-01-27 2021-06-04 徐州徐工施维英机械有限公司 混凝土泵车臂架控制系统、方法及混凝土泵车
CN112943323B (zh) * 2021-02-08 2022-07-22 中国铁建重工集团股份有限公司 锚杆台车控制系统
AU2022258326A1 (en) 2021-04-12 2023-11-23 Structural Services, Inc. Systems and methods for assisting a crane operator
CN113899915B (zh) * 2021-09-28 2024-06-04 湖南三一智能控制设备有限公司 一种臂架线速度获取方法、装置及工程车辆
CN114215362B (zh) * 2021-12-17 2023-04-25 徐州徐工施维英机械有限公司 一种臂架自动避障系统、避障方法及泵车

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS612312A (ja) 1984-06-15 1986-01-08 Hitachi Ltd コンデンサ形ブツシングpd
JPS6123212A (ja) * 1984-07-11 1986-01-31 Hitachi Ltd 多関節構造機械の制御装置
DE19503895A1 (de) 1995-02-07 1996-08-08 Putzmeister Maschf Betonpumpe mit Verteilermast
JP3091667B2 (ja) * 1995-06-09 2000-09-25 日立建機株式会社 建設機械の領域制限掘削制御装置
JP3811190B2 (ja) * 1997-06-20 2006-08-16 日立建機株式会社 建設機械の領域制限掘削制御装置
DE10046546A1 (de) * 2000-09-19 2002-03-28 Putzmeister Ag Großmanipulator mit Schwingungsdämpfer
DE10240180A1 (de) * 2002-08-27 2004-03-11 Putzmeister Ag Vorrichtung zur Betätigung eines Knickmasts
DE102007012575A1 (de) * 2007-03-13 2008-09-18 Putzmeister Concrete Pumps Gmbh Großmanipulator
CN102575457B (zh) * 2009-10-19 2014-12-17 日立建机株式会社 作业机械
IT1397794B1 (it) * 2010-01-26 2013-01-24 Cifa Spa Dispositivo per il controllo attivo delle vibrazioni di un braccio articolato per il pompaggio di calcestruzzo.
DE102010035291A1 (de) * 2010-08-25 2012-03-01 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Lagebestimmung eines bestimmten Teils eines Arbeitsarms einer Arbeitsmaschine
AT514115B1 (de) * 2013-04-09 2015-05-15 Ttcontrol Gmbh Elektrohydraulischer Steuerkreis
AT514116A1 (de) 2013-04-09 2014-10-15 Ttcontrol Gmbh Regelsystem und Verfahren zum Steuern der Orientierung eines Segments eines Manipulators
JP5823046B1 (ja) * 2014-05-14 2015-11-25 株式会社小松製作所 油圧ショベルの較正システム及び較正方法
WO2015186201A1 (fr) * 2014-06-03 2015-12-10 株式会社小松製作所 Système de commande d'engin de terrassement et engins de terrassement
WO2015186215A2 (fr) * 2014-06-04 2015-12-10 株式会社小松製作所 Dispositif de calcul de l'orientation d'un engin de chantier, engin de chantier et procédé de calcul de l'orientation d'un engin de chantier

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US10407282B2 (en) 2019-09-10
CN107406237A (zh) 2017-11-28
WO2016131977A1 (fr) 2016-08-25
EP3259221B1 (fr) 2020-02-12
US20180037444A1 (en) 2018-02-08
CN107406237B (zh) 2020-08-25
DE102015102368A1 (de) 2016-08-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3259221B1 (fr) Contrôle de la position d'une pointe de mât
AT514115B1 (de) Elektrohydraulischer Steuerkreis
EP2422018B1 (fr) Engin de chantier mobile équipé d'un dispositif de régulation de position d'un bras de travail et procédé pour réguler la position d'un bras de travail d'un engin de chantier mobile
EP1537282B1 (fr) Manipulateur de grande taille avec un mât articulé et avec un dispositif de réglage pour commander ledit mât
EP3649072B1 (fr) Grue et procédé de commande d'une telle grue
EP3556969B1 (fr) Pompe à béton
EP3183963B1 (fr) Dispositif d'extraction de liquides et/ou d'agents actifs solides et procédé de commande d'un tel dispositif
DE102018005068A1 (de) Kran und Verfahren zum Steuern eines solchen Krans
EP3439834B1 (fr) Commande cartésienne d'une pointe de mât d'un manipulateur de grande dimension, en particulier une pompe à béton
EP3689141A1 (fr) Dispositif d'extraction de liquides et/ou d'agents actifs solides et procédé de commande d'un tel dispositif
DE102009032267A1 (de) Kran zum Umschlagen einer an einem Lastseil hängenden Last
EP3556967B1 (fr) Manipulateur de grande taille, en particulier pour pompes à béton
EP1478898A1 (fr) Sonde pour appareil de mesure a coordonnees
AT514116A1 (de) Regelsystem und Verfahren zum Steuern der Orientierung eines Segments eines Manipulators
DE102013014626A1 (de) Bestimmung der Position eines verlagerbaren Messpunktes an einerMaschine
WO2011020561A1 (fr) Engin de travail mobile équipé d'un dispositif de réglage et d'un bras de travail et procédé de réglage ponctuel de travail d'un bras de travail d'un engin de travail mobile
WO2017178106A1 (fr) Grue et procédé de commande de ladite grue
DE102015208577A1 (de) Verfahren zur Ansteuerung eines Knickmasts in einem Großmanipulator
DE102018109098A1 (de) Betonpumpe
EP1992583A2 (fr) Commande de grue, grue et procédé
DE202019004672U1 (de) Ausgleichsvorrichtung zum störungsfreien 3D-Beton-Druck mittels Autobetonpumpe
WO2024088882A1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un bras articulé avec une unité de télécommande mobile située spatialement à distance de celui-ci, et excavatrice à aspiration
CH712422A2 (de) Regelungsvorrichtung zum Nachführen einer richtbaren Waffe.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170919

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190315

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B66C 13/06 20060101ALI20190816BHEP

Ipc: E04G 21/04 20060101ALI20190816BHEP

Ipc: B66C 13/46 20060101AFI20190816BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190910

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: KEMMETMUELLER, WOLFGANG

Inventor name: HENIKL, JOHANNES

Inventor name: KUGI, ANDREAS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1231843

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502016008700

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200512

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200512

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200513

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200612

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200705

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200219

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502016008700

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200229

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200229

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20201113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200219

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200229

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1231843

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210219

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210219

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20231108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240228

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240220

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20240206

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20240222

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240226

Year of fee payment: 9