EP1791621A2 - Catalyseurs et procede pour la reduction d'oxydes d'azote - Google Patents

Catalyseurs et procede pour la reduction d'oxydes d'azote

Info

Publication number
EP1791621A2
EP1791621A2 EP05815306A EP05815306A EP1791621A2 EP 1791621 A2 EP1791621 A2 EP 1791621A2 EP 05815306 A EP05815306 A EP 05815306A EP 05815306 A EP05815306 A EP 05815306A EP 1791621 A2 EP1791621 A2 EP 1791621A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
catalyst
zsm
degrees celsius
monolith
nitrogen oxides
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP05815306A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1791621A4 (fr
Inventor
Kevin C. Ott
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of California
Original Assignee
University of California
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/899,749 external-priority patent/US7378069B2/en
Application filed by University of California filed Critical University of California
Publication of EP1791621A2 publication Critical patent/EP1791621A2/fr
Publication of EP1791621A4 publication Critical patent/EP1791621A4/fr
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/92Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
    • B01D53/94Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
    • B01D53/9404Removing only nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/9409Nitrogen oxides
    • B01D53/9413Processes characterised by a specific catalyst
    • B01D53/9418Processes characterised by a specific catalyst for removing nitrogen oxides by selective catalytic reduction [SCR] using a reducing agent in a lean exhaust gas
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8621Removing nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/8625Nitrogen oxides
    • B01D53/8628Processes characterised by a specific catalyst
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J29/00Catalysts comprising molecular sieves
    • B01J29/04Catalysts comprising molecular sieves having base-exchange properties, e.g. crystalline zeolites
    • B01J29/06Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof
    • B01J29/076Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof containing arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J29/00Catalysts comprising molecular sieves
    • B01J29/04Catalysts comprising molecular sieves having base-exchange properties, e.g. crystalline zeolites
    • B01J29/06Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof
    • B01J29/40Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof of the pentasil type, e.g. types ZSM-5, ZSM-8 or ZSM-11, as exemplified by patent documents US3702886, GB1334243 and US3709979, respectively
    • B01J29/48Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof of the pentasil type, e.g. types ZSM-5, ZSM-8 or ZSM-11, as exemplified by patent documents US3702886, GB1334243 and US3709979, respectively containing arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/02Impregnation, coating or precipitation
    • B01J37/024Multiple impregnation or coating
    • B01J37/0246Coatings comprising a zeolite
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/20Reductants
    • B01D2251/206Ammonium compounds
    • B01D2251/2062Ammonia
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/206Rare earth metals
    • B01D2255/2065Cerium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/207Transition metals
    • B01D2255/2073Manganese
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/207Transition metals
    • B01D2255/20738Iron
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/50Zeolites
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/50Zeolites
    • B01D2255/504ZSM 5 zeolites
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J29/00Catalysts comprising molecular sieves
    • B01J29/04Catalysts comprising molecular sieves having base-exchange properties, e.g. crystalline zeolites
    • B01J29/06Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof
    • B01J29/40Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof of the pentasil type, e.g. types ZSM-5, ZSM-8 or ZSM-11, as exemplified by patent documents US3702886, GB1334243 and US3709979, respectively
    • B01J29/42Crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites; Isomorphous compounds thereof of the pentasil type, e.g. types ZSM-5, ZSM-8 or ZSM-11, as exemplified by patent documents US3702886, GB1334243 and US3709979, respectively containing iron group metals, noble metals or copper
    • B01J29/46Iron group metals or copper
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/19Catalysts containing parts with different compositions
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/10Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of nitrous oxide (N2O)

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the abatement of nitrogen oxides and more particularly to the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of nitrogen oxides using a zeolite catalyst impregnated with iron, cerium, and manganese.
  • SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction
  • NO x is the term generally used to represent nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O), as well as mixtures containing these gases. NO x forms in the high temperature zones of combustion processes. The internal combustion engine, and coal or gas-fired or oil-fired furnaces, boilers and incinerators, all contribute to NO x emissions.
  • NO x is also produced during a variety of chemical processes such as the manufacture of nitric acid, the nitration of organic chemicals, the production of adipic acid, and the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel rods.
  • fuel-rich combustion mixtures produce exhaust gases with less NO x than do lean fuel-air mixtures, i.e. mixtures in which more air is provided than the stoichiometric amount required to completely combust the fuel.
  • Lean fuel mixtures will produce an exhaust gas that contains gaseous oxygen.
  • NO x abatement from mobile and stationary emission sources.
  • NO x emissions will be required to not exceed 0.07grams/mile, down from the current level of around 0.8 grams/mile. This represents a NO x abatement requirement of greater than 90% over current technology.
  • Some of this abatement will come from advanced vehicle design and advances in combustion technology, but most of the reduction will come from advanced emission controls of which NO x reduction catalysts are the central technology. Similar reductions will be required of heavy diesel trucks in the near future, hence the need for new technologies having the capability of achieving very high reduction of NO x from lean burn engines, and at low operating temperatures as well (150 0 C- 25O 0 C).
  • the NO x gases may be thermodynamically unstable with respect to decomposition into elemental oxygen and nitrogen, no simple, economical method or catalyst has been described for inducing this decomposition at high enough rates over broad temperature ranges to make lean NO x reduction economically feasible. It has been discovered, however, that the addition of a reductant such as ammonia to the exhaust gas, under appropriate conditions, converts NO x to elemental nitrogen and steam.
  • a reductant such as ammonia
  • SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction
  • the catalyst employed in the converter must be active over a broad range of temperature (usually in the range of about 150-500 degrees Celsius, or broader is better), must have very high activity for the conversion of NO x to elemental nitrogen (N 2 ) and water (HbO), must react with a broad range of NO and NO 2 in the gas sent from the engine to the catalytic converter, must be sulfur tolerant, and should not produce N 2 O or only a few ppm at most.
  • Some of the better catalyst materials have included metal-substituted zeolite catalysts such as Cu-ZSM-5, Fe- ZSM-5, and related catalysts consisting of various zeolites with metal ions substituted into the zeolite structure. These materials are better in some ways than conventional platinum-based deNO x catalysts, but usually the best operating temperature ranges are too high (above 400 degrees Celsius) and too narrow (only about a hundred degrees Celsius in effective temperature width) for many practical applications.
  • metal-substituted zeolite catalysts such as Cu-ZSM-5, Fe- ZSM-5, and related catalysts consisting of various zeolites with metal ions substituted into the zeolite structure.
  • N 2 O emissions are not yet regulated, but because N 2 O is a potent greenhouse gas, it is a very undesirable byproduct, and a technologically useful catalyst should produce little, if any N 2 O.
  • This oxidation catalyst will convert some of the NO to NO2, perhaps up to 20 to 30 percent at a temperature of about 150 degrees Celsius, but not the 50 percent required to achieve the fastest rates of NO x reduction. Because most NO x catalysts are not capable of oxidizing NO to NO 2 at low temperature, these catalysts cannot assist the hydrocarbon oxidation catalyst to generate the advantageous mixture of NO/NO 2 and so these catalysts are largely ineffective at low temperatures, that being below 300 degrees Celsius where the feed contains mostly NO.
  • a strategy for improving the low temperature activity of SCR catalysts is to provide an additional non-precious metal containing catalyst that can oxidize NO to NO 2 so that the highest rates of NO x reduction can be realized.
  • This is a strategy employed with the present invention.
  • internal combustion engines emit a large amount of unburned hydrocarbons during cold engine start-up.
  • a large fraction of the total emitted hydrocarbons released during the first minutes of engine operation are due to the uncombusted hydrocarbons.
  • Such release of hydrocarbons after cold engine start-up poses a special problem, as at that point the temperatures of the exhaust gas and the catalytic converter are generally not high enough for conversion of the gaseous pollutants by conventional catalysts.
  • the catalysts in present catalytic converter systems are generally ineffective at ambient temperatures and must reach high temperatures, often in the range of 300 degrees Celcius to 400 degrees Celcius, before they become effective. During this time period, unburned hydrocarbons may adsorb onto the catalyst, causing a further diminution in activity. Indeed, under some circumstances, the adsorbed hydrocarbons may form carbonaceous deposits, requiring high temperatures to remove the deposit oxidatively. This can lead to irreversible damage of the catalyst. Therefore, catalysts that can avoid hydrocarbon deposition at low temperature, or more preferably, oxidize unburned hydrocarbons at the lower temperatures, are highly desired.
  • SCR processes offer the possibility that unspent ammonia reductant could be emitted to the environment.
  • ammonia is a regulated toxic substance, there are stringent emissions standards for ammonia. Therefore, another desired feature for a broad temperature range SCR process is one in which very little, if any ammonia is allowed to escape into the atmosphere, even under strenuous transient conditions where the process temperature is increasing rapidly because of load on the engine.
  • the catalytic NO x reduction process should consume all of the ammonia, or the catalyst should consume any excess ammonia by oxidation.
  • the GHSV is the volume of exhaust passed in one hour divided by the volume of the catalyst bed, and is related to the residence time or reaction time that the gaseous species have to react on the catalyst before they leave the catalyst bed. It is generally desirable to minimize the catalyst volume to the extent possible, and a useful catalyst should have high activity at high GHSV.
  • the GHSV is typically in a range from about 20,000 h "1 to about 200,000 h "1 .
  • One difficulty in comparing the activity of one catalyst to another when relative flow rates are given in terms of GHSV arises when one tries to compare a compacted powder catalyst with a catalyst that is supported on a monolith. In a powder catalyst, the bed volume is measured in a straightforward manner.
  • the catalyst volume is given as the volume of the honeycomb.
  • the problem here is that the amount of catalyst supported on the honeycomb is very small; most of the volume of the honeycomb catalyst is void space and the volume of the honeycomb itself. This makes it very difficult to make a simple comparison of catalyst activity between a powder catalyst and a monolith- supported catalyst.
  • a rule of thumb that is commonly used is to make a rough comparison in activity between a powder catalyst and a monolith catalyst is to multiply the GHSV of the powder catalyst by about 4, or conversely to divide the GHSV of the monolith catalyst test result by about 4.
  • a powder catalyst is reported to have a certain activity at 30,000 h "1 GHSV, then it should be compared to a monolith catalyst at roughly 7,500 h "1 GHSV. Conversely, if a monolith catalyst has been reported to have a certain activity at 30,000 h "1 GHSV, then the powder catalyst should be compared at a GHSV of about 120,000 h "1 .
  • Aluminosilicate Molecular Sieves and Ammonia discloses the catalytic reduction of noxious nitrogen oxides in a waste stream (stack gas from a fossil-fuel-fired power generation plant or other industrial plant off-gas stream) using ammonia as reductant in the presence of a zeolite catalyst in the hydrogen or sodium form having pore openings of about 3 to 10 Angstroms.
  • HZSM-5 zeolite ZSM-5
  • the hydrogen form of zeolite ZSM-5 catalyzes the SCR reaction at temperatures between about 400 degrees Celsius to about 500 degrees Celsius. At temperatures below about 400 degrees Celsius, HZSM-5 is significantly less efficient at removing nitrogen oxides from the gas stream. These catalysts were tested as compacted powder extrudates at space velocities below 10,000 IY 1 .
  • a catalyst used with this process includes an intermediate pore size zeolite powder that has been contacted with a water-soluble iron salt or salt precursor to produce an iron loading of at least 0.4 weight percent, and a binder such as titania, zirconia, or silica.
  • the impregnated zeolite is calcined and hydrothermally treated at a temperature of about 400-850 degrees Celsius to produce a catalyst that is capable of greater than 80 percent conversion of the NO x to innocuous compounds when the catalyst has been aged using 100 percent steam at 700 degrees Celsius for 7 hours prior to sending the exhaust gas over the catalyst.
  • These catalysts were tested as powders at space velocities of 12,000 h "1 .
  • MnO ⁇ /USY had high activity and high selectivity to nitrogen at temperatures of from 80-180 degrees Celsius, and that the addition of iron oxide or cerium oxide increased NO conversion.
  • a catalyst of 14% cerium and 6% manganese impregnated into ultrastable Y zeolite produced nearly 100 percent conversion of NO at 180 degrees Celsius at gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 30,000 h "1 as a powder catalyst.
  • GHSV gas hourly space velocity
  • an object of the present invention is to provide a catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO x in the presence of ammonia that shows excellent conversion at temperatures below 200 degrees Celsius at space velocities greater than 30,000 h "1 when tested as a monolith-supported catalyst, or 120,000 h '1 when tested as a powder.
  • the present invention includes a method for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of nitrogen oxides.
  • the method involves contacting an exhaust gas stream that includes nitrogen oxides, ammonia, and oxygen, with a catalyst under conditions effective to catalytically reduce the nitrogen oxides such that less than about 0.6 percent N 2 O is generated.
  • the catalyst is a medium pore zeolite that has been ion exchanged with iron to provide an efficient SCR function and impregnated with manganese and cerium to provide an efficient function for the low temperature oxidation of NO to NO 2 and any unbumed hydrocarbons.
  • These invention catalysts that combine these dual functions are termed 'hybrid' catalysts,' as they are hybrids of SCR catalysts and potent NO oxidation catalysts.
  • the invention also includes a supported catalyst effective for the Selective
  • the catalyst is supported on a monolith, and includes ZSM-5 zeolite that has been exchanged with iron and impregnated with manganese and cerium.
  • the invention also includes a method for catalytically reducing nitrogen oxides in an exhaust gas stream that contains nitrogen oxides, ammonia, and oxygen.
  • the method involves contacting the exhaust gas stream under conditions effective to catalytically reduce the nitrogen oxides with Fe-ZSM-5 catalyst and thereafter with a second catalyst.
  • the second catalyst includes a medium pore zeolite ion that has been ion exchanged with iron and impregnated with manganese and cerium.
  • the invention also includes a method for improving the low temperature performance of a lean NO x trap.
  • the method involves putting a catalyst upstream of a lean NO x trap.
  • the catalyst is a medium pore zeolite impregnated with iron, cerium, and manganese. When the catalyst is contacted with NO and oxygen, it substantially oxidizes the NO to NO 2 to produce a NO 2 enriched stream that improves the low temperature performance of the lean NO x trap.
  • FIGURE 1 shows a graphical representation of percent NO x conversion as a function of temperature at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 30,000 hr "1 (monolith) and in a temperature range from 100 degrees Celsius to 400 degrees Celsius for the following catalysts and NO x compositions: FeZSM-5/MnO x , 4:1
  • FIGURE 2 shows a graphical representation of % (NO 2 /(NO+NO 2 )) as a function of temperature in the temperature range of from about 100 degrees Celsius to about 500 degrees Celsius for the following catalysts and conditions: monolith supported FeZSM-5/MnO x , 30,000 hr "1 (hollow circles); invention catalyst monolith-supported FeZSM-5/CeO x /MnO y , 30,000 hr '1 (hollow squares); monolith supported Pt, space velocity of 3OK (filled diamonds); powder catalyst CeO x /MnO x on Y zeolite, 120,000 hr "1 (filled squares); powder catalyst MnO x supported on Y zeolite 120,000 hr "1 (filled triangles); and powder catalyst MnZSM-5,30K GHSV (x- shaped symbols).
  • FIGURE 2 shows that the invention catalysts are superior catalysts for the oxidation of NO to NO 2 at low temperatures, which is a requirement for achieving high rates of NO x conversion by SCR in the presence of ammonia.
  • FIGURE 3 shows a graphical representation of % NOx conversion versus temperature in the temperature range of from about 10O degrees Celsius to about 400 degrees Celsius for the following catalysts and conditions: FeZSM-5 (hollow circles); CeOx/FeZSM-5 after the first impregnation with Ce (hollow squares); CeOx/FeZSM-5 after the second impregnation with Ce (filled squares); and MnOx/CeOx/FeZSM-5 (hollow triangles).
  • Cerium impregnation was accomplished by immersing iron zeolite into an aqueous solution of cerous nitrate, followed by drying and calcination to convert the cerous nitrate into cerium oxides (CeO x ).
  • the measured activity of the catalyst before and after impregnation were not significantly different. However, the addition of MnO x in combination with the cerium oxides improved the performance of the catalyst at lower temperatures (below about 250 degrees Celsius).
  • FIGURE 4a and FIGURE 4b show graphs related to results of NO x conversion and NO conversion for catalysts A, B, C, D, and E prepared by dip coating a monolith with catalyst solution, drying, and calcination.
  • Catalyst A was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 2 molar cerous nitrate and 2 molar manganous nitrate.
  • Catalyst B was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 1 molar cerous nitrate and 1 molar manganous nitrate.
  • Catalyst C was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 0.5 molar cerous nitrate and 0.5 molar manganous nitrate.
  • Catalyst D was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 1 molar manganous nitrate and 0.5 molar cerous nitrate.
  • Catalyst E was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 0.5 molar manganous nitrate and 1 molar cerous nitrate.
  • Catalyst A was re-impregnated with the aqueous 2 molar solution of manganese nitrate and cerium nitrate, dried, and calcined to generate Catalyst F.
  • Catalyst F was impregnated again in the cerium and manganese solution, dried, and calcined to generate Catalyst G.
  • the results of NO x conversion and NO conversion for catalyst F and for catalyst G are also shown in FIGURE 4a and FIGURE 4b.
  • FIGURE 5 shows results related to the stability of the Ce, MnO x Fe-ZSM- 5/monolith catalyst of the present invention to aging using sulfur trioxide (SO 3 ).
  • FIGURE 6 shows the results of NOx conversion as a function of temperature for a dual bed catalyst of the present invention.
  • the invention relates to the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NO x in the presence of ammonia and excess oxygen over a broad temperature range.
  • the invention includes a catalyst that has been shown to convert gaseous mixtures of NO and NO 2 to N 2 .
  • the catalyst an embodiment of which includes a monolith-supported medium pore zeolite ion-exchanged with small amounts of iron, manganese, and cerium, has been demonstrated as being a highly active catalyst for the conversion of NO x in the presence of ammonia in the temperature range from about 200 degrees Celsius to about 400 degrees Celsius, and shows surprising activity at temperatures below 200 degrees Celsius, which is highly desirable because state-of-the-art combustion engines are becoming so efficient that exhaust gas temperatures are dropping into the range below 200 degrees Celsius. Activity at these low temperatures is also desirable because of the emission during 'cold start' conditions, which occurs before conventional catalysts become hot enough to display effective catalytic activity.
  • a standard by which deNO x catalysts are currently being measured is that they perform better than the best commercial catalyst if they can provide better than 60 percent conversion at a temperature of 200 degrees Celsius when 20 percent of the feed into the catalyst is nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ).
  • the catalyst of the invention has been shown to meet this standard by displaying greater than 60 percent conversion of a gaseous, 4 to 1 mixture of NO/NO 2 at 200 degrees Celsius.
  • exhaust gases that can be treated in the catalytic system of the present invention can come from the combustion of fuels in automotive engines (such as diesel engines), gas turbines, engines using an oxygen-rich mixture (lean-burn conditions), and electrical power generation stations.
  • exhaust gas means any waste gas that is formed in an industrial process or operation and that is normally disposed of by discharge to the atmosphere, with our without additional treatment.
  • exhaust gas includes the gas produced by internal combustion engines. The composition of such a gas varies and depends on the particular process or operation that leads to its formation. When formed in the combustion of fossil fuels, it will generally include nitrogen, steam and carbon dioxide. In addition it will also contain smaller amounts of NO x .
  • the fuels can be, for example, natural gas, gasoline, LPG, kerosene, heavy oil and coal.
  • Fuels that contain sulfur will typically produce an exhaust gas that contains one or more sulfur oxides. Rich fuel-air mixtures will generally produce an exhaust gas that contains little if any free oxygen along with some carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons (where the term 'hydrocarbons' is meant to include both hydrocarbons and partially oxidized hydrocarbons, as described earlier), and hydrogen.
  • Lean fuel-air mixtures which contain more air than what is stoichiometrically required to completely burn the fuel, will form an exhaust gas that contains oxygen.
  • nitration uranium recovery
  • calcining solid salts that contain nitrates produce exhaust gases that can have compositions different from those produced from combustion of fossil fuels. They may be substantially devoid of steam, for example, and may contain very high concentrations of nitrogen or other materials.
  • the present invention is effective for treating exhaust gas containing the approximate stoichiometric amount of ammonia.
  • the ammonia may be present in the gas, may be added to the gas, or may be produced by an upstream process
  • urea (such as by decomposition of urea).
  • approximately stoichiometric amount means from about 0.75 to about 1.25 times the molar amount of ammonia indicated in equations (1), (2), and (3) above.
  • the exhaust gas is typically treated in the catalytic system of this invention at a temperature of from about 50 degrees Celsius to about 1000 degrees Celsius or more, e.g. within the range of within the range of about 100 degrees Celsius to about 900 degrees Celsius, e.g. of about 100 degrees Celsius to about 600 degrees Celsius, e.g. of about 120 degrees Celsius to about 600 degrees Celsius, e.g. of about 120 degrees Celsius to about 400 degrees Celsius, and at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV, relating to volumes of gas at standard temperature and pressure (STP) per volume of catalyst per hour) adjusted to provide the desired conversion.
  • the GHSV can be from about 1 ,000 to about 500,000 hr '1 , e.g. within the range of about 2,500 to about 250,000 hr '1 , e.g. from about 5,000 to about 150,000 hr-1 , e.g. from about 10,000 to about 100,000 hr "1 .
  • the process of the invention is operable at subatmospheric to superatmospheric pressure, e.g. from about 5 psia to about 500 psia, preferably from about 10 psia to about 50 psia, i.e. near or slightly above atmospheric pressure.
  • the gas mixture directed over the catalyst should contain at least a stoichiometric amount of oxygen as indicated by " equations (1) and (2), or enough oxygen to convert half the NO to NO 2 to proceed by the way of the 'fast' SCR reaction (equation 3). Excess levels of oxygen above the stoichiometric amount may be desirable.
  • a source of oxygen such as air
  • a source of oxygen e.g. air
  • Adequate conversion may be readily achieved with a simple stationary fixed-bed of catalyst.
  • the fixed includes a bed of the invention catalyst, which is a ZSM-5 type zeolite having small amounts of iron, manganese, and cerium impregnated therein.
  • This bed can be used alone, or in combination with other catalyst beds, e.g. a dual bed.
  • a bed of the invention catalyst can be used in combination with another catalyst bed such as a FeZSM-5 catalyst bed, to provide a dual bed that may be capable of even better overall performance than a single bed over the wide range of operating conditions for a combustion engine, for example.
  • Suitable mixing may be used before the gas reaches the catalyst to produce a homogeneous gas mixture for catalytic conversion.
  • the mixers may be any suitable arrangement, including, for example, baffles, discs, ceramic discs, static mixers, or combinations of these.
  • the mixing may be integral with the gas flow paths.
  • Catalysts useful with the present invention typically include an active material and a support.
  • Suitable support materials include cordierite, nitrides, carbides, borides, intermetallics, mullite, alumina, natural and synthetic zeolites, lithium aluminosilicate, titania, feldspars, quartz, fused or amorphous silica, clays, aluminates, zirconia, spinels, or metal monoliths of aluminum-containing ferrite type stainless steel, or austenite type stainless steel, and combinations thereof.
  • Typical substrates are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,127,691 and 3,885,977, incorporated by reference herein.
  • a catalyst useful with the present invention comprises a medium pore zeolite, whether naturally occurring or synthesized crystalline zeolites.
  • these zeolites are medium pore zeolites with a silica to alumina ratio of at least 50. Examples include ZSM-5, ZSM-11 , ZSM-12, ZSM-21 , ZSM-23, ZSM-35, ZSM-38, and ZSM-48.
  • the zeolite is ZSM-5.
  • An embodiment of the catalyst of the present invention was prepared by ion exchanging a zeolite with iron and then impregnating manganese and cerium onto the iron zeolite in a stepwise fashion.
  • the products were tested at various stages during the preparation.
  • a slurry of ZSM-5 was coated onto a monolith of cordierite monolith (the support).
  • the slurry-coated monolith was then dried at a temperature of about 450-500 degrees Celsius.
  • ferric chloride (FeCI 3 ) was sublimed onto ZSM-5 treated cordierite, after which the product was subjected to calcination at a temperature of about 500 degrees Celsius.
  • This material is abbreviated "FeZSM-5" on FIGURE 1 and FIGURE 2.
  • the activity of this product was determined by performing Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NO x using two different gaseous mixtures of nitrogen oxides, 1 :1 mixture of NO/NO 2 and a 4:1 mixture of NO/NO 2 , in the presence of about 1 equivalent of ammonia and excess oxygen gas.
  • SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction
  • the conversion data for both the 1 :1 mixture and the 4:1 mixture are each reported in FIGURE 1 , which shows a graphical representation of percent NO x conversion as a function of temperature at a GHSV of 30,000 hr "1 and in a temperature range from 100 degrees Celsius to 400 degrees Celsius.
  • the curve with hollow diamond symbols shows the conversion data for the 1 :1 mixture, and the curve with triangle symbols shows the conversion data for the 4:1 mixture.
  • the material prepared by subliming FeCI 3 onto ZSM-5 converts about 65 percent of the NO x from a feed stream of 4:1 NO/NO 2 at 200 degrees Celcius.
  • Cerium was added to the iron zeolite catalyst by immersing the catalyst into an aqueous solution of cerous nitrate. The drying and calcining steps converted the cerous nitrate into cerium oxides (CeO x ). The activity of this catalyst was measured, and was found not to be significantly different than the starting iron catalyst. The data are plotted on the graph shown in FIGURE 3.
  • the iron- and cerium-containing product catalyst prepared as described above was immersed into an aqueous solution of manganese (II) nitrate, then dried and calcined.
  • the drying and calcinations step are believed to convert at least some of the manganese nitrate into manganese oxides (MnO x ) and possibly mixed cerium-manganese oxides.
  • the activity of this catalyst was determined by performing Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) with a gas mixture containing a 4:1 mixture of NO/NO2, about one equivalent ammonia, and excess oxygen gas.
  • SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction
  • FIGURE 3 shows, the addition of MnO x in combination with the cerium oxides improved the performance of the catalyst by acting as a potent oxidizer, as demonstrated by improved conversion of 4:1 mixture of NO/NO 2 at the lower temperatures.
  • the performance of the invention catalyst was compared to that of a catalyst powder described by Gonshin Qi et al. in the following paper: "Low- Temperature SCR of NO with NH 3 over USY-supported Manganese Oxide-Based Catalysts," Catalysis Letters, vol. 87, nos. 1-2.
  • the Qi et al. powder catalyst is composed of 14 percent cerium and 6 percent manganese impregnated into ultrastable (i.e.
  • the CeO x /MnO x /Y catalyst of Qi, Yang, and Chang has even better low temperature performance than FeZSM-5.
  • the catalyst of the present invention Ce/MnOx/FeZSM-5 has substantially better low temperature performance.
  • Another aspect of the present invention relates to "dual bed” catalyst systems.
  • these new catalysts are too active for ammonia oxidation at high temperature but have fantastic low temperature performance
  • one solution to get a broader range of operation involves putting a "high temperature catalyst” such as FeZSM-5 that has excellent performance at high temperature in front of a bed of the hybrid catalysts of the invention.
  • the high temperature catalyst converts NO x to nitrogen with high efficiency.
  • the "high temperature” catalyst is capable of only converting around 60 percent of the NO x at 200 degrees Celsius at 4:1 NO/NO 2 feeds.
  • the hybrid catalyst would efficiently convert a large fraction of the remaining NO x , likely attaining better than 90 percent conversion over a broad temperature range of about 150 degrees Celsius.
  • This dual functioning catalyst bed enables NO x conversion over broad temperature ranges from 150 degrees Celsius to greater than 450 degrees Celsius, even up to 500 degrees Celsius.
  • EXAMPLE 1 Preparation of Fe ZSM-5 supported on cordierite monolith. Cylinders of cordierite monolith (10 mm in diameter x 12 mm long; 400 cells per inch 2 ) were coated with H-ZSM-5 (ZEOLYST INTERNATIONAL) zeolite by dipping the monolith into an aqueous slurry of the zeolite powder followed by drying at 110 degrees Celsius. Several cycles of coating followed by drying were necessary to achieve a zeolite coating of around 20 to 24 percent by weight. The coated monolith was then calcined at a temperature of about 500 degrees Celsius. Iron was exchanged into the pores of the zeolites by the well-known method of gas- phase exchange using FeCU as the volatile iron component.
  • H-ZSM-5 ZEOLYST INTERNATIONAL
  • a piece of ZSM-5 coated cordierite monolith was placed into a boat downstream from a boat of anhydrous FeCb.
  • the boats were contained within a quartz apparatus that was purged with dry nitrogen gas.
  • the quartz apparatus was heated to a temperature of from between 300 degrees Celsius and 325 degrees Celsius to initiate the sublimation of FeCI 3 .
  • the apparatus was cooled under dry nitrogen, and the resulting monolith was calcined in ambient air at a temperature of about 500 degrees Celsius to yield a catalyst referred to as Fe-ZSM-5/monolith.
  • the catalyst gained approximately 7 percent by weight of FeO x based on the weight of the zeolite coating.
  • EXAMPLE 2 Testing of Fe ZSM-5 monolith catalyst.
  • the Fe-ZSM-5/monolith prepared according to EXAMPLE 1 was tested for NO x conversion activity and for NO oxidation activity.
  • the Fe-ZSM- 5/monolith was placed into a 10 mm diameter quartz reactor tube.
  • Reaction gases NO, NO 2 , NH 3 , and O 2 in He
  • ppm parts per million
  • ppm parts per million
  • 5 percent steam was added using a syringe pump and an evaporator.
  • the NO:NO 2 ratio was either 1 :1 or 4:1.
  • the space velocity was either 30,000 h “1 or 60,000 h “1 .
  • Products and reactants (NO, NO 2 , N 2 O, NH 3 ) were analyzed using a Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer with a heated cell having a 2 meter, or 10 meter, path length. Nitrogen was measured using a gas chromatograph. Operation of the reactor was automated. Catalytic performance data was obtained over the temperature range of 500 degrees Celsius to 120 degrees Celsius. The data is summarized in FIGURE 1.
  • MnO x ZY catalyst Preparation of MnO x ZY catalyst.
  • MnO x supported on zeolite Y catalyst comparable to a catalyst reported by Yang et al. ("A Superior Catalyst for Low- Temperature NO Reduction With NH 3 ,” Chem. Commun. (2003), pp. 848-849) was prepared by incipient wetness impregnation.
  • a six gram sample of zeolite Y (ZEOLYST®) was impregnated with approximately 3 cubic centimeters (cc) of 5 molar manganous nitrate solution to achieve a catalyst having approximately 10 to 15 percent by weight Mn.
  • the catalyst was dried at a temperature of about 120 degrees Celsius, and then calcined at a temperature of about 500 degrees Celsius.
  • MnO x ZY catalyst Testing of MnO x ZY catalyst.
  • the MnO x A" catalyst prepared in EXAMPLE 3 was tested for NO x conversion in an identical fashion as given in EXAMPLE 2. This catalyst was tested as a powder diluted in 1.5 cc of crushed cordierite.
  • the GHSV of 120,000 h "1 (based on volume of active catalyst powder) was chosen to make a good comparison to other catalytic results from monolith catalysts.
  • the results for the 4:1 NO/NO 2 conditions are shown in FIGURE 1.
  • the NO oxidation activity of this catalyst at the same GHSV as the NO x conversion experiment and as a function of temperature was determined as described in EXAMPLE 2. The data are presented in FIGURE 2.
  • MnO x ZY catalyst Preparation and testing of MnO x ZY catalyst.
  • Ce,MnO x /Y catalyst was tested for NO x conversion as described in EXAMPLE 2.
  • Ce,MnO x /Y catalyst powder was diluted 50/50 with 1.5 cc of crushed cordierite.
  • the GHSV of 120,000 h '1 (based on volume of active catalyst powder) was chosen to make a good comparison to other catalytic results from monolith catalysts.
  • the results for the 4:1 NO/NO 2 conditions are shown in FIGURE 1.
  • the NO oxidation activity of this catalyst at the same GHSV as the NO x conversion experiment and as a function of temperature was determined as described in EXAMPLE 2.
  • the data is presented in FIGURE 2.
  • EXAMPLE 6 Preparation of CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst.
  • the Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst from EXAMPLE 1 was dip coated in an aqueous 4M cerous nitrate solution. The excess solution was shaken off, and the catalyst dried at a temperature of about 120 degrees Celsius. The catalyst was then calcined at a temperature of about 500 degrees Celsius. The product was CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst.
  • CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst was tested for NO x conversion in an identical fashion as described in EXAMPLE 2.
  • CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst powder was diluted 50/50 with 1.5 cc of crushed cordierite.
  • the GHSV of 120,000 h '1 was chosen to make a good comparison to other catalytic results from monolith catalysts.
  • the results for the 4:1 NO/NO 2 conditions are shown in FIGURE 3.
  • CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst Preparation of CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst.
  • the CeO x -Fe-ZSM- 5/monolith catalyst from EXAMPLE 6 was impregnated a second time by dip coating in an aqueous solution of 4M cerous nitrate. The catalyst was dried and calcined as described in EXAMPLE 6.
  • Mn 1 CeO x -Fe-ZSMS monolith catalyst Preparation of Mn 1 CeO x -Fe-ZSMS monolith catalyst.
  • the CeO x -Fe-ZSM- 5/monolith catalyst from EXAMPLE 7 was impregnated with Mn by dip coating the monolith into an aqueous solution of 1 molar manganous nitrate. The excess solution was shaken off and the catalyst was then dried at a temperature of about 120 degrees Celsius and afterward calcined at a temperature of about 500 degrees Celsius.
  • the product was the catalyst Mn,CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5.
  • Mn,CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5 monolith catalyst The Mn 1 CeO x -Fe-ZSM- 5/monolith catalyst prepared as described in EXAMPLE 10 was tested for NO x conversion using the same conditions as in EXAMPLE 2. These data are shown in FIGURE 1.
  • Catalyst A was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 2 molar cerous nitrate and 2 molar manganous nitrate.
  • Catalyst B was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 1 molar cerous nitrate and 1 molar manganous nitrate.
  • Catalyst C was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 0.5 molar cerous nitrate and 0.5 molar manganous nitrate.
  • Catalyst D was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 1 molar manganous nitrate and 0.5 molar cerous nitrate.
  • Catalyst E was prepared by dip-coating a monolith into solutions of 0.5 molar manganous nitrate and 1 molar cerous nitrate.
  • Catalyst A from EXAMPLE 12 was re-impregnated with the aqueous 2 molar solution of manganese nitrate and cerium nitrate, dried, and calcined to generate Catalyst F.
  • the NO x conversion and NO conversion for catalyst F were measured.
  • catalyst F was impregnated again in the cerium and manganese solution, dried, and calcined to generate Catalyst G.
  • the results of NO x conversion and NO conversion for catalyst F and for catalyst G are shown in FIGURE 4a and FIGURE 4b.
  • Catalyst F was placed into a 10 mm diameter quartz reactor. A gas mixture including about 500 ppm of NH 3 and 12 percent O 2 diluted in He were delivered to the reactor along with 5 percent steam. The conversion of ammonia was monitored by FT-IR and gas chromatography (GC) to detect N 2 . At a temperature of about 300 degrees Celsius, the ammonia was completely converted. The selectivity to N 2 was about 80 percent, and the selectivity to NO x was about 20 percent.
  • GC gas chromatography
  • Catalyst F was used to demonstrate the resistance of Mn 1 CeO x -Fe-ZSM-5 monolith catalyst to hydrocarbon poisoning. While maintaining the catalyst at a temperature of 177 degrees Celsius, a NO/NO 2 ratio of 4:1 , and the conditions given in EXAMPLE 2, the NO x conversion of 95 percent was measured. A train of 4 pulses of 10 microliters of liquid toluene injected at 4 minute intervals were then vaporized and delivered upstream of the catalyst bed. After each pulse, a sharp decrement in NO x conversion was noted, declining by about 10 points, but then rapidly recovering to above 90 percent. After the 4 pulses of toluene, NO x conversion was greater than 90 percent, and recovered to 95 percent conversion in less than 3 hours.
  • EXAMPLE 17 Stability of Ce, MnO x Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst to aging with SO 3 .
  • the Ce, MnO x Fe-ZSM-5/monolith catalyst from EXAMPLE 10 was tested for stability to SO3 aging.
  • a blend of 45 ppm SO x , mostly SO 3 , in air with steam was passed over the catalyst for 15 hours while the temperature of the catalyst was held at a temperature of about 350 degrees Celsius.
  • the catalyst was then heated briefly to a temperature of about 500 degrees Celsius, and the NO x conversion in a 4:1 NO/NO 2 blend was tested as outlined in EXAMPLE 2.
  • the data are shown graphically in the plot shown in FIGURE 5.
  • Dual bed catalyst To provide a broad temperature window process, dual bed catalysts were prepared. Catalyst F from EXAMPLES 14, 15, and 16 was placed downstream from a 10 mm diameter x 12 mm long piece of Fe-ZSM- 5/monolith catalyst prepared as described in EXAMPLE 1. The dual bed catalyst was tested as described in EXAMPLE 2, except that the flow was doubled to account for the doubling of volume of the overall bed; thus the GHSV for the dual bed was 30,000 h "1 . The NO x conversion as a function of temperature is shown in FIGURE 6. EXAMPLE 19
  • Dual bed catalyst A dual bed catalyst was prepared by placing a 10 mm diameter x 5.4 mm diameter piece of Fe-ZSM-5 monolith catalyst prepared as in EXAMPLE 1 upstream from catalyst F (from EXAMPLE 18). The flow rate was adjusted to give an overall GHSV of 30,000 h "1 . The results of the NO x conversion test are shown in FIGURE 6.
  • Lean NO x traps are approach for the conversion of NO x from lean burn engines. These traps operate by adsorbing NO 2 with an adsorbent, followed by reacting the adsorbed NO2 to N 2 . While this approach provides yet another way to abate NO x at higher temperatures, it is necessary to convert NO to NO 2 in order for the trap to be effective. This conversion of NO to NO 2 is difficult at the lower temperatures of the desired operating range, particularly at temperatures from about 100 degrees Celsius to about 250 degrees Celsius.
  • One aspect of the present invention is related to a potent catalyst for the catalytic oxidation of NO to NO 2 to enable a lean NO x trap to operate more efficiently over a broader temperature range, particularly at temperatures below 250 degrees Celsius.
  • invention catalysts having Mn and Ce to oxidize NO to NO 2 at low temperatures allows lean NO x traps to operate more effectively at lower temperature by increasing the amount of NO 2 in the gas, and thus increasing the amount of NO x trapped as NO 2 .
  • the invention catalyst having manganese and cerium is, therefore, a low temperature catalyst that, when placed upstream from a lean NO x trap catalyst, improves the low temperature efficiency of the trap device.
  • iron was incorporated into the zeolite structure by sublimation, iron may also be incorporated by ion exchange techniques as well.
  • the embodiment(s) were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas Treatment By Means Of Catalyst (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention a trait à un catalyseur de réduction catalytique sélective préparé par le revêtement par suspension épaisse à base de zéolithe ZSM-5 sur un bloc de cordiérite, la calcination du bloc, et l'immersion du bloc soit dans une solution aqueuse de nitrate de manganèse ou de nitrate de cérium suivie d'une calcination, ou un traitement analogue avec des solutions séparées de nitrate de manganèse et de nitrate de cérium. Le catalyseur supporté contenant du fer, du manganèse, et du cérium a présenté une conversion de 80 % à 113 degrés Celsius d'un gaz d'alimentation contenant des oxydes d'azote ayant 4 parties d'oxyde d'azote pour une partie de dioxyde d'azote, environ un équivalent d'ammoniac, et un excédent d'oxygène; la conversion s'est améliorée à 94 % à 147 degrés Celsius. Aucun oxyde nitreux n'a été détecté (limite de détection: 0,6 % d'oxyde nitreux).
EP05815306A 2004-07-27 2005-07-25 Catalyseurs et procede pour la reduction d'oxydes d'azote Ceased EP1791621A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/899,749 US7378069B2 (en) 2004-07-27 2004-07-27 Catalyst and method for reduction of nitrogen oxides
US66306505P 2005-03-18 2005-03-18
PCT/US2005/026372 WO2006031297A2 (fr) 2004-07-27 2005-07-25 Catalyseurs et procede pour la reduction d'oxydes d'azote

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1791621A2 true EP1791621A2 (fr) 2007-06-06
EP1791621A4 EP1791621A4 (fr) 2010-09-22

Family

ID=36060468

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05815306A Ceased EP1791621A4 (fr) 2004-07-27 2005-07-25 Catalyseurs et procede pour la reduction d'oxydes d'azote

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US7413720B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1791621A4 (fr)
JP (1) JP5354903B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2575338C (fr)
WO (1) WO2006031297A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7378069B2 (en) * 2004-07-27 2008-05-27 Los Alamos National Security, Llc Catalyst and method for reduction of nitrogen oxides
JP2006136776A (ja) * 2004-11-10 2006-06-01 Toyota Central Res & Dev Lab Inc NOx選択還元触媒
US20070149385A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2007-06-28 Ke Liu Catalyst system for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions
US8568678B2 (en) * 2006-07-08 2013-10-29 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Structured SCR catalyst for the reduction of nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gas from lean-burn engines using ammonia as reducing agent
US20080053071A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2008-03-06 Karen Adams System and Method for Reducing NOx Emissions
TWI449572B (zh) * 2006-11-29 2014-08-21 Umicore Shokubai Japan Co Ltd Oxidation catalyst and the oxidation catalyst using an exhaust gas purification system
US8802582B2 (en) * 2007-01-09 2014-08-12 Catalytic Solutions, Inc. High temperature ammonia SCR catalyst and method of using the catalyst
US7527776B2 (en) * 2007-01-09 2009-05-05 Catalytic Solutions, Inc. Ammonia SCR catalyst and method of using the catalyst
US7943097B2 (en) * 2007-01-09 2011-05-17 Catalytic Solutions, Inc. Reactor system for reducing NOx emissions from boilers
US7767175B2 (en) * 2007-01-09 2010-08-03 Catalytic Solutions, Inc. Ammonia SCR catalyst and method of using the catalyst
EP3626329B1 (fr) * 2007-04-26 2021-10-27 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Système de traitement de gaz avec catalyseur rsc de zéolite de type zsm-34/cuivre et procédé de conversion d'oxydes d'azote
KR101394625B1 (ko) 2007-06-25 2014-05-13 에스케이이노베이션 주식회사 선택적 촉매 환원 반응용 철 담지 제올라이트 촉매의제조방법
US20100115930A1 (en) * 2008-11-07 2010-05-13 Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. Exhaust after treatment system
KR101251499B1 (ko) * 2008-12-05 2013-04-05 오덱(주) 질소 산화물 제거용 제올라이트 촉매, 이의 제조 방법 및 이를 이용한 질소 산화물 제거 방법
US8097554B2 (en) * 2009-02-09 2012-01-17 Airflow Catalyst Systems, Inc. Apparatus for removing soot from diesel engine exhaust streams at temperatures at or below 150° C.
US20110113762A1 (en) * 2009-11-16 2011-05-19 Airflow Catalyst Systems Use Of Powder Coated Nickel Foam As A Resistor To Increase The Temperature of Catalytic Converter Devices With The Use Of Electricity
CN101879452B (zh) * 2010-07-09 2012-08-22 清华大学 一种锰基低温脱硝催化剂及其制备方法
US8057767B1 (en) * 2010-08-10 2011-11-15 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Base metal oxides oxidation catalyst
WO2012117042A2 (fr) * 2011-03-03 2012-09-07 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Matériau catalytiquement actif et catalyseur assurant la réduction catalytique sélective d'oxydes d'azote
CZ305861B6 (cs) * 2014-06-27 2016-04-13 Ústav fyzikální chemie J. Heyrovského AV ČR, v. v. i. Katalyzátor pro selektivní katalytickou redukci oxidů dusíku, způsob jeho výroby a použití
CN111001435B (zh) * 2019-12-23 2022-12-27 中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所 一种中空Cu-SSZ-13分子筛催化剂及应用
CN111921523B (zh) * 2020-07-13 2022-11-18 内蒙古大学 中低温sco脱硝催化剂及其制备方法
CN112275314A (zh) * 2020-09-14 2021-01-29 无锡威孚环保催化剂有限公司 一种锰铈基分子筛scr脱硝催化剂及其制备方法
CN114832852A (zh) * 2022-04-20 2022-08-02 柳州华锡有色设计研究院有限责任公司 一种锑掺杂改性Mn/ZSM-5分子筛低温脱硝催化剂的制备方法

Family Cites Families (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3885977A (en) 1973-11-05 1975-05-27 Corning Glass Works Anisotropic cordierite monolith
JPS50131848A (fr) * 1974-04-09 1975-10-18
US4220632A (en) 1974-09-10 1980-09-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Reduction of nitrogen oxides with catalytic acid resistant aluminosilicate molecular sieves and ammonia
JPS5194470A (fr) * 1975-02-18 1976-08-19
JPS52139683A (en) * 1976-05-18 1977-11-21 Agency Of Ind Science & Technol No# reduction catalyst
US4127691A (en) 1977-06-20 1978-11-28 Corning Glass Works Thermal shock resistant honeycomb structures
JPS6022922A (ja) * 1983-07-20 1985-02-05 Babcock Hitachi Kk アンモニア還元脱硝触媒、装置および脱硝法
US4778665A (en) * 1986-09-09 1988-10-18 Mobil Oil Corporation Abatement of NOx in exhaust gases
US4952385A (en) 1987-03-02 1990-08-28 Georgia Tech Research Corp. Ferrisilicate molecular sieve and use as a catalyst
US5024981A (en) 1989-04-20 1991-06-18 Engelhard Corporation Staged metal-promoted zeolite catalysts and method for catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides using the same
US4961917A (en) * 1989-04-20 1990-10-09 Engelhard Corporation Method for reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia using promoted zeolite catalysts
JPH03296436A (ja) * 1990-04-13 1991-12-27 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd 高温排ガス用脱硝触媒
US5238890A (en) * 1990-10-31 1993-08-24 Idemitsu Kosan Company Limited Exhaust gas purifying catalyst and an exhaust gas purifying method using the catalyst
JPH06165919A (ja) * 1992-11-30 1994-06-14 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd 亜酸化窒素の除去方法
JPH0760126A (ja) * 1993-08-27 1995-03-07 Babcock Hitachi Kk 排ガス中の亜酸化窒素除去用触媒
JPH07155554A (ja) * 1993-12-10 1995-06-20 Sekiyu Sangyo Kasseika Center 窒素酸化物の接触還元方法
US5776423A (en) 1994-05-10 1998-07-07 Engelhard Corporation Trimetallic zeolite catalyst and method of NOx abatement using the same
US5451387A (en) 1994-07-07 1995-09-19 Mobil Oil Corporation Selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides using an iron impregnated zeolite catalyst
US5520895A (en) 1994-07-07 1996-05-28 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for the reduction of nitrogen oxides using iron impregnated zeolites
US5482692A (en) 1994-07-07 1996-01-09 Mobil Oil Corporation Selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides using a ferrocene impregnated zeolite catalyst
US5552129A (en) 1994-07-07 1996-09-03 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic system for the reduction of nitrogen oxides
US5589147A (en) 1994-07-07 1996-12-31 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic system for the reducton of nitrogen oxides
EP0756891A1 (fr) * 1995-07-26 1997-02-05 Corning Incorporated Zéolithe de fer pour la conversion de NOx
DE60038075T2 (de) 1999-07-02 2009-02-19 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Yokohama-shi Abgasreinigungssystem
WO2001030696A1 (fr) 1999-10-28 2001-05-03 The Regents Of The University Of California Catalyseur pour reduire les gaz d'echappement d'un moteur a melange pauvre
DE10020100A1 (de) * 2000-04-22 2001-10-31 Dmc2 Degussa Metals Catalysts Verfahren und Katalysator zur Reduktion von Stickoxiden
US7438878B2 (en) * 2001-03-12 2008-10-21 Basf Catalysts Llc Selective catalytic reduction of N2O

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GONGSHIN QI ET AL.: "A SUPERIOR CATALYST FOR LOW-TEMPERATURE NO REDUCTION WITH NH3" CHEM. COMMUN., 3 March 2003 (2003-03-03), pages 848-849, XP002596639 *
See also references of WO2006031297A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1791621A4 (fr) 2010-09-22
JP2008508090A (ja) 2008-03-21
CA2575338C (fr) 2015-09-01
US20060159607A1 (en) 2006-07-20
WO2006031297A2 (fr) 2006-03-23
CA2575338A1 (fr) 2006-03-23
WO2006031297A3 (fr) 2006-04-27
US7413720B2 (en) 2008-08-19
JP5354903B2 (ja) 2013-11-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7691769B2 (en) Catalyst for reduction of nitrogen oxides
US7413720B2 (en) Catalyst and method for reduction of nitrogen oxides
JP2020116573A (ja) リーン/リッチエージングに対する耐久性を有する窒素酸化物の還元のための小細孔分子篩担持銅触媒
EP2150328B1 (fr) PROCÉDÉ ET SYSTÈME SCR UTILISANT CATALYSEUR ZÉOLITIQUE À BASE DE Cu/SAPO-34
US20150375221A1 (en) Oxidation Catalyst for a Lean Burn Internal Combustion Engine
WO2006013998A1 (fr) Procédé pour la réduction catalytique des oxydes d’azote
EP3463629B1 (fr) Procédé et système d'échappement pour traiter des nox dans un gaz d'échappement provenant de sources d'émission fixes
JP2008531260A (ja) 炭化水素またはアルコールにより排気流中の窒素酸化物を還元するための触媒および方法
US6143681A (en) NOx reduction catalyst
WO2004002611A1 (fr) Catalyseur nh3 scr a base de zeolite contenant de l'oxyde de cerium dope
EP0945166B1 (fr) Catalyseur pour la réduction de NOx dans des gaz de combustion
KR20210087743A (ko) 촉매 및 촉매의 제조 방법
JP3994862B2 (ja) 排ガス浄化触媒及び浄化方法
US5869013A (en) Process and catalyst for reducing Nox in exhaust combustion gases
Ott Catalyst for reduction of nitrogen oxides
Ott Catalyst and method for reduction of nitrogen oxides
WO1999003579A1 (fr) Catalyseur de reduction des oxydes d'azote
JPH11342336A (ja) 窒素酸化物の分解除去用触媒a及び窒素酸化物の分解除去方法
JPH06254352A (ja) 燃焼排ガスの浄化方法および該方法に用いられる触媒
Constantinou Performance of a perovskite-based lean-NOX-Trap catalyst and effects of thermal degradation and sulfur poisoning
JP2004261754A (ja) 排ガス浄化触媒及び浄化方法
JPH09299805A (ja) NOx含有排ガス浄化用触媒、その製造方法及びNOx含有排ガスの浄化方法
MING THE SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION OF NITRIC OXIDE BY PROPYLENE OVER BIMETALLIC CeO2-ZrO2 SUPPORTED CATALYST
Liu et al. 5 Selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides by NH3
JPH09253450A (ja) 燃焼排ガスの浄化方法、その浄化用触媒及びその製造方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070224

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20100825

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20110819

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R003

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20170605