EP0324068B1 - Verfahren zur Bewältigung des Personenverkehrs auf der Haupthaltestelle einer Aufzugsanlage - Google Patents
Verfahren zur Bewältigung des Personenverkehrs auf der Haupthaltestelle einer Aufzugsanlage Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0324068B1 EP0324068B1 EP88117726A EP88117726A EP0324068B1 EP 0324068 B1 EP0324068 B1 EP 0324068B1 EP 88117726 A EP88117726 A EP 88117726A EP 88117726 A EP88117726 A EP 88117726A EP 0324068 B1 EP0324068 B1 EP 0324068B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- cage
- lift
- load
- algorithm
- conveying performance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/24—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration
- B66B1/2408—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration where the allocation of a call to an elevator car is of importance, i.e. by means of a supervisory or group controller
- B66B1/2458—For elevator systems with multiple shafts and a single car per shaft
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
- B66B2201/20—Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
- B66B2201/215—Transportation capacity
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
- B66B2201/20—Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
- B66B2201/222—Taking into account the number of passengers present in the elevator car to be allocated
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for coping with the building-filling passenger traffic at a main stop of an elevator group consisting of at least one elevator with an elevator car, the elevator cars being dispatched from the main stop as a function of the building-filling passenger traffic.
- a dispatch control for an elevator group consisting of several elevators according to EP-A2 0 030 163 is known, in which the dispatch interval relates to an approximate round trip time of an elevator car or to an average round trip time which results from the three preceding, approximate round trip times.
- the round trip time is divided by the number of elevator cars involved in the operation of the main stop. This results in an average sending interval time.
- the approximate round trip time is the expected time that the elevator car needs for the ascent, the operation of the car calls registered at the main stop and for the return trip to the main stop and is calculated from building parameters, system parameters and operating parameters. If, after the calculated interval time, the elevator car has less than half the nominal load, the calculated interval time is reduced as a function of the cars available at the main stop. If, after the calculated interval time, the elevator car has at least half the nominal load, the calculated interval time is shortened in the same way, but with a different weighting of the available cars.
- the disadvantage of this known control is that the current send interval time is determined on the basis of approximate round trip times calculated from the data of the past. At best, this can be used to estimate the sending interval required to cope with the actual volume of traffic.
- Another disadvantage is that the control system only differentiates between a departure load that is less than half the nominal load and a departure load that is at least equal to half the nominal load, thereby reducing the interval time due to the cabins available at the main stop. This in turn results in an approximate adaptation to the effective fluctuations in traffic. Both disadvantages result in the elevator cabs not being used optimally.
- the invention seeks to remedy this.
- the invention as characterized in the claims, solves the problem of designing a method in such a way that quantitative and qualitative optimization of the filling traffic in buildings with elevator systems is ensured.
- the advantages achieved by the invention are essentially to be seen in the fact that neither congestion nor gaps can form when handling passenger traffic at the main stop.
- the cabin load is measured in such a way that the lift capacity of the elevator group and the actual traffic volume are in balance.
- Another advantage is that if one or more elevator cars fail, the delivery capacity of the failed elevator cars is automatically allocated to the other elevator cars in the elevator group.
- Another advantage is that, according to the method according to the invention, the transport offer at the main stop is also based on the transport demand in the case of non-upward peak traffic is voted.
- Another advantage is that different nominal loads of the elevator cars are taken into account when allocating the conveying capacity.
- Another advantage is that several elevator cars can execute their orders independently of one another.
- the volume of traffic at the main stop is determined centrally and managed decentrally by the elevator cars.
- a reference symbol indexed with .X refers to one of the sensors A; B ... N. Steps are shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 in which it is checked whether constants, status variables or variables satisfy the triangularly framed conditions positively or negatively. A positive result of a test is identified by the reference symbol J, a negative result of a test is identified by the reference symbol N in the respective test step.
- a conveyor machine labeled MOTOR.1 drives an elevator car KABINE.1 of the elevator 1.
- the MOTOR.1 carrier is supplied with electrical energy by a SYSTEM.1 drive system, which is controlled by an elevator control unit CONTROL.1.
- load measuring devices or people counting devices are provided as design variants of a sensor SENSOR.1 arranged on the elevator car CABIN.1.
- the sensor SENSOR.1 is connected to the elevator control CONTROL1.
- elevator controls CONTROL.2; STEUERUNG.3 ... STEUERUNG.n, sensors SENSOR.2; SENSOR.3 ... SENSOR.n and the elevator cars, not shown, CABIN.2; KABINE.3 ... KABINE.n correspond in structure and function to elevator 1.
- SENSOR.A; SENSOR.B ... SENSOR.N The designated sensors record the incoming, building-filling passenger traffic at the main stop MAIN STOP.
- a process computer RECHNER stands with the elevator controls CONTROL 1; STEUERUNG.2 ... STEUERUNG.n, with the sensors SENSOR.A; SENSOR.B ...
- REGLER implemented in the process computer RECHNER controls together with lower-level algorithms REGLER.1; REGLER.2 ... REGLER.n the building-filling passenger traffic at the main stop MAIN STOP.
- RECHNER REGULATORS
- CONTROLLER 1 REGLER.2 ... REGLER.n
- the main stop, MAIN STOP has sensors SENSOR.A; for the detection of incoming, building-filling passenger traffic.
- SENSOR.B ... SENSOR.N light barriers, turnstiles, infrared detectors, field detectors or call registration devices.
- the building-filling passenger traffic departing from the main MAIN STOP station is served by the KABINE.1; KABINE.2 ... KABINE.n arranged sensors SENSOR.1; SENSOR.2 ... SENSOR.n recorded and sent to the elevator controls CONTROL1.
- the higher-level algorithm REGULATOR regulates a corrected, total departure load ASL with a proportional, integral and differential control characteristic from the traffic volume UT and the actual departure load LFB, from which a total delivery rate TTC for the elevator group is derived.
- a conveying capacity per PTC load component results from the total conveying capacity TTC and a total nominal load LC of the elevator group.
- a delivery rate TC.x determined for the respective elevator car KABINE.x is calculated from the delivery rate per load share PTC and a load share LS.x dependent on the respective elevator car KABINE.x.
- the higher-level algorithm REGLER checks whether the total delivery capacity TTC is sufficiently large for an allocation based on the nominal load and whether the nominal load-dependent output TC.x is at least one. Depending on the result of the test, the higher-level algorithm CONTROLLER allocates the delivery rate TC.x calculated from the total delivery rate TTC or a predetermined delivery rate TC.x.
- the constants load component LS.1; LS.2 ... LS.n, total nominal load LC, sampling time ST, number of lifts NOC, gain factor GAN, integration time INT and calibration factor CF can be freely selected via the input / output unit TERMINAL.
- the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x determines a round trip time RT.x for each trip and increases a number of trips CR.x by one. An average round trip time ART.x is then calculated from the sum of the previous round trip times and the number of trips. Combining the mean round trip time ART.x with the allocated, imported conveying capacity TC.x results in a target departure load SL.x for the respective elevator car KABINE.x. In a further step, the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x controls a corrected departure load ASL.x with a proportional, integral and differential control characteristic from the target departure load SL.x and the imported actual departure load LFB.x.
- the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x continuously compares the actual departure load LFB.x with the corrected departure load ASL.x.
- a subordinate algorithm REGLER.x exports a door closing command DC.x to the elevator control CONTROL.x.
- the constants door opening time DT.x, statistical cycle time SRT.x, gain factor GAN.x, integration time INT.x, the status variables elevator entrance CA.x, elevator start CS.x and the variable actual departure load LFB.x are from the entrance / Output unit TERMINAL and data imported from the elevator control unit STEUERUNG.x.
- the actual shutdown load LFB.x is exported for further processing by the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x according to the superordinate algorithm REGLER.
- step S1 all the constants and variables used in the higher-level algorithm CONTROLLER are brought once to the initial state in a known manner.
- the determination of the delivery rate begins with step S2, in which it is checked whether the constant sampling time ST imported from the input / output unit TERMINAL has expired.
- a positive result of Check justifies entry into the import procedure shown in step S3. It takes over from the sensors SENSOR.A; SENSOR.B ... SENSOR.N generated traffic volume UT.A; UT.B ... UT.N and those of the subordinate algorithms REGLER.1; REGLER.2 ... REGLER.n exported actual departure loads LFB.1; LFB.2 ...
- step S4 the traffic volume UT and the total actual departure load LFB for the elevator group are calculated.
- the control process carried out in step S5 to correct the shutdown load ASL is explained in more detail in FIG. 5.
- the departure load ASL multiplied by the calibration factor CF in step S6 gives the total conveying capacity TTC for the elevator group.
- the nominal load-dependent distribution of the total conveying capacity to the subordinate algorithms REGLER.1; REGLER.2 ... REGLER.n takes place in steps S7; S8 ... S13.
- step S7 the delivery rate per load component PTC is calculated by relating the total delivery rate TTC to the nominal load LC of the elevator group.
- step S8 it is checked whether the total conveying capacity TTC is less than or equal to the number of elevators NOC.
- a positive result of the test justifies entry into the selection procedure shown in step S9. It divides the total delivery rate TTC regardless of the nominal load in such a way that the delivery rates TC.1, TC.2 ... TC.n are at most one.
- the symbol used in the selection procedure: means that the variable to the left of the symbol takes the variable value to the right of the symbol. If, for example, the total conveying capacity TTC has a value of two, the conveying capacity TC.1 and the conveying capacity TC.2 are each assigned an elevator passenger.
- the other funding services TC.3; TC.4 ... TC.n is assigned a zero or no delivery rate.
- step S10 the delivery rate TC.x is dependent determined by the load share LS.x of the respective elevator car KABINE.x.
- the load share LS.x relates directly to the nominal load of the respective elevator car KABINE.x.
- variable delivery rate TC.x is consequently overwritten after the end of step S10 with the value of the delivery rate TC.x calculated at the beginning of step S10 plus the value of the delivery rate error TCE.
- the meaning of the delivery rate error TCE is explained in more detail in steps S12 and S13.
- step S11 it is checked whether the conveying capacity TC.x to be allocated to the respective elevator car KABINE.x is less than one. A positive result of the test justifies the start of the actions listed in step S13.
- the value of the delivery rate TC.x calculated in step S10 is assigned to the delivery rate error TCE together with the previous value of the delivery rate error TCE in step S13.
- the TC.x output is then assigned the value zero or no output.
- Step S13 is always important if there are nominal load-dependent delivery capacities that are less than one and therefore cannot be carried out.
- each delivery rate calculation results in a delivery rate TC.x less than one. This would result in a non-allocation of elevator passengers registered at the main stop MAIN STOP. Therefore, in step S13, delivery capacities TC.x, which are less than one, are recorded with the variable delivery performance error TCE, if necessary summed up and taken into account in the subsequent calculation of the delivery performance TC.x.
- a negative result of the test performed in step S11 justifies execution of the one shown in step S12 Action, namely the resetting of the delivery error TCE.
- step S14 those from step S9 or from steps S10; S11 ... S13 resulting funding TC.1; TC.2 ... TC.n according to the subordinate algorithms REGLER.1; CONTROLLER.2 ... CONTROLLER.n exported.
- REGLER.1; CONTROLLER.2 ... CONTROLLER.n exported.
- step S1 shows the structure and the sequential sequence of the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x.
- a step S2 all the constants, status variables and variables used in the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x are brought once to the initial state in a known manner.
- the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x is activated, as shown in step S2, when the respective elevator car KABINE.x enters the main stop MAIN STOP. The entrance is checked using the elevator entry CA.x status variable imported from the elevator control unit CONTROL.x.
- a positive result of the test justifies the execution of the test shown in step S3, in which it is determined whether the respective elevator car KABINE.x still has its first journey ahead of it or whether it is already integrated into normal elevator operation.
- a positive result of the test justifies the sequence for normal operation starting with step S4.
- step S6 A negative result of the test justifies the start of the process for the execution of the first trip.
- step S3 the process to be followed for the execution of the first trip is explained, and then the process to be followed for normal operation is explained in more detail. If it is clear on the basis of the test carried out in step S3 that the respective elevator car KABINE.x has not yet carried out a journey, then steps S4 and S5 are skipped and the test shown in step S6 is initiated, which determines is whether the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x was really allocated funding to TC.x. The procedure that follows if the test is positive is explained in the handling of the procedure for normal operation. A negative result of the test carried out in step S6 justifies the execution of step S13.
- step S15 is carried out in which the calculation of the target departure load for the first journey from the allocated conveying capacity TC.x and the statistically determined round trip time SRT.x takes place.
- the subsequent execution of steps S16; S17 ... S24 are essentially responsible for checking and checking the cabin loading. Steps S16; S17 ... S24 are explained in more detail when dealing with the sequence for normal operation.
- a negative result of the test carried out in step S25 justifies the execution of step S30, in which the variable number of trips CR.x is set from zero to one.
- the actual departure load LFB.x which has been checked after the cabin loading, is then transmitted to the higher-level algorithm REGLER shown in step S31.
- REGLER.x the sequence for executing the first trip is thus ended.
- the normal operation procedure begins when the respective elevator car KABINE.x is re-entered at the MAIN STOP main stop.
- the data obtained from the first trip serve as a loader for determining the variable values of the subsequent trips.
- the first cabin loading only runs in a controlled manner and, together with the execution of the first trip, serves as the basis for the subsequent execution of the sequence for normal operation.
- step S4 The sequence for normal operation begins with the renewed entry of the respective elevator car KABINE.x determined in step S2 at the main stop MAIN STOP. If the test carried out in step S3 is positive fails, step S4 is initiated. The round trip time RT.x of the previous trip is evaluated and in step S5 the average round trip time ART.x is determined from the sum of all round trip times and the number of trips CR.x.
- the sequence that follows if the result of the test carried out in step S6 is positive is explained in the treatment of the sequence for zero delivery. A negative result of the test carried out in step S6 justifies the execution of step S13 and, since the first journey has already been carried out, of step S19.
- step S19 With the start of the door opening time DT.x in step S19, the loading of the respective elevator car KABINE.x is initiated.
- the iteration procedure of step S20 checks the current actual departure load LFB.x and the door opening time DT.x. As soon as the respective elevator car KABINE.x has an actual departure load LFB.x that corresponds to the corrected departure load ASL.x or as soon as the constant door opening time DT.x imported by the input / output unit TERMINAL has elapsed, the door closing command shown in step S21 becomes DC.x exported to the elevator control STEUERUNG.x.
- step S22 checks the status variable Elevator Start CS.x until a value imported by the elevator control CONTROL.x meets the condition shown in step S22.
- the round trip time RT.x is started in step S23 and the current actual departure load LFB.x is measured in step S24.
- the sequence for normal operation continues with step S26, in which the target departure load SL.x is determined on the basis of the specified delivery rate TC.x and the mean round trip time ART.x.
- step S27 it is checked whether the target departure load SL.x calculated in step S26 is smaller than an elevator passenger.
- a positive result of the test results in the target departure load SL.x being set to one in step S28 and a reduction in the delivery capacity TC.x by one.
- the in step S29 The control process carried out to correct the shutdown load ASL.x is explained in more detail in FIG. 6.
- a cycle for normal operation of the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x is ended with the steps S30 and S31 explained in the sequence for the first trip. Another cycle begins as soon as the respective elevator car KABINE.x arrives at the MAIN STOP main stop.
- step S6 A positive result of the check for zero delivery performance carried out in step S6 initiates a check for passengers in the cabin shown in step S7.
- step S10 the control algorithm explained in FIG. 6 is brought into the initial state and the variable delivery rate TC.x is then checked in step S11. A renewed allocation of delivery performance triggers step S12.
- step S12 justifies the calculation of the target departure load SL.x, which is necessary after a new allocation of the conveying capacity, on the basis of the previous average round trip time ART.x.
- step S12 justifies step S15 explained in the sequence for the first trip.
- the subsequent steps S16 and S17 correspond to the steps S27 and S28 explained in the sequence for normal operation.
- step S18 the target departure load SL.x calculated in step S14 or S15 is allocated to the corrected departure load ASL.x for the first journey after a zero delivery rate. The rest of the process for zero delivery corresponds to the process for normal operation.
- FIG. 5 shows the control algorithm of the higher-level algorithm REGLER and FIG. 6 shows the control algorithm of the subordinate algorithm REGLER.x.
- Both control algorithms are structurally the same. They are dealt with below.
- the shutdown load is regulated with a proportional, an integral and a not shown, differential control characteristic.
- the differential control characteristic results from a differential departure load error and a differential component calculated on the basis of the differential departure load error, the amplification factor, the differentiation time and the sampling time.
- a control algorithm with a dead-beat control characteristic is provided.
- a control algorithm with a state / observer control characteristic is provided.
- a shutdown load error SLE SLE.x from the difference between the traffic volume UT or the target departure load SL.x and the actual departure load LFB; LFB.x determined.
- a proportional part PPA is calculated; PPA.x and in step S4 the calculation of an integral part IPA; IPA.x.
- both components add up to the corrected departure load ASL; ASL.x.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Elevator Control (AREA)
- Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
- Control Of Vehicle Engines Or Engines For Specific Uses (AREA)
- Escalators And Moving Walkways (AREA)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT88117726T ATE70522T1 (de) | 1988-01-14 | 1988-10-25 | Verfahren zur bewaeltigung des personenverkehrs auf der haupthaltestelle einer aufzugsanlage. |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CH108/88 | 1988-01-14 | ||
CH10888 | 1988-01-14 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0324068A1 EP0324068A1 (de) | 1989-07-19 |
EP0324068B1 true EP0324068B1 (de) | 1991-12-18 |
Family
ID=4179452
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP88117726A Expired - Lifetime EP0324068B1 (de) | 1988-01-14 | 1988-10-25 | Verfahren zur Bewältigung des Personenverkehrs auf der Haupthaltestelle einer Aufzugsanlage |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4930603A (sv) |
EP (1) | EP0324068B1 (sv) |
JP (1) | JP2592516B2 (sv) |
CN (1) | CN1015700B (sv) |
AT (1) | ATE70522T1 (sv) |
CA (1) | CA1313714C (sv) |
DE (1) | DE3867058D1 (sv) |
ES (1) | ES2029312T3 (sv) |
FI (1) | FI97796C (sv) |
HK (1) | HK21493A (sv) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5235143A (en) * | 1991-11-27 | 1993-08-10 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator system having dynamically variable door dwell time based upon average waiting time |
US5329076A (en) * | 1992-07-24 | 1994-07-12 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator car dispatcher having artificially intelligent supervisor for crowds |
FI118732B (sv) | 2000-12-08 | 2008-02-29 | Kone Corp | Hiss |
US6439349B1 (en) | 2000-12-21 | 2002-08-27 | Thyssen Elevator Capital Corp. | Method and apparatus for assigning new hall calls to one of a plurality of elevator cars |
ES2302816T3 (es) | 2001-06-21 | 2008-08-01 | Kone Corporation | Ascensor. |
US9573792B2 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2017-02-21 | Kone Corporation | Elevator |
FI119234B (sv) * | 2002-01-09 | 2008-09-15 | Kone Corp | Hiss |
WO2007014477A2 (de) * | 2005-08-04 | 2007-02-08 | Inventio Ag | Verfahren zur zuteilung eines benutzers zu einer aufzugsanlage |
EP2178782B1 (en) | 2007-08-06 | 2012-07-11 | Thyssenkrupp Elevator Capital Corporation | Control for limiting elevator passenger tympanic pressure and method for the same |
US8151943B2 (en) | 2007-08-21 | 2012-04-10 | De Groot Pieter J | Method of controlling intelligent destination elevators with selected operation modes |
CN103663015A (zh) * | 2013-12-06 | 2014-03-26 | 江苏蒙哥马利电梯有限公司 | 一种电梯停车控制方法 |
EP3604194A1 (en) * | 2018-08-01 | 2020-02-05 | Otis Elevator Company | Tracking service mechanic status during entrapment |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3422928A (en) * | 1964-04-23 | 1969-01-21 | Otis Elevator Co | Analog computer variable interval dispatcher for an elevator system with trip time as a measure of traffic |
US4112419A (en) * | 1975-03-28 | 1978-09-05 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Apparatus for detecting the number of objects |
US4058187A (en) * | 1975-09-04 | 1977-11-15 | United Technologies Corporation | Limited stop elevator dispatching system |
US4305479A (en) * | 1979-12-03 | 1981-12-15 | Otis Elevator Company | Variable elevator up peak dispatching interval |
JPS59153770A (ja) * | 1983-02-21 | 1984-09-01 | 三菱電機株式会社 | エレベ−タの管理装置 |
US4846311A (en) * | 1988-06-21 | 1989-07-11 | Otis Elevator Company | Optimized "up-peak" elevator channeling system with predicted traffic volume equalized sector assignments |
-
1988
- 1988-10-25 EP EP88117726A patent/EP0324068B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-10-25 ES ES198888117726T patent/ES2029312T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-10-25 DE DE8888117726T patent/DE3867058D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-10-25 AT AT88117726T patent/ATE70522T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1988-12-30 FI FI886041A patent/FI97796C/sv not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1989
- 1989-01-05 CA CA000587590A patent/CA1313714C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1989-01-12 JP JP1005851A patent/JP2592516B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1989-01-12 CN CN89101110A patent/CN1015700B/zh not_active Expired
- 1989-01-12 US US07/296,536 patent/US4930603A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1993
- 1993-03-11 HK HK214/93A patent/HK21493A/xx not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FI97796C (sv) | 1997-02-25 |
JPH01209290A (ja) | 1989-08-23 |
FI97796B (sv) | 1996-11-15 |
ATE70522T1 (de) | 1992-01-15 |
CN1015700B (zh) | 1992-03-04 |
JP2592516B2 (ja) | 1997-03-19 |
HK21493A (en) | 1993-03-19 |
CA1313714C (en) | 1993-02-16 |
CN1039229A (zh) | 1990-01-31 |
EP0324068A1 (de) | 1989-07-19 |
US4930603A (en) | 1990-06-05 |
ES2029312T3 (es) | 1992-08-01 |
FI886041A (sv) | 1989-07-15 |
DE3867058D1 (de) | 1992-01-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0321657B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Steuerung der Absendung von Aufzugskabinen von der Haupthaltestelle bei Aufwärtsspitzenverkehr | |
EP0324068B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Bewältigung des Personenverkehrs auf der Haupthaltestelle einer Aufzugsanlage | |
EP0032213B1 (de) | Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge | |
EP0443188B1 (de) | Verfahren und Einrichtung zur sofortigen Zielrufzuteilung bei Aufzugsgrupppen, aufgrund von Bedienungskosten und von variablen Bonus-/Malus-Faktoren | |
EP0440967B1 (de) | Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit vom Rufeingabeort auf einem Stockwerk abhängiger Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen | |
EP0356731B1 (de) | Gruppensteuerung mit Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen | |
DE112009002258B4 (de) | Fahrstuhlgruppen-Verwaltungssystem | |
EP0246395B1 (de) | Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge | |
EP0091554B1 (de) | Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit einer Einrichtung für die Steuerung des Abwärtsspitzenverkehrs | |
EP0301173B1 (de) | Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge | |
DE69208843T2 (de) | Verwendung von Fuzzy-Logik zur Bestimmung der Anzahl der ein- und ausssteigenden Passagiere bei einer Aufzugskabine | |
EP0365782B1 (de) | Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Gruppensteuerung von Aufzügen mit Doppelkabinen | |
DE3611173A1 (de) | Fahrstuhlanlage mit mehrabteilkabinen-rufzuweisung | |
EP0378834B1 (de) | Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen | |
WO2020212061A1 (de) | Verfahren zur prädiktion einer verkehrssituation für ein fahrzeug | |
EP0291553B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Regelung einer Differential-Dosierwaage, insbesondere für Schüttgüter, und Differential-Dosierwaage zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
EP0419802B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Behandlung von in Aufzugskabinen abgesetzten Zielrufen | |
EP0308590B1 (de) | Gruppensteuerung für Aufzüge mit Sofortzuteilung von Zielrufen | |
DE2411861A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum verteilen der stockwerksrufe auf eine mehrzahl von aufzuegen | |
DE69738638T2 (de) | System zum testen von echtzeit/netzunabhängigen anwendungen | |
DE112013007085B4 (de) | Aufzugsteuersystem | |
DE4400031A1 (de) | Einrichtung und Verfahren zur Produktionsplanung | |
WO2012004274A1 (de) | Elektronische vorrichtung mit kühlvorrichtung | |
DE10138240B4 (de) | Adaptionsverfahren für die Steuerung von Schaltelementen | |
EP0735786A2 (de) | Verfahren zur Überlastabwehr in einem Kommunikationsnetz |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19891216 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19910205 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 70522 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19920115 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3867058 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19920130 |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) | ||
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L. |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2029312 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20071030 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20071025 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20071016 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20071015 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20071025 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20071023 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20071016 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20080117 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20081024 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20081025 |
|
NLV7 | Nl: ceased due to reaching the maximum lifetime of a patent |
Effective date: 20081025 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20081027 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20081027 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20081024 |