WO2014054232A1 - 情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および情報システム構築支援プログラム - Google Patents
情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および情報システム構築支援プログラム Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2014054232A1 WO2014054232A1 PCT/JP2013/005469 JP2013005469W WO2014054232A1 WO 2014054232 A1 WO2014054232 A1 WO 2014054232A1 JP 2013005469 W JP2013005469 W JP 2013005469W WO 2014054232 A1 WO2014054232 A1 WO 2014054232A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- construction
- system model
- server element
- information
- requirement
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3447—Performance evaluation by modeling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/50—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/067—Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3409—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment for performance assessment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3466—Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring
- G06F11/3495—Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring for systems
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an information system construction support apparatus, an information system construction support method, and an information system construction support program.
- Patent Document 1 discloses an information processing apparatus that builds an execution environment of an application in the cloud environment when an execution of the application is requested from a user terminal in an information system in the cloud environment.
- Patent Document 1 an execution environment is set in advance for each combination of resources or middleware included in the operation requirements of an application.
- the information processing apparatus selects an execution environment satisfying the operation requirements of the application from preset execution environments. That is, the user operates the application under an execution environment that satisfies all the operation requirements of the application requested to be executed.
- the information processing apparatus relaxes the requirements.
- Patent Document 1 does not disclose a means for recognizing what kind of environment is given if what requirements are relaxed to what extent. Therefore, in such a case, in order to obtain a satisfactory environment, the user needs to repeat trial and error using various requirements.
- the present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and an information system construction support apparatus, an information system construction support method, and an information system construction support capable of easily realizing construction support in accordance with a user's request.
- One of the purposes is to provide a program.
- An information system construction support apparatus includes a system model that is set in a pre-stored system design information unit when a construction requirement of a construction planned system that is a planned information system is input. Based on the system model selection unit that selects the system model satisfying the construction requirement from among the system model, the system model selected by the system model selection unit, and a similar system model similar to the system model When evaluating the performance of the system model using an operation information acquisition unit that acquires operation information of an existing system that is an information system being used, and parameters included in the operation information acquired by the operation information acquisition unit A parameter calculation unit for calculating an evaluation parameter to be used for the calculation, and the parameter calculation The performance evaluation unit that evaluates the performance of the system model selected by the system model selection unit using the evaluation parameter calculated by the method, the performance of the system model evaluated by the performance evaluation unit, and the input Is included in the design information of the system model selected by the system model selection unit while maintaining at least the construction requirement set as essential among the construction requirements.
- the server element determination unit that determines whether or not
- An information system construction support method includes a system model that is set in a design information unit of a system that is stored in advance when a construction requirement of a construction planned system that is a planned information system is input.
- the system model selection step for selecting the system model satisfying the construction requirement from among the system model, the system model selected in the system model selection step, and a similar system model similar to the system model
- an operation information acquisition step for acquiring operation information of an existing system, which is an information system being used, and parameters included in the operation information acquired in the operation information acquisition step
- a server element determination step for determining whether or not a server element which is an element for determining a size of the server included in the design information of the model is determined, and a determination that the server element is not determined in the server element determination step.
- An information system construction support program is set in a design information unit of a system stored in advance when a construction requirement of a construction planned system that is a planned information system is input to a computer.
- a system model selection step for selecting the system model satisfying the construction requirements from among the system models, the system model selected in the system model selection step, and a similar system model similar to the system model Using the parameters included in the operation information acquired in the operation information acquisition step, and the operation information acquisition step of acquiring operation information of the existing system that is an already constructed information system.
- Evaluation parameters used for evaluation A parameter calculation step for calculating the performance, a performance evaluation step for evaluating the performance of the system model selected in the system model selection step using the evaluation parameters calculated in the parameter calculation step, and the performance evaluation step
- the performance of the system model evaluated in step 1 is compared with the input construction requirement, and the construction requirement set at least essential among the construction requirements is maintained.
- the object of the present invention is also achieved by a computer-readable recording medium storing the above program.
- FIG. 1 It is a figure which illustrates the composition of the information system construction support device in the embodiment of the present invention.
- the information system construction support apparatus evaluates the performance of various information systems constructed using virtual machines in a cloud environment, and exchanges information with the user to construct an information system that meets the construction requirements presented by the user. It is a device that supports while performing.
- the information system construction support apparatus 1 functionally includes, for example, a system model selection unit 11, an operation information acquisition unit 12, a parameter calculation unit 13, a performance evaluation unit 14, and a sizing factor. It has the determination part 15, the sizing factor calculation part 16, the relaxation condition presentation part 17, and the construction candidate presentation part 18.
- each block diagram is a configuration shown for convenience of explanation.
- the present invention described by taking the embodiment as an example is not limited to the configuration shown in each block diagram in the implementation.
- FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the information system construction support apparatus 1.
- the information system construction support device 1 physically includes, for example, a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 20, a storage device 30, and an input / output interface 40.
- the storage device 30 is, for example, a ROM (Read Only Memory) or HDD (Hard Disk Drive) that stores programs and data processed by the CPU 20, and a RAM (Random Access Memory) that is mainly used as various work areas for control processing. Etc. These elements are connected to each other via a bus 50.
- the CPU 20 executes a computer program (hereinafter referred to as “program”) stored in the ROM and processes a message received via the input / output interface 40, data developed in the RAM, and the like.
- program computer program
- each unit in the information system construction support device 1 is realized.
- the present invention which will be described as an example of this embodiment and a modified example described later, is also configured by a non-volatile storage medium 60 such as a compact disk in which such a program is stored.
- the program stored in the storage medium 60 is read by the drive device 70, for example.
- the hardware configuration example of the information system construction support apparatus 1 illustrated in FIG. 12 can be applied to a modification example described later.
- the information system construction support device 1 may be a dedicated device.
- the information system construction support device 1 may be configured by connecting two or more physically separated devices in a wired or wireless manner.
- the system model selection unit 11 selects a system model that satisfies the construction requirement when the construction requirement of the information system (hereinafter referred to as “construction planned system”) that the user plans to construct from now on is input by the user.
- the system model information DB (database, hereinafter referred to as “DB”) 2 is selected with reference to FIG.
- the system model selection unit 11 selects a plurality of system models when there are a plurality of system models that satisfy the construction requirements.
- the functional requirements are conditions for determining the role played by the application, and include, for example, functions such as data processing, data store, image analysis, response creation, statistical processing, or inventory management.
- the service level requirement is a condition for determining the quality assurance level to be provided by the system to be built. For example, throughput, CPU maximum usage rate, disk maximum usage rate, network usage rate, TAT (Turn Around) Time), etc. Including assurance levels.
- the system model is a model that is set in the design information unit for constructing the information system.
- the design information includes, for example, information describing a network configuration, a server configuration, a relationship between application components, or a processing flow indicating the operation of the application.
- the system model information DB 2 is a database that stores system model information including design information of an already constructed information system (hereinafter referred to as “existing system”).
- the system model information DB 2 is designed so that system model information can be searched using the construction requirements as a key.
- the system model information DB 2 may be provided inside the information system construction support apparatus 1 or may be provided outside.
- FIG. 2 is an example of a screen used when a user constructs an information system.
- an area ga for inputting service level requirements and an area gb for inputting functional requirements are provided on the display screen GA.
- a region Gp that displays the selected one or more system models as candidates is displayed in a pop-up on the display screen GA.
- FIG. 3 shows an example of a screen configuration displayed in the service level requirement input area ga.
- a service level name item ga2 and a target value item ga3 for inputting a service level name set as a service level requirement and a target value are displayed.
- the priority in evaluating the performance of the system model becomes higher. In other words, the priority of the item input at the uppermost level is the highest, the priority is lower at the lower level, and the priority of the item input at the lowest level is the lowest.
- a mandatory item ga1 is displayed for each service level name item ga2.
- This essential item ga1 is a check item for selecting whether or not to make it a necessary requirement that the corresponding service level name item ga2 achieves the target value when evaluating the performance of the system model. .
- a check is entered in the mandatory item ga1 corresponding to “throughput” and “CPU maximum usage rate”.
- “throughput” and “CPU maximum usage rate” are essential requirements, "throughput” and “CPU maximum usage rate” have the highest priority, and "disk maximum usage rate” and “network usage rate” , "TAT” in order of decreasing priority.
- the system model candidates presented to the user are at least system models whose “throughput” is “600” or more and whose “CPU maximum utilization” is “80”% or less.
- a level bar ga4 is displayed for each service level name item ga2.
- the level bar ga4 indicates the degree of possibility that the service level name item ga2 corresponding to the level bar ga4 will achieve the target value based on the simulation result of the system model selected as the evaluation target by the user.
- FIG. 4 shows an example of the screen configuration displayed in the functional requirement selection area gb. As shown in FIG. 4, various items for selecting and inputting data processing, data store, image analysis, response creation, statistical processing, and inventory management are displayed in the functional requirement selection area gb. The user uses the functional requirement selection area gb to input a desired functional requirement for the construction scheduled system.
- FIG. 5 shows an example of a screen configuration displayed in the system model candidate display area Gp.
- an area gc for selecting a system model used for performance evaluation and an area for displaying a model diagram of the system model selected in the selection area gc gd.
- model diagrams displayed in the display area gd include an internal function correlation diagram, a function stack diagram, and a processing flow diagram.
- the user uses the system model candidate display area Gp to execute the performance evaluation of the planned construction system or the construction of the information system. Specifically, for example, the user selects one system model in the selection area gc, and clicks the similarity search button to cause the performance evaluation of the planned system to be executed. The user who accepts the evaluation result clicks the system creation button to execute the construction of the information system.
- the operation information acquisition unit 12 shown in FIG. 1 acquires operation information of an existing system constructed in the past by using the system model selected by the system model selection unit 11 from the operation information DB 3.
- the operation information of the existing system adopting the system model selected by the user in the selection area gc is acquired from the operation information DB3.
- the operation information acquisition unit 12 further acquires operation information of an existing system constructed in the past by using a system model similar to the system model selected by the system model selection unit 11 from the operation information DB 3.
- a system model similar to the system model selected by the system model selection unit 11 is referred to as a “selected system model group”.
- a system model similar to the selected system model for example, a system model having design information in which only the sizing factor of the server is different among the design information of the selected system model can be adopted.
- the server sizing factor is an element (server element) that determines the size of the server, and includes, for example, the number of servers or the number of CPU cores mounted on the server.
- the operation information is information managed by an operator who operates the information system, and includes, for example, CPU load, request processing count, hard disk failure history, and the like.
- the operation information DB 3 is a database that stores operation information of the existing system.
- the operation information DB 3 is designed so that operation information can be searched using the system model as a key.
- the operation information DB 3 may be provided inside the information system construction support device 1 or may be provided outside.
- the parameter calculation unit 13 uses the parameters included in the operation information acquired by the operation information acquisition unit 12 to perform performance, reliability, expandability, security, or mission criticality (hereinafter referred to as “MC (Mission)” of the information system.
- M (Mission) the parameters included in the operation information acquired by the operation information acquisition unit 12 to perform performance, reliability, expandability, security, or mission criticality (hereinafter referred to as “MC (Mission)” of the information system.
- M mission criticality
- the parameter for evaluation used when evaluating non-functional requirements such as “Critical” is calculated.
- the index of the non-functional requirement becomes higher as the quality index such as reliability, availability, and maintainability and the performance index such as performance are higher.
- Parameters include, for example, the arrival rate of requests, the average transmission size of application messages, the Web load expressed by average CPU time, the Web read load expressed by disk read time, the Web write load expressed by disk write time, and SQL (Structured Query Query Language)
- An average size at the time of execution, an application load expressed by average CPU time, an application write load expressed by disk write time, or the like can be used.
- the evaluation parameters are provided in accordance with the parameters included in the operation information of the selected system model group acquired by the operation information acquisition unit 12.
- an evaluation parameter value an average value of parameter values of the selected system model group is set.
- Figure 6 shows an example of the evaluation parameter display screen.
- the evaluation parameter display screen GB displays evaluation parameter item names and evaluation parameter values in a list format.
- the performance evaluation unit 14 shown in FIG. 1 evaluates the performance of the system model selected by the system model selection unit 11 using the evaluation parameters calculated by the parameter calculation unit 13.
- the sizing factor determination unit 15 compares the result evaluated by the performance evaluation unit 14 with the service level requirement input by the user, and maintains at least the service level requirement set as essential among the service level requirements. Thus, it is determined whether or not the sizing factor of the system model selected by the system model selection unit 11 is determined. The case where the sizing factor is not determined corresponds to the case where the sizing factor exceeds the specified upper limit number or lower limit number.
- the sizing factor determination unit 15 is within a range in which the performance of the system model selected by the system model selection unit 11 satisfies at least the service level requirement in which a check is input in the essential item ga1 in FIG. It is determined whether or not the sizing factor of the selected system model can be determined.
- the service level requirement for which the check is not input in the essential item ga1 of FIG. 3 may not necessarily be satisfied, but the degree of not satisfying becomes smaller as the priority corresponding to the service level requirement is higher.
- the weighting is set to determine whether or not the sizing factor is determined.
- the sizing factor calculation unit 16 calculates the sizing factor by relaxing the service level requirement input by the user.
- the degree to which the service level requirement is relaxed can be arbitrarily determined within a range in which the sizing factor is determined.
- the relaxation condition presentation unit 17 presents the service level requirements relaxed by the sizing factor calculation unit 16.
- FIG. 7B shows an example of a screen that displays relaxation conditions.
- the mitigation condition presentation screen GD displays a service level requirement name item gd1 for displaying the name of the service level requirement to be mitigated, and a target value item gd2 for displaying the target value to be mitigated.
- FIG. 7A is an example of a screen that displays a simulation result.
- an essential item gc1, a service level name item gc2, a target value item gc3, and a simulation result bar gc4 are displayed.
- the construction candidate presenting unit 18 sets an information system that can be constructed using the system model in which the sizing factor is set as a candidate for the system to be built. To present.
- FIG. 8 and FIG. 9 are flowcharts for explaining the procedure for supporting the construction of the information system.
- the system model selection unit 11 determines whether or not each input of the functional requirements and service level requirements of the system to be built has been confirmed by the user (step S101). If this determination is NO (NO in step S101), the process waits until it becomes YES.
- step S101 when it is determined in the determination in step S101 that each input of the functional requirement and the service level requirement is confirmed (YES in step S101), the system model selection unit 11 determines that the system model satisfies the functional requirement and the service level requirement. Is selected with reference to the system model information DB 2 (step S102). When there are a plurality of selected system models, the system model selected in step S102 is narrowed down to one by allowing the user to select one of the system models.
- the operation information acquisition unit 12 acquires from the operation information DB 3 the operation information of the existing system that employs the system model selected in step S102 and a system model similar to this system model (step S103).
- the parameter calculation unit 13 uses the parameters included in the operation information acquired in step S103 to calculate evaluation parameters used when evaluating the non-functional requirements of the information system (step S104).
- the performance evaluation unit 14 evaluates the performance of the system model selected in step S102 using the evaluation parameters calculated in step S104 (step S105).
- the sizing factor determination unit 15 compares the result evaluated in step S105 with the service level requirement input in step S101, and the service level requirement set at least as essential among the service level requirements. Whether or not the sizing factor in the system model selected in step S102 is determined is determined (step S106).
- step S106 When the determination in step S106 is NO (NO in step S106), the sizing factor calculation unit 16 relaxes the service level requirement input in step S101, and in the system model selected in step S102. A sizing factor is calculated (step S107).
- the mitigation condition presentation unit 17 presents the service level requirement relaxed in step S107 to the user (step S108).
- step S109 the process waits until the re-input of the service level requirement is confirmed (NO in step S109), and when the re-input of the service level requirement is confirmed (YES in step S109), the process proceeds to the above-described step S102.
- step S106 when it is determined in step S106 that the sizing factor in the system model is determined (YES in step S106), the construction candidate presentation unit 18 uses the system model after the sizing factor is set in step S106. An information system that can be constructed is presented to the user as a candidate for a construction-scheduled system (step S110).
- the system model selection unit 11 selects a system model that satisfies the functional requirements and service level requirements input by the user.
- the operation information acquisition unit 12 acquires operation information of an existing system corresponding to the selected system model group.
- the parameter calculation unit 13 calculates an evaluation parameter using a parameter included in the acquired operation information.
- the performance evaluation unit 14 evaluates the performance of the selected system model using the evaluation parameters.
- the sizing factor determination unit 15 compares the performance of the evaluated system model with the input service level requirement to determine whether or not the sizing factor of the selected system model is determined. When it is determined that the sizing factor is not determined, the sizing factor calculation unit 16 calculates the sizing factor by relaxing the input service level requirement.
- the mitigation condition presentation unit 17 presents relaxed service level requirements.
- the information system construction support apparatus 1 can select a system model that satisfies the construction requirements input by the user as a candidate for a construction-scheduled system.
- the information system construction support device 1 can evaluate the non-functional requirements of the selected system model using the evaluation parameters calculated based on the operation information of the existing system corresponding to the selected system model group.
- the information system construction support apparatus 1 calculates the sizing factor by relaxing the service level requirement when the evaluation result is compared with the service level requirement input by the user and the sizing factor in the selected system model is not determined. And relaxed service level requirements can be presented to the user.
- construction support according to the user's request can be easily realized.
- FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating another configuration of the information system construction support apparatus according to the present invention.
- the information system construction support device 1A shown in FIG. 10 is obtained by omitting the sizing factor calculation unit 16 and the construction candidate presentation unit 18 from each function of the information system construction support device 1 shown in FIG.
- Each omitted function can be provided in an external device connectable via a network.
- the information system construction support device 1B in the modification differs from the information system construction support device 1 in the above-described embodiment in that a similarity calculation unit 19 is added, and a sizing factor determination unit 15 and a sizing factor calculation unit. A part of the 16 functions is changed. About another structure, it is the same as that of each structure of the information system construction assistance apparatus 1 in embodiment. Therefore, the same reference numerals are given to the respective components, and the description thereof is omitted. In the following, differences from the embodiment will be mainly described.
- the similarity calculation unit 19 compares the parameters included in the operation information acquired by the operation information acquisition unit 12 with the input construction requirements, and calculates the similarity with the input construction requirements for each operation information. To do.
- the sizing factor determination unit 15 and the sizing factor calculation unit 16 use the inverse of the similarity calculated by the similarity calculation unit 19 as an element of uncertainty, and perform sizing using robust optimization described later. Find the factor.
- the reciprocal of the similarity calculated by the similarity calculation unit 19 is used as an element of uncertainty, so that the construction requirement can be satisfied even if the reciprocal of the similarity reaches the worst value assumed. Set the sizing factor.
- the purpose can be achieved even when a predictable worst situation occurs.
- An information system that can be achieved can be presented to the user.
- the construction requirement of the construction planned system that is the information system to be constructed is inputted, the construction requirement that satisfies the construction requirement is selected from the system models set in the system design information unit stored in advance.
- a system model selection unit that selects a system model, an existing system that is an information system that is already constructed based on the system model selected by the system model selection unit, and a similar system model similar to the system model.
- An operation information acquisition unit that acquires operation information, and a parameter calculation that calculates an evaluation parameter used when evaluating the performance of the system model using parameters included in the operation information acquired by the operation information acquisition unit And the evaluation parameter calculated by the parameter calculation unit
- the performance evaluation unit for evaluating the performance of the system model selected by the system model selection unit is compared with the performance of the system model evaluated by the performance evaluation unit and the input construction requirement
- the size of the server included in the design information of the system model selected by the system model selection unit is determined while maintaining at least the construction requirement set as essential among the construction requirements.
- a server element determination unit that determines whether or not a server element that is an element to be determined is determined, and a relaxation condition that presents the relaxed construction requirement when the server element determination unit determines that the server element is not determined
- An information system construction support apparatus comprising: a presentation unit.
- the parameter contained in the said operation information acquired by the said operation information acquisition part is compared with the said inputted construction requirements, and the similarity with the said said construction requirements inputted for every said operation information
- the server element determination unit uses the reciprocal of the similarity calculated by the similarity calculation unit as an element of uncertainty when determining whether or not the server element is determined.
- the server element is calculated using the optimization, and the server element calculation unit uses the reciprocal of the similarity calculated by the similarity calculation unit as an element of uncertainty and uses robust optimization.
- Calculates the server element the relaxed condition presentation unit presents the said construction requirements are relaxed by the server element calculation unit, the information system configuration supporting apparatus according to Supplementary Note 1, wherein the.
- the said construction requirements are the functional requirements for determining the role which an application plays, and the service level requirements for determining the quality assurance level provided by the said construction planned system
- the said server element determination part is said performance
- the server compares the performance of the system model evaluated by the evaluation unit with the input service level requirement, and maintains the service level requirement set at least as essential among the service level requirements.
- the server element calculation unit relaxes the input service level requirement when the server element determination unit determines that the server element is not determined by the server element determination unit.
- the relaxation condition presenting unit calculates an element, and the relaxed condition presenting unit relaxes the service relaxed by the server element calculating unit. Presenting Sureberu requirements, the information system configuration supporting apparatus according to Supplementary Note 1 or 2, wherein the.
- the said similar system model is the said system model of the other said design information from which only the said server element differs among the said design information of the said system model selected by the said system model selection part, It is characterized by the above-mentioned.
- the information system construction support device according to any one of supplementary notes 1 to 4.
- a system model selection step for selecting a system model, the system model selected in the system model selection step, and an existing system that is an information system that has already been constructed based on a similar system model similar to the system model.
- An operation information acquisition step for acquiring operation information, and a parameter calculation for calculating an evaluation parameter for use in evaluating the performance of the system model, using parameters included in the operation information acquired in the operation information acquisition step.
- Step and parameter calculation step A performance evaluation step for evaluating the performance of the system model selected in the system model selection step using the evaluation parameters calculated in the step; and a performance of the system model evaluated in the performance evaluation step;
- the design information of the system model selected in the system model selection step is compared with the input construction requirements and the construction requirements set at least essential among the construction requirements are maintained.
- a server element determination step for determining whether or not a server element that is an element for determining a size of the server included is determined, and mitigation when it is determined in the server element determination step that the server element is not determined
- the mitigation condition presentation step presenting If, the information system configuration supporting method, which comprises a.
- the parameter included in the operation information acquired in the operation information acquisition step is compared with the input construction requirement, and the operation information is similar to the input construction requirement for each operation information. Similarity calculation step for calculating the degree, and server element calculation step for calculating the server element by relaxing the input construction requirement when it is determined that the server element is not determined in the server element determination step
- the server element determination step when determining whether or not the server element is determined, the reciprocal of the similarity calculated in the similarity calculation step is used as an element of uncertainty, and robust optimization is performed.
- the server element is calculated using the conversion, and the server element calculation step is calculated by the similarity calculation step.
- the server element is calculated using robust optimization using the reciprocal of the similarity as an element of uncertainty, and in the relaxation condition presentation step, the construction requirement relaxed in the server element calculation step is presented.
- the construction requirements are a functional requirement for determining a role played by an application and a service level requirement for determining a quality assurance level provided by the planned construction system.
- the server element determination step the performance The server compares the performance of the system model evaluated in the evaluation step with the input service level requirement and maintains the service level requirement set at least as essential among the service level requirements. It is determined whether or not an element is determined.
- the server element calculation step when it is determined that the server element is not determined in the server element determination step, the input service level requirement is relaxed and the server Element is calculated, and in the relaxation condition presentation step, Over bar presents a relaxed the service level requirements in element calculation step, Appendix 7 or 8 information system configuration supporting method wherein a.
- the said similar system model is the said system model of the other said design information from which only the said server element differs among the said design information of the said system model selected in the said system model selection step, It is characterized by the above-mentioned.
- the information system construction support method according to any one of appendices 7 to 10.
- a system model selection step for selecting the system model that satisfies the conditions, the system model selected in the system model selection step, and an information system that has already been constructed based on a similar system model similar to the system model
- An operation information acquisition step for acquiring operation information of an existing system, and parameters for evaluation used for evaluating the performance of the system model are calculated using parameters included in the operation information acquired in the operation information acquisition step.
- Parameter calculation step to perform Using the evaluation parameters calculated in the parameter calculation step, a performance evaluation step for evaluating the performance of the system model selected in the system model selection step, and the performance of the system model evaluated in the performance evaluation step The design information of the system model selected in the system model selection step while maintaining at least the construction requirement set to be essential among the construction requirements.
- a server element determination step for determining whether a server element that is an element for determining the size of the server included in the server is determined, and when it is determined in the server element determination step that the server element is not determined, Present relaxed construction requirements Information systems development support program for causing to execute a sum condition presenting step.
- the parameter contained in the said operation information acquired in the said operation information acquisition step is compared with the said input construction requirements, and it is similar to the said construction requirements inputted for every said operation information Similarity calculation step for calculating the degree, and server element calculation step for calculating the server element by relaxing the input construction requirement when it is determined that the server element is not determined in the server element determination step
- Similarity calculation step for calculating the degree, and server element calculation step for calculating the server element by relaxing the input construction requirement when it is determined that the server element is not determined in the server element determination step In the server element determination step, when determining whether or not the server element is determined, the reciprocal of the similarity calculated in the similarity calculation step is used as an element of uncertainty, and robust optimization is performed.
- the server element is calculated using the conversion, and the server element calculating step is calculated by the similarity calculating step.
- the reciprocal of the similarity is used as an element of uncertainty, and the server element is calculated using robust optimization.
- the relaxation condition presentation step the construction requirement relaxed in the server element calculation step is presented.
- the construction requirement is a functional requirement for determining a role played by an application and a service level requirement for determining a quality assurance level provided by the planned construction system.
- the server element determination step the performance The server compares the performance of the system model evaluated in the evaluation step with the input service level requirement and maintains the service level requirement set at least as essential among the service level requirements. It is determined whether or not an element is determined.
- the server element calculation step when it is determined that the server element is not determined in the server element determination step, the input service level requirement is relaxed and the server In the relaxation condition presentation step, the element is calculated, Presenting the service level requirements are relaxed in the server element calculation step, Appendix 13 or 14, wherein the information system configuration support program, characterized in that.
- the said similar system model is the said system model of the other said design information from which only the said server element differs among the said design information of the said system model selected in the said system model selection step, It is characterized by the above-mentioned.
- the information system construction support program according to any one of supplementary notes 13 to 16.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
ここで、情報システム構築支援装置1は、物理的には、例えば、CPU(Central Processing Unit)20と、記憶装置30と、入出力インターフェース40とを含む。記憶装置30は、例えば、CPU20で処理されるプログラムおよびデータを記憶するROM(Read Only Memory)やHDD(Hard Disk Drive)、主として制御処理のための各種作業領域として使用するRAM(Random Access Memory)等を含む。これらの各要素は、互いにバス50を介して接続する。CPU20が、ROMに記憶されたコンピュータプログラム(以下、「プログラム」と称する)を実行し、入出力インターフェースを40を介して受信されるメッセージや、RAMに展開されるデータ等を処理することで、情報システム構築支援装置1における各部の機能を実現する。尚、本実施形態および後述する変形例を例として説明される本発明は、係るプログラムが格納されたコンパクトディスク等の不揮発性の記憶媒体60によっても構成される。記憶媒体60が格納するプログラムは、例えばドライブ装置70により読み出される。図12に示す情報システム構築支援装置1のハードウェア構成例は、後述する変形例にも適用可能である。尚、情報システム構築支援装置1は専用の装置であってもよい。情報システム構築支援装置1は、2つ以上の物理的に分離した装置が有線または無線で接続されることによって構成されていてもよい。
2 システムモデル情報DB
3 運用情報DB
11 システムモデル選定部
12 運用情報取得部
13 パラメータ算出部
14 性能評価部
15 サイジングファクタ判定部
16 サイジングファクタ算出部
17 緩和条件提示部
18 構築候補提示部
19 類似度算出部
20 CPU
30 記憶装置
40 入出力インターフェース
50 バス
60 記憶媒体
70 ドライブ装置
Claims (18)
- 構築予定の情報システムである構築予定システムの構築要件が入力された場合に、予め記憶されているシステムの設計情報単位に設定されるシステムモデルの中から、前記構築要件を満たす前記システムモデルを選定するシステムモデル選定部と、
前記システムモデル選定部により選定された前記システムモデル、および当該システムモデルと類似する類似システムモデルに基づいて、既に構築されている情報システムである既存システムの運用情報を取得する運用情報取得部と、
前記運用情報取得部により取得された前記運用情報に含まれるパラメータを用いて、前記システムモデルの性能を評価する際に用いる評価用パラメータを算出するパラメータ算出部と、
前記パラメータ算出部により算出された前記評価用パラメータを用いて、前記システムモデル選定部により選定された前記システムモデルの性能を評価する性能評価部と、
前記性能評価部により評価された前記システムモデルの性能と前記入力された前記構築要件とを比較して、当該構築要件のうち少なくとも必須に設定された前記構築要件を維持したままで、前記システムモデル選定部により選定された前記システムモデルの前記設計情報に含まれるサーバの当該サーバに関するサイズを決定する要素であるサーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定するサーバ要素判定部と、
前記サーバ要素判定部により前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、緩和された前記構築要件を提示する緩和条件提示部と、
を備えることを特徴とする情報システム構築支援装置。 - 前記運用情報取得部により取得された前記運用情報に含まれるパラメータと前記入力された前記構築要件とを比較して、前記運用情報ごとに、前記入力された前記構築要件との類似度を算出する類似度算出部と、
前記サーバ要素判定部により前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、前記入力された前記構築要件を緩和して前記サーバ要素を算出するサーバ要素算出部と、をさらに備え、
前記サーバ要素判定部は、前記サーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定する際に、前記類似度算出部により算出された前記類似度の逆数を不確実性の要素とし、ロバスト最適化を用いて、前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記サーバ要素算出部は、前記類似度算出部により算出された前記類似度の逆数を不確実性の要素とし、ロバスト最適化を用いて、前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記緩和条件提示部は、前記サーバ要素算出部により緩和された前記構築要件を提示する、
ことを特徴とする請求項1記載の情報システム構築支援装置。 - 前記構築要件は、アプリケーションが果たす役割を決めるための機能要件および前記構築予定システムで提供する品質の保証レベルを決めるためのサービスレベル要件であり、
前記サーバ要素判定部は、前記性能評価部により評価された前記システムモデルの性能と前記入力された前記サービスレベル要件とを比較して、当該サービスレベル要件のうち少なくとも必須に設定された前記サービスレベル要件を維持したままで、前記サーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定し、
前記サーバ要素算出部は、前記サーバ要素判定部により前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、前記入力された前記サービスレベル要件を緩和して前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記緩和条件提示部は、前記サーバ要素算出部により緩和された前記サービスレベル要件を提示する、
ことを特徴とする請求項1または2記載の情報システム構築支援装置。 - 前記サーバ要素判定部により前記サーバ要素が定まると判定された場合に、当該サーバ要素を設定した前記システムモデルを用いて構築可能な情報システムを、前記構築予定システムの候補として提示する構築候補提示部を、さらに備えることを特徴とする請求項1~3のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援装置。
- 前記類似システムモデルは、前記システムモデル選定部により選定された前記システムモデルの前記設計情報のうち前記サーバ要素のみが異なる他の前記設計情報の前記システムモデルである、ことを特徴とする請求項1~4のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援装置。
- 前記システムモデルの性能は、非機能要件である、ことを特徴とする請求項1~5のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援装置。
- 構築予定の情報システムである構築予定システムの構築要件が入力された場合に、予め記憶されているシステムの設計情報単位に設定されるシステムモデルの中から、前記構築要件を満たす前記システムモデルを選定するシステムモデル選定ステップと、
前記システムモデル選定ステップにおいて選定された前記システムモデル、および当該システムモデルと類似する類似システムモデルに基づいて、既に構築されている情報システムである既存システムの運用情報を取得する運用情報取得ステップと、
前記運用情報取得ステップにおいて取得された前記運用情報に含まれるパラメータを用いて、前記システムモデルの性能を評価する際に用いる評価用パラメータを算出するパラメータ算出ステップと、
前記パラメータ算出ステップにおいて算出された前記評価用パラメータを用いて、前記システムモデル選定ステップにおいて選定された前記システムモデルの性能を評価する性能評価ステップと、
前記性能評価ステップにおいて評価された前記システムモデルの性能と前記入力された前記構築要件とを比較して、当該構築要件のうち少なくとも必須に設定された前記構築要件を維持したままで、前記システムモデル選定ステップにおいて選定された前記システムモデルの前記設計情報に含まれるサーバの当該サーバに関するサイズを決定する要素であるサーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定するサーバ要素判定ステップと、
前記サーバ要素判定ステップにおいて前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、緩和された前記構築要件を提示する緩和条件提示ステップと、
を含むことを特徴とする情報システム構築支援方法。 - 前記運用情報取得ステップにおいて取得された前記運用情報に含まれるパラメータと前記入力された前記構築要件とを比較して、前記運用情報ごとに、前記入力された前記構築要件との類似度を算出する類似度算出ステップと、
前記サーバ要素判定ステップにおいて前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、前記入力された前記構築要件を緩和して前記サーバ要素を算出するサーバ要素算出ステップと、をさらに含み、
前記サーバ要素判定ステップでは、前記サーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定する際に、前記類似度算出ステップにおいて算出された前記類似度の逆数を不確実性の要素とし、ロバスト最適化を用いて、前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記サーバ要素算出ステップでは、前記類似度算出ステップにより算出された前記類似度の逆数を不確実性の要素とし、ロバスト最適化を用いて、前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記緩和条件提示ステップでは、前記サーバ要素算出ステップにおいて緩和された前記構築要件を提示する、
ことを特徴とする請求項7記載の情報システム構築支援方法。 - 前記構築要件は、アプリケーションが果たす役割を決めるための機能要件および前記構築予定システムで提供する品質の保証レベルを決めるためのサービスレベル要件であり、
前記サーバ要素判定ステップでは、前記性能評価ステップにおいて評価された前記システムモデルの性能と前記入力された前記サービスレベル要件とを比較して、当該サービスレベル要件のうち少なくとも必須に設定された前記サービスレベル要件を維持したままで、前記サーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定し、
前記サーバ要素算出ステップでは、前記サーバ要素判定ステップにおいて前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、前記入力された前記サービスレベル要件を緩和して前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記緩和条件提示ステップでは、前記サーバ要素算出ステップにおいて緩和された前記サービスレベル要件を提示する、
ことを特徴とする請求項7または8記載の情報システム構築支援方法。 - 前記サーバ要素判定ステップにおいて前記サーバ要素が定まると判定された場合に、当該サーバ要素を設定した前記システムモデルを用いて構築可能な情報システムを、前記構築予定システムの候補として提示する構築候補提示ステップを、さらに含むことを特徴とする請求項7~9のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援方法。
- 前記類似システムモデルは、前記システムモデル選定ステップにおいて選定された前記システムモデルの前記設計情報のうち前記サーバ要素のみが異なる他の前記設計情報の前記システムモデルである、ことを特徴とする請求項7~10のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援方法。
- 前記システムモデルの性能は、非機能要件である、ことを特徴とする請求項7~11のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援方法。
- コンピュータに、
構築予定の情報システムである構築予定システムの構築要件が入力された場合に、予め記憶されているシステムの設計情報単位に設定されるシステムモデルの中から、前記構築要件を満たす前記システムモデルを選定するシステムモデル選定ステップと、
前記システムモデル選定ステップにおいて選定された前記システムモデル、および当該システムモデルと類似する類似システムモデルに基づいて、既に構築されている情報システムである既存システムの運用情報を取得する運用情報取得ステップと、
前記運用情報取得ステップにおいて取得された前記運用情報に含まれるパラメータを用いて、前記システムモデルの性能を評価する際に用いる評価用パラメータを算出するパラメータ算出ステップと、
前記パラメータ算出ステップにおいて算出された前記評価用パラメータを用いて、前記システムモデル選定ステップにおいて選定された前記システムモデルの性能を評価する性能評価ステップと、
前記性能評価ステップにおいて評価された前記システムモデルの性能と前記入力された前記構築要件とを比較して、当該構築要件のうち少なくとも必須に設定された前記構築要件を維持したままで、前記システムモデル選定ステップにおいて選定された前記システムモデルの前記設計情報に含まれるサーバの当該サーバに関するサイズを決定する要素であるサーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定するサーバ要素判定ステップと、
前記サーバ要素判定ステップにおいて前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、緩和された前記構築要件を提示する緩和条件提示ステップと、
を実行させることを特徴とする情報システム構築支援プログラム。 - 前記運用情報取得ステップにおいて取得された前記運用情報に含まれるパラメータと前記入力された前記構築要件とを比較して、前記運用情報ごとに、前記入力された前記構築要件との類似度を算出する類似度算出ステップと、
前記サーバ要素判定ステップにおいて前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、前記入力された前記構築要件を緩和して前記サーバ要素を算出するサーバ要素算出ステップと、をさらに含み、
前記サーバ要素判定ステップでは、前記サーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定する際に、前記類似度算出ステップにおいて算出された前記類似度の逆数を不確実性の要素とし、ロバスト最適化を用いて、前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記サーバ要素算出ステップでは、前記類似度算出ステップにより算出された前記類似度の逆数を不確実性の要素とし、ロバスト最適化を用いて、前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記緩和条件提示ステップでは、前記サーバ要素算出ステップにおいて緩和された前記構築要件を提示する、
ことを特徴とする請求項13記載の情報システム構築支援プログラム。 - 前記構築要件は、アプリケーションが果たす役割を決めるための機能要件および前記構築予定システムで提供する品質の保証レベルを決めるためのサービスレベル要件であり、
前記サーバ要素判定ステップでは、前記性能評価ステップにおいて評価された前記システムモデルの性能と前記入力された前記サービスレベル要件とを比較して、当該サービスレベル要件のうち少なくとも必須に設定された前記サービスレベル要件を維持したままで、前記サーバ要素が定まるか否かを判定し、
前記サーバ要素算出ステップでは、前記サーバ要素判定ステップにおいて前記サーバ要素が定まらないと判定された場合に、前記入力された前記サービスレベル要件を緩和して前記サーバ要素を算出し、
前記緩和条件提示ステップでは、前記サーバ要素算出ステップにおいて緩和された前記サービスレベル要件を提示する、
ことを特徴とする請求項13または14記載の情報システム構築支援プログラム。 - 前記サーバ要素判定ステップにおいて前記サーバ要素が定まると判定された場合に、当該サーバ要素を設定した前記システムモデルを用いて構築可能な情報システムを、前記構築予定システムの候補として提示する構築候補提示ステップを、さらに含むことを特徴とする請求項13~15のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援プログラム。
- 前記類似システムモデルは、前記システムモデル選定ステップにおいて選定された前記システムモデルの前記設計情報のうち前記サーバ要素のみが異なる他の前記設計情報の前記システムモデルである、ことを特徴とする請求項13~16のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援プログラム。
- 前記システムモデルの性能は、非機能要件である、ことを特徴とする請求項13~17のいずれか1項に記載の情報システム構築支援プログラム。
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2014539590A JP6094595B2 (ja) | 2012-10-02 | 2013-09-17 | 情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および情報システム構築支援プログラム |
US14/432,942 US20150261647A1 (en) | 2012-10-02 | 2013-09-17 | Information system construction assistance device, information system construction assistance method, and recording medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2012-220617 | 2012-10-02 | ||
JP2012220617 | 2012-10-02 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2014054232A1 true WO2014054232A1 (ja) | 2014-04-10 |
Family
ID=50434578
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2013/005469 WO2014054232A1 (ja) | 2012-10-02 | 2013-09-17 | 情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および情報システム構築支援プログラム |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20150261647A1 (ja) |
JP (1) | JP6094595B2 (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2014054232A1 (ja) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9886296B2 (en) * | 2014-12-01 | 2018-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing hypervisor weights in a virtual environment |
CN105426300B (zh) * | 2015-10-20 | 2021-01-15 | 中国电力科学研究院 | 一种电力系统cim/e模型的标准符合性测试系统和方法 |
WO2019148040A1 (en) * | 2018-01-26 | 2019-08-01 | Ge Inspection Technologies, Lp | Autonomous hybrid analytics modeling platform |
US11068284B2 (en) * | 2019-07-25 | 2021-07-20 | Huuuge Global Ltd. | System for managing user experience and method therefor |
JP7236419B2 (ja) | 2020-10-26 | 2023-03-09 | 健次 前山 | ブラインドおよびブラインド用羽板 |
US20230310995A1 (en) * | 2022-03-31 | 2023-10-05 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Detecting personal-space violations in artificial intelligence based non-player characters |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07160762A (ja) * | 1993-12-06 | 1995-06-23 | Hitachi Ltd | 見積り支援装置 |
JP2011013716A (ja) * | 2009-06-30 | 2011-01-20 | Nec Corp | プロセッササイジング装置、プロセッササイジング方法、および情報処理プログラム |
Family Cites Families (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5261086A (en) * | 1987-10-26 | 1993-11-09 | Nec Corporation | Performance analyzing and diagnosing system for computer systems |
US7783468B2 (en) * | 1998-05-13 | 2010-08-24 | Accretive Technologies, Inc. | Automated system and method for service and cost architecture modeling of enterprise systems |
JP3391313B2 (ja) * | 1999-10-13 | 2003-03-31 | 日本電気株式会社 | 嗜好情報収集装置及びその制御プログラムを記録した記録媒体 |
US6859768B1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2005-02-22 | The Beck Technology | Computer-implemented automated building design and modeling and project cost estimation and scheduling system |
US9087319B2 (en) * | 2002-03-11 | 2015-07-21 | Oracle America, Inc. | System and method for designing, developing and implementing internet service provider architectures |
JP4787460B2 (ja) * | 2003-01-17 | 2011-10-05 | 日本電気株式会社 | ソフトウェア・コンポーネントの性能測定を基にしたシステム性能予測方式および方法 |
JP2007524907A (ja) * | 2003-06-20 | 2007-08-30 | ストラテジック キャピタル ネットワーク エルエルシー | 資源配分方法 |
US7827557B2 (en) * | 2004-03-24 | 2010-11-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for allocating resources to applications using a linearized objective function |
US20050234937A1 (en) * | 2004-04-15 | 2005-10-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for rating performance of computing grid service providers |
JP4572093B2 (ja) * | 2004-07-06 | 2010-10-27 | 日本電気株式会社 | システム構築ガイドシステム |
GB2416221A (en) * | 2004-07-10 | 2006-01-18 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Analysing a multi stage process |
US20060064335A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-03-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and storage medium for performing business process modeling |
JP2006163482A (ja) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-22 | Hitachi Ltd | 情報処理装置の制御方法、情報処理装置、及びプログラム |
US8104033B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2012-01-24 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Managing virtual machines based on business priorty |
US7853671B2 (en) * | 2006-07-31 | 2010-12-14 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method for performing a comprehensive comparison of system designs |
WO2008084826A1 (ja) * | 2007-01-11 | 2008-07-17 | Nec Corporation | プロビジョニングシステム、方法、及び、プログラム |
JP2009134511A (ja) * | 2007-11-30 | 2009-06-18 | Nec Corp | サイジング装置、サイジング方法、サイジング用プログラム及び記録媒体 |
JP4872945B2 (ja) * | 2008-02-25 | 2012-02-08 | 日本電気株式会社 | 運用管理装置、運用管理システム、情報処理方法、及び運用管理プログラム |
US20090249284A1 (en) * | 2008-02-29 | 2009-10-01 | Doyenz Incorporated | Automation for virtualized it environments |
GB2458388A (en) * | 2008-03-21 | 2009-09-23 | Dressbot Inc | A collaborative online shopping environment, virtual mall, store, etc. in which payments may be shared, products recommended and users modelled. |
CN101739407A (zh) * | 2008-11-19 | 2010-06-16 | 日电(中国)有限公司 | 自动构建用于相关信息浏览的信息组织结构的方法和系统 |
US9015663B2 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2015-04-21 | Nec Corporation | Information processing device, information processing method, and information processing program |
JP2012022544A (ja) * | 2010-07-15 | 2012-02-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | セキュリティ製品組合せ候補特定装置、セキュリティ製品組合せ候補特定装置のセキュリティ製品組合せ候補特定方法およびセキュリティ製品組合せ候補特定プログラム |
US9479382B1 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2016-10-25 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Execution plan generation and scheduling for network-accessible resources |
WO2014054230A1 (ja) * | 2012-10-02 | 2014-04-10 | 日本電気株式会社 | 情報システム構築装置、情報システム構築方法および記憶媒体 |
WO2014054231A1 (ja) * | 2012-10-02 | 2014-04-10 | 日本電気株式会社 | 情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および記憶媒体 |
WO2014061229A1 (ja) * | 2012-10-16 | 2014-04-24 | 日本電気株式会社 | 情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および情報システム構築支援プログラム |
-
2013
- 2013-09-17 WO PCT/JP2013/005469 patent/WO2014054232A1/ja active Application Filing
- 2013-09-17 JP JP2014539590A patent/JP6094595B2/ja active Active
- 2013-09-17 US US14/432,942 patent/US20150261647A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07160762A (ja) * | 1993-12-06 | 1995-06-23 | Hitachi Ltd | 見積り支援装置 |
JP2011013716A (ja) * | 2009-06-30 | 2011-01-20 | Nec Corp | プロセッササイジング装置、プロセッササイジング方法、および情報処理プログラム |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP6094595B2 (ja) | 2017-03-15 |
US20150261647A1 (en) | 2015-09-17 |
JPWO2014054232A1 (ja) | 2016-08-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11870704B2 (en) | Instant notification of load balance and resource scheduling based on resource capacities and event recognition | |
JP6094595B2 (ja) | 情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および情報システム構築支援プログラム | |
JP6299599B2 (ja) | 情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および情報システム構築支援プログラム | |
JP4982216B2 (ja) | ポリシ作成支援方法、ポリシ作成支援システム、およびプログラム | |
CN106233252B (zh) | 用于定制软件的动态更新安装器 | |
JP6094593B2 (ja) | 情報システム構築装置、情報システム構築方法および情報システム構築プログラム | |
US20140189703A1 (en) | System and method for distributed computing using automated provisoning of heterogeneous computing resources | |
US20140189702A1 (en) | System and method for automatic model identification and creation with high scalability | |
JP6094594B2 (ja) | 情報システム構築支援装置、情報システム構築支援方法および情報システム構築支援プログラム | |
US20140278723A1 (en) | Methods and systems for predicting workflow preferences | |
US12020186B2 (en) | Method and system for intelligently managing facilities | |
US9785464B2 (en) | Intellective switching between tasks | |
JP5967091B2 (ja) | システムパラメータ設定支援システム、システムパラメータ設定支援装置のデータ処理方法、およびプログラム | |
KR101351079B1 (ko) | 데이터베이스와 연동되는 프로그램을 제어하는 서비스 제공 방법 및 시스템 | |
US10469279B2 (en) | Scalable computing systems for generating notifications, and methods of operating thereof | |
JP2008299661A (ja) | 統合コンフィギュレーション装置、統合コンフィギュレーション方法、および統合コンフィギュレーションプログラム | |
KR102546847B1 (ko) | Erp의 커스터마이징 자동화 처리 및 커스터마이징된 erp 솔루션의 제공 방법, 장치 및 시스템 | |
US20240069887A1 (en) | Computer system, deployment plan generation method, and deployment control system | |
US20240103885A1 (en) | Computer system, system configuration candidate output method, and storage medium storing system configuration candidate output program | |
JP2017167650A (ja) | 改善支援装置、改善支援方法、及びプログラム | |
JP6498588B2 (ja) | 情報配信システムおよび情報配信方法 | |
US20140170618A1 (en) | System and Method for Facilitating Career Growth in an Organization | |
JP6657677B2 (ja) | 情報処理装置並びにミドルウェアの設定方法及び設定プログラム | |
WO2023113889A1 (en) | Method and system for intelligently managing facilities | |
US9372942B1 (en) | System and method for facilitating data visualization via a map-reduce framework |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 13844160 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2014539590 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 14432942 Country of ref document: US |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 13844160 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |