WO1999028696A1 - Procede pour le reglage d'une arme automatique destinee a lutter contre des vehicules - Google Patents

Procede pour le reglage d'une arme automatique destinee a lutter contre des vehicules Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999028696A1
WO1999028696A1 PCT/EP1998/007297 EP9807297W WO9928696A1 WO 1999028696 A1 WO1999028696 A1 WO 1999028696A1 EP 9807297 W EP9807297 W EP 9807297W WO 9928696 A1 WO9928696 A1 WO 9928696A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
weapon
terrain
target
point
angle
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP1998/007297
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Rolf Menne
Rainer Schöffl
Original Assignee
Dynamit Nobel Gmbh Explosivstoff- Und Systemtechnik
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dynamit Nobel Gmbh Explosivstoff- Und Systemtechnik filed Critical Dynamit Nobel Gmbh Explosivstoff- Und Systemtechnik
Priority to EP98961200A priority Critical patent/EP1032801A1/fr
Priority to JP2000523512A priority patent/JP2001525533A/ja
Priority to KR1020007005812A priority patent/KR20010032567A/ko
Priority to CA002311775A priority patent/CA2311775A1/fr
Publication of WO1999028696A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999028696A1/fr
Priority to NO20002716A priority patent/NO20002716D0/no

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/06—Aiming or laying means with rangefinder
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B23/00—Land mines ; Land torpedoes
    • F42B23/04—Land mines ; Land torpedoes anti-vehicle, e.g. anti-aircraft or anti tank

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for setting an automatic weapon with an unguided projectile to combat vehicles according to the preamble of the first claim.
  • the active body the projectile
  • a tubular launching device which is arranged on a base frame and is aligned with the target by means of an adjusting device.
  • a sensor system is assigned to the weapon, which triggers the weapon when a target is recognized.
  • the defense weapon is usually triggered by at least one sensor.
  • Pass-over sensors that register physical contact with the vehicle use contactless sensors.
  • the target is located acoustically, on the basis of heat radiation, laser light reflection or using radar.
  • the weapon should be aligned in such a way that there is as flat an area as possible between the maximum possible target or combat point and the weapon.
  • a target can be set up at the maximum possible combat point and the weapon can be aligned with the sighting device become.
  • the area between the maximum possible combat point and the defense weapon is not flat, but deviates more or less strongly downwards with respect to the firing axis at this point.
  • this results in a terrain-dependent, vertical directional error since the different ballistic trajectory increases occurring at different target distances are not taken into account in the case of a permanently set weapon with an unguided projectile. This leads to a topographically reduced probability of being hit.
  • the topography of the terrain lying in the intended effective area of the weapon is taken into account for the first time.
  • target points which can be both above and below the location of the launcher, not only the distance from the location of the weapon is taken into account, but also the respective distance from a zero plane in which the weapon is in the starting position. If the weapon is aimed at a target point in the field, the weapon is pivoted from the starting position, which changes the firing angle. While in the conventional setting the distance to the target is taken into account at most, according to the invention, due to the stored topography when pivoting from the starting position by a certain angle, a correction of the firing angle with respect to the targeted target is possible.
  • the tactical use of the weapon, in particular on uneven terrain is considerably increased by the invention, because the probability of being hit is increased considerably by the optimally set firing angle.
  • the distances between the possible target points and the location of the weapon can be measured on the map and together with the respective height differences in relation to the weapon location can be entered into the memory on the adjustment device.
  • the second possibility is that the weapon is equipped with a range finder and with a protractor.
  • the protractor With the protractor, the pivoting of the launcher can be measured in a vertical plane from an initial position. If a possible target point is sighted in the field, the distance of the target point from the weapon can be determined with the aid of the range finder and the alignment of the launching device with respect to the starting position with the protractor. With the help of the setting angle and the distance, the level difference of the sighted target point compared to the location of the weapon can be determined.
  • This value can be entered manually into the memory after its calculation, but it is more advantageous if this value is determined automatically by means of a computer. This can already be done when aiming at the target point. From the distance determined by the range finder and from the setting angle of the adjusting device, which can be detected in a known manner, for example via a potentiometer circuit, the topographical value of the target point can be immediately calculated in a computer and the optimum firing angle can be assigned.
  • This method has the advantage that there is no manual input into the computer. The automatic calculation thus excludes input errors. As a rule, it is not necessary for the entire terrain profile to be recorded between the maximum possible target or combat point and the weapon.
  • the terrain profile is determined in fixed removal steps. This makes it possible to keep the set-up time and storage capacity for storing the data within reasonable limits. If, for example, the maximum possible combat point is set at a distance of 100 m from the weapon, the topography of the terrain can be recorded, for example, at intervals of 10 m.
  • the area to be secured extends linearly from the weapon to the maximum possible target or combat point.
  • a circle vector is laterally connected in which the topographical data are also recorded. This makes it possible for the weapon to track the recognized target and for the defense projectile to be fired only when the target has reached a topographically favorable position.
  • a horizontal movement can be superimposed on the vertical movement of the launcher, the topography of the respectively associated terrain point being assigned to the targeted target as a function of the horizontal and vertical swivel angles and the firing angle being optimized.
  • the sectors comprise the terrain area that is detected by the sensor that detects the vehicles to be combated.
  • the weapon can already be aimed at the vehicle and, according to the direction of vehicle movement, a target point that is topographically favorable for combating can be selected, thereby increasing the accuracy.
  • FIG. 1 shows the weapon according to the invention in a schematic illustration
  • FIG. 2 shows a top view of the weapon and the area to be secured
  • Figure 3 is a vertical section through the site showing the
  • Figure 4 shows a terrain profile along a set shot path with a few topographically relevant deviations.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of the weapon for performing the method according to the invention. Only the features contributing to the invention are shown and described.
  • the automatic weapon 1 has a base frame 2 on which the launcher 3 stands. In the tubular launcher 3, an undeflected defense floor 4 is loaded.
  • the launcher 3 is rotatably mounted to align the weapon on the base frame 2, as by the Double arrow 5 is indicated.
  • the rotary movement can take place in the adjusting device 6 by a drive, not shown here.
  • the pivoting movement in a vertical plane for setting the setting angle ⁇ or ⁇ from a starting position 8, indicated by the double arrow 7, takes place in the present exemplary embodiment by a hydraulic cylinder 9 of the adjusting device 6, which has one end on the adjusting device 6 and on the other end the launcher 3 is attached.
  • a hydraulic cylinder 9 of the adjusting device 6 which has one end on the adjusting device 6 and on the other end the launcher 3 is attached.
  • other drives for example pneumatic, electrical or prestressed springs, can also be used to set the launcher 3.
  • the tubular launching device 3 in contrast to the prior art, is not pivotally mounted on the holding frame 10 which stands on the adjusting device 6.
  • the holding frame 10 is divided into two halves 10a and 10b, which are connected to one another in a pivot joint 11.
  • One half 10a is connected to the launcher 3 and the lower half 10b to the adjusting device 6.
  • the launching device 3 is thus stored below its center of gravity 12, so that the launching device 3 is in an unstable equilibrium in its starting position.
  • the tilting moment of the launcher 3 can be used to adjust the setting angle ⁇ or ß and drive energy can be saved if the launcher is brought out of its unstable equilibrium position by the actuation of the hydraulic cylinder 9.
  • the angle of the launcher 13 can be used to correct the firing angle, or if an automatic adjustment is made, it can be checked.
  • the scale 14 of the protractor 13 is fastened to the pivotable part 10a of the holding frame in the swivel joint 11. With the help of a pointer 15, on the fixed part 10b of the holding frame, the set angle or ⁇ can be read off.
  • the weapon 1 with its telescopic legs 16, which are fastened to the base frame 2 is set up and aligned at a location 17 in front of the terrain to be monitored.
  • the weapon 1 has a range finder 18 with which the distance to a possible target point (FIGS. 2 to 4) can be determined automatically.
  • the rangefinder 18 is combined with the sensor 19 for recognizing a vehicle in a trigger sensor system 20, as is shown schematically in FIG. 1.
  • the distance between the weapon and the target point can be read on the rangefinder 18 and manually entered into a memory of the control 22 of the adjusting device 6 via an input device 21, for example a keyboard. With appropriate electronic equipment, the distance can also be determined and saved automatically.
  • the setting angle ⁇ or ⁇ is required to calculate the topographical deviation of the sighted target point in the field from the location of the weapon.
  • This setting angle can either be read on the scale 13 of the protractor 14 or it is recorded electronically.
  • the topographical deviation, the height difference, for the targeted point can be calculated and entered into the control 22 of the adjusting device 6 via the input device 21.
  • the setting angle ⁇ or ⁇ is automatically detected when the possible target point is sighted together with the distance, and the topographic deviation, the height difference, is automatically calculated and stored in the memory of the controller 22 for this possible target point.
  • FIG. 2 shows a top view of a terrain area to be secured. It extends along the shot axis 23 from the weapon set up at location 17 1 to the maximum possible combat point 24. The distance between the maximum possible control point 24 and the location 17 of the weapon 1 should be 100 m in the present exemplary embodiment.
  • Contour lines run through contour lines 25 with height information in meters, as can also be found in topographical maps.
  • the altitude information usually refers to a defined reference point, the sea level, which gives the reference point normal zero, NN.
  • the weapon 1 is at a level of 100 meters in height to simplify the explanations.
  • the apparent intersection points 26 of the contour lines 25 with the firing axis 23 denoted by x lie at different distances from the location 17 of the weapon 1. If the level differences in the terrain are read from the map, the distances 27 of the contour lines 25 from the location 17 of the weapon 1 must be on the Card to be measured. The height difference 28 to the location 17 can then be read from the map.
  • the apparent intersection 26 of the contour line, which indicates a level of 90 vertical meters, with the firing axis 23, has a distance 27 from the location 17 of the weapon 1, which is 33 m. Terrain point 26 is therefore 10 m below the level of weapon 1.
  • the distances of the contour lines 25 from the location 17 of the weapon 1 are to be measured and with the associated height differences 28 (FIG. 3) via the input device 21 into the memory of the controller 22 of the adjusting device 6 to enter. If the distance between the contour lines is too coarse, ie if the specified height differences are too large, the terrain level can be interpolated between two contour lines. It must be accepted that the terrain profile between these two points must be viewed as a straight line. The correction of the firing angle depends on the distance of the target point from location 17 of weapon 1.
  • the target point lies between two contour lines in a terrain whose level is above location 17 of weapon 1, for example in the range between 110 m and 115 m to set a different launch angle, as if the terrain level in the targeted point is below the level of the location of the weapon, for example between 95 m and 90 m.
  • the level differences can be determined as follows: The distance between the maximum possible combat point 24 and the location 17 of the weapon 1 is divided into sections of equal size. In the present exemplary embodiment, the distance to the maximum possible control point 24 is 100 m. The distance between the terrain points 29 indicated with o is 10 m in each case. In order to facilitate the sighting of these selected target points 29, it is possible for these target points to be marked with disks, which are then sighted using the range finder 18. The resulting setting angle ⁇ when the terrain point is below the starting position of the launcher or the setting angle ⁇ when the terrain point is above the starting position of the launcher 3 can be read on the protractor 13 or is automatically determined after sighting the terrain point.
  • the number of possible measuring points results from the number of contour lines lying between the maximum combat point 24 and the location 17 of the weapon
  • the number of measuring points is freely selectable and can either be based on the terrain profile or , as shown here, can be determined on the basis of measuring points in the same distance steps.
  • FIG. 3 shows a longitudinal section through the terrain along the firing axis 23 from the weapon 1 to the maximum possible combat point 24.
  • the profile course 31 shows that the entire terrain to be secured can be seen from the automatic weapon 1.
  • the level differences 28 of the terrain profile 31 are plotted at intervals of 5 m, on the ordinate through the maximum possible combat point 24, the height information of the contour lines 25.
  • the method in which the terrain can be scanned using a range finder the possibility of arbitrarily determining the number of measuring points 29 and thereby determining the terrain profile 31 much more precisely on the basis of the level differences 28 ascertained.
  • the steep slope of the terrain beginning at a distance of 90 m from weapon 1, cannot be seen on the map due to the large distance between the contour lines 110 m and 115 m.
  • the measurements at a distance of 80 m and 90 m determine a much more precise course of the terrain profile 31.
  • Both methods only allow the terrain profile between the individual measurement points to be taken in a simplified manner either as a straight line 35 between the two measurement points or to define the terrain profile from measurement point to measurement point as a horizontal plane 36. According to both methods, the natural terrain profile 31 is not reproduced correctly. In the case of a connecting straight line 35 between two measurement points 29 lying one behind the other, the level of possibly intermediate target points can be interpolated on the basis of the slope of the straight line 35.
  • FIG. 4 shows the profile of a section through an area to be secured, which is subdivided into several areas which, at different levels, extend topographically mainly to the maximum possible control point 24. In the present exemplary embodiment, therefore, only target points which mark level limits are to be sighted for marking the terrain profile.
  • an incision 32 and a terrain step 33 extend essentially transversely to the firing axis 23. The level zero is assigned to the weapon location 17, as on the ordinate in location 17 the weapon 1 is registered.
  • the terrain at an embankment 34 first descends to the terrain point 29 at a distance of approximately 19 m to a level with a height difference 28 of 10 m below the location 17 of the weapon 1.
  • the incision 32 for example Road course, extends on the same level to a distance of about 42 m. This is followed by a steep slope, which is only about 4 km long m rises again to a level below the location level 17 of the weapon 1, which only has a level difference 28 of 2.5 m.
  • the terrain profile 31 runs essentially flat up to the terrain level 33, for example a wall, at a distance of 85 m from the location 17 of the weapon 1, at which the terrain is up to a height of 2.5 m above the level of the weapon location 17 increases.
  • due to the few striking topographical deviations 28 only four measuring points 29 up to the assumed maximum possible combat point 24 are required in order to record the terrain profile required for setting the weapon.
  • two sectors 37 and 38 are shown on the left and right next to the weft axis 23, which are also monitored. These two sectors can, for example, be monitored simultaneously by sensor 19 (FIG. 1) to recognize a vehicle.
  • the sectors 37 and 38 can also be the area 15 in which the weapon 1 can be tracked to a recognized vehicle.
  • the opening angle 39 of the sectors 37 and 38 depends on the detection range of the sensor 19 and is 15 ° in the present exemplary embodiment.
  • each of the sectors 37 and 25 38 is further divided between the boundary lines 40 and the firing axis 23 depending on the distance from the weapon 1 and the detected area.
  • the distance between the apparent intersection 26 of the contour line is 95 m with the firing axis 23 and the
  • the example of an automatic determination of the topography is shown in sector 38.
  • it is possible to obtain further measurement points with the aid of the bisector 42 and the angle delimiter 43 or 44. Only in this case not the intersection of the corresponding angle-limiting lines with the contour lines is selected, but rather the intersection with the line of the same distance 45 to the automatic weapon 1.
  • the topography in the terrain points 29 which lie at the intersection of the angle-delimiters with the lines of the same distance can be determined using the procedure described above.
  • the two sectors 37 and 38 can be used as follows.
  • the first possibility is that the automatic weapon 1 is set in the direction of the firing axis 23 to the maximum possible combat point 24. If a vehicle 41 penetrates into the detection range of the sensor 19 for recognizing a vehicle, in which it crosses the boundary line 40 of the sector 37 in the direction 46, the automatic weapon 1 is automatically adjusted to the vehicle 41 and the distance to it is measured using the range finder 18 Weapon determined.
  • the firing angle is then set via the control device 22 with the aid of the adjusting device 6 on the basis of the topography on which the determined distance is based.
  • the adjustment device can be controlled by waiting until the vehicle has reached a topographically favorable position.
  • the topographically favorable position can be in the entire monitored sectors 37 and 38 are sought and is selected based on the topography lying in the direction of travel 46 of the vehicle.
  • Another way to use sectors 37 and 38 is to track the automatic weapon.
  • the automatic weapon 1 is also aimed at the maximum possible combat point 24. If the sensor 19 detects a vehicle 47 to detect a vehicle which crosses the shot axis 23 in the direction of travel 48, the distance of the vehicle 47 is determined by the range finder 18 and the control of the adjusting device 22 is then given the corresponding setting angle. Either an automatic weapon 1 is triggered directly or the weapon is tracked to the vehicle 47 and a topographically favorable launch position is determined within the sector 38, which results from the direction of travel 48 of the vehicle and the stored topography lying in the direction of travel.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)

Abstract

La lutte contre des véhicules, notamment des chars, est déjà assurée par des armes défensives déclenchées automatiquement par la présence du véhicule, qui protègent une bande de terrain dont l'étendue correspond généralement à la portée de l'arme. L'arme doit être pointée de telle manière qu'il existe, entre la cible ou l'objet à combattre, se trouvant à une distance maximale, et l'arme, un terrain le plus plat possible. Mais généralement, le terrain situé entre la cible la plus éloignée possible et l'arme défensive n'est pas plat, mais présente un écart plus ou moins important vers le bas par rapport à l'axe de tir en direction de cette cible. Dans le cas de distances d'objectif différentes, il s'ensuit une erreur de pointage verticale dépendante de la configuration du terrain, étant donné que lorsqu'une arme est réglée de manière fixe et tire des projectiles non guidés, les surélévations de trajectoire balistiques différentes apparaissant dans ce cas ne sont pas prises en compte, ce qui conduit à une probabilité de toucher réduite en fonction de la topographie. Selon l'invention, la topographie du terrain située dans la zone d'action prévue de l'arme est déterminée par rapport à l'emplacement du système de lancement, mémorisée dans une mémoire de la commande du système de réglage de l'arme et utilisée lors de l'alignement sur l'objectif en vue du réglage de l'angle de lancement respectif.
PCT/EP1998/007297 1997-11-27 1998-11-14 Procede pour le reglage d'une arme automatique destinee a lutter contre des vehicules WO1999028696A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP98961200A EP1032801A1 (fr) 1997-11-27 1998-11-14 Procede pour le reglage d'une arme automatique destinee a lutter contre des vehicules
JP2000523512A JP2001525533A (ja) 1997-11-27 1998-11-14 車両を攻撃するための自動兵器を調整する方法
KR1020007005812A KR20010032567A (ko) 1997-11-27 1998-11-14 전투 차량용 자동화 무기의 조정 방법
CA002311775A CA2311775A1 (fr) 1997-11-27 1998-11-14 Procede pour le reglage d'une arme automatique destinee a lutter contre des vehicules
NO20002716A NO20002716D0 (no) 1997-11-27 2000-05-26 FremgangsmÕte for innstilling av et automatisk vÕpen for bekjempelse av kjøretøy

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19752464A DE19752464A1 (de) 1997-11-27 1997-11-27 Geländeadaptive automatische Waffe zur Bekämpfung von Fahrzeugen
DE19752464.8 1997-11-27

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999028696A1 true WO1999028696A1 (fr) 1999-06-10

Family

ID=7849908

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP1998/007297 WO1999028696A1 (fr) 1997-11-27 1998-11-14 Procede pour le reglage d'une arme automatique destinee a lutter contre des vehicules

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1032801A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2001525533A (fr)
KR (1) KR20010032567A (fr)
CA (1) CA2311775A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE19752464A1 (fr)
NO (1) NO20002716D0 (fr)
WO (1) WO1999028696A1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1239301A1 (fr) * 2001-03-05 2002-09-11 Sick AG Procédé et dispositif pour surveiller une zone de protection
EP1883786A2 (fr) * 2005-05-26 2008-02-06 BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Correction de gain basee sur une source de lumiere embarquee pour chercheurs laser semi-actifs
EP1923657A1 (fr) * 2006-11-16 2008-05-21 Saab Ab Une base d'arme éloignée compacte, intégralement stabilisée et équipée de quatre axes, avec ligne de visée indépendante
US7516689B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2009-04-14 Lockheed Martin Corporation Optimized weapons release management system

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10045354A1 (de) 2000-09-14 2002-03-28 Dynamit Nobel Ag Verfahren zur Installation und zum Überwachen eines Sperrsystems
AUPR080400A0 (en) * 2000-10-17 2001-01-11 Electro Optic Systems Pty Limited Autonomous weapon system
JP5184864B2 (ja) * 2007-11-09 2013-04-17 株式会社Ｉｈｉエアロスペース 遠隔制御型障害システムとその機器配置方法
KR101160143B1 (ko) 2010-06-08 2012-06-27 국방과학연구소 발사대 수평 레벨링 장치 및 방법
KR101394326B1 (ko) * 2012-11-07 2014-05-13 주식회사 동인광학 총기용 조준장치
DE202015006150U1 (de) 2015-08-31 2016-12-05 Paul Wolf Grenzsicherungssystem auf flexibel modulierbarer Trägerplattform mit Laser angesteuerter Sensorik
KR102402093B1 (ko) * 2020-10-28 2022-05-25 엘아이지넥스원 주식회사 광축 정렬을 위한 미세 조절 핸들 장치
KR102546814B1 (ko) * 2022-11-28 2023-06-23 국방과학연구소 유도탄의 지형 간섭 판단방법 및 이를 위한 판단장치

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2108244A (en) * 1981-10-08 1983-05-11 Ferranti Ltd Weapon triggering system
DE3545175A1 (de) * 1985-12-20 1987-07-02 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm Richtmine
DE3816050A1 (de) * 1988-05-11 1989-11-23 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm Zielortungssystem mit grossem suchgesichtsfeld
EP0396822A1 (fr) * 1989-04-18 1990-11-14 Rheinmetall GmbH Mine placée à distance avec fusée chercheuse optique

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE133136C (fr) *
DE4421520A1 (de) * 1994-06-20 1997-07-24 Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag Verfahren zur Einstellung eines Effektors

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2108244A (en) * 1981-10-08 1983-05-11 Ferranti Ltd Weapon triggering system
DE3545175A1 (de) * 1985-12-20 1987-07-02 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm Richtmine
DE3816050A1 (de) * 1988-05-11 1989-11-23 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm Zielortungssystem mit grossem suchgesichtsfeld
EP0396822A1 (fr) * 1989-04-18 1990-11-14 Rheinmetall GmbH Mine placée à distance avec fusée chercheuse optique

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1239301A1 (fr) * 2001-03-05 2002-09-11 Sick AG Procédé et dispositif pour surveiller une zone de protection
US6812450B2 (en) 2001-03-05 2004-11-02 Sick Ag Method and an apparatus for monitoring a protected zone
EP1883786A2 (fr) * 2005-05-26 2008-02-06 BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Correction de gain basee sur une source de lumiere embarquee pour chercheurs laser semi-actifs
US7516689B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2009-04-14 Lockheed Martin Corporation Optimized weapons release management system
EP1883786A4 (fr) * 2005-05-26 2010-06-02 Bae Systems Information Correction de gain basee sur une source de lumiere embarquee pour chercheurs laser semi-actifs
EP1923657A1 (fr) * 2006-11-16 2008-05-21 Saab Ab Une base d'arme éloignée compacte, intégralement stabilisée et équipée de quatre axes, avec ligne de visée indépendante

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20010032567A (ko) 2001-04-25
EP1032801A1 (fr) 2000-09-06
NO20002716L (no) 2000-05-26
JP2001525533A (ja) 2001-12-11
DE19752464A1 (de) 1999-07-15
CA2311775A1 (fr) 1999-06-10
NO20002716D0 (no) 2000-05-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1304539B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour pointer un tube de cannon et utilisation du dispositif
DE102005007910A1 (de) Feuerwaffe für langsam fliegende Geschosse
WO1999028696A1 (fr) Procede pour le reglage d'une arme automatique destinee a lutter contre des vehicules
DE1941692B2 (de) Feuerleitanlage
DE1456163C1 (de) Fernlenksystem zur kontinuierlichen Lenkung eines Flugkoerpers
EP3367047B1 (fr) Dispositif de visée
EP0411073A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'amelioration de la precision du tir
DE2936643A1 (de) Verfahren und anordnung fuer die abschaetzung der richtgenauigkeit einer waffe
DE2650804C1 (de) Einrichtung an tieffliegenden Waffentraegern zur Bekaempfung von Bodenzielen
DE1951622C3 (de) Anordnung zur simulierten Darstellung von Schußbahnen
DE3303763C2 (fr)
EP3060872B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'une arme orientable d'un véhicule dans le cadre d'exercices de tir
DE3013405A1 (de) Verfahren zum vermeiden des nachrichtens von abschussgeraeten fuer ballistische flugkoerper
DE3821309C2 (fr)
DE3545175C2 (fr)
DE2222785A1 (de) Infanteriegeschoss zur bekaempfung von erdzielen
CH656453A5 (en) Device for firing simulation using light pulses
WO2022083822A1 (fr) Détermination de solution de guidage de tir d'arme d'artillerie
DE19912093A1 (de) Verfahren zur Schußsimulation
DE3348136C2 (en) Method for determining the ballistic trajectory (flight path) of a projectile, and a device for carrying out the method
DE3236206C1 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung der Ablage des Geschosseinschlages bei Schiesssimulatoren
EP3460378B1 (fr) Dispositif de détermination d'une distance de remplacement entre un emplacement et un point d'impact de remplacement d'un étage
EP0519315B1 (fr) Dispositif pour mesurer le profil en hauteur d'un vent au sol
DE19712371A1 (de) Flächenverteidigungsmine
DE3800998C1 (en) Weapon system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA IL JP KR NO TR US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2311775

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2311775

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020007005812

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998961200

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09554663

Country of ref document: US

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998961200

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020007005812

Country of ref document: KR

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1998961200

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1020007005812

Country of ref document: KR