EP2807103B1 - Verfahren und steuereinrichtung zur überwachung von fahrbewegungen einer aufzugskabine - Google Patents

Verfahren und steuereinrichtung zur überwachung von fahrbewegungen einer aufzugskabine Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2807103B1
EP2807103B1 EP13701254.8A EP13701254A EP2807103B1 EP 2807103 B1 EP2807103 B1 EP 2807103B1 EP 13701254 A EP13701254 A EP 13701254A EP 2807103 B1 EP2807103 B1 EP 2807103B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
detected
speed
accelerations
acceleration
speeds
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP13701254.8A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2807103A1 (de
Inventor
Stefan STÖLZL
Thomas Schmidt
Michael Degen
Dominik DÜCHS
Frank Schreiner
Erich Bütler
Michael Geisshüsler
Nicolas Gremaud
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Inventio AG
Original Assignee
Inventio AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=47603744&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2807103(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Inventio AG filed Critical Inventio AG
Priority to SI201330154T priority Critical patent/SI2807103T1/sl
Priority to EP13701254.8A priority patent/EP2807103B1/de
Priority to PL13701254T priority patent/PL2807103T3/pl
Publication of EP2807103A1 publication Critical patent/EP2807103A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2807103B1 publication Critical patent/EP2807103B1/de
Revoked legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
    • B66B5/0018—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system
    • B66B5/0031—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system for safety reasons
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
    • B66B1/24—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration
    • B66B1/28—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration electrical
    • B66B1/30—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration electrical effective on driving gear, e.g. acting on power electronics, on inverter or rectifier controlled motor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
    • B66B1/24—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration
    • B66B1/28—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration electrical
    • B66B1/32—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration electrical effective on braking devices, e.g. acting on electrically controlled brakes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
    • B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
    • B66B1/3415—Control system configuration and the data transmission or communication within the control system
    • B66B1/3423—Control system configuration, i.e. lay-out
    • B66B1/343—Fault-tolerant or redundant control system configuration
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
    • B66B5/04—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions for detecting excessive speed
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
    • B66B5/04—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions for detecting excessive speed
    • B66B5/06—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions for detecting excessive speed electrical

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for monitoring travel movements of an elevator car, an electronic control device for monitoring travel movements of an elevator car and an elevator car with a corresponding control device.
  • Dynamically moving objects such as elevators in the present embodiment, or elevator cars, may generally not exceed predetermined accelerations and speeds for safety reasons, since otherwise injuries to the transported people as well as damage to the moving object itself can no longer be ruled out. Therefore, usually adapted to the object control device is provided which detects an excessive acceleration and the drive torque correspondingly reduced or activated at too high speeds a braking function.
  • WO 2007/145613 A2 is a method for monitoring driving movements of an elevator car according to the prior Tecknik known.
  • At least two acceleration sensor signals and at least one speed sensor signal or one displacement sensor signal simultaneously for the plausibility check.
  • at least one acceleration sensor signal and at least two speed sensor signals or two position sensor signals are used simultaneously for the plausibility check or at least two acceleration sensor signals and at least two speed sensor signals or two displacement sensor signals are used simultaneously for the plausibility check.
  • the motion quantities used are continuously subjected to a plausibility check and / or an error check.
  • autonomously operating devices can be created that can safely monitor travel movements.
  • the respective sensor signals are preferably evaluated in an electronic control device (ECU).
  • ECU electronice control device
  • the ECU is advantageously arranged on the dynamically moving object, or on the elevator car.
  • the elevator car is usually carried by suspension means.
  • the support means are guided over pulleys, which are arranged on the elevator car.
  • a required load capacity in the support means according to a determined by an arrangement of the pulleys Um Grahammine.
  • at least the speed sensors or displacement sensors for detecting the speed sensor signals or the displacement sensor signals are assembled with these deflection rollers or integrated in these.
  • the pulleys are safely driven by the support means because of the high load and the corresponding speed sensor signals or Wegsensorsignale are correspondingly accurate and secure.
  • the electronic control device or its processor unit with arithmetic unit for evaluating the detected speed sensor signals or path sensor signals, is also arranged in the immediate vicinity of the Ünlenkrollen.
  • sensor parts for example an incremental sensor for detecting increment markings of the deflection roller, are arranged directly on a circuit board of the processor unit.
  • an acceleration sensor or the redundant acceleration sensors, for detecting the acceleration sensor signals may also be arranged on this board.
  • At least two pulleys are equipped with a corresponding processor unit with arithmetic unit .
  • individual measured variables can be exchanged for error and plausibility checks or results of the individual arithmetic units can be compared.
  • the inventive method preferably comprises a first activation stage, which allows a reduction, or an adjustment of the drive torque of the dynamically moving object, or the elevator car.
  • two acceleration sensors are used, which are preferably structurally integrated into the ECU, as described above.
  • the monitoring of the two acceleration sensor signals a1 and a2 takes place for example by means of comparison of the two acceleration sensor signals. If the two acceleration signals are substantially the same, reliable values are available. Essentially the same can be determined by the inequality
  • a warning signal is generated, on the basis of which, for example, a check can be made. Is the amount
  • the adaptation may be a reduction or an increase of the drive torque depending on a loading state and direction of travel of the elevator car. In many cases, however, this adaptation or regulation of the drive torque is perceived by a separate, a drive of the elevator car associated with, drive control, whereby this first activation stage can also be omitted.
  • the measured values of the sensor signals for a drive control, for shaft information or for other driving information, the control of the entire elevator can be provided.
  • a plausibility check of the acceleration signals with the speed signal or path signal can be carried out as previously carried out by direct comparison or by converting the other quantities of motion. This plausibility check preferably serves for the general monitoring of the sensor signals.
  • the at least two acceleration signals are evaluated directly and without previous conversion or processing. This results in the advantage that very sensitively and quickly on a speed change of the dynamically moving object, or the elevator car, can be concluded, since already the tendency to high speed is detected and the drive torque can be adjusted accordingly early.
  • object is understood to mean the elevator car.
  • a Object movement is thus an elevator car movement or an object speed is an elevator car speed, etc.
  • a threshold value for the acceleration, at which an adaptation of the drive torque or a shutdown of the drive torque occurs, is preferably predetermined in such a way that an allowable maximum acceleration is previously exceeded.
  • the measured acceleration must therefore be above the permissible acceleration in order to reduce or switch off the drive torque.
  • a second activation stage is additionally provided, which is preferably independent of the first activation stage.
  • the second activation stage activates at least one brake device (e.g., an emergency brake system) and / or shuts off the drive torque.
  • This is advantageously carried out on the basis of an excessively high actual speed v, possibly additionally combined with at least one too high actual acceleration a1, or a2.
  • the checking of the sensor signals and their plausibility is preferably carried out as previously described.
  • acceleration monitoring on exceeding a threshold acceleration makes it possible to detect a multiplicity of faulty operating conditions, but not all faulty operating conditions.
  • accelerations below the threshold acceleration can likewise lead to safety-critical exceedances of the threshold speed.
  • Such threshold speed overshoots can be detected by monitoring a speed value.
  • F is a suitably chosen calculation rule of the time-dependent accelerations a1, or a1 and a2.
  • F is preferably an integral rule.
  • the plausibility check and thus monitoring of the speed value obtained from the acceleration sensors can also take place with the displacement sensor signal s.
  • the plausibility check and thus the monitoring of the speed value obtained from the acceleration sensors with the displacement sensor signal s is thus preferably effected via the relationship Va - V ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ 1 . respectively Va - D s ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ 1.
  • the threshold value ⁇ 1 is exceeded, then the sensor signals are no longer plausible and the system must be transferred directly to a safe state in an emergency.
  • the speed sensor signal or the displacement sensor signal preferably has the task of monitoring the speed signal calculated from the acceleration sensor signals.
  • a direct speed comparison can be performed.
  • a time delay can occur here in comparison to purely acceleration-sensor-based monitoring. Fast motion changes are thus safely detected by monitoring the acceleration value, and slow motion changes can be detected by monitoring the speed value.
  • Such or generic error handling makes it possible to maintain a basic functionality despite a detected error until the end of a maintenance interval appropriate to the particular application. This can also provide an improved diagnosis (eg whether a speed sensor or an acceleration sensor needs to be replaced). For example, a detection of a faulty sensor may trigger a maintenance request.
  • speed sensor signals be used to calculate an acceleration signal.
  • speed sensor signals instead of a Integral specification preferably uses a differentiation rule for calculating the acceleration signal from the speed sensor signal.
  • a differentiation rule for calculating the acceleration signal from the speed sensor signal.
  • the threshold values are dependent on the respective operating conditions of the object, e.g. the speed of the object or even a distance of the object to an obstacle or a track end.
  • the sensors are subjected to a calibration method which is known per se once prior to their use, at defined time intervals during their use, irregularly or as required.
  • a self-regulating calibration method is possible and preferred.
  • any combinations of said calibration methods are possible and preferred.
  • a mutual monitoring of all sensors used with each other takes place.
  • the safety device according to the invention is also used for applications in which a minimum acceleration or minimum speed is generally required, so that if the minimum acceleration or the minimum speed are not adhered to, suitable safety measures can also be initiated.
  • an electronic control device 11 (ECU 11) is shown, which includes acceleration sensors 12 and 13 and a speed sensor 14 or a displacement sensor 14.1.
  • the ECU 11 is part of the control electronics of an electrically operated elevator, or an elevator car.
  • the acceleration sensors 12 and 13 are disposed directly in the ECU 11, while the speed sensor 14 or the displacement sensor 14.1 is located outside the ECU 11 and continues only a speed sensor signal v or a displacement signal s to a first microprocessor 16 in the ECU 11. If necessary, the first microprocessor 16 calculates the speed sensor signal v from the path signal s.
  • a second microprocessor 15 receives the acceleration sensor signals a1 and a2 from the acceleration sensors 12 and 13 and checks them for plausibility. At the same time, the second microprocessor 15 calculates a speed Va1 from the acceleration sensor signals a1 and a2 by means of an integral rule and executes an error system algorithm in order to detect any common cause errors of the acceleration sensors a1 and a2.
  • the speed Va1 is output to the first microprocessor 16, which compares the speed Va1 with the speed v and thus checks for plausibility.
  • the first microprocessor 16 calculates an acceleration av by means of a differentiation rule and forwards the acceleration av to the second microprocessor 15.
  • the second microprocessor 15 now compares the acceleration av with the acceleration sensor signals a1 and a2 for plausibility. If a faulty sensor is detected on the basis of the plausibility analysis, a corresponding warning signal W can be generated, or the elevator car can be shut down, for example after completion of a drive cycle.
  • the second microprocessor 15 and the first microprocessor 16 constantly compare the acceleration values av, a1 and a2 and the velocity values v and Va1 with predetermined threshold values.
  • the second microprocessor 15 compares the values a1, a2 and av with predetermined threshold values while the first microprocessor 16 compares the values va1 and v with predetermined threshold values. If one of the values av, a1, a2, v or va1 exceeds a predetermined threshold and a sensor error is excluded, or a faulty signal can not be identified beyond doubt, a safety information Sk for reducing the drive torque, or for initiating a braking process, of the one Microprocessor output, which has detected the exceeding of the threshold.
  • Exceeding the threshold usually leads in a first activation stage to a reduction of the drive torque or to a controlled shutdown of the elevator car, while exceeding the threshold in a second activation stage leads to the initiation of a braking operation.
  • the second microprocessor 15 is subdivided into a first partial processor 15.1 and a second partial processor 15.2, so that an evaluation and comparison in connection with the one acceleration sensor 12 is perceived by the first partial processor 15.1 and an evaluation and comparison in connection with the other acceleration sensor 13 is perceived by the second part processor 15.2. As a result, any errors in the area of the processors can be detected.
  • the second microprocessor 15 processes sensor output information of at least one acceleration sensor 12, 13, and the second electronic calculating unit 16 evaluates sensor output information of at least one speed sensor 14 or a displacement sensor 14.1.
  • FIG. 2 is a possible flow of a process in the form of a flow chart to see.
  • the acceleration value a1 is read. Regardless of this, two speed values v1 and v2 are read in at the same time in method step 22.
  • step 24 a comparison of the acceleration value a1 with a predetermined acceleration threshold a takes place. If the acceleration value a1 exceeds the predetermined acceleration threshold value as, corresponding safety information Sk is output, and accordingly, the driving torque which causes the acceleration is reduced or braking is initiated. If the acceleration value a1 does not exceed the predefined acceleration threshold, no further reaction takes place in step 24. Simultaneously with step 24, in step 23, the Acceleration value a1 converted by means of an integral validation in the speed value Va.
  • step 25 a plausibility check and error check of the read speed values v1 and v2 takes place. If the speed values v1 and v2 are plausible and no error is detected, the process continues in steps 26 and 27. Otherwise, for example, the warning signal W is output.
  • a comparison is made of speed values v1 and v2 with a threshold value vs for the speed. If at least one of the speed values v1 or v2 exceeds the predetermined threshold value vs for the speed, the safety information Sk is output and, accordingly, the drive torque that drives the elevator car is adjusted or a braking operation is initiated. If none of the speed values v1 and v2 exceeds the preset threshold value for the speed, no further reaction takes place. At the same time, in step 27, speed values v1 or v2 are converted into a mean acceleration a by means of a differentiation rule.
  • a plausibility check and error check are carried out on the speed values v1 and v2 read in step 22 with the speed value Va calculated in step 23.
  • a plausibility check and error check is performed on the acceleration value a1 read in in step 21 and on the in Step 27 calculated acceleration value a performed. If an implausibility or an error is detected in one of the steps 28 and 29, a corresponding warning signal W is output and the elevator car is shut down immediately or after completion of the drive cycle.
  • the ECU 11 is composed of a first microprocessor 30 and a second microprocessor 36.
  • the acceleration sensors 12 and 13 are associated with the first microprocessor 30, and the speed sensor 14 or the displacement sensor 14.1 is associated with the second microprocessor 36.
  • a first step 31.1, 31.2 in the first microprocessor 30, the acceleration sensor signals a1 and a2 of the two acceleration sensors 12 and 13 are compared with an acceleration threshold value as. If one of the two acceleration sensor signals exceeds the threshold value, ie a1, or a2> (greater than) as is , the safety information sk is output and Accordingly, the drive torque, which drives the elevator car, adapted or a braking operation is initiated.
  • a plausibility check and error check of the read-in acceleration sensor signals a1 and a2 takes place. If the acceleration sensor signals a1 and a2 are plausible, that is, if a difference of the two values lies below an error threshold value ⁇ and thus no error is detected, a status signal is set to ok. Otherwise, the warning signal W is output. Thus, for example, a service is requested, or depending on further, later described assessments, the elevator system continues to operate, shut down or operated only in a reduced mode.
  • the error threshold ⁇ is related in each case to the values to be compared, such as speed, acceleration, etc.
  • a next step 35.1, 35.2 the speed values Val and Va2 are compared with a speed threshold value Vs. If one of the two speed values exceeds the speed threshold value Vs, ie Va1 or Va2> (greater than) Vs, the safety information sk is output.
  • the first microprocessor 30 is divided into two sub-processors 30.1 and 30.2, wherein the two acceleration sensors 12 and 13 are divided between the two sub-processors 30.1, 30.2.
  • the two sub-processors can execute the comparison and calculation steps in parallel, with which any processor errors can be detected.
  • the plausibility check and error check in steps 32.1, 32.2 and 34.1, 34.2 can also be performed mutually redundantly in the two sub-processors 30.1, 30.2, or they can be adopted by one of the sub-processors.
  • the speed sensor signal V of the speed sensor 14 is detected or detected.
  • a speed value V is detected, for example by means of a tachometer.
  • a displacement sensor 14.1 is used which, for example, detects a path difference s by means of path increments, from which the velocity value V is derived or determined by means of a calculation routine 14.2.
  • the speed value V is further compared with a speed threshold value Vs. If the speed value V exceeds the threshold value, ie V> (greater than) Vs, the safety information sk is output.
  • a comparison step 37 it is checked whether the status signals of the plausibility checking and error checking steps 32.1, 32.2, 34.1, 34.2 are set to ok by the first microprocessor, or whether a warning signal W was output. Further, the speed value V is compared with the speed values Va1 and Va2 calculated by the first microprocessor 30. If a difference of the respective calculated speed values Va1 and Va2 to the speed value V is below an error threshold value ⁇ , the status signal is set to ok. Otherwise, the warning signal W is output.
  • step 37 If it is determined in comparison step 37 that all the status signals of the plausibility check and error checking steps 32.1, 32.2, 34.1, 34.2 and 37 are set to ok, the monitoring device or the electronic control device 11 continues to operate. Otherwise, another error analysis 38 is started.
  • step 38.1 of the error analysis 38 If, according to step 38.1 of the error analysis 38, the speed values Va2 and V in the predetermined tolerance band, Va1 and V outside the predetermined tolerance band, it can be determined that the acceleration sensor signal a1 or the associated calculation routine is faulty.
  • step 38.2 If, according to step 38.2, the speed values Va1 and V in the predetermined tolerance band, Va2 and V are outside the predetermined tolerance band, it can be determined that the acceleration sensor signal a2 or the associated calculation routine is faulty.
  • step 38.3 the acceleration sensor signals a1 and a2 are in given tolerance band but the speed comparison values Va2 to V and Va1 to V, however, outside the specified tolerance band, it can be determined that the speed signal V or possibly the associated calculation routine is faulty.
  • the faulty signal can be specifically determined and a service technician can quickly replace the affected component.
  • the faulty signal can be suppressed or temporarily replaced by one of the two intact signals.
  • Preferred electronic control devices 11 for monitoring object speeds v, v1, v2 and object accelerations a, a1, a2 comprise, for example, a first electronic arithmetic unit 15 or corresponding first processors 30, which performs sensor output information evaluation and, depending on a result of the sensor output information evaluation, a reduction of a drive torque and / or a shutdown of the drive torque and / or an activation of a braking device initiates, wherein the control device 11 performs a method as in the preceding examples 1 to 20 or a combination of these examples.
  • the second arithmetic unit 16, or the second processor 36 likewise carries out a sensor output information evaluation and initiates the reduction of the drive torque and / or the shutdown of the drive torque and / or the activation of the braking device depending on the result of the sensor output information evaluation.
  • the electronic control unit (ECU) 11 is shown in FIG Elevator installation, preferably mounted on the elevator car 40 to monitor their driving movements.
  • the elevator car is supported and moved by means of suspension 41.
  • the support means 41 are fixedly suspended at one end, for example in a building structure (not shown) attached.
  • they are movable by a drive means, which is indicated by double arrows in the FIG. 4 is indicated.
  • the support means are performed under the elevator car 40, wherein they are deflected by support rollers 43.1, 43.2, 43.3, 43.4.
  • the elevator car is guided by means of guide rails 42.
  • a respective suspension element is arranged on both sides of a guide plane determined by the guide rails 42.
  • the electronic control device (ECU) 11 is associated with one of the support rollers 43.1, that is, an incremental encoder for detecting the path s of the elevator car is removed directly from a rotational movement of the support roller 43.1.
  • the ECU 11 is implemented as explained in the preceding examples.
  • the at least one acceleration sensor 12, 13 is preferably structurally integrated into an enclosure of the control device 11.
  • a division of the sensors to different microprocessors and sub-processors can be selected by the expert.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
  • Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
  • Elevator Control (AREA)
  • Professional, Industrial, Or Sporting Protective Garments (AREA)
  • Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
EP13701254.8A 2012-01-25 2013-01-24 Verfahren und steuereinrichtung zur überwachung von fahrbewegungen einer aufzugskabine Revoked EP2807103B1 (de)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SI201330154T SI2807103T1 (sl) 2012-01-25 2013-01-24 Postopek in krmilna priprava za nadzor premikov kabine dvigala
EP13701254.8A EP2807103B1 (de) 2012-01-25 2013-01-24 Verfahren und steuereinrichtung zur überwachung von fahrbewegungen einer aufzugskabine
PL13701254T PL2807103T3 (pl) 2012-01-25 2013-01-24 Sposób oraz urządzenie sterujące do monitorowania ruchów przemieszczania kabiny dźwigowej

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102012201086 2012-01-25
EP12189011 2012-10-18
EP12190499 2012-10-30
PCT/EP2013/051318 WO2013110693A1 (de) 2012-01-25 2013-01-24 Verfahren und steuereinrichtung zur überwachung von fahrbewegungen einer aufzugskabine
EP13701254.8A EP2807103B1 (de) 2012-01-25 2013-01-24 Verfahren und steuereinrichtung zur überwachung von fahrbewegungen einer aufzugskabine

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2807103A1 EP2807103A1 (de) 2014-12-03
EP2807103B1 true EP2807103B1 (de) 2015-12-30

Family

ID=47603744

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13701254.8A Revoked EP2807103B1 (de) 2012-01-25 2013-01-24 Verfahren und steuereinrichtung zur überwachung von fahrbewegungen einer aufzugskabine

Country Status (14)

Country Link
US (1) US20150014098A1 (sl)
EP (1) EP2807103B1 (sl)
JP (1) JP2015508367A (sl)
KR (1) KR20140128343A (sl)
BR (1) BR112014017973A8 (sl)
CA (1) CA2861399A1 (sl)
CO (1) CO7010799A2 (sl)
ES (1) ES2566386T3 (sl)
HU (1) HUE027471T2 (sl)
MX (1) MX2014008910A (sl)
PL (1) PL2807103T3 (sl)
SI (1) SI2807103T1 (sl)
WO (1) WO2013110693A1 (sl)
ZA (1) ZA201405388B (sl)

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102012106056A1 (de) * 2012-07-05 2014-01-09 Rg Mechatronics Gmbh Regelvorrichtung zum Regeln der Beschleunigung einer in vertikaler Richtung bewegten Transporteinrichtung
SG11201502862VA (en) * 2012-10-18 2015-05-28 Inventio Ag Safety device of an elevator system
CN105980284B (zh) 2014-02-06 2019-10-22 奥的斯电梯公司 电梯中的制动器操作管理
US10112801B2 (en) 2014-08-05 2018-10-30 Richard Laszlo Madarasz Elevator inspection apparatus with separate computing device and sensors
DE102015202700A1 (de) * 2015-02-13 2016-08-18 Thyssenkrupp Ag Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Aufzugsystems
EP3317218B1 (de) * 2015-06-30 2022-10-26 Inventio Ag Überwachungsvorrichtung und überwachungsverfahren für eine aufzugsanlage
CN107835780B (zh) * 2015-07-22 2019-05-21 三菱电机株式会社 电梯装置
US10781074B2 (en) 2015-09-25 2020-09-22 Inventio Ag Elevator car movement monitoring device, assembly device and assembly method for an elevator system
US10472206B2 (en) 2015-12-04 2019-11-12 Otis Elevator Company Sensor failure detection and fusion system for a multi-car ropeless elevator system
WO2017168035A1 (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-10-05 Kone Corporation A method, a safety control unit, and an elevator system for verifying speed data of an elevator car for overspeed monitoring of the elevator car
US10571899B2 (en) * 2016-08-18 2020-02-25 i Smart Technologies Corporation Operating state acquisition apparatus, production management system, and production management method for manufacturing line
US10407274B2 (en) * 2016-12-08 2019-09-10 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. System and method for parameter estimation of hybrid sinusoidal FM-polynomial phase signal
US10462638B2 (en) 2017-06-20 2019-10-29 Otis Elevator Company Lone worker fall detection
EP3459890B1 (en) 2017-09-20 2024-04-03 Otis Elevator Company Health monitoring of safety braking systems for elevators
EP3527522B1 (en) * 2018-02-15 2021-06-02 KONE Corporation A method for preventive maintenance of an elevator and an elevator system
US11572251B2 (en) * 2018-08-20 2023-02-07 Otis Elevator Company Elevator door sensor fusion, fault detection, and service notification
JP7140634B2 (ja) * 2018-10-30 2022-09-21 株式会社日立製作所 エレベーターの制御システム
US11591183B2 (en) * 2018-12-28 2023-02-28 Otis Elevator Company Enhancing elevator sensor operation for improved maintenance
EP3848313B1 (en) * 2020-01-09 2023-03-01 KONE Corporation Method of position detection of an elevator car
US11676119B2 (en) 2021-06-17 2023-06-13 Capital One Services, Llc System and method for activating a beacon-based service location application
CN113979260B (zh) * 2021-10-27 2023-06-02 日立楼宇技术（广州）有限公司 一种电梯超速保护方法、装置、设备及存储介质

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003004397A1 (de) 2001-07-04 2003-01-16 Inventio Ag Verfahren zum verhindern einer unzulässig hohen fahrgeschwindigkeit des lastaufnahmemittels eines aufzugs
WO2007145613A2 (en) 2006-06-07 2007-12-21 Otis Elevator Company Multi-car elevator hoistway separation assurance
US7377366B2 (en) 2002-11-25 2008-05-27 Otis Elevator Company Sheave assembly for an elevator system
EP2022742A1 (de) 2007-08-07 2009-02-11 ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG Aufzugsystem
WO2009074627A1 (de) 2007-12-11 2009-06-18 Inventio Ag Aufzugssystem mit vertikal und horizontal verfahrbaren aufzugkabinen
WO2009105903A1 (de) 2008-02-29 2009-09-03 Inventio Ag Messeinrichtung für eine aufzugsanlage sowie eine aufzugsanlage mit einer solchen messeinrichtung
DE102008022416A1 (de) 2008-05-06 2009-11-12 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Beschleunigungsmessung an einer Aufzugseinrichtung
EP1602610B1 (en) 2004-06-02 2010-04-14 Inventio Ag Elevator supervision
WO2011076590A1 (de) 2009-12-22 2011-06-30 Inventio Ag Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der bewegung und/oder der position einer aufzugskabine

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5274203A (en) * 1989-06-30 1993-12-28 Otis Elevator Company "Smart" position transducer system for elevators
US5407028A (en) * 1993-04-28 1995-04-18 Otis Elevator Company Tested and redundant elevator emergency terminal stopping capability
JP3251844B2 (ja) * 1996-03-29 2002-01-28 三菱電機株式会社 エレベータの制御装置
JPH10236746A (ja) * 1997-02-26 1998-09-08 Toshiba Fa Syst Eng Kk 油圧エレベータの位置検出装置
US6173813B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2001-01-16 Otis Elevator Company Electronic control for an elevator braking system
EP1731470B1 (en) * 2004-03-30 2011-09-28 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Control device of elevator
JP2005289532A (ja) * 2004-03-31 2005-10-20 Mitsubishi Electric Corp エレベータ制御装置
CN100406689C (zh) * 2004-04-27 2008-07-30 三菱扶桑卡客车公司 内燃机的可变气门机构
US7614481B2 (en) * 2004-04-27 2009-11-10 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Elevator apparatus including a safety control portion that detects an abnormality
JP4994837B2 (ja) * 2004-05-31 2012-08-08 三菱電機株式会社 エレベータ装置
ES2293392T5 (es) * 2005-01-07 2011-07-20 Thyssenkrupp Elevator Ag Ascensor con sistema de control.
WO2007086872A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-02 Otis Elevator Company Managing an encoder malfunction in an elevator drive system
JP4991269B2 (ja) * 2006-12-13 2012-08-01 株式会社日立製作所 エレベータ監視装置
JP4812037B2 (ja) * 2007-07-23 2011-11-09 株式会社日立製作所 エレベーター乗りかごの速度検出装置およびエレベーターの安全装置
JP4803560B2 (ja) * 2008-09-11 2011-10-26 東芝エレベータ株式会社 エレベータの安全装置
EP2367746B1 (de) * 2008-12-23 2013-05-08 Inventio AG Aufzuganlage

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003004397A1 (de) 2001-07-04 2003-01-16 Inventio Ag Verfahren zum verhindern einer unzulässig hohen fahrgeschwindigkeit des lastaufnahmemittels eines aufzugs
US7377366B2 (en) 2002-11-25 2008-05-27 Otis Elevator Company Sheave assembly for an elevator system
EP1602610B1 (en) 2004-06-02 2010-04-14 Inventio Ag Elevator supervision
WO2007145613A2 (en) 2006-06-07 2007-12-21 Otis Elevator Company Multi-car elevator hoistway separation assurance
EP2022742A1 (de) 2007-08-07 2009-02-11 ThyssenKrupp Elevator AG Aufzugsystem
WO2009074627A1 (de) 2007-12-11 2009-06-18 Inventio Ag Aufzugssystem mit vertikal und horizontal verfahrbaren aufzugkabinen
WO2009105903A1 (de) 2008-02-29 2009-09-03 Inventio Ag Messeinrichtung für eine aufzugsanlage sowie eine aufzugsanlage mit einer solchen messeinrichtung
DE102008022416A1 (de) 2008-05-06 2009-11-12 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Beschleunigungsmessung an einer Aufzugseinrichtung
WO2011076590A1 (de) 2009-12-22 2011-06-30 Inventio Ag Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der bewegung und/oder der position einer aufzugskabine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2015508367A (ja) 2015-03-19
US20150014098A1 (en) 2015-01-15
WO2013110693A1 (de) 2013-08-01
SI2807103T1 (sl) 2016-04-29
CA2861399A1 (en) 2013-08-01
BR112014017973A8 (pt) 2017-07-11
EP2807103A1 (de) 2014-12-03
CO7010799A2 (es) 2014-07-31
HUE027471T2 (en) 2016-09-28
MX2014008910A (es) 2014-08-26
PL2807103T3 (pl) 2016-06-30
KR20140128343A (ko) 2014-11-05
RU2014134594A (ru) 2016-03-20
ZA201405388B (en) 2015-12-23
ES2566386T3 (es) 2016-04-12
BR112014017973A2 (sl) 2017-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2807103B1 (de) Verfahren und steuereinrichtung zur überwachung von fahrbewegungen einer aufzugskabine
EP2516305B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der bewegung und/oder der position einer aufzugskabine
EP2914529B1 (de) Bewegungs-überwachungssystem einer aufzugsanlage
EP2909122B1 (de) Sicherheitseinrichtung einer aufzugsanlage
EP1445075B1 (de) Verfahren zum Überwachen eines Roboters und Roboter mit einer Überwachungseinrichtung
EP3317218B1 (de) Überwachungsvorrichtung und überwachungsverfahren für eine aufzugsanlage
EP2804826B1 (de) Überwachung einer bahngeschwindigkeit einer materialbahn
DE10153072B4 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung sich anbahnender Laufstreifenablösungen eines Luftreifens an einem Fahrzeug
DE102012003178B4 (de) Einrichtung zur Überwachung der Funktion einer Rolltreppe oder eines Rollsteiges
EP1881312B1 (de) Rollenbremsenprüfstand
WO2009112564A1 (de) Verschleissüberwachungssystem, seilbetriebene transportanlage und verfahren zur überwachung von verschleissteilen derselben
DE102010062154A1 (de) Sicherheitseinrichtung für einen Aufzug
WO2017055022A1 (de) Verfahren zur erkennung eines defekts eines beschleunigungssensors und messsystem
EP3262394B1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zur erhöhung der sicherheit von achterbahnen und/oder karussels
DE102018208664A1 (de) Überwachung einer elektrodynamischen Bremse in einem Schienenfahrzeug
WO2014005835A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum frühzeitigen auslösen einer aufzugsbremse
EP3385086B1 (de) Verfahren zur bestimmung der axialen radreifendicke eines gummigefederten eisenbahnrads
EP2567923A1 (de) Redundante Schachtkopierung
EP2701962B1 (de) Schienenfahrzeug mit einer heissläuferüberwachung
DE102010045720B4 (de) Überwachung von Messanordnungen mit Messwertgebern zur Ermittlung von Drehzahlwerten und/oder Geschwindigkeiten in Schienenfahrzeugen
DE102022212649A1 (de) Lenkantrieb für ein Lenksystem eines Kraftfahrzeugs, Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Lenkantriebs, Lenksystem für ein Kraftfahrzeug und Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Lenksystems
DE102004058471A1 (de) Sicherheitseinrichtung für eine automatisiert arbeitende Anlage mit zumindest einem automatisiert bewegbaren Anlagenteil
DE102012022801A1 (de) Verfahren zur Lenkungsüberwachung und Lenksystem
DE102010049431B4 (de) Verfahren zur Diagnose mindestens einer zu diagnostizierenden Sensoreinheit einer elektromechanischen Lenkung und elektromechanische Lenkung
EP3963291B1 (de) Sensoranordnung zum überwachen eines technischen systems und verfahren zum betreiben einer sensoranordnung

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140729

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: SCHREINER, FRANK

Inventor name: BUETLER, ERICH

Inventor name: SCHMIDT, THOMAS

Inventor name: GEISSHUESLER, MICHAEL

Inventor name: DEGEN, MICHAEL

Inventor name: GREMAUD, NICOLAS

Inventor name: STOELZL, STEFAN

Inventor name: DUECHS, DOMINIK

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B66B 1/34 20060101ALI20150618BHEP

Ipc: B66B 5/00 20060101ALI20150618BHEP

Ipc: B66B 5/06 20060101AFI20150618BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150812

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 767370

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502013001700

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20160311

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2566386

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20160412

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: T3

Ref document number: E 20762

Country of ref document: SK

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160430

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160124

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E027471

Country of ref document: HU

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502013001700

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR AG

Effective date: 20160929

Opponent name: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

Effective date: 20160929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160124

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Payment date: 20161227

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20170119

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20170111

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20170123

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170120

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20170119

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20170130

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170120

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20170117

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20170123

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20170123

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: SI

Payment date: 20161229

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20170119

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20170119

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: SK

Payment date: 20170123

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20170113

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20170124

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20170118

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R064

Ref document number: 502013001700

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R103

Ref document number: 502013001700

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20170120

Year of fee payment: 5

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PLX

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20171020

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Effective date: 20171020

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: MC4A

Ref document number: E 20762

Country of ref document: SK

Effective date: 20171020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES

Effective date: 20151230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MA03

Ref document number: 767370

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171020

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SI

Ref legal event code: KO00

Effective date: 20180925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230