EP2718501B1 - Überbrückungsvorrichtung in mittelträgerbauweise für eine bauwerksfuge - Google Patents
Überbrückungsvorrichtung in mittelträgerbauweise für eine bauwerksfuge Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2718501B1 EP2718501B1 EP12726807.6A EP12726807A EP2718501B1 EP 2718501 B1 EP2718501 B1 EP 2718501B1 EP 12726807 A EP12726807 A EP 12726807A EP 2718501 B1 EP2718501 B1 EP 2718501B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- bridging device
- breaking point
- centre
- bridging
- movement
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 title claims description 10
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims description 67
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 5
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000446313 Lamella Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000000078 claw Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009413 insulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008092 positive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D19/00—Structural or constructional details of bridges
- E01D19/06—Arrangement, construction or bridging of expansion joints
- E01D19/062—Joints having intermediate beams
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a bridging device in center-beam construction for a building joint between two structural parts with at least two each associated with a building part edge profiles and at least one center support is disposed between the edge profiles and at least one of the building structure bridging traverse.
- such devices are used to bridge building joints between two parts of the structure, in particular between two bridge parts such as a bridgehead or abutment and a bridge support or bridge girder or adjoining bridge girder so that vehicles and animals safely from one component to another component can reach.
- the construction joints also called movement joints or expansion joints, serve to compensate for movements of the building parts to each other, so as to avoid damage or destruction of the building parts.
- the size of the building gap is therefore chosen so that the building parts in the course of their use with the greatest possible probability do not touch.
- the movements that the building parts experience in the course of their use can be divided into two categories, namely in proper movements in use and extraordinary movements due to rare load effects.
- Movements in the state of use occur almost constantly, regularly and / or permanently.
- the movements of the state of use include, for example, movements that are caused by thermal expansion or result from creeping and shrinkage of the materials used.
- this also movements from burdens include, resulting from the use of structural parts, such as caused by passage of people and / or vehicles traffic loads, braking loads when braking vehicles, wind loads, etc ..
- Extraordinary movements are relatively rare. In most cases, it is larger movements from burdens such as earthquakes, building ground movements, explosion loads, loads from the impact of objects or vehicles, etc.
- Bridging devices for building joints which compensate for such movements of the building parts are known from the prior art in various embodiments.
- a proven form of a lock-up device is known as the center-carrier construction or lamella design variant.
- the bridging device has at least one center carrier, which is fixedly arranged on at least one traverse mounted rotatably and / or displaceably on the adjacent building parts. If the building gap to be bridged is larger, the bridging device has a plurality of center supports, which are each connected to their own crossbar.
- the trusses are usually installed in so-called truss boxes in the respective building part.
- control devices act on the trusses of the respective center carrier and keep the variable distances between the individual center carriers or to the edge carriers largely constant.
- Such controls are formed for example by spring chains, scissors or with the help of so-called pivoting traverses.
- the bridging device according to the invention is thus distinguished from the above-described bridging devices in that it has at least two center supports, which arranged on a common cross member in a fixed in use state distance to each other shear-resistant are where the connection between at least one center carrier and the traverse is designed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point.
- This approach is based on the idea to orientate the number of movable center support in the bridging solution mainly on the size of the movements of the building parts in use and not as usual today on the size of the maximum pathways to be included in extraordinary movements or loads.
- the solution according to the invention has the advantage that significantly fewer functional parts are required for the control of the distances of the center girders.
- significantly fewer functional parts are required for the control of the distances of the center girders.
- the entire construction is thus more economical to perform, has a longer life and a lower maintenance than the known from the prior art bridging devices.
- the executed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point connection between traverse and center girder is designed so that it fails in an extraordinary movement of the building parts to each other.
- the introduction of force necessary for triggering the predetermined breaking point is effected by touching the center support with an adjacent edge profile and / or an adjacent center support.
- connection can be made so that the failure force is reliably predefined and minimized. Furthermore, this also results in a staggering of the extent of damage in extreme events, since the connections of the individual means carriers successively and not fail simultaneously. Ultimately, so can the dimensions of the lock-up device can be minimized, since the truss boxes can be made significantly shorter, since the lock-up device releases targeted by own deformation path in the building joint and no longer has to be designed for much larger movements.
- the executed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point connection is designed as a positive, non-positive and / or cohesive connection.
- the connection may be a welded connection, a bolt connection or even a connection with clamps.
- the non-positive connection has the advantage that it can be upgraded after a extreme event with relatively little effort.
- the failure force for example, by tightened with different force bolts can be variably adjusted.
- At least one center support is additionally secured against lifting so that it remains lying on the truss or trusses after an extraordinary movement of the structural parts and the associated failure of the predetermined breaking point or predetermined breaking points.
- the securing can be done in any suitable manner, for example by claws, straps, ropes or the like. Consequently, the bridging device remains traversable even after a Extermereignis especially for rescue workers with even increased security.
- the edge profiles and / or the center support profile impact surfaces which are designed so that at least one center support is guided in an extraordinary movement of the building parts to the top of the lock-up device.
- the profile impact surfaces of an edge profile and a center support or adjacent center support can be performed alternately bevelled, so that there is a ramp-like impact surface over which the center support is guided at force application to the top. This allows additional path to be released during an extraordinary movement.
- the distance between adjacent center carriers fixed in the use state lies in the range between 40 mm and 100 mm. It is also advantageous if the variable distance between an edge profile and the adjacent center support and / or between two mutually displaceably mounted center supports amounts to at least 0 mm and a maximum of 100 mm. These distances have just emerged as suitable for road junctions, with a large distance a particularly economical and the smaller size requires a particularly comfortable overrunning lock-up device.
- the bridging device has at least one safety device associated with a structural part, which permits a further movement of the structural parts closing the structural joint to one another when the connections designed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point have failed. This therefore releases an additional path that is available for particularly violent events, such as very strong earthquakes. This additionally protects the structural parts against damage.
- the safety device has a ramp assigned to each cross member and extending in the direction of the upper side of the structural part, wherein the edge profile is connected to the ramp via a predetermined breaking point.
- the edge profile and the center girder are feasible after failure of the predetermined breaking point on the ramp from the lock-up device. This ensures that the traverse remains after an extreme event within the lock-up device, and only the edge profile and the center carrier are guided out of the lock-up device. After the event, the center carrier can and the edge profile are pushed back into the lock-up device, whereby the Kochfahrmaschine is restored.
- the predetermined breaking point between edge profile and ramp is designed for a greater force application, so that initially the connections between the center beams and the traverse fail before the predetermined breaking point of the edge profile fails. Otherwise, the safety device would trigger too early.
- the safety device has a cover part, which is flat with the upper side of the structural part, between the ramp and the edge profile, wherein the cover part can be guided out of the bridging device. As a result, the safety device is easy to drive over in use.
- the safety device is designed as a replaceable fuse box.
- the safety device can be replaced quickly and inexpensively after an extraordinary load.
- the building is after a extraordinary load again in a short time in its normal state and fully used.
- a sealing profile is arranged between an edge profile and a center support, wherein the sealing profile can be expanded with respect to one another during an opening movement of the building parts.
- the sealing profile is used for sound insulation and prevents the ingress of dirt, water, animals or the like in the lock-up device. The overextensibility ensures that this function is given to each other in an opening movement of the building parts.
- sealing profiles are arranged between an edge profile and between two adjacent center beams. It is conceivable that a failure of the at least one connection between the center beam and Traverse, by these can be brought about by these sealing profiles in an extraordinary opening movement of the building parts.
- the sealing profiles and their connections with the edge beams and the center beams must be designed so tensile that they can solve the sollbruchstellenartigen connections.
- the staggered release of additional route This has a positive effect on the override.
- Fig. 1 shows a bridging device 1 according to the invention according to a first embodiment as a longitudinal section, ie transversely to a building joint 2 between two structural parts 3 and 4.
- the bridging device 1 has two edge profiles 5, 6 each associated with a building part 3, 4.
- the bridging device 1 has five double-T-shaped support beams 7, which are arranged on a traverse 8 bridging the building joint 2.
- all center girders 7 are connected to the traverse 8 in a shear-resistant manner via the connections 9.
- the connections 9 are designed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point, in this example as a welded joint.
- the gaps between the center girders thus have a fixed distance FA during use.
- This fixed distance FA can be, for example, 60 mm.
- the bridging device 1 has six sealing profiles 14, which are arranged between the edge profiles 5, 6 and an adjacent center girder 7 and between adjacent center girders 7 and which are held by claw-like overhangs.
- the traverse 8 can be moved in and out of each of a building part 3, 4 associated truss boxes 15 in movements of the building parts 3, 4.
- the Traverse 8 is stored accordingly, the storage can be done for example by pressure bearings.
- the gaps have a variable distance VA.
- VA mean variable distance
- damage-free movements of up to ⁇ 80 mm per gap can thus be accommodated, wherein opening movements of the building parts 3, 4 to one another are made possible by an overstretching of the corresponding sealing profile 14.
- the adjacent to the edge profiles 5, 6 center carrier 7 are arranged displaceably on the traverse 8, so as to create an additional gap with a variable distance VA for receiving movements of the building parts 3, 4 to each other.
- Fig. 1a and 1b are movements of the building parts 3, 4 shown in use, wherein Fig. 1b the maximum possible movement of the building parts 3, 4 to each other in use is shown.
- the edge profiles 5, 6 touch the respectively adjacent center support 7 and the variable distances VA of the center supports 7 are 0 mm.
- the closing movement of the building parts 3, 4 to each other as in Fig. 1b represented a total of 80 mm. It also does not matter whether both parts of the building move, or whether it is a one-sided movement, since in one-sided movement, the cross member 8 is pushed on.
- the lock-up device 1 is also designed for opening movements of this magnitude, the total movement capacity is 640 mm, of which only 160 mm are received by the variable distances VA between the edge profiles 5, 6 and the respective adjacent center supports 7.
- a second embodiment of a lock-up device 1 according to the invention is shown. Unlike the in Fig. 1 shown bridging device 1, the lock-up device 1 according to the second embodiment, an additional safety device 10 which is associated with a building part 4.
- the other building part 3 has a extended truss box 15, in which the Traverse (s) 8 is moved in and out or are.
- the safety device 10 comprises a ramp 12 associated with each cross member 8.
- the ramp 12 has a section parallel to the respective cross member 8 and substantially flat with the upper side of the cross member 8, and a rising portion extending in the direction of the upper side 11 of the structural member 4.
- the edge profile 6 is connected to the flat portion of the ramp 12 via a predetermined breaking point 9, here for example a bolt connection, shear-resistant.
- the safety device 10 has a cover part 13, which terminates as flush as possible with the upper side 11 of the structural part 4 or eienr thereon arranged roadway or the like.
- the cover 12 extends here between the edge profile 6 and ramp 12 and the top 11 of the building part. 4
- FIG. 2b Analogous to the in Fig. 1 shown embodiment shows the Fig. 2b the maximum possible movement of the building parts 3, 4 to each other in use.
- the edge profiles 5, 6 touch the corresponding adjacent center beams 7 and the variable distances VA are 0 mm.
- the edge profile 6 is pushed in the direction of the rising part of the ramp 12 and the cover 13 is guided out of the bridging device 1 along the surface 11 of the building part 4 (see. Fig. 2g ).
- the bridging device 1 according to the invention still remains traversable without further ado.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
- Body Structure For Vehicles (AREA)
- Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102011050977A DE102011050977A1 (de) | 2011-06-09 | 2011-06-09 | Überbrückungsvorrichtung in Mittelträgerbauweise für eine Bauwerksfuge |
PCT/EP2012/061026 WO2012168476A1 (de) | 2011-06-09 | 2012-06-11 | Überbrückungsvorrichtung in mittelträgerbauweise für eine bauwerksfuge |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2718501A1 EP2718501A1 (de) | 2014-04-16 |
EP2718501B1 true EP2718501B1 (de) | 2015-10-14 |
Family
ID=46246083
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12726807.6A Active EP2718501B1 (de) | 2011-06-09 | 2012-06-11 | Überbrückungsvorrichtung in mittelträgerbauweise für eine bauwerksfuge |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2718501B1 (es) |
DE (1) | DE102011050977A1 (es) |
EA (1) | EA026449B1 (es) |
ES (1) | ES2558178T3 (es) |
PT (1) | PT2718501E (es) |
WO (1) | WO2012168476A1 (es) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2925932B1 (de) | 2012-11-27 | 2017-09-27 | Mageba S.A. | Dehnfugen-überbrückungsvorrichtung |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103469727A (zh) * | 2013-10-09 | 2013-12-25 | 湖南广和桥梁构件有限公司 | 桥梁伸缩缝桁梁箱 |
CN103590329B (zh) * | 2013-11-25 | 2015-12-02 | 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司 | 铁路预应力混凝土部分斜拉桥梁端伸缩缝 |
DE102013224460A1 (de) | 2013-11-28 | 2015-05-28 | Maurer Söhne Engineering GmbH & Co. KG | Überbrückungsvorrichtung |
MD1107Z (ro) * | 2016-08-24 | 2017-07-31 | Григоре ЧАПА | Pod telescopic mobil |
CZ201794A3 (cs) * | 2017-02-17 | 2018-06-20 | České vysoké učení technické v Praze, Fakulta stavební, Katedra ocelových a dřevěných konstrukcí | Lamelový mostní závěr |
CN107299590A (zh) * | 2017-07-07 | 2017-10-27 | 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司 | 双缝浅埋型钢式桥梁伸缩装置 |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1278470B (de) * | 1965-12-31 | 1968-09-26 | Gutehoffnungshuette Sterkrade | Wasserdichte Abdeckvorrichtung fuer Dehnungsfugen in Bruecken od. dgl. |
DE19630328C2 (de) | 1996-07-26 | 1999-11-18 | Maurer Friedrich Soehne | Überbrückungsvorrichtung für Fugenspalte |
JP4019295B2 (ja) * | 1999-03-09 | 2007-12-12 | 日本鋳造株式会社 | 伸縮継手装置 |
GB0110996D0 (en) * | 2001-05-04 | 2001-06-27 | Devlin Seamus M | Improved bridge joint |
US20080148499A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-26 | Construction Research & Technology Gmbh | Expansion joint system |
-
2011
- 2011-06-09 DE DE102011050977A patent/DE102011050977A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2012
- 2012-06-11 WO PCT/EP2012/061026 patent/WO2012168476A1/de active Application Filing
- 2012-06-11 ES ES12726807.6T patent/ES2558178T3/es active Active
- 2012-06-11 EA EA201391791A patent/EA026449B1/ru not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2012-06-11 EP EP12726807.6A patent/EP2718501B1/de active Active
- 2012-06-11 PT PT127268076T patent/PT2718501E/pt unknown
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2925932B1 (de) | 2012-11-27 | 2017-09-27 | Mageba S.A. | Dehnfugen-überbrückungsvorrichtung |
EP2925932B2 (de) † | 2012-11-27 | 2024-02-21 | Mageba S.A. | Dehnfugen-überbrückungsvorrichtung |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EA026449B1 (ru) | 2017-04-28 |
WO2012168476A1 (de) | 2012-12-13 |
EP2718501A1 (de) | 2014-04-16 |
ES2558178T3 (es) | 2016-02-02 |
DE102011050977A1 (de) | 2012-12-13 |
PT2718501E (pt) | 2016-02-05 |
EA201391791A1 (ru) | 2014-05-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2718501B1 (de) | Überbrückungsvorrichtung in mittelträgerbauweise für eine bauwerksfuge | |
EP3526427B1 (de) | Absturzsicherung für personen | |
EP2270354B1 (de) | Seilendverankerung mit Überlastungsschutz | |
EP2925932B1 (de) | Dehnfugen-überbrückungsvorrichtung | |
EP2455546B1 (de) | Pfostenanordnung für eine Schutzplankenkonstruktion und Schutzplankenkonstruktion zur Absicherung von Fahrbahnen auf Bauwerken | |
EP1355009B1 (de) | Überbrückungsvorrichtung für Fugenspalte | |
EP2089597B1 (de) | Klettersystem im bauwesen mit einem kletter- oder führungsschuh | |
DE102005042400B4 (de) | Crashsicherheiterhöhende Ausrüstungs-Befestigungsvorrichtung eines Luftfahrzeugs | |
DE102013101776B3 (de) | Leitschwellenschranke sowie Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem mit einer solchen Leitschwellenschranke | |
EP0748709A1 (de) | Entriegelungsvorrichtung für eine Fensterscheibe, insbesondere für Eisenbahnwaggons, mit einem Schieber | |
EP1726560B1 (de) | Scherenhubtisch | |
EP1419307A1 (de) | Hubtor | |
EP3564441B1 (de) | Stützwerk zum schutz vor lawinen, steinschlägen und erdrutschen | |
DE2900486C2 (de) | Rundlaufkran | |
DE102011053263A1 (de) | Leitschwellenschranke sowie Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem mit einer Leitschwellenschranke | |
DE2833353A1 (de) | Fanganlage zum gezielten und gewaltsamen abbremsen und einfangen von fahrzeugen | |
EP3645443B1 (de) | Aufzugsanlage | |
DE102016110674B3 (de) | Scharniergelenkstruktur | |
DE102006034666B4 (de) | Überladebrücke mit Sicherheitsspere und Verfahren zum Betreiben der Überladebrücke | |
DE102021105872B3 (de) | Verfahren für den Abbruch von Brückenbauwerken | |
DE10250505B3 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Schutz eines Bauwerkes gegen Anprall von Schienenfahrzeugen | |
AT504234B1 (de) | Schiebetür oder schiebetor | |
EP3680388B1 (de) | Zufahrtschutz | |
DE202010015898U1 (de) | Mechanisch ausfahrbare Ausmauerungsvorrichtung für Konverter in Stahlwerken | |
DE102015200419A1 (de) | Überbrückungsvorrichtung für eine bewegliche Brücke und bewegliche Brücke mit einer solchen Überbrückungsvorrichtung |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20131204 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20150512 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 755179 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20151015 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502012004932 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: RO Ref legal event code: EPE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: TROESCH SCHEIDEGGER WERNER AG, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2558178 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20160202 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20160107 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20151014 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160214 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20160400034 Country of ref document: GR Effective date: 20160414 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502012004932 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Payment date: 20160509 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20160715 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160611 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160611 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170611 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20120611 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160611 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 755179 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170611 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151014 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170611 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20230719 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20230702 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240617 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20240617 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20240606 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240621 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: BG Payment date: 20240614 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20240529 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20240530 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20240628 Year of fee payment: 13 |