EP2718501B1 - Dispositif de transition de type à support central pour un joint de construction - Google Patents

Dispositif de transition de type à support central pour un joint de construction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2718501B1
EP2718501B1 EP12726807.6A EP12726807A EP2718501B1 EP 2718501 B1 EP2718501 B1 EP 2718501B1 EP 12726807 A EP12726807 A EP 12726807A EP 2718501 B1 EP2718501 B1 EP 2718501B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bridging device
breaking point
centre
bridging
movement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP12726807.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2718501A1 (fr
Inventor
Christian Braun
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Maurer Soehne Engineering GmbH and Co KG
Original Assignee
Maurer Soehne Engineering GmbH and Co KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Maurer Soehne Engineering GmbH and Co KG filed Critical Maurer Soehne Engineering GmbH and Co KG
Publication of EP2718501A1 publication Critical patent/EP2718501A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2718501B1 publication Critical patent/EP2718501B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
    • E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
    • E01D19/00—Structural or constructional details of bridges
    • E01D19/06—Arrangement, construction or bridging of expansion joints
    • E01D19/062—Joints having intermediate beams

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a bridging device in center-beam construction for a building joint between two structural parts with at least two each associated with a building part edge profiles and at least one center support is disposed between the edge profiles and at least one of the building structure bridging traverse.
  • such devices are used to bridge building joints between two parts of the structure, in particular between two bridge parts such as a bridgehead or abutment and a bridge support or bridge girder or adjoining bridge girder so that vehicles and animals safely from one component to another component can reach.
  • the construction joints also called movement joints or expansion joints, serve to compensate for movements of the building parts to each other, so as to avoid damage or destruction of the building parts.
  • the size of the building gap is therefore chosen so that the building parts in the course of their use with the greatest possible probability do not touch.
  • the movements that the building parts experience in the course of their use can be divided into two categories, namely in proper movements in use and extraordinary movements due to rare load effects.
  • Movements in the state of use occur almost constantly, regularly and / or permanently.
  • the movements of the state of use include, for example, movements that are caused by thermal expansion or result from creeping and shrinkage of the materials used.
  • this also movements from burdens include, resulting from the use of structural parts, such as caused by passage of people and / or vehicles traffic loads, braking loads when braking vehicles, wind loads, etc ..
  • Extraordinary movements are relatively rare. In most cases, it is larger movements from burdens such as earthquakes, building ground movements, explosion loads, loads from the impact of objects or vehicles, etc.
  • Bridging devices for building joints which compensate for such movements of the building parts are known from the prior art in various embodiments.
  • a proven form of a lock-up device is known as the center-carrier construction or lamella design variant.
  • the bridging device has at least one center carrier, which is fixedly arranged on at least one traverse mounted rotatably and / or displaceably on the adjacent building parts. If the building gap to be bridged is larger, the bridging device has a plurality of center supports, which are each connected to their own crossbar.
  • the trusses are usually installed in so-called truss boxes in the respective building part.
  • control devices act on the trusses of the respective center carrier and keep the variable distances between the individual center carriers or to the edge carriers largely constant.
  • Such controls are formed for example by spring chains, scissors or with the help of so-called pivoting traverses.
  • the bridging device according to the invention is thus distinguished from the above-described bridging devices in that it has at least two center supports, which arranged on a common cross member in a fixed in use state distance to each other shear-resistant are where the connection between at least one center carrier and the traverse is designed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point.
  • This approach is based on the idea to orientate the number of movable center support in the bridging solution mainly on the size of the movements of the building parts in use and not as usual today on the size of the maximum pathways to be included in extraordinary movements or loads.
  • the solution according to the invention has the advantage that significantly fewer functional parts are required for the control of the distances of the center girders.
  • significantly fewer functional parts are required for the control of the distances of the center girders.
  • the entire construction is thus more economical to perform, has a longer life and a lower maintenance than the known from the prior art bridging devices.
  • the executed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point connection between traverse and center girder is designed so that it fails in an extraordinary movement of the building parts to each other.
  • the introduction of force necessary for triggering the predetermined breaking point is effected by touching the center support with an adjacent edge profile and / or an adjacent center support.
  • connection can be made so that the failure force is reliably predefined and minimized. Furthermore, this also results in a staggering of the extent of damage in extreme events, since the connections of the individual means carriers successively and not fail simultaneously. Ultimately, so can the dimensions of the lock-up device can be minimized, since the truss boxes can be made significantly shorter, since the lock-up device releases targeted by own deformation path in the building joint and no longer has to be designed for much larger movements.
  • the executed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point connection is designed as a positive, non-positive and / or cohesive connection.
  • the connection may be a welded connection, a bolt connection or even a connection with clamps.
  • the non-positive connection has the advantage that it can be upgraded after a extreme event with relatively little effort.
  • the failure force for example, by tightened with different force bolts can be variably adjusted.
  • At least one center support is additionally secured against lifting so that it remains lying on the truss or trusses after an extraordinary movement of the structural parts and the associated failure of the predetermined breaking point or predetermined breaking points.
  • the securing can be done in any suitable manner, for example by claws, straps, ropes or the like. Consequently, the bridging device remains traversable even after a Extermereignis especially for rescue workers with even increased security.
  • the edge profiles and / or the center support profile impact surfaces which are designed so that at least one center support is guided in an extraordinary movement of the building parts to the top of the lock-up device.
  • the profile impact surfaces of an edge profile and a center support or adjacent center support can be performed alternately bevelled, so that there is a ramp-like impact surface over which the center support is guided at force application to the top. This allows additional path to be released during an extraordinary movement.
  • the distance between adjacent center carriers fixed in the use state lies in the range between 40 mm and 100 mm. It is also advantageous if the variable distance between an edge profile and the adjacent center support and / or between two mutually displaceably mounted center supports amounts to at least 0 mm and a maximum of 100 mm. These distances have just emerged as suitable for road junctions, with a large distance a particularly economical and the smaller size requires a particularly comfortable overrunning lock-up device.
  • the bridging device has at least one safety device associated with a structural part, which permits a further movement of the structural parts closing the structural joint to one another when the connections designed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point have failed. This therefore releases an additional path that is available for particularly violent events, such as very strong earthquakes. This additionally protects the structural parts against damage.
  • the safety device has a ramp assigned to each cross member and extending in the direction of the upper side of the structural part, wherein the edge profile is connected to the ramp via a predetermined breaking point.
  • the edge profile and the center girder are feasible after failure of the predetermined breaking point on the ramp from the lock-up device. This ensures that the traverse remains after an extreme event within the lock-up device, and only the edge profile and the center carrier are guided out of the lock-up device. After the event, the center carrier can and the edge profile are pushed back into the lock-up device, whereby the Kochfahrmaschine is restored.
  • the predetermined breaking point between edge profile and ramp is designed for a greater force application, so that initially the connections between the center beams and the traverse fail before the predetermined breaking point of the edge profile fails. Otherwise, the safety device would trigger too early.
  • the safety device has a cover part, which is flat with the upper side of the structural part, between the ramp and the edge profile, wherein the cover part can be guided out of the bridging device. As a result, the safety device is easy to drive over in use.
  • the safety device is designed as a replaceable fuse box.
  • the safety device can be replaced quickly and inexpensively after an extraordinary load.
  • the building is after a extraordinary load again in a short time in its normal state and fully used.
  • a sealing profile is arranged between an edge profile and a center support, wherein the sealing profile can be expanded with respect to one another during an opening movement of the building parts.
  • the sealing profile is used for sound insulation and prevents the ingress of dirt, water, animals or the like in the lock-up device. The overextensibility ensures that this function is given to each other in an opening movement of the building parts.
  • sealing profiles are arranged between an edge profile and between two adjacent center beams. It is conceivable that a failure of the at least one connection between the center beam and Traverse, by these can be brought about by these sealing profiles in an extraordinary opening movement of the building parts.
  • the sealing profiles and their connections with the edge beams and the center beams must be designed so tensile that they can solve the sollbruchstellenartigen connections.
  • the staggered release of additional route This has a positive effect on the override.
  • Fig. 1 shows a bridging device 1 according to the invention according to a first embodiment as a longitudinal section, ie transversely to a building joint 2 between two structural parts 3 and 4.
  • the bridging device 1 has two edge profiles 5, 6 each associated with a building part 3, 4.
  • the bridging device 1 has five double-T-shaped support beams 7, which are arranged on a traverse 8 bridging the building joint 2.
  • all center girders 7 are connected to the traverse 8 in a shear-resistant manner via the connections 9.
  • the connections 9 are designed in the manner of a predetermined breaking point, in this example as a welded joint.
  • the gaps between the center girders thus have a fixed distance FA during use.
  • This fixed distance FA can be, for example, 60 mm.
  • the bridging device 1 has six sealing profiles 14, which are arranged between the edge profiles 5, 6 and an adjacent center girder 7 and between adjacent center girders 7 and which are held by claw-like overhangs.
  • the traverse 8 can be moved in and out of each of a building part 3, 4 associated truss boxes 15 in movements of the building parts 3, 4.
  • the Traverse 8 is stored accordingly, the storage can be done for example by pressure bearings.
  • the gaps have a variable distance VA.
  • VA mean variable distance
  • damage-free movements of up to ⁇ 80 mm per gap can thus be accommodated, wherein opening movements of the building parts 3, 4 to one another are made possible by an overstretching of the corresponding sealing profile 14.
  • the adjacent to the edge profiles 5, 6 center carrier 7 are arranged displaceably on the traverse 8, so as to create an additional gap with a variable distance VA for receiving movements of the building parts 3, 4 to each other.
  • Fig. 1a and 1b are movements of the building parts 3, 4 shown in use, wherein Fig. 1b the maximum possible movement of the building parts 3, 4 to each other in use is shown.
  • the edge profiles 5, 6 touch the respectively adjacent center support 7 and the variable distances VA of the center supports 7 are 0 mm.
  • the closing movement of the building parts 3, 4 to each other as in Fig. 1b represented a total of 80 mm. It also does not matter whether both parts of the building move, or whether it is a one-sided movement, since in one-sided movement, the cross member 8 is pushed on.
  • the lock-up device 1 is also designed for opening movements of this magnitude, the total movement capacity is 640 mm, of which only 160 mm are received by the variable distances VA between the edge profiles 5, 6 and the respective adjacent center supports 7.
  • a second embodiment of a lock-up device 1 according to the invention is shown. Unlike the in Fig. 1 shown bridging device 1, the lock-up device 1 according to the second embodiment, an additional safety device 10 which is associated with a building part 4.
  • the other building part 3 has a extended truss box 15, in which the Traverse (s) 8 is moved in and out or are.
  • the safety device 10 comprises a ramp 12 associated with each cross member 8.
  • the ramp 12 has a section parallel to the respective cross member 8 and substantially flat with the upper side of the cross member 8, and a rising portion extending in the direction of the upper side 11 of the structural member 4.
  • the edge profile 6 is connected to the flat portion of the ramp 12 via a predetermined breaking point 9, here for example a bolt connection, shear-resistant.
  • the safety device 10 has a cover part 13, which terminates as flush as possible with the upper side 11 of the structural part 4 or eienr thereon arranged roadway or the like.
  • the cover 12 extends here between the edge profile 6 and ramp 12 and the top 11 of the building part. 4
  • FIG. 2b Analogous to the in Fig. 1 shown embodiment shows the Fig. 2b the maximum possible movement of the building parts 3, 4 to each other in use.
  • the edge profiles 5, 6 touch the corresponding adjacent center beams 7 and the variable distances VA are 0 mm.
  • the edge profile 6 is pushed in the direction of the rising part of the ramp 12 and the cover 13 is guided out of the bridging device 1 along the surface 11 of the building part 4 (see. Fig. 2g ).
  • the bridging device 1 according to the invention still remains traversable without further ado.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
  • Body Structure For Vehicles (AREA)
  • Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)

Claims (13)

  1. Dispositif de pontage (1) de type à support central pour un joint de construction (2) entre deux parties de construction (3, 4), en particulier entre deux parties de pont avec au moins deux profilés de bord (5, 6) associés respectivement à une partie de construction et au moins un support central (7) qui est agencé entre les profilés de bord (5, 6) et sur au moins la traverse (8) couvrant le joint de construction (2),
    caractérisé en ce que
    le dispositif de pontage (1) présente au moins deux supports centraux (7) qui sont agencés de manière à résister au déplacement sur une traverse commune (8) à une distance fixée (FA) l'un par rapport à l'autre dans l'état d'utilisation, la liaison (9) étant réalisée entre au moins un support central (7) et la traverse (8) comme un point destiné à la rupture, la liaison (9) réalisée comme un point destiné à la rupture entre la traverse (8) et le support central (7) étant conçue de sorte qu'elle lâche en cas de mouvement extraordinaire des parties de construction (3, 4) l'une par rapport à l'autre.
  2. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon la revendication 1,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'introduction de force nécessaire au déclenchement du point destiné à la rupture est effectuée par un contact du support central (7) avec un profilé de bord (5, 6) contigu et/ou un support central (7) contigu.
  3. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    la liaison (9) réalisée comme un point destiné à la rupture est réalisée comme une liaison à complémentarité de formes, à force et/ou par matière.
  4. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce
    qu'au moins un support central (7) est bloqué contre le levage de sorte qu'il reste en appui après un mouvement extraordinaire des parties de construction (3, 4) et le lâchage consécutif de son/ses point(s) destiné(s) à la rupture sur la ou les traverse(s) (8).
  5. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    les profilés de bord (5, 6) et/ou les supports centraux (7) présentent des surfaces de collision de profilé qui sont conçues de sorte qu'au moins un support central (7) soit guidé lors d'un mouvement extraordinaire des parties de construction (3, 4) vers le haut hors du dispositif de pontage (1).
  6. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    la distance fixée (FA) dans l'état d'utilisation entre des supports centraux (7) contigus se trouve dans la plage entre 40 et 100 mm.
  7. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    la distance variable (VA) dans l'état d'utilisation entre un profilé de bord (5, 6) et le support central contigu (7) et/ou entre deux supports centraux (7) logés de manière mobile l'un par rapport à l'autre s'élève au minimum à 0 mm et au maximum à 100 mm.
  8. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le dispositif de pontage (1) présente au moins un dispositif de sécurité (10) associé à une partie de construction (3, 4) qui permet un autre mouvement fermant le joint de construction (2) des parties de construction (3, 4) l'une par rapport à l'autre lorsque toutes les liaisons (9) réalisées comme un point destiné à la rupture ont lâché.
  9. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon la revendication 8,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le dispositif de sécurité (10) présente une rampe (12) associée à chaque traverse (8) et s'étendant en direction du côté supérieur (11) de la partie de construction (3, 4), le profilé de bord (5, 6) étant relié par un point destiné à la rupture à la rampe (12) et le profilé de bord (5, 6) et les supports centraux (7) pouvant être guidés après le lâchage du point destiné à la rupture sur la rampe (12) hors du dispositif de pontage (1).
  10. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon la revendication 8 ou 9,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le dispositif de sécurité (10) présente une partie de recouvrement (13) plane avec le côté supérieur (11) de la partie de construction (3, 4) entre la rampe (12) et le profilé de bord (6), la partie de partie de recouvrement (13) pouvant être guidée hors du dispositif de pontage (1).
  11. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes 8 à 10,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le dispositif de sécurité (10) est réalisé comme une boîte de sécurité interchangeable.
  12. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    un profilé étanche (14) est agencé entre un profilé de bord (5, 6) et un support central (7), le profilé étanche (14) étant surextensible en cas de mouvement d'ouverture des parties de construction (3, 4) l'une par rapport à l'autre.
  13. Dispositif de pontage (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    des profilés étanches (14) sont agencés entre un profilé de bord (5, 6) ainsi qu'entre au moins deux supports centraux (7) contigus, un lâchage de l'au moins une liaison (9) réalisée comme un point destiné à la rupture pouvant être provoqué par les profilés étanches (14) en cas de mouvement ouvrant extraordinaire des parties de construction l'une par rapport à l'autre.
EP12726807.6A 2011-06-09 2012-06-11 Dispositif de transition de type à support central pour un joint de construction Active EP2718501B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102011050977A DE102011050977A1 (de) 2011-06-09 2011-06-09 Überbrückungsvorrichtung in Mittelträgerbauweise für eine Bauwerksfuge
PCT/EP2012/061026 WO2012168476A1 (fr) 2011-06-09 2012-06-11 Dispositif d'enjambement de type à support central pour un joint de construction

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2718501A1 EP2718501A1 (fr) 2014-04-16
EP2718501B1 true EP2718501B1 (fr) 2015-10-14

Family

ID=46246083

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12726807.6A Active EP2718501B1 (fr) 2011-06-09 2012-06-11 Dispositif de transition de type à support central pour un joint de construction

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2718501B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102011050977A1 (fr)
EA (1) EA026449B1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2558178T3 (fr)
PT (1) PT2718501E (fr)
WO (1) WO2012168476A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2925932B1 (fr) 2012-11-27 2017-09-27 Mageba S.A. Dispositif de pontage pour joints de dilatation

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103469727A (zh) * 2013-10-09 2013-12-25 湖南广和桥梁构件有限公司 桥梁伸缩缝桁梁箱
CN103590329B (zh) * 2013-11-25 2015-12-02 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司 铁路预应力混凝土部分斜拉桥梁端伸缩缝
DE102013224460A1 (de) * 2013-11-28 2015-05-28 Maurer Söhne Engineering GmbH & Co. KG Überbrückungsvorrichtung
MD1107Z (ro) * 2016-08-24 2017-07-31 Григоре ЧАПА Pod telescopic mobil
CZ307351B6 (cs) * 2017-02-17 2018-06-20 České vysoké učení technické v Praze, Fakulta stavební, Katedra ocelových a dřevěných konstrukcí Lamelový mostní závěr
CN107299590A (zh) * 2017-07-07 2017-10-27 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司 双缝浅埋型钢式桥梁伸缩装置

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1278470B (de) * 1965-12-31 1968-09-26 Gutehoffnungshuette Sterkrade Wasserdichte Abdeckvorrichtung fuer Dehnungsfugen in Bruecken od. dgl.
DE19630328C2 (de) 1996-07-26 1999-11-18 Maurer Friedrich Soehne Überbrückungsvorrichtung für Fugenspalte
JP4019295B2 (ja) * 1999-03-09 2007-12-12 日本鋳造株式会社 伸縮継手装置
GB0110996D0 (en) * 2001-05-04 2001-06-27 Devlin Seamus M Improved bridge joint
US20080148499A1 (en) * 2006-12-13 2008-06-26 Construction Research & Technology Gmbh Expansion joint system

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2925932B1 (fr) 2012-11-27 2017-09-27 Mageba S.A. Dispositif de pontage pour joints de dilatation
EP2925932B2 (fr) † 2012-11-27 2024-02-21 Mageba S.A. Dispositif de pontage pour joints de dilatation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2558178T3 (es) 2016-02-02
EP2718501A1 (fr) 2014-04-16
WO2012168476A1 (fr) 2012-12-13
PT2718501E (pt) 2016-02-05
EA026449B1 (ru) 2017-04-28
EA201391791A1 (ru) 2014-05-30
DE102011050977A1 (de) 2012-12-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2718501B1 (fr) Dispositif de transition de type à support central pour un joint de construction
EP3526427B1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurité anti-chute pour les personnes
EP2270354B1 (fr) Ancrage d'extrémité de corde doté d'une protection contre les surcharges
EP2925932B1 (fr) Dispositif de pontage pour joints de dilatation
EP2455546B1 (fr) Agencement de poteau pour une construction de glissière de sécurité et construction de glissière de sécurité pour sécuriser des bandes de roulement sur des chantiers
EP2089597B1 (fr) Système grimpant dans le domaine de la construction, pourvu d'un patin grimpant ou de guidage
EP1355009A2 (fr) Dispositif de recouvrement pour joints
DE102005042400B4 (de) Crashsicherheiterhöhende Ausrüstungs-Befestigungsvorrichtung eines Luftfahrzeugs
EP0748709A1 (fr) Dispositif de déverrouillage pour une vitre, en particulier pour wagons de chemin de fer, avec un curseur
EP2959061A2 (fr) Barrière de séparation de voie et système de retenue de véhicule équipé d'une telle barrière de séparation de voie
EP1726560B1 (fr) Table élévatrice à ciseaux
WO2003018950A1 (fr) Porte relevable
EP3564441B1 (fr) Bâti de protection contre les avalanches, les éboulements rocheux et les glissements de terrain
DE2900486C2 (de) Rundlaufkran
DE10210247A1 (de) Schnellauftor
DE102011053263A1 (de) Leitschwellenschranke sowie Fahrzeugrückhaltesystem mit einer Leitschwellenschranke
DE2833353A1 (de) Fanganlage zum gezielten und gewaltsamen abbremsen und einfangen von fahrzeugen
EP3645443B1 (fr) Système d'ascenseur
DE102007026919A1 (de) Schutzplankenanordnung
DE102006034666B4 (de) Überladebrücke mit Sicherheitsspere und Verfahren zum Betreiben der Überladebrücke
DE102021105872B3 (de) Verfahren für den Abbruch von Brückenbauwerken
DE202013104418U1 (de) Fassadenkonsole sowie Fassadenkonstruktion
AT504234B1 (de) Schiebetür oder schiebetor
EP3680388B1 (fr) Protection d'accès
DE102016110674B3 (de) Scharniergelenkstruktur

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131204

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150512

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 755179

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151015

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502012004932

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: TROESCH SCHEIDEGGER WERNER AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2558178

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20160202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20160107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20151014

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160214

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20160400034

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20160414

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502012004932

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20160509

Year of fee payment: 5

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160715

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20160611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160611

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120611

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160611

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 755179

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151014

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170611

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20230526

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20230530

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230622

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: BG

Payment date: 20230620

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20230605

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230630

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20230719

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230702

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240617

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20240617

Year of fee payment: 13