EP1727679A2 - Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires - Google Patents

Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires

Info

Publication number
EP1727679A2
EP1727679A2 EP05717040A EP05717040A EP1727679A2 EP 1727679 A2 EP1727679 A2 EP 1727679A2 EP 05717040 A EP05717040 A EP 05717040A EP 05717040 A EP05717040 A EP 05717040A EP 1727679 A2 EP1727679 A2 EP 1727679A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
image
benefit
quality
printing material
data record
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP05717040A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1727679B1 (fr
Inventor
Jens LOCHMÜLLER
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Koenig and Bauer AG
Original Assignee
Koenig and Bauer AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=34961308&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1727679(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from DE200410014549 external-priority patent/DE102004014549B3/de
Priority claimed from DE200410029140 external-priority patent/DE102004029140A1/de
Application filed by Koenig and Bauer AG filed Critical Koenig and Bauer AG
Publication of EP1727679A2 publication Critical patent/EP1727679A2/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1727679B1 publication Critical patent/EP1727679B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/0036—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control

Definitions

  • the invention relates to methods for identifying a single benefit with a print image of defective quality on a printing material with multiple benefits. According to the preamble of claim 1 or 11.
  • a printing press in particular a sheet-fed offset printing press, is known, in which an image capturing device detects the printing substrate and an evaluation device connected to the image capturing device detects the quality of a print image arranged on a printing material
  • the image capture device compares the image of the printing material recorded with a reference image, wherein the printing material is printed with a plurality of identical print images and the evaluation device evaluates only a subset of the print images from the image of the printing material, the evaluation device emitting a signal to a signal if the evaluated subset matches the reference image Outputs counter for registration of the subset.
  • DE 44 32 371 A1 discloses a method for identifying an individual use with a print image of defective quality on a printing material with multiple uses, an inspection system with a camera taking an image of the printing material and processing data of the recorded image in an image processing system , wherein the image processing system compares the data of the recorded image with a single benefit on the record relating to the printing material.
  • an image inspection system for a printing press in which the printing material printed in the commercial print is detected by an image recording device and the image signals obtained are processed in a downstream image processing system, the printing device being followed by a printing device which can be controlled in accordance with the image signals Which markings for identifying areas identified as defective can be generated at the intended locations of the printing material, as a result of which incorrectly printed benefits can be removed in a suitably designed device for further processing.
  • EP 1 403 045 A2 discloses a method for determining the position and / or shape of at least one mark on a web to be printed, the position and / or shape of the at least one mark in the image to be printed being determined using prepress data ,
  • the invention has for its object to provide methods for identifying a single benefit with a print image of defective quality on a printing material with multiple benefits, in which the identification of the benefit having the printing image of defective quality is carried out without the aid of a printed reference printing material, in which for the identification of individual defective benefits and for a procurement of a data set to carry out this identification results in an efficient production process.
  • the object is achieved by the features of claim 1 or 11.
  • the advantages that can be achieved with the invention consist in particular in the fact that a printing material, in particular a sheet, printed by a printing press cannot be treated as a reject if a single use of the printing material has a print image of defective quality.
  • the benefit with the print image of defective quality can be separated in a step subsequent to the printing process, so that all other benefits with a print image of good quality can be used for the intended purpose.
  • an individual benefit with a print image of defective quality can be clearly identified. It is very advantageous that each of the proposed methods is suitable for identifying individual benefits of any shape and orientation on the printing material.
  • a set-up phase of the printing press remains unaffected by the method for identifying a single use with a print image of defective quality, so that in the set-up phase of the printing press an additional work step is not necessary, which, for. B. could consist in an evaluation of a custom-made setup sheet.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of an inspection system.
  • Fig. 2 shows a sheet with multiple benefits.
  • An inspection system which is particularly suitable for a print image inspection has, according to its schematic representation in FIG. B. one or more coupled color line cameras 01 or a color area camera 01, which captures an image illuminated by an illumination device 02 of a printing material 03, preferably formed as a sheet 03, after the z. B. existing paper substrate 03 from a printing press, for. B. a rotary printing press, in particular a sheet-fed offset printing press, has been printed with at least one print image.
  • the printing material 03 is preferably printed in multicolor printing as it passes through the printing press, so that a plurality of color separations to be printed one on top of the other and differing in the color tone of the respective printed printing ink are involved in the production of the printing product.
  • the image recorded by the camera 01 depicts at least part of the printing substrate 03.
  • Data determined by the camera 01 from the recording of the image, which, for. B. correlate with amplitude values of individual color channels are processed in an image processing system 04.
  • the result is output e.g. B. on a monitor connected to the data processing image processing system 04 06.
  • Inputs, for. B. the image processing system 04 necessarily to be communicated for its calculations parameters are entered via a keyboard 07 connected to the image processing system 04.
  • the substrate 03 here z. B. the sheet 03, is printed in its passage through the printing press in the printed form and, according to FIG.
  • the individual benefits 09 can be repetitive, e.g. B. also act identical print motifs, which are preferably structured, eg. B. lattice-shaped, ie in rows and columns, are arranged on the sheet 03, the benefit 09 arranged on the sheet 03 need not cover the entire printable surface of the sheet 03 in the preferred embodiment.
  • the contours 09 arranged on the sheet 03 are identical in their contours or for the respective contours being essentially rectangular or for those arranged on the sheet 03 Seamlessly adjoin panels 09 or that the panels 09 are arranged on the arch 03 in a regular structure, ie a grid with a fixed orientation.
  • the selective evaluation of the sheet 03 with respect to at least one error reducing the quality of the printed image e.g. B. a color error, contamination or any other error added to the sheet 03 before or in particular during the printing process is designed such that it is determined which of the benefits 09 arranged on the sheet 03 is the error detected by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 is to be assigned.
  • information about the location of the detected error with respect to the area specified by the sheet 03, in particular its printable area is preferably determined in the image processing system 04 by a corresponding evaluation of the data correlating with the captured image, so that the quality of the printed image is reduced Error z. B.
  • An individual benefit 09 is identified by the fact that the image processing system 04, in its process steps, applies a template to the image captured by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 from the sheet 03, the template consisting of an electronically generated data record, this data record not taken from a photographic image and in particular not obtained within the printing press, but e.g. B. data stored in a prepress is removed.
  • the data set forming the template is e.g. B. with a CAD system (computer-aided design) and a memory z. B. supplied in the prepress, this data set information about the position, shape or shape or size, z.
  • the individual arranged on the sheet 03 benefit 09 or this information is at least inferred from this data set.
  • the information can also relate to the arrangement of individual benefits 09 in the entirety of all benefits 09 and thus provide information about the location of an individual benefit 09 relative to one or more other benefits 09.
  • the shape of a benefit 09 characterizes its type or type, e.g. B. circle, rectangle or any other geometric shape.
  • the data record is generated in connection with the production of a die for separating the blanks 09 from the sheet 03 and is fed to the image processing system 04. This measure is advantageous because it makes use of an existing data record, so that no additional effort is required to generate this data record.
  • a different error 09 can be directly determined when determining an error reducing the quality of the printed image the fault location relating to sheet 03 can be concluded because this different type of benefit 09 is in a fixed connection with the other benefits 09 arranged on sheet 03.
  • a fixed relationship between an error detected by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 can be produced for an individual benefit 09 on the sheet 03 by the information, for. B.
  • the data from the image taken by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 or at least the information on the location of the detected error is superimposed for the purpose of comparison. Because with the help of the data record forming the template, z. B. by the image processing system 04 by comparing the information on the determined location of the error with the information on the arrangement, shape or size of the individual arranged on the sheet 03 benefit 09 which of the arranged on the sheet 03 benefit 09 one on the Sheet 03 is assigned to detected and localized errors.
  • a benefit 09 identified in this way with regard to an error detected by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 can be obtained from a z. B. from the image processing system 04 controlled marking device 08 z. B. marked by applying a numbering or some other type of marking or also displayed on the monitor 06, so that the marking of the relevant benefit 09 can also be carried out, for example, by the operating personnel of the printing press with a print image of faulty quality.
  • the benefit 09 identified on the sheet 03 within the contour of which the error detected by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 lies, can be separated from the other benefits 09 in a processing step following the actual printing process by the benefits 09 arranged on the sheet 03 being e.g. , B. are punched out with a punching tool and the detected error, preferably marked benefit 09 z. B. is extracted by discharge.
  • the benefits 09 arranged on the sheet 03 are except the marked ones Benefit 09 of the intended use can be supplied, which is particularly advantageous for high-quality printed products.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Inking, Control Or Cleaning Of Printing Machines (AREA)
  • Accessory Devices And Overall Control Thereof (AREA)
  • Image Analysis (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
EP05717040A 2004-03-23 2005-03-15 Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires Active EP1727679B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE200410014549 DE102004014549B3 (de) 2004-03-23 2004-03-23 Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
DE200410029140 DE102004029140A1 (de) 2004-06-17 2004-06-17 Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
PCT/EP2005/051163 WO2005092620A2 (fr) 2004-03-23 2005-03-15 Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1727679A2 true EP1727679A2 (fr) 2006-12-06
EP1727679B1 EP1727679B1 (fr) 2008-10-01

Family

ID=34961308

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05717040A Active EP1727679B1 (fr) 2004-03-23 2005-03-15 Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7710595B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1727679B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE409584T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE502005005538D1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2310814T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005092620A2 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015203358A1 (de) 2015-02-25 2016-08-25 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Beurteilung von mehreren jeweils mindestens ein Druckbild aufweisenden Druckerzeugnissen hinsichtlich ihrer jeweiligen Weiterverarbeitungsfähigkeit

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102006015828A1 (de) * 2006-04-03 2007-10-04 Man Roland Druckmaschinen Ag Gewichtete Bogeninspektion
US20130087059A1 (en) * 2011-10-06 2013-04-11 Applied Vision Corporation System and method for detecting decorator wheel blanket defects
DE102019110853B4 (de) 2019-04-26 2022-05-12 Koenig & Bauer Ag Bogenbearbeitungsmaschine und Verfahren zur Inspektion zumindest eines verbliebenen und von einer Formgebungseinrichtung bearbeiteten Teils zumindest eines Bogens
DE102019110854A1 (de) * 2019-04-26 2020-10-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Inspektion zumindest eines Bogens und Vorrichtungen zur Inspektion zumindest eines Bogens
DE102021114252A1 (de) 2021-06-02 2022-12-08 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Ausschleusung und/oder Entnahme fehlerhafter Nutzen

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE59208384D1 (de) * 1991-08-12 1997-05-28 Koenig & Bauer Ag Qualitätskontrolle einer Bildvorlage z. B. eines gedruckten Musters
DE4432371B4 (de) * 1994-09-12 2004-12-09 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Verfahren zum Drucken und Weiterverarbeiten von Nutzen
DE19613083A1 (de) * 1996-04-02 1997-10-09 Koenig & Bauer Albert Ag Verfahren zur qualitativen Beurteilung von bearbeitetem Material
US7096784B2 (en) 2000-05-08 2006-08-29 Kba-Giori S.A. Installation for treating sheets of printed paper
DE20010920U1 (de) 2000-06-20 2000-09-14 Roland Man Druckmasch Druckmaschine, insbesondere Bogenoffsetdruckmaschine
DE20213431U1 (de) 2002-08-31 2002-11-07 Roland Man Druckmasch Einrichtung zur Qualitätskontrolle an Drucksachen
DE10244437B4 (de) 2002-09-24 2009-09-17 Maschinenfabrik Wifag Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Position und Form von Marken auf einer bedruckten Papierbahn
DE20303574U1 (de) 2003-03-06 2003-04-30 Roland Man Druckmasch Bildinspektionssystem für eine Druckmaschine
US7017492B2 (en) * 2003-03-10 2006-03-28 Quad/Tech, Inc. Coordinating the functioning of a color control system and a defect detection system for a printing press

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2005092620A2 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015203358A1 (de) 2015-02-25 2016-08-25 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Beurteilung von mehreren jeweils mindestens ein Druckbild aufweisenden Druckerzeugnissen hinsichtlich ihrer jeweiligen Weiterverarbeitungsfähigkeit
DE102015203358B4 (de) * 2015-02-25 2016-09-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Beurteilung von mehreren jeweils mindestens ein Druckbild aufweisenden Druckerzeugnissen hinsichtlich ihrer jeweiligen Weiterverarbeitungsfähigkeit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE409584T1 (de) 2008-10-15
DE502005005538D1 (de) 2008-11-13
WO2005092620A2 (fr) 2005-10-06
US7710595B2 (en) 2010-05-04
US20070181026A1 (en) 2007-08-09
ES2310814T3 (es) 2009-01-16
WO2005092620A3 (fr) 2006-03-02
EP1727679B1 (fr) 2008-10-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE102015207566B3 (de) Verfahren zur Detektion ausgefallener Druckdüsen in Inkjet-Drucksystemen
EP1728380A1 (fr) Procede d'identification precoce d'un ecart dans des images imprimees produites en continu par une presse d'impression
EP0741026A2 (fr) Procédé d'inspection d'images et d'alimentation en encre dans des produits imprimés d'une machine d'impression
EP2902203B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à la commande et au réglage d'un processus d'impression numérique
EP1727679B1 (fr) Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires
EP2960058B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à la commande générique et au réglage d'un processus d'impression numérique
AT501210B1 (de) Verfahren zur qualitätskontrolle an oberflächenvariablen drucksachen
DE10244437B4 (de) Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Position und Form von Marken auf einer bedruckten Papierbahn
DE102004031129B4 (de) Verfahren zur Erkennung von Farbbalken auf doppelseitigen Farbdrucken und System zur Qualitätskontrolle eines Farbdrucks
EP1785276A2 (fr) Système de contrôle de la qualité pour une machine à imprimer
DE102008000031B4 (de) Verfahren zur Kontrolle einer Anordnung von an Formzylindern einer Druckmaschine angeordneten Druckformen
DE102009007864B4 (de) Druckbildabhängige Positionierung von Farbmess-Streifen
DE102019211758A1 (de) Passer-Registermessung mit kreisförmigen Messmarken
EP3426492B1 (fr) Procédé de vérification du maintien du registre d'images d'impression à imprimer sur deux faces opposées d'un substrat d'impression
DE102008056170B4 (de) Farbmessgerät mit automatischer Seitenerkennung
DE102010049945A1 (de) Ermittlungsverfahren und -vorrichtung für Geometriefehler eines Bedruckstoffes
DE102006012513A1 (de) Bildverarbeitungssystem für eine Druckmaschine
DE102004029140A1 (de) Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
DE102004014549B3 (de) Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
DE102015203358B4 (de) Verfahren zur Beurteilung von mehreren jeweils mindestens ein Druckbild aufweisenden Druckerzeugnissen hinsichtlich ihrer jeweiligen Weiterverarbeitungsfähigkeit
EP0681525B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'impression
EP3104299B1 (fr) Production de marques a un stade preliminaire d'un processus d'impression
EP3628489A1 (fr) Mesure de registre sans marque
EP3003721B1 (fr) Procédé de réimpression d'au moins un exemplaire imprimé individualisé
DE102019121401B3 (de) Verfahren zum Vereinzeln von gemeinsam auf einen Bogen gedruckten Druckprodukten

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060331

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20071106

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502005005538

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20081113

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2310814

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090201

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090302

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: MANROLAND AG

Effective date: 20090701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090101

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: MANROLAND AG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090331

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20111219

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120322

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20120425

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20120403

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20120402

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 502005005538

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20111219

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20120330

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20120321

Year of fee payment: 8

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER A.G.

Effective date: 20130331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20131001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 409584

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130315

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130315

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20140613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130316

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502005005538

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 97080 WUERZBURG, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230322

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240301

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 20