EP1372856B1 - Vorrichtung und verfahren zur entwertung von blattgut - Google Patents

Vorrichtung und verfahren zur entwertung von blattgut Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1372856B1
EP1372856B1 EP02716832A EP02716832A EP1372856B1 EP 1372856 B1 EP1372856 B1 EP 1372856B1 EP 02716832 A EP02716832 A EP 02716832A EP 02716832 A EP02716832 A EP 02716832A EP 1372856 B1 EP1372856 B1 EP 1372856B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sheet material
discharged
fed
canceling
monitoring
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP02716832A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1372856A1 (de
Inventor
Alfred Schmidt
Friedmann LÖFFLER
Wilhelm Hell
Gerhard Sporer
Frank Werner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Original Assignee
Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Giesecke and Devrient GmbH filed Critical Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Publication of EP1372856A1 publication Critical patent/EP1372856A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1372856B1 publication Critical patent/EP1372856B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C18/00—Disintegrating by knives or other cutting or tearing members which chop material into fragments
    • B02C18/0007—Disintegrating by knives or other cutting or tearing members which chop material into fragments specially adapted for disintegrating documents

Definitions

  • the invention relates to devices and methods for devaluation, in particular Destruction, of sheet material, according to the generic terms of the independent Claims.
  • Generic devices and methods are particularly used in banknote processing systems used in which a machine test, Sorting and possibly destruction of banknotes takes place.
  • banknotes are deducted individually from a stack, according to different Criteria for authenticity and / or condition, in particular pollution, limpness or damage, tested, depending on the result of this test assigned to certain sorting classes and finally via a transport system supplied to corresponding output devices. Damaged or strong soiled banknotes that are unusable for another round, are fed to a corresponding facility for destruction.
  • European Patent EP 0 374 481 B1 discloses a banknote processing system according to the preambles of the independent claims, in which the cutting device leaving a cut sheet directly behind the cutting device sensory, for example with an optical Sensor, an ultrasonic sensor or a sensor based on piezoelectric Materials, is detected. To improve the reliability of Monitor the sensor signals with the signal one in front of the cutting device arranged light barrier can be correlated.
  • the devaluation device according to GB 2 209 963 A, in which the monitored for devaluation sheet material supplied while the number counted sheets and those from the validator arising noise can be measured by means of microphones to the number to determine the devalued leaves.
  • the invention is based on the idea of at least one monitoring device for monitoring the devaluation device supplied To provide sheet material.
  • the monitored, supplied Blattgut is in at least an evaluation device with the exiting or leaked Compared sheet material.
  • it is checked in particular whether the detected with the control device, from the devaluation device leaking sheet material is identical with the expectations, which from the Monitoring the supplied sheet material are derived. For example is for a fed sheet with a large area a larger amount of exiting, destroyed leaves are to be expected than for a leaf with a smaller area.
  • the monitoring device is preferably in a feed area in front of Devaluation arranged, in which the z.
  • the devaluation device In a banknote processing system certified and for the devaluation intended sheet material the devaluation device is supplied, and is in particular for tracking the position of the delivery area and the validation facility fed sheets and / or to detect specific Properties of the supplied leaves, z.
  • the control device for monitoring the exiting or leaked Sheet material is preferred in an exit area after the validator arranged in which the devalued sheet material from the Devaluation device exits.
  • the supplied sheet material By monitoring the supplied sheet material, in particular by tracking the leaves to be debased and / or recording their specific Properties, the supplied sheets can be detected with higher accuracy be than with the known from the prior art use a light barrier in the feed is possible.
  • the comparison of in this way supervised fed Blattguts with the exiting Sheet material therefore allows a more reliable and accurate monitoring of the Devaluation process.
  • disorders such as As jams or multiple prints, easier and more essential in the feed be reconstructed in more detail.
  • Fig. 1 shows in the right part of an embodiment of the invention Device for monitoring the destruction of banknotes.
  • One too destructive banknote 1 is in the feed area 3 by means of a transport belt 13 and transport rollers 15 existing transport system in the transport direction 14 a devaluation device 2 supplied.
  • the devaluation device 2 is a shredder in which to be destroyed Banknotes 1 in their passage between rotating knife rollers 12 are chopped up.
  • the destroyed sheet material 11 leaves the validation device 2 in the output area 4 in the form of small Schnipseln.
  • monitoring devices are image sensing devices 6a and 6b, in particular cameras, arranged in the feed region 3, which in each case Images of the front and back of the supply area 3 to the validator 2 transported banknotes record 1. preferably, are the image capturing means 6a and 6b for continuous recording of images of the entire taking place in the feeding area 3 Transport process including the banknotes to be destroyed 1 designed.
  • a first light barrier 8 is arranged, which information generated by the presence of banknotes 1 in the feed area 3.
  • a control device for monitoring the Result of the destruction of banknotes 1 arranged.
  • the control device it may be, for example, an acoustic, optical or piezoelectric sensor or a second image capture device 7, in particular a camera, to capture images.
  • the Signals of the sensor or the images of the second image capture device 7 are fed to an evaluation device 9 and evaluated there and / or stored. Preferably, this is from the sensor signals or images of the control device of the mass flow or volume flow the destroyed bank notes issuing from the validator 2 11 determined.
  • the percentage destruction degree and / or the middle Chip size of the leaked or emerging shredded Banknote 11 are determined.
  • the information generated by the first light barrier 8 are combined with the detected by the image sensing devices 6a, 6b and 7 Pictures of the processes in the supply and output area 3 and 4 of an evaluation 9 supplied.
  • the evaluation device 9 data the captured images together with those of the first photocell 8 detected Information is saved. If necessary, especially when occurring a fault in the feed area 3 and / or in the exit area 4, can then store the data and information with each other be compared by the time history of the stored information the first photocell 8 with the recorded time course the captured images are related to each other. This can for example with the aid of a graphical representation of the data and information respectively.
  • FIG. 1 In the left part of Figure 1 is a side view of the right part of Fig.1 shown course of a banknote 1 shown.
  • the banknote 1 is in the feeder area 3 by means of a here indicated only by the conveyor belt 13 Transport system transported to the validation device 2 and there destroyed.
  • the destroyed sheet material 11 leaves in the form of small chopped snip the devaluation device 2.
  • the dashed Lines in the area of the banknote 1 as well as in the exit area 4 give respectively the approximate location of the first and second image capture devices 6a and 6b and 7, respectively.
  • the image capturing devices 6a, 6b and 7 are in the illustrated embodiment designed as line scan cameras. This is sequential, d. H. in successive regular time intervals, a row-shaped one Section of the camera passing object, here the banknote 1 or the snippet 11, recorded and then to a complete and continuous image flow, d. H. to a movie, put together.
  • the dashed lines in the banknote 1 and the snippet 11 indicate the approximate location of the line-shaped section.
  • the image acquisition devices 6a, 6b and 7 may be for acquisition of two-dimensional images with horizontal and vertical extension be designed.
  • the dashed lines indicate the approximate image center of the captured image.
  • the monitoring device comprises at least one instead of the image capture devices 6a and 6b first light barrier 8.
  • Fig. 2 shows in the right part an embodiment of the invention, in which the image capture devices 6a, 6b and 7, in particular cameras, for Capture of two-dimensional images are designed.
  • this embodiment has the advantage that events of the entire, respectively recorded image section 18a, 18b and 19 are detected.
  • particularly suitable cameras have a Frame rate of more than about 100 frames per second.
  • the recorded Image sections 18a, 18b and 19 are preferably chosen so that also the area immediately before and / or after the validation device 2 is detected. Based on the recorded data, the history of the validation process also with transport disturbances in direct proximity to Devaluation device 2, z. Due to rolled up or delayed Banknotes to be analyzed.
  • the data of the image acquisition devices 6a, 6b and 7 in FIGS and 2 may be permanently accompanied by time information, e.g. B. clock signals or derived time values.
  • the record takes place for. B. by video recording on tape or ein.Speicherung on a digital medium, such as. B. a hard disk of the computer system.
  • To analyze a fault can then be saved using the Time information on the data in the immediate temporal environment the accident are accessed.
  • the meter reading information be z. B. by means of a counter (not shown), which the the debiting device 2 fed banknotes 1 counts generated.
  • the recorded data of the image capture devices 6a, 6b and 7 according to the data or the image of a sought To search banknote 1.
  • the wanted banknote and / or more Banknotes in a temporal environment of the banknote sought can or can then be tracked on their way to the devaluation facility.
  • FIG. 2 In the left part of Fig. 2 is analogous to the example illustrated in Figure 1 a Side view of the course of a bank note shown in the right part of FIG. 2 1 shown.
  • the dashed lines in the area of the supplied or emerging banknote 1 or 11 respectively give the average position of the image sections 18a and 18b and 19, respectively, of the first and second image capture devices 6a and 6b and 7, respectively.
  • Fig. 3 shows a comparison of the fed Banknotert 1 with the from the Devaluation issuing banknotes 11 in an undisturbed Banknote transport.
  • those of the image capture devices 6a, 6b and 7 captured images 22, 23 and 24, respectively, of the one to be destroyed or destroyed banknotes 1 and 11 together with the course of the signal 21 of the first light barrier 8 over the time t applied.
  • the first Image capture devices 6a and 6b and second image capture devices 7 eliminated, so that events that belong to a banknote 1, each lie directly below each other.
  • the comparison is the comparison the data and thus the analysis or reconstruction of disturbances in the entire validation process particularly simple, secure and clear feasible.
  • banknotes 1 with a large area such as B. the banknote with the value 20
  • a larger snippet in the Exit area 4 of the validator 2 result as banknotes 1 with a small area, such. B. the banknote with the value 5.
  • Fig. 4 shows the comparison of the fed banknotes 1 with those from the Devaluation device escaping banknotes 11 in a disturbed Banknote transport.
  • the banknote was with the Value 5 delayed for a short time and only together with the banknote with the Value 20 transported further. It therefore goes through with this the first photoelectric barrier 8 and the cameras 6a and 6b in the feeding area 3.
  • the first photocell 8 is therefore a correspondingly extended Photocell signal 21 detected. From those with the image capture devices 6a and 6b recorded images 23 and 22 can then at a fault easily be recognized that this relatively long light barrier signal 21 to explain with two partially overlapping banknotes is.
  • the denomination i. H. the value involved in the failure Banknotes are recognized.
  • Fig. 5 shows a further embodiment of the invention.
  • the supply of Banknotes 1 to the validation device 2 along a transport path 17 takes place, as in the example in Figure 1, by means of a transport system of transport belt 13 and transport rollers 15.
  • a plurality of sensor devices 16 are arranged, which the Detect position of a banknote 1 to be destroyed on the transport path 17.
  • the sensor devices 16 for tracking the position of the transport path 17 passing Banknotes 1 designed.
  • the sensor devices 16 can in this case be arranged as close together as possible to a high spatial resolution to receive and the current position of a banknote 1 on the Transport route 17 to locate as accurately as possible at any time.
  • sensor devices 16 for tracking the banknotes for example Transmission sensors used with which the light transmission the banknotes 1 can be detected. From the measured translucency can then z. B. can be determined by what kind or which Value of the banknote it concerns or if necessary a multiple deduction is present. Alternatively, as sensor devices 16 and simple light barriers be used to adjust the position of the leading and trailing edges to detect the banknotes 1.
  • At least one of the sensor devices 16 for detection at least one specific property, e.g. Denomination, printed image, Dimension or multiple prints, the sheet material 1 may be formed.
  • this has the advantage that monitored in addition to the position of the supplied banknotes 1 can be how many and in particular which banknotes 1 supplied become.
  • a sensor device 16 may be simpler Dracktruckdetektor be formed, which only checks whether the Entêts engaged 2 transported leaves have a printed image or not. This can be an unauthorized introduction of unprinted Blanks are easily detected.
  • a control device 7 In the exit area 4 of the validation device 2 is a control device 7, in particular a camera provided, with which from the Devaluation 2 emerging destroyed banknotes 11 are detected.
  • the control device 7 and the outputs of the sensor devices 16 are connected to the evaluation unit 9.
  • the evaluation unit 9 For the sake of clarity were only the connections of the two outer sensor devices 16 completely shown to the evaluation unit 9.
  • For simplification are the connections of the outputs of all other sensor devices 16 indicated to the evaluation device 9 by a dashed line.
  • the evaluation device 9 is the with the sensor devices 16 monitored supply of banknotes 1 and with the control device 7 monitored banknotes 11 compared.
  • the correlation of the signals of the sensor devices 16 with the images of the control device 7 takes place here in analogy to the examples described in FIGS. 3 and 4.
  • Enable special image recognition methods in the evaluation device 9 based on the signals of the image capture device 7 additional Monitoring functions. It is generally assumed that a destroyed banknote 1 no longer be reconstructed from the snippets 11 can, if the snippets 11 a certain maximum size accordingly do not exceed the constructive interpretations of the devaluation device 2. However, a mechanical defect of the validator can 2, z. B. by breaking or wear of cutting elements, a cause general or local limited increase in snippet size. By calculating the average and maximum size of the Snippet 11 in the evaluation device 9 may be a malfunction of the Entêtseinhchtung 2 are recognized immediately upon occurrence and banknote processing be stopped with an appropriate error message.
  • Another evaluation option is the area of the original one Banknote 1 with the number and dimensions of the snippet 11 too compare and verify that the banknote 1 is completely destroyed has been. This calculation is made approximately by determining the Total area of the snippet 11, which is proportional to the area of banknote 1 Relationship stands. Taking into account the known thickness The banknote 1 can on this basis, a volume flow of the snippets 11 are determined.
  • control device 7 on Output of the devaluation device 2 the mass flow of the snippet eleventh to capture.
  • This measurement can e.g. on the basis of a measuring device after the Coriolis principle.
  • By comparing the expected values due to the supplied mass of banknotes 1 and the measured Mass flow of the snippet 11 can be checked if the Banknotes 1 were destroyed completely and at the expected time.
  • FIG. 6 shows a further embodiment of the invention.
  • a monitoring device which the supply of the banknote 1 to be canceled to the validation device 2 monitors, a first light barrier 8 is provided with which indicates the presence of a banknote 1 to be canceled in the delivery area 3 is detected.
  • the transport of banknote 1 and its cancellation in the devaluation 2 done in accordance with the related with the Fig. 1 described embodiment.
  • the devalued banknote 11 issuing from the validation device 2 is monitored by means of a control device, which one in the output range 4 of the validation device 2 arranged second light barrier 28 includes.
  • the light of the second light barrier 28 forms here a light curtain consisting essentially of one or more Layers extending light rays consists.
  • the from the devaluation device 2 leaking banknote 11 passes through the light curtain of the second Photocell 28, depending on the result of the devaluation or Destruction different light barrier signals are generated. These be - preferably together with the light barrier signals of the first Photoelectric sensor 8 - the evaluation device 9 for storage and / or Evaluation supplied.
  • FIG. 7 a shows the basic structure and the mode of operation of FIG. 6 illustrated second photocell 28 in a schematic view in Viewing direction B with undefended as well as destroyed banknote 11 (left or right part of the picture).
  • the light barrier 28 has a linear light source 30, for example a light emitting diode array emitting as homogeneously as possible, on.
  • the light source generates 30 one by means of an optical device, which e.g. a cylindrical Scatter lens covers, fanned laser beam.
  • the rays of the light 32 emitted by the light source 30 form at least one plane 29, i.e. a light curtain, and are from a linear light receiver 31 detected.
  • the light receiver 31 is preferably for integral, i.
  • the light source 30 and the light receiver 31 are preferably each one end on a common rod-shaped holder (not shown) attached, so that a U-shaped profile is created. Such light barrier arrangements are therefore also called fork light barriers.
  • light source 30 and / or light receiver 31 independently of each other directly to the validation device 2 to be appropriate.
  • the light 32 may spectral components in the visible and / or have invisible spectral range and monochromatic or broadband be.
  • the linear light source 30 and the linear light receiver 31 are arranged in this embodiment so that the light beams 32nd extend substantially parallel to the plane of a leaking banknote 11. In the example shown, this is achieved in that the light source 30 and the light receiver 31 perpendicular to the plane of the exiting Banknote 11 are aligned.
  • limit values for the signal reduction the Lichtbachensignals 28 predetermined.
  • a simple comparison of the measured Signal reduction with the limit value indicates whether banknote 11 is proper or only partial or not destroyed has been. In the latter case, for example, an immediate stop the processing be provided.
  • Fig. 8a shows a modification of the embodiment shown in Fig. 7a.
  • the line-shaped light source 30 or, the linear Light receiver 31 arranged so that the light rays 32 substantially perpendicular to the plane of a leaking banknote 11 run.
  • this is achieved in that the linear light source 30th and the linear light receiver 31 substantially parallel to the plane the outgoing banknote 11 are aligned.
  • an undirected banknote passes 11 the light curtain 29. This is a large part of the light rays 32 of the banknote 11 reflected or at least significantly weakened.
  • the snippet cloud passes through a banknote destroyed 11 the light curtain 29, wherein the Light rays 32 in comparison to the unknotted bank note 11 (left part of the image) less reflected or weakened. Consequently, the of the Light receiver 31 detected amount of light larger than in the example of the left part of the image.
  • the photocell 28 with light curtain described above is suitable In addition, as a monitoring device in the feed 3, to There also a simple and reliable monitoring of the supplied To reach Blattguts 1.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
  • Controlling Sheets Or Webs (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Crushing And Pulverization Processes (AREA)
  • Cash Registers Or Receiving Machines (AREA)
  • Radiography Using Non-Light Waves (AREA)
  • Registering, Tensioning, Guiding Webs, And Rollers Therefor (AREA)
  • Folding Of Thin Sheet-Like Materials, Special Discharging Devices, And Others (AREA)
EP02716832A 2001-03-13 2002-03-11 Vorrichtung und verfahren zur entwertung von blattgut Expired - Lifetime EP1372856B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10111907 2001-03-13
DE10111907A DE10111907A1 (de) 2001-03-13 2001-03-13 Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Entwertung von Blattgut
PCT/EP2002/002661 WO2002072270A1 (de) 2001-03-13 2002-03-11 Vorrichtung und verfahren zur entwertung von blattgut

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1372856A1 EP1372856A1 (de) 2004-01-02
EP1372856B1 true EP1372856B1 (de) 2005-12-07

Family

ID=7677200

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02716832A Expired - Lifetime EP1372856B1 (de) 2001-03-13 2002-03-11 Vorrichtung und verfahren zur entwertung von blattgut

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US7661617B2 (zh)
EP (1) EP1372856B1 (zh)
CN (1) CN100340346C (zh)
AT (1) ATE311938T1 (zh)
DE (2) DE10111907A1 (zh)
HK (1) HK1062280A1 (zh)
RU (1) RU2298436C2 (zh)
WO (1) WO2002072270A1 (zh)

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10050486A1 (de) * 2000-10-12 2002-04-18 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bearbeitung von Blattgut
US6978954B2 (en) * 2001-08-28 2005-12-27 Fellowes, Inc. Detector for a shredder
NL1023224C2 (nl) * 2003-04-18 2004-10-19 Syntech Holdings Bv Werkwijze voor het veilig desintegreren van waardepapieren, alsmede een daarvoor geschikte inrichting.
US8672247B2 (en) * 2005-07-11 2014-03-18 Fellowes, Inc. Shredder with thickness detector
JP4984554B2 (ja) * 2006-01-31 2012-07-25 富士ゼロックス株式会社 廃棄処理装置、廃棄処理情報管理システムおよび廃棄処理方法
JP2007206879A (ja) * 2006-01-31 2007-08-16 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd 廃棄装置、廃棄システム及び廃棄方法
JP2007206822A (ja) * 2006-01-31 2007-08-16 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd 文書管理システム、文書廃棄管理システム、文書管理方法および文書廃棄管理方法
DE102006036136A1 (de) * 2006-07-28 2008-01-31 Martin Yale International Gmbh Zerkleinerungsvorrichtung für Flachmaterial und Verfahren zum Betrieb einer solchen Zerkleinerungsvorrichtung
DE102006042186A1 (de) * 2006-09-08 2008-03-27 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Verfahren für die Vernichtung von Banknoten
US10115259B2 (en) * 2012-06-15 2018-10-30 Ncr Corporation Item validation
JP2015095154A (ja) * 2013-11-13 2015-05-18 株式会社東芝 紙葉類処理装置
CN106216038B (zh) * 2016-08-31 2018-05-15 福建巨昂电子科技有限公司 一种感应切纸机
EP3413014B1 (de) * 2017-06-08 2023-07-19 Stephan Brauss Verfahren und vorrichtung zum erfassen und vermessen von objekten
DE102017121248A1 (de) * 2017-09-13 2019-03-14 Leitz Acco Brands Gmbh & Co Kg Aktenvernichter

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US661910A (en) * 1900-09-27 1900-11-13 Frederic Lionel Graham Nib-ejecting penholder.
SU389399A1 (ru) 1971-08-05 1973-07-05 Филиал ордена Ленина физико технического института А. Ф. Иоффе Датчик линейных перемещений
GB8722063D0 (en) * 1987-09-18 1987-10-28 De La Rue Syst Shredding sheets
US4991008A (en) * 1988-12-01 1991-02-05 Intec Video Systems, Inc. Automatic transaction surveillance system
DE3843602A1 (de) * 1988-12-23 1990-07-05 Gao Ges Automation Org Verfahren bzw. vorrichtung zum automatischen ueberwachen der zerstoerung von duennem blattgut
JPH0583499A (ja) 1991-03-13 1993-04-02 Riso Kagaku Corp 紙葉類情報廃棄処理装置
JPH0568907A (ja) 1991-03-13 1993-03-23 Riso Kagaku Corp 紙葉類情報廃棄処理装置
FR2681429B1 (fr) * 1991-09-13 1995-05-24 Thomson Csf Procede et dispositif d'inspection du verre.
US5430664A (en) 1992-07-14 1995-07-04 Technitrol, Inc. Document counting and batching apparatus with counterfeit detection
DE9401074U1 (de) * 1994-01-22 1995-06-14 Eba Maschinenfabrik Adolf Ehinger GmbH, 72336 Balingen Aktenvernichter mit einer Steuerung
DE4413079A1 (de) * 1994-04-15 1995-10-19 Schleicher & Co Int Schalteinrichtung zum Schalten eines Schneidwerk-Antriebes eines zerkleinernden Dokumentenvernichters
US6661910B2 (en) * 1997-04-14 2003-12-09 Cummins-Allison Corp. Network for transporting and processing images in real time
US6198537B1 (en) 1997-07-11 2001-03-06 Philip Morris Incorporated Optical inspection system for the manufacture of banded cigarette paper
US6351552B1 (en) * 2000-03-09 2002-02-26 Recot, Inc. Predestruction note image audit
DE102005055682A1 (de) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung für die Überprüfung der Echtheit von Banknoten

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE10111907A1 (de) 2002-10-31
EP1372856A1 (de) 2004-01-02
WO2002072270A1 (de) 2002-09-19
CN100340346C (zh) 2007-10-03
CN1496283A (zh) 2004-05-12
RU2298436C2 (ru) 2007-05-10
US20100116918A1 (en) 2010-05-13
US7661617B2 (en) 2010-02-16
US8002210B2 (en) 2011-08-23
DE50205192D1 (de) 2006-01-12
HK1062280A1 (en) 2004-10-29
ATE311938T1 (de) 2005-12-15
US20040112998A1 (en) 2004-06-17
RU2003129067A (ru) 2005-04-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1372856B1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zur entwertung von blattgut
EP0374481B1 (de) Verfahren bzw. Vorrichtung zum automatischen Überwachen der Zerstörung von dünnem Blattgut
DE2824849C2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Feststellung des Zustandes und/oder der Echtheit von Blattgut
DE3587836T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Validierung von Zahlungsmitteln.
EP1810251B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung für die bearbeitung von banknoten
EP2619735B1 (de) Verfahren für die überwachung des transports von banknoten
DE10234431A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bearbeitung von Wertdokumenten
WO2004055740A2 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung für die überprüfung von banknoten
EP1178441A2 (de) Verfahren zur Bestimmung von Strukturinhomogenitäten in Blattgut
EP2795590B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum prüfen eines wertdokumentes
EP1309949A2 (de) Verifikation von dickenmodulationen in oder auf blattgut
EP3113122A1 (de) Rücknahmesystem für zu entwertende einweggüter und vorrichtung sowie verfahren zur manipulationserkennung an demselben
DE102010004580A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Handhabung von Wertscheinen mit einer Transportpfadüberwachung
EP2765559B1 (de) Vorrichtung zum Sortieren von Münzen
DE3325486C2 (zh)
DE102005008747B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung für die Erfassung von Banknoten
EP1927086A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichung zum testen von wertdokumenten
DE102020114980B4 (de) Vorrichtung und system zur inspektion zumindest eines diffraktiven optischen elements eines dokuments
DE102010055700A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Messen der Länge von Blattgut
EP3539091A1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zur klassifizierung von wertdokumenten, insbesondere banknoten, sowie wertdokumentbearbeitungssystem
DE102009035183A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Handhabung von Wertdokumenten
DE10123119A1 (de) Überwachungseinrichtung für Wertbelegbearbeitungsmaschinen
DE10329587A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Erfassen von Banknotenmerkmalen
EP2783354B1 (de) Verfahren zum überwachen von transportvorgängen zum befördern von wertscheinen in einem selbstbedienungsterminal
DE2319149C3 (de) Verfahren zur Echtheitsprüfung von Wertpapieren und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20031013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20041029

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051207

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051207

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051207

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051207

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE SCHAAD, BALASS, MENZL & PARTNER AG

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20051207

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 50205192

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20060112

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060307

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060307

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060307

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060318

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060331

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060331

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060508

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20060908

EN Fr: translation not filed
BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20060331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070126

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051207

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051207

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051207

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20130318

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20140324

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 50205192

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 311938

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140311

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140311

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 50205192

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT CURRENCY TECHNOLOGY GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GMBH, 81677 MUENCHEN, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20180118 AND 20180124

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20200331

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20210324

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 50205192

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20220310

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20220310