EP1002213A1 - System zum schutz von objekten gegen geformte ladungen - Google Patents
System zum schutz von objekten gegen geformte ladungenInfo
- Publication number
- EP1002213A1 EP1002213A1 EP99926501A EP99926501A EP1002213A1 EP 1002213 A1 EP1002213 A1 EP 1002213A1 EP 99926501 A EP99926501 A EP 99926501A EP 99926501 A EP99926501 A EP 99926501A EP 1002213 A1 EP1002213 A1 EP 1002213A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- bodies
- interference
- interference body
- interfering
- armor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/007—Reactive armour; Dynamic armour
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/023—Armour plate, or auxiliary armour plate mounted at a distance of the main armour plate, having cavities at its outer impact surface, or holes, for deflecting the projectile
Definitions
- the invention relates to a system for protection against shaped charges approaching an object or placed thereon according to the preamble of claim 1.
- Threats that come from above primarily include so-called bomblets, which are ejected from artillery grenades or warheads above the battlefield and cover the last flight distance in free fall, mostly with simple aerodynamic stabilization.
- bomblets which are ejected from artillery grenades or warheads above the battlefield and cover the last flight distance in free fall, mostly with simple aerodynamic stabilization.
- the safety releasing takes place during or after ejection from the warhead by means of aerodynamic and mechanical aids.
- the ignition of the bomblet is mostly triggered by the jerky delay when it hits the target surface.
- the actual active part of such charges consists of so-called shaped charges with a conical or trumpet-shaped insert, which can have a wall thickness that is the same or variable over their height, which is then referred to as a degressive or progressive shaped charge.
- shaped charges with a conical or trumpet-shaped insert, which can have a wall thickness that is the same or variable over their height, which is then referred to as a degressive or progressive shaped charge.
- a shaped charge in the form of a bomblet 1 is shown schematically at the time of impact with the surface 10 of an object to be protected.
- the bomblet 1 consists essentially of a housing 2, which is filled with explosive 3 in such a way that this explosive 3 surrounds a downwardly opening insert 4 made of a material such as copper.
- the insert 4 is thus formed by the detonation of the explosive 3 into the jet 5, which moves towards the surface 10 with continuous stretching and penetrates into it.
- the top speeds of the particles forming the beam 5 are between 5 and 8 km / s, the diameter of the beam 5 formed being in the millimeter range. With perfect precision, penetration depths of between four and eight times the largest insert diameter are achieved in homogeneous steel armor.
- the mechanical impact ignition usually takes place in that a firing needle 7 moves due to its inertia in a channel 8 when it strikes the object and punctures the igniter 6, whereby the bomb 1 is ignited.
- the detonator 6 detonates the explosive 3.
- the performance of the bomblet 1 essentially depends on the extension of the beam 5. This is achieved in that the beam, which was originally quasi-homogeneous at the time of its creation, is stretched and particulated. A depth effect then results from the addition of the individual powers of the individual particles forming the beam 5, which have to penetrate one after the other with absolute precision.
- the beam 5 is stretched continuously, the distance between the particles continuously decreasing from the tip in the direction of the bomblet 1.
- a certain stretch 9, which is generally referred to as stand off, is necessary for a desired breakdown performance.
- the stand off 9 is formed by the distance from the lower cone boundary of the insert 4 to the surface 10.
- the stand off 9 is designed to be small in comparison to the diameter of the insert 4 of the bomblet 1 (see, for example, FIG. 1). In warheads with proximity detonators or with electrical ignition, the stand off 9 can be made correspondingly larger (approx. 2 times the diameter of the insert).
- the object of the invention is to provide a system for protecting against shaped loads, primarily bomblets.
- the principle of the protection system according to the invention is based on impairing the formation of the symmetrical beam of a bomblet and thus significantly reducing its performance.
- This is advantageously done by introducing at least one interfering body into the inner area of the shaped charge insert and / or into the area of the insert opening.
- the beam can be disturbed in a particularly advantageous manner at the beginning of its extension and before the beam has fully developed in such a way that the final ballistic performance of the shaped charge is reduced to a fraction of their maximum performance is reduced. Comparable reductions in performance cannot be achieved with any other target-based measure known from practice, not even with the most modern dynamic processes.
- Fig. 1 components of a shaped charge in the form of a bomblet for attacking an object to be protected from above;
- FIG. 5 shows a zone B with further examples of differently shaped interfering bodies
- 9a u. 9b a sunk or partially extended interfering body
- a perforated plate which is provided with interfering bodies, and a perforated plate adapted to armor and attached thereto;
- FIG. 16 shows a schematic illustration, in which an interfering body pierces a casing protecting the insert
- 18a and 18b show a schematic representation of grid-like coverings of the surface of the object to be protected from above;
- 23a and 23b show a thin surface structure with beam-interfering properties
- Fig. 24 modular elements for receiving interference bodies
- 28a and 28b extendable disturbing bodies by means of a bellows, the bellows remaining in the armor; 29a and 29b, disruptible bodies which can be extended by means of the bellows, the bellows projecting beyond the armor;
- FIG. 31 disruptible bodies which can be extended and retracted by means of a bellows
- Fig. 33 extendable controlled by a proximity sensor
- the area of the insert 4, including the stand off 9, is subdivided into three zones. 2, these are with zone A for the lower cone area and the stand off 9, zone B for the middle area of the insert 4 and zone C for the tip area of the insert 4, which is arranged on the side of the insert 4 facing the igniter 6 , designated.
- FIG. 3 shows a bomblet 1, which is arranged on the surface of an object (armor) 10.
- a plurality of focal points 14A, 14B, 14C, 14D, 14E, 14F possible interference bodies are drawn in characteristic positions in an inner region 129 of the insert 4.
- the focus of the interference masses or interference bodies are not identical to the actual center of gravity in the different geometrical configurations of the interference bodies. Rather, they denote the location at which a disturbing body causes its greatest radiation disturbance.
- the connection between the focal points of action 14A to 14F and the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected is made either by a special device or by the interfering body, such as. B. the interference body 16A to 16G, 17, 18 and 19 itself.
- the part of the insert 4 which has already been formed is designated by 4A.
- the main fault position 14A is located on the inner wall of the lining (insert) 4.
- the disturbing body projects into the upper region of the insert 4, at position 14C into the middle region of the insert 4 outside the axis of symmetry 11.
- the interference body is at position 14D in the lower central region of the insert 4 near the symmetry triaxis 11 arranged and at position 14E the interfering body acts in the area of the stand off 9.
- Position 14F of the center of action represents a special case. Here the interfering body mechanically pierces or deforms the insert 4.
- the interference bodies 16A to 16G are designed as different geometric bodies.
- the interfering body 16A is cylindrical
- the interfering body 16B is pin-shaped
- the interfering body 16C is spherical
- the interfering body 16D is cylindrical with a truncated cone tip
- the interfering body 16E is cylindrical with a rounded tip
- the interfering body 16F as a pointed cone
- the interfering body 16G as a blunt cone.
- All of the rotationally symmetrical interfering bodies listed can also be designed to be angular, for example as cuboids or truncated pyramids, if this proves to be advantageous for reasons of signature behavior (e.g. radar detection). It is at the discretion of the person skilled in the art to use the embodiments of a disturbing body shown in FIG. 4 also for the desired focal points 14D and 14E of the disturbing bodies shown schematically in FIG. 3.
- Fig. 5 shows some versions of interfering bodies which have such a length that they protrude into zone B of the insert 4.
- a disturbing body 17A is designed as a hollow cylinder, which in the present exemplary embodiment is filled with a medium 17B.
- the disturbing body 17A can also simply be designed as a hollow body without a filling medium.
- the disturbing body 18A is designed in the form of a pin and can likewise have a cavity 18B and / or also a tip 18C.
- the disturbing body 18A can be solid and without a tip.
- An interference body 19A shown in FIG. 5 is cylindrical and is formed with a rounded tip 19B, the cylindrical base body being connected to the rounded tip 19B via a pin 19C.
- a disturbing body 20A is designed as a blunt cone, which is fastened, for example, by means of a pin 20B in the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected as a support structure.
- the disturbing body 17A represents a special embodiment of the focal points 14C and 14D shown in FIG. 3.
- the disturbance body 19A represents a special embodiment of the center of action 14D according to FIG. 3 and the disturbance body 20A one for the focus of action 14A according to FIG. 3.
- the transitions between the individual illustrated embodiments of the disturbance bodies are fluid, and there are a large number of combinations the same conceivable.
- 6 shows zone C of insert 4, a pin-shaped interfering body 23 being designed such that it extends into zone C and its basic configuration corresponds to the center of action 14B according to FIG. 3.
- a pin-shaped interference body 23A with a conical base interference body 23B is shown as an example.
- This combination also includes disturbances of the beam 5 in the zones A, B and C, as is shown schematically in FIG. 3 by the focal points 14B, 14D and 14E.
- This disturbing body 21 which is designed as a cylindrical disturbing body in the present exemplary embodiment, penetrates the insert 4 of the bomblet 1 which strikes the object surface (armor) 10. This forms a larger deformed or disturbed zone 22 which, when the explosive 3 detonates, leads to particularly pronounced disturbances of the Beam 5 leads.
- FIG. 7a to 7c show three examples of typical beam disturbances corresponding to the positions of the centers of action 14A, 14B, 14C, 14D, 14E.
- the beam disturbance shown in FIG. 7a represented by the dashed line 24A, is triggered by the position of the center of action 14B.
- the focus of action 14B of the interfering body is reproduced in a highly schematic manner as a black circle, which represents the end of the interfering body which extends into the inner region 129 of the insert 4.
- the tip of the insert 4 Since the lower, fast part of the jet, which makes the greatest contribution to the performance in penetrating the armor of the object to be protected, is formed by the tip of the insert 4, in this part, i. H. in zone C the disturbance caused by an interference body is greatest.
- the disturbance introduced also continues in the following areas, so that the disturbance of the beam is not only remains limited to this area. Incidentally, this consideration applies to all other examples shown and described.
- the beam disturbance shown in FIG. 7b which is represented graphically by the dashed line 24B, is caused by the interfering bodies with the focal points 14A and 14C, which are introduced into the inner region 129 of the insert 4. There is a wide deflection of the middle part of the beam 5.
- the beam deflection shown in FIG. 7c according to a dashed line 24C is caused by the introduction of the interfering bodies with the focal points 14D, 14E into the inner region 129 of the insert 4.
- the disturbances in the formation of the beam 5 remain mainly concentrated on the rear part of the beam, while the disturbing body with the center of action 14D, due to its position close to the axis of symmetry, allows further disturbances to be expected in the front part of the beam.
- the most varied combinations of the position and design of the outer shape and the length of the interfering bodies result in corresponding beam interferences, which generally add up, since they fundamentally support the asymmetry.
- Such covers are of particular interest when a certain signature behavior of the surface is desired. It is also possible to set a favorable signature behavior by means of certain shapes and materials of the surface (armor) 10 of an object carrying the interfering body.
- interference zones are dynamically built up as required.
- disruptive bodies 27 can be extended or pushed out of the surface 26 of a correspondingly executed target.
- the interference body is shown in the retracted state in FIG. 9a and in the partially extended state in FIG. 9b.
- FIGS. 9a and 9b show an alternative to FIGS. 9a and 9b, wherein a surface 26 originally covering the interference body 27 withdraws in the direction of the arrow (FIG. 10a) and thereby releases the interference body 27 (FIG. 10b).
- 11a to 11d show some special configurations of targets with the above-mentioned protective properties, wherein on the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected, interfering bodies are attached, which cause the desired radiation disturbance.
- 11a to 11d show examples of interfering bodies which are embedded in a relatively soft, flexible matrix 30.
- a conical interfering body 28 is positioned in a defined manner in such a material.
- FIG. 11b there are spherical interfering bodies 29 in a regular or irregular distribution in the matrix 30.
- FIG. 11c a combination of the embodiments of the interfering bodies 28 and 29 shown in FIGS. 11a and 11b is shown.
- the matrix 30 is designed as a positioning or embedding layer for a spherical interfering body 31 which is not completely surrounded by the matrix 30.
- a matrix 30 can e.g. B. consist of a foamed material or a deformable polymeric material.
- a layer 32 upstream of the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected is made of a material that is flexible enough to move in the direction of the insert 4 during the penetration of the bomblet 1 into this layer 32, as by an arrow 33 to be accelerated (Fig. 12b).
- a disturbing body 34 consisting of the material of the layer 32 for disturbing the beam formation is introduced into the inner region 129 of the insert 4.
- Such interference bodies 35 are shown in FIGS. 13a and 13b.
- the bomber 1 approaching the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected which is occupied by the interfering bodies 35 in FIG. 13 a, pushes one (as shown) or more (not shown) interfering body 35 into the inner region 129 depending on the distribution density the insert 4 and bends the interference body 35 into a shape shown at 36.
- FIG. 14a and 14b show two further examples of how the tip region of the insert 4 of an impacting bomblet 1 can be reached by means of slim interfering bodies 35.
- the state shown in FIG. 14a corresponds to the example shown in FIG. 13b.
- the disturbing body 35 is flexible so that it can be brought into the shape shown at 36.
- the disturbing body 35 is fixed, as shown at 37, in the surface (armor) 10 of the object.
- the disturbing body 35 can also be rigid and can be moved in the surface (armor) 10 of the object by means of a rotating device 39 and can be brought into the deflection positions 38.
- the rotating device 39 can, as shown for example in Fig. 14c, from a z. B. with an elastomeric material filled housing 40, which is embedded in the surface (armor) 10 of the object.
- the layer carrying the interfering bodies can be modular. It can also be advantageous to cover curved surfaces with such interfering layers.
- 15a shows, by way of example, a perforated plate 41 in which disruptive bodies 42 are fastened. Two basic interfering body shapes are shown, first a slim design according to interfering body 16B according to FIG. 4 or interfering body 18A according to FIG. 5 and a conical embodiment according to interfering body 16F or 16G according to FIG. 4.
- FIG. 14c shows, by way of example, a perforated plate 41 in which disruptive bodies 42 are fastened.
- Two basic interfering body shapes are shown, first a slim design according to interfering body 16B according to FIG. 4 or interfering body 18A according to FIG. 5 and a conical embodiment according to interfering
- a carrier layer 44 from a hollow structure that carries the interfering body 42. Following the curvature of the carrier armor 43, this structure is connected to the carrier armor 43 by means of a fastening element (not shown) or a schematically illustrated fastening layer 45.
- such a protective surface can also consist of perforated metal strips with one or more rows of interfering bodies.
- the insert 4 of an impacting bomblet 1 is provided with a cover 46, it is entirely possible to pierce the cover 46 with an appropriately designed interference body 130, which corresponds in principle to the interference body 21 according to FIG. 6, and to penetrate into the inner region 129 of the insert 4. This is shown in principle in Fig. 16.
- FIG. 17 A special embodiment of an interference layer formed from a plurality of interfering bodies 47A, 47B is shown in FIG. 17.
- the interfering bodies 47A, 47B are fixed on a carrier plate 49 by means of bores 48 and surrounded by an enveloping layer 50 which, for. B. is applied to the disruptive bodies 47A, 47B by means of negative pressure, such as a deep-drawn film.
- 18a and 18b each show an occupation of the object surface (armor) 10 with interfering bodies 51 and 52, these being arranged in such a way that one or more interfering bodies 51, 52 simultaneously in the interior of a bomblet, which is indicated schematically by the circles , can penetrate.
- a precisely aligned high-performance jet is much easier to disrupt by means of dynamically particularly effective devices such as buckling structures than an already widely fanned jet. It is therefore sensible to intercept the beam disturbed by an upstream fault zone 53 in a ballistically effective subsequent armor 54, such as high-strength steel or ceramic.
- the subsequent armor or layer 54 can then e.g. B. on an insulating layer 55, which is also suitable for the further distribution of possibly still emerging behind the layer 54 residual jet parts, on a support armor 56, which in turn is attached to the surface of an object.
- 20a to 20c three target structures are shown in comparison.
- 20a shows a homogeneous steel armor 57 which is just penetrated by the bomblet 1 (breakdown).
- the reference mass and the reference height H1 are each 100%, which corresponds to the value 1.
- FIG. 20b the same bomblet 1 just barely penetrates a high-quality special armor 58 of conventional structure.
- Its height H2 still corresponds approximately to the height of the massive armor 57, its mass being only a third.
- 20c shows two armor structures of the same performance with interfering bodies 59A and 59B. Their total height H3 should be half the height H1 of the homogeneous armor. Assuming a ratio of interference area height to subsequent armor of 1: 4 for the example on the right (relatively massive interference body), the result is an average of a quarter of the mass of the homogeneous steel target.
- thin, thin interfering bodies are used, which allow a ratio of the interference area height / subsequent armor of 2: 1. This reduces the mass to one sixth of the mass of the homogeneous steel target.
- the performance of a protective arrangement by means of the product of mass efficiency, which corresponds to the ratio of the penetrated target mass of a steel armor in the breakthrough to the penetrated target mass of the target under consideration, and space efficiency, which in turn corresponds to the ratio of the thickness of the steel armor penetrated in the boundary breakthrough to the thickness of the target, specified.
- the example shown in FIG. 20a gives a product of 1 as a reference, whereas the special armor 58 according to FIG. 20b gives a product of three and the structure provided with interfering bodies according to FIG. 20c gives a product of 8 for the example on the right and 12 for that left example shows. No other inert armor known from the prior art even comes close to achieving such overall efficacies.
- FIG. 21 Such an example is shown in FIG. 21.
- disturbing bodies 16F are mounted on a surface 10 of the object to be protected.
- interfering bodies 60 and the surface 10 of the object to be protected should be formed in one piece.
- the individual modules forming the protective surface are connected via connecting members 61, which also allow a certain mobility of the composite thus produced.
- a special technical solution of the principle proposed here is represented by variable interfering bodies with regard to their height, as exemplified in FIG. 22.
- carrier element 62 there are spring-like interfering bodies 63 which are held in a chamber 131 by means of a movable cover 65.
- the perturbing body 63 or 63A can be provided with an additional perturbation mass 64 arranged at its end facing away from the carrier element 62.
- This principle of a height-variable interfering body can be implemented in different ways. So rubber-like interfering bodies are also conceivable, which can be folded like a bellows. Metal springs also perform this task. The variation in height can also be achieved by folding resilient interfering bodies, which can be raised resiliently if necessary.
- FIGS. 23a and 23b Two further technically interesting embodiments of the arrangement are shown in FIGS. 23a and 23b.
- the radiation-disturbing surface is realized using thin structures.
- the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected has a thin structure which contains interfering bodies 66 for early beam interference. Structures of this type can be cast, deep drawn, punched, forged or pressed, for example, from relatively thin, metallic sheets, from glass fiber reinforced plastics or polymers.
- 23b shows a further surface profile 67, interfering bodies of different lengths and shapes being provided. It is also conceivable to introduce additional masses in the upper region of the interfering bodies 66, 67 to improve the interfering effect.
- punctiform interfering bodies In addition to the use of punctiform interfering bodies, lattice or strip-like interfering structures with at least a comparable protective effect can also be used. Experiments as well as numerical simulation calculations have shown that even single interfering bodies can cause large beam interferences. This applies to a correspondingly greater extent to line-like interfering bodies.
- punctiform interfering bodies can also be combined with line-like interfering structures, e.g. B. with an optimization of the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected.
- Equipment that has a modular structure and into which the desired interfering bodies can be inserted may also be of interest for use.
- 24 shows two modules 68 with corresponding transducers 69. These can be metallic carrier modules as well as those made of plastic, rubber, glass fiber reinforced plastic or the like. Non-planar surfaces can be taken into account either by modular design or by means of flexible carrier materials.
- 25a to 25c the principle described above is carried out further with regard to a more flexible design.
- This is a lattice-like support structure 70, which preferably has sensors 71 for interference bodies in the node.
- 25b shows a sensor 71 of a node in a plan view in an enlarged view.
- An inserted interfering body 72 is fastened in the receiver 71 via a pin 73 according to FIG. 25c.
- Such a principle is suitable for receiving arbitrarily shaped interfering bodies made of different materials or for exchanging interfering bodies such. B. against different threats.
- interference structures or carrier layers for interference bodies shown in FIGS. 12, 23, 24 and 25 are so thin or soft that they have pronounced damping properties. As a result, it is quite conceivable to catch threats or bomblets that hit at a relatively high speed or falling speed so softly or resiliently that the bomblets are not ignited at all.
- Another advantage of relatively compliant, thick interfering or carrier layers for interfering bodies can be that threats are immersed relatively deep before they are ignited. This is advantageous if the bomblet is provided with a splinter jacket, which accelerates splinters in the lateral direction at the same time as the hollow charge jet is formed via the detonating explosive. These are then taken up by the interfering or carrier layer, at least in the immersed part.
- a particular advantage of the system described here for disrupting shaped charge jets during their training is that weak points in protective structures can be avoided in this way. This is illustrated by the embodiments of interfering bodies shown in the figures described below.
- the disturbing bodies 75, 77 are basically arranged here in such a way that a critical edge area or joint area between the protection modules 74 is strengthened. This can be done in that the individual protective modules 74 have interfering bodies in their edge area, or in that interfering bodies are integrated directly into the joint area.
- This bar 76 can also serve as a buffer element between the protection modules 74 or take on other secondary functions (such as fixings).
- 26 also shows an example of how a decisive increase in protection performance can be achieved by means of a central interference body 77 in the joint area of a plurality of protection modules 74.
- 27 shows further examples for the avoidance of weak points in modular armouring by means of interfering bodies.
- the edge areas of the protective modules 74 can be reinforced either by a one-sided edge strip or flap 78 that supports interfering bodies, and two strips that combine two modules and cover strips or flaps 79, 80 that cover the edge regions of the same, or by impact plates 81 that cover the joint area of several protective modules 74.
- the edge strip or tab 78 is provided specifically for the outer region of the carrier layers, to which no further carrier layer adjoins.
- the strip or tab 79 is made relatively wide and has two rows of interfering bodies arranged next to one another.
- the strip or tab 80 is formed, which has only one row of interfering bodies.
- the bumper plate 81 is of square or round basic shape and carrier of z. B. four disruptive bodies.
- the interfering bodies can be of any geometric shape, such as spherical, cylindrical, conical or pyramid-shaped and of different lengths depending on their needs.
- the interfering bodies can consist of metallic materials, polymeric substances, glass or ceramics, of glass fiber reinforced plastics, of pressed bodies, cast bodies and / or of foamed materials.
- 28a to 31 show a number of technical approaches to this.
- 28a an arrangement for protection against shaped charges is integrated into an armor 82, wherein if necessary, interfering bodies 90 can be moved out of a space 83 by means of a bellows 84 and a carrier plate 85.
- a closed cover 93 of the protection system takes place here via a perforated plate 91, the bores 92 of which are assigned to the interfering bodies 90.
- a thin plate or film can serve as the outer cover 93, the z. B. can be pierced by the disruptive bodies 90.
- Such a cover 93 can also perform special functions with regard to the signature.
- the bellows 84 together with the carrier plate 85 encloses a pressure space 86. Is z. B. released via a gas-generating element 87, which is controlled via a line 88, a working gas, the interference body 90 are pushed out of the surface of the protective structure. It is also possible for the working gas to be passed directly into the pressure chamber 86 via a bore 89.
- FIGS. 28a and 28b the movement of the disturbing bodies 90 is limited by means of the plate 91.
- interfering bodies can be pushed out relatively far from relatively flat protective arrangements by means of movable platforms.
- 29a and 29b show an embodiment for this.
- 28a and 28b disturbing bodies 95 are extended out of a module 94 again via a bellows 84.
- the module 94 is by means of a layer 96 closed.
- a working medium such as e.g. B. a working gas can be introduced so that the volume 86A of the pressure chamber 86 is increased significantly and the bellows 84 is extended as shown in Fig. 29b. Relatively large lifting heights HuH 97 can be achieved here.
- FIG. 30 shows the case in which 98 individual disruptive bodies can be extended from a protective structure.
- an interference body 100 is moved in a piston 99 via an overpressure in the feed line 102 and the bore 103.
- the base piece 101 serves as a seal and stroke limitation.
- the height of the interfering body 100 primarily determines the achievable lifting height HuH at 97. It is also conceivable that with such an arrangement, the interfering body 100 is extended or retracted using an overpressure or underpressure.
- telescopic interfering bodies are extended.
- a second piston 105 is moved via a piston 104, in which in turn an end body 100A moves.
- the working gas is supplied via the bores 103 and 103A.
- FIG. 31 shows a technical embodiment for ejecting individual disruptive bodies 110 from a protective structure 107, which is either open or covered by a layer 111.
- the disturbing body is extended and retracted using a working gas.
- a bellows 109 is shown in the retracted state and at 109A in the extended state.
- the performance of shaped charges is determined by the stand off 9, that is to say the distance between the lower edge of the insert and the surface of the structure to be protected.
- the so-called bomblets 1 are generally distinguished by the fact that they achieve the desired breakdown performance even at a small stand off.
- their breakdown capacity also increases when the stand off is enlarged.
- the principle of action proposed here for disturbing the beam formation or the radiation disturbance even in the area of the insert is particularly suitable for decisively reducing the final ballistic performance of shaped charges even with larger stand offs. The reason for this is shown in Fig. 32.
- Fig. 33 shows an example of such an "active" solution.
- the approaching bomblet 1 is detected via a short-range sensor 118, as shown by a double arrow 119 with a broken line.
- This sensor 118 emits a pulse via a line 120 to a control unit 121, which in turn z. B. is connected via a connection 122 to a gas transmission device or the pressure chamber 86 according to FIGS. 28a, 28b or 29a, 29b.
- the extension can also be done using other techniques. Electromagnetic devices or simple mechanical devices such as springs can serve as examples.
- a target structure 123 contains individual acceleration chambers 98, which are provided with a cover 111, as described in FIG. 31.
- a short-range sensor 124 is linked to individual or groups of defense devices via the control element 126 and detects threats that are approaching such as B. Bomblets 1 in areas that are shown at 125.
- the ejected and in this example leaving the target structure disruptive bodies 110 fly towards the bomblet 1 over a relatively short distance, the direction of which is indicated by the arrow 127, through the drilling or receiving the acceleration chamber 98.
- the interfering bodies of all of the above-mentioned exemplary embodiments can be concave, convex, flat or pointed.
- their flanks can be formed at right angles or at an acute angle in a straight line with respect to the object surface (armor) 10.
- a curved surface of the flanks of the interfering bodies is also possible.
- an optimal measurement distribution in the design of the interfering bodies In order to guarantee the most efficient possible beam interference and to keep the weight of the object to be protected as low as possible, an optimal measurement distribution in the design of the interfering bodies. In principle, it is favorable for the beam disturbance if the disturbing bodies are essentially adapted to the shape of the insert, which is usually conical or trumpet-shaped. This means that the further the interfering bodies enter or protrude into the inner region of the insert 4, the less mass is required, particularly in the end region of the interfering body, for an effective disruption of the beam formation. In the area of the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected, more mass is required to disrupt the beam formation, so that a profile similar to the Gaussian normal distribution curve essentially results in a mass and effect-optimized interfering body.
- the interfering bodies are arranged movably in slide rails which enable the interfering bodies to be displaced on the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected. This means that a large area can be effectively protected with few interfering objects.
- the arrangement of the interfering bodies could also be controlled via a motion detector or sensor arranged on the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected.
- the disruptive body can be firmly connected to the surface (armor) 10 of the object to be protected by means of gluing, soldering, welding or an interference fit.
- the interfering bodies can consist of a combination of metallic, glass fiber-reinforced plastics, glass or ceramic, polymeric substances and / or foamed materials.
- the wall thicknesses of metallic interference bodies can be of the order of magnitude of the wall thickness of the insert 4 at the fault location, but wall thicknesses of the interference bodies can also be provided which differ from the wall thickness of the insert 4.
- the average diameter of the interfering bodies can be approximately two to five times the wall thickness of the insert 4 at the point of interruption.
- the diameter of the interfering bodies can correspond in a special embodiment to the average wall thickness of the insert 4. If the interference body is made of non-metallic materials, the interference mass in the interference center can correspond approximately to the mass of the mass of the insert 4 located at this point.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19825260 | 1998-06-05 | ||
DE19825260A DE19825260B4 (de) | 1998-06-05 | 1998-06-05 | Anordnung zum Schutz von Objekten gegen geformte Ladungen |
PCT/EP1999/003808 WO1999064811A1 (de) | 1998-06-05 | 1999-06-02 | System zum schutz von objekten gegen geformte ladungen |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1002213A1 true EP1002213A1 (de) | 2000-05-24 |
EP1002213B1 EP1002213B1 (de) | 2006-05-17 |
Family
ID=7870082
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP99926501A Expired - Lifetime EP1002213B1 (de) | 1998-06-05 | 1999-06-02 | System zum schutz von objekten gegen geformte ladungen |
Country Status (12)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6311605B1 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1002213B1 (de) |
AT (1) | ATE326678T1 (de) |
AU (1) | AU4372999A (de) |
CA (1) | CA2300272C (de) |
DE (1) | DE19825260B4 (de) |
DK (1) | DK1002213T3 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2264260T3 (de) |
IL (1) | IL134375A (de) |
PT (1) | PT1002213E (de) |
TR (1) | TR200000811T1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO1999064811A1 (de) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2011649A2 (de) | 2007-07-04 | 2009-01-07 | manroland AG | Bogenrotationsdruckmaschine |
Families Citing this family (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2805037B1 (fr) * | 2000-02-10 | 2002-04-05 | Giat Ind Sa | Dispositif de protections d'une paroi |
CA2328285A1 (fr) * | 2000-12-15 | 2002-06-15 | Gauthier, Alain | Blindage anti projectile a charge creuse |
US7562612B2 (en) | 2001-07-25 | 2009-07-21 | Aceram Materials & Technologies, Inc. | Ceramic components, ceramic component systems, and ceramic armour systems |
ATE528609T1 (de) * | 2001-07-25 | 2011-10-15 | Aceram Materials And Technologies Inc | Panzerplatte für verwendung als körperschutz oder fahrzeugschutz |
DE60235817D1 (de) * | 2002-11-19 | 2010-05-12 | Hans-Dieter Heinen | Einbruchsichere Tür |
ATE449948T1 (de) * | 2003-12-29 | 2009-12-15 | Ruag Land Systems | Schutz-schicht gegen geformte ladungen |
JP2008502879A (ja) | 2004-06-11 | 2008-01-31 | スチユワート・アンド・ステイブンソン・タクテイカル・ビークル・システムズ・エル・ピー | 車両用装甲付きキャブ |
WO2006134407A1 (en) * | 2005-06-14 | 2006-12-21 | Soukos Robots S.A. | Rocket-propelled grenade protection system |
US7866248B2 (en) | 2006-01-23 | 2011-01-11 | Intellectual Property Holdings, Llc | Encapsulated ceramic composite armor |
US7866250B2 (en) * | 2006-02-09 | 2011-01-11 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | Vehicle protection system |
US7900548B2 (en) * | 2006-02-09 | 2011-03-08 | Foster Miller, Inc. | Protection system including a net |
AU2009357653B2 (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2012-04-19 | Force Protection Technologies, Inc. | Multilayer armor system for defending against missile-borne and stationary shaped charges |
GB2480939B (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2012-11-07 | Force Prot Technologies Inc | Multilayer armor system for defending against missile-borne and stationary shaped charges |
US8132495B2 (en) | 2008-01-23 | 2012-03-13 | Force Protection Technologies, Inc. | Multilayer armor system for defending against missile-borne and stationary shaped charges |
US8615851B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2013-12-31 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | Net patching devices |
US8607685B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2013-12-17 | QinetiQ North America, Inc. | Load sharing hard point net |
US8443709B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2013-05-21 | QinetiQ North America, Inc. | Vehicle and structure shield hard point |
US8468927B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2013-06-25 | QinetiQ North America, Inc. | Vehicle and structure shield with a cable frame |
US8011285B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2011-09-06 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | Vehicle and structure shield |
US8464627B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2013-06-18 | QinetiQ North America, Inc. | Vehicle and structure shield with improved hard points |
US8453552B2 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2013-06-04 | QinetiQ North America, Inc. | Method of designing an RPG shield |
US8245620B2 (en) * | 2008-04-16 | 2012-08-21 | QinetiQ North America, Inc. | Low breaking strength vehicle and structure shield net/frame arrangement |
US20110079135A1 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2011-04-07 | Farinella Michael D | Vehicle and structure shield net/frame arrangement |
EP2202478A1 (de) * | 2008-12-29 | 2010-06-30 | Ruag Land Systems | Objektschutz vor Hohlladungen und Verfahren zu dessen Herstellung |
DE102009050838A1 (de) | 2009-10-27 | 2011-05-05 | Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh | Schutzsystem insbesondere gegen Bomblets bzw. Hohlladungen von oben |
DE102009052820B4 (de) * | 2009-11-13 | 2012-06-14 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Schutzabdeckung für Schutzelemente zum Schutz gegen Hohlladungsgeschosse, Schutzelement mit einer Schutzabdeckung sowie mit einem Schutzelement geschütztes Objekt |
WO2011057628A1 (de) * | 2009-11-13 | 2011-05-19 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Schutzelement zum schutz gegen hohlladungsgeschosse, schutzabdeckung für ein schutzelement, geschütztes objekt sowie verfahren zum schutz eines objektes |
DE102009052821B4 (de) * | 2009-11-13 | 2012-05-24 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Schutzelement zum Schutz gegen Hohlladungsgeschosse, Schutzabdeckung für ein Schutzelement, geschütztes Objekt sowie Verfahren zum Schutz eines Objektes |
FR2957665A1 (fr) * | 2010-03-22 | 2011-09-23 | Nexter Systems | Dispositif de protection balistique deployable anti-charges creuses |
DE102010034257B4 (de) * | 2010-08-13 | 2013-09-12 | Geke Schutztechnik Gmbh | Reaktive Schutzanordnung |
US8677882B2 (en) | 2010-09-08 | 2014-03-25 | QinetiQ North America, Inc. | Vehicle and structure shield with flexible frame |
DE102010047735B4 (de) * | 2010-10-08 | 2015-02-12 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Anordnung mit selbstheilender Schutzschicht |
SE535388C2 (sv) * | 2010-11-17 | 2012-07-17 | Bae Systems Haegglunds Ab | Anordning för skydd mot RSV-granater och fordon med sådan anordning |
DE102011001809B4 (de) * | 2011-04-05 | 2013-04-25 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Schutzelement und Verfahren zur Beschleunigung von Wirkelelementen |
US8448560B1 (en) | 2011-05-11 | 2013-05-28 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Propelled impacter reactive armor |
IL213397A (en) * | 2011-06-06 | 2015-05-31 | Ilan Gavish | Protection module with buffer zone and method for creating it |
US8297193B1 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2012-10-30 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | Surrogate RPG |
US8813631B1 (en) | 2013-02-13 | 2014-08-26 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | Vehicle and structure film/hard point shield |
DE102013008941A1 (de) | 2013-05-25 | 2014-11-27 | Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg | Anordnung zum Schutz eines Objekts, insbesondere eines Kraftfahrzeugs, gegen anfliegende Projektile |
KR101714577B1 (ko) * | 2016-10-19 | 2017-03-09 | 국방과학연구소 | 기능성 물질을 이용한 자탄 방호 구조 및 방법 |
US10215536B2 (en) | 2017-04-21 | 2019-02-26 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | Hard point net |
IL271158B2 (en) * | 2019-12-03 | 2024-04-01 | Cohen Michael | Composite shutter/mesh armor |
Family Cites Families (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE127317C (de) * | ||||
CH80709A (de) * | 1918-07-04 | 1919-08-01 | Robert Hartmann | Schutzpanzer gegen Geschosse von Handfeuerwaffen |
DE688526C (de) * | 1938-07-05 | 1940-02-23 | Bergedorfer Eisenwerk Akt Ges | Fluessigkeitsstandsfernmessung bei Kaeltemaschinen |
US3324768A (en) * | 1950-05-22 | 1967-06-13 | Robert J Eichelberger | Panels for protection of armor against shaped charges |
FR1041126A (fr) * | 1951-08-07 | 1953-10-21 | Blindage de protection contre projectiles à charge creuse | |
FR1103549A (fr) * | 1954-04-21 | 1955-11-03 | Cie De Fives Lille Pour Const | Dispositif de blindage |
US3137205A (en) * | 1959-02-04 | 1964-06-16 | Bofors Ab | Device for protection against bursting projectiles |
US3826172A (en) * | 1969-07-28 | 1974-07-30 | Us Navy | Metal, matrix-fiber composite armor |
US3684631A (en) * | 1969-12-12 | 1972-08-15 | Textron Inc | Glass armor fabrication |
DE2031658C3 (de) * | 1970-06-26 | 1979-07-12 | Krauss-Maffei Ag, 8000 Muenchen | Panzerungswand mit schottähnlichen Kammern |
DE2053345C3 (de) * | 1970-10-30 | 1978-12-21 | Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh, 8000 Muenchen | Schutzeinrichtung gegen Geschosse |
DE2601562A1 (de) * | 1975-07-02 | 1977-01-13 | Pignal | Panzerplatte |
DE2719150C1 (de) * | 1977-04-29 | 1987-03-05 | Industrieanlagen Betriebsges | Schutzvorrichtung gegen Geschosse hoher Energie |
FR2498312A1 (fr) * | 1981-01-22 | 1982-07-23 | Bruge Jean | Blindage dynamique |
US4665794A (en) * | 1982-03-12 | 1987-05-19 | Georg Fischer Aktiengesellschaft | Armor and a method of manufacturing it |
SE452910B (sv) * | 1986-03-27 | 1987-12-21 | Ffv Affersverket | Aktivt pansar |
GB8918252D0 (en) * | 1988-12-10 | 1998-11-18 | Diehl Gmbh & Co | Armour |
US5025707A (en) * | 1990-03-19 | 1991-06-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | High pressure gas actuated reactive armor |
US5217185A (en) * | 1992-05-21 | 1993-06-08 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Ablative shielding for hypervelocity projectiles |
FR2727506B1 (fr) * | 1994-11-30 | 1997-01-24 | Giat Ind Sa | Dispositif de protection d'un vehicule ou d'une structure |
GB9520979D0 (en) * | 1995-10-13 | 1996-08-28 | Pilkington Thorn Optronics Ltd | Armoured vehicle protection |
US5616885A (en) * | 1996-06-03 | 1997-04-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Apparatus for dispersing a jet from a shaped charge liner via non-uniform charge confinement |
-
1998
- 1998-06-05 DE DE19825260A patent/DE19825260B4/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-11-20 US US09/197,029 patent/US6311605B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1999
- 1999-06-02 ES ES99926501T patent/ES2264260T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-06-02 WO PCT/EP1999/003808 patent/WO1999064811A1/de active IP Right Grant
- 1999-06-02 DK DK99926501T patent/DK1002213T3/da active
- 1999-06-02 AT AT99926501T patent/ATE326678T1/de active
- 1999-06-02 IL IL13437599A patent/IL134375A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-06-02 TR TR2000/00811T patent/TR200000811T1/xx unknown
- 1999-06-02 PT PT99926501T patent/PT1002213E/pt unknown
- 1999-06-02 CA CA002300272A patent/CA2300272C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-06-02 EP EP99926501A patent/EP1002213B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-06-02 AU AU43729/99A patent/AU4372999A/en not_active Abandoned
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO9964811A1 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2011649A2 (de) | 2007-07-04 | 2009-01-07 | manroland AG | Bogenrotationsdruckmaschine |
DE102007031001A1 (de) | 2007-07-04 | 2009-01-08 | Manroland Ag | Bogenrotationsdruckmaschine |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
IL134375A (en) | 2004-09-27 |
PT1002213E (pt) | 2006-09-29 |
AU4372999A (en) | 1999-12-30 |
IL134375A0 (en) | 2001-04-30 |
CA2300272A1 (en) | 1999-12-16 |
ES2264260T3 (es) | 2006-12-16 |
US6311605B1 (en) | 2001-11-06 |
WO1999064811A1 (de) | 1999-12-16 |
CA2300272C (en) | 2004-06-22 |
TR200000811T1 (tr) | 2000-10-23 |
DK1002213T3 (da) | 2006-09-11 |
EP1002213B1 (de) | 2006-05-17 |
ATE326678T1 (de) | 2006-06-15 |
DE19825260A1 (de) | 1999-12-16 |
DE19825260B4 (de) | 2007-02-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1002213B1 (de) | System zum schutz von objekten gegen geformte ladungen | |
EP2382437B1 (de) | Objektschutz vor hohlladungen und verfahren zu dessen herstellung | |
EP0806623B1 (de) | Drallstabilisierbares, eine Nutzlast enthaltendes Projektil | |
EP1847797B1 (de) | Umschaltbare Ladung | |
DE2741984A1 (de) | Hohlladung mit zur bahntangente geneigter achse | |
DE1901472C1 (de) | Gefechtskopf zur Bekaempfung gepanzerter Ziele | |
DE19524726B4 (de) | Gefechtskopf | |
EP0435083B1 (de) | Einstellbarer Abstandshalter auf einem Hohlladungsgefechtskopf, umschaltbar für Tiefen- oder Seitenwirkung | |
DE3501649C2 (de) | ||
DE1578077C2 (de) | Gefechtskopf fuer ein Panzerabwehrgeschoss | |
EP2053341B1 (de) | Hohlladung | |
DE4226897C1 (de) | Aktive Schutzvorrichtung | |
DE102012100573A1 (de) | Schutzelement zum Schutz gegen ballistische Geschosse und militärisches Fahrzeug | |
DE4114145C1 (de) | Gefechtskopf zur Bekämpfung von reaktiven Panzerungen | |
DE3608959B3 (de) | Aktivpanzerung | |
DE3919314A1 (de) | Zerlegergeschoss | |
DE4331236C1 (de) | Gefechtskopf zur Bekämpfung gepanzerter Ziele | |
DE10223334B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Räumung von Munition | |
EP4038340B1 (de) | Wirkkörper und verfahren zum zünden eines wirkkörpers | |
DE102020002461B3 (de) | Gefechtskopf zum Erzeugen zumindest eines Projektils und Verfahren zum Ausformen eines Projektils mit einem Gefechtskopf | |
DE3619127C1 (de) | Hohlladungsgeschoß | |
DE102017102174A1 (de) | Vorsatzschutzelement | |
DE4108633C2 (de) | Verwendung des scharfen Wirkteiles einer Suchzünder-Submunition als Übungsmunition mit reduzierter Reichweite | |
DE3620795C1 (de) | Einzelhohlladung für Flugkörper und Rohrmunition | |
DE4018204B3 (de) | Gefechtskopf zur Bekämpfung additiver reaktiver Ziele |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20000202 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IT LI NL PT SE |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: GEKE TECHNOLOGIE GMBH |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20040914 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DK ES FI FR GB GR IT LI NL PT SE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Effective date: 20060803 |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20060911 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: A. BRAUN, BRAUN, HERITIER, ESCHMANN AG PATENTANWAE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20060403810 Country of ref document: GR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2264260 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLBP | Opposition withdrawn |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: PPS POLYVALENT PATENT SERVICE AG Effective date: 20070214 Opponent name: RUAG LAND SYSTEMS Effective date: 20070211 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: PPS POLYVALENT PATENT SERVICE AG Opponent name: RUAG LAND SYSTEMS |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PLBD | Termination of opposition procedure: decision despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPC1 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20071130 |
|
PLBM | Termination of opposition procedure: date of legal effect published |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009276 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION PROCEDURE CLOSED |
|
27C | Opposition proceedings terminated |
Effective date: 20071028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: RN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: FC |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060818 |
|
NLR2 | Nl: decision of opposition |
Effective date: 20071028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: GEKE TECHNOLOGIE GMBH Free format text: GEKE TECHNOLOGIE GMBH#ERASMUSSTR. 16#79098 FREIBURG (DE) -TRANSFER TO- GEKE TECHNOLOGIE GMBH#ERASMUSSTR. 16#79098 FREIBURG (DE) |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060630 |
|
PGRI | Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Effective date: 20080319 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: PC Ref document number: 326678 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Owner name: GEKE SCHUTZTECHNIK GMBH, DE Effective date: 20140414 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PCAR Free format text: NEW ADDRESS: HOLBEINSTRASSE 36-38, 4051 BASEL (CH) |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PUE Owner name: GEKE SCHUTZTECHNIK GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GEKE TECHNOLOGIE GMBH, DE Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: HEPP WENGER RYFFEL AG, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: PC4A Owner name: GEKE SCHUTZTECHNIK GMBH, DE Effective date: 20150612 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20150618 AND 20150624 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: PC2A Owner name: GEKE SCHUTZTECHNIK GMBH Effective date: 20150714 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP Owner name: GEKE SCHUTZTECHNIK GMBH, DE Effective date: 20150922 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: PD Owner name: GEKE SCHUTZTECHNIK GMBH; DE Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: VERANDERING VAN EIGENAAR(S), OVERDRACHT; FORMER OWNER NAME: GEKE TECHNOLOGIE GMBH Effective date: 20151111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20160525 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20170626 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20170620 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20170620 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20170622 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20170621 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20170621 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20170703 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171204 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20180629 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20180621 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20180622 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20180630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180603 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180602 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 326678 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180602 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: PD Owner name: GEKE SCHUTZTECHNIK GMBH; DE Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), AFFECTATION / CESSION; FORMER OWNER NAME: GEKE TECHNOLOGIE GMBH Effective date: 20151001 Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180701 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180602 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180602 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20190601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20190916 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20190601 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180603 |