EP0813701A1 - Systeme de gestion pour installations de l'industrie primaire ou de l'industrie manufacturiere - Google Patents

Systeme de gestion pour installations de l'industrie primaire ou de l'industrie manufacturiere

Info

Publication number
EP0813701A1
EP0813701A1 EP96905686A EP96905686A EP0813701A1 EP 0813701 A1 EP0813701 A1 EP 0813701A1 EP 96905686 A EP96905686 A EP 96905686A EP 96905686 A EP96905686 A EP 96905686A EP 0813701 A1 EP0813701 A1 EP 0813701A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
control system
model
optimization
values
casting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP96905686A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0813701B1 (fr
Inventor
Hannes Schulze Horn
Jürgen ADAMY
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=7756201&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0813701(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP0813701A1 publication Critical patent/EP0813701A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0813701B1 publication Critical patent/EP0813701B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • B22D11/16Controlling or regulating processes or operations

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a control system for a plant in the basic material or processing industry or the like, e.g. for a metallurgical plant, for example for the production of strips of steel or non-ferrous metals, the control system using computer technology, based on input of prior knowledge, the condition of the plant and details of a manufacturing process running in the plant, e.g. a continuous casting process for strips, which recognizes itself automatically and gives instructions appropriate to the situation in order to achieve a safe production success.
  • a control system for a plant in the basic material or processing industry or the like e.g. for a metallurgical plant, for example for the production of strips of steel or non-ferrous metals
  • the control system using computer technology, based on input of prior knowledge, the condition of the plant and details of a manufacturing process running in the plant, e.g. a continuous casting process for strips, which recognizes itself automatically and gives instructions appropriate to the situation in order to achieve a safe production success.
  • Expert systems as so-called intelligent systems, with which the quality of the manufactured products is also to be improved with regard to quality features that are difficult to control from a control point of view, are also known for systems in the basic material industry, e.g. from the article "Process optimization for maximum availability in continuous casting", published in the journal "Metallurgical Plant and Technologie International 5/1994". Expert systems of this type, which can certainly improve the success of production, do not, however, overcome the basic weaknesses of conventional control. These are particularly visible when it comes to processes that are more suitable (such as in the raw materials industry) due to the lack
  • the task is solved by an actually intelligently designed control system, which, based on the input of prior knowledge, automatically gives appropriate instructions for a safe and as good as possible (optimal) process control. It is therefore a fully developed technical intelligence that, surprisingly, can already be implemented for the process control systems of large systems using the computing resources available today.
  • control system is designed to optimize the situation-specific instructions step by step in terms of computing. This results in a further increase in the intelligent behavior, which leads to a quality of the process control which cannot be achieved by human operating personnel or at least not in the short time that can be achieved by computer technology. .
  • the prior knowledge entered that is to say the process knowledge predefined by humans, preferably automatically, continuously improved by knowledge obtained internally computationally in the process during production, for example in different operating points, and this self-generated process knowledge in one, in particular, constantly updated data storage is adopted as new prior knowledge. So one becomes very advantageous constantly improved basis for further adaptation or optimization of the process.
  • the knowledge gained is not only limited to more precise parameters etc., but also includes the principles of the algorithms used, etc. in particular.
  • the control system has a basic functional system for the system components, which contains the instructions from the computational, e.g. knowledge gained from a process model, preferably an overall process model, is reliably implemented in the plant management.
  • a safe basic function system which is preferably designed as a basic automation system that makes the system components safe to work on their own or in summary, with a static process model adapted to the situation, results in an implementation that is related to the safety of the process - Management of the conventional design of a control system is at least equivalent, in terms of the cost / benefit ratio and the reliably achievable process result, but is superior.
  • the basic automation system is advantageously designed as an autonomous subsystem that guarantees a safe state of the system or the system components and the process state, for example as a hazard state relapse system, which, if necessary, recognized as safe instead of the computationally generated instructions , operating values stored in the data memory can be used. This enables safe, albeit suboptimal, operation of the system even in the event of a failure or malfunction of the intelligent computer part.
  • the basic function system advantageously also has start-up and run-up routines that can be entered manually or automatically, as well as suboptimal normal operating routines in which individual, otherwise computationally determined, instructions can be replaced by constant, reliable specifications.
  • Such a configuration of the basic function system is particularly advantageous for the commissioning phases, for operation with a sudden change in requirements, etc.
  • For the, albeit sub-optimal, function of the intelligent computer part it is not always necessary for all model parts to be available in a specifically adapted form. Operation with an only partially elaborated and / or adapted overall process model is also advantageously possible.
  • the process model itself in the form of an overall process model, is particularly modular and describes the behavior between the process input variables and the manipulated variables and the process output variables, for example quality parameters of the product produced.
  • the modularity allows a particularly advantageous design and processing of the overall process model, since it is possible to start from individual, easily visible, partial models.
  • the process model is advantageously based as far as possible on mathematical forms of description. Where such mathematical forms of description are not possible, use is made, for example, of linguistically formulated model parts, which can be implemented, for example, by fuzzy systems, neuro-fuzzy systems, expert systems or the like.
  • self-learning systems for example neural networks, are used. This means that all production plants, regardless of how large they are designed or how they are designed, have the option of creating an overall process model.
  • the process model is advantageously continuously adapted and further improved to the process on the basis of process data collected on the system and archived in a process database, this advantageously using adaptive methods, learning methods, e.g. through a backpropagation learning process or a selection process for different sub-models, such as neural networks or their parts. This results in a largely self-taught model that can be adapted or improved on-line or off-line.
  • the adjustable process variables are optimized by the optimizer on the process model in such a way that the model output variables, which are in particular quality parameters of the product, are matched as well as possible with predetermined, e.g. the target,
  • the off-line optimization can be carried out on a separate computing unit parallel to the model adaptation, as well as during breaks, for example at weekends or during repair downtimes on the computer, which outputs the reference values of the basic function system during operation.
  • the optimization is advantageously carried out using known optimization methods, in particular using genetic algorithms.
  • the selection of the optimization process depends on the situation and problem. It can be done by a specification, e.g. on the basis of an analysis of the course of the process, or by means of a computational selection from an optimization method collection. A simple "trial and error” procedure can be used for this, but in order to reduce the computational effort, it is advisable to support the "trial and error” procedure by means of convergence criteria, methods of pattern recognition in the course of error acceptance, etc.
  • the respective start values for an optimization are advantageously determined on the basis of the suboptimal operating data archived in a process data memory. This reduces the optimization effort, since the optimization calculation starts with pre-optimized values when it uses intermediate values that are recognized as safe as start values.
  • the overall system is improved at least in three stages.
  • the lowest level is the continuous improvement of the existing process knowledge, stored in the data memory, for example in the form of suboptimal, safe operating points, which are continuously brought up to a better adapted level of knowledge, and which is then again assumed.
  • the second stage essentially forms the model adaptation, which adapts the model behavior to the process behavior as well as possible.
  • the third stage is a continuous improvement of the situation-specific instructions by the process optimizer, e.g. about evolutionary strategies, genetic algorithms etc. These strategies require a large computing time and preferably run off-line.
  • the system improvement is advantageously also continuously supported by external simulation calculations, model tests, possibly also by tests on the production plant with new aids, etc.
  • control system according to the invention is described below by way of example on the basis of a strip casting installation for steel. Further, also inventive details and advantages result from the drawing and the description of the drawing as well as from the subclaims.
  • FIG. 5 essential components of the process model and their rough link structure
  • FIG. 1, 1 denotes the casting rolls of a two-roll casting device
  • the material, between the casting rolls 1, Liquid steel, for example, is poured in from the ladle 4 via the tundish 5 and a dip tube 6 and solidifies into a strip 3, which can be further deformed in a rolling mill symbolized by the circles 2 with arrows.
  • the downstream rolling plant can also be simply replaced by conveyor rollers, a reel or the like if the rolling is not to take place immediately after the casting.
  • the design of the overall system is carried out in a requirement-specific manner. It is also possible to design the system downstream of the casting device as a hot-cold rolling mill and is recommended at very high casting speeds, since the cold rolling section of the system can then also be sufficiently utilized.
  • the casting roll device preferably has an electrodynamic system 8, 9, also shown only symbolically, and an induction heating system 10.
  • the electrodynamic system part 8 advantageously serves to relieve the weight, the cast band 3, which is still very soft and therefore at risk of constriction, and the electrodynamic system part 9 guides the band 3, while the induction heating system 10 maintains a predetermined temperature profiles over the bandwidth is incumbent if, for example this is followed by direct post-forming in a rolling mill. This is particularly advantageous for crack-sensitive steels.
  • the cast strip 3 is checked for cracks by a camera 73, it being possible advantageously to use the fact that the crack pattern in the scale is influenced by cracks in the base material.
  • the formation of a measured variable is advantageously carried out by a neuro-fuzzy system.
  • the casting roller device Due to the data transmissions 1, 11 and VI, which are symbolized by arrows, the casting roller device, in which the solidification shells of the steel formed on the two casting rollers 1 are not only combined, but also formed in a rolling manner, with the intelligent one Part of the control system connected.
  • FIG. 2 shows the structure of the intelligent part of the control system. This essentially consists of the parts of process optimizer 15, model 20, model adaptation 16 and data storage device 17. These parts of the control system work together in such a way that the setpoint output 13 provides the best possible, situation-specific instructions via data line V for process control become. These instructions are then converted into setpoints for the basic automation. The task and function of the individual parts are described below.
  • the model output variables are typical quality parameters of the product.
  • the model description y, (" ⁇ -...,” ,, ...- v ,, - .., v ,, ...)
  • the process behavior generally does not exactly understand why y, - and y, differ more or less from one another.
  • the manipulated variables w and the non-influenceable manipulated variables v are transmitted via the data lines I and II.
  • the model adaptation 16 has the task of improving the model so that the model behavior corresponds as well as possible to the process behavior. This can be done online, at least for model parts, by adapting or tracking these model parts on the basis of continuously acquired process data.
  • the adaptation can also be carried out off-line at specific times. This is done on the basis of a number m of process states representing the process (“, *, v *, y *), which are stored in the data memory 17.
  • the index k quantifies the respective process status.
  • model parameters or the model structure are varied so that ⁇ becomes as small as possible.
  • the process optimizer has the task of using an optimization method and the process model to find manipulated variables u t which lead to the best possible process behavior.
  • the process optimizer works off-line at specific times, for example, which can be predetermined manually, as follows:
  • the non-influenceable manipulated variables v for which the optimization is to take place - for example the current ones - are kept constant and supplied to the model via the data line II.
  • the process optimizer is then connected to the model by means of switch 18. It gives control values u t on the Model.
  • the initial values y i are determined via the model. These are compared with target output values y target l , and it becomes the error
  • the error E should be minimized.
  • the process optimizer varies the manipulated variables u t in an iterative loop, each of which contains the calculation of v and E and the new selection of u t , until the error cannot be reduced further or this optimization is terminated.
  • genetic algorithms, hill-clibing methods, etc. can be used as optimization methods.
  • the optimal manipulated variables u opll obtained in this way which are the result of the above-mentioned minimization, are then transferred as setpoints to the basic function system via the setpoint specification and the data line V.
  • the main task of the data memory is to archive representative process states (w.-v ,,; - /). In doing so, he replaces old process data again and again with new ones, in order to enable a current, albeit selective, process description based on this data.
  • the data memory then supplies the model adaptation, as described above. On the other hand, it also supplies start values w for the process optimizer.
  • Start values are selected, for example, in such a way that the output values y belonging to these start values correspond as closely as possible to the target values y target l .
  • model 20 and process optimizer 15 which uses, for example, genetic algorithms for, for example, evolutionary, model improvement, preferably works off-line because, because of the grain complexity of a plant control model with its many possible configurations, the computing time of an evolutionary optimization process becomes comparatively long. Even with good optimization strategies, which are selected, for example, on the basis of an analysis of the probable model behavior, many optimization processes can be calculated until a significant model improvement is achieved.
  • Workstations are used as computers for process optimization and parameter adaptation, e.g. from the Sun company.
  • computers working in parallel are advantageously used. This applies in particular if the model can be divided into groups of Mode11 modules, which can be partially optimized depending on one another.
  • FIG. 3 shows more precise details of the program structure with which the optimization is terminated and the new setpoint output is started.
  • 58 designates an error function to be selected in each case, into which the errors (setpoint deviations) determined flow.
  • the error function fulfills the termination criteria of the optimization. If this is the case, further optimized control and regulating variables are output.
  • start values continuously arrive from the data memory in the start value specification 59, from which in search steps in 60, not from the optimizer, but from the data memory, for example with the aid of fuzzy interpolation, control and regulating parameters for a sub-optional process control be won.
  • Switching takes place after reaching the predetermined quality factor, which is adapted to the respective control system knowledge.
  • the minimization which can never be absolute, is stopped when the specified quality factor is reached.
  • the model is also advantageous if it is connected to the process, i.e. Switch 1 is closed, an alarm signal is also generated which signals that critical operating states have been reached.
  • Switch 1 is closed, an alarm signal is also generated which signals that critical operating states have been reached.
  • FIG. 4 which shows the structure of a model adaptation by means of an optimization algorithm
  • data from the start value specification 61 arrive in a search step unit 62 and are passed on from there to the model 63 as model parameters.
  • the model 63 forms, together with the data memory 64, a parameter improvement loop which compares the values formed and stored in a known manner in 65.
  • the comparison values are fed to the error function 67, which forwards their values to the termination criteria unit 66. If the termination criteria are met, the model is no longer improved and the existing values are used. Otherwise the optimization is continued with further search steps and the intermediate values in the data memory.
  • FIG. 5 which shows the essential partial models of the overall process model of the exemplary embodiment, 46 denotes this
  • Input model in which the external influences, such as the influences from the quality of the material used, are summarized.
  • the quality of the steel used results e.g. the liquidus value, the solidus value, and other variables that characterize the casting behavior.
  • 47 denotes the tundish model in which e.g. the steel volume of the tundish, the dip tube position or the like, the stopper position and the steel outflow temperature.
  • the input models 46 and 47 are combined in the sub-model 56, which reflects the status of the material supplied.
  • Such partial models can advantageously be parallel to other partial models, such as the casting area model, the rolling area model or the like. be optimized.
  • the input model 48 contains the influences that affect the solidification, e.g. the casting roll cooling, the infrared heating etc.
  • the input model 49 contains the values that are necessary for the heat balance, such as the steel casting roll temperature difference, the influence of lubricant as a function of the amount of lubricant, the rate of crystal formation of the respective steel type and e.g. the roller surface condition.
  • the input model 50 contains e.g. the influences of the casting level characteristics, such as the level of the casting level, the thickness of the slag layer and the radiation coefficient.
  • the input models 48, 49 and 50 are combined to form a partial model 54, which represents the status of the casting area. This
  • Model area summary is generally advantageous for production areas, since it simplifies and improves the overall model optimization.
  • the sub-models are still partially dependent on one another, for example the input models 49 (input model heat balance) and 50 to a considerable extent (Initial model of the mold level characteristic). Secondary dependencies are not shown for simplification.
  • the sub-model 51 contains all influences on the solidification front, i.e. to the area where the metal shells solidified on the two cooling rolls meet. Essentially, these influences are the forming work performed by the casting rolls, the vibration width of the casting rolls or the emerging strip, the side gap sealing influences and the degree of effort of the overall system, this is e.g. a fuzzy model.
  • the partial model 52 reproduces the exit values, e.g. the quality of the strip, the outlet temperature and distribution, but also the tendency to stick and the condition of the scale formed.
  • the input model 53 and the input model 74 which relate to the temperature profile transverse to the strip and to the surface condition of the strip, also go into the partial part 52.
  • the rolling mill part models 54 are also included in this special process model, since the product formation after the exit from the roll stands is the decisive criterion.
  • the partial models are combined to form the product training model 57, which summarizes the thickness profile of the strip formed, the strip thickness, a possible defect pattern, the grain structure of the strip, the surface structure, etc.
  • the surface structure and in particular the grain structure of the strip can only be determined with a considerable time delay. It is therefore advantageous here to work with submodels based on neural networks for the qualitative and quantitative determination of influencing variables.
  • the above illustration shows the particular advantage that results from the design of the model in module form, since in particular the parts of a complex overall process model can be processed in parallel. This is particularly advantageous for the commissioning period of a system, in which the input and partial models are adapted to the actual conditions, linked together, etc.
  • 68 denotes the process data archive, 69 the model parameter memory part, 70 the part with the start values for the optimizer and 71 the memory part for the safe operating points.
  • the respective model formation is also stored in 68.
  • the basic automation which with its controls, controls, interlocks etc., is an indispensable part of the
  • Control system because it Guaranteeing the safe functioning of the system even in the event of a malfunction of the model part of the control system operating according to the invention must perform a multitude of functions.
  • 21 means in the exemplary embodiment the mass flow control via the individual speed controller, 22 the control of the tundish heating, 23 the mold level control, 24 the tundish outflow control and 25 the heating power of the infrared or above screen 7 for maintaining the operating temperature of the casting rolls.
  • 26 means the regulation of the lubricant additions, for example in the form of loose casting powder or of casting powder paste applied to the casting rolls, 27 the cooling water quantity regulation, 28 possibly the roll oscillation regulation, 29 the electric drive regulation and 30 the roll gap setting.
  • 31 means the roll speed control and 32 possibly the control of the roll torque, 33 the setting of the cleaning system, consisting for example of a brush and a scraper for the casting rolls and 34 the control of the electrodynamic System for balancing the belt weight and 35 the regulation of the vibration width of the cast belt.
  • 36 means the regulation of the individual parts of an electrodynamic system for side gap sealing and 37 the regulation of the heating for the side walls of the space between the casting rolls.
  • 38 means the temperature profile control of the induction heating system 10.
  • 39 and indicated further control units relate to controls of the downstream deformation units, for example roll stands, the train between these roll stands etc.
  • the timing control 45 acts on the above actuators, controllers etc. which coordinates the manipulated variable outputs etc. in time.
  • auxiliary controls and the interlocks are summarized, for example 41 means the automatic start-up, 42 the automatic switch-off, 43 and 44 interlocks which, for example, prevent molten steel from flowing before the casting roller pair and the forming rollers are operational , etc.
  • 41 means the automatic start-up
  • 42 the automatic switch-off
  • 43 and 44 interlocks which, for example, prevent molten steel from flowing before the casting roller pair and the forming rollers are operational , etc.
  • the strip edge separation that may be required, for example by laser, for influencing the scale formation, for example by
  • the casting and rolling process consists of a number of sub-processes, the formation and influences of which are decisive for the end product.
  • the properties of the end product for example its thickness, its thickness profile and its surface formation, can be influenced and optimized by a number of adjustable process variables, such as, for example Casting roll gap, the casting roll profile, the casting level, etc., which in turn influence the position of the union zone of the solidified metal shells deposited on the casting rolls.
  • an overall process model is advantageously created according to the invention, which describes the process behavior.
  • the influencing variables with which the process is influenced can be adapted and optimized step by step in accordance with the process conditions.
  • the intelligent, self-improving part of the control system is composed of three essential elements: the process model, the model adaptation and the process optimizer.
  • the process model consists of subsystems (modules), which will be of different types depending on the process knowledge. Knowing the physical relationships, classic, physical-mathematical models can be created. If, on the other hand, one only has experience or estimates, then fuzzy or neuro-fuzzy systems are used. If one knows little or nothing about the process behavior, such as crack formation and surface formation, neural networks are used, at least initially, for process formation.
  • the model describes the relationship between the process variables, such as the height of the mold level in the selected example, the condition values and the quality of the cast material, the setting values of the casting rolls, etc. and the quality parameters of the Band, for example the thickness, the profile and the surface training.
  • model adaptation which is based on data from past process states.
  • model adaptation provides the model parameters above. in such a way that the model behavior corresponds as closely as possible to that of the process.
  • the models themselves are optimized in a changing manner, e.g. through genetic algorithms, combinatorial evolution etc. Appropriate optimization strategies are known, e.g. from Ulrieh Hoffmann, Hanns Hofmann “Introduction to Optimization", Verlag Chemie GmbH, 1971 Weinheim / Bergstrasse; H.P.
  • control structure according to the invention with the procedure according to the invention described above leaves the previous structure of a control system.
  • level I a basic automation
  • level II a basic automation
  • intelligent self-optimization it ensures better and better process results due to the process results already achieved.
  • Individual feedback control loops can be omitted.
  • Quality control sensors are only for checking the process results necessary.
  • the control system according to the invention therefore only has two essential levels, of which the intelligent level requires no visualization except for programming. For control purposes, however, the elements of the basic automation can be visualized in a known manner.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Control Of Metal Rolling (AREA)
EP96905686A 1995-03-09 1996-03-06 Systeme de gestion pour installations de l'industrie primaire ou de l'industrie manufacturiere Revoked EP0813701B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE19508476A DE19508476A1 (de) 1995-03-09 1995-03-09 Leitsystem für eine Anlage der Grundstoff- oder der verarbeitenden Industrie o. ä.
DE19508476 1995-03-09
PCT/DE1996/000397 WO1996028772A1 (fr) 1995-03-09 1996-03-06 Systeme de gestion pour installations de l'industrie primaire ou de l'industrie manufacturiere

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0813701A1 true EP0813701A1 (fr) 1997-12-29
EP0813701B1 EP0813701B1 (fr) 1999-10-13

Family

ID=7756201

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP96905686A Revoked EP0813701B1 (fr) 1995-03-09 1996-03-06 Systeme de gestion pour installations de l'industrie primaire ou de l'industrie manufacturiere

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US5727127A (fr)
EP (1) EP0813701B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN1244032C (fr)
AT (1) ATE185626T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE19508476A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO1996028772A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (60)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19508474A1 (de) * 1995-03-09 1996-09-19 Siemens Ag Intelligentes Rechner-Leitsystem
DE19513801A1 (de) * 1995-04-11 1996-10-17 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur automatischen Erzeugung einer Steuerung
BR9709926A (pt) * 1996-06-21 1999-08-10 Siemens Ag Processo e sistema para o início de operacão de instalações indústrias em especial de indústrias de matéria-prima
DE19640806C2 (de) * 1996-10-02 2002-03-14 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Gießen eines Stranges aus flüssigem Material
DE19704983B4 (de) * 1997-01-29 2006-07-06 Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg Autonomes System, insbesondere autonome Plattform
DE19706767A1 (de) * 1997-02-20 1998-09-03 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Simulation einer Anlage der Grundstoffindustrie
JP3802965B2 (ja) * 1997-03-21 2006-08-02 ヴイ.ウリヤノフ セルゲイ 非線形の物理的な制御対象の最適制御のための自己組織化方法及び装置
DE19715503A1 (de) * 1997-04-14 1998-10-15 Siemens Ag Integriertes Rechner- und Kommunikationssystem für den Anlagenbereich
DE19731980A1 (de) * 1997-07-24 1999-01-28 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Steuerung und Voreinstellung eines Walzgerüstes oder einer Walzstraße zum Walzen eines Walzbandes
DE19744815C1 (de) * 1997-10-02 1999-03-11 Mannesmann Ag Verfahren zur Materialflußbestimmung und -steuerung von stranggegossenen Brammen
DE19752548A1 (de) * 1997-11-27 1999-06-10 Schloemann Siemag Ag Verfahren zur Vorrichtung zum Einstellen und Halten der Temperatur einer Stahlschmelze beim Stranggießen
DE19807114B4 (de) * 1998-02-20 2006-11-23 Sms Demag Ag Verfahren zur Qualitätsüberwachung des Gießvorganges einer Stranggießanlage
AT409229B (de) * 1998-04-29 2002-06-25 Voest Alpine Ind Anlagen Verfahren zur verbesserung der kontur gewalzten materials und zur erhöhung der gewalzten materiallänge
DE19832762C2 (de) * 1998-07-21 2003-05-08 Fraunhofer Ges Forschung Gießwalzanlage, insbesondere Dünnbrammengießwalzanlage
DE19916190C2 (de) * 1998-12-22 2001-03-29 Sms Demag Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Stranggießen von Brammen
DE10001400C2 (de) * 1999-01-14 2003-08-14 Sumitomo Heavy Industries Vorrichtung zum Regeln des Gießspiegels einer Stranggußvorrichtung
DE10027324C2 (de) * 1999-06-07 2003-04-10 Sms Demag Ag Verfahren zum Gießen eines metallischen Strangs sowie System hierzu
DE19931331A1 (de) * 1999-07-07 2001-01-18 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Herstellen eines Stranges aus Metall
US6505475B1 (en) 1999-08-20 2003-01-14 Hudson Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring and improving efficiency in refrigeration systems
US6564194B1 (en) * 1999-09-10 2003-05-13 John R. Koza Method and apparatus for automatic synthesis controllers
DE19959204A1 (de) * 1999-12-08 2001-07-12 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Ermittlung einer Beizzeit eines eine Zunderschicht aufweisenden Metallbandes
US7216113B1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2007-05-08 Symyx Technologies, Inc. Remote Execution of Materials Library Designs
AT409352B (de) * 2000-06-02 2002-07-25 Voest Alpine Ind Anlagen Verfahren zum stranggiessen eines metallstranges
US6581672B2 (en) 2000-09-29 2003-06-24 Nucor Corporation Method for controlling a continuous strip steel casting process based on customer-specified requirements
KR100868143B1 (ko) * 2000-09-29 2008-11-10 누코 코포레이션 주문에 의한 강 스트립 공급 방법
US7591917B2 (en) * 2000-10-02 2009-09-22 Nucor Corporation Method of producing steel strip
US6801817B1 (en) * 2001-02-20 2004-10-05 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for integrating multiple process controllers
US6615098B1 (en) * 2001-02-21 2003-09-02 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling a tool using a baseline control script
US6915172B2 (en) 2001-11-21 2005-07-05 General Electric Method, system and storage medium for enhancing process control
US7367018B2 (en) * 2002-10-25 2008-04-29 Aspen Technology, Inc. System and method for organizing and sharing of process plant design and operations data
KR101338012B1 (ko) * 2002-12-09 2013-12-09 허드슨 테크놀로지스, 인코포레이티드 냉각 시스템 최적화 방법 및 장치
US8463441B2 (en) * 2002-12-09 2013-06-11 Hudson Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for optimizing refrigeration systems
DE10306273A1 (de) 2003-02-14 2004-09-02 Siemens Ag Mathematisches Modell für eine hüttentechnische Anlage und Optimierungsverfahren für den Betrieb einer hüttentechnischen Anlage unter Verwendung eines derartigen Modells
DE10310357A1 (de) * 2003-03-10 2004-09-30 Siemens Ag Gießwalzanlage zur Erzeugen eines Stahlbandes
JP2004315949A (ja) * 2003-04-21 2004-11-11 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> 物理状態制御用情報計算装置、物理状態制御用情報計算方法、物理状態制御用情報計算用プログラム及び物理状態制御装置
SE527168C2 (sv) * 2003-12-31 2006-01-10 Abb Ab Förfarande och anordning för mätning, bestämning och styrning av planhet hos ett metallband
JP4834988B2 (ja) * 2004-12-14 2011-12-14 横河電機株式会社 連続系プロセス制御方法および連続系プロセス制御システム
DE102007025447A1 (de) * 2006-10-09 2008-04-17 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Steuerung und/oder Regelung eines industriellen Prozesses
DE102008020381A1 (de) * 2008-04-23 2009-10-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft System und Verfahren zum Sammeln von Daten aus industriellen Anlagen
WO2010051981A1 (fr) * 2008-11-04 2010-05-14 Sms Siemag Ag Procédé et dispositif de commande de la solidification d'une barre de coulée dans une installation de coulée continue lors de la mise en marche du processus de coulée
US8042602B2 (en) * 2009-06-16 2011-10-25 Nucor Corporation High efficiency plant for making steel
KR101130222B1 (ko) * 2009-12-24 2012-03-29 주식회사 오토스윙 용접 헬멧의 카트리지 제어방법
KR101299094B1 (ko) * 2010-08-30 2013-08-27 현대제철 주식회사 래들 교환시 용강 오염범위 예측 방법
EP2578333A1 (fr) * 2011-10-07 2013-04-10 Nemak Linz GmbH Procédé de commande d'un système de coulée
CN102520705B (zh) * 2011-12-31 2014-11-26 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 一种炼化生产过程优化分析方法及系统
CN103293951B (zh) * 2013-06-14 2015-07-29 湘潭大学 一种智能出钢材组炉组浇装置及方法
DE102013220657A1 (de) * 2013-07-26 2015-01-29 Sms Siemag Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Herstellung eines metallischen Bandes im kontinuierlichen Gießwalzverfahren
ITUD20130128A1 (it) * 2013-10-04 2015-04-05 Danieli Off Mecc Impianto siderurgico a linea di co-laminazione multipla e relativo metodo di produzione
AT516440B1 (de) * 2014-10-28 2017-03-15 Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH Strangführungssegment, Strangführungssystem und Verfahren zum Konfigurieren eines solchen Strangführungssystems
KR20170098223A (ko) * 2014-12-17 2017-08-29 프리메탈스 테크놀로지스 오스트리아 게엠베하 동작 모드의 최적화에 의한 야금 시설에 대한 동작 방법
US20160275219A1 (en) * 2015-03-20 2016-09-22 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. Simulating an industrial system
EP3293594A1 (fr) 2016-09-13 2018-03-14 Primetals Technologies Germany GmbH Utilisation d'intelligence artificielle globale dans des installations de l'industrie de base
EP3318342A1 (fr) * 2016-11-07 2018-05-09 Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH Procédé de fonctionnement d'un ensemble de coulée-laminage
EP3511782A1 (fr) * 2018-01-15 2019-07-17 Covestro Deutschland AG Procédé permettant d'améliorer un processus de production chimique
EP3511783A1 (fr) * 2018-01-15 2019-07-17 Covestro Deutschland AG Procédé permettant d'améliorer un processus de production chimique
EP3511784A1 (fr) * 2018-01-15 2019-07-17 Covestro Deutschland AG Procédé permettant d'améliorer un processus de production chimique
EP3534278A1 (fr) * 2018-02-28 2019-09-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Procédé et système de dessin assisté par ordinateur d'une usine
US11262734B2 (en) * 2018-08-29 2022-03-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Systems and methods to ensure robustness for engineering autonomy
CN113485267A (zh) * 2021-07-12 2021-10-08 湖南先登智能科技有限公司 一种镍基靶材生产自动控制系统
EP4354232A1 (fr) 2022-10-11 2024-04-17 Primetals Technologies Germany GmbH Procédé et système d'adaptation d'un processus de fabrication

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4368510A (en) * 1980-10-20 1983-01-11 Leeds & Northrup Company Automatic identification system for self tuning process controller
DE3133222A1 (de) * 1981-08-21 1983-03-03 Kraftwerk Union AG, 4330 Mülheim Verfahren zur ermittlung des augenblicklichen und des zukuenftigen zustandes eines technischen prozesses mit hilfe von nichtlinearen prozessmodellen
EP0138059A1 (fr) * 1983-09-19 1985-04-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Procédé et dispositif pour couler une bande métallique entre deux cylindres
US4678023A (en) * 1985-12-24 1987-07-07 Aluminum Company Of America Closed loop delivery gauge control in roll casting
JP2697908B2 (ja) * 1989-08-03 1998-01-19 新日本製鐵株式会社 双ロール式連続鋳造機の制御装置
US5212765A (en) * 1990-08-03 1993-05-18 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc. On-line training neural network system for process control
DE4125176A1 (de) * 1991-07-30 1993-02-04 Lucas Nuelle Lehr Und Messgera Steuerfeld einer industriellen anlage mit einer speicherprogrammierbaren steuerung
JP3136183B2 (ja) * 1992-01-20 2001-02-19 株式会社日立製作所 制御方法
DE4209746A1 (de) * 1992-03-25 1993-09-30 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur Optimierung eines technischen Neuro-Fuzzy-Systems
US5412756A (en) * 1992-12-22 1995-05-02 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Artificial intelligence software shell for plant operation simulation
DE4310332A1 (de) * 1993-03-31 1994-10-06 Mueller Weingarten Maschf Verfahren zur Ermittlung von optimalen Parametern eines Gießprozesses insbesondere an Druckgießmaschinen
US5486998A (en) * 1993-06-14 1996-01-23 Amax Coal West, Inc. Process stabilizing process controller

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9628772A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1179840A (zh) 1998-04-22
DE19508476A1 (de) 1996-09-12
DE59603352D1 (de) 1999-11-18
ATE185626T1 (de) 1999-10-15
US5727127A (en) 1998-03-10
CN1244032C (zh) 2006-03-01
EP0813701B1 (fr) 1999-10-13
WO1996028772A1 (fr) 1996-09-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0813701B1 (fr) Systeme de gestion pour installations de l&#39;industrie primaire ou de l&#39;industrie manufacturiere
EP0813700B1 (fr) Systeme de gestion integre intelligent
DE4008510C2 (de) Regeleinrichtung mit Optimal-Entscheidungseinheit
EP0534221B1 (fr) Dispositif d&#39;amélioration avec paramètre de réglage pour installation industrielles
EP2603333B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination en temps réel de la température et de la géométrie d&#39;un feuillard métallique laminé à chaud dans un train finisseur
WO2012159866A1 (fr) Procédé de commande pour train de laminage
EP1200216B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de fabrication d&#39;un brin metallique
DE4040360A1 (de) Regelung eines mehrgeruestigen warm- und/oder kaltband-walzwerks
DE4417808C2 (de) Verfahren zum Stranggießen eines Metallstranges
EP0756219A2 (fr) Procédé de surveillance des propriétés de produits et procédé de contrÔle d&#39;un procédé de fabrication
DE19637917C2 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Entwurf oder zur Steuerung des Prozeßablaufs einer Anlage der Grundstoffindustrie
DE2344920A1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zur regelung eines walzwerkes
EP2288969B1 (fr) Système de conduite d&#39;une installation avec optimisation du modèle en plusieurs phases
EP3733323B1 (fr) Procédé et installation de coulée en continu d&#39;une barre de coulée
EP0732979B1 (fr) Installation de coulee continue et de laminage pour bandes d&#39;acier et systeme de reglage connexe
EP3642372B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un four de recuit
DE19623671C2 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Führen eines Prozesses in der Grundstoffindustrie
DE102012002774A1 (de) Verfahren und System zum automatischen optimalen Betrieb einer Strangpresse für Metalle
EP0735443B1 (fr) Réseau neuronal pour compenser une déviation de position dans une installation d&#39;usinage de pièces
DE19740691A1 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Kühlung von Metallen in einem Hüttenwerk
EP4069448A1 (fr) Procédé et système informatique pour prédire le retrait d&#39;un produit métallique coulé
DE10204064A1 (de) Maulweitenregelung an Segmenten für Stranggießanlagen
WO2021180719A1 (fr) Procédé de réduction de perturbations de processus dans la production d&#39;un produit laminé
EP4130895A1 (fr) Procédé de détermination d&#39;un paramètre de commande permettant de commander un laminoir
WO2021228927A1 (fr) Système et procédé de commande d&#39;une usine de production constituée d&#39;une pluralité de parties d&#39;usine, en particulier d&#39;une usine de production pour la production de marchandises industrielles telles que des produits semi-finis métalliques

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19970902

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT DE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19971229

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT DE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 185626

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19991015

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59603352

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19991118

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: ABB PATENT GMBH

Effective date: 20000630

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: VOEST ALPINE INDUSTRIEANLAGEN GES.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20000712

Opponent name: ABB PATENT GMBH

Effective date: 20000630

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: ABB PATENT GMBH * 20000712 VOEST-ALPINE INDUSTRIEA

Effective date: 20000630

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: ABB PATENT GMBH * 20000712 VOEST-ALPINE INDUSTRIEA

Effective date: 20000630

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAA Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFN

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20050519

Year of fee payment: 10

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20060310

Year of fee payment: 11

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20060118