EP0320639B2 - Bloc de soutènement - Google Patents

Bloc de soutènement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0320639B2
EP0320639B2 EP88119162A EP88119162A EP0320639B2 EP 0320639 B2 EP0320639 B2 EP 0320639B2 EP 88119162 A EP88119162 A EP 88119162A EP 88119162 A EP88119162 A EP 88119162A EP 0320639 B2 EP0320639 B2 EP 0320639B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
retaining
wall
projections
building block
retaining building
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP88119162A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0320639A1 (fr
EP0320639B1 (fr
Inventor
Peter Rausch
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=3548125&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0320639(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP0320639A1 publication Critical patent/EP0320639A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0320639B1 publication Critical patent/EP0320639B1/fr
Publication of EP0320639B2 publication Critical patent/EP0320639B2/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D29/00Independent underground or underwater structures; Retaining walls
    • E02D29/02Retaining or protecting walls
    • E02D29/025Retaining or protecting walls made up of similar modular elements stacked without mortar

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an embankment block, wherein the front longitudinal wall is approximately shield-like and has projections of approximately wall thickness protruding on the upper side and in its longitudinal direction beyond the outline of the frame.
  • Slope blocks with an essentially frame-like design are already known.
  • An approximately box-like stone is known from US Pat. No. 4,229,123, which consists of a frame of smooth, sharp-edged walls, the two transverse walls having a step falling backwards, which serves as an approach for stones to be put on.
  • the stones are built up in a lattice-like structure and filled with soil. The resulting gaps between the stones release an embankment and can be planted.
  • Another slope block is known from DE-PS 25 37 408. This has an approximately bowl to trough-like shape with a base plate, but without a rear wall.
  • a hollow form stone for the construction of bank embankments which has a shield-shaped end wall, which has an edge and a height above the side walls.
  • this hollow form is designed as a trough with a closed bottom wall. This means that it is more difficult to handle due to its higher weight.
  • plants and shrubs used in the troughs have only a limited root space, and there is also the risk that they can dry out easily or rot at a location with a high water intake or in a damp environment or a rainy summer.
  • the present invention has for its object to improve the function of such stones and overall to find an aesthetic solution from a technical and ecological point of view, which should also be simple and economical to manufacture.
  • this object is achieved in that the building block for the erection of embankment structures is essentially frame-shaped, that the projections have rounded corners and edges, and that the rear wall and the two transverse walls have a conical cross section which widens downwards is, the taper in the lower region is stronger, such that the cone angle is larger.
  • This configuration ensures that the earth embankments in the gaps of an embankment wall are advantageously protected from the lateral projections of the front wall of the stones according to the invention, whereby a high stability of the wall is achieved.
  • the stones according to the invention also achieve an aesthetic appearance of embankment structures
  • Stones with protrusions and curves on the top side can usually only be produced in hand molds that can be dismantled or using tilting machines.
  • the most economical way of producing such stones is with stationary systems using the vibratory press method.
  • the uncompressed building material e.g. Concrete or the like
  • the upper edges of the - undensified - stone lie in one plane, namely in the plane of the top of the mold box.
  • uniform compression - to lower the upper edges of the transverse walls and the rear wall by approximately the wall thickness compared to the upper edge of the front wall.
  • the rear wall and the two transverse walls have a conical cross section which is too wide at the bottom and where. the taper in the lower area is stronger, the type that the cone angle is larger.
  • the rear wall and transverse walls are therefore more voluminous in the lower area.
  • the press ram can push down the volume of building material during the compression process, to a greater extent in the case of the rear wall and transverse walls, because according to the invention, more volume can be taken up in the lower region here.
  • the conical design of the rear wall and the transverse walls, especially in the lower area on the inside of the wall, has another technical advantage.
  • embankment structures it is important that the supported soil on or in the embankment stones has a hold against slipping.
  • this requirement is achieved not only by the projections, but also by the conicity of the rear wall and the transverse walls in the lower region of the inner sides
  • the front longitudinal wall has an approximately approximately thumb-shaped cross section with a convex Has curvature towards the front (outside) and beard-like projection on the underside towards the back (inside).
  • the beard-like projection on the inside of the front longitudinal wall also serves to support the backfill base inside the stone.
  • front longitudinal wall - seen in plan view - has a flat front bulge which merges into the curves of the longitudinal projections.
  • the longitudinal projections are designed in terms of dimensions and shape as a grip strip.
  • the projections are matched in size and shape to the human handgrip and can thus be optimally handled and held.
  • recesses for tines of assembly forks or the like can be provided in the transverse walls on the underside, which enables the stones to be removed from the pallet in an advantageous manner and economically installed, particularly in the case of large-sized stones.
  • the slope blocks according to the invention can also have slots on the upper sides of the transverse walls in the region of the corners with the rear wall, which advantageously and force-fit enable the insertion of anchor bands or the like.
  • the stones according to the invention can also be installed as embankments according to the soil-anchor composite principle.
  • the oblique view according to FIG. 1 shows an embankment block with an approximately frame-like design.
  • the front longitudinal wall 1 is approximately shield-like. It protrudes on the upper side and in the longitudinal direction by approximately the wall thickness beyond the outer limits of the frame, the projections 2 having curves 3 at corners and edges.
  • a rear wall 4 and both transverse walls 5 together with the front wall form an approximately rectangular to square frame. The corners formed by the four walls are rounded on both the outside and the inside.
  • recesses 9 are arranged on the transverse walls, which are provided for unproblematic installation by means of a mounting fork or the like and which allow the fork tines to engage.
  • slots 10 are formed on the upper side in order to enable the advantageous insertion of anchor bands or the like.
  • Fig. 2 as a cross section through a stone according to the invention (section transverse to the slope wall) shows the profile of the front wall 1 and the rear wall 4.
  • the cross section of the longitudinal front wall can be described as approximately thumb-like and has an approximately pointed beard-like projection 8 in the lower section.
  • the rear wall 4 clearly shows a taper in profile, which is reinforced in the lower area 6.
  • the transverse wall 5 seen in view has recesses 9 on the underside and a slot 10 on the top in the connection area to the rear wall.
  • Fig. 3 section parallel to the slope wall plane
  • the two transverse walls 5 appear in profile
  • the front wall 1 can be seen in the rear view.
  • the cuts through the transverse walls show the profile with taper, which is also stronger on the inside in the lower region 6 than above.
  • the protrusions 2 of the front wall appear in the longitudinal direction thereof.
  • the upper corners of the front wall are formed by curves 3.
  • the floor plan section according to FIG. 4 of a slope wall shows two stones according to the invention in a row next to one another and set back between them (drawn in broken lines) a stone of the row arranged above it. It is thus illustrated that the projections 2 of the front walls 1 reduce the opening of the vacant space between the stones and thus create a protective niche 7.
  • an anchor band loop 11 runs through the slots 10 designed for this purpose and interacts positively with the embankment stone.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Revetment (AREA)
  • Pit Excavations, Shoring, Fill Or Stabilisation Of Slopes (AREA)
  • Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)

Claims (8)

  1. Bloc de soutènement de talus, dont la paroi longitudinale avant (1) forme un écran et comporte des bords proéminents (2) qui dépassent son profil du cadre vers le haut et longitudinalement, dans une mesure approximativement égale à l'épaisseur de la paroi,
    caractérisé
    en ce que le block, pour la construction de soutènements de talus à garnir de plantes, a sensiblement une forme de cadre, en ce que les bords proéminents (2) présentent des arrondis (3) à leurs angles et sur leurs arêtes, et en ce que la paroi arrière (4) et les deux parois transversales (5) présentent une section transversale conique qui s'élargit en direction du bas, dont la conicité est plus forte dans la partie inférieure pour agrandir l'angle au sommet du cône.
  2. Bloc selon la revendication 1,
    caractérisé
    en ce que la paroi longitudinale avant (1) a une section transversale approximativement en forme de pouce présentant une courbure convexe à l'avant (l'extérieur) et un rebord inférieur (8) dirigé vers l'arrière (l'intérieur).
  3. Bloc selon l'une des revendications 1 à 2,
    caractérisé
    en ce que la paroi longitudinale avant (1) présente à l'avant, en vue en plan, un bombement aplati qui se raccorde aux arrondis des bords proéminents (2) dirigés longitudinalement.
  4. Bloc selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3,
    caractérisé
    en ce que les bords proéminents longitudinalement (2) constituent des bandes de prise grâce à leurs dimensions et leur forme.
  5. Bloc selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4,
    caractérisé
    en ce que les deux parois transversales (5) possèdent, sur leur face inférieure, des évidements (9) pour des branches ou des organes similaires d'une fourche de montage ou d'un organe similaire.
  6. Bloc selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5,
    caractérisé
    en ce que les deux parois transversales (5) possèdent chacune sur leur face supérieure, dans la zone de leur angle avec la paroi arrière (4), des échancrures (10) ou des organes similaires pour l'insertion de bandes d'ancrage ou d'organes similaires.
  7. Soutènement des talus fait de blocs selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6,
    caractérisé
    en ce que, par coopération de deux blocks adjacents d'une rangée, l'intervalle entre les blocs forme une niche de protection (7) pour des plantes, grâce aux bords proéminents longitudinalement (2) de la paroi longitudinale avant (1) des blocs.
  8. Soutènement selon la revendication 7,
    caractérisé
    en ce qu'il comporte des bandes d'ancrage (11) ou des organes similaires qui passent dans le échancrures (10) et qui coopèrent avec les blocs de soutènement selon le principe d'ancrage combiné dans le sol.
EP88119162A 1987-12-14 1988-11-18 Bloc de soutènement Expired - Lifetime EP0320639B2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT3279/87 1987-12-14
AT327987 1987-12-14

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0320639A1 EP0320639A1 (fr) 1989-06-21
EP0320639B1 EP0320639B1 (fr) 1991-03-20
EP0320639B2 true EP0320639B2 (fr) 1993-12-01

Family

ID=3548125

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP88119162A Expired - Lifetime EP0320639B2 (fr) 1987-12-14 1988-11-18 Bloc de soutènement

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0320639B2 (fr)
AT (1) ATE61830T1 (fr)
DE (3) DE3810031A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2022578T5 (fr)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4920712A (en) * 1989-01-31 1990-05-01 Stonewall Landscape Systems, Inc. Concrete retaining wall block, retaining wall and method of construction therefore
DE4333942A1 (de) * 1993-10-06 1995-04-13 Sf Koop Gmbh Beton Konzepte Bausatz aus Beton-Formsteinen sowie eine Vorrichtung zur Herstellung derselben
DE19654529C2 (de) * 1996-12-27 2000-07-06 Fiege & Bertoli Gmbh & Co Kg Böschungsbaustein
CA2314417C (fr) * 1999-11-04 2003-05-20 Gordon Graham Bloc de beton servant a monter et a retenir des surfaces

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH636922A5 (de) * 1979-01-04 1983-06-30 Rolf Scheiwiller Satz von stuetzmauer-elementen und dessen verwendung.
DE3040410A1 (de) * 1980-08-02 1982-03-11 Schulte & Hennes Gmbh Betonwerke & Co, 5779 Eslohe Boeschungselement
DE3163893D1 (en) * 1980-09-05 1984-07-05 Steiner Silidur Ag Hollow block for constructing bank acclivities
FR2545128B1 (fr) * 1983-04-26 1989-01-13 Sotubema Bloc de construction et ouvrage constitue par de tels blocs
CA1247870A (fr) * 1985-10-17 1989-01-03 Arnaldo Giardini Bloc en beton pour mur de soutenement

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE3862111D1 (de) 1991-04-25
DE8805360U1 (de) 1988-10-20
EP0320639A1 (fr) 1989-06-21
ES2022578T5 (es) 1995-08-16
EP0320639B1 (fr) 1991-03-20
DE3810031A1 (de) 1989-06-22
ATE61830T1 (de) 1991-04-15
ES2022578B3 (es) 1991-12-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE68910631T2 (de) Bepflanzbare Stützmauer mit Nischen, welche als verlorene Schalung benutzt werden können.
DE2443329A1 (de) Formstein aus zement fuer eine wand und verfahren zum zusammensetzen dieser formsteine zu einer stuetzmauer
EP0234175B1 (fr) Ensemble de construction pour la réalisation de murs
EP0320639B2 (fr) Bloc de soutènement
DE2618459A1 (de) Verfahren zum befestigen von boden an boeschungen
CH665442A5 (de) Boeschungselement.
DE3501908C2 (de) Mauer für Garten-, Park- und Landschaftsgestaltung
DE3316040C2 (fr)
EP0024500B1 (fr) Elément de construction en béton
EP0055987A1 (fr) Mur de soutènement préfabriqué pour murs ou buttes
DE9103220U1 (de) Lärmschutz- und Hangstützwand aus Drahtgittermatten
DE2705385A1 (de) Fertigbaukoerper, sowie verfahren und vorrichtung zu seiner herstellung
EP0562154A1 (fr) Mur anti-bruit et stabilisation de talus constitués de tissu en fils métalliques
DE2837126A1 (de) Auf dem erdboden, insbesondere einem rasen zu verlegende platte
DE3833389A1 (de) Verbundring aus beton zur bildung von mauern und waenden sowie aus verbundringen gebildete mauer oder wand
DE19643084A1 (de) Zellenbauwerk mit Erd- oder Gesteinsfüllung und Verfahren zu dessen Herstellung
EP0343112A1 (fr) Brique
DE2908578A1 (de) Beton-bauelement
DE3633537A1 (de) Hohlstein fuer pflanzzwecke
DE8805141U1 (de) Pflanzgehäuse
EP0093453A1 (fr) Elément de remblais
DE3139432A1 (de) L-foermiger betonstein
DE4208286A1 (de) Laermschutz- und hangstuetzwand aus bauchigen drahtgittermatten
DE8309872U1 (de) Boeschungs- beziehungsweise umfassungsstein
EP1031275A2 (fr) Elément profilé pour limiter un parterre de plantes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR IT LI NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19890414

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19891212

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR IT LI NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 61830

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19910415

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3862111

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19910425

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: STEINER SILIDUR AG,

Effective date: 19911206

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: STEINER SILIDUR AG

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 19931201

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR IT LI NL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: AEN

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
NLR3 Nl: receipt of modified translations in the netherlands language after an opposition procedure
ET3 Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: DC2A

Kind code of ref document: T5

Effective date: 19950816

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19951122

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19961122

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19961125

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19970601

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19970601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19971130

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: RAUSCH PETER

Effective date: 19971130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20030207

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20031105

Year of fee payment: 16

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20041119

Year of fee payment: 17

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051118

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20070907

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20071026

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20081119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20081119