WO2013002416A1 - Procédé de récupération de manganèse - Google Patents

Procédé de récupération de manganèse Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013002416A1
WO2013002416A1 PCT/JP2012/067137 JP2012067137W WO2013002416A1 WO 2013002416 A1 WO2013002416 A1 WO 2013002416A1 JP 2012067137 W JP2012067137 W JP 2012067137W WO 2013002416 A1 WO2013002416 A1 WO 2013002416A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
manganese
liquid
iron
ions
leaching
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2012/067137
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
山口　東洋司
八尾　泰子
Original Assignee
Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 filed Critical Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社
Priority to CN201280031548.1A priority Critical patent/CN103620069B/zh
Publication of WO2013002416A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013002416A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/18—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes with the aid of microorganisms or enzymes, e.g. bacteria or algae
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P3/00—Preparation of elements or inorganic compounds except carbon dioxide
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/20—Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching
    • C22B3/22—Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching by physical processes, e.g. by filtration, by magnetic means, or by thermal decomposition
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B47/00—Obtaining manganese
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M6/00—Primary cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M6/52—Reclaiming serviceable parts of waste cells or batteries, e.g. recycling
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20—Recycling
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
    • Y02W30/50—Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
    • Y02W30/84—Recycling of batteries or fuel cells

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a technology for recovering manganese, which is a valuable metal, from ironworks by-products containing manganese components, low-grade minerals, used batteries, and the like.
  • an acid or alkali treatment liquid is brought into contact with the mineral, and the valuable metals contained in the mineral are dissolved and leached into the treatment liquid.
  • a method of recovering by selectively neutralizing a metal is known.
  • a method of leaching and recovering valuable metals from target minerals using an acid such as sulfuric acid is employed.
  • a method of recovering valuable metals by leaching valuable metal ions from minerals into the processing liquid using microorganisms is also known. According to this method, the valuable metal can be leached from the mineral into the treatment liquid without using a large amount of sulfuric acid or the like, so that the valuable metal can be recovered from the mineral without causing the above-described problems.
  • bioleaching the method of leaching metal from minerals using microorganisms as described above is called a bioleaching method (bioleaching), and is characterized by lower energy consumption and lower risk to the environment.
  • bioleaching is considered to be capable of improving the metal leaching rate and reducing the cost, and has attracted attention as an effective means for leaching valuable metals from low-grade minerals.
  • an iron-reducing bacterium is allowed to act to reduce trivalent iron to divalent iron, and using the divalent iron, a metal contained in the group consisting of a metal oxide and a metal hydroxide ( Cobalt, nickel, manganese, etc.) are leached to produce a leachate and a residue, and the leachate and residue are separated to recover a desired metal.
  • a leaching treatment medium, an iron-reducing bacterium, and a metal oxide or metal hydroxide are placed in a reactor to perform leaching treatment.
  • a batch-type agitation type Using a reactor, while stirring the medium so that metal oxides and the like do not settle, adjust the maximum pH during the leaching process to 8.5 or less, preferably neutral (for example, pH 7.5 or less), Techniques have been proposed for leaching metals with the entire preferred pH range being preferred. According to this technology, it is said that valuable metals (cobalt, nickel) contained in the leachate can be recovered by a known method and used for a desired application.
  • Patent Document 1 does not specifically describe a method for recovering valuable metals contained in the leachate. Therefore, there is a concern that depending on the recovery method, the high-concentration iron-containing solution becomes disposable and uneconomical. That is, when manganese contained in a workpiece (metal oxide or the like) is leached according to the technique proposed in Patent Document 1, manganese ions and iron ions (obtained by oxidation of divalent iron during the leaching treatment). In addition, it is necessary to recover manganese from the leachate containing trivalent iron or divalent iron remaining without being oxidized.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and after leaching manganese contained in an object containing manganese into the leachate, the leached manganese is concentrated and recovered, and the leachate can be used repeatedly. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for recovering manganese from low-grade minerals and manganese-containing wastes and by-products at low cost.
  • the present inventors mix a treatment object containing manganese and iron-reducing bacteria in a treatment solution containing trivalent iron, act iron-reducing bacteria, and reduce trivalent iron to divalent iron.
  • Manganese ions are leached into the treatment liquid from the treatment object containing manganese by utilizing the action of valence iron being oxidized to trivalent iron, and the leachate from which manganese ions are leached is separated into solid and liquid.
  • the inventors studied diligently about means for precipitating and separating the target manganese while leaving the soluble iron remaining in the separated liquid. As a result, it was found that the precipitate can be separated by subjecting the separation liquid to a predetermined oxidation treatment and insolubilizing manganese ions contained in the separation liquid mainly as manganese oxide.
  • FIG. 1 is a state diagram (Eh-pH diagram) of oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) and pH of manganese and iron in an aqueous solution at 25 ° C.
  • ORP oxidation-reduction potential
  • FIG. 1 shows that in the Eh-pH diagram, the region where manganese precipitates and the region where iron precipitates are substantially the same except for the region surrounded by circles in FIG. 1, and the region where iron precipitates is wider. Yes. Therefore, when the state of redox potential (ORP) and pH is changed from the region where both manganese and iron are dissolved (ionized), iron is first converted into an oxide or hydroxide in most regions. Solidified and precipitated. However, only the low pH / high ORP region (the region surrounded by a circle in FIG. 1) has a region where manganese is mainly solidified and precipitated as an oxide.
  • the inventors of the present invention have described the pH and redox potential (ORP) of the above-mentioned separation liquid containing manganese ions and trivalent iron ions in the region where manganese is solidified and precipitated mainly as oxides in the Eh-pH diagram.
  • ORP pH and redox potential
  • the present inventors have reduced the pH of the separation liquid using acid and raised the ORP of the separation liquid by acting ozone, so that the manganese ions can be easily and inexpensively produced. It has been found that manganese can be mainly solidified as an oxide from the above-mentioned separation liquid containing trivalent iron ions.
  • the above separation liquid contains abundant trivalent iron ions or further divalent iron ions. Therefore, the iron ions contained in the separation liquid are not separated by precipitation, and the iron ions remain in the separation liquid, so that the separation liquid is reused as a treatment liquid used for leaching manganese ions from the object to be treated. It can be used.
  • the present inventors examined means for reducing the content of impurities (carbon, phosphorus, etc.) of manganese finally recovered.
  • the treatment liquid usually contains a plurality of kinds of components for promoting the metal leaching reaction by iron-reducing bacteria.
  • a treatment solution containing iron-reducing bacteria it contains components such as a trivalent iron ion, an electron donor, a pH adjuster, and a pH buffer.
  • the treatment liquid also contains carbon and phosphorus, which are essential elements for the growth of iron-reducing bacteria, which are microorganisms. If these components are deficient, iron-reducing bacteria cannot grow, and as a result, it is difficult to leach metals. Therefore, the treatment liquid generally contains components (C, P, etc.) that can become impurities depending on the intended use of the recovered metal.
  • the inventors of the present invention have found that there is a problem that a component that can be an impurity in the treatment liquid is mixed into the recovered material depending on the ratio of the existing component.
  • a component that can be an impurity in the treatment liquid is mixed into the recovered material depending on the ratio of the existing component.
  • the impurity concentration in the treatment liquid by limiting the impurity concentration in the treatment liquid, the amount of impurities transferred from the treatment liquid into the recovered manganese is reduced while promoting the leaching of manganese ions from the object to be treated.
  • the impurity concentration of recovered manganese can be reduced.
  • an iron (III) citrate medium-compliant solution was prepared as a treatment liquid containing trivalent iron.
  • Common components of this iron (III) citrate medium compliant solution are iron (III) citrate, sodium citrate, sodium formate, carbon, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, phosphorus, and peptone. Contains carbon and phosphorus as elements. All of these elements are essential components for the metal leaching reaction by iron-reducing bacteria, and the concentrations (or contents) of various components are as follows.
  • concentrations (or contents) of the various components described above are all values per 1 L of iron (III) citrate medium-compliant solution.
  • mM shows mmol / L.
  • the present inventors have determined that the carbon concentration and phosphorus concentration in the iron (III) citrate medium-based solution (treatment liquid containing trivalent iron) are the carbon concentration and phosphorus in the manganese finally recovered. Presumed to affect the concentration.
  • the treatment liquid having the concentrations (or contents) of the various components described above is used as a reference treatment liquid, and the carbon concentration or phosphorus concentration is changed in total as shown in (A) to (C) below with respect to this reference treatment liquid.
  • An iron (III) citrate medium-based solution was prepared as a treatment solution, and the effects of carbon concentration and phosphorus concentration on the manganese leaching rate were investigated.
  • concentration (or content) of components other than sodium dihydrogen phosphate was made the same with a reference
  • (B) A treatment liquid in which the concentration of iron (III) citrate trihydrate as a carbon component is reduced stepwise from 16.7 g / L (56 mM) of the standard treatment liquid to 1.5 g / L. (Concentration: 16.7 g / L, 7.5 g / L, 3.0 g / L, 1.5 g / L in total 4 types).
  • concentration (or content) of components other than iron (III) citrate trihydrate was the same as that of the standard treatment solution, with no addition of sodium dihydrogen phosphate.
  • (C) A treatment liquid in which the concentration of sodium citrate dihydrate, which is a carbon component, is gradually reduced from 10.3 g / L (35 mM) to 0 g / L of the standard treatment liquid. (Concentration: 10.3 g / L, 2.9 g / L, 1.03 g / L, 0 g / L in total 4 types).
  • the concentration (or content) of components other than sodium citrate dihydrate is 1.5 g / L of iron (III) citrate trihydrate, no sodium dihydrogen phosphate is added, The other components were the same as the standard treatment solution.
  • peptone containing a carbon component or phosphorus component and sodium formate containing a carbon component are added in small amounts, so that their respective concentrations (or contents) are the same as the standard treatment liquid. .
  • Table 1 shows the results of performing the leaching process for 24 hours using the processing liquid (A).
  • the leaching treatment time manganese at 24 hours between when the sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH 2 PO 4 ), which is a phosphorus component, is added as in the standard treatment solution and when it is not added There was no significant difference in the leaching rate.
  • NaH 2 PO 4 sodium dihydrogen phosphate
  • Table 2 shows the results of leaching treatment using the treatment liquid (B). As shown in Table 2, when the concentration of iron (III) citrate containing a carbon component was reduced, the initial manganese leaching rate was lowered. However, in the leaching treatment time: 144 hours, even when the concentration of the iron (III) citrate trihydrate containing the carbon component is reduced to 1.5 g / L, the manganese leaching rate equivalent to that in the case of the standard treatment liquid was gotten.
  • Table 3 shows the results of the leaching process using the above processing liquid (C). Reducing the concentration of sodium citrate containing carbon components significantly reduced the manganese leaching rate, and the leaching rate remained low even if the leaching time was extended. That is, from the viewpoint of manganese leaching rate, it is preferable to maintain the sodium citrate dihydrate concentration in the treatment liquid at the same concentration (10.3 g / L) as in the case of the standard treatment liquid without reducing it. It can be said.
  • Treatment liquid when the iron (III) citrate trihydrate concentration in the treatment liquid is 1.5 g / L (5 mM) and the sodium citrate dihydrate concentration is 10.3 g / L (35 mM)
  • the carbon concentration inside was 270 mM.
  • the present inventors repeated the same experiment as described above, and finally measured the impurity concentration (carbon concentration and phosphorus concentration) of manganese recovered.
  • the carbon concentration in the treatment solution is limited to 300 mM or less and the phosphorus concentration to 0.5 mM or less, the impurity concentration of manganese finally recovered is greatly reduced, and recovery applicable to steelmaking raw materials and the like. It was found that manganese can be obtained.
  • a treatment solution containing trivalent iron ions is mixed with a treatment object containing manganese and iron-reducing bacteria, and the iron-reducing bacteria reduce the trivalent iron ions to divalent iron ions.
  • a manganese recovery method comprising: an insolubilization step of oxidizing and insolubilizing manganese ions contained in a separation liquid; and a recovery step of separating and recovering a manganese component obtained in the insolubilization step.
  • [2] A method for recovering manganese according to [1], wherein the post-recovery separation liquid containing trivalent iron ions from which the manganese component has been recovered from the separation liquid is reused as a treatment liquid in the leaching step.
  • the insolubilization step is a step in which manganese ions are oxidized and insolubilized by applying ozone to the separated liquid after the solid-liquid separation step under acidic conditions.
  • a method for recovering manganese is a step in which manganese ions are oxidized and insolubilized by applying ozone to the separated liquid after the solid-liquid separation step under acidic conditions.
  • the workpiece is an ironworks by-product and / or low-grade ore, and / or used battery, and / or manganese-containing dust, and / or A method for recovering manganese, which is / or manganese-containing sludge and / or manganese-containing slurry.
  • manganese contained in manganese minerals can be concentrated and recovered at a high concentration rate under relatively mild conditions such as room temperature and atmospheric pressure.
  • relatively mild conditions such as room temperature and atmospheric pressure.
  • the manganese recovery method of the present invention can recover manganese from a large amount of material to be processed at low cost and easily, so that it is extremely useful as a method for recovering manganese from a steelworks by-product generated in large quantities at a steelworks. It is valid.
  • FIG. 1 is a state diagram (Eh-pH diagram) of redox potential (ORP) and pH of manganese and iron in an aqueous solution.
  • Fig.2 (a) is a flowchart explaining one form of the manganese recovery method of this invention.
  • FIG.2 (b) is a flowchart explaining the other form of the manganese recovery method of this invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the manganese leaching rate of an example in which waste dry cell crushed waste was tested.
  • FIG. 4 is a view showing a composition in a solid substance when ozone diffusion is performed on the manganese leachate of the example under acidic conditions.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the manganese recovery rate when ozone diffusing was performed on the manganese leachate of the example under acidic conditions.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph showing changes in manganese recovery rate and filtrate color when the manganese leachate of the present invention is treated with ozone aeration under acidic conditions.
  • a treatment liquid containing trivalent iron ions is mixed with a treatment object containing manganese and iron-reducing bacteria, and the iron-reducing bacteria reduce the trivalent iron ions to divalent iron ions.
  • FIG. 2A is a flowchart showing an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig.2 (a) in this invention, first, the to-be-processed object 1 containing manganese is grind
  • the treatment object 1, the treatment liquid 4 containing trivalent iron ions, and iron-reducing bacteria are mixed to obtain a leaching slurry (leaching liquid) 5.
  • trivalent iron ions are reduced to divalent iron ions by iron-reducing bacteria, and the divalent iron ions are allowed to act on the manganese component in the object 1 to be processed.
  • the manganese component in 1 is dissolved.
  • the object to be treated 1 contains manganese.
  • manganese For example, ironworks by-products such as manganese-containing dust and / or manganese-containing sludge, low-grade ore, and used batteries can be used.
  • a manganese containing dust and / or manganese containing sludge and / or a manganese containing slurry other than the solid substance containing manganese can be illustrated.
  • the object 1 to be processed When a used battery is used as the object 1 to be processed, it is desirable to separate a metal such as iron used in the casing by crushing, sieving, or the like in advance to obtain a mixture of a positive electrode material and a negative electrode material.
  • a metal such as iron used in the casing by crushing, sieving, or the like
  • the manganese component contained in the object to be processed 1 it may be exemplified MnO 2, Mn 2 O 3, Mn 3 O 4 and the like.
  • the object to be processed 1 is mixed with the treatment liquid 4 and subjected to a leaching step 3 in which manganese ions are leached into the treatment liquid 4.
  • a leaching step 3 in which manganese ions are leached into the treatment liquid 4.
  • the specific surface area becomes small and the solid-liquid contact area (contact area between the object 1 and the process liquid 4) decreases. Leaching rate is reduced.
  • the leaching step 3 is performed using a batch-type reaction vessel, if the particle size of the workpiece 1 is large, the workpiece 1 is settled during the leaching treatment, and the leaching treatment cannot be sufficiently performed. Is also a concern.
  • the crushing step 2 when the workpiece 1 is solid, it is preferable to provide the crushing step 2 for the purpose of improving the reaction efficiency in the leaching step 3 by reducing the particle diameter.
  • the particle diameter of the workpiece 1 be 1 ⁇ m or more.
  • a crushing method a known crushing method such as a jaw crusher or a rolling mill can be used.
  • the crushing step 2 may be omitted.
  • the workpiece 1 obtained as described above is transferred to the leaching step 3.
  • the treatment liquid 4 and the workpiece 1 are mixed, and manganese ions are leached into the treatment liquid 4 from the workpiece 1 using an action in which divalent iron ions are oxidized to trivalent iron ions.
  • divalent iron is oxidized to trivalent iron and the workpiece 1 is reduced by the reaction (i) below, and manganese ions are leached into the treatment liquid 4.
  • Fe 2+ + Mn oxide or hydroxide eg MnO 2 , Mn 2 O 3 , Mn 3 O 4 ) ⁇ Fe 3+ + Mn 2+ (soluble) ... (i)
  • a treatment liquid to which divalent iron ions are added can also be used.
  • a treatment liquid containing trivalent iron ions is used, the treatment object and iron-reducing bacteria are mixed in the treatment liquid, and the trivalent iron ions are reduced to divalent iron ions.
  • manganese ions are leached into the treatment liquid 4 from the workpiece 1 using valent iron ions as a reducing agent.
  • An iron-reducing bacterium is a bacterium that grows by respiration of iron that receives and transfers electrons from an electron donor (such as an organic substance) and supplies it to trivalent iron ions that are electron acceptors, and is trivalent by the following reaction (ii). Has the effect of reducing iron to divalent iron.
  • the iron-reducing bacteria use the electrons (e ⁇ ) from the electron donor to convert trivalent iron ions (Fe 3+ ).
  • Direct reduction produces divalent iron ions (Fe 2+ ), resulting in a treatment liquid containing divalent iron and iron-reducing bacteria.
  • the divalent iron generated by the reaction (ii) contributes to the reaction (i), so that manganese ions can be leached into the treatment liquid 4 in the leaching step 3.
  • Examples of the trivalent iron and iron-reducing bacteria used in the present invention include the following types.
  • An electron donor is added to the treatment solution containing trivalent iron ions together with an electron acceptor (trivalent iron ions) necessary for iron respiration of iron-reducing bacteria.
  • iron-reducing bacteria used in the leaching step 3 of the present invention include, for example, Geobacter metalliducens Quarry et al. (ATCC 53774, DSM 7210), Desulfomonas palmitatis Coates et al. (ATCC 51701, DSM 12931), Desulfuromusakisii Liesack & Finster (DSM 7343), Pelobacter venetianus Schin & Stieb (DSM 2395), Shewanella algae . 1990 (NBRC 103173, IAM 14159, ATCC 51181), Ferrimonas balearica Rossello-Mora et al. (DSM 9799), Aeromonas hydrophila subsp.
  • Geobacter metalliducens Surrey et al. ATCC 53774, DSM 7210)
  • Desulfomonas palmitatis Coates et al. ATCC 51701, DSM 12931
  • Desulfuromusakisii Liesack & Finster D
  • iron-reducing archaea can also be used.
  • iron-reducing archaea examples include Archaeoglobus fulgidus Stetter (ATCC 49558, DSM 4304), Pyrococcus furiosus Finala & Setter (ATCC 49587, DSM 36, 38). Pyrodictium abyssi Pley and Stetter (ATCC 49828 , DSM 6158), Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus (Huber et al.) Whitman (DSM 2095, JCM 10549, ATCC 35097) , and the like can be given.
  • the strain number is described in parentheses, but the present invention is not limited to this.
  • the synonyms of the above bacterial species are equivalent to the above bacterial species, and the bacterial species to which the above strain belongs are also equivalent to the above bacterial species.
  • the bacterial species may be specified by a genus name (including acronym) and a species name.
  • strain storage institutions and facilities respectively represent the following.
  • ATCC American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA
  • DSM Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany
  • NBRC NITE Biological Resource Center, Chiba, Japan [National Biological Resource Center (NITE Biological Resource Center)]
  • JCM IAM: Japan Collection of Microorganisms, RIKEN, Saitama, Japan [RIKEN BioResource Center, Microbial Materials Development Office (JCM)]
  • the iron-reducing bacteria are preferably facultative anaerobic bacteria from the viewpoint of ease of handling outdoors.
  • those described as iron-reducing bacteria can be mentioned.
  • iron-reducing bacteria those that grow in a normal temperature range are preferable from the viewpoint of easy handling outdoors.
  • those described as iron-reducing bacteria excluding Gethorix fermentans and Thermotoga maritime
  • an iron-reducing bacterium Geobacter metallyreducens or Shewanella algae is preferable, and Shewanella algae is more preferable.
  • the number of iron-reducing bacteria is not particularly limited. However, from the viewpoint of a higher leaching rate-leach efficiency, during the leaching step, as an initial value, preferably contains 1.0 ⁇ 10 13 atoms / m 3 or more in the treatment solution, 1.0 ⁇ 10 13 ⁇ 1 0.0 ⁇ 10 15 pieces / m 3 is more preferable, and 5.0 ⁇ 10 13 to 2.0 ⁇ 10 14 pieces / m 3 is further more preferable.
  • the trivalent iron ion used in the leaching step 3 of the present invention is not particularly limited. However, the trivalent iron ion is preferably added to the treatment liquid as a water-soluble trivalent iron salt.
  • the water-soluble trivalent iron salt is preferably an inorganic acid salt or an organic acid salt.
  • iron chloride (III), iron nitrate (III), iron sulfate (III), etc. can be mentioned, for example.
  • organic acid salt include iron (III) citrate, iron (III) formate, and iron (III) acetate.
  • the concentration of trivalent iron ions is not particularly limited, but from the viewpoint of further increasing the leaching rate and leaching efficiency, it is preferable that the treatment liquid contains 10 mol / m 3 or more as an initial value during the leaching step. More preferably, m 3 is contained, and even more preferably 25 to 100 mol / m 3 is contained.
  • the electron donor can be appropriately selected according to the iron-reducing bacteria.
  • the iron-reducing bacterium is Geobacter metalreducens or Shewanella algae
  • an organic substance can be used as an electron donor.
  • organic substance examples include organic substances having 1 to 7 carbon atoms [carboxylate (fatty carboxylate (fatty acid salt): formate, acetate, etc., aromatic carboxylate: benzoate, etc., oxocarboxylic acid, etc. Salt: pyruvate, etc., other carboxylates: lactate, etc.), alcohol (ethanol, etc.), unsaturated aromatic (toluenephenol, etc.)] and the like.
  • the organic substance may contain, for example, nitrogen, sulfur and other elements in addition to carbon, hydrogen and oxygen.
  • the organic material is not limited to water-soluble or water-dispersible materials, and may be contained as organic fine particles that are neither water-soluble nor water-dispersible.
  • the concentration of the electron donor is not particularly limited. However, it is preferable to contain 100 mol / m 3 or more as an initial value in the leaching step.
  • ⁇ Acid, alkali, pH adjuster> One or more selected from the group consisting of acids, alkalis, and pH adjusters can be added to the treatment liquid 4 to adjust the pH of the treatment liquid 4 to a predetermined pH described later.
  • the acid is not particularly limited, and for example, inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and nitric acid, and organic acids such as formic acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, citric acid, succinic acid, and malic acid can be used.
  • the alkali is not particularly limited, and for example, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, an aqueous solution thereof or the like can be used.
  • the said pH adjuster is also not specifically limited, For example, potassium carbonate, sodium hydrogencarbonate, etc. can be used.
  • the pH may change as the reaction proceeds. Therefore, the pH adjusting agent and / or pH buffering agent may be added to adjust the pH appropriately and suppress fluctuations.
  • the pH buffer added to the treatment liquid 4 is not particularly limited as long as it has a buffering ability in a neutral pH range.
  • the pH buffering agent to be added to the treatment solution 4 can also be used for the can also function as the electron donor.
  • the iron-reducing bacterium is Shewanella algae
  • lactic acid / sodium lactate and the like can function as a pH buffer and at the same time as an electron donor.
  • a pH buffer agent added to the said process liquid 4 what can form a complex with the manganese ion leached from the to-be-processed object 1 can be used.
  • citric acid / sodium citrate or the like can form a complex with Mn 2+ .
  • the said pH buffering agent should be used by arbitrary content in the range which does not impair the objective of this invention, and does not impair pH buffering effect individually or in combination of 2 or more types. Can do.
  • the optimum growth pH is in the neutral pH range.
  • the pH of the treatment liquid 4 may vary as the reaction proceeds. Therefore, the pH of the treatment liquid 4 is not particularly limited as long as it is around 7.0. However, when the pH of the treatment liquid 4 varies, it is controlled to 5.0 or more and 9.0 or less, preferably 6.0 or more and 8.0 or less, and more preferably 6.5 or more and 7.5 or less. Efficient leaching can be achieved.
  • recovered manganese it is required to reduce impurities in the manganese as much as possible.
  • high purity recovered manganese is required to prevent carbon and phosphorus from being mixed into the steel.
  • the treatment liquid 4 is a treatment liquid in which the carbon concentration and the phosphorus concentration are limited. That is, it is preferable that the composition of the treatment solution before adding the iron-reducing bacteria is such that the carbon concentration and phosphorus concentration are below certain values.
  • the carbon concentration before adding the iron-reducing bacteria in the treatment solution 4 is 300 mM or less and the phosphorus concentration is 0.5 mM or less. More preferably, the carbon concentration is 270 mM or less and the phosphorus concentration is 0.16 mM or less.
  • the carbon concentration and phosphorus concentration are extremely reduced, the growth of iron-reducing bacteria is inhibited and the manganese leaching rate is adversely affected. Therefore, it is preferable that the carbon concentration is 100 mM or more and the phosphorus concentration is 0.05 mM or more.
  • the workpiece 1 and the treatment liquid 4 are contacted and mixed in a state where oxygen is blocked. This is because when oxygen is present, there is a concern that the iron-reducing bacteria will not perform a reduction reaction from trivalent iron to divalent iron.
  • the temperature of the treatment liquid 4 is preferably maintained at 10 to 35 ° C.
  • the leaching time varies depending on the leaching conditions, but is usually 24 to 72 hours.
  • the trivalent iron ions in the treatment liquid 4 are reduced by the iron-reducing bacteria to become divalent iron ions.
  • the divalent iron ions act as a reducing agent to the object to be processed 1
  • divalent iron is 3 is oxidized to ferric in Rutotomoni treatment object in one manganese leach into the processing solution 4, and manganese ions
  • a leaching slurry (leaching solution) 5 containing trivalent iron ions or unreacted divalent iron ions is obtained.
  • the leaching slurry (leaching solution) 5 obtained in the leaching step 3 is sent to the solid-liquid separation step 6.
  • the leaching slurry (leaching liquid) 5 is subjected to solid-liquid separation.
  • a manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 and a residue (solid matter) 7 which are supernatant components are obtained.
  • the solid-liquid separation means used in the solid-liquid separation step 6 is any means selected from gravity sedimentation separation, filtration, centrifugation, filter press, membrane separation and the like.
  • a filter press when the solid substance concentration of the leaching slurry 5 is high, it is preferable to use a filter press.
  • the manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 mainly contains manganese ions and iron ions (trivalent iron ions or further divalent iron ions). Further, the residue (solid matter) 7 mainly contains iron-reducing bacteria and solid components other than manganese of the object 1 to be processed. Next, the manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 is transferred to the insolubilization step 11. On the other hand, since the residue (solid matter) 7 contains many iron-reducing bacteria, a part thereof is returned to the leaching step 3 as a return residue 9 and a part is recovered as an unreacted residue 8 (FIG. 2 (a)).
  • the manganese component-containing leachate (separation solution) 10 obtained in the solid-liquid separation step 6 is subjected to a predetermined insolubilization process, and the pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) of the manganese component-containing leachate (separation solution) 10 are set.
  • Manganese is insolubilized (solidified) and precipitated as an oxide, but iron is not precipitated, that is, adjusted to pH and redox potential (ORP) in the region surrounded by circles in the Eh-pH diagram (Fig. 1). To do. Thereby, the manganese dissolved in the manganese component-containing leachate 10 is preferentially insolubilized and becomes a solid.
  • This insolubilization step 11 is preferably a step in which ozone is allowed to act on the manganese component-containing leachate (separation solution) 10 under acidic conditions.
  • ozone is diffused by the ozone generator 13.
  • the region where both Fe and Mn are solidified varies depending on the concentration of each component in the solution.
  • Fe is between the lines of 10 0 M and 10 ⁇ 2 M.
  • Mn may be considered as the boundary (line * 2 in FIG. 1) between the lines of 10 0 M and 10 ⁇ 2 M.
  • the pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) of the region where manganese solidifies and precipitates as an oxide are approximately “pH: 0” as shown in FIG. 0.1 to less than 2.2 "and” Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP): about +0.9 V or more and +1.2 V or less ".
  • FIG. 1 shows a case where the water temperature is 25 ° C., but if the water temperature is different, temperature correction may be performed.
  • a correction method a known method (for example, correction of an equilibrium multiplier by the Van't Hoff equation) may be performed. Therefore, in the case where the manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 obtained in the solid-liquid separation step 6 has the above Fe and Mn concentrations, acid 12 is added to this solution to lower the pH to less than 2.2, Next, ozone is diffused to raise the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) to +0.9 V or more, whereby manganese becomes a solid as an oxide and can be precipitated.
  • ORP oxidation-reduction potential
  • the acid 12 may be a general acid, and sulfuric acid, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, and other acids can be used.
  • ozone was diffused while observing the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) was a predetermined value (for example, the temperature of the manganese-containing leachate was 25 ° C., It is preferable to adjust so that the Fe and Mn concentrations in the leachate are +1 V or more when Fe: 0.05M and Mn: 0.1M, respectively.
  • ORP oxidation-reduction potential
  • the most efficient method may be selected by comparing costs and the like.
  • the manganese component-containing leachate (separated liquid) 10 during the insolubilization process becomes black due to the manganese oxide generated by the oxidation of manganese, and the progress of the manganese oxidation reaction progresses. It becomes difficult to distinguish visually.
  • the manganese oxidation reaction in the insolubilization process 11 is inadequate, manganese ion does not precipitate as a solid substance and causes a deterioration in manganese recovery rate.
  • the ORP in which manganese peroxide (the uppermost part in FIG. 1, the substance called MnO 4 ⁇ ) is mainly present is around +1.6 V even at pH 2. Usually, such an increase in ORP is observed. Not. However, it was found that when the manganese oxidation reaction becomes excessive, some manganese oxides become peroxides due to the action of ozone. It was also found that peroxide was formed after almost all manganese was solidified as an oxide.
  • the solution containing manganese peroxide ions is reddish purple. Therefore, the formation of manganese peroxide in the solution can be easily determined by observing the color of the solution.
  • the entire solution becomes black, which is the color of manganese oxide. The discoloration of the solution cannot be determined.
  • manganese oxide is separated from the manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 during the insolubilization treatment, it is possible to observe the color change of the leachate, and thus determine the formation of manganese peroxide. It becomes possible.
  • the manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 during the insolubilization treatment is taken out periodically or continuously, manganese oxide is separated from the taken-out liquid, and the solution itself It is preferable to determine the end point of the oxidation reaction of manganese ions by observing the color.
  • the manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 during the insolubilization process is taken out and separated from the taken-out liquid by filtering or standing still to settle the manganese oxide,
  • the manganese recovery rate can be maximized.
  • more objective evaluation can be performed by measuring the supernatant with an absorptiometer.
  • the absorbance at wavelengths near 525-545 nm increases rapidly due to the generation of manganese peroxide ions. Thereby, the coloring of the supernatant and the reaction end point can be objectively determined.
  • the absorbance near 525-545 nm is measured in advance for the solution before the ozone oxidation reaction, and the coloration of the supernatant and the end point of the reaction are determined from the increase in absorbance when this absorbance is 1. Just decide.
  • a separation / observation tank 19 can be provided as shown in FIG.
  • a small amount of the manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 during the insolubilization process is taken out from the reaction tank (not shown) in the insolubilization step 11 to the separation / observation tank 19 periodically or continuously.
  • the liquid is allowed to stand to precipitate and separate the manganese oxide, and the color of the supernatant (that is, the color of the solution itself) is observed.
  • the supernatant and the precipitated manganese oxide may be returned to the reaction tank of the insolubilization step 11 in order to increase the manganese recovery rate.
  • the operation of returning the supernatant and / or manganese oxide to the reaction vessel is not essential. Such an operation may be repeated until the end point of the oxidation reaction of manganese ions is confirmed (that is, until the supernatant turns light red).
  • the method for precipitating and separating manganese oxide by removing a small amount of the manganese component-containing leachate (separation solution) 10 during the insolubilization treatment and leaving it in the separation / observation tank 19 has been described.
  • the extracted liquid may be filtered, and the color of the filtrate may be observed to determine the manganese ion oxidation reaction end point.
  • the manganese oxide separated by filtration and / or filtration may be returned to the reaction tank of the insolubilization step 11 in order to increase the manganese recovery rate after observation.
  • the operation of returning the filtrate and / or manganese oxide to the reaction vessel is not essential.
  • the manganese component-containing leachate (separation solution) 10 being insolubilized is taken out and the color thereof is observed, it is not always necessary to completely separate the taken-out solution and the manganese oxide. That is, the separation state of both may be such that the color of the taken out solution itself can be observed.
  • manganese dissolved in the manganese component-containing leachate (separation liquid) 10 is preferentially insolubilized to become a solid, and most of the iron ions (trivalent iron ions or even divalent iron ions) are manganese components. It will be in the state melt
  • FIG. 14 the concentrated high concentration manganese oxide 15 is recovered by solid-liquid separation of the separation liquid 10 after the insolubilization step 11.
  • the solid-liquid separation means used for the solid-liquid separation can be any means selected from gravity sedimentation separation, filtration, centrifugation, filter press, membrane separation, and the like.
  • the post-recovery separation liquid 10a from which the manganese oxide 15 has been recovered is rich in iron ions (trivalent iron ions or even divalent iron ions). Therefore, in the present invention, the post-recovery separation liquid 10a can be neutralized in the neutralization step 16 and reused as the treatment liquid 4 used in the leaching step 3.
  • the post-recovery separation liquid 10 a sent to the neutralization step 16 is neutralized by the alkali 18.
  • the alkali 18 used for neutralization include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, and sodium bicarbonate. However, it is not limited to these.
  • the post-recovery separation liquid 10a that has passed through the neutralization step 16 is then mixed with the treatment liquid 4 in the leaching step 3. Then, the trivalent iron ions in the separation liquid 10a after recovery are reduced to divalent iron ions by the iron reducing bacteria contained in the treatment liquid 4, and the divalent iron ions act as a reducing agent for the object 1 to be processed. Will do.
  • a neutralization step 16 is provided as a subsequent step of the recovery step 14, and the neutralized post-recovery separation liquid 10a is leached.
  • the processing liquid can be reused by a simple process of mixing with the processing liquid 4 in step 3.
  • medium components other than iron are consumed and reduced by microorganisms, so that a new treatment is performed as necessary. Liquid can be added.
  • the manganese contained in the object to be treated is reduced. It can be leached in time and at low cost.
  • the residue is separated from the leachate from which manganese has been leached, and the separated leachate is treated with ozone under acidic conditions, so that manganese is preferentially insolubilized and precipitated as manganese oxide to recover manganese.
  • the leachate remaining after separating the precipitate eg, as a supernatant
  • the treatment liquid 4 used in the leaching step 3 is a treatment liquid containing trivalent iron ions, and an object to be treated and iron-reducing bacteria are mixed therewith, first, the iron-reducing bacteria reduce the trivalent iron ions in the treatment liquid. Then, divalent iron is generated by the reaction (Fe 3+ + e ⁇ ⁇ Fe 2+ ) of (ii).
  • the reaction (i) Fe 2+ + (“Mn oxide, hydroxide, etc.” or “MnO 2 , Mn 2 O 3 , Mn 3 O 4 ”)
  • a leaching solution (leaching slurry) 5 containing manganese ions and trivalent iron ions is obtained.
  • the leachate (leaching slurry) 5 is solid-liquid separated, manganese is recovered from the separated liquid 10 after solid-liquid separation, and after the separation, the separated liquid 10a is neutralized and mixed with the treatment liquid 4 used in the leaching step 3.
  • iron-reducing bacteria in the treatment liquid 4 reduce trivalent iron ions in the manganese recovery / separation liquid 10a, and divalent iron ions are generated by the reaction (Fe 3+ + e ⁇ ⁇ Fe 2+ ).
  • manganese can be recovered and the leachate can be reused.
  • the treatment liquid 4 used in the leaching step 3 is a treatment liquid containing trivalent iron ions, and the treatment object containing manganese and iron-reducing bacteria are mixed with the treatment liquid 4 so that manganese ions are leached from the treatment object.
  • the leachate 10a after the manganese recovery step 14 can be neutralized in the neutralization step 16, and then mixed with the treatment liquid 4 in the leach step 3 without taking any special measures.
  • the treatment liquid and the object to be treated were mixed in a reaction vessel, and leaching treatment was performed under the following conditions.
  • FIG. 3 shows the result of calculating the ratio of leached manganese (leaching rate) to manganese in the workpiece based on the quantitative value.
  • the manganese concentration in the filtrate after the 24-hour leaching treatment was 0.1 mol / 1000 cm 3 , and according to the present invention, a high manganese leaching rate of about 80% was obtained as shown in FIG. 3 ((0.1 mol / 1000 cm 3 ) ⁇ (22 g / 1000 cm 3 ⁇ 32 mass% ⁇ Mn molecular weight 55 g / mol) ⁇ 80%).
  • other components are considered to be manganese dioxide, so oxygen is bound to manganese, and it is dried for a long time at low temperature to avoid changes in morphology, so water remains. It is done. It was also confirmed that the sulfur content derived from sulfuric acid added to make the leachate acidic was hardly contained in the solid matter.
  • the iron content in the precipitate is less than 10%, and it can be said that manganese and iron are well separated.
  • iron was mixed in the precipitate by 10% or more, exceeding the target value of less than 10% initially set by the present inventors.
  • manganese has moved to a solid matter of 80% or more with respect to the amount of manganese in the leachate.
  • only less than 1% of manganese on the filtrate side is detected with respect to the amount of manganese in the leachate.
  • the remaining manganese is almost a recovery loss. Actually, it is considered that almost 100% of the manganese in the leachate is solidified and transferred to the solid.
  • As a factor of recovery loss when manganese is oxidized with ozone and becomes a solid substance, it is considered that the reaction vessel is stuck in a thin film.
  • the leachate was sampled immediately before ozone diffusion and during ozone diffusion treatment.
  • the sampling during the ozone aeration treatment was performed several times with the passage of the ozone aeration time.
  • the sampled leachate was filtered through a 0.22 ⁇ m membrane filter to separate manganese oxide, and the color of the filtrate (solution part) was observed. Further, each manganese recovery rate was measured from the sampled leachate by the same method as in 2) above. The total amount of manganese (mass) contained in the leachate sampled immediately before ozone diffusion was set to 100%.
  • FIG. 6 shows changes in the color of the filtrate and the manganese recovery rate with the passage of ozone aeration time.
  • FIG. 6 shows changes in the color of the filtrate and the manganese recovery rate with the passage of ozone aeration time.
  • the manganese recovery rate rises rapidly in a short time as the ozone aeration time elapses, and a manganese recovery rate of 99% or more is achieved in the vicinity of the ozone aeration time: 150 minutes. It was.
  • Table 8 shows that the ozone aeration time is 150 minutes, that is, the ozone aeration time optimal for the high manganese recovery obtained in 3) above is the same as in 3) above under sulfuric acid acidity.
  • the experiment of aeration and solidification with manganese as an oxide was conducted four times, and the results (batch Nos. 1A to 4A) were shown.
  • the absorbance at a wavelength of 525.5 nm was measured, and the ratio with the absorbance of the solution at the start of the reaction was determined.
  • Table 9 shows the same conditions as the above 3) except that the time when the color of the filtrate changed from light yellow to light red was determined as the “manganese oxidation reaction end point” and the “ozone diffusion time” was determined.
  • the experiment was conducted four times in which ozone was diffused in the presence of sulfuric acid and solidified with manganese as an oxide, and the results (batch Nos. 1B to 4B) were shown. That is, in this experiment, the acidic ozone aeration process is completed when the color of the filtrate changes from light yellow to light red.
  • the same manganese recovery rate is not necessarily obtained in the same reaction time (ozone aeration time). It is not necessarily obtained.
  • the composition of the leachate may vary greatly depending on the activity of the microorganism, the number of bacteria, etc., so management by reaction time is difficult and realistic. I can't say that.
  • the amount of the solution and the concentration of iron-reducing bacteria are as follows for both of the treatment liquids A and B.
  • Amount of solution 500 cm 3
  • Initial iron-reducing bacteria concentration 5 ⁇ 10 13 cells / m 3 (5 ⁇ 10 7 cells / cm 3 )
  • “Mineral solutions” in Tables 4 and 10 are Wolfe's Mineral Solution having the ingredients shown in Table 5, and “Vitamin solutions” in Tables 4 and 10 are ingredients in Table 6.
  • Wolfe's Vitamin Solution with The carbon concentration and phosphorus concentration in the treatment liquids A and B before adding the iron-reducing bacteria are quantified by a total organic carbon meter and a high-frequency inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry (ICP emission spectrometry). Concentration.
  • ICP emission spectrometry high-frequency inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry
  • the treatment liquid and the object to be treated were mixed in a reaction vessel, and leaching treatment was performed under the following conditions.
  • the obtained manganese leaching solution was filtered with a 0.45 ⁇ m membrane filter.
  • concentration of manganese contained in the filtered sample (filtrate) was quantified by high frequency inductively coupled plasma emission analysis (ICP emission analysis). The quantitative results are shown in Table 11.
  • manganese was recovered by ozone aeration treatment using the obtained manganese leachate after filtration.
  • the ozone diffusion treatment conditions were the same as the above 2) except that the acid concentration was 1N, and a treatment for solidifying manganese as an oxide by ozone diffusion was performed. After the treatment, it was filtered through a 0.22 ⁇ m membrane filter, and the solid was dried at 50 ° C. for 3 days and then weighed. Next, the solid matter was dissolved in an acid, and manganese, carbon, and phosphorus were quantified by ICP emission analysis and a carbon sulfur analyzer, whereby the manganese concentration, carbon concentration, and phosphorus concentration of the solid matter were quantified. The quantitative results are shown in Table 11.
  • the carbon concentration and phosphorus concentration in the treatment liquids A and B before adding the iron-reducing bacteria are 600 mM and 5.2 mM in the treatment liquid A, whereas in the treatment liquid B, 270 mM and 0 16 mM.
  • the manganese concentration of the leaching liquid after the 24-hour leaching treatment was 42 mM, and a high manganese leaching rate of 75% or more was obtained.
  • the manganese leaching rate when manganese was leached using the treatment liquid B was the same as the case where manganese was leached using the treatment liquid A.
  • the content of manganese, carbon and phosphorus in the solid matter containing manganese recovered by the ozone aeration treatment when the treatment liquid A is used, manganese: 45 mass%, carbon: 0.14 mass%, Phosphorus: 0.8% by mass, but when treatment solution B is used, manganese: 45% by mass, carbon: 0.07% by mass, phosphorus: 0.03% by mass, based on the manganese content
  • the carbon and phosphorus content is greatly reduced.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Water By Oxidation Or Reduction (AREA)
  • Primary Cells (AREA)
  • Purification Treatments By Anaerobic Or Anaerobic And Aerobic Bacteria Or Animals (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Removal Of Specific Substances (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour récupérer de façon économique du manganèse à partir de minéraux de basse qualité et de déchets contenant du manganèse. Des bactéries de réduction du fer et une substance contenant du manganèse devant être traitée sont mélangées dans une solution de traitement contenant des ions fer trivalents, les ions fer trivalents sont réduits en ions fer divalents au moyen des bactéries de réduction du fer, les ions manganèse sont lixiviés à partir de la substance traitée dans la solution de traitement mentionnée ci-dessus avec les ions de fer divalents comme agent réducteur, le lixiviat obtenu est soumis à une séparation solide-liquide, les ions manganèse contenus dans le liquide séparé sont rendus insolubles (solidifiés) principalement en tant qu'oxydes, et les oxydes de manganèse obtenus sont précipités, séparés et récupérés.
PCT/JP2012/067137 2011-06-29 2012-06-28 Procédé de récupération de manganèse WO2013002416A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201280031548.1A CN103620069B (zh) 2011-06-29 2012-06-28 锰回收方法

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011143704 2011-06-29
JP2011-143704 2011-06-29
JP2012124450 2012-05-31
JP2012-124450 2012-05-31

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013002416A1 true WO2013002416A1 (fr) 2013-01-03

Family

ID=47424300

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2012/067137 WO2013002416A1 (fr) 2011-06-29 2012-06-28 Procédé de récupération de manganèse

Country Status (3)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5229416B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN103620069B (fr)
WO (1) WO2013002416A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104357662A (zh) * 2014-11-04 2015-02-18 中国环境科学研究院 一种电解锰渣的无害化处理工艺

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6121359B2 (ja) * 2014-03-31 2017-04-26 Ｊｘ金属株式会社 金属酸化物の浸出方法
JP6070898B2 (ja) * 2014-04-21 2017-02-01 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 廃乾電池からの有価成分の回収方法および回収設備
CN104313335B (zh) * 2014-09-23 2016-09-14 郑景宜 铁合金锰尘灰湿法分离利用方法
CN104458607A (zh) * 2014-11-24 2015-03-25 广东省生态环境与土壤研究所 一种快速检测微生物胞外呼吸活性的方法
JP6289411B2 (ja) 2015-03-31 2018-03-07 Ｊｘ金属株式会社 鉄含有溶液からの鉄の除去方法及び、有価金属の回収方法
CN105238932B (zh) * 2015-11-27 2017-11-21 江苏理工学院 钴锰废料中钴和锰的分离回收方法
CN105349790B (zh) * 2015-11-27 2017-11-21 江苏理工学院 用氨‑碳酸氢铵分离回收低钴高锰废料中钴和锰的方法
CN105349789B (zh) * 2015-11-27 2017-11-21 江苏理工学院 用氨‑碳酸钠分离回收低钴高锰废料中钴和锰的方法
WO2021075135A1 (fr) 2019-10-18 2021-04-22 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 Procédé et installation de récupération de manganèse à partir de batteries sèches usagées
JP7004091B2 (ja) 2019-10-18 2022-02-04 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 廃乾電池からのマンガン回収方法および回収設備
KR20230098861A (ko) 2021-03-04 2023-07-04 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 폐건전지로부터의 망간 회수 방법 및 회수 설비
CN117242196A (zh) 2021-08-26 2023-12-15 杰富意钢铁株式会社 锰的除去方法及氧化铁的制造方法
KR20230089751A (ko) * 2021-12-14 2023-06-21 창원대학교 산학협력단 폐리튬이온전지 양극재를 이용한 유가금속 회수방법

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007113116A (ja) * 2005-09-26 2007-05-10 Osaka Prefecture Univ 金属回収方法
JP2010209384A (ja) * 2009-03-09 2010-09-24 Dowa Metals & Mining Co Ltd マンガンの回収方法
JP2010207674A (ja) * 2009-03-09 2010-09-24 Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd 排水からのマンガンの除去方法

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1237192C (zh) * 2002-11-26 2006-01-18 中南大学 硫酸锰溶液的深度净化方法
JP2011127156A (ja) * 2009-12-16 2011-06-30 Jfe Engineering Corp 金属回収方法

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007113116A (ja) * 2005-09-26 2007-05-10 Osaka Prefecture Univ 金属回収方法
JP2010209384A (ja) * 2009-03-09 2010-09-24 Dowa Metals & Mining Co Ltd マンガンの回収方法
JP2010207674A (ja) * 2009-03-09 2010-09-24 Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd 排水からのマンガンの除去方法

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104357662A (zh) * 2014-11-04 2015-02-18 中国环境科学研究院 一种电解锰渣的无害化处理工艺

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103620069B (zh) 2016-04-13
JP2014005496A (ja) 2014-01-16
CN103620069A (zh) 2014-03-05
JP5229416B1 (ja) 2013-07-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2013002416A1 (fr) Procédé de récupération de manganèse
Kaksonen et al. Bioleaching and recovery of metals from final slag waste of the copper smelting industry
Peng et al. Selective leaching of vanadium from chromium residue intensified by electric field
JP5090697B2 (ja) 金属回収方法
Mal et al. Continuous removal and recovery of tellurium in an upflow anaerobic granular sludge bed reactor
Su et al. Cr (VI) reduction in chromium-contaminated soil by indigenous microorganisms under aerobic condition
Ramos-Ruiz et al. Continuous reduction of tellurite to recoverable tellurium nanoparticles using an upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor
Baral Bioleaching of rare earth elements from spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst using Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans
Chen et al. Effects of sulfur dosage and inoculum size on pilot-scale thermophilic bioleaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge
Lan et al. Environmentally-friendly bioleaching of manganese from pyrolusite: Performance and mechanisms
Zhao et al. Comparison of bio-dissolution of spent Ni–Cd batteries by sewage sludge using ferrous ions and elemental sulfur as substrate
JP5666835B2 (ja) 金属の回収方法
CN107162276A (zh) 一种三氯化铁蚀刻废液的除铬方法
Miao et al. Efficient removal of As, Cu and Cd and synthesis of photo-catalyst from Cu-smelting waste acid through sulfide precipitation by biogenic gaseous H2S produced by anaerobic membrane bioreactor
JP2011127156A (ja) 金属回収方法
Figueroa et al. Recovery of gold and silver and removal of copper, zinc and lead ions in pregnant and barren cyanide solutions
AU2013255067B2 (en) Sulfide ore leaching process
CN109879491A (zh) 一种电解处理含锰废水回收锰方法
JP5985926B2 (ja) 金属回収方法、および、それに用いられる金属回収装置
Sinharoy et al. Biomineralization of indium to indium selenide by anaerobic granular sludge in the presence of selenium oxyanions for sustainable recovery
CN115552047A (zh) 贱金属的氧化生物浸出
RU2337156C1 (ru) Способ чанового бактериального выщелачивания сульфидсодержащих продуктов
Garg et al. Bioleaching of pyrrhotite tailings for Ni extraction-insights into an adaptive evolution study
Yan et al. Sulfate reduction and heavy metal removal by a novel metal-resistant sulfate-reducing bacterium: mechanism and optimization
AU2017362828B2 (en) Method for removing manganese

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12804887

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12804887

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1