US20020102672A1 - Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution - Google Patents

Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020102672A1
US20020102672A1 US09/412,085 US41208599A US2002102672A1 US 20020102672 A1 US20020102672 A1 US 20020102672A1 US 41208599 A US41208599 A US 41208599A US 2002102672 A1 US2002102672 A1 US 2002102672A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
lactic acid
solution
lactate
source
extraction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/412,085
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Joseph Mizrahi
Aharon Eyal
Canari Riki
Betty Hazan
John Starr
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Corbion NV
Cargill Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US09/412,085 priority Critical patent/US20020102672A1/en
Assigned to CARGILL DOW POLYMERS, LLC reassignment CARGILL DOW POLYMERS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HAZAN, BETTY, RIKI, CANARI, MIZRAHI, JOSEPH, EYAL, AHARON, STARR, JOHN N.
Priority to KR1020027004319A priority patent/KR20020040833A/ko
Priority to JP2001528130A priority patent/JP2003511360A/ja
Priority to EP00973399A priority patent/EP1220828A1/en
Priority to BR0014510-6A priority patent/BR0014510A/pt
Priority to PCT/US2000/027200 priority patent/WO2001025180A1/en
Priority to AU11906/01A priority patent/AU1190601A/en
Priority to CNB008137102A priority patent/CN1174953C/zh
Assigned to CARGILL DOW LLC reassignment CARGILL DOW LLC CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CARGILL DOW POLYMERS LLC
Priority to ZA200203508A priority patent/ZA200203508B/xx
Priority to US10/162,935 priority patent/US7026145B2/en
Publication of US20020102672A1 publication Critical patent/US20020102672A1/en
Priority to HK03101166.3A priority patent/HK1048985B/zh
Assigned to CARGILL INCORPORATED, CSM NV reassignment CARGILL INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CARGILL DOW LLC
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
    • C07C51/00—Preparation of carboxylic acids or their salts, halides or anhydrides
    • C07C51/41—Preparation of salts of carboxylic acids
    • C07C51/412—Preparation of salts of carboxylic acids by conversion of the acids, their salts, esters or anhydrides with the same carboxylic acid part
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
    • C07C51/00—Preparation of carboxylic acids or their salts, halides or anhydrides
    • C07C51/42—Separation; Purification; Stabilisation; Use of additives
    • C07C51/48—Separation; Purification; Stabilisation; Use of additives by liquid-liquid treatment

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to lactic acid processing. It particularly concerns a method for obtaining a purified lactic acid solution from a source of lactate material having either a neutral or low pH, and the resulting products.
  • lactic acid as a commodity chemical, for example for use in the production of various industrial polymers, is known.
  • the use of lactic acid as a commodity chemical is particularly of interest because polylactic acid and many of its products are biodegradable. Additionally, lactic acid can be produced by fermentation, using renewable carbon sources.
  • Low pH fermentation is a process under investigation for improving the commercial viability of lactic acid production.
  • neutral pH fermentation e.g., pH in the range of 5.0 to 8.0, inclusive, more typically 5.0 to 7.0, inclusive
  • lactate material formed using a low pH fermentation e.g., at a pH below 5.0, typically below 4.8, more typically below 4.3
  • isolating lactic acid from an aqueous solution having a pH below 5.0 tends to reduce the need for acidulation technology typically necessary for isolating lactic acid from an aqueous solution having a pH above 5.0.
  • mixed sugar streams provide a relatively low cost carbon source
  • mixed sugar streams typically have more impurities, such as lignin, than conventional dextrose streams.
  • impurities increase the burden on the microorganism, which must tolerate the impurities
  • the impurities also must be separated from the fermentation broth and the lactate material. Therefore, a separation process that is capable of reducing the presence of impurities due to the use of mixed sugar streams, or other carbohydrates sources, is also desirable.
  • the present disclosure provides a process for preparing a purified lactic acid solution suitable for use in connection with a source of lactate material having either a neutral pH (e.g., between about 5.0 and 8.0, inclusive, more typically between about 5.0 and 7.0, inclusive) or a low pH (e.g., below 5.0, typically below 4.8, more typically below 4.3).
  • a neutral pH e.g., between about 5.0 and 8.0, inclusive, more typically between about 5.0 and 7.0, inclusive
  • a low pH e.g., below 5.0, typically below 4.8, more typically below 4.3
  • One preferred process disclosed herein includes steps of providing a source of lactate material which includes calcium lactate; concentrating the source of lactate material to form a concentrated solution; acidulating the concentrated solution with sulfuric acid to form an acidulated solution which includes lactic acid and calcium sulfate; reducing the amount the calcium sulfate in the acidulated solution; extracting the acidulated solution with an extractant to form a loaded solvent; and stripping the loaded solvent to provide a purified solution of lactic acid, for example, by back extraction with an immiscible aqueous solution.
  • the process steps do not have to be performed in the order recited.
  • the step of concentrating can be performed before and/or after the step of acidulating.
  • the process can be applied in a manner including the steps of providing a source of lactate material which includes calcium lactate; acidulating the source of lactate material with sulfuric acid to form an acidulated solution which includes lactic acid and calcium sulfate; reducing the amount of calcium sulfate in the acidulated solution; combining the acidulated solution with an extractant to form an extraction solution wherein the extraction solution includes sulfuric acid, extracting the acidulated solution with the extraction solution to form a loaded solvent; and stripping the loaded solvent to provide a purified solution of lactic acid.
  • the sulfuric acid in the extraction solution can be residual sulfuric acid from the acidulation step. Alternately, sulfuric acid can be added to the extraction solution prior to or during the extraction step.
  • the process can be applied in a manner that includes a step of reducing the amount of impurities having a molecular weight of about 5,000 Da and greater in the source of lactate material prior to the step of concentrating.
  • the source of lactate material includes a fermentation broth and calcium lactate is formed a result of using calcium carbonate or calcium hydroxide as pH controlling agents during the fermentation.
  • FIG. 1 is a process flow chart showing a process for generating a purified lactic acid solution.
  • FIG. 2 is a process flow chart of an alternate process for generating a purified lactic acid solution.
  • FIG. 3 is a plot showing a McCabe-Thiele diagram for the extraction of lactic acid in an amine extractant.
  • FIG. 4 is a plot showing the equilibrium curves of an amine extractant with and without sulfate present in the extract.
  • the invention provides a process for obtaining a purified lactic acid solution from a source of lactate material having either a neutral or low pH.
  • the source of lactate material includes a fermentation broth.
  • “fermentation” refers to any metabolic process that produces a useful product by the mass culture of microorganisms. A variety of microorganisms are suitable for use in the fermentation process, for example, bacteria, yeast and fungi.
  • lactate material herein refers to 2-hydroxypropionate in either its free acid or salt form and also to lactic acid oligomers, such as lactoyl lactate, in their free acid and/or salt form.
  • lactic acid and “free lactic acid” are employed interchangeably herein to refer to the acid form, e.g., 2-hydroxypropionic acid, also called the “undissociated” form and lactic acid oligomers in the acid form.
  • the salt or “dissociated” form of lactate is specifically referred to herein as a “lactate salt,” for example, as the sodium (or calcium) salt of lactic acid or sodium lactate (or calcium lactate) and the salt or “dissociated” form of lactic acid oligomers.
  • “Nutrient medium” refers to media in the form originally provided to the microorganism for fermentation and typically includes a carbon source, a nitrogen source and other nutrients.
  • fermentation broth refers to a mixture that includes lactate material (e.g., free lactic acid and lactate salt) produced after some or all of the originally provided nutrients have been consumed and fermentation products including lactate material have been excreted into the media by the microorganism.
  • lactate material e.g., free lactic acid and lactate salt
  • the fermentation broth can include recycle streams from other processes, including the process described herein.
  • the fermentation broth is also referred to as a “source of lactate material.”
  • “Clarified solution” refers to the source of lactate material or fermentation broth after at least some impurities have been removed.
  • polylactic acid or “polylactate” are intended to refer to any polymer comprising at least 50% by wt. polymer units of lactic acid residue or lactide residue. Thus, the two terms include within their scope polylactides.
  • polylactic acid and polylactate are not meant to specifically identify the polymerized monomer, for example whether the material polymerized was lactide (lactic acid dimer) or lactic acid itself.
  • the amount of lactate material in a solution can be represented by the weight percent of lactate material present calculated as if it was all in the undissociated or acid form; or the weight percent of lactate material present in the solution calculated as if it was all in the dissociated or salt form.
  • the amount of lactate material in a solution is provided herein, it generally represents the weight percent of lactate material present if calculated as it was all in the undissociated or acid form, unless otherwise noted.
  • the process described herein provides a method for obtaining a purified lactic acid solution from a source of lactate material.
  • Suitable sources of lactate material include, but are not limited to, a fermentation broth, a recycle stream from polylactic acid production which contains lactate material, or recycled polylactic acid (e.g., post-consumer waste or production scraps) that has been hydrolyzed to form a solution containing lactate material.
  • the source of lactate material is a fermentation broth.
  • fermentation broth may refer to a fermentation broth which includes recycle streams from the process described herein or other processes.
  • the source of lactate material includes compounds other than lactic acid, referred to as impurities.
  • fermentation broth may include both lactic acid and lactate salt, collectively referred to as lactate material, along with cellular debris, residual carbohydrates, nutrients and other impurities.
  • lactate material a compound that includes lactic acid in an aqueous carrier with less than about 1.0 g/L to about 5.0 g/L impurities, more preferably less than about 0.005 g/L to about 1.0 g/L impurities.
  • the acceptable concentration of impurities can vary depending on the commercial use of the solution and the concentration of lactic acid within the solution.
  • the process provides a method for obtaining a purified lactic acid solution from a source of lactate material such as a fermentation broth.
  • purified lactic acid solution refers to a solution which contains between about 5 wt % to about 90 wt % lactic acid, more typically between about 10 wt % to about 90 wt % lactic acid, most typically between about 20 wt % to about 50 wt % lactic acid, an aqueous carrier and no more than about 1.0 g/L to about 5.0 g/L impurities, more preferably no more than about 0.005 g/L to about 1.0 g/L impurities, such as proteins, carbohydrates, cellular debris, etc . . . .
  • FIG. 1 One preferred process is shown in FIG. 1.
  • a source of lactate material which includes calcium lactate (A) is concentrated (H) to form a concentrated solution.
  • the concentrated solution is acidulated (B) with sulfuric acid to form an acidulated slurry which includes lactic acid and calcium sulfate.
  • the amount of calcium sulfate in the acidulated slurry is reduced (C) and the acidulated solution is then extracted (D) with an extractant to form a loaded solvent.
  • the loaded solvent is stripped (E) to provide a purified solution of lactic acid (F), for example, by back extraction with an immiscible aqueous solution.
  • the process can be applied in a manner shown in FIG. 2, including the steps of (A) providing a source of lactate material which includes calcium lactate; (B) acidulating the source of lactate material with sulfuric acid to form an acidulated solution which includes lactic acid and calcium sulfate; (C) reducing the amount of calcium sulfate in the acidulated solution; (D) combining the acidulated solution with an extractant to form an extraction solution wherein the extraction solution includes sulfuric acid (G); (D) extracting the acidulated solution with the extraction solution to form a loaded solvent; and (E) stripping the loaded solvent to provide a purified solution of lactic acid (F).
  • the process includes the steps of acidulating a source of lactate material (which includes calcium lactate) with sulfuric acid to form an acidulated solution containing lactic acid and calcium sulfate (gypsum) in combination with the steps of gypsum filtration, amine extraction and stripping the extractant, for example by aqueous back extraction, to obtain a purified lactic acid solution.
  • a source of lactate material which includes calcium lactate
  • gypsum calcium sulfate
  • a “clarification” process may be performed to reduce the presence of suspended cell mass and other high molecular weight compounds (e.g., impurities having a molecular weight of about 5,000 Da and greater, preferably about 40,000 Da and greater) in the source of lactate material. (See FIG. 1(G)).
  • the step of clarification includes cross-flow filtration. More preferably, a two-stage cross-flow filtration technique is employed.
  • the process does not require the relatively expensive equipment used in many existing commercial processes.
  • equipment used in CO 2 extraction U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,526
  • Membranes and membrane modules used in water splitting electrodialysis are expensive and the operating costs for water splitting electrodialysis (e.g., electricity) can be expensive.
  • Ion exchange processes particularly when used in connection with large scale process using a neutral pH broth, require multiple beds with large resin volumes.
  • Regeneration of cation exchange resins to a protonated form requires excess hydrochloric acid or another strong mineral acid and creates water soluble salt stream that requires disposal. Landfilling a water soluble salt typically requires the evaporation of water to crystallize the salt, thus increasing disposal costs. Before and after each regeneration step, the resin is typically rinsed. The rinse water tends to add more water to the system and thus increases the water evaporation load.
  • the process according to the preferred techniques described herein can be performed using equipment that is relatively simple and inexpensive, e.g., an acidulation vessel and/or a gypsum crystallization vessel can be less complex and less expensive as compared to a CO 2 vessel or equipment needed for water splitting electrodialysis.
  • the process is also easily integrated with other lactic acid production processes.
  • the loaded solvent from the process described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,526, incorporated by reference herein can be used as an extractant in the present process.
  • the process can also be used to purify contaminated side streams from known polymerization processes.
  • Ion exchange processes are effective for acidulation of a low pH broth but tend to be less efficient for acidulation of neutral pH broth.
  • fermentation broth is contacted with a protonated cation exchange resin.
  • the proton from the resin and cation of the salt are exchanged to form lactic acid.
  • the cation from the salt remains on the resin.
  • the lactate material is nearly all in the free lactic acid form.
  • the resin can process many volumes of broth before it needs to be regenerated.
  • the fermentation broth is at a neutral pH, only a few volumes of broth can be processed before regeneration is required. Consequently, efficiency is decreased because the resin needs to be regenerated frequently.
  • Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) assisted liquid-liquid extraction is an acidulation technique designed to recover lactate salt from a neutral fermentation broth.
  • CO 2 assisted liquid-liquid extraction lactate salt is converted to free lactic acid by CO 2 chemistry and then the newly converted lactic acid is extracted from the broth.
  • CO 2 assisted liquid-liquid extraction tends to be less efficient for use in connection with a low pH fermentation broth as compared to a neutral pH fermentation broth.
  • lactate salt may not be converted to free lactic acid via the CO 2 chemistry because the concentration of free lactic acid in the organic phase may be already greater than the lactic acid concentration achievable through the CO 2 chemistry.
  • Extractive fermentation is a method by which free lactic acid is recovered from fermentation broth by liquid-liquid extraction or adsorption and the lactate salt is recycled back to the fermentation to help control the pH of the fermentation. See, e.g., PCT 99/19290 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,786,185, incorporated by reference herein. Extractive fermentation tends to be more efficient when the fermentation broth has significant amounts of both free lactic acid and lactate salt (i.e., at low pH). However, when the lactate material is present mainly as lactate salt (i.e., at neutral pH), the advantages of extractive fermentation tend to decrease. High concentrations of lactate salt in the recycle stream may be inhibitory to the microorganisms in the fermentor.
  • Process productivity as measured by pounds of free lactic acid recovered per gallon of fermentation broth per hour, tends to be low because of the low amount of free lactic acid recovered per gallon.
  • large amounts of fermentation broth must be processed to achieve a high capacity plant.
  • free lactic acid is mainly present in the fermentation broth (i.e., at a low pH)
  • the recycle stream increases the complexity of the process, adds impurities into the system, and provides little benefit since the free lactic acid concentration is already high.
  • lactic acid (referred to by abbreviations HLa and/or LaH) dissociates into a proton, H + , and a lactate anion, La ⁇ (sometimes referred to herein as dissolved lactate salt when another source of cation is present, typically from the buffering salt).
  • the amount of dissociation at equilibrium is related to the pH of the solution and the pK a of lactic acid. Equation 1 below demonstrates the general relationship between pH, pK a , and degree of lactic acid dissociation, where [La ⁇ ] and [HLa] are the thermodynamic activities of the lactate anion and the free lactic acid, respectively.
  • pH pK a + log - [ La - ] [ HLa ] Equation ⁇ ⁇ 1
  • the pK a of the lactate material can vary. For example, at 25° C. the pK a of lactic acid is 3.86, whereas at 5° C., the pK a is about 3.89. Furthermore, it has been noticed that the pK a of lactic acid tends to decrease as the concentration of lactic acid in solution increases, and tends to increase as the concentration of lactic acid in solution decreases. However, the pK a of lactic acid is generally within the range of about 3.4 to about 3.9.
  • the amount of free lactic acid present in a solution is a function of both the pH of the solution and the overall concentration of lactate material (i.e. lactic acid plus dissolved lactate salt) in the mixture.
  • lactate material i.e. lactic acid plus dissolved lactate salt
  • specifying these two parameters for a given solution e.g., a fermentation broth
  • the lower the solution pH the higher the percentage of the lactate material which is present in the free acid form.
  • the medium (solution or mixture) pH is equal to the pK a of lactic acid (which is about 3.8 at 25° C.), 50% of the lactate material is present in the free acid form.
  • Lactic acid has a chiral center and is found in both the D and L forms.
  • the chiral purity of the lactic acid can be important in some industrial applications, see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,142,023; 5,338,822; 5,484,881; and 5,536,807, incorporated by reference herein.
  • bacteria for example from the Lactobacillus genus, that can make either the D-lactic acid or the L-lactic acid.
  • bacteria strains typically produce predominantly one enantiomer. Indeed, fermentation broths with high chiral purity (90% or greater) of lactic acid can be readily obtained.
  • This chirality is obtained from the metabolism of dextrose or other carbohydrates by microorganism cells during fermentation.
  • Lactobacillus bulgaricas and Lactobacillus coryniformis typically make the D-lactic acid enantiomer almost exclusively. Lactobacillus casei has been found to produce, in majority, L-lactic acid.
  • the chiral purity of the lactic acid can influence on the properties of a polylactic acid polymer.
  • the ability of the polymer to crystallize is affected by the chiral purity of the polymer; See for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,484,881; 5,585,191; and, 5,536,807. (Each of these references are incorporated herein by reference.)
  • Polymers with a particular crystallinity may be desired in a particular industrial application.
  • polymer crystallinity can affect the heat distortion temperature of the polymer.
  • the crystallinity of the polymer can also affect the storage, transfer and processing of polylactic acid resins into fibers, non-woven fabrics, films, and other end products.
  • Lactic acid currently used in food applications has chiral purity requirements greater than 95% chiral purity, generally with a preference for the “L” form.
  • the chiral purity of lactic acid is also important for end products such as pharmaceuticals and other medical devices where lactic acid is a starting material.
  • 95% chiral purity means 95% of the lactic acid/lactate content is one of two possible enantiomers. (Thus, the composition could alternatively be characterized as 10% racemic or 90% optically pure.)
  • an optical purity of the lactic acid of at least 50%, more preferably at least 75% and most preferably at least 90% may be desirable.
  • Fermentation can be conducted using microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi or yeast, capable of forming lactic acid upon metabolizing a carbon source.
  • microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi or yeast, capable of forming lactic acid upon metabolizing a carbon source.
  • lactate material producing organisms are known.
  • bacteria of the family Lactobacillaceae are employed.
  • fungi those of the family Rhizopus can be employed.
  • Suitable yeasts include Saccharomyces and Kluveromyces, for example, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  • Fermentation is typically conducted at a temperature suitable for the particular organism being used, typically between about 30° C. and about 60° C. for bacterial fermentations and between about 20° C. and about 45° C. for yeast fermentations.
  • the temperature may vary widely but are often within the range of about 25° C. to about 50° C.
  • the nutrient media typically contains a carbon source.
  • the carbon source includes carbohydrate containing raw materials.
  • suitable carbon sources include molasses; cane or beet sugar; corn, potato or rice starch and hydrolysates; whey and whey permeate.
  • suitable solutions containing sugars such as glucose and sucrose can also be prepared.
  • raw materials such as barley, cassava, corn, oats and rice may be used as a carbon source.
  • the nutrient media also contains a nitrogen source.
  • the nitrogen source includes a combination of organic and inorganic nitrogenous compounds. Examples of suitable nitrogen sources include yeast extract, corn steep liquor, soy hydrolysate, malt sprouts and ammonium sulfate.
  • the pH of the fermentation broth during the incubation step can be expressed in terms of the “average incubation pH” or the “final incubation pH.” If fermentation is carried out to a point where pH and/or lactic acid concentration inhibits further lactate production, the “average incubation pH” is determined based on an average of the pH values measured at ten (10) or more equal time intervals over the time period necessary to produce 90% of the limiting lactate concentration.
  • the “limiting lactate concentration” is the lactate concentration (concentration of undissociated and dissociated lactic acid) under a given set of incubation conditions (nutrient medium, temperature, degree of aeration) at which pH and/or lactic acid concentration generated by the fermentation inhibits further lactate production.
  • the term “limiting incubation pH” means the pH of the fermentation broth for a given set of incubation conditions at which the pH and/or lactic acid concentration inhibits further lactate production. Inhibition of lactate production is considered to have occurred when the amount of lactate produced in a batch fermentation does not increase by more than about 3% upon further incubation for a period of up to about twelve (12) hours under the same conditions. This definition presumes that sufficient nutrients for lactate production are still available in the fermentation broth and applies to both batch and continuous operations.
  • the fermentation process can be run in a continuous fashion wherein a limiting lactate concentration is not reached.
  • startup phase where the pH of the fermentation broth fluctuates, as does the nutrient concentration and lactate concentration.
  • steady state conditions are achieved.
  • the response time to reach a steady state is at least about 3 to about 5 times the residence time, depending on the dilution rate.
  • steady state conditions processing variables such as pH, lactate concentration and nutrient concentration do not change significantly over time.
  • the pH of the fermentation broth generally does not fluctuate by more than about 0.5 pH units, more preferably about 0.2 pH units during the course of one residence time.
  • the term “residence time” or “residence period” refers to the average time that a molecule is present in the fermentation tank.
  • the residence time can be determined by calculating the ratio of the broth volume over the flow rate of what all streams entering and exiting the fermentor.
  • the flow rate of all streams entering the fermentor is equal to the flow rate of all streams exiting the fermentor. For example, in a tank having a volume of 100,000 gallons and a flow rate of 12,500 gallons per hour, one residence time equals 8 hours.
  • one residence time is about 2 to about 10 hours, more typically about 5 to about 7 hours.
  • lactate concentration generally does not fluctuate by more than about 2%, more preferably no more than about 1% and nutrient concentration by no more than about 0.3%, more preferably no more than about 0.1% during the course of one residence time.
  • “average incubation pH” is determined based on an average of the pH values measured at ten (10) or more equal time intervals over the course of the fermentation after steady state conditions have been achieved.
  • the “final incubation pH” is the pH of the fermentation broth at the point that growth and/or lactate material production by the microorganism ceases.
  • the cessation of growth and/or lactate material production may be the result of a change in reaction temperature, the exhaustion of one or more necessary nutrients in the fermentation broth, a deliberate change in pH, or the separation of the fermentation broth from the bacterial cells.
  • the final incubation pH is defined to be the pH of the nutrient medium just prior to the addition of acid or base.
  • growth and/or lactate material production may stop due to the accumulation of one or more fermentation products and/or a change in broth pH resulting from the production of fermentation products, i.e., the fermentation reaction has reached a self limiting point for the given set of incubation conditions. It is quite common for bacterial fermentations which produce an organic acid such as lactic acid to be subject to end-product inhibition.
  • the source of lactate material can have a neutral pH, for example, a broth from a neutral pH fermentation.
  • a neutral pH for example, a broth from a neutral pH fermentation.
  • a large number of strains of microorganisms are known and used for production of lactic acid at a neutral pH. The most important of these are homofermentative lactic acid bacteria of the genera lactobacillus, streptococcus and pediococcus.
  • optimal productivity for these microorganisms is achieved at a pH between about 5.0 and 8.0, more typically between about 5.0 and 7.0 (a “neutral pH”). See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,526, incorporated by reference herein.
  • a neutral pH is typically maintained by adding a neutralizing agent, such as alkali- or alkali earth hydroxide (calcium hydroxide), calcium carbonate, milk of lime, ammonia water or ammonia gas to the fermentation broth.
  • a neutralizing agent such as alkali- or alkali earth hydroxide (calcium hydroxide), calcium carbonate, milk of lime, ammonia water or ammonia gas
  • the cation from the neutralizing agent combines with the dissociated lactic acid to form a lactate salt.
  • a calcium base such as calcium carbonate or calcium hydroxide
  • a neutralizing agent such that calcium lactate is formed.
  • Calcium bases tend to be more acceptable to many lactate producing microorganisms when compared to other neutralizing agents. Additionally, calcium bases tend to be less expensive than other neutralizing agents.
  • many existing process are not well suited for processing solutions which contain calcium base. For example, calcium base tends to clog membranes in electrodialytic water splitting—based processes. CO 2 liquid-liquid extraction tends to be inefficient when used in connection with calcium lactate containing solutions (Lightfoot et. al. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35,1156).
  • Neutral pH fermentation can be performed as a batch process or a continuous process.
  • an appropriate nutrient media is dispensed into a fermentation vessel.
  • the nutrient media includes a suitable carbohydrate source along with a suitable complex nitrogen source to supply various amino acids, vitamins, minerals and other growth factors.
  • the nutrient media is then inoculated with the desired microorganism.
  • the temperature and pH of the fermentation vessel is maintained within an optimal range (depending on the microorganism or strain) until the carbohydrate supply is exhausted.
  • a neutral pH is maintained by the addition of a neutralizing agent. After the carbohydrate supply is exhausted the product (lactate material) is purified from the fermentation broth.
  • nutrient media, microorganisms and other additives such as a neutralizing agent
  • fermentation broth is removed from the fermentor in such a manner that a limiting lactate concentration is not obtained.
  • the nutrient media, microorganisms and other additives are added in specified amounts at a specified rate or at specified intervals.
  • Fermentation broth is removed at a rate that compensates for the addition of these materials such that a steady state condition is obtained.
  • the fermentation broth is removed at a rate equal to the flow rate of the nutrient media, microorganisms and additives added to the fermentor.
  • a multi-stage continuous fermentation process is used in which multiple fermentation vessels are used. Fresh media, microorganisms and the like are added to a first vessel. The fermentation broth from the first vessel is then transferred to a second vessel and the fermentation broth from the second vessel is transferred to a third vessel, and so on.
  • the concentration of lactate material increases and the concentration of the carbon source decreases with each stage such that the first vessel has the highest concentration of carbon source and the lowest concentration of lactic acid and the final vessel has the highest concentration of lactate material and the lowest concentration of carbon source.
  • a multi-stage process having about 2 to about 8 stages is used.
  • the calcium lactate may crystallize during fermentation because the calcium lactate concentration may exceed the solubility limit of calcium lactate.
  • the fermentation broth may be cooled to cause the crystallization of calcium lactate.
  • the crystallized calcium lactate may be separated from the fermentation broth and used as a source of the lactate material.
  • the mother liquor (filtrate) from the calcium lactate separation can be recycled back to the fermentor.
  • the process is also suitable for purifying lactic acid from a source of lactate material having a low pH, for example a low pH fermentation broth.
  • the lactate material produced in a low pH fermentation i.e., in an aqueous solution having a pH below 5.0, preferably below 4.8, more preferably below 4.3
  • isolating lactic acid from an aqueous solution having a pH below 4.5 tends to eliminate significant costs associated follow up processes, such as acidulation, that are typically necessary with neutral fermentation processes.
  • substantially less energy and/or chemicals, such as acid is typically required per unit of lactate material formed in the fermentation.
  • low pH refers to a solution having a pH on the order of 5.0 or below, preferably 4.8 or below, more preferably about 4.3 or below and typically about 2.5 to 4.2. Even though the microorganism is capable of retaining high productivity at a low pH, a neutralizing agent, such as calcium hydroxide or calcium carbonate, may be added to the fermentation broth to maintain the desired, albeit low, pH.
  • a neutralizing agent such as calcium hydroxide or calcium carbonate
  • Organisms capable of metabolizing a carbohydrate source to form lactic acid at a low pH are known.
  • low pH fermentation can be performed using acid-tolerant bacteria, such as acid-tolerant homolactic bacteria.
  • acid-tolerant refers to bacteria which are capable of producing lactate material at a pH sufficient to furnish a substantial portion of the lactate material in the free acid form. This is described, for example, in PCT 99/19503 (discloses fermentation of carbohydrates to lactic acid at a final pH of about 3.8 with a lactic acid concentration of about 70 to 80 g/L using an acid-tolerant Lactobacillus isolated from a natural source), incorporated by reference herein.
  • low pH fermentation can be performed using fungi or yeast.
  • PCT 99/14335 discloses fermentation of carbohydrates to lactic acid at a final pH of about 2.8 with yeast strains transformed with at least one copy of lactate dehydrogenase to allow the production of lactic acid from pyruvate, hereby incorporated by reference.
  • Low pH fermentation can be performed as a batch or continuous process, described above.
  • the source of lactate material typically contains impurities that may need to be removed to produce a commercially useful purified lactic acid solution.
  • a source of lactate material obtained from either neutral or low pH fermentation typically contains dissociated and undissociated lactate material (i.e., both free acid and salt), unconverted starting material (carbon source), heavy metals, metabolic by products, cells, cell fragments and inorganic salts. Processing is typically required to obtain a purified lactic acid solution.
  • the process may include a “clarification” step in which the amount of suspended cell mass and/or other high molecular weight debris in the source of lactate material is reduced.
  • high molecular weight debris refers to impurities having a molecular weight of about 10,000 Da to about 500,000 Da, more preferably about 40,000 Da to about 500,000 Da, such as macroscopic solids, undissociated salts, DNA, lipids, polysaccharides, proteins, carbohydrates, and fragments thereof.
  • Clarification techniques are known and include, but are not limited to, filtration, such as ultrafiltration, filter pressing or rotary vacuum filtration, and centrifugation.
  • Cross-flow filtration is a preferred method of broth clarification.
  • the source of lactate material also referred to herein as a slurry
  • a pressure gradient is created across the membrane to facilitate migration of the liquid (and low molecular weight compounds dissolved therein, including lactate material) through the membrane.
  • the filtered liquid is also referred to as a clarified liquid or permeate.
  • Cells, cell fragments and other high molecular weight debris do not migrate through the membrane and are retained in a concentrated slurry or retentate.
  • Cross-flow filtration is preferred because it effectively separates impurities and debris having a variety of particle sizes (such as microorganism size) from the remainder of the solution.
  • Cross-flow filtration is also effective for solutions having a variety of concentrations. The concentrated retentate from the cross flow filtration can be recycled back to the fermentation vessel.
  • membranes capable of withstanding temperatures between about 40° C. and 100° C., and pH values between 2 and 7 are suitable.
  • the membrane material can also withstand chemical or thermal sterilization.
  • Membrane materials that are suitable include both polymeric materials (polyethersulfone, polysulfone, polytetrafluoroethylene, and polyvinylidene fluoride) and inorganic materials (alumina, zirconia, stainless steel, and others). Companies that have membrane equipment suitable for this process include Koch Membrane Systems, Wilmington, Mass.; and U.S. Filter, Warrendale, Pa.
  • Cross-flow filtration can be performed as a one step process.
  • cells and high molecular weight debris are removed from the fermentation broth using a membrane with a pore size from about 0.1 to 1.0 microns or a molecular weight cut off (MWCO) between 5,000 Da and 500,000 Da, inclusive. That is, a membrane having a MWCO of 5,000 Da can be used, a membrane having a MWCO of 500,000 Da can be used, or a membrane having a MWCO between 5,000 Da and 500,000 Da can be used. More preferably, to avoid membrane fouling, a membrane having a molecular weight cut off from 40,000 to 500,000 is used.
  • a two step cross-flow filtration process is used.
  • large materials such as cells are removed using a membrane having a pore size greater than 500,000 MWCO.
  • high molecular weight debris such as proteins and polysaccharides, are removed from the broth using a membrane having a MWCO between 300 Da and 500,000 Da, inclusive. More typically, this second step uses a membrane with a MWCO between 2,000 Da and 300,000 Da, inclusive.
  • the two step cross-flow filtration process is particularly advantageous for clarification of a fermentation broth. Because large cellular debris is filtered out in the first step, the membrane in the second step tends to not become clogged with cellular debris. Thus, the two step cross-flow filtration process tends to result in a longer membrane life and higher flux, particularly when the fermentation is performed using larger organisms such as yeast.
  • the membrane modules are typically interchangeable so that the membrane pore size or MWCO can be altered as needed.
  • Cross-flow filtration can be run in a variety of flow configurations.
  • cross-flow filtration processes can be run either continuously or in batch mode.
  • a variety of configurations are also suitable.
  • a tubular configuration in which the membranes are arranged longitudinally in tubes similar to the tubes in a shell and tube heat exchanger, is preferred because it can process solutions which include a variety of particle sizes (such as microorganisms).
  • any flow configuration spiral wound, flat sheet, etc.
  • any flow configuration spiral wound, flat sheet, etc.
  • a concentration step is optionally performed before and/or after acidulation.
  • the concentration step can also be performed before and/or after the clarification step.
  • Concentrating the source of lactate material tends to increase the yield of lactic acid obtained during extraction.
  • a source of lactate material obtained by fermentation includes about 5 wt % to 15 wt %, more typically 8 wt % to 15 wt % lactate material.
  • the concentration of lactate material can vary as the pH of the fermentation broth decreases, the carbon source changes, or the microorganism changes.
  • the concentration step involves exposing the source of lactate material to an elevated temperature to reduce the volume of the solution without substantially reducing the amount of lactate material present in the solution.
  • the volume of the solution is reduced by about 10 wt %, more preferably by about 25 wt %, most preferably by about 75 wt %, without a similar reduction in the amount of lactate material, e.g., while reducing the amount of lactate material by only about 10 wt %, more preferably by about 5 wt %, most preferably by about 0.1 wt % about 1 wt %.
  • a concentration step provides a solution having concentration of lactate material of about 12 wt % to about 60 wt %, preferably about 12 wt % to about 30 wt %, most preferably about 15 wt % to about 25 wt %.
  • the concentration step is performed at an elevated temperature to improve retention of lactate material in solution, particularly when fermentation is performed at a neutral pH and the lactate material is predominantly in a salt form.
  • the concentration step is performed at a temperature between about 60° C. and 150° C., more preferably about 70° C. to about 100° C.
  • Concentration can be accomplished by evaporation, pervaporation, reverse osmosis, or any other method where water is preferentially separated from the lactate material.
  • a preferred method is the use of multiple effect evaporators.
  • the use of multiple effects in series can evaporate of thousands to hundreds of thousands of pounds per hour of water.
  • Multiple effect evaporators use heat generated by condensation in one effect to provide re-boiler heat for another effect. In most multiple effect units, the overhead vapor from one effect is condensed directly on the heating element of the next effect.
  • a variety of heating unit styles can be used, from tubes to plates to mechanically agitated thin-film devices.
  • the heating units reduce the thermal history of the broth (i.e., the amount of heat the broth is exposed to in terms of time and temperature). Reducing the thermal history tends to reduce thermal degradation of impurities and racemization of lactic acid. Thermal degradation of impurities generally increases the color of the solution and may result in additional separation steps being required to increase the lactic acid purity. As discussed earlier, the chiral purity of the lactic acid is important for some applications, and increased racemization associated with the concentration step may make the lactic acid inappropriate for some commercial applications.
  • Falling film evaporator or rising film evaporators can reduce residence time and thus reduce thermal degradation and racemization.
  • a forced circulation evaporator may be desirable because it can process slurries (where salts may precipitate out) and viscous fluids.
  • a falling film or rising film evaporator may be less suitable for use with a slurry from which lactate salt may precipitate.
  • a thermal recompression evaporator or a mechanical recompression evaporator may be appropriate.
  • Table 1 shows the percent lactic acid recovered from a four theoretical stage extraction using a solvent which includes 54 wt % Alamine 304 (Cognis, Tuscon, Ariz.) and 46 wt % Isopar K (Exxon) at 50° C. for sources of lactate material having varying concentrations.
  • the weight ratio of entering organic phase to entering aqueous phase was 2.5.
  • the amount of lactic acid recovered is greatly dependent upon the concentration of lactic acid in the source.
  • concentrating the source of lactate material prior to lactic acid extraction improves the efficiency of the process.
  • FIG. 3 shows a McCabe-Thiele diagram for lactic acid extracted using an organic solvent which includes 54 wt % Alamine 304 and 46 wt % IsoPar K at 50° C.
  • Line A is the equilibrium line which shows the partitioning of lactic acid between an aqueous and an organic phase.
  • the equilibrium line is experimentally determined by measuring the partitioning of lactic acid between the two phases.
  • the shape of the equilibrium curve for lactic acid is unusual.
  • the curve has a relatively low slope at low lactic acid concentrations in the aqueous phase ([Lactic acid] ⁇ 10 wt %).
  • the slope increases at intermediate lactic acid concentrations in the aqueous phase (10 wt % ⁇ [Lactic acid] ⁇ 21 wt %) and flattens out again at the highest aqueous lactic acid concentrations measured (21 wt % ⁇ [Lactic acid]).
  • Lines B and D are operating lines and stages for two sources of lactic acid having different initial lactic acid concentrations.
  • the operating line is a measure of the ratio of aqueous phase to organic phase at any stage of the extraction.
  • Operating lines generally become straight when the partitioning solute (lactic acid) is dilute and aqueous phase has very low solubility in the organic phase, and vice versa.
  • Operating lines generally become more curved as the solute becomes more concentrated and as the solubility of the aqueous phase in the organic phase increases, and vice versa.
  • the operating line becomes curved because the weight ratio of the aqueous phase to the organic phase changes rapidly as the source of lactic acid becomes more concentrated.
  • the amount of aqueous phase decreases and the amount of organic phase increases as lactic acid is extracted from the aqueous phase into the organic phase. This is due, in part, to the co-extraction of the aqueous phase into the organic phase along with the lactic acid. Additionally, movement of lactic acid from the aqueous phase into the organic phase increases the mass of the organic phase while decreasing the mass of the aqueous phase.
  • Operating lines B and D are not linear due to the high concentration of lactic acid and the partitioning of water into the organic phase.
  • Line B is the operating line for a source of lactic acid having an initial lactic acid concentration of 60 wt %.
  • Line D is the operating line for a source of lactic acid having an initial lactic acid concentration of 30 wt %. Note that at lower initial lactic acid concentrations (e.g., 30 wt % versus 60 wt %), the operating line becomes more linear.
  • Lines C and E show the stages of a multistage extraction for the extraction of the sources of lactic acid shown in lines B and D, respectively.
  • Each “step” of lines C and D represent one stage of four stage theoretical extraction.
  • a pinch point is located around 10 wt % lactic acid in the aqueous phase.
  • the pinch point in the equilibrium curve tends to result in a decrease in lactic acid recovery because more stages are required.
  • the operating line for the source of lactic acid having a higher initial lactic acid concentration (line B) is curved favorably to reduce the effect of the pinch point.
  • line D the extraction stages become smaller and more frequent
  • line C the extraction stages remain larger and less frequent
  • the process is also suitable for use in connection with a solvent in which the equilibrium curve does not have a pinch point.
  • a solvent in which the equilibrium curve does not have a pinch point.
  • an enhancer like octanol or tributylphosphate is added to the organic solvent, the equilibrium curve tends to become more linear.
  • the process still provides an efficient extraction of lactic acid from a solvent which includes an enhancer.
  • the concentration step provides benefits to the overall process.
  • the concentrating step allows solutions having uniform concentrations to be produced, regardless of the concentration of the source of lactate material. Without a concentration step, subsequent separation steps would have to be designed to process the lowest expected lactic material concentration. With the concentration step, the remaining processes steps can be designed to process a near constant lactate material concentration. Thus, only the clarification and concentration steps need to be flexible enough to handle varying concentrations of lactate material.
  • Both the clarification and concentration steps are easily adapted to process sources of lactate material having a variety of concentrations.
  • the cross-flow filtration step for broth clarification is easily expanded if needed because a large plant is likely to use parallel filtration units and addition of another parallel is relatively inexpensive.
  • Transmembrane pressure, feed fluid velocity, and other operating parameters can also be modified to obtain additional flux through the membrane.
  • many operating parameters can be altered to increase or decrease the amount of water evaporated. For example, the temperature of the heating media can be altered and/or the velocities of the fluid through the heat exchanger can be altered.
  • the concentration step also reduces the amount of material to be processed in the subsequent steps. For example, increasing the lactate material concentration from 10 wt % to 20 wt % decreases the amount of material for further processing by half. That is, a 200 lb solution containing a pre-concentration composition of 90% water (180 lb water) and 10% lactic acid (20 lb) can be concentrated to a 100 lb solution which contains 80% (80 lb) water and 20% (20 lb) lactic acid.
  • the reduced volume of material to be processes substantially reduces equipment costs. Additionally, decreasing the volume of material to be processed reduces heating and cooling costs in subsequent steps.
  • Concentrating the source of lactate material also helps reduce the amount of impurities present in the source of lactate material.
  • impurities in the source of lactate material may be volatile carboxylic acids (e.g. acetic acid), which, in their free acid form, can be removed from the solution by evaporation.
  • Other impurities may have limited water solubility.
  • a contaminating acid may be less water soluble in its salt form (particularly as calcium salts).
  • Other contaminating acids may be less soluble in their free acid form.
  • Such contaminating acid impurities may be precipitated out of solution upon concentration, either prior to acidulation or after acidulation. Consequently, the amount of impurities in the source of lactate material may be reduced.
  • the concentration of lactic acid in the loaded solvent tends to increase as does the concentration of lactic acid in the aqueous solution obtained by back extraction.
  • the costs associated with a final concentration step are typically diminished.
  • increasing the concentration of lactic acid tends to increase the yield of lactic acid obtained during back extraction, particularly when the solvent contains a limited amount or no enhancer. Consequently, loss of lactic acid in the lean solvent is reduced.
  • the source of lactate material is acidulated to convert the lactate material in the source of lactate material from its dissociated or salt form to an undissociated acid form.
  • One method for converting lactate salt in the fermentation broth to free lactic acid is by the addition of a strong mineral acid, such as sulfuric acid, to the concentrated solution.
  • a strong mineral acid such as sulfuric acid
  • sulfuric acid is added to the clarified broth, free lactic acid is formed as well as a sulfate salt.
  • the concentrated solution of lactate material contains calcium lactate such that lactic acid and calcium sulfate (gypsum) are formed upon addition of sulfuric acid. Gypsum is only slightly soluble in water and is easily removed from solution, for example, by crystallization.
  • acidulation is performed under process conditions that favor formation of large calcium sulfate crystals.
  • acidulation is preferably performed while agitating the solution to reduce secondary nucleation.
  • Sulfuric acid is preferably added in a manner that reduces local high superstaturation to reduce primary nucleation. Techniques for making large crystals are known and described, for instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,663,456, incorporated herein by reference.
  • Sulfuric acid added to the clarified fermentation broth at a stoichiometric ratio of sulfuric acid to lactate salt effective to convert lactate salt to lactic acid.
  • the sulfuric acid to lactate salt ratio is between 0.90 and 1.20, preferably between 0.95 and 1.05, and most preferably 0.99 and 1.01. If other carboxylic acids, amino acids or carboxylic acid functional groups are present as impurities, a higher ratio of sulfuric acid to lactate salt may be used to acidulate the impurities as well as the lactic acid.
  • Sulfuric acid is preferably added to the source of lactate material in a single step.
  • sulfuric acid addition is preferably performed in a two step process.
  • a large proportion, for example about 80% to 95%, by volume, of the sulfuric acid is added to the broth and agitated.
  • the slurry of acidified lactic acid and calcium sulfate is then transferred to another tank.
  • sulfuric acid is carefully metered into the system to obtain the desired stoichiometric ratio of sulfuric acid to lactate salt.
  • Sulfuric acid acidulation is suitable for purifying lactic acid from a source of lactate material having a pH within the range of 0.8 to 9.0.
  • a source of lactate material having a low pH the amount of sulfuric acid required tends to decrease.
  • the chemical cost for acidulation tends to decrease.
  • a source of lactate material having a low pH tends to produce less gypsum and thus tends to decrease salt disposal issues.
  • the lactate salt in the clarified source of lactate material may be converted to lactic acid by sulfuric acid acidulation. Addition of sulfuric acid to the clarified broth also results in the production of a sulfate salt. At least some of the sulfate salt, for example, calcium sulfate or gypsum, is removed from the clarified broth to provide a purified lactic acid solution.
  • the amount of sulfate salt present in the source of lactate material is reduced by at least about 10 wt % (by weight of the sulfate salt), preferably by about 50 wt % to about wt % (by weight of the sulfate salt), more preferably by about 90 wt % (by weight of the sulfate salt), most preferably by about 98 wt % (by weight of the sulfate salt), resulting in a solution containing no more than about 5 wt % sulfate salt (by weight of the solution), preferably, no more than about 1 wt % sulfate salt (by weight of the solution).
  • Methods for the filtration of gypsum are known.
  • a rotary drum vacuum filter, belt filter, or press filter can be used to reduce the amount of gypsum present in the broth.
  • Centrifugal separators or decanters can also be used. See, e.g., Fermentation and Biochemical Engineering Handbook: Principles, Process Design, & Equipment , ed. by Vogel and Todaro, Noyes Publications, Westwood, N.J., 1997, Chpt. 6 (filtration) and 12 (centrifugation).
  • residual calcium sulfate e.g., calcium sulfate remaining after gypsum removal
  • at least some of the residual calcium sulfate is removed by additional processing.
  • the amount of residual calcium sulfate is preferably reduced such that the solution then includes no more than about 1 wt % calcium sulfate (by weight of the solution), preferably no more than about 0.5 wt % calcium sulfate (by weight of the solution), most preferably no more than about 0.1 wt % calcium sulfate (by weight of the solution).
  • the residual calcium sulfate can be removed by ion exchange. In an ion exchange process, calcium ions in the lactic acid solution are removed by contact with an ion exchange resin which replaces the calcium ions with hydrogen, sodium or potassium ions.
  • Suitable cation exchange resins include the Amberlite ion exchange resins (Amberlite IR120 for instance) from Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, Pa. and Dowex ion exchange resins (Dowex Marathon C for instance) from The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich.
  • the sulfate can then be removed by an anion exchange process.
  • the sulfate ions are removed by contact with an anion exchange resin which replaces the sulfate with hydroxyl ion.
  • suitable anion exchange resins include Amberlite and Dowex ion exchange resins mentioned above.
  • the amount of residual sulfate can be reduced by a sulfate pre-extraction process.
  • the same organic solvent can be used for both lactic acid extraction and sulfate pre-extraction.
  • the tertiary amine solvents described later in this application are strongly selective towards sulfuric acid over lactic acid. Therefore, the sulfate ion can be extracted from the lactic acid solution by contacting the solution with an organic phase which includes 30 to 80 wt % long chain tertiary amine, 30 to 70 wt % kerosene, and 0 to 20 wt % polar organic enhancer.
  • the amine solution is typically added to the lactic acid solution after calcium ions are removed such that there is about a 1.0:1.5 to 0.8:1.0 molar ratio of tertiary amine to sulfate ion.
  • the organic phase may be washed with a small amount (e.g., about 1 wt % to about 10 wt %) of an aqueous solution to recover co-extracted lactic acid. Then organic solvent can be regenerated by contacting the sulfate loaded solvent with a basic aqueous solution. This is discussed in more detail in the section labeled XV.Lean Solvent Wash.
  • the residual sulfate in the lactic acid solution can be controlled by the amine to sulfate ratio. This is particularly useful because residual sulfate in the lactic acid solution during extraction can function as an enhancer (see Section XII).
  • the amount of residual sulfuric acid can also be reduced during the step of back-extraction. Whereas both sulfuric acid and lactic acid are co-extracted during the amine extraction (see Section XI), only lactic acid is back-extracted in the aqueous back-extraction (see Section XIV) due to the high selectivity of the amine extractant for sulfuric acid.
  • the amount of residual sulfuric acid in the lean solvent can be reduced during a lean solvent wash (see Section XV).
  • Nanofiltration may be able to selectively separate lactic acid from divalent ions like calcium and sulfate. Nanofiltration also tends to remove other high molecular weight impurities like disaccharides and oligosaccharides or thermal decomposition products.
  • Electodialysis could be used to remove the calcium and sulfate. However, electrodialysis tends to work best with monovalent ions.
  • a second concentration step can optionally be performed after acidulation, for example, if a sufficient concentration of lactic acid is not obtained in the first concentration step, for example, due to the presence of insoluble calcium lactate salt.
  • the solution contains mostly lactate material in an acid (undissociated) form.
  • the undissociated acid form of lactate material is more soluble and therefore this concentration step is not limited by the solubility of the lactate salt.
  • the solution of lactic acid is concentrated to about 20 wt % to about 70 wt %, more typically about 40 wt % to about 60 wt % lactic acid. Suitable concentration techniques are described above.
  • the purified lactic acid solution is preferably prepared by extracting the lactic acid solution with a water insoluble amine based solvent, which is also referred to as an amine solvent, organic phase, extractant or extracting solvent.
  • a water insoluble amine based solvent which is also referred to as an amine solvent, organic phase, extractant or extracting solvent.
  • the lactic acid extraction results in the partitioning of lactic in the extractant to form a lactic acid loaded extractant, which is also referred to in the following as loaded amine solvent, loaded extracting solvent, or loaded organic phase.
  • the choice of the extraction solvent is important to the overall efficiency and economics of the separation process.
  • a measure of extraction efficiency is the partition coefficient.
  • the partition coefficient is defined as the equilibrium concentration of lactic acid in the solvent phase divided by the equilibrium concentration of free lactic acid in the aqueous phase.
  • the partition coefficient can be calculated (after equilibration) by the concentration (wt. basis) of lactic acid in the organic phase (extractant) divided by the concentration of the lactic acid in the aqueous phase (phase from which extraction occurs).
  • a partition coefficient greater than 0.5 is generally even more desirable and a partition coefficient greater than 1.0 is generally even better.
  • the partition coefficient is affected by the choice of solvent.
  • extraction efficiency is related to the ability of a system to achieve a combination of high yield, low extractant volume, and concentrated product.
  • extraction is conducted with a water insoluble amine.
  • Use of an amine solvent is preferred due to favorable partitioning of lactic acid and selectivity.
  • the amine is immiscible in water and contains at least 18 carbon atoms.
  • extraction is conducted with a tertiary amines. See for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,771,001; 5,132,456; and 5,510,526; and Shimizu et al, J. of Fermentation and Bioengineering (1996), Vol. 81 pp. 240-246; Yabannavar and Wang, Biotech Bioeng ., (1991) Vol. 37, p. 1095-1100; and, Chen and Lee, Appl. Biochem. Biotech , (1997), Vol. 63-65, pp. 435-447. These six references are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Suitable amines include aliphatic, araliphatic or aromatic amines, or mixed aliphatic-araliphatic or aliphatic-aromatic amines, or mixtures of such amines.
  • amines include triethylamine, dioctylamine, trioctylamine, tridecylamine, methyl didodecylamine and industrial preparations such as Amberlite LA-1 (a dialkyl amine mixture with twelve carbon atoms in each alkyl chain, available from Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, Pa.), Alamine 304 (tridodecylamine, available from Cognis, Tuscon, Ariz., formerly Henkel Corp.), Alamine 308 (a trialkyl mixture of branched chains with a total of 8 carbon atoms on each chain, available from Cognis, Arlington, Ariz.), and Alamine 336 (a mixture of trioctyl ⁇ ; tridecyl ⁇ ; dioc
  • the temperature at which the extraction is performed can vary depending on a number of parameters, including the effect of temperature on the extraction efficiency, viscosity, and the costs cooling the extractant.
  • the extraction is performed at a temperature between about 20° C. and about 70° C., more preferably between about 30° C. and 60° C.
  • Suitable equipment for contacting the two liquid phases includes packed columns, mechanically-agitated columns, perforated plate columns, pulsed columns, mixer/settlers, and centrifugal contactors.
  • the choice of equipment may depend upon the combined flowrates of the two phases, the tendency for emulsion formation, and other operating parameters such as temperature and pressure.
  • the extracting solvent may also preferably contain a hydrocarbon fraction to modify the viscosity, phase coalescence, and other physical properties of the system.
  • a hydrocarbon is kerosene.
  • the IsoPar family of products from Exxon are suitable kerosene products. IsoPar K is particularly preferred.
  • the hydrocarbon is typically (if used at all) included in the extraction solvent at about 1 wt % to about 70 wt %.
  • a preferred solvent system comprises, by wt., 30 wt % to 70 wt % Alamine 304, 0 wt % to 20 wt % polar organic enhancer such as octanol or tributyl phosphate, and 30 wt % to 70 wt % kerosene.
  • a second organic phase may form during the extraction of lactic acid.
  • the second organic phase includes a high concentration of lactic acid.
  • the presence of a second organic phase could cause some operational difficulty.
  • the solvent used for lactic acid extraction may be obtained from another lactic acid process and therefore may contain lactic acid.
  • the solvent from a CO 2 driven process (described above) can be used.
  • the solvent contains a low concentration of lactic acid (e.g., about 1 wt % to about 5 wt %).
  • the solvent may contain some lactic acid, the solvent generally has additional extraction capacity and therefore can be used to extract lactic acid from the acidulated and concentrated solutions. If lactic acid remains in solution, it can be extracted with lean solvent. Alternately, the solution which contains the remaining lactic acid can be recycled, as described below.
  • Integrating the present process with another lactic acid process can reduce solvent flow rates and increase lactic acid concentrations in the solutions obtained by aqueous back extraction (described below).
  • the reduced flow rates can reduce equipment costs, e.g., for lactic acid extraction, back extraction and evaporation, and operating costs, e.g., energy. Integration is particularly attractive in existing lactic acid production facilities because it increases capacity at relatively low cost.
  • the lactic acid extraction may be designed to extract only part of the lactic acid present in the acidulated and concentrated solution, preferably between about 70 wt % and 95 wt % of the lactic acid present in the acidulated and concentrated solution.
  • the extraction raffinate containing the residual lactic acid can then be recycled upstream, preferably prior to a concentration step, and combined with another source of lactate material. Less extraction stages tend to be required when only a part of the lactic acid present in the acidulated and concentrated solution is extracted. Additionally, solvent flow rates and capital costs also tend to be decreased.
  • the raffinate when the raffinate is recycled, a variety of methods can be used to reduce impurities in the system. For example, a fraction of the raffinate can be purged or diverted as a waste stream. Alternately, the lactate in the raffinate can be precipitated as calcium lactate by adding lime to the solution. The calcium lactate can then be separated from the solution which can then be acidulated, preferably by acidulation, described in section VII.
  • the extraction solvent can also include an enhancer to increase the partition coefficient of the lactic acid.
  • Enhancers are especially useful when the free lactic acid concentration in the aqueous phase is low, i.e., less than 15 wt %.
  • lactic acid partitions more strongly into the organic phase in the presence of an enhancer and more strongly into the aqueous phase in the absence of an enhancer.
  • the enhancer is typically selected based on its enhancement strength, volatility, reactivity, or any other property required for extraction efficiency or operating ease.
  • Typical enhancers are polar organic compounds including alcohols, ketones, esters, amides, and other polar organic liquids. A volatile enhancer is preferred because it can be distilled from the loaded solvent prior to aqueous back extraction.
  • FIG. 4 shows the equilibrium concentrations for lactic acid between water and an organic solvent which includes 54 wt % Alamine 304 and 46 wt % IsoPar K at 50° C. with and with out a sulfuric acid. Without sulfuric acid, the equilibrium curve is “S” shaped (line “A” in FIG. 4).
  • Table 2 shows the percent lactic acid recovered in a four theoretical stage extraction of lactic acid using a solvent containing 54 wt % Alamine 304 and 46 wt % IsoPar K at 50° C. for extractions containing 0.1 mol/kg sulfate and no sulfate.
  • the weight ratio of entering organic phase to entering aqueous phase was 2.5.
  • Table 2 shows the greatly increased extraction efficiency upon the use of sulfate as the enhancer.
  • Sulfate as an enhancer has many benefits compared to other enhancers. Most enhancers are polar organic liquids that have some volatility and solubility in an aqueous solvent and may contaminate the lactic acid solution such that additional costs may be incurred in removing the contamination from the solvent. Additionally, most enhancers degrade or become reactive at high temperatures. In contrast, sulfate has excellent thermal and reactive stability.
  • the sulfate enhanced solvent contains between about 0.01 mole/Kg and about 1.0 mole/Kg sulfate, more preferably between about 0.05 mole/Kg and about 0.5 mole/Kg sulfate.
  • polar organic enhancers are not added to the sulfate enhanced solvent such that the amount of polar organic material in the sulfate enhanced solvent is less than about 5 wt %, more preferably less than about 1 wt %.
  • a sulfuric acid loaded solvent can be obtained in a variety of ways.
  • the sulfuric acid loaded solvent can be obtained by adding sulfuric acid directly to the amine based solvent (e.g., the sulfuric acid is not residual sulfuric acid from a prior processing step) prior to or during the step of extracting.
  • the sulfuric acid in the amine based solvent can also be residual sulfuric acid from the acidulation step, particularly if the sulfuric acid is added in excess during the acidulation step.
  • the sulfuric acid in the amine based solvent can be residual sulfuric acid from regenerating a cation exchange resin.
  • the sulfuric acid loaded solvent can be generated in the back-extraction step (as described in section IX). Essentially, lactic acid and sulfuric acid are co-extracted during the organic solvent extraction. However, sulfuric acid tends to be retained in the organic extractant during the aqueous back extraction due to the high selectivity of the organic extractant for sulfuric acid whereas lactic acid tends to be back-extracted during the aqueous back-extraction.
  • the sulfuric acid loaded solvent may be used in a subsequent extraction step with or without further treatment. If desired, the amount of sulfate in the organic solvent can be controlled by a small by-pass around an anion exchange column or by controlling the amount of sulfate removed during solvent wash (discussed later).
  • the amine solvent which includes lactic acid can be referred to as a “loaded” solvent.
  • the loaded amine solvent can be contacted with a minor amount of aqueous solution to reduce the amount of impurities in the solvent.
  • impurities may be co-extracted into the solvent with the lactic acid or introduced by entrainment.
  • impurities include salts, sugars or amino acids.
  • suitable aqueous solutions include water or a dilute solution which includes lactic acid and water.
  • An aqueous solution which includes a small amount (e.g., about 1 wt % to about 10 wt %) lactic acid tends to reduce the amount of lactic acid that back extracts into the aqueous solution.
  • Multiple contacting stages can be used to obtain an organic phase that is virtually free of entrained and extracted impurities.
  • an aqueous solution can be combined with the loaded solvent, and the mixture agitated.
  • the aqueous phase is then separated from the organic phase and removed.
  • Suitable equipment for use in this liquid-liquid contacting step is known.
  • a centrifugal extractor is used to reduce entrainment of the aqueous phase.
  • the increase in purity is typically balanced with the amount of lactic acid back extracted from the organic phase.
  • the ratio of organic phase to aqueous solution can be changed to meet the amount of purification required and may vary depending upon the amount of impurities in the fermentation broth and/or the end use of the purified lactic acid solution.
  • the aqueous solution can be disposed of as wastewater or, more preferably, recycled back into the process. More preferably, the aqueous solution is recycled into the acidified, clarified solution fed to the lactic acid extraction step.
  • the lactic acid is “stripped” from the loaded organic amine based solvent.
  • the solvent may be referred to as a “lean” solvent. Stripping the lactic acid from the solvent can be achieved by a variety of known methods, for example, back extraction, phase-splitting, membrane separation, distillation of the solvent, distillation of the lactic acid product, crystallization of the lactic acid product, and aqueous extraction. These stripping methods are described in detail in WO 99/19290, incorporated by reference herein.
  • a purified lactic acid solution is obtained by extracting the lactic acid from the organic phase into an aqueous phase. Transferring the lactic acid to an immiscible liquid phase, which is relatively inexpensive, allows the amine solvent, which is relatively expensive, to be recycled.
  • the back extraction is performed at a temperature higher than the temperature of the extraction of lactic acid into the organic phase so that the equilibrium partitioning of lactic acid between the amine-based organic phase and water becomes more favorable towards the water, for example, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,275,234 (incorporated by reference herein).
  • An increase in back extraction temperature tends to increase the concentration of extracted acid in the aqueous solution.
  • increased back extraction temperatures may degrade the solvent components and/or the lactic acid. Because the source of lactate material is concentrated prior to extraction and, particularly if the polar organic enhancer content of the solvent is low (e.g., less than about 5 wt %. more preferably less than about 1 wt %), high back extraction temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about 120° C.) are generally not required.
  • the back extraction is performed at a temperature about 20° C. to about 160° C. higher than the temperature of the lactic acid extraction, more typically about 40° C. to about 100° C. higher.
  • the lactic acid extraction is performed at a temperature of about 15° C. to about 60° C. and at atmospheric pressure
  • the subsequent aqueous back extraction is typically performed at a temperature of at least about 70° C., more typically at least about 100° C.
  • the aqueous back extraction is typically performed under pressure, typically using nitrogen.
  • the water used in the aqueous back extraction can also include a basic compound to increase the distribution of lactic acid in the aqueous phase, such as sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, or calcium hydroxide.
  • a basic compound to increase the distribution of lactic acid in the aqueous phase such as sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, or calcium hydroxide.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,771,001 discloses the use of trialkyl tertiary amines in an organic solvent with back extraction into an aqueous phase (with a relatively strong base such as ammonia).
  • a two step back extraction can be performed.
  • the extracted acid from the organic phase is extracted with water to obtain a solution having a concentration of lactic acid greater than 30 wt %.
  • the first step preferably uses only about 1-3 stages and has a ratio of organic phase to aqueous phase greater than 2. This first step generally recovers about 60 wt % to about 90 wt % of the lactic acid from the organic phase.
  • the remaining lactic acid is recovered from the organic phase by contacting the organic phase with a basic solution, such as sodium hydroxide, to obtain a lactate salt, such as sodium lactate.
  • a two step back extraction may be preferred where some lactate salt production is desired and in production facilities which have salt-splitting capabilities.
  • a two step back extraction also tends to have lower capital costs (fewer contacting stages) and operating costs (lower product concentrating costs).
  • the lean organic solvent e.g., the organic solvent from which at least some of the lactic acid has been extracted
  • the solvent is preferably washed to reduce the amount of impurities and then recycled.
  • the solvent eventually emulsifies and becomes unusable.
  • the lean solvent wash the solvent is combined with a solution which includes a base, such as sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide.
  • the lean solvent wash is a caustic (sodium hydroxide) wash, for example, using 5% sodium hydroxide.
  • Impurities such as sulfate and chlorine partition into the basic solution along with amine degradation products.
  • the basic phase is then removed and disposed of as a waste stream. All of the organic phase or just a portion of the organic phase can be run through the lean solvent wash depending upon the amounts of impurities in the solvent, the phase coalescence characteristics, and solvent degradation rates.
  • the caustic wash provides a mechanism for sulfate to be removed from the solvent.
  • the process provides a cost effective method for obtaining a purified lactic acid solution from a source of lactate material such as a fermentation broth.
  • a fermentation broth typically contains substantial amounts of impurities
  • the purified lactic acid solution contains only a minor amount of impurities.
  • a fermentation broth typically contains about 5 g/L to about 40 g/L impurities, such as intact cells, cellular debris, nutrient media including a carbon and nitrogen source, heavy metals, metabolic by products, and inorganic salts.
  • the purified lactic acid solution typically contains no cells or cellular debris and small amounts of impurities.
  • the purified lactic acid solution includes no more than about 1.0 g/L total nitrogen, more preferably no more than about 0.5 g/L total nitrogen and no more than about 1 g/L total carbohydrate, more preferably no more than about 0.5 g/L total carbohydrate.
  • the desired impurity profile of the purified lactic acid solution may vary depending on the desired use of the solution.
  • the purified lactic acid solution contains between about 5 wt % to about 90 wt % lactic acid, more typically between about 10 wt % to about 90 wt % lactic acid, most typically between about 20 wt % to about 50 wt % lactic acid; an aqueous carrier; and no more than about 1.0 g/L to about 5.0 g/L impurities, more preferably no more than about 0.005 g/L to about 1.0 g/L impurities, such as, proteins, carbohydrates, cellular debris, etc . . . .
  • the purity of the purified lactic acid solution can be evaluated using a heated color test (See Example 1).
  • the color of a solution is determined before treatment by measuring the Yellowness Index of the solution.
  • the Yellowness Index value is reflective of the relative purity of a solution.
  • the actual Yellowness Index values for any given lactate material sample and the resulting purified lactic acid solution may vary depending on the composition of the source of lactate material and the operating parameters of the purification process. For instance, many bacterial fermentations require complex nutrient sources that cause Yellowness Index values to be higher than the Yellowness Index values for some yeast or fungi fermentations that do not require complex nutrients.
  • an impure sample such as an unprocessed fermentation broth sample will have a Yellowness Index value of about 30 to about 150, more typically about 40 to about 90.
  • the purified lactic acid solution sample will typically have a Yellowness Index value of about 5 to about 30, more typically about 10 to about 25.
  • the sample is heated at about 140° C. to about 180° C., more preferably about 140° C. to about 160° C. for about 60 minutes to about 180 minutes, more preferably about 100 minutes to about 120 minutes.
  • an impure solution such as an unprocessed fermentation broth sample will have a Yellowness Index value of about 60 to about 300, more typically about 70 to 200.
  • the purified lactic acid solution sample after heat treatment will typically have a Yellowness Index value of about 10 to 150, more typically 10 to 100.
  • the Yellowness Index values for the fermentation broth and the purified lactic acid solution, before and after heat treatment, can be compared.
  • the ratio of the Yellowness Index values for the fermentation broth sample to the purified lactic acid solution sample is about 1.2 to 20.0, more typically 1.5 to 8.0.
  • the purified lactic acid solution is an aqueous solution that is suitable for a variety of end uses.
  • the purified lactic acid solution can be concentrated to form an 88% aqueous solution.
  • the purified lactic acid solution can be used to form lactate esters such as ethyl lactate or stearoyl lactate.
  • the purified lactic acid solution can also be used to form 1,2-propanediol or acrylic acid.
  • the purified lactic acid solution can be further processed to reduce impurities, for example, by cation exchange, anion exchange, ion exclusion chromatography, evaporation, distillation, ultra filtration, nanofiltration, carbon treatment, electrodialysis, adsorption, extraction, and/or combinations thereof.
  • the overall ratio of organic phase to aqueous phase was 0.96 on a volume basis.
  • the loading in the extractant phase was 13.2 wt % lactic acid and the raffinate had a loading of 27.7% lactic acid.
  • the loaded extractant phase was back extracted with deionized water at 100° C.
  • the phase ratio for this operation was O/A of 0.78 on a volume basis.
  • the loading in the aqueous product was 5.0 wt % lactic acid and the loading in the depleted organic stream was 5.7 wt % lactic acid.
  • the method for determining the Yellowness Index uses a Hunter ColorQuest II Sphere colorimeter equipped with a 20 mm cell to measure yellowness index.
  • the instrument is first standardized using a black card and a white tile to set the top and bottom of the neutral axis.
  • the black card is used to simulate total absorption and the white tile is used to simulate total transmitance.
  • the 20 mm sample cell containing the sample is than placed into the sample holder.
  • the calorimeter scans the visible region of the ultraviolet spectrum and calculates the yellowness index base on the tristimulus values (X,Y,Z).
  • the Yellowness Index is determined by integrating the visible region of the ultraviolet transmission spectrum of the sample and referencing it with the visible region of the ultraviolet transmission spectrum of the light source.
  • the APHA Index for the APHA 25 standard should be measured before testing samples to determine method accuracy.
  • Example 2b The procedure described in “Example 2b” was repeated where the amounts of the extractant and that of the lactic acid solution were 3.01 grams and 20.02 grams, respectively. The amount of the H 2 SO 4 solution was increased to 0.311 grams. The results showed that the lactic acid partition coefficient was 0.70 and the concentration of the H 2 SO 4 in the organic phase was about 0.3mol/kg. Again the H 2 SO 4 concentration in the aqueous phases was below detection level.
  • Example2b The procedure described in “Example2b” was repeated where the amounts of the extractant and that of the lactic acid solution were 3.02 grams and 20.01 grams, respectively. The amount of the H 2 SO 4 solution was increased to 0.514 grams. The results showed that the lactic acid partition coefficient was 0.68 and the H 2 SO 4 concentration in the organic phase was about 0.5 mol/kg. Again the H 2 SO 4 concentration in the aqueous phases was below detection level.
  • Example 2 The experiments in Example 2 show that the partition coefficient of lactic acid into the organic phase increases when sulfuric acid is present in the solvent as compared to the solvent without sulfate.
  • Example 3 shows that sulfuric acid does not partition strongly into the aqueous phase during the aqueous back extraction step. In contrast, lactic acid is efficiently back extracted into the aqueous phase.
  • a lactobacillus organism is added to a fermentor containing dextrose as a carbon source.
  • the pH of the fermentor is maintained at 6.0 by the addition of calcium hydroxide as the neutralizing agent.
  • the continuous neutral fermentation of dextrose by the Lactobacillus organism provides 250,000 pounds of fermentation broth per hour.
  • the amount of lactate material in a solution can be represented by the weight percent of lactate material present if it was all in the undissociated or acid form; or the weight percent of lactate material present in the solution if it was all in the dissociated or salt form. Accordingly, when the amount of lactate material was measured as lactic acid, it was determined to be present in the amount of 10 wt % lactic acid. Alternately, when the amount of lactate material was measured as lactate salt (calcium lactate because calcium hydroxide is used as the neutralizing agent) the lactate material was determined to be present in the amount of 12.1 wt % calcium lactate.
  • the fermentation broth is clarified by cross-flow filtration using a 40,000 MWCO polyethersulfone membrane in a tubular configuration.
  • the broth is then filtered by diafiltration to obtain 97% recovery of the calcium lactate.
  • Diafiltration results in net addition of 20,000 pounds per hour water to the product stream.
  • the clarified broth is concentrated using a mechanically recompressed evaporator under a vacuum at an internal temperature below 90° C. The evaporation step removes 120,000 pounds of water per hour. The water can be reused and/or recycled back into the process.
  • a concentrated, clarified broth which includes 16.3 wt % lactate material (measured as lactic acid) is obtained at the rate of 149,091 pounds per hour.
  • a product stream of 13.6 wt % lactic acid from the ion exchange operation at a rate of 173,618 pounds per hour is then concentrated.
  • concentration step 126,563 pounds of water per hour are removed from the product stream to obtain a 50 wt % lactic acid solution at a rate of 47,055 pounds per hour.
  • the 50 wt % solution is contacted with 140,000 pounds of organic solvent per hour.
  • the organic solvent includes 0.67 wt % lactic acid, 0.07 wt % water, and 53.6 wt % Alamine 304 and 45.7 wt % IsoPar K.
  • Four theoretical extraction stages of contacting were performed in a mechanically-agitated extraction column. After the contacting step, an organic phase which includes 14.1 wt % lactic acid at a rate of 164,389 pounds per hour at was separated from the aqueous lactic acid solution. A lactic acid recovery of 94.6% was obtained in the extraction step. No loaded solvent wash was performed.
  • the lactic acid loaded organic phase was contacted with 24,000 pounds of water in an pressurized, mechanically agitated extraction column at 140° C. Four theoretical stages of extraction were achieved to obtain an aqueous product which included 45.3 wt % lactic acid at a rate of 47,840 pounds per hour. About 10% of the solvent stream was contacted with a 5 wt % sodium hydroxide solution at a phase ratio of 30:1 organic to aqueous (by mass).
  • a yeast organism that has been genetically modified to produce lactic acid at a low pH is used in a batch fermentation of a mixed sugar stream. After fermentation is complete (e.g., the mixed sugar stream has been depleted), the broth is added to a holding tank. A continuous stream of fermentation broth is delivered to the downstream processing at a rate of 250,000 pounds per hour. The fermentation broth includes 8 wt % lactic acid and 2 wt % calcium lactate. The fermentation broth is clarified using a ceramic membrane with a 0.1 micron pore size. Proteins are then removed from the broth using a 10,000 MWCO polyethersulfone membrane in a spiral wound configuration. Diafiltration for both ultrafiltration processes adds an additional 25,000 pounds of water to the product stream per hour.
  • the resulting clarified broth is concentrated using a multi-effect evaporator under vacuum. All effects are operated at a temperature below 95° C.
  • the evaporation step removes 155,000 pounds of water per hour.
  • the water is suitable for recycle or reuse.
  • a concentrated broth that includes about 16.2 wt % lactate material is obtained at a rate of 139,031 pounds per hour.
  • the acidulated lactic acid stream is sent to a cation exchange process which replaces the calcium with protons.
  • the ion exchange operation reduces the residual calcium in the acidulated lactic acid stream to 5 ppm with a lactic acid recovery of 99%.
  • An additional 10,000 pound of water per hour is added to the product stream by the cation exchange process.
  • a product stream containing 14.8 wt % lactic acid is obtained at a rate of 148,998 pounds per hour from the cation exchange operation. This product stream is sent to the concentration step. In the concentration step, 93,805 pounds of water are removed from the product stream per hour to obtain a 40 wt % lactic acid solution at a rate of 55,194 pounds per hour.
  • the 40 wt % solution is contacted with 140,000 pounds of organic solvent per hour to form a solution which includes 0.6 wt % lactic acid, 0.06 wt % water, 53.6 wt % Alamine 304 and 45.7 wt % IsoPar K.
  • Four theoretical extraction stages are performed in a mechanically-agitated extraction column. After the contacting, an organic phase including 13.5 wt % lactic acid is separated from the aqueous lactic acid solution at a rate of 163,356 pounds per hour. A lactic acid recovery of 96.3% is obtained in the extraction step. No loaded solvent wash is performed.
  • the lactic acid loaded organic phase is contacted with 24,000 pounds of water in a pressurized, mechanically agitated extraction column at 140° C. Four theoretical stages of separation are performed to obtain an aqueous product which includes 44.7 wt % lactic acid at a rate of 47,174 pounds per hour. About 10% of the solvent stream is contacted with a 5 wt % sodium hydroxide solution at an organic to aqueous phase ratio of 30:1 by mass.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Heterocyclic Compounds That Contain Two Or More Ring Oxygen Atoms (AREA)
US09/412,085 1999-10-04 1999-10-04 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution Abandoned US20020102672A1 (en)

Priority Applications (11)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/412,085 US20020102672A1 (en) 1999-10-04 1999-10-04 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution
CNB008137102A CN1174953C (zh) 1999-10-04 2000-10-03 生产纯化乳酸溶液的方法
PCT/US2000/027200 WO2001025180A1 (en) 1999-10-04 2000-10-03 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution
AU11906/01A AU1190601A (en) 1999-10-04 2000-10-03 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution
JP2001528130A JP2003511360A (ja) 1999-10-04 2000-10-03 精製乳酸溶液の製造方法
EP00973399A EP1220828A1 (en) 1999-10-04 2000-10-03 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution
BR0014510-6A BR0014510A (pt) 1999-10-04 2000-10-03 Processo para produção de uma solução de ácido láctico purificada
KR1020027004319A KR20020040833A (ko) 1999-10-04 2000-10-03 정제된 젖산용액의 제조방법
ZA200203508A ZA200203508B (en) 1999-10-04 2002-05-03 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution.
US10/162,935 US7026145B2 (en) 1999-10-04 2002-06-04 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution
HK03101166.3A HK1048985B (zh) 1999-10-04 2003-02-18 生產純化乳酸溶液的方法

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/412,085 US20020102672A1 (en) 1999-10-04 1999-10-04 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/162,935 Continuation US7026145B2 (en) 1999-10-04 2002-06-04 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020102672A1 true US20020102672A1 (en) 2002-08-01

Family

ID=23631553

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/412,085 Abandoned US20020102672A1 (en) 1999-10-04 1999-10-04 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution
US10/162,935 Expired - Fee Related US7026145B2 (en) 1999-10-04 2002-06-04 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/162,935 Expired - Fee Related US7026145B2 (en) 1999-10-04 2002-06-04 Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (2) US20020102672A1 (ja)
EP (1) EP1220828A1 (ja)
JP (1) JP2003511360A (ja)
KR (1) KR20020040833A (ja)
CN (1) CN1174953C (ja)
AU (1) AU1190601A (ja)
BR (1) BR0014510A (ja)
HK (1) HK1048985B (ja)
WO (1) WO2001025180A1 (ja)
ZA (1) ZA200203508B (ja)

Cited By (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040116740A1 (en) * 2000-09-15 2004-06-17 Jan Van Krieken Method for the purification of alpha-hydroxy acid on an industrial scale
US20080254165A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2008-10-16 Rashid Patel Novel manufacturing process for milk acid
US20090318713A1 (en) * 2008-06-12 2009-12-24 Ktanton Ltd. Process for manufacturing a cyclic diester of an a-hydroxy acid
US7674941B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2010-03-09 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US20100113806A1 (en) * 2006-12-13 2010-05-06 Wajc Samuel J Production of cyclic diesters of alpha-hydroxyacids
US20100273224A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2010-10-28 Uhde Gmbh Production of lactic acid by way of fermentation and extraction of amines
US7838708B2 (en) 2001-06-20 2010-11-23 Grt, Inc. Hydrocarbon conversion process improvements
US7847139B2 (en) 2003-07-15 2010-12-07 Grt, Inc. Hydrocarbon synthesis
US7880041B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2011-02-01 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Process for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US20110028710A1 (en) * 2008-04-08 2011-02-03 Hcl Cleantech Ltd. Process for the recovery of hcl from a dilute solution thereof and extractant composition for use therein
US7883568B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2011-02-08 Grt, Inc. Separation of light gases from halogens
US7964764B2 (en) 2003-07-15 2011-06-21 Grt, Inc. Hydrocarbon synthesis
US7998438B2 (en) 2007-05-24 2011-08-16 Grt, Inc. Zone reactor incorporating reversible hydrogen halide capture and release
US8008535B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2011-08-30 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Process for converting gaseous alkanes to olefins and liquid hydrocarbons
US8053616B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2011-11-08 Grt, Inc. Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons
WO2012055997A1 (en) 2010-10-28 2012-05-03 Total S.A. Process for polylactic acid production using monascus
US8173851B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2012-05-08 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US8198495B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2012-06-12 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for the staged synthesis of alkyl bromides
US8273929B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2012-09-25 Grt, Inc. Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons
US8282810B2 (en) 2008-06-13 2012-10-09 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Bromine-based method and system for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons using electrolysis for bromine recovery
US8367884B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2013-02-05 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for the staged synthesis of alkyl bromides
WO2013028955A1 (en) * 2011-08-24 2013-02-28 Red Shield Acquisitions, Llc D/B/A Old Town Fuel & Fiber System and method for conditioning a hardwood pulp liquid hydrolysale
US8436220B2 (en) 2011-06-10 2013-05-07 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for demethanization of brominated hydrocarbons
US8642822B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2014-02-04 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons using microchannel reactor
US8802908B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2014-08-12 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for separate, parallel methane and higher alkanes' bromination
US8815050B2 (en) 2011-03-22 2014-08-26 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for drying liquid bromine
US8829256B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-09-09 Gtc Technology Us, Llc Processes and systems for fractionation of brominated hydrocarbons in the conversion of natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons
US9056946B2 (en) 2010-06-17 2015-06-16 Hitachi Zosen Corporation Method for producing polylactic acid
US9115467B2 (en) 2010-08-01 2015-08-25 Virdia, Inc. Methods and systems for solvent purification
US9193641B2 (en) 2011-12-16 2015-11-24 Gtc Technology Us, Llc Processes and systems for conversion of alkyl bromides to higher molecular weight hydrocarbons in circulating catalyst reactor-regenerator systems
US9206093B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2015-12-08 Gtc Technology Us, Llc Process for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US9663836B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2017-05-30 Virdia, Inc. Methods and systems for processing sugar mixtures and resultant compositions
CN114014836A (zh) * 2021-12-16 2022-02-08 内蒙古久泰新材料有限公司 环状交酯的纯化方法
CN114591164A (zh) * 2022-01-29 2022-06-07 安徽丰原发酵技术工程研究有限公司 一种乳酸的纯化方法

Families Citing this family (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1294728B1 (it) 1997-09-12 1999-04-12 Biopolo S C A R L Ceppi di lievito per la riproduzione di acido lattico
US20020102672A1 (en) * 1999-10-04 2002-08-01 Joseph Mizrahi Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution
CA2414012A1 (en) * 2000-05-30 2001-12-06 Birgir Norddahl Method for producing lactic acid
US6632966B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2003-10-14 Purac Biochem B.V. Method for the preparation of lactic acid and calcium sulphate dihydrate
ES2256509T3 (es) * 2001-08-24 2006-07-16 Purac Biochem B.V. Metodo para la preparacion de acido lactico y dihidrato de sulfato de calcio.
US7009281B2 (en) * 2003-03-14 2006-03-07 Lam Corporation Small volume process chamber with hot inner surfaces
US7507561B2 (en) * 2004-05-20 2009-03-24 Reliance Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. Process for the production of polylactic acid (PLA) from renewable feedstocks
EP1929009A2 (en) 2005-09-22 2008-06-11 Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. Improved strains for the production of organic acids
CN101410526B (zh) * 2006-03-29 2015-08-12 生物能源株式会社 来自乳酸发酵液的乳酸成分的分离方法和分离部件
CN101506371B (zh) * 2006-07-05 2012-12-12 詹森药业有限公司 制备金属纳米颗粒的方法
CN101688224A (zh) 2007-06-29 2010-03-31 东丽株式会社 乳酸的制造方法
GB0800081D0 (en) * 2008-01-04 2008-02-13 Univ Gent Silver nanoparticles with specific surface area and/or isoelectric point and a method for producing them
WO2010003534A1 (de) * 2008-07-11 2010-01-14 Uhde Gmbh Isolierung von organischen säuren aus fermenterbrühe mit hilfe chromatographischer methoden
KR102237801B1 (ko) * 2009-06-04 2021-04-07 게노마티카 인코포레이티드 발효액 성분들의 분리 방법
CN101967091A (zh) * 2009-07-28 2011-02-09 凯发知识产权资源私人有限公司 用于有机酸提纯的方法
CA2778818A1 (en) * 2009-10-26 2011-05-05 University Of Maine System Board Of Trustees Production of lactic acid from hemicellulose extracts
JPWO2012081112A1 (ja) * 2010-12-16 2014-05-22 株式会社日立製作所 精製乳酸溶液の製造方法
JP2012162471A (ja) * 2011-02-04 2012-08-30 Nippon Shokubai Co Ltd アクリル酸およびその重合体の製造方法
JP2013043860A (ja) 2011-08-24 2013-03-04 Hitachi Plant Technologies Ltd 精製乳酸の製造方法
WO2013109143A1 (en) * 2012-01-18 2013-07-25 Stichting Public Private Partnership Institute For Sustainable Process Technology Extraction of carboxylic acids from a dilute aqueous stream
WO2013192451A1 (en) * 2012-06-20 2013-12-27 Opx Biotechnologies, Inc. Dehydration of 3-hydroxypropionic acid to acrylic acid
SG11201501013PA (en) 2012-08-10 2015-04-29 Opx Biotechnologies Inc Microorganisms and methods for the production of fatty acids and fatty acid derived products
NZ706072A (en) 2013-03-08 2018-12-21 Xyleco Inc Equipment protecting enclosures
WO2014146026A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Opx Biotechnologies, Inc. Bioproduction of chemicals
BR112016001026A2 (pt) 2013-07-19 2017-10-24 Cargill Inc organismo geneticamente modificado
US11408013B2 (en) 2013-07-19 2022-08-09 Cargill, Incorporated Microorganisms and methods for the production of fatty acids and fatty acid derived products
GB201315929D0 (en) * 2013-09-06 2013-10-23 Plaxica Ltd Lactate production process
EP2993228B1 (en) 2014-09-02 2019-10-09 Cargill, Incorporated Production of fatty acid esters
CN105693503A (zh) * 2016-03-15 2016-06-22 滨州市华康梦之缘生物科技有限公司 一种提取高光学纯度d-乳酸的方法
CN106244638B (zh) * 2016-07-29 2020-01-07 河南金丹乳酸科技股份有限公司 一种生物质循环发酵生产乳酸的综合利用工艺
WO2018089971A1 (en) * 2016-11-14 2018-05-17 Lygos, Inc. Process for purification of malonic acid from fermentation broth
JP2020506702A (ja) 2017-02-02 2020-03-05 カーギル インコーポレイテッド Ｃ６−ｃ１０脂肪酸誘導体を生成する遺伝子組み換え細胞
CN107857700B (zh) * 2017-12-11 2022-04-12 南京大学扬州化学化工研究院 一种1,2-丙二醇氧化制乳酸的产物分离工艺
CN109503352A (zh) * 2018-12-04 2019-03-22 桂林理工大学 一种从乙酸盐溶液中回收乙酸和分离其他元素的方法
JP2023524744A (ja) * 2020-05-04 2023-06-13 大塚製薬株式会社 無水乳酸を合成する方法
CN114380683A (zh) * 2021-12-21 2022-04-22 安徽丰原发酵技术工程研究有限公司 一种从含乳酸钙的发酵液中提取乳酸的方法
CN114409529A (zh) * 2022-01-30 2022-04-29 安徽丰原发酵技术工程研究有限公司 一种从乳酸聚合物中回收乳酸的方法

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1906068A (en) * 1931-03-02 1933-04-25 Grasselli Chemical Co Lactic acid
US2712516A (en) * 1950-06-17 1955-07-05 Corn Prod Refining Co Method of treating steep liquor
IL39710A (en) * 1972-06-19 1975-04-25 Imi Inst For Res & Dev Recovery of acids from aqueous solutions by solvent extraction
IL57024A (en) * 1979-04-09 1982-03-31 Yissum Appl Eng Syst Process for the separation of a strong mineral acid from an aqueous solution
US4334095A (en) * 1980-10-06 1982-06-08 Miles Laboratories, Inc. Extraction of organic acids from aqueous solutions
US4771001A (en) * 1986-03-27 1988-09-13 Neurex Corp. Production of lactic acid by continuous fermentation using an inexpensive raw material and a simplified method of lactic acid purification
AT398982B (de) * 1993-02-18 1995-02-27 Vogelbusch Gmbh Verfahren zur abtrennung und reinigung von milchsäure
US5510526A (en) * 1993-06-29 1996-04-23 Cargill, Incorporated Lactic acid production, separation and/or recovery process
US5426219A (en) * 1993-07-26 1995-06-20 A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co. Process for recovering organic acids
IL109003A (en) 1994-03-16 1999-09-22 Yissum Res Dev Co Process and extractant composition for extracting water-soluble carboxylic and mineral acids
IL109724A (en) * 1994-05-23 1999-11-30 Innova Sa Recovery of carboxylic acid from organic solution that contains an amine and an extraction enhancer
IL110206A (en) * 1994-07-04 1996-10-16 Innova Sa Recovery of carboxylic acid from organic solution that contains an amine and an extraction enhancer
US5814498A (en) * 1996-04-29 1998-09-29 Archer Daniels Midland Company Process for the recovery of organic acids and ammonia from their salts
IL119387A (en) * 1996-10-09 2001-06-14 Cargill Inc Process for the recovery of lactic acid by liquid-liquid extraction with a basic extractant
US5766439A (en) * 1996-10-10 1998-06-16 A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co. Production and recovery of organic acids
BE1011197A3 (fr) 1997-06-06 1999-06-01 Brussels Biotech En Abrege Bb Procede de purification d'acide lactique.
US6229046B1 (en) * 1997-10-14 2001-05-08 Cargill, Incorported Lactic acid processing methods arrangements and products
US20020102672A1 (en) * 1999-10-04 2002-08-01 Joseph Mizrahi Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution

Cited By (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7002039B2 (en) * 2000-09-15 2006-02-21 Purac Biochem B.V. Method for the purification of an alpha-hydroxy acid on an industrial scale
US20040116740A1 (en) * 2000-09-15 2004-06-17 Jan Van Krieken Method for the purification of alpha-hydroxy acid on an industrial scale
US7838708B2 (en) 2001-06-20 2010-11-23 Grt, Inc. Hydrocarbon conversion process improvements
US8415512B2 (en) 2001-06-20 2013-04-09 Grt, Inc. Hydrocarbon conversion process improvements
US7964764B2 (en) 2003-07-15 2011-06-21 Grt, Inc. Hydrocarbon synthesis
US7847139B2 (en) 2003-07-15 2010-12-07 Grt, Inc. Hydrocarbon synthesis
US8232441B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2012-07-31 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Process for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US7674941B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2010-03-09 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US7880041B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2011-02-01 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Process for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US8173851B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2012-05-08 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US8642822B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2014-02-04 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons using microchannel reactor
US9206093B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2015-12-08 Gtc Technology Us, Llc Process for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons
US8008535B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2011-08-30 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Process for converting gaseous alkanes to olefins and liquid hydrocarbons
US8053616B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2011-11-08 Grt, Inc. Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons
US7883568B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2011-02-08 Grt, Inc. Separation of light gases from halogens
US20100113806A1 (en) * 2006-12-13 2010-05-06 Wajc Samuel J Production of cyclic diesters of alpha-hydroxyacids
US8921625B2 (en) 2007-02-05 2014-12-30 Reaction35, LLC Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons
US20080254165A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2008-10-16 Rashid Patel Novel manufacturing process for milk acid
US7998438B2 (en) 2007-05-24 2011-08-16 Grt, Inc. Zone reactor incorporating reversible hydrogen halide capture and release
US20100273224A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2010-10-28 Uhde Gmbh Production of lactic acid by way of fermentation and extraction of amines
US20110028710A1 (en) * 2008-04-08 2011-02-03 Hcl Cleantech Ltd. Process for the recovery of hcl from a dilute solution thereof and extractant composition for use therein
US20090318713A1 (en) * 2008-06-12 2009-12-24 Ktanton Ltd. Process for manufacturing a cyclic diester of an a-hydroxy acid
US8282810B2 (en) 2008-06-13 2012-10-09 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Bromine-based method and system for converting gaseous alkanes to liquid hydrocarbons using electrolysis for bromine recovery
US8273929B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2012-09-25 Grt, Inc. Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons
US8415517B2 (en) 2008-07-18 2013-04-09 Grt, Inc. Continuous process for converting natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons
US8367884B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2013-02-05 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for the staged synthesis of alkyl bromides
US9133078B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2015-09-15 Gtc Technology Us, Llc Processes and systems for the staged synthesis of alkyl bromides
US8198495B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2012-06-12 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for the staged synthesis of alkyl bromides
US9056946B2 (en) 2010-06-17 2015-06-16 Hitachi Zosen Corporation Method for producing polylactic acid
US9115467B2 (en) 2010-08-01 2015-08-25 Virdia, Inc. Methods and systems for solvent purification
US11242650B2 (en) 2010-08-01 2022-02-08 Virdia, Llc Methods and systems for solvent purification
US10240217B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2019-03-26 Virdia, Inc. Methods and systems for processing sugar mixtures and resultant compositions
US9663836B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2017-05-30 Virdia, Inc. Methods and systems for processing sugar mixtures and resultant compositions
WO2012055997A1 (en) 2010-10-28 2012-05-03 Total S.A. Process for polylactic acid production using monascus
US8815050B2 (en) 2011-03-22 2014-08-26 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for drying liquid bromine
US8436220B2 (en) 2011-06-10 2013-05-07 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for demethanization of brominated hydrocarbons
US8829256B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-09-09 Gtc Technology Us, Llc Processes and systems for fractionation of brominated hydrocarbons in the conversion of natural gas to liquid hydrocarbons
WO2013028955A1 (en) * 2011-08-24 2013-02-28 Red Shield Acquisitions, Llc D/B/A Old Town Fuel & Fiber System and method for conditioning a hardwood pulp liquid hydrolysale
US9228243B2 (en) 2011-08-24 2016-01-05 Red Shield Acquistion, LLC System and method for conditioning a hardwood pulp liquid hydrolysate
US8802908B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2014-08-12 Marathon Gtf Technology, Ltd. Processes and systems for separate, parallel methane and higher alkanes' bromination
US9193641B2 (en) 2011-12-16 2015-11-24 Gtc Technology Us, Llc Processes and systems for conversion of alkyl bromides to higher molecular weight hydrocarbons in circulating catalyst reactor-regenerator systems
CN114014836A (zh) * 2021-12-16 2022-02-08 内蒙古久泰新材料有限公司 环状交酯的纯化方法
CN114591164A (zh) * 2022-01-29 2022-06-07 安徽丰原发酵技术工程研究有限公司 一种乳酸的纯化方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20030004375A1 (en) 2003-01-02
US7026145B2 (en) 2006-04-11
AU1190601A (en) 2001-05-10
ZA200203508B (en) 2003-07-30
HK1048985B (zh) 2005-09-02
CN1174953C (zh) 2004-11-10
KR20020040833A (ko) 2002-05-30
EP1220828A1 (en) 2002-07-10
CN1377335A (zh) 2002-10-30
WO2001025180A1 (en) 2001-04-12
BR0014510A (pt) 2002-06-11
HK1048985A1 (en) 2003-04-25
JP2003511360A (ja) 2003-03-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7026145B2 (en) Process for producing a purified lactic acid solution
US6229046B1 (en) Lactic acid processing methods arrangements and products
JP6321743B2 (ja) 発酵ブロスの成分を分離する方法
EP2534252B1 (en) Process for manufacturing lactic acid
EP0711269A4 (ja)
RU2631503C2 (ru) Испытание качества полимеризуемой молочной кислоты и способ его осуществления
US9162965B2 (en) Method for producing a lactic ester from a fermentation juice containing ammonium lactate
CN109879752A (zh) 一种从乳酸发酵液获得乳酸酯的方法
CN116262696A (zh) 一种从有机酸盐发酵液中分离有机酸的方法
Wei et al. Study on recovery and purification of l-lactic acid
MXPA00003607A (en) Lactic acid processing;methods;arrangements;and, products

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CARGILL DOW POLYMERS, LLC, MINNESOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MIZRAHI, JOSEPH;EYAL, AHARON;RIKI, CANARI;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:010441/0945;SIGNING DATES FROM 19991013 TO 19991027

AS Assignment

Owner name: CARGILL DOW LLC, MINNESOTA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:CARGILL DOW POLYMERS LLC;REEL/FRAME:012139/0314

Effective date: 20000601

AS Assignment

Owner name: CSM NV, NETHERLANDS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CARGILL DOW LLC;REEL/FRAME:015338/0792

Effective date: 20030718

Owner name: CARGILL INCORPORATED, MINNESOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CARGILL DOW LLC;REEL/FRAME:015338/0792

Effective date: 20030718

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION