EP3682070B1 - Support redondant et système de fixation redondant pour des vitres de façade collées - Google Patents

Support redondant et système de fixation redondant pour des vitres de façade collées Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3682070B1
EP3682070B1 EP18772752.4A EP18772752A EP3682070B1 EP 3682070 B1 EP3682070 B1 EP 3682070B1 EP 18772752 A EP18772752 A EP 18772752A EP 3682070 B1 EP3682070 B1 EP 3682070B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bonding
adhesive
bond
pane
redundant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP18772752.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3682070A1 (fr
Inventor
Barbara Siebert
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP3682070A1 publication Critical patent/EP3682070A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3682070B1 publication Critical patent/EP3682070B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F13/00—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings
    • E04F13/07—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor
    • E04F13/08—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor composed of a plurality of similar covering or lining elements
    • E04F13/0885—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor composed of a plurality of similar covering or lining elements specially adapted for being adhesively fixed to the wall; Fastening means therefor; Fixing by means of plastics materials hardening after application
    • E04F13/0887—Adhesive means specially adapted therefor, e.g. adhesive foils or strips
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04—BUILDING
    • E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
    • E04F13/00—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings
    • E04F13/07—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor
    • E04F13/08—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor composed of a plurality of similar covering or lining elements
    • E04F13/14—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor composed of a plurality of similar covering or lining elements stone or stone-like materials, e.g. ceramics concrete; of glass or with an outer layer of stone or stone-like materials or glass
    • E04F13/145—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor composed of a plurality of similar covering or lining elements stone or stone-like materials, e.g. ceramics concrete; of glass or with an outer layer of stone or stone-like materials or glass with an outer layer of glass

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a redundant pane holder and such a holding system for exclusively glued panes of a facade cladding in construction, in particular for glass panes, with a first bond of the pane to a structure which bears the dead weight of the panes and loads on the panes from other influences on the structure, and a second bond which, if the first bond fails, completely takes over the dead weight and the loads and transfers them to the structure.
  • the invention also relates to a redundant pane holder and such a holding system for glued panes of a facade cladding in construction with a mechanical holding device for a pane to a structure which bears the dead weight of the pane to the structure, with a first bond which bears loads on the pane from other influences on the structure, and a second bond which, if the first bond fails, takes over the loads from other influences and transfers them to the structure.
  • Adhesive joints are an economical alternative to mechanical fastening of facade panes.
  • the advantage is that they evenly transfer the load via the adhesive joints into the substructure, without generating stress peaks in the facade panes through holes or recesses.
  • load-bearing bonded glass constructions may only be used with additional mechanical securing devices that safely transfer the load in the event of bonding failure.
  • the "Guideline for European Technical Approval for Bonded Glass Constructions" (ETAG 002) provides several options for designing so-called SSG facades (structural sealant glazing), i.e. glass facades supported by adhesives, for load transfer of the dead weight and for holding devices to reduce the risk of bonding failure.
  • Panels are flat elements with a significantly greater length and width in relation to their thickness. They can be facade panels made of metal, plastic, fiber cement or similar and preferably made of glass. Beyond the scope of the regulations of ETAG 002, inclined or horizontal installation is also conceivable, the latter for example for suspended ceilings and light ceilings.
  • the adhesives can be point-based, linear or flat and hold the panes to a structure, for example a supporting frame, which in turn is attached to a substructure.
  • the first bond is usually a bond that is structurally loaded from the start, while the second bond initially remains largely unloaded.
  • the pane shifts until the second bond fully takes over the loads from the dead weight and from the other influences.
  • the shift leads to a change in the position of the pane that can be optically detected without the need for tools, in order to provide an indication of the failure of the first bond and thus of the need for maintenance.
  • the individual panes of glass are double-glued according to the redundancy principle. They are attached in a line to aluminum profiles, which in turn are attached to a substructure. The connection between the aluminum profiles and the panes of glass is made using load-bearing silicone bonds.
  • the panes of glass are attached using at least two independent adhesive joints in two levels. The first level is where the primary joint is supported. The second level, the support in a secondary joint, is offset inwards and is normally load-free.
  • unloaded Z-profiles are initially glued to the panes of glass.
  • the secondary joint is activated if the primary joint fails.
  • the pane of glass then sinks by a maximum of 9 mm, and the additionally glued Z-profiles hook behind the aluminum profile.
  • the defective bonding of the primary joint is therefore visible externally by an offset of the panes of glass in the joint area.
  • the secondary joint takes over the load transfer of the glazing until it is replaced, thus eliminating any potential danger to people.
  • the EP 1 873 344 A1 relates to an adhesive composite for fastening a metallic holder to a pane, wherein the holder and the pane are bonded together via a (meth)acrylate adhesive which is completely coated with a silicone sealant.
  • the glazing In order to ensure that in the event of fire, a frameless glazing arranged on a facade profile does not fall off the facade elements as a whole, the glazing must be installed in accordance with the DE 38 08 978 A1 connected to the facade elements via areas made of a highly heat-resistant elastic sealant. These areas ensure that the glazing is held to the facade until the panes of the glazing shatter due to the effects of heat.
  • the object of the invention is to provide alternative designs for redundant disc holders.
  • both the first and the second adhesive bond can, according to the invention, carry the entire dead weight of a pane and its loads from the other effects on the structure.
  • they differ in terms of their behavior in that they have different deformation behavior under load, in particular different deformation paths. This means that the adhesive bond with the smaller deformation path initially takes on the main load, while the other adhesive bond remains under considerably less load.
  • the second adhesive bond takes on the full load including additional effects. Due to its greater deformation path under load, the displacement path of the pane also occurs, which visually indicates a need for maintenance.
  • the invention therefore avoids arranging two bondings, one of which is completely unloaded and the other fully loaded, and the load is transferred almost suddenly to the previously unloaded bonding in the event of failure.
  • the sudden load transfer is based on a constructive load differentiation, according to which the temporally different loading of the first and second bondings occurs through the bonding of initially unloaded Z-profiles.
  • the invention rather follows the principle of making a physical or chemical load differentiation instead of a constructive one, according to which in the normal state the first bonding is more heavily loaded and the second bonding less heavily loaded, but both bonds are structurally simultaneously are involved. This means that if the first bond fails, the second bond also takes on the full loads from its own weight and additional effects, but does not have to absorb any dynamic loads resulting from the failure of the first bond.
  • a second bond when mentioned according to the invention, this should also include several second bonds.
  • a third and fourth redundant bond can also be present, each designed in the sense of the second bond described above and the one described below.
  • a second bond is mentioned in the following description, which does not exclude the arrangement of a third and further bonds. This can further increase the security of the window holder.
  • the different deformation paths of the first bond and the second bond can be created physically or chemically.
  • a first adhesive can be used for the first bond and a different second adhesive for the second bond, whereby the first adhesive has a higher rigidity in the cured state than the second adhesive.
  • the load differentiation or the different deformation paths can therefore be achieved by the composition of the adhesives or by choosing different adhesives for the first and second bond.
  • the stiffer adhesive initially takes on the majority of the loads from its own weight and other influences, whereas the second bond initially remains under significantly less load.
  • the window holder according to the invention thus offers a very simple assembly, where only the use of two different adhesives in otherwise identical conditions has to be ensured. The low complexity leads to a low susceptibility to errors and thus to a reliably functioning assembly of the window holder.
  • the use of different adhesives can also take into account the probability of failure, for example as a result of aggressive media, since the sensitivity of the adhesives can be selected differently for this. While the first bond may be less susceptible and thus highly durable, the second bond may have a more sensitive and thus, for example, more cost-effective or easier to process adhesive. A more sensitive adhesive would be conceivable because after a maintenance requirement is indicated, the service life of the adhesive is expected to be shorter anyway. second bonding is to be expected. In principle, doubts about the behavior of different adhesives in the face of aggressive environmental influences can be more easily countered by using different materials with different sensitivities. If one adhesive actually fails, for example due to UV radiation or water exposure, the other UV- or water-insensitive adhesive can still be available. The use of different adhesives therefore offers additional redundancy at the material level in addition to the static level.
  • the first bond can have a smaller material thickness of the adhesive than the material thickness of the adhesive of the second bond.
  • the material or application thickness of the adhesive is to be considered orthogonal to the pane surface, whereas both the respective contact surface of the adhesives in the pane plane and in the construction plane, as well as the adhesive itself, can be identical for the first bond and the second bond.
  • no different adhesives are required, which could possibly lead to confusion and thus to incorrect assembly, but rather it is based on the same adhesive.
  • the only thing to note is the different material thickness, which distinguishes the first bond from the second bond. In the case of a flat panel to be fastened, the difference in material thickness must be structurally provided on the side of the construction, i.e.
  • Ensuring different deformation paths using different material thicknesses represents a physical stress differentiation between the first bond and the second bond.
  • the two principles of chemical and physical stress differentiation can also be used in combination, so that adhesives with different stiffness as well as bonds with different material thicknesses can be used to further support the inventive effect of different deformation paths.
  • the object of the invention can also be implemented by a redundant holding system with a holder or the adhesives according to one of the embodiments described above, which comprises a carrier with an adhesive surface for receiving adhesive of an adhesive bond, wherein the carrier is designed to be arranged and fastened between the structure and the pane.
  • the carrier has interfaces for fastening to the structure, for example screw holes, welding surfaces or the like, which are generally arranged opposite the largely flat adhesive surface on the carrier. It therefore offers a defined adhesive surface which is optimized for an adhesive bond, for example in terms of its area and/or its surface.
  • the carrier can also carry either just one of the two adhesive bonds or both adhesive bonds. If it only carries one adhesive bond, at least two carriers must be provided for each adhesive point.
  • the carrier can have a stepped adhesive surface with a first adhesive surface for the first bond and a second adhesive surface offset parallel to it for the second bond.
  • the extent of the parallel offset of the two adhesive surfaces on the carrier to one another can define the difference in the application thickness of the first and second bond according to the above mounting with physical load differentiation. If the first and second bonding are carried out with the same adhesive, they differ essentially in a difference in the application thickness, which can already be defined in the carrier at the factory.
  • the holding system can thus define the essential parameters of the first and second bonding so that assembly errors are excluded as far as possible.
  • the carrier can therefore specify a predefined and largely confusion-free assembly of the panes.
  • the redundant holding system can have one or both adhesive bonds encapsulated against environmental influences.
  • Relevant environmental influences can be, for example, sunlight, acid rain, air humidity or the like, which can age an adhesive bond and put a strain on its load-bearing capacity and durability or can also contribute to its hardening.
  • the encapsulation can prevent damaging influences and thus significantly increase the service life of the holding system.
  • the encapsulation can allow air to enter and balance moisture, which can also ensure that condensation is removed.
  • the first bond can be encapsulated so that the first bond is protected and the second bond can be exposed to a post-curing influence, such as humidity or UV exposure.
  • a post-curing influence such as humidity or UV exposure.
  • the bonding can be encapsulated structurally by surrounding the bonding with a rigid or elastic casing during assembly or afterwards.
  • the encapsulation of one bond for example the second bond
  • the first bond can surround the second bond in a ring-like manner. As long as the first bond is intact, it also protects the second bond from potentially damaging environmental influences. In this way, the effort required to assemble a structural encapsulation can be eliminated, which makes the manufacture of the redundant holding system cheaper.
  • the above-mentioned object is achieved in the redundant pane holder mentioned at the outset and the redundant holder system for bonded panes of a facade cladding with a mechanical holding device of a pane on a structure which transfers the pane's own weight to the structure, in that it comprises first adhesive bonds and second adhesive bonds which are designed to withstand different structural or physical or chemical loads.
  • the first and second adhesive bonds can therefore be subject to physical or chemical load differentiation in the manner described above, which means that they are designed to withstand different loads from the outset.
  • they can be subject to structural load differentiation according to the state of the art, i.e. they can basically be equally resilient, but for structural reasons they can be subjected to different loads over time during their service life, namely the first bond first and then the second bond after its failure, each on its own.
  • the weight of the panes is carried by mechanical blocking, for example. Only the loads The first bonds wear down as a result of further or changing influences such as wind. If they fail, the second bonds spring into place in the manner described above.
  • Type II offers the advantage that only one mechanical support for the dead weight is required - which in the case of vertical panes may only extend into the pane joint, or through the pane plane in the case of inclined or horizontal panes of overhead glazing - and the facade surface is not disturbed by surrounding suction protection.
  • Figure 1 shows a first exemplary embodiment of a redundant holding system according to the invention for facade panes made of a carrier 1 which is arranged between a substructure 2 and a glass pane 3.
  • the carrier 1 is symmetrical to the axis a and T-shaped and comprises a post 11 and a crossbeam 12.
  • the free end of the post 11 forms a coupling point 13 with the substructure 2.
  • the carrier 1 can be screwed, welded or otherwise fastened to the substructure 2, which is otherwise of no significant importance for the subject matter of the invention.
  • the crossbeam 12 On its side facing away from the post 11, the crossbeam 12 has a flat adhesive surface 14. It is set up and designed to provide a suitable base for adhesives.
  • the adhesives in this case based on silicone, form an external first adhesive 22 and a second adhesive 24 arranged between them.
  • the adhesive surface 14 can also be applied directly to the substructure 2. In the embodiment shown However, it offers the advantage that it can be particularly protected against physical or chemical influences, for example until the adhesive for the bonds 22, 24 is applied. In order to provide the best possible adhesion base for the bonds, it can be provided with a protective film, for example.
  • the carrier 1 can be suitably tempered to improve the bonding and independently of the substructure 2.
  • the bonds 22, 24 connect the glass pane 3 to the adhesive surface 14 and thus to the carrier 1.
  • the external bond represents the first bond 22, the internal bond represents the second bond 24.
  • the adhesives of the first bond 22 and the second bond 24 are applied with the same thickness and cover largely the same adhesive surface. However, they differ in terms of their composition and their rigidity in the cured state: while the first bond 22 shows a small deformation path under load, the second bond 24 shows a larger deformation path under the same load under otherwise identical conditions.
  • the stiffer first bond 22 takes on the main load from the glass pane 3. It consists essentially of the dead weight of the glass pane, but also of the other loads acting on the glass pane, such as wind pressure or wind suction forces, impact loads or the like.
  • the second bond 24, on the other hand virtually avoids the load due to its lower stiffness, so that it is subjected to considerably less load.
  • the second bond 24 is subject to a weaker aging process than the first bond 22. It can be assumed that the first bond 22 will therefore fail at an earlier point in time than the second bond 24. It is irrelevant whether this is an adhesive failure, as shown in the figures, or a cohesive failure, or a mixture of both. When the first bond 22 fails, the second bond 24 then takes on the full load from the glass pane 3.
  • the glass pane 3 Due to its lower stiffness, however, it gives way under the full load of the glass pane 3 by a deformation path s, as shown in Figure 2
  • the lower stiffness of the second bond 24 thus has a dual function, namely, on the one hand, that of a load differentiation between the first bond 22 and the second bond 24, and on the other hand, that of the representation of a recognizable deformation path in the event of failure of the first bond 22.
  • the arrangement according to the invention brings about a load differentiation with regard to the load on the bonds 22 and 24 over the course of their service life. Because the load differentiation results from the different stiffnesses of the first bond 22 and the second bond 24 and the latter in turn from the different chemical formulation of the adhesives used for this purpose, it can be referred to as chemical load differentiation.
  • stiffer acrylate adhesives can be used for the first bond and softer silicone adhesives for the second bond.
  • the layer thicknesses of acrylate adhesives are usually considerably thinner than those of silicone adhesives, which are used in thicknesses between 2 mm and 12 mm.
  • Figure 3 shows a further embodiment of the invention by means of so-called physical load differentiation:
  • a support 4 which is also basically T-shaped in cross section, the stem 11 of which, as previously shown in Figure 1 described, can be attached to the substructure 2, the crossbeam 12 of which, however, has a different, namely stepped adhesive surface 14: it thus comprises an inner adhesive surface 15, which is further away from the glass pane 3, and an outer adhesive surface 16, which is closer to the glass pane 3.
  • the inner adhesive surface 15 and the outer adhesive surface 16 lie in planes which are basically parallel to one another and to the plane of extension of the glass pane 3, but have a parallel offset d of a few mm or cm to one another.
  • a first bond 26 and a second bond 28 are also arranged between the carrier 4 and the glass pane 3.
  • the first bond 26 is applied to the outer bonding surface 16, the second bond 28 to the inner bonding surface 15. Since the glass pane 3 is flat at least in the area of the carrier 4, the first bond 26 and the second bond 28 have a different thickness, which differs by the amount of the parallel offset d.
  • the first bond 26 and the second bond 28 basically take up the same contact or bonding surface on the glass pane 3 or on the carrier 4 and consist of the same adhesive. Due to its lower thickness with the same contact surface, the first bond 26 is subject to hardened state, a higher load than the second bond 28.
  • the first bond 26 therefore takes on the main load from the glass pane 3, while the second bond 28 only contributes a smaller proportion to the load transfer. Due to the higher stress, the first bond 26 is subject to more severe aging processes than the second bond 28, which will probably cause the first bond 26 to fail sooner.
  • the holding systems according to Figures 1 to 4 are shown for an overhead installation of the glass panes 3.
  • the directions of the main loads that the adhesives 22, 24, 26, 28 have to transfer to the structure 2 coincide.
  • the deformation path s is set in the same direction downwards and orthogonal to the construction plane of the substructure 2, in this case a ceiling or a horizontal support.
  • the holding systems according to the invention according to Figures 1 to 4 can also be used in other installation situations, in particular as holding systems for vertically or inclined glass panes, for example on external facades. In these cases, the deformation path s also runs vertically downwards, to the Figures 1 to 4 for example, perpendicular to the drawing plane.
  • the principle and advantages of the holding system according to the invention remain unchanged.
  • the representations according to Figures 1 to 4 suggest a rotationally symmetrical design of the carrier 1, 4 around the axis a. If the first adhesive joints 22, 26 and the second adhesive joints 24, 28 are also arranged rotationally symmetrically, they are arranged concentrically to one another, so that the first adhesive joints 22, 26 completely surround the second adhesive joints 24, 28. The first adhesive joints 22, 26 thus completely encapsulate the second adhesive joints 24, 28 against environmental influences. This means that the second adhesive joints 24, 28 are arranged in a particularly protected manner, so that for this reason they are also subject to a slower aging process than the first adhesive joints 22, 26. However, this does not rule out the possibility of, for example, openings on the underside being provided in a vertical arrangement, which allow condensation to drain away or allow the air or humidity necessary for curing to enter.
  • the representations of the beams 1, 4 in the Figures 1 to 4 are not to be understood as rotationally symmetrical point supports. As point supports they can also have a square, rectangular, elliptical or other cross-section. In addition, the representations of the supports 1, 4 in the Figures 1 to 4 can also be understood as a cross-section through a linear design as a support strip or support beam, without compromising its inventive function.
  • Figures 1 and 2 chemical load differentiation
  • Figures 3, 4 physical load differentiation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Securing Of Glass Panes Or The Like (AREA)
  • Load-Bearing And Curtain Walls (AREA)

Claims (8)

  1. Support de vitre redondant pour des vitres exclusivement collées d'un revêtement de façade dans le construction, en particulier pour des vitres, avec un premier collage (22; 26) d'une vitre (3) sur une construction (1; 2), qui transmet à la construction (1; 2) le poids propre de la vitre (3) et les charges de la vitre (3) dues à d'autres actions, et un deuxième collage (24; 28) qui, en cas de défaillance du premier collage (22; 26), reprend le poids propre et les charges et les transmet à la construction (1; 2), caractérisé par des premiers collages (22; 26) et des deuxièmes collages (24; 28) réalisés de manière à pouvoir supporter des charges différentes, le premier (22; 26) et le deuxième (24; 28) collages étant réalisés de telle sorte qu'ils présentent des chemins de déformation différents sous charge, de sorte que les chemins de déformation différents des collages (22; 24; 26; 28) les chargent différemment, la course de déplacement provoquée par les chemins de déformation permettant de reconnaître visuellement le besoin d'entretien du support de vitre.
  2. Support selon la revendication 1, caractérisé par un premier adhésif pour le premier collage (22; 26) et un deuxième adhésif, différent du premier, pour le deuxième collage (24; 28), le premier adhésif présentant, à l'état durci, une rigidité supérieure à celle du deuxième adhésif.
  3. Support selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé par une épaisseur de matériau plus faible de la colle du premier collage (22; 26) par rapport à l'épaisseur de matériau de la colle du deuxième collage (24; 28).
  4. Système de support redondant comprenant un support selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3 et comprenant un support (1; 4) avec une surface adhésive (14) pour recevoir de la colle d'un collage (22; 24; 26; 28), le support (1; 4) étant adapté pour être placé et fixé entre la construction (2) et la vitre (3).
  5. Système de support redondant selon la revendication 4, caractérisé par une surface de collage étagée (14) du support (4) comprenant une première surface de collage (15) pour le premier collage (22; 26) selon la revendication 3 et une deuxième surface de collage (16) décalée parallèlement à celle-ci pour le deuxième collage (24; 28) selon la revendication 3.
  6. Système de support redondant selon l'une des revendications ci-dessus, caractérisé par une encapsulation des collages (22; 24; 26; 28) vis-à-vis des influences environnementales.
  7. Système de support redondant selon la revendication 6, caractérisé par une encapsulation d'un collage (24; 28) par l'autre collage (22; 26).
  8. Support de vitre redondant et système de support redondant pour des vitres collées d'un revêtement de façade dans le construction, en particulier pour des vitres, avec un dispositif de support mécanique d'une vitre sur une construction, qui transmet le poids propre de la vitre à la construction, avec un premier collage, qui transmet à la construction les charges de la vitre résultant d'autres actions, et un deuxième collage qui, en cas de défaillance du premier collage, prend en charge les charges résultant d'autres actions et les transmet à la construction, caractérisé par des premiers collages et des deuxièmes collages conçus pour supporter des charges différentes, le premier (22; 26) et le deuxième collage (24; 28) sont conçus de telle sorte qu'ils présentent des chemins de déformation différents sous charge, de sorte que les chemins de déformation différents des collages (22; 24; 26; 28) les chargent différemment, le chemin de déplacement provoqué par les chemins de déformation permettant de reconnaître visuellement le besoin d'entretien du support de vitre.
EP18772752.4A 2017-09-14 2018-09-05 Support redondant et système de fixation redondant pour des vitres de façade collées Active EP3682070B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102017121353.8A DE102017121353A1 (de) 2017-09-14 2017-09-14 Redundante Halterung und redundantes Haltesystem für verklebte Fassadenscheiben
PCT/EP2018/073911 WO2019052878A1 (fr) 2017-09-14 2018-09-05 Support redondant et système de fixation redondant pour des vitres de façade collées

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3682070A1 EP3682070A1 (fr) 2020-07-22
EP3682070B1 true EP3682070B1 (fr) 2024-05-01

Family

ID=63637862

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18772752.4A Active EP3682070B1 (fr) 2017-09-14 2018-09-05 Support redondant et système de fixation redondant pour des vitres de façade collées

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3682070B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102017121353A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2019052878A1 (fr)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3808978A1 (de) * 1988-03-17 1989-09-28 Gartner & Co J Rahmenlose verglasung
EP1426541A1 (fr) * 2002-12-04 2004-06-09 Sika Technology AG Procédé de collage de vitres
DE202016103049U1 (de) * 2015-07-27 2016-08-31 Hamberger Industriewerke Gmbh Paneel

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2612244A1 (fr) * 1987-03-11 1988-09-16 Paquet Fontaine Sa Vitrage isolant colle a double securite
AU2006228089B2 (en) * 2005-12-21 2008-09-04 Stegbar Pty Limited Window sash and window assembly
EP1873344A1 (fr) * 2006-06-30 2008-01-02 Sika Technology AG Agglutination étanchée par silicone
DE102008024804A1 (de) * 2008-05-23 2009-11-26 Ewald Dörken Ag Flächiges Klebemittel, wie Klebeband, Klebefolie oder Kleberand, insbesondere zur Verwendung im Baubereich
SE536279C2 (sv) * 2010-10-18 2013-07-30 Atricon Ab Monteringsunderlag för en byggskiva samt förfarande vid ett sådant

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3808978A1 (de) * 1988-03-17 1989-09-28 Gartner & Co J Rahmenlose verglasung
EP1426541A1 (fr) * 2002-12-04 2004-06-09 Sika Technology AG Procédé de collage de vitres
DE202016103049U1 (de) * 2015-07-27 2016-08-31 Hamberger Industriewerke Gmbh Paneel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102017121353A1 (de) 2019-03-14
WO2019052878A1 (fr) 2019-03-21
EP3682070A1 (fr) 2020-07-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE19938250C2 (de) Befestigung zum Haltern einer Verbundscheibe
DE3908983A1 (de) Glasbauelement fuer eine ganzglasfassade
EP0301166B1 (fr) Elément de façade vitré
DE4004103C2 (de) Wandelement für Gebäudeaußenwände und Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Wandelements
DE102009012071B4 (de) Brandschutz-Verglasung
EP3682070B1 (fr) Support redondant et système de fixation redondant pour des vitres de façade collées
DE3425740C2 (fr)
AT396614B (de) Isolierglaselement
DE102019103516B3 (de) Glasverbundeinheit und Verwendung einer Glasverbundeinheit als funktionelles Element eines Gebäudes
EP1458947A1 (fr) Element de liaison pour structure montants-barres horizontales en verre
EP1843001B1 (fr) Poteau en verre pour vitrage structurel
CH674541A5 (fr)
DE102006032364B4 (de) Verglasungssystem
EP1734217A2 (fr) Elément de fenêtre, de porte ou de façade
EP3088620A1 (fr) Vitrage avec construction de retenue pour vitres isolantes
EP0367908A1 (fr) Vitrage sans cadre
EP2829681B1 (fr) Vitrage isolant
DE9205103U1 (de) Vorrichtung zum Befestigen einer Beschattungsanlage an dem Rahmenwerk einer Glasfassade oder eines Glasdaches
DE202007002745U1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Abstützung einer Geländerbrüstung
DE102004016215B4 (de) Pfosten-Riegel-System mit geringer Ansichtsbreite
DE102013014196A1 (de) Aufzugschachtverkleidung für Fassadenaufzüge
CH676269A5 (fr)
DE202021101714U1 (de) Lichtdurchlässige umschliessende Konstruktion
DE9207156U1 (de) Brandschutzverglasung in horizontaler Einbaulage
DE102013217209A1 (de) Tragendes Glaswandelement für leichte Holzbauten

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200217

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20220429

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20231221

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502018014562

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN