EP1980345B1 - Procede de production d'une piece en acier coulee en continu et systeme destine au traitement d'un defaut de surface d'une piece coulee - Google Patents

Procede de production d'une piece en acier coulee en continu et systeme destine au traitement d'un defaut de surface d'une piece coulee Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1980345B1
EP1980345B1 EP07737461.9A EP07737461A EP1980345B1 EP 1980345 B1 EP1980345 B1 EP 1980345B1 EP 07737461 A EP07737461 A EP 07737461A EP 1980345 B1 EP1980345 B1 EP 1980345B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
slabs
defects
surface layer
conditioning
sheets
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
EP07737461.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1980345A4 (fr
EP1980345A1 (fr
Inventor
Jun Kubota
Yukinori Iizuka
Hajime Takada
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Publication of EP1980345A1 publication Critical patent/EP1980345A1/fr
Publication of EP1980345A4 publication Critical patent/EP1980345A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1980345B1 publication Critical patent/EP1980345B1/fr
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • B22D11/16Controlling or regulating processes or operations
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B1/00Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations
    • B21B1/02Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations for rolling heavy work, e.g. ingots, slabs, blooms, or billets, in which the cross-sectional form is unimportant ; Rolling combined with forging or pressing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21CMANUFACTURE OF METAL SHEETS, WIRE, RODS, TUBES OR PROFILES, OTHERWISE THAN BY ROLLING; AUXILIARY OPERATIONS USED IN CONNECTION WITH METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL
    • B21C51/00Measuring, gauging, indicating, counting, or marking devices specially adapted for use in the production or manipulation of material in accordance with subclasses B21B - B21F
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B1/00Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations
    • B21B1/46Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations for rolling metal immediately subsequent to continuous casting
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B38/00Methods or devices for measuring, detecting or monitoring specially adapted for metal-rolling mills, e.g. position detection, inspection of the product

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of producing a continuous casting slab of steel, according to the preamble of claim 1 and to a conditioning system of surface layer defects according to the preamble of claim 4.
  • US 6,436,205 B1 there is described a method for surface processing of a continuously cast steel product and device therefor.
  • at least a portion of at least one metal product surface is cooled for a defined temperature decrease of a surface to be treated and a surface treatment is then performed.
  • the device has a cooling device for cooling at least a portion of at least one metal product surface for a defined temperature decrease of a surface to be treated and a surface treatment device downstream of the cooling device in the product conveying direction.
  • the production arrangement for this has a continuous slab casting device, a heating arrangement with at least one of a heating device and a temperature equilibration device arranged downstream of the casting device.
  • a hot mill train is arranged downstream of the heating arrangement in the conveying direction.
  • the surface processing device for removing surface flaws has a device for cooling at least a portion of at least one metal product surface for a defined temperature decrease of a surface to be treated and a surface treatment device downstream of the cooling device in the product conveying direction.
  • the surface processing device is arranged between the casting device and the hot mill train.
  • slab continuous casting slab
  • defects such as inclusions of surface layers of slabs
  • the surface conditioning of slabs is often performed by, for example, partial scarfing or overall scarfing using a oxygen torch, or partial grinding or overall grinding using a grinder.
  • partial scarfing or overall scarfing using a oxygen torch or partial grinding or overall grinding using a grinder.
  • the defects are removed by further performing partial scarfing using an oxygen torch or partial grinding using a grinder.
  • the surface conditioning operations using these methods can be used to remove defects up to a certain depth of a slab
  • the surface conditioning operations cannot be used to remove defects that are deeper than the certain depth. Therefore, for example, a defect in the slab remaining directly below a scarfed surface or a ground surface may become a surface defect of a thin sheet after the slab is rolled into the thin sheet. Consequently, even if the surface conditioning of the slab is performed, the occurrence of the surface defect in the rolled sheet, which is a product, cannot be prevented completely.
  • an attempt is made to remove a deep defect at a slab stage even a flawless portion around the defect is removed, thereby increasing a decrease in yield ratio or increasing the conditioning work time.
  • Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 02-15806 proposes a method of producing a stainless steel sheet that does not have scabs.
  • the technology discussed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 02-15806 corresponds to a method of producing a stainless steel sheet which is subjected to hot rolling.
  • pinholes existing at at least portions near front and rear surfaces of side faces of slabs and existing in the front and rear surfaces of the slabs are detected, after which the portions pinholes having a diameter greater than or equal to 0.2 mm among the detected pinholes are conditioned and removed.
  • Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 10-296306 proposes a method of producing a hot-rolled steel sheet.
  • pinholes in a slab prior to rough rolling are detected.
  • the depths of the pinholes from a slab surface, the slab thickness, and the finish rolling thickness are estimated.
  • conditioning is performed at a sheet bar stage or a slab stage prior to the finish rolling.
  • an artificial flaw is previously provided in a slab to perform a rolling test.
  • the depth from a slab surface and the size of pinholes that become surface flaws after the rolling, and rolling reduction are formulated as parameters. Based on this, the sizes of the pinholes to be removed prior to the rolling are determined.
  • pinholes that are formed at deep positions from the slab surface are ground after rough rolling because the grinding amount of the slab at the slab stage is large, thereby decreasing yield ratio.
  • the sizes of pinholes to be removed are estimated on the basis of the result of a rolling test of artificial flaw.
  • the slabs according to the present invention are for ordinary steel sheets.
  • surface layer defects which cause surface detects, include, in addition to pinholes, inclusions, formed of deoxidation products or mold powder, and cracks.
  • the present invention can overcome such related art problems, and has as its object the provision of a method of producing a continuous casting slab of steel, which can restrict the occurrence of surface defects in a thin steel sheet (thin sheet), which is a product, so that the thin sheet (rolled product) has a required surface quality level.
  • the present invention has as its object the provision of a conditioning system of surface layer defects of slabs, which can efficiently remove surface layer defects of slabs, which become surface defects of thin sheets (rolled products).
  • the gist of the present invention is as follows.
  • the conditioning standards are composed of a step 9, in which the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1, which determines the sizes and the three-dimensional positions of the surface layer defects 5 in the slabs 1, is compared with and checked against (9A) surface defects data 6A of sheets 7, which determines sizes (widths, lengths) and two-dimensional positions of the surface defects 6 in the sheets 7, obtained from the slabs 1, and in which features of the surface layer defects 5 of the slabs 1, which become the surface defects 6A of the sheets 7, are extracted (9B), is repeatedly performed on the slabs 1, so that said any surface layer defect 5B that needs to be removed in accordance with steel type and process is determined and classified so that the surface layer defects are capable of being indicated.
  • the two-dimensional positions of the surface defects 6 refer to a position in a production line direction (thin-sheet longitudinal direction), and a position perpendicular to the production line direction (thin-sheet widthwise direction).
  • the width of the surface defects 6 refers to a maximum width in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction of the thin sheets 7, and the length of the surface defects 6 refers to a maximum length in the rolling direction of the thin sheets 7.
  • the inventors et al. have found out that, to obtain thin sheets 7 (rolled products) having a required surface quality level, it was important to efficiently and completely remove surface layer defects 5B of slabs 1, which become surface defects 6 of the thin sheets 7 (rolled products), which are products. To achieve this, the inventor et al.
  • means 12 of measuring surface layer defects of slabs (surface layer defects measuring device) of an ultrasonic reflection type defects measuring device was used to measure the size (diameter of the equivalent circle) and three-dimensional positions (position in a lengthwise direction of the slabs, position in the widthwise direction of the slabs, and a position from the slab surfaces) of the surface layer defects 5 of the slabs 1 (primarily inclusions). Then, the measured values were stored in a storage means so as to be retrievable.
  • Fig. 5 stored surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1 and surface defects data 6A of the steel sheets 7, which are materials of the slabs, were extracted, and compared and checked (9A) to confirm the state of correspondence between the surface layer defects 5 and the surface defects 6.
  • the results of the relationships between the depth (three-dimensional position) of the surface layer defects 5 at the slabs and the size of the surface layer defects are shown in Fig. 5 .
  • the symbol ⁇ stands for surface layer defects 5 that were not detected as surface defects 6 of the steel sheets 7; and the symbol ⁇ stands for surface layer defects 5 that were detected as the surface defects 6 of the steel sheets.
  • Fig. 5 the same scabs level ranges of the surface defects 6 were divided. From Fig. 5 , it can be understood that boundary lines between the ⁇ and ⁇ , or division lines of the scab levels can be used as the features (three-dimension positions, sizes) of the surface layer defects 5B of the slabs to be removed.
  • the inventor et al. have conceived that setting the features of the surface layer defects 5 of the slabs, which become the surface defects 6 of such products, as predetermined conditioning standards in accordance with a surface quality demand degree of the products (steel sheets), indicating the surface layer defects 5B to be removed, and removing the matched surface layer defects 5 of the slabs at the slab stage can effectively and considerably reduce the occurrence of the surface defects 6 (scabs) of the products.
  • the present invention since the surface layer defects 5, which cause the surface defects of the products (steel sheets 7), can be efficiently removed, the present invention is industrially considerably effective in making it possible to considerably reduce frequency of surface defects of the products and of considerably improving manufacturing yield ratio.
  • it is not necessary to perform overall scarfing and grinding conditioning of the entire slabs, so that the present invention is also effective in making it possible to easily and efficiently produce products required to satisfy strict surface quality level.
  • the present invention makes it possible to efficiently remove all inclusions, which become scabs of the products, without a decrease in yield ratio caused by excessive conditioning or without any scabs remaining due to insufficient conditioning in overall conditioning to a certain thickness.
  • a method of producing a slab according to the present invention includes a continuous casting process 2, in which molten steel is continuously casted into slabs, and a conditioning process 4 of slabs 1, in which the slabs 1 are conditioned after the continuous casting process 2.
  • the means 12 of measuring surface layer defects of the slabs measures the surface layer defects of the slabs 1, to extract the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs. From the obtained results, the surface layer defects 5B that need to be removed are removed by the conditioning process 4 of the slabs. This procedure is schematically illustrated in Fig. 4 .
  • the sizes (diameters of the equivalent circle) and the three-dimensional positions of the surface layer defects 5 of the slabs 1 to be measured are determined.
  • Examples of the surface layer defects 5 of the slabs 1 are inclusions, blowholes, and cracks.
  • conditioning places and depths of the slabs 1 become clear, so that conditioning is facilitated, and correspondences between the surface layer defects 5 and the occurrence of the surface defects of the steel sheets 7 after rolling can be easily made clear.
  • the obtained surface layer defects data is, as the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1, is stored in surface layer defects database 5C of the slabs so that it can be searched.
  • Fig. 3 on the basis of predetermined conditioning standards 8, that is, by comparing data (5B'), which is indicated in the conditioning standards 8, of the surface layer defects 5B that need to be removed with the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1, a determination is made as to whether or not the surface layer defects 5 of the slabs correspond to the surface layer defects 5B that need to be removed.
  • the conditioning standards 8 it is desirable that the surface layer defects that need to be removed in accordance with steel type, sheet thickness, and process be classified (so that they can be indicated) so as to be searchable.
  • Fig. 6 shows example conditioning standards 8. For example, in Fig.
  • the slabs 1 having the surface layer defects 5 that are determined as corresponding to the surface layer defects 53 that need to be removed are immediately conveyed to the conditioning process 4 of the slabs, and are removed by means 11 of conditioning the slabs.
  • Any means of conditioning the slabs may be used for the means 11 of conditioning the slabs as long as it is a device of a type that is connected to a process computer and that is automatically operated, and that can remove local defects. Accordingly, the means 11 is not particularly limited.
  • Example means 11 may be those that perform scarfing using an oxygen torch or grinding using a grinder.
  • the slabs 1 whose surface layer defects 5B that need to be removed in the slab conditioning process 4 have been removed, or the flawless slabs 1 whose surface layer defects 5B do not need to be removed are subjected to the following processes, that is, the hot rolling process 21 and the cold rolling process 22, or are further subjected to a surface treatment process 23, so that they are formed as the products 7 (steel sheets).
  • the procedure is shown in Fig. 3 .
  • a surface inspection process 24 in a surface inspection process 24, the products 7 (steel sheets) are inspected by the means 13 of measuring surface layer defects to determine whether or not surface defects 6 exist.
  • the conditioning standards 8 need to be such that the data (5B') of the surface layer defects 5B that need to be removed in accordance with steel type, process, use, sheet thickness, etc., can be classified, searched, checked, indicated, and updated. As shown in Fig. 2 , it is desirable that it be predetermined by the following procedure.
  • the means 12 of measuring the surface layer defects of the slabs is used to obtain the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs that determines the sizes and the three-dimensional positions of the surface layer defects 6 of the slabs 1.
  • the means 12 of measuring the surface layer defects of slabs any one of the following surface layer defects measuring devices, that is, an ultrasonic reflection type defects measuring device, a transmitting type defects measuring device using radiation such as X rays or ⁇ rays, and a leakage magnetic flux type defects measuring device, may be suitably used.
  • the slabs 1 are subjected to the hot rolling process 21, the cold rolling process 22, or the surface treatment process 23 to form the steel sheets 7.
  • the means 13 of measuring the surface layer defects of the steel sheets is used to determine the sizes (width, length) and two-dimensional positions of the surface defects 6 (surface scabs, etc.) of the steel sheets. Accordingly, the surface defects data 6A of the steel sheets obtained as the materials of the slabs is obtained. Examples of the surface defects 6 of the steel sheets may include scabs, sliver, and blisters.
  • any one of the following surface defects measuring devices that is, a surface defects measuring device based on image data processing and online continuous photography of the surfaces of the steel sheets 7 (coils), and a leakage magnetic flux type measuring device, may be suitably used.
  • the obtained surface defects data 6A is stored in the storage means of the database 5C of the surface layer defects of the slabs and database 6C of surface layer defects of the steel sheets so that it can be retrieved, searched, and checked. It is desirable that the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1 and the surface defects data 6A of the steel sheets 7, which are the materials of the slabs 1 be constantly collected and accumulated online.
  • the obtained surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1 and the surface defects data 6A of the steel sheets 7, which are the materials of the slabs 1, are compared with each other (9A), so that features regarding the sizes and the three-dimensional positions of the surface layer defects 5B of the slabs 1, which become the surface defects 6 of the steel sheets 7, are extracted (9B).
  • This step is repeatedly performed on the plurality of slabs 1, to provide the conditioning standards 8 in which the features (the sizes (diameters of the equivalent circle), three-dimensional positions) of the surface layer defects 5 of the slabs 1, which need to be removed in accordance with steel type, process, use, sheet thickness, etc., because they become the surface defects 6 of the steel sheets 7, can be classified, searched, checked, and indicated.
  • the obtained conditioning standards 8 are stored in the storage means of conditioning standard database 14 so that it can be retrieved and updated.
  • the features (the sizes (diameters of the equivalent circle), three-dimensional positions) of the surface layer defects 6 of the slabs 1, which become the surface defects 6 of the steel sheet products 7, can be extracted and indicated as the conditioning standards 8 in accordance with, for example, steel type, process, or use, or the sizes (widths, lengths) of the surface defects 6 (surface scabs) of the steel sheets 7.
  • the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1 and the surface defects data 6A of the steel sheets 7, which are the materials of the slabs 1, be constantly collected and accumulated online.
  • the conditioning standards 8 to be updated periodically or non-periodically on the basis of latest data. This makes it possible to constantly possess the latest conditioning standards 8 in accordance with changes in, for example, casting conditions and rolling conditions.
  • the surface layer defects conditioning system 10 of the slabs 1 used in the present invention comprises the means 12 of measuring surface layer defects of slabs, the means 13 of measuring surface defects of steel sheets, the means 15 of calculation, the means 11 of conditioning slabs, the database 5C of surface layer defects of slabs, the database 6C of surface defects of steel sheets, and the conditioning standard database 14.
  • the surface layer defects conditioning system 10 of the slabs 1 is connected to, for example, a high-end process computer and a low-end process computer. It goes without saying that the surface layer defects conditioning system 10 of the slabs 1 is formed so as to allow input of information of, for example, use and process of the steel sheets, which are products, or of the history of, for example, manufacturing conditions and slab composition.
  • the means 12 of measuring surface layer defects of slabs and the means 13 of measuring surface defects of steel sheets, and the means 11 of conditioning slabs 11 are connected to the means 15 of calculation.
  • the database 5C of surface layer defects of slabs, the database 6C of surface defects of steel sheets, and the conditioning standard base 14 are also connected to the means 15 of calculation.
  • the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs regarding, for example, the three-dimensional positions and sizes of the surface layer defects 5 of the slabs 1 is measured.
  • the surface defects data 6A regarding the sizes (widths, lengths) and the two-dimensional positions of the surface defects 6 of the steel sheets 7, obtained as materials of the slabs 1 is measured.
  • the database 5C of the surface layer defects of the slabs is a database in which the obtained surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1 is stored so that it can be input and output along with process-related information such as manufacturing conditions and composition.
  • the database 5C of the surface layer defects of the steel sheets is a database in which the surface defects data 6A of the steel sheets 7, obtained as the materials of the slabs 1, is stored so that it can be input and output along with process-related information such as processes and steel type.
  • the conditioning standard database 14 is a database in which the surface layer defects that need to be removed in accordance with, for example, steel type, process, and use is stored so that it can be input and output as the surface layer defects data 5B that need to be determined, classified, and removed.
  • the surface layer defects data 5A of the slabs 1, measured by the means 12 of measuring surface layer defects of slabs, and the surface layer defects data 5B', which need to be removed in accordance with, for example, steel type, process, and use and is output from the conditioning standard database 14, are input.
  • they are compared (9A), to determine the surface layer defects 5B that need to be removed in the conditioning slabs.
  • a signal 16 used to remove the surface layer defects 5B is output to the means 11 of conditioning slabs.
  • the slabs 1 prior to the rolling operations using the means of measuring surface layer defects of slabs (surface layer defects measuring device) of an ultrasonic reflection type shown in Fig. 7 , the sizes and the three-dimensional positions (position in a lengthwise direction of the slabs, position in the widthwise direction of the slabs, and a depth from the front and back surfaces of the slabs) of the surface layer defects 5 (primarily inclusions) of the entire front and back surfaces of the slabs 1 (surface layer defects data 5A) were measured. Then, the surface layer defects data 5A was compared with the data 5A of the surface layer defects to be removed at a slab stage, the data 5A being indicated in the conditioning standards 8 output from the conditioning standard database 14 and used for the present purpose.
  • a slab conditioning operation was performed to selectively remove the surface layer defects 5B that need to be removed by the means 11 of conditioning slabs (a grinder that can perform local conditioning).
  • This corresponds to the example (number of coils 102) of the present invention.
  • Some of the slabs 1 were subjected to overall grinding for a 2mm slab thickness. This corresponds to a comparative example (number of coils 98).
  • the frequency of the surface defects in the example of the present invention was 0.1% on average. In contrast, in the comparative example, it was 1.0% on average.
  • the present invention since the surface layer defects, which cause the surface defects of the products (steel sheets), can be efficiently removed, the present invention is industrially considerably effective in making it possible to considerably reduce frequency of surface defects of the products and of considerably improving manufacturing yield ratio.
  • it is not necessary to perform overall scarfing and grinding conditioning of the entire slabs, so that the present invention is also effective in making it possible to easily and efficiently produce products required to satisfy strict surface quality level.
  • the present invention makes it possible to efficiently remove all inclusions, which become scabs of the products, without a decrease in yield ratio caused by excessive conditioning or without any scabs remaining due to insufficient conditioning in overall conditioning to a certain thickness.

Claims (5)

  1. Procédé de production de brames d'acier, comprenant un processus de coulée en continu (2) consistant à couler en continu de l'acier fondu pour former des brames (1), dans lequel les brames sont soumises à un processus de laminage à chaud (21) et à un processus de laminage à froid (22) pour former des tôles (7), le procédé étant en outre caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend :
    un processus de conditionnement des brames (1) consistant à conditionner les surfaces des brames (1) après le processus de coulée en continu,
    dans lequel, après le processus de coulée en continu et avant le processus de conditionnement des brames (1), un processus d'inspection des brames (1) est effectué sur les brames (1) pour obtenir des données de défauts de couche superficielle (5A) des brames (1), qui déterminent des tailles et des positions tridimensionnelles de défauts de couche superficielle dans les brames (1), et, quant aux données obtenues de défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1), une détermination est faite quant à savoir si n'importe quel défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être enlevé sur la base de normes de conditionnement prédéterminées (8) existe ou pas, après quoi, si ledit quelconque défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être enlevé existe, ledit quelconque défaut de couche superficielle est enlevé dans le processus de conditionnement de brames (1) ; et
    dans lequel les normes de conditionnement (8) sont composées d'une étape, dans laquelle les données de défauts de couche superficielle (5A) des brames (1), qui déterminent les tailles et les positions tridimensionnelles des défauts de couche superficielle dans les brames (1), sont comparées et vérifiées par rapport à des données de défauts de surface (6A) des tôles (7), qui déterminent des tailles et des positions bidimensionnelles des défauts de surface dans les tôles (7) obtenues à partir des brames (1), et dans lequel des particularités des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1), qui deviennent les défauts de surface des tôles (7) sont extraites, qui est effectuée de façon répétée sur les brames (1), de sorte que ledit quelconque défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être enlevé selon le type d'acier et le processus est déterminé et classé de sorte que les défauts de couche superficielle sont susceptibles d'être indiqués.
  2. Procédé de production de brames d'acier selon la revendication 1, dans lequel les défauts de couche superficielle sont n'importe lesquelles d'inclusions, de soufflures, et de fissures.
  3. Système de conditionnement des défauts de couche superficielle de brames (1), dans lequel des brames sont formées en effectuant un processus de coulée en continu (2) et sont soumises à un processus de laminage à chaud (21) et à un processus de laminage à froid (22) pour former des tôles, le système de conditionnement étant caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend :
    un moyen (12) de mesure des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1), un moyen (13) de mesure de défauts de surface de tôles (7), une base de données (5C) des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1), une base de données (6C) des défauts de surface des tôles (7), une base de données de normes de conditionnement (14), un moyen (15) de calcul et un moyen (11) de conditionnement des brames (1),
    dans lequel la base de données (5C) des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1) stocke des données de défauts de couche superficielle (5A) des brames (1), qui sont mesurés par le moyen (12) de mesure des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1) et qui déterminent des tailles et des positions tridimensionnelles des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1), de sorte que les données de défauts de couche superficielle (5A) des brames (1) sont susceptibles d'être entrées et sorties,
    dans lequel la base de données (6C) des défauts de surface des tôles (7) stocke des données de défauts de surface (6A) des tôles (7), qui sont mesurés par le moyen (13) de mesure des défauts de surface des tôles (7) et qui déterminent des degrés et des positions bidimensionnelles des défauts de surface des tôles (7), obtenues en tant que matières des brames (1), de sorte que les données de défauts de surface (6A) des tôles (7) sont susceptibles d'être entrées et sorties,
    dans lequel la base de données de normes de conditionnement (14) est obtenue quand une étape, dans laquelle, en utilisant le moyen (15) de calcul, les données de défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1), qui sont stockées dans la base de données (5C) des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1), sont comparées et vérifiées par rapport aux données de défauts de surface des tôles (7), qui sont stockées dans la base de données (6C) des défauts de surface des tôles (7), obtenues en tant que matières des brames (1), et dans lequel des particularités des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1), qui deviennent les défauts de surface des tôles (7), sont extraites, est effectuée de façon répétée sur les brames (1), de sorte que de quelconques défauts de couche superficielle qui doivent être enlevés sont stockés dans la base de données de normes de conditionnement (14) afin d'être susceptible d'être entrées et sorties en tant que données du défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être déterminé, classé, et enlevé,
    dans lequel, en ce qui concerne une quelconque brame de conditionnement, le moyen (12) de mesure des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1) mesure le défaut de couche superficielle de celles-ci pour former des données de défaut de couche superficielle de ladite quelconque brame de conditionnement ; en utilisant le moyen (15) de calcul, lesdites données de défaut de couche superficielle sont comparées et vérifiées par rapport aux données du défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être enlevé, les données du défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être enlevé étant sorties de la base de données de normes de conditionnement (14) ; et une détermination est faite quant à savoir s'il existe ou non n'importe quel défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être enlevé dans une quelconque dite brame de conditionnement, de sorte que, lorsque ledit quelconque défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être enlevé existe dans la brame (1), un signal utilisé pour enlever ledit quelconque défaut de couche superficielle qui doit être enlevé est sorti vers le moyen (11) de conditionnement des brames.
  4. Système de conditionnement de défauts de couche superficielle de brames selon la revendication 3, dans lequel le moyen (12) de mesure des défauts de couche superficielle des brames (1) est au moins l'un de dispositifs de mesure de défauts suivants : un dispositif de mesure de défauts de type à réflexion ultrasonique, un dispositif de mesure de défauts de type à émission utilisant un rayonnement, et un dispositif de mesure de défauts de type à flux magnétique de fuite.
  5. Système de conditionnement de défauts de couche superficielle de brames selon l'une ou l'autre de la revendication 3 ou de la revendication 4, dans lequel le moyen (13) de mesure de défauts de surface de tôles est au moins l'un de dispositifs de mesure de défauts suivants : un dispositif de mesure de défauts de surface basé sur une photographie continue en ligne et sur un traitement de données d'image et un dispositif de mesure de défauts de type à flux magnétique de fuite.
EP07737461.9A 2006-02-22 2007-02-21 Procede de production d'une piece en acier coulee en continu et systeme destine au traitement d'un defaut de surface d'une piece coulee Expired - Fee Related EP1980345B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006044799A JP4816130B2 (ja) 2006-02-22 2006-02-22 鋼の連続鋳造鋳片の製造方法および鋳片の表層欠陥手入システム。
PCT/JP2007/053701 WO2007099977A1 (fr) 2006-02-22 2007-02-21 Procede de production d'une piece en acier coulee en continu et systeme destine au traitement d'un defaut de surface d'une piece coulee

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1980345A1 EP1980345A1 (fr) 2008-10-15
EP1980345A4 EP1980345A4 (fr) 2012-05-23
EP1980345B1 true EP1980345B1 (fr) 2013-05-22

Family

ID=38459080

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07737461.9A Expired - Fee Related EP1980345B1 (fr) 2006-02-22 2007-02-21 Procede de production d'une piece en acier coulee en continu et systeme destine au traitement d'un defaut de surface d'une piece coulee

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1980345B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP4816130B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR101066333B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN101389428B (fr)
WO (1) WO2007099977A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015175403A1 (fr) * 2014-05-12 2015-11-19 Stewart Patricia Appareil et procédé de laminage de métaux

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102007020240A1 (de) * 2007-04-24 2008-10-30 Sms Demag Ag Verfahren zur Erkennung und Klassifizierung von Oberflächenfehlern auf stranggegossenen Brammen
US8143885B2 (en) * 2008-10-30 2012-03-27 Og Technologies, Inc. Surface flaw detection and verification on metal bars by Eddy current testing and imaging system
KR101189516B1 (ko) * 2010-02-08 2012-10-10 주식회사 포스코 주편 처리 방법 및 주편 처리 시스템
JP5633173B2 (ja) * 2010-04-07 2014-12-03 Jfeスチール株式会社 冷延鋼板の製造方法
CN102019393B (zh) * 2010-12-31 2012-11-28 中冶连铸技术工程股份有限公司 用于连铸机的铸体质量判定方法和装置
KR101277689B1 (ko) 2011-06-29 2013-06-21 현대제철 주식회사 슬라브 표면 결함 제거장치 및 방법
KR101350452B1 (ko) * 2011-12-23 2014-01-16 주식회사 포스코 냉연강판의 용접점 판단 방법
CN109982805A (zh) * 2016-11-18 2019-07-05 Sms集团有限公司 用于制造连续的带状复合材料的方法以及设备
DE102017221086A1 (de) * 2017-11-24 2019-05-29 Sms Group Gmbh Verfahren zur Analyse von Fehlerursachen beim Stranggießen
CN108435794B (zh) * 2018-04-10 2019-09-24 中冶赛迪工程技术股份有限公司 一种连铸连轧的工艺方法
KR101942999B1 (ko) * 2018-05-16 2019-01-28 한국원자력연구원 방사성 폐기물 용기 제작 통합 관리 시스템 및 이를 이용한 방사성 폐기물 용기 제작 통합 관리 방법
CN109738514A (zh) * 2019-03-13 2019-05-10 中国科学院大学 一种用于薄金属箔材中缺陷探测的电磁检测方法
DE102020205077A1 (de) * 2019-09-23 2021-03-25 Sms Group Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Herstellung und Weiterbehandlung von Brammen
EP4110537A1 (fr) * 2020-02-27 2023-01-04 Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Properties Inc. Détection et élimination de défauts de coulée continue sur des brames
EP3925729A1 (fr) * 2020-06-16 2021-12-22 ABB Schweiz AG Procédé et agencement pour l'élimination de fissures
CN111695271B (zh) * 2020-06-29 2023-07-25 武汉钢铁有限公司 一种钢坯表面金属在塑性变形中的追踪方法
JP7468558B2 (ja) * 2021-03-19 2024-04-16 Jfeスチール株式会社 表面疵の発生原因特定システム及び工業製品の製造方法

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2904951A1 (de) * 1978-02-06 1981-05-21 Ssab Svenskt Staal Ab, Stockholm Verfahren und vorrichtung zur anzeige und entfernung von fehlern an metallischen brammen
JPS57106855A (en) * 1980-12-24 1982-07-02 Nippon Steel Corp Ultrasonic detection of flaw in ingot during continuous casting
DE19953252A1 (de) 1999-11-04 2001-05-10 Sms Demag Ag Verfahren zur Oberflächenbearbeitung eines kontinuierlich gegossenen Stahlproduktes und Einrichtung hierzu
JP2002323481A (ja) * 2001-04-27 2002-11-08 Kawasaki Steel Corp 超音波探傷方法および装置
JP4259164B2 (ja) * 2003-04-07 2009-04-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 連続鋳造鋳片の品質監視装置及び品質監視方法

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015175403A1 (fr) * 2014-05-12 2015-11-19 Stewart Patricia Appareil et procédé de laminage de métaux
RU2693246C2 (ru) * 2014-05-12 2019-07-01 Арконик Инк. Устройство и способ для прокатки металла

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2007099977A1 (fr) 2007-09-07
EP1980345A4 (fr) 2012-05-23
CN101389428B (zh) 2011-09-07
KR20080089474A (ko) 2008-10-06
CN101389428A (zh) 2009-03-18
JP2007222884A (ja) 2007-09-06
KR101066333B1 (ko) 2011-09-20
EP1980345A1 (fr) 2008-10-15
JP4816130B2 (ja) 2011-11-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1980345B1 (fr) Procede de production d'une piece en acier coulee en continu et systeme destine au traitement d'un defaut de surface d'une piece coulee
JP4552680B2 (ja) 金属帯の製造方法およびマーキング付き金属帯
JP4661252B2 (ja) マーキング付き金属帯
CN113198853A (zh) 一种检测带钢板廓缺陷的方法及装置
JP2003080357A (ja) 連続鋳造における表面疵検出方法
JP4397825B2 (ja) Hcr可否判定方法
CN106975662A (zh) 一种热轧卷取钢卷内圈卷形控制方法
KR100368280B1 (ko) 박판주조공정에서의주편의표면결함부제거방법
JP4815913B2 (ja) 厚鋼板の剪断割れ防止方法
CN113453845B (zh) 钢片的磨削方法、棒钢的制造方法以及线材的制造方法
JP4770274B2 (ja) 厚鋼板の剪断方法
JP4477269B2 (ja) コイル材の先後端不良部除去方法およびそのシステム
JP4281464B2 (ja) 表面欠陥の少ない冷延鋼帯、表面処理鋼帯の製造方法
JP2006218504A (ja) 金属帯の製造方法
CN103862006A (zh) 一种判断连铸板坯的皮下裂纹缺陷的方法
JP2006021218A (ja) 鋳片の溶削量決定方法
JP2008188637A (ja) 鍛造性に優れた棒鋼の製造方法
JP4060937B2 (ja) 鋼板切断制御装置
KR100836451B1 (ko) 열간압연공정에서 롤마크 표면결함 감소방법
Biś et al. Defects and Incompatibilities of Pipes Manufactured by Pilgrim Method
JP4874319B2 (ja) コイル製品の最適製造方法および最適製造装置
JP2005103584A (ja) 熱延鋼板の製造方法および熱間圧延設備
JP2006150400A (ja) 連続鋳造鋳片、その製造方法及び熱延鋼板の製造方法
RU2227773C2 (ru) Способ оценки качества металлической заготовки
JP2000271712A (ja) 連続鋳造プロセスにおける鋳片の表面欠陥評点判定方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080723

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT DE

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AT DE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20120424

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B22D 11/16 20060101AFI20120418BHEP

Ipc: B21C 51/00 20060101ALI20120418BHEP

Ipc: G01N 27/90 20060101ALI20120418BHEP

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B21C 51/00 20060101ALI20121119BHEP

Ipc: B22D 11/16 20060101AFI20121119BHEP

Ipc: G01N 27/90 20060101ALI20121119BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 612928

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602007030602

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130718

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602007030602

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140225

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20211230

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20220125

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602007030602

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 612928

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20230221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230901