EP1852219A1 - Flusstrommelpoliervorrichtung und polierverfahren - Google Patents

Flusstrommelpoliervorrichtung und polierverfahren Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1852219A1
EP1852219A1 EP05719135A EP05719135A EP1852219A1 EP 1852219 A1 EP1852219 A1 EP 1852219A1 EP 05719135 A EP05719135 A EP 05719135A EP 05719135 A EP05719135 A EP 05719135A EP 1852219 A1 EP1852219 A1 EP 1852219A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
workpieces
polishing
inner cylinder
media
mass
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP05719135A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1852219B1 (de
EP1852219A4 (de
Inventor
Masatomo c/o Sintobrator Ltd. WATANABE
Hiroaki c/o Sintobrator Ltd. SUESUGA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sintokogio Ltd
Original Assignee
Sintobrator Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sintobrator Ltd filed Critical Sintobrator Ltd
Publication of EP1852219A1 publication Critical patent/EP1852219A1/de
Publication of EP1852219A4 publication Critical patent/EP1852219A4/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1852219B1 publication Critical patent/EP1852219B1/de
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B31/00—Machines or devices designed for polishing or abrading surfaces on work by means of tumbling apparatus or other apparatus in which the work and/or the abrasive material is loose; Accessories therefor
    • B24B31/10—Machines or devices designed for polishing or abrading surfaces on work by means of tumbling apparatus or other apparatus in which the work and/or the abrasive material is loose; Accessories therefor involving other means for tumbling of work
    • B24B31/108—Machines or devices designed for polishing or abrading surfaces on work by means of tumbling apparatus or other apparatus in which the work and/or the abrasive material is loose; Accessories therefor involving other means for tumbling of work involving a sectioned bowl, one part of which, e.g. its wall, is stationary and the other part of which is moved, e.g. rotated

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a fluid barrel-polishing device and polishing method that can increase the ability and efficiency for the polishing, increase the productivity by shortening the polishing time, and decrease the running cost by suppressing the wear of media.
  • Fig. 2 is a sectional view of a conventional fluid barrel-polishing device.
  • the conventional fluid barrel-polishing device comprises a cylindrical fixed tank 11, a turntable 12 that is located at the bottom of the tank 11, and a gap 13 that allows the turntable to rotate slidably on it.
  • the horizontal rotation of the turntable 12 imparts a centrifugal force (A) in a direction going from the center of the rotation to the lateral wall of the fixed tank 11 to the workpieces and the media that have been put into the tank 11.
  • the centrifugal force (A) that is imparted to the workpieces and the media is transformed into a climbing force (B) when they reach the lateral wall of the fixed tank 11.
  • the climbing force (B) drives them up to the summit (C) and then they are moved downward by the force of gravity. In this way, the workpieces and the media are formed into the mass (M) that is rotating, and the workpieces are polished by the contact pressures and relative velocities between the workpieces and the media.
  • the polishing ability of a mechanism of a fluid barrel-polishing device depends on the choice of the media for the workpiece and the object to be polished when the mechanism is for dry polishing, and it depends on the choice of the media and the abrasive compound for use with them when it is for wet polishing. Further, it depends on the ratio of the number of workpieces to that of the media when the mechanism is for dry polishing, and it depends on the ratio of the number of workpieces to the media and the ratio of the quantity of the abrasive compound to the water when the mechanism is for wet polishing.
  • the polishing ability of a barrel-polishing device depends on the contact pressure between the workpieces and the media and on the differential velocity between them. This is the same for a fluid barrel-polishing device.
  • the area near the turntable or near the lateral wall of the fixed tank has a strong polishing ability, wherein the contact pressures between the media and the workpieces is strong and the velocity of the flow of the mass is high.
  • the mass is free from the rotating and there are no media or workpieces.
  • Japanese Patent Laid-open Publication No. 2003-103450 shows the open space of the mass that is formed above the center of the rotation of the turntable, in Fig. 2.
  • the present invention was conceived so as to solve the above problems without making any specially significant structural alteration. It comprises an inner cylinder 4 on the center of rotation of the turntable 2 of a polishing device, wherein its centerline is shared with the turntable 2.
  • the pressure of the mass (M) also works on the inner surface of it, and it achieves an effect that increases the contact pressure between the workpieces and media that compose the mass (M) and increases the polishing ability of the device.
  • the present invention has an inner cylinder that has an appropriate outer diameter in correspondence with the inner diameter of the fixed tank and in accord with the purpose to process the workpieces. It is located at the same place as the open space that would appear in a conventional polishing device in an appropriate way. Thus, no open space, which would be an air hole in the mass, is formed in it.
  • the above is a mechanism whereby the inner cylinder can increase the polishing ability. Now we discuss the wear of the media.
  • the polishing of the workpieces wears the media.
  • the rubbing between media i.e., the contact pressure between them and the differences of the relative velocities between them, wears the media far more than the wear caused by the polishing of the workpieces.
  • the reason that the ratio of the wear of the media to the polishing of the workpieces does not increase is that the flow velocity of the mass becomes less as a whole because of the effects of (1) and (2) above, and because the inner cylinder is put on the center of the rotation of the turntable. Namely, the wear of the media is decreased because the flow velocity of the mass is less as a whole.
  • the increase in the wear of the media by increasing the pressure that is applied to the mass is compensated for by the decrease in the wear by decreasing its flow velocity.
  • the polishing of the workpieces was increased by 1.4 - 2.4 times more than that of the conventional technology that had no inner cylinder.
  • the wear of the media was increased by just 1.2 - 1.4 times more than that of the conventional technology.
  • the efficiency for the polishing was increased by 1.2 - 1.7 times. Namely, the wear of the media can be decreased in order to polish a certain number of workpieces and the polishing ability can be increased compared to the wear of the media. Therefore, the running cost of the media can be decreased, the time necessary to polish can be decreased, and the productivity can be increased.
  • a workpiece means an object to be polished
  • a medium means an abrasive material that polishes the workpieces by removing the burrs of them, rounding them, glazing them, and removing the scales of them by rubbing the workpieces with it.
  • any configuration can be adopted for the inside of the inner cylinder 4, which is concentrically put on the center of rotation of the turntable 2.
  • the inside of it may be solid or hollow, and the hollow part may be reinforced.
  • the shape of it is not restricted to be cylindrical. It may be conical or shaped as an inverted cone.
  • the fluid barrel-polishing device of the invention comprises a cylindrical fixed tank 1, a turntable 2 that is located at the bottom of the tank 1 with a gap 3 that allows the turntable to rotate slideably on it, and an inner cylinder 4 that is concentrically put on the center of rotation of the turntable 2, as Fig. 1 shows.
  • the horizontal rotation of the turntable 2 imparts a centrifugal force going in a direction from the center of the rotation to the lateral wall of the fixed tank 1 to the workpieces and the media that are put in the fixed tank 1.
  • the centrifugal force that is imparted to the workpieces and the media is transformed into a climbing force when they reach the lateral wall of the fixed tank 1, and the climbing force drives them up.
  • the mass (M) circulates under this condition. Accordingly, the pressure for the mass (M) also works on the inner side of it, and the contact pressure between the workpieces and media, which compose the mass (M), is increased, and thus the polishing ability of the device is increased.
  • hard and soft test pieces were used as the objects to be polished (also referred to as a "workpiece"), and the amount and the rate of the wear of the media were examined, and the amount and the ratio of the polishing of the soft and the hard workpieces respectively in examples 1 and 2, and comparative example 1 were examined.
  • the ways of attaching the inner cylinder are considered to be three types, i. e., a fixed rotating type, an accompanied rotating type, and a variable rotating type.
  • the fixed rotating type means the type that has an inner cylinder that is put on the center of rotation of a turntable and that is fixed by fixing bolts so that it is rotated at the same speed as the turntable.
  • Fig. 3A shows this type.
  • the accompanied rotating type means the type that has an inner cylinder that is put on the center of rotation of a turntable and supported by bearings so that it is rotated by being driven by the circulating flow of the mass.
  • Fig. 3B shows this type.
  • the variable rotating type means the type that has an inner cylinder that is put on the center of rotation of a turntable and has another rotating mechanism that controls its velocity at an appropriate value in accordance with the specifications of the workpiece and/or the medium.
  • Fig 3C shows this type.
  • Examples 1 and 2 had an inner cylinder 4 that was put on the center of rotation of a turntable 2, but comparative example 1 had no inner cylinder.
  • the common testing conditions were that hard test pieces made of a material S45C and soft test pieces made of a material A2017 were used as the objects to be polished (hereafter, "workpieces"), a material that had a cone shape with a 20 mm bottom diameter, an abrasive compound, and water, were used as an abrasive material (hereafter, "media”), the velocity of the rotation of the turntable 2 was 250 min -1 , and the time for polishing was 30 min.
  • the inner cylinder 4 of examples 1 and 2 had a diameter of 220 mm.
  • the inner cylinder 4 was not tightly fixed on the center of rotation of the turntable 2, but it was supported by a shaft so that it could be rotated as accompanied rotating, and its velocity rotation was 50 min -1 .
  • comparative example 1 was conventional technology, i.e., no inner cylinder was provided.
  • the amount and the ratio of wear of the media of examples 1 and 2 were compared to those of comparative example 1.
  • the inner cylinder 4 was provided on the center of rotation of the turntable 2.
  • comparative example 1 a conventional technology was used and no inner cylinder was provided.
  • the amount and the ratio of wear of the media of example 1 were more than those of comparative example 1, and those of example 2 were almost the same as those of comparative example 1.
  • the reason that the amount and the ratio of wear of the media of example 1 were more than those of comparative example 1, which used a conventional technology, is considered to be that the contact pressure between the media and the object to be polished and that between the media were increased by being provided with the inner cylinder 4 shown in Fig. 1, because no open space of a mass (M) as shown in Fig. 2 was formed, which would have been formed if a conventional fluid barrel-polishing device had been used. It is also considered to be that the velocity of the rotation of the inner cylinder 4 was 250 mm -1 (i.e., it was a relatively high velocity), which was the same velocity as that of turntable 2. In the above case, the velocity of the flow of the mass (M) as a whole was less than that when conventional technology was used, wherein no inner cylinder was provided.
  • the flow velocity of the mass (M) was estimated by the measurement of the velocity of the upper surface of the mass (M), because there was no way to measure it directly.
  • the amount and the ratio of the polishing of the hard and the soft test pieces of examples 1 and 2 were both increased to about twice those of comparative example 1, which used a conventional technology. This is because the inner cylinder 4 shown in Fig. 1 was provided as discussed above, and because no open space, which would have been formed in conventional technology (comparative example 1), was formed. Therefore the pressure from the inner cylinder against the mass (M) worked to increase the polishing ability. Thus, it was proven that the inner cylinder of the invention was able to increase the amount and the ratio of the polishing of the test pieces, whether they were hard or soft.
  • the amount and the ratio of the polishing in example 2 were both increased to twice above those of the conventional technology shown in comparative example 1.
  • the reason is considered to be that since the velocity of the flow of the mass was less than that of example 1, the workpieces (test pieces) were fluidized in the area that was at the bottom of the polishing tank and near the turntable, where the polishing ability was largest.
  • the ratio of the polishing means the value that is given by dividing the amount of the polishing of a test piece per hour by the ratio of the wear of the media. It suggests that the larger the ratio is, the lower the running cost is.
  • Examples 3, 4, and 5 had an inner cylinder 4, which was put on the center of rotation of a turntable 2. But comparative example 2 had no inner cylinder.
  • the common testing condition was that actual workpieces, which were rocker arms used as automotive parts and were made of SCM, were used as the objects to be polished (workpieces). Test pieces that were made of the same material as the actual workpieces were used for reference. Fired ceramic that was harder, smaller, and had a larger specific gravity than the one used in examples 1 and 2, an abrasive compound, and water were used as media.
  • the velocity of the rotation of the turntable 2 was 250 min -1 , and the time for polishing was 30 min.
  • the shape of the workpiece, which is the rocker arm used as an automotive part, is shown in Fig. 4.
  • the outside diameter of it was 220 mm, which was the same as that of examples 1 and 2.
  • the outside diameter of it was 260 mm, which was larger than that.
  • the way of providing it on the turntable 2 in examples 3 and 5 it was put on the center of rotation of the turntable 2 and fixed by fixing bolts and was rotated at the same velocity (200 min -1 ) as that of the turntable 2.
  • no inner cylinder 4 was provided, which was conventional technology.
  • the workpieces, the media, the abrasive compound, and water were put into the respective devices that corresponded to the examples and the comparative example, and the turntable was rotated at a velocity of 200 min -1 .
  • the results of the tests were as shown in Table 4.
  • the machine, the media, and the abrasive compound that were used for the tests were all made by Sintobrator, Ltd.
  • Table 3 Testing Machine (Type) Fluid Barrel-Polishing Device (EVF - 04) Testing Machine / Inside Diameter of Fixed Tank ⁇ 440 mm Testing Machine / Inner Volume of Fixed Tank 40 L Testing Machine / Velocity of the Rotation of the Turntable 200 min -1 Inner Cylinder / Outside Diameter ⁇ 220 mm (cylindrical), ⁇ 260 mm (cylindrical) Medium (Part No.) / Size, Shape Ceramic (AX-T6 ⁇ 5) / triangle pole, 6 mm on a side Medium / Quantity 15 L Abrasive Compound SCL-3 Abrasive Compound / Quantity 30 mL Water / Added Quantity 11.5 L Workpiece / Name of Article, Material, and Quantity Rocker Arm for Tappet Roller, S45C, Shown Fig.
  • example 5 But the amount and the ratio of example 5 were 1.2 times more than example 3, wherein its inner cylinder had a larger outside diameter (D2) than did that of example 3. This is because as the outside diameter of the inner cylinder was increased, the width (D1 - D2) of the fluidized mass (M), which had an inside diameter of D1, was decreased and the pressure from it against the mass (M) was considered to be increased, and the height (H1 and H2) of the mass (M) also became higher and the pressure from the upper part of the mass (M) was considered to be increased.
  • either the maximum outside diameter (D2) of the inner cylinder 4 or the maximum ratio of it to the internal diameter (D1) of the fixed tank 1, which determines the fluidized area of mass (M) and the contact pressure between the media and the workpieces, must be determined by considering the material and the size of the media, and the shape, the size, the material, the quality of the workpieces, etc.
  • an inner cylinder 4 with a large outside diameter (D2) is preferable when the workpieces and media are small, and that with a small outside diameter (D2) is preferable when they are large.
  • the efficiency for the polishing of workpieces is equivalent to the ratio of the polishing of the test pieces, which was already defined in the previous description of examples 1 and 2 and comparative example 1. Namely, it is given by dividing the amount of the polishing of the work pieces per hour by the ratio of the wear of the media. It suggests that the larger the ratio is, the lower the running cost.
  • the quantity of the soft test pieces as the objects to be polished (workpieces) of Table 2 was few (3 pieces). The purpose of this test was to confirm that the workpieces were polished without making any scratch marks or marks caused by collisions on the surfaces of them. In the case of polishing the workpieces that are rigorously quality-controlled, it was found that their quantity to be thrown into the fixed tank should decrease. The example shown in Table 2 falls into this case. In contrast, in the case of Table 4, the quantity of the rocker arms of automotive parts (actual workpieces) as the object to be polished (workpieces) was more than that of Table 2, because the purpose of this test was to evaluate the efficiency for polishing certain hard workpieces.
  • the contact pressures on the workpieces were varied in each case depending on the media, which are listed in Table 5. Namely, the contact pressure of the firing media that were used as the examples in Table 4 (examples 3 - 5, and comparative example 2) was greater than that of the synthetic resin media that were used as the examples in Table 2 (examples 1 and 2, and comparative example 1).
  • Table 5 Table 2 (examples 1 and 2, comparative example 1)
  • Table 4 (examples 3-5, comparative example 2) Material Synthetic Resin Media Firing Media Base Synthetic Resin Ceramic Shape (size) Cone ( ⁇ 20 mm) Triangle Pole ( ⁇ 6 mm ⁇ t 5 mm) Bulk Density (kg/L) 1.1 1.5
  • the amount and the ratio of the wear of the media had no significant differences between examples 1 and 2.
  • the differences were associated with "whether the inner cylinder was provided.” Further, they had no significant differences between examples 1 and 2. The differences were associated with "what was the velocity of rotation of the inner cylinder.”
  • Table 6 was prepared to show the data that correspond to the figures if each item of the comparative data were to be converted to 100 for reference. Each item of the data was obtained when no inner cylinder was provided (i.e., comparative examples 1 and 2). Table 6 (The Conversion Table of Table 2) Comparative Example 1 Example 1 Example 2 Inner Cylinder?

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
  • Mechanical Treatment Of Semiconductor (AREA)
EP05719135A 2005-02-15 2005-02-15 Flusstrommelpoliervorrichtung und polierverfahren Not-in-force EP1852219B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2005/002233 WO2006087765A1 (ja) 2005-02-15 2005-02-15 流動バレル研磨装置及び研磨方法

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1852219A1 true EP1852219A1 (de) 2007-11-07
EP1852219A4 EP1852219A4 (de) 2009-04-15
EP1852219B1 EP1852219B1 (de) 2010-11-03

Family

ID=36916181

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05719135A Not-in-force EP1852219B1 (de) 2005-02-15 2005-02-15 Flusstrommelpoliervorrichtung und polierverfahren

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US7871307B2 (de)
EP (1) EP1852219B1 (de)
JP (1) JP4985393B2 (de)
KR (1) KR101083479B1 (de)
CN (1) CN101163569B (de)
AT (1) ATE486692T1 (de)
CA (1) CA2597508C (de)
DE (1) DE602005024621D1 (de)
MX (1) MX2007009920A (de)
TW (1) TWI449596B (de)
WO (1) WO2006087765A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2594365A1 (de) * 2011-11-15 2013-05-22 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Verfahren zur Ermittlung eines Strömungsverhaltens eines Mediums

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102294642B (zh) * 2010-06-25 2014-03-26 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 抛光装置
CN103240661A (zh) * 2013-05-11 2013-08-14 河北金音乐器集团有限公司 一种铜质乐器零部件表面抛光方法
CN104416636B (zh) * 2013-08-27 2017-08-29 中集集团集装箱控股有限公司 去除竹筒表面竹青的方法及设备
WO2017170257A1 (ja) * 2016-03-28 2017-10-05 新東工業株式会社 振動バレル研磨方法及び振動バレル研磨システム
CN113414703B (zh) * 2021-08-23 2021-11-12 江苏巨亨智能科技有限公司 一种不锈钢管件打磨抛光设备

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4177608A (en) * 1978-01-16 1979-12-11 Roto-Finish Company, Inc. Finishing apparatus embodying improved seal and method
JPS5859762A (ja) * 1981-10-06 1983-04-08 Toyota Motor Corp メデイアかす除去装置付流動バレル装置
DE4243380A1 (de) * 1992-12-21 1994-06-23 Roesler Roland Oberflaechen Fliehkraftgleitschleifmaschine
AT178U1 (de) * 1991-09-24 1995-04-25 Johann Tauss Ges M B H Johann Maschine zum gleitschleifen

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS4635838Y1 (de) * 1968-04-18 1971-12-09
DE2700800C3 (de) 1977-01-11 1980-10-16 Herbert 4690 Herne Kuhlmann Steuerschieber für Betonpumpen
JPS57156165A (en) * 1981-03-20 1982-09-27 Toyota Motor Corp Barrel work unit
DE3604619A1 (de) * 1986-02-14 1987-08-20 Spaleck Gmbh Max Fliehkraftbearbeitungsmaschine
US5012620A (en) * 1987-10-06 1991-05-07 Roto-Finish Company, Inc. Centrifugal finishing apparatus embodying improved seal and method
DE3802542C1 (de) * 1988-01-28 1989-08-24 Max Spaleck Gmbh & Co Kg, 4290 Bocholt, De
DE4038253A1 (de) * 1990-11-30 1992-06-04 Spaleck Gmbh Max Fliehkraftbearbeitungsmaschine
JPH05329765A (ja) * 1992-05-28 1993-12-14 Hitachi Metals Ltd バレルによる研磨装置及び方法
JP2913473B2 (ja) * 1997-01-31 1999-06-28 株式会社チップトン 間隙調整機能を有する渦流バレル加工機及び退避層成形方法並びに間隙調整方法
DE29702859U1 (de) * 1997-02-19 1998-03-19 Gegenheimer, Helmut, 75210 Keltern Fliehkraft-Gleitschleifmaschine
JPH11285959A (ja) * 1998-04-01 1999-10-19 Sinto Brator Co Ltd 乾式バレル研磨方法及び乾式バレル研磨装置
DE19912348A1 (de) * 1999-03-19 2000-09-28 Gegenheimer Helmut Schleifmaschine
JP2001038601A (ja) * 1999-07-30 2001-02-13 Nissha Printing Co Ltd パターン状研磨物の製造方法
DE20009539U1 (de) * 2000-05-26 2001-08-02 Otec Praezisionsfinish Gmbh Vorrichtung zum Schleifen von Schleifgut
JP2003053656A (ja) * 2001-08-10 2003-02-26 Murata Mfg Co Ltd バレル研磨方法
JP2003103450A (ja) 2001-09-28 2003-04-08 Sinto Brator Co Ltd 乾式流動型バレル研磨装置における固定槽と回転盤との摺接部のシール方法および乾式流動型バレル研磨装置
JP2003191161A (ja) * 2001-12-21 2003-07-08 Ube Machinery Corporation Ltd 骨材研磨装置
JP2006055924A (ja) * 2004-08-18 2006-03-02 Shin Etsu Chem Co Ltd 希土類合金の面取り方法

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4177608A (en) * 1978-01-16 1979-12-11 Roto-Finish Company, Inc. Finishing apparatus embodying improved seal and method
JPS5859762A (ja) * 1981-10-06 1983-04-08 Toyota Motor Corp メデイアかす除去装置付流動バレル装置
AT178U1 (de) * 1991-09-24 1995-04-25 Johann Tauss Ges M B H Johann Maschine zum gleitschleifen
DE4243380A1 (de) * 1992-12-21 1994-06-23 Roesler Roland Oberflaechen Fliehkraftgleitschleifmaschine

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2006087765A1 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2594365A1 (de) * 2011-11-15 2013-05-22 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Verfahren zur Ermittlung eines Strömungsverhaltens eines Mediums
US9330231B2 (en) 2011-11-15 2016-05-03 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg Method for determining a flow behavior of a medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2597508C (en) 2012-02-07
CA2597508A1 (en) 2006-08-24
WO2006087765A1 (ja) 2006-08-24
US20080166954A1 (en) 2008-07-10
EP1852219B1 (de) 2010-11-03
CN101163569A (zh) 2008-04-16
MX2007009920A (es) 2008-03-13
KR20070110494A (ko) 2007-11-19
US7871307B2 (en) 2011-01-18
ATE486692T1 (de) 2010-11-15
TWI449596B (zh) 2014-08-21
KR101083479B1 (ko) 2011-11-16
EP1852219A4 (de) 2009-04-15
CN101163569B (zh) 2013-01-02
TW200631729A (en) 2006-09-16
DE602005024621D1 (de) 2010-12-16
JPWO2006087765A1 (ja) 2008-07-03
JP4985393B2 (ja) 2012-07-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1852219B1 (de) Flusstrommelpoliervorrichtung und polierverfahren
EP2996840B1 (de) Anordnungen und verfahren zur schleifmittelstromesbearbeitung
US5997390A (en) Polishing apparatus with improved alignment of polishing plates
US6171179B1 (en) Ball grinding machine
CN103894916B (zh) 一种圆锥抛光装置
JP2009197873A (ja) セラミックス製球状体の製造方法、この方法で得られた転動体を有する転がり支持装置、転がり軸受、エアコンのインバータモータ用転がり軸受
US3746523A (en) Device for holding a ring formed workpiece
JP2008224669A (ja) 浮遊研磨粒子を含有するラッピング・システムを有するセンターレス超仕上げ装置
JP2001025948A (ja) 球体研磨砥石
CN112276785B (zh) 一种双行波作动轴承滚子超声研磨装置
CN209394483U (zh) 用于圆柱滚子滚动表面精加工的磁性研磨盘及设备
CN112605821B (zh) 电子陶瓷材料表面湿研磨设备及其研磨方法
JPH08257897A (ja) 中心に穴を有する浮子と砥粒を含む磁性流体の循環装 置のある球体の研磨方法及びその装置
US2655769A (en) Lapping machine
CN108673341B (zh) 快速定心夹紧机构
JP4671996B2 (ja) ボール加工用竪軸型研磨機
US11850812B2 (en) Environmentally friendly straw and manufacturing method thereof
Lynah Lapping
Molenda Influence of lapping velocity, pressure, and time on ceramic elements machining results
JPS6039510B2 (ja) 平面研摩方法
JPH03234465A (ja) 円柱体の製造方法およびラップ装置
CN115740957A (zh) 一种基于挤压滚磨的光整加工方法及加工装置
JPH11300604A (ja) 球体研磨盤
Kang et al. A study on the lapping of ceramic balls
Przyklenek Abrasive Flow Machining: A Process for Surface Finishing and Deburring of Workpieces with a Complicated Shape

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070814

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20090313

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090914

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SINTOKOGIO, LTD.

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005024621

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20101216

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20101103

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20101103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110303

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110203

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110303

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110204

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110214

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110228

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602005024621

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110215

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20120228

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20120222

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20120405

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 602005024621

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120823

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20130215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101103

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20131031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005024621

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130903

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130215

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130228

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130903