EP1817438A1 - Migrationsarme kupferlegierung - Google Patents
Migrationsarme kupferlegierungInfo
- Publication number
- EP1817438A1 EP1817438A1 EP06840971A EP06840971A EP1817438A1 EP 1817438 A1 EP1817438 A1 EP 1817438A1 EP 06840971 A EP06840971 A EP 06840971A EP 06840971 A EP06840971 A EP 06840971A EP 1817438 A1 EP1817438 A1 EP 1817438A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- alloy
- components
- copper alloy
- copper
- weight
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C9/00—Alloys based on copper
- C22C9/04—Alloys based on copper with zinc as the next major constituent
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C9/00—Alloys based on copper
- C22C9/10—Alloys based on copper with silicon as the next major constituent
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a copper alloy.
- the present invention relates to a low-migration copper alloy for the production of components for gas and sanitary installation, especially for components that are used in drinking water installation and directly with the in the components, usually pipes, fittings and fittings, guided drinking water in contact come.
- EP-1 045 041 has already proposed a lead-free copper alloy which is said to have satisfactory machinability and which comprises up to 79% by weight of copper, from 2 to 4% by weight of silicon and the remainder zinc.
- This alloy is particularly suitable for the production of fittings, fittings and the like parts for water-bearing piping systems in question.
- the alloy does not behave like gunmetal, particularly with regard to corrosion resistance, and consequently can not substitute it.
- GB 1 443 090 discloses a dezincification-enhanced copper alloy having between 80 and 90 weight percent copper, between 6.3 and 17.5 weight percent zinc, and between 2.8 and 4.75 weight percent. % Silicon as essential alloying constituents with between 0.03 and 0.05 wt.% Arsenic.
- a heat treatment of the cast parts is proposed. In this heat treatment, the cast parts are annealed at temperatures between 600 0 C and 750 0 C over the period of 5 to 10 days and then quenched. This heat treatment is carried out with the aim of obtaining the ⁇ and ⁇ phases to be preferred in view of the corrosion. By quenching in particular the formation of phases is to be avoided, the corrosion resistance is low, so the ⁇ - and ⁇ -phase.
- a copper alloy is known containing up to 10% by weight of aluminum and up to 5 wt .-% iron and which is used for the production of water-bearing components of water installations.
- this alloy shows inadequate corrosion behavior and, in particular, excessive migration of metal ions into the water.
- the object of the present invention is to provide a copper alloy improved in terms of migration behavior, which is particularly suitable for producing media-carrying gas or water pipes and their parts and which has good corrosion resistance to the media, good strength and good machinability and castability has.
- machinability in particular, the chipping properties of the copper alloy are important.
- the invention wants to specify corresponding media-carrying components, in particular fittings or fittings, as well as an advantageous use of the copper alloy according to the invention.
- a copper alloy with the features of claim 1 is proposed with this.
- This copper alloy comprises between 2 and 4.5% by weight of silicon, between 1 and 15% by weight of zinc and between 0.05 and 2% by weight of manganese.
- the copper alloy may contain between 0.05 and 0.5% by weight of aluminum and / or between 0.05 and 2% by weight of tin.
- the remainder of the alloy contains copper and unavoidable impurities. These impurities are preferably limited to a content of 0.5% by weight. Most preferably, the upper limit for the impurities is 0.25%. This upper limit applies in particular to the cumulative nickel and lead content in the alloy, which has proven to be a particularly effective measure for suppressing the migration of lead or nickel.
- the alloy is preferably free of lead and / or nickel.
- a lead-free alloy an alloy is considered in which the content of lead is less than 0.25%.
- the nickel-free alloy is considered to be an alloy in which the nickel content is less than 0.15%.
- the alloy should contain between 0.01 and 0.05 wt% zircon.
- the zirconium content should be between 0.01% and 0.03% by weight; more preferably, the upper limit is set at 0.02 wt%. This interval applies to all cast components except sand castings. Grain refining usually results only from 0.01% by weight; above 0.02 wt.%, the risk of zirconium formation in the grain boundary region increases. Zircon improves the solidification morphology and reduces the formation of hot cracks, especially during chill casting. In particular, in castings, which are made by sand casting, however, can be dispensed with a deliberate addition of zirconium. In these components, the zirconium content may be below 0.01 wt%, preferably even below 5 ppm (0.0005%).
- the preferred zirconia upper limit of 0.02% should be maintained to avoid zirconia formation in the grain boundary region of the microstructure leading to increased tool wear during machining of the alloyed water-pipe components.
- phosphorus should be provided with certain proportions.
- Phosphorus is preferably present at a level of from 0.01% to 0.2% by weight.
- Phosphorus is controlled in particular with a view to improving the castability (flow and feeding behavior of the alloy) within the limits specified.
- phosphorus reduces the dezincification of the alloy and improves the corrosion resistance.
- the alloy shows a good casting behavior.
- the components produced by casting can be easily machined. Tests on specimens have shown that the strength meets the requirements to be met.
- the corrosion resistance of the alloy is high. It has been shown that by controlling the phosphorus content in the alloy, the scrap rate in the castings can be limited. Accordingly, the degree of impurity of phosphorus is preferably controlled in a range of 0.01 to 0.05% by weight.
- the aluminum content of the copper alloy of the present invention is set with respect to the corrosion resistance thereof. At present, it is considered that good corrosion resistance can be obtained with an aluminum content of between 0.05 and 0.5% by weight. Without significant loss of quality, the upper limit of the aluminum content may be set to 0.4% by weight.
- the components in question for media-carrying lines easily with the usual casting process, for example, in the sand, mold, spin or continuous casting can be produced.
- the casting thus obtained can be processed well spanariad.
- the casting is preferably annealed at between 400 0 C and 800 0 C for at least half an hour.
- the heat treatment is carried out in a temperature interval of between 600 ° C and 700 0 C.
- the annealing time can be arbitrarily long. In terms of economic constraints, however, this is set at between 2 and 16 hours. In this glow time, the Aufzeitphase is not included.
- the annealing takes place in particular with the aim of adjusting the ⁇ -phase in the cast component, which, according to the present inventions, enables the combination of different properties to be achieved. It should be noted, however, that even the majority of the necessary alloying elements copper, zinc and silicon solidifies in the form of ⁇ -mixed crystals during a natural cooling from the melt without separate heat treatment.
- the upper limit of the silicon content is set to 4.5 wt% not least also in view of the machinability of the alloy.
- the zinc content is limited to 15 wt .-%.
- a minimum content of 1% by weight of zinc guarantees a minimum of machinability.
- Manganese is added to the alloy within the limits of 0.05 to 2% by weight in order to improve the microstructure. Manganese refines the microstructure and positively influences the solidification behavior of the copper alloy. However, the manganese content is limited to 2% by weight in consideration of the migration tendency of manganese.
- Limiting the sum of the impurities to a maximum of 0.5% by weight limits the content of ingredients that may possibly migrate into the drinking water to a minimum that is also economically desirable. With a further limited upper limit of the unavoidable impurities of 0.25% by weight, a higher security against migration, but at the expense of manufacturing costs, can be achieved.
- the alloy according to the invention contains between 5 and 15% by weight of zinc. In this limited interval, the best possible combination of corrosion resistance and machinability can be achieved.
- the silicon content is set at between 2.8% by weight and 4% by weight.
- the content is preferably set at 0.2 to 0.6 wt .-%.
- the alloy preferably contains no nickel or lead at all for the same reasons.
- the copper content in the alloy should be at least 80 and not more than 96.95% by weight.
- the use of the copper alloy according to the invention for the production of components for media-carrying Gas L. Water pipes proposed. These include, in particular, such components Understand which drinking water pipes form, in particular fittings and fittings and parts thereof. Not least because of the good stress-strain properties of the copper alloy according to the invention should preferably be made of a compression connector of the copper alloy according to the invention.
- the compression connectors can either be designed as separate components or can be provided with material or positive fit to the fitting or the fitting.
- the press connectors can be realized as integral components in the casting of the fitting or the fitting of the copper alloy according to the invention.
- the cast alloy according to the invention is particularly suitable for producing an element of a press connection arrangement, as known, for example, from EP 0 343 395 or DE 102004 031 247.
- FIG. 2 is a graph comparing nickel migration of one embodiment of the copper alloy of the present invention versus a conventional gunmetal alloy.
- FIG. 3 is a graph comparing copper migration of one embodiment of the copper alloy of the present invention versus a conventional gunmetal alloy.
- FIG. 4 is a graph comparing zinc migration of one embodiment of the copper alloy of the present invention versus a conventional gunmetal alloy.
- Figs. 1 to 4 show the time course of the release of certain metal ions in a measurement arrangement according to DIN 50931-1 over a total period of 26 weeks.
- the DIN specifies the examination arrangement and the examination conditions, with the help of which the corrosion likelihood of materials for metallic components of a drinking water installation can be determined in case of corrosive contamination of drinking water.
- Mn 0.5% by weight; unavoidable impurities in total: max. 0.5% by weight; and as the rest of copper.
- the results are compared in the respective representations of FIGS. 1 to 4 with those measured values that can be achieved in a conventional gunmetal alloy under the same experimental conditions.
- the gunmetal alloy has the following composition:
- the measurement results with the exemplary embodiment of the copper alloy according to the invention are marked with A.
- the comparison measurement with the gunmetal alloy with B.
- FIGS. 1 to 3 also contain a limit value according to the German Drinking Water Ordinance (TrinkwV) for the delivery of certain ions to water and the parameter value W (15) to be observed during migration tests.
- This parameter value W (15) must be adhered to if it is intended to avoid exceeding the value of the TrinkwV when using the tested component.
- the parameter value W (15) results from the product of the limit value according to the TrinkwV and the ratio of the form factors A and B.
- the form factor A results according to DIN 50931-1 from the ratio of the water-wetted surface of the material to the water-contacting surface of the entire test section.
- the form factor B is a standardization factor in accordance with DIN 50930-6, which takes into account the type of components.
- FIG. 1 illustrates that the lead-release quantity of the gunmetal alloy of a very high value, greater than 50 ⁇ g / l, drops almost exponentially within the first four weeks of the trial to a value which is just above the limit value of the German PrincipalwV of 10 ⁇ g / l after 12 to 26 weeks of testing.
- this significant excess is attributed to the fact that lead, which had been introduced to the surface of the component to be tested, migrated into the drinking water as a result of the processing and production of the test part.
- the near-surface lead has migrated out of the sample and the amount of discharged lead remains approximately constant.
- the embodiment of the invention A are on the drinking water as good as no lead. Even an increased value at the beginning of the experiments can not be seen. Since the measured values are at the limit of the resolution of the measurement analysis, the fluctuations in the measured values are attributed to the measuring accuracy of the measuring apparatus. Essentially, the measured value for the lead release in the sample according to the invention remains significantly below the limit value of the drinking water consumption of 10 ⁇ g / l.
- the comparison sample from the gunmetal alloy shows a typical course in which the conventional alloy after nine weeks exceeds the limit value according to the German UlwV, after a maximum in about the 18th Week slowly back to the limit value of the TrinkwV.
- the copper alloy A according to the invention does not emit any appreciable nickel ions to the drinking water.
- the measured values of about 2 ⁇ g / l are in the range of the resolution of the analysis related to the measuring instruments.
- the two alloys compared show essentially the same course.
- the alloy A according to the invention in each case assumes lower values for the copper release in ⁇ g / l within the time-meaningful test results. The maximum for both alloys is the measured value after 18 weeks of testing. Thereafter, the copper output drops for both alloys.
- Fig. 4 shows the amount of zinc released by the alloy into the drinking water.
- no limit is set according to the TrinkwV.
- the course of the zinc release in the case of the copper alloy A according to the invention differs considerably from the corresponding course for the comparative alloy B.
- the migration of the embodiment A of the zinc alloy according to the invention is at all times below 100 ⁇ g / l.
- the conventional alloy B exceeds this value many times.
- FIGS. 1 to 4 illustrate the advantages of the copper alloy according to the invention, in particular the influence of silicon for the suppression of undesired metal ion migration into the drinking water.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Domestic Plumbing Installations (AREA)
- Rigid Pipes And Flexible Pipes (AREA)
- Conductive Materials (AREA)
- Parts Printed On Printed Circuit Boards (AREA)
- Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP06840971A EP1817438B1 (de) | 2005-12-14 | 2006-12-13 | Migrationsarme kupferlegierung |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP05027341.6A EP1798298B2 (de) | 2005-12-14 | 2005-12-14 | Verwendung einer migrationsarmen Kupferlegierung sowie Bauteile aus dieser Legierung |
PCT/EP2006/012008 WO2007068470A1 (de) | 2005-12-14 | 2006-12-13 | Migrationsarme kupferlegierung |
EP06840971A EP1817438B1 (de) | 2005-12-14 | 2006-12-13 | Migrationsarme kupferlegierung |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1817438A1 true EP1817438A1 (de) | 2007-08-15 |
EP1817438B1 EP1817438B1 (de) | 2008-10-01 |
Family
ID=36499302
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05027341.6A Active EP1798298B2 (de) | 2005-12-14 | 2005-12-14 | Verwendung einer migrationsarmen Kupferlegierung sowie Bauteile aus dieser Legierung |
EP06840971A Revoked EP1817438B1 (de) | 2005-12-14 | 2006-12-13 | Migrationsarme kupferlegierung |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05027341.6A Active EP1798298B2 (de) | 2005-12-14 | 2005-12-14 | Verwendung einer migrationsarmen Kupferlegierung sowie Bauteile aus dieser Legierung |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20090214380A1 (de) |
EP (2) | EP1798298B2 (de) |
JP (1) | JP4838859B2 (de) |
AT (2) | ATE380259T1 (de) |
DE (2) | DE502005002181D1 (de) |
ES (2) | ES2297598T5 (de) |
NO (1) | NO20083081L (de) |
WO (1) | WO2007068470A1 (de) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2290114A1 (de) | 2009-08-04 | 2011-03-02 | Gebr. Kemper GmbH + Co. KG Metallwerke | Wasserführendes Bauteil |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1801250B1 (de) * | 2005-12-22 | 2017-11-08 | Viega Technology GmbH & Co. KG | Migrationsarme Bauteile aus Kupferlegierung für Medien oder Trinkwasser führender Gewerke |
DE102007059182B4 (de) | 2007-12-06 | 2017-04-13 | Viega Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren zum Herstellen einer unlösbaren Verbindung sowie unlösbare Verbindung zwischen einem Fitting und einem Rohr, Fitting für ein Rohr mit einem vorgegebenen Innendurchmesser und lösbare Verbindung zwischen mindestens einem Fitting und einem Fittinggrundkörper |
DE202009016240U1 (de) | 2009-11-27 | 2010-04-29 | Weihmann, Andreas, Dipl.-Designer | Wassergewinnungssystemtechnologie |
DE102010055055B3 (de) * | 2010-12-17 | 2012-05-10 | Wieland-Werke Ag | Verwendung einer Kupfer-Zinn-Mehrstoffbronze |
DE102012013817A1 (de) * | 2012-07-12 | 2014-01-16 | Wieland-Werke Ag | Formteile aus korrosionsbeständigen Kupferlegierungen |
DE102013012288A1 (de) | 2013-07-24 | 2015-01-29 | Wieland-Werke Ag | Korngefeinte Kupfer-Gusslegierung |
DE202016101661U1 (de) | 2016-03-29 | 2017-06-30 | Geberit International Ag | Bauteil für medienführende Gas- oder Wasserleitungen |
CN106011528A (zh) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-10-12 | 来安县赛华管业有限公司 | 用于饮用水管的环保合金管材 |
DE102018004702A1 (de) | 2018-06-12 | 2019-12-12 | Gebr. Kemper Gmbh + Co. Kg Metallwerke | Formteile aus einer korrosionsbeständigen und zerspanbaren Kupferlegierung |
DE202019101597U1 (de) * | 2019-03-20 | 2019-04-23 | Otto Fuchs - Kommanditgesellschaft - | Cu-Zn-Legierung |
GB2614752B (en) | 2022-01-18 | 2024-07-31 | Conex Ipr Ltd | Components for drinking water pipes, and method for manufacturing same |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH148195A (de) * | 1930-05-27 | 1931-07-15 | Hirsch Kupfer & Messingwerke | Kupfer-Silizium-Zinklegierung. |
DE585002C (de) * | 1930-05-28 | 1933-09-27 | Hirsch Kupfer Und Messingwerke | Kupfer-Silicium-Zink-Legierung |
AU465605B2 (en) | 1971-08-11 | 1975-10-02 | Toyo Valve Co., Ltd | Copper rase alloy |
GB1443090A (en) | 1974-03-25 | 1976-07-21 | Anaconda Co | Silicon brass resistant to partin corrosion- |
JPS5837143A (ja) * | 1981-08-27 | 1983-03-04 | Furukawa Electric Co Ltd:The | 高強度耐食銅合金 |
ATE139017T1 (de) | 1988-05-25 | 1996-06-15 | Nussbaum & Co Ag R | Pressverbindungsanordnung, armatur und verfahren zur herstellung |
WO1994024325A1 (de) * | 1993-04-16 | 1994-10-27 | Ideal-Standard Gmbh | Messinglegierung |
DE4324008C2 (de) * | 1993-07-17 | 2003-03-27 | Km Europa Metal Ag | Verwendung einer korrosionsbeständigen Legierung auf Kupferbasis |
DE4326550C1 (de) * | 1993-08-07 | 1994-11-24 | Sprenger Herm Gmbh Co Kg | Verwendung einer Kupferlegierung zur Herstellung von Pferdegebissen bzw. Teilen davon |
JP3734372B2 (ja) * | 1998-10-12 | 2006-01-11 | 三宝伸銅工業株式会社 | 無鉛快削性銅合金 |
EP2230323A1 (de) * | 2002-09-09 | 2010-09-22 | Mitsubishi Shindoh Co., Ltd. | Hochfeste Kupferlegierung |
DE10308778B3 (de) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-08-12 | Wieland-Werke Ag | Bleifreie Kupferlegierung und deren Verwendung |
CH696672A5 (de) | 2003-10-01 | 2007-09-14 | Nussbaum & Co Ag R | Armatur. |
DE102004013181B3 (de) * | 2004-03-17 | 2005-09-22 | Federal-Mogul Nürnberg GmbH | Kolben für einen Verbrennungsmotor, Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Kolbens sowie Verwendung einer Kupferlegierung zur Herstellung eines Kolbens |
-
2005
- 2005-12-14 ES ES05027341.6T patent/ES2297598T5/es active Active
- 2005-12-14 DE DE502005002181T patent/DE502005002181D1/de active Active
- 2005-12-14 EP EP05027341.6A patent/EP1798298B2/de active Active
- 2005-12-14 AT AT05027341T patent/ATE380259T1/de active
-
2006
- 2006-12-13 ES ES06840971T patent/ES2314946T3/es active Active
- 2006-12-13 JP JP2008544870A patent/JP4838859B2/ja active Active
- 2006-12-13 WO PCT/EP2006/012008 patent/WO2007068470A1/de active Application Filing
- 2006-12-13 AT AT06840971T patent/ATE409753T1/de active
- 2006-12-13 US US12/095,615 patent/US20090214380A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-12-13 DE DE502006001675T patent/DE502006001675D1/de active Active
- 2006-12-13 EP EP06840971A patent/EP1817438B1/de not_active Revoked
-
2008
- 2008-07-09 NO NO20083081A patent/NO20083081L/no not_active Application Discontinuation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2007068470A1 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2290114A1 (de) | 2009-08-04 | 2011-03-02 | Gebr. Kemper GmbH + Co. KG Metallwerke | Wasserführendes Bauteil |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2007068470A1 (de) | 2007-06-21 |
US20090214380A1 (en) | 2009-08-27 |
EP1798298B1 (de) | 2007-12-05 |
EP1817438B1 (de) | 2008-10-01 |
JP2009519377A (ja) | 2009-05-14 |
EP1798298B2 (de) | 2016-05-04 |
ES2297598T3 (es) | 2008-05-01 |
ES2314946T3 (es) | 2009-03-16 |
ATE409753T1 (de) | 2008-10-15 |
DE502005002181D1 (de) | 2008-01-17 |
ES2297598T5 (es) | 2016-06-03 |
DE502006001675D1 (de) | 2008-11-13 |
ATE380259T1 (de) | 2007-12-15 |
JP4838859B2 (ja) | 2011-12-14 |
EP1798298A1 (de) | 2007-06-20 |
NO20083081L (no) | 2008-07-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1817438B1 (de) | Migrationsarme kupferlegierung | |
DE69838115T2 (de) | Bleifreie Automatenkupferlegierung | |
DE69828818T2 (de) | Automatenlegierung auf kupferbasis | |
DE69124835T2 (de) | Verfahren für gut zerspanbare bleifreie Knetlegierungen auf Kupferbasis | |
EP3225707B1 (de) | Bauteil für medienführende gas- oder wasserleitungen, das eine kupferlegierung enthält | |
EP2964798B1 (de) | Kupfer-zink-legierung für eine sanitärarmatur sowie verfahren zu deren herstellung | |
EP1801250B1 (de) | Migrationsarme Bauteile aus Kupferlegierung für Medien oder Trinkwasser führender Gewerke | |
EP1439238B1 (de) | Korrosionsbeständige Messinglegierung für Trinkwasserformteile | |
EP3908682B1 (de) | Pb-freie cu-zn-legierung | |
EP3529389A1 (de) | Kupfer-zink-legierung | |
DE4233668C2 (de) | Korrosionsfeste Legierung auf Kupferbasis | |
EP1273671B1 (de) | Entzinkungsbeständige Kupfer-Zink-Legierung sowie Verfahren zu ihrer Herstellung | |
EP1749897B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Herstellung von wasserführenden Kupfer-Gussteilen mit durch Glühen verringerter Migrationsneigung | |
EP0642596B1 (de) | Messinglegierung | |
DE60311803T2 (de) | Kupferlegierung, die exzellente Korrosionsbeständigkeit und Entzinkungsbeständigkeit aufweist, und eine Methode zu deren Herstellung | |
EP3581667A2 (de) | Formteile aus einer korrosionsbeständigen und zerspanbaren kupferlegierung | |
EP1980633B1 (de) | Verwendung einer Bronzelegierung für ein Schneckenzahnrad | |
EP2290114A1 (de) | Wasserführendes Bauteil | |
EP3899073B1 (de) | Cu-zn-legierung | |
EP0572959A1 (de) | Messinglegierung | |
DE102022002927B4 (de) | Knetwerkstoff aus einer Kupfer-Zink- Legierung, Halbzeug aus einemKnetwerkstoff und Verfahren zur Herstellung von solchem Halbzeug | |
AT512120B1 (de) | Aluminiumlegierung mit tantal | |
EP1652946A1 (de) | Kupferlegierung | |
EP3436615A2 (de) | Bauteil für medienführende gas- oder wasserleitungen, das eine kupferlegierung enthält | |
WO1994024325A1 (de) | Messinglegierung |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20070504 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: R. A. EGLI & CO. PATENTANWAELTE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502006001675 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20081113 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2314946 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090101 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090302 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090201 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: GEBR. KEMPER G.M.B.H. + CO. KG METALLWERKE Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: VIEGA G.M.B.H. & CO. KG Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: R. NUSSBAUM A.G. METALLGIESSEREI UND ARMATURENFAB Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: JRG GUNZENHAUSER A.G. Effective date: 20081231 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: REHAU AG & CO. Effective date: 20090626 Opponent name: KAIMER GMBH & CO. HOLDING KG Effective date: 20090701 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: KAIMER GMBH & CO. HOLDING KG Opponent name: REHAU AG & CO. |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081213 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090402 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090102 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: REHAU AG & CO. Effective date: 20090626 Opponent name: KAIMER GMBH & CO. HOLDING KG Effective date: 20090701 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20121224 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20121217 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20121227 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20121219 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R103 Ref document number: 502006001675 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R064 Ref document number: 502006001675 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20130117 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20121227 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20121226 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20121221 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20121218 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
RDAG | Patent revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
27W | Patent revoked |
Effective date: 20130424 |
|
GBPR | Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state |
Effective date: 20130424 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R107 Ref document number: 502006001675 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20131212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MA03 Ref document number: 409753 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20131023 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES Effective date: 20081001 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF THE APPLICANT RENOUNCES Effective date: 20081001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: ECNC |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: ECNC |