EP1481287A2 - Vorrichtung, euv-lithographiegerät und verfahren zur vermeidung und reinigung von kontamination auf optischen elementen - Google Patents
Vorrichtung, euv-lithographiegerät und verfahren zur vermeidung und reinigung von kontamination auf optischen elementenInfo
- Publication number
- EP1481287A2 EP1481287A2 EP03711941A EP03711941A EP1481287A2 EP 1481287 A2 EP1481287 A2 EP 1481287A2 EP 03711941 A EP03711941 A EP 03711941A EP 03711941 A EP03711941 A EP 03711941A EP 1481287 A2 EP1481287 A2 EP 1481287A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- photocurrent
- gas
- threshold value
- hydrogen
- carbon
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/20—Exposure; Apparatus therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/708—Construction of apparatus, e.g. environment aspects, hygiene aspects or materials
- G03F7/70908—Hygiene, e.g. preventing apparatus pollution, mitigating effect of pollution or removing pollutants from apparatus
- G03F7/70925—Cleaning, i.e. actively freeing apparatus from pollutants, e.g. using plasma cleaning
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B7/00—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass
- B08B7/0035—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass by radiant energy, e.g. UV, laser, light beam or the like
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/708—Construction of apparatus, e.g. environment aspects, hygiene aspects or materials
- G03F7/70908—Hygiene, e.g. preventing apparatus pollution, mitigating effect of pollution or removing pollutants from apparatus
- G03F7/70916—Pollution mitigation, i.e. mitigating effect of contamination or debris, e.g. foil traps
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for avoiding contamination on surfaces of optical elements according to the preamble of patent claim 1.
- the invention also relates to a device for controlling the contamination of the surface of at least one optical element and an EUV lithography device with optical elements, a detector for photoelectrons and secondary electrons being attached to at least one of the optical elements and being operatively connected to an evaluation unit ,
- the invention also relates to a method for cleaning contaminated surfaces from optical elements by irradiation in a vacuum containing controlled residual gas.
- Multi-layer systems are also understood to mean those with a special top layer (s) (cap layer).
- Optical elements such as photomasks or multi-layer mirrors, for the extremely ultraviolet wavelength range (EUV), in particular wavelengths between 11 nm and 14 nm, are required for use in EUV lithography of semiconductor components.
- EUV lithography devices have eight or more mirrors.
- the mirrors In order to achieve a sufficient overall intensity of the working radiation, the mirrors must have as high a reflectivity as possible, because the overall intensity is proportional to the product of the reflectivities of the individual mirrors. The mirrors should maintain this high reflectivity, if possible, throughout their entire service life. Furthermore, the homogeneity across the mirror surfaces must be maintained over the entire service life.
- the reflectivity and the lifespan of EUV mirrors and EUV photomasks is particularly affected by the contamination of the surface under EUV radiation in the form of carbon deposits and by oxidation of the surface.
- Deposits stir e.g. from carbonaceous substances that outgas from individual device components or from the photoresist with which the wafers to be irradiated are coated.
- Oxidation is caused by the presence of oxygen-containing molecules in the residual gas atmosphere, which are split into free radicals by EUV radiation via photoemission.
- Photoelectrons emerging from the surface of the optical element lead to the accumulation of contamination by splitting molecules of the residual gas adsorbed on the surface in a dynamic equilibrium into fragments, which are then permanently deposited on the surface or react with it.
- a method for determining contamination by means of photoemission in which photoelectrons are released by sequential illumination of a surface and are detected with an electron collecting device.
- the thickness of the contamination layer is inferred from the photoelectron current.
- a second electron collecting device is provided, which adjoins the first electron collecting device and is at the same distance from the surface. Both of them
- No. 6,004,180 is concerned with the cleaning of electron-emitting components which form the cathode of the cathode ray tube.
- a gas such as oxygen
- a targeted control of the gas inlet is not described.
- JP 62051224 A it is known to follow the cleaning with UV light-assisted oxidation by measuring photoelectrons.
- Surfaces contaminated with carbon-containing substances are irradiated with UV light in an oxygen-containing atmosphere.
- ozone is formed, which in turn is broken down into free radicals in oxygen, which etch away the carbon contamination of the surface to be cleaned.
- the UV light also stimulates the emission of secondary electrons. The number increases with decreasing contamination layer thickness.
- the intensity of the photo emission is displayed. However, this signal is not used to control a cleaning process.
- EP 0 987 601 A2 discloses a method and a device for measuring the degree of contamination of optical elements within a lithography device for soft X-rays. For this purpose, the photoelectrons emerging from the potentially contaminated surface are measured. This signal is evaluated online by converting it into a degree of contamination by comparison with empirically obtained data. If a certain degree of contamination is reached, the optical element in question must be replaced.
- This object is achieved with a method in which the photocurrent is used to regulate the gas composition of the residual gas, the gas composition of the residual gas in Dependence on at least a lower and an upper threshold value of the photocurrent is changed.
- the residual gas analysis with a residual gas analyzer can also be used to determine experimentally (calibration) whether it is a carbonizing or an oxidizing environment, which in turn determines the type and degree of contamination.
- a residual gas analyzer e.g. mass spectrometer
- the incident EUV intensity and the spectrum of the incident radiation must be taken into account.
- an oxidizing atmosphere can be converted into a carbonizing atmosphere and vice versa.
- the residual gas components (eg hydrocarbons) adsorbed on the surface from the residual gas atmosphere are split by the photoelectrons in the area of EUV-irradiated surfaces, so that a carbon layer is deposited on the surface of optical elements, which leads to a change in the photocurrent.
- a competing process is the oxidation of carbon to CO and C0 2 , whereby the carbon layer can be removed again, which leads to an opposite change in the photocurrent.
- the contamination rate and also the degradation of the contamination layer can thus be controlled in a simple manner.
- the first threshold value Si is obtained at the beginning of the irradiation after settling effects have subsided and is characteristic of the initial actual state of the irradiated surface
- the second threshold value or values S 2 , i are predetermined and depend not only on the structure of the reflective layer system, ie its material and thickness structure, but strongly dependent on the initial composition of the residual gas atmosphere and the EUV intensity.
- the decay of transient effects is understood in particular to mean the desorption of the typically present water layer on the surface of the optical element, which leads to a high photocurrent at the beginning of the irradiation, which accordingly decreases as the water layer decreases. This process takes a few minutes, a period of up to 20 minutes, preferably up to 5 minutes, being required until the photocurrent has stabilized.
- the one or more second threshold values S 2 , i must be obtained beforehand from calibration measurements.
- the requirements of the radiation application must also be taken into account, for example that in lithography the contamination and thus the reflectivity should only fluctuate within certain limits.
- the thresholds Si and S 2 , i are preferably determined from the photocurrent of a clean, non-oxidized surface under operating conditions, ie after settling effects have subsided.
- Si corresponds to the photocurrent of the clean surface
- S 2 , i corresponds to the photocurrent which corresponds to a desired carbon thickness.
- the exponential decay of the corresponding current signal can play a role in the evaluation of the photoemission measurement if the time constant of the drop is less than the period T of the radiation source.
- Synchrotron radiation has pulse frequencies in the upper megahertz range, so that a constant current can be measured due to the inertia of the photocurrent measurement.
- pulsed lasers have frequencies in the lower kilohertz range, so that with the time constant a sawtooth current is measured during the photoemission process.
- the photoemission signal is preferably converted into the averaged time integral ⁇ of the corresponding photocurrent:
- time-averaged current integral for each individual irradiated optical surface is on the incident one
- the photocurrent is preferably used to control the oxygen partial pressure or the partial pressure of oxygen-containing gases.
- the photocurrent is preferably used to regulate the partial pressure of gases containing hydrocarbons.
- the threshold values of the photocurrent from the range between the minimum photo current I m i n and the maximum photocurrent l ma ⁇ be chosen which occur when the minimum and the maximum of the electric field intensity of the forming on reflection of the irradiated wavelength of operation in the multilayer system standing Wave lie in the free interface of the multilayer system. It is important to ensure that the free interface of the Multi-layer system only moves in the area of the falling flank or the rising flank of the standing wave of the electric field intensity. If the free interface would pass through the extreme values of the standing wave during the irradiation, no sensible regulation of the residual gas composition could be guaranteed.
- the design of the multilayer system determines whether the free interface is located on the falling or rising flank at the beginning of the irradiation. In the case of a multilayer system with an Ru cover layer, the design of the cover layer is particularly preferably selected such that the free interface of the cover layer is located on the falling flank of the standing wave of the electric field intensity when carbon is grown.
- the supplied gas is preferably an oxidizing gas. If S ⁇ > S 2 i is selected, the free interface is in the falling flank of the standing wave of the electrical Field intensity. If S ⁇ ⁇ S 2i is selected, the free interface is in the rising flank.
- the supplied gas is preferably a carbonizing gas. If S ⁇ > S 2 i is selected, the free interface is in the falling flank of the standing wave of the electric field intensity. If S ⁇ ⁇ S 2 ⁇ is selected, the free interface is on the rising flank.
- Both of the aforementioned method variants can also be combined with one another, the gases in question being alternately supplied and throttled as a function of the threshold values.
- It can be a gas that is already contained in the residual gas atmosphere, but whose proportion is too small to achieve the desired effect.
- the possible effects are either the prevention of oxidation or the defined setting of the desired carbon coverage.
- the ratio of the residual gas components can be changed by adding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, water, oxygen or nitrogen.
- an inert gas such as SF6, He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe is preferred. Such gases influence the effectiveness or the reaction rate of carbonizing or oxidizing gases.
- hydrocarbons preferably of alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes and other hydrocarbons.
- oxygen-containing gases preferably formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, hydrogen peroxide, hydrazine, N 2 0, NO, N0 2 , S0 2 and other oxygen-containing gases.
- halogen- and hydrogen-containing compounds preferably of F, Cl, Br, I, chloromethane, Dichloromethane, trichloromethane, carbon tetrachloride, tetrafluorocarbon, fluoromethane, difluoromethane, ammonia, phosphine, antimony hydrogen, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen bromide, hydrogen iodide, boron fluoride, diborane, nitrogen trifluoride, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen sulfide or other, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride, from hydrogen chloride or more of these gases.
- the gases can preferably be supplied continuously.
- the valves of the gas supply can be opened continuously and, when the photocurrent approaches a threshold value, can also be closed again continuously.
- the partial pressures of the above gases are regulated via the photocurrent.
- the photocurrent is preferably used to regulate the partial pressure of oxygen-containing gases.
- the method according to the invention can be used to react to contamination layers in the angstrom to nanometer range and to keep the contamination efficiently minimal during the irradiation.
- the oxygen partial pressure is preferably regulated in the range from 10 "12 to 10 2 mbar, particularly preferably in the range from 10 " 9 to 10 3 mbar, in particular in the range from 10 -8 to 10 '5 mbar.
- the threshold values are maximum values of the photocurrent that are just tolerable Degree of oxidation. If a maximum value is exceeded, the residual gas composition must be changed so that any further oxidation is immediately prevented.
- threshold values are minimum values of the photocurrent, which correspond to a just tolerable covering with carbon. If the temperature falls below a minimum value, the residual gas composition must be changed so that any further carbon deposition is immediately prevented.
- threshold values are also conceivable as meaningful threshold values, which result when the initial course of the electric field intensity at the free interface is taken into account. It also makes sense to convert the time curve of the photocurrent curve into its mathematical 1st and higher derivatives. In accordance with the desired operating conditions, threshold values can then also be introduced with respect to these derivatives of the photocurrent curve.
- a plurality of second threshold values S ⁇ are preferably specified, wherein
- S 2 , ⁇ + ⁇ -S ⁇ I ⁇ IS 2 , rS ⁇ I or IS 2l ⁇ + rS 2 , i I ⁇ IS 2l rS 2 , n I with i 1, 2, 3, ..
- the method can be further improved if, prior to the EUV irradiation, the position of the nearest minimum and / or inflection point and / or the maximum (curve position) of the electrical field intensity of the standing wave which forms when the irradiated operating wavelength is reflected in the multilayer system with respect to the free interface of the Multi-layer system is determined, and depending on this, the second threshold value S 2j ⁇ with respect to the first threshold value Si is defined as the lower or the upper threshold value.
- the splitting of the residual gas molecules, such as hydrocarbon or water molecules, deposited on the surfaces from the residual gas in a dynamic equilibrium is largely prevented, which could otherwise cause contamination of the free interface.
- the dynamic equilibrium can be shifted by means of a photocurrent control loop in such a way that, despite photoemission, neither oxidation nor accumulation of carbon occurs.
- the curve position of the uncontaminated multilayer system determines the initial course of the photocurrent curve during operation, ie during the contamination of the surface of the optical element.
- the growth of a carbon layer on the one hand causes a change in the curve position, and on the other hand the addition of the carbon material causes the photoconversion efficiency to decrease.
- the superimposition of both effects leads either to a more or less strong increase or decrease in the photocurrent.
- the second threshold values S 2 , i are to be selected as lower or as upper threshold values.
- the upper threshold value S 2 , i is preferably chosen to be less than or equal to the maximum photocurrent ⁇ m ax , at which the free interface lies in the maximum of the electric field intensity of the standing wave.
- the lower threshold value S 2 , ⁇ is preferably chosen to be greater than or equal to the minimum photocurrent ⁇ m i n , at which the free interface lies in the minimum of the electric field intensity of the standing wave.
- the threshold values S 2 are preferably set to 80% to 10% of the range ⁇ max - ⁇ min, particularly preferably to 50% - 20%.
- the gas is advantageously supplied as close to the surface as possible, ie in the vicinity of the optical element.
- a device for regulating the contamination on the surface of at least one optical element with a detection device for photoelectrons emitted by the optical element, with an evaluation unit connected to the detection device and with a control device connected to the evaluation unit and to a gas supply device is connected, the evaluation unit being designed to compare the measured photocurrent with at least two stored threshold values of the photocurrent and to output threshold-dependent signals to the control device.
- An EUV lithography device with optical elements, wherein in the vicinity of at least one of the optical elements a detection device for photoelectrons is attached, which is operatively connected to an evaluation unit, is characterized in that a control unit is connected to the evaluation unit, which has at least one gas supply device is operatively connected, the evaluation unit being designed to compare the measured photocurrent with at least two stored threshold values of the photocurrent and to output threshold-dependent signals to the control device.
- the device according to the invention or its expression as an EUV lithography device are suitable for carrying out the method according to the invention.
- the photoemission measurement is carried out with the detection device.
- These data are preferably converted in their evaluation over time (or their derivatives, integrals or other suitable functions) and compared with threshold values.
- the resulting information is passed on to the control unit, which then controls the gas supply device.
- the detection device preferably comprises a detection ring or a detection network which is arranged above the surface of the optical element and which is arranged and / or configured such that it does not or only slightly affects the incoming EUV radiation.
- the photocurrent can also be dissipated over any nearby metal surface. This can be a plate or the vacuum chamber wall.
- the open diameter of the detection device can be chosen to be large enough that the EUV radiation can pass through unhindered, but on the other hand the photoelectrons can still be measured reliably.
- the gas supply device preferably has at least one gas supply line, which is advantageously arranged adjacent to the surface of the optical element.
- An adjacent arrangement significantly shortens the reaction time until the gas supplied acts.
- the device and the EUV lithography device have a mass spectrometer, which likewise forwards its measurement signals to the evaluation unit.
- This mass spectrometer is used to measure the residual gas composition before or at the beginning of the irradiation or to measure the gas composition or its partial pressures during the irradiation parallel to the measurement of the photoemission.
- At least one measuring device for the total pressure is provided.
- control unit The evaluation unit and the control unit are advantageously combined to form a control unit.
- This can be designed as an analog or digital circuit, also in the form of an integrated circuit. It can also be a computer equipped with appropriate data acquisition and control cards.
- one or more (for example on each mirror) devices for measuring the EUV intensity are preferably provided.
- the object is achieved by a method for cleaning surfaces contaminated with carbon from optical elements by irradiation with EUV radiation, which is characterized in that the photocurrent generated during the irradiation of the surface to be cleaned is measured and as the stop point for the admission of gases Time is selected at which the photocurrent exceeds or falls below predetermined threshold values.
- These threshold values are the above-mentioned threshold values Si, S 2 .
- Fig. 1 shows the schematic structure of an inventive
- FIGS. 3-6 regulated photocurrent curves for an optical element with an oxidation-resistant surface for four different curve positions of the electric field intensity
- FIGS. 7-10 regulated photocurrent curves for an optical element with an oxidation-sensitive carbon surface for four different positions of the electric field intensity
- FIGS. 11-14 regulated photocurrent curves for an optical element with a very oxidation-sensitive Si surface for four different positions of the electric field intensity.
- the device 1 has a vacuum chamber 3 in which an optical element 2, e.g. a mirror with a multi-layer system or an optical mask is arranged, which is illuminated with EUV radiation.
- a detection ring or detection grating 41 which is essentially transparent to the EUV radiation, is arranged above the optical element 2 for detecting the photoelectrons. So that the photoelectrons are attracted to the ring 41, a voltage of a few volts (0 to 100 V) is applied via a voltage source 43 between the optical element 2 and the ring 41. If a photoelectron strikes the ring 41, a current flows which is measured with the aid of the ammeter 42.
- the evaluation unit 5 which e.g.
- the current signal is evaluated as an analog or digital circuit, but also as an integrated circuit or can be combined with the control unit 6 to form a control unit, for example in the form of a computer, for example by integrating it over time and with predetermined and stored threshold values is compared.
- the information as to which threshold value is currently being exceeded or undershot is passed on to the control unit 6, which then opens or closes the valve 72 of the gas feed line 71.
- the gas feed line 71 opens in the immediate vicinity of the surface of the optical element 2, so that the balance between the deposition and the oxidation process of carbon can be changed with as little delay as possible.
- the initial partial pressure of the residual gas components is measured with a mass spectrometer or residual gas analyzer 8 and passed on to the evaluation unit 5.
- the appropriate threshold set is selected based on this data. Even during the irradiation, the entire residual gas spectrum continues to be measured with the mass spectrometer 8 in parallel with the photocurrent. With this additional Information can be checked, among other things, whether the appropriate threshold value set is still used as the basis for the evaluation.
- the regulation of the gas supply can also be refined such that the valve 72 is not only opened or closed, but also intermediate stages are set. Steplessly adjustable valves are preferably used for this.
- a plurality of gas supply lines 71 should be arranged around the surface. In this case it can also be controlled which gas supply is opened in a metered manner and which is not.
- a device 7 for measuring the EUV intensity is connected to the evaluation unit 5.
- 2a-d show an optical element which has a multilayer system 10 on a substrate 11.
- the electric field intensity I is shown for different cases 1, 2, 3, 4.
- the free interface 100 of the multilayer system 10 lies between a turning point and the rising edge of the electrical field intensity away from the multilayer system.
- the free interface 100 of the multilayer system 10 lies between a relative maximum and the turning point on the flank of the electrical field intensity falling away from the multilayer system.
- the free interface 100 of the multilayer system 10 lies between an inflection point and the flank of the electrical field intensity falling away from the multilayer system. In case 4, the free interface 100 of the multilayer system 10 lies between a relative minimum and the turning point on the flank of the electric field intensity rising away from the multilayer system.
- FIGS. 2a-d clearly show how the growing carbon layer 20 changes the curve position of the electric field intensity in relation to the free interface 101.
- FIGS. 3-14 show the photocurrent for various multilayer systems for initially uncontaminated, free interfaces 100 in cases 1, 2, 3 and 4.
- the time course of the photocurrent corresponds to the time course of the electric field intensity at the free interface.
- the consideration of the exit depth of photoelectrons leads in a further approximation to the addition of a constant background to the photocurrent characteristic. Higher approximations are possible.
- the photocurrent curves of FIGS. 3 to 6 represent cases 1 to 4 on a multilayer system with an oxidation-insensitive surface layer made of ruthenium.
- the multilayer system can have the following layer structure, for example:
- case 3 relates to case 1 in FIG. 2a.
- the free interface 100 is at a turning point in the electric field intensity, which means that the photocurrent has an average value Si.
- the curve of the electric field intensity increases, which is accompanied by an increase in the photocurrent.
- the growth of carbon as a material causes a decrease in the number of photoelectrons, but the increase in photoelectrons outweighs the growth of the free interface towards the maximum of the electric field intensity in which the photoemission is greatest.
- the overall photocurrent curve increases until the second threshold value S 2 , ⁇ is reached. With a suitable supply of oxygen, this curve swings back to the threshold value Si (see FIG. 3). The oxygen supply is throttled and finally completely shut off, which in turn leads to a growth of the carbon.
- the second threshold value S2.2 which is less than S2, ⁇ , is reached, oxygen is again introduced, etc.
- the free interface 100 is also at a turning point at the beginning, but the free interface 101 moves in the direction of the wave node due to the growth of the carbon, i.e. towards the minimum of the electric field intensity, which is associated with a decrease in the photocurrent. This decrease is reinforced by the decrease in photoemission caused by the material carbon, which leads to the curve profile shown in FIG. 5.
- the second threshold values S 2 ⁇ 2 , S 2 ⁇ 3 , S 2 , 4, S2.5 each being set lower than the previous second threshold value, so that over time the threshold value Si approaches and thus the control range can be minimized.
- the free interface 100 of the multilayer system is at the maximum of the curve of the electric field intensity of the standing wave.
- the photoemission is significantly higher than in case 4 due to the position of the curve.
- the first threshold value Si is approximately 180 nA.
- the carbon layer grows, the surface migrates out of this position, which is associated with a decrease in the photocurrent.
- the growth of the carbon layer also manifests itself in a reduction in photoemission, which overall leads to a sharp decrease in the photocurrent curve.
- the curve continues to decrease until the limit value S 2 , ⁇ is reached. Before or when this limit value is reached or exceeded, the appropriate oxygen supply is started, which leads to a degradation of the carbon layer.
- the photocurrent curve therefore swings back to the initial value Si.
- Figs. 7 to 10 show the photocurrent curves for an optical element with an oxidation-sensitive carbon top layer (e.g. C-Caplayer 1 nm).
- the four curves also refer to cases 1 to 4 in FIGS. 2a-d.
- the figures 11 to 14 relate to a multilayer system with an oxidation-sensitive surface, such as with a silicon layer.
- an oxidation-sensitive surface such as with a silicon layer.
- a carbonizing residual gas atmosphere was first set. The oxygen supply is initiated when the second threshold value S 2 , ⁇ is reached and then slowly throttled, so that the threshold value Si cannot be reached, which would be equivalent to the start of oxidation of the surface.
- the photocurrent curves according to FIGS. 11-14 each show an asymptotic course.
- carbon-containing gas may be added before the threshold value Si is submitted.
- the grown carbon is then removed again by adding oxygen-containing gas. This would also lead to an oscillating curve of the photocurrent.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Atmospheric Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Exposure Of Semiconductors, Excluding Electron Or Ion Beam Exposure (AREA)
- Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE10209493 | 2002-03-07 | ||
| DE10209493A DE10209493B4 (de) | 2002-03-07 | 2002-03-07 | Verfahren zur Vermeidung von Kontamination auf optischen Elementen, Vorrichtung zur Regelung von Kontamination auf optischen Elementen und EUV-Lithographievorrichtung |
| PCT/EP2003/002372 WO2003075098A2 (de) | 2002-03-07 | 2003-03-07 | Vermeidung von kontamination auf optischen elementen und reinigung dieser elemente |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP1481287A2 true EP1481287A2 (de) | 2004-12-01 |
Family
ID=27770969
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP03711941A Withdrawn EP1481287A2 (de) | 2002-03-07 | 2003-03-07 | Vorrichtung, euv-lithographiegerät und verfahren zur vermeidung und reinigung von kontamination auf optischen elementen |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US7060993B2 (de) |
| EP (1) | EP1481287A2 (de) |
| JP (1) | JP2005519333A (de) |
| KR (1) | KR20040102031A (de) |
| CN (1) | CN1639643B (de) |
| AU (1) | AU2003218706A1 (de) |
| DE (1) | DE10209493B4 (de) |
| WO (1) | WO2003075098A2 (de) |
Families Citing this family (50)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE10150874A1 (de) * | 2001-10-04 | 2003-04-30 | Zeiss Carl | Optisches Element und Verfahren zu dessen Herstellung sowie ein Lithographiegerät und ein Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Halbleiterbauelements |
| DE10209493B4 (de) * | 2002-03-07 | 2007-03-22 | Carl Zeiss Smt Ag | Verfahren zur Vermeidung von Kontamination auf optischen Elementen, Vorrichtung zur Regelung von Kontamination auf optischen Elementen und EUV-Lithographievorrichtung |
| EP1403715A3 (de) * | 2002-09-30 | 2006-01-18 | ASML Netherlands B.V. | Lithographischer Apparat und Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Artikels |
| SG128447A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2007-01-30 | Asml Netherlands Bv | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
| DE10309084A1 (de) * | 2003-03-03 | 2004-09-16 | Carl Zeiss Smt Ag | Reflektives optisches Element und EUV-Lithographiegerät |
| US20070285643A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2007-12-13 | Carl Zeiss Smt Ag | Method For Manufacturing Reflective Optical Element, Reflective Optical Elements, Euv-Lithography Apparatus And Methods For Operating Optical Elements And Euv-Lithography Apparatus, Methods For Determining The Phase Shift, Methods For Determining The Layer Thickness, And Apparatuses For Carrying Out The Methods |
| GB0408543D0 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2004-05-19 | Boc Group Plc | Cleaning of multi-layer mirrors |
| US7381950B2 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2008-06-03 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Characterizing dimensions of structures via scanning probe microscopy |
| US7355672B2 (en) | 2004-10-04 | 2008-04-08 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Method for the removal of deposition on an optical element, method for the protection of an optical element, device manufacturing method, apparatus including an optical element, and lithographic apparatus |
| JP4539335B2 (ja) * | 2005-01-12 | 2010-09-08 | 株式会社ニコン | 多層膜反射鏡、euv露光装置、及び多層膜反射鏡におけるコンタミネーションの除去方法 |
| US7868304B2 (en) * | 2005-02-07 | 2011-01-11 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Method for removal of deposition on an optical element, lithographic apparatus, device manufacturing method, and device manufactured thereby |
| US7394083B2 (en) * | 2005-07-08 | 2008-07-01 | Cymer, Inc. | Systems and methods for EUV light source metrology |
| US7561247B2 (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2009-07-14 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Method for the removal of deposition on an optical element, method for the protection of an optical element, device manufacturing method, apparatus including an optical element, and lithographic apparatus |
| JP2007067344A (ja) * | 2005-09-02 | 2007-03-15 | Canon Inc | 露光装置および方法ならびにデバイス製造方法 |
| JP4599342B2 (ja) * | 2005-12-27 | 2010-12-15 | エーエスエムエル ネザーランズ ビー.ブイ. | 光学装置、リソグラフィ装置、および、デバイス製造方法 |
| US8507879B2 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2013-08-13 | Xei Scientific, Inc. | Oxidative cleaning method and apparatus for electron microscopes using UV excitation in an oxygen radical source |
| US20070284541A1 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2007-12-13 | Vane Ronald A | Oxidative cleaning method and apparatus for electron microscopes using UV excitation in a oxygen radical source |
| GB0611648D0 (en) * | 2006-06-13 | 2006-07-19 | Boc Group Plc | Method of controlling contamination of a surface |
| DE102006044591A1 (de) | 2006-09-19 | 2008-04-03 | Carl Zeiss Smt Ag | Optische Anordnung, insbesondere Projektionsbelichtungsanlage für die EUV-Lithographie, sowie reflektives optisches Element mit verminderter Kontamination |
| JP2008277585A (ja) * | 2007-04-27 | 2008-11-13 | Canon Inc | 露光装置の洗浄装置及び露光装置 |
| DE102007037942A1 (de) | 2007-08-11 | 2009-02-19 | Carl Zeiss Smt Ag | Optische Anordnung, Projektionsbelichtungsanlage und Verfahren zum Bestimmen der Dicke einer Kontaminationsschicht |
| DE102008041628A1 (de) * | 2007-09-14 | 2009-03-19 | Carl Zeiss Smt Ag | Verfahren zur Reinigung von Vakuumkammern und Vakuumkammer |
| EP2091068A1 (de) * | 2008-02-15 | 2009-08-19 | Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast- natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek TNO | Sensor, Überwachungssystem und Verfahren zum Nachweis einer Substanz in einer Gasprobe |
| JP5171422B2 (ja) * | 2008-06-19 | 2013-03-27 | ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 | 感光性組成物、これを用いたパターン形成方法、半導体素子の製造方法 |
| US20110001952A1 (en) * | 2008-09-25 | 2011-01-06 | Eran & Jan, Inc | Resist exposure and contamination testing apparatus for EUV lithography |
| JP5559562B2 (ja) | 2009-02-12 | 2014-07-23 | ギガフォトン株式会社 | 極端紫外光光源装置 |
| US8349125B2 (en) * | 2009-07-24 | 2013-01-08 | Xei Scientific, Inc. | Cleaning device for transmission electron microscopes |
| JP2012114140A (ja) * | 2010-11-22 | 2012-06-14 | Renesas Electronics Corp | 露光方法および露光装置 |
| US8399868B2 (en) * | 2011-02-15 | 2013-03-19 | Sematech Inc. | Tools, methods and devices for mitigating extreme ultraviolet optics contamination |
| NL2009846A (en) * | 2011-12-23 | 2013-06-26 | Asml Netherlands Bv | Radiation source and method for lithographic apparatus and device manufacture. |
| US9453801B2 (en) | 2012-05-25 | 2016-09-27 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Photoemission monitoring of EUV mirror and mask surface contamination in actinic EUV systems |
| DE102012222451A1 (de) * | 2012-12-06 | 2014-06-26 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Reflektives optisches Element für die EUV-Lithographie |
| DE102012222466A1 (de) | 2012-12-06 | 2014-06-12 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Reflektives optisches Element für die EUV-Lithographie |
| DE102013201193A1 (de) | 2013-01-25 | 2014-07-31 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Verfahren zum Bestimmen der Phasenlage und/oder der Dicke einer Kontaminationsschicht an einem optischen Element und EUV-Lithographievorrichtung |
| US9389180B2 (en) | 2013-02-15 | 2016-07-12 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Methods and apparatus for use with extreme ultraviolet light having contamination protection |
| US8764905B1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2014-07-01 | Intel Corporation | Cleaning organic residues from EUV optics and masks |
| US10953441B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-03-23 | Kla Corporation | System and method for cleaning optical surfaces of an extreme ultraviolet optical system |
| US20150097485A1 (en) * | 2013-10-08 | 2015-04-09 | XEI Scientific Inc. | Method and apparatus for plasma ignition in high vacuum chambers |
| DE102014114572A1 (de) * | 2014-10-08 | 2016-04-14 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | EUV-Lithographiesystem und Betriebsverfahren dafür |
| KR102346227B1 (ko) | 2014-11-19 | 2021-12-31 | 삼성전자주식회사 | 극자외선 광 생성 장치, 시스템 및 극자외선 광 생성 장치의 사용 방법 |
| KR102211898B1 (ko) | 2014-11-27 | 2021-02-05 | 삼성전자주식회사 | 노광 장치용 액체 누출 감지 장치 및 방법 |
| JP2015127837A (ja) * | 2015-04-03 | 2015-07-09 | ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 | 露光方法および露光装置 |
| WO2017080817A1 (en) * | 2015-11-11 | 2017-05-18 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | A radiation system and optical device |
| NL2022644A (en) * | 2018-03-05 | 2019-09-10 | Asml Netherlands Bv | Prolonging optical element lifetime in an euv lithography system |
| US11979971B2 (en) * | 2018-06-29 | 2024-05-07 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | EUV light source and apparatus for lithography |
| DE102019200208A1 (de) | 2019-01-10 | 2020-07-16 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Verfahren zum in situ dynamischen Schutz einer Oberfläche und optische Anordnung |
| US11273794B2 (en) * | 2019-07-18 | 2022-03-15 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Optical surface contaminant detection |
| JP2021071543A (ja) * | 2019-10-29 | 2021-05-06 | ギガフォトン株式会社 | 極端紫外光集光ミラー、極端紫外光生成装置、及び電子デバイスの製造方法 |
| DE102019219024A1 (de) | 2019-12-06 | 2021-06-10 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Verfahren zur Vermeidung einer Degradation eines optischen Elements, Projektionssystem, Beleuchtungssystem sowie Projektionsbelichtungsanlage |
| CN118414583A (zh) | 2021-12-17 | 2024-07-30 | Asml荷兰有限公司 | 用于防止用于euv光刻的光学部件的材料的劣化的方法和系统 |
Family Cites Families (21)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS6251224A (ja) | 1985-08-30 | 1987-03-05 | Hitachi Ltd | 紫外線洗浄モニタ方法 |
| JP2725295B2 (ja) * | 1988-08-02 | 1998-03-11 | 日本電気株式会社 | シンクロトロン放射光露光装置 |
| US4998019A (en) * | 1989-10-03 | 1991-03-05 | Tencor Instruments | Photoemission contaminant detector |
| US5393980A (en) * | 1993-05-11 | 1995-02-28 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Quality monitor and monitoring technique employing optically stimulated electron emmission |
| WO1995007152A1 (en) * | 1993-09-08 | 1995-03-16 | Uvtech Systems, Inc. | Surface processing |
| JPH0864559A (ja) * | 1994-06-14 | 1996-03-08 | Fsi Internatl Inc | 基板面から不要な物質を除去する方法 |
| JPH10223512A (ja) * | 1997-02-10 | 1998-08-21 | Nikon Corp | 電子ビーム投影露光装置 |
| US6268904B1 (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 2001-07-31 | Nikon Corporation | Optical exposure apparatus and photo-cleaning method |
| US6004180A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 1999-12-21 | Candescent Technologies Corporation | Cleaning of electron-emissive elements |
| JP3096021B2 (ja) * | 1998-05-18 | 2000-10-10 | キヤノン株式会社 | 放射光照射装置および方法 |
| AU3957599A (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 1999-12-20 | Nikon Corporation | Laser-excited plasma light source, exposure apparatus and its manufacturing method, and device manufacturing method |
| JP2000100685A (ja) * | 1998-09-17 | 2000-04-07 | Nikon Corp | 露光装置及び該装置を用いた露光方法 |
| JP2000346817A (ja) * | 1999-06-07 | 2000-12-15 | Nikon Corp | 測定装置、照射装置および露光方法 |
| US6533952B2 (en) * | 1999-06-08 | 2003-03-18 | Euv Llc | Mitigation of radiation induced surface contamination |
| US6571057B2 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2003-05-27 | Nikon Corporation | Optical instrument, gas replacement method and cleaning method of optical instrument, exposure apparatus, exposure method and manufacturing method for devices |
| JP3628939B2 (ja) * | 2000-06-27 | 2005-03-16 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | 露光方法及び露光装置 |
| DE10061248B4 (de) * | 2000-12-09 | 2004-02-26 | Carl Zeiss | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur In-situ-Dekontamination eines EUV-Lithographiegerätes |
| US6772776B2 (en) * | 2001-09-18 | 2004-08-10 | Euv Llc | Apparatus for in situ cleaning of carbon contaminated surfaces |
| US6828569B2 (en) * | 2001-11-19 | 2004-12-07 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic projection apparatus, device manufacturing method and device manufactured thereby |
| DE10209493B4 (de) * | 2002-03-07 | 2007-03-22 | Carl Zeiss Smt Ag | Verfahren zur Vermeidung von Kontamination auf optischen Elementen, Vorrichtung zur Regelung von Kontamination auf optischen Elementen und EUV-Lithographievorrichtung |
| US6847463B2 (en) * | 2002-06-05 | 2005-01-25 | Euv, Llc | Method and apparatus for detecting the presence and thickness of carbon and oxide layers on EUV reflective surfaces |
-
2002
- 2002-03-07 DE DE10209493A patent/DE10209493B4/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-03-07 US US10/506,555 patent/US7060993B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-03-07 AU AU2003218706A patent/AU2003218706A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-03-07 CN CN038055147A patent/CN1639643B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-03-07 KR KR10-2004-7013943A patent/KR20040102031A/ko not_active Ceased
- 2003-03-07 WO PCT/EP2003/002372 patent/WO2003075098A2/de not_active Ceased
- 2003-03-07 EP EP03711941A patent/EP1481287A2/de not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-03-07 JP JP2003573498A patent/JP2005519333A/ja active Pending
-
2006
- 2006-03-14 US US11/375,267 patent/US7462842B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| See references of WO03075098A2 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20050104015A1 (en) | 2005-05-19 |
| AU2003218706A1 (en) | 2003-09-16 |
| US7462842B2 (en) | 2008-12-09 |
| DE10209493A1 (de) | 2003-10-02 |
| US7060993B2 (en) | 2006-06-13 |
| CN1639643A (zh) | 2005-07-13 |
| WO2003075098A3 (de) | 2004-02-19 |
| KR20040102031A (ko) | 2004-12-03 |
| JP2005519333A (ja) | 2005-06-30 |
| AU2003218706A8 (en) | 2003-09-16 |
| WO2003075098A2 (de) | 2003-09-12 |
| DE10209493B4 (de) | 2007-03-22 |
| US20060192158A1 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
| CN1639643B (zh) | 2011-08-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP1481287A2 (de) | Vorrichtung, euv-lithographiegerät und verfahren zur vermeidung und reinigung von kontamination auf optischen elementen | |
| DE10061248B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur In-situ-Dekontamination eines EUV-Lithographiegerätes | |
| DE3888992T2 (de) | Laser-Lumineszenz-Monitor für Materialdickenprozesse. | |
| DE69222892T2 (de) | Verfahren zur Herstellung dünner Schichten und mehrlagiger Schichten | |
| DE60128659T2 (de) | Verfahren zur reparatur von lithographischen masken unter verwendung eines strahls geladener teilchen | |
| DE102008000551A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Reinigen einer EUV-Lithographievorrichtung, Verfahren zur Messung der Restgasatmosphäre bzw. der Kontamination sowie EUV-Lithographievorrichtung | |
| DE10016008A1 (de) | Villagensystem und dessen Herstellung | |
| EP1356476A2 (de) | Schmalbandiger spektralfilter und seine verwendung | |
| DE102004043430A1 (de) | Dämpfender Phasenverschiebungsmaskenrohling und Photomaske | |
| DE10150874A1 (de) | Optisches Element und Verfahren zu dessen Herstellung sowie ein Lithographiegerät und ein Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Halbleiterbauelements | |
| WO2021165078A1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben einer optischen anordnung für die euv-lithographie und optische anordnung für die euv-lithographie | |
| WO2004099878A2 (de) | Verfahren zur vermeidung von kontamination und euv-lithographievorrichtung | |
| WO2020115086A2 (de) | Optisches element zur reflexion von vuv-strahlung und optische anordnung | |
| WO2010115526A1 (de) | Verfahren zur kontaminationsvermeidung und euv-lithographieanlage | |
| DE102015204308A1 (de) | Reflektives optisches Element und Verfahren zum Betrieb einer EUV-Lithographievorrichtung mit einem reflektiven optischen Element | |
| DE102020209482A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Kalibration, Vorrichtung zur Zuführung eines Kalibriergases zu einem Vakuum, Kalibriersubstanz, System zur Ausbildung einer Vakuumumgebung und Projektionsbelichtungsanlage | |
| DE102024104446A1 (de) | Organohalogen-Präkursoren zur teilchenstrahlinduzierten Maskenreparatur | |
| DE10209161B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Energieregelung von gepulst betriebenen, gasentladungsgepumpten Strahlungsquellen | |
| EP4244674A1 (de) | Endpunktbestimmung mittels kontrastgas | |
| EP4314926B1 (de) | Optische anordnung für den fuv/vuv-wellenlängenbereich | |
| DE3632400A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur charakterisierung kondensationsfaehiger stoerstellen auf einer oberflaeche | |
| DE19950987A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Waferbelichtung | |
| DE19904305A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Herstellung von Strukturkörpern mittels selektivem Ätzen | |
| DE102022210492A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Maskenreparatur | |
| DE102024211318A1 (de) | Verfahren zum betreiben einer lithographieanlage, optisches system und lithographieanlage |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20040820 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK |
|
| RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: KLEIN, ROMAN Inventor name: MERTENS, BAS Inventor name: STIETZ, FRANK Inventor name: WEDOWSKI, MARCO |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20050202 |
|
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: CARL ZEISS SMT AG |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| RTI1 | Title (correction) |
Free format text: PREVENTION AND REMOVAL OF CONTAMINATION ON OPTICAL ELEMENTS |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
| 18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20091001 |