EP0365782A1 - Dispositif et méthode de commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs pour cabines à compartiments doubles - Google Patents

Dispositif et méthode de commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs pour cabines à compartiments doubles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0365782A1
EP0365782A1 EP89115629A EP89115629A EP0365782A1 EP 0365782 A1 EP0365782 A1 EP 0365782A1 EP 89115629 A EP89115629 A EP 89115629A EP 89115629 A EP89115629 A EP 89115629A EP 0365782 A1 EP0365782 A1 EP 0365782A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cabin
costs
double
total
operating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP89115629A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0365782B1 (fr
Inventor
Johannes C. Van Straaten
Miroslav Kostka
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Inventio AG
Original Assignee
Inventio AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Inventio AG filed Critical Inventio AG
Priority to AT89115629T priority Critical patent/ATE96124T1/de
Publication of EP0365782A1 publication Critical patent/EP0365782A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0365782B1 publication Critical patent/EP0365782B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
    • B66B1/24—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration
    • B66B1/2408—Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration where the allocation of a call to an elevator car is of importance, i.e. by means of a supervisory or group controller
    • B66B1/2458—For elevator systems with multiple shafts and a single car per shaft
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/10—Details with respect to the type of call input
    • B66B2201/102—Up or down call input
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20—Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/211—Waiting time, i.e. response time
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20—Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/212—Travel time
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20—Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/222—Taking into account the number of passengers present in the elevator car to be allocated
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00—Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/30—Details of the elevator system configuration
    • B66B2201/306—Multi-deck elevator cars
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S187/00—Elevator, industrial lift truck, or stationary lift for vehicle
    • Y10S187/902—Control for double-decker car

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and a device for group control of elevators with double cabins, the service costs defined as loss time of all passengers involved in a call operation being used as a decision criterion for determining the elevator that can be optimally used to service a floor call on a floor E in a scanning position ⁇ serve and where these operating costs for each elevator separately, within the framework of a cost calculation cycle for each scanning position ⁇ - regardless of whether there is a floor call or not - are calculated and stored and subsequently compared for all elevators together within the framework of a cost comparison cycle in order to use a control device to Allocate elevator with the lowest operating costs to the scanning position ⁇ in question as a favorite for the operation of a possible floor call and also the assignment of a certain single cabin to the corresponding one double cab to be provided for the scanning position to be operated.
  • Such group controls are intended to make it possible to allocate the double cabins to the floor calls in such a way that minimum average waiting times and minimum average destination travel times of the passengers are achieved.
  • This loss also called service costs, is stored in a cost memory.
  • an allocation instruction which designates the floor to which the relevant car is optimally assigned in time can be stored in an allocation memory of the elevator with the lowest operating costs.
  • the lower operating costs of the individual cabins of a double cabin are then stored in the cost storage of the elevator in question and are compared by floors with the lower operating costs of the other double cabins in the elevator group. With such controls, the floor calls are not assigned to the optimal double cabin, but to the optimal individual cabin. A uniform distribution of the passengers to the double cabins in the elevator group is therefore impaired during normal operation of the elevator system.
  • the invention is based on the object, starting from Swiss Patent No. 660 585, to a method and a device create, in group controls for elevators with double cabins, the two degrees of freedom given by the single cabins of each double cabin and the double cabins of each group to be fully used for call control.
  • the usability of a double cabin with regard to a floor call should not only be determined by the position and direction of this floor call as well as the load and operating states of the two single cabins, but also by the different types of call operation resulting from the possibility of operating two adjacent calls at the same time the two single cabins result.
  • the mutual cost effects of the two single cabins must therefore be taken into account.
  • the method and equipment should be designed in such a way that they can be easily and quickly adapted to different operating and traffic conditions and that the required computing effort is minimal.
  • the invention proposes with the features characterized in the patent claims, taking into account the mutual influence of the partial operating costs calculated separately for each single cabin, to calculate total operating costs (for example recursively) for each double cabin in the elevator group for all scanning positions, whereby if there are allocation instructions for rectified floor calls from two adjacent floors (congruence) and / or coincidences of cabin calls and scanning positions, the total operating costs to be stored are reduced, the total operating costs of all elevators are compared with one another by means of a comparison device, each in an allocation memory of An elevator can be stored with the lowest total operating costs, an assignment instruction that designates the floor to which the respective double cabin is optimally assigned in time, and by means of a selection based on criteria chains of Each double cabin is assigned a specific single cabin to the floor call in such a way that the servicing of cabin calls and rectified floor calls on the same floor, of rectified floor calls from two adjacent floors and of cabin calls and rectified floor calls from two adjacent floors is promoted so that overlaps of "own" stop positions, ie
  • the double cabin with the lowest total operating costs is allocated to a floor call, with a single floor call and non-existent coincidence and / or congruence
  • the less loaded cabin or optionally also the one in the direction of travel " front "or" rear "cabin is allocated to the floor call and the stopping on the same floor with cabin call and rectified floor call and / or on adjacent floors with rectified floor calls or cabins and rectified floor calls is promoted in such a way that there are fewer stops
  • the individual double cabins den Distribute total traffic evenly among each other, the two single cabins of a double cabin are filled evenly, which reduces waiting times on the floors and reduces travel times, while waiting times in the non-operating cabin for any intermediate stops for the "absolutely n necessary "minimum remain limited and the delivery rate is increased.
  • this solution is characterized in that priorities for the operating behavior of the elevators can be achieved through the adjustable parameters, so that, for example, in both single cabins the same load is aimed for, or that the load balancing only becomes effective when the imbalance of the two single cabins can be set.
  • 1, 1 denotes an elevator shaft of an elevator a, an elevator group consisting of, for example, three elevators a, b and c.
  • a conveyor machine 2 drives, via a conveyor cable 3, a double cabin 4, which is guided in the elevator shaft 1 and is formed from two single cabins 5, 6 arranged in a common car frame, sixteen floors E1 to E16 being operated according to the elevator system chosen as an example.
  • the distance between the two single cabins 5, 6 is selected so that it corresponds to the distance between two adjacent floors.
  • the carrier 2 is controlled by a drive control known from European Patent No.
  • the setpoint generation, the control functions and the initiation of the stop being implemented by means of a microcomputer system 7, and with 8 the measuring and actuating elements of the drive control which are symbolized are connected to the microcomputer system 7 via a first interface IF 1.
  • Each single cabin 5, 6 of the double cabin 4 has a load measuring device 9, the respective operating state Z the cabin signaling device 10 and cabin call transmitter 11.
  • the devices 9, 10 are connected to the microcomputer system 7 via the first interface IF 1.
  • the car call transmitter 11 and the floor call transmitter 12 provided on the floors are connected to the microcomputer system 7, for example, via an input device 13 which has become known with European Patent No. 0 062 141 and a second interface IF 2.
  • the microcomputer system 7 consists of a storey call memory RAM 1, two cabin call memories RAM 2, RAM 3 assigned to the single cabins 5, 6 of the double cabin 4, a load memory RAM 4 storing the current load P M of each single cabin 5, 6, two the operating state Z of the single cabins 5 , 6 storing memories RAM 5, RAM 6, two tabular partial cost memories RAM 7, RAM 8 assigned to the single cabins of the elevator, a first total cost memory RAM 9, a second total cost memory RAM 10, a single cabin / call assignment memory RAM 11, one with the elevator the lowest operating costs per scanner position and direction of operation, characterizing the double cabin / call allocation memory RAM 12, a program memory EPROM, a power failure-proof data memory DBRAM and a microprocessor CPU which is connected via a bus B to the memories RAM 1 to RAM 12, EPROM and DBRAM.
  • R1 and R2 denote a first and a second scanner of a scanner, the scanner R1, R2 being registers by means of which addresses corresponding to the floor numbers and the direction of travel are formed.
  • the cost memories RAM 7 to RAM 10 each have one or more storage locations which can be assigned to the individual possible cabin positions.
  • R3 and R4 denote the selectors corresponding to the individual cabins in the form of a register which, when the cabin is moving, indicates the address of the floor on which the cabin can still stop. At a standstill, R3 and R4 point to the floor where a call can be answered or to a possible cabin position (for "blind" floors).
  • the selector addresses are assigned target paths which are compared with a target path generated in a setpoint generator. If these paths are identical and a stop command is present, the delay phase is initiated. If there is no stop command, the selectors R3 and R4 are switched to the next floor.
  • the microcomputer systems 7 of the individual elevators a, b, c are via a comparison device 14 known from European Patent No. 0 050 304 and a third interface IF 3 and via a Partyline transmission system 15 and known from European Patent No. 0 050 305 a fourth interface IF 4 connected to one another and in this way form the group control according to the invention.
  • the first scanner R1 assigned to the elevator in question begins with one cycle, hereinafter referred to as the KBZ cost calculation cycle, starting from the "rear" selector position in the direction of travel of the cabin (in the case of no direction of travel starting with the lower cabin), the circulation also being possible in a different direction or sequence.
  • the event may occur at elevator a (time I).
  • the microprocessor CPU of the microcomputer system 7 With each scanning position, the microprocessor CPU of the microcomputer system 7 now creates one for each single cabin 5, 6 and for the double cabin 4 according to the patent claims the time loss of all passengers involved is calculated as a sum, also known as operating costs K, the individual cost components being determined by the group control for elevators with double cabins, which works according to the following principle.
  • the total internal costs for a double cabin position ( ⁇ , ⁇ + 1) are calculated by adding the separately calculated internal service costs of the two single cabins on floors ⁇ and ⁇ + 1 determined.
  • the external operating costs consist of three parts; - a portion m ⁇ t m depending on the floor distance travel time - A proportion of KAE depending on the operating state of the two single cabins - a share of KAZ which is dependent on call operation on intermediate floors (both cabins).
  • the surcharges for operating status and call operation are calculated separately for each single cabin.
  • the greater increase in the two single cabins is taken as an increase in the external operating costs due to call control by the double cabin.
  • the increase is defined as the largest increase from the two for individual cabins.
  • the "worst case" values are used.
  • the total external operating costs for a double cabin position result from the fact that the three parts mentioned above are added to the external operating costs of the previous double cabin position.
  • the total operating costs consist of the inner and outer operating costs.
  • the total costs K g ( ⁇ ) for an elevator position ( ⁇ , ⁇ + 1) are stored in the space ( ⁇ + 1) of the total cost memory RAM 9, the scanner R1 is switched to the next floor and the calculation is analogous repeated.
  • the second scanners R2 simultaneously begin one round for all elevators a, b, c, hereinafter referred to as the KVZ cost comparison cycle, starting from the first floor (time III).
  • the KVZ cost comparison cycles start five to ten times per second.
  • the modified total service costs K gm contained in the total cost memories RAM 10 of the elevators a, b, c are fed to the comparison device 14 and compared with one another, wherein in the allocation memory RAM 12 of the elevator a, b, c with the lowest modified total -Operating costs K gm an allocation instruction can be stored in the form of a logical "1", which designates the floor to which the elevator a, b, c in question is optimally assigned in terms of time. For example, based on the comparison in the scanning position 9, a reassignment may take place by deleting an assignment instruction for elevator b and enrolling one for elevator a (FIG. 1).
  • a new cost calculation cycle KBZ is started for elevators a and b and the cost comparison cycle KVZ is interrupted, since the former has priority. Since, according to the example for floor E9, a floor call is stored and the elevator a is reserved for its operation, the result of the scan R1 in the scanning position 9 during the cost calculation cycle KBZ is the deck / call assignment algorithm DRZ in the single cabin / call assignment memory RAM 11 of the clarifications notes which cabin of the elevator a is the cheaper one for the service of the floor call.
  • the cost comparison is then continued from scanner position 10 in order to be interrupted again at scanner position 9 (downward) by the occurrence of an event in elevator c, for example a change in the selector position (time IV).
  • an event in elevator c for example a change in the selector position (time IV).
  • KBZ for elevator c time VII
  • the KVZ cost comparison cycle continues and ends when the scanner is in position 2 (downwards).
  • a further cost calculation cycle KBZ for elevator a triggered for example by a car call, runs between times VIII and IX, whereupon the next cost comparison cycle KVZ is started at time X.
  • the entire cost comparison cycle can (selectable) also run uninterrupted (regardless of incoming events).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Elevator Control (AREA)
  • Forklifts And Lifting Vehicles (AREA)
  • Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
EP89115629A 1988-10-28 1989-08-24 Dispositif et méthode de commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs pour cabines à compartiments doubles Expired - Lifetime EP0365782B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT89115629T ATE96124T1 (de) 1988-10-28 1989-08-24 Verfahren und einrichtung zur gruppensteuerung von aufzuegen mit doppelkabinen.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH4032/88 1988-10-28
CH403288 1988-10-28

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0365782A1 true EP0365782A1 (fr) 1990-05-02
EP0365782B1 EP0365782B1 (fr) 1993-10-20

Family

ID=4268537

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89115629A Expired - Lifetime EP0365782B1 (fr) 1988-10-28 1989-08-24 Dispositif et méthode de commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs pour cabines à compartiments doubles

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US4993518A (fr)
EP (1) EP0365782B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2736136B2 (fr)
AT (1) ATE96124T1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2001607C (fr)
DE (1) DE58905966D1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2047073T3 (fr)
FI (1) FI97215C (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0459169A1 (fr) * 1990-06-01 1991-12-04 Inventio Ag Commande de groupes pour ascenseurs avec deux cabines superposées avec distribution directe d'appels
US6161652A (en) * 1998-02-02 2000-12-19 Inventio Ag Method and apparatus for controlling elevator cars in a common sling
US6439349B1 (en) 2000-12-21 2002-08-27 Thyssen Elevator Capital Corp. Method and apparatus for assigning new hall calls to one of a plurality of elevator cars
US8534426B2 (en) 2007-08-06 2013-09-17 Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation Control for limiting elevator passenger tympanic pressure and method for the same

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5625176A (en) * 1995-06-26 1997-04-29 Otis Elevator Company Crowd service enhancements with multi-deck elevators
FI111929B (fi) 1997-01-23 2003-10-15 Kone Corp Hissiryhmän ohjaus
JP3889108B2 (ja) * 1997-02-28 2007-03-07 東芝エレベータ株式会社 乗り場機器パラメータ設定装置
FI107379B (fi) 1997-12-23 2001-07-31 Kone Corp Geneettinen menetelmä hissiryhmän ulkokutsujen allokoimiseksi
JP2001310876A (ja) * 2000-04-19 2001-11-06 Otis Elevator Co ダブルデッキエレベータシステムの制御装置および制御方法
FI112062B (fi) * 2002-03-05 2003-10-31 Kone Corp Menetelmä matkustajien allokoimiseksi hissiryhmässä
JPWO2006092865A1 (ja) * 2005-03-03 2008-08-07 三菱電機株式会社 トリプルデッキエレベータ用設備計画支援装置
DE502006007856D1 (de) 2005-08-04 2010-10-21 Inventio Ag Verfahren zur zuteilung eines benutzers zu einer aufzugsanlage
JP2007084242A (ja) * 2005-09-21 2007-04-05 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd エレベータの群管理制御装置
FI118381B (fi) * 2006-06-19 2007-10-31 Kone Corp Hissijärjestelmä
JP2008024413A (ja) * 2006-07-20 2008-02-07 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd エレベータ群管理制御装置
WO2009024853A1 (fr) 2007-08-21 2009-02-26 De Groot Pieter J Système de commande d'ascenseur de destination intelligent
FI119686B (fi) * 2007-10-11 2009-02-13 Kone Corp Hissijärjestelmä
MY154656A (en) * 2008-07-31 2015-07-15 Inventio Ag Method for controllling an elevator system with consideration for disabled persons and privileged users
JP5347492B2 (ja) * 2008-12-25 2013-11-20 フジテック株式会社 エレベータの群管理制御方法及び装置
WO2013164882A1 (fr) * 2012-05-01 2013-11-07 三菱電機株式会社 Système d'ascenseur
AU2013316924B2 (en) * 2012-09-11 2018-02-22 Kone Corporation Elevator system
JP6505887B1 (ja) * 2018-02-16 2019-04-24 東芝エレベータ株式会社 エレベータ群管理装置

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0134892A1 (fr) * 1983-08-12 1985-03-27 Inventio Ag Commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs pour cabines à compartiments doubles
EP0177741A1 (fr) * 1984-10-09 1986-04-16 Inventio Ag Dispositif de commande d'ascenseurs à cabines doubles

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH625767A5 (fr) * 1978-01-17 1981-10-15 Inventio Ag
CH632723A5 (de) * 1978-08-22 1982-10-29 Inventio Ag Einrichtung zur auswahl einer aufzugskabine fuer direktfahrten bei einer mittels gruppensteuerung gesteuerten aufzugsgruppe.
CH649517A5 (de) * 1979-09-27 1985-05-31 Inventio Ag Antriebssteuereinrichtung fuer einen aufzug.
CH648001A5 (de) * 1979-12-21 1985-02-28 Inventio Ag Gruppensteuerung fuer aufzuege.
CH651950A5 (de) * 1980-10-20 1985-10-15 Inventio Ag Multiprozessoranordnung.
CH651951A5 (de) * 1980-10-20 1985-10-15 Inventio Ag Einrichtung zur steuerung des zugriffes von prozessoren auf eine datenleitung.
CH653155A5 (de) * 1981-03-26 1985-12-13 Inventio Ag Schaltungsanordnung zur eingabe von steuerbefehlen in ein mikrocomputersystem.
US4632224A (en) * 1985-04-12 1986-12-30 Otis Elevator Company Multicompartment elevator call assigning
ATE51386T1 (de) * 1986-04-11 1990-04-15 Inventio Ag Gruppensteuerung fuer aufzuege.

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0134892A1 (fr) * 1983-08-12 1985-03-27 Inventio Ag Commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs pour cabines à compartiments doubles
EP0177741A1 (fr) * 1984-10-09 1986-04-16 Inventio Ag Dispositif de commande d'ascenseurs à cabines doubles

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0459169A1 (fr) * 1990-06-01 1991-12-04 Inventio Ag Commande de groupes pour ascenseurs avec deux cabines superposées avec distribution directe d'appels
US6161652A (en) * 1998-02-02 2000-12-19 Inventio Ag Method and apparatus for controlling elevator cars in a common sling
US6439349B1 (en) 2000-12-21 2002-08-27 Thyssen Elevator Capital Corp. Method and apparatus for assigning new hall calls to one of a plurality of elevator cars
US8534426B2 (en) 2007-08-06 2013-09-17 Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation Control for limiting elevator passenger tympanic pressure and method for the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FI97215B (fi) 1996-07-31
ES2047073T3 (es) 1994-02-16
CA2001607C (fr) 1999-01-05
JP2736136B2 (ja) 1998-04-02
CA2001607A1 (fr) 1990-04-28
FI895103A0 (fi) 1989-10-27
ATE96124T1 (de) 1993-11-15
EP0365782B1 (fr) 1993-10-20
FI97215C (fi) 1996-11-11
DE58905966D1 (de) 1993-11-25
US4993518A (en) 1991-02-19
JPH02169478A (ja) 1990-06-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0365782A1 (fr) Dispositif et méthode de commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs pour cabines à compartiments doubles
DE3611173C2 (de) Fahrstuhlanlage mit mehreren Doppelabteil-Kabinen
EP0443188B1 (fr) Méthode et dispositif de distribution directe d'appels de groupes d'ascenseurs, basés sur des charges de service et sur des facteurs bonus/malus variables
EP1418147B1 (fr) Contrôleur pour ascenseur avec cabine avec plusieurs compartiments
EP0246395B1 (fr) Commande d'un groupe d'ascenceur
DE69802876T2 (de) Passagier-reisezeit optimierendes steuerverfahren für aufzugsgruppen aus doppeldeck-aufzügen
DE3738891C2 (de) Fahrstuhlanlage mit adaptiver Kabinenrufzuweisung
DE69714347T2 (de) Aufzugssystem mit Gruppensteuerung
EP0312730B1 (fr) Commande de groupe pour ascenceurs avec commande des cabines dépendant de leur charge
CH648001A5 (de) Gruppensteuerung fuer aufzuege.
EP0091554B1 (fr) Commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs comportant un dispositif pour la commande d'une pointe de trafic descendante
EP0134892B1 (fr) Commande d'un groupe d'ascenseurs pour cabines à compartiments doubles
EP0459169B1 (fr) Commande de groupes pour ascenseurs avec deux cabines superposées avec distribution directe d'appels
DE69417152T2 (de) Steuerungsverfahren für eine Aufzugsgruppe
EP0440967A1 (fr) Commande de groupes pour ascenseurs avec distribution directe d'appels d'une entrée d'appels située sur l'étage
DE2459887A1 (de) Steuervorrichtung fuer aufzuege
DE102014201804A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Aufzugsystems
EP0248997B1 (fr) Dispositif de commande de la répartition des cabines à un palier principal pour un groupe d'ascenseurs
DE69208427T2 (de) Aufzugssystem mit dynamischer Sektorzuteilung
DE2512950A1 (de) Aufzugssteuerung
DE2517514A1 (de) Aufzugssteuersystem
EP0308590B1 (fr) Commande d'un groupe d'ascenceurs avec attribution immédiate des appels
DE2411824C2 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Aufzugsanlage
EP1193207A1 (fr) Méthode de contrôle pour un ascenseur avec une cabine à plusieurs compartiments
DE2411861C2 (de) Verfahren zum Verteilen von Stockwerksrufen auf eine Anzahl von Aufzugskabinen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900927

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19911209

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 96124

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19931115

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 58905966

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19931125

ET Fr: translation filed
GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 19931118

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2047073

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 89115629.1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20071116

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20080828

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080822

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20080813

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20080814

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080813

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20080826

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20080821

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20080815

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20090823

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20090825

NLV7 Nl: ceased due to reaching the maximum lifetime of a patent

Effective date: 20090824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090823

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20090825