US6469662B2 - Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type - Google Patents

Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6469662B2
US6469662B2 US09/269,567 US26956799A US6469662B2 US 6469662 B2 US6469662 B2 US 6469662B2 US 26956799 A US26956799 A US 26956799A US 6469662 B2 US6469662 B2 US 6469662B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
interference
frequency
time
signal
fourier transform
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US09/269,567
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20020027522A1 (en
Inventor
Bert-Eric Tullsson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Saab AB
Original Assignee
CelsiusTech Electronics AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from SE9603810A external-priority patent/SE507857C2/sv
Priority claimed from SE9604775A external-priority patent/SE506797C2/sv
Priority claimed from SE9604774A external-priority patent/SE9604774L/
Application filed by CelsiusTech Electronics AB filed Critical CelsiusTech Electronics AB
Assigned to CELSIUSTECH ELECTRONICS AB reassignment CELSIUSTECH ELECTRONICS AB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TULLSSON, BERT-ERIC
Publication of US20020027522A1 publication Critical patent/US20020027522A1/en
Publication of US6469662B2 publication Critical patent/US6469662B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Assigned to SAABTECH ELECTRONICS AB reassignment SAABTECH ELECTRONICS AB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CELSIUSTECH ELECTRONICS AB
Assigned to SAABTECH ELECTRONICS AB reassignment SAABTECH ELECTRONICS AB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CELSIUSTECH ELECTRONICS AB
Assigned to SAAB AB reassignment SAAB AB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SAABTECH ELECTRONICS AB
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/36Means for anti-jamming, e.g. ECCM, i.e. electronic counter-counter measures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/06Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S13/08Systems for measuring distance only
    • G01S13/32Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated
    • G01S13/34Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated using transmission of continuous, frequency-modulated waves while heterodyning the received signal, or a signal derived therefrom, with a locally-generated signal related to the contemporaneously transmitted signal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/06Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S13/08Systems for measuring distance only
    • G01S13/32Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated
    • G01S13/34Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated using transmission of continuous, frequency-modulated waves while heterodyning the received signal, or a signal derived therefrom, with a locally-generated signal related to the contemporaneously transmitted signal
    • G01S13/343Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated using transmission of continuous, frequency-modulated waves while heterodyning the received signal, or a signal derived therefrom, with a locally-generated signal related to the contemporaneously transmitted signal using sawtooth modulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/023Interference mitigation, e.g. reducing or avoiding non-intentional interference with other HF-transmitters, base station transmitters for mobile communication or other radar systems, e.g. using electro-magnetic interference [EMI] reduction techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/023Interference mitigation, e.g. reducing or avoiding non-intentional interference with other HF-transmitters, base station transmitters for mobile communication or other radar systems, e.g. using electro-magnetic interference [EMI] reduction techniques
    • G01S7/0232Avoidance by frequency multiplex
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/35Details of non-pulse systems
    • G01S7/352Receivers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/28Details of pulse systems
    • G01S7/285Receivers
    • G01S7/292Extracting wanted echo-signals
    • G01S7/2923Extracting wanted echo-signals based on data belonging to a number of consecutive radar periods
    • G01S7/2928Random or non-synchronous interference pulse cancellers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/35Details of non-pulse systems
    • G01S7/352Receivers
    • G01S7/356Receivers involving particularities of FFT processing

Definitions

  • This invention concerns a procedure for the elimination of interference, such as pulses and linear chirps, in a radar unit of the FMCW type with linear frequency sweep, where the transmitted and received signals are combined to form a useable signal in the form of a difference signal.
  • This difference signal is commonly termed the beat signal, and it includes a wave for each target, where the frequency, amplitude and phase of the wave contain information about the target.
  • the procedure can be used in the field of mobile radar, but it can also be used for other FMCW radar applications.
  • a frequency sweep controls an oscillator with a variable frequency so that the transmitted frequency varies periodically.
  • Each period has principally three parts, namely a constant base frequency extent, a linear frequency sweep extent and a rapid return to base frequency extent.
  • the linear frequency sweep extent is the time when the radar unit is “carrying out useful work” and often constitutes 70-80% of the total time (work factor 0.7-0.8).
  • the radar unit and its target are considered stationary.
  • the Doppler effect also comes into play.
  • the Doppler effect only involves a minor correction.
  • the propagation time from the radar unit to a target and back again is typically a few microseconds.
  • a signal received from a target therefore has the frequency that was transmitted a certain time previously. Since the frequency is swept this is not the same frequency that is being transmitted.
  • the received frequency also has a linear frequency sweep.
  • the received frequency sweep and the transmitted frequency sweep are parallel with a time-displacement equal to the propagation time. Therefore for a fixed target the difference in frequency between the transmitted and received signal will be constant. This constant frequency difference is given by the product of the propagation time to the target and the gradient of the frequency sweep expressed as frequency per unit of time.
  • Signal processing in a linear FMCW radar unit consists principally of the transmitted and received signals being combined, so that the difference signal (the beat signal) is generated.
  • This signal is the sum of a number of sine waves, where each sine wave represents a radar target.
  • the sine waves have different frequencies, amplitudes and initial phases. Typically a large amplitude corresponds to large target, and a high frequency corresponds to a target at a great distance.
  • the Doppler effect (due to the relative speed) mainly affects the initial phases.
  • the difference signal is frequency-analysed.
  • the frequency analysis is best carried out digitally.
  • the difference signal is passed through an anti-alias filter and then sampled at a constant sampling rate. Thereafter the sampled signal is multiplied by a window function to reduce the amplitude of the signal at the start and end of the sampling period and the product is sent to a signal processor that carries out a Discrete Fourier Transform, DFT, usually with a fast algorithm, known as an FFT, Fast Fourier Transform.
  • DFT Discrete Fourier Transform
  • FFT Fast Fourier Transform
  • the Fourier Transform is generally complex but for a real time signal (difference signal) it has a certain degree of symmetry.
  • the number of samples is usually selected as a power of two (256, 512, 1024 . . . ). 256 samples give 256 FFT coefficients, but if the signal is real the symmetry means that of these 256 values only 128 (actually 129) are independent.
  • the signal is divided up into a number of discrete frequency components, such as sines. Each frequency corresponds, as indicated, to a distance.
  • the amplitude of a complex FFT coefficient is a measurement of the radar target area (the received power) for the target in the corresponding frequency window (distance window).
  • the FFT performs what is known as a coherent integration of the target signal, which is advantageous.
  • the subsequent signal processing in the system is carried out digitally on the calculated FFT coefficients.
  • the nominal width of a distance window is inversely proportional to the change in frequency of the linear FMCW sweep during the sampling period.
  • a change in frequency of 150 MHz is required.
  • the gradient of the frequency sweep can, for example, be changed while retaining the same sampling time.
  • the sampling rate limits the frequencies of the beat signal that can be studied and thereby the total observed distance.
  • the width of this “useable band” that lies parallel to the linear FMCW sweep is often less than 1 MHz.
  • a linear FMCW radar unit can be subjected to interference if it receives signals other than its own transmitted signals reflected from various targets.
  • the radar unit can be subjected to interference from other radar units, including pulse radar units, pulse compression radar units and other FMCW radar units that are operating at the same time.
  • a pulse present during the sampling period has a very short extent in the time domain and is very broad-band in the frequency domain.
  • a strong interfering pulse only affects a few samples of the beat signal but can affect all the frequencies or frequency bins in the Fourier Transform.
  • the “noise level” in the Fourier Transform appears to be increased, so that small targets can be masked by the interference.
  • a very common form of interference is what is known as a chirp, where the wave form causing the interference moves with a linear frequency through the useable band of the FMCW radar unit.
  • Such chirps are generated by a pulse compression radar unit, and also by another FMCW radar unit if that unit's transmitted wave form during the base and return extents enters the first unit's useable band during its sampling period.
  • the third extent, the linear frequency sweep can also generate a chirp if the frequency sweep of the radar unit causing the interference has a different gradient from the frequency sweep of the first radar unit, e.g. because the radar unit causing the interference has a different distance resolution.
  • Interference in the form of a linear chirp is always broad-band in frequency, but can also have a considerable extent in time and cause interference to the whole FFT and affect a very large part of the sampled time signal.
  • the chirps that are caused by the base extent or return- extent of an interfering FMCW radar unit are of this type.
  • Interference of short duration such as short pulses or rapid chirps can generally be detected and eliminated in the sampled time signal. and an FFT without interference can then in general be reconstructed.
  • a chirp interference with a large extent in both the time domain and in the Fourier domain can, however, not be eliminated by any simple manipulation of the time signal without negative consequences for the FFT.
  • a procedure for eliminating interference in radar units of the FMCW type that is capable of eliminating interference with a large extent in both the time domain and Fourier domain.
  • the method according to the invention is characterised by (1) the beat signal being subjected to time-frequency division for time-local resolution, (2) by the interference being detected and eliminated separately in each frequency band individually, after which (3) the time signal free of the interference and its Discrete Fourier Transform, DFT, are calculated from the time-frequency resolution.
  • the sampled beat signal lies completely in the time domain.
  • the samples give a resolution in time but no resolution at all in frequency.
  • the FFT is a description of the same signal in the Fourier domain.
  • the FFT gives a good resolution in frequency, but no resolution at all in time.
  • Interference e.g. a chirp, present for a short time is poorly visible in the Fourier domain.
  • Information about the position of the interference is to be found mainly in the phases of the complex FFT values and not in the amounts or amplitude.
  • time-frequency resolution makes it possible to have certain (coarse) resolution of the signal in the time domain and in the Fourier domain.
  • a known time-frequency resolution is the Wigner-Ville Transform, which is what is known as a quadratic transform and therefore creates false cross-modulation products, see Mayer, Wavelets, Algorithms & Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1993.
  • Another known time-frequency resolution is what is known as the wavelet transform, see the book by Mayer, or Rioul/Vetterli, Wavelets and Signal Processing, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, October 1991, that makes a “musical” frequency division. The frequency division is into different scalesor “octaves”. For high frequencies the frequency resolution (expressed in Hz) is coarser but the time resolution is finer.
  • time-frequency analysis “time-frequency decomposition” (cf. the above book by Mayer), “time-frequency distribution” and “time-frequency representation” (cf. the references in the above paper by Rioul/Vetterli) of a signal, leading to a ‘time-frequency resolution”, are all in common use and mean essentially the same thing: some expressions stress the work done (“analysis”), other the result of the work (“decomposition”, “representation”, “resolution”), still other the particular methods used (“distribution”). Here the expressions are used as synonyms.
  • STFT Short Time Fourier Transform
  • the STFT provides a frequency decomposition for every small part of the time signal and is a time-frequency decomposition. After the elimination of interference in each frequency band individually, the original time signal is calculated from the STFT.
  • the STFT can therefore usefully contain redundant (overlapping) information.
  • an FMCW radar unit is the only common type of radar unit where a target corresponds to a standing wave with a certain frequency thus fulfilling the conditions for application of normal Fourier analysis with band-pass filter or DFT (FFT).
  • FFT normal Fourier analysis with band-pass filter
  • Detection of interference in each frequency band can advantageously be carried out by methods suitable for the detection of short duration interference.
  • the detection of linear chirps and pulses is carried out by methods for detecting straight lines in images, for example so that interference patterns in the form of straight lines not parallel with the time axis are identified, the times where interference lines intersect the different frequency bands of the STFT are determined and the interference is eliminated separately in each affected frequency band.
  • Methods for detecting straight lines in images are known from image processing, see for example Gonzalez/Woods, Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley, 1992.
  • a Hough Transform can be used for the detection of the straight lines.
  • the beat signal is filtered in association with the time-frequency resolution in narrow frequency bands of the signal in order to increase the sensitivity of the detection.
  • the filter can be determined using adaptive methods.
  • the filter is applied on one or more of the narrow-band frequency bins of the time-frequency resolution.
  • the beat signal or useable signal is reconstructed after the elimination of interference by extrapolation from samples without interference, in one or more of the narrow-band frequency bands of the time-frequency resolution.
  • STFT-time-frequency resolution for the detection of interference the elimination of interference and synthesis of the useable signal has many advantages, particularly for chirps.
  • the advantages consist in general of two characteristics. The first is that a chirp in each frequency bin in the STFT is of short duration and can therefore be detected/eliminated by the same methods as, for example, pulses. The second is that chirps are narrow-band in each frequency band in the STFT and can therefore be described (reduced to zero/extrapolated) using simple polynomials of already known structure.
  • FIG. 1 shows diagrammatically the principle for how a linear FMCW radar unit works and can be modified in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows examples of suitable frequency sweeps in a time-frequency diagram.
  • FIG. 3 shows samples of a simulated FMCW beat signal with Gaussian noise and interference.
  • FIG. 4 shows the absolute value of the FFT for the beat signal in FIG. 3 .
  • FIG. 5 shows the result of a time-frequency analysis of the beat signal in FIG. 3 .
  • FIG. 6 shows the absolute value of the FFT for a beat signal in FIG. 3 without interference.
  • the radar unit shown in FIG. 1 includes a transmitter 1 and a receiver 2 .
  • An antenna 3 is connected to the transmitter and the receiver via a circulator 4 .
  • an oscillator control device 5 connected to a variable frequency oscillator 6 .
  • the frequency sweep from the oscillator control device 5 controls the oscillator 6 so that a signal is generated with periodically varying frequency.
  • the signal is transmitted by the antenna 3 via a directional coupler 7 and the circulator 4 .
  • the period of a frequency sweep see FIG. 2, has principally three parts in the form of a constant base frequency extent 30 , a linear frequency sweep extent 31 and a quick return extent 32 .
  • the oscillator 6 can work within the Gigahertz range, e.g. 77 GHz.
  • the reflected signal received by the antenna 3 is taken via the circulator 4 to a mixer 8 , where the reflected signal is combined with the transmitted signal. After amplification in the amplifier 9 and filtering in the filter 10 a difference signal or beat signal is obtained.
  • the beat signal is used as the basis for the subsequent signal processing, for detecting and eliminating interference and synthesis of the useable signal without interference in a processor block 11 that can also contain what is known as an FFT processor 11 ′.
  • FIGS. 3-6 An example of how the time-frequency resolution allows the analysis of a difference signal with interference is shown in FIGS. 3-6.
  • FIG. 3 shows 1024 samples of an FMCW beat signal (time signal) that is simulated as a number of sine/cosine signals+Gaussian noise+interference. It is difficult by eye to locate and accurately characterise the interference.
  • FIG. 4 shows the absolute value of the FFT for the beat signal in FIG. 3 .
  • This illustration reveals four distinct peaks 12 , 13 , 14 and 15 above a high noise base. Each peak 12 - 15 corresponds to a target. It is not possible to characterise the interference from FIG. 4 .
  • FIG. 5 shows the result of a time-frequency analysis of the beat signal in FIG. 3 .
  • FIG. 5 is the result of a STFT performed on batches of 64 samples at a time with overlaps. From FIG. 5 it appears directly from the V 16 that can be seen in the center of the signal that the interference is a linear chirp. The explanation for the chirp being a V and not just a line is that the FFT analysis cannot distinguish between positive and negative frequencies. The dominant peaks in the spectrum appear as horizontal bands 17 - 21 corresponding to standing sine waves with constant frequency. In FIG. 5 the frequency resolution is quite coarse and the two peaks 14 , 15 in FIG. 4 move partly together into a single broad band 19 , 20 . A horizontal band 21 at approximately 0.8*Nyquist frequency does not correspond to any peak in FIG. 4 .
  • a fifth peak 22 appears associated with the band 21 corresponding to a fifth target. In FIG. 4 this peak is completely submerged by the interference.
  • FIG. 5 One of the great advantages of time-frequency resolution (STFT) for the elimination of interference in FMCW signals can be seen by comparing FIG. 5 and FIG. 3 .
  • the interference is long.
  • the length of the interference corresponds to the projection of the V on the horizontal time axis in FIG. 5 .
  • the interference is, on the other hand, relatively short.
  • chirps By processing each frequency bin individually in an STFT, chirps can be detected and eliminated using the same methods that are used for interferences of short duration pulses.
  • the V 16 in FIG. 5 can be detected and eliminated and the horizontal bands, the useable-signals, can be reconstructed, after which the reconstructed time signal without interference and FFT without interference can be calculated from the STFT. This is the principle behind the method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows that a chirp appears as a V, labeled 16 , in an STFT analysis.
  • a pulse appears as a vertical line localized in time but broad-band.
  • the useable signals are, however, horizontal lines. It is therefore possible to detect interference of a pulse or a linear chirp by looking in an STFT image for lines that are not parallel with the time axis.
  • Such methods are known from image processing, see for example the Gonzalez/Woods reference mentioned above. A suitable method in this connection is described in chapter 7 in this reference and is based on what is known as a Hough Transform.
  • the useable signal in an FMCW radar unit i.e., the signal that corresponds to the actual target, is a sum of sine waves.
  • T is the sampling interval.
  • x ( n+ 1) 2*cos( ⁇ )* x ( n ) ⁇ x ( n ⁇ 1)
  • next sample can be predicted by a linear combination of the immediately preceding samples.
  • corresponding filters can be created by multiplication of second order FIR filters.
  • a signal that is the sum of four different sine waves, i.e. an FMCW signal with four strong targets, can thus be reduced to zero by an FIR filter of order 8 and a sample can be predicted linearly from the 8 preceding ones.
  • point 1 The application of point 1 is that the sensitivity of the detection of interference is greatly increased if the useable signal is pre-filtered in a suitable way. In FIG. 5 this corresponds to the horizontal bands being filtered away. Only the interference then remains against a weak background. This permits the detection of interference with an amplitude that is much lower than that of the useable signal, e.g. a signal that is completely invisible by analysis of the amplitudes in FIG. 3 but that still increases the noise base in the FFT in FIG. 6 .
  • Point 2 makes it possible to interpolate the useable signal past a short section with interference, which will be described in greater detail later on.
  • a “suitable” filter can be calculated in various ways, or calculated as an adaptive filter. Both problems according to point 1 and point 2 above are known from adaptive signal processing, see for example Haykin, Adaptive Filter Thoery, 2 nd Ed., Prentice-Hall 1991.
  • the coefficients can be determined by the usual algorithms, e.g. LMS, normalized LMS, RLS, etc, see in particular chapters 9 and 13 in the above reference.
  • a usual method of attenuating interference is to detect interference, e.g. a pulse, by the signal amplitude being unusually large and then to carry out clipping of the signal, preferably to the level 0. This can in itself eliminate the interference, but adversely affects the FFT by also affecting the useable signal.
  • the precondition for an FFT is that the sample is sampled equidistantly over a suitable period. Clipping of the signal removes samples. It can be said that the time base of the useable signal is affected. A consequence is that distinct targets are widened in the Fourier domain, which among other things can result in a reduction in the resolution.
  • a very useful method is to follow up the interference elimination by a synthesis of the useable signal.
  • point 2 above can be used.
  • the synthesis can consist of an extrapolation (one-ended) or interpolation (two-ended) of the signal based on values without interference. Such a synthesis can result in a dramatic improvement in the reconstruction of the FMCW signal without interference and its FFT.
  • the polynomial of the interpolation/extrapolation can as mentioned above be determined adaptively or in another way.
  • the interpolation is particularly simple if the signal is narrow-band, as an interpolation polynomial of low order is usually sufficient.
  • the interpolation/extrapolation is numerically sensitive, among other things on account of the fact that the roots of the polynomial of the extrapolation lie on or near the unit circle and numerical interference therefore does not die out, and can also for other reasons only be carried out over short sections of time. It is therefore not possible simply to interpolate/extrapolate past a chirp of a certain length.
US09/269,567 1996-10-17 1997-10-16 Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type Expired - Lifetime US6469662B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE9603810 1996-10-17
SE9603810-4 1996-10-17
SE9603810A SE507857C2 (sv) 1996-10-17 1996-10-17 Förfarande för störningseliminering i en radar av FMCW-typ
SE9604774 1996-12-20
SE9604775 1996-12-20
SE9604775-8 1996-12-20
SE9604774-1 1996-12-20
SE9604774A SE9604774L (sv) 1996-12-20 1996-12-20 Förfarande för störningseliminering i en radar
SE9604775A SE506797C2 (sv) 1996-12-20 1996-12-20 Förfarande för störningseliminering i en radar
PCT/SE1997/001732 WO1998016846A1 (en) 1996-10-17 1997-10-16 Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the fmcw type

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020027522A1 US20020027522A1 (en) 2002-03-07
US6469662B2 true US6469662B2 (en) 2002-10-22

Family

ID=27355846

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/269,562 Expired - Lifetime US6121918A (en) 1996-10-17 1997-10-16 Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type
US09/269,565 Expired - Lifetime US6191726B1 (en) 1996-10-17 1997-10-16 Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type
US09/269,567 Expired - Lifetime US6469662B2 (en) 1996-10-17 1997-10-16 Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/269,562 Expired - Lifetime US6121918A (en) 1996-10-17 1997-10-16 Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type
US09/269,565 Expired - Lifetime US6191726B1 (en) 1996-10-17 1997-10-16 Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (3) US6121918A (de)
EP (3) EP0932837B1 (de)
JP (1) JP2001502425A (de)
KR (1) KR100488028B1 (de)
AU (3) AU4732897A (de)
DE (1) DE69737354T2 (de)
ES (1) ES2387612T3 (de)
WO (3) WO1998016847A1 (de)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6810342B1 (en) * 1999-06-01 2004-10-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for the noise-free evaluation of radar signals
US20060097909A1 (en) * 2004-11-08 2006-05-11 Blunt Shannon D Multistatic adaptive pulse compression method and system
US20070040728A1 (en) * 2004-05-11 2007-02-22 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Radar system
US7590209B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2009-09-15 L3 Communications Integrated Systems L.P. Method and computer program for identifying a transition in a phase-shift keying or frequency-shift keying signal
US20090251360A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2009-10-08 Tetsuji Uebo Distance measuring device and distance measuring method
US20110050484A1 (en) * 2005-05-16 2011-03-03 Motoi Nakanishi Radar
US8059026B1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2011-11-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Interference avoiding transform domain radar
US9952312B2 (en) 2015-07-06 2018-04-24 Navico Holding As Radar interference mitigation
US11002829B2 (en) * 2016-04-15 2021-05-11 Mediatek Inc. Radar interference mitigation method and apparatus
US11209523B2 (en) * 2018-04-11 2021-12-28 Infineon Technologies Ag FMCW radar with interference signal rejection

Families Citing this family (62)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3622565B2 (ja) * 1999-03-31 2005-02-23 株式会社デンソー レーダ装置
JP4111667B2 (ja) * 2000-09-26 2008-07-02 富士通テン株式会社 Fm−cwレーダ装置
US7403153B2 (en) * 2004-12-15 2008-07-22 Valeo Raytheon Systems, Inc. System and method for reducing a radar interference signal
JP4825574B2 (ja) * 2005-05-18 2011-11-30 株式会社東芝 レーダ装置
DE102006024460B4 (de) 2006-05-24 2016-08-04 Infineon Technologies Ag Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Durchführung eines Tests
DE102006024457B4 (de) 2006-05-24 2014-06-05 Infineon Technologies Ag Integrierte Schaltung zum Senden und/oder Empfangen von Signalen
DE102006024458B4 (de) * 2006-05-24 2016-04-14 Infineon Technologies Ag Integrierte Mehrfachmischer-Schaltung
JP4492628B2 (ja) * 2007-03-20 2010-06-30 株式会社デンソー 干渉判定方法,fmcwレーダ
US7612707B2 (en) 2007-09-28 2009-11-03 Banner Engineering Corporation Configurable radar sensor
JP2010014488A (ja) * 2008-07-02 2010-01-21 Fujitsu Ltd Fmcwレーダ装置用信号処理装置、fmcwレーダ装置用信号処理方法、fmcwレーダ装置
JP5110531B2 (ja) * 2008-07-24 2012-12-26 日本無線株式会社 Fm−cwレーダ装置
US7791528B2 (en) * 2008-11-24 2010-09-07 Autoliv Asp, Inc. Method and apparatus for radar signal processing
US7982666B2 (en) * 2009-03-10 2011-07-19 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and method for increasing spectral resolution
US7773029B1 (en) * 2009-03-10 2010-08-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and method for filtering clutter
CN102121991B (zh) * 2010-01-08 2013-01-23 郑州威科姆科技股份有限公司 基于北斗一代卫星信号接收的干扰抑制方法及装置
KR101135982B1 (ko) * 2010-04-14 2012-04-17 국방과학연구소 주파수 변조 연속파 레이다에서 간섭 제거를 위한 시스템 간 동기화 방법
EP2391022B1 (de) 2010-05-27 2012-10-24 Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe B.V. Klassifizierung von Störungen
EP2390679B1 (de) * 2010-05-27 2012-10-03 Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe B.V. Automobilradar mit Funkfrequenzstörungsvermeidung
KR101759975B1 (ko) * 2011-01-03 2017-07-24 팅크웨어(주) 전자 기기 및 전자 기기의 차선 이탈 경보 방법
EP2492709A1 (de) * 2011-02-25 2012-08-29 Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast -natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek TNO FMCW-Radarsystem
NO335171B1 (no) * 2011-10-07 2014-10-13 3D Radar As Adaptiv interferensundertrykkelse for georadar
WO2013118121A1 (en) * 2012-02-11 2013-08-15 Ilan Saul Barak A microwave contactless heart rate sensor
DE102012021212A1 (de) 2012-10-27 2014-04-30 Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh Verfahren zur Detektion einer Interferenz in einem Empfangssignal eines Radarsensors, Fahrerassistenzeinrichtung und Kraftfahrzeug
DE102012021239A1 (de) 2012-10-27 2014-04-30 Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh Verfahren zur Detektion einer Interferenz in einem Empfangssignal eines Radarsensors, Fahrassistenzeinrichtung und Kraftfahrzeug
DE102012021240A1 (de) 2012-10-27 2014-04-30 Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh Verfahren zum Unterdrücken einer Interferenz in einem Empfangssignal einesRadarsensors eines Kraftfahrzeugs und entsprechende Fahrerassistenzeinrichtung
US9671488B2 (en) * 2013-03-12 2017-06-06 Rosemount Tank Radar Ab Radar level gauge with signal division
KR101465370B1 (ko) * 2013-12-09 2014-11-26 한국항공우주연구원 위상누적다항식을 이용하여 양방향 첩신호를 생성하는 장치 및 방법
DE102014114110A1 (de) * 2014-09-29 2016-03-31 Hella Kgaa Hueck & Co. Radarsensor
EP3173812B1 (de) 2015-11-24 2021-01-06 Veoneer Sweden AB Kraftfahrzeug-radarsystem zur verringerung von interferenzen
JP6678022B2 (ja) * 2015-12-11 2020-04-08 古野電気株式会社 探知装置、水中探知装置、及びレーダ装置
US10261179B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2019-04-16 Uhnder, Inc. Software defined automotive radar
US9846228B2 (en) 2016-04-07 2017-12-19 Uhnder, Inc. Software defined automotive radar systems
WO2017175190A1 (en) 2016-04-07 2017-10-12 Uhnder, Inc. Adaptive transmission and interference cancellation for mimo radar
EP3449272B1 (de) 2016-04-25 2022-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Fahrzeugradarsystem mit einem gemeinsamen radar und kommunikationssystem, und verfahren zur verwaltung eines solchen systems in einem fahrzeug
WO2017187306A1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Adaptive filtering for fmcw interference mitigation in pmcw radar systems
US10573959B2 (en) 2016-04-25 2020-02-25 Uhnder, Inc. Vehicle radar system using shaped antenna patterns
US9575160B1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-02-21 Uhnder, Inc. Vehicular radar sensing system utilizing high rate true random number generator
US9791551B1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-10-17 Uhnder, Inc. Vehicular radar system with self-interference cancellation
WO2017187299A2 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Successive signal interference mitigation
WO2017187304A2 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. Digital frequency modulated continuous wave radar using handcrafted constant envelope modulation
WO2017187242A1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-11-02 Uhnder, Inc. On-demand multi-scan micro doppler for vehicle
CN109073741B (zh) 2016-04-25 2019-07-02 乌恩德股份有限公司 用于车辆的雷达感测系统及缓解其干扰的方法
US9753121B1 (en) 2016-06-20 2017-09-05 Uhnder, Inc. Power control for improved near-far performance of radar systems
US10353062B2 (en) * 2016-07-13 2019-07-16 Texas Instruments Incorporated Methods and apparatus for narrowband ranging systems using reference signal interpolation
US9869762B1 (en) 2016-09-16 2018-01-16 Uhnder, Inc. Virtual radar configuration for 2D array
US11588567B2 (en) * 2016-12-02 2023-02-21 Texas Instruments Incorporated Synchronizing vehicle devices over a controller area network
WO2018146633A1 (en) 2017-02-10 2018-08-16 Uhnder, Inc. Programmable code generation for radar sensing systems
US10908272B2 (en) 2017-02-10 2021-02-02 Uhnder, Inc. Reduced complexity FFT-based correlation for automotive radar
US11454697B2 (en) 2017-02-10 2022-09-27 Uhnder, Inc. Increasing performance of a receive pipeline of a radar with memory optimization
KR102401188B1 (ko) 2017-08-28 2022-05-24 삼성전자주식회사 차량의 레이더를 이용한 오브젝트 검출 방법 및 장치
IL255982A (en) * 2017-11-29 2018-01-31 Arbe Robotics Ltd Detection, mitigation and prevention of mutual interference between fixed water radars in vehicles
US11105890B2 (en) 2017-12-14 2021-08-31 Uhnder, Inc. Frequency modulated signal cancellation in variable power mode for radar applications
US10718860B2 (en) * 2018-01-11 2020-07-21 Infineon Technologies Ag System and method to improve range accuracy in FMCW radar using FSK modulated chirps
IL259190A (en) * 2018-05-07 2018-06-28 Arbe Robotics Ltd System and method for frequency hopping MIMO FMCW imaging radar
CA3110818A1 (en) * 2018-08-30 2020-03-05 Atomic Energy Of Canada Limited / Energie Atomique Du Canada Limitee Continuous wave ultrasound or acoustic non-destructive testing
EP3637127A1 (de) 2018-10-12 2020-04-15 Axis AB Verfahren, vorrichtung und system zur interferenzreduktion in einer frequenzmodulierten dauerstrichradareinheit
US11474225B2 (en) 2018-11-09 2022-10-18 Uhnder, Inc. Pulse digital mimo radar system
US11681017B2 (en) 2019-03-12 2023-06-20 Uhnder, Inc. Method and apparatus for mitigation of low frequency noise in radar systems
EP3770628A1 (de) * 2019-07-24 2021-01-27 Veoneer Sweden AB Verfahren zur radarinterferenzabschwächung
EP3822663B1 (de) 2019-11-15 2022-02-23 Axis AB Verfahren, computerprogrammprodukt, vorrichtung und frequenzmoduliertes dauerstrichradarsystem
US11899126B2 (en) 2020-01-13 2024-02-13 Uhnder, Inc. Method and system for multi-chip operation of radar systems
EP4155756A1 (de) * 2021-09-27 2023-03-29 Infineon Technologies AG Fmcw-radar

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2380557A1 (fr) 1977-02-09 1978-09-08 Int Standard Electric Corp Systeme de guidage a pseudo-bruit avec rejet des fuites d'emetteur
GB2248359A (en) 1990-09-26 1992-04-01 Philips Electronic Associated Resolving range/Doppler coupling in a swept-frequency radar
EP0557660A2 (de) 1991-12-31 1993-09-01 Raytheon Company Signalprozessor
USH1720H (en) * 1997-03-31 1998-04-07 Chen; Victor C. Time frequency processor for radar imaging of moving targets

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US36095A (en) * 1862-08-05 Improvement in funnel pleasures
DE3116612A1 (de) * 1981-04-27 1982-11-11 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Puls-doppler-radarempfaenger mit einer schaltung zur wiederherstellung des ungestoerten signalverlaufs
US4692766A (en) * 1985-09-25 1987-09-08 Rolfs John C Linearizer frequency discriminator for frequency modulated radar transmitters
FR2600778B1 (fr) * 1986-06-27 1988-09-02 Trt Telecom Radio Electr Dispositif radar pour mesurer la distance qui le separe d'une surface
US4743910A (en) * 1986-12-16 1988-05-10 Hughes Aircraft Company Frequency domain, pulse compression radar apparatus for eliminating clutter
GB2218293A (en) * 1988-05-04 1989-11-08 Philips Electronic Associated Continuous wave radar receiver and apparatus
GB2235346B (en) * 1989-08-25 1994-01-05 Marconi Co Ltd Radar receiver
JP2787855B2 (ja) * 1991-06-28 1998-08-20 三菱電機株式会社 不要信号抑圧装置
US5294933A (en) * 1993-01-29 1994-03-15 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Wideband radar system utilizing adaptive interference canceler
US5381357A (en) * 1993-05-28 1995-01-10 Grumman Corporation Complex adaptive fir filter
GB9401361D0 (en) * 1994-01-25 1994-03-23 Philips Electronics Uk Ltd A radar system
SE503650C2 (sv) 1994-11-10 1996-07-22 Hans Hellsten Sätt att vid en radar förbättra radardata
JP3347571B2 (ja) * 1996-03-12 2002-11-20 富士通株式会社 レーダ装置

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2380557A1 (fr) 1977-02-09 1978-09-08 Int Standard Electric Corp Systeme de guidage a pseudo-bruit avec rejet des fuites d'emetteur
GB2248359A (en) 1990-09-26 1992-04-01 Philips Electronic Associated Resolving range/Doppler coupling in a swept-frequency radar
EP0557660A2 (de) 1991-12-31 1993-09-01 Raytheon Company Signalprozessor
USH1720H (en) * 1997-03-31 1998-04-07 Chen; Victor C. Time frequency processor for radar imaging of moving targets

Non-Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
B. Völcker; On Detection and Suppression of a Chirp Disturbance in a FMCW Radar Signal, IR-SB-EX-9513, Sep. 1995; Royal Institute of Technology; Stockholm, Sweden.
Gonzales et al., Digital Image Processing, 1987, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., (USA), pp. 344-349.
Gonzales/Woods, Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., 1992, see pp. 432-439.
Haykin, Adapted Filter Theory, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, 1991, pp. ix and xii.
Mayer, Wavelets, Algorithms & Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1993.
Proceedings of SPEI, vol. 2027, 1993, (USA), Fargues et al., Application of Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Transforms to Ultra-Wideband Radar Transient Signal Detection, pp. 180-193, see especially pp. 180-181 and pp. 184-185.
Rioul/Vetterli, Wavelets and Signal Processing, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 1991.
Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill 1980, Section 3.3.

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6810342B1 (en) * 1999-06-01 2004-10-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for the noise-free evaluation of radar signals
US20070040728A1 (en) * 2004-05-11 2007-02-22 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Radar system
US7336218B2 (en) * 2004-05-11 2008-02-26 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Radar system with peak frequency analysis and window functions
US20060097909A1 (en) * 2004-11-08 2006-05-11 Blunt Shannon D Multistatic adaptive pulse compression method and system
US7474257B2 (en) * 2004-11-08 2009-01-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Multistatic adaptive pulse compression method and system
US20110050484A1 (en) * 2005-05-16 2011-03-03 Motoi Nakanishi Radar
US8125375B2 (en) * 2005-05-16 2012-02-28 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Radar
US20090251360A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2009-10-08 Tetsuji Uebo Distance measuring device and distance measuring method
US7932855B2 (en) * 2005-09-02 2011-04-26 Saika Technological Institute Foundation Distance measuring device and distance measuring method
US7590209B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2009-09-15 L3 Communications Integrated Systems L.P. Method and computer program for identifying a transition in a phase-shift keying or frequency-shift keying signal
US8059026B1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2011-11-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Interference avoiding transform domain radar
US9952312B2 (en) 2015-07-06 2018-04-24 Navico Holding As Radar interference mitigation
US11002829B2 (en) * 2016-04-15 2021-05-11 Mediatek Inc. Radar interference mitigation method and apparatus
US11209523B2 (en) * 2018-04-11 2021-12-28 Infineon Technologies Ag FMCW radar with interference signal rejection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1998016848A1 (en) 1998-04-23
AU4733097A (en) 1998-05-11
KR20000049137A (ko) 2000-07-25
EP0932838B1 (de) 2007-02-14
EP0932839A1 (de) 1999-08-04
EP0932838A1 (de) 1999-08-04
EP0932837A1 (de) 1999-08-04
ES2387612T3 (es) 2012-09-27
EP0932837B1 (de) 2012-07-25
JP2001502425A (ja) 2001-02-20
WO1998016846A1 (en) 1998-04-23
AU4732997A (en) 1998-05-11
US6121918A (en) 2000-09-19
US6191726B1 (en) 2001-02-20
KR100488028B1 (ko) 2005-05-09
DE69737354D1 (de) 2007-03-29
WO1998016847A1 (en) 1998-04-23
US20020027522A1 (en) 2002-03-07
AU4732897A (en) 1998-05-11
DE69737354T2 (de) 2007-10-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6469662B2 (en) Procedure for the elimination of interference in a radar unit of the FMCW type
EP1672379B1 (de) System und Verfahren zur Verminderung eines Radarstörsignals
EP3620810B1 (de) Radarinterferenzerkennung
US7683827B2 (en) System and method for reducing the effect of a radar interference signal
EP3173812B1 (de) Kraftfahrzeug-radarsystem zur verringerung von interferenzen
US5309161A (en) Radar with doppler tolerant range sidelobe suppression and time domain signal processing
EP3816665A1 (de) Frequenzmodulierte dauerstrichradarempfänger, module dafür und zugehörige verfahren
KR20070089789A (ko) 레이더장치
WO2011002316A1 (en) Signal processing system and method
US5565872A (en) System and method for detecting and characterizing vibrating targets
NL1005067C2 (nl) Radarapparaat.
JP3773779B2 (ja) レーダ信号処理装置
EP1802995B1 (de) Verbesserter breitband-radar
CN114966598A (zh) 低慢小雷达强地杂波自适应抑制方法及装置
Grimaldi et al. Enhancing ultrasonic sensor performance by optimization of the driving signal
JPH08122431A (ja) 合成開口レーダの画像データ処理方法及 び装置
EP4040181A1 (de) Radarsignalverarbeitungsvorrichtung, radarvorrichtung, radarsignalverarbeitungsverfahren und radarsignalverarbeitungsprogramm
RU2792418C1 (ru) Многоканальное устройство обработки фазоманипулированных радиолокационных сигналов
Muja et al. Assessment of RF interference mitigation methods for automotive radars using real data
SE507857C2 (sv) Förfarande för störningseliminering i en radar av FMCW-typ
Zhang et al. A New Waveform with Low Sidelobe
Healey et al. A complex frequency approach towards pulse-echo attenuation estimation
Cherniakov et al. Optimisation of the radar for buried object detection
SE506797C2 (sv) Förfarande för störningseliminering i en radar
Linssen et al. Multi-frequency narrowband tissue characterization

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CELSIUSTECH ELECTRONICS AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TULLSSON, BERT-ERIC;REEL/FRAME:010926/0880

Effective date: 19990409

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: SAABTECH ELECTRONICS AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CELSIUSTECH ELECTRONICS AB;REEL/FRAME:021158/0446

Effective date: 20041213

Owner name: SAABTECH ELECTRONICS AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CELSIUSTECH ELECTRONICS AB;REEL/FRAME:021158/0420

Effective date: 20041213

AS Assignment

Owner name: SAAB AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SAABTECH ELECTRONICS AB;REEL/FRAME:021824/0237

Effective date: 20080929

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12