US20040234649A1 - Method for producing ethanol using raw starch - Google Patents

Method for producing ethanol using raw starch Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040234649A1
US20040234649A1 US10/798,226 US79822604A US2004234649A1 US 20040234649 A1 US20040234649 A1 US 20040234649A1 US 79822604 A US79822604 A US 79822604A US 2004234649 A1 US2004234649 A1 US 2004234649A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fermenting
saccharifying
fermentation
ethanol
plant material
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/798,226
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Stephen Lewis
Shon Van Hulzen
John Finck
Debbie Roth
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Broin and Associates Inc
Original Assignee
Broin and Associates Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US10/798,226 priority Critical patent/US20040234649A1/en
Application filed by Broin and Associates Inc filed Critical Broin and Associates Inc
Assigned to BROIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. reassignment BROIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FINCK, JOHN MICHALE, ROTH, DEBBIE LYNN, LEWIS, STEPHEN M., VAN HULZEN, SHON ERRON
Publication of US20040234649A1 publication Critical patent/US20040234649A1/en
Priority to US11/077,971 priority patent/US20050239181A1/en
Priority to US11/077,969 priority patent/US20050233030A1/en
Assigned to BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: BROIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Priority to US11/676,965 priority patent/US7842484B2/en
Priority to US11/682,195 priority patent/US8409640B2/en
Priority to US12/405,125 priority patent/US7919291B2/en
Priority to US12/886,483 priority patent/US8470550B2/en
Priority to US12/944,618 priority patent/US8409639B2/en
Priority to US12/944,606 priority patent/US8497082B2/en
Priority to US13/850,196 priority patent/US8748141B2/en
Priority to US13/866,002 priority patent/US8679793B2/en
Priority to US14/285,030 priority patent/US20140283226A1/en
Assigned to POET, LLC F/K/A BROIN COMPANIES, LLC, POET RESEARCH, INC. F/K/A BROIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., POET PLANT MANAGEMENT, LLC, POET INVESTMENTS, INC. F/K/A BROIN ENTERPRISES, INC. reassignment POET, LLC F/K/A BROIN COMPANIES, LLC RELEASE OF PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT SECURITY INTEREST Assignors: BOKF, N.A., DBA BANK OF OKLAHOMA
Priority to US15/957,818 priority patent/US20180235167A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L7/00—Cereal-derived products; Malt products; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L7/10—Cereal-derived products
    • A23L7/104—Fermentation of farinaceous cereal or cereal material; Addition of enzymes or microorganisms
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L7/00—Cereal-derived products; Malt products; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L7/20—Malt products
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P7/00—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
    • C12P7/02—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
    • C12P7/04—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
    • C12P7/06—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/10—Biofuels, e.g. bio-diesel

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods for producing high levels of alcohol during fermentation of plant material, and to the high alcohol beer produced.
  • the present invention also relates to methods for producing high protein distiller's dried grain from fermentation of plant material, and to the high protein distiller's dried grain produced.
  • the present invention further relates to reduced stack emissions from drying distillation products from the production of ethanol.
  • the present invention relates to methods for producing high levels of alcohol during fermentation of plant material, and to the high alcohol beer produced.
  • the present invention also relates to methods for producing high protein distiller's dried grain from fermentation of plant material, and to the high protein distiller's dried grain produced.
  • the present invention relates to a process for producing ethanol from plant material.
  • This method includes grinding the plant material to produce ground plant material including starch; saccharifying the starch, without cooking; fermenting the incubated starch; and recovering the ethanol from the fermentation.
  • the present method can include varying the temperature during fermentation.
  • the present method can include employing a plant material with a particle size such that more than 50% of the material fits though a sieve with a 0.5 mm mesh.
  • the present method can yield a composition including at least 18 vol-% ethanol.
  • the present invention relates to a process for producing high protein distiller's dried grain from plant material.
  • This method includes grinding the plant material to produce ground plant material including starch; producing sugars from the starch without cooking; fermenting the uncooked sugars to yield a composition including ethanol; and recovering distiller's dried grain from the fermentation.
  • the distiller's dried grain can include at least about 30% protein.
  • the distillers dried grain can include increased levels of the protein zein.
  • the present invention relates to a process of producing ethanol from corn.
  • This process includes producing starch from corn and ethanol from the starch; producing dryer stack emissions including a significantly lower level of volatile organic compounds than conventional technologies.
  • FIGS. 1 A-E schematically illustrate a comparison of the yield of the process of the present invention compared to the conventional process.
  • FIGS. 2A-2C schematically illustrate the effect of dosages of glucoamylase and acid fungal amylase in the present process.
  • FIGS. 3A-3D schematically illustrate the effect of grind size and enzyme dosage on fermentation efficiency in the present process.
  • FIGS. 4A-4C schematically illustrate the effect of grind particle size, glucoamylase type, and acid fungal amylase dosage on fermentation efficiency in the present process.
  • FIGS. 5A-5J schematically illustrate the effect of initial dry solids and temperature on fermentation performance in the present process.
  • FIGS. 6A and 6B schematically illustrate high levels of ethanol production from the process of the present invention using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) batch or continuous modes of operation.
  • SSF simultaneous saccharification and fermentation
  • FIG. 7 schematically illustrates that the present process maintained low levels of glycerol during SSF batch operations.
  • FIG. 8 schematically illustrates that the present process maintained low levels of fusel oils during SSF batch operations.
  • FIGS. 9A and 9B schematically illustrate that the present process maintained low levels of glucose during SSF batch or continuous fermentation modes of operation.
  • FIGS. 10A and 10B schematically illustrate that the present process maintained low levels of maltose during SSF batch or continuous fermentation modes of operation.
  • FIGS. 11A and 11B schematically illustrate that the present process maintained low levels of maltotriose (DP3) during SSF batch or continuous fermentation modes of operation.
  • DP3 maltotriose
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B schematically illustrate that the present process maintained low levels of dextrins (DP4+) during SSF batch or continuous fermentation modes of operation.
  • FIG. 13 schematically illustrates that the present process impacts DDGS quality favorably based on caking tendency.
  • FIGS. 14A and 14B schematically illustrate mass balance of the present process related to proximate separations during the centrifugation step of ethanol production.
  • FIGS. 15 A-D schematically illustrate that the present process affords advantageous fermentation of non traditional feedstocks.
  • FIGS. 16 A-C schematically illustrate that the process of the present invention is capable of stable operation in a continuous mode of operation without significant loss due to acid producing bacterial contaminants.
  • FIG. 17 schematically illustrates that the present process is capable of achieving low residual starch levels in a continuous mode of operation.
  • without cooking refers to a process for converting starch to ethanol without heat treatment for gelatinization and dextrinization of starch using alpha-amylase.
  • “without cooking” refers to maintaining a temperature below starch gelatinization temperatures, so that saccharification occurs directly from the raw native insoluble starch to soluble glucose while bypassing conventional starch gelatinization conditions.
  • Starch gelatinization temperatures are typically in a range of 57° C. to 93° C. depending on the starch source and polymer type.
  • dextrinization of starch using conventional liquefaction techniques is not necessary for efficient fermentation of the carbohydrate in the grain.
  • plant material refers to all or part of any plant (e.g., cereal grain), typically a material including starch.
  • Suitable plant material includes grains such as maize (corn, e.g., whole ground corn), sorghum (milo), barley, wheat, rye, rice, and millet; and starchy root crops, tubers, or roots such as sweet potato and cassaya.
  • the plant material can be a mixture of such materials and byproducts of such materials, e.g., corn fiber, corn cobs, stover, or other cellulose and hemicellulose containing materials such as wood or plant residues.
  • Suitable plant materials include corn, either standard corn or waxy corn.
  • saccharification and “saccharifying” refer to the process of converting starch to smaller polysaccharides and eventually to monosaccharides, such as glucose.
  • Conventional saccharification uses liquefaction of gelatinized starch to create soluble dextrinized substrate which glucoamylase enzyme hydrolyzes to glucose.
  • saccharification refers to converting raw starch to glucose with enzymes, e.g., glucoamylase and acid fungal amylase (AFAU).
  • AFAU acid fungal amylase
  • the raw starch is not subjected to conventional liquefaction and gelatinization to create a conventional dextrinized substrate.
  • a unit of acid fungal amylase activity refers to the standard Novozymes units for measuring acid fungal amylase activity.
  • the Novozymes units are described in a Novozymes technical bulletin SOP No. EB-SM-0259.02/01. Such units can be measured by detecting products of starch degradation by iodine titration.
  • 1 unit is defined as the amount of enzyme that degrades 5.260 mg starch dry matter per hour under standard conditions.
  • a unit of glucoamylase activity refers to the standard Novozymes units for measuring glucoamylase activity.
  • the Novozymes units and assays for determining glucoamylase activity are described in a publicly available Novozymes technical bulletin.
  • a unit of amyloglucosidase activity refers to the standard Novozymes units for measuring amyloglucosidase activity.
  • the Novozymes units are described in a Novozymes technical bulletin SOP No EB-SM-0131.02/01.
  • Such units can be measured by detecting conversion of maltose to glucose.
  • the glucose can be determined using the glucose dehydrogenase reaction.
  • 1 unit is defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 1 mmol maltose per minute under the given conditions.
  • the term “about” modifying any amount refers to the variation in that amount encountered in real world conditions of producing sugars and ethanol, e.g., in the lab, pilot plant, or production facility.
  • an amount of an ingredient employed in a mixture when modified by “about” includes the variation and degree of care typically employed in measuring in an ethanol production plant or lab.
  • the amount of a component of a product when modified by “about” includes the variation between batches in an ethanol production plant or lab and the variation inherent in the analytical method. Whether or not modified by “about,” the amounts include equivalents to those amounts. Any quantity stated herein and modified by “about” can also be employed in the present invention as the amount not modified by “about.”
  • the present invention relates to methods for producing high levels of alcohol during fermentation of plant material, and to the high alcohol beer produced.
  • the present invention also relates to methods for producing high protein distiller's dried grain from fermentation of plant material, to the high protein distiller's dried grain produced, and to the cleaner dryer stack emissions.
  • the present method converts starch from plant material to ethanol.
  • the present method can include preparing the plant material for saccharification, converting the prepared plant material to sugars without cooking, and fermenting the sugars.
  • the plant material can be prepared for saccharification by any a variety of methods, e.g., by grinding, to make the starch available for saccharification and fermentation.
  • the vegetable material can be ground so that a substantial portion, e.g., a majority, of the ground material fits through a sieve with a 0.1-0.5 mm screen.
  • about 70% or more, of the ground vegetable material can fit through a sieve with a 0.1-0.5 mm screen.
  • the reduced plant material can be mixed with liquid at about 20 to about 50 wt-% or about 25 to about 45 wt-% dry reduced plant material.
  • the present process can include converting reduced plant material to sugars that can be fermented by a microorganism such as yeast.
  • This conversion can be effected by saccharifying the reduced plant material with an enzyme preparation, such as a saccharifying enzyme composition.
  • a saccharifying enzyme composition can include any of a variety of known enzymes suitable for converting reduced plant material to fermentable sugars, such as amylases (e.g., ⁇ -amylase and/or glucoamylase).
  • saccharification is conducted at a pH of about 6.0 or less, for example, about 4.5 to about 5.0.
  • the present process includes fermenting sugars from reduced plant material to ethanol. Fermenting can be effected by a microorganism, such as yeast. In an embodiment, fermentation is conducted at a pH of about 6 or less, for example, about 4.5 to about 5. In an embodiment, the present method can include varying the pH. For example, fermentation can include filling the fermenter at pH of about 3 to about 4.5 during the first half of fill and at a pH of about 4.5 to about 6 during the second half of the fermenter fill cycle. In an embodiment, fermentation is conducted at a temperature of about 25 to about 40° C. or about to about 35° C. In an embodiment, during fermentation the temperature is decreased from about 40° C. to about 30° C.
  • fermentation is conducted for about to (e.g., 24) to about to 150 hours, for example, for about 48 (e.g., 47) to about 96 hours.
  • the present process can include simultaneously converting reduced plant material to sugars and fermenting those sugars with a microorganism such as yeast.
  • the product of the fermentation process is referred to herein as “beer”.
  • Ethanol can be recovered from the fermentation mixture, from the beer, by any of a variety of known processes, such as by distilling.
  • the remaining stillage includes both liquid and solid material.
  • the liquid and solid can be separated by, for example, centrifugation.
  • the present method converts starch from plant material to ethanol.
  • the plant material can be reduced by a variety of methods, e.g., by grinding, to make the starch available for saccharification and fermentation.
  • Other methods of plant material reduction are available.
  • vegetable material such as kernels of corn
  • the use of emulsion technology, rotary pulsation, and other means of particle size reduction can be employed to increase surface area of plant material while raising the effectiveness of flowing the liquefied media.
  • the prepared plant material can be referred to as being or including “raw starch”.
  • a fine grind exposes more surface area of the plant material, or vegetable material, and can facilitate saccharification and fermentation.
  • the vegetable material is ground so that a substantial portion, e.g., a majority, of the ground material fits through a sieve with a 0.1-0.5 mm screen.
  • about 35% or more of the ground vegetable material can fit through a sieve with a 0.1-0.5 mm screen.
  • about 35 to about 70% of the ground vegetable material can fit through a sieve with a 0.1-0.5 mm screen.
  • about 50% or more of the ground vegetable material can fit through a sieve with a 0.1-0.5 mm screen.
  • about 90% of the ground vegetable material can fit through a sieve with a 0.1-0.5 mm screen.
  • all of the ground vegetable material can fit through a sieve with a 0.1-0.5 mm screen.
  • the vegetable material can be fractionated into one or more components.
  • a vegetable material such as a cereal grain or corn can be fractionated into components such as fiber (e.g., corn fiber), germ (e.g., corn germ), and a mixture of starch and protein (e.g., a mixture of corn starch and corn protein).
  • fiber e.g., corn fiber
  • germ e.g., corn germ
  • starch and protein e.g., a mixture of corn starch and corn protein
  • One or a mixture of these components can be fermented in a process according to the present invention.
  • Fractionation of corn or another plant material can be accomplished by any of a variety of methods or apparatus.
  • a system manufactured by Satake can be used to fractionate plant material such as corn.
  • the present process can include converting reduced plant material to sugars that can be fermented by a microorganism such as yeast.
  • This conversion can be effected by saccharifying the reduced plant material with any of a variety of known saccharifying enzyme compositions.
  • the saccharifying enzyme composition includes an amylase, such as an alpha amylase (e.g., acid fungal amylase).
  • the enzyme preparation can also include glucoamylase.
  • the enzyme preparation need not, and, in an embodiment, does not include protease.
  • ethanol production methods according to the present invention can conserve water by reusing process waters (backset) which may contain protease.
  • the present method employs acid fungal amylase for hydrolyzing raw starch.
  • Saccharifying can be conducted without cooking.
  • saccharifying can be conducted by mixing source of saccharifying enzyme composition (e.g., commercial enzyme), yeast, and fermentation ingredients with ground grain and process waters without cooking.
  • source of saccharifying enzyme composition e.g., commercial enzyme
  • yeast e.g., yeast, and fermentation ingredients with ground grain and process waters without cooking.
  • saccharifying can include mixing the reduced plant material with a liquid, which can form a slurry or suspension and adding saccharifying enzyme composition (e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase) to the liquid.
  • the method includes mixing the reduced plant material and liquid and then adding the saccharifying enzyme composition (e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase).
  • adding enzyme composition can precede or occur simultaneously with mixing.
  • the reduced plant material can be mixed with liquid at about 20 to about 50 wt-%, about 25 to about 45 (e.g., 44) wt-%, about 30 to about 40 (e.g., 39) wt-%, or about 35 wt-% dry reduced plant material.
  • wt-% of reduced plant material in a liquid refers to the percentage of dry substance reduced plant material or dry solids.
  • the method of the present invention can convert raw or native starch (e.g., in dry reduced plant material) to ethanol at a faster rate at higher dry solids levels compared to conventional saccharification with cooking. Although not limiting to the present invention, it is believed that the present method can be practiced at higher dry solids levels because, unlike the conventional process, it does not include gelatinization, which increases viscosity.
  • Suitable liquids include water and a mixture of water and process waters, such as stillage (backset), scrubber water, evaporator condensate or distillate, side stripper water from distillation, or other ethanol plant process waters.
  • the liquid includes water.
  • the liquid includes water in a mixture with about 1 to about 70 vol-% stillage, about 15 to about 60 vol-% stillage, about 30 to about 50 vol-% stillage, or about 40 vol-% stillage.
  • stillage provides nutrients for efficient yeast fermentation, especially free amino nitrogen (FAN) required by yeast.
  • FAN free amino nitrogen
  • the present invention can provide effective fermentation with reduced levels of stillage and even without added stillage.
  • the present method employs a preparation of plant material that supplies sufficient quantity and quality of nitrogen for efficient fermentation under high gravity conditions (e.g., in the presence of high levels of reduced plant material).
  • high gravity conditions e.g., in the presence of high levels of reduced plant material.
  • the present method provides the flexibility to employ high levels of stillage if desired.
  • the present method does not employ conventional liquefaction.
  • Conventional liquefaction increases viscosity of the fermentation mixture and the resulting stillage.
  • the present method produces lower viscosity stillage. Therefore, in an embodiment, increased levels of stillage can be employed in the present method without detrimental increases in viscosity of the fermentation mixture or resulting stillage.
  • Saccharification can employ any of a variety of known enzyme sources (e.g., a microorganism) or compositions to produce fermentable sugars from the reduced plant material.
  • the saccharifying enzyme composition includes an amylase, such as an alpha amylase (e.g., acid fungal amylase) or a glucoamylase.
  • saccharification is conducted at a pH of about 6.0 or less, pH of about 3.0 to about 6.0, about 3.5 to about 6.0, about 4.0 to about 5.0, about 4.0 to about 4.5, or about 4.5 to about 5.0.
  • the initial pH of the saccharification mixture can be adjusted by addition of, for example, ammonia, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, process waters (e.g., stillage (backset), evaporator condensate (distillate), side stripper bottoms, and the like), and the like.
  • Activity of certain saccharifying enzyme compositions e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase
  • saccharification is conducted at a temperature of about 25 to about 40° C. or about 30 to about 35° C.
  • saccharifying can be carried out employing quantities of saccharifying enzyme composition (e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase) selected to maintain low concentrations of dextrin in the fermentation broth.
  • the present process can employ quantities of saccharifying enzyme composition (e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase) selected to maintain maltotriose (DP3) at levels at or below about 0.2 wt-% or at or below about 0.1 wt-%.
  • saccharifying enzyme composition e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase
  • DP3 maltotriose
  • the present process can employ quantities of saccharifying enzyme composition (e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase) selected to maintain dextrin with a degree of polymerization of 4 or more (DP4+) at levels at or below about 1 wt-% or at or below about 0.5 wt-%.
  • saccharifying enzyme composition e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase
  • suitable levels of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase include about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU/gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) of acid fungal amylase and about 1 to about 2.5 (e.g., 2.4) AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) of glucoamylase.
  • the reaction mixture includes about 1 to about 2 AFAU/gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) of acid fungal amylase and about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) of glucoamylase.
  • saccharifying can be carried out employing quantities of saccharifying enzyme composition (e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase) selected to maintain low concentrations of maltose in the fermentation broth.
  • the present process can employ quantities of saccharifying enzyme composition (e.g., at least one of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase) selected to maintain maltose at levels at or below about 0.3 wt-%.
  • suitable levels of acid fungal amylase and glucoamylase include about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU/gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) of acid fungal amylase and about 1 to about 2.5 (e.g., 2.4) AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) of glucoamylase.
  • the reaction mixture includes about 1 to about 2 AFAU/gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) of acid fungal amylase and about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) of glucoamylase.
  • the present method employs an ⁇ -amylase.
  • the ⁇ -amylase can be one produced by fungi.
  • the ⁇ -amylase can be one characterized by its ability to hydrolyze carbohydrates under acidic conditions.
  • An amylase produced by fungi and able to hydrolyze carbohydrates under acidic conditions is referred to herein as acid fungal amylase, and is also known as an acid stable fungal ⁇ -amylase.
  • Acid fungal amylase can catalyze the hydrolysis of partially hydrolyzed starch and large oligosaccharides to sugars such as glucose.
  • the acid fungal amylase that can be employed in the present process can be characterized by its ability to aid the hydrolysis of raw or native starch, enhancing the saccharification provided by glucoamylase.
  • the acid fungal amylase produces more maltose than conventional (e.g., bacterial) ⁇ -amylases.
  • Suitable acid fungal amylase can be isolated from any of a variety of fungal species, including Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Mucor, Candida, Coriolus, Endothia, Enthomophtora, Irpex, Penicillium, Sclerotium and Torulopsis species.
  • the acid fungal amylase is thermally stable and is isolated from Aspergillus species, such as A. niger, A. saitoi or A. oryzae , from Mucor species such as M. pusillus or M. miehei , or from Endothia species such as E. parasitica .
  • the acid fungal amylase is isolated from Aspergillus niger .
  • the acid fungal amylase activity can be supplied as an activity in a glucoamylase preparation, or it can be added as a separate enzyme.
  • a suitable acid fungal amylase can be obtained from Novozymes, for example in combination with glucoamylase.
  • the amount of acid fungal amylase employed in the present process can vary according to the enzymatic activity of the amylase preparation. Suitable amounts include about 0.1 to about 10 acid fungal amylase units (AFAU) per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., dry solids corn (DSC). In an embodiment, the reaction mixture can include about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU/gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC). In an embodiment, the reaction mixture can include about 1 to about 2 AFAU/gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • AFAU acid fungal amylase units
  • DSC dry solids corn
  • the reaction mixture can include about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU/gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC). In an embodiment, the reaction mixture can include about 1 to about 2 AFAU/gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • the present method can employ a glucoamylase.
  • Glucoamylase is also known as amyloglucosidase and has the systematic name 1,4- alpha -D-glucan glucohydrolase (E.C. 3.2.1.3).
  • Glucoamylase refers to an enzyme that removes successive glucose units from the non-reducing ends of starch.
  • certain glucoamylases can hydrolyze both the linear and branched glucosidic linkages of starch, amylose, and amylopectin.
  • suitable glucoamylases are known and commercially available. For example, suppliers such as Novozymes and Genencor provide glucoamylases.
  • the glucoamylase can be of fungal origin.
  • the amount of glucoamylase employed in the present process can vary according to the enzymatic activity of the amylase preparation. Suitable amounts include about 0.1 to about 6.0 glucoamylase units (AGU) per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC). In an embodiment, the reaction mixture can include about 1 to about 3 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC). In an embodiment, the reaction mixture can include about 1 to about 2.5 (e.g., 2.4) AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC). In an embodiment, the reaction mixture can include about 1 to about 2 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • AGU glucoamylase units
  • the reaction mixture can include about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC). In an embodiment, the reaction mixture can include about 1.2 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • the present process includes fermenting sugars from reduced plant material to ethanol.
  • Fermenting can be effected by a microorganism, such as yeast.
  • the fermentation mixture need not, and in an embodiment does not, include protease.
  • the process waters may contain protease.
  • the amount of protease can be less than that used in the conventional process.
  • fermenting is conducted on a starch composition that has not been cooked.
  • the present fermentation process produces potable alcohol. Potable alcohol has only acceptable, nontoxic levels of other alcohols, such as fusel oils.
  • Fermenting can include contacting a mixture including sugars from the reduced plant material with yeast under conditions suitable for growth of the yeast and production of ethanol.
  • fermenting employs the saccharification mixture.
  • yeasts can be employed as the yeast starter in the present process.
  • Suitable yeasts include any of a variety of commercially available yeasts, such as commercial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae .
  • Suitable strains include “Fali” (Fleischmann's), Thermosac (Alltech), Ethanol Red (LeSafre), BioFerm AFT (North American Bioproducts), and the like.
  • the yeast is selected to provide rapid growth and fermentation rates in the presence of high temperature and high ethanol levels.
  • Fali yeast has been found to provide good performance as measured by final alcohol content of greater than 17% by volume.
  • the amount of yeast starter employed is selected to effectively produce a commercially significant quantity of ethanol in a suitable time, e.g., less than 75 hours.
  • yeast starter can be added by as a dry batch, or by conditioning/propagating.
  • yeast starter is added as a single inoculation.
  • yeast is added to the fermentation during the fermenter fill at a rate of 5 to 100 pounds of active dry yeast (ADY) per 100,000 gallons of fermentation mash.
  • the yeast can be acclimated or conditioned by incubating about 5 to 50 pounds of ADY per 10,000 gallon volume of fermenter volume in a prefermenter or propagation tank. Incubation can be from 8 to 16 hours during the propagation stage, which is also aerated to encourage yeast growth.
  • the prefermenter used to inoculate the main fermenter is can be from 1 to 10% by volume capacity of the main fermenter, for example, from 2.5 to 5% by volume capacity relative to the main fermenter.
  • the fermentation is conducted at a pH of about 6 or less, pH of about 3 to about 6, about 3.5 to about 6, about 4 to about 5, about 4 to about 4.5, or about 4.5 to about 5.
  • the initial pH of the fermentation mixture can be adjusted by addition of, for example, ammonia, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, process waters (e.g., stillage (backset), evaporator condensate (distillate), side stripper bottoms, and the like), and the like.
  • distillery yeast grow well over the pH range of 3 to 6, but are more tolerant of lower pH's down to 3.0 than most contaminant bacterial strains. Contaminating lactic and acetic acid bacteria grow best at pH of 5.0 and above. Thus, in the pH range of 3.0 to 3.5, it is believed that ethanol fermentation will predominate because yeast will grow better than contaminating bacteria.
  • the present method can include varying the pH. It is believed that varying the pH can be conducted to reduce the likelihood of contamination early in fermentation and/or to increase yeast growth and fermentation during the latter stages of fermentation.
  • fermentation can include filling the fermenter at pH of about 3 to about 4.5 during the first half of fill.
  • Fermentation can include increasing the slurry pH to pH of about 4.5 to about 6 during the second half of the fermenter fill cycle.
  • Fermentation can include maintaining pH by adding fresh substrate slurry at the desired pH as described above.
  • pH is not adjusted. Rather, in this embodiment, the pH is determined by the pH of the components during filling.
  • the pH is decreased to about five (5) or below in the corn process waters.
  • the pH is about pH 4 (e.g. 4.1) at the start of fermentation fill and is increased to about pH 5 (e.g. 5.2) toward the end of fermentation fill.
  • the method includes stopping pH control of the mash slurry after the yeast culture becomes established during the initial process of filling the fermenter, and then allowing the pH to drift up in the corn process waters during the end stages of filling the fermenter.
  • fermentation is conducted for about to 25 (e.g., 24) to about to 150 hours, about 25 (e.g., 24) to about 96 hours, about 40 to about 96 hours, about 45 (e.g., 44) to about 96 hours, about 48 (e.g., 47) to about 96 hours.
  • fermentation can be conducted for about 30, about 40, about 50, about 60, or about 70 hours.
  • fermentation can be conducted for about 35, about 45, about 55, about 65, or about 75 hours.
  • fermentation is conducted at a temperature of about 25 to about 40° C. or about 30 to about 35° C.
  • the temperature is decreased from about 40° C. to about 30° C. or about 25° C., or from about 35° C. to about 30° C., during the first half of the fermentation, and the temperature is held at the lower temperature for the second half of the fermentation.
  • the temperature can be decreased as ethanol is produced.
  • the temperature can be as high as about 99° F. and then reduced to about 79° F. This temperature reduction can be coordinated with increased ethanol titers (%) in the fermenter.
  • the present method includes solids staging.
  • Solids staging includes filling at a disproportionately higher level of solids during the initial phase of the fermenter fill cycle to increase initial fermentation rates.
  • the solids concentration of the mash entering the fermenter can then be decreased as ethanol titers increase and/or as the fermenter fill cycle nears completion.
  • the solids concentration can be about 40% (e.g. 41%) during the first half of the fermentation fill. This can be decreased to about 25% after the fermenter is 50% full and continuing until the fermenter fill cycle is concluded. In the above example, such a strategy results in a full fermenter with solids at 33%.
  • solids staging can accelerate enzyme hydrolysis rates and encourage a rapid onset to fermentation by using higher initial fill solids. It is believed that lowering solids in the last half of fill can reduce osmotic pressure related stress effects on the yeast. By maintaining overall fermenter fill solids within a specified range of fermentability, solids staging improves the capacity of the yeast to ferment high gravity mashes toward the end of fermentation.
  • the present process can include simultaneously converting reduced plant material to sugars and fermenting those sugars with a microorganism such as yeast. Simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can be conducted using the reagents and conditions described above for saccharifying and fermenting.
  • saccharification and fermentation is conducted at a temperature of about 25 to about 40° C. or about 30 to about 35° C.
  • the temperature is decreased from about 40 to about 25° C. or from about 35 to about 30° C. during the first half of the saccharification, and the temperature is held at the lower temperature for the second half of the saccharification.
  • saccharification and fermentation is conducted at a pH of about 6 or less, pH of about 3 to about 6, about 3.5 to about 6, about 4 to about 5, about 4 to about 4.5, or about 4.5 to about 5.
  • the initial pH of the saccharification and fermentation mixture can be adjusted by addition of, for example, ammonia, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, process waters (e.g., stillage (backset), evaporator condensate (distillate), side stripper bottoms, and the like), and the like.
  • saccharification and fermentation is conducted for about to 25 (e.g., 24) to about to 150 hours, about 25 (e.g., 24) to about 72 hours, about 45 to about 55 hours, about 50 (e.g., 48) to about 96 hours, about 50 to about 75 hours, or about 60 to about 70 hours.
  • saccharification and fermentation can be conducted for about 30, about 40, about 50, about 60, or about 70 hours.
  • saccharification and fermentation can be conducted for about 35, about 45, about 55, about 65, or about 75 hours.
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can be carried out employing quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain high concentrations of yeast and high levels of budding of the yeast in the fermentation broth.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain yeast at or above about 300 cells/mL or at about 300 to about 600 cells/mL.
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can be carried out employing quantities of enzyme and yeast selected for effective fermentation without added exogenous nitrogen; without added protease; and/or without added backset.
  • Backset can be added, if desired, to consume process water and reduce the amount of wastewater produced by the process.
  • the present process maintains low viscosity during saccharifying and fermenting.
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can employ acid fungal amylase at about 0.1 to about 10 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 0.5 to about 6 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can employ acid fungal amylase at about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 3 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can employ acid fungal amylase at about 1 to about 2 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • dry solids reduced plant material e.g., DSC
  • glucoamylase at about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can be carried out employing quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain low concentrations of glucose in the fermentation broth.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain glucose at levels at or below about 2 wt-%, at or below about 1 wt-%, at or below about 0.5 wt-%, or at or below about 0.1 wt-%.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain glucose at levels at or below about 2 wt-% during saccharifying and fermenting.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain glucose at levels at or below about 2 wt-% from hours 0-10 (or from 0 to about 15% of the time) of saccharifying and fermenting.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain glucose at levels at or below about 1 wt-%, at or below about 0.5 wt-%, or at or below about 0.1 wt-% from hours 12-54 (or from about 15% to about 80% of the time) of saccharifying and fermenting.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain glucose at levels at or below about 1 wt-% from hours 54-66 (or about from 80% to about 100% of the time) of saccharifying and fermenting.
  • Suitable levels of enzyme include acid fungal amylase at about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 3 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can employ acid fungal amylase at about 1 to about 2 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can be carried out employing quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain low concentrations of maltose (DP2) in the fermentation broth.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain maltose at levels at or below about 0.5 wt-% or at or below about 0.2 wt-%.
  • Suitable levels of enzyme include acid fungal amylase at about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 3 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can employ acid fungal amylase at about 1 to about 2 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • dry solids reduced plant material e.g., DSC
  • glucoamylase at about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can be carried out employing quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain low concentrations of dextrin in the fermentation broth.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain maltotriose (DP3) at levels at or below about 0.5 wt-%, at or below about 0.2 wt-%, or at or below about 0.1 wt-%.
  • DP3 maltotriose
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain dextrin with a degree of polymerization of 4 or more (DP4+) at levels at or below about 1 wt-% or at or below about 0.5 wt-%.
  • Suitable levels of enzyme include acid fungal amylase at about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 3 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can employ acid fungal amylase at about 1 to about 2 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can be carried out employing quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain low concentrations of fusel oils in the fermentation broth.
  • the present process can employ quantities of enzyme and yeast selected to maintain fusel oils at levels at or below about 0.4 to about 0.5 wt-%.
  • Suitable levels of enzyme include acid fungal amylase at about 0.3 to about 3 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 3 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting can employ acid fungal amylase at about 1 to about 2 AFAU per gram of dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC) and glucoamylase at about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material (e.g., DSC).
  • dry solids reduced plant material e.g., DSC
  • glucoamylase at about 1 to about 1.5 AGU per gram dry solids reduced plant material
  • the saccharification and/or fermentation mixture can include additional ingredients to increase the effectiveness of the process.
  • the mixture can include added nutrients (e.g., yeast micronutrients), antibiotics, salts, added enzymes, and the like.
  • Nutrients can be derived from stillage or backset added to the liquid.
  • Suitable salts can include zinc or magnesium salts, such as zinc sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and the like.
  • Suitable added enzymes include those added to conventional processes, such as protease, phytase, cellulase, hemicellulase, exo- and endo-glucanase, xylanase, and the like.
  • the product of the fermentation process is referred to herein as “beer”.
  • fermenting corn produces “corn beer”.
  • Ethanol can be recovered from the fermentation mixture, from the beer, by any of a variety of known processes. For example, ethanol can be recovered by distillation.
  • the remaining stillage includes both liquid and solid material.
  • the liquid and solid can be separated by, for example, centrifugation.
  • the recovered liquid, thin stillage can be employed as at least part of the liquid for forming the saccharification and fermentation mixture for subsequent batches or runs.
  • the recovered solids, distiller's dried grain include unfermented grain solids and spent yeast solids. Thin stillage can be concentrated to a syrup, which can be added to the distiller's dried grain and the mixture then dried to form distiller's dried grain plus solubles. Distiller's dried grain and/or distiller's dried grain plus solubles can be sold as animal feed.
  • the present method can include heat treatment of the beer or stillage, e.g., between the beer well and distillation.
  • This heat treatment can convert starches to dextrins and sugars for subsequent fermentation in a process known as burn-out.
  • Such a treatment step can also reduce fouling of distillation trays and evaporator heat exchange surfaces.
  • heat treatment staging can be performed on whole stillage. Following enzymatic treatment of the residual starches, in an embodiment, the resulting dextrins and sugars can be fermented within the main fermentation process as recycled backset or processed in a separate fermentation train to produce ethanol.
  • Large pieces of germ and fiber can ferment the residual starch in the fermenter. After fermentation, the fractions could be removed prior to or after distillation. Removal can be effected with a surface skimmer before to distillation. In an embodiment, screening can be performed on the beer. The screened material can then be separated from the ethanol/water mix by, for example, centrifugation and rotary steam drum drying, which can remove the residual ethanol from the cake. In embodiments in which the larger fiber and germ pieces are removed prior to bulk beer distillation, a separate stripper column for the fiber/germ stream can be utilized. Alternatively, fiber and germ could be removed by screening the whole stillage after distillation.
  • all the components are blended and dried together.
  • the fiber and germ can be removed from the finished product by aspiration and/or size classification.
  • the fiber from the DDGS can be aspirated. Removal of fiber by aspiration after drying increased the amount of oil and protein in the residual DDGS by 0.2 to 1.9% and 0.4 to 1.4%, respectively.
  • the amount of NDF in the residual DDGS decreased by 0.1 to 2.8%.
  • fractionation can employ the larger fiber and germ pieces to increase the particle size of that part of the DDGS derived from the endosperm, as well as to improve syrup carrying capacity.
  • a ring dryer disintegrator can provide some particle size reduction and homogenization.
  • the present process can be run via a batch or continuous process.
  • a continuous process includes moving (pumping) the saccharifying and/or fermenting mixtures through a series of vessels (e.g., tanks) to provide a sufficient duration for the process.
  • vessels e.g., tanks
  • a multiple stage fermentation system can be employed for a continuous process with 48-96 hours residence time.
  • reduced plant material can be fed into the top of a first vessel for saccharifying and fermenting.
  • Partially incubated and fermented mixture can then be drawn out of the bottom of the first vessel and fed in to the top of a second vessel, and so on.
  • the present method is more suitable than conventional methods for running as a continuous process. It is believed that the present process provides reduced opportunity for growth of contaminating organisms in a continuous process.
  • the majority of dry grind ethanol facilities employ batch fermentation technology. This is in part due to the difficulty of preventing losses due to contamination in these conventional processes.
  • the conventional belief is that a separate saccharification stage prior to fermentation is necessary to pre-saccharify the mash for fermentation. Such pre-saccharification insures that there is adequate fermentable glucose for the continuous fermentation process.
  • the present method achieves efficient production of high concentrations of ethanol without a liquefaction or saccharification stage prior to fermentation. This is surprising since this conventional wisdom teaches that it is necessary to have adequate levels of fermentable sugar available during the fermentation process when practiced in a continuous mode. In contrast the present method can provide low concentrations of glucose and efficient fermentation. In the present method, it appears that the glucose is consumed rapidly by the fermenting yeast cell. It is believed that such low glucose levels reduce stress on the yeast, such as stress caused by osmotic inhibition and bacterial contamination pressures. According to the present invention, ethanol levels greater than 18% by volume can be achieved in about to about 96 hours.
  • the present invention also relates to a high alcohol beer.
  • the process of the present invention produces beer containing greater than 18 vol-% ethanol.
  • the present process can produce such a high alcohol beer in about 40 to about 96 hours or about to about 96 hours.
  • the beer includes 18 vol-% to about 23 vol-% ethanol.
  • the present method can produce alcohol contents in the fermenter of 18 to 23% by volume in about 45 to 96 hours.
  • the present method can produce alcohol content in the fermenter of 18 to 23% by volume in about 45 to 96 hours.
  • the majority of the alcohol 80% or more of the final concentration
  • an additional 2 to 5 vol-% alcohol can be produced in the final 12-48 hours.
  • Concentrations of ethanol up to 23 vol-% can be achieved with fermentation time up to 96 hours. It can be economically advantageous to harvest after 48 to 72 hours of fermentation to increase fermenter productivity.
  • the present beer can include this high level of ethanol even when it includes high levels of residual starch.
  • the present beer can include ethanol at 18 to 23 vol-% when it contains 0 to 30% residual starch.
  • the present beer can contain residual starches as low as 0% to as high as 20% residual starch.
  • the present beer includes fewer residual byproducts than conventional beers, even though residual starch can be higher.
  • residual glucose, maltose, and higher dextrins can be as much as 0.8 wt-% lower than in conventional beers produced under similar fermentation conditions.
  • residual glycerol can be as much as 0.45 wt-% less. Lactic acid and fusel oils can also be significantly reduced.
  • the present beer can include less than or equal to about 0.2 wt-% glucose, about 0.4 wt-%, about 0.1 wt-% DP3, undetectable DP4+, 0.45 wt-% glycerol, about 0.01 wt-% lactic acid, and/or about 0.4 wt-% fusel oils.
  • the present invention also relates to a distiller's dried grain product.
  • the distiller's dried grain can also include elevated levels of one or more of protein, fat, fiber (e.g., neutral detergent fiber (NDF)), and starch.
  • NDF neutral detergent fiber
  • the distiller's dried grain can include 34 or more wt-% protein or about 30 to about 45 wt-% protein, or about 1 to about 2 wt-% more protein than produced by the conventional process.
  • the distiller's dried grain can include 15 or more wt-% fat, about 13 to about 17 wt-% fat, or about 1 to about 6 wt-% more fat than produced by the conventional process.
  • the distiller's dried grain can include 31 or more wt-% fiber, about 23 to about 37 wt-% fiber, or about 3 to about 13 wt-% more fiber than produced by the conventional process.
  • the distiller's dried grain can include 12 or more wt-% starch, about 1 to about 23 wt-% starch, or about 1 to about 18 wt-% more starch than produced by the conventional process.
  • the present distiller's dried grain includes elevated levels of B vitamins, vitamin C, vitamin E, folic acid, and/or vitamin A, compared to conventional distiller's dried grain products.
  • the present distiller's dried grain has a richer gold color compared to conventional distiller's dried grain products.
  • the present invention also relates to a distiller's dried grain with one or more improved physical characteristics, such as decreased caking or compaction or increase ability to flow.
  • the present process can produce such an improved distiller's dried grain.
  • the present process can produce fermentation solids including higher molecular weight forms of carbohydrates. Such fermentation solids can, it is believed, exhibit a higher glass transition temperature (i.e. higher T g values). For example, residual starches have a high T g value. Thus, through control of starch content in the DDG and DDGS, the present process can manufacture DDG or DDGS with target T g values.
  • adding an alkaline syrup blend e.g., syrup plus added lime or other alkaline material
  • the fermentation solids e.g., distiller's dried grains
  • DDGS distiller's dried grain with solubles
  • organic acids such as lactic, acetic, and succinic acids which are produced in fermentation have a lower T g value than their corresponding calcium salts.
  • process of the present invention can need not destroy protein in the fermented plant material.
  • Corn contains prolamins, such as zein.
  • Grain sorghum for example, contains a class of zein-like proteins known as kafirins, which resemble zein in amino acid composition.
  • the thermal degradation that occurs during liquefaction, distillation, and high temperature drying produces DDG and DDGS including significant amounts of degraded protein. It is believed that the process of the present invention can provides improved levels of the prolamin fraction of cereal grains.
  • efficient fermentation of the present process removes from the DDG or DDGS non zein components such as starch.
  • Fractionating the plant material, e.g., corn can also increase levels of proteins, such as zein, in the DDG or DDGS.
  • proteins such as zein
  • removing the bran and germ fractions prior to fermentation can concentrate zein in the substrate.
  • Zein in corn is isolated in the endosperm. Fermentation of zein enriched endosperm results in concentration of the zein in the residuals from fermentation.
  • the process of the present invention can provide DDG and DDGS with different, predetermined T g values.
  • the process of the present invention can ferment fractions containing high, medium, or low levels of zein, thus varying the glass transition temperature of the resulting DDG or DDGS.
  • the resulting co-product T g can be directly proportional to the prolamin protein (such as zein) content.
  • the process of the current invention is desirable for the fermentation of high protein corn. This also allows production of DDG and DDGS with a higher prolamin (zein) content.
  • the wet cake fraction produced by the present method which can be dried separately to produce DDG, can be higher in prolamin protein (such as zein) than conventional DDG.
  • the present process allows syrup and wet cake blend ratios to be varied. This results in DDG/DDGS with varying ratios of prolamin protein (such as zein) and residual starch. As the residual starch in the wet cake reduces the protein in the wet cake increases. This indicates an inverse relationship. A similar response occurs in the syrup fraction.
  • starch can segregate into the liquid fraction.
  • the amount of starch in the DDGS can be varied by blending syrup at rates ranging from 0 lbs. dry weight of syrup solids to 1.2 lbs. of syrup solids per lb. of wet cake solids before, and various times during drying to create the final DDGS product.
  • the disproportionate segregation of residual starches into the backset or thin stillage fraction can provide both the aforementioned burn-out and secondary fermentation to be performed on these fractions. Since the thin stillage is evaporated to produce syrup, the centrifuge mass balance also enables DDGS production at various T g values depending on the desired properties and their dependence on T g .
  • the present invention has emissions benefits. Emissions benefits result in the reduction in byproducts created in the ethanol manufacturing process. There is a marked reduction in extraction of fats and oils in the mash from the germ fraction of cereal grains. There is a reduction of byproducts from Maillard reactions typically formed during cooking and liquefaction. And there is a reduction in fermentation byproducts. These observations result in reduced emissions during the recovery of co-products. The concentration and emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxide compounds (NOx), sulfur oxides (SO2), and other emissions are considerably lower. See Table 1. Note that other manufacturers have attempted to lower emissions by manufacturing wet cake instead of drying to DDG or DDGS.
  • VOC volatile organic compounds
  • CO carbon monoxide
  • NOx nitric oxide compounds
  • SO2 sulfur oxides
  • the present invention also relates to volatile organic compounds (VOC), such as those produced by drying products of a fermentation process.
  • VOC volatile organic compounds
  • the present method includes producing ethanol, distiller's dried grain, and additional useful fermentation products with production of lower levels of VOC compared to conventional processes.
  • drying distillation products e.g., spent grain
  • VOC volatile organic compounds
  • VOC produced by fermentation processes include ethanol, acetic acid, formaldehyde, methanol, acetaldehyde, acrolein, furfural, lactic acid, formic acid, and glycerol.
  • the present invention also relates to carbon monoxide (CO), such as those produced by drying products of a fermentation process.
  • CO carbon monoxide
  • the present method includes producing ethanol, distiller's dried grain, and additional useful fermentation products with production of lower levels of CO compared to conventional processes.
  • drying distillation products e.g., spent grain
  • a method according to the present invention was employed to produce distiller's dried grain from corn. This method produced high protein, high fat, and high fiber distiller's dried grain. Comparison with a conventional saccharification and liquefaction process indicates superior performance of the present method.
  • Yeast inoculum was prepared by adding glucoamylase (0.088 ml of Novozyme's Spirizyme Plus gluco-amylase at 400 AGU/g) and protease (0.018 ml of Genencor International's GC 106 protease 1000 SAPU/g) to 400 ml of stillage containing 70 grams of maltodextrin.
  • Stillage (backset) used was prepared from prior conventional or raw starch fermentations by distilling off the alcohol and subjecting the resulting whole stillage to centrifugal separation to produce backset.
  • Corn was obtained from commercial suppliers of seed corn and was ground through a 0.5 mm screen using a hammermill prior to fermentation. Several varieties of conventional number 2 yellow dent corn were compared, and in several experiments their isogenically equivalent of waxy corn was also tested. Different corn varieties were tested to demonstrate that the present methods produce improved DDG using any of a variety of corn hybrids.
  • Fermentations were conducted for 72 hours with sampling conducted at approximately 24 (e.g. 25) hour intervals. All samples were analyzed by HPLC. At the end of fermentation beer samples were placed in metal pans, pH was decreased to ⁇ 3.5 to inactivate residual enzyme activity, and dried.
  • Waxy corn is almost entirely comprised of amylopectin starch, whereas normal #2 yellow corn is about 25 to 28% amylose starch with the remainder being amylopectin.
  • Waxy corn is generally not used in the conventional process because of the high peak viscosity and more rapid rate of viscosity development compared to regular corn. The high initial viscosity makes the corn slurry more difficult to pump during the initial primary high temperature liquefaction. Waxy corn varieties can, however, be readily employed in the present process. Because no cook stage is employed, the high peak viscosity is not a processing issue.
  • the Present Process Provides Improved Yield Potential
  • the yield potential of the method of the present invention was compared to a conventional process.
  • the present method exhibited improved yield using temperature staging.
  • the present method exhibited an increased potential maximum yield for ethanol production. Comparison with conventional saccharification and liquefaction process indicates superior performance of the present method.
  • Fermentations were prepared in a similar manner as in Example 1 except for intentional differences in particle size, alpha amylase enzyme dose, gluco-amylase enzyme dose, or acid fungal amylase enzyme dose. Conditions for this experiment are described in Table 3. Corn for all tests was obtained from Broin Enterprises (BEI), Scotland, S. Dak., USA. Corn representing a coarse particle size by raw starch standards was ground at BEI. Finely ground corn was produced using a lab hammermill through a 0.5 mm screen.
  • the conventional process utilized indicated levels of Liquozyme SC and GC 480.
  • the raw starch process used indicated levels of Spirizyme Plus and SP 288 acid fungal amylase at 1700 AFAU's per gm. Dosages of urea liquor, zinc sulfate, and antibiotic were adjusted accordingly for the conventional process.
  • Stillage (backset) used was prepared from prior conventional or raw starch fermentations by distilling off the alcohol and subjecting the resulting whole stillage to centrifugal separation to produce backset. Fermentation temperatures were staged according to the following set points: 0-18 hours at 90° F., 18-42 hours at 86° F., and 42-72 hours at 82° F. Samples were taken at 65 hours to represent the end of fermentation.
  • FIG. 1C illustrates the potential for the new process to produce more alcohol than the conventional process, even when residual starch levels are higher.
  • Conventional wisdom would suggest the raw starch process is less efficient due to the higher levels of residual starch, however, this is not the case.
  • the present process is superior to the conventional method. Note that fermentation efficiency can also be assessed by examining the fermentation drop solids. This is shown in the composite data comparing both processes in FIG. 1D. Since all fermentations in the above example were started at the same initial set solids, a lower drop solids suggests a more efficient conversion of starch to ethanol. The potential of this process is also indicated by the achievement of an equal to or reduced level of drop solids, despite the higher residual starches observed.
  • FIG. 1E shows the temperature staging done during the present process. Fermentation temperatures were staged according to the following set points: 0-18 hours at approximately 90° F. (ranging from about 95° F. to about 90° F.), 18-42 hours at approximately 86° F. (ranging from 90° F. to 86° F.), and 42-72 hours at about 82° F. (ranging from 86° F. to 84° F.). Staging of temperature helps to increase ethanol production process by reducing stress on yeast. The temperature is decreased as ethanol is produced to reduce the stress on yeast caused by ethanol production. TABLE 3 Comparison of the Yield Potential of Conventional vs.
  • the Present Process Exhibits Improved Results with Increased Levels of Acid Fungal Amylase and Increased Levels of Glucoamylase
  • Results of an embodiment of the method of the present invention were evaluated with increased levels of acid fungal amylase and increased levels of glucoamylase. Increased levels of acid fungal amylase improved results with the present process. The increased levels of glucoamylase improved results with the present process.
  • Glucoamylase Novozymes Spirizyme Plus
  • acid fungal amylase Novozymes SP 288
  • the objective of this test was to examine the effect of a range of dosages of glucoamylase and acid fungal amylase on production of ethanol and other products from raw starch hydrolysis fermentations.
  • dosages above 0.3 AFAU's per gm dry solids corn for acid fungal amylase and dosages above 0.3 AGU's per gram of dry solids corn produce higher alcohol and consistently higher residual glucose. The consistently higher glucose indicates that these fermentations have the potential for even higher ethanol yield.
  • Results of an embodiment of the method of the present invention were evaluated with varying particle size of the ground plant material. Smaller particle sizes improved results with the present process.
  • Results are shown in Table 4, and FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3 C, 3 D.
  • the data illustrates that smaller grind size provided higher ethanol yield and lower residual starch.
  • grind size was a more influential factor.
  • a higher enzyme dosage was required to achieve the same relative results.
  • Results of an embodiment of the method of the present invention were evaluated with varying particle size of the ground plant material, varying glucoamylase type, and dosage of acid fungal amylase.
  • FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4 C Final fermenter results are shown in FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4 C.
  • Conventional glucoamylase enzymes such as Distillase from Genencor International contained a very low level of acid fungal amylase activity.
  • Spirizyme Plus contained about 2.5 times as much AFAU activity per ml of enzyme and exhibited improved performance for hydrolyzing raw starch.
  • SP 288 acid fungal amylase contained a relatively low level of glucoamylase.
  • An embodiment of the present invention was employed to produce ethanol from corn. This process produced high alcohol corn beer, high protein, high fat, and high fiber distiller's dried grain. Comparison with conventional saccharification and liquefaction process indicate superior performance of the present method.
  • Example 6 was set up in a manner similar to prior examples except the initial fermentation solids and temperature were varied as described in the presentation of the results.
  • An interesting feature of the present raw starch fermentation process is the ability to enhance the rate of fermentation through increasing the solids content or initial temperature of fermentation. Solids loading, temperature, grind size, glucoamylase dosage, acid fungal amylase dosage, and yeast dosage can be combined to increase the performance of raw starch fermentation.
  • FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5 C, 5 D, 5 E, 5 F, 5 G, 5 H, 5 I, and 5 J illustrate the influence of temperature at different solids loadings.
  • the residual starch values reported for this Example suggest that temperature can be used to improve the efficiency of raw starch fermentations at intermediate fermentation gravities, which are defined as fermentation solids levels which would yield between 15% to 18% ethanol.
  • the fermentation temperature could be used to accelerate raw starch fermentations so that they finish in less than 48 hours, yet still achieve alcohol levels of 15% to 18%, with acceptable residual starch levels.
  • the increased fermentation set point will help to accelerate enzymatic conversion of native starch to glucose, which appears to be the rate limiting step in the raw starch process.
  • Fermentation performance using higher temperature set points is an aspect of the process for intermediate ethanol ranges, especially when viewed from the perspective of prior examples establishing that raw starch fermentations can tolerate a higher level of residual starch in the residual distillers dried grains and with distillers dried grains solubles, and still produce excellent quality DDG or DDGS according to the proximate analysis.
  • the dry substance of raw starch fermentations can be increased by approximately 20% to increase the rate of fermentation, while producing higher alcohol content in the fermenter and more DDGS with excellent quality even if the residual starch levels are high.
  • the present method produced ethanol containing corn beer with greater than 18 vol-% ethanol. Runs produced at least 18 vol-% ethanol and up to 23 vol-% ethanol within 48 to 96 hours of incubation and fermentation. The beer contained these high levels of ethanol even when it also included higher levels of residual starch. After 24 hours of incubating and fermenting the corn beer contained 9-16.5 or 12-15 vol-% ethanol. After 48 hours of incubating and fermenting the corn beer contained 13-20 vol-% ethanol. Ethanol production was linear up to a level of 14-16 vol-%. A compilation of ethanol production results from various runs is illustrated at least in FIGS. 6A and 6B.
  • the beer contained approximately 0.4 to 0.5 wt-% less glycerol than conventional fermentation at otherwise identical fermentation conditions (FIG. 7).
  • the beer contained less extracted oil from the germ fraction, resulting in reduced fouling and lower VOC emissions in the water vapor during drying of the residual animal feed product.
  • Table 1 The beer contained less extracted oil from the germ fraction, resulting in reduced fouling and lower CO emissions in the water vapor during drying of the residual animal feed product (Table 1).
  • the beer contained less fusel oil (FIG. 8), which inhibits yeast cell growth and fermentation if these alcohol compounds are unintentionally recycled in distillation side stripper bottoms streams. Fusel oils are also an undesirable component of potable alcohol manufacturing operations, so the present process offers an improved method of production of potable alcohol.
  • the beer also contained less lactic and acetic acid relative to the conventional process.
  • the beer also contained higher yeast cell counts, which contributes to improved feed products.
  • the present process maintained yeast at or above 300 cells/mL in these numerous runs. Yeast budding was observed in at least 40% of the yeast from hours 0-20 of incubating and fermenting and/or at least 15-20% of the yeast after hours 60 of incubating and fermenting. These yeast counts and budding are higher than observed in the conventional process.
  • the Present Process Maintains Low Levels of Glucose, Maltose (DP2), Maltotriose (DP3), and Dextrins (DP4+)
  • the levels of glucose, maltose (DP2), maltotriose (DP3), and dextrins (DP4+) produced by an embodiment of the present invention was compared to a conventional process.
  • the present method exhibited decreased levels of glucose, maltose (DP2), maltotriose (DP3), and dextrins (DP4+) respectively. Comparison of the level of glucose to the conventional process indicates superior performance of the present method.
  • Batch fermentations were set up in a similar manner as Example 1.
  • Continuous ethanol fermentation was evaluated in a bench top system consisting of a refrigerated cold slurry tank followed by five (5) fermenters operating in continuous mode and finishing with a beerwell collecting the fermented beer.
  • the volume of each fermentation stage was approximately two (2) liters.
  • Average fermenter fill solids was approximately 30-35% dry solids corn, depending on the starch content of the substrate.
  • the mash slurry for feeding fermentation was prepared every 3 to 4 days and maintained between 6 to 12 degrees Centigrade to discourage bacterial growth in the feed tank.
  • the mash preparation procedures did not sterilize the mash prior to fermentation, and the fermentation train was operated with no antibiotic addition to inhibit bacterial contaminants.
  • the mash was stored at a cold temperature to reduce the amount of work required for substrate preparation. 15 to 20 ml of 50% urea liquor was added to the cold slurry tank, which had a final mash volume of approximately 9000 liters.
  • Each fermenter in the continuous series was fed from the prior fermenter, while the first fermenter was fed directly from the cold slurry tank. Fermentation temperature was held at a constant 82° F. through the five (5) stage fermentation. Glucoamylase was dosed into the first fermenter to provide a dosage of approximately 2.0 to 2.4 AGU's per gram dry substance corn. Fali yeast, obtained from Fleischmann's Yeast, was added at a rate of approximately 0.65 grams per liter of slurry makeup, and was batched into the cold slurry each time fresh mash was prepared.
  • a continuous fermentation run was set up employing the procedure described above for experiment 1. Lactic acid and acetic acid measurements were taken at various times and stages during the continuous multistage fermentation process. Toward the end of the run, the initial slurry pH was purposely increased, as shown, to challenge the system microbiologically. In certain circumstances, slurry pH was intermittently lowered to keep contamination in check (see, e.g., FIGS. 16A, 16B, and 16 C).
  • FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate that the present process maintained low levels of glucose during simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and continuous raw starch fermentations.
  • SSF simultaneous saccharification and fermentation
  • this low level of glucose reduces potential reactions such as reversion, condensation, or Maillard Browning Reactions. Such reactions in turn can reduce ethanol yield.
  • the data compiled in this example demonstrates that the process maintained glucose at levels at or below 3 wt-% for the entire run and at or below 1 wt-% for about 90% of the run. In particular, the process maintained glucose at levels at or below 1 wt-% from hours 12-54 of incubating and fermenting.
  • FIGS. 10-12 illustrate that the present process maintained low levels of dextrin during SSF and continuous raw starch fermentation.
  • FIGS. 10A and 10B illustrate that the present process maintained maltose (DP2) at levels at or below about 0.2 wt-% during simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting and below about 0.34 wt-% during continuous raw starch fermentation.
  • the data shown in FIG. 11A demonstrate that the process maintained low levels of maltotriose (DP3) during simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting at levels at or below 0.2 wt-% and at or below 0.1 wt-%.
  • the data shown in FIG. 11B demonstrate that the present process maintained low levels of maltotriose (DP3) during a continuous raw starch fermentation at levels at or below 0.25 wt-%.
  • the data shown in FIG. 12A demonstrate that the process maintained low levels of dextrins (DP4+) during simultaneous saccharifying and fermenting at levels at or below 1 wt-% and at or below 0.5 wt-%.
  • the data shown in FIG. 12B demonstrate that the process maintained low levels of dextrins (DP4+) during continuous raw starch system at levels at or below 0.3 wt-%.
  • the results of experiment 3 demonstrate that a continuous embodiment of the present method produced residual starch levels lower than that produced by the conventional process (FIG. 17).
  • the residual starch levels produced using this embodiment of the present method remained lower than the residual starch levels of the conventional process (FIG. 17).
  • the percentage of starch produced using this embodiment of the present method remained at about twenty (e.g. 21) or less (FIG. 17) whereas the percentage starch produced using the conventional process was as high as 27 (FIG. 17).
  • temperature staging can be employed to minimize residual glucose production. That is, the temperature of the fermentation can be reduced as the fermentation progresses. It is believed that, in general, for every 10° C. (18° F.) increase in temperature, the rate of an enzymatic reaction approximately doubles.
  • enzyme action can be slowed by decreasing the temperature of the fermentation mixture after a time period, such as after 30 hours. It is believed that cooling also maintains yeast viability, so that fermentation can continue to utilize the glucose that has been formed.
  • the present process does not require a saccharification stage before fermentation and produces improved results.
  • Another conventional continuous process includes aerating the 1 st fermentor, and possibly the second fermentor, to encourage yeast growth.
  • the present process provides improved results and does not require aeration of the fermentor.
  • Some conventional continuous systems employ a yeast recycle method.
  • the present method does not require yeast recycling and provides improved results.
  • This embodiment of the present invention is superior to such conventional continuous fermentation systems.
  • the present invention can employ simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of raw starch and can operate at high gravity. In an embodiment, the process of the present invention can produce ethanol at fast rates despite the apparent lack of adequate fermentable substrate.
  • a continuous ethanol production embodiment of the present method maintained low acidity levels throughout the fermentation cycle.
  • a continuous ethanol production embodiment of the present method maintained lower starch levels throughout the fermentation cycle. Comparison of the present residual starch level to the conventional process provides an indication of advantageous performance from the present method. The mass balance of the present raw starch process suggests that residual starches can actually be higher in this process relative to the conventional, while still achieving a higher ethanol yield and improved proximate mass balance.
  • the DDGS according to an embodiment of the present invention was compared to that produced by a conventional process.
  • the present method produced an inventive DDGS that exhibited less caking compared to DDGS produced by the conventional process.
  • the present DDGS with less caking is superior to conventional DDGS.
  • the DDGS was collected as a co-product of ethanol production from the conventional high temperature liquefaction process and from the process of the present invention.
  • the caking/collapse assay was performed by filling a 500 ml cylinder with approximately 400 ml of DDGS. Attention was given to avoiding physical packing of the DDGS when filling the cylinder. After filling, a 4.4 cm diameter disc weighing 78 grams was placed on top of the DDGS, followed by placement of 1.5 kg of lead shot (in an appropriately sized plastic bag) on top of the disc. Assay preparation was completed by covering each cylinder with a plastic bag and sealing the apparatus with a rubber band to prevent moisture loss.
  • the weight applied to the DDGS is used to exaggerate the effect and approximate the conditions which DDGS is exposed to during transport, for example, in a railcar.
  • the level of the DDGS is noted at the beginning of storage and at various times during storage at a temperature of 50° C.
  • the measured height of the collapsed (caked) DDGS was compared to the initial height of the DDGS.
  • the measured height was compared to the initial height as an estimate of the tendency of the product to collapse or cake.
  • the DDGS from the present invention shows less caking collapse over time (FIG. 13) when compared to the DDGS of the conventional process. Over a twenty-five hour compaction time the DDGS according to the present invention collapsed only 4-5% of the initial volume as compared to 10-14% of the volume collapse for DDGS of the conventional process.
  • DDGS compaction of DDGS at controlled conditions models the DDGS caking observed in the containers of transportation vehicles, for example railcars and trucks.
  • DDGS produced using the process of this invention exhibited less caking related collapse than that of the conventional process, indicating superior performance of the present method.
  • glass transition temperature increases with molecular weight for polymers such as those found in DDGS.
  • the present DDG includes higher levels of such polymers and should exhibit a higher glass transition temperature. It is believed that product moisture, storage temperature, and chemical composition can impact the transition of DDGS from an amorphous glass to an amorphous rubber phase. DDGS in the rubber phase compacts more readily that DDGS in the glass phase.
  • the Present Process can Employ High Protein Corn to Produce High Protein DDGS and High Levels of Ethanol
  • the present invention can include fermenting high protein corn to produce high protein DDGS and high levels of ethanol. This provides for advantageous flexibility for processing high protein corn.
  • DDGS was collected as a co-product of ethanol production from fermentation of various corn hybrids with fermentations set up in a similar manner as Example 1. All fermentations were set up using identical conditions. Different corn hybrids were tested using various grind sizes using a lab scale hammermill. The hammermill screen size was varied from 0.5 mm to 4.0 mm to create flour particle sizes ranging from fine (0.5 mm screen) to coarse (4.0 mm screen).
  • FIG. 15A illustrates the dependence of protein level in DDGS on grind size. This figure illustrates the inverse correlation between grind size and protein: as particle size increases the protein content of DDGS decreases for each tested corn hybrid (FIG. 15A).
  • FIG. 15B illustrates the dependence of starch level in DDGS on grind size. This figure illustrates a positive correlation between grind size and starch content in: as particle size increases the starch content of the DDGS increases for each tested corn hybrid (FIG. 15B).
  • FIG. 15C illustrates the dependence of ethanol production on grind size. This figure illustrates that as particle size decreases there is an increase in ethanol production (FIG. 15C).
  • “highly fermentable corn” hybrids can have a higher starch concentration and not a high protein concentration.
  • This example demonstrates that higher protein corn hybrid varieties of standard #2 yellow corn can be used to obtain high levels of ethanol production.
  • fermenter dry solids can be increased to maintain ethanol % levels in the fermenter while producing a higher protein DDGS.
  • the present invention provides improved access to the prolamin protein (such as zein) fraction of cereal grains.
  • the high protein content of DDG and DDGS is useful in compounding.
  • FIGS. 14A and 14B show the relationship of: wet cake, syrup starch, and protein levels. As the residual starch in the wet cake reduces the protein in the wet cake increases. This indicates an inverse relationship. A similar response occurs in the syrup fraction.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
US10/798,226 2003-03-10 2004-03-10 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch Abandoned US20040234649A1 (en)

Priority Applications (13)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/798,226 US20040234649A1 (en) 2003-03-10 2004-03-10 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US11/077,971 US20050239181A1 (en) 2004-03-10 2005-03-10 Continuous process for producing ethanol using raw starch
US11/077,969 US20050233030A1 (en) 2004-03-10 2005-03-10 Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US11/676,965 US7842484B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2007-02-20 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US11/682,195 US8409640B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2007-03-05 Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US12/405,125 US7919291B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2009-03-16 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US12/886,483 US8470550B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-09-20 Composition comprising raw starch for the production of ethanol
US12/944,618 US8409639B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-11-11 Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US12/944,606 US8497082B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-11-11 Composition comprising corn flour and saccharification enzymes
US13/850,196 US8748141B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2013-03-25 Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US13/866,002 US8679793B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2013-04-18 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US14/285,030 US20140283226A1 (en) 2003-03-10 2014-05-22 Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US15/957,818 US20180235167A1 (en) 2003-03-10 2018-04-19 Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US45344203P 2003-03-10 2003-03-10
US10/798,226 US20040234649A1 (en) 2003-03-10 2004-03-10 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch

Related Child Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/077,969 Continuation-In-Part US20050233030A1 (en) 2003-03-10 2005-03-10 Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US11/077,971 Continuation-In-Part US20050239181A1 (en) 2004-03-10 2005-03-10 Continuous process for producing ethanol using raw starch
US11/676,965 Continuation US7842484B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2007-02-20 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US11/682,195 Continuation-In-Part US8409640B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2007-03-05 Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040234649A1 true US20040234649A1 (en) 2004-11-25

Family

ID=32990774

Family Applications (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/798,226 Abandoned US20040234649A1 (en) 2003-03-10 2004-03-10 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US11/676,965 Active 2026-05-07 US7842484B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2007-02-20 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US12/405,125 Expired - Lifetime US7919291B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2009-03-16 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US12/886,483 Active 2025-06-13 US8470550B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-09-20 Composition comprising raw starch for the production of ethanol
US12/944,606 Active 2025-05-30 US8497082B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-11-11 Composition comprising corn flour and saccharification enzymes
US13/866,002 Expired - Lifetime US8679793B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2013-04-18 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch

Family Applications After (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/676,965 Active 2026-05-07 US7842484B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2007-02-20 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US12/405,125 Expired - Lifetime US7919291B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2009-03-16 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US12/886,483 Active 2025-06-13 US8470550B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-09-20 Composition comprising raw starch for the production of ethanol
US12/944,606 Active 2025-05-30 US8497082B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-11-11 Composition comprising corn flour and saccharification enzymes
US13/866,002 Expired - Lifetime US8679793B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2013-04-18 Method for producing ethanol using raw starch

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (6) US20040234649A1 (zh)
EP (2) EP1603406B1 (zh)
CN (2) CN102210376B (zh)
AU (1) AU2004219649A1 (zh)
BR (1) BRPI0408215B1 (zh)
CA (1) CA2517920C (zh)
ES (1) ES2398216T3 (zh)
MX (2) MX349099B (zh)
WO (1) WO2004081193A2 (zh)
ZA (1) ZA200507013B (zh)

Cited By (81)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040219649A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2004-11-04 Novozymes A/S Alcohol product processes
US20050042737A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2005-02-24 Novozymes A/S Starch process
US20050107332A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2005-05-19 Norman Barrie E. Starch process
US20050233030A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-10-20 Broin And Associates, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20050239181A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-10-27 Broin And Associates, Inc. Continuous process for producing ethanol using raw starch
US20060057251A1 (en) * 2001-12-04 2006-03-16 Larry Dawley Mid-level protein distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) - production and use
US20060147581A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-07-06 Novozymes A/S Hybrid enzymes
US20060233864A1 (en) * 2003-05-12 2006-10-19 Power Ronan F Methods for improving the nutritional quality of residues of the fuel, beverage alcohol, food and feed industries
US20070037267A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2007-02-15 Broin And Associates, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
WO2007056321A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2007-05-18 Novozymes North America, Inc. Dewatering whole stillage
US20070178567A1 (en) * 2005-10-10 2007-08-02 Lewis Stephen M Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and selecting plant material
US20070196907A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2007-08-23 Broin & Associates, Inc. Method For Producing Ethanol Using Raw Starch
WO2007109750A2 (en) 2006-03-22 2007-09-27 Novozymes North America, Inc. Fermentation processes
US20070231437A1 (en) * 2006-03-30 2007-10-04 Novus International, Inc. Dry milling process for the production of ethanol and feed with highly digestible protein
US20070292927A1 (en) * 2006-05-02 2007-12-20 Donaldson Gail K Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US20080044547A1 (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-21 Semo Milling, Llc Kernel fractionation system
US20080045730A1 (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-21 Semo Milling, Llc Carbon dioxide extraction of corn germ oil from corn germ
US20080182308A1 (en) * 2005-09-29 2008-07-31 Donaldson Gail K Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US20080190845A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2008-08-14 Novozymes North America, Inc. Methods for Enhancing the Dewaterability of Sludge with Alpha-Amylase Treatment
US20080199918A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2008-08-21 Novozymes A/S Starch Process
US20080274525A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Bramucci Michael G Method for the production of 2-butanol
US20080274526A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Bramucci Michael G Method for the production of isobutanol
US20080274522A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Bramucci Michael G Method for the production of 2-butanone
US20080274524A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Bramucci Michael G Method for the production of 1-butanol
US20080299256A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2008-12-04 Syngenta Participations Ag Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US20090017164A1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2009-01-15 Renessen Llc Fermentation process for the preparation of ethanol from a corn fraction having low oil content
US20090047382A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2009-02-19 Syngenta Participations Ag Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US20090047715A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2009-02-19 Syngenta Participations Ag Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US20090068309A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2009-03-12 Lakefront Brewery, Inc. Gluten-free beer and method for making the same
US20090071066A1 (en) * 2007-09-17 2009-03-19 Russell Meier Method of Producing Dried Distillers Grain with Solubles Agglomerated Particles
US20090110792A1 (en) * 2007-10-24 2009-04-30 Mor Technology, Llc Super critical fluid extraction and fractionation of bran extraction materials
US20090117630A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2009-05-07 Novozymes A/S Fermentation product processes
US20090142448A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Ukrainian Technological Company Cereal grain treatment and mash preparation for by-products
US20090233340A1 (en) * 2008-03-13 2009-09-17 North American Bioproducts Corp. Use of erythromycin as a selective antimicrobial agent in the production of alcohols
WO2009129320A2 (en) 2008-04-15 2009-10-22 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Protein concentrate from starch containing grains: composition, method of making, and uses thereof
US20090269817A1 (en) * 2008-04-29 2009-10-29 Icm, Inc. Pretreatment of grain slurry with alpha-amylase and a hemicellulase blend prior to liquefaction
US20100047889A1 (en) * 2008-08-12 2010-02-25 Tommy Mack Davis Method and apparatus for continuous flow bio-fuel production
US20100058649A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-11 Poet Research Oil composition and method of recovering the same
US20100159550A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-06-24 Poet Research, Inc. System for production of ethanol and co-products with apparatus for solvent washing of fermentation product
US20100260918A1 (en) * 2009-04-01 2010-10-14 Hui Wang Novel corn degerming Ethanol fermentation processes
US20100261243A1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2010-10-14 Poet Research Incorporated System for recycling water to facilitate the production of ethanol
US20100316761A1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2010-12-16 Jean-Luc Baret Nutritional Supplement for Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation Medium for the Manufacture of Ethanol
US20110008489A1 (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-01-13 Abengoa Bioenergy New Technologies, Inc. quality and value of co-products of the ethanol production industry
US20110008864A1 (en) * 2008-03-28 2011-01-13 Novozymes North America, Inc. Processes for Producing Fermentation Products
US7910342B2 (en) 2007-04-18 2011-03-22 Butamax(Tm) Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of isobutanol using highly active ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzymes
US20110086149A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2011-04-14 Poet Research, Inc. Oil composition and method for producing the same
US20110143013A1 (en) * 2008-12-31 2011-06-16 Poet Research Incorporated Zein composition and methods of production
US20110236559A1 (en) * 2007-06-18 2011-09-29 Byproduct Feed Technologies Llc Method of producing ruminant-edible feed products
US8093023B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2012-01-10 Little Sioux Corn Processor, LLC. De-fatted soy production process and value added by-products from de-fatted soy flour
US8227012B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2012-07-24 Mor Technology, Llc Grain fraction extraction material production system
US8273558B2 (en) 2005-10-26 2012-09-25 Butamax(Tm) Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US20120282388A1 (en) * 2009-12-21 2012-11-08 Archer Daniels Midland Company Process for modifying protein digestion of ruminant feeds and products produced therefrom
US8450094B1 (en) 2009-03-03 2013-05-28 Poet Research, Inc. System for management of yeast to facilitate the production of ethanol
WO2013149192A1 (en) 2012-03-30 2013-10-03 Danisco Us Inc. Direct starch to fermentable sugar as feedstock for the production of isoprene, isoprenoid precursor molecules, and/or isoprenoids
WO2013148207A2 (en) 2012-03-30 2013-10-03 Danisco Us Inc. Direct starch to fermentable sugar
US20140127769A1 (en) * 2007-06-29 2014-05-08 Kfi Intellectual Properties L.L.C. Method for Extracting Oil from a Water and Solids Composition, Method for the Production of Ethanol, and Ethanol Production Facility
US8815552B2 (en) 2009-03-03 2014-08-26 Poet Research, Inc. System for fermentation of biomass for the production of ethanol
US8828704B2 (en) 2006-05-02 2014-09-09 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
WO2014160184A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-10-02 Poet Research, Inc. Systems and methods for yeast propagation
US20140322782A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2014-10-30 Tommy Mack Davis Method and apparatus for bio-fuel seeding
US9068206B1 (en) 2009-03-03 2015-06-30 Poet Research, Inc. System for treatment of biomass to facilitate the production of ethanol
US9169467B2 (en) 2012-05-11 2015-10-27 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzymes and methods of use
US9238801B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2016-01-19 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Ketol-acid reductoisomerase using NADH
US9340767B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2016-05-17 Poet Research, Inc. Propagating an organism and related methods and compositions
US9422582B2 (en) 2011-03-24 2016-08-23 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Host cells and methods for production of isobutanol
US9512408B2 (en) 2012-09-26 2016-12-06 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Polypeptides with ketol-acid reductoisomerase activity
US9856498B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2018-01-02 Novozymes A/S Processes of producing fermentation products
US9896643B2 (en) 2014-01-16 2018-02-20 Poet Research, Inc. Light phase product recovery methods and systems
US20180213820A1 (en) * 2009-10-14 2018-08-02 Xyleco, Inc. Producing edible residues from ethanol production
US10227613B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2019-03-12 Novozymes A/S Processes for producing fermentation products
US10407704B2 (en) * 2013-02-21 2019-09-10 Novozymes A/S Methods of saccharifying and fermenting a cellulosic material
US10486083B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2019-11-26 Kiinja Corporation Separator for fractional separation of supercritical carbon dioxide extracts
US10858674B2 (en) 2017-12-14 2020-12-08 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for propagating microorganisms on stillage compositions
US10889837B2 (en) 2014-11-24 2021-01-12 Poet Research, Inc. Corn blends that include high oil corn and methods of making one or more biochemicals using high oil corn or corn blends that include high oil corn
US11248197B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2022-02-15 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for recovering products from a corn fermentation mash
US11254955B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2022-02-22 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for separating whole stillage to produce a fiber rich product that includes C5 and C6 polysaccharides
US11305212B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2022-04-19 Kiinja Corporation Multifunctional vessels for extraction and fractionation of extracts from biomass
US11618861B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2023-04-04 Icm, Inc. Cellulosic biofuel
US11718863B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2023-08-08 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for recovering products from a slurry
US11730172B2 (en) 2020-07-15 2023-08-22 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for concentrating a solids stream recovered from a process stream in a biorefinery
US11905502B2 (en) 2011-04-18 2024-02-20 Poet Research, Inc. Systems and methods for stillage fractionation

Families Citing this family (108)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6962722B2 (en) * 2001-12-04 2005-11-08 Dawley Larry J High protein corn product production and use
CN100506997C (zh) 2003-05-30 2009-07-01 诺维信公司 酒精产品生产方法
EP1491253A1 (en) * 2003-06-26 2004-12-29 Urea Casale S.A. Fluid bed granulation process and apparatus
WO2005021742A2 (en) 2003-08-29 2005-03-10 Ultraforce Technology Llc Alcohol production using sonication
US7504245B2 (en) 2003-10-03 2009-03-17 Fcstone Carbon, Llc Biomass conversion to alcohol using ultrasonic energy
EP1745122A4 (en) 2004-01-16 2010-11-03 Novozymes North America Inc PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING FERMENTATION PRODUCT
EP1723248A2 (en) * 2004-03-10 2006-11-22 Broin and Associates, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
RU2006144096A (ru) * 2004-05-13 2008-06-20 Новозаймз Норт Америка, Инк. Способ производства ферментационного продукта
CA2567570C (en) 2004-05-27 2014-07-08 Genencor International, Inc. Aspergillus kawachi acid-stable alpha amylase and applications in granular starch hydrolysis
US7413887B2 (en) 2004-05-27 2008-08-19 Genecor International, Inc. Trichoderma reesei glucoamylase and homologs thereof
US8419378B2 (en) 2004-07-29 2013-04-16 Pursuit Dynamics Plc Jet pump
DE602005025038D1 (de) 2004-12-22 2011-01-05 Novozymes As Seaminosäuresequenz und einem kohlenhydratbindenden modul als zweiter aminosäuresequenz
ES2621921T3 (es) 2004-12-22 2017-07-05 Novozymes A/S Enzimas para tratamiento de almidón
CN101094918B (zh) 2004-12-30 2014-05-14 金克克国际有限公司 酸性真菌蛋白酶
EP1877568B9 (en) 2005-04-26 2021-05-12 Novozymes A/S Hydrolysis of arabinoxylan
US8980598B2 (en) 2005-06-14 2015-03-17 Danisco Us Inc. Dry solids staging fermentation process
US20080280328A1 (en) 2005-11-18 2008-11-13 Novozymes A/S Glucoamylase Variants
EP1966386A4 (en) * 2005-12-22 2009-06-17 Novozymes North America Inc METHOD FOR PRODUCING A FERMENTATION PRODUCT
US7968318B2 (en) 2006-06-06 2011-06-28 Genencor International, Inc. Process for conversion of granular starch to ethanol
DE102006033791A1 (de) * 2006-07-19 2008-01-24 Prokon Nord Energiesysteme Gmbh Verbesserte Verfahren zur Herstellung von Ethanol, Gluten und und Kleie aus Getreide
CN101495642B (zh) * 2006-08-11 2013-06-19 丹尼斯科美国公司 用于颗粒状淀粉水解的酶组合物中天然的谷物淀粉酶
CA2665595A1 (en) 2006-10-10 2008-04-17 Danisco Us, Inc., Genencor Division Glucoamylase variants with altered properties
US9499635B2 (en) 2006-10-13 2016-11-22 Sweetwater Energy, Inc. Integrated wood processing and sugar production
WO2008112282A1 (en) * 2007-03-14 2008-09-18 Danisco Us, Inc., Genencor Division Production of ethanol from barley and ddgs containing reduced beta-glucan and phytic acid
US8592194B2 (en) 2007-10-09 2013-11-26 Danisco Us Inc. Glucoamylase variants with altered properties
EP2481796B1 (en) 2007-10-09 2014-06-11 Danisco US Inc. Glucoamylase variants
AU2008310711A1 (en) * 2007-10-12 2009-04-16 Novozymes A/S A process of producing a fermentation product from molasses
MX2010005461A (es) 2007-11-20 2010-06-02 Danisco Us Inc Variantes de glucoamilasa con propiedades alteradas.
WO2009072878A1 (en) 2007-12-04 2009-06-11 Jantinus Kappe Process for the manufacture of bioethanol
CN101289676B (zh) * 2008-01-22 2012-10-03 泉州市博大纳米科技有限公司 蕉芋生产酒精的方法
CA2638159C (en) 2008-07-24 2012-09-11 Sunopta Bioprocess Inc. Method and apparatus for treating a cellulosic feedstock
CA2638157C (en) 2008-07-24 2013-05-28 Sunopta Bioprocess Inc. Method and apparatus for conveying a cellulosic feedstock
CA2638150C (en) 2008-07-24 2012-03-27 Sunopta Bioprocess Inc. Method and apparatus for conveying a cellulosic feedstock
CA2650919C (en) 2009-01-23 2014-04-22 Sunopta Bioprocess Inc. Method and apparatus for conveying a cellulosic feedstock
CA2650913C (en) 2009-01-23 2013-10-15 Sunopta Bioprocess Inc. Method and apparatus for conveying a cellulosic feedstock
CA2638160C (en) 2008-07-24 2015-02-17 Sunopta Bioprocess Inc. Method and apparatus for conveying a cellulosic feedstock
US8915644B2 (en) 2008-07-24 2014-12-23 Abengoa Bioenergy New Technologies, Llc. Method and apparatus for conveying a cellulosic feedstock
US9127325B2 (en) 2008-07-24 2015-09-08 Abengoa Bioenergy New Technologies, Llc. Method and apparatus for treating a cellulosic feedstock
EP2329033A4 (en) * 2008-08-27 2012-05-16 Edeniq Inc MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING BIOMASS IN BIOFUEL
CN105063116A (zh) * 2008-08-27 2015-11-18 易登尼有限公司 用于将生物质转化为生物燃料的材料和方法
US8529765B2 (en) 2008-12-09 2013-09-10 Sweetwater Energy, Inc. Ensiling biomass for biofuels production and multiple phase apparatus for hydrolyzation of ensiled biomass
US8187848B2 (en) 2008-12-22 2012-05-29 Inbicon A/S Methods of processing ensiled biomass
WO2010102060A2 (en) * 2009-03-03 2010-09-10 Poet Research, Inc. System for pre-treatment of biomass for the production of ethanol
US8778433B2 (en) 2009-05-26 2014-07-15 Fluid Quip, Inc. Methods for producing a high protein corn meal from a whole stillage byproduct
CN102712915B (zh) 2009-08-19 2014-12-10 丹尼斯科美国公司 具有改良比活和/或热稳定性的葡糖淀粉酶的组合变体
BR112012003787A2 (pt) 2009-08-19 2017-07-04 Danisco variantes de glicoamilase
PL2467532T3 (pl) 2009-08-24 2014-11-28 Abengoa Bioenergy New Tech Llc Sposób wytwarzania etanolu i współproduktów z biomasy celulozowej
US20110183389A1 (en) * 2009-10-26 2011-07-28 Van Walsum G Peter Production of lactic acid from hemicellulose extracts
EP2427561A4 (en) 2009-11-04 2013-01-02 Abengoa Bioenergy New Technologies Inc HIGHLY EFFICIENT ETHANOL PRODUCTION PROCESS AND COPRODUCT THEREOF WITH HIGH PROTEIN SUPPLEMENT
WO2011066576A1 (en) 2009-11-30 2011-06-03 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
DK2507370T3 (en) 2009-11-30 2015-05-11 Novozymes As Polypeptides with glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding them
CN104169417B (zh) 2009-12-01 2020-05-08 诺维信公司 具有葡糖淀粉酶活性的多肽及其编码多核苷酸
EP2547778B1 (en) 2010-03-19 2019-09-04 POET Research, Inc. System for the treatment of biomass
CA2795503C (en) 2010-03-19 2020-02-18 Poet Research, Inc. System for treatment of biomass to facilitate the production of ethanol
ES2649555T3 (es) 2010-11-08 2018-01-12 Novozymes A/S Polipéptidos con actividad glucoamilasa y polinucleótidos que los codifican
US9732332B2 (en) 2010-11-08 2017-08-15 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
CN103347615B (zh) * 2010-12-03 2017-04-12 李介英 从用于生产醇的谷物中分离高价值副产品的系统和方法
MX2013008370A (es) 2011-01-18 2014-01-20 Poet Res Inc Sistemas y metodos para la hidrolisis de biomasa.
CN102226141B (zh) * 2011-04-27 2012-06-20 湖南农业大学 紫甘薯保健醋的生产方法
CN102286544B (zh) * 2011-07-14 2016-03-02 中国科学院广州能源研究所 一种淀粉基燃料乙醇的清洁生产方法
WO2013029496A1 (en) 2011-08-26 2013-03-07 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having glucoamylase activity and polynucleotides encoding same
CN104011067B (zh) 2011-12-22 2017-12-26 杜邦营养生物科学有限公司 具有葡糖淀粉酶活性的多肽及其制备方法
US8765430B2 (en) 2012-02-10 2014-07-01 Sweetwater Energy, Inc. Enhancing fermentation of starch- and sugar-based feedstocks
CN104244729A (zh) * 2012-02-22 2014-12-24 波伊特研究股份有限公司 玉米粉组合物及生产方法
US8563277B1 (en) 2012-04-13 2013-10-22 Sweetwater Energy, Inc. Methods and systems for saccharification of biomass
BR112014028043A2 (pt) 2012-05-10 2017-06-27 Abengoa Bioenergy New Tech Llc processo de etanol de alta eficiência e coproduto de alimentação de alta proteína
WO2013180863A1 (en) * 2012-06-01 2013-12-05 Pursuit Dynamics Plc Systems and methods for treating biomass and calculating ethanol yield
MX2015002099A (es) 2012-08-22 2015-05-11 Dupont Nutrition Biosci Aps Variantes que tienen actividad glucoamilasa.
US9334516B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-05-10 Abengoa Bioenergy New Technologies, Inc. Method for adding enzymes to obtain high ethanol yield from cereal mash
US9809867B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-11-07 Sweetwater Energy, Inc. Carbon purification of concentrated sugar streams derived from pretreated biomass
RU2527070C1 (ru) * 2013-04-16 2014-08-27 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Кемеровский технологический институт пищевой промышленности" Способ получения пивного сусла
RU2529714C1 (ru) * 2013-07-12 2014-09-27 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Кемеровский технологический институт пищевой промышленности" Способ получения пивного сусла
CA2918685C (en) 2013-08-30 2024-01-02 Novozymes A/S Enzyme composition and uses thereof
EP3041923A1 (en) * 2013-09-05 2016-07-13 Novozymes A/S Method for production of brewers wort
WO2015168020A2 (en) 2014-04-28 2015-11-05 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for reducing one or more impurities and/or moisture from grain oil, and related compositions
US10190086B2 (en) 2014-06-24 2019-01-29 Poet Research, Inc. Methods of pitching yeast for fermentation, and related methods of fermentation and systems
WO2016044606A1 (en) 2014-09-17 2016-03-24 Danisco Us Inc Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process in the presence of benzoate
WO2016061339A1 (en) 2014-10-15 2016-04-21 Danisco Us Inc. A method for yeast modification for improved fermentation
HRP20221024T1 (hr) 2014-12-09 2022-11-11 Sweetwater Energy, Inc. Brza prethodna obrada
WO2016138437A1 (en) 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Novozymes A/S Processes of producing ethanol using a fermenting organism
BR112017027311B1 (pt) * 2015-06-17 2024-01-23 Poet Research, Inc Método para propagar um microrganismo e sistema para propagar o dito microrganismo
CN108350442A (zh) 2015-06-18 2018-07-31 诺维信公司 具有海藻糖酶活性的多肽及其在产生发酵产物的方法中的用途
CN105032889A (zh) * 2015-07-03 2015-11-11 北京加朗传奇新能源科技有限责任公司 有机生鲜和餐厨垃圾蒸煮处理方法和装置
US10618850B2 (en) 2015-10-15 2020-04-14 Poet Research, Inc. Methods of extracting inorganic nutrients from pretreated biomass to form a fertilizer composition, and related systems
CN109070092A (zh) 2015-11-25 2018-12-21 富林特希尔斯资源有限公司 用于碾磨玉米并由此制备乙醇的方法和系统
CN109068601B (zh) * 2016-02-16 2021-08-24 英国贝纳曼服务有限公司 用于种植植物的系统和方法
CN109642244A (zh) 2016-06-16 2019-04-16 波特研究公司 基于淀粉的增殖微生物的方法和系统
US11821047B2 (en) 2017-02-16 2023-11-21 Apalta Patent OÜ High pressure zone formation for pretreatment
BR112019024623A2 (pt) 2017-05-24 2020-06-16 Poet Research, Inc. Uso de uma esterase para aumentar teor de éster de etila em meios de fermentação
CA3196057A1 (en) 2017-05-24 2018-11-29 Poet Research, Inc. Enhanced alkyl ester containing oil compositions and methods of making and using the same
US10851327B2 (en) 2018-06-11 2020-12-01 Poet Research, Inc. Methods of refining a grain oil composition feedstock, and related systems, compositions and uses
CN110997701A (zh) 2017-06-28 2020-04-10 诺维信公司 具有海藻糖酶活性的多肽以及编码其的多核苷酸
BR112020002029A2 (pt) 2017-07-31 2020-10-06 Poet Research, Inc. remediação de toxinas em correntes de processo de biorrefinaria
US11220679B2 (en) 2017-08-08 2022-01-11 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having trehalase activity
EP3665293B1 (en) 2017-08-11 2022-10-05 POET Research, Inc. Systems and methods for extracting oil from plant material
CA3074721A1 (en) 2017-09-05 2019-03-14 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for propagation of a microorganism using a pulp mill and/or a paper mill waste by-product, and related methods and systems
US10926267B2 (en) 2017-11-27 2021-02-23 Fluid Quip Technologies, Llc Method and system for reducing the unfermentable solids content in a protein portion at the back end of a corn dry milling process
US10711221B2 (en) 2018-02-09 2020-07-14 Poet Research, Inc. Method of refining a grain oil composition to make one or more grain oil products, and related systems
US10875889B2 (en) 2018-12-28 2020-12-29 Fluid Quip Technologies, Llc Method and system for producing a zein protein product from a whole stillage byproduct produced in a corn dry-milling process
US20220232855A1 (en) * 2019-06-05 2022-07-28 Danisco Us Inc Methods for improving the amino acid content of animal feed products
HUE064068T2 (hu) * 2019-09-13 2024-02-28 Danisco Us Inc Eljárás száraz õrléses alkoholelõállítás során a szeszmoslék újrahasznosításának fokozására
CA3163108A1 (en) 2019-11-29 2021-06-03 Lallemand Hungary Liquidity Management Llc Yeast expressing heterologous glucoamylase
US11739352B1 (en) 2019-12-09 2023-08-29 Poet Research, Inc. Methods of subjecting biomass solids to at least one disruption process after the biomass solids have been exposed to at least fermentation, and related systems
CA3165573A1 (en) 2019-12-22 2021-07-01 Sweetwater Energy, Inc. Methods of making specialized lignin and lignin products from biomass
CA3189121A1 (en) 2020-08-06 2022-02-10 Poet Research, Inc. Endogenous lipase for metal reduction in distillers corn oil
CN114807245A (zh) * 2021-01-18 2022-07-29 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 通过酒糟二次发酵提高玉米乙醇工艺中ddgs品质的方法
WO2023122220A1 (en) 2021-12-22 2023-06-29 Poet Research, Inc. Enzyme production using one or more co-product compositions from a bioprocessing facility
US20240067909A1 (en) 2022-08-23 2024-02-29 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for propagating microorganisms for mitigating mycotoxin contamination, and related systems and methods

Citations (71)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2440925A (en) * 1944-04-27 1948-05-04 Chemprotin Producs Fermenting method
US3940492A (en) * 1973-07-09 1976-02-24 Alfa-Laval Ab Continuous fermentation process
US4009074A (en) * 1975-03-13 1977-02-22 Cpc International Inc. Preparation of levulose from granular starch
US4092434A (en) * 1974-11-26 1978-05-30 Suntory Ltd. Preparation of alcohol or alcoholic beverages
US4243750A (en) * 1979-05-29 1981-01-06 National Distillers And Chemical Corp. Process for the hydrolysis of starch and the continuous fermentation of the sugars obtained therefrom to provide ethanol
US4279747A (en) * 1980-01-17 1981-07-21 Fabcon Incorporated Rapid continuous clarifier
US4287303A (en) * 1979-11-13 1981-09-01 Alfa-Laval Ab Production of ethanol
US4309254A (en) * 1980-04-17 1982-01-05 Stone And Webster Eng. Corp. Alcohol recovery process
US4316956A (en) * 1980-02-06 1982-02-23 Novo Industri A/S Fermentation process
US4358536A (en) * 1979-02-27 1982-11-09 Alfa-Laval Ab Production of ethanol
US4376163A (en) * 1979-10-01 1983-03-08 Alfa-Laval Ab Process for producing ethanol by continuous fermentation of polysaccharide-containing raw materials
US4460687A (en) * 1981-03-23 1984-07-17 Alfa Laval Ab Fermentation method
US4474883A (en) * 1981-03-14 1984-10-02 Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. Process for saccharification of rootstocks and subsequent alcohol fermentation
US4490469A (en) * 1980-01-30 1984-12-25 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization Production of ethanol by fermentation
US4514496A (en) * 1980-12-16 1985-04-30 Suntory Limited Process for producing alcohol by fermentation without cooking
US4540663A (en) * 1983-05-20 1985-09-10 Grain Processing Corporation Liquefaction of starch
US4591560A (en) * 1983-01-17 1986-05-27 Director Of National Food Research Institute Ministry Of Agriculture, Forstry And Fisheries Process for saccharification of starch using enzyme produced by fungus belonging to genus Chalara
US4618579A (en) * 1984-09-28 1986-10-21 Genencor, Inc. Raw starch saccharification
US4716218A (en) * 1986-01-15 1987-12-29 Purdue Research Foundation Grain extraction milling
US4727026A (en) * 1985-11-26 1988-02-23 Godo Shusei Co., Ltd. Method for direct saccharification of raw starch using enzyme produced by a basidiomycete belonging to the genus Corticium
US4760025A (en) * 1984-05-29 1988-07-26 Genencor, Inc. Modified enzymes and methods for making same
US4863864A (en) * 1984-12-15 1989-09-05 Suntory Limited Glucoamylase gene of rhizopus oryzae
US4876196A (en) * 1984-10-18 1989-10-24 Vogelbusch Gesellschaft M.B.H. Method of continuously producing ethanol from sugar-containing substrates
US4933279A (en) * 1986-07-09 1990-06-12 Novo Industri A/S Starch liquefaction with alpha amylase mixtures
US5061497A (en) * 1989-09-11 1991-10-29 Clovis Grain Processing, Ltd. Process for the co-production of ethanol and an improved human food product from cereal grains
US5084385A (en) * 1984-12-15 1992-01-28 Suntory Limited Process for producing alcohol using yeast transformed by rhizopus glucoamylase gene
US5087417A (en) * 1986-10-08 1992-02-11 University Of Waterloo Control of senescence in fruits, vegetables and flowers
US5180669A (en) * 1991-03-27 1993-01-19 Genencor International, Inc. Liquefaction of granular-starch slurries using alpha-amylase in the presence of carbonate ion
US5231017A (en) * 1991-05-17 1993-07-27 Solvay Enzymes, Inc. Process for producing ethanol
US5250182A (en) * 1992-07-13 1993-10-05 Zenon Environmental Inc. Membrane-based process for the recovery of lactic acid and glycerol from a "corn thin stillage" stream
US5322778A (en) * 1991-10-31 1994-06-21 Genencor International, Inc. Liquefaction of granular starch slurries using an antioxidant with alpha amylase
US5364770A (en) * 1985-08-29 1994-11-15 Genencor International Inc. Heterologous polypeptides expressed in aspergillus
US5545543A (en) * 1987-08-12 1996-08-13 Technipetrol S.P.A. Process for the continuous production of ethanol from cereals
US5559031A (en) * 1987-08-12 1996-09-24 Technipetrol S.P.A. Apparatus for the continuous production of ethanol from cereals
US5652127A (en) * 1995-06-02 1997-07-29 Genencor International, Inc. Method for liquefying starch
US5688674A (en) * 1995-09-29 1997-11-18 Cha-yong Choi Continuous fermentation process for the production of metabolities using a moving filter
US5721127A (en) * 1992-12-28 1998-02-24 Genencor International, Inc. Pullulanase
US5736499A (en) * 1995-06-06 1998-04-07 Genencor International, Inc. Mutant A-amylase
US5756714A (en) * 1995-03-09 1998-05-26 Genencor International, Inc. Method for liquefying starch
US5824532A (en) * 1993-02-11 1998-10-20 Genencor International, Inc. Oxidativley stable alpha-amylase
US5958739A (en) * 1996-06-06 1999-09-28 Genencor International Inc. Mutant α-amylase
US5981237A (en) * 1995-11-30 1999-11-09 Board Of Regents Method for liquefaction of cereal grain starch substrate and apparatus therefor
US6136576A (en) * 1996-11-13 2000-10-24 Genencor International, Inc. Method for the recombinant production of 1,3-propanediol
US6228177B1 (en) * 1996-09-30 2001-05-08 Midwest Research Institute Aqueous fractionation of biomass based on novel carbohydrate hydrolysis kinetics
US6313328B1 (en) * 1999-02-11 2001-11-06 Cargill, Incorporated Extraction of corn oil from flaked corn grain
US6423145B1 (en) * 2000-08-09 2002-07-23 Midwest Research Institute Dilute acid/metal salt hydrolysis of lignocellulosics
US6451063B1 (en) * 1996-09-25 2002-09-17 Genencor International, Inc. Cellulase for use in industrial processes
US6509180B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2003-01-21 Zeachem Inc. Process for producing ethanol
US20030134395A1 (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-07-17 Shetty Jayarama K. Process for hydrolyzing starch without pH adjustment
US20030134396A1 (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-07-17 Shetty Jayarama K. Process for hydrolyzing starch without pH adjustment
US6616948B2 (en) * 2000-10-06 2003-09-09 Jagotec Ag Starch
US20030180900A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-09-25 Oreste Lantero Methods for producing ethanol from carbon substrates
US20030203454A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-10-30 Chotani Gopal K. Methods for producing end-products from carbon substrates
US6664095B1 (en) * 1998-11-17 2003-12-16 Biocon India Limited Solid state fermentation
US20040023349A1 (en) * 2002-06-13 2004-02-05 Novozymes A/S Processes for making ethanol
US20040043117A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-04 Jason Cope Apparatus and method for removal of seed pericarp
US20040063184A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-01 Novozymes North America, Inc. Fermentation processes and compositions
US20040091983A1 (en) * 2000-11-10 2004-05-13 Christopher Veit Secondary liquefaction in ethanol production
US6774284B1 (en) * 1998-06-26 2004-08-10 Senesco, Inc. DNA encoding a plant lipase, transgenic plants and a method for controlling senescence in plants
US20040192896A1 (en) * 2003-01-14 2004-09-30 Icm, Inc. Method for extracting gluten
US20040197409A1 (en) * 2001-01-16 2004-10-07 Vascular Therapies, Llc Apparatus and methods for preventing or treating failure of hemodialysis vascular access and other vascular grafts
US6803218B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2004-10-12 Genencor Intl., Inc. Enzymes which dehydrate glycerol
US20040219649A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2004-11-04 Novozymes A/S Alcohol product processes
US6849782B2 (en) * 1999-07-06 2005-02-01 Senesco, Inc. Arabidopsis antisense deoxyhypusine synthase molecule and method of inhibiting deoxyhypusine synthase expression in plants
US20050026261A1 (en) * 2002-11-15 2005-02-03 Novozymes North America, Inc. Ethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF)
US20050042737A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2005-02-24 Novozymes A/S Starch process
US6867237B1 (en) * 2001-07-23 2005-03-15 Senesco Technologies, Inc. DNA encoding apoptosis-induced eucaryotic initiation factor-5A and deoxyhypusine synthase and a method for controlling apoptosis in animals and humans
US6878860B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2005-04-12 Senesco, Inc. DNA encoding a plant deoxyhypusine synthase, a plant eukaryotic initiation factor 5A, transgenic plants and a method for controlling senescence programmed and cell death in plants
US20050136525A1 (en) * 2003-11-21 2005-06-23 Baldwin Toby M. Expression of granular starch hydrolyzing enzymes in Trichoderma and process for producing glucose from granular starch substrates
US20050233030A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-10-20 Broin And Associates, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20050239181A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-10-27 Broin And Associates, Inc. Continuous process for producing ethanol using raw starch

Family Cites Families (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE267508C (zh) *
US4343750A (en) * 1976-01-30 1982-08-10 United Technologies Corporation Method for producing metal powder
CA1143677A (en) 1980-04-15 1983-03-29 Lidia S. Losyakova Process for producing ethyl alcohol from amylaceous raw stock
US4361651A (en) * 1980-07-18 1982-11-30 Keim Carroll R Process for making fermentable sugars and high-protein products
JPS585145A (ja) 1981-06-27 1983-01-12 Suntory Ltd トウモロコシの胚芽分離法
US4422920A (en) * 1981-07-20 1983-12-27 Occidental Chemical Corporation Hydrogen cathode
JPS59179093A (ja) 1983-03-29 1984-10-11 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co Ltd 澱粉の糖化法
EP0140410B2 (en) 1983-09-11 1996-12-04 Gist-Brocades N.V. Novel enzyme product and its use in the saccharification of starch
DK438283D0 (da) 1983-09-26 1983-09-26 Novo Industri As Syrestabilt alpha-amylaseenzymprodukt og fremstilling deraf
DE3587623T2 (de) 1984-08-06 1994-05-19 Genencor Inc Enzymatische Hydrolyse von körniger Stärke direkt bis zu Glukose.
DD267508A1 (de) * 1985-10-31 1989-05-03 Spirituosen Wein U Sekt Veb K Verfahren zum aufschluss von getreide unter drucklosen bedingungen
DE3853921T2 (de) * 1987-12-22 1996-02-22 Willem Hemmo Kampen Verfahren zur produktion von ethanol, glycerin und bernsteinsäure.
US5177008A (en) * 1987-12-22 1993-01-05 Kampen Willem H Process for manufacturing ethanol and for recovering glycerol, succinic acid, lactic acid, betaine, potassium sulfate, and free flowing distiller's dry grain and solubles or a solid fertilizer therefrom
US7109005B2 (en) 1990-01-15 2006-09-19 Danisco Sweeteners Oy Process for the simultaneous production of xylitol and ethanol
US5205182A (en) * 1991-02-04 1993-04-27 Britax Rainsfords Pty Ltd Cable actuated mirror tilt control
RU2001103C1 (ru) 1991-11-11 1993-10-15 Институт микробиологии и вирусологии им.Д.К.Заболотного АН УССР Штамм бактерий BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS - продуцент термостабильных амилолитических ферментов
WO1993014218A1 (en) * 1992-01-13 1993-07-22 Duke University Enzymatic rna molecules
US5260089A (en) * 1992-01-30 1993-11-09 Harvest Fuel, Inc. Feed supplement composition and method of manufacturing
US5789210A (en) 1993-11-08 1998-08-04 Purdue Research Foundation Recombinant yeasts for effective fermentation of glucose and xylose
US5756194A (en) 1996-01-25 1998-05-26 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Enhanced water resistance of starch-based materials
KR100247345B1 (ko) * 1997-01-28 2000-03-15 윤종용 디브이디오디오디스크재생장치및방법
RU2127760C1 (ru) 1997-04-22 1999-03-20 Акционерное общество открытого типа "Туласпирт" спиртоводочный завод "Лужковский" Способ производства этилового спирта из зернового сырья
MXPA01010051A (es) * 1999-04-07 2003-07-14 White Strap Molasses Technolog Tratamiento de jugo de azucar.
US6849439B2 (en) * 2001-01-10 2005-02-01 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Modified barley α-glucosidase
AR036370A1 (es) * 2001-08-27 2004-09-01 Syngenta Participations Ag Plantas con auto-procesamiento y partes de las mismas
BRPI0306740B1 (pt) 2002-01-23 2019-08-27 C5 Yeast Company B V célula hospedeira transformada com um construto de ácido nucléico e processo para a produção de etanol
WO2003066816A2 (en) 2002-02-08 2003-08-14 Genencor International, Inc. Methods for producing end-products from carbon substrates
MX264256B (es) 2002-02-14 2009-02-03 Novozymes As Proceso para producir hidrolizado de almidon.
US20040115779A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2004-06-17 Olsen Hans Sejr Fermentation process
US7022448B2 (en) * 2002-09-03 2006-04-04 Ricoh Printing Systems, Ltd. Electrophotographic toner and image-forming system
US7072188B2 (en) * 2002-10-29 2006-07-04 Arctic Cat Inc. Power distribution module for personal recreational vehicle
US7344876B2 (en) * 2003-01-24 2008-03-18 Phage Biotechnology, Inc. Kluyveromyces strains metabolizing cellulosic and hemicellulosic materials
WO2004081193A2 (en) * 2003-03-10 2004-09-23 Broin And Associates, Inc. Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
CN100506997C (zh) 2003-05-30 2009-07-01 诺维信公司 酒精产品生产方法
KR100975057B1 (ko) * 2003-09-17 2010-08-11 삼성전자주식회사 투사형 화상표시장치
CN101123883B (zh) 2004-02-23 2013-03-13 金克克国际有限公司 高纯度稻米蛋白浓缩物的制备方法
RU2006144096A (ru) * 2004-05-13 2008-06-20 Новозаймз Норт Америка, Инк. Способ производства ферментационного продукта
DE602005023308D1 (de) * 2004-06-04 2010-10-14 Fluxome Sciences As Stoffwechseltechnisch hergestellte zellen zur produktion mehrfach ungesättigter fettsäuren
US7919289B2 (en) * 2005-10-10 2011-04-05 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and selecting plant material
US20080090283A1 (en) * 2006-10-13 2008-04-17 Rowan Universtity Ethanol resistant and furfural resistant strains of E. coli FBR5 for production of ethanol from cellulosic biomass
JP5731194B2 (ja) * 2007-06-27 2015-06-10 ノボザイムス アクティーゼルスカブ 発酵製品を生産するための方法
MX2011009269A (es) * 2009-03-03 2011-09-26 Poet Res Inc Fermentacion de biomasa para la produccion de etanol.
WO2010102060A2 (en) * 2009-03-03 2010-09-10 Poet Research, Inc. System for pre-treatment of biomass for the production of ethanol

Patent Citations (83)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2440925A (en) * 1944-04-27 1948-05-04 Chemprotin Producs Fermenting method
US3940492A (en) * 1973-07-09 1976-02-24 Alfa-Laval Ab Continuous fermentation process
US4092434A (en) * 1974-11-26 1978-05-30 Suntory Ltd. Preparation of alcohol or alcoholic beverages
US4009074A (en) * 1975-03-13 1977-02-22 Cpc International Inc. Preparation of levulose from granular starch
US4358536A (en) * 1979-02-27 1982-11-09 Alfa-Laval Ab Production of ethanol
US4522920A (en) * 1979-02-27 1985-06-11 Alfa-Laval Ab Production of ethanol
US4243750A (en) * 1979-05-29 1981-01-06 National Distillers And Chemical Corp. Process for the hydrolysis of starch and the continuous fermentation of the sugars obtained therefrom to provide ethanol
US4376163A (en) * 1979-10-01 1983-03-08 Alfa-Laval Ab Process for producing ethanol by continuous fermentation of polysaccharide-containing raw materials
US4287303A (en) * 1979-11-13 1981-09-01 Alfa-Laval Ab Production of ethanol
US4279747A (en) * 1980-01-17 1981-07-21 Fabcon Incorporated Rapid continuous clarifier
US4490469A (en) * 1980-01-30 1984-12-25 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization Production of ethanol by fermentation
US4316956A (en) * 1980-02-06 1982-02-23 Novo Industri A/S Fermentation process
US4309254A (en) * 1980-04-17 1982-01-05 Stone And Webster Eng. Corp. Alcohol recovery process
US4514496A (en) * 1980-12-16 1985-04-30 Suntory Limited Process for producing alcohol by fermentation without cooking
US4474883A (en) * 1981-03-14 1984-10-02 Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. Process for saccharification of rootstocks and subsequent alcohol fermentation
US4460687A (en) * 1981-03-23 1984-07-17 Alfa Laval Ab Fermentation method
US4591560A (en) * 1983-01-17 1986-05-27 Director Of National Food Research Institute Ministry Of Agriculture, Forstry And Fisheries Process for saccharification of starch using enzyme produced by fungus belonging to genus Chalara
US4540663A (en) * 1983-05-20 1985-09-10 Grain Processing Corporation Liquefaction of starch
US4760025A (en) * 1984-05-29 1988-07-26 Genencor, Inc. Modified enzymes and methods for making same
USRE34606E (en) * 1984-05-29 1994-05-10 Genencor, Inc. Modified enzymes and methods for making same
US4618579A (en) * 1984-09-28 1986-10-21 Genencor, Inc. Raw starch saccharification
US4876196A (en) * 1984-10-18 1989-10-24 Vogelbusch Gesellschaft M.B.H. Method of continuously producing ethanol from sugar-containing substrates
US4863864A (en) * 1984-12-15 1989-09-05 Suntory Limited Glucoamylase gene of rhizopus oryzae
US5084385A (en) * 1984-12-15 1992-01-28 Suntory Limited Process for producing alcohol using yeast transformed by rhizopus glucoamylase gene
US5364770A (en) * 1985-08-29 1994-11-15 Genencor International Inc. Heterologous polypeptides expressed in aspergillus
US6171817B1 (en) * 1985-08-29 2001-01-09 Genencor International, Inc. Heterologous polypeptides expressed in filamentous fungi, process for making same, and vectors for making same
US4727026A (en) * 1985-11-26 1988-02-23 Godo Shusei Co., Ltd. Method for direct saccharification of raw starch using enzyme produced by a basidiomycete belonging to the genus Corticium
US4716218A (en) * 1986-01-15 1987-12-29 Purdue Research Foundation Grain extraction milling
US4933279A (en) * 1986-07-09 1990-06-12 Novo Industri A/S Starch liquefaction with alpha amylase mixtures
US5087417A (en) * 1986-10-08 1992-02-11 University Of Waterloo Control of senescence in fruits, vegetables and flowers
US5559031A (en) * 1987-08-12 1996-09-24 Technipetrol S.P.A. Apparatus for the continuous production of ethanol from cereals
US5545543A (en) * 1987-08-12 1996-08-13 Technipetrol S.P.A. Process for the continuous production of ethanol from cereals
US5061497A (en) * 1989-09-11 1991-10-29 Clovis Grain Processing, Ltd. Process for the co-production of ethanol and an improved human food product from cereal grains
US5180669A (en) * 1991-03-27 1993-01-19 Genencor International, Inc. Liquefaction of granular-starch slurries using alpha-amylase in the presence of carbonate ion
US5231017A (en) * 1991-05-17 1993-07-27 Solvay Enzymes, Inc. Process for producing ethanol
US5322778A (en) * 1991-10-31 1994-06-21 Genencor International, Inc. Liquefaction of granular starch slurries using an antioxidant with alpha amylase
US5250182A (en) * 1992-07-13 1993-10-05 Zenon Environmental Inc. Membrane-based process for the recovery of lactic acid and glycerol from a "corn thin stillage" stream
US5736375A (en) * 1992-12-28 1998-04-07 Genencor International, Inc. Expression system for novel pullulanase
US5721128A (en) * 1992-12-28 1998-02-24 Genencor International, Inc. Process for the production of novel pullulanase
US5721127A (en) * 1992-12-28 1998-02-24 Genencor International, Inc. Pullulanase
US6074854A (en) * 1992-12-28 2000-06-13 Genencor International, Inc. Pullulanase, microorganisms which produce it, processes for the preparation of this pullulanese and the uses thereof
US5817498A (en) * 1992-12-28 1998-10-06 Genencor International, Inc. Pullulanase producing microrganisms
US5849549A (en) * 1993-02-11 1998-12-15 Genencor International Oxidatively stable alpha-amylase
US5824532A (en) * 1993-02-11 1998-10-20 Genencor International, Inc. Oxidativley stable alpha-amylase
US5756714A (en) * 1995-03-09 1998-05-26 Genencor International, Inc. Method for liquefying starch
US5652127A (en) * 1995-06-02 1997-07-29 Genencor International, Inc. Method for liquefying starch
US5736499A (en) * 1995-06-06 1998-04-07 Genencor International, Inc. Mutant A-amylase
US5688674A (en) * 1995-09-29 1997-11-18 Cha-yong Choi Continuous fermentation process for the production of metabolities using a moving filter
US5981237A (en) * 1995-11-30 1999-11-09 Board Of Regents Method for liquefaction of cereal grain starch substrate and apparatus therefor
US5958739A (en) * 1996-06-06 1999-09-28 Genencor International Inc. Mutant α-amylase
US6451063B1 (en) * 1996-09-25 2002-09-17 Genencor International, Inc. Cellulase for use in industrial processes
US6228177B1 (en) * 1996-09-30 2001-05-08 Midwest Research Institute Aqueous fractionation of biomass based on novel carbohydrate hydrolysis kinetics
US6136576A (en) * 1996-11-13 2000-10-24 Genencor International, Inc. Method for the recombinant production of 1,3-propanediol
US6774284B1 (en) * 1998-06-26 2004-08-10 Senesco, Inc. DNA encoding a plant lipase, transgenic plants and a method for controlling senescence in plants
US6664095B1 (en) * 1998-11-17 2003-12-16 Biocon India Limited Solid state fermentation
US6313328B1 (en) * 1999-02-11 2001-11-06 Cargill, Incorporated Extraction of corn oil from flaked corn grain
US6509180B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2003-01-21 Zeachem Inc. Process for producing ethanol
US6878860B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2005-04-12 Senesco, Inc. DNA encoding a plant deoxyhypusine synthase, a plant eukaryotic initiation factor 5A, transgenic plants and a method for controlling senescence programmed and cell death in plants
US6855529B2 (en) * 1999-07-06 2005-02-15 Senesco, Inc. DNA encoding a plant deoxyhypusine synthase, a plant eukaryotic initiation factor 5A, transgenic plants and a method for controlling senescence programmed and cell death in plants
US6849782B2 (en) * 1999-07-06 2005-02-01 Senesco, Inc. Arabidopsis antisense deoxyhypusine synthase molecule and method of inhibiting deoxyhypusine synthase expression in plants
US6803218B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2004-10-12 Genencor Intl., Inc. Enzymes which dehydrate glycerol
US6423145B1 (en) * 2000-08-09 2002-07-23 Midwest Research Institute Dilute acid/metal salt hydrolysis of lignocellulosics
US6616948B2 (en) * 2000-10-06 2003-09-09 Jagotec Ag Starch
US20040091983A1 (en) * 2000-11-10 2004-05-13 Christopher Veit Secondary liquefaction in ethanol production
US20040197409A1 (en) * 2001-01-16 2004-10-07 Vascular Therapies, Llc Apparatus and methods for preventing or treating failure of hemodialysis vascular access and other vascular grafts
US6867237B1 (en) * 2001-07-23 2005-03-15 Senesco Technologies, Inc. DNA encoding apoptosis-induced eucaryotic initiation factor-5A and deoxyhypusine synthase and a method for controlling apoptosis in animals and humans
US20030134395A1 (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-07-17 Shetty Jayarama K. Process for hydrolyzing starch without pH adjustment
US20030134396A1 (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-07-17 Shetty Jayarama K. Process for hydrolyzing starch without pH adjustment
US20030203454A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-10-30 Chotani Gopal K. Methods for producing end-products from carbon substrates
US20040157301A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2004-08-12 Chotani Gopal K. Methods for producing end-products from carbon substrates
US20050100996A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2005-05-12 Lantero Oreste J.Jr. Methods for producing ethanol from carbon substrates
US20030180900A1 (en) * 2002-02-08 2003-09-25 Oreste Lantero Methods for producing ethanol from carbon substrates
US20040023349A1 (en) * 2002-06-13 2004-02-05 Novozymes A/S Processes for making ethanol
US20040043117A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-04 Jason Cope Apparatus and method for removal of seed pericarp
US20040063184A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-01 Novozymes North America, Inc. Fermentation processes and compositions
US20050026261A1 (en) * 2002-11-15 2005-02-03 Novozymes North America, Inc. Ethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF)
US20040192896A1 (en) * 2003-01-14 2004-09-30 Icm, Inc. Method for extracting gluten
US20040219649A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2004-11-04 Novozymes A/S Alcohol product processes
US20050042737A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2005-02-24 Novozymes A/S Starch process
US20050136525A1 (en) * 2003-11-21 2005-06-23 Baldwin Toby M. Expression of granular starch hydrolyzing enzymes in Trichoderma and process for producing glucose from granular starch substrates
US20050208623A1 (en) * 2003-11-21 2005-09-22 Baldwin Toby M Expression of granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme in Trichoderma
US20050233030A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-10-20 Broin And Associates, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20050239181A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-10-27 Broin And Associates, Inc. Continuous process for producing ethanol using raw starch

Cited By (164)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8093023B1 (en) * 1999-01-13 2012-01-10 Little Sioux Corn Processor, LLC. De-fatted soy production process and value added by-products from de-fatted soy flour
US20060057251A1 (en) * 2001-12-04 2006-03-16 Larry Dawley Mid-level protein distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) - production and use
US20090142817A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2009-06-04 Novozymes A/S Process for hydrolysis of starch
US20050107332A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2005-05-19 Norman Barrie E. Starch process
US7919291B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2011-04-05 Poet Research, Inc. Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US20070196907A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2007-08-23 Broin & Associates, Inc. Method For Producing Ethanol Using Raw Starch
US8409639B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2013-04-02 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20090017511A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2009-01-15 Novozymes A/S Alcohol product processes
US8409640B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2013-04-02 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20100041116A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2010-02-18 Broin & Associates, Inc. Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US8772001B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2014-07-08 Novozymes A/S Alcohol product processes
US7842484B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-11-30 Poet Research, Inc. Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US20070202214A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2007-08-30 Broin & Associates, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20040219649A1 (en) * 2003-03-10 2004-11-04 Novozymes A/S Alcohol product processes
US8470550B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2013-06-25 Poet Research, Inc. Composition comprising raw starch for the production of ethanol
US8497082B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2013-07-30 Poet Research, Inc. Composition comprising corn flour and saccharification enzymes
US9670509B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2017-06-06 Novozymes A/S Alcohol product processes
US8679793B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2014-03-25 Poet Research, Inc. Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US8748141B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2014-06-10 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20060233864A1 (en) * 2003-05-12 2006-10-19 Power Ronan F Methods for improving the nutritional quality of residues of the fuel, beverage alcohol, food and feed industries
US7618795B2 (en) 2003-06-25 2009-11-17 Novozymes A/S Starch process
US8105801B2 (en) 2003-06-25 2012-01-31 Novozymes A/S Starch process
US20050042737A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2005-02-24 Novozymes A/S Starch process
US7998709B2 (en) 2003-06-25 2011-08-16 Novozymes A/S Process of producing a starch hydrolysate
US20080199918A1 (en) * 2003-06-25 2008-08-21 Novozymes A/S Starch Process
US20050239181A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-10-27 Broin And Associates, Inc. Continuous process for producing ethanol using raw starch
US20050233030A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-10-20 Broin And Associates, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20090117630A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2009-05-07 Novozymes A/S Fermentation product processes
US20060147581A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-07-06 Novozymes A/S Hybrid enzymes
US8440444B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2013-05-14 Novozymes A/S Hybrid enzymes
US20070037267A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2007-02-15 Broin And Associates, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US9650276B2 (en) 2005-09-02 2017-05-16 Novozymes North America, Inc. Methods for enhancing the dewaterability of sludge with—alpha-amylase treatment
US20080190845A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2008-08-14 Novozymes North America, Inc. Methods for Enhancing the Dewaterability of Sludge with Alpha-Amylase Treatment
US20080182308A1 (en) * 2005-09-29 2008-07-31 Donaldson Gail K Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US9297028B2 (en) 2005-09-29 2016-03-29 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US8597919B2 (en) 2005-10-10 2013-12-03 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and selecting plant material
US20070178567A1 (en) * 2005-10-10 2007-08-02 Lewis Stephen M Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and selecting plant material
US7919289B2 (en) 2005-10-10 2011-04-05 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and selecting plant material
US8273558B2 (en) 2005-10-26 2012-09-25 Butamax(Tm) Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US20080257821A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2008-10-23 Novozymes North America, Inc. Dewatering Whole Stillage
WO2007056321A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2007-05-18 Novozymes North America, Inc. Dewatering whole stillage
US7641928B2 (en) 2005-11-08 2010-01-05 Novozymes North America, Inc. Dewatering whole stillage
US20090068309A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2009-03-12 Lakefront Brewery, Inc. Gluten-free beer and method for making the same
US20100316761A1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2010-12-16 Jean-Luc Baret Nutritional Supplement for Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation Medium for the Manufacture of Ethanol
WO2007109750A2 (en) 2006-03-22 2007-09-27 Novozymes North America, Inc. Fermentation processes
US20070231437A1 (en) * 2006-03-30 2007-10-04 Novus International, Inc. Dry milling process for the production of ethanol and feed with highly digestible protein
US8962298B2 (en) 2006-05-02 2015-02-24 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Recombinant host cell comprising a diol dehydratase
US8828704B2 (en) 2006-05-02 2014-09-09 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US20070292927A1 (en) * 2006-05-02 2007-12-20 Donaldson Gail K Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US8980612B2 (en) 2006-05-02 2015-03-17 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of four carbon alcohols
US7524522B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2009-04-28 Mor Technology, Llc Kernel fractionation system
US7612220B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2009-11-03 Mor Technology, Llc Carbon dioxide extraction of corn germ oil from corn germ
US8603328B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2013-12-10 Mor Supercritical, Llc Carbon dioxide corn germ oil extraction system
US8227012B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2012-07-24 Mor Technology, Llc Grain fraction extraction material production system
US20080045730A1 (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-21 Semo Milling, Llc Carbon dioxide extraction of corn germ oil from corn germ
US8747106B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2014-06-10 Mor Technology, Llc Power production using grain fractionation products
US8551553B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2013-10-08 Mor Technology, Llc Grain endosperm extraction system
US20080044547A1 (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-21 Semo Milling, Llc Kernel fractionation system
US20090239185A1 (en) * 2006-08-18 2009-09-24 Semo Milling, Llc Power production using grain fractionation products
US20090017164A1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2009-01-15 Renessen Llc Fermentation process for the preparation of ethanol from a corn fraction having low oil content
US7910342B2 (en) 2007-04-18 2011-03-22 Butamax(Tm) Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of isobutanol using highly active ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzymes
US9284612B2 (en) 2007-04-18 2016-03-15 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Fermentive production of isobutanol using highly active ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzymes
US20080274524A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Bramucci Michael G Method for the production of 1-butanol
US20080274526A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Bramucci Michael G Method for the production of isobutanol
US8426173B2 (en) 2007-05-02 2013-04-23 Butamax (Tm) Advanced Biofuels Llc Method for the production of 1-butanol
US20080274525A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Bramucci Michael G Method for the production of 2-butanol
US8426174B2 (en) 2007-05-02 2013-04-23 Butamax(Tm) Advanced Biofuels Llc Method for the production of 2-butanol
EP2540817A1 (en) 2007-05-02 2013-01-02 Butamax (TM) Advanced Biofuels LLC Methods and recombinant microbial hosts for the production of isobutanol
US20080274522A1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2008-11-06 Bramucci Michael G Method for the production of 2-butanone
US7727726B2 (en) 2007-06-01 2010-06-01 Syngenta Participations Ag Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US7914993B2 (en) 2007-06-01 2011-03-29 Syngenta Participations Ag. Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US20090047715A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2009-02-19 Syngenta Participations Ag Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US7915020B2 (en) 2007-06-01 2011-03-29 Syngenta Participations Ag Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US20090047382A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2009-02-19 Syngenta Participations Ag Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US20080299256A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2008-12-04 Syngenta Participations Ag Process for starch liquefaction and fermentation
US20110236559A1 (en) * 2007-06-18 2011-09-29 Byproduct Feed Technologies Llc Method of producing ruminant-edible feed products
US10512855B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2019-12-24 Kfi Intellectual Properties L.L.C. Method for extracting oil from a water and solids composition, method for the production of ethanol, and ethanol production facility
US9260676B2 (en) * 2007-06-29 2016-02-16 Kfi Intellectual Properties L.L.C. Method for extracting oil from a water and solids composition, method for the production of ethanol, and ethanol production facility
US20140127769A1 (en) * 2007-06-29 2014-05-08 Kfi Intellectual Properties L.L.C. Method for Extracting Oil from a Water and Solids Composition, Method for the Production of Ethanol, and Ethanol Production Facility
WO2009039099A1 (en) * 2007-09-17 2009-03-26 Meier Russell J Method of producing dried distiller's grain with solubles agglomerated particles
US20090071066A1 (en) * 2007-09-17 2009-03-19 Russell Meier Method of Producing Dried Distillers Grain with Solubles Agglomerated Particles
US7695747B2 (en) 2007-09-17 2010-04-13 Russell Meier Method of producing dried distillers grain agglomerated particles
US20090110792A1 (en) * 2007-10-24 2009-04-30 Mor Technology, Llc Super critical fluid extraction and fractionation of bran extraction materials
US8747931B2 (en) 2007-10-24 2014-06-10 Mor Supercritical, Llc Super critical fluid extraction and fractionation of bran extraction materials
US20090142448A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Ukrainian Technological Company Cereal grain treatment and mash preparation for by-products
US7770827B2 (en) 2007-11-29 2010-08-10 Ukrainian Technological Company Cereal grain treatment and mash preparation for by-products
US20110008489A1 (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-01-13 Abengoa Bioenergy New Technologies, Inc. quality and value of co-products of the ethanol production industry
US9238801B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2016-01-19 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Ketol-acid reductoisomerase using NADH
US20090233340A1 (en) * 2008-03-13 2009-09-17 North American Bioproducts Corp. Use of erythromycin as a selective antimicrobial agent in the production of alcohols
US8058039B2 (en) 2008-03-13 2011-11-15 North American Bioproducts Corporation Use of erythromycin as a selective antimicrobial agent in the production of alcohols
US20110008864A1 (en) * 2008-03-28 2011-01-13 Novozymes North America, Inc. Processes for Producing Fermentation Products
WO2009129320A2 (en) 2008-04-15 2009-10-22 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Protein concentrate from starch containing grains: composition, method of making, and uses thereof
US20090269817A1 (en) * 2008-04-29 2009-10-29 Icm, Inc. Pretreatment of grain slurry with alpha-amylase and a hemicellulase blend prior to liquefaction
US20160068868A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2016-03-10 Tommy Mack Davis Method and apparatus for bio-fuel seeding
US20140322782A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2014-10-30 Tommy Mack Davis Method and apparatus for bio-fuel seeding
US20160068867A1 (en) * 2008-08-12 2016-03-10 Tommy Mack Davis Method and apparatus for continuous flow bio-fuel production
US20100047889A1 (en) * 2008-08-12 2010-02-25 Tommy Mack Davis Method and apparatus for continuous flow bio-fuel production
US20120301938A1 (en) * 2008-08-12 2012-11-29 Tommy Mack Davis Method and Apparatus for Continuous Flow Bio-Fuel Production
US8702819B2 (en) 2008-09-10 2014-04-22 Poet Research, Inc. Oil composition and method of recovering the same
US20100058649A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-11 Poet Research Oil composition and method of recovering the same
US11359218B2 (en) 2008-09-10 2022-06-14 Poet Research, Inc. Oil composition and method of recovering same
US9061987B2 (en) * 2008-09-10 2015-06-23 Poet Research, Inc. Oil composition and method for producing the same
US10526623B2 (en) 2008-09-10 2020-01-07 Poet Research, Inc. Oil composition and method of recovering same
US9695449B2 (en) 2008-09-10 2017-07-04 Poet, Llc Oil composition and method of recovering same
US20110086149A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2011-04-14 Poet Research, Inc. Oil composition and method for producing the same
US8449728B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2013-05-28 Poet Research, Inc. System for production of ethanol and co-products with fractionation of feedstock and solvent washing of fermentation product
US8603786B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2013-12-10 Poet Research, Inc. System for production of ethanol and co-products with apparatus for solvent washing of fermentation product
US8454802B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2013-06-04 Poet Research, Inc. System for production of ethanol and co-products with solvent washing of fermentation product
US20100159550A1 (en) * 2008-12-23 2010-06-24 Poet Research, Inc. System for production of ethanol and co-products with apparatus for solvent washing of fermentation product
WO2010075541A2 (en) 2008-12-23 2010-07-01 Poet Research, Inc. System for production of ethanol and co-products
US20110143013A1 (en) * 2008-12-31 2011-06-16 Poet Research Incorporated Zein composition and methods of production
US9487565B2 (en) 2008-12-31 2016-11-08 Poet Research, Inc. Zein composition and methods of production
US8795760B2 (en) 2008-12-31 2014-08-05 Poet Research, Inc. Zein composition and methods of production
US8450094B1 (en) 2009-03-03 2013-05-28 Poet Research, Inc. System for management of yeast to facilitate the production of ethanol
US9416376B2 (en) 2009-03-03 2016-08-16 Poet Research, Inc. System for management of yeast to facilitate the production of ethanol
US8815552B2 (en) 2009-03-03 2014-08-26 Poet Research, Inc. System for fermentation of biomass for the production of ethanol
US9068206B1 (en) 2009-03-03 2015-06-30 Poet Research, Inc. System for treatment of biomass to facilitate the production of ethanol
US9234167B2 (en) 2009-03-03 2016-01-12 Poet Research, Inc. System for management of yeast to facilitate the production of ethanol
US20100260918A1 (en) * 2009-04-01 2010-10-14 Hui Wang Novel corn degerming Ethanol fermentation processes
US9567612B2 (en) * 2009-04-01 2017-02-14 Hui Wang Corn degerming ethanol fermentation processes
US20100261243A1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2010-10-14 Poet Research Incorporated System for recycling water to facilitate the production of ethanol
US9309539B2 (en) * 2009-04-10 2016-04-12 Poet Research, Inc. System for recycling water to facilitate the production of ethanol
US10316280B2 (en) 2009-04-10 2019-06-11 Poet Research, Inc. System for recycling water to facilitate the production of ethanol
US20180213820A1 (en) * 2009-10-14 2018-08-02 Xyleco, Inc. Producing edible residues from ethanol production
US10076127B2 (en) * 2009-12-21 2018-09-18 Archer Daniels Midland Company Process for modifying protein digestion of ruminant feeds and products produced therefrom
US20120282388A1 (en) * 2009-12-21 2012-11-08 Archer Daniels Midland Company Process for modifying protein digestion of ruminant feeds and products produced therefrom
CN103153079A (zh) * 2010-09-08 2013-06-12 波伊特研究股份有限公司 油组合物及其生产方法
US9422582B2 (en) 2011-03-24 2016-08-23 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Host cells and methods for production of isobutanol
US9422581B2 (en) 2011-03-24 2016-08-23 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Host cells and methods for production of isobutanol
US9790521B2 (en) 2011-03-24 2017-10-17 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Host cells and methods for production of isobutanol
US11905502B2 (en) 2011-04-18 2024-02-20 Poet Research, Inc. Systems and methods for stillage fractionation
US9856498B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2018-01-02 Novozymes A/S Processes of producing fermentation products
WO2013148207A2 (en) 2012-03-30 2013-10-03 Danisco Us Inc. Direct starch to fermentable sugar
US10954533B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2021-03-23 Novozymes A/S Processes of producing fermentation products
US10526620B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2020-01-07 Novozymes A/S Processes for producing fermentation products
WO2013149192A1 (en) 2012-03-30 2013-10-03 Danisco Us Inc. Direct starch to fermentable sugar as feedstock for the production of isoprene, isoprenoid precursor molecules, and/or isoprenoids
US11987831B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2024-05-21 Novozymes A/S Processes for producing a fermentation product
US10364445B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2019-07-30 Novozymes A/S Processes of producing fermentation products
US10227613B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2019-03-12 Novozymes A/S Processes for producing fermentation products
US9315831B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2016-04-19 Danisco Us Inc. Direct starch to fermentable sugar as feedstock for the production of isoprene, isoprenoid precursor molecules, and/or isoprenoids
US9388392B2 (en) 2012-05-11 2016-07-12 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzymes and methods of use
US9169467B2 (en) 2012-05-11 2015-10-27 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzymes and methods of use
US10174345B2 (en) 2012-09-26 2019-01-08 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Polypeptides with ketol-acid reductoisomerase activity
US9512408B2 (en) 2012-09-26 2016-12-06 Butamax Advanced Biofuels Llc Polypeptides with ketol-acid reductoisomerase activity
US10407704B2 (en) * 2013-02-21 2019-09-10 Novozymes A/S Methods of saccharifying and fermenting a cellulosic material
US9340767B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2016-05-17 Poet Research, Inc. Propagating an organism and related methods and compositions
US9034631B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-05-19 Poet Research, Inc. Systems and methods for yeast propagation
WO2014160184A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-10-02 Poet Research, Inc. Systems and methods for yeast propagation
US11618861B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2023-04-04 Icm, Inc. Cellulosic biofuel
US9896643B2 (en) 2014-01-16 2018-02-20 Poet Research, Inc. Light phase product recovery methods and systems
US10889837B2 (en) 2014-11-24 2021-01-12 Poet Research, Inc. Corn blends that include high oil corn and methods of making one or more biochemicals using high oil corn or corn blends that include high oil corn
US11254955B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2022-02-22 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for separating whole stillage to produce a fiber rich product that includes C5 and C6 polysaccharides
US11286509B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2022-03-29 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for recovering products from a corn fermentation mash
US11248197B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2022-02-15 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for recovering products from a corn fermentation mash
US11713474B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2023-08-01 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for producing one or more fermentation products in a second fermentation
US11718863B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2023-08-08 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for recovering products from a slurry
US11987774B2 (en) 2015-11-25 2024-05-21 Poet Grain (Octane), Llc Processes for recovering products from a corn fermentation mash
US10486083B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2019-11-26 Kiinja Corporation Separator for fractional separation of supercritical carbon dioxide extracts
US11305212B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2022-04-19 Kiinja Corporation Multifunctional vessels for extraction and fractionation of extracts from biomass
US11235261B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2022-02-01 Kiinja Corporation Separator for fractional separation of supercritical carbon dioxide extracts
US11478726B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2022-10-25 Kiinja Corporation Extractor for high pressure extraction of a matrix
US10625175B2 (en) 2016-04-06 2020-04-21 Kiinja Corporation Extractor for high pressure extraction of a matrix
US10858674B2 (en) 2017-12-14 2020-12-08 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for propagating microorganisms on stillage compositions
US11730172B2 (en) 2020-07-15 2023-08-22 Poet Research, Inc. Methods and systems for concentrating a solids stream recovered from a process stream in a biorefinery

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA200507013B (en) 2007-01-31
US7842484B2 (en) 2010-11-30
US20110097446A1 (en) 2011-04-28
EP1603406A2 (en) 2005-12-14
US8497082B2 (en) 2013-07-30
CA2517920C (en) 2012-12-18
BRPI0408215B1 (pt) 2015-11-03
CN102210376A (zh) 2011-10-12
CN1780560A (zh) 2006-05-31
BRPI0408215A (pt) 2006-02-14
EP1603406B1 (en) 2012-10-24
US20110070618A1 (en) 2011-03-24
US20130309360A1 (en) 2013-11-21
WO2004081193A2 (en) 2004-09-23
EP1603406A4 (en) 2010-10-20
WO2004081193A3 (en) 2005-08-04
CN1780560B (zh) 2011-05-25
MX349099B (es) 2017-07-11
US20070196907A1 (en) 2007-08-23
US20100041116A1 (en) 2010-02-18
ES2398216T3 (es) 2013-03-14
CA2517920A1 (en) 2004-09-23
AU2004219649A1 (en) 2004-09-23
EP2534961A1 (en) 2012-12-19
US8679793B2 (en) 2014-03-25
MXPA05009553A (es) 2006-03-17
US8470550B2 (en) 2013-06-25
US7919291B2 (en) 2011-04-05
CN102210376B (zh) 2014-12-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8679793B2 (en) Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
US20180235167A1 (en) Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US7919289B2 (en) Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and selecting plant material
CA2559015C (en) Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
US20050239181A1 (en) Continuous process for producing ethanol using raw starch
US20070037267A1 (en) Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
ZA200608032B (en) Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation
CA2768844C (en) Method for producing ethanol using raw starch
MXPA06010266A (en) Methods and systems for producing ethanol using raw starch and fractionation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BROIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., SOUTH DAKOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEWIS, STEPHEN M.;VAN HULZEN, SHON ERRON;FINCK, JOHN MICHALE;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014914/0986;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040721 TO 20040726

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINIS

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:BROIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018697/0548

Effective date: 20061228

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: EXPRESSLY ABANDONED -- DURING EXAMINATION

AS Assignment

Owner name: POET, LLC F/K/A BROIN COMPANIES, LLC, SOUTH DAKOTA

Free format text: RELEASE OF PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BOKF, N.A., DBA BANK OF OKLAHOMA;REEL/FRAME:035603/0610

Effective date: 20150505

Owner name: POET PLANT MANAGEMENT, LLC, SOUTH DAKOTA

Free format text: RELEASE OF PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BOKF, N.A., DBA BANK OF OKLAHOMA;REEL/FRAME:035603/0610

Effective date: 20150505

Owner name: POET RESEARCH, INC. F/K/A BROIN AND ASSOCIATES, IN

Free format text: RELEASE OF PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BOKF, N.A., DBA BANK OF OKLAHOMA;REEL/FRAME:035603/0610

Effective date: 20150505

Owner name: POET INVESTMENTS, INC. F/K/A BROIN ENTERPRISES, IN

Free format text: RELEASE OF PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BOKF, N.A., DBA BANK OF OKLAHOMA;REEL/FRAME:035603/0610

Effective date: 20150505