JP2004037286A - Indoor tire durability testing method - Google Patents
Indoor tire durability testing method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2004037286A JP2004037286A JP2002195551A JP2002195551A JP2004037286A JP 2004037286 A JP2004037286 A JP 2004037286A JP 2002195551 A JP2002195551 A JP 2002195551A JP 2002195551 A JP2002195551 A JP 2002195551A JP 2004037286 A JP2004037286 A JP 2004037286A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- tire
- indoor
- test
- market
- temperature
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、室内タイヤ耐久試験方法に関し、さらに詳しくは、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて市場でのタイヤ故障を精度良く再現して評価することを可能にした室内タイヤ耐久試験方法に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
従来、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いてタイヤの耐久試験を実施する場合、試験室温を一定に保つようにしているが、試験室の走行環境は市場での走行環境に比べて空冷効果が大きく異なるため、特に高速走行条件でのタイヤ内部温度が市場に比べて大きく異なっている。
【0003】
これに対して、市場でのタイヤ故障は、機械的な破壊要因と、内部温度の上昇による熱的な破壊要因との複合によってもたらされる場合が殆どである。そのため、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて市場でのタイヤ故障を再現するに際し、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度が市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度よりも高いことが障害となり、市場でのタイヤ故障を精度良く再現することができないという問題があった。
【0004】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
本発明の目的は、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて市場でのタイヤ故障を精度良く再現して評価することを可能にした室内タイヤ耐久試験方法を提供するものである。
【0005】
【課題を解決するための手段】
上記目的を達成するための本発明の室内タイヤ耐久試験方法は、任意のタイヤについて実車による市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度を計測し、その後、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて前記タイヤと実質的に同一構造を有するタイヤを市場走行時の速度荷重条件に相当する条件で走行させ、この時の試験室温を市場走行時の気温よりも下げることによって、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度に合わせた状態でタイヤ耐久試験を実施することを特徴とするものである。
【0006】
より具体的に、本発明の室内タイヤ耐久試験方法は、任意のタイヤについて実車による市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度を計測し、その後、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて前記タイヤと実質的に同一構造を有するタイヤを市場走行時の速度荷重条件に相当する条件で走行させて室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を計測し、これら計測された市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度と室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度との差に基づいて室内試験時の試験室温を市場走行時の気温よりも下げることによって、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度に合わせた状態でタイヤ耐久試験を実施することを特徴とするものである。
【0007】
このように実車による市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度を計測した上で、室内試験時の試験室温を調整することで、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度に合わせるので、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて市場でのタイヤ故障を精度良く再現して評価することができる。
【0008】
本発明において、必要に応じて、室内試験時の試験室温を市場走行時の気温よりも下げることに加えて、その試験室温よりも更に低い温度に制御された冷風をタイヤに当てることによって、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度に合わせることが好ましい。また、室温を空調装置によって制御する恒温室を備えた室内試験機を使用し、その恒温室内でタイヤ耐久試験を実施することが好ましい。
【0009】
市場走行環境を再現するために、室内試験時に、タイヤにスリップ角及びキャンバ角を付与してタイヤ耐久試験を実施すると良い。また、室内試験時に、市場走行環境を再現する複数の走行モードを設定し、これら走行モードを繰り返しながらタイヤ耐久試験を実施すると良い。
【0010】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下、本発明の構成につき添付の図面を参照しながら詳細に説明する。
【0011】
図1は本発明の室内タイヤ耐久試験方法を実施するための室内タイヤ耐久試験機を示すものである。図1に示すように、本実施形態の室内タイヤ耐久試験機は、室温を空調装置1によって制御する恒温室2を備えている。この恒温室2内には、支持台3が配設されている。支持台3上には、モータ4と、ベルト5を介してモータ4によって駆動されるドラム6と、タイヤTを回転自在に支持するタイヤ支持部を備えた台車7とが搭載されている。台車7は、ドラム6の回転軸に対して直交する方向に移動自在であると共に、重量体8を有する試験荷重負荷部9からの荷重を受けてタイヤTをドラム6の外周面に押し付けるようになっている。また、タイヤTの近傍には、試験室温よりも更に低い温度に制御された冷風をタイヤTのトレッド面に吹きつける冷風供給装置10が配置されている。
【0012】
上記室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いてタイヤ耐久試験を実施する場合、重量体8の重量に基づいてタイヤTへの荷重を設定し、モータ4の回転速度に基づいてタイヤTの走行速度を設定し、空調装置1により恒温室2内の試験室温を設定するのである。必要であれば、冷風供給装置10を用いてタイヤTのトレッド面に冷風を吹きつけるようにしても良い。また、タイヤTの支持軸の角度を調整することにより、タイヤTに所望のスリップ角及びキャンバ角を付与するのである。
【0013】
次に、本発明の室内タイヤ耐久試験方法について説明する。本発明では、室内試験に先駆けて、試験すべき任意のタイヤについて、実車による市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度を計測する。その後、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて上記タイヤと実質的に同一構造を有するタイヤを市場走行時の速度荷重条件に相当する条件で走行させて室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を計測する。
【0014】
ここで、市場とは、そのタイヤが主として使用される地域であり、例えば、国や大陸などによって区分される。また、市場走行時に使用したタイヤと実質的に同一構造を有するタイヤとは、実際に市場走行時に使用したタイヤであっても良く、或いは、それと実質的に同じ構造を有する他のタイヤであっても良い。なお、発熱特性に実質的な影響を与えない程度であれば、実際に市場走行時に使用したタイヤの構造と、室内タイヤ耐久試験に供するタイヤの構造とが相違していても良い。例えば、トレッドパターンの僅かな変更は発熱特性に殆ど影響を与えない。室内試験時の走行条件としては、市場走行時の速度と荷重をそのまま選択しても良いが、タイヤ内部温度が速度と荷重の積の関数で表されることを考慮し、その関数に基づいて室内試験時の速度と荷重を調整するようにすれば、タイヤ耐久試験を効率良く行うことができる。
【0015】
耐久試験を実施するに際しては、上記のように計測された市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度と室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度との差に基づいて室内試験時の試験室温を市場走行時の気温よりも下げることによって、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度に合わせた状態でタイヤ耐久試験を実施する。つまり、走行条件を共通にした場合、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度は市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度よりも高くなってしまうので、その温度上昇分だけ室内試験時の試験室温を下げるのである。
【0016】
このように室内試験時の試験室温を下げた場合、その温度降下分がタイヤ内部温度に反映され、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度と市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度とが略一致することになる。その結果、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて市場でのタイヤ故障を精度良く再現して評価することができる。
【0017】
タイヤ内部温度の測定箇所は、特に限定されるものではなく、耐久性を評価したい部分の温度を測定すれば良く、例えば、タイヤ内に充填された空気の温度を使用しても良い。
【0018】
上記のように室内試験時の試験室温を市場走行時の気温よりも下げることに加えて、その試験室温よりも更に低い温度に制御された冷風をタイヤに当てるようにすれば、市場でのタイヤ故障をより精度良く再現することが可能になる。また、室内試験時に、タイヤにスリップ角及びキャンバ角を付与してタイヤ耐久試験を実施すれば、市場走行環境を再現し、市場でのタイヤ故障をより精度良く再現することが可能になる。室内試験時に、市場走行環境を再現する複数の走行モードを設定し、これら走行モードを繰り返しながらタイヤ耐久試験を実施すれば、市場でのタイヤ故障をより精度良く再現することが可能になる。複数の走行モードにおける変動要因としては、キャンバ角、スリップ角、速度などを挙げることができ、例えば、増速と減速との繰り返し、制動と駆動との繰り返し、直線走行とコーナリング走行との繰り返しを実行すれば良い。
【0019】
本発明によれば、特定の気温で市場を走行した場合のタイヤ故障を再現することが可能であるが、その特定の気温によって市場が限定されるものではない。市場走行時の気温としては、タイヤにとって最も過酷な季節、つまり使用を想定する地域の夏(7,8月)の平均気温を選択することが好ましい。
【0020】
また、実車による通常の走行は、厳密には速度が一定ではないし、加速や減速や停止を伴うものである。しかしながら、タイヤ耐久性能にとって厳しい条件とは、略一定の速度で連続走行することである。そのため、本発明では、タイヤ耐久試験をより精度良く行うために、実車による市場走行において略一定の速度で連続走行を行うことが望ましい。
【0021】
【実施例】
タイヤサイズ11R22.5の空気入りタイヤについて、本発明の室内タイヤ耐久試験方法を実施した。
【0022】
(1)実車試験
試験タイヤを実車に装着し、空気圧700kPa、荷重2500kgの条件で、市場において種々異なる速度で実車走行を行い、2時間走行後のタイヤ内部温度(タイヤ内部に充填された空気の温度)を計測し、その結果を表1に示した。市場走行時の気温は28℃であった。
【0023】
(2)室内試験(仮試験)
試験タイヤを室内タイヤ耐久試験機に装着し、空気圧700kPa、荷重2500kgの条件で、種々異なる速度で室内試験を行い、2時間走行後のタイヤ内部温度(タイヤ内部に充填された空気の温度)を計測し、その結果を表1に示した。そして、市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度と室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いた仮試験でのタイヤ内部温度との温度差を求め、これを表1に併せて示した。但し、試験室温は38℃とした。
【0024】
【表1】
(3)室内試験(本試験)
試験タイヤを室内タイヤ耐久試験機に装着し、空気圧700kPa、荷重2500kgの条件で、種々異なる速度で室内試験を行い、2時間走行後のタイヤ内部温度(タイヤ内部に充填された空気の温度)を計測し、その結果を表2に示した。このとき、試験室温を仮試験で得られた温度差に基づいて試験速度毎に異ならせた。そして、市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度と室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いた本試験でのタイヤ内部温度との温度差を求め、これを表2に併せて示した。
【0025】
【表2】
この表2から判るように、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いた本試験で得られたタイヤ内部温度は、実車による市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度と略同じであった。従って、市場でのタイヤ故障を精度良く再現可能であることが明らかである。
【0026】
なお、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を実車による市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度に更に正確に合わせるために、表1に示す温度差をそのまま室温から減じるのではなく、両者のタイヤ内部温度がより正確に一致するような室温を選択することが望ましい。
【0027】
【発明の効果】
以上説明したように本発明によれば、任意のタイヤについて実車による市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度を計測し、その後、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて上記タイヤと実質的に同一構造を有するタイヤを市場走行時の速度荷重条件に相当する条件で走行させ、この時の試験室温を市場走行時の気温よりも下げることによって、室内試験時のタイヤ内部温度を市場走行時のタイヤ内部温度に合わせた状態でタイヤ耐久試験を実施するから、室内タイヤ耐久試験機を用いて市場でのタイヤ故障を精度良く再現して評価することができる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の室内タイヤ耐久試験方法を実施するための室内タイヤ耐久試験機を示す側面図である。
【符号の説明】
1 空調装置
2 恒温室
3 支持台
4 モータ
5 ベルト
6 ドラム
7 台車
8 重量体
9 試験荷重負荷部
10 冷風供給装置
T タイヤ[0001]
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an indoor tire endurance test method, and more particularly, to an indoor tire endurance test method that makes it possible to accurately reproduce and evaluate a tire failure in a market using an indoor tire endurance tester.
[0002]
[Prior art]
Conventionally, when performing a tire durability test using an indoor tire durability tester, the test room temperature is kept constant, but the running environment of the test room differs greatly in the air cooling effect compared to the running environment in the market Therefore, the internal temperature of the tire particularly under high-speed running conditions is significantly different from the market.
[0003]
In contrast, tire failure in the market is often caused by a combination of a mechanical destruction factor and a thermal destruction factor due to an increase in internal temperature. Therefore, when reproducing a tire failure in the market using an indoor tire durability tester, it is an obstacle that the internal temperature of the tire at the time of the indoor test is higher than the internal temperature of the tire at the time of driving in the market. There was a problem that it could not be reproduced well.
[0004]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
An object of the present invention is to provide an indoor tire durability test method which makes it possible to accurately reproduce and evaluate a tire failure in a market using an indoor tire durability test machine.
[0005]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
The indoor tire durability test method of the present invention for achieving the above object measures the internal temperature of the tire at the time of running the market with an actual vehicle for an arbitrary tire, and then, substantially using the indoor tire durability tester and the tire The tire having the same structure is run under the conditions corresponding to the speed load condition during market running, and the test room temperature at this time is made lower than the temperature during market running, so that the tire internal temperature during the indoor test during the market running is reduced. The tire durability test is performed in a state where the temperature is adjusted to the tire internal temperature.
[0006]
More specifically, the indoor tire durability test method of the present invention measures the tire internal temperature of a given tire when the vehicle is running on the market with an actual vehicle, and then uses an indoor tire durability tester to have substantially the same structure as the tire. A tire having a tire is driven under the conditions corresponding to the speed load condition during the market running, and the tire internal temperature during the indoor test is measured.The measured tire internal temperature during the market running and the tire internal temperature during the indoor test are The tire endurance test shall be performed in a state where the internal temperature of the tire during the indoor test matches the internal temperature of the tire during market operation by lowering the test room temperature during the indoor test from the air temperature during the market operation based on the difference It is characterized by the following.
[0007]
In this way, the internal temperature of the tire during the indoor test is adjusted to the internal temperature of the tire during market operation by adjusting the test room temperature during the indoor test after measuring the internal temperature of the tire during market operation with the actual vehicle. Using a tire durability tester, it is possible to accurately reproduce and evaluate a tire failure in the market.
[0008]
In the present invention, if necessary, in addition to lowering the test room temperature at the time of the indoor test than the temperature at the time of driving on the market, by applying cold air controlled to a temperature lower than the test room temperature to the tires, It is preferable that the internal temperature of the tire at the time of the test is adjusted to the internal temperature of the tire during running on the market. In addition, it is preferable to use an indoor tester provided with a constant temperature room for controlling the room temperature by an air conditioner, and to perform a tire durability test in the constant temperature room.
[0009]
In order to reproduce the market driving environment, it is preferable to perform a tire durability test by giving a slip angle and a camber angle to the tire at the time of the indoor test. Further, it is preferable to set a plurality of driving modes for reproducing the market driving environment at the time of the indoor test, and perform the tire durability test while repeating these driving modes.
[0010]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, the configuration of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0011]
FIG. 1 shows an indoor tire durability tester for performing the indoor tire durability test method of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the indoor tire durability tester of the present embodiment includes a constant temperature chamber 2 that controls a room temperature by an air conditioner 1. A support table 3 is provided in the constant temperature chamber 2. A motor 4, a drum 6 driven by the motor 4 via a belt 5, and a cart 7 having a tire supporting portion for rotatably supporting the tire T are mounted on the
[0012]
When a tire durability test is performed using the indoor tire durability tester, a load on the tire T is set based on the weight of the
[0013]
Next, the indoor tire durability test method of the present invention will be described. According to the present invention, prior to the indoor test, the internal temperature of each tire to be tested when the vehicle is running on the market is measured. Thereafter, a tire having substantially the same structure as that of the tire is run under the conditions corresponding to the speed load conditions during market running using an indoor tire durability tester, and the tire internal temperature during the indoor test is measured.
[0014]
Here, the market is an area where the tire is mainly used, and is classified, for example, by country or continent. In addition, the tire having substantially the same structure as the tire used during running on the market may be the tire actually used during running on the market, or may be another tire having substantially the same structure as that of the tire used during running on the market. Is also good. Note that the structure of the tire actually used at the time of running on the market may be different from the structure of the tire used for the indoor tire durability test as long as the heat generation characteristic is not substantially affected. For example, a slight change in the tread pattern has little effect on the heat generation characteristics. As the running conditions at the time of the indoor test, the speed and load during market driving may be selected as they are, but considering that the tire internal temperature is represented by a function of the product of speed and load, based on the function, By adjusting the speed and load during the indoor test, the tire durability test can be performed efficiently.
[0015]
When performing the endurance test, the test room temperature during the indoor test based on the difference between the tire internal temperature during the market run and the tire internal temperature during the indoor test measured as described above is lower than the air temperature during the market run. By lowering the tire temperature, the tire durability test is performed in a state where the temperature inside the tire at the time of the indoor test is adjusted to the temperature inside the tire during running on the market. That is, when the driving conditions are common, the tire internal temperature during the indoor test becomes higher than the tire internal temperature during the market driving, so the test room temperature during the indoor test is reduced by the rise in temperature.
[0016]
When the test room temperature at the time of the indoor test is lowered in this way, the temperature drop is reflected in the tire internal temperature, and the internal temperature of the tire at the time of the indoor test and the internal temperature of the tire at the time of running on the market substantially match. As a result, the tire failure in the market can be accurately reproduced and evaluated using the indoor tire durability tester.
[0017]
The location for measuring the internal temperature of the tire is not particularly limited, and it is sufficient to measure the temperature of the portion where durability is to be evaluated. For example, the temperature of the air filled in the tire may be used.
[0018]
As described above, in addition to lowering the test room temperature at the time of the indoor test than the temperature at the time of driving in the market, if the cold air controlled to a temperature lower than the test room temperature is applied to the tire, the tire in the market can be obtained. The failure can be reproduced with higher accuracy. In addition, if a tire durability test is performed by giving a slip angle and a camber angle to the tire during the indoor test, it is possible to reproduce the market running environment and reproduce the tire failure in the market with higher accuracy. By setting a plurality of driving modes for reproducing the market driving environment during the indoor test and performing the tire durability test while repeating these driving modes, it becomes possible to more accurately reproduce the tire failure in the market. The variation factors in the plurality of traveling modes include camber angle, slip angle, speed, and the like.For example, repetition of acceleration and deceleration, repetition of braking and driving, and repetition of straight traveling and cornering traveling are described. Just do it.
[0019]
According to the present invention, it is possible to reproduce a tire failure when traveling on a market at a specific temperature, but the market is not limited by the specific temperature. As the temperature at the time of driving in the market, it is preferable to select the season that is the harshest for the tires, that is, the average temperature in summer (July and August) in the area where use is assumed.
[0020]
In addition, the normal traveling by the actual vehicle is not strictly a constant speed, but involves acceleration, deceleration, and stopping. However, a severe condition for the tire durability performance is that the vehicle continuously runs at a substantially constant speed. Therefore, in the present invention, in order to perform the tire durability test with higher accuracy, it is desirable that the vehicle is continuously driven at a substantially constant speed in the market running by the actual vehicle.
[0021]
【Example】
The indoor tire durability test method of the present invention was performed on a pneumatic tire having a tire size of 11R22.5.
[0022]
(1) Actual vehicle test The test tire was mounted on an actual vehicle, and the vehicle was run at various speeds in the market under the conditions of air pressure 700 kPa and load 2500 kg, and the tire internal temperature after running for 2 hours (the air filled in the tire). Temperature), and the results are shown in Table 1. The temperature at the time of driving on the market was 28 ° C.
[0023]
(2) Laboratory test (temporary test)
The test tire was mounted on an indoor tire durability tester, and indoor tests were performed at various speeds under the conditions of an air pressure of 700 kPa and a load of 2500 kg, and the inside temperature of the tire after 2 hours of running (temperature of the air filled inside the tire) was measured. The measurement was performed and the results are shown in Table 1. Then, the temperature difference between the tire internal temperature during running on the market and the tire internal temperature in the provisional test using the indoor tire durability tester was determined, and this is also shown in Table 1. However, the test room temperature was 38 ° C.
[0024]
[Table 1]
(3) Laboratory test (main test)
The test tire was mounted on an indoor tire durability tester, and indoor tests were performed at various speeds under the conditions of an air pressure of 700 kPa and a load of 2500 kg, and the inside temperature of the tire after 2 hours of running (temperature of the air filled inside the tire) was measured. The measurement was performed and the results are shown in Table 2. At this time, the test room temperature was varied for each test speed based on the temperature difference obtained in the preliminary test. Then, a temperature difference between the tire internal temperature at the time of running on the market and the tire internal temperature in the present test using the indoor tire durability tester was obtained, and this is also shown in Table 2.
[0025]
[Table 2]
As can be seen from Table 2, the internal temperature of the tire obtained in this test using the indoor tire durability tester was substantially the same as the internal temperature of the tire when the vehicle was running on the market. Therefore, it is clear that a tire failure in the market can be accurately reproduced.
[0026]
In order to more accurately match the tire internal temperature at the time of the indoor test with the tire internal temperature at the time of driving on the market with an actual vehicle, the temperature difference shown in Table 1 is not directly reduced from room temperature, but both tire internal temperatures are more accurate. It is desirable to select a room temperature that matches
[0027]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the present invention, a tire having substantially the same structure as the above tire is measured using an indoor tire endurance tester by measuring the internal temperature of the tire when the vehicle runs on the market with an actual vehicle for an arbitrary tire. The vehicle was run under conditions equivalent to the speed load conditions during market driving, and by lowering the test room temperature at this time than the temperature during market driving, the tire internal temperature during the indoor test was adjusted to the tire internal temperature during market driving. Since the tire durability test is performed in the state, the tire failure in the market can be accurately reproduced and evaluated using the indoor tire durability tester.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a side view showing an indoor tire durability tester for performing an indoor tire durability test method of the present invention.
[Explanation of symbols]
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Air conditioner 2
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2002195551A JP4079703B2 (en) | 2002-07-04 | 2002-07-04 | Indoor tire durability test method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2002195551A JP4079703B2 (en) | 2002-07-04 | 2002-07-04 | Indoor tire durability test method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2004037286A true JP2004037286A (en) | 2004-02-05 |
JP4079703B2 JP4079703B2 (en) | 2008-04-23 |
Family
ID=31703895
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2002195551A Expired - Lifetime JP4079703B2 (en) | 2002-07-04 | 2002-07-04 | Indoor tire durability test method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP4079703B2 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007078453A (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2007-03-29 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Tire endurance test method |
JP2008008695A (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-01-17 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Method for setting of tire test condition |
JP2009133631A (en) * | 2007-11-28 | 2009-06-18 | Bridgestone Corp | Durability test method of tire drum |
JP2014066608A (en) * | 2012-09-26 | 2014-04-17 | Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd | Tire performance measuring apparatus |
WO2018012022A1 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-01-18 | 横浜ゴム株式会社 | Rubber wear testing device |
WO2018012023A1 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-01-18 | 横浜ゴム株式会社 | Method for evaluating wear resistance of rubber |
JP2020085718A (en) * | 2018-11-28 | 2020-06-04 | Toyo Tire株式会社 | Rubber adhesion test method and rubber adhesion test system |
CN117928874A (en) * | 2024-03-21 | 2024-04-26 | 季华实验室 | Wind tunnel test system and wind tunnel test method |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9428018B2 (en) | 2012-12-28 | 2016-08-30 | Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, Llc | Scalable vehicle models for indoor tire testing |
-
2002
- 2002-07-04 JP JP2002195551A patent/JP4079703B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007078453A (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2007-03-29 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Tire endurance test method |
JP4710500B2 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2011-06-29 | 横浜ゴム株式会社 | Tire durability test method |
JP2008008695A (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-01-17 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Method for setting of tire test condition |
JP2009133631A (en) * | 2007-11-28 | 2009-06-18 | Bridgestone Corp | Durability test method of tire drum |
JP2014066608A (en) * | 2012-09-26 | 2014-04-17 | Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd | Tire performance measuring apparatus |
CN109313111A (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2019-02-05 | 横滨橡胶株式会社 | The abrasion test device of rubber |
CN109154547B (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2021-11-12 | 横滨橡胶株式会社 | Method for evaluating wear resistance of rubber |
JP2018009823A (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-01-18 | 横浜ゴム株式会社 | Rubber abrasion testing device |
JP2018009822A (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-01-18 | 横浜ゴム株式会社 | Method for testing rubber abrasion |
CN109154547A (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2019-01-04 | 横滨橡胶株式会社 | The abrasion performance evaluation method of rubber |
WO2018012022A1 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-01-18 | 横浜ゴム株式会社 | Rubber wear testing device |
AU2017296468B2 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2020-04-23 | The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. | Rubber wear testing device |
US11333592B2 (en) | 2016-07-12 | 2022-05-17 | The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. | Rubber wear testing device |
AU2017296469B2 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2020-08-20 | The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. | Method for evaluating wear resistance of rubber |
US10989641B2 (en) | 2016-07-12 | 2021-04-27 | The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. | Rubber wear resistance evaluation method |
WO2018012023A1 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-01-18 | 横浜ゴム株式会社 | Method for evaluating wear resistance of rubber |
CN109313111B (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2022-03-08 | 横滨橡胶株式会社 | Abrasion test device for rubber |
JP2020085718A (en) * | 2018-11-28 | 2020-06-04 | Toyo Tire株式会社 | Rubber adhesion test method and rubber adhesion test system |
JP7138025B2 (en) | 2018-11-28 | 2022-09-15 | Toyo Tire株式会社 | Rubber adhesion test method and rubber adhesion test system |
CN117928874A (en) * | 2024-03-21 | 2024-04-26 | 季华实验室 | Wind tunnel test system and wind tunnel test method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4079703B2 (en) | 2008-04-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9003864B2 (en) | Method for estimating wear resistance of tread portion of tire | |
CN108871815B (en) | All-weather full-period tire performance testing method and equipment | |
JP2004037286A (en) | Indoor tire durability testing method | |
JP2008014667A (en) | Device for measuring tire performance on snow | |
JP2007078667A (en) | Ice test device for tire, and method of evaluating on-ice performance of tire | |
JP4076380B2 (en) | Indoor tire durability test method and testing machine | |
JP2006300725A (en) | Method of testing tire wear | |
JP2017096759A (en) | Method for evaluating the on-ice brake performance of tire | |
JP6363920B2 (en) | Method for evaluating hydroplaning performance of tires | |
JP3878768B2 (en) | Friction tester and friction test method | |
JP3997647B2 (en) | Abrasion test equipment | |
JP5869307B2 (en) | Tire testing method | |
CN109708903A (en) | A kind of tire drag coefficient measuring method, system and device | |
CN110987484B (en) | Indoor testing method for endurance performance of belt ply of tire | |
JP2010249693A (en) | On-ice friction tester and on-ice friction test method using the same | |
JP2019113406A (en) | Evaluation method of uneven wear resistance of rubber member and tire manufacturing method using the same | |
JP4826443B2 (en) | Adjustment method of tire indoor running test machine | |
KR100570144B1 (en) | Testing apparatus of durability for controlling surface temperature of tire | |
JP5839797B2 (en) | Pneumatic tire air leak test apparatus and air leak test method | |
JP6922270B2 (en) | Tire performance evaluation method | |
JP2002214102A (en) | Load moving test device | |
JP4591218B2 (en) | Friction testing machine | |
KR101685992B1 (en) | Measuring Apparatus for Wear Endurance of Pneumatic Tires and Measuring Method Thereof | |
WO2001035070A1 (en) | Abrasion tester | |
JP6491572B2 (en) | Evaluation method of tire performance on ice |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20050405 |
|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20060911 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20071113 |
|
A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20071221 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20080129 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20080205 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110215 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Ref document number: 4079703 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110215 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120215 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120215 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130215 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130215 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130215 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140215 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |