JP4710500B2 - Tire durability test method - Google Patents

Tire durability test method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4710500B2
JP4710500B2 JP2005265266A JP2005265266A JP4710500B2 JP 4710500 B2 JP4710500 B2 JP 4710500B2 JP 2005265266 A JP2005265266 A JP 2005265266A JP 2005265266 A JP2005265266 A JP 2005265266A JP 4710500 B2 JP4710500 B2 JP 4710500B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
tire
test
durability test
drum
test method
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2005265266A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2007078453A (en
Inventor
敏男 落合
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd filed Critical Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority to JP2005265266A priority Critical patent/JP4710500B2/en
Publication of JP2007078453A publication Critical patent/JP2007078453A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4710500B2 publication Critical patent/JP4710500B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
  • Tires In General (AREA)

Description

本発明は、タイヤ耐久試験方法に関し、更に詳しくは、市場でのタイヤ故障により近い状態でタイヤ故障を再現することができるタイヤ耐久試験方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a tire durability test method, and more particularly to a tire durability test method capable of reproducing a tire failure in a state closer to a tire failure on the market.

市場でのタイヤ故障を再現し、耐久性を評価するタイヤ耐久試験として、JIS D4230に規定される試験が周知である。また、このJISに規定されるタイヤ耐久試験を改良したタイヤ耐久試験方法が提案されている(例えば、特許文献1,2参照)。   A test defined in JIS D4230 is well known as a tire durability test for reproducing tire failures on the market and evaluating durability. In addition, a tire durability test method that improves the tire durability test defined in JIS has been proposed (see, for example, Patent Documents 1 and 2).

ところで、市場で使用されるタイヤの故障は、機械的な破壊要因と内部温度の上昇による熱的な破壊要因との複合によってもたらされる場合が殆どである。しかるに、上述したJISなどに規定されるタイヤ耐久試験方法では、熱的な破壊要因が大きく作用し、機械的な破壊要因の影響が低い傾向にある。即ち、市場で故障したタイヤと、上述したタイヤ耐久試験方法で故障したタイヤを調べてみると、ゴムの熱酸化劣化の度合いが市場で故障したタイヤの方が低い傾向にあり、市場でのタイヤ故障を高い精度で必ずしも再現しているとは言えず、改善の余地が残されていた。
特開2003−161674号公報 特開2004−37286号公報
By the way, the failure of tires used in the market is mostly caused by a combination of a mechanical destruction factor and a thermal destruction factor due to an increase in internal temperature. However, in the tire endurance test method defined in the above-mentioned JIS and the like, thermal destruction factors act greatly, and the influence of mechanical destruction factors tends to be low. That is, when examining tires that failed in the market and tires that failed using the tire durability test method described above, the degree of thermal oxidation degradation of rubber tends to be lower in tires that fail in the market. The failure was not necessarily reproduced with high accuracy, leaving room for improvement.
JP 2003-161694 A JP 2004-37286 A

本発明の目的は、市場でのタイヤ故障により近い状態でタイヤ故障を再現することが可能なタイヤ耐久試験方法を提供することにある。   An object of the present invention is to provide a tire durability test method capable of reproducing a tire failure in a state closer to a tire failure on the market.

上記目的を達成する本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法は、空気入りタイヤに所定の試験荷重を加えながら所定の試験速度でドラム上を走行させるドラム耐久試験を行う際に、前記試験荷重と試験速度の少なくとも一方を段階的に増加させ、該段階的に増加させた少なくとも一方を各段階で周期的に上下に変動させることを特徴とする。 The tire endurance test method of the present invention that achieves the above-mentioned object is the method of performing the drum endurance test in which a pneumatic tire is run on a drum at a predetermined test speed while applying a predetermined test load. At least one is increased stepwise, and at least one increased stepwise is periodically changed up and down in each step .

上述した本発明によれば、試験速度や試験荷重を周期的に上下動させることで、試験を行う空気入りタイヤ内の最大応力・歪みを増大させながら内部温度の上昇を抑えることができるため、機械的な破壊要因と熱的な破壊要因とを従来より市場に近づけた状態で作用させることができるようになる。その結果、試験におけるゴムの熱酸化劣化の度合いが市場のそれに近づき、市場でのタイヤ故障により近い状態でタイヤ故障を再現し、耐久性を評価することが可能になる。   According to the present invention described above, by periodically moving up and down the test speed and test load, it is possible to suppress an increase in internal temperature while increasing the maximum stress and strain in the pneumatic tire to be tested, The mechanical and thermal destruction factors can be made to act in a state closer to the market than before. As a result, the degree of thermal oxidative degradation of the rubber in the test approaches that of the market, and it becomes possible to reproduce the tire failure in a state closer to the tire failure in the market and evaluate the durability.

以下、本発明の実施の形態について添付の図面を参照しながら詳細に説明する。
図1は、本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一実施形態を示し、1は試験を行う空気入りタイヤ(試験タイヤ)、2は試験タイヤ1を加熱するためのオーブン、3はドラム耐久試験を行うためのドラムである。
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of a tire durability test method according to the present invention. 1 is a pneumatic tire (test tire) to be tested, 2 is an oven for heating the test tire 1, and 3 is a drum durability test. It is a drum for.

この図1に示す本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法は、乾熱前処置を実施した後、ドラム耐久試験を行う例を示している。先ず、図1(a)に示すように、試験タイヤ1をホイールWのリムにリム組し、気体を充填する。充填する気体としては、空気でもよいが、酸化劣化を促進し、試験期間を短縮するため、好ましくは、酸素分圧の割合を空気より高くした酸素含有気体を充填するのがよい。酸素分圧の割合としては、好ましくは30%以上、より好ましくは60%以上がよい。酸素濃度は高ければ高いほど劣化を促進できるため、酸素分圧の割合の上限値は可能であれば100%であってもよい(実際上は100%未満)。   The tire durability test method of the present invention shown in FIG. 1 shows an example in which a drum durability test is performed after dry heat pretreatment is performed. First, as shown in FIG. 1 (a), the test tire 1 is assembled on the rim of the wheel W and filled with gas. The gas to be filled may be air. However, in order to promote oxidative degradation and shorten the test period, it is preferable to fill an oxygen-containing gas whose oxygen partial pressure is higher than that of air. The proportion of oxygen partial pressure is preferably 30% or more, more preferably 60% or more. Since the higher the oxygen concentration is, the more the deterioration can be promoted, the upper limit value of the oxygen partial pressure ratio may be 100% if possible (actually less than 100%).

なお、ここで言う酸素分圧とは、充填気体の全圧力に対する酸素の分圧を示すものである。例えば、通常のやり方でタイヤをリム組みし、酸素を300kPa充填した場合、タイヤ内の1気圧(100kP)の空気に含まれる酸素分(20kPa)を加え、このタイヤ内の酸素分圧は320kPaとなり、酸素分圧の割合は80%となる。但し、空気中に含有される酸素の量は20%とする。   In addition, the oxygen partial pressure said here shows the partial pressure of oxygen with respect to the total pressure of filling gas. For example, when a tire is rim-assembled in a normal manner and oxygen is filled at 300 kPa, oxygen content (20 kPa) contained in 1 atm (100 kPa) air in the tire is added, and the oxygen partial pressure in the tire is 320 kPa. The ratio of oxygen partial pressure is 80%. However, the amount of oxygen contained in the air is 20%.

次いで、図1(b)に示すように、気体を充填した試験タイヤ1をオーブン2内で加熱する乾熱前処理を実施する。ここで行う乾熱前処理は、従来と同様にして行われる。例えば、酸素分圧の割合を80%にした酸素含有気体を充填した場合には、80℃程度で5日間程オーブン2内で加熱する。加熱後、試験タイヤ1をオーブン2から取り出し、試験タイヤ1内の気体を排出する。   Next, as shown in FIG. 1B, dry heat pretreatment is performed in which the test tire 1 filled with gas is heated in an oven 2. The dry heat pretreatment performed here is performed in the same manner as in the past. For example, when an oxygen-containing gas with an oxygen partial pressure ratio of 80% is filled, heating is performed in the oven 2 at about 80 ° C. for about 5 days. After heating, the test tire 1 is taken out of the oven 2 and the gas in the test tire 1 is discharged.

乾熱前処理が終了した試験タイヤ1に、従来と同様にして、空気または酸素分圧の割合を空気より高くした気体(酸素分圧の割合が30%以上、より好ましくは60%以上の酸素含有気体)を充填した後、室内に設置したドラム試験機に取り付け、所定の試験荷重を試験タイヤ1に加えながら所定の試験速度で回転するドラム3上をタイヤ故障(ベルト層のエッジセパレーション)が発生するまで走行させるドラム耐久試験を行う(図1(c)参照)。   In the same manner as in the past, the test tire 1 that has been subjected to the dry heat pretreatment is subjected to air or oxygen partial pressure higher than air (oxygen partial pressure is 30% or more, more preferably 60% or more oxygen). The gas is contained in a drum testing machine installed indoors, and a tire failure (belt layer edge separation) occurs on the drum 3 rotating at a predetermined test speed while applying a predetermined test load to the test tire 1. A drum endurance test is performed until it is generated (see FIG. 1C).

高速耐久性を試験する場合には、試験荷重を一定にする一方、試験速度を段階的に増加させる。その際、本発明では、図2に示すように、各段階における試験速度を周期的に上下に変動させるようにする。上下に変動させる幅は、使用される状況や地域(市場)に応じて適宜設定することができる。一般的には、試験速度が増加しても変動幅は一定とするが、速度の増加につれて変動幅を増加させてもよい。   When testing high-speed durability, the test load is made constant while the test speed is increased stepwise. At that time, in the present invention, as shown in FIG. 2, the test speed at each stage is periodically changed up and down. The range to be varied up and down can be set as appropriate according to the situation and region (market) used. In general, the fluctuation range is constant even if the test speed increases, but the fluctuation range may be increased as the speed increases.

荷重耐久性を試験する場合には、試験速度を一定にする一方、試験荷重を段階的に増加させる。その際、本発明では、図3に示すように、各段階における試験荷重を周期的に上下に変動させるようにする。上下に変動させる幅は、上記と同様に、使用される状況や地域(市場)に応じて適宜設定することができる。一般的には、試験荷重が増加しても変動幅は一定とするが、荷重の増加につれて変動幅を増加させてもよい。   When testing the load durability, the test load is increased stepwise while keeping the test speed constant. At that time, in the present invention, as shown in FIG. 3, the test load at each stage is periodically changed up and down. The width to be varied up and down can be set as appropriate according to the situation and region (market) used, similarly to the above. Generally, the fluctuation range is constant even when the test load increases, but the fluctuation range may be increased as the load increases.

周期的な変動の仕方としては、図2,3に示すように、サイン波状に変動するものに限定されず、矩形波状や鋸波状など、変動を一定の周期で繰り返すものであればよい。   As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the method of periodic fluctuation is not limited to the one that fluctuates in a sine wave shape, and may be any one that repeats fluctuations at a constant cycle, such as a rectangular wave shape or a sawtooth wave shape.

両試験とも、各段階での走行時間は、少なくとも5時間確保するのがよい。この時間が短いと、即ち、試験速度あるいは試験荷重を短い時間で増加させると、タイヤ故障時におけるゴムの劣化度合いが、実使用における経年劣化のレベル(市場レベル)より小さく、高速走行或いは荷重に伴う熱的要因でタイヤ故障が発生するため、評価結果が実使用における評価結果と異なる結果となり易い。   In both tests, it is advisable to secure at least 5 hours of running time at each stage. If this time is short, that is, if the test speed or test load is increased in a short time, the degree of deterioration of the rubber at the time of a tire failure is smaller than the level of aging deterioration (market level) in actual use, and high speed running or load Since tire failure occurs due to the accompanying thermal factors, the evaluation result tends to be different from the evaluation result in actual use.

各段階の試験速度あるいは試験荷重での走行時間は、市場レベルの熱酸化疲労により近づけるため、好ましくは6時間以上にするのがよい。上限値としては、耐久試験の評価精度及び試験効率の点から6日以内、好ましくは5日(120時間)以内にするのがよい。   The running time at the test speed or test load at each stage is preferably 6 hours or more in order to approach the thermal oxidation fatigue at the market level. The upper limit value is within 6 days, preferably within 5 days (120 hours) from the viewpoint of evaluation accuracy and test efficiency of the durability test.

各段階で周期的に上下動させながら、試験速度あるいは試験荷重を段階的に増加させ、タイヤ故障が発生した段階でドラム耐久試験が終了する。   While periodically moving up and down at each stage, the test speed or test load is increased stepwise, and the drum endurance test ends when a tire failure occurs.

図4は、本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法の他の実施形態を示し、ここでは乾熱前処置を実施することなく、ドラム耐久試験を行う例を示している。先ず、図4(a)に示すように、試験タイヤ1をホイールWのリムにリム組し、気体を充填するが、その際には酸化劣化を促進するため、酸素分圧の割合が30%以上、好ましくは60%以上の酸素含有気体を充填する。次いで、図4(b)に示すようにドラム耐久試験を行うが、これは上記と同様である。   FIG. 4 shows another embodiment of the tire durability test method of the present invention. Here, an example in which a drum durability test is performed without performing dry heat pretreatment is shown. First, as shown in FIG. 4 (a), the test tire 1 is assembled on the rim of the wheel W and filled with gas. In this case, the oxygen partial pressure ratio is 30% in order to promote oxidative degradation. Above, preferably 60% or more of oxygen-containing gas is filled. Next, a drum durability test is performed as shown in FIG. 4B, which is the same as described above.

ドラム耐久試験において、試験速度や試験荷重を上げると、試験タイヤ内の応力・歪みが増大する。そのまま走行し続けると、タイヤの発熱量の増大に伴い内部温度が上昇し、タイヤが熱的な故障要因で故障し易くなるが、上述した本発明では、試験速度や試験荷重を周期的に上下動させることで、試験タイヤ1内の最大応力・歪みを増大させながら内部温度の上昇を抑えることができるので、機械的な破壊要因と熱的な破壊要因とを従来より市場に近づけた状態で作用させることが可能になる。そのため、試験におけるゴムの熱酸化劣化の度合いが市場のそれに近づき、市場でのタイヤ故障により近い状態でタイヤ故障を再現し、耐久性を評価することが可能になる。   In the drum endurance test, when the test speed and the test load are increased, the stress / strain in the test tire increases. If the vehicle continues to run as it is, the internal temperature rises with an increase in the amount of heat generated by the tire, and the tire is liable to break down due to a thermal failure factor. By moving it, it is possible to suppress the rise in internal temperature while increasing the maximum stress / strain in the test tire 1, so that mechanical and thermal destruction factors are closer to the market than before. It becomes possible to act. Therefore, the degree of thermal oxidative degradation of rubber in the test approaches that of the market, and it becomes possible to reproduce the tire failure and evaluate the durability in a state closer to the tire failure in the market.

本発明において、ドラム耐久試験中、試験タイヤ1には、スリップ角及び/またはキャンバ角を付与するのが、市場での走行環境に近い状態となるので好ましい。より好ましくは、スリップ角及び/またはキャンバ角を上記周期的変動に同期させて周期的に変動させるのがよい。スリップ角及び/またはキャンバ角を同期的に変動させる場合、試験速度が増加領域にある時に、図5(a)に示すようにスリップ角及び/またはキャンバ角を一方側(図の+側)に向ける(傾ける)、あるいは図5(b)に示すように他方側(図の−側)に向ける(傾ける)ことができる。   In the present invention, during the drum durability test, it is preferable to give the test tire 1 a slip angle and / or a camber angle because it is close to the running environment in the market. More preferably, the slip angle and / or the camber angle is periodically changed in synchronization with the periodic change. When the slip angle and / or camber angle are changed synchronously, when the test speed is in the increase region, the slip angle and / or camber angle is set to one side (+ side in the figure) as shown in FIG. It can be directed (tilted), or can be directed (tilted) to the other side (the minus side in the figure) as shown in FIG.

本発明は、上述した実施形態のタイヤ耐久試験方法に限定されず、試験タイヤ1に所定の試験荷重を加えながら所定の試験速度でドラム3上を走行させるドラム耐久試験を行うものであれば、いずれにも適用することができる。例えば、試験速度や試験荷重を段階的に増加させずに一定にして行う耐久試験であってもよく、また、より過酷なタイヤ耐久試験として、試験荷重と試験速度の両者を段階的に増加させるようにした試験方法にも用いることができる。その場合、試験荷重と試験速度の少なくとも一方を周期的に変動させるようにすればよい。   The present invention is not limited to the tire durability test method of the above-described embodiment, as long as a drum durability test for running on the drum 3 at a predetermined test speed while applying a predetermined test load to the test tire 1 is performed. It can be applied to both. For example, it may be an endurance test that is performed without increasing the test speed and the test load stepwise, and as a more severe tire endurance test, both the test load and the test speed are increased stepwise. It can also be used for the test method. In that case, it suffices to periodically vary at least one of the test load and the test speed.

タイヤサイズを265/70R16 112Sで共通にした各試験タイヤを、表1に示す条件でそれぞれタイヤ高速耐久試験を行ったところ、表1に示す結果を得た。なお、表1に記載される規格最大荷重とは、JATMAに規定される最大負荷能力の荷重である。また、スリップ角及びキャンバ角はそれぞれ0°である。   Each test tire having a common tire size of 265 / 70R16 112S was subjected to a tire high speed durability test under the conditions shown in Table 1, and the results shown in Table 1 were obtained. In addition, the standard maximum load described in Table 1 is the load of the maximum load capacity prescribed | regulated to JATMA. The slip angle and camber angle are each 0 °.

表1から、本発明の方法を採用した実施例1、2は、故障発生時のゴムの熱酸化疲労の度合いを実使用における経年劣化のレベル(市場レベル)と同レベルにすることができ、従来の方法を採用した比較例1より市場でのタイヤ故障に近い状態でタイヤ故障を再現できることがわかる。なお、故障発生速度が低下しているが、これは機械的な破壊要因が増加したことを意味する。 From Table 1, in Examples 1 and 2 adopting the method of the present invention, the degree of thermal oxidative fatigue of rubber at the time of failure can be made the same level as the level of aging (market level) in actual use, It can be seen that the tire failure can be reproduced in a state close to a tire failure on the market, as compared with Comparative Example 1 in which the conventional method is adopted. In addition, although the failure occurrence rate has decreased, this means that the mechanical destruction factor has increased.

タイヤサイズを265/70R16 LTで共通にした各試験タイヤを、表2に示す条件でそれぞれタイヤ荷重耐久試験を行ったところ、表2に示す結果を得た。なお、表2に記載される規格最大荷重とは、実施例1と同様にJATMAに規定される最大負荷能力の荷重である。また、スリップ角及びキャンバ角もそれぞれ0°である。   When the tire load endurance tests were performed on the test tires having the same tire size of 265 / 70R16 LT under the conditions shown in Table 2, the results shown in Table 2 were obtained. In addition, the standard maximum load described in Table 2 is the load of the maximum load capacity prescribed | regulated to JATMA similarly to Example 1. FIG. The slip angle and camber angle are also 0 °.

表2から、本発明の方法を採用した実施例3、4も、故障発生時のゴムの熱酸化疲労の度合いを実使用における経年劣化のレベル(市場レベル)と同レベルにできることがわかる。 From Table 2, it can be seen that in Examples 3 and 4 employing the method of the present invention, the degree of thermal oxidation fatigue of rubber at the time of failure can be made the same level as the level of aging deterioration (market level) in actual use.

(a)〜(c)は、本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一実施形態を示す説明図である。(A)-(c) is explanatory drawing which shows one Embodiment of the tire durability test method of this invention. 周期的に変動する試験速度の例を示すグラフ図である。It is a graph which shows the example of the test speed which fluctuates periodically. 周期的に変動する試験荷重の例を示すグラフ図である。It is a graph which shows the example of the test load which fluctuates periodically. (a),(b)は、本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法の他の実施形態を示す説明図である。(A), (b) is explanatory drawing which shows other embodiment of the tire durability test method of this invention. (a),(b)は、スリップ角及び/またはキャンバ角を試験速度や試験荷重の周期的変動に同期させて周期的に変動させる例を示すグラフ図である。(A), (b) is a graph which shows the example which changes a slip angle and / or a camber angle periodically synchronizing with a periodic change of a test speed or a test load.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 空気入りタイヤ(試験タイヤ)
2 オーブン
3 ドラム
W ホイール
1 Pneumatic tire (test tire)
2 Oven 3 Drum W Wheel

Claims (6)

空気入りタイヤに所定の試験荷重を加えながら所定の試験速度でドラム上を走行させるドラム耐久試験を行う際に、前記試験荷重と試験速度の少なくとも一方を段階的に増加させ、該段階的に増加させた少なくとも一方を各段階で周期的に上下に変動させるタイヤ耐久試験方法。 When performing a drum durability test in which a predetermined test load is applied to a pneumatic tire while running on a drum at a predetermined test speed, at least one of the test load and the test speed is increased stepwise and the stepwise increase. A tire durability test method in which at least one of the two is periodically moved up and down at each stage . 各段階での走行時間が少なくとも5時間である請求項に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。 Tire durability test method according to claim 1 running time at each stage is at least 5 hours. 各段階での走行時間が6〜120時間である請求項に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。 The tire durability test method according to claim 2 , wherein the running time at each stage is 6 to 120 hours. 前記空気入りタイヤに酸素分圧の割合を空気より高くした酸素含有気体を充填した後加熱する乾熱前処理を実施した後、前記ドラム耐久試験を行う請求項1乃至のいずれか1項に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。 The drum endurance test is performed according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , wherein the drum endurance test is performed after performing a dry heat pretreatment in which the pneumatic tire is filled with an oxygen-containing gas whose oxygen partial pressure is higher than that of air and then heated. The tire endurance test method described. 前記ドラム耐久試験の際に酸素分圧の割合が30%以上の酸素含有気体を前記空気入りタイヤに充填する請求項1乃至のいずれか1項に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。 The tire durability test method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the pneumatic tire is filled with an oxygen-containing gas having an oxygen partial pressure ratio of 30% or more during the drum durability test. 前記空気入りタイヤのスリップ角及び/またはキャンバ角を前記周期的変動に同期させて周期的に変動させる請求項1乃至のいずれか1項に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。 The tire durability test method according to any one of claims 1 to 5 , wherein a slip angle and / or a camber angle of the pneumatic tire is periodically changed in synchronization with the periodic change.
JP2005265266A 2005-09-13 2005-09-13 Tire durability test method Active JP4710500B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005265266A JP4710500B2 (en) 2005-09-13 2005-09-13 Tire durability test method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005265266A JP4710500B2 (en) 2005-09-13 2005-09-13 Tire durability test method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007078453A JP2007078453A (en) 2007-03-29
JP4710500B2 true JP4710500B2 (en) 2011-06-29

Family

ID=37938940

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005265266A Active JP4710500B2 (en) 2005-09-13 2005-09-13 Tire durability test method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4710500B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6096485B2 (en) * 2012-11-27 2017-03-15 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Test methods for pneumatic tires
ITMI20131988A1 (en) 2013-11-28 2015-05-29 Pirelli METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING TIRES
JP2015141017A (en) * 2014-01-27 2015-08-03 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Tire testing method
JP6512661B2 (en) * 2015-10-23 2019-05-15 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Tire Durability Test Method
JP7161389B2 (en) * 2018-12-04 2022-10-26 株式会社ブリヂストン Tire grounding characteristics measuring method, tire grounding characteristics measuring device, and tire grounding characteristics measuring system

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001341504A (en) * 2000-06-02 2001-12-11 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co Ltd Pneumatic radial tire
JP2003161674A (en) * 1995-09-07 2003-06-06 Bridgestone Corp Endurance testing method for pneumatic tire
JP2003294585A (en) * 2002-04-01 2003-10-15 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Device and method for testing tire
JP2004037286A (en) * 2002-07-04 2004-02-05 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Indoor tire durability testing method
JP2005098754A (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-04-14 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Aging test method of automobile tire
JP2005219596A (en) * 2004-02-05 2005-08-18 Bridgestone Corp Heavy duty pneumatic radial tire

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003161674A (en) * 1995-09-07 2003-06-06 Bridgestone Corp Endurance testing method for pneumatic tire
JP2001341504A (en) * 2000-06-02 2001-12-11 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co Ltd Pneumatic radial tire
JP2003294585A (en) * 2002-04-01 2003-10-15 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Device and method for testing tire
JP2004037286A (en) * 2002-07-04 2004-02-05 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Indoor tire durability testing method
JP2005098754A (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-04-14 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Aging test method of automobile tire
JP2005219596A (en) * 2004-02-05 2005-08-18 Bridgestone Corp Heavy duty pneumatic radial tire

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2007078453A (en) 2007-03-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4710500B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP6412437B2 (en) Tire rolling resistance prediction method and tire rolling resistance prediction apparatus
JP4687344B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP2009133631A (en) Durability test method of tire drum
JP5583737B2 (en) Test methods for pneumatic tires
JPH09133611A (en) Test method for durability of pneumatic tire
JP6393035B2 (en) Tire friction evaluation method
JP4496945B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP4622608B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP2006337100A (en) Durability testing method for tire
Sandberg et al. Influence of tyre tread rubber hardness on tyre/road noise emission
JP2006084290A (en) Degradation promotion testing method
CN114034631A (en) Method for evaluating service life of high-temperature vulcanized rubber
JP4687401B2 (en) Test method for evaluating thermal degradation of pneumatic tires
JP4617865B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP6096485B2 (en) Test methods for pneumatic tires
Daws Nitrogen inflation for passenger car and light truck tires
JP5613591B2 (en) Pneumatic tire testing apparatus and testing method
JP5839797B2 (en) Pneumatic tire air leak test apparatus and air leak test method
JP5912492B2 (en) Method for evaluating crack resistance of tires
JP2003161674A (en) Endurance testing method for pneumatic tire
JP6475491B2 (en) Tire durability evaluation method
JP7035544B2 (en) Tire test method
CN111796084B (en) Run-flat tire support rubber, screening method thereof and tire
Altman et al. Development for an Aged Tire Durability Standard-Comparison of Stepped-Up Load and Steady State DOE Results

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080903

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20101207

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20101214

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110128

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110222

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110307

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4710500

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140401

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250