JP4496945B2 - Tire durability test method - Google Patents

Tire durability test method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4496945B2
JP4496945B2 JP2004352779A JP2004352779A JP4496945B2 JP 4496945 B2 JP4496945 B2 JP 4496945B2 JP 2004352779 A JP2004352779 A JP 2004352779A JP 2004352779 A JP2004352779 A JP 2004352779A JP 4496945 B2 JP4496945 B2 JP 4496945B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
tire
test
durability test
speed
oxygen
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2004352779A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2006162381A (en
Inventor
敏男 落合
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd filed Critical Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority to JP2004352779A priority Critical patent/JP4496945B2/en
Publication of JP2006162381A publication Critical patent/JP2006162381A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4496945B2 publication Critical patent/JP4496945B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、タイヤ耐久試験方法に関し、更に詳しくは、比較的暑い地域で連続走行する車両に装着される空気入りタイヤに発生しがちな内部故障を精度良く再現評価することができるタイヤ耐久試験方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a tire endurance test method, and more particularly, a tire endurance test method capable of accurately reproducing and evaluating an internal failure that tends to occur in a pneumatic tire mounted on a vehicle continuously running in a relatively hot area. About.

近年、タイヤの耐久試験として、空気入りタイヤ内を酸素により劣化促進処理した後、空気入りタイヤ内に空気を充填してドラム耐久試験を行うようにしたタイヤ耐久試験方法が提案されている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。   In recent years, as a tire durability test, a tire durability test method has been proposed in which a pneumatic tire is subjected to deterioration promotion treatment with oxygen, and then the pneumatic tire is filled with air to perform a drum durability test (for example, , See Patent Document 1).

長期にわたる実使用で経年劣化した空気入りタイヤは、その内部を構成するゴム部材がゴム本来の柔軟でねばりのある性質を失うことによる故障を生じており、その内部故障はリム組時に封入された空気中の酸素によるゴムの酸素劣化が大きく関与している。上記耐久試験方法では、この酸素による劣化促進処理を行うことにより、新品のタイヤにおいて、短期間に効率良く実使用における経年劣化を内部で再現して劣化耐久性を評価できるようにしたものである。   Pneumatic tires that have deteriorated over a long period of actual use have suffered a failure due to the loss of the rubber's natural soft and sticky properties, and the internal failure was enclosed when the rim was assembled. Oxygen degradation of rubber due to oxygen in the air is greatly involved. In the above durability test method, by performing the deterioration promotion treatment with oxygen, it is possible to evaluate deterioration durability by reproducing internally aged deterioration efficiently in a short time in a new tire. .

しかしながら、比較的暑い地域で連続走行する車両に装着される空気入りタイヤでは、試験結果のバラツキが大きく、精度良く再現評価することが難しいという問題があった。
特開2003−161674号公報
However, pneumatic tires mounted on vehicles that run continuously in a relatively hot area have a problem that variations in test results are large and it is difficult to accurately reproduce and evaluate.
JP 2003-161694 A

本発明の目的は、比較的暑い地域で連続走行する車両に装着される空気入りタイヤに発生しがちな内部故障を精度良く再現評価することが可能なタイヤ耐久試験方法を提供することにある。   An object of the present invention is to provide a tire durability test method capable of accurately reproducing and evaluating an internal failure that tends to occur in a pneumatic tire mounted on a vehicle that continuously runs in a relatively hot area.

上記目的を達成する本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法は、空気入りタイヤ内を酸素により劣化促進処理した後、該空気入りタイヤ内に空気を充填し、試験荷重を加えながら所定の試験速度でドラム耐久試験を行うタイヤ耐久試験方法において、前記劣化促進処理を酸素分圧の割合が60%以上の酸素含有気体を空気入りタイヤ内に充填して該空気入りタイヤを乾燥した状態で加熱しながら行う一方で、前記ドラム耐久試験の試験速度を段階的に増加させると共に、各段階の試験速度を6〜120時間維持することを特徴とする。 The tire endurance test method of the present invention that achieves the above-described object is the method of accelerating deterioration of a pneumatic tire with oxygen, filling the pneumatic tire with air, and applying a test load to the drum endurance at a predetermined test speed. In the tire durability test method for performing the test, the deterioration promoting treatment is performed while filling the pneumatic tire with an oxygen-containing gas having a ratio of oxygen partial pressure of 60% or more and heating the pneumatic tire in a dry state. in, with increasing test speed of the drum durability test stepwise, and maintains a test speed of each stage 6-120 hours.

上述した本発明によれば、ドラム耐久試験の試験速度を少なくとも時間維持しながら段階的に上げることにより、比較的暑い地域で連続走行する車両に装着される空気入りタイヤにおいて、市場レベルの熱酸化疲労を発生させると共に、高速耐久性の試験結果のバラツキを小さく抑えることができるので、タイヤ内部で発生しがちな速度に起因する内部故障を精度良く再現して評価することが可能になる。 According to the present invention described above, in a pneumatic tire that is mounted on a vehicle that continuously runs in a relatively hot area by gradually increasing the test speed of the drum durability test for at least 6 hours, Oxidation fatigue can be generated, and variations in high-speed durability test results can be kept small, so that it is possible to accurately reproduce and evaluate internal failures due to speed that tends to occur inside the tire.

以下、本発明の実施の形態について添付の図面を参照しながら詳細に説明する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

図1は本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一実施形態を示す。この図1に示すタイヤ耐久試験方法は、先ず、試験する空気入りタイヤ(試験タイヤ)内を酸素により劣化促進処理する。この処理は、リム組した試験タイヤT内に酸素を充填し、タイヤ空洞部内を高濃度の酸素を含有する気体で満たすようにする。   FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of a tire durability test method of the present invention. In the tire durability test method shown in FIG. 1, first, the inside of a pneumatic tire to be tested (test tire) is subjected to deterioration promotion treatment with oxygen. This treatment fills the rim-assembled test tire T with oxygen and fills the tire cavity with a gas containing a high concentration of oxygen.

この酸素含有気体の酸素濃度としては、酸素分圧の割合が60%以上となるようにするのが、内部のゴムの劣化を効率的に促進する上でよい。酸素濃度は高ければ高いほど劣化を促進できるのでよく、酸素分圧の割合の上限値は可能であれば100%であってもよい(実際上は100%未満)。 The oxygen concentration of the oxygen-containing gas should be such that the oxygen partial pressure ratio is 60 % or more in order to efficiently promote the deterioration of the internal rubber. The higher the oxygen concentration, the better the deterioration, and the upper limit of the oxygen partial pressure ratio may be 100% if possible (actually less than 100%).

なお、ここで言う酸素分圧とは、充填気体の全圧力に対する酸素の分圧を示したものである。例えば、通常のやり方でタイヤをリム組みし、酸素を300kPa充填した場合、タイヤ内の1気圧(100kP)の空気に含まれる酸素分を加え、このタイヤ内の酸素分圧は320kPaとなり、酸素分圧の割合は80%となる。但し、空気中に含有される酸素の量は20%とする。   In addition, the oxygen partial pressure said here shows the partial pressure of oxygen with respect to the total pressure of filling gas. For example, when a tire is rim-assembled in a normal manner and oxygen is filled with 300 kPa, oxygen contained in 1 atm (100 kPa) of air in the tire is added, and the oxygen partial pressure in the tire becomes 320 kPa. The pressure ratio is 80%. However, the amount of oxygen contained in the air is 20%.

充填後の試験タイヤ内の圧力としては、一般的にはJATMA最大空気圧までの範囲とするが、タイヤの安全を確認した上で、最大空気圧を超える空気圧としてもよい。   The pressure in the test tire after filling is generally in the range up to the JATMA maximum air pressure, but may be an air pressure exceeding the maximum air pressure after confirming the safety of the tire.

高濃度の酸素を含有する気体を充填した試験タイヤTは、次いでオーブン1内で加熱される。ここでは蒸気を加えたりすることなく、オーブン1内で乾燥した状態で加熱する(乾熱処理)。乾熱処理における加熱温度としては、65〜85℃、好ましくは70〜80℃にするのが、試験タイヤTのゴムに悪影響を及ぼすことなく、劣化促進処理を効率的に行う上でよい。当然のことながら、常温(例えば、20℃前後の雰囲気温度)で行うことも可能であるが、乾熱処理を行うのがゴムの劣化を促進してタイヤ耐久試験を効率よく行う上でよい。   The test tire T filled with a gas containing a high concentration of oxygen is then heated in the oven 1. Here, heating is performed in a dry state in the oven 1 without adding steam (dry heat treatment). The heating temperature in the dry heat treatment is set to 65 to 85 ° C., preferably 70 to 80 ° C., in order to efficiently perform the deterioration promoting treatment without adversely affecting the rubber of the test tire T. As a matter of course, it is possible to carry out at normal temperature (for example, ambient temperature around 20 ° C.), but dry heat treatment is effective for promoting the tire durability test by promoting the deterioration of rubber.

乾熱処理時間としては、酸素濃度、乾熱処理温度及びタイヤの種類により適宜選択されるが、例えば、265/70R16の乗用車用タイヤでは、酸素分圧の割合を80%、乾熱処理温度を80℃にした場合、想定する市場によって4〜8日程度とする。   The dry heat treatment time is appropriately selected depending on the oxygen concentration, the dry heat treatment temperature and the type of tire. For example, in a passenger car tire of 265 / 70R16, the oxygen partial pressure ratio is 80% and the dry heat treatment temperature is 80 ° C. If it does, it will be about 4-8 days depending on the assumed market.

乾熱処理を行った後、オーブン1内から取り出した試験タイヤT内の気体を排出し、常温まで冷却した後、試験タイヤT内に通常(酸素20%)の空気を充填する。充填圧力としては、JISD4230の高速性能試験Aに準拠することができるが、それに限定されず、実質的にそのレベルの空気圧であればよい。   After performing the dry heat treatment, the gas in the test tire T taken out from the oven 1 is discharged, cooled to room temperature, and then filled with normal (20% oxygen) air in the test tire T. The filling pressure can conform to the high-speed performance test A of JIS D4230, but is not limited to this, and any air pressure at that level may be used.

次いで、試験タイヤTを室内3に設置したドラム試験機2に取り付け、試験荷重を加えながら所定の試験速度で回転するドラム2a上を走行させるドラム耐久試験を行う。この試験は高速耐久性を調べる試験であり、試験速度を段階的に増加させながら行う。この時重要なのは、段階的に上げる際に各段階の試験速度を少なくとも時間維持することである。 Next, the test tire T is attached to the drum testing machine 2 installed in the room 3, and a drum durability test is performed in which the test tire T runs on the drum 2a rotating at a predetermined test speed while applying a test load. This test is a test for examining high-speed durability, and is performed while gradually increasing the test speed. What is important at this time is that the test speed of each step is maintained for at least 6 hours as it is stepped up.

この時間が短いと、タイヤ故障時におけるゴムの劣化度合いが、実使用における経年劣化のレベル(市場レベル)より小さく、高速走行に伴う熱的要因でタイヤ故障が発生するため、評価結果が実使用における評価結果と異なる結果となる。また、試験速度を段階的に上げずに一定の高い速度で実施すると、試験結果のバラツキが大きく、精度良く再現評価することができない。   If this time is short, the degree of rubber deterioration at the time of tire failure is smaller than the level of aging deterioration (market level) in actual use, and tire failure occurs due to thermal factors associated with high-speed driving, so the evaluation results are actually used. The result is different from the evaluation result in. Further, if the test speed is increased at a constant high speed without increasing the test speed step by step, the test results vary greatly and cannot be accurately reproduced and evaluated.

各段階の試験速度の持続時間は、市場レベルの熱酸化疲労を得るため、時間以上にするのがよい。上限値としては、耐久試験の評価精度及び試験効率の点から日(120時間)以内にするのがよい。 The duration of the test speed at each stage should be 6 hours or more to obtain market-level thermal oxidative fatigue. The upper limit value is preferably within 5 days (120 hours) from the viewpoint of evaluation accuracy and test efficiency of the durability test.

開始する試験速度としては、120km/h程度から始めるのが、耐久試験の評価精度と試験効率の点からよい。   The starting test speed is preferably about 120 km / h from the viewpoint of evaluation accuracy and test efficiency of the durability test.

試験荷重としては、タイヤの規格最大荷重(JATMAに規定される最大負荷能力の荷重)以下とするのがよい。試験荷重をタイヤの規格最大荷重を超える荷重にすると、高速耐久試験では、試験タイヤTの温度上昇が大幅に増加し、熱的要因でタイヤが故障し易くなる。また、試験荷重は一定にするのが、試験要因を複雑化させないために好ましい。   The test load is preferably equal to or less than the standard maximum load of the tire (the load with the maximum load capacity specified in JATMA). If the test load exceeds the standard maximum load of the tire, in the high-speed endurance test, the temperature rise of the test tire T is greatly increased, and the tire is likely to break down due to thermal factors. Moreover, it is preferable to make the test load constant so as not to complicate the test factors.

ドラム耐久試験を行う室内3の温度(試験室温)は、JISD4230の高速性能試験Aと同じ20度以上にすることができる。好ましくは、略25〜34度の範囲にするのが比較的暑い地域で使用されるタイヤ条件により合わせる上でよい。   The temperature of the room 3 where the drum durability test is performed (test room temperature) can be set to 20 degrees or more, which is the same as the high speed performance test A of JIS D4230. Preferably, the range of approximately 25 to 34 degrees may be adjusted according to the tire conditions used in a relatively hot area.

上述した図1に示す本発明によれば、ドラム耐久試験を行う工程において、試験速度を段階的に増加させると共に、各段階の試験速度を少なくとも時間維持することにより、比較的暑い地域で連続走行する車両に装着される空気入りタイヤにおいて、市場レベルの熱酸化疲労を発生させると共に、高速耐久性の試験結果のバラツキを小さく抑えることができるので、タイヤ内部で発生しがちな速度に起因する内部故障を従来より精度良く再現して評価することが可能になる。 According to the present invention shown in FIG. 1 described above, in the process of performing the drum durability test, the test speed is increased stepwise, and the test speed of each stage is maintained for at least 6 hours, thereby continuously in a relatively hot area. Pneumatic tires mounted on traveling vehicles can generate thermal oxidation fatigue at the market level and can suppress variations in test results for high-speed durability, resulting in speeds that tend to occur inside the tires. It is possible to reproduce and evaluate internal failures with higher accuracy than before.

タイヤサイズを265/70R16112Sで共通にし、タイヤ仕様を異にした2種類の試験タイヤA,Bを各16本作製した。試験タイヤAは、比較的暑い地域で連続走行する車両(高速走行する頻度が高い乗用車)に装着した際に問題はないが、試験タイヤBはそのような車両に装着した際に摩耗限度までタイヤが摩耗する前に故障が見られるタイヤである。   Sixteen test tires A and B, each having a tire size common to 265 / 70R16112S and different tire specifications, were produced. There is no problem when the test tire A is mounted on a vehicle that continuously runs in a relatively hot area (passenger car that frequently travels at a high speed), but the test tire B is tired up to the wear limit when mounted on such a vehicle. It is a tire in which a failure is seen before it wears.

各2本の試験タイヤA,Bを表1に示す条件でそれぞれタイヤ高速耐久試験を行ったところ、表1に示す結果を得た。   When each of the two test tires A and B was subjected to a tire high speed durability test under the conditions shown in Table 1, the results shown in Table 1 were obtained.

Figure 0004496945
Figure 0004496945

表1の実施例1〜4は、各段階の試験速度を維持する時間を十分に長く(6時間以上)したものであるが、このように長い時間で行った際の故障発生時のゴムの劣化度合いを調べてみると、問題がない試験タイヤA及び問題がある試験タイヤB共に、実使用における経年劣化のレベル(市場レベル)と同レベルの熱酸化疲労を起こしてタイヤが故障しており、実際に評価したタイヤとも大差なく再現評価できた。   In Examples 1 to 4 of Table 1, the time for maintaining the test speed at each stage is sufficiently long (6 hours or more), but the rubber at the time of failure occurrence in such a long time is used. Examining the degree of deterioration, both the test tire A that has no problem and the test tire B that has a problem have both failed due to thermal oxidation fatigue at the same level as the level of aging in actual use (market level). It was possible to reproduce and evaluate the tires that were actually evaluated.

それに対して、比較例1は、各段階の試験速度を維持する時間を3時間と短くしたものであるが、このように短い時間で行った際の故障発生時のゴムの劣化度合いを調べてみると、市場レベルより劣化度合いが小さく、故障が高速走行による発熱の熱的要因で発生していた。   On the other hand, in Comparative Example 1, the time for maintaining the test speed at each stage is shortened to 3 hours, but the degree of deterioration of the rubber at the time of occurrence of the failure when conducted in such a short time is examined. As a result, the degree of deterioration was smaller than the market level, and the failure was caused by the thermal factor of heat generated by high-speed driving.

比較例2は、一定の高い速度で行ったものであるが、このように一定の速度で高速耐久性を試験すると、同じ種類のタイヤでもタイヤの故障時間に大きなバラツキが発生して、精度よく再現評価できなかった。   Comparative Example 2 was performed at a constant high speed. When high-speed durability was tested at a constant speed in this way, even with the same type of tire, there was a large variation in the tire failure time, and the accuracy was high. Reproduction evaluation could not be performed.

比較例3は、ドラム耐久試験も酸素濃度を高くして行ったものであるが、このようにドラム耐久試験も高い酸素濃度の条件で試験を行うと、故障発生時のゴムの劣化度合いが市場レベルを超えており、やはり精度よく再現評価できなかった。   In Comparative Example 3, the drum endurance test was also performed with a high oxygen concentration. When the drum endurance test was also performed under conditions of a high oxygen concentration, the degree of rubber degradation at the time of failure occurred in the market. Since the level was exceeded, it was still impossible to accurately reproduce and evaluate.

比較例4は、劣化促進処理を行わずにドラム耐久試験を行ったものであるが、劣化促進処理を行わずに耐久試験を行うと、故障発生時のゴムの劣化度合いが市場レベルより小さく、高速走行時に発生する熱によりタイヤが故障し、精度よく再現評価できなかった。   Comparative Example 4 is a drum endurance test without performing the deterioration promotion process, but when the endurance test is performed without performing the deterioration promotion process, the degree of deterioration of the rubber at the time of failure is smaller than the market level, The tire failed due to heat generated during high-speed driving, and could not be accurately reproduced.

本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一実施形態を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows one Embodiment of the tire durability test method of this invention.

1 オーブン
2 ドラム試験機
2a ドラム
3 室内
T 空気入りタイヤ(試験タイヤ)
1 Oven 2 Drum Testing Machine 2a Drum 3 Indoor T Pneumatic Tire (Test Tire)

Claims (4)

空気入りタイヤ内を酸素により劣化促進処理した後、該空気入りタイヤ内に空気を充填し、試験荷重を加えながら所定の試験速度でドラム耐久試験を行うタイヤ耐久試験方法において、前記劣化促進処理を酸素分圧の割合が60%以上の酸素含有気体を空気入りタイヤ内に充填して該空気入りタイヤを乾燥した状態で加熱しながら行う一方で、前記ドラム耐久試験の試験速度を段階的に増加させると共に、各段階の試験速度を6〜120時間維持するタイヤ耐久試験方法。 After accelerated degradation process by oxygen pneumatic within the tire, the air is filled in the pneumatic tire, the tire durability test method of performing drum durability test at a predetermined test speed while applying the test load, the accelerated deterioration treatment While the pneumatic tire is filled with an oxygen-containing gas with an oxygen partial pressure ratio of 60% or more and heated in a dry state, the test speed of the drum durability test is increased stepwise. And a tire durability test method in which the test speed of each stage is maintained for 6 to 120 hours. 前記劣化促進処理における加熱温度を65〜85℃にした請求項1に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。 The tire durability test method according to claim 1, wherein a heating temperature in the deterioration promotion treatment is set to 65 to 85 ° C. 前記試験荷重をタイヤの規格最大荷重以下にした請求項1または2に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。 The tire durability test method according to claim 1 or 2 , wherein the test load is equal to or less than a tire standard maximum load. 前記試験荷重を一定にした請求項に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。 The tire durability test method according to claim 3 , wherein the test load is constant.
JP2004352779A 2004-12-06 2004-12-06 Tire durability test method Active JP4496945B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004352779A JP4496945B2 (en) 2004-12-06 2004-12-06 Tire durability test method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004352779A JP4496945B2 (en) 2004-12-06 2004-12-06 Tire durability test method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006162381A JP2006162381A (en) 2006-06-22
JP4496945B2 true JP4496945B2 (en) 2010-07-07

Family

ID=36664570

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004352779A Active JP4496945B2 (en) 2004-12-06 2004-12-06 Tire durability test method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4496945B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5457662B2 (en) * 2008-12-03 2014-04-02 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Pneumatic tire durability test method
JP7155741B2 (en) * 2018-08-17 2022-10-19 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Tire testing method and tire testing apparatus
CN112765727B (en) * 2021-01-04 2023-10-13 东风汽车股份有限公司 Method for calculating reinforcement coefficient of light truck driving load endurance test
CN113281116B (en) * 2021-04-15 2023-12-26 中策橡胶集团股份有限公司 Stability control tire, rapid processing method, application and stability judging method

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0390339A (en) * 1989-09-04 1991-04-16 Bridgestone Corp Reclaiming method for radial tire
JPH11115409A (en) * 1997-10-16 1999-04-27 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic bias tire
JPH11334313A (en) * 1998-05-28 1999-12-07 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic radial tire
JP2003262568A (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-19 Bridgestone Corp Durability test method for tire

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0390339A (en) * 1989-09-04 1991-04-16 Bridgestone Corp Reclaiming method for radial tire
JPH11115409A (en) * 1997-10-16 1999-04-27 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic bias tire
JPH11334313A (en) * 1998-05-28 1999-12-07 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic radial tire
JP2003262568A (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-19 Bridgestone Corp Durability test method for tire

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2006162381A (en) 2006-06-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5457662B2 (en) Pneumatic tire durability test method
JP2006300725A (en) Method of testing tire wear
JP4496945B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP5583737B2 (en) Test methods for pneumatic tires
JP4687344B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP2009133631A (en) Durability test method of tire drum
CN103134696B (en) The bead durability evaluation method of tyre for heavy load
JP3373737B2 (en) Durability test method for pneumatic tires
JP4710500B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP4743754B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP6852452B2 (en) Tire surface crack evaluation method
JP4369836B2 (en) Degradation acceleration test method
JP4622608B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JPH05246212A (en) Pneumatic radial tire
JP3497502B2 (en) Durability test method for pneumatic tires
JP2004037286A (en) Indoor tire durability testing method
JP6096485B2 (en) Test methods for pneumatic tires
JP5698514B2 (en) Tire deterioration promotion method
JP2006162560A (en) Durability testing method for pneumatic tire
JP2007045274A (en) Pneumatic tire for summer
US6119513A (en) Method for endurance testing of pneumatic tires
JP4415845B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP7035544B2 (en) Tire test method
JP5977219B2 (en) Test methods for pneumatic tires
JP2008203145A (en) Durability test method of pneumatic tire

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20070921

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20091210

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100105

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100212

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20100323

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20100405

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130423

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 4496945

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130423

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130423

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140423

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250