JP4743754B2 - Tire durability test method - Google Patents

Tire durability test method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4743754B2
JP4743754B2 JP2005159876A JP2005159876A JP4743754B2 JP 4743754 B2 JP4743754 B2 JP 4743754B2 JP 2005159876 A JP2005159876 A JP 2005159876A JP 2005159876 A JP2005159876 A JP 2005159876A JP 4743754 B2 JP4743754 B2 JP 4743754B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
tire
pneumatic tire
deterioration
durability test
test method
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2005159876A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2006337100A (en
Inventor
和美 山崎
恒之 中川
和裕 山元
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2005159876A priority Critical patent/JP4743754B2/en
Publication of JP2006337100A publication Critical patent/JP2006337100A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4743754B2 publication Critical patent/JP4743754B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
  • Tires In General (AREA)

Description

本発明は、タイヤが経時劣化した状態を短時間で精度良く再現させうる劣化促進工程を含むタイヤの耐久試験方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a tire durability test method including a deterioration accelerating step capable of accurately reproducing a state in which a tire has deteriorated with time in a short time.

タイヤは、長期に亘って使用されることにより、例えば紫外線、酸素、水分及び/又は温度等の様々な要因によってゴムないしタイヤコード等に経時劣化が生じる。従来、空気入りタイヤの耐久性を評価する場合、上述のような経時劣化を考慮に入れるために、該劣化したタイヤで耐久試験が行われる(例えば下記特許文献1ないし2参照)。しかし、実際に長い時間をかけてタイヤを劣化させることは効率が悪く、タイヤの開発にも長期間を要するという欠点がある。   When a tire is used over a long period of time, the rubber or tire cord or the like deteriorates with time due to various factors such as ultraviolet rays, oxygen, moisture, and / or temperature. Conventionally, when evaluating the durability of a pneumatic tire, a durability test is performed on the deteriorated tire in order to take into account the deterioration over time as described above (see, for example, Patent Documents 1 and 2 below). However, actually degrading a tire over a long period of time is inefficient and has a drawback that it takes a long time to develop a tire.

特開2004−132847号公報JP 2004-132847 A 特開2004−233218号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2004-233218

本発明は、以上のような実情に鑑み案出なされたもので、空気入りタイヤとリムとが囲むタイヤ内腔に、酸素濃度が30%以上である高酸素空気と、10〜3000ccの水とが充填されたタイヤ組立体を準備する第1の工程と、前記タイヤ組立体を、温度50〜100℃及び湿度70〜100%の高温高湿雰囲気中に少なくとも3日間放置する第2の工程とを含ませることにより、タイヤの経時劣化した状態を短時間で再現し、さらに精度の高い性能試験等を行うのに役立つタイヤの耐久試験方法を提供することを目的としている。   The present invention has been devised in view of the above circumstances, and in a tire lumen surrounded by a pneumatic tire and a rim, high oxygen air having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more, 10 to 3000 cc of water, And a second step of leaving the tire assembly in a high-temperature and high-humidity atmosphere at a temperature of 50 to 100 ° C. and a humidity of 70 to 100% for at least three days, It is an object of the present invention to provide a tire durability test method that is useful for reproducing a state of deterioration of a tire over time in a short time and for performing a performance test or the like with higher accuracy.

本発明のうち請求項1記載の発明は、空気入りタイヤの劣化を促進させる劣化促進工程を含む空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法であって、前記劣化促進工程は、空気入りタイヤとリムとが囲むタイヤ内腔に、酸素濃度が30%以上である高酸素空気と、10〜3000ccの水とが充填されたタイヤ組立体を準備する第1の工程と、前記タイヤ組立体を、温度50〜100℃及び湿度70〜100%の高温高湿雰囲気中に少なくとも3日間放置する第2の工程とを含み、前記第2の工程の後、前記空気入りタイヤに規格最大荷重の100%以上の負荷をかけて速度20km/h以上で走行させる耐久試験を行うことを特徴とする空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法である。
Invention of Claim 1 among this invention is a durability test method of the pneumatic tire including the deterioration promotion process which accelerates | stimulates deterioration of a pneumatic tire, Comprising: The said deterioration acceleration process encloses a pneumatic tire and a rim. A first step of preparing a tire assembly filled with high oxygen air having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more and 10 to 3000 cc of water in a tire lumen; ℃ and saw including a second step of standing at least 3 days in a high-temperature, high-humidity atmosphere of a humidity 70% to 100%, after the second step, the load of 100% or more standard maximum load on the pneumatic tire Is a durability test method for a pneumatic tire characterized in that a durability test is performed by traveling at a speed of 20 km / h or more .

ここで、空気(ガス)の酸素濃度は、下記式(1)によって計算される。
酸素濃度(%)=(Po/Pt)×100 …(1)
上記”Pt”は対象となる空気の全圧(Pa)であり、”Po”は前記全圧に対する酸素分圧(Pa)である。
Here, the oxygen concentration of air (gas) is calculated by the following equation (1).
Oxygen concentration (%) = (Po / Pt) × 100 (1)
The “Pt” is the total pressure (Pa) of the target air, and “Po” is the oxygen partial pressure (Pa) with respect to the total pressure.

また請求項2記載の発明は、前記第2の工程において、前記タイヤ組立体は、前記高温高湿雰囲気中に3〜70日間放置される請求項1記載の空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法である。   The invention according to claim 2 is the pneumatic tire durability test method according to claim 1, wherein, in the second step, the tire assembly is left in the high-temperature and high-humidity atmosphere for 3 to 70 days. .

本発明では、タイヤ組立体のタイヤ内腔に高酸素空気と水とが充填されるとともに、該組立体は、高温高湿雰囲気中に少なくとも3日間放置される。このため、タイヤを、短期間で内側及び外側から十分に劣化させ得る。   In the present invention, the tire lumen of the tire assembly is filled with high oxygen air and water, and the assembly is left in a high temperature and high humidity atmosphere for at least three days. For this reason, the tire can be sufficiently deteriorated from the inside and the outside in a short period of time.

以下、本発明の実施の一形態を図面に基づき説明する。
本発明のタイヤの試験方法は、酸素及び水を用いて空気入りタイヤの劣化を促進させる劣化促進工程を含む。この劣化促進工程を行うことにより、実際に長い時間をかけて空気入りタイヤを走行させて経時劣化させなくとも、それに近い劣化が生じた空気入りタイヤを比較的短時間で得ることができる。そして、劣化させられた空気入りタイヤについて、耐久性試験が行われる。これにより、経時劣化後のタイヤ耐久性能を能率良く短時間で解析することができる。
Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
The tire testing method of the present invention includes a deterioration promoting step of accelerating the deterioration of a pneumatic tire using oxygen and water. By performing this deterioration accelerating step, it is possible to obtain a pneumatic tire having deteriorated in a relatively short time without actually deteriorating over time by running the pneumatic tire over a long time. A durability test is performed on the deteriorated pneumatic tire. Thereby, the tire durability performance after deterioration with time can be analyzed efficiently and in a short time.

また、本発明では、前記劣化促進工程は、第1の工程及び第2の工程を含む。   In the present invention, the deterioration promoting step includes a first step and a second step.

前記第1の工程では、図1に示されるように、該空気入りタイヤ1とリム2とが囲むタイヤ内腔iに、酸素濃度が30%以上である高酸素空気と、10〜3000ccの水とが充填されたタイヤ組立体3が準備される。   In the first step, as shown in FIG. 1, in the tire lumen i surrounded by the pneumatic tire 1 and the rim 2, high oxygen air having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more, and 10 to 3000 cc of water. Is prepared.

前記空気入りタイヤ1は、トレッド部1aと、その両側からタイヤ半径方向内方にのびるサイドウォール部1b、1bと、該サイドウォール部1bの内方端に設けられかつリム3に装着されるビード部1cとを有し、本実施形態ではトラック、バス用のラジアルタイヤが例示される。   The pneumatic tire 1 includes a tread portion 1a, sidewall portions 1b and 1b extending inward in the tire radial direction from both sides thereof, and a bead provided at an inner end of the sidewall portion 1b and attached to the rim 3. In this embodiment, a radial tire for trucks and buses is exemplified.

また空気入りタイヤ1には、トロイド状のカーカス4と、該カーカス4のタイヤ半径方向外側かつトレッド部1aの内部に配されたベルト層5とが設けられる。前記カーカス4は、本実施形態では、1枚のカーカスプライ4Aから構成される。該カーカスプライ4Aは、例えば有機繊維コード又はスチールコードからなり、ビード部1c、1c間をトロイド状にのびる本体部4aと、該本体部4aの両端部に連なりかつ前記ビードコア1dの回りをタイヤ軸方向内側から外側に折り返された折返し部4bとを有する。また、本実施形態のベルト層5は、金属コードからなる複数枚のベルトプライ5A〜5Dが重ね合わされて構成される。   The pneumatic tire 1 is provided with a toroidal carcass 4 and a belt layer 5 disposed on the outer side in the tire radial direction of the carcass 4 and inside the tread portion 1a. In the present embodiment, the carcass 4 is composed of a single carcass ply 4A. The carcass ply 4A is made of, for example, an organic fiber cord or a steel cord. The main body portion 4a extends in a toroidal manner between the bead portions 1c and 1c; And a folded portion 4b folded back from the inner side in the direction. Further, the belt layer 5 of the present embodiment is configured by superposing a plurality of belt plies 5A to 5D made of a metal cord.

前記リム2は、本実施形態では正規リムであり、かつ、タイヤ内腔に充填される空気圧は正規内圧に設定されるのが望ましい。これは、実際にタイヤが使用される環境により近い状態で、前記空気入りタイヤ1の劣化を行うのに役立つ。本明細書において前記「正規リム」とは、タイヤが基づいている規格を含む規格体系において、当該規格がタイヤ毎に定めるリムであり、例えばJATMAであれば標準リム、TRAであれば "Design Rim" 、ETRTOであれば "Measuring Rim"とする。また「正規内圧」とは、タイヤが基づいている規格を含む規格体系において、各規格がタイヤ毎に定めている空気圧であり、JATMAであれば最高空気圧、TRAであれば表 "TIRE LOAD LIMITS AT VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES" に記載の最大値、ETRTOであれば "INFLATION PRESSURE" であるが、タイヤが乗用車用である場合は一律に200KPaとする。   In the present embodiment, the rim 2 is a normal rim, and it is desirable that the air pressure filled in the tire lumen is set to a normal internal pressure. This is useful for deteriorating the pneumatic tire 1 in a state closer to the environment where the tire is actually used. In the present specification, the “regular rim” is a rim determined for each tire in a standard system including a standard on which the tire is based. For example, a standard rim for JATMA and a “Design Rim” for TRA. "If ETRTO," Measuring Rim ". In addition, “regular internal pressure” is the air pressure that each standard defines for each tire in the standard system including the standard on which the tire is based. The maximum air pressure for JATMA and the table “TIRE LOAD LIMITS AT for TRA” The maximum value described in “VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES”, “INFLATION PRESSURE” for ETRTO, but 200 kPa for tires for passenger cars.

タイヤ内腔iに充填される高酸素空気及び水は、空気入りタイヤ1を内側から劣化させる。このため、前記酸素濃度が30%未満の場合、空気入りタイヤ1の内側からの劣化を短期間で促進させることができない。また、前記高酸素空気は、その酸素濃度は30%以上であれば特に限定はされないが、該濃度を大とすることにより、酸素をタイヤ1の内部により迅速に拡散させ、劣化促進工程時間を削減できる。このような観点より、前記高酸素空気の酸素濃度は、好ましくは40%以上、さらに好ましくは50%以上が望ましい。他方、高酸素空気の酸素濃度が高すぎても、その維持や調整が困難になるため、前記酸素濃度は、例えば95%以下、より好ましくは90%以下が望ましい。このような高酸素空気は、例えば図2に示されるように、例えば所定の空気ボンベ6からタイヤバルブ7を介してタイヤ内腔iに充填される。   The high oxygen air and water filled in the tire lumen i deteriorate the pneumatic tire 1 from the inside. For this reason, when the oxygen concentration is less than 30%, deterioration from the inside of the pneumatic tire 1 cannot be promoted in a short period of time. The high oxygen air is not particularly limited as long as the oxygen concentration is 30% or more, but by increasing the concentration, oxygen can be diffused more quickly into the tire 1 and the deterioration promoting process time can be increased. Can be reduced. From such a viewpoint, the oxygen concentration of the high oxygen air is preferably 40% or more, more preferably 50% or more. On the other hand, even if the oxygen concentration of the high oxygen air is too high, it becomes difficult to maintain or adjust the oxygen concentration. For example, the oxygen concentration is desirably 95% or less, and more desirably 90% or less. For example, as shown in FIG. 2, such high oxygen air is filled into the tire lumen i from a predetermined air cylinder 6 through the tire valve 7.

また、タイヤ内腔iには、10〜3000ccの水が充填される。タイヤ内腔iに空気中の水分を超える量の水を含ませることによって、タイヤの内部構造材、とりわけベルトプライ5A、5B等の金属コードの腐食を促進させ、より短期間でタイヤの劣化を再現できる。ここで、タイヤ内腔に注入される水が10cc未満の場合と、前記金属コード等の腐食促進効果が十分に得られない傾向があり、逆に3000ccを超えると、タイヤから漏らさずにリム組みするのが困難な傾向がある。このような観点より、タイヤ内腔iに充填される水の量は、特に好ましくは50cc以上、より好ましくは100cc以上、さらに好ましくは300cc以上が望ましく、また上限については、好ましくは2000cc以下、さらに好ましくは1000cc以下が望ましい。   The tire lumen i is filled with 10 to 3000 cc of water. By including the amount of water exceeding the moisture in the air in the tire lumen i, the corrosion of the internal cords of the tire, particularly the metal cords such as the belt plies 5A and 5B, is promoted, and the tire is deteriorated in a shorter period. Can be reproduced. Here, when the water injected into the tire lumen is less than 10 cc, there is a tendency that the corrosion promotion effect of the metal cord or the like is not sufficiently obtained. Conversely, when it exceeds 3000 cc, the rim assembly is not leaked from the tire. Tend to be difficult to do. From such a viewpoint, the amount of water filled in the tire lumen i is particularly preferably 50 cc or more, more preferably 100 cc or more, further preferably 300 cc or more, and the upper limit is preferably 2000 cc or less. Preferably it is 1000 cc or less.

なお、前記水は純水でも良いし、例えば食塩水などが用いられても良い。食塩水を用いた場合、タイヤの内部の金属コードの腐食をより一層促進させることができる。食塩水の塩分濃度は特に定めないが、好ましくは5〜20%程度が望ましい。また、前記水は、リム組み前に、空気入りタイヤ1の内腔面に予め注入しておくことができる。   The water may be pure water, for example, saline. When salt water is used, corrosion of the metal cord inside the tire can be further promoted. The salt concentration of the saline is not particularly defined, but preferably about 5 to 20%. In addition, the water can be injected in advance into the inner surface of the pneumatic tire 1 before assembling the rim.

また第2の工程では、第1の工程で準備されたタイヤ組立体3を、温度50〜100℃及び湿度70〜100%の高温高湿雰囲気中に少なくとも3日間放置することにより行われる。該第2の工程は、温度及び湿度管理が可能なスチームオーブン室などで行われるのが望ましい。これにより、高温高湿雰囲気下の温度及び湿度を自在にコントロールすることができる。   In the second step, the tire assembly 3 prepared in the first step is left in a high-temperature and high-humidity atmosphere at a temperature of 50 to 100 ° C. and a humidity of 70 to 100% for at least three days. The second step is preferably performed in a steam oven chamber or the like capable of temperature and humidity management. Thereby, the temperature and humidity in a high-temperature, high-humidity atmosphere can be freely controlled.

発明者らは、図1に示したような空気入りタイヤ1を例えばドラム試験器を用いて耐久テストを行うと、新品時と、経時劣化時とでは異なる結果が得られることを知見した。   The inventors have found that when a pneumatic tire 1 as shown in FIG. 1 is subjected to an endurance test using, for example, a drum tester, different results are obtained when it is new and when it deteriorates with time.

先ず、新品タイヤについて耐久テストを行うと、タイヤに最初に生じる損傷は、カーカスプライ4Aの折返し部4bの端部を起点とした剥離又はトレッドゴム8とベルト層5との間の界面剥離が殆どである。これに対し、実際に経時劣化したタイヤについて耐久テストを行うと、ビード部ではなくトレッド部に損傷が集中する。また、その内訳は、概ね以下のイないしハの損傷に大別される。
イ)カーカス4のサイドウォール1bでの損傷
ロ)ベルトプライ5A、5B間の界面剥離
ハ)カーカス4とベルト層5との間の界面剥離
First, when a durability test is performed on a new tire, most of the damage that occurs in the tire is the separation starting from the end portion of the folded portion 4b of the carcass ply 4A or the interface separation between the tread rubber 8 and the belt layer 5. It is. On the other hand, when a durability test is performed on a tire that has actually deteriorated over time, damage concentrates on the tread portion instead of the bead portion. The breakdown is roughly divided into the following damages (i) to (c).
B) Damage on the side wall 1b of the carcass 4 b) Interfacial peeling between the belt plies 5A and 5B c) Interfacial peeling between the carcass 4 and the belt layer 5

従って、劣化促進工程によりタイヤの経時劣化を精度良く再現するためには、前記イ〜ハの界面における接着強度を短期間に低下させることが必要になる。発明者らは、条件を種々異ならせて劣化促進工程を行った。その結果、空気入りタイヤ1の内部に高酸素空気及び水を充填したタイヤ組立体は、高湿雰囲気下に放置されることによって、前記イ〜ハの損傷を短期間で再現しうることをを見出した。   Therefore, in order to accurately reproduce the deterioration over time of the tire by the deterioration promoting step, it is necessary to reduce the adhesive strength at the interface A to C in a short time. The inventors performed the deterioration accelerating step under various conditions. As a result, the tire assembly in which the pneumatic tire 1 is filled with high oxygen air and water can be reproduced in a short period of time by leaving the tire assembly in a high humidity atmosphere. I found it.

即ち、例えば雰囲気温度を50〜100℃の高温に維持した場合でも、その湿度が70%未満の場合には、前記イないしハの損傷が空気入りタイヤ1に十分に再現できない。しかし、前記湿度を70%以上とすることにより、空気入りタイヤ1をその外部から劣化させ、とりわけトレッド部1aないしサイドウォール部1bの内部に配された金属コードの腐食乃至劣化を効率的に促進させ得る。特に、前記湿度が高いほどタイヤ1がより効率的に劣化されるため、好ましくは80%以上、より好ましくは90%以上の湿度が特に望ましい。   That is, for example, even when the atmospheric temperature is maintained at a high temperature of 50 to 100 ° C., if the humidity is less than 70%, the damage of a to c cannot be sufficiently reproduced in the pneumatic tire 1. However, by setting the humidity to 70% or more, the pneumatic tire 1 is deteriorated from the outside, and particularly, corrosion or deterioration of the metal cord disposed inside the tread portion 1a or the sidewall portion 1b is efficiently promoted. Can be. In particular, since the tire 1 is more efficiently deteriorated as the humidity is higher, the humidity is preferably 80% or more, more preferably 90% or more.

また、タイヤ組立体1が放置される雰囲気の前記温度が50℃未満の場合、空気入りタイヤ1を短期間で劣化させることができない。特に好ましくは前記高温高湿雰囲気下の温度は、とりわけ60℃以上、より好ましくは70℃以上、さらに好ましくは80℃以上が特に望ましい。なお前記温度が100℃を超えると、空気入りタイヤ1のゴム層(トレッドゴム8、サイドウォール部1b)において、ゴム焼け等が生じる。従って、次のテストを行うことができない。   Further, when the temperature of the atmosphere in which the tire assembly 1 is left is less than 50 ° C., the pneumatic tire 1 cannot be deteriorated in a short period of time. Particularly preferably, the temperature in the high-temperature and high-humidity atmosphere is particularly preferably 60 ° C. or higher, more preferably 70 ° C. or higher, and still more preferably 80 ° C. or higher. When the temperature exceeds 100 ° C., the rubber layer (tread rubber 8, sidewall portion 1 b) of the pneumatic tire 1 causes rubber burning or the like. Therefore, the next test cannot be performed.

前記タイヤ組立体3は、高温高湿雰囲気中に少なくとも3日間放置されるが、好ましくは7日以上、より好ましくは10日以上、さらに好ましくは20日以上が望ましい。前記放置時間が3日(即ち、72時間)未満の場合、タイヤ1の劣化が不十分となる。逆に前記放置期間が長すぎても、タイヤの試験効率が低下するため、好ましくは70日以内、より好ましくは60日以内、さらに好ましくは50日以内が望ましい。   The tire assembly 3 is left in a high-temperature and high-humidity atmosphere for at least 3 days, preferably 7 days or more, more preferably 10 days or more, and even more preferably 20 days or more. When the leaving time is less than 3 days (that is, 72 hours), the tire 1 is not sufficiently deteriorated. On the other hand, if the standing period is too long, the test efficiency of the tire is lowered, so that it is preferably within 70 days, more preferably within 60 days, and even more preferably within 50 days.

そして、上述のような第1及び第2の工程を経て空気入りタイヤ1の劣化を促進させることにより、実際の経年劣化と非常に相関性の良い劣化状態が短時間で得られる。   Then, by promoting the deterioration of the pneumatic tire 1 through the first and second steps as described above, a deterioration state having a very good correlation with the actual aging deterioration can be obtained in a short time.

本実施形態において、前記第2の工程を終えると、例えばドラム試験器などを用いて空気入りタイヤ1の耐久試験が行われる。空気入りタイヤ1には、実際の経年劣化に近似した劣化ないし老化が生じている。従って、かかる空気入りタイヤ1を用いて耐久試験を行うことによって、経年劣化後の性能を精度良く、かつ、実際にタイヤを経年劣化させることなく評価できる。従って、短期間での評価が可能となる。耐久テストとしては、特に限定はされないが、例えばJIS−D4230の高速耐久性試験方法などを挙げることができる。   In the present embodiment, when the second step is completed, a durability test of the pneumatic tire 1 is performed using, for example, a drum tester. In the pneumatic tire 1, deterioration or aging similar to actual aging has occurred. Therefore, by performing an endurance test using such a pneumatic tire 1, the performance after aging can be evaluated accurately and without actually aging the tire. Therefore, evaluation in a short period is possible. Although it does not specifically limit as an endurance test, For example, the high-speed endurance test method of JIS-D4230 etc. can be mentioned.

なお、空気入りタイヤ1としては、例えば上述のカテゴリーのタイヤに限定されるものではなく、乗用車用、トラック用又は自動二輪車用など種々のカテゴリーのタイヤを含ませることができる。また、本発明は、トレッド部に、金属コードからなるベルト層又はブレーカ層を具える空気入りタイヤに特に効果を発揮しうる。   The pneumatic tire 1 is not limited to the above-mentioned category of tires, for example, and can include various categories of tires such as passenger cars, trucks, and motorcycles. In addition, the present invention can be particularly effective for a pneumatic tire having a belt layer or a breaker layer made of a metal cord in the tread portion.

本発明の効果を確認するために、表1の仕様に基づいて、それぞれ20本づつ空気入りタイヤの劣化促進工程を行った。タイヤは、図1に示したトラック、バス用の空気入りラジアルタイヤ(サイズ:11R22.5)であり、金属コードからなるベルトプライ及びカーカスプライを具えている。また、リムは22.5×8.25とし、内圧は800kPaである。   In order to confirm the effects of the present invention, the process of promoting the deterioration of 20 pneumatic tires was performed on the basis of the specifications shown in Table 1. The tire is a pneumatic radial tire (size: 11R22.5) for trucks and buses shown in FIG. 1, and includes a belt ply and a carcass ply made of a metal cord. The rim is 22.5 × 8.25 and the internal pressure is 800 kPa.

また実際の経年劣化したタイヤとして、約1年間走行し、トレッド溝が完全摩耗した同じタイヤを用意した。そして、各タイヤ10本づつを解体し、トレッドゴムとベルト層との間の界面(以下、「界面1」という。)、ベルトプライ間の界面(以下、「界面2」という。)及びベルト層とカーカスとの間の界面(以下、「界面3」という。)について、それぞれそれぞれ接着力を測定し、その平均値を示した。該接着力は、引っ張り試験機によって剥離巾25mmの条件で測定された。   In addition, as an actually deteriorated tire, the same tire having been run for about one year and having completely worn out tread grooves was prepared. Then, 10 tires are disassembled, and the interface between the tread rubber and the belt layer (hereinafter referred to as “interface 1”), the interface between the belt plies (hereinafter referred to as “interface 2”), and the belt layer. Adhesive strength was measured for each of the interfaces (hereinafter referred to as “interface 3”) between the carcass and the average value. The adhesive force was measured with a tensile tester under the condition of a peel width of 25 mm.

また残りの10本については、JIS−D4230の高速耐久性試験方法を行い、タイヤに生じた最初の損傷発生部位を調べた。
テスト結果などを表1に示す。
Further, the remaining ten pieces were subjected to the high-speed durability test method of JIS-D4230, and the first damage occurrence site on the tire was examined.
Table 1 shows the test results.

Figure 0004743754
Figure 0004743754
Figure 0004743754
Figure 0004743754

テストの結果、実施例のタイヤは、実際の経年劣化したタイヤと同様、界面2ないし3に損傷が集中しており、かつ、界面での接着力も非常に相関が強いことが確認できたた。他方、比較例のタイヤでは、損傷形態がいずれも新品時のタイヤのそれと近似しており、十分な経時劣化が再現されていないことが確認できる。   As a result of the test, it was confirmed that, in the tire of the example, damage was concentrated on the interfaces 2 to 3 as well as the actual aged tire, and the adhesive force at the interface was also highly correlated. On the other hand, in the tire of the comparative example, all the damage forms are similar to those of the new tire, and it can be confirmed that sufficient deterioration with time is not reproduced.

本実施形態の第1の工程を説明する略図である。It is a schematic diagram explaining the 1st process of this embodiment. 空気入りタイヤの断面図である。It is sectional drawing of a pneumatic tire.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 空気入りタイヤ
2 リム
3 タイヤ組立体
1 Pneumatic tire 2 Rim 3 Tire assembly

Claims (2)

空気入りタイヤの劣化を促進させる劣化促進工程を含む空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法であって、
前記劣化促進工程は、空気入りタイヤとリムとが囲むタイヤ内腔に、酸素濃度が30%以上である高酸素空気と、10〜3000ccの水とが充填されたタイヤ組立体を準備する第1の工程と、
前記タイヤ組立体を、温度50〜100℃及び湿度70〜100%の高温高湿雰囲気中に少なくとも3日間放置する第2の工程とを含み、
前記第2の工程の後、前記空気入りタイヤに規格最大荷重の100%以上の負荷をかけて速度20km/h以上で走行させる耐久試験を行うことを特徴とする空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法。
A durability test method for a pneumatic tire including a deterioration promoting step for promoting deterioration of the pneumatic tire,
In the deterioration promoting step, a tire assembly is prepared in which a tire lumen surrounded by a pneumatic tire and a rim is filled with high oxygen air having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more and 10 to 3000 cc of water. And the process of
The tire assembly, viewed contains a second step of standing at least 3 days in a high temperature and high humidity atmosphere at 50 to 100 ° C. and humidity 70% to 100%,
A durability test method for a pneumatic tire, characterized in that after the second step, a durability test is performed in which a load of 100% or more of a standard maximum load is applied to the pneumatic tire to run at a speed of 20 km / h or more .
前記第2の工程において、前記タイヤ組立体は、前記高温高湿雰囲気中に3〜70日間放置される請求項1記載の空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法。   The durability test method for a pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein in the second step, the tire assembly is left in the high-temperature and high-humidity atmosphere for 3 to 70 days.
JP2005159876A 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Tire durability test method Active JP4743754B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005159876A JP4743754B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Tire durability test method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005159876A JP4743754B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Tire durability test method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006337100A JP2006337100A (en) 2006-12-14
JP4743754B2 true JP4743754B2 (en) 2011-08-10

Family

ID=37557789

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005159876A Active JP4743754B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Tire durability test method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4743754B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5457662B2 (en) * 2008-12-03 2014-04-02 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Pneumatic tire durability test method
JP5467091B2 (en) * 2011-10-19 2014-04-09 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Evaluation method of tire performance
JP6922277B2 (en) * 2017-03-13 2021-08-18 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Tire durability test method
CN112440625A (en) * 2020-11-26 2021-03-05 赵光天 Internal and external integrated closed-loop tire
CN113281116B (en) * 2021-04-15 2023-12-26 中策橡胶集团股份有限公司 Stability control tire, rapid processing method, application and stability judging method

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003262568A (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-19 Bridgestone Corp Durability test method for tire
JP2004132847A (en) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-30 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Durability performance testing method for tire
JP2004233218A (en) * 2003-01-30 2004-08-19 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Method and apparatus for evaluating tire
JP2004263312A (en) * 2003-02-28 2004-09-24 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Steel cord for reinforcing rubber and pneumatic tire using the same in belt layer
JP2004284453A (en) * 2003-03-20 2004-10-14 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP2005098754A (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-04-14 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Aging test method of automobile tire

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3373737B2 (en) * 1995-09-07 2003-02-04 株式会社ブリヂストン Durability test method for pneumatic tires

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003262568A (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-19 Bridgestone Corp Durability test method for tire
JP2004132847A (en) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-30 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Durability performance testing method for tire
JP2004233218A (en) * 2003-01-30 2004-08-19 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Method and apparatus for evaluating tire
JP2004263312A (en) * 2003-02-28 2004-09-24 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Steel cord for reinforcing rubber and pneumatic tire using the same in belt layer
JP2004284453A (en) * 2003-03-20 2004-10-14 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP2005098754A (en) * 2003-09-22 2005-04-14 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Aging test method of automobile tire

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2006337100A (en) 2006-12-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5457662B2 (en) Pneumatic tire durability test method
US7543619B2 (en) Heavy duty tire
JP4939854B2 (en) Heavy duty pneumatic tire
EP2628612B1 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5022003B2 (en) Heavy duty tire
JP4743754B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP4330647B2 (en) Pneumatic radial tire
JP5317520B2 (en) Tire testing method
JP2006327469A (en) Tire deterioration determination unit and forecasting method of tire life using the unit
JP2003237316A (en) Pneumatic tire
CN102458886B (en) Heavy-duty pneumatic tire
RU2440251C2 (en) Safety tire
JP6121295B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP4369836B2 (en) Degradation acceleration test method
EP3093161A1 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6790368B2 (en) Pneumatic tires for heavy loads
JPH09272308A (en) Pneumatic radial tire
EP1757463B1 (en) Retread tire and method of producing the same
JP2005241369A (en) Tire testing method
JP6852309B2 (en) Pneumatic tire test method
JP4616072B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4622608B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP2013130442A (en) Tire testing method
JPH10258606A (en) Pneumatic radial tire
JP6362217B2 (en) Tire durability test method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080407

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100709

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100720

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20101207

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110106

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110502

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110506

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140520

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4743754

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250