JPH09133611A - Test method for durability of pneumatic tire - Google Patents

Test method for durability of pneumatic tire

Info

Publication number
JPH09133611A
JPH09133611A JP8225610A JP22561096A JPH09133611A JP H09133611 A JPH09133611 A JP H09133611A JP 8225610 A JP8225610 A JP 8225610A JP 22561096 A JP22561096 A JP 22561096A JP H09133611 A JPH09133611 A JP H09133611A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
tire
oxygen
deterioration
durability test
test method
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP8225610A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3373737B2 (en
Inventor
Kenichi Tanaka
顕一 田中
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bridgestone Corp
Original Assignee
Bridgestone Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bridgestone Corp filed Critical Bridgestone Corp
Priority to JP22561096A priority Critical patent/JP3373737B2/en
Publication of JPH09133611A publication Critical patent/JPH09133611A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3373737B2 publication Critical patent/JP3373737B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a test method, for a pneumatic tire, in which a secular change in an actual use is reproduced well and in which a durability evaluation in the secular change is performed properly and with good efficiency. SOLUTION: Oxygen at a high concentration in which an oxygen concentration (x) expressed by an expression mentioned below is at 3.0 or higher is injected into a tire, and the degradation of the tire due to the oxygen is promoted. The oxygen at the high concentration is injected into the tire. After the passage of time, the tire is kept as it is or the oxygen is discharged. The air is injected. An actual durability test process is performed. Expression: x=(PO/PT)×100 (%) In Expression, PT represents the total pressure (kgf/cm<2> ) of a filled gas after its filling, and PO represents the partial pressure (kgf/cm<2> ) of oxygen with reference to the total pressure.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、空気入りタイヤの
耐久試験方法に関し、詳しくは、経年劣化時の耐久性評
価を適切に行いうる空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法に関
する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a pneumatic tire endurance test method, and more particularly to a pneumatic tire endurance test method capable of appropriately performing durability evaluation upon deterioration over time.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、タイヤの耐久性試験としては、J
IS D4230に規定するように所定の空気圧の空気
を充填し、室温38±3℃にて3時間放置し、空気圧を
安定させた後、元の空気圧に再調整して耐久試験を行
う。さらに、JIS D4230−1978には、当
時、夏期にしばしば発生したスチールコードの剥がれに
対する対策として、乗用車用スチールラジアルタイヤの
高温、高湿条件下における経時劣化を調べる耐調湿性能
試験方法が参考に記載されている。この方法は、リム組
みしないタイヤを温度38℃湿度95%に20日間放置
した後、JIS D4230の高速耐久性能試験方法に
準拠したドラム耐久試験を実施するものである。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, as a tire durability test, J
Air is filled with a predetermined air pressure as specified in IS D4230, left at room temperature of 38 ± 3 ° C. for 3 hours to stabilize the air pressure, and then readjusted to the original air pressure to perform a durability test. In addition, JIS D4230-1978 refers to the humidity control performance test method for examining the deterioration of steel radial tires for passenger cars under high temperature and high humidity conditions as a countermeasure against the peeling of steel cord that often occurs in the summer at that time. Have been described. In this method, a tire not assembled on a rim is left at a temperature of 38 ° C. and a humidity of 95% for 20 days, and then a drum durability test based on a high speed durability test method of JIS D4230 is performed.

【0003】空気入りタイヤに期待される保証寿命は車
両システムの信頼性向上にともない、近年、ますます長
期化しており、経年劣化時の耐久評価が不可欠になりつ
つある。しかしながら、JIS D4230−1978
の解説にも記載されている如く前記耐調湿性能試験方法
も、高温、高湿下での放置条件などの実験条件が確定さ
れたわけではなく、長期にわたる実使用で経年劣化をう
けた空気入りタイヤの故障には、従来公知の室内・外で
の耐久試験では再現できない故障があることもわかって
きた。
The warranty life expected of a pneumatic tire has become longer and longer in recent years as the reliability of the vehicle system has improved, and it is becoming indispensable to evaluate the durability against deterioration over time. However, JIS D4230-1978
As described in the explanation of the above, the humidity control performance test method is not such that the experimental conditions such as the condition of being left under high temperature and high humidity have not been fixed, and the aeration that has been aged over a long period of actual use It has also been found that some tire failures cannot be reproduced by a conventionally known indoor / outdoor durability test.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】このため、実使用にお
ける経年劣化を再現しうる、即ち、経年劣化における耐
久性評価を適切に、効率よく行いうる空気入りタイヤの
試験方法が切望されていた。
Therefore, there has been a strong demand for a pneumatic tire test method capable of reproducing aging deterioration in actual use, that is, capable of appropriately and efficiently evaluating durability against aging deterioration.

【0005】[0005]

【問題点を解決するための手段】本発明者らが検討した
ところ、長期にわたる実使用で経年劣化した空気入りタ
イヤの内部を構成するゴム部材には、ゴム本来の柔軟で
ねばりのある性質が失われることによる故障を生じてお
り、リム組時に封入された空気中の酸素によるゴムの酸
素劣化が大きく関与していることが明らかとなった。そ
こで本発明らは、ゴムの酸素劣化に着目し、高濃度酸素
を用いることにより、短期間に効率良く市場での故障、
即ち、実使用での経年劣化を再現しうることを見出し、
本発明を完成した。
[Means for Solving the Problems] As a result of studies by the present inventors, the rubber member constituting the inside of a pneumatic tire that has deteriorated over time due to long-term actual use has the inherent soft and sticky nature of rubber. It was revealed that the loss caused the loss, and the oxygen deterioration of the rubber due to the oxygen contained in the air when the rim was assembled was significantly involved. Therefore, the present inventors pay attention to the oxygen deterioration of rubber, and by using high-concentration oxygen, failure in the market efficiently in a short period of time,
That is, it was found that aging deterioration in actual use can be reproduced,
The present invention has been completed.

【0006】(1)本発明の請求項1に係る空気入りタ
イヤの耐久試験方法は、下記式(I)で表される酸素濃
度xを30以上とした高濃度の酸素をタイヤ内に注入
し、酸素によるタイヤの劣化を促進させる工程を含むこ
とを特徴とする。
(1) The durability test method for a pneumatic tire according to claim 1 of the present invention comprises injecting a high concentration of oxygen having an oxygen concentration x represented by the following formula (I) of 30 or more into the tire. , A step of promoting deterioration of the tire due to oxygen.

【0007】式(I) x=(PO/PT)×100(%) 〔式中、PTは、充填後の充填気体の全圧(kgf/c
2 )を、POは、該全圧に対する酸素の分圧(kgf
/cm2 )を表す。〕 (2)本発明の請求項2に係る空気入りタイヤの耐久試
験方法は、(1)記載の試験方法であって、前記酸素に
よるタイヤの劣化促進工程が、i)タイヤ内に酸素を注
入する工程と、ii)該タイヤを放置もしくは加熱する工
程と、iii )酸素を排出する工程と、を含み、且つ、該
酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程が終了した後、該タイ
ヤに空気を注入し、負荷を掛けて実耐久試験工程を行う
こと、を特徴とする。
Formula (I) x = (PO / PT) × 100 (%) [In the formula, PT is the total pressure (kgf / c) of the filling gas after filling.
m 2 ), PO is the partial pressure of oxygen (kgf) with respect to the total pressure.
/ Cm 2 ). (2) The durability test method for a pneumatic tire according to claim 2 of the present invention is the test method according to (1), wherein the step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire by oxygen includes i) injecting oxygen into the tire. And ii) leaving or heating the tire, and iii) discharging oxygen, and injecting air into the tire after the step of promoting deterioration of the tire due to oxygen is completed. The actual durability test process is performed by applying a load.

【0008】(3)本発明の請求項3に係る空気入りタ
イヤの耐久試験方法は、(1)記載の試験方法であっ
て、前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程が、i)タイ
ヤ内に酸素を注入する工程と、ii)該タイヤを放置もし
くは加熱する工程と、を含み、且つ、該酸素によるタイ
ヤの劣化促進工程が終了した後、該タイヤに高濃度の酸
素を注入した状態において、負荷を掛けて実耐久試験工
程を行うこと、を特徴とする。
(3) A durability test method for a pneumatic tire according to claim 3 of the present invention is the test method according to (1), wherein the step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire by oxygen is i) oxygen in the tire. And a step of ii) leaving or heating the tire, and after the step of accelerating deterioration of the tire due to the oxygen is completed, a load is applied in a state where high concentration oxygen is injected into the tire. And an actual durability test process is performed.

【0009】(4)本発明の請求項4に係る空気入りタ
イヤの耐久試験方法は、(3)記載の試験方法であっ
て、前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程における前記
式(I)で表される酸素濃度xが、30以上60以下で
あること、を特徴とする.また、(5)本発明の請求項
5に係る空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法は、i)下記式
(I)で表される酸素濃度xを30以上とした高濃度の
酸素をタイヤ内に注入する工程と、ii)該タイヤを放置
もしくは加熱する工程と、iii )酸素を排出する工程
と、を含む酸素による劣化促進工程を行い、しかる後、
該タイヤに空気を注入し、負荷を掛けて実耐久試験工程
を行い、その後、該タイヤから空気を排出し、そこに
i)前記高濃度の酸素を注入する工程と、ii)該タイヤ
を放置もしくは加熱する工程と、iii )酸素を排出する
工程と、を含む酸素による第2次劣化促進工程を行い、
しかる後、該タイヤに空気を注入し、そこに前記高濃度
の酸素を注入し、負荷を掛けて第2次実耐久試験工程を
行うこと、を特徴とする。
(4) The durability test method for a pneumatic tire according to claim 4 of the present invention is the test method according to (3), which is represented by the formula (I) in the step of promoting deterioration of the tire by oxygen. The oxygen concentration x is 30 or more and 60 or less. Further, (5) the durability test method for a pneumatic tire according to claim 5 of the present invention comprises: i) injecting a high concentration of oxygen having an oxygen concentration x represented by the following formula (I) of 30 or more into the tire. And a step of ii) leaving or heating the tire, and iii) a step of discharging oxygen.
Injecting air into the tire, applying a load to perform an actual durability test step, and then exhausting air from the tire, i) injecting the high concentration oxygen into the tire, and ii) leaving the tire Alternatively, a secondary deterioration promoting step by oxygen including a heating step and iii) a step of discharging oxygen is performed,
Thereafter, air is injected into the tire, the high-concentration oxygen is injected therein, and a load is applied to perform the second actual durability test process.

【0010】式(I) x=(PO/PT)×100(%) 〔式中、PTは、充填後の充填気体の全圧(kgf/c
2 )を、POは、該全圧に対する酸素の分圧(kgf
/cm2 )を表す。〕 また、前記(1)〜(5)記載の空気入りタイヤの耐久
試験方法において、前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工
程における一部又は全部の工程が、20℃〜120℃の
温度範囲で行われること、前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化
促進工程におけるii)該タイヤを放置もしくは加熱する
工程が、少なくとも24時間行われること、さらに、前
記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程が、タイヤに10〜
3000ccの水を封入した状態で行われることが、実
使用上の経時劣化を適切に再現しうる観点から好まし
い。
Formula (I) x = (PO / PT) × 100 (%) [wherein, PT is the total pressure (kgf / c) of the filling gas after filling.
m 2 ), PO is the partial pressure of oxygen (kgf) with respect to the total pressure.
/ Cm 2 ). Further, in the pneumatic tire durability test method according to (1) to (5), some or all of the steps of promoting deterioration of the tire due to oxygen are performed in a temperature range of 20 ° C to 120 ° C. Ii) In the step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire due to oxygen, ii) the step of leaving or heating the tire is performed for at least 24 hours, and further, the step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire due to oxygen is 10 to 10 times.
It is preferable to perform the treatment in a state where 3000 cc of water is enclosed, from the viewpoint that the deterioration with time in actual use can be appropriately reproduced.

【0011】本発明において負荷を掛けた実耐久試験工
程とは、例えば、JIS D4230の高速耐久性能試
験方法に準拠したドラム耐久試験等を含むドラム耐久試
験全般、さらには、実車耐久試験を包含するものとす
る。
In the present invention, the actual durability test process under load includes, for example, all the drum durability tests including the drum durability test based on the high speed durability test method of JIS D4230, and further the actual vehicle durability test. I shall.

【0012】[0012]

【発明の実施の形態】酸素濃度xを30以上とした高濃
度の酸素をタイヤ内に注入して、耐久試験を行うことに
より、従来の空気を充填する耐久試験の方法よりも、短
時間で、実際に使用した場合の経時変化を、より正確に
再現しうることになる。式(I)で表される酸素濃度の
調整方法は公知の方法を適用することができる。酸素濃
度(もしくは酸素分圧)は、短時間に劣化を促進させる
観点からは高い程好ましいが、xは30〜99程度が好
ましく、ハンドリング性等を考慮すれば、xは30〜9
5程度がさらに好ましい。xが30未満であると劣化の
促進が不十分であり、また、99を超える高濃度酸素を
タイヤ中に充填するのは困難であり、いずれも好ましく
ない。また、タイヤの発熱が高くバーストし易い条件で
実耐久性試験を行う場合には、xは30〜60程度がさ
らに好ましい。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION A high-concentration oxygen having an oxygen concentration x of 30 or more is injected into a tire and a durability test is performed, so that the durability test can be performed in a shorter time than a conventional durability test method in which air is filled. Therefore, it is possible to more accurately reproduce the change with time when actually used. A known method can be applied to the method for adjusting the oxygen concentration represented by the formula (I). The oxygen concentration (or oxygen partial pressure) is preferably as high as possible from the viewpoint of accelerating the deterioration in a short time, but x is preferably about 30 to 99, and in consideration of handling property, x is 30 to 9
About 5 is more preferable. When x is less than 30, acceleration of deterioration is insufficient, and it is difficult to fill the tire with high-concentration oxygen exceeding 99, which is not preferable. Further, when the actual durability test is performed under the condition that the tire generates a large amount of heat and tends to burst, x is more preferably about 30 to 60.

【0013】この酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程は、
i)タイヤ内に酸素を注入する工程と、ii)該タイヤを
放置もしくは加熱する工程とを含み、その後、負荷を掛
けて実耐久性試験工程を行う際に、iii )酸素を排出す
る工程を経て、そのタイヤに通常の空気を注入して行っ
てもよく、酸素を排出せずに、高濃度の酸素をタイヤに
注入した状態で行ってもよい。
The step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire by this oxygen is
i) a step of injecting oxygen into the tire, and ii) a step of leaving or heating the tire, and thereafter, iii) a step of discharging oxygen when a load is applied and an actual durability test step is performed. Ordinarily, normal air may be injected into the tire, or high-concentration oxygen may be injected into the tire without discharging oxygen.

【0014】これらの耐久性試験については、以下、前
者の、酸素による劣化促進工程→高濃度酸素(以下、単
に酸素と称する)排出→空気注入→実耐久性試験工程を
行うものを試験(A)と称し、後者の、酸素による劣化
促進工程→酸素注入状態のまま実耐久性試験工程を行う
ものを試験(B)と称する。本発明においては、いずれ
の試験方法を採用することもできるが、例えば、実耐久
試験でタイヤの発熱が高くバースト故障し易い大型タイ
ヤの実耐久試験等を行う場合には、試験(A)を採用す
ることが好ましく、バースト故障の虞がない条件で実耐
久試験を行う場合、劣化促進をより効果的に行いうる試
験(B)を採用することが好ましい。
As for these durability tests, the former one, in which the deterioration promoting process by oxygen → high-concentration oxygen (hereinafter simply referred to as oxygen) discharge → air injection → actual durability test process, is performed (A) ), And the latter one, in which the actual durability test step is performed in the oxygen injection state while the oxygen deterioration promotion step is referred to as the test (B). In the present invention, any test method can be adopted. For example, in the case of performing an actual durability test of a large tire which is likely to cause a burst failure due to high heat generation of the tire in the actual durability test, the test (A) is performed. It is preferable to adopt the test (B), which can more effectively accelerate deterioration, when the actual durability test is performed under the condition that there is no risk of burst failure.

【0015】また、本発明の請求項5に記載の如く、空
気入りタイヤの耐久試験工程において、前記i)高濃度
の酸素をタイヤ内に注入する工程と、ii)該タイヤを放
置もしくは加熱する工程と、iii )酸素を排出する工程
と、を含む酸素による劣化促進工程を行い、そのタイヤ
に空気を注入し、負荷を掛けて実耐久試験工程を行った
後、該タイヤから空気を排出し、そこに前記高濃度の酸
素を再度注入し、負荷を掛けて高濃度の酸素をタイヤに
充填した状態で第2次の一連の工程を行うこともでき
る。この酸素による第1の劣化促進工程→酸素排出→空
気注入→第1の実耐久性試験→空気排出→酸素注入→第
2の劣化促進工程→酸素排出→空気注入→第2の実耐久
性試験工程を行うものを、以下、試験(C)と称する。
Further, as described in claim 5 of the present invention, in the durability test step of the pneumatic tire, the step of i) injecting a high concentration of oxygen into the tire and ii) leaving or heating the tire. And a step of iii) discharging oxygen, a deterioration promoting step due to oxygen is performed, air is injected into the tire, a load is applied to perform an actual durability test step, and then the air is discharged from the tire. It is also possible to inject the high-concentration oxygen again into the tire, apply a load, and fill the tire with the high-concentration oxygen to perform the second series of steps. The first deterioration promoting process by oxygen → oxygen discharge → air injection → first actual durability test → air discharge → oxygen injection → second deterioration promoting process → oxygen discharge → air injection → second actual durability test What performs a process is hereafter called test (C).

【0016】この試験(C)は、再生タイヤ等2次ライ
フ以降の耐久性を保証する必要がある場合、劣化促進と
走行による損傷とを繰り返し与えることにより、このよ
うな保証にかなう耐久性の有無を判断する試験に好適に
用いられる。
In this test (C), when it is necessary to guarantee the durability after the secondary life of a recycled tire or the like, the acceleration of deterioration and the damage due to running are repeatedly given, so that the durability can be guaranteed. It is suitable for use in tests to determine the presence or absence.

【0017】酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程は、常温
(例えば、20℃前後の雰囲気温度)で行うこともでき
るが、さらに、加熱して常温よりも高い温度雰囲気下で
行うことにより、タイヤを構成するゴム組成物中への酸
素の拡散を促進することが可能になる。本発明の試験方
法における実施温度は20〜120℃程度であることが
好ましい。試験における雰囲気温度が20℃未満である
と劣化の促進が不十分となり、実使用に近い試験結果を
得るためには長い放置時間を要することになり、一方、
120℃を超えると酸素劣化工程中に、タイヤがバース
トする危険性が増すため、いずれも好ましくない。
The step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire by oxygen can be carried out at room temperature (for example, an ambient temperature of about 20 ° C.), but by further heating and carrying out in an atmosphere at a temperature higher than room temperature, the tire is constructed. It becomes possible to promote the diffusion of oxygen into the rubber composition. The working temperature in the test method of the present invention is preferably about 20 to 120 ° C. If the atmospheric temperature in the test is less than 20 ° C., the acceleration of deterioration is insufficient, and a long standing time is required to obtain a test result close to actual use.
If the temperature exceeds 120 ° C, the risk of bursting of the tire during the oxygen deterioration step increases, and thus both are not preferable.

【0018】常温よりも高い温度に加熱して試験を行う
場合、加熱は酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程の全工程
及び実耐久性試験工程の全工程に亘って連続して行って
もよく、タイヤの劣化促進工程の全工程のみで行っても
よく、また、タイヤの劣化促進工程のうち、ii)高濃度
酸素を注入したタイヤを放置もしくは加熱する工程のみ
において行ってもよい。
When the test is carried out by heating to a temperature higher than room temperature, the heating may be continuously carried out in all steps of the step of promoting deterioration of the tire by oxygen and all steps of the actual durability test step. It may be carried out only in all the steps of the deterioration accelerating step, or, in the tire deterioration accelerating step, it may be carried out only in the step of ii) leaving or heating the tire injected with high concentration oxygen.

【0019】加熱方法は、加熱装置を用いて試験工程の
雰囲気温度を上げる方法でもよく、耐久試験のタイヤの
転動による自己発熱を利用して加熱する方法でもよい。
自己発熱を利用する場合においても、他の温度制御装置
と組み合わせて、温度条件をコントロールすることが好
ましく、これによって安定した試験が可能となる。劣化
促進工程においては高濃度酸素を用いるため、加熱装置
としては、安全性の高いスチームオーブン等を使用する
ことが好ましい。
The heating method may be a method of raising the atmospheric temperature in the test process using a heating device, or a method of utilizing self-heating due to rolling of the tire in the durability test.
Even in the case of utilizing self-heating, it is preferable to control the temperature condition by combining with another temperature control device, which enables a stable test. Since high-concentration oxygen is used in the deterioration promoting step, it is preferable to use a highly safe steam oven or the like as the heating device.

【0020】タイヤを構成するゴム組成物中へ十分に酸
素を拡散する観点から、この酸素によるタイヤの劣化促
進工程は、少なくとも1日間、即ち、24時間以上に亘
って行われることが好ましい。
From the viewpoint of sufficiently diffusing oxygen into the rubber composition constituting the tire, the step of promoting deterioration of the tire by oxygen is preferably performed for at least one day, that is, for 24 hours or more.

【0021】タイヤの劣化促進工程に用いられる酸素ガ
ス中には水分が含まれない場合が多く、この工程におい
てタイヤ中に注入された高濃度の酸素に含まれる水分量
は空気中に含まれる水分よりも少なくなる。このため、
水分による劣化、例えば、ゴム組成物やタイヤのカーカ
スプライに用いられるスチールコードの水分による劣化
への影響が低下し、実使用における経時劣化を短期間で
効率よく再現しえない虞がでてくる。このため、タイヤ
の劣化促進工程においては、空気中に含まれる以上の水
分を同時にタイヤ中に封入するとが好ましい。この水分
量としてはタイヤ1本あたりに、10〜3000cc程
度であることが好ましい。水分の添加量が10cc未満
では安定した試験が困難であり、3000ccを超える
とタイヤをリム組みする際に水がタイヤから漏れ易くな
るため、いずれも好ましくない。適切な水分量の添加に
より、スチールコードなどの腐食が促進され、短期間
で、効率よく経時変化を再現できる。
Moisture is often not contained in the oxygen gas used in the step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire, and the amount of water contained in the high concentration of oxygen injected into the tire in this step is the water contained in the air. Less than. For this reason,
Deterioration due to moisture, for example, the influence on the deterioration due to moisture of the steel composition used for the rubber composition and the carcass ply of the tire decreases, and there is a possibility that the deterioration over time in actual use cannot be efficiently reproduced in a short period of time. . For this reason, in the tire deterioration promoting step, it is preferable to simultaneously fill the tire with more water than is contained in the air. This water content is preferably about 10 to 3000 cc per tire. If the amount of water added is less than 10 cc, a stable test is difficult, and if it exceeds 3000 cc, water easily leaks from the tire when the tire is assembled on the rim, which is not preferable. Corrosion of steel cords is promoted by adding an appropriate amount of water, and changes over time can be efficiently reproduced in a short period of time.

【0022】[0022]

【実施例】以下に本発明の試験方法について、実施例を
挙げて詳細に説明するが本発明はこれらの実施例に制限
されるものではない。試験用タイヤ 試験用タイヤとしてスチールラジアルタイヤ185SR
14サイズ(以下、PSRと称する)及び、スチールラ
ジアルタイヤ12R22.5サイズ(以下、TBRと称
する)を準備した。劣化促進工程 それぞれのタイヤの規格最大空気圧をPM〔kgf/c
2 〕とし、リム組みしたタイヤに、下記表1の充填圧
PT〔kgf/cm2 〕、酸素濃度x〔%〕となるよう
に酸素を充填・調整し、恒温室にて保存した。条件を表
1に示すが、表中、t〔℃〕は上記のリム組みしたタイ
ヤを保存した恒温室の温度、L〔days〕は 恒温室
に保存した期間を表す。実耐久性試験工程 実耐久性試験については、(A)酸素による劣化促進工
程→酸素排出→空気注入→実耐久性試験工程、(B)酸
素による劣化促進工程→酸素注入状態のまま実耐久性試
験工程、(C)酸素による第1の劣化促進工程→酸素排
出→空気注入→第1の実耐久性試験→空気排出→酸素注
入→第2の劣化促進工程→酸素排出→空気注入→第2の
実耐久性試験工程、のいずれを採用したかを下記表1に
示す。また、この結果はドラムライフとして表1に示
す。クラックの発生状況が実使用におけるものに近いも
の程、ドラムライフが低い傾向が見られる。実使用との比較評価 前記のPSRタイヤ及びTBRタイヤを、通常の条件に
て2〜4年間実使用したもの(一日1〜6時間走行、平
均速度40km/hr)について内部の劣化の状態を、
ゴムの弾力性の低下、クラックの発生状況、スチールコ
ードの劣化状況の各項目について評価した。これらと、
前記各実施例、比較例との異同を下記基準に従って専門
パネラー5名により評価した。結果を表1に示した。
EXAMPLES The test method of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited to these examples. Test tire Steel radial tire 185SR as a test tire
14 sizes (hereinafter referred to as PSR) and steel radial tires 12R22.5 sizes (hereinafter referred to as TBR) were prepared. Deterioration acceleration process The standard maximum air pressure of each tire is PM [kgf / c
m 2 ], and the rim-assembled tire was filled and adjusted with oxygen so that the filling pressure PT [kgf / cm 2 ] and the oxygen concentration x [%] in Table 1 below were obtained, and the tire was stored in a temperature-controlled room. The conditions are shown in Table 1. In the table, t [° C.] represents the temperature of the temperature-controlled room in which the tire with the above-mentioned rim is stored, and L [days] represents the period of storage in the temperature-controlled room. Actual durability test process For the actual durability test, (A) Degradation acceleration process by oxygen → Oxygen discharge → Air injection → Actual durability test process, (B) Degradation acceleration process by oxygen → Actual durability in the oxygen injection state Test process, (C) first deterioration promoting process by oxygen → oxygen discharge → air injection → first actual durability test → air discharge → oxygen injection → second deterioration promoting process → oxygen discharge → air injection → second Table 1 below shows which of the actual durability test steps was adopted. The results are shown in Table 1 as drum life. The closer the cracks are to those in actual use, the shorter the drum life is. Comparative evaluation with actual use The above-mentioned PSR tire and TBR tire were actually used under normal conditions for 2 to 4 years (running for 1 to 6 hours a day, average speed 40 km / hr) to determine the state of internal deterioration. ,
Each item of deterioration of rubber elasticity, occurrence of cracks and deterioration of steel cord was evaluated. With these,
Differences between the above-mentioned Examples and Comparative Examples were evaluated by 5 expert panelists according to the following criteria. The results are shown in Table 1.

【0023】 〇:実使用タイヤの状態と極めて類似している。 △:実使用タイヤの状態と若干相違する。◯: It is very similar to the state of the actually used tire. Δ: Slightly different from the state of the actually used tire.

【0024】 ×:実使用タイヤの状態とまったく相違する。 (実施例1)PSRタイヤの規格最大空気圧を2.4
(kgf/cm2 )とし、充填後の充填気体の全圧を
2.4(kgf/cm2 )として高濃度酸素をx=40
となる条件でタイヤ内に注入し、60℃の恒温室に14
日間放置した。その後、タイヤ内に高濃度酸素を充填し
たまま、内圧を調製して、荷重:規格最大荷重×1.
2、ドラム走行速度:90km/hrの条件にて、室内
ドラム耐久試験にて実耐久性試験を行った〔試験
(B)〕。下記比較例1におけるドラムライフを100
として、ドラムライフの指数表示を行った。結果を表1
に示す。
X: completely different from the condition of the tire actually used. (Example 1) The standard maximum air pressure of the PSR tire is 2.4.
(Kgf / cm 2 ), the total pressure of the filled gas after filling is 2.4 (kgf / cm 2 ), and the high concentration oxygen is x = 40.
It is injected into the tire under the conditions that
Left for days. After that, the internal pressure was adjusted while the tire was filled with high-concentration oxygen, and the load was: standard maximum load × 1.
2. Under the condition of drum running speed: 90 km / hr, an actual durability test was conducted by an indoor drum durability test [test (B)]. 100 drum life in Comparative Example 1 below
As an index of drum life was displayed. Table 1 shows the results
Shown in

【0025】(比較例1)PSRタイヤの規格最大空気
圧を2.4(kgf/cm2 )とし、高濃度酸素による
劣化促進工程を経ずに、タイヤに空気を充填したまま、
実施例1と同様の条件で実耐久性試験を行った。本比較
例1におけるドラムライフを100として、結果を表1
に示す。
(Comparative Example 1) The standard maximum air pressure of a PSR tire was set to 2.4 (kgf / cm 2 ), and the tire was filled with air without undergoing a deterioration promoting step due to high concentration oxygen.
An actual durability test was conducted under the same conditions as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 1 with the drum life in Comparative Example 1 set to 100.
Shown in

【0026】(比較例2)PSRタイヤの規格最大空気
圧を2.4(kgf/cm2 )とし、高濃度酸素ではな
く、空気(酸素濃度はx=21にあたる)を注入し、6
0℃の恒温室に14日間保存した後、実施例1と同様の
条件で実耐久性試験を行った。比較例1におけるドラム
ライフを100として、ドラムライフの指数表示を行っ
た。結果を表1に示す。
(Comparative Example 2) The standard maximum air pressure of a PSR tire was set to 2.4 (kgf / cm 2 ), and air (oxygen concentration corresponds to x = 21) was injected instead of high concentration oxygen, and 6
After storing in a thermostatic chamber at 0 ° C. for 14 days, an actual durability test was conducted under the same conditions as in Example 1. The drum life in Comparative Example 1 was set to 100, and the drum life index was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0027】(実施例2)PSRタイヤの充填後の充填
気体の全圧を4.8(kgf/cm2 )とした他は、実
施例1と同様の条件で、劣化促進工程を経て、実耐久性
試験を行った〔試験(B)〕。比較例1におけるドラム
ライフを100として、ドラムライフの指数表示を行っ
た。結果を表1に示す。
(Example 2) Except that the total pressure of the filled gas after filling the PSR tire was set to 4.8 (kgf / cm 2 ), the deterioration acceleration process was conducted under the same conditions as in Example 1 A durability test was conducted [test (B)]. The drum life in Comparative Example 1 was set to 100, and the drum life index was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0028】(実施例3)PSRタイヤに高濃度酸素を
x=76となる条件でタイヤ内に注入して劣化促進工程
を行った他は、実施例1と同様の条件で実耐久性試験を
行った〔試験(B)〕。比較例1におけるドラムライフ
を100として、ドラムライフの指数表示を行った。結
果を表1に示す。
(Example 3) An actual durability test was conducted under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that high concentration oxygen was injected into the PSR tire under the condition of x = 76 to carry out the deterioration promoting step. Conducted [Test (B)]. The drum life in Comparative Example 1 was set to 100, and the drum life index was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0029】(実施例4)PSRタイヤを保存する恒温
室の温度が40℃である他は、実施例3と同様の条件
で、劣化促進工程を経て、実耐久性試験を行った〔試験
(B)〕。比較例1におけるドラムライフを100とし
て、ドラムライフの指数表示を行った。結果を表1に示
す。
(Example 4) An actual durability test was conducted through a deterioration promoting step under the same conditions as in Example 3 except that the temperature of the temperature-controlled room for storing the PSR tire was 40 ° C [test (test ( B)]. The drum life in Comparative Example 1 was set to 100, and the drum life index was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0030】(実施例5)PSRタイヤを保存する恒温
室の温度が20℃である他は、実施例1と同様の条件
で、劣化促進工程を経て、実耐久性試験を行った〔試験
(B)〕。比較例1におけるドラムライフを100とし
て、ドラムライフの指数表示を行った。結果を表1に示
す。
(Example 5) An actual durability test was conducted through a deterioration promoting process under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that the temperature of the temperature-controlled room for storing the PSR tire was 20 ° C [test (test ( B)]. The drum life in Comparative Example 1 was set to 100, and the drum life index was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0031】(実施例6)TBRタイヤの規格最大空気
圧を8.0(kgf/cm2 )とし、充填後の充填気体
の全圧を8.0(kgf/cm2 )として高濃度酸素を
x=80となる条件でタイヤ内に注入し、80℃の恒温
室に3日間放置した。その後、タイヤから酸素を排出
し、空気を充填した他は実施例1と同様にして、実耐久
性試験を行った〔試験(A)〕。下記比較例3における
ドラムライフを100として、ドラムライフの指数表示
を行った。結果を表1に示す。
(Embodiment 6) The standard maximum air pressure of a TBR tire is set to 8.0 (kgf / cm 2 ), the total pressure of the filled gas after filling is set to 8.0 (kgf / cm 2 ), and high concentration oxygen is set to x. It was injected into the tire under the condition of = 80 and left in a thermostatic chamber at 80 ° C for 3 days. Then, an actual durability test was conducted in the same manner as in Example 1 except that oxygen was discharged from the tire and air was filled therein (test (A)). The drum life in Comparative Example 3 below was set to 100, and the index of the drum life was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0032】(比較例3)TBRタイヤの規格最大空気
圧を8.0(kgf/cm2 )とし、高濃度酸素による
劣化促進工程を経ずに、比較例1と同様の条件で実耐久
性試験を行った。本比較例3におけるドラムライフを1
00として、結果を表1に示す。
(Comparative Example 3) A TBR tire having a standard maximum air pressure of 8.0 (kgf / cm 2 ) was subjected to an actual durability test under the same conditions as in Comparative Example 1 without passing through a deterioration promoting step due to high concentration oxygen. I went. The drum life in this Comparative Example 3 is 1
The results are shown in Table 1 as 00.

【0033】(比較例4)TBRタイヤにおいて、高濃
度酸素ではなく、空気(酸素濃度はx=21にあたる)
を注入し、80℃の恒温室に12時間(0.5日間)保
存した後、実施例6と同様の条件で実耐久性試験を行っ
た。比較例3におけるドラムライフを100として、ド
ラムライフの指数表示を行った。結果を表1に示す。
(Comparative Example 4) In a TBR tire, not high concentration oxygen but air (oxygen concentration is x = 21)
Was injected and stored in a thermostatic chamber at 80 ° C. for 12 hours (0.5 days), and then an actual durability test was conducted under the same conditions as in Example 6. The drum life in Comparative Example 3 was set to 100, and the drum life index was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0034】(実施例7)TBRタイヤにおいて、恒温
室での放置期間を14日間とした他は、実施例6と同様
の条件で実耐久性試験を行った〔試験(A)〕。比較例
3におけるドラムライフを100として、ドラムライフ
の指数表示を行った。結果を表1に示す。
(Example 7) A TBR tire was subjected to an actual durability test under the same conditions as in Example 6 except that the period of standing in a temperature-controlled room was 14 days [Test (A)]. The drum life in Comparative Example 3 was set to 100, and the drum life index was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0035】(実施例8)TBRタイヤにおいて、リム
組み時にタイヤ内に気体とともに300ccの水を注入
し、恒温室での放置期間を14日間とした他は、実施例
7と同様の条件で実耐久性試験を行った〔試験
(A)〕。比較例3におけるドラムライフを100とし
て、ドラムライフの指数表示を行った。結果を表1に示
す。
(Embodiment 8) In a TBR tire, under the same conditions as in Embodiment 7, except that 300 cc of water was injected together with gas into the tire at the time of assembling the rim, and the period of standing in a temperature-controlled room was 14 days. A durability test was conducted [Test (A)]. The drum life in Comparative Example 3 was set to 100, and the drum life index was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0036】(実施例9)TBRタイヤにおいて、劣化
促進工程を実施例6と同様の条件で行った。次いで、酸
素をタイヤから排出し、空気を注入した。第1次実耐久
性試験は、実施例6と同様の条件で、比較例3のドラム
ライフ100に対し、指数30に相当する走行時間行っ
た。次いで、空気を排出した後、先の劣化促進工程と同
様の条件でタイヤに高濃度酸素を注入し、第2次劣化促
進工程を実施し、酸素をタイヤから排出し、空気を注入
して実施例6と同様の条件で第2次実耐久性試験を行っ
た〔試験(C)〕。比較例3におけるドラムライフを1
00として、第2次実耐久性試験におけるドラムライフ
の指数表示を行った。結果を表1に示す。
(Example 9) A TBR tire was subjected to a deterioration promoting step under the same conditions as in Example 6. The oxygen was then evacuated from the tire and air was infused. The first actual durability test was performed under the same conditions as in Example 6 with respect to the drum life 100 of Comparative Example 3 for a running time corresponding to an index of 30. Next, after exhausting air, inject high concentration oxygen into the tire under the same conditions as the previous deterioration promoting step, carry out secondary deterioration promoting step, discharge oxygen from the tire and inject air A second actual durability test was conducted under the same conditions as in Example 6 [Test (C)]. 1 drum life in Comparative Example 3
As 00, the index of the drum life in the second actual durability test was displayed. Table 1 shows the results.

【0037】[0037]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0038】本発明の酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程
を含む実施例1〜9の空気入りタイヤの試験方法によれ
ば、短期間で実使用タイヤの経時劣化状態と極めて類似
した結果が得られることがわかった。特に、タイヤ内に
水を封入した実施例8においては、タイヤのゴム組成物
のみならず、タイヤコードの劣化状態も実使用に極めて
類似していることが確認された。また、劣化促進工程と
実耐久性試験をそれぞれ2回繰り返す実施例9は、極め
て短期間で再生タイヤにおける経時劣化状態を再現しう
ることがわかった。一方、高濃度の酸素による劣化促進
工程を経なかった各比較例は、実使用タイヤの状態と大
きく異なっており、実使用の経時劣化を適切に再現した
耐久性評価を行えないことが確認された。
According to the pneumatic tire testing method of Examples 1 to 9 including the step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire by oxygen of the present invention, it is possible to obtain a result very similar to the deteriorated state of an actual tire in a short period of time. I understood. In particular, in Example 8 in which water was enclosed in the tire, it was confirmed that not only the rubber composition of the tire but also the deteriorated state of the tire cord was very similar to actual use. Further, it was found that Example 9 in which the deterioration promoting step and the actual durability test are repeated twice each can reproduce the deterioration state over time in the recycled tire in an extremely short period of time. On the other hand, each comparative example that did not go through the deterioration promoting step due to high concentration of oxygen is significantly different from the state of the tire actually used, and it was confirmed that the durability evaluation that appropriately reproduces the deterioration with time in actual use cannot be performed. It was

【0039】[0039]

【発明の効果】本発明の空気入りタイヤの耐久試験方法
によれば、実使用における経年劣化を再現しうる、即
ち、経年劣化における耐久性評価を適切に、効率よく行
うことができるという、優れた効果を奏する。
According to the durability test method of the pneumatic tire of the present invention, aging deterioration in actual use can be reproduced, that is, durability evaluation in aging deterioration can be appropriately and efficiently performed, which is excellent. Produce the effect.

Claims (8)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 空気入りタイヤの耐久試験工程におい
て、 下記式(I)で表される酸素濃度xを30以上とした高
濃度の酸素をタイヤ内に注入し、酸素によるタイヤの劣
化を促進させる工程を含むことを特徴とする空気入りタ
イヤの耐久試験方法。 式(I) x=(PO/PT)×100(%) 〔式中、PTは、充填後の充填気体の全圧(kgf/c
2 )を、POは、該全圧に対する酸素の分圧(kgf
/cm2 )を表す。〕
1. In a pneumatic tire durability test process, a high concentration of oxygen having an oxygen concentration x represented by the following formula (I) of 30 or more is injected into the tire to accelerate deterioration of the tire due to oxygen. A pneumatic tire durability test method comprising the steps of: Formula (I) x = (PO / PT) × 100 (%) [In the formula, PT is the total pressure (kgf / c) of the filling gas after filling.
m 2 ), PO is the partial pressure of oxygen (kgf) with respect to the total pressure.
/ Cm 2 ). ]
【請求項2】 前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程
が、i)タイヤ内に酸素を注入する工程と、ii)該タイ
ヤを放置もしくは加熱する工程と、iii )酸素を排出す
る工程と、を含み、 且つ、該酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程が終了した
後、該タイヤに空気を注入し、負荷を掛けて実耐久試験
工程を行うこと、 を特徴とする請求項1に記載の空気入りタイヤの耐久試
験方法。
2. The step of promoting deterioration of a tire by oxygen includes i) injecting oxygen into the tire, ii) leaving or heating the tire, and iii) discharging oxygen. And, after the step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire due to the oxygen is completed, injecting air into the tire and applying a load to perform an actual durability test step, the pneumatic tire according to claim 1, Durability test method.
【請求項3】 前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程
が、i)タイヤ内に酸素を注入する工程と、ii)該タイ
ヤを放置もしくは加熱する工程と、を含み、 且つ、該酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程が終了した
後、該タイヤに高濃度の酸素を注入した状態において、
負荷を掛けて実耐久試験工程を行うこと、 を特徴とする請求項1に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。
3. The step of accelerating deterioration of a tire due to oxygen includes i) the step of injecting oxygen into the tire, and ii) the step of leaving or heating the tire, and the deterioration of the tire due to the oxygen. After the acceleration step is completed, in a state where high concentration oxygen is injected into the tire,
The tire durability test method according to claim 1, wherein an actual durability test process is performed by applying a load.
【請求項4】 前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程に
おける前記式(I)で表される酸素濃度xが、30以上
60以下であること、 を特徴とする請求項3に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。
4. The tire durability test method according to claim 3, wherein the oxygen concentration x represented by the formula (I) in the step of accelerating deterioration of the tire due to oxygen is 30 or more and 60 or less. .
【請求項5】 空気入りタイヤの耐久試験工程におい
て、 i)下記式(I)で表される酸素濃度xを30以上とし
た高濃度の酸素をタイヤ内に注入する工程と、ii)該タ
イヤを放置もしくは加熱する工程と、iii )酸素を排出
する工程と、を含む酸素による劣化促進工程を行い、 しかる後、該タイヤに空気を注入し、負荷を掛けて実耐
久試験工程を行い、 その後、該タイヤから空気を排出し、そこにi)前記高
濃度の酸素を注入する工程と、ii)該タイヤを放置もし
くは加熱する工程と、iii )酸素を排出する工程と、を
含む酸素による第2次劣化促進工程を行い、 、しかる後、該タイヤに空気を注入し、負荷を掛けて第
2次実耐久試験工程を行うこと、 を特徴とするタイヤの耐久試験方法。 式(I) x=(PO/PT)×100(%) 〔式中、PTは、充填後の充填気体の全圧(kgf/c
2 )を、POは、該全圧に対する酸素の分圧(kgf
/cm2 )を表す。〕
5. In a durability test process of a pneumatic tire, i) a step of injecting a high-concentration oxygen having an oxygen concentration x represented by the following formula (I) of 30 or more into the tire, and ii) the tire A step of leaving or heating the tire, and a step of iii) discharging oxygen to accelerate deterioration by oxygen, and then inject air into the tire and apply a load to perform an actual durability test step. A step of exhausting air from the tire and injecting the high concentration of oxygen into the air; ii) leaving or heating the tire; and iii) exhausting oxygen. Performing a secondary deterioration accelerating step, and then injecting air into the tire and applying a load to perform a secondary actual durability test step. Formula (I) x = (PO / PT) × 100 (%) [In the formula, PT is the total pressure (kgf / c) of the filling gas after filling.
m 2 ), PO is the partial pressure of oxygen (kgf) with respect to the total pressure.
/ Cm 2 ). ]
【請求項6】 前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程に
おける一部又は全部の工程が、20℃〜120℃の温度
範囲で行われることを特徴とする請求項1乃至4に記載
のタイヤ耐久試験方法。
6. The tire durability test method according to claim 1, wherein some or all of the steps of promoting deterioration of the tire by oxygen are performed in a temperature range of 20 ° C. to 120 ° C. .
【請求項7】 前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程に
おけるii)該タイヤを放置もしくは加熱する工程が、少
なくとも24時間行われることを特徴とする請求項2乃
至4に記載のタイヤ耐久試験方法。
7. The tire durability test method according to claim 2, wherein ii) the step of leaving or heating the tire in the step of promoting deterioration of the tire due to oxygen is performed for at least 24 hours.
【請求項8】 前記酸素によるタイヤの劣化促進工程
が、タイヤに10〜3000ccの水を封入した状態で
行われることを特徴とする請求項1乃至4に記載のタイ
ヤの耐久試験方法。
8. The tire durability test method according to claim 1, wherein the step of accelerating the deterioration of the tire due to oxygen is performed in a state where the tire is filled with 10 to 3000 cc of water.
JP22561096A 1995-09-07 1996-08-27 Durability test method for pneumatic tires Expired - Lifetime JP3373737B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP22561096A JP3373737B2 (en) 1995-09-07 1996-08-27 Durability test method for pneumatic tires

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP22998995 1995-09-07
JP7-229989 1995-09-07
JP22561096A JP3373737B2 (en) 1995-09-07 1996-08-27 Durability test method for pneumatic tires

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002300963A Division JP3497502B2 (en) 1995-09-07 2002-10-15 Durability test method for pneumatic tires

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH09133611A true JPH09133611A (en) 1997-05-20
JP3373737B2 JP3373737B2 (en) 2003-02-04

Family

ID=26526731

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP22561096A Expired - Lifetime JP3373737B2 (en) 1995-09-07 1996-08-27 Durability test method for pneumatic tires

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3373737B2 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003262568A (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-19 Bridgestone Corp Durability test method for tire
JP2006084290A (en) * 2004-09-15 2006-03-30 Bridgestone Corp Degradation promotion testing method
JP2006170693A (en) * 2004-12-14 2006-06-29 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Tire endurance test method
JP2006337100A (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-12-14 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Durability testing method for tire
JP2006349641A (en) * 2005-06-20 2006-12-28 Bridgestone Corp Deterioration testing method of tire component and deterioration testing device of tire component
JP2007132694A (en) * 2005-11-08 2007-05-31 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Thermal degradation evaluating/testing method of pneumatic tire
JP2012181072A (en) * 2011-02-28 2012-09-20 Bridgestone Corp Test device and test method for pneumatic tire
JP2013088309A (en) * 2011-10-19 2013-05-13 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Method for evaluating tire performance
JP2013134159A (en) * 2011-12-27 2013-07-08 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Evaluation method of tire
JP2013178214A (en) * 2012-02-29 2013-09-09 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Tire testing method
JP2014041069A (en) * 2012-08-23 2014-03-06 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Evaluation method of product
JP2015090329A (en) * 2013-11-07 2015-05-11 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Test method for pneumatic tire
JP2018031742A (en) * 2016-08-26 2018-03-01 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Method for testing pneumatic tire
JP2018151255A (en) * 2017-03-13 2018-09-27 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Test method of tire durability

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003262568A (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-19 Bridgestone Corp Durability test method for tire
JP2006084290A (en) * 2004-09-15 2006-03-30 Bridgestone Corp Degradation promotion testing method
JP2006170693A (en) * 2004-12-14 2006-06-29 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Tire endurance test method
JP2006337100A (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-12-14 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Durability testing method for tire
JP2006349641A (en) * 2005-06-20 2006-12-28 Bridgestone Corp Deterioration testing method of tire component and deterioration testing device of tire component
JP2007132694A (en) * 2005-11-08 2007-05-31 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Thermal degradation evaluating/testing method of pneumatic tire
JP2012181072A (en) * 2011-02-28 2012-09-20 Bridgestone Corp Test device and test method for pneumatic tire
JP2013088309A (en) * 2011-10-19 2013-05-13 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Method for evaluating tire performance
JP2013134159A (en) * 2011-12-27 2013-07-08 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Evaluation method of tire
JP2013178214A (en) * 2012-02-29 2013-09-09 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Tire testing method
JP2014041069A (en) * 2012-08-23 2014-03-06 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Evaluation method of product
JP2015090329A (en) * 2013-11-07 2015-05-11 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Test method for pneumatic tire
JP2018031742A (en) * 2016-08-26 2018-03-01 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Method for testing pneumatic tire
JP2018151255A (en) * 2017-03-13 2018-09-27 住友ゴム工業株式会社 Test method of tire durability

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3373737B2 (en) 2003-02-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3373737B2 (en) Durability test method for pneumatic tires
US8367260B2 (en) Remedial start method in a fuel cell
US4895610A (en) Self-sealing pneumatic tire and method of manufacturing the same
JP3497502B2 (en) Durability test method for pneumatic tires
JP5746198B2 (en) Method for detecting the sealing state of a fuel cell
US4137206A (en) Tire protection composition
JPWO2005005546A1 (en) Rubber composition and pneumatic tire using the same
CN108571362A (en) Detect the method and system of the oxygen sensor deterioration caused by deflating due to sealant
JP4743754B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP4687344B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP4710500B2 (en) Tire durability test method
US6119513A (en) Method for endurance testing of pneumatic tires
US11179667B2 (en) Method for the treatment of air of a compressed air system
JP4496945B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP2006349641A (en) Deterioration testing method of tire component and deterioration testing device of tire component
JP2008203145A (en) Durability test method of pneumatic tire
JP5698514B2 (en) Tire deterioration promotion method
JP4369836B2 (en) Degradation acceleration test method
JP4622608B2 (en) Tire durability test method
JP3129657B2 (en) Rubber composition for sidewall
JP2003072329A (en) Pneumatic tire and its manufacturing method
JP2005241369A (en) Tire testing method
JPH09216968A (en) Adhesive rubber composition
KR100227568B1 (en) A rubber composition for inner liner of tire
JPH10258603A (en) Pneumatic radial tire

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071122

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081122

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091122

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091122

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101122

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111122

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121122

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121122

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131122

Year of fee payment: 11

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term