EP3535739B2 - Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant - Google Patents

Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3535739B2
EP3535739B2 EP17798229.5A EP17798229A EP3535739B2 EP 3535739 B2 EP3535739 B2 EP 3535739B2 EP 17798229 A EP17798229 A EP 17798229A EP 3535739 B2 EP3535739 B2 EP 3535739B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fitting arrangement
leaf
distance
state
securing apparatus
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP17798229.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3535739A1 (fr
EP3535739B1 (fr
Inventor
Jörg Hofmann
Gerd Truß
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Maco Technologie GmbH
Original Assignee
Maco Technologie GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=60331630&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP3535739(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Maco Technologie GmbH filed Critical Maco Technologie GmbH
Priority to PL17798229.5T priority Critical patent/PL3535739T5/pl
Publication of EP3535739A1 publication Critical patent/EP3535739A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3535739B1 publication Critical patent/EP3535739B1/fr
Publication of EP3535739B2 publication Critical patent/EP3535739B2/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
    • G08B13/08—Mechanical actuation by opening, e.g. of door, of window, of drawer, of shutter, of curtain, of blind
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/18—Prevention or correction of operating errors
    • G08B29/185—Signal analysis techniques for reducing or preventing false alarms or for enhancing the reliability of the system
    • G08B29/188—Data fusion; cooperative systems, e.g. voting among different detectors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
    • G08B25/008—Alarm setting and unsetting, i.e. arming or disarming of the security system

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a security device for securing the sash of a window, a door or the like against unauthorized opening.
  • an alarm device can be provided for this purpose.
  • an alarm can comprise an optical and/or an acoustic signal which, in the event of an alarm, is emitted at the location or in the vicinity of the unauthorized opening in order to act as a deterrent and to draw widespread attention to the unauthorized opening.
  • an alarm can additionally or alternatively also include the transmission of an alarm signal to a remote entity, e.g. to the police and/or a security service.
  • provision can be made for suitable defensive measures to be initiated, preferably automatically, in response to the alarm.
  • a safety device for securing the wing is therefore advantageously designed to detect a respective state of the wing, wherein a closed state of the wing is to be distinguished from an open state of the wing.
  • the closed state and the open state are not necessarily set to specific positions of the leaf. Rather, the leaf can be in various positions in the closed state and in various other positions in the open state.
  • the closed state includes such positions of the leaf in which entry through the respective window or the respective door is not possible, and the open state such positions of the leaf in which entry is possible.
  • the closed state can include the fully closed position as well as all tilt-open positions of the sash, provided the latter do not allow easy entry through the respective window or door.
  • the open state can then include all other positions, ie in particular all rotationally open positions.
  • the tilted positions can, however, also be assigned to the open state.
  • the closed state can in particular only include the fully closed position of the leaf. If the safety device can be used to detect whether the wing is in the open state or in the closed state, opening can be recognized by the fact that the open state is detected after the closed state of the wing has been previously detected.
  • the safety device is designed to output a respective status signal as a function of the respective detected status of the wing.
  • a respective status signal can also depend on a detected respective status of the wing to the extent that it depends on a respective change in the status, for example by taking into account one or more previously detected respective statuses in addition to the respective last detected respective status of the wing.
  • the respective status signal can in particular be output to an alarm device which can then, for example, as explained above, trigger an alarm depending on the received status signal.
  • an alarm device is provided separately from the security device.
  • the alarm device may be provided at a central location within a building, particularly when the alarm device is a central unit of an alarm system.
  • the alarm device is an alarm siren, it may be advantageous to have a location from which the alarm can be heard from afar.
  • the alarm device is formed integrally with the safety device.
  • an alarm should not be triggered in all cases in which an opening of the wing is determined by means of the safety device based on the detected respective state of the wing. This is because not every opening of a window or door constitutes unauthorized opening. It is known for alarm devices that they can therefore be activated and deactivated selectively, in particular manually. This allows a detected opening of the leaf to trigger an alarm only when the alarm device is armed, i.e. activated. Consequently, by simply deactivating the alarm device, possibly also by deactivating the security device, it is possible to prevent regular opening from triggering an alarm. However, this assumes that the deactivation is not forgotten before opening the sash. Otherwise a false alarm will be triggered.
  • the safety device or a downstream alarm device e.g. for a permitted opening of the wing
  • the reliability of securing the wing is consequently also dependent on the attention of the respective user. Because the user when opening and closing the sash, also having to consider whether the safety device and/or the alarm device is activated and possibly activating or deactivating it, comfort is also compromised.
  • the WO 2005/066440 A1 and the EP 1 856 354 A2 each disclose a window handle in whose housing switching devices are provided, by means of which on the one hand the rotational position of the window handle and on the other hand the proximity of the sash to the frame and thus the state of the sash are detected.
  • WO 2012/054942 A1 discloses a monitoring arrangement for a window fitting that includes a magnetic sensor and causes activation of a signal transmitter or an alarm system when the window is opened despite the locking of the fitting.
  • the safety device is designed in particular to detect, in addition to the respective state of the sash, also a respective position of a fitting arrangement of the sash, which can be adjusted between an unlocked position and one or more locking positions, the sash being fully openable, in particular rotatable, when the Unlocking position of the fitting arrangement is present, and the wing is only partially open, for example, kippöffenbar, or locked against opening when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
  • the safety device can not only distinguish between the state of the wing between the open state and the closed state, but also, in particular, at the same time, or at least promptly, detect which position the fitting arrangement of the wing occupies.
  • the respective position of the fitting arrangement can then be used in particular as a criterion for whether a detected opening of the sash has taken place in a permissible or impermissible manner. Because if the hardware arrangement is in one of its locking positions, in which the sash cannot actually be opened completely, but an opening of the sash is detected based on a transition from the closed state to the open state, this can be taken as a clear indication that that the opening is not permitted, in particular by circumventing locking devices, e.g. the hardware arrangement. Conversely, by detecting the unlocked position of the fitting arrangement, impermissible opening of the wing can be ruled out, since the wing can be fully opened when the unlocked position is present.
  • the safety device is also designed to output the respective status signal not only as a function of the detected respective status of the leaf, but also as a function of the respective position of the fitting arrangement. If the respective position of the fitting arrangement and the respective state of the wing are not detected at the same time, the respective state signal is preferably dependent on the last detected state of the wing and the last detected position of the fitting arrangement. In this case, whether a respective status signal is output at all and/or the content of the respective status signal can depend in particular on the respective status of the leaf and/or the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the additional detection of the position of the fitting arrangement and its consideration in the output status signal can, in particular, make it unnecessary to activate or deactivate the safety device or an alarm device, which receives the status signal and optionally reacts to it. Because it no longer needs to be manually determined by activating or deactivating when opening the sash will trigger an alarm and when not. Instead, by moving the fitting arrangement into the unlocked position, the safety device or the alarm device can be deactivated automatically, as it were. Conversely, the safety device or the alarm device is automatically quasi-activated by moving the fitting arrangement into one of the locking positions. A real activation or deactivation does not have to take place at all. Because it can be sufficient to be able to distinguish between permissible and impermissible opening of the sash on the basis of the respective status signal.
  • the convenience of operating a sash of a window, door or the like secured with a safety device according to the invention is improved because when opening and closing the sash, the fitting arrangement only has to be actuated in the usual way, but not additionally activating or deactivating the safety device or the alarm device must be considered. Therefore, such an activation or deactivation cannot be forgotten either, so that false alarms can be avoided and the safety device or the alarm device can always remain active. In this way, the safety device contributes to an improved reliability of the safety of the wing.
  • the security device can in particular be designed to interact with known alarm devices or entire alarm systems, in particular to be in a communication connection at least in the transmission direction, so that respective status signals can be transmitted from the security device.
  • the signal is preferably transmitted by radio.
  • the security device can also be viewed as a sensor within a larger alarm system, which can include a large number of other sensors for detecting other parameters, in particular parameters relevant to security.
  • One or more common protocols can be supported for the communication connection in order to be flexibly compatible with different systems.
  • the respective status signal can be continuously output by the safety device.
  • the safety device outputs respective status signals discontinuously over time.
  • the status signal can be output at regular time intervals or according to a predefined or definable time pattern. Provision can also be made for the status signal to be output additionally or only if there has been any change in the status of the wing and/or the position of the fitting arrangement, or if there has been a change that corresponds to impermissible opening . Alternatively or additionally, provision can also be made for the status signal to be output when the security device receives an interrogation signal, e.g. from the alarm device.
  • a respective status signal is a raw signal, namely insofar as it simply contains the information about the recorded respective status of the wing and the recorded respective position of the fitting arrangement includes.
  • the safety device itself to evaluate the state of the leaf or the position of the fitting arrangement or whether the state or position or a change in state or position causes an alarm to be triggered.
  • the evaluation can be carried out downstream, for example in an alarm device, which receives the respective status signals from the safety device and uses the status signals to independently determine whether an alarm or other reaction is to be triggered or not.
  • the safety device independently determines whether the detected respective state of the sash and the detected respective position of the fitting arrangement indicate the existence of an irregular state, which would then have to be responded to in particular by means of an alarm.
  • the safety device can be designed to emit a specific signal in the event of a state evaluated as irregular and otherwise to emit no signal or a different specific signal, as will be explained further below.
  • the respective status signal therefore does not need to be further evaluated by a downstream device which receives the respective status signals, but it is sufficient if the respective status signal is reacted to in a suitable manner.
  • the safety device is designed to output the respective status signal continuously or repeatedly, in particular regularly.
  • the safety device is designed to output the respective status signal only when the leaf is in the open state. If the condition of the wing is not continuously recorded, the last recorded condition of the wing is decisive. In such an embodiment, no status signal is output when the wing is closed. This can be dispensable, since the sash cannot have been opened inadmissibly in any case as long as the sash is in the closed state.
  • the safety device is designed to only output the respective status signal when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present. In this embodiment, therefore, no status signal is output when the fitting arrangement is in the unlocked position. This can be dispensable, since the sash is in the unlocked position of the fitting arrangement not locked against a full opening anyway, so that no impermissible opening can take place.
  • a combination of the two above embodiments is particularly preferred, in which the safety device is designed to output the respective status signal only when the leaf is open and when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is also present present. Because if the fitting arrangement is in a locked position, the sash should actually not be able to be put into the open state. Therefore, if the open state of the wing is detected in a locking position of the fitting arrangement, this is an indication that the wing has been opened in an impermissible manner. Since in this embodiment the respective status signal is only output in this case, the status signal corresponds to an alarm signal which then does not need to be evaluated further. Because the fact that the status signal is sent at all is then already sufficient as an indication to determine that the sash was opened in an impermissible manner and, if necessary, to react to this with an alarm.
  • the security device is designed to output the respective status signal in response to a received query signal.
  • the respective status signal is only output when the security device has previously received an interrogation signal.
  • the sending of a respective status signal triggered by a query can also supplement the regular sending of respective status signals and/or the automatic sending of respective status signals, for example if respective status signals are otherwise sent when there is a change in the status of the wing and/or the position of the Hardware arrangement was recorded.
  • Such an external request for a status signal can be particularly useful in embodiments in which a respective status signal is otherwise only sent if an irregular status has been detected, i.e. if in particular the open status of the sash and at the same time one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement are present.
  • the absence of the status signal can therefore be interpreted as a sign that everything is in order.
  • a failure of the safety device could then result in an irregular state being incorrectly not recognized as such, since the respective state signal is absent, although it should have been sent.
  • an external device such as an alarm device, occasionally or regularly requests a respective status signal in order to check the functionality of the security device. If there is no status signal despite the query, a failure of the safety device can be identified.
  • the safety device itself does not have to be designed to use the detected state of the sash and the detected position of the fitting arrangement to evaluate whether a regular or an irregular state is present. Rather, it may be sufficient in these embodiments if the respective status signal that is output contains both items of information in such a way that a device receiving the respective status signal can carry out the evaluation.
  • security devices need not have any logic or logic that merely decides whether a respective status signal is sent at all.
  • an evaluation can also be carried out entirely or partially by the safety device itself.
  • a status signal output by the safety device can be a regular signal or an irregular signal, in particular only either a regular signal or an irregular signal, wherein preferably exactly one regular signal and exactly one irregular signal are provided.
  • the safety device can only emit two different signals at all. Which of these two signals is output as the respective status signal then depends on both the (most recently) detected status of the sash and the (most recently) detected position of the fitting arrangement. It may be the case, however, that the signal that is output cannot be used to unequivocally infer what the state of the sash is and what the position of the hardware arrangement is. This does not have to be necessary, since the safety device can already have evaluated whether this combination of the state of the sash and the position of the fitting arrangement corresponds to a regular or an irregular state.
  • the regular signal indicates that everything is in order, without it having to be clear from this what position the hardware arrangement is in or whether the sash is open or closed.
  • the irregular signal signals that an irregular condition is present, ie in particular that the wing has been opened impermissibly, again without it having to be evident from this in which position the fitting arrangement is located or whether the wing is open or closed.
  • the irregular signal can be evaluated as an alarm signal in response to which an alarm can be triggered by an alarm device, for example.
  • more than one regular signal and/or more than one irregular signal can be provided, one of which the safety device emits as a respective status signal.
  • two irregular signals can be distinguished, one of which is emitted when the sash is open and at the same time one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present, and which is therefore to be evaluated as an alarm signal, and the other of which is emitted when the battery level is low or a detected other existing or impending impairment of the safety device and which is consequently to be evaluated as an error signal.
  • the safety device is designed to output a regular signal, in particular only when the sash is in the closed state and/or the fitting arrangement is in the unlocked position.
  • a regular signal For the output of a regular signal, both conditions do not necessarily have to be met, since an impermissible opening of the sash can already be ruled out by one of the conditions. In principle, however, it can be provided that one or more additional conditions must be met for the output of a regular signal.
  • the safety device is designed to emit an irregular signal when the leaf is in the open state and one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
  • the safety device can be designed to emit an irregular signal only when the leaf is in the open state and one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present. In this way, in the case of an impermissible opening of the sash, in which case the fitting arrangement has not previously been placed in the unlocked position, an irregular signal is reliably output, to which a suitable response can then be made.
  • the safety device is designed to detect a position of a gear, a connecting rod or an element of the fitting arrangement arranged thereon in order to detect the position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the safety device can include a sensor or be designed as a sensor that is provided on the gear, which is typically effective between a handle and a connecting rod of the fitting arrangement to actuation of the handle to a displacement of the connecting rod and thus in particular to a displacement of Derive the locking pin provided for the connecting rod.
  • the position of the fitting arrangement can also be detected directly on the drive rod or on an element connected thereto for joint movement, such as the aforementioned locking pin.
  • the locking pin does not necessarily have to be a pin that also specifically interacts with a locking part to lock the leaf. Rather, the pin can also be designed in the manner of such a locking pin.
  • the safety device comprises at least one or more distance-dependent switching devices, in particular for the unlocking position and for each of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement, a distance-dependent switching device, in particular in the manner of a reed contact, in order to detect the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the movement of the respective elements of the fitting arrangement is typically narrowly limited and only possible in one dimension, ie only along a path (back and forth).
  • Distance-dependent switching devices can therefore be suitable for detecting the respective position of the fitting arrangement, which are arranged in particular along the said movement path of a respective element with which they interact.
  • a distance-dependent switching device is preferably arranged in such a way that the respective element cooperating with it moves relative to the switching device when there is a change in the position of the fitting arrangement to be detected.
  • Reed contacts are particularly suitable as distance-dependent switching devices, since they can be reliable, inexpensive, compact and robust. Instead of such magnetic switching devices, however, switching devices can also be provided whose distance dependency is based on a mechanical, electrical or other interaction.
  • the distance-dependent switching device can assume exactly two switching states, which can be described as closed or switched or as open or unswitched.
  • An individual distance-dependent device can therefore be limited to detecting whether or not the fitting arrangement is in a specific position (within the scope of the accuracy or range of the respective switching device).
  • a corresponding number of distance-dependent switching devices can be provided.
  • Distance-dependent switching devices can advantageously not only be used to detect the current position of the fitting arrangement, but also the current state of the wing.
  • at least one respective distance-dependent switching device is used to detect both the respective position of the fitting arrangement and the respective state of the wing, or at least to contribute in each case. This can be possible in particular by a suitable arrangement of the respective switching device.
  • the respective status signal depends, in particular exclusively, on the respective switching states of the distance-dependent switching devices and/or on a change in the respective switching states of the distance-dependent switching devices.
  • the safety device can have a comparatively low level of complexity.
  • every change in the state of the leaf or the position of the fitting arrangement leads to a change in the switching state of at least one distance-dependent switching device, so that it can be provided that an evaluation is carried out and/or a respective state signal is sent only when there is a change in a switching state.
  • the security device comprises a frame part for arrangement on the frame side, in particular in the rebate of the respective window or the respective door, wherein the frame part has the at least one distance-dependent switching device and is designed to interact with an element arranged on a connecting rod of the fitting arrangement, in particular a locking pin , to record the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the element arranged on the connecting rod is an element that is not specifically provided for the safety device, but would also otherwise be provided, such as a locking pin, it may be necessary to use the element for interaction with the distance-dependent switching device to be modified appropriately.
  • the element is not already permanently magnetic, it can be provided with a permanent magnet, which can interact with a switching device designed as a reed contact.
  • the safety device comprises a wing part, in particular a permanent magnet, which is designed to be arranged on the drive rod of the fitting arrangement or on an element arranged on it, in particular a locking pin, in order to interact with the at least one distance-dependent switching device , to record the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the safety device can be designed in such a way that it can easily be retrofitted to conventional windows or doors.
  • the frame part has several, in particular at least three, distance-dependent switching devices, the arrangement of which corresponds to the respective positions of the element arranged on the connecting rod, in particular the locking pin , corresponds, so that at least in the closed state of the wing, depending on the respective position of the fitting arrangement, a different one of the distance-dependent switching devices is switched and the others are not switched, or vice versa, and preferably also in the open state of the wing independently of the respective position of the fitting arrangement none or all distance-dependent switching devices are switched.
  • the safety device is designed as a locking part to be arranged on the frame side, into which a locking pin of the fitting arrangement engages in such a way that the sash is blocked from opening completely when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
  • the safety device then has a dual function. It not only serves to detect the respective status of the wing and the respective position of the fitting arrangement and the transmission of a corresponding respective status signal, but also contributes to the locking of the wing on the respective frame. In this respect, it can be provided instead of a conventional closing part. Then no additional locking pin or any other additional element for the interaction with the distance-dependent switching devices needs to be provided on the drive rod.
  • a locking pin provided anyway for engaging in a locking part for locking the sash, which under certain circumstances only has to be provided with a permanent magnet, can interact with the security device on the one hand as with a conventional locking part and on the other hand with the switching devices of the security device for detecting the respective position of the fitting arrangement interact.
  • the fitting arrangement according to the invention for a window, a door or the like comprises a safety device as described above, which is designed in particular according to one of the embodiments described above.
  • the advantages of such a fitting arrangement correspond in each case at least essentially to those of the respective safety device and also include that retrofitting a conventional fitting arrangement is not necessary in each case and that the safety device can be particularly well matched to the rest of the fitting arrangement.
  • a fitting arrangement which can be adjusted between an unlocked position and one or more locked positions, the sash being fully openable, in particular rotatable, when the unlocked position of the Fitting arrangement is present, and the wing is only partially evident, in particular kippöffenbar, or locked against opening when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
  • the method includes that a respective state of the wing, which can be in a closed state or in an open state, and a respective position of the fitting arrangement are detected and that depending on both the detected respective state of the wing and the detected respective Position of the fitting arrangement a respective status signal, in particular to an alarm device, is output.
  • In 1 is an embodiment of a safety device 11 according to the invention in a view from the side (in 1 above) and a view from above (in 1 shown below).
  • the security device 11 has a flat oblong shape that allows the security device 11 to be placed in the rebate between a frame 13 of a window or door and the sash of the window or door.
  • the securing device 11 can be attached in particular by screwing the securing device 11 to the window frame 13, which is shown in an example in 2 is shown, in which the frame 13 in cross section and the 1 shown embodiment of the safety device 11 from the front (this corresponds to 1 a viewing direction from left to right).
  • the safety device 11 has four bores 15, which are provided in a middle section 17 of the safety device 11, but in principle can also be provided in a different number at other respective locations.
  • a sensor section 19 provided at one end of the longitudinal extent of the safety device 11 is thinner than the middle section 17, in particular compared to the rest of the safety device 11, ie with a smaller height.
  • this sensor section 19 a total of three distance-dependent switching devices 21 are arranged in the form of a respective reed contact, which cannot be seen from the outside (cf. Figures 3 to 6 , in which the reed contacts are nevertheless shown, as if the housing of the fuse device 11 were transparent).
  • the distance-dependent switching devices 21 are connected to electronics that are arranged inside the safety device 11 , in particular in the central section 17 .
  • the electronics are designed to emit status signals by radio as a function of the respective switching states of the switching devices 21 or of changes in these switching states.
  • the safety device 11 can be designed in particular according to ISO/IEC 14543-3-10, so that the transmission of the respective status signals can in principle take place without a battery.
  • the safety device has a battery compartment 23 for accommodating batteries as a voltage source for the safety device 11 at the end of its longitudinal extent opposite the sensor section 19 .
  • the safety device 11 is made so thin that, as in FIG 2 shown in the fold between the frame 13 and an associated wing (not shown) can be attached to the frame 13. In this respect, the in 1 safety device 11 shown around a frame part. In the 2 The arrangement shown is purely exemplary. In principle, the safety device 11 can be arranged on different frames 13 with different cross sections, with spacers possibly having to be provided between individual bores 15 and the frame if the frame 13 does not offer a sufficiently wide area for arranging the safety device 11.
  • the safety device 11 is preferably arranged on the respective window frame 13 in such a way that the safety device 11 and a fitting arrangement 25 provided on the respective sash, in particular a connecting rod fitting, lie directly opposite one another when the sash is closed, i.e. are arranged in particular parallel to one another and essentially adjacent to one another.
  • the distance between the safety device 11 and the fitting arrangement 25 is then preferably such that a permanent magnet 27 provided on the fitting arrangement 25, ie on the wing, can interact with the distance-dependent switching devices 21.
  • the permanent magnet 27 represents a wing part of the safety device 11.
  • the offset is not necessarily parallel (as shown), but the safety device 11 and the fitting arrangement 25 can also be offset at an angle to one another, in particular when the sash is opened by turning. At least in the embodiment shown, only the state in which the wing as in FIGS Figures 3 and 5 is at least essentially completely closed. An offset, as in the Figures 4 and 6 is shown, however, corresponds to the open state of the wing.
  • FIGS. 3 to 6 differ Figures 3 to 6 with regard to the respective position of a pin 29 which is designed similarly to an ordinary locking pin and which has the permanent magnet 27 .
  • the pin 29 can in principle also itself be designed to be permanently magnetic, at least in certain areas, in particular in a head area.
  • the pin 29 is fastened to a drive rod 31 of the fitting arrangement 25 so that it follows movements of the drive rod 31 .
  • the connecting rod 31 is largely concealed by a faceplate 33 of the fitting assembly 25 which has an elongated hole 35 through which the pin 29 extends so that the pin 29 can move longitudinally in the elongated hole 35 when the fitting assembly is adjusted.
  • the fitting arrangement 25 shown has three defined positions, each of which corresponds to a position of the pin 29 in the slot 35 .
  • the fitting arrangement 25 assumes a rotary opening position, which is an unlocking position in that the sash can be fully opened in a rotary manner when the fitting arrangement 25 is in the rotary opening position.
  • the pin 29 is there within the slot 35 in the in the Figures 3 and 4 middle position shown.
  • the fitting assembly 25 assumes a closed position, which is a locking position of the fitting assembly 25, since the wing is blocked in this position of the fitting assembly 25 in a conventional manner by the fitting assembly 25 against opening.
  • the pin 29 is located within the slot 35 in the Figures 5 and 6 shown right position.
  • the pin 29 is located within the slot 35 on the left.
  • This position of the fitting arrangement 25 is a tilt opening position in which the sash can be tilted open a defined gap to a limited extent. Since in this position a complete opening of the sash is nevertheless prevented, this position is defined as a further locking position of the fitting arrangement 25. In principle, however, the tilting opening position could also be regarded as an unlocking position.
  • the respective switching state of the individual switching devices 21 is indicated by a respective symbol, with a cross (x) representing the open switching state and a circle (o) representing the closed switching state of the respective switching device 21.
  • the open state of the leaf can therefore be detected.
  • the open state can, if necessary, be differentiated from an intermediate position of the fitting arrangement 25, in which likewise none of the switching devices 21 can be switched, in that in the open state all switching devices 21 are open for longer than a certain minimum duration, since the intermediate positions of the fitting arrangement 25 are usually only when the fitting arrangement 25 is adjusted and are therefore only used temporarily for a short period of time.
  • the safety device 11 could output the detected switching statuses of the respective distance-dependent switching devices 21 exclusively, at least essentially unchanged, i.e. merely combined with one another and/or encoded in some way, as a respective status signal, which is then received by an external device, e.g. an alarm device, and can be evaluated to determine whether a regular or an irregular state is present. According to the invention, however, such an evaluation already takes place in the safety device 11.
  • the safety device 11 therefore outputs a regular signal or an irregular signal as the respective status signal, from which it can be recognized without further evaluation whether a regular or an irregular status is present.
  • a regular condition is in particular in the 4 shown.
  • the fitting arrangement 25 is in the unlocked position and the wing is in the open state. This is permissible because the wing is released in the unlocked position of the fitting assembly 25 for full opening.
  • the 6 shows an example of an irregular state. Because the wing is in the open state, although the fitting arrangement 25 is in a locked state in which the wing should not open. This can be interpreted as an indication of unauthorized opening, eg the sash being prized open. (Even in the tilt-open position of the fitting arrangement 25, not shown, a detected open state can be regarded as irregular if the safety device is attached to the window frame 13 on the side of the tilt axis, where the sash should not move away from the window frame 13 when tilted open.)
  • the switching states in the in the 4 are no different from those in the state shown in FIG 6 . shown condition.
  • the position of the fitting arrangement 25 In order to be able to distinguish between a regular and an irregular state on the basis of the switching states, the position of the fitting arrangement 25 must therefore be taken into account, which was present at the moment when a transition from the closed state to the open state of the sash was detected. If, for example, a change in the switching states of the in the 3 shown switching states of the switching devices 21 to the in the 4 detected switching states shown, it can be deduced that the wing has passed into the open state when the fitting assembly 25 took the unlocked position, which is permissible.
  • a change in the switching states of the in the figure 5 shown switching states of the switching devices 21 to the in the 6 Switching states shown represent a transition that is not permitted because in the in the figure 5 adopted locking position of the fitting assembly 25 a transition into the in the 6 shown open position of the wing should be locked.
  • a security device 11 according to the invention can be arranged in a simple manner on existing windows, doors or the like and also integrated into existing alarm systems and enables reliable detection of the respective regular or irregular states.
  • the safety device 11 also has the advantage of improved convenience, since the additional detection of the respective state of the sash automatically distinguishes between permissible opening and impermissible opening of the sash can be.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)

Claims (13)

  1. Dispositif de sécurisation (11) destiné à sécuriser le battant d'une fenêtre, d'une porte ou similaire à l'encontre d'une ouverture non autorisée,
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) étant réalisé pour :
    - détecter un état respectif du battant qui peut être dans un état fermé ou dans un état ouvert ;
    - détecter une position respective d'un ensemble de ferrure (25) du battant, qui peut être déplacé entre une position de déverrouillage et une ou plusieurs positions de verrouillage, le battant pouvant être entièrement ouvert, en particulier par rotation, lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans la position de déverrouillage, et le battant pouvant être ouvert seulement de façon restreinte, en particulier par basculement, ou étant bloqué à l'encontre d'une ouverture, lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage de; et
    - émettre un signal d'état respectif, en particulier à un dispositif d'alarme, en fonction de l'état respectif détecté du battant et en supplément en fonction de la position respective détectée de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    dans lequel
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend au moins un ou plusieurs dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance, en particulier respectivement un dispositif de commutation respectif (21) dépendant de la distance pour la position de déverrouillage et pour chacune des positions de verrouillage de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), réalisé en particulier à la manière d'un contact Reed, afin de détecter la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend une partie de cadre pour l'agencement du côté cadre, qui comprend ledit au moins un dispositif de commutation (21) dépendant de la distance et qui est réalisée pour coopérer avec un élément (29), en particulier avec un tenon de fermeture, disposé sur une crémone (31) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), afin de détecter la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    l'un au moins des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance est utilisé pour détecter ou en tout cas pour contribuer à détecter aussi bien la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) que l'état respectif du battant ;
    un signal d'état émis par le dispositif de sécurisation (11) peut être un signal régulier ou un signal irrégulier ; et
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre un signal irrégulier lorsque le battant est dans l'état ouvert et que l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage.
  2. Dispositif de sécurisation selon la revendication 1,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif de manière progressive ou répétée, en particulier de manière régulière.
  3. Dispositif de sécurisation selon la revendication 1,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif uniquement lorsque le battant est dans l'état ouvert.
  4. Dispositif de sécurisation selon la revendication 1 ou 3,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif uniquement lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage.
  5. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif en réponse à un signal d'interrogation reçu.
  6. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre un signal régulier, en particulier uniquement lorsque le battant est dans l'état fermé et/ou lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans la position de déverrouillage.
  7. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel, en vue de détecter la position de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour détecter une position d'un engrenage, d'une crémone (31) ou de l'élément (29) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) disposé sur celui-ci/celle-ci.
  8. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le signal d'état respectif dépend, en particulier exclusivement, des états de commutation respectifs des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance et/ou d'une modification des états de commutation respectifs des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance.
  9. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend une partie de battant (27), en particulier une partie de battant à aimant permanent, qui est réalisée pour être agencée sur la crémone (31) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ou sur un élément (29) disposé sur celle-ci, en particulier un tenon de fermeture, afin de coopérer avec ledit au moins un dispositif de commutation (21) dépendant de la distance pour détecter la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25).
  10. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel la partie de cadre présente plusieurs, en particulier au moins trois, dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance, dont la disposition correspond aux positions respectives de l'élément (29), en particulier du tenon de fermeture, disposé sur la crémone (31), de sorte qu'au moins dans l'état fermé du battant, en fonction de la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), respectivement un autre dispositif parmi les dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance est commuté et les dispositifs restants ne sont pas commutés, ou inversement, et de préférence dans l'état ouvert du battant, aucun dispositif de commutation n'est commuté ou bien tous les dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance sont commutés, quelle que soit la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25).
  11. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé sous la forme d'une une pièce de fermeture à disposer du côté du cadre, dans laquelle vient s'engager un tenon der fermeture (29) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) de telle manière que le battant est ainsi bloqué à l'encontre d'une ouverture complète lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage.
  12. Ensemble de ferrure (25) d'une fenêtre, d'une porte ou similaire, comportant un dispositif de sécurisation (11) selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes.
  13. Procédé pour sécuriser le battant d'une fenêtre, d'une porte ou similaire à l'encontre d'une ouverture non autorisée,
    dans lequel est prévu un ensemble de ferrure (25) qui peut être déplacé entre une position de déverrouillage et une ou plusieurs positions de verrouillage, le battant pouvant être entièrement ouvert, en particulier par rotation, lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans la position de déverrouillage, et le battant pouvant être ouvert seulement de façon restreinte, en particulier par basculement, ou étant bloqué à l'encontre d'une ouverture, lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage,
    le procédé consistant à
    - détecter un état respectif du battant qui peut être dans un état fermé ou dans un état ouvert ;
    - détecter une position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ; et
    - émettre un signal d'état respectif, en particulier à un dispositif d'alarme, en fonction de l'état respectif détecté du battant et en supplément en fonction de la position respective détectée de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    dans lequel
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend au moins un ou plusieurs dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance, en particulier respectivement un dispositif de commutation respectif (21) dépendant de la distance pour la position de déverrouillage et pour chacune des positions de verrouillage de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), réalisé en particulier à la manière d'un contact Reed, qui détectent la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend une partie de cadre pour l'agencement du côté cadre, qui comprend ledit au moins un dispositif de commutation (21) dépendant de la distance et qui coopère avec un élément (29), en particulier avec un tenon de fermeture, disposé sur une crémone (31) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), afin de détecter la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    l'un au moins des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance est utilisé pour détecter ou en tout cas pour contribuer à détecter aussi bien la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) que l'état respectif du battant ;
    un signal d'état émis par le dispositif de sécurisation (11) peut être un signal régulier ou un signal irrégulier ; et
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) émet un signal irrégulier lorsque le battant est dans l'état ouvert et que l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage.
EP17798229.5A 2016-12-06 2017-11-16 Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant Active EP3535739B2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL17798229.5T PL3535739T5 (pl) 2016-12-06 2017-11-16 Urządzenie zabezpieczające do kontroli położenia skrzydła

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102016123574.1A DE102016123574A1 (de) 2016-12-06 2016-12-06 Sicherungsvorrichtung
PCT/EP2017/079476 WO2018104024A1 (fr) 2016-12-06 2017-11-16 Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un battant

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3535739A1 EP3535739A1 (fr) 2019-09-11
EP3535739B1 EP3535739B1 (fr) 2020-10-28
EP3535739B2 true EP3535739B2 (fr) 2023-07-05

Family

ID=60331630

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17798229.5A Active EP3535739B2 (fr) 2016-12-06 2017-11-16 Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3535739B2 (fr)
DE (1) DE102016123574A1 (fr)
PL (1) PL3535739T5 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018104024A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3116672B1 (fr) 2020-11-25 2022-11-25 Somfy Activites Sa Procédé de gestion d’énergie, pour un détecteur de position d’une pièce de ferrure mobile d’huisserie

Family Cites Families (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9025907D0 (en) 1990-11-28 1991-01-09 Higgins Andrew Alarm arrangements
DE19518527A1 (de) 1995-05-19 1996-11-21 Winkhaus Fa August Überwachbare Verriegelungsanordnung für ein Fenster oder eine Türe oder dergleichen
DE19815768C2 (de) * 1998-04-08 2000-11-30 Richard Ross Kippfensterverriegelung einer Objektsicherungsanlage
DE10017182C2 (de) 2000-04-07 2003-10-16 Seca Gmbh Alarmvorrichtung
US6567708B1 (en) 2000-07-25 2003-05-20 Gentex Corporation System to interconnect, link, and control variable transmission windows and variable transmission window constructions
DE20017433U1 (de) 2000-10-10 2001-03-29 Seca Gmbh Vorrichtung zum Erfassen des Öffnungszustandes einer Tür, eines Fensters o.dgl.
DE10056119B4 (de) 2000-11-13 2005-12-15 Stobbe, Anatoli, Dipl.-Ing. Elektronisch codierbares Schloss-System
DE112004002571D2 (de) * 2003-12-31 2006-11-30 Schueco Int Kg Überwachungsvorrichtung für Fenstergriffe
PT1700284E (pt) * 2003-12-31 2011-11-28 Schueco Int Kg Janela e manípulo para uma janela
JP2008531875A (ja) 2005-02-25 2008-08-14 ヴェル アーゲー 窓およびドア用監視装置
DE102005018826B3 (de) 2005-04-22 2006-10-05 Robert Seuffer Gmbh & Co. Kg Vorrichtung zur Erfassung der Position eines Schließelements, insbesondere eines Fensters oder einer Tür
DE102005000182A1 (de) 2005-12-13 2007-06-21 Aug. Winkhaus Gmbh & Co. Kg Überwachbare Verriegelungsanordnung für ein Fenster, eine Türe oder dergleichen und Verfahren zum Betrieb einer solchen Verriegelungsanordnung
DE202008000919U1 (de) * 2008-01-23 2008-04-10 Carl Fuhr Gmbh & Co. Kg Schließanlage für eine einen Gangflügel und einen Standflügel aufweisende zweiflügelige Tür
DE102008017479A1 (de) 2008-04-03 2009-10-15 Moresens Gmbh Vorrichtung zur magnetischen Positionsüberwachung
WO2012054942A1 (fr) 2010-10-25 2012-05-03 Helmut Katherl Agencement de surveillance de l'état d'ouverture d'une fenêtre ou d'une porte
DE102013220176A1 (de) 2013-10-07 2015-04-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Zustands eines zu überwachenden Objekts
DE102014201130A1 (de) 2014-01-22 2015-07-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bestimmen eines unberechtigten Eindringens an einer Tür
DE102014008058A1 (de) 2014-05-28 2015-12-03 Heike Bedoian Vorrichtung und System zur Haus- und Gebäudeautomation
DE202014006760U1 (de) 2014-08-22 2015-11-24 Siegenia-Aubi Kg Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Schließstellung einer Verriegelungseinrichtung
DE102014115187A1 (de) 2014-09-22 2016-03-24 ABUS Seccor GmbH Türschließsystem
JP6739353B2 (ja) 2015-02-06 2020-08-12 株式会社村田製作所 半導体素子およびその製造方法
DE102015011299A1 (de) 2015-09-02 2017-03-02 Siegenia-Aubi Kg Anordnung zur Verschlussüberwachung
DE102015220139A1 (de) 2015-10-16 2017-04-20 Aug. Winkhaus Gmbh & Co. Kg Überwachungseinrichtung eines Treibstangenbeschlages für einen in einem Rahmen verriegelbaren Flügel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL3535739T5 (pl) 2023-10-30
EP3535739A1 (fr) 2019-09-11
DE102016123574A1 (de) 2018-06-07
EP3535739B1 (fr) 2020-10-28
PL3535739T3 (pl) 2021-05-31
WO2018104024A1 (fr) 2018-06-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1801328B1 (fr) Porte avec un dispositif de verrouillage surveillé et procédé d'utilisation d'un tel porte
EP2728093B1 (fr) Système de sécurité doté d'un capteur de détection d'accident
WO2012054942A1 (fr) Agencement de surveillance de l'état d'ouverture d'une fenêtre ou d'une porte
EP3342964B1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance formant cadre pour fenêtres ou pour portes et fenêtre ou porte dotées du dispositif de surveillance formant cadre
EP1747538B1 (fr) Procede pour eviter des declenchements intempestifs d'un systeme d'acces passif dans le secteur automobile
EP3617428A1 (fr) Fermeture pour deux-roues
DE102013103535A1 (de) Überwachungsvorrichtung zur Überwachung von Verschlusseinrichtungen von Objektöffnung eines Objekts, insbesondere Haus, und ein entsprechendes Verfahren
DE4024689C2 (fr)
EP3535739B2 (fr) Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant
EP0642623B1 (fr) Installation de securite pour elements de fermeture d'un acces
DE3031726C2 (de) Alarmschloß
EP3045623B1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurisation de porte
DE19815768C2 (de) Kippfensterverriegelung einer Objektsicherungsanlage
EP3156567B1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance d´une ferrure à crémone pour un ouvrant verrouillable d´un dormant
EP3765688B1 (fr) Ensemble ferrure pour un châssis de battant d'une fenêtre, fenêtre correspondante, procédé pour faire fonctionner un ensemble ferrure, procédé pour monter un ensemble ferrure et dispositif capteur
EP2921617B1 (fr) Dispositif de verrouillage
EP3511490B1 (fr) Poignée pour une fenêtre ou une porte et système d'installation d'alarme doté de plusieurs de poignées
EP1479575B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'activation d'un circuit électronique d'un véhicule automobile
EP2107191B1 (fr) Serrure avec un sélecteur pour modifier les fonctions d'une serrure
EP2387010A1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurisation de porte d'issue de secours
DE19518491C2 (de) Anordnung aus zwei Schließzylindern für abzusichernde Zugangsbereiche
AT509234B1 (de) Überwachungsanordnung für den öffnungszustand eines fensters oder einer tür
EP1338733B1 (fr) Serrure cylindrique
EP1640933A1 (fr) Dispositif d'activer et de désactiver pour un système d'alarme
EP1405974B1 (fr) Mécanisme de verrouillage pour fenêtre ou porte oscillobattante

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190606

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200507

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502017007970

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1328992

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20201028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210128

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210129

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210301

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210128

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210228

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502017007970

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201116

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20201130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: ROTO FRANK FENSTER- UND TUERTECHNOLOGIE GMBH

Effective date: 20210723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210228

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20211116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

PLBP Opposition withdrawn

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211116

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20230705

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 502017007970

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231124

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231120

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20231102

Year of fee payment: 7