EP3535739B1 - Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant - Google Patents

Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3535739B1
EP3535739B1 EP17798229.5A EP17798229A EP3535739B1 EP 3535739 B1 EP3535739 B1 EP 3535739B1 EP 17798229 A EP17798229 A EP 17798229A EP 3535739 B1 EP3535739 B1 EP 3535739B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fitting arrangement
leaf
signal
state
distance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP17798229.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3535739A1 (fr
EP3535739B2 (fr
Inventor
Jörg Hofmann
Gerd Truß
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Maco Technologie GmbH
Original Assignee
Maco Technologie GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=60331630&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP3535739(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Maco Technologie GmbH filed Critical Maco Technologie GmbH
Priority to PL17798229.5T priority Critical patent/PL3535739T5/pl
Publication of EP3535739A1 publication Critical patent/EP3535739A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3535739B1 publication Critical patent/EP3535739B1/fr
Publication of EP3535739B2 publication Critical patent/EP3535739B2/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
    • G08B13/08—Mechanical actuation by opening, e.g. of door, of window, of drawer, of shutter, of curtain, of blind
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/18—Prevention or correction of operating errors
    • G08B29/185—Signal analysis techniques for reducing or preventing false alarms or for enhancing the reliability of the system
    • G08B29/188—Data fusion; cooperative systems, e.g. voting among different detectors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
    • G08B25/008—Alarm setting and unsetting, i.e. arming or disarming of the security system

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a safety device for securing the sash of a window, a door or the like against unauthorized opening.
  • the sash of a window, a door or the like can be secured against unauthorized opening, among other things, by triggering an alarm in the event of unauthorized opening.
  • An alarm device can be provided for this purpose.
  • An alarm can in particular comprise a visual and / or an acoustic signal which, in the event of an alarm, is sent at the location or in the vicinity of the impermissible opening in order to act as a deterrent and to draw attention to the impermissible opening.
  • an alarm can additionally or alternatively also include the transmission of an alarm signal to a remote entity, e.g. to the police and / or a security service.
  • suitable countermeasures are initiated in response to the alarm, preferably automatically.
  • a securing device for securing the wing is therefore advantageously designed to detect a respective state of the wing, a closed state of the wing being differentiated from an open state of the wing.
  • the closed state and the open state are not necessarily set to specific positions of the sash. Rather, can the sash are in various positions in the closed state and in various other positions in the open state.
  • the closed state preferably includes those positions of the sash in which penetration through the respective window or the respective door is not possible, and the open state comprises such positions of the sash in which penetration is possible.
  • the closed state can include the fully closed position and all tilt-open positions of the sash, provided the latter do not allow easy penetration through the respective window or door.
  • the open state can then include all other, that is to say in particular all rotationally open positions.
  • the tilt-open positions can, however, also be assigned to the open state.
  • the closed state can in particular only include the completely closed position of the sash. If it can be detected by means of the safety device whether the sash is in the open state or in the closed state, an opening can be recognized by the fact that the open state is detected after the closed state of the sash has previously been detected.
  • the safety device is designed to output a respective status signal as a function of the detected respective state of the wing.
  • a respective state signal can also depend on a recorded respective state of the wing insofar as it depends on a respective change in the state, for example by taking into account one or more previously recorded respective states in addition to the respectively most recently recorded respective state of the wing.
  • the respective status signal can in particular be output to an alarm device, which then, for example, as explained above, depending on the received Status signal can trigger an alarm.
  • an alarm device is typically provided separately from the safety device.
  • the alarm device can be provided at a central point within a building, in particular if the alarm device is a central unit of an alarm system. If the alarm device is an alarm siren, a location from which the alarm can be widely heard can be particularly advantageous. In principle, however, it can also be provided that the alarm device is formed integrally with the safety device.
  • an alarm should not be triggered in all cases in which an opening of the sash is determined by means of the safety device on the basis of the detected respective state of the sash. Because not every opening of a window or a door represents an impermissible opening. It is known for alarm devices that they can therefore be activated and deactivated optionally, in particular manually. This enables a detected opening of the wing to trigger an alarm only when the alarm device is armed, i.e. armed. is activated. Consequently, by simply deactivating the alarm device, possibly also by deactivating the safety device, it can be prevented that regular opening triggers an alarm. However, this assumes that the deactivation is not forgotten before opening the sash. Otherwise a false alarm will be triggered.
  • the safety device or a downstream alarm device for example for a permissible opening of the sash, has been deactivated, however, it is important to remember to reactivate the safety device or the alarm device after the sash has been closed. Otherwise, the wing can then be opened in an impermissible manner without this being detected by the safety device or a corresponding status signal being received by the alarm device.
  • the reliability of the securing of the wing is consequently also of concern with such a system of the respective user.
  • the WO 2005/066440 A1 and the EP 1 856 354 A2 each disclose a window handle, in the housing of which switching devices are provided, by means of which on the one hand the rotational position of the window handle and on the other hand the proximity of the sash to the frame and thus the state of the sash are detected.
  • a monitoring arrangement for a window fitting which comprises a magnetic sensor and causes a signal transmitter or an alarm system to be activated if the window is opened despite the fitting being locked.
  • the safety device is designed in particular to also have a respective position of an in addition to the respective state of the wing To detect fitting arrangement of the sash that is adjustable between an unlocked position and one or more locking positions, the sash being fully open, in particular rotatable, when the unlocking position of the fitting arrangement is present, and wherein the sash is only partially apparent, for example tiltable, or against a Opening is blocked when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
  • the securing device can not only differentiate the state of the sash between the open state and the closed state, but in particular simultaneously, but at least promptly, detect which position the fitting arrangement of the sash occupies.
  • the respective position of the fitting arrangement can then be used in particular as a criterion for determining whether a detected opening of the sash has taken place in a permissible or inadmissible manner. Because if the fitting arrangement is currently in any of its locking positions in which the sash cannot actually be fully opened, but opening of the sash is detected based on a transition from the closed state to the open state, this can be interpreted as a clear indication that that opening is not permitted, in particular by bypassing locking means, for example the fitting arrangement has been made. Conversely, by detecting the unlocked position of the fitting arrangement, impermissible opening of the sash can be ruled out, since the sash can in any case be completely opened when the unlocked position is present.
  • the safety device is also designed to output the respective status signal not only as a function of the detected respective state of the sash, but also as a function of the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the respective status signal is preferably dependent on the respectively most recently detected state of the sash and the respectively most recently detected position of the fitting arrangement. It can depend in particular on the respective state of the sash and / or on the respective position of the fitting arrangement whether a respective state signal is output at all and / or what the content of the respective state signal has.
  • the additional detection of the position of the fitting arrangement and its consideration in the output status signal can in particular make it unnecessary to activate or deactivate the safety device or an alarm device which receives the status signal and possibly reacts to it. Because it no longer needs to be determined manually by activating or deactivating when opening the sash leads to an alarm and when it does not. Instead, by moving the fitting arrangement into the unlocked position, the safety device or the alarm device can be deactivated automatically. Conversely, the safety device or the alarm device is automatically quasi-activated by moving the fitting arrangement into one of the locking positions. There is no need to actually activate or deactivate. This is because it may be sufficient to be able to differentiate between an allowable and an inadmissible opening of the sash based on the respective status signal.
  • the convenience of operating a sash of a window, door or the like secured with a safety device according to the invention is improved because the fitting arrangement only has to be actuated in the usual way when opening and closing the sash, but not additionally activating or deactivating the safety device or the alarm device must be considered. Therefore, such activation or deactivation cannot be forgotten, so that false alarms can be avoided and the safety device or the alarm device in principle can remain active at all times. In this way, the securing device contributes to improved reliability of securing the wing.
  • the safety device can in particular be designed to interact with known alarm devices or entire alarm systems, in particular to have a communication link, at least in the transmission direction, so that respective status signals can be transmitted from the safety device.
  • the signal is preferably transmitted by radio.
  • the safety device can also be viewed as a sensor within a larger alarm system, which can include a large number of additional sensors for detecting other, in particular safety-relevant, parameters.
  • One or more common protocols can be supported for the communication connection in order to be flexibly compatible with different systems.
  • the respective status signal can in principle be output continuously by the safety device. However, it can also be sufficient if the safety device outputs respective status signals discontinuously over time.
  • the status signal can be output at regular time intervals or according to a predefined or predefinable time pattern. It can also be provided that the status signal is output additionally or only in each case when there has been any change in the status of the sash and / or the position of the fitting arrangement, or whenever a change has occurred which corresponds to impermissible opening . Alternatively or in addition, it can also be provided that the status signal is output when the safety device, for example from the alarm device, receives a query signal.
  • a respective status signal can be a raw signal insofar as it simply comprises the information about the detected respective status of the sash and the detected respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the evaluation can take place downstream, for example in an alarm device which receives the respective status signals from the safety device and independently determines on the basis of the status signals whether or not an alarm or other reaction is to be triggered.
  • an embodiment can be preferred in which the safety device is designed to output the respective status signal continuously or repeatedly, in particular regularly.
  • an evaluation of the status of the sash and the position of the fitting arrangement takes place in whole or at least partially in the securing device.
  • the safety device independently determines whether the detected respective state of the sash and the detected respective position of the fitting arrangement indicate the presence of an irregular state to which an alarm would then have to be responded in particular.
  • the safety device can be designed to send out a specific signal in the event of a state assessed as irregular and otherwise to send no or a different specific signal. The respective status signal then does not need to be further evaluated by a downstream device which receives the respective status signals It is sufficient if the respective status signal is responded to in a suitable manner.
  • the safety device is designed to only output the respective status signal when the sash is in the open status. If the condition of the sash is not continuously recorded, the most recently recorded condition of the sash is relevant. In such an embodiment, no status signal is output when the sash is closed. This can be dispensable, since the sash cannot have opened inadmissibly as long as the sash is in the closed state.
  • the securing device is designed to output the respective status signal only when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
  • no status signal is output when the fitting arrangement is in the unlocked position. This can be dispensed with, since in the unlocked position of the fitting arrangement the wing is in any case not blocked against complete opening, so that no unauthorized opening can take place.
  • a combination of the two above embodiments is particularly preferred, in which the securing device is designed to output the respective status signal only when the sash is in the open state and when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is also present. Because if the fitting arrangement is in a locked position, the wing should actually not be able to be put into the open state. Therefore, if the open state of the sash is detected in a locked position of the fitting arrangement, this is an indication that the sash has been opened inadmissibly. Since in this embodiment the respective status signal is output only in this case, the status signal corresponds an alarm signal that does not need to be evaluated any further. Because the fact that the status signal is sent at all is then sufficient as an indication to determine that the wing has been opened in an impermissible manner and to react to it with an alarm if necessary.
  • the absence of a signal can also be interpreted as an indication that there is an irregular condition, in particular impermissible opening of the sash, whereas the mere presence of a signal can then be interpreted as a sign of a regular condition .
  • Such an embodiment can be advantageous in that a failure of the safety device, e.g. in the event of damage, empty batteries or an interruption in the power supply, it does not appear as a regular state, but can be recognized as an irregular state.
  • an embodiment can be advantageous in which the securing device is designed to output the respective status signal only when the sash is in the closed state and / or the hardware arrangement is in the unlocked position. So if either the sash is in the closed state and the sash has not been opened at all, or if the unlocking position of the fitting arrangement is present and the sash is therefore normally fully open anyway, or if both are the case, a respective status signal is output, which is an all-clear signal can be understood that signals a regular state.
  • no respective status signal is output in any case if the open status is present and at the same time one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present, that is to say was at least last detected.
  • an alarm can then be triggered in response to the absence of the status signal.
  • the security device is designed to output the respective status signal in response to a received interrogation signal.
  • the respective status signal is output only when the security device has previously received an interrogation signal.
  • a transmission of a respective status signal triggered by a query can also be used in addition to a regular transmission of the respective status signals and / or to an automatic transmission of the respective status signals, for example if the respective status signals are otherwise sent when a change in the status of the sash and / or the position the hardware arrangement was recorded.
  • Such an external request for a status signal can be particularly useful in embodiments in which a respective status signal is otherwise only sent when an irregular condition has been detected, i.e. when in particular the open status of the sash and at the same time one of the locking positions of the hardware arrangement are present.
  • the absence of the status signal can be interpreted as a sign that everything is in order.
  • failure of the safety device could then lead to an irregular state incorrectly not being recognized as such, since the respective state signal does not materialize although it would have to be sent. It can therefore be useful if an external device, such as an alarm device, occasionally or regularly, requests a respective status signal in order to check the functionality of the safety device. If the status signal is absent despite the query, a failure of the safety device can be recognized.
  • the securing device itself does not have to be designed to evaluate whether a regular or a fixed position on the basis of the detected state of the sash and the detected position of the fitting arrangement there is an irregular condition. Rather, in these embodiments it can be sufficient if the respective status signal output contains both items of information in such a way that a device receiving the respective status signal can carry out the evaluation. In this respect, such safety devices do not need to have any logic or logic which only decides whether a respective status signal is sent at all. An evaluation can, however, already be carried out entirely or partially by the safety device itself.
  • a status signal output by the safety device can be a regular signal or an irregular signal, in particular only either a regular signal or an irregular signal, with preferably exactly one regular signal and exactly one irregular signal being provided. If this is the case, in other words the safety device can only output two different signals. Which of these two signals is output as the respective status signal then continues to depend both on the (respectively most recently) detected state of the sash and the (respectively most recently) detected position of the fitting arrangement. However, it may not be possible to unambiguously deduce from the output signal which state of the sash is present and which position of the fitting arrangement is present. This does not even have to be necessary, since the evaluation of whether this combination of the state of the sash and the position of the fitting arrangement corresponds to a regular or an irregular state can already have been carried out by the safety device.
  • the regular signal or the irregular signal is sent out accordingly.
  • the regular signal signals that everything is in order without it having to be clear which position the fitting arrangement is in or whether the sash is open or closed.
  • the irregular signal signals that an irregular State is present, in particular that the sash has been opened inadmissibly, again without it having to be apparent in which position the fitting arrangement is or whether the sash is open or closed.
  • the irregular signal can be evaluated as an alarm signal in response to which, for example, an alarm can be triggered by an alarm device.
  • more than one regular signal and / or more than one irregular signal are provided, one of which the safety device sends out as a respective status signal.
  • the securing device is designed to output a regular signal, in particular only when the sash is in the closed state and / or the fitting arrangement is in the unlocked position. Both conditions do not necessarily have to be met in order to output a regular signal, since an impermissible opening of the sash can be excluded by just one of the conditions. In principle, however, it can be provided that one or more additional conditions must be met in order to output a regular signal.
  • the securing device can advantageously be designed to output an irregular signal, in particular only when the sash is in the open state and one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present. On In this way, in the event of an impermissible opening of the sash, in which the fitting arrangement was not previously placed in the unlocked position, an irregular signal is reliably output, to which an appropriate reaction can then be made.
  • the securing device is designed to detect a position of a gear, a connecting rod or an element of the fitting arrangement arranged thereon in order to detect the position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the securing device can comprise a sensor or be designed as a sensor which is provided on the transmission, which is typically effective between a handle and a drive rod of the fitting arrangement, in order to actuate the handle to move the drive rod and thus in particular to move from the drive rod provided locking pin to derive.
  • the position of the fitting arrangement can also be detected directly on the drive rod or on an element connected to it for joint movement, such as the aforementioned locking pin.
  • the locking pin does not necessarily have to be a pin that also interacts specifically with a locking part to lock the sash. Rather, the pin can also only be designed in the manner of such a locking pin.
  • the safety device comprises at least one or more distance-dependent switching devices, in particular for the unlocking position and for each of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement, a distance-dependent switching device, in particular in the manner of a reed contact, in order to detect the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the movement of the respective elements of the fitting arrangement is typically narrowly limited and only possible in one dimension, that is to say exclusively along a path (there and back). Therefore, you can register for each position the fitting arrangement are suitable for distance-dependent switching devices which are arranged in particular along the mentioned movement path of a respective element with which they interact.
  • a distance-dependent switching device is preferably arranged in such a way that the respective element interacting with it moves relative to the switching device when the position of the fitting arrangement to be detected changes.
  • the distance to the switching device and consequently its switching state can change, so that the change in position can be recognized on it.
  • Reed contacts are particularly suitable as distance-dependent switching devices, since they can be reliable, inexpensive, compact and robust. Instead of such magnetic switching devices, however, switching devices can also be provided whose distance dependence is based on a mechanical, electrical, or other interaction.
  • the distance-dependent switching device can assume exactly two switching states, which can be designated as closed or switched or as open or unswitched. Therefore, an individual distance-dependent device can be limited to detecting whether a certain position of the fitting arrangement (within the accuracy or range of the respective switching device) is present or not. Depending on how precisely the respective position of the fitting arrangement is to be detected, in particular how many different positions of the fitting arrangement are to be differentiated, a corresponding number of distance-dependent switching devices can be provided.
  • Distance-dependent switching devices can advantageously not only be used to detect the respective position of the fitting arrangement, but also the respective state of the sash.
  • at least one respective distance-dependent switching device is used to both the respective To detect the position of the fitting arrangement as well as the respective state of the sash or at least contribute to it. This can be possible in particular through a suitable arrangement of the respective switching device.
  • the respective status signal depends, in particular exclusively, on the respective switching states of the distance-dependent switching devices and / or on a change in the respective switching states of the distance-dependent switching devices.
  • the security device can have a comparatively low complexity.
  • every change in the state of the sash or the position of the fitting arrangement leads to a change in the switching state of at least one distance-dependent switching device, so that it can be provided that an evaluation takes place and / or a respective state signal is sent out only when a switching state changes.
  • the securing device comprises a frame part for arrangement on the frame side, in particular in the rebate of the respective window or the respective Door, wherein the frame part has the at least one distance-dependent switching device and is designed to interact with an element arranged on a drive rod of the fitting arrangement, in particular a locking pin, in order to detect the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the element arranged on the drive rod is an element that is not provided specifically for the safety device, but would also otherwise be provided, such as a locking pin, it may be necessary to use the element for interaction with the distance-dependent switching device to modify appropriately.
  • the element is not already permanently magnetic, it can be provided with a permanent magnet which can interact with a switching device designed as a reed contact.
  • the securing device comprises a, in particular permanently magnetic, wing part which is designed to be arranged on the drive rod of the fitting arrangement or on an element arranged thereon, in particular a locking pin, in order to interact with the at least one distance-dependent switching device to detect the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the safety device can be designed in such a way that it can be easily retrofitted to conventional windows or doors.
  • the frame part has several, in particular at least three, distance-dependent switching devices, the arrangement of which has respective positions of the element arranged on the connecting rod, in particular the locking pin , corresponds, so that at least in the closed state of the sash, depending on the respective position of the fitting arrangement, a respective other of the distance-dependent switching devices is switched and the rest are not switched, or vice versa, and preferably also in the open state of the sash independent of the respective position of the fitting arrangement, no or all distance-dependent switching devices are switched.
  • the securing device is designed as a locking part to be arranged on the frame side, into which a locking pin of the fitting arrangement engages in such a way that the sash is blocked against complete opening when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
  • the safety device then has a double function. It is not only used to detect the respective status of the sash and the respective position of the fitting arrangement and to send out a corresponding status signal, but also helps to lock the sash to the respective frame. In this respect, it can be provided instead of a conventional locking part. Then no additional locking pin or any other additional element for interacting with the distance-dependent switching devices needs to be provided on the drive rod.
  • a locking pin which is provided anyway for engaging a locking part to lock the sash and which may only have to be provided with a permanent magnet, can be provided with the safety device on the one hand cooperate as with an ordinary locking part and on the other hand cooperate with the switching devices of the safety device for detecting the respective position of the fitting arrangement.
  • the fitting arrangement according to the invention for a window, a door or the like comprises a securing device as described above, which is designed in particular according to one of the embodiments described above.
  • the advantages of such a fitting arrangement correspond at least essentially to those of the respective securing device and also include that retrofitting of a conventional fitting arrangement is not necessary in each case and that the securing device can be coordinated particularly well with the rest of the fitting arrangement.
  • a fitting arrangement which is adjustable between an unlocked position and one or more locking positions, the sash being completely open, in particular rotatable, when the unlocked position is Fitting arrangement is present, and the sash is only apparent to a limited extent, in particular can be tilted open, or is locked against opening when one of the locking positions of the fitting arrangement is present.
  • the method includes that a respective state of the sash, which can be in a closed state or in an open state, as well as a respective position of the fitting arrangement are detected and that depending on both the detected respective state of the sash and the detected respective Position of the fitting arrangement a respective status signal, in particular to an alarm device, is output.
  • Fig. 1 is an embodiment of a securing device 11 according to the invention in a view from the side (in Fig. 1 above) and a view from above (in Fig. 1 below).
  • the securing device 11 has a flat, elongated shape which makes it possible to arrange the securing device 11 in the fold between a frame 13 of a window or a door and the sash of the window or the door.
  • the securing device 11 can be fastened in particular by screwing the securing device 11 onto the frame 13, which is exemplified in FIG Fig. 2 is shown in which the frame 13 in cross section and the in Fig. 1 Shown embodiment of the safety device 11 from the front (this corresponds to in Fig. 1 a viewing direction from left to right) is shown.
  • the securing device 11 has four bores 15 which are provided in a central section 17 of the securing device 11, but can in principle also be provided in other numbers at other respective locations.
  • a sensor section 19 provided at one end of the longitudinal extent of the securing device 11 is thinner than the central section 17, in particular compared to the rest of the securing device 11, that is to say has a lower height.
  • this sensor section 19 a total of three distance-dependent switching devices 21 in the form of a respective reed contact are arranged, which cannot be seen from the outside (cf. Figures 3 to 6 in which the reed contacts are nevertheless shown as if the housing of the fuse device 11 were transparent).
  • the distance-dependent switching devices 21 are connected to electronics that are arranged in the interior of the safety device 11, in particular in the central section 17.
  • the electronics are designed to send out respective status signals by radio as a function of the respective switching states of the switching devices 21 or changes in these switching states.
  • the security device 11 can be designed in particular according to ISO / IEC 14543-3-10, so that the transmission of the respective status signals can basically take place without batteries.
  • the securing device has a battery compartment 23 for receiving batteries as a voltage source for the securing device 11 at the end of its longitudinal extension opposite the sensor section 19.
  • the securing device 11 is made so thin that it is as in FIG Fig. 2 shown in the fold between the frame 13 and an associated wing (not shown) can be attached to the frame 13.
  • the in Fig. 1 shown securing device 11 around a frame part.
  • the securing device 11 can be arranged on different frames 13 with different cross-sections, spacers possibly having to be provided between individual bores 15 and the frame if the frame 13 does not offer a sufficiently wide area for arranging the securing device 11.
  • the securing device 11 is preferably arranged on the respective frame 13 in such a way that the securing device 11 and a fitting arrangement 25 provided on the respective sash, in particular a connecting rod fitting, are straight opposite one another when the sash is closed, i.e. are in particular arranged parallel to one another and essentially adjacent to one another.
  • the distance between the securing device 11 and the fitting arrangement 25 is then preferably such that a permanent magnet 27 provided on the fitting arrangement 25, that is to say on the sash, can interact with the distance-dependent switching devices 21.
  • the permanent magnet 27 represents a wing part of the safety device 11.
  • the offset is not necessarily parallel (as shown), but the securing device 11 and the fitting arrangement 25 can also be offset at an angle to one another, in particular when the sash is rotated open.
  • the closed state of the wing at least in the embodiment shown, only the state in which the wing as in FIG Figures 3 and 5 is at least substantially completely closed.
  • FIG. 3 to 6 with regard to the respective position of a pin 29 which is designed similarly to a conventional locking pin and which has the permanent magnet 27.
  • the pin 29 can in principle also be permanently magnetic itself, at least in some areas, in particular in a head area.
  • the pin 29 is attached to a drive rod 31 of the fitting arrangement 25, so that it also carries out movements of the drive rod 31.
  • the drive rod 31 is largely covered by a faceplate 33 of the fitting arrangement 25, which has an elongated hole 35 through which the pin 29 extends so that the pin 29 extends in the longitudinal direction can move in the elongated hole 35 when the fitting assembly is adjusted.
  • the illustrated fitting arrangement 25 has three defined positions, each of which corresponds to a position of the pin 29 in the elongated hole 35.
  • the fitting arrangement 25 assumes a rotationally open position which is an unlocking position insofar as the sash can be completely rotationally opened when the fitting arrangement 25 is in the rotationally open position.
  • the pin 29 is located within the elongated hole 35 in the Figures 3 and 4 middle position shown.
  • the fitting arrangement 25 assumes a closed position, which is a locking position of the fitting arrangement 25, since the sash in this position of the fitting arrangement 25 is locked against opening by the fitting arrangement 25 in a conventional manner.
  • the pin 29 is located within the elongated hole 35 in the Figures 5 and 6 right position shown.
  • the pin 29 is located inside the elongated hole 35 on the left.
  • This position of the fitting arrangement 25 is a tilt opening position in which the sash can be tilted to a limited extent by a defined gap. Since complete opening of the sash is nevertheless prevented in this position, this position is defined as a further locking position of the fitting arrangement 25. In principle, the tilt opening position could also be viewed as an unlocking position.
  • the respective switching status of the individual switching devices 21 is indicated by a respective symbol, a cross (x) representing the open switching status and a circle (o) the closed switching status of the respective switching device 21.
  • the open state of the sash can therefore be detected from the fact that none of the switching devices 21 is closed. (If necessary, the open state can be distinguished from an intermediate position of the fitting arrangement 25 in which none of the switching devices 21 can be switched by the fact that in the open state all switching devices 21 are open for longer than a certain minimum duration, since the intermediate positions of the fitting arrangement 25 are usually can only be used when adjusting the fitting arrangement 25 and therefore only temporarily for a short period of time.)
  • the securing device 11 can output the detected switching states of the respective distance-dependent switching devices 21 at least essentially unchanged, that is to say, for example, merely combined with one another and / or encoded in any way, as the respective state signal.
  • a status signal can then be received by an external device, for example an alarm device, and evaluated as to whether a regular or an irregular state is present.
  • an evaluation can, however, also take place in the safety device 11 itself.
  • the safety device 11 can then output a regular signal or an irregular signal as the respective status signal, on the basis of which it can be recognized in each case without further evaluation whether a regular or an irregular status is present.
  • a regular state is particularly in the Fig. 4 shown.
  • the fitting arrangement 25 is in the unlocked position and the wing is in the open state. This is permissible because the wing is released for complete opening in the unlocked position of the fitting arrangement 25.
  • the Fig. 6 shows an example of an irregular state. This is because the sash is in the open state, although the fitting arrangement 25 assumes a locked state in which the sash should not open. This can be interpreted as an indication of inadmissible opening, e.g. prying open the sash.
  • a detected open state can be regarded as irregular, namely if the securing device is attached to the frame 13 on the side of the tilt axis, where the sash should not move away from the frame 13 when it is tilted open.
  • the switching states in the Fig. 4 do not differ from those in the Fig. 6 . shown condition.
  • the position of the fitting arrangement 25 In order to be able to differentiate between a regular and an irregular state on the basis of the switching states, the position of the fitting arrangement 25 must therefore be taken into account that was present at the moment when a transition from the closed state to the open state of the sash was detected. If, for example, there is a change in the switching states of the Fig. 3 Switching states shown of the switching devices 21 to the in the Fig. 4 switching states shown detected, it can be deduced from this that the sash has passed into the open state when the fitting arrangement 25 assumed the unlocked position, which is permissible. On the other hand, a change in the switching states from those in the Fig.
  • a safety device 11 according to the invention can be arranged in a simple manner both on existing windows, doors or the like and can also be integrated into existing alarm systems and enables reliable detection of respective regular or irregular states.
  • the securing device 11 also has the advantage of improved convenience, since the additional detection of the respective state of the sash automatically differentiates between permissible opening and impermissible opening of the sash can be.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Dispositif de sécurisation (11) destiné à sécuriser le battant d'une fenêtre, d'une porte ou similaire à l'encontre d'une ouverture non autorisée,
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) étant réalisé pour :
    - détecter un état respectif du battant qui peut être dans un état fermé ou dans un état ouvert ;
    - détecter une position respective d'un ensemble de ferrure (25) du battant, qui peut être déplacé entre une position de déverrouillage et une ou plusieurs positions de verrouillage, le battant pouvant être entièrement ouvert, en particulier par rotation, lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans la position de déverrouillage, et le battant pouvant être ouvert seulement de façon restreinte, en particulier par pivotement, ou étant bloqué à l'encontre d'une ouverture, lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage de; et
    - émettre un signal d'état respectif, en particulier à un dispositif d'alarme, en fonction de l'état respectif détecté du battant et en supplément en fonction de la position respective détectée de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    dans lequel
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend un ou plusieurs dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance, en particulier respectivement un dispositif de commutation respectif (21) dépendant de la distance pour la position de déverrouillage et pour chacune des positions de verrouillage de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), réalisé en particulier à la manière d'un contact Reed, afin de détecter la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ; l'un au moins des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance est utilisé pour détecter ou en tout cas pour contribuer à détecter aussi bien la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) que l'état respectif du battant ; et
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend une partie de cadre pour l'agencement du côté cadre, qui comprend l'un au moins des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance et qui est réalisée pour coopérer avec un élément (29), en particulier avec un tenon de fermeture, disposé sur une crémone (31) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), afin de détecter la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25).
  2. Dispositif de sécurisation selon la revendication 1,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif de manière progressive ou répétée, en particulier de manière régulière.
  3. Dispositif de sécurisation selon la revendication 1,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif uniquement lorsque le battant est dans l'état ouvert.
  4. Dispositif de sécurisation selon la revendication 1 ou 3,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif uniquement lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage.
  5. Dispositif de sécurisation selon la revendication 1,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif uniquement lorsque le battant est dans l'état fermé et/ou lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans la position de déverrouillage.
  6. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre le signal d'état respectif en réponse à un signal d'interrogation reçu.
  7. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel un signal d'état émis par le dispositif de sécurisation (11) peut être un signal régulier ou un signal irrégulier, en particulier seulement soit un signal régulier soit un signal irrégulier, et il est prévu de préférence exactement un signal régulier et exactement un signal irrégulier, et
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est de préférence réalisé pour émettre un signal régulier, en particulier uniquement lorsque le battant est dans l'état fermé et/ou lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans la position de déverrouillage.
  8. Dispositif de sécurisation selon la revendication 7,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour émettre un signal irrégulier, en particulier uniquement lorsque le battant est dans l'état ouvert et lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage.
  9. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins une des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel, en vue de détecter la position de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé pour détecter une position d'un engrenage, d'une crémone (31) ou d'un élément (29) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) disposé sur celui-ci/celle-ci.
  10. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le signal d'état respectif dépend, en particulier exclusivement, des états de commutation respectifs des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance et/ou d'une modification des états de commutation respectifs des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance.
  11. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend une partie de battant (27), en particulier une partie de battant à aimant permanent, qui est réalisée pour être fixée à la crémone (31) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ou à un élément (29) disposé sur celle-ci, en particulier un tenon de fermeture, afin de coopérer avec ledit au moins un dispositif de commutation (21) dépendant de la distance pour détecter la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25).
  12. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel la partie de cadre présente plusieurs, en particulier au moins trois, dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance, dont la disposition correspond aux positions respectives de l'élément (29), en particulier du tenon de fermeture, disposé sur la crémone (31), de sorte qu'au moins dans l'état fermé du battant, en fonction de la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), respectivement un autre dispositif parmi les dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance est commuté et les dispositifs restants ne sont pas commutés, ou inversement, et de préférence dans l'état ouvert du battant, aucun dispositif de commutation n'est commuté ou bien tous les dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance sont commutés, quelle que soit la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25).
  13. Dispositif de sécurisation selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes,
    dans lequel le dispositif de sécurisation (11) est réalisé sous la forme d'une une pièce de fermeture à disposer du côté du cadre, dans laquelle vient s'engager un tenon der fermeture (29) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) de telle manière que le battant est ainsi bloqué à l'encontre d'une ouverture complète lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage.
  14. Ensemble de ferrure (25) d'une fenêtre, d'une porte ou similaire, comportant un dispositif de sécurisation (11) selon l'une au moins des revendications précédentes.
  15. Procédé pour sécuriser le battant d'une fenêtre, d'une porte ou similaire à l'encontre d'une ouverture non autorisée,
    dans lequel est prévu un ensemble de ferrure (25) qui peut être déplacé entre une position de déverrouillage et une ou plusieurs positions de verrouillage, le battant pouvant être entièrement ouvert, en particulier par rotation, lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans la position de déverrouillage, et le battant pouvant être ouvert seulement de façon restreinte, en particulier par pivotement, ou étant bloqué à l'encontre d'une ouverture, lorsque l'ensemble de ferrure (25) est dans l'une des positions de verrouillage ; le procédé consistant à
    - détecter un état respectif du battant qui peut être dans un état fermé ou dans un état ouvert ;
    - détecter une position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ; et
    - émettre un signal d'état respectif, en particulier à un dispositif d'alarme, en fonction de l'état respectif détecté du battant et en supplément en fonction de la position respective détectée de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    dans lequel
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend un ou plusieurs dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance, en particulier respectivement un dispositif de commutation respectif (21) dépendant de la distance pour la position de déverrouillage et pour chacune des positions de verrouillage de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), réalisé en particulier à la manière d'un contact Reed, qui détecte la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) ;
    l'un au moins des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance est utilisé pour détecter ou en tout cas pour contribuer à détecter aussi bien la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25) que l'état respectif du battant ; et
    le dispositif de sécurisation (11) comprend une partie de cadre pour l'agencement du côté cadre, qui comprend l'un au moins des dispositifs de commutation (21) dépendants de la distance et qui est réalisée pour coopérer avec un élément (29), en particulier avec un tenon de fermeture, disposé sur une crémone (31) de l'ensemble de ferrure (25), afin de détecter la position respective de l'ensemble de ferrure (25).
EP17798229.5A 2016-12-06 2017-11-16 Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant Active EP3535739B2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL17798229.5T PL3535739T5 (pl) 2016-12-06 2017-11-16 Urządzenie zabezpieczające do kontroli położenia skrzydła

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102016123574.1A DE102016123574A1 (de) 2016-12-06 2016-12-06 Sicherungsvorrichtung
PCT/EP2017/079476 WO2018104024A1 (fr) 2016-12-06 2017-11-16 Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un battant

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3535739A1 EP3535739A1 (fr) 2019-09-11
EP3535739B1 true EP3535739B1 (fr) 2020-10-28
EP3535739B2 EP3535739B2 (fr) 2023-07-05

Family

ID=60331630

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17798229.5A Active EP3535739B2 (fr) 2016-12-06 2017-11-16 Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3535739B2 (fr)
DE (1) DE102016123574A1 (fr)
PL (1) PL3535739T5 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018104024A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3116672B1 (fr) 2020-11-25 2022-11-25 Somfy Activites Sa Procédé de gestion d’énergie, pour un détecteur de position d’une pièce de ferrure mobile d’huisserie

Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2250367A (en) 1990-11-28 1992-06-03 Andrew Higgins Alarm arrangements
DE19518527A1 (de) 1995-05-19 1996-11-21 Winkhaus Fa August Überwachbare Verriegelungsanordnung für ein Fenster oder eine Türe oder dergleichen
DE19815768C2 (de) 1998-04-08 2000-11-30 Richard Ross Kippfensterverriegelung einer Objektsicherungsanlage
DE10017182A1 (de) 2000-04-07 2001-10-18 Seca Gmbh Alarmvorrichtung
DE10056119A1 (de) 2000-11-13 2002-06-06 Anatoli Stobbe Elektronisch codierbares Schloss-System
EP1325479B1 (fr) 2000-10-10 2004-12-22 Seca GmbH Dispositif pour determiner l'etat d'ouverture d'une porte, d'une fenetre ou similaire
WO2005066440A1 (fr) 2003-12-31 2005-07-21 SCHÜCO International KG Dispositif de surveillance pour poignees de fenetre
WO2005066913A2 (fr) 2003-12-31 2005-07-21 SCHÜCO International KG Fenetre et poignee de fenetre
WO2006089795A2 (fr) 2005-02-25 2006-08-31 Weru Ag Dispositif de surveillance pour portes et fenetres
DE102005018826B3 (de) 2005-04-22 2006-10-05 Robert Seuffer Gmbh & Co. Kg Vorrichtung zur Erfassung der Position eines Schließelements, insbesondere eines Fensters oder einer Tür
DE102005000182A1 (de) 2005-12-13 2007-06-21 Aug. Winkhaus Gmbh & Co. Kg Überwachbare Verriegelungsanordnung für ein Fenster, eine Türe oder dergleichen und Verfahren zum Betrieb einer solchen Verriegelungsanordnung
DE202008000919U1 (de) 2008-01-23 2008-04-10 Carl Fuhr Gmbh & Co. Kg Schließanlage für eine einen Gangflügel und einen Standflügel aufweisende zweiflügelige Tür
WO2012054942A1 (fr) 2010-10-25 2012-05-03 Helmut Katherl Agencement de surveillance de l'état d'ouverture d'une fenêtre ou d'une porte
EP2112676B1 (fr) 2008-04-03 2013-03-20 Link GmbH Dispositif de surveillance de position magnétique
DE102013220176A1 (de) 2013-10-07 2015-04-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Zustands eines zu überwachenden Objekts
DE102014201130A1 (de) 2014-01-22 2015-07-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bestimmen eines unberechtigten Eindringens an einer Tür
DE102014008058A1 (de) 2014-05-28 2015-12-03 Heike Bedoian Vorrichtung und System zur Haus- und Gebäudeautomation
EP1307795B1 (fr) 2000-07-25 2016-03-09 Gentex Corporation Systeme d'interconnexion, de liaison et de controle de fenetres de transmission variable, et constructions de fenetres de transmission variable
EP2998473A1 (fr) 2014-08-22 2016-03-23 Siegenia-Aubi Kg Appareil pour contrôler la position de fermeture un dispositif de verrouillage
DE102014115187A1 (de) 2014-09-22 2016-03-24 ABUS Seccor GmbH Türschließsystem
WO2016125520A1 (fr) 2015-02-06 2016-08-11 株式会社村田製作所 Élément semi-conducteur et son procédé de fabrication
EP3156567A1 (fr) 2015-10-16 2017-04-19 Aug. Winkhaus GmbH & Co. KG Dispositif de surveillance d´une ferrure à crémone pour un ouvrant verrouillable d´un dormant
EP3159464A1 (fr) 2015-09-02 2017-04-26 Siegenia-Aubi KG Systeme de surveillance de fermeture

Patent Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2250367A (en) 1990-11-28 1992-06-03 Andrew Higgins Alarm arrangements
DE19518527A1 (de) 1995-05-19 1996-11-21 Winkhaus Fa August Überwachbare Verriegelungsanordnung für ein Fenster oder eine Türe oder dergleichen
DE19815768C2 (de) 1998-04-08 2000-11-30 Richard Ross Kippfensterverriegelung einer Objektsicherungsanlage
DE10017182A1 (de) 2000-04-07 2001-10-18 Seca Gmbh Alarmvorrichtung
EP1307795B1 (fr) 2000-07-25 2016-03-09 Gentex Corporation Systeme d'interconnexion, de liaison et de controle de fenetres de transmission variable, et constructions de fenetres de transmission variable
EP1325479B1 (fr) 2000-10-10 2004-12-22 Seca GmbH Dispositif pour determiner l'etat d'ouverture d'une porte, d'une fenetre ou similaire
DE10056119A1 (de) 2000-11-13 2002-06-06 Anatoli Stobbe Elektronisch codierbares Schloss-System
WO2005066440A1 (fr) 2003-12-31 2005-07-21 SCHÜCO International KG Dispositif de surveillance pour poignees de fenetre
WO2005066913A2 (fr) 2003-12-31 2005-07-21 SCHÜCO International KG Fenetre et poignee de fenetre
WO2006089795A2 (fr) 2005-02-25 2006-08-31 Weru Ag Dispositif de surveillance pour portes et fenetres
DE102005018826B3 (de) 2005-04-22 2006-10-05 Robert Seuffer Gmbh & Co. Kg Vorrichtung zur Erfassung der Position eines Schließelements, insbesondere eines Fensters oder einer Tür
DE102005000182A1 (de) 2005-12-13 2007-06-21 Aug. Winkhaus Gmbh & Co. Kg Überwachbare Verriegelungsanordnung für ein Fenster, eine Türe oder dergleichen und Verfahren zum Betrieb einer solchen Verriegelungsanordnung
DE202008000919U1 (de) 2008-01-23 2008-04-10 Carl Fuhr Gmbh & Co. Kg Schließanlage für eine einen Gangflügel und einen Standflügel aufweisende zweiflügelige Tür
EP2112676B1 (fr) 2008-04-03 2013-03-20 Link GmbH Dispositif de surveillance de position magnétique
WO2012054942A1 (fr) 2010-10-25 2012-05-03 Helmut Katherl Agencement de surveillance de l'état d'ouverture d'une fenêtre ou d'une porte
DE102013220176A1 (de) 2013-10-07 2015-04-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Zustands eines zu überwachenden Objekts
DE102014201130A1 (de) 2014-01-22 2015-07-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bestimmen eines unberechtigten Eindringens an einer Tür
DE102014008058A1 (de) 2014-05-28 2015-12-03 Heike Bedoian Vorrichtung und System zur Haus- und Gebäudeautomation
EP2998473A1 (fr) 2014-08-22 2016-03-23 Siegenia-Aubi Kg Appareil pour contrôler la position de fermeture un dispositif de verrouillage
DE102014115187A1 (de) 2014-09-22 2016-03-24 ABUS Seccor GmbH Türschließsystem
WO2016125520A1 (fr) 2015-02-06 2016-08-11 株式会社村田製作所 Élément semi-conducteur et son procédé de fabrication
EP3159464A1 (fr) 2015-09-02 2017-04-26 Siegenia-Aubi KG Systeme de surveillance de fermeture
EP3156567A1 (fr) 2015-10-16 2017-04-19 Aug. Winkhaus GmbH & Co. KG Dispositif de surveillance d´une ferrure à crémone pour un ouvrant verrouillable d´un dormant

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL3535739T5 (pl) 2023-10-30
EP3535739A1 (fr) 2019-09-11
DE102016123574A1 (de) 2018-06-07
EP3535739B2 (fr) 2023-07-05
PL3535739T3 (pl) 2021-05-31
WO2018104024A1 (fr) 2018-06-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1490284B1 (fr) Systeme de controle de cage destine a un ascenseur
EP2728093B1 (fr) Système de sécurité doté d'un capteur de détection d'accident
EP1801328B1 (fr) Porte avec un dispositif de verrouillage surveillé et procédé d'utilisation d'un tel porte
DE102011107279A1 (de) Fehlervermeidung bei der gestengesteuerten Öffnung eines Kraftfahrzeug-Stellelements
WO2012054942A1 (fr) Agencement de surveillance de l'état d'ouverture d'une fenêtre ou d'une porte
DE102013103535A1 (de) Überwachungsvorrichtung zur Überwachung von Verschlusseinrichtungen von Objektöffnung eines Objekts, insbesondere Haus, und ein entsprechendes Verfahren
EP0720136B1 (fr) Dispositif pour armer un système d'alarme et pour surveiller une porte d'entrée
DE4024689C2 (fr)
EP3535739B1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurité pour surveiller la position d'un ouvrant
EP0469333B1 (fr) Automobile avec un système de verrouillage central et d'alarme anti-vol
EP0642623B1 (fr) Installation de securite pour elements de fermeture d'un acces
EP0654769B1 (fr) Dispositif pour la mise en veille d'un système radio d'alarme
EP3156567B1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance d´une ferrure à crémone pour un ouvrant verrouillable d´un dormant
WO2020228895A1 (fr) Serrure de portière de véhicule automobile
EP2921617B1 (fr) Dispositif de verrouillage
DE3823276C2 (de) Diebstahlschutzvorrichtung
DE102019107281A1 (de) Method of operating an alarm system and alarm installation
EP3511490B1 (fr) Poignée pour une fenêtre ou une porte et système d'installation d'alarme doté de plusieurs de poignées
EP2107191B1 (fr) Serrure avec un sélecteur pour modifier les fonctions d'une serrure
EP1479575B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'activation d'un circuit électronique d'un véhicule automobile
EP2387010A1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurisation de porte d'issue de secours
EP1849950B1 (fr) Ensemble de porte coulissante
DE102019107282A1 (de) Türschlossbetätigungsvorrichtung zum Betätigen eines Türschlosses und Alarmanlage mit einer solchen Türschlossbetätigungsvorrichtung
DE19518491C2 (de) Anordnung aus zwei Schließzylindern für abzusichernde Zugangsbereiche
AT509234B1 (de) Überwachungsanordnung für den öffnungszustand eines fensters oder einer tür

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190606

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200507

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502017007970

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1328992

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20201028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210128

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210129

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210301

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210128

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210228

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502017007970

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201116

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20201130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: ROTO FRANK FENSTER- UND TUERTECHNOLOGIE GMBH

Effective date: 20210723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210228

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201028

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20211116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

PLBP Opposition withdrawn

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211116

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20230705

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 502017007970

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231124

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231120

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20231102

Year of fee payment: 7