EP3350535B1 - Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée - Google Patents

Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3350535B1
EP3350535B1 EP16747886.6A EP16747886A EP3350535B1 EP 3350535 B1 EP3350535 B1 EP 3350535B1 EP 16747886 A EP16747886 A EP 16747886A EP 3350535 B1 EP3350535 B1 EP 3350535B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weapon
control signal
projectiles
firing
sequence
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16747886.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3350535A1 (fr
EP3350535B8 (fr
EP3350535B9 (fr
Inventor
Günter KROGMANN
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rheinmetall Electronics GmbH
Original Assignee
Rheinmetall Defence Electronics GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=58224589&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP3350535(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Rheinmetall Defence Electronics GmbH filed Critical Rheinmetall Defence Electronics GmbH
Publication of EP3350535A1 publication Critical patent/EP3350535A1/fr
Publication of EP3350535B1 publication Critical patent/EP3350535B1/fr
Publication of EP3350535B8 publication Critical patent/EP3350535B8/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3350535B9 publication Critical patent/EP3350535B9/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/04Aiming or laying means for dispersing fire from a battery ; for controlling spread of shots; for coordinating fire from spaced weapons
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/06Aiming or laying means with rangefinder

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon, which is mounted in a mount so that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation, for fighting a target object.
  • the present invention also relates to a military vehicle with such a remotely controllable weapon station and a method for operating a remotely controllable weapon station.
  • Military vehicles such as ships or land vehicles, are often equipped with a weapon which is arranged on the outer shell of the vehicle and which is mounted in a mount such that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation.
  • mounts are often designed as remote-controlled weapon stations that can be actuated from the ballistically protected interior of the vehicle.
  • Such remotely controllable weapon stations are for example from the DE 10 2011 050 277 A1 and from the DE 10 2006 034 689 A1 known. Individual shots or volleys can be fired from the remote-controlled weapon station.
  • a remotely controllable weapon station which comprises a control device with a display device and a memory device.
  • the display device shows a stored view of a target device and the storage device stores the information about the filing between the line of fire (LOF) and the line of sight (LOS).
  • LEF line of fire
  • LOS line of sight
  • the weapon in the mount is aimed at the target by a fire control device.
  • a conventional lead calculation is used in the fire control of the remote-controlled weapon station.
  • LSS targets Low-Slow-Small
  • UAV targets Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicles
  • a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon for fighting a target object is proposed, which is mounted in a mount such that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station comprises at least one drive, controllable by a control signal, for aligning the weapon in azimuth and / or elevation.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a control unit for providing the control signal.
  • control unit is set up to supply the control signal provided for activating the weapon in order to fire a sequence of projectiles vary so that the fired projectiles of the sequence map a predetermined projectile pattern perpendicular to the trajectory of the fired projectiles, the control unit being set up to provide a varied control signal for controlling the weapon for firing the sequence of projectiles with the predetermined projectile pattern by a link of the provided control signal with an additional control signal, and a variation unit which is set up to vary the additional control signal over time according to a certain variation pattern in such a way that the control unit is set up to fire the weapon by means of the varied control signal to be controlled in such a way that the fired projectiles of the sequence map the predetermined projectile pattern, the variation unit being set up to set the variation pattern as a function of a coincidence window set for the weapon.
  • the projectile pattern enables the weapon station to deliver a controlled volley that is scattered around the target or target object. This significantly increases the hit probability, especially with small and moving air targets, compared to conventional methods.
  • the projectiles released by the weapon depict the projectile pattern
  • targets with trajectories that are difficult to predict are also hit.
  • the projectile pattern causes a targeted blurring for the weapon in order to hit targets with trajectories that are difficult to predict.
  • the projectile pattern can form a hit field of projectiles around a target meeting point calculated by the weapon station.
  • a target meeting point can also be understood to be a hit area.
  • the hit area is particularly large compared to the spread of the weapon.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station is arranged in particular on a military vehicle.
  • the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
  • the command center of the warship includes a fire control computer by means of which the weapon station can be remotely controlled.
  • the target object is, for example, an enemy military vehicle, such as an enemy warship.
  • the weapon is, for example, a naval gun.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a plurality of drives for aligning the weapon in azimuth and elevation.
  • the control unit is set up to generate a varied control signal for activating the weapon for firing the sequence of projectiles with the predetermined projectile pattern by linking the control signal provided with an additional control signal.
  • the additional control signal is added to the provided or conventional control signal which defines the optimal orientation in space for combating the target object.
  • the additional control signal correlates in particular with the cadence of the weapon in such a way that, for example, the additional control signal is switched on between the firing of each individual shot by the weapon.
  • the cadence can also be referred to as the rate of fire, rate of fire, frequency of fire, rate of fire or rate of fire and relates to the rate of fire of the weapon or gun.
  • the cadence is given in shots per unit of time, preferably in shots per minute.
  • the weapon station comprises a variation unit, which is set up to vary the additional control signal over time in accordance with a specific variation pattern, the control unit being set up to fire the weapon
  • the additional control signal is varied according to the specific variation pattern, for example the control signal value in elevation or azimuth is increased or decreased by 0.2 angular minutes.
  • the increase or decrease of the additional control signal values is provided in such a way that previously defined movement patterns are possible as projectile patterns in the target plane perpendicular to the flight path of the projectiles.
  • the respective unit for example the control unit or the variation unit, can be implemented in terms of hardware and / or also in terms of software.
  • the respective unit can be designed as a device or as part of a device, for example as a computer or as a microprocessor or as a fire control computer.
  • the respective unit can be designed as a computer program product, as a function, as a routine, as part of a program code or as an executable object.
  • the additional control signal comprises an offset for the control signal provided.
  • the additional signal value is increased by an exemplary offset of 0.2 angular minutes, so that the weapon is aimed at a new target point.
  • the weapon is controlled with a further additional control signal value with an increase in the elevation value by, for example, 0.2 angular minutes, so that the weapon is aimed at a further target point and a third projectile leaves the weapon.
  • the following is an example of the additional control signal value reduced by 0.2 angular minutes, so that the weapon is aimed at a fourth target point and the shot is fired in this direction.
  • the additional signal values for azimuth and elevation can also be selected differently. For example, double or triple the value for the elevation can be selected for the azimuth. This is particularly useful when fighting targets that are heavily influenced by wind, since wind disturbances are much more pronounced in the horizontal direction than in the vertical direction.
  • the variation pattern comprises a sequence of offsets with a specific step size between two consecutive offsets, the respective offset causing a change in the orientation of the weapon in azimuth and / or elevation.
  • the determined step size is large in relation to a spread of the weapon.
  • the variation unit is set up to set the variation pattern as a function of a coincidence window set for the weapon.
  • the coincidence window In a remote-controlled weapon station, there can be a deviation between the line of fire (LOF) and the line of sight (LOS). This deviation can also be referred to as the coincidence window and is ideally small.
  • LEF line of fire
  • LOS line of sight
  • the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a determination unit for determining a target distance of the target object, the control unit being set up to vary the provided control signal as a function of the determined target distance.
  • the values for the additional control signals can depend on the target range, for example 0.2 angular minutes for distances below 1000 meters and 0.1 angular minutes from and above a target range of 1000 meters.
  • control unit is set up to control the at least one drive by means of the varied control signal in a manner correlated to the cadence of the weapon.
  • the variation unit is set up to apply the additional control signal to the control signal provided between the firing of two projectiles.
  • control unit is set up to trigger the firing of a projectile or the firing of a sequence of projectiles by means of a varied control signal output at a specific point in time.
  • the number of shots can vary between the application of the respective additional control signal, so that, for example, two floors or three floors are emitted in the direction of a target point for the target object.
  • the variation unit is set up to set a shape and / or a step size of the projectile pattern by means of setting the variation pattern.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a display system for the optical representation of a target area of the weapon and an image of the target object within the target area.
  • the display system includes, in particular, a screen, for example a touchscreen, and a user interface with input means for entering commands for the weapon station, in particular for the display system.
  • the display system is connected in particular to a number of cameras which record the surroundings of the weapon.
  • the user or operator determines the target on the display system, for example by means of a crosshair, which the user is can move on the screen of the display system by means of the user interface.
  • a military vehicle which has a number N of remotely controllable weapon stations according to the first aspect, with N 1.
  • the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
  • the military vehicle can also be a land vehicle, such as a tank, in particular a remotely controllable tank.
  • a computer program product which causes the method as explained above according to the third aspect to be carried out on a program-controlled device.
  • a computer program product such as a computer program means, for example, as a storage medium, e.g. Memory card, USB stick, CD-ROM, DVD, or also in the form of a downloadable file from a server in a network. This can be done, for example, in a wireless communication network by transmitting a corresponding file with the computer program product or the computer program means.
  • a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon which is mounted in a mount in azimuth and elevation, and drives for aligning the weapon in azimuth and elevation is proposed, with at least one additional control signal values for aligning the weapon at a target Control signal is switched on, which allows the alignment of the weapon in azimuth and / or elevation to deviate from the alignment by a predetermined value.
  • Fig. 1 a schematic block diagram of a first embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1 is shown.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station 1 comprises a weapon 2 for combating a target object, which is mounted in a mount 3 in azimuth A and elevation E so that it can be directed.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station 1 is installed in particular on a military vehicle.
  • the military vehicle can comprise a plurality of remotely controllable weapon stations 1.
  • the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station 1 comprises at least one drive 4, controllable by a control signal S, V, for aligning the weapon 2 in azimuth A and / or elevation E.
  • the weapon station 1 comprises a control unit 5 for providing the control signal S, V, wherein the control unit 5 is set up to use the control signal S provided for activating the weapon 2 to fire a sequence of projectiles to vary in such a way that the projectiles fired in the sequence have a predetermined projectile pattern GM (see Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 ) perpendicular to the trajectory of the projectiles fired.
  • GM projectile pattern
  • control unit 5 is set up to control the at least one drive 4 by means of the varied control signal V in a manner correlated to the cadence of the weapon 2.
  • control unit 5 is additionally or alternatively set up to trigger the firing of a projectile or the firing of a sequence of projectiles by means of a varied control signal V output at a specific point in time.
  • a varied control signal V also triggers the firing of a single projectile or a sequence, that is to say several projectiles.
  • the control unit 5 is integrated in a fire control computer 9, for example.
  • the fire control computer 9 comprises, for example, a display system 11.
  • the display system 11 has a screen and a user interface with input means for entering commands for the display system 11.
  • the display system 11 is in particular connected to a number of cameras which record the surroundings of the weapon 2.
  • the weapon 2 and the fire control computer 9 are coupled by means of a communication link 12.
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic block diagram of a second embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1.
  • the weapon station 1 according to FIG Fig. 2 includes all features of the first embodiment of the Fig. 1 .
  • the control unit 5 is the Fig. 2 set up to generate a varied control signal V to control the weapon 2 for firing the sequence of projectiles with the predetermined projectile pattern GM by linking the control signal S provided with an additional control signal Z.
  • the control unit 5 has Fig. 2 a variation unit 6 for provision of the additional control signal Z and a provision unit 7 for providing the control signal S on.
  • a linking unit 8 of the control unit 5 is set up to combine the control signal S provided by the provision unit 7 with the additional control signal Z of the variation unit 6 to form the varied control signal V and to output it to the drive 4.
  • the variation unit 6 is set up in particular to vary the additional control signal Z over time in accordance with a specific variation pattern in such a way that the control unit 5 is set up to control the weapon 2 for firing the projectiles by means of the varied control signal V in such a way that the projectiles fired the sequence map the predetermined projectile pattern GM.
  • the variation unit 6 is set up to set the variation pattern as a function of a coincidence window set for the weapon 2.
  • the variation pattern includes, in particular, a sequence of offsets with a specific step size between two consecutive offsets. The respective offset causes a change in the orientation n of the weapon 2 in azimuth A and / or elevation E.
  • the Fig. 4 the bullet pattern GM the Fig. 3 with a hit on the target object ZO when shooting S4.
  • variation unit 6 can be set up to set the variation pattern as a function of a coincidence window set for the weapon 2.
  • variation unit 6 is preferably set up to generate the additional control signal Z (cf. Fig. 2 ) between the firing of two projectiles to apply the control signal S provided.
  • additional control signal Z cf. Fig. 2
  • variation unit 6 can be set up to set a shape and / or a step size of the projectile pattern GM by means of an adjustment of the variation pattern.
  • Fig. 5 a schematic block diagram of a third embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1 is shown.
  • the third embodiment of the Fig. 5 is based on the second embodiment of Fig. 2 and includes all features of the Fig. 2 .
  • the fire control computer 9 comprises Fig. 5 a determination unit 10.
  • the determination unit 10 is set up to determine a target distance ZE of the target object ZO.
  • the control device 5 can be set up to vary the control signal S provided as a function of the determined target distance ZE.
  • Fig. 6 a schematic flow diagram of an embodiment of a method for operating a remotely controllable weapon station 1 is shown.
  • the remotely controllable weapon station 1 comprises a weapon 2 for combating a target object ZO, which is mounted in a mount 3 in azimuth A and elevation E so that it can be directed.
  • the weapon station 1 comprises at least one drive 4, which can be controlled by a control signal S, V, for aligning the weapon in azimuth A and / or elevation E. Examples of the remotely controllable weapon station 1 are shown in FIG Fig. 1 , 2 and 5 shown.
  • step 601 the control signal S for activating the weapon 2 to fire a sequence of projectiles of the weapon 2 is varied in such a way that the projectiles fired in the sequence map a predetermined projectile pattern GM perpendicular to the trajectory of the projectiles fired.
  • step 602 the at least one drive 4 is activated by means of the varied control signal V. This results in the desired projectile pattern GM (see Fig. 3 and 4th ).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Station d'arme (1) télécommandée avec une arme (2), qui est montée dans un support (3) de manière à être réglable en azimut (A) et en élévation (E) pour combattre un objet cible (ZO), comprenant :
    au moins un propulseur (4) pour aligner l'arme (2) en azimut (A) et/ou en élévation (E) pouvant être commandé par un signal de commande (S, V),
    une unité de commande (5) pour fournir le signal de commande (S, V), dans lequel l'unité de commande (5) est agencée pour faire varier le signal de commande fourni (S) pour actionner l'arme (2) afin de tirer une séquence de projectiles de telle sorte que les projectiles tirés de la séquence reproduisent un modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM) perpendiculaire à la trajectoire des projectiles tirés, dans lequel l'unité de commande (5) est configurée pour générer un signal de commande varié (V) pour commander l'arme (2) afin de tirer la séquence de projectiles selon le modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM) en combinant le signal de commande fourni (S) avec un signal de commande supplémentaire (Z), et
    une unité de variation (6) configurée pour varier le signal de commande supplémentaire (Z) selon un modèle de variation dans le temps déterminé de telle sorte que l'unité de contrôle (5) est configurée pour contrôler l'arme (2) pour tirer des projectiles au moyen du signal de commande varié (V) de telle sorte que les projectiles tirés de la séquence reproduisent le modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM), l'unité de variation (6) étant configurée pour régler le modèle de variation en fonction d'une fenêtre de coïncidence définie pour l'arme (2), la fenêtre de coïncidence étant définie comme l'écart entre la ligne de tir et la ligne de visée et dépendant de la taille et de la distance de l'objet cible.
  2. Station d'arme selon la revendication 1,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le signal de commande supplémentaire (Z) comprend un décalage pour le signal de commande fourni (S).
  3. Station d'arme selon la revendication 2,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le modèle de variation est une séquence de décalages avec un incrément déterminé entre deux des décalages, le décalage respectif causant un changement d'orientation (n) de l'arme (2) en azimut et/ou en élévation.
  4. Station d'arme selon la revendication 3,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'incrément déterminé est grand par rapport à une dispersion de l'arme (2).
  5. Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'unité de variation (6) est configurée pour appliquer le signal de commande supplémentaire (Z) au signal de commande fourni (S) entre le tir de deux projectiles.
  6. Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'unité de variation (6) est configurée pour régler une forme et/ou un incrément du modèle de projectile (GM) par le biais d'un ajustement du modèle de variation.
  7. Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6,
    caractérisé par
    une unité de détermination (10) pour déterminer une distance cible (ZE) de l'objet cible (ZO), dans lequel l'unité de commande (5) est configurée pour faire varier le signal de commande fourni (S) en fonction de la distance cible (ZE) déterminée.
  8. Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'unité de commande (5) est configurée pour commander au moins un propulseur (4) au moyen du signal de commande varié (V) corrélé avec la cadence de l'arme (2).
  9. Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 8,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'unité de commande (5) est configurée pour déclencher le tir d'un projectile ou le tir d'une séquence de projectiles au moyen d'un signal de commande (V) varié émis à un moment précis.
  10. Véhicule militaire avec un nombre N de stations d'armes télécommandées (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 à 9, où N ≥ 1.
  11. Procédé d'utilisation d'une station d'arme télécommandée (1) avec une arme (2) montée dans un support (3) de manière à pouvoir être orientée en azimut (A) et en élévation (E) pour combattre un objet cible (ZO) et avec au moins un propulseur (4) pouvant être commandé par un signal de commande (S, V) pour orienter l'arme (2) en azimut (A) et/ou en élévation (E), le procédé comprenant :
    varier (601) le signal de commande (S) pour actionner l'arme (2) afin de tirer une séquence de projectiles de telle sorte que les projectiles tirés de la séquence reproduisent un modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM) perpendiculaire à la trajectoire des projectiles tirés, et
    commander l'au moins un propulseur (4) au moyen du signal de commande varié (V), le signal de commande varié (V) pour la commande de l'arme (2) étant généré par la combinaison d'un signal de commande prévu (S) avec un signal de commande supplémentaire (Z), le signal de commande supplémentaire (Z) étant modifié selon un modèle de variation spécifique dans le temps de telle sorte que l'arme (2) puisse être utilisée pour tirer les projectiles au moyen du signal de commande varié (V) de telle sorte que les projectiles tirés de la séquence reproduisent le modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM), le modèle de variation étant réglé en fonction d'une fenêtre de coïncidence réglée pour l'arme (2), la fenêtre de coïncidence étant définie comme l'écart entre la ligne de tir et la ligne de visée et dépendant de la taille et de la distance de l'objet cible.
  12. Produit de programme informatique qui, sur un dispositif commandé par un programme, provoque l'exécution du procédé selon la revendication 11.
EP16747886.6A 2015-09-17 2016-08-01 Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée Active EP3350535B9 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102015011796 2015-09-17
DE102015120030.9A DE102015120030A1 (de) 2015-09-17 2015-11-19 Fernbedienbare Waffenstation und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer fernbedienbaren Waffenstation
PCT/EP2016/068297 WO2017045828A1 (fr) 2015-09-17 2016-08-01 Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3350535A1 EP3350535A1 (fr) 2018-07-25
EP3350535B1 true EP3350535B1 (fr) 2020-11-11
EP3350535B8 EP3350535B8 (fr) 2020-12-30
EP3350535B9 EP3350535B9 (fr) 2021-05-12

Family

ID=58224589

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16747886.6A Active EP3350535B9 (fr) 2015-09-17 2016-08-01 Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3350535B9 (fr)
DE (1) DE102015120030A1 (fr)
HU (1) HUE052872T2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2017045828A1 (fr)

Citations (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1553994A1 (de) 1965-11-26 1969-08-28 Thomson Houston Comp Francaise Kurzstreckengeschuetz fuer nicht gelenkte Geschosse
DE2439250A1 (de) 1973-08-22 1975-02-27 Gen Electric Steuerung fuer den streubereich eines feuerstosses
US3974740A (en) 1971-02-17 1976-08-17 Thomson-Csf System for aiming projectiles at close range
US4244272A (en) 1978-10-10 1981-01-13 General Electric Company Dispersion-controlled multibarrel gun system
US4464975A (en) 1981-12-29 1984-08-14 General Electric Company Control of dispersion of gun systems
DE3531596A1 (de) 1984-09-04 1986-03-06 Aktiebolaget Bofors, Bofors Verfahren zum bekaempfen unterschiedlicher arten von luftzielen
CH667523A5 (en) 1985-07-31 1988-10-14 Oerlikon Buehrle Ag Strike rate improvement appts. for weapon against airborne target - uses selective braking of fired shells with controlled detonation at optimum strike point at surface of imaginary sphere
EP0313536A1 (fr) 1987-10-22 1989-04-26 Aktiebolaget Bofors Procédé pour augmenter la probabilité des coups portants d'armes automatiques défensives aériennes
SE468868B (sv) 1991-09-16 1993-03-29 Bofors Ab Anordning foer att bekaempa maal
US5212672A (en) 1991-11-20 1993-05-18 Loisch Julius A Timing control apparatus
WO2003006916A1 (fr) 2001-07-11 2003-01-23 Metal Storm Limited Procede et appareil d'ouverture de breche dans un mur
DE10346001A1 (de) 2003-10-02 2005-05-04 Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern
US6973865B1 (en) 2003-12-12 2005-12-13 Raytheon Company Dynamic pointing accuracy evaluation system and method used with a gun that fires a projectile under control of an automated fire control system
DE102006034689A1 (de) 2006-07-24 2008-01-31 Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh Schutzeinrichtung für ein militärisches Fahrzeug, welches als Unterstützungsfahrzeug fungiert und alle pionier- und bergtechnischen Arbeiten ausführen kann
JP2009293865A (ja) 2008-06-05 2009-12-17 Sumitomo Heavy Ind Ltd 発射レート制御装置及び発射レート制御方法
US7752952B1 (en) 2005-03-22 2010-07-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Dynamic barrier system
EP2208958A2 (fr) 2009-01-16 2010-07-21 Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS Dispositif de commande électronique de cadance de tir pour opération à distance d'une arme à feu automatique
WO2010082974A2 (fr) 2008-11-21 2010-07-22 U.S. Army Rdecom-Ardec Système d'arme activé à distance, pouvant être rechargé automatiquement et doté d'une arme à feu à actionnement externe
US20100237147A1 (en) 2007-09-27 2010-09-23 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Method and device for controlling the cadence of an automatic weapon
US20110288804A1 (en) 2010-05-19 2011-11-24 In Jung Sighting Apparatus for Remote-Control Shooting System and Sight Alignment Method Using the Same
WO2011149350A1 (fr) 2010-05-27 2011-12-01 Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepast-Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek Tno Procédé permettant de guider une salve de projectiles guidés vers une cible, système et produit de programme informatique
KR20120064429A (ko) 2010-12-09 2012-06-19 삼성테크윈 주식회사 무장 시스템 및 무장 유니트의 제어방법
US20120153021A1 (en) 2009-08-10 2012-06-21 Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace As Remote weapon system
DE102011050277A1 (de) 2011-05-11 2012-11-15 Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg Adapter zur Befestigung einer Lafette an einem Objekt, Lafette und militärisches Fahrzeug
US20140251123A1 (en) 2012-01-22 2014-09-11 Raytheon Company Unmanned range-programmable airburst weapon system for automated tracking and prosecution of close-in targets
US9074847B1 (en) 2014-08-28 2015-07-07 Flex Force Enterprises LLC Stabilized weapon platform with active sense and adaptive motion control
US20150247704A1 (en) 2012-04-12 2015-09-03 Philippe Levilly Remotely operated target-processing system
RU2564686C1 (ru) 2014-08-18 2015-10-10 Василий Васильевич Ефанов Способ определения характеристик рассеивания снарядов при стрельбе из артиллерийского оружия и информационно-вычислительная система для его осуществления
US20150330744A1 (en) 2012-12-17 2015-11-19 Nexter Systems Method for acquiring the coordinates of a trigger point of a projectile and fire-control system implementing the method
DE102014019199A1 (de) 2014-12-19 2016-06-23 Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg Maschinenwaffe
EP3367044B1 (fr) 2017-02-27 2020-06-24 Swarovski-Optik KG. Élément de réglage d'une ligne de visée d'un dispositif de visée optique ainsi que lunette de visée pourvue d'un tel élément de réglage et arme pourvue d'une telle lunette de visée ainsi que procédé de réglage de la ligne de visée

Patent Citations (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1553994A1 (de) 1965-11-26 1969-08-28 Thomson Houston Comp Francaise Kurzstreckengeschuetz fuer nicht gelenkte Geschosse
US3974740A (en) 1971-02-17 1976-08-17 Thomson-Csf System for aiming projectiles at close range
DE2439250A1 (de) 1973-08-22 1975-02-27 Gen Electric Steuerung fuer den streubereich eines feuerstosses
US4244272A (en) 1978-10-10 1981-01-13 General Electric Company Dispersion-controlled multibarrel gun system
US4464975A (en) 1981-12-29 1984-08-14 General Electric Company Control of dispersion of gun systems
US4712181A (en) 1984-09-04 1987-12-08 Aktiebolaget Bofors Method of combating different types of air targets
DE3531596A1 (de) 1984-09-04 1986-03-06 Aktiebolaget Bofors, Bofors Verfahren zum bekaempfen unterschiedlicher arten von luftzielen
CH667523A5 (en) 1985-07-31 1988-10-14 Oerlikon Buehrle Ag Strike rate improvement appts. for weapon against airborne target - uses selective braking of fired shells with controlled detonation at optimum strike point at surface of imaginary sphere
EP0313536A1 (fr) 1987-10-22 1989-04-26 Aktiebolaget Bofors Procédé pour augmenter la probabilité des coups portants d'armes automatiques défensives aériennes
SE468868B (sv) 1991-09-16 1993-03-29 Bofors Ab Anordning foer att bekaempa maal
US5212672A (en) 1991-11-20 1993-05-18 Loisch Julius A Timing control apparatus
WO2003006916A1 (fr) 2001-07-11 2003-01-23 Metal Storm Limited Procede et appareil d'ouverture de breche dans un mur
DE10346001A1 (de) 2003-10-02 2005-05-04 Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern
US6973865B1 (en) 2003-12-12 2005-12-13 Raytheon Company Dynamic pointing accuracy evaluation system and method used with a gun that fires a projectile under control of an automated fire control system
US7752952B1 (en) 2005-03-22 2010-07-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Dynamic barrier system
DE102006034689A1 (de) 2006-07-24 2008-01-31 Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh Schutzeinrichtung für ein militärisches Fahrzeug, welches als Unterstützungsfahrzeug fungiert und alle pionier- und bergtechnischen Arbeiten ausführen kann
US20100237147A1 (en) 2007-09-27 2010-09-23 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Method and device for controlling the cadence of an automatic weapon
JP2009293865A (ja) 2008-06-05 2009-12-17 Sumitomo Heavy Ind Ltd 発射レート制御装置及び発射レート制御方法
WO2010082974A2 (fr) 2008-11-21 2010-07-22 U.S. Army Rdecom-Ardec Système d'arme activé à distance, pouvant être rechargé automatiquement et doté d'une arme à feu à actionnement externe
EP2208958A2 (fr) 2009-01-16 2010-07-21 Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS Dispositif de commande électronique de cadance de tir pour opération à distance d'une arme à feu automatique
US20120153021A1 (en) 2009-08-10 2012-06-21 Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace As Remote weapon system
US20110288804A1 (en) 2010-05-19 2011-11-24 In Jung Sighting Apparatus for Remote-Control Shooting System and Sight Alignment Method Using the Same
WO2011149350A1 (fr) 2010-05-27 2011-12-01 Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepast-Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek Tno Procédé permettant de guider une salve de projectiles guidés vers une cible, système et produit de programme informatique
KR20120064429A (ko) 2010-12-09 2012-06-19 삼성테크윈 주식회사 무장 시스템 및 무장 유니트의 제어방법
DE102011050277A1 (de) 2011-05-11 2012-11-15 Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg Adapter zur Befestigung einer Lafette an einem Objekt, Lafette und militärisches Fahrzeug
US20140251123A1 (en) 2012-01-22 2014-09-11 Raytheon Company Unmanned range-programmable airburst weapon system for automated tracking and prosecution of close-in targets
US20150247704A1 (en) 2012-04-12 2015-09-03 Philippe Levilly Remotely operated target-processing system
US20150330744A1 (en) 2012-12-17 2015-11-19 Nexter Systems Method for acquiring the coordinates of a trigger point of a projectile and fire-control system implementing the method
RU2564686C1 (ru) 2014-08-18 2015-10-10 Василий Васильевич Ефанов Способ определения характеристик рассеивания снарядов при стрельбе из артиллерийского оружия и информационно-вычислительная система для его осуществления
US9074847B1 (en) 2014-08-28 2015-07-07 Flex Force Enterprises LLC Stabilized weapon platform with active sense and adaptive motion control
DE102014019199A1 (de) 2014-12-19 2016-06-23 Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg Maschinenwaffe
EP3367044B1 (fr) 2017-02-27 2020-06-24 Swarovski-Optik KG. Élément de réglage d'une ligne de visée d'un dispositif de visée optique ainsi que lunette de visée pourvue d'un tel élément de réglage et arme pourvue d'une telle lunette de visée ainsi que procédé de réglage de la ligne de visée

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Typical antiaircraft fire control systems. Part G", SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME NATIONAL PARK ASSOCIATION, 2013, XP055838923
"Waffentechnisches Taschenbuch", RHEINMETALL GMBH, Düsseldorf, pages: 179 - 209, XP055838926
OGORKIEWICZ, RICHARD M.: "Technologie der Panzer II", Wien, article "IX. Feuerleitanlagen für Panzer", pages: 258 - 269, XP055838978
STUTZ WALTER: "Schiesslehre", 1959, BIRKHÄUSER, Basel, Stuttgart, pages: 1 - 93, XP055838919

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3350535A1 (fr) 2018-07-25
EP3350535B8 (fr) 2020-12-30
WO2017045828A1 (fr) 2017-03-23
EP3350535B9 (fr) 2021-05-12
DE102015120030A1 (de) 2017-03-23
HUE052872T2 (hu) 2021-05-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1304539B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour pointer un tube de cannon et utilisation du dispositif
EP0977003A1 (fr) Procédé pour combattre au moins une cible aérienne au moyen d'un groupe de tir, groupe de tir comprenant au moins deux unités de tir et utilisation du groupe de tir
DE102005007910A1 (de) Feuerwaffe für langsam fliegende Geschosse
EP1920209B1 (fr) Procede d'optimisation du declenchement du tir d'une arme ou d'une piece d'artillerie
WO1990008936A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'amelioration de la precision du tir
DE102012213747A1 (de) Verfahren und Zieleinrichtung zur Ermittlung einer Wahrscheinlichkeit eines Treffers eines Zielobjekts
EP0547391A1 (fr) Procédé pour élever la probabilité de succès pour une défence anti-aérienne utilisant des projectiles à dispersion télé-commandée
EP2413086A2 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un corps volent articlé guidé par turbine
DE3013405C2 (de) Verfahren zum Vermeiden des Nachrichtens von Abschußgeräten für ballistische Flugkörper
EP3350535B1 (fr) Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée
EP3350536B1 (fr) Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée
DE102018110241A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz eines Fahrzeugs vor einer Bedrohung
DE1951622A1 (de) Anordnung zur Simulation von Schussbahnen
EP3060872B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'une arme orientable d'un véhicule dans le cadre d'exercices de tir
DE2627183C2 (de) Einrichtung zur Bekämpfung von Bodenzielen an einem fliegenden Waffenträger
EP3350534B1 (fr) Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée
DE2105016C3 (de) Prüf- und Trainingsanlage für die Bedienung von Flakgeschützen
DE3734758C2 (fr)
EP2989408B1 (fr) Procédé d'exploitation d'un système d'arme
EP3377840B9 (fr) Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de fonctionnement d'une tourelle téléopérée
DE19806911C2 (de) Verfahren zur Überwachung der Ausichtung einer Artilleriewaffe
EP1450125A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour combattre une cible
DE102014014906B3 (de) Flugkörper und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Flugkörpers
DE102014203771B3 (de) Waffensystem zum luftangriff auf feststehende oder bewegte ziele
EP0862042B1 (fr) Procédé pour la formation d'équipes d'artilleurs, installation pour la mise en oeuvre du procédé et utilisation de cette installation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180313

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200420

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
GRAR Information related to intention to grant a patent recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR71

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20201001

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502016011684

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RHEINMETALL DEFENCE ELECTRONICS GMBH, 28309 BREMEN, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1333893

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502016011684

Country of ref document: DE

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502016011684

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH, 28309 BREMEN, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PK

Free format text: BERICHTIGUNG B8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

GRAT Correction requested after decision to grant or after decision to maintain patent in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNCDEC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PK

Free format text: BERICHTIGUNG B9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210311

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210211

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210212

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E052872

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210311

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502016011684

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: KRAUSS-MAFFEI WEGMANN GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 20210806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210311

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210801

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210801

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210831

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1333893

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210801

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210801

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20230726

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20230721

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20230823

Year of fee payment: 8

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: KNDS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 20210806

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20240821

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201111

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Payment date: 20240823

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240821

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240826

Year of fee payment: 9