EP3350535B1 - Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée - Google Patents
Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3350535B1 EP3350535B1 EP16747886.6A EP16747886A EP3350535B1 EP 3350535 B1 EP3350535 B1 EP 3350535B1 EP 16747886 A EP16747886 A EP 16747886A EP 3350535 B1 EP3350535 B1 EP 3350535B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- weapon
- control signal
- projectiles
- firing
- sequence
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 14
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/04—Aiming or laying means for dispersing fire from a battery ; for controlling spread of shots; for coordinating fire from spaced weapons
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/06—Aiming or laying means with rangefinder
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon, which is mounted in a mount so that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation, for fighting a target object.
- the present invention also relates to a military vehicle with such a remotely controllable weapon station and a method for operating a remotely controllable weapon station.
- Military vehicles such as ships or land vehicles, are often equipped with a weapon which is arranged on the outer shell of the vehicle and which is mounted in a mount such that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation.
- mounts are often designed as remote-controlled weapon stations that can be actuated from the ballistically protected interior of the vehicle.
- Such remotely controllable weapon stations are for example from the DE 10 2011 050 277 A1 and from the DE 10 2006 034 689 A1 known. Individual shots or volleys can be fired from the remote-controlled weapon station.
- a remotely controllable weapon station which comprises a control device with a display device and a memory device.
- the display device shows a stored view of a target device and the storage device stores the information about the filing between the line of fire (LOF) and the line of sight (LOS).
- LEF line of fire
- LOS line of sight
- the weapon in the mount is aimed at the target by a fire control device.
- a conventional lead calculation is used in the fire control of the remote-controlled weapon station.
- LSS targets Low-Slow-Small
- UAV targets Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicles
- a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon for fighting a target object is proposed, which is mounted in a mount such that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises at least one drive, controllable by a control signal, for aligning the weapon in azimuth and / or elevation.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a control unit for providing the control signal.
- control unit is set up to supply the control signal provided for activating the weapon in order to fire a sequence of projectiles vary so that the fired projectiles of the sequence map a predetermined projectile pattern perpendicular to the trajectory of the fired projectiles, the control unit being set up to provide a varied control signal for controlling the weapon for firing the sequence of projectiles with the predetermined projectile pattern by a link of the provided control signal with an additional control signal, and a variation unit which is set up to vary the additional control signal over time according to a certain variation pattern in such a way that the control unit is set up to fire the weapon by means of the varied control signal to be controlled in such a way that the fired projectiles of the sequence map the predetermined projectile pattern, the variation unit being set up to set the variation pattern as a function of a coincidence window set for the weapon.
- the projectile pattern enables the weapon station to deliver a controlled volley that is scattered around the target or target object. This significantly increases the hit probability, especially with small and moving air targets, compared to conventional methods.
- the projectiles released by the weapon depict the projectile pattern
- targets with trajectories that are difficult to predict are also hit.
- the projectile pattern causes a targeted blurring for the weapon in order to hit targets with trajectories that are difficult to predict.
- the projectile pattern can form a hit field of projectiles around a target meeting point calculated by the weapon station.
- a target meeting point can also be understood to be a hit area.
- the hit area is particularly large compared to the spread of the weapon.
- the remotely controllable weapon station is arranged in particular on a military vehicle.
- the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
- the command center of the warship includes a fire control computer by means of which the weapon station can be remotely controlled.
- the target object is, for example, an enemy military vehicle, such as an enemy warship.
- the weapon is, for example, a naval gun.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a plurality of drives for aligning the weapon in azimuth and elevation.
- the control unit is set up to generate a varied control signal for activating the weapon for firing the sequence of projectiles with the predetermined projectile pattern by linking the control signal provided with an additional control signal.
- the additional control signal is added to the provided or conventional control signal which defines the optimal orientation in space for combating the target object.
- the additional control signal correlates in particular with the cadence of the weapon in such a way that, for example, the additional control signal is switched on between the firing of each individual shot by the weapon.
- the cadence can also be referred to as the rate of fire, rate of fire, frequency of fire, rate of fire or rate of fire and relates to the rate of fire of the weapon or gun.
- the cadence is given in shots per unit of time, preferably in shots per minute.
- the weapon station comprises a variation unit, which is set up to vary the additional control signal over time in accordance with a specific variation pattern, the control unit being set up to fire the weapon
- the additional control signal is varied according to the specific variation pattern, for example the control signal value in elevation or azimuth is increased or decreased by 0.2 angular minutes.
- the increase or decrease of the additional control signal values is provided in such a way that previously defined movement patterns are possible as projectile patterns in the target plane perpendicular to the flight path of the projectiles.
- the respective unit for example the control unit or the variation unit, can be implemented in terms of hardware and / or also in terms of software.
- the respective unit can be designed as a device or as part of a device, for example as a computer or as a microprocessor or as a fire control computer.
- the respective unit can be designed as a computer program product, as a function, as a routine, as part of a program code or as an executable object.
- the additional control signal comprises an offset for the control signal provided.
- the additional signal value is increased by an exemplary offset of 0.2 angular minutes, so that the weapon is aimed at a new target point.
- the weapon is controlled with a further additional control signal value with an increase in the elevation value by, for example, 0.2 angular minutes, so that the weapon is aimed at a further target point and a third projectile leaves the weapon.
- the following is an example of the additional control signal value reduced by 0.2 angular minutes, so that the weapon is aimed at a fourth target point and the shot is fired in this direction.
- the additional signal values for azimuth and elevation can also be selected differently. For example, double or triple the value for the elevation can be selected for the azimuth. This is particularly useful when fighting targets that are heavily influenced by wind, since wind disturbances are much more pronounced in the horizontal direction than in the vertical direction.
- the variation pattern comprises a sequence of offsets with a specific step size between two consecutive offsets, the respective offset causing a change in the orientation of the weapon in azimuth and / or elevation.
- the determined step size is large in relation to a spread of the weapon.
- the variation unit is set up to set the variation pattern as a function of a coincidence window set for the weapon.
- the coincidence window In a remote-controlled weapon station, there can be a deviation between the line of fire (LOF) and the line of sight (LOS). This deviation can also be referred to as the coincidence window and is ideally small.
- LEF line of fire
- LOS line of sight
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a determination unit for determining a target distance of the target object, the control unit being set up to vary the provided control signal as a function of the determined target distance.
- the values for the additional control signals can depend on the target range, for example 0.2 angular minutes for distances below 1000 meters and 0.1 angular minutes from and above a target range of 1000 meters.
- control unit is set up to control the at least one drive by means of the varied control signal in a manner correlated to the cadence of the weapon.
- the variation unit is set up to apply the additional control signal to the control signal provided between the firing of two projectiles.
- control unit is set up to trigger the firing of a projectile or the firing of a sequence of projectiles by means of a varied control signal output at a specific point in time.
- the number of shots can vary between the application of the respective additional control signal, so that, for example, two floors or three floors are emitted in the direction of a target point for the target object.
- the variation unit is set up to set a shape and / or a step size of the projectile pattern by means of setting the variation pattern.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a display system for the optical representation of a target area of the weapon and an image of the target object within the target area.
- the display system includes, in particular, a screen, for example a touchscreen, and a user interface with input means for entering commands for the weapon station, in particular for the display system.
- the display system is connected in particular to a number of cameras which record the surroundings of the weapon.
- the user or operator determines the target on the display system, for example by means of a crosshair, which the user is can move on the screen of the display system by means of the user interface.
- a military vehicle which has a number N of remotely controllable weapon stations according to the first aspect, with N 1.
- the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
- the military vehicle can also be a land vehicle, such as a tank, in particular a remotely controllable tank.
- a computer program product which causes the method as explained above according to the third aspect to be carried out on a program-controlled device.
- a computer program product such as a computer program means, for example, as a storage medium, e.g. Memory card, USB stick, CD-ROM, DVD, or also in the form of a downloadable file from a server in a network. This can be done, for example, in a wireless communication network by transmitting a corresponding file with the computer program product or the computer program means.
- a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon which is mounted in a mount in azimuth and elevation, and drives for aligning the weapon in azimuth and elevation is proposed, with at least one additional control signal values for aligning the weapon at a target Control signal is switched on, which allows the alignment of the weapon in azimuth and / or elevation to deviate from the alignment by a predetermined value.
- Fig. 1 a schematic block diagram of a first embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1 is shown.
- the remotely controllable weapon station 1 comprises a weapon 2 for combating a target object, which is mounted in a mount 3 in azimuth A and elevation E so that it can be directed.
- the remotely controllable weapon station 1 is installed in particular on a military vehicle.
- the military vehicle can comprise a plurality of remotely controllable weapon stations 1.
- the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
- the remotely controllable weapon station 1 comprises at least one drive 4, controllable by a control signal S, V, for aligning the weapon 2 in azimuth A and / or elevation E.
- the weapon station 1 comprises a control unit 5 for providing the control signal S, V, wherein the control unit 5 is set up to use the control signal S provided for activating the weapon 2 to fire a sequence of projectiles to vary in such a way that the projectiles fired in the sequence have a predetermined projectile pattern GM (see Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 ) perpendicular to the trajectory of the projectiles fired.
- GM projectile pattern
- control unit 5 is set up to control the at least one drive 4 by means of the varied control signal V in a manner correlated to the cadence of the weapon 2.
- control unit 5 is additionally or alternatively set up to trigger the firing of a projectile or the firing of a sequence of projectiles by means of a varied control signal V output at a specific point in time.
- a varied control signal V also triggers the firing of a single projectile or a sequence, that is to say several projectiles.
- the control unit 5 is integrated in a fire control computer 9, for example.
- the fire control computer 9 comprises, for example, a display system 11.
- the display system 11 has a screen and a user interface with input means for entering commands for the display system 11.
- the display system 11 is in particular connected to a number of cameras which record the surroundings of the weapon 2.
- the weapon 2 and the fire control computer 9 are coupled by means of a communication link 12.
- Fig. 2 shows a schematic block diagram of a second embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1.
- the weapon station 1 according to FIG Fig. 2 includes all features of the first embodiment of the Fig. 1 .
- the control unit 5 is the Fig. 2 set up to generate a varied control signal V to control the weapon 2 for firing the sequence of projectiles with the predetermined projectile pattern GM by linking the control signal S provided with an additional control signal Z.
- the control unit 5 has Fig. 2 a variation unit 6 for provision of the additional control signal Z and a provision unit 7 for providing the control signal S on.
- a linking unit 8 of the control unit 5 is set up to combine the control signal S provided by the provision unit 7 with the additional control signal Z of the variation unit 6 to form the varied control signal V and to output it to the drive 4.
- the variation unit 6 is set up in particular to vary the additional control signal Z over time in accordance with a specific variation pattern in such a way that the control unit 5 is set up to control the weapon 2 for firing the projectiles by means of the varied control signal V in such a way that the projectiles fired the sequence map the predetermined projectile pattern GM.
- the variation unit 6 is set up to set the variation pattern as a function of a coincidence window set for the weapon 2.
- the variation pattern includes, in particular, a sequence of offsets with a specific step size between two consecutive offsets. The respective offset causes a change in the orientation n of the weapon 2 in azimuth A and / or elevation E.
- the Fig. 4 the bullet pattern GM the Fig. 3 with a hit on the target object ZO when shooting S4.
- variation unit 6 can be set up to set the variation pattern as a function of a coincidence window set for the weapon 2.
- variation unit 6 is preferably set up to generate the additional control signal Z (cf. Fig. 2 ) between the firing of two projectiles to apply the control signal S provided.
- additional control signal Z cf. Fig. 2
- variation unit 6 can be set up to set a shape and / or a step size of the projectile pattern GM by means of an adjustment of the variation pattern.
- Fig. 5 a schematic block diagram of a third embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1 is shown.
- the third embodiment of the Fig. 5 is based on the second embodiment of Fig. 2 and includes all features of the Fig. 2 .
- the fire control computer 9 comprises Fig. 5 a determination unit 10.
- the determination unit 10 is set up to determine a target distance ZE of the target object ZO.
- the control device 5 can be set up to vary the control signal S provided as a function of the determined target distance ZE.
- Fig. 6 a schematic flow diagram of an embodiment of a method for operating a remotely controllable weapon station 1 is shown.
- the remotely controllable weapon station 1 comprises a weapon 2 for combating a target object ZO, which is mounted in a mount 3 in azimuth A and elevation E so that it can be directed.
- the weapon station 1 comprises at least one drive 4, which can be controlled by a control signal S, V, for aligning the weapon in azimuth A and / or elevation E. Examples of the remotely controllable weapon station 1 are shown in FIG Fig. 1 , 2 and 5 shown.
- step 601 the control signal S for activating the weapon 2 to fire a sequence of projectiles of the weapon 2 is varied in such a way that the projectiles fired in the sequence map a predetermined projectile pattern GM perpendicular to the trajectory of the projectiles fired.
- step 602 the at least one drive 4 is activated by means of the varied control signal V. This results in the desired projectile pattern GM (see Fig. 3 and 4th ).
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Claims (12)
- Station d'arme (1) télécommandée avec une arme (2), qui est montée dans un support (3) de manière à être réglable en azimut (A) et en élévation (E) pour combattre un objet cible (ZO), comprenant :au moins un propulseur (4) pour aligner l'arme (2) en azimut (A) et/ou en élévation (E) pouvant être commandé par un signal de commande (S, V),une unité de commande (5) pour fournir le signal de commande (S, V), dans lequel l'unité de commande (5) est agencée pour faire varier le signal de commande fourni (S) pour actionner l'arme (2) afin de tirer une séquence de projectiles de telle sorte que les projectiles tirés de la séquence reproduisent un modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM) perpendiculaire à la trajectoire des projectiles tirés, dans lequel l'unité de commande (5) est configurée pour générer un signal de commande varié (V) pour commander l'arme (2) afin de tirer la séquence de projectiles selon le modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM) en combinant le signal de commande fourni (S) avec un signal de commande supplémentaire (Z), etune unité de variation (6) configurée pour varier le signal de commande supplémentaire (Z) selon un modèle de variation dans le temps déterminé de telle sorte que l'unité de contrôle (5) est configurée pour contrôler l'arme (2) pour tirer des projectiles au moyen du signal de commande varié (V) de telle sorte que les projectiles tirés de la séquence reproduisent le modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM), l'unité de variation (6) étant configurée pour régler le modèle de variation en fonction d'une fenêtre de coïncidence définie pour l'arme (2), la fenêtre de coïncidence étant définie comme l'écart entre la ligne de tir et la ligne de visée et dépendant de la taille et de la distance de l'objet cible.
- Station d'arme selon la revendication 1,
caractérisé en ce que
le signal de commande supplémentaire (Z) comprend un décalage pour le signal de commande fourni (S). - Station d'arme selon la revendication 2,
caractérisé en ce que
le modèle de variation est une séquence de décalages avec un incrément déterminé entre deux des décalages, le décalage respectif causant un changement d'orientation (n) de l'arme (2) en azimut et/ou en élévation. - Station d'arme selon la revendication 3,
caractérisé en ce que
l'incrément déterminé est grand par rapport à une dispersion de l'arme (2). - Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4,
caractérisé en ce que
l'unité de variation (6) est configurée pour appliquer le signal de commande supplémentaire (Z) au signal de commande fourni (S) entre le tir de deux projectiles. - Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5,
caractérisé en ce que
l'unité de variation (6) est configurée pour régler une forme et/ou un incrément du modèle de projectile (GM) par le biais d'un ajustement du modèle de variation. - Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6,
caractérisé par
une unité de détermination (10) pour déterminer une distance cible (ZE) de l'objet cible (ZO), dans lequel l'unité de commande (5) est configurée pour faire varier le signal de commande fourni (S) en fonction de la distance cible (ZE) déterminée. - Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7,
caractérisé en ce que
l'unité de commande (5) est configurée pour commander au moins un propulseur (4) au moyen du signal de commande varié (V) corrélé avec la cadence de l'arme (2). - Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 8,
caractérisé en ce que
l'unité de commande (5) est configurée pour déclencher le tir d'un projectile ou le tir d'une séquence de projectiles au moyen d'un signal de commande (V) varié émis à un moment précis. - Véhicule militaire avec un nombre N de stations d'armes télécommandées (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 à 9, où N ≥ 1.
- Procédé d'utilisation d'une station d'arme télécommandée (1) avec une arme (2) montée dans un support (3) de manière à pouvoir être orientée en azimut (A) et en élévation (E) pour combattre un objet cible (ZO) et avec au moins un propulseur (4) pouvant être commandé par un signal de commande (S, V) pour orienter l'arme (2) en azimut (A) et/ou en élévation (E), le procédé comprenant :varier (601) le signal de commande (S) pour actionner l'arme (2) afin de tirer une séquence de projectiles de telle sorte que les projectiles tirés de la séquence reproduisent un modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM) perpendiculaire à la trajectoire des projectiles tirés, etcommander l'au moins un propulseur (4) au moyen du signal de commande varié (V), le signal de commande varié (V) pour la commande de l'arme (2) étant généré par la combinaison d'un signal de commande prévu (S) avec un signal de commande supplémentaire (Z), le signal de commande supplémentaire (Z) étant modifié selon un modèle de variation spécifique dans le temps de telle sorte que l'arme (2) puisse être utilisée pour tirer les projectiles au moyen du signal de commande varié (V) de telle sorte que les projectiles tirés de la séquence reproduisent le modèle de projectile prédéterminé (GM), le modèle de variation étant réglé en fonction d'une fenêtre de coïncidence réglée pour l'arme (2), la fenêtre de coïncidence étant définie comme l'écart entre la ligne de tir et la ligne de visée et dépendant de la taille et de la distance de l'objet cible.
- Produit de programme informatique qui, sur un dispositif commandé par un programme, provoque l'exécution du procédé selon la revendication 11.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102015011796 | 2015-09-17 | ||
DE102015120030.9A DE102015120030A1 (de) | 2015-09-17 | 2015-11-19 | Fernbedienbare Waffenstation und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer fernbedienbaren Waffenstation |
PCT/EP2016/068297 WO2017045828A1 (fr) | 2015-09-17 | 2016-08-01 | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée |
Publications (4)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3350535A1 EP3350535A1 (fr) | 2018-07-25 |
EP3350535B1 true EP3350535B1 (fr) | 2020-11-11 |
EP3350535B8 EP3350535B8 (fr) | 2020-12-30 |
EP3350535B9 EP3350535B9 (fr) | 2021-05-12 |
Family
ID=58224589
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP16747886.6A Active EP3350535B9 (fr) | 2015-09-17 | 2016-08-01 | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3350535B9 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102015120030A1 (fr) |
HU (1) | HUE052872T2 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2017045828A1 (fr) |
Citations (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1553994A1 (de) | 1965-11-26 | 1969-08-28 | Thomson Houston Comp Francaise | Kurzstreckengeschuetz fuer nicht gelenkte Geschosse |
DE2439250A1 (de) | 1973-08-22 | 1975-02-27 | Gen Electric | Steuerung fuer den streubereich eines feuerstosses |
US3974740A (en) | 1971-02-17 | 1976-08-17 | Thomson-Csf | System for aiming projectiles at close range |
US4244272A (en) | 1978-10-10 | 1981-01-13 | General Electric Company | Dispersion-controlled multibarrel gun system |
US4464975A (en) | 1981-12-29 | 1984-08-14 | General Electric Company | Control of dispersion of gun systems |
DE3531596A1 (de) | 1984-09-04 | 1986-03-06 | Aktiebolaget Bofors, Bofors | Verfahren zum bekaempfen unterschiedlicher arten von luftzielen |
CH667523A5 (en) | 1985-07-31 | 1988-10-14 | Oerlikon Buehrle Ag | Strike rate improvement appts. for weapon against airborne target - uses selective braking of fired shells with controlled detonation at optimum strike point at surface of imaginary sphere |
EP0313536A1 (fr) | 1987-10-22 | 1989-04-26 | Aktiebolaget Bofors | Procédé pour augmenter la probabilité des coups portants d'armes automatiques défensives aériennes |
SE468868B (sv) | 1991-09-16 | 1993-03-29 | Bofors Ab | Anordning foer att bekaempa maal |
US5212672A (en) | 1991-11-20 | 1993-05-18 | Loisch Julius A | Timing control apparatus |
WO2003006916A1 (fr) | 2001-07-11 | 2003-01-23 | Metal Storm Limited | Procede et appareil d'ouverture de breche dans un mur |
DE10346001A1 (de) | 2003-10-02 | 2005-05-04 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern |
US6973865B1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2005-12-13 | Raytheon Company | Dynamic pointing accuracy evaluation system and method used with a gun that fires a projectile under control of an automated fire control system |
DE102006034689A1 (de) | 2006-07-24 | 2008-01-31 | Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh | Schutzeinrichtung für ein militärisches Fahrzeug, welches als Unterstützungsfahrzeug fungiert und alle pionier- und bergtechnischen Arbeiten ausführen kann |
JP2009293865A (ja) | 2008-06-05 | 2009-12-17 | Sumitomo Heavy Ind Ltd | 発射レート制御装置及び発射レート制御方法 |
US7752952B1 (en) | 2005-03-22 | 2010-07-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Dynamic barrier system |
EP2208958A2 (fr) | 2009-01-16 | 2010-07-21 | Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS | Dispositif de commande électronique de cadance de tir pour opération à distance d'une arme à feu automatique |
WO2010082974A2 (fr) | 2008-11-21 | 2010-07-22 | U.S. Army Rdecom-Ardec | Système d'arme activé à distance, pouvant être rechargé automatiquement et doté d'une arme à feu à actionnement externe |
US20100237147A1 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2010-09-23 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Method and device for controlling the cadence of an automatic weapon |
US20110288804A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2011-11-24 | In Jung | Sighting Apparatus for Remote-Control Shooting System and Sight Alignment Method Using the Same |
WO2011149350A1 (fr) | 2010-05-27 | 2011-12-01 | Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepast-Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek Tno | Procédé permettant de guider une salve de projectiles guidés vers une cible, système et produit de programme informatique |
KR20120064429A (ko) | 2010-12-09 | 2012-06-19 | 삼성테크윈 주식회사 | 무장 시스템 및 무장 유니트의 제어방법 |
US20120153021A1 (en) | 2009-08-10 | 2012-06-21 | Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace As | Remote weapon system |
DE102011050277A1 (de) | 2011-05-11 | 2012-11-15 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Adapter zur Befestigung einer Lafette an einem Objekt, Lafette und militärisches Fahrzeug |
US20140251123A1 (en) | 2012-01-22 | 2014-09-11 | Raytheon Company | Unmanned range-programmable airburst weapon system for automated tracking and prosecution of close-in targets |
US9074847B1 (en) | 2014-08-28 | 2015-07-07 | Flex Force Enterprises LLC | Stabilized weapon platform with active sense and adaptive motion control |
US20150247704A1 (en) | 2012-04-12 | 2015-09-03 | Philippe Levilly | Remotely operated target-processing system |
RU2564686C1 (ru) | 2014-08-18 | 2015-10-10 | Василий Васильевич Ефанов | Способ определения характеристик рассеивания снарядов при стрельбе из артиллерийского оружия и информационно-вычислительная система для его осуществления |
US20150330744A1 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2015-11-19 | Nexter Systems | Method for acquiring the coordinates of a trigger point of a projectile and fire-control system implementing the method |
DE102014019199A1 (de) | 2014-12-19 | 2016-06-23 | Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg | Maschinenwaffe |
EP3367044B1 (fr) | 2017-02-27 | 2020-06-24 | Swarovski-Optik KG. | Élément de réglage d'une ligne de visée d'un dispositif de visée optique ainsi que lunette de visée pourvue d'un tel élément de réglage et arme pourvue d'une telle lunette de visée ainsi que procédé de réglage de la ligne de visée |
-
2015
- 2015-11-19 DE DE102015120030.9A patent/DE102015120030A1/de active Pending
-
2016
- 2016-08-01 WO PCT/EP2016/068297 patent/WO2017045828A1/fr active Application Filing
- 2016-08-01 HU HUE16747886A patent/HUE052872T2/hu unknown
- 2016-08-01 EP EP16747886.6A patent/EP3350535B9/fr active Active
Patent Citations (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1553994A1 (de) | 1965-11-26 | 1969-08-28 | Thomson Houston Comp Francaise | Kurzstreckengeschuetz fuer nicht gelenkte Geschosse |
US3974740A (en) | 1971-02-17 | 1976-08-17 | Thomson-Csf | System for aiming projectiles at close range |
DE2439250A1 (de) | 1973-08-22 | 1975-02-27 | Gen Electric | Steuerung fuer den streubereich eines feuerstosses |
US4244272A (en) | 1978-10-10 | 1981-01-13 | General Electric Company | Dispersion-controlled multibarrel gun system |
US4464975A (en) | 1981-12-29 | 1984-08-14 | General Electric Company | Control of dispersion of gun systems |
US4712181A (en) | 1984-09-04 | 1987-12-08 | Aktiebolaget Bofors | Method of combating different types of air targets |
DE3531596A1 (de) | 1984-09-04 | 1986-03-06 | Aktiebolaget Bofors, Bofors | Verfahren zum bekaempfen unterschiedlicher arten von luftzielen |
CH667523A5 (en) | 1985-07-31 | 1988-10-14 | Oerlikon Buehrle Ag | Strike rate improvement appts. for weapon against airborne target - uses selective braking of fired shells with controlled detonation at optimum strike point at surface of imaginary sphere |
EP0313536A1 (fr) | 1987-10-22 | 1989-04-26 | Aktiebolaget Bofors | Procédé pour augmenter la probabilité des coups portants d'armes automatiques défensives aériennes |
SE468868B (sv) | 1991-09-16 | 1993-03-29 | Bofors Ab | Anordning foer att bekaempa maal |
US5212672A (en) | 1991-11-20 | 1993-05-18 | Loisch Julius A | Timing control apparatus |
WO2003006916A1 (fr) | 2001-07-11 | 2003-01-23 | Metal Storm Limited | Procede et appareil d'ouverture de breche dans un mur |
DE10346001A1 (de) | 2003-10-02 | 2005-05-04 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern |
US6973865B1 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2005-12-13 | Raytheon Company | Dynamic pointing accuracy evaluation system and method used with a gun that fires a projectile under control of an automated fire control system |
US7752952B1 (en) | 2005-03-22 | 2010-07-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Dynamic barrier system |
DE102006034689A1 (de) | 2006-07-24 | 2008-01-31 | Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh | Schutzeinrichtung für ein militärisches Fahrzeug, welches als Unterstützungsfahrzeug fungiert und alle pionier- und bergtechnischen Arbeiten ausführen kann |
US20100237147A1 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2010-09-23 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Method and device for controlling the cadence of an automatic weapon |
JP2009293865A (ja) | 2008-06-05 | 2009-12-17 | Sumitomo Heavy Ind Ltd | 発射レート制御装置及び発射レート制御方法 |
WO2010082974A2 (fr) | 2008-11-21 | 2010-07-22 | U.S. Army Rdecom-Ardec | Système d'arme activé à distance, pouvant être rechargé automatiquement et doté d'une arme à feu à actionnement externe |
EP2208958A2 (fr) | 2009-01-16 | 2010-07-21 | Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS | Dispositif de commande électronique de cadance de tir pour opération à distance d'une arme à feu automatique |
US20120153021A1 (en) | 2009-08-10 | 2012-06-21 | Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace As | Remote weapon system |
US20110288804A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2011-11-24 | In Jung | Sighting Apparatus for Remote-Control Shooting System and Sight Alignment Method Using the Same |
WO2011149350A1 (fr) | 2010-05-27 | 2011-12-01 | Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepast-Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek Tno | Procédé permettant de guider une salve de projectiles guidés vers une cible, système et produit de programme informatique |
KR20120064429A (ko) | 2010-12-09 | 2012-06-19 | 삼성테크윈 주식회사 | 무장 시스템 및 무장 유니트의 제어방법 |
DE102011050277A1 (de) | 2011-05-11 | 2012-11-15 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Adapter zur Befestigung einer Lafette an einem Objekt, Lafette und militärisches Fahrzeug |
US20140251123A1 (en) | 2012-01-22 | 2014-09-11 | Raytheon Company | Unmanned range-programmable airburst weapon system for automated tracking and prosecution of close-in targets |
US20150247704A1 (en) | 2012-04-12 | 2015-09-03 | Philippe Levilly | Remotely operated target-processing system |
US20150330744A1 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2015-11-19 | Nexter Systems | Method for acquiring the coordinates of a trigger point of a projectile and fire-control system implementing the method |
RU2564686C1 (ru) | 2014-08-18 | 2015-10-10 | Василий Васильевич Ефанов | Способ определения характеристик рассеивания снарядов при стрельбе из артиллерийского оружия и информационно-вычислительная система для его осуществления |
US9074847B1 (en) | 2014-08-28 | 2015-07-07 | Flex Force Enterprises LLC | Stabilized weapon platform with active sense and adaptive motion control |
DE102014019199A1 (de) | 2014-12-19 | 2016-06-23 | Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg | Maschinenwaffe |
EP3367044B1 (fr) | 2017-02-27 | 2020-06-24 | Swarovski-Optik KG. | Élément de réglage d'une ligne de visée d'un dispositif de visée optique ainsi que lunette de visée pourvue d'un tel élément de réglage et arme pourvue d'une telle lunette de visée ainsi que procédé de réglage de la ligne de visée |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
"Typical antiaircraft fire control systems. Part G", SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME NATIONAL PARK ASSOCIATION, 2013, XP055838923 |
"Waffentechnisches Taschenbuch", RHEINMETALL GMBH, Düsseldorf, pages: 179 - 209, XP055838926 |
OGORKIEWICZ, RICHARD M.: "Technologie der Panzer II", Wien, article "IX. Feuerleitanlagen für Panzer", pages: 258 - 269, XP055838978 |
STUTZ WALTER: "Schiesslehre", 1959, BIRKHÄUSER, Basel, Stuttgart, pages: 1 - 93, XP055838919 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3350535A1 (fr) | 2018-07-25 |
EP3350535B8 (fr) | 2020-12-30 |
WO2017045828A1 (fr) | 2017-03-23 |
EP3350535B9 (fr) | 2021-05-12 |
DE102015120030A1 (de) | 2017-03-23 |
HUE052872T2 (hu) | 2021-05-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1304539B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour pointer un tube de cannon et utilisation du dispositif | |
EP0977003A1 (fr) | Procédé pour combattre au moins une cible aérienne au moyen d'un groupe de tir, groupe de tir comprenant au moins deux unités de tir et utilisation du groupe de tir | |
DE102005007910A1 (de) | Feuerwaffe für langsam fliegende Geschosse | |
EP1920209B1 (fr) | Procede d'optimisation du declenchement du tir d'une arme ou d'une piece d'artillerie | |
WO1990008936A1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif d'amelioration de la precision du tir | |
DE102012213747A1 (de) | Verfahren und Zieleinrichtung zur Ermittlung einer Wahrscheinlichkeit eines Treffers eines Zielobjekts | |
EP0547391A1 (fr) | Procédé pour élever la probabilité de succès pour une défence anti-aérienne utilisant des projectiles à dispersion télé-commandée | |
EP2413086A2 (fr) | Procédé de commande d'un corps volent articlé guidé par turbine | |
DE3013405C2 (de) | Verfahren zum Vermeiden des Nachrichtens von Abschußgeräten für ballistische Flugkörper | |
EP3350535B1 (fr) | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée | |
EP3350536B1 (fr) | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée | |
DE102018110241A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz eines Fahrzeugs vor einer Bedrohung | |
DE1951622A1 (de) | Anordnung zur Simulation von Schussbahnen | |
EP3060872B1 (fr) | Procédé de commande d'une arme orientable d'un véhicule dans le cadre d'exercices de tir | |
DE2627183C2 (de) | Einrichtung zur Bekämpfung von Bodenzielen an einem fliegenden Waffenträger | |
EP3350534B1 (fr) | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée | |
DE2105016C3 (de) | Prüf- und Trainingsanlage für die Bedienung von Flakgeschützen | |
DE3734758C2 (fr) | ||
EP2989408B1 (fr) | Procédé d'exploitation d'un système d'arme | |
EP3377840B9 (fr) | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de fonctionnement d'une tourelle téléopérée | |
DE19806911C2 (de) | Verfahren zur Überwachung der Ausichtung einer Artilleriewaffe | |
EP1450125A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour combattre une cible | |
DE102014014906B3 (de) | Flugkörper und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Flugkörpers | |
DE102014203771B3 (de) | Waffensystem zum luftangriff auf feststehende oder bewegte ziele | |
EP0862042B1 (fr) | Procédé pour la formation d'équipes d'artilleurs, installation pour la mise en oeuvre du procédé et utilisation de cette installation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20180313 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200420 |
|
GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
GRAR | Information related to intention to grant a patent recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR71 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20201001 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502016011684 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RHEINMETALL DEFENCE ELECTRONICS GMBH, 28309 BREMEN, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1333893 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502016011684 Country of ref document: DE |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502016011684 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH, 28309 BREMEN, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PK Free format text: BERICHTIGUNG B8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: RO Ref legal event code: EPE |
|
GRAT | Correction requested after decision to grant or after decision to maintain patent in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNCDEC |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PK Free format text: BERICHTIGUNG B9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210311 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210211 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210212 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HU Ref legal event code: AG4A Ref document number: E052872 Country of ref document: HU |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210311 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502016011684 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: KRAUSS-MAFFEI WEGMANN GMBH & CO. KG Effective date: 20210806 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20210831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210311 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210801 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1333893 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210801 |
|
RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210801 |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20230726 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20230721 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Payment date: 20230823 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: KNDS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH & CO. KG Effective date: 20210806 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20240821 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201111 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Payment date: 20240823 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240821 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240826 Year of fee payment: 9 |