EP3350534B1 - Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée - Google Patents
Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3350534B1 EP3350534B1 EP16747885.8A EP16747885A EP3350534B1 EP 3350534 B1 EP3350534 B1 EP 3350534B1 EP 16747885 A EP16747885 A EP 16747885A EP 3350534 B1 EP3350534 B1 EP 3350534B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- target
- weapon
- unit
- target object
- display system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 17
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/04—Aiming or laying means for dispersing fire from a battery ; for controlling spread of shots; for coordinating fire from spaced weapons
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41A—FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE
- F41A19/00—Firing or trigger mechanisms; Cocking mechanisms
- F41A19/58—Electric firing mechanisms
- F41A19/64—Electric firing mechanisms for automatic or burst-firing mode
- F41A19/65—Electric firing mechanisms for automatic or burst-firing mode for giving ripple fire, i.e. using electric sequencer switches for timed multiple-charge launching, e.g. for rocket launchers
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/06—Aiming or laying means with rangefinder
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/14—Indirect aiming means
- F41G3/16—Sighting devices adapted for indirect laying of fire
- F41G3/165—Sighting devices adapted for indirect laying of fire using a TV-monitor
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/22—Aiming or laying means for vehicle-borne armament, e.g. on aircraft
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon, which is mounted in a mount so that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation, for fighting a target object.
- the present invention also relates to a military vehicle with such a remotely controllable weapon station and a method for operating a remotely controllable weapon station.
- Military vehicles such as ships or land vehicles, are often equipped with a weapon which is arranged on the outer shell of the vehicle and which is mounted in a mount such that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation.
- mounts are often designed as remote-controlled weapon stations that can be actuated from the ballistically protected interior of the vehicle.
- Such remotely controllable weapon stations are for example from the DE 10 2011 050 277 A1 known. Individual shots or volleys can be fired from the remote-controlled weapon station.
- a remotely controllable weapon station which comprises a control device with a display device and a memory device.
- the display device shows a stored view of a target device and the storage device stores the information about the filing between the line of fire (LOF) and the line of sight (LOS).
- LEF line of fire
- LOS line of sight
- a method and a device are disclosed for controlling and varying the firing sequence of a machine gun, with a given firing sequence (cadence) which is in the range of a resonance cadence, the firing sequence is changed from shot to shot in such a way that the time interval between adjacent firings alternately once is less and one time greater than the constant time interval between the individual shot releases calculated for the specified cadence, so that the total desired cadence is achieved, but the resonance cadence is avoided.
- the disadvantage of the conventional solutions is that the variation of the cadence refers exclusively to parameters internal to the weapon, such as the resonance behavior or the vibration behavior of the weapon, but not to parameters external to the weapon, such as the distance to the target or the size of the target.
- the document WO01 / 36893 discloses a variation in cadence in a handheld weapon based on the range and size of the target.
- the document U.S. 5,247,867 A describes a speed adjustment system for an automatic defense cannon with controllable muzzle velocity.
- the speed adjustment system comprises a control device for determining the projectile ejection speed which is necessary in order to achieve an effective target impact speed which is less than a predetermined projectile impact speed.
- the determined projectile ejection speed is made available to the automatic weapon gun system.
- a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon for fighting a target object is proposed, which is mounted in a mount such that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a first unit for determining a target distance of the target object to the weapon, a second unit for determining a physical target extent of the target object and a third unit for setting a maximum cadence of the weapon depending on the determined target distance and on the determined physical target extent .
- the remotely controllable weapon station is arranged in particular on a military vehicle.
- the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
- the command center of the warship includes a fire control computer by means of which the weapon station can be remotely controlled.
- the target object is, for example, an enemy military vehicle, such as an enemy warship.
- the weapon is, for example, a naval gun.
- the cadence can also be referred to as the rate of fire, rate of fire, frequency of fire, rate of fire or rate of fire and relates to the rate of fire of the weapon or gun.
- the cadence is given in shots per unit of time, preferably in shots per minute.
- a variation or setting of the cadence is advantageously made possible automatically with regard to parameters external to the weapon, the physical target extent and the target range. This makes it possible to adjust the cadence of the weapon adaptively to the target object.
- the coincidence window In a remote-controlled weapon station, there can be a deviation between the line of fire (LOF) and the line of sight (LOS). This deviation can also be referred to as the coincidence window and is ideally small.
- LEF line of fire
- LOS line of sight
- the setting or variation of the cadence of the remotely controllable weapon station now makes it possible to vary the coincidence window as a function of the target distance and the target size (or target size).
- the The triggering of a shot is instructed, for example, by pressing the fire button, the weapon fires shots, the cadence being set and thus varying as a function of the target distance and target extension.
- the automated variation of the cadence according to the invention is advantageous in particular when fighting fast sea targets or air targets that are moving towards the remotely controllable weapon station with at least a part of their speed vector. If the distance is initially great, a small coincidence window can be set for effective combat against the target object, so that only a low rate of cadence is provided for the weapon. While the distance to the target object is subsequently reduced, the coincidence window is enlarged so that an increasing cadence is permissible for effective combat. In this way, the optimal cadence of the weapon of the remote-controlled weapon station is automatically selected even when the target distance varies greatly, thus maximizing the combat efficiency and at the same time saving resources.
- the cadence can thus be determined by the target distance and / or the target extension in such a way that the cadence can increase when the target distance is reduced.
- the respective unit for example the first unit, can be implemented in terms of hardware and / or also in terms of software.
- the respective unit can be designed as a device or as part of a device, for example as a computer or as a microprocessor or as a fire control computer.
- the respective unit can be designed as a computer program product, as a function, as a routine, as part of a program code or as an executable object.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a display system for the optical representation of a target area of the weapon and an image of the target object within the target area.
- the display system comprises in particular a screen, for example a touchscreen, and a user interface with input means for entering commands for the display system.
- the display system is connected in particular to a number of cameras which record the surroundings of the weapon.
- the second unit is set up to determine a size of a target shown on the display system and assigned to the target object, and the physical target extent of the target object as a function of the determined size of the particular target on the display system and the to determine a specific target distance of the target object.
- the second unit is set up to determine the size of the target shown and determined on the display system by counting the pixels covered by the target on the display system.
- the pixel elements covered by the target in the display system or the framed pixel area of the target are recorded as target size or target extent. Taking into account the measured target distance, the recorded pixel area can then be converted into square meters of a real physical target area.
- the third unit which is integrated in particular in the fire control software, determines the necessary target accuracy by calculating the permissible coincidence value for the next shot to be released. Provided the operator then pressed the fire button is, as long as the fire button is pressed, the optimal cadence is calculated again and again for each pending shot and the shot is only released when all conditions are met. This process is repeated as long as the operator keeps the fire button pressed or the magazine of the weapon is empty.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a fourth unit which is set up to determine the target shown on the display system, which is assigned to the target object, as a function of a user input by the user to identify the target on the display system.
- the user or operator determines the target on the display system, for example by means of a crosshair, which the user can move on the screen of the display system by means of a user interface.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a fourth unit which is set up to automatically determine the target shown on the display system, which is assigned to the target object, by means of pattern recognition.
- the pattern recognition uses in particular a database in which possible target objects, for example patterns of enemy warships, are stored.
- the patterns stored in the database represent the reference for the automatic pattern recognition.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a fourth unit which is set up to output to the user a target proposal for the target calculated by means of pattern recognition and the target, which is assigned to the target object, as a function of user input of the user to confirm the proposed target.
- This embodiment is a semi-automatic variant.
- a suggested goal for the goal is automatically proposed to the user.
- the suggested goal becomes the goal.
- a new target is calculated and suggested to the user.
- the fourth unit is set up to determine sensitive parts of the target object as the target.
- Examples of a sensitive part of a warship as an exemplary target object are the command center, the drive of the warship and its weapon systems.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a fourth unit which is set up to define a coincidence window for the weapon as a function of the determined target distance and the determined physical target extent.
- the first unit is set up to determine the target distance of the target object from the weapon in real time.
- the third unit is then set up to set the maximum cadence of the weapon as a function of the determined target distance and the determined physical target extension in real time.
- the determination of the target range in real time and the determination of the maximum cadence of the weapon in real time enable optimization of the use of the weapon, in particular with regard to accuracy and efficiency.
- the first unit comprises a laser range finder.
- a military vehicle which has a number N of remotely controllable weapon stations according to the first aspect, with N 1.
- the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
- the military vehicle can also be a land vehicle, such as a tank, in particular a remotely controllable tank.
- a computer program product which causes the method as explained above according to the third aspect to be carried out on a program-controlled device.
- a computer program product such as a computer program means, for example, can be used as a storage medium such as a memory card, USB stick, CD-ROM, DVD, or in the form of a downloadable file from a server in a Network deployed or delivered. This can be done, for example, in a wireless communication network by transmitting a corresponding file with the computer program product or the computer program means.
- a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon for fighting a target object is proposed, the weapon being mounted in a mount in azimuth and elevation so that it can be directed.
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprises a first means, a second means and a third means.
- the first means is set up for determining a target range of the target object from the weapon.
- the second means is set up to determine a physical target extent of the target object.
- the third means is set up to define a coincidence window for the weapon as a function of the determined target range and of the determined physical target extent.
- a remotely controllable weapon station with a weapon which is mounted in a mount in azimuth and elevation, can be directed, is proposed for fighting a target
- the remotely controllable weapon station comprising a device for varying the cadence of the weapon, the cadence being determined by the target distance and / or the target extent can be determined in such a way that the cadence can increase when the target distance is reduced.
- Fig. 1 a schematic block diagram of a first embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1 is shown.
- the remotely controllable weapon station 1 comprises a weapon 2 for combating a target object, which is mounted in a mount 3 so that it can be directed in azimuth and elevation.
- the remotely controllable weapon station 1 is installed in particular on a military vehicle.
- the military vehicle can comprise a plurality of remotely controllable weapon stations 1.
- the military vehicle is, for example, a warship.
- the remote-controlled weapon station 1 of the Fig. 1 comprises a first unit 4, a second unit 5, a third unit 6 and a fire control computer 7.
- the first unit 4, the second unit 5 and the third unit 6 are part of the fire control computer 7.
- the first unit 4 is set up to determine a target distance ZE of the target object to the weapon 2.
- the first unit 4 comprises in particular a laser range finder.
- the second unit 5 is set up to determine a physical target extent ZA of the target object.
- the third unit 6 is set up to determine a maximum cadence of the weapon 2 as a function of the determined target distance ZE and of the determined physical target extension ZA.
- the first unit 4 is set up in particular to determine the target distance ZE of the target object to the weapon 2 in real time, the third unit 6 then also being set up to determine the maximum cadence of the weapon 2 as a function of the determined target distance ZE and from the specific physical target extent ZA to be set in real time.
- Fig. 2 shows a schematic block diagram of a second embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1.
- the second embodiment of the weapon station 1 according to FIG Fig. 2 includes all features of the first exemplary embodiment according to Fig. 1 .
- the remote-controlled weapon station 1 of the Fig. 2 comprises a first unit 4, a second unit 5, a third unit 6, a fire control computer 7, a communication link 8 between the weapon 2 and the fire control computer 7 Display system 9 and a communication link 10 between the fire control computer 7 and the display system 9.
- the display system 9 shows a target Z which is assigned to a physical target object, for example an enemy ship.
- a target Z denotes the target distance of the target Z and thus the target object of the weapon 2.
- G denotes the size of the target Z shown and determined on the display system 9, which is assigned to the target object. The assignment of the target Z to the target object and thus the determination of the target Z is carried out either by the operator of the display system 9, automatically by the display system 9 and the fire control computer 7 or semi-automatically, as detailed below.
- the second unit 5 is set up in particular to determine a size G of the specific target Z shown on the display system 9, which is assigned to the target object, and the physical target extent ZA of the target object as a function of the determined size G of the specific target Z on the display system 9 and the determined target distance ZE of the target object. For example, the second unit determines the size G of the target Z shown and determined on the display system 9 by counting the image points covered by the target Z on the display system 9.
- Fig. 3 a schematic block diagram of a third embodiment of a remotely controllable weapon station 1 is shown.
- the third embodiment of the remotely controllable weapon station 1 according to Fig. 3 includes all features of the second exemplary embodiment according to Fig. 2 .
- the fire control computer 7 comprises Fig. 3 a fourth unit 11, a user interface 12 and a fifth unit 13.
- the fourth unit 11 is set up in particular to determine the target Z shown on the display system 9 as a function of a user input by the user for identifying the target Z on the display system 9. For this purpose, the user can in particular use a crosshair shown on the display system 9.
- the fourth unit 11 can be set up to automatically determine the target Z shown on the display system 9 by means of pattern recognition.
- the fourth unit 11 can be set up to output a target proposal for the target Z calculated by means of pattern recognition and to determine the target Z as a function of a user input by the user for actuating the output target proposal.
- the fire control computer 7 includes the user interface 12, which in particular includes at least one input unit, such as a touchscreen, a joystick and / or switching elements (virtual and / or mechanical).
- the fourth unit 11 is set up to determine sensitive parts of the target object as the target Z.
- the target Z does not correspond to the entire target object, but only to one sensitive part or to several sensitive parts of the target object.
- Examples of a sensitive part of a warship as an exemplary target object are the command center, the drive of the warship and its weapon systems.
- the fifth unit 13 is set up to define a coincidence window for the weapon 2 as a function of the determined target distance ZE and of the determined physical target extent ZA.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Claims (14)
- Station d'arme télécommandée (1) avec une arme (2), qui est montée dans un support (3) de manière à être réglable en azimut et en élévation, pour combattre un objet cible, comprenant :une première unité (4) pour déterminer une distance de cible (ZE) de l'objet cible par rapport à l'arme (2),une deuxième unité (5) pour déterminer une étendue physique de cible (ZA) de l'objet cible, etune troisième unité (6) pour le réglage d'une cadence de tir maximale de l'arme (2) en fonction de la distance de cible (ZE) déterminée et de l'étendue physique de cible (ZA) déterminée, la cadence étant la vitesse de tir de l'arme, etune cinquième unité (13) adaptée pour définir une fenêtre de coïncidence pour l'arme (2) en fonction de la distance de la cible (ZE) déterminée et de l'étendue physique de cible (ZA) déterminée, la fenêtre de coïncidence représentant l'écart entre une ligne de tir et une ligne de visée.
- Station d'arme selon la revendication 1,
caractérisé par
un système d'affichage (9) permettant d'afficher optiquement une zone cible de l'arme (2) et une image de l'objet cible dans la zone cible. - Station d'arme selon la revendication 2,
caractérisé en ce que
la deuxième unité (5) est configurée pour déterminer une taille (G) d'une cible spécifique (Z) qui est affichée sur le système d'affichage (9) et qui est affectée à l'objet cible, et pour déterminer l'étendue physique de cible (ZA) de l'objet cible en fonction de la taille déterminée (G) de la cible spécifique (Z) sur le système d'affichage (9) et de la distance déterminée de la cible (ZE) de l'objet cible. - Station d'arme selon la revendication 3,
caractérisé en ce que
la deuxième unité (5) est configurée pour déterminer la taille (G) de la cible (Z) déterminée et affichée sur le système d'affichage (9) par le biais du comptage des pixels couverts par la cible (Z) sur le système d'affichage (9). - Station d'arme selon la revendication 3 ou 4,
caractérisé par
une quatrième unité (11) configurée pour déterminer la cible (Z) affichée sur le système d'affichage (9) et associée à l'objet cible en fonction d'une entrée de l'utilisateur pour identifier la cible (Z) sur le système d'affichage (9). - Station d'arme selon la revendication 3 ou 4,
caractérisé par
une quatrième unité (11) configurée pour déterminer automatiquement la cible (Z) affichée sur le système d'affichage (9) et associée à l'objet cible au moyen d'une reconnaissance des formes. - Station d'arme selon la revendication 3 ou 4,
caractérisé par
une quatrième unité (11) configurée pour fournir à l'utilisateur une proposition de cible pour la cible calculée par reconnaissance de formes et pour déterminer la cible (Z) associée à l'objet cible en fonction d'une entrée de l'utilisateur pour confirmer la proposition de cible sortie. - Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 5 à 7,
caractérisé en ce que
la quatrième unité (11) est adaptée pour déterminer des parties sensibles de l'objet cible comme la cible (Z). - Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 8,
caractérisé en ce que
la première unité (4) est configurée pour déterminer la distance de cible (ZE) de l'objet cible à l'arme (2) en temps réel, et la troisième unité (6) est configurée pour régler la cadence maximale de l'arme (2) en temps réel en fonction de la distance de cible (ZE) déterminée et de l'étendue physique de cible (ZA) déterminée. - Station d'arme selon l'une des revendications 1 à 9,
caractérisé en ce que
la première unité (4) comprend un télémètre laser. - Véhicule militaire comportant un nombre N de stations d'armes (1) télécommandées selon l'une des revendications 1 à 10, avec N ≥ 1.
- Véhicule militaire selon la revendication 11,
caractérisé en ce que
le véhicule militaire est un navire de guerre. - Procédé d'utilisation d'une poste d'arme (1) télécommandé avec une arme (2) qui est montée dans un support (3) de manière à être réglable en azimut et en élévation pour combattre un objet cible, comprenant :déterminer (401) une distance de cible (ZE) de l'objet cible par rapport à l'arme (2),déterminer (402) une étendue physique de cible (ZA) de l'objet cible, etfixer (403) une cadence maximale de l'arme (2) en fonction de la distance de la cible (ZE) déterminée et de l'étendue physique de la cible déterminée (ZA), la cadence étant la vitesse de tir de l'arme, etdéterminer une fenêtre de coïncidence pour l'arme (2) en fonction de la distance de la cible (ZE) déterminée et de l'étendue physique de cible (ZA) déterminée, la fenêtre de coïncidence représentant l'écart entre une ligne de tir et une ligne de visée.
- Produit de programme informatique qui, sur un dispositif commandé par un programme, provoque l'exécution du procédé selon la revendication 13.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102015011954 | 2015-09-18 | ||
DE102015119847.9A DE102015119847A1 (de) | 2015-09-18 | 2015-11-17 | Fernbedienbare Waffenstation und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer fernbedienbaren Waffenstation |
PCT/EP2016/068292 WO2017045827A1 (fr) | 2015-09-18 | 2016-08-01 | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3350534A1 EP3350534A1 (fr) | 2018-07-25 |
EP3350534B1 true EP3350534B1 (fr) | 2020-09-30 |
EP3350534B8 EP3350534B8 (fr) | 2020-11-18 |
Family
ID=58224607
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP16747885.8A Active EP3350534B8 (fr) | 2015-09-18 | 2016-08-01 | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3350534B8 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102015119847A1 (fr) |
HU (1) | HUE051720T2 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2017045827A1 (fr) |
Citations (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1728222A1 (de) | 1968-09-12 | 1972-03-23 | Rheinmetall Gmbh | Feuerbereichsbegrenzung |
JPS534399A (en) | 1976-07-02 | 1978-01-14 | Hitachi Ltd | Shot-velocity regulators of machin gun |
US4084480A (en) | 1975-08-20 | 1978-04-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Lightweight small craft gun system |
DE2658770A1 (de) | 1976-12-24 | 1978-07-06 | Rheinmetall Gmbh | Verfahren zum steuern der kadenz bei feuerstoessen an einer maschinenkanone und anordnung zum durchfuehren des verfahrens |
EP0009984A1 (fr) | 1978-10-10 | 1980-04-16 | General Electric Company | Système de commande de la dispersion de tir d'un canon |
US4464975A (en) | 1981-12-29 | 1984-08-14 | General Electric Company | Control of dispersion of gun systems |
DE3531596A1 (de) | 1984-09-04 | 1986-03-06 | Aktiebolaget Bofors, Bofors | Verfahren zum bekaempfen unterschiedlicher arten von luftzielen |
US4922801A (en) | 1988-08-12 | 1990-05-08 | Societe D'applications Generales D'electricite Et De Mecanique Sagem | Fire control system with aiming error compensation |
US5247867A (en) | 1992-01-16 | 1993-09-28 | Hughes Missile Systems Company | Target tailoring of defensive automatic gun system muzzle velocity |
US5379676A (en) | 1993-04-05 | 1995-01-10 | Contraves Usa | Fire control system |
US5822713A (en) | 1993-04-05 | 1998-10-13 | Contraves Usa | Guided fire control system |
WO2001036893A1 (fr) | 1999-11-18 | 2001-05-25 | Metal Storm Limited | Petites armes |
US20040050240A1 (en) | 2000-10-17 | 2004-03-18 | Greene Ben A. | Autonomous weapon system |
WO2005033611A1 (fr) | 2003-10-09 | 2005-04-14 | Elbit Systems Ltd. | Systeme d'armement multiple pour vehicule blinde |
US7239976B2 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2007-07-03 | American Gnc Corporation | Method and system for automatic pointing stabilization and aiming control device |
US20070208459A1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. | Sentry robot |
US20080101784A1 (en) | 2006-11-01 | 2008-05-01 | Altek Corporation | Method for calculating distance and actual size of shot object |
WO2008060662A2 (fr) | 2006-04-12 | 2008-05-22 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Système laser semi-actif d'imagerie à champ de vision double |
US20080148931A1 (en) | 2006-11-16 | 2008-06-26 | Saab Ab | Compact, fully stablised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight |
US7493846B2 (en) | 2002-11-26 | 2009-02-24 | Recon/Optical, Inc. | Dual elevation weapon station and method of use |
US7509904B2 (en) | 2005-12-05 | 2009-03-31 | Fn Herstal S.A. | Device for the remote control of a firearm |
DE102007046545A1 (de) | 2007-09-27 | 2009-04-02 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung der Schussfolge einer Maschinenwaffe |
JP2009293865A (ja) | 2008-06-05 | 2009-12-17 | Sumitomo Heavy Ind Ltd | 発射レート制御装置及び発射レート制御方法 |
US7650826B2 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2010-01-26 | Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. | Automatic shooting mechanism and robot having the same |
EP2208958A2 (fr) | 2009-01-16 | 2010-07-21 | Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS | Dispositif de commande électronique de cadance de tir pour opération à distance d'une arme à feu automatique |
WO2010082974A2 (fr) | 2008-11-21 | 2010-07-22 | U.S. Army Rdecom-Ardec | Système d'arme activé à distance, pouvant être rechargé automatiquement et doté d'une arme à feu à actionnement externe |
US7793578B1 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2010-09-14 | Cta International | Percussion device for a medium or large calibre weapon |
US7870816B1 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2011-01-18 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Continuous alignment system for fire control |
KR20120064429A (ko) | 2010-12-09 | 2012-06-19 | 삼성테크윈 주식회사 | 무장 시스템 및 무장 유니트의 제어방법 |
US20120153021A1 (en) | 2009-08-10 | 2012-06-21 | Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace As | Remote weapon system |
EP2520985A1 (fr) | 2011-04-13 | 2012-11-07 | Manufacture et fabrique de montres et chronomètres Ulysse Nardin Le Locle SA | Mécanisme d'indication |
DE102011050277A1 (de) | 2011-05-11 | 2012-11-15 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Adapter zur Befestigung einer Lafette an einem Objekt, Lafette und militärisches Fahrzeug |
US8608069B1 (en) | 2009-09-11 | 2013-12-17 | Laurence Andrew Bay | System and method for ballistic solutions |
US9074847B1 (en) | 2014-08-28 | 2015-07-07 | Flex Force Enterprises LLC | Stabilized weapon platform with active sense and adaptive motion control |
RU2557873C1 (ru) | 2014-01-09 | 2015-07-27 | Николай Евгеньевич Староверов | Комплекс высокоточного оружия /варианты/ |
EP3367044B1 (fr) | 2017-02-27 | 2020-06-24 | Swarovski-Optik KG. | Élément de réglage d'une ligne de visée d'un dispositif de visée optique ainsi que lunette de visée pourvue d'un tel élément de réglage et arme pourvue d'une telle lunette de visée ainsi que procédé de réglage de la ligne de visée |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR1467098A (fr) * | 1965-11-26 | 1967-01-27 | Thomson Houston Comp Francaise | Perfectionnements aux systèmes de tir de projectiles non guidés à courte distance |
DE102011100269A1 (de) * | 2011-05-03 | 2012-11-08 | Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg | Elektrooptische Feuerleiteinheit für ein Geschütz |
-
2015
- 2015-11-17 DE DE102015119847.9A patent/DE102015119847A1/de active Pending
-
2016
- 2016-08-01 HU HUE16747885A patent/HUE051720T2/hu unknown
- 2016-08-01 EP EP16747885.8A patent/EP3350534B8/fr active Active
- 2016-08-01 WO PCT/EP2016/068292 patent/WO2017045827A1/fr active Application Filing
Patent Citations (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1728222A1 (de) | 1968-09-12 | 1972-03-23 | Rheinmetall Gmbh | Feuerbereichsbegrenzung |
US4084480A (en) | 1975-08-20 | 1978-04-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Lightweight small craft gun system |
JPS534399A (en) | 1976-07-02 | 1978-01-14 | Hitachi Ltd | Shot-velocity regulators of machin gun |
DE2658770A1 (de) | 1976-12-24 | 1978-07-06 | Rheinmetall Gmbh | Verfahren zum steuern der kadenz bei feuerstoessen an einer maschinenkanone und anordnung zum durchfuehren des verfahrens |
EP0009984A1 (fr) | 1978-10-10 | 1980-04-16 | General Electric Company | Système de commande de la dispersion de tir d'un canon |
US4464975A (en) | 1981-12-29 | 1984-08-14 | General Electric Company | Control of dispersion of gun systems |
DE3531596A1 (de) | 1984-09-04 | 1986-03-06 | Aktiebolaget Bofors, Bofors | Verfahren zum bekaempfen unterschiedlicher arten von luftzielen |
US4922801A (en) | 1988-08-12 | 1990-05-08 | Societe D'applications Generales D'electricite Et De Mecanique Sagem | Fire control system with aiming error compensation |
US5247867A (en) | 1992-01-16 | 1993-09-28 | Hughes Missile Systems Company | Target tailoring of defensive automatic gun system muzzle velocity |
US5379676A (en) | 1993-04-05 | 1995-01-10 | Contraves Usa | Fire control system |
US5822713A (en) | 1993-04-05 | 1998-10-13 | Contraves Usa | Guided fire control system |
WO2001036893A1 (fr) | 1999-11-18 | 2001-05-25 | Metal Storm Limited | Petites armes |
US20040050240A1 (en) | 2000-10-17 | 2004-03-18 | Greene Ben A. | Autonomous weapon system |
US7493846B2 (en) | 2002-11-26 | 2009-02-24 | Recon/Optical, Inc. | Dual elevation weapon station and method of use |
WO2005033611A1 (fr) | 2003-10-09 | 2005-04-14 | Elbit Systems Ltd. | Systeme d'armement multiple pour vehicule blinde |
US7239976B2 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2007-07-03 | American Gnc Corporation | Method and system for automatic pointing stabilization and aiming control device |
US7509904B2 (en) | 2005-12-05 | 2009-03-31 | Fn Herstal S.A. | Device for the remote control of a firearm |
US7793578B1 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2010-09-14 | Cta International | Percussion device for a medium or large calibre weapon |
US7870816B1 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2011-01-18 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Continuous alignment system for fire control |
US20070208459A1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. | Sentry robot |
US7650826B2 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2010-01-26 | Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. | Automatic shooting mechanism and robot having the same |
WO2008060662A2 (fr) | 2006-04-12 | 2008-05-22 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Système laser semi-actif d'imagerie à champ de vision double |
US20080101784A1 (en) | 2006-11-01 | 2008-05-01 | Altek Corporation | Method for calculating distance and actual size of shot object |
US20080148931A1 (en) | 2006-11-16 | 2008-06-26 | Saab Ab | Compact, fully stablised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight |
DE102007046545A1 (de) | 2007-09-27 | 2009-04-02 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung der Schussfolge einer Maschinenwaffe |
JP2009293865A (ja) | 2008-06-05 | 2009-12-17 | Sumitomo Heavy Ind Ltd | 発射レート制御装置及び発射レート制御方法 |
WO2010082974A2 (fr) | 2008-11-21 | 2010-07-22 | U.S. Army Rdecom-Ardec | Système d'arme activé à distance, pouvant être rechargé automatiquement et doté d'une arme à feu à actionnement externe |
EP2208958A2 (fr) | 2009-01-16 | 2010-07-21 | Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS | Dispositif de commande électronique de cadance de tir pour opération à distance d'une arme à feu automatique |
US20120153021A1 (en) | 2009-08-10 | 2012-06-21 | Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace As | Remote weapon system |
US8608069B1 (en) | 2009-09-11 | 2013-12-17 | Laurence Andrew Bay | System and method for ballistic solutions |
KR20120064429A (ko) | 2010-12-09 | 2012-06-19 | 삼성테크윈 주식회사 | 무장 시스템 및 무장 유니트의 제어방법 |
EP2520985A1 (fr) | 2011-04-13 | 2012-11-07 | Manufacture et fabrique de montres et chronomètres Ulysse Nardin Le Locle SA | Mécanisme d'indication |
DE102011050277A1 (de) | 2011-05-11 | 2012-11-15 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Adapter zur Befestigung einer Lafette an einem Objekt, Lafette und militärisches Fahrzeug |
RU2557873C1 (ru) | 2014-01-09 | 2015-07-27 | Николай Евгеньевич Староверов | Комплекс высокоточного оружия /варианты/ |
US9074847B1 (en) | 2014-08-28 | 2015-07-07 | Flex Force Enterprises LLC | Stabilized weapon platform with active sense and adaptive motion control |
EP3367044B1 (fr) | 2017-02-27 | 2020-06-24 | Swarovski-Optik KG. | Élément de réglage d'une ligne de visée d'un dispositif de visée optique ainsi que lunette de visée pourvue d'un tel élément de réglage et arme pourvue d'une telle lunette de visée ainsi que procédé de réglage de la ligne de visée |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
"Schießlehre", 1959, BIRKHAUSER VERLAG BASEL, Stuutgart, article W. STUT Z: "Chapter 6, 8,9,14", pages: 86-176 - 236-266- 267-282,455-481, XP055936109 |
"Technologie der Panzer II", vol. 40B, 1999, VELAG HEROLD, WIEN, article M. OGORKIEWICZ: "IX. Feuerleitanlagen für panzer A. Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Feuerleitanlagen in Panzern", pages: 258 - 269, XP055936081 |
"Truppendienst Taschenbuch Bd 31", vol. 2, 2007, article F. FELBERBAUER: "Waffentechnik I, Band 2", pages: 794 - 825, XP055876660 |
"Waffentechnisches Taschenbuch", 1977, RHEINMETALL, article "Chapter 4 and Chapter 6", pages: 178-179 - 208-209, XP055936101 |
ANONYMOUS: "Entwicklungsschwerpunkt Effektoren", 7 January 2015 (2015-01-07), pages 1 - 3, XP055935280, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://web.archive.org/web/ 20150701 063146/ https://www.rheinmetall- defence.com/de/rheinmetall_ defence/public_ relations/themen_im_ fokus/ entwicklungsschwerpunkt _effektoren/index.php> |
ANONYMOUS: "Typical antiaircraft fire control systems", SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME NATIONAL PARK ASSOCIATION, 2013, pages 1 - 59, XP055838923 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2017045827A1 (fr) | 2017-03-23 |
HUE051720T2 (hu) | 2021-03-29 |
EP3350534B8 (fr) | 2020-11-18 |
EP3350534A1 (fr) | 2018-07-25 |
DE102015119847A1 (de) | 2017-03-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1304539B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour pointer un tube de cannon et utilisation du dispositif | |
DE102005013117A1 (de) | Gewehr mit einer Zieleinrichtung | |
EP1920209B1 (fr) | Procede d'optimisation du declenchement du tir d'une arme ou d'une piece d'artillerie | |
DE3317001C2 (fr) | ||
DE102012213747A1 (de) | Verfahren und Zieleinrichtung zur Ermittlung einer Wahrscheinlichkeit eines Treffers eines Zielobjekts | |
DE2452586C3 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Festlegung der Dauer des Flugweges eines Geschosses | |
DE2912587C1 (de) | Feuerleiteinrichtung,insbesondere fuer ein mobiles Flugabwehrsystem | |
DE102012005682B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Lenken eines Wirkelements durch einen Schützen | |
EP3034986A1 (fr) | Arme | |
EP3350534B1 (fr) | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée | |
EP3350536B1 (fr) | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée | |
EP3034983B2 (fr) | Arme | |
DE102005057323A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Trefferwahrscheinlichkeit einer Schusswaffe | |
EP3350535B1 (fr) | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de commande d'une tourelle téléopérée | |
EP0154809A1 (fr) | Procédé de simulation de combat | |
DE3734758C2 (fr) | ||
EP3377840B9 (fr) | Tourelle téléopérée et procédé de fonctionnement d'une tourelle téléopérée | |
EP2120002B1 (fr) | Méthode de classification de projectiles du type RAM en approche | |
EP2989408B1 (fr) | Procédé d'exploitation d'un système d'arme | |
DE102011107950A1 (de) | System von Waffen | |
EP3260808B1 (fr) | Procédé de correction de déviation d'un système d'arme | |
DE3127844C2 (de) | Verfahen zum Abwerfen von Munition von einem Kampfflugzeug aus | |
DE19806911C2 (de) | Verfahren zur Überwachung der Ausichtung einer Artilleriewaffe | |
EP1450125A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour combattre une cible | |
WO2022223407A1 (fr) | Appareil, procédé et véhicule |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20180313 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200406 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502016011332 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RHEINMETALL DEFENCE ELECTRONICS GMBH, 28309 BREMEN, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1319242 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201015 Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502016011332 Country of ref document: DE |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: RHEINMETALL ELECTRONICS GMBH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PK Free format text: BERICHTIGUNG B8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201231 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201230 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HU Ref legal event code: AG4A Ref document number: E051720 Country of ref document: HU |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210201 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210130 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502016011332 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: KRAUSS-MAFFEI WEGMANN GMBH & CO. KG Effective date: 20210629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20210831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210130 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210801 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1319242 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210801 |
|
RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20230726 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20230721 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Payment date: 20230823 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: KNDS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH & CO. KG Effective date: 20210629 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20240821 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Payment date: 20240823 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240821 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240826 Year of fee payment: 9 |